----- Original Message -----

From: thypentacle

To: pota@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:17 PM

Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Join the cause!

Sorry, I made a goof. She wasn't asking for ideas, but she asked something like... "what would you want to see in POTA 2... it's already written, I just want to confirm our efforts are going to be received well..." or words to that effect. I don't really remember. It's all archived in the group but I don't feel like looking for it right now.

Anyway, she seems convincing, I really hope she is on the POTA staff. That would at least confirm the few good juicy facts she let out about the new movie. Guess there's no way to be sure. I can only hope.

ThyPentacle

 

  LordTZer0@... wrote:

  She's probably not legit because she wouldn't want to hear ideas.

You got that right.  It's a good way to loose a lot of money in court.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calima 5021 [calima5021com@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 11:50
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] POTA DVDs
>
>
> I'm afraid their not, there NTSC.
> But that's were your trusty dvd-rom comes in.
>
> Sorry, but that's the best I could do.
>
> Best.
> Al
>
> P.S. Use your hight tech skills, Luke.
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
> >Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> >To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> >Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] POTA DVDs
> >Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 07:54:22 +1000
> >
>
>
>
>
> _____

LOL, you're probably correct about that, but it's fun to pretend ain't it? :o)

ThyPentacle

  veetus@... wrote:

  Oh, it's already written, huh? Sounds like a loon. Lock her up! Etc.                         - - - Jeff

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: thypentacle

To: pota@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:17 PM

Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Join the cause!

Sorry, I made a goof. She wasn't asking for ideas, but she asked something like... "what would you want to see in POTA 2... it's already written, I just want to confirm our efforts are going to be received well..." or words to that effect. I don't really remember. It's all archived in the group but I don't feel like looking for it right now.

Anyway, she seems convincing, I really hope she is on the POTA staff. That would at least confirm the few good juicy facts she let out about the new movie. Guess there's no way to be sure. I can only hope.

ThyPentacle

  LordTZer0@... wrote:

  She's probably not legit because she wouldn't want to hear ideas.

You got that right.  It's a good way to loose a lot of money in court.

---

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calima 5021 [calima5021com@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 23:52
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] RE: POTA DVDs
>
>
> Anyway if I am still invited to choose a DVD it will be Toons.
>
> So who does have DVD burners in the group?
>
> Michael
>
>
> No problem, just send me your mailing address and you'll have it in JULY.
>
> Best.
> Al
>
> P.S. You have EP2 and Spidey on DVD, and yet you have no burner?
> What did you do? Use your high tech skills in buying? :o)
>
>
>
> _____

>Oh and I forgot to mention the tv series books and those four
>records, as well, in my earlier post.
>Me again
>Kassidy

Yahoo is a piece of crap.... blame it on them.

--- In pota@y..., thypentacle <thypentacle@y...> wrote:
> In addition to helping out with John Roche and his post-card
campaign, I
> have set up an on-line petition. Please take just a moment to sign
it for
> me and show your support for another ape flick.
>
> http://www.petitiononline.com/POTA/petition.html"
>
> Thank you for your time,
>
> ThyPentacle - Matthew W. Davis
>
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "james611102" <JamesA1102@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 6:41 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: New POTA sequel petition


> Just curious. What would everyone prefer to see; a sequel to the
> 2001 film or one that picks up the storyline from the original
> series?
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., thypentacle <thypentacle@y...> wrote:
> > In addition to helping out with John Roche and his post-card
> campaign, I
> > have set up an on-line petition. Please take just a moment to sign
> it for
> > me and show your support for another ape flick.
> >
> > http://www.petitiononline.com/POTA/petition.html"
> >
> > Thank you for your time,
> >
> > ThyPentacle - Matthew W. Davis
> >
> >

I only clicked it once... same as always...

ThyPentacle

  CheeseGOTAS@... wrote:

No problem. I set up the petition about 5 minutes before I sent out the email to tell everyone about it. :o)  I'm also going to post to a few forums now to try to spread the word and get more people to sign it.

ThyPentacle

  CheeseGOTAS@... wrote:

> Maybe it's a Jedi mind trick:-) Either way I'm sure Patrick will
> come up with a 10,000 word explaination for this.
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., "Ken and Heather Taylor" <ktaylor@z...> wrote:
> > Uncle Owen must also loose his memory as by the time of 'A New
> Hope' he buys
> > C3PO from the Jawas but doesn't seem to recognise him even though
> he owned
> > him in Ep 2.

>
> > What would everyone prefer to see; a sequel to the
> > 2001 film or one that picks up the storyline from the original
> > series?
>
> I'd rather it pick up the storyline from the book. It might as well. That's
> where they got that ending from.

> *** I promise this won't be 10,000 words long...
> One of the things that Lucas doesn't seem to "get" is the fact that a space
> opera, involving ships that can zip all around a galaxy containing literally
> BILLIONS of stars and planets, should be more expansive than his
> multi-episodic "STAR WARS" series has proved to be.
>
> It sure seemed like 10,000 words.***
> Anyway, if they're going into HYPERSPACE, or WARP DRIVE, as they say on ST,
> when they get back shouldn't everyone on the planet be deader than Stewart's
> ovaries?

On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 01:42 AM, patrickmichaeltilton wrote:

> CONQUEST, which I've deduced was 27 years prior to BATTLE

> -----Original Message-----
> From: james611102 [JamesA1102@...]
> Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 11:42
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: New POTA sequel petition
>
>
> Just curious. What would everyone prefer to see; a sequel to the
> 2001 film or one that picks up the storyline from the original
> series?
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., thypentacle <thypentacle@y...> wrote:
> > In addition to helping out with John Roche and his post-card
> campaign, I
> > have set up an on-line petition. Please take just a moment to sign
> it for
> > me and show your support for another ape flick.
> >
> > http://www.petitiononline.com/POTA/petition.html"
> >
> > Thank you for your time,
> >
> > ThyPentacle - Matthew W. Davis
> >
> >

> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 16:48
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel problems
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> > *** I promise this won't be 10,000 words long...
> > One of the things that Lucas doesn't seem to "get" is the fact
> that a space
> > opera, involving ships that can zip all around a galaxy
> containing literally
> > BILLIONS of stars and planets, should be more expansive than his
> > multi-episodic "STAR WARS" series has proved to be.
> >
> > It sure seemed like 10,000 words.***
> > Anyway, if they're going into HYPERSPACE, or WARP DRIVE, as
> they say on ST,
> > when they get back shouldn't everyone on the planet be deader
> than Stewart's
> > ovaries?
>
> *** Nope; there's no Time Dilation in Hyperspace. It's only travel
> through Real Space, through Einstein's 4-dimensional "spacetime
> continuum", where the relativistic effects of Time Dilation, Length
> Contraction, and Mass Increase occur. Those effects take place at
> velocities NEAR the speed of light (i.e. at, say, 99.999999999...%
> lightspeed), whereas "warp drive"/"hyperspace" travel occurs at FASTER
> THAN LIGHT velocities.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> I don't believe it was 27 years, despite what Mandemus says. I

> was more like 12 years. Here are two of my reasons for

>
> MacDonald was in charge of the Archives before the revolt and

> be more than 35.
>
> I imagine it took Breck less than a year to use the bomb on his

> city. Caesar would have led the surviving apes and

> the valley and begun to build the new settlement almost

> afterward. He and Lisa were young, in love, and optimistic

> future. I believe they would have conceived Cornelius, who was

> time of Battle, as soon as they had a roof over their heads.

> way they would have waited 17 years.
>
> ABMAC
>
> On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 01:42 AM, patrickmichaeltilton

>
> > CONQUEST, which I've deduced was 27 years prior to

> Prove it.
>
> Michael

>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@y...]
> > Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 16:48
> > To: pota@y...
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel

> >
> >
> > --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> > > *** I promise this won't be 10,000 words long...
> > > One of the things that Lucas doesn't seem to "get" is the

> > that a space
> > > opera, involving ships that can zip all around a galaxy
> > containing literally
> > > BILLIONS of stars and planets, should be more expansive

> > > multi-episodic "STAR WARS" series has proved to be.
> > >
> > > It sure seemed like 10,000 words.***
> > > Anyway, if they're going into HYPERSPACE, or WARP

> > they say on ST,
> > > when they get back shouldn't everyone on the planet be

> > than Stewart's
> > > ovaries?
> >
> > *** Nope; there's no Time Dilation in Hyperspace. It's only

> > through Real Space, through Einstein's 4-dimensional

> > continuum", where the relativistic effects of Time Dilation,

> > Contraction, and Mass Increase occur. Those effects take

> > velocities NEAR the speed of light (i.e. at, say,

> > lightspeed), whereas "warp drive"/"hyperspace" travel occurs

> > THAN LIGHT velocities.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> >
> >
> >

----- Original Message -----
From: <LordTZer0@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel problems


> *** I promise this won't be 10,000 words long...
> One of the things that Lucas doesn't seem to "get" is the fact that a
space
> opera, involving ships that can zip all around a galaxy containing
literally
> BILLIONS of stars and planets, should be more expansive than his
> multi-episodic "STAR WARS" series has proved to be.
>
> It sure seemed like 10,000 words.***
> Anyway, if they're going into HYPERSPACE, or WARP DRIVE, as they say on
ST,
> when they get back shouldn't everyone on the planet be deader than
Stewart's
> ovaries?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 11:42 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] New POTA sequel... and thoughts on a
post-BATTLE conundrum


> --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> >
> > > What would everyone prefer to see; a sequel to the
> > > 2001 film or one that picks up the storyline from the original
> > > series?
> >
> > I'd rather it pick up the storyline from the book. It might as well.
That's
> > where they got that ending from.
>
> *** I agree with T. A faithful adaptation of Boulle's novel would be
> preferable to both a sequel of Burton's film and to the original
> series' storyline.
>
> The original series begins when Taylor gives his "final report"--the
> EARTH-TIME date of 2673. When POTA became a series, it ended--with the
> Lawgiver "frame-scenes" for BATTLE--in the year 2670: it comes Full
> Circle.
> In a way, we've already had the storyline "picked up" already, a
> number of times: in the comic book stories (I'm thinking more
> specifically about the Marvel originals, "Terror on the Planet of the
> Apes" and "Future History Chronicles"). In TERROR, we have what seems
> to be the same peaceful Lawgiver that we saw in BATTLE, preaching the
> same message of multicultural tolerance and peace... with Brutus' Ape
> Supremacy movement clouding the horizon.
>
> There are a number of ways that a sequel to the main events of BATTLE
> could be done (i.e. ignoring the Lawgiver scenes at the beginning and
> end); one thought that I had (and which I'll be exploring in my own
> mega-novel) involves the fact that Caesar's heir--young Cornelius--is
> dead. With no heir to take over the mantle of kingship, Caesar will
> have to establish another mode of government for the ape-and-human
> society he hopes will live in peace for the rest of Time (i.e. beyond
> the destruction date of "Thirty-Nine Fifty"--as he heard his mom say
> it in the Archives tape). Unless, that is, Caesar and Lisa can beget
> and bear another child to be the royal offspring who will eventually
> govern after Caesar dies. But this depends on several factors. How old
> is Lisa--Caesar's wife--in BATTLE? If we assume that she is about the
> same age as Caesar (who was 18 years old in CONQUEST, which I've
> deduced was 27 years prior to BATTLE due to Mandemus' line about being
> the keeper of the Armory for that amount of time), then at the time
> when their only child is murdered, she must be about 18 plus 27 years
> old: around 45 years old. Does Lisa have enough time left to bear
> another child? How early do "evolved chimpanzees" go into menopause?
> What if she's too old to bear for Caesar a second child?
>
> And what if Caesar's exposure to the radiated City should result in
> cancer or leukemia in either himself or in any child he might beget in
> Lisa? Even IF Lisa could become pregnant again, what might the chances
> be that the child would be "malformed" due to Caesar's exposure to the
> radioactive environment of the Forbidden City?
>
> And... what if Caesar's son Cornelius was NOT his firstborn child?
> Anybody else remember that scene in CONQUEST where Caesar and two (?)
> gorillas ("superior specimens") are sent from Ape Management to the
> "Breeding Annex" in order to inseminate female apes that had just
> arrived there? Presumably, the humans overseeing the Breeding Annex
> would make sure that the "stud" apes they'd introduced into the cages
> with the females would fulfill their function and successfully
> inseminate them. So, then... whatever happened to that flirty chimp
> chick whom Caesar inseminated? It wasn't Lisa he boffed... it was a
> DIFFERENT female chimpanzee. Did SHE bear a child? A son? A daughter?
> Twins, even? What if... after the events of BATTLE, after Caesar and
> Lisa try to have another kid (and, perhaps, can't)... what if the
> grown-up result of that Breeding Annex insemination were to show up
> and declare himself (or herself) to be the firstborn child of
> Caesar... and the rightful heir to Caesar's "crown"? Granted, such a
> child (by the time BATTLE happens, actually a 26-year-old grown-up)
> would not be the favorite child--the child of his beloved wife Lisa.
>
> [Compare this scenario with the children of Jacob/Israel, born to 4
> different women (2 wives and their 2 respective servantwomen): it was
> the firstborn son of Rachel (the wife Jacob worked 14 years to get),
> JOSEPH (who was born AFTER most of his other brothers), who inherited
> the "birthright" of the Abrahamic Covenant, passing it on to his sons
> Manasseh and Ephraim--although the "sceptre" of kingship would pass
> through JUDAH (who also was not the firstborn son, being the fourth-
> born son through Leah, who was "hated" (Gen. 29:31)--that is, Jacob
> loved Rachel more than Leah (whom he was tricked into marrying)--born
> after Reuben, Simeon, and Levi).]
>
> It became "standard practice" for kingship to pass from King-to-prince
> (i.e. to the firstborn legitimate son), throughout most of European
> history, at any rate. The succession to the throne--where no heir-
> apparent is available--was often a bone of contention and the cause of
> more than a few wars. If a monarch's legitimate sons and daughters
> were either nonexistent or dead, one way around it would be for the
> king (or queen, if there happened to be no king at the time) to
> legitimize a bastard child (in legalese, to "acknowledge" him) whom he
> had begotten on a concubine. A child born to Caesar, begotten on the
> Breeding Annex chimp, could be "acknowledged"--publicly declared a
> now-legitimate blood-heir to the King. Or, if the king (i.e. Caesar)
> did not particularly like his bastard child, he could refrain from
> giving that acknowledgment, in which case the illegitimate child would
> have no legal claim to the throne.
> That's not to say that those who favor him (despite his illegitimate
> status) could not wage a coup d'etat and install him as their next
> king, claiming that the royal blood in his veins qualifies him.
>
> That's the trouble with monarchical governments: unlike our (the
> USA's) Constitutional republic, with its clear-cut chain of
> succession, a monarchy is beset by all sorts of problems, including
> the death of a King whose heir is only an infant (requiring, then, a
> "lord protector" to govern until the kid grows old enough--provided
> the power-hungry protector permits it), or is retarded (perhaps due to
> in-breeding), or is unfit to govern (i.e. known to be violently
> insane, or unreasonably peaceful towards hostile enemies). But a
> society that is foolish enough to deem one particular bloodline to be
> "special" (either Royal or even Divine) and deserving of Rule over the
> masses, sets itself up for all sorts of conflicts like those I've
> mentioned above.
> Does Caesar's community give up on Monarchy as a form of government?
> At the end of BATTLE, Lisa refers to him as "a good and wise king"...
> implying that somehow a monarchical form of government WILL be
> perpetuated. Is Caesar's non-acknowledged son (or daughter), begotten
> on the Breeding Annex chimp, "waiting in the wings" for his/her
> opportunity to ascend the throne?
> We POTA fans can only wonder...
>
> Patrick Michael Tilton
> EARTH-TIME 5-30-2002
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> You can have copies of my mp3s from the TV stories record if you

> make them available for downloading. They take about 45MB total.
>
> -Tom
>
>
> 14302145 Oct 3 2000 Planet_Of_The_Apes-Battle_Of_Two_Worlds.mp3
> 11233488 Oct 3 2000 Planet_Of_The_Apes-Dawn_Of_The_Tree_People.mp3
> 11962827 Oct 3 2000 Planet_Of_The_Apes-Mountain_Of_The_Delphi.mp3
> 9143806 Oct 3 2000 Planet_Of_The_Apes-Volcano.mp3
>
>
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony B. McElveen" <abmac@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] New POTA sequel... and thoughts on a
post-BATTLE conundrum


> I don't believe it was 27 years, despite what Mandemus says. I think it
> was more like 12 years. Here are two of my reasons for thinking this:
>
> MacDonald was in charge of the Archives before the revolt and he can't
> be more than 35.
>
> I imagine it took Breck less than a year to use the bomb on his own
> city. Caesar would have led the surviving apes and sympathetic humans to
> the valley and begun to build the new settlement almost immediately
> afterward. He and Lisa were young, in love, and optimistic about the
> future. I believe they would have conceived Cornelius, who was 10 at the
> time of Battle, as soon as they had a roof over their heads. There's no
> way they would have waited 17 years.
>
> ABMAC
>
> On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 01:42 AM, patrickmichaeltilton wrote:
>
> > CONQUEST, which I've deduced was 27 years prior to BATTLE
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel problems


> --- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Prove it.
> >
> > Michael
>
> *** The effects of relativity (i.e. Time Dilation, etc.) have been
> proven thousands of times experimentally. The fictitious
> "hyperdrive"/"warp drive" effects, as used in science fiction
> stories, is--as yet--unprovable. However, look up Miguel
> Alcubierre on any Internet search engine, and you'll find that he
> has shown that it cannot be ruled out theoretically that a "warp
> drive" type of effect can actually be created.
>
> Patrick
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@y...]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 16:48
> > > To: pota@y...
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel
> problems
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> > > > *** I promise this won't be 10,000 words long...
> > > > One of the things that Lucas doesn't seem to "get" is the
> fact
> > > that a space
> > > > opera, involving ships that can zip all around a galaxy
> > > containing literally
> > > > BILLIONS of stars and planets, should be more expansive
> than his
> > > > multi-episodic "STAR WARS" series has proved to be.
> > > >
> > > > It sure seemed like 10,000 words.***
> > > > Anyway, if they're going into HYPERSPACE, or WARP
> DRIVE, as
> > > they say on ST,
> > > > when they get back shouldn't everyone on the planet be
> deader
> > > than Stewart's
> > > > ovaries?
> > >
> > > *** Nope; there's no Time Dilation in Hyperspace. It's only
> travel
> > > through Real Space, through Einstein's 4-dimensional
> "spacetime
> > > continuum", where the relativistic effects of Time Dilation,
> Length
> > > Contraction, and Mass Increase occur. Those effects take
> place at
> > > velocities NEAR the speed of light (i.e. at, say,
> 99.999999999...%
> > > lightspeed), whereas "warp drive"/"hyperspace" travel occurs
> at FASTER
> > > THAN LIGHT velocities.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> Just curious. What would everyone prefer to see; a sequel to the
> 2001 film or one that picks up the storyline from the original
> series?
>
>

>From: thypentacle <thypentacle@...>
>In addition to helping out with John Roche and his post-card campaign, I
>have set up an on-line petition. Please take just a moment to sign it for
>me and show your support for another ape flick.

>From: "Melkor" <melkor@...>
>You can have copies of my mp3s from the TV stories record if you want to
>make them available for downloading. They take about 45MB total.
>14302145 Oct 3 2000 Planet_Of_The_Apes-Battle_Of_Two_Worlds.mp3
>11233488 Oct 3 2000 Planet_Of_The_Apes-Dawn_Of_The_Tree_People.mp3
>11962827 Oct 3 2000 Planet_Of_The_Apes-Mountain_Of_The_Delphi.mp3
> 9143806 Oct 3 2000 Planet_Of_The_Apes-Volcano.mp3

That's up to Fox to decide. Really though, I'd be happy with anything as long as they try to make it better than the last.

ThyPentacle

  Haristas@... wrote:

In a message dated 5/29/02 8:42:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, thypentacle@... writes:

LOL :-p~~~~~ pffffffft

ThyPentacle / Matthew

  Rich Handley <handleyr@...> wrote:

> 2001 film or one that picks up the storyline from the original
> series? >>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 19:14
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel problems
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Prove it.
> >
> > Michael
>
> *** The effects of relativity (i.e. Time Dilation, etc.) have been
> proven thousands of times experimentally. The fictitious
> "hyperdrive"/"warp drive" effects, as used in science fiction
> stories, is--as yet--unprovable. However, look up Miguel
> Alcubierre on any Internet search engine, and you'll find that he
> has shown that it cannot be ruled out theoretically that a "warp
> drive" type of effect can actually be created.
>
> Patrick
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@y...]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 16:48
> > > To: pota@y...
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel
> problems
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> > > > *** I promise this won't be 10,000 words long...
> > > > One of the things that Lucas doesn't seem to "get" is the
> fact
> > > that a space
> > > > opera, involving ships that can zip all around a galaxy
> > > containing literally
> > > > BILLIONS of stars and planets, should be more expansive
> than his
> > > > multi-episodic "STAR WARS" series has proved to be.
> > > >
> > > > It sure seemed like 10,000 words.***
> > > > Anyway, if they're going into HYPERSPACE, or WARP
> DRIVE, as
> > > they say on ST,
> > > > when they get back shouldn't everyone on the planet be
> deader
> > > than Stewart's
> > > > ovaries?
> > >
> > > *** Nope; there's no Time Dilation in Hyperspace. It's only
> travel
> > > through Real Space, through Einstein's 4-dimensional
> "spacetime
> > > continuum", where the relativistic effects of Time Dilation,
> Length
> > > Contraction, and Mass Increase occur. Those effects take
> place at
> > > velocities NEAR the speed of light (i.e. at, say,
> 99.999999999...%
> > > lightspeed), whereas "warp drive"/"hyperspace" travel occurs
> at FASTER
> > > THAN LIGHT velocities.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>From: thypentacle <thypentacle@...>
> LOL :-p~~~~~ pffffffft

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rich Handley" <handleyr@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1077


> >From: thypentacle <thypentacle@...>
> > LOL :-p~~~~~ pffffffft
>
> Heh heh... I'm glad you had a sense of humor about that. :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 A sense of humor is one of the few things I do have. I missed out on the money, sports car, a kick ass easy job that pays big bucks, and super powers, but by golly I got a sense of humor! :o) Good thing too, or I'd be crying for all the before mentioned stuff that seems to be missing.

ThyPentacle

  Rich Handley <handleyr@...> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel problems


> --- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Prove it.
> >
> > Michael
>
> *** The effects of relativity (i.e. Time Dilation, etc.) have been
> proven thousands of times experimentally. The fictitious
> "hyperdrive"/"warp drive" effects, as used in science fiction
> stories, is--as yet--unprovable. However, look up Miguel
> Alcubierre on any Internet search engine, and you'll find that he
> has shown that it cannot be ruled out theoretically that a "warp
> drive" type of effect can actually be created.
>
> Patrick
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@y...]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 16:48
> > > To: pota@y...
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel
> problems
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> > > > *** I promise this won't be 10,000 words long...
> > > > One of the things that Lucas doesn't seem to "get" is the
> fact
> > > that a space
> > > > opera, involving ships that can zip all around a galaxy
> > > containing literally
> > > > BILLIONS of stars and planets, should be more expansive
> than his
> > > > multi-episodic "STAR WARS" series has proved to be.
> > > >
> > > > It sure seemed like 10,000 words.***
> > > > Anyway, if they're going into HYPERSPACE, or WARP
> DRIVE, as
> > > they say on ST,
> > > > when they get back shouldn't everyone on the planet be
> deader
> > > than Stewart's
> > > > ovaries?
> > >
> > > *** Nope; there's no Time Dilation in Hyperspace. It's only
> travel
> > > through Real Space, through Einstein's 4-dimensional
> "spacetime
> > > continuum", where the relativistic effects of Time Dilation,
> Length
> > > Contraction, and Mass Increase occur. Those effects take
> place at
> > > velocities NEAR the speed of light (i.e. at, say,
> 99.999999999...%
> > > lightspeed), whereas "warp drive"/"hyperspace" travel occurs
> at FASTER
> > > THAN LIGHT velocities.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel problems


> --- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Prove it.
> >
> > Michael
>
> *** The effects of relativity (i.e. Time Dilation, etc.) have been
> proven thousands of times experimentally. The fictitious
> "hyperdrive"/"warp drive" effects, as used in science fiction
> stories, is--as yet--unprovable. However, look up Miguel
> Alcubierre on any Internet search engine, and you'll find that he
> has shown that it cannot be ruled out theoretically that a "warp
> drive" type of effect can actually be created.
>
> Patrick
>
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@y...]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 16:48
> > > To: pota@y...
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel
> problems
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> > > > *** I promise this won't be 10,000 words long...
> > > > One of the things that Lucas doesn't seem to "get" is the
> fact
> > > that a space
> > > > opera, involving ships that can zip all around a galaxy
> > > containing literally
> > > > BILLIONS of stars and planets, should be more expansive
> than his
> > > > multi-episodic "STAR WARS" series has proved to be.
> > > >
> > > > It sure seemed like 10,000 words.***
> > > > Anyway, if they're going into HYPERSPACE, or WARP
> DRIVE, as
> > > they say on ST,
> > > > when they get back shouldn't everyone on the planet be
> deader
> > > than Stewart's
> > > > ovaries?
> > >
> > > *** Nope; there's no Time Dilation in Hyperspace. It's only
> travel
> > > through Real Space, through Einstein's 4-dimensional
> "spacetime
> > > continuum", where the relativistic effects of Time Dilation,
> Length
> > > Contraction, and Mass Increase occur. Those effects take
> place at
> > > velocities NEAR the speed of light (i.e. at, say,
> 99.999999999...%
> > > lightspeed), whereas "warp drive"/"hyperspace" travel occurs
> at FASTER
> > > THAN LIGHT velocities.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: veetus@... [veetus@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2002 10:06
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] The Sum of Ape Fears
>
>
> I don't know, I just wanted to use that title. I guess the sum of "Ape"
> fears is that Richard Zanuck is our best hope for a sequel (God help us!).
> Question for the weekend: what would you say is the "sum of "Ape" fears"?
> Etc. - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel problems
>
>
> > --- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > Prove it.
> > >
> > > Michael
> >
> > *** The effects of relativity (i.e. Time Dilation, etc.) have been
> > proven thousands of times experimentally. The fictitious
> > "hyperdrive"/"warp drive" effects, as used in science fiction
> > stories, is--as yet--unprovable. However, look up Miguel
> > Alcubierre on any Internet search engine, and you'll find that he
> > has shown that it cannot be ruled out theoretically that a "warp
> > drive" type of effect can actually be created.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@y...]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 16:48
> > > > To: pota@y...
> > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: STAR WARS's prequel
> > problems
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> > > > > *** I promise this won't be 10,000 words long...
> > > > > One of the things that Lucas doesn't seem to "get" is the
> > fact
> > > > that a space
> > > > > opera, involving ships that can zip all around a galaxy
> > > > containing literally
> > > > > BILLIONS of stars and planets, should be more expansive
> > than his
> > > > > multi-episodic "STAR WARS" series has proved to be.
> > > > >
> > > > > It sure seemed like 10,000 words.***
> > > > > Anyway, if they're going into HYPERSPACE, or WARP
> > DRIVE, as
> > > > they say on ST,
> > > > > when they get back shouldn't everyone on the planet be
> > deader
> > > > than Stewart's
> > > > > ovaries?
> > > >
> > > > *** Nope; there's no Time Dilation in Hyperspace. It's only
> > travel
> > > > through Real Space, through Einstein's 4-dimensional
> > "spacetime
> > > > continuum", where the relativistic effects of Time Dilation,
> > Length
> > > > Contraction, and Mass Increase occur. Those effects take
> > place at
> > > > velocities NEAR the speed of light (i.e. at, say,
> > 99.999999999...%
> > > > lightspeed), whereas "warp drive"/"hyperspace" travel occurs
> > at FASTER
> > > > THAN LIGHT velocities.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

>
>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calima 5021 [calima5021com@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2002 15:21
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Sum of Ape Fears
>
>
> I don't know, I just wanted to use that title. I guess the sum of "Ape"
> fears is that Richard Zanuck is our best hope for a sequel (God help us!).
> Question for the weekend: what would you say is the "sum of "Ape" fears"?
> Etc. - - Jeff
>
>
> The sum of ape fears?
> Not seeing a POTA sequel.
> And as most, like myself having mixed feelings about POTA 2001. After
> watching EP2 and EP1, I can't help but really enjoy POTA 2001 soooo much
> more.
>
> It's like a breath of fresh air compared to Star Wars.
>
> It's funny, all those who I ask about EP2 and how they liked it.
> They always give the same responce. It was better than EP1.
> The only question is, what movie in all film history wasn't? :o)
>
>
> Best.
> Al
>
>
>
>
> _____

>
> > Patrick Stewart has ovaries?
>
> No, but Patrick Tilton thinks he has a Low Cute Ass.

> POTA 2001, that's what!
>
> Michael
>

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Calima 5021 [calima5021com@m...]
> > Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2002 15:21
> > To: pota@y...
> > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Sum of Ape Fears
> >
> >
> > I don't know, I just wanted to use that title. I guess the sum of "Ape"
> > fears is that Richard Zanuck is our best hope for a sequel (God help us!).
> > Question for the weekend: what would you say is the "sum of "Ape" fears"?
> > Etc. - - Jeff
> >
> >
> > The sum of ape fears?
> > Not seeing a POTA sequel.
> > And as most, like myself having mixed feelings about POTA 2001. After
> > watching EP2 and EP1, I can't help but really enjoy POTA 2001 soooo much
> > more.
> >
> > It's like a breath of fresh air compared to Star Wars.
> >
> > It's funny, all those who I ask about EP2 and how they liked it.
> > They always give the same responce. It was better than EP1.
> > The only question is, what movie in all film history wasn't? :o)
> >
> >
> > Best.
> > Al
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _____

> *** "Star Trek: Insurrection"--in addition to being a horrible

> was an affront to the very philosophy that Star Trek had

> from the get-go. How dare they promulgate an "anti-technology"

> in a film which is part of a series that shows time and again that

> exploitation of Science and Technology are necessary for the
> betterment of all sentient life! The "new-age" types living in

> little "renaissance festival" village are too friggin' selfish to
> share the rest of their planet with others? How many square miles

> their little village take up? How many millions of square miles

> available for their plastic-surgery-indulging relatives? And they
> can't share it? Remember when Kirk and Spock were around saving

> galaxy? They would have declared the la-la land new-age village to

> a non-viable society in the long-term, since they seem to have
> eschewed technology altogether. Thus, when their star goes nova

> it will, eventually), they'll still be stuck on terra firma,

> techno-society would have long since exploited starflight and

> their asses.
> I tolerated "Star Trek: Generations". I liked "Star Trek: First
> Contact". I absolutely DESPISED "ST: Insurrection". Let's hope

> "Star Trek 'Ten'" is more about what Star Trek used to be all

> And please... PLEASE!!!... don't let whoever did the faggy theme

> for ENTERPRISE do the music for the movie!
>
> As much as I hated THE PHANTOM MENACE, I have to begrudgingly

> that it was ever-so-slightly better than INSURRECTION. But not by
> much.
>
> Patrick Michael Tilton
> EARTH-TIME 6-01-2002
>
> P.S. I'm going to see THE SUM OF ALL FEARS today, so I'll let you

> what I thought about it tomorrow. I haven't read the book, but I
> understand that the terrorists who steal the nuke and detonate it

> America are--in the book--radical Islamic extremists, and not the

> nazis that the movie has. Given that the film was in production

> to September 11th, I can understand the "politically correct"

> to change villains (you can ALWAYS bash Nazis... even though there
> ain't a modern Nazi movement anywhere on Earth with the financial
> resources available to Al-Qaeda), so as to placate Muslim groups.

> wonder if--had the movie not been green-lighted until AFTER

> 11th--they would have been so quick to make the villains into

> rather than Muslim terrorists. Quite frankly, if they HAD gone

> Muslim terrorists in the movie, and if, then, Muslim groups were

> voice their outrage at the "stereotype" depiction of them as
> terrorists, no one would give a shit... since the attacks on the

> and the Pentagon have proven to one and all exactly what those
> bastards are capable of.
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Calima 5021 [calima5021com@m...]
> > > Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2002 15:21
> > > To: pota@y...
> > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Sum of Ape Fears
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't know, I just wanted to use that title. I guess the sum

> > > fears is that Richard Zanuck is our best hope for a sequel

> > > Question for the weekend: what would you say is the "sum

> > > Etc. - - Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > > The sum of ape fears?
> > > Not seeing a POTA sequel.
> > > And as most, like myself having mixed feelings about POTA

> > > watching EP2 and EP1, I can't help but really enjoy POTA 2001

> > > more.
> > >
> > > It's like a breath of fresh air compared to Star Wars.
> > >
> > > It's funny, all those who I ask about EP2 and how they liked

> > > They always give the same responce. It was better than EP1.
> > > The only question is, what movie in all film history

> > >
> > >
> > > Best.
> > > Al
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >

> The contest?
> The winner will receive a Battle UNcut DVD along with a DVD request.

> that you'll get toons or 2001 as well. (whichever your choice)

>From: LordTZer0@...
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] BATTLE CONTEST
>Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 13:32:38 EDT
>

--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> many that may as well be
> Nazis like the KKK, FOX news anchors and the Attorney General.
>
> We have our share of left wing liberal kooks as well.
> Eh, Jimbo?

> Since Adams, Franklin, Jefferson and Washington were the Left

> kooks of their day; we're in good company. Better than being in

> group Hitler would be in today.
>
> Why do demos lump all conservitives with Hitler?

> Only people whith more money than they deserve
> and people with none want to spend tax dollars carelessly.

--- In pota@y..., CheeseGOTAS@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 6/1/02 4:05:28 PM Central Daylight Time,
> JamesA1102@a... writes:
>
> << Tried to send directly but wouldn't go through so I'll post it
here. >>
>
> Wow, that looks nice. Good work!
>
> -Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2002 23:40
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Sum of Ape Fears
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > POTA 2001, that's what!
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
> *** "Star Trek: Insurrection"--in addition to being a horrible film--
> was an affront to the very philosophy that Star Trek had championed
> from the get-go. How dare they promulgate an "anti-technology" message
> in a film which is part of a series that shows time and again that the
> exploitation of Science and Technology are necessary for the
> betterment of all sentient life! The "new-age" types living in their
> little "renaissance festival" village are too friggin' selfish to
> share the rest of their planet with others? How many square miles does
> their little village take up? How many millions of square miles are
> available for their plastic-surgery-indulging relatives? And they
> can't share it? Remember when Kirk and Spock were around saving the
> galaxy? They would have declared the la-la land new-age village to be
> a non-viable society in the long-term, since they seem to have
> eschewed technology altogether. Thus, when their star goes nova (which
> it will, eventually), they'll still be stuck on terra firma, whereas a
> techno-society would have long since exploited starflight and saved
> their asses.
> I tolerated "Star Trek: Generations". I liked "Star Trek: First
> Contact". I absolutely DESPISED "ST: Insurrection". Let's hope that
> "Star Trek 'Ten'" is more about what Star Trek used to be all about.
> And please... PLEASE!!!... don't let whoever did the faggy theme song
> for ENTERPRISE do the music for the movie!
>
> As much as I hated THE PHANTOM MENACE, I have to begrudgingly agree
> that it was ever-so-slightly better than INSURRECTION. But not by
> much.
>
> Patrick Michael Tilton
> EARTH-TIME 6-01-2002
>
> P.S. I'm going to see THE SUM OF ALL FEARS today, so I'll let you know
> what I thought about it tomorrow. I haven't read the book, but I
> understand that the terrorists who steal the nuke and detonate it in
> America are--in the book--radical Islamic extremists, and not the neo-
> nazis that the movie has. Given that the film was in production prior
> to September 11th, I can understand the "politically correct" pressure
> to change villains (you can ALWAYS bash Nazis... even though there
> ain't a modern Nazi movement anywhere on Earth with the financial
> resources available to Al-Qaeda), so as to placate Muslim groups. I
> wonder if--had the movie not been green-lighted until AFTER September
> 11th--they would have been so quick to make the villains into Nazis,
> rather than Muslim terrorists. Quite frankly, if they HAD gone with
> Muslim terrorists in the movie, and if, then, Muslim groups were to
> voice their outrage at the "stereotype" depiction of them as
> terrorists, no one would give a shit... since the attacks on the WTC
> and the Pentagon have proven to one and all exactly what those
> bastards are capable of.
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Calima 5021 [calima5021com@m...]
> > > Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2002 15:21
> > > To: pota@y...
> > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Sum of Ape Fears
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't know, I just wanted to use that title. I guess the
> sum of "Ape"
> > > fears is that Richard Zanuck is our best hope for a sequel
> (God help us!).
> > > Question for the weekend: what would you say is the "sum of
> "Ape" fears"?
> > > Etc. - - Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > > The sum of ape fears?
> > > Not seeing a POTA sequel.
> > > And as most, like myself having mixed feelings about POTA 2001. After
> > > watching EP2 and EP1, I can't help but really enjoy POTA 2001
> soooo much
> > > more.
> > >
> > > It's like a breath of fresh air compared to Star Wars.
> > >
> > > It's funny, all those who I ask about EP2 and how they liked it.
> > > They always give the same responce. It was better than EP1.
> > > The only question is, what movie in all film history wasn't? :o)
> > >
> > >
> > > Best.
> > > Al
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____

> -----Original Message-----
> From: LordTZer0@... [LordTZer0@...]
> Sent: Sunday, 2 June 2002 3:33
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] BATTLE CONTEST
>
>
> Meaning that you'll get toons or 2001 as well. (whichever your choice)
>
> If I win can I get toons and 2001 instead of Battle?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calima 5021 [calima5021com@...]
> Sent: Sunday, 2 June 2002 4:43
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] BATTLE CONTEST
>
>
> Lord T:
>
> I guess.
> But wouldn't you like to see your art work on a DVD?
> I think that would something to be proud of, don't you think.
>
> Alan:
>
> Thanks. Send me as many as you can.
> The same rules aply for 2001 and Toons, for anyone interested.
>
> By the time this is said and done with. These DVDs will be known as the
> e-group DVDs :o)
>
> I'll start burning DVDs tomorrow and shipping out on Monday.
> Thanks again.
> Al
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: LordTZer0@...
> >Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> >To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] BATTLE CONTEST
> >Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 13:32:38 EDT
> >
>
>
>
>
> _____

> Your image looks great James.
> But I'm leaning a bit towards Alan's Battle Pic.
> Alan, If only you could change the Charator's in the Backdrop to

> Charator's, and make it to a sharp 800X600, I think that would

> soft charactor backdrop would allow me to write in the DVD options

> it being lost in the picture.

>From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [Planet of the Apes] BATTLE CONTEST
>Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 08:31:39 +1000
>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Maxwell" <alan@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] BATTLE PIC


> "Calima 5021" <calima5021com@...> wrote:
> > Your image looks great James.
> > But I'm leaning a bit towards Alan's Battle Pic.
> > Alan, If only you could change the Charator's in the Backdrop to
> Battle
> > Charator's, and make it to a sharp 800X600, I think that would
> workout. The
> > soft charactor backdrop would allow me to write in the DVD options
> without
> > it being lost in the picture.
>
> I'll perhaps get that done tomorrow - in the meantime, here are my
> other two versions (in miniature so you don't have to spend ages
> downloading).
>
> The one with the logo filled in with pics I've already sent to Alex
> but I thought I'd post it here for the group to see anyway - the large
> version shows it off a little better, in my humble opinion but I'll
> not send it out on the list!
>
> Likewise, I've also attached a third one that I put together (what can
> I say, I was really getting into this!) - again the small picture
> doesn't show it off, but on the large version you can see that I've
> doctored it slightly so that Aldo's face appears in Caesar's eye.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> Wow! My vote is for the top one, but it might be hard to put menu

> it.

>From: "Alan Maxwell" <alan@...>
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] BATTLE PIC
>Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 00:21:47 +0100
>

----- Original Message -----
From: <JamesA1102@...>
To: <calima5021com@...>; <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 6:03 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Battle DVD


> I did another version and left some black space in the middle for the
menu.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Just wondering if it's too late to change my vote from Uncut Battle to the toons??? I just got a chance to see a bit of one and decided that would be better. It not, that's cool. Had to ask though. :o)

By the way, all you guys that did the Battle wallpapers, you're very good and creative! I'm way out of my league here!

I noticed in a couple of those wallpapers someone used a Planet of the Apes font. Is there any chance that someone who has those fonts could maybe send them my way please?

Just wondering,

>From: thypentacle <thypentacle@...>
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Free DVD
>Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 18:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>Just wondering if it's too late to change my vote from Uncut Battle to the
>toons??? I just got a chance to see a bit of one and decided that would be
>better. It not, that's cool. Had to ask though. :o)
>
>By the way, all you guys that did the Battle wallpapers, you're very good
>and creative! I'm way out of my league here!
>
>ThyPentacle
>
>
>
>---------------------------------

Don't know if this is legit or not. Just stumbled upon it during my late nite net surfin. The page will take a while to load, so if you're on a 56k modem be prepared to wait a bit. :o)

http://1starwars.4t.com/Star%20Wars%20Episode%20III.htm

----- Original Message -----

From: thypentacle

To: pota

Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 11:19 PM

Subject: [Planet of the Apes] OT - Star Wars 3 script

Don't know if this is legit or not. Just stumbled upon it during my late nite net surfin. The page will take a while to load, so if you're on a 56k modem be prepared to wait a bit. :o)

http://1starwars.4t.com/Star%20Wars%20Episode%20III.htm

ThyPentacle

---

> Patrick,
>
> Would you agree with me that you would prefer to watch

> over (a la Clockwork Orange) than to watch POTA 2001 again?
>
> By the way, I heard that "Enterprise" theme song in the closing

> movie the other day - Patch Adams! It fitted well there. So it

> ORIGINAL! They should have done something orchestral as

> other series.
>
> I was still more entertained by Insurrection than I was by POTA

>
> Michael
>