|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18613 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Calling Alex |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18614 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Battle Cited |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18615 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Patrick's Greatest Hits |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18616 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: The Hatch of the ship (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18617 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Timeline issues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18618 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18619 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Timeline issues (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18620 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Mother#$@*er |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18621 |
From: thypentacle |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18622 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18623 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18624 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Mother#$@*er |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18625 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18626 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18627 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18628 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18629 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18630 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18631 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18632 |
From: Anthony B. McElveen |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18633 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18634 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18635 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18636 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18637 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18638 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18639 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18640 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18641 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18642 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Truth About Cats & Dogs |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18643 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Truth About Cats & Dogs |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18644 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Lawgiver |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18645 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18646 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Mutants |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18647 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Zira |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18648 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18649 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18650 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18651 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Zira |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18652 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18653 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18654 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18655 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18656 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18657 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Zira |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18658 |
From: sand_hill_school |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18659 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Lawgiver |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18660 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18661 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18662 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18663 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Zira |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18664 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18665 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Zira |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18666 |
From: Jeff & Susan Stringer |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Truth About Cats & Dogs |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18667 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18668 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18669 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18670 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18671 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18672 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18673 |
From: Anthony B. McElveen |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18674 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Milo (conclusion) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18675 |
From: Ken and Heather Taylor |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Milo (conclusion) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18676 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Milo (conclusion) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18677 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Milo (conclusion) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18678 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Believability of rival scenarios... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18679 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Planet of the Apes] Timeline issues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18680 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Taylor's Final Report |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18681 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18682 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18683 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: The Logic of Number, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18684 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: She's a witch...BURN HER!! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18685 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Rival Scenarios |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18686 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Timeline issues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18687 |
From: JamesA1102@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18688 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: What? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18689 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: What? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18690 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Planet of the Apes] Timeline issues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18691 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Reasons for Cornelius' few untruths... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18692 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18693 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18694 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: OT: God's flubs... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18695 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Believability of rival scenarios... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18696 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Planet of the Apes] Timeline issues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18697 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18698 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Locations |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18699 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Hatred of Humanity |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18700 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18701 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18702 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Timeline issues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18703 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Believability of rival scenarios... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18704 |
From: Jeff & Susan Stringer |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18705 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: God's flubs... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18706 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18707 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18708 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18709 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18710 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Taylor's Final Report |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18711 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18712 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: She's a witch...BURN HER!! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18613 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Calling Alex |
|
.html Alex, are you locked in the laboratory?
Michael <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18614 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Battle Cited |
|
.html In the latest issue of "Maxim" they have an article on the 50 worst movies of all time. BATTLE ranked #45.
Topping the list was BATMAN and ROBIN. No argument there, although a case could be made for Ron Howard's GRINCH.
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18615 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Patrick's Greatest Hits |
.html>Later on, when "Skipper" asks Brent, "Did you contact EARTH?", it
>doesn't make any sense to suppose that he means the planet Earth,
>Patrick Michael Tilton
Another glorious Patrick moment. Priceless.
My plan is that we designate one person each week who has to read all of
Patrick's posts that week and report back so that we don't miss any gems like
this one. Who wants to take the shift the first week?
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18616 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: The Hatch of the ship (OT) |
.html>Patrick,
>
>This post is too long.
>
>I think you might "win" a lot of arguments because people just give
>up trying to communicate and you have the nature of a Politician.
>That's not a compliment but I think it is an accurate observation.
>
Bingo.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18617 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Timeline issues |
.html> In my chronology the second timeline ends with the cartoon (don't hate
>me!). That gives us a semi conclusion : the world survives past 3955 (the
>destruction of Earth in "Beneath"), thus Caesar is triumphant, and the
>mutants become the Underdwellers. Etc. - - - Jeff
I bet yours makes more sense than all of the "official" timelines.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18618 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc |
.html>that even die-hard conservatives who advocated a firm stance against
>Communism did so out of motives that--in their own way--were as pure
>as the so-called liberal "good guys". The foundations of Communist
>philosophy are a recipe for disaster--for endless class warfare (the
Patrick, are you aware that people tend to glaze over your stuff because
so much of it seems to be either irrelevent or far-fetched? You missed
the point completely. This is not a discussion on the pros and cons of
the Vietnam war or of Communism. There are plenty of better places
on the internet for that and I would encourage you to search for them.
You seem like you spend all your spare time making a bunch of 10 page posts
to POTA. But how about looking for some other Yahoo groups or Usenet
newsgroups and start reading them and spreading around some of your ideas
to other places besides just POTA? I bet that would benefit both you and
the group.
>> In case anyone in the audience still couldn't figure out that the
bad guys are conservatives BENEATH is even more blunt. Zira says
about Zaius "He has but one motive. To keep things exactly the way
they have always been". Which is the very definition of
"conservative".
>[*** Actually, the word "conservative" refers more to
>the idea of LESS-government; a "conservative" approach means that
>which involves a MINIMUM of effort/input. Zira states that Zaius
>wants to keep the "status quo"--where he and the other "top
>orangutans" are in control of the government
Get a dictionary and look up the word "conservative". What Zira says about
Zaius -- "He has but one motive. To keep things exactly the way they have
always been" -- fits the definition EXACTLY. Instead of doing that you'll post
10 pages of off topic 1980's style political propaganda which was nonsensical
right from the start. BENEATH and PLANET were written a long time before the
"conservatives" of the 1980's, and Dr. Zaius EXACTLY fits the definition of a
real conservative. Zaius says NOTHING about the size of government, but it
is obvious that the conservative authoritarian government in POTA is too big
and repressive BECAUSE it is too conservative. (Also true in CONQUEST).
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18619 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Timeline issues (OT) |
.html>--- In pota@y..., "Melkor" <melkor@m...> wrote:
>> >Patrick, be fair would you? This doesn't rule out ANYTHING!!!!
>Just like nothing anyone here says makes any difference to your ideas,
>it only gives you more motivation to find more reasons you could be
>right based on things as far fetched as a mothership called Earth.
>Really, after your mothership scenario which is the most far
>fetched idea I have heard of, you cannot discount anything anyone
>says!!
>>
>> I think Pole-Shifted Australia wins out over Mothership Earth for
>the "most far fetched idea" title.
>
>*** "Far fetched" could be used to describe ANY "Pole-Shift" theory.
>Unfortunately, there is a body of evidence that there indeed WAS a
>Pole Shift about 12,500 years ago, although irrefutable PROOF of it,
>of course, does not exist. It's all a matter of interpreting the
>evidence. For those of you who might care to read up on some of the
>more recent books that deal with the "Earth crust displacement"
>theory, I'd suggest Graham Hancock's "FOOTPRINTS OF THE GODS" and Rand
>Flem-Ath's books "WHEN THE SKY FELL" and "THE ATLANTIS BLUEPRINT". The
>fact that temperate zone Wooly Mammoths were flash-frozen with
>undigested buttercups in their mouths... and then SOMEHOW wound up at
>the tundra of the Arctic Circle, should, perhaps, give scoffers of the
>"pole shift" theory some pause.
>
>Patrick
It takes millions of years for continents to move even half way across
the globe. Your Pole-Shifted Australia jumps all the way in a century or
two because of a nuclear war.
Lets take a look at your greatest hits so far. And who knows how many
of your great ideas we missed.
1. Pole-Shifted Australia
2. Australia renamed "New America"
3. Mothership Earth
4. Roswell Aliens create Mandemus
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18620 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Mother#$@*er |
.html.html
So in other words you are saying that:
What I'm saying is that no one was trying to fool anyone with unseen motherships that aren't talked about but only alluded to as Earth, or any of that crap! What you saw is what you got! They didn't think it past that! And anyone who says different is only fooling themselves and needs to have their head examined! Patrick may now invent some theorems to prove me wrong.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18621 |
From: thypentacle |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc |
.htmllol ThyPentacle, Pentaclese, Mr. Pentacle... I've been called worse. :o) I have many user names on other forums and IRC chat rooms: eRRoR_404 / DreemWeever / HackerJack and about twenty others that I don't even remember at the moment. ;o) So of course I don't mind cause I don't even know what the hell to call myself.
Thy
veetus@... wrote:
I just call him Mr. Pentacle. Etc. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18622 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Milo |
|
.html I have a question.
It is assumed by many that Milo has known Zira and/or Cornelius for
years.
Is it possible (within the confines of believability) that they have
not known him for years?
I am looking for inferences/evidence from the movie (Escape, as I do
not believe Milo is mentioned in any of the others, is he?).
I have always thought they were all close but I really don't know why.
Looking forward to many varied responses.
Michael <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18623 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Milo |
.htmlHe's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship in
Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a spaceship
and were going to fly it away who would you take with you, friends
or strangers?
--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> I have a question.
>
> It is assumed by many that Milo has known Zira and/or Cornelius
for
> years.
>
> Is it possible (within the confines of believability) that they
have
> not known him for years?
>
> I am looking for inferences/evidence from the movie (Escape, as I
do
> not believe Milo is mentioned in any of the others, is he?).
>
> I have always thought they were all close but I really don't know
why.
>
> Looking forward to many varied responses.
>
> Michael <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18624 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Mother#$@*er |
.html
.html
That's for sure. They weren't thinking
beyond what's on the screen and sometimes they weren't even thinking about
what's ON the screen in past movies. But you need people like me and Patrick.
You need people like us so you can point your f**king finger and say, "That's
the bad guy".
Etc.
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:20
PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
Mother#$@*er
So in other words you are saying that:
What I'm
saying is that no one was trying to fool anyone with unseen motherships that
aren't talked about but only alluded to as Earth, or any of that crap!
What you saw is what you got! They didn't think it past that! And
anyone who says different is only fooling themselves and needs to have their
head examined! Patrick may now invent some theorems to prove me wrong.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18625 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 6/27/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlI agree they are friends and I think that is undenyable, but it does
not mean there has been a LONG relationship necessarily, does it?
Zira and Cornelius befriend Taylor very quickly (and Stevie & Lewis,
and Armando).
I am just wondering if it is totally necessary that they have been
friends for a long time (again I FEEL they have, but I don't think
that feeling is justified by evidence).
Michael
--- "james611102" < JamesA1102@...> wrote:
> He's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship in
> Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a
spaceship
> and were going to fly it away who would you take with you, friends
> or strangers?
>
> --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > I have a question.
> >
> > It is assumed by many that Milo has known Zira and/or Cornelius
> for
> > years.
> >
> > Is it possible (within the confines of believability) that they
> have
> > not known him for years?
> >
> > I am looking for inferences/evidence from the movie (Escape, as I
> do
> > not believe Milo is mentioned in any of the others, is he?).
> >
> > I have always thought they were all close but I really don't know
> why.
> >
> > Looking forward to many varied responses.
> >
> > Michael
>
>
> ------------------------ ---------------------
~-->
> Free $5 Love Reading
> Risk Free!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/9_IolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-~->
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18626 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlNo, I get the feeling they've known each other because of the intensity of
their feelings. Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but not as
intense as when they speak about Milo (true, he was killed horribly but
still, they talk about him like an old friend).
- - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> I agree they are friends and I think that is undenyable, but it does
> not mean there has been a LONG relationship necessarily, does it?
>
> Zira and Cornelius befriend Taylor very quickly (and Stevie & Lewis,
> and Armando).
>
> I am just wondering if it is totally necessary that they have been
> friends for a long time (again I FEEL they have, but I don't think
> that feeling is justified by evidence).
>
> Michael
>
> --- "james611102" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
> > He's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship in
> > Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a
> spaceship
> > and were going to fly it away who would you take with you, friends
> > or strangers?
> >
> > --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > I have a question.
> > >
> > > It is assumed by many that Milo has known Zira and/or Cornelius
> > for
> > > years.
> > >
> > > Is it possible (within the confines of believability) that they
> > have
> > > not known him for years?
> > >
> > > I am looking for inferences/evidence from the movie (Escape, as I
> > do
> > > not believe Milo is mentioned in any of the others, is he?).
> > >
> > > I have always thought they were all close but I really don't know
> > why.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to many varied responses.
> > >
> > > Michael
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ ---------------------
> ~-->
> > Free $5 Love Reading
> > Risk Free!
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/9_IolB/TM
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -~->
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18627 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlBy the way, Alex is having Yahoo troubles so he's technically (literally
technically!) not in the group at the moment. But he's slaving away on the
DVDs and said they should be ready mid-July. Etc. - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> I agree they are friends and I think that is undenyable, but it does
> not mean there has been a LONG relationship necessarily, does it?
>
> Zira and Cornelius befriend Taylor very quickly (and Stevie & Lewis,
> and Armando).
>
> I am just wondering if it is totally necessary that they have been
> friends for a long time (again I FEEL they have, but I don't think
> that feeling is justified by evidence).
>
> Michael
>
> --- "james611102" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
> > He's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship in
> > Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a
> spaceship
> > and were going to fly it away who would you take with you, friends
> > or strangers?
> >
> > --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > I have a question.
> > >
> > > It is assumed by many that Milo has known Zira and/or Cornelius
> > for
> > > years.
> > >
> > > Is it possible (within the confines of believability) that they
> > have
> > > not known him for years?
> > >
> > > I am looking for inferences/evidence from the movie (Escape, as I
> > do
> > > not believe Milo is mentioned in any of the others, is he?).
> > >
> > > I have always thought they were all close but I really don't know
> > why.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to many varied responses.
> > >
> > > Michael
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ ---------------------
> ~-->
> > Free $5 Love Reading
> > Risk Free!
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/9_IolB/TM
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -~->
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18628 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.html.html
Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but not as
intense as when they speak about Milo
Hey, they named their son after him!
That about says it all. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18629 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlYeah I know, they named their son after him. This intensity of
feelings towards him could also be explained by the fact that they
are the only 3 of their kind to be around. I do agree they have
intense feelings for him, but it is still arguable that this is from
the amount of time they have had together. It is possible that
someone who thinks as they do (and this is obvious) and who obviously
shares their dangerous knowledge would have become a close friend
very quickly, not necessarily over time.
I just want to be clear here that it is not totally unacceptable and
ridiculous to avoid concluding that they have known each other for a
long time.
Hey, I haven't known you long and I called both my twins T (well,
they are identical, so I gave them identical names).
By the way, guess who will be starring as the Skywalker twins in SW3?
Michael
--- LordTZer0@... wrote:
>
> > Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but not as
> > intense as when they speak about Milo
>
> Hey, they named their son after him!
> That about says it all.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18630 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Milo |
.html
< He's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship in Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a spaceship and were going to fly it away who would you take with you, friends or strangers?>
If I were going to get into that previously water-logged alien spaceship, I'd take whoever I thought knew the most about flying the thing. Even if I hated them.
I had the impression that they seemed to be friends, but maybe not GREAT friends. Like collegues who found they get along really well together. Why? No real reason. Maybe their reaction at his death?
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18631 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Milo |
.html>I had the impression that they seemed to be friends, but maybe not GREAT
>friends. Like collegues who found they get along really well together.
That sounds about right to me. On the other hand they did name their son
after Milo. (Why did Armando rename him Caesar?) Any interpretation would
work here.
Another question is when does Milo tell Cornelius and Zira about the Icarus?
The way I pictured it is that Milo comes to visit them about 30 minutes
after Zira's last appearance in BENEATH. There is some urgency to leave ape
city for awhile because they don't know what the result of the war will be.
-Tom
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18632 |
From: Anthony B. McElveen |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlI want to know why Drs. Galen and Milo were named for ancient Greeks
when all of the other non-mutant inhabitants of the 40th century had
Romanesque names in the movies. I say Romanesque only because of Zira;
did Boulle invent her name, or did it exist previously?
Anthony B. McElveen
On Friday, June 28, 2002, at 09:31 AM, Melkor wrote:
>> I had the impression that they seemed to be friends, but maybe not
>> GREAT
>> friends. Like collegues who found they get along really well together.
>
> That sounds about right to me. On the other hand they did name their
> son
> after Milo. (Why did Armando rename him Caesar?) Any interpretation
> would
> work here.
>
> Another question is when does Milo tell Cornelius and Zira about the
> Icarus?
> The way I pictured it is that Milo comes to visit them about 30 minutes
> after Zira's last appearance in BENEATH. There is some urgency to
> leave ape
> city for awhile because they don't know what the result of the war will
> be.
>
> -Tom <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18633 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlThat's true, there's a lot of viariables. I'm closer to people I've met in
the '90's then to some I've known all my life. On the other hand there's
something about people dying you've known all your life that really gets to
me.
Congrats on your twins' gig. Make sure Lucas gives you script approval.
Etc. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> Yeah I know, they named their son after him. This intensity of
> feelings towards him could also be explained by the fact that they
> are the only 3 of their kind to be around. I do agree they have
> intense feelings for him, but it is still arguable that this is from
> the amount of time they have had together. It is possible that
> someone who thinks as they do (and this is obvious) and who obviously
> shares their dangerous knowledge would have become a close friend
> very quickly, not necessarily over time.
>
> I just want to be clear here that it is not totally unacceptable and
> ridiculous to avoid concluding that they have known each other for a
> long time.
>
> Hey, I haven't known you long and I called both my twins T (well,
> they are identical, so I gave them identical names).
>
> By the way, guess who will be starring as the Skywalker twins in SW3?
>
> Michael
>
> --- LordTZer0@... wrote:
> >
> > > Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but not as
> > > intense as when they speak about Milo
> >
> > Hey, they named their son after him!
> > That about says it all.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18634 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlI've always taken that as bitter irony that Armando renamed him Caesar
after the death of C & Z. They died because of fears of an ape takeover, so
he names him "Caesar" in defiance. After all, Armando was there when they
named him Milo (and Dehn wrote both movies - - that's another one of those
things where you either go, "Damn, that's sloppy!" or they're us more fodder
for Patrick to mull over). Maybe the name was changed so the authorities
wouldn't get wise about a chimp being named after one of the ape-o-nauts.
Etc. - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Melkor" <melkor@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:31 AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> >I had the impression that they seemed to be friends, but maybe not GREAT
> >friends. Like collegues who found they get along really well together.
>
> That sounds about right to me. On the other hand they did name their son
> after Milo. (Why did Armando rename him Caesar?) Any interpretation would
> work here.
>
> Another question is when does Milo tell Cornelius and Zira about the
Icarus?
> The way I pictured it is that Milo comes to visit them about 30 minutes
> after Zira's last appearance in BENEATH. There is some urgency to leave
ape
> city for awhile because they don't know what the result of the war will
be.
>
> -Tom
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18635 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlI assume he told them before "Beneath" and that's a reason they're
cooperating with Zauis, they're sooo out of there. Milo's fixing it up
during "Beneath". Maybe they told him about it during "Planet" after they
learned about it from Taylor. Yet, they talk about going and Taylor says
they won't find anything but a rubber life raft and a flag. D'oh! Patrick?
Etc. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Melkor" <melkor@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:31 AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> >I had the impression that they seemed to be friends, but maybe not GREAT
> >friends. Like collegues who found they get along really well together.
>
> That sounds about right to me. On the other hand they did name their son
> after Milo. (Why did Armando rename him Caesar?) Any interpretation would
> work here.
>
> Another question is when does Milo tell Cornelius and Zira about the
Icarus?
> The way I pictured it is that Milo comes to visit them about 30 minutes
> after Zira's last appearance in BENEATH. There is some urgency to leave
ape
> city for awhile because they don't know what the result of the war will
be.
>
> -Tom
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18636 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlI have a strong suspicion that Boulle got the name Cornelius from the book
"Lord Jim". Joseph Conrad was Boulle's favorite author and he had a habit of
naming his characters after Conrad characters. I don't remember any off
hand, I'll have to consult my notes, except the star of Boulle's first book,
"William Conrad", was based on Joseph Conrad himself. Maybe form Cornelius
is where we got the "us"es: Cornelius, Zauis, Lucius. Those are very ancient
world sounding so we got more of the same, Galen, etc. There doesn't seem to
be a distinction, the writers use names from both the ancient Greek and
Roman. Etc. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony B. McElveen" <abmac@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> I want to know why Drs. Galen and Milo were named for ancient Greeks
> when all of the other non-mutant inhabitants of the 40th century had
> Romanesque names in the movies. I say Romanesque only because of Zira;
> did Boulle invent her name, or did it exist previously?
>
> Anthony B. McElveen
>
> On Friday, June 28, 2002, at 09:31 AM, Melkor wrote:
>
> >> I had the impression that they seemed to be friends, but maybe not
> >> GREAT
> >> friends. Like collegues who found they get along really well together.
> >
> > That sounds about right to me. On the other hand they did name their
> > son
> > after Milo. (Why did Armando rename him Caesar?) Any interpretation
> > would
> > work here.
> >
> > Another question is when does Milo tell Cornelius and Zira about the
> > Icarus?
> > The way I pictured it is that Milo comes to visit them about 30 minutes
> > after Zira's last appearance in BENEATH. There is some urgency to
> > leave ape
> > city for awhile because they don't know what the result of the war will
> > be.
> >
> > -Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18637 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
|
.html Milo & Cornelius were college roommates. But after Milo used
Cornelius' bong for an experiment that blew up the room; Dean Zaius
evicted them both. There were rooms available at the Chimpette dorm;
so they dressed up as females, calling themselves Lola & Mimi, to
enrolled there. The plan worked perfectly until Cornelius met and
fell in love with Zira. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18638 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.html.html In a message dated 6/28/02 12:38:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
I have a strong suspicion that Boulle got the name Cornelius from the book
"Lord Jim". Joseph Conrad was Boulle's favorite author and he had a habit of
naming his characters after Conrad characters. I don't remember any off
hand, I'll have to consult my notes, except the star of Boulle's first book,
"William Conrad", was based on Joseph Conrad himself. Maybe form Cornelius
is where we got the "us"es: Cornelius, Zauis, Lucius. Those are very ancient
world sounding so we got more of the same, Galen, etc. There doesn't seem to
be a distinction, the writers use names from both the ancient Greek and
Roman. Etc. - - - Jeff
That's a pretty good theory there, Jeff.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18639 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.html.html
The way I pictured it is that Milo comes to visit them about 30 minutes
after Zira's last appearance in BENEATH
I disagree. I think that they've been thinking about it since the rumors of war with the Forbidden zone humans. They seem to have an extreme aversion to war. As do most of the chimpanzees, being pacifists. Bu them especially, perhaps because they know from the Zaius' scroll that war with the humans leads to total destruction. And with Zira's overwhelming need to be honest with someone, no doubt they told Milo about it. With a child on the way it isn't likely they're gong to stick around given what they know about human technology versus horses and guns. There's no sense of time underground, but I'm guessing it wasn't more than a day or so since Zira's last appearance that they left, probably in the middle of the night or very early, before dawn, so as not to arouse suspicion. They the would have launched by mid-morning in time to see the big firework go Phoom! <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18640 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
.html"Michael Whitty" < whitty@...> wrote:
> I think this is the best place to start and it is the first question
we
> should ask new members to the chat group:
>
> WHAT IS PLANET OF THE APES?????
I am always able to view Planet of the Apes as a standalone 1968 film,
and it's my favourite, that's for sure. But by and large when I think
of Planet of the Apes I think of the franchise - and I don't just
think it's because of the collectibles and things either. I think it
is probably influenced by how I saw the films. Battle was the first
PotA film I saw, followed by Conquest (a couple of times) and I loved
them both. The original was actually the third film that I saw in the
series.
I suspect that has a lot to do with it - who knows, maybe if I'd
actually seen the original first, I'd be right up there with Rory
defending the original and mauling the sequels and TV series!
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18641 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues |
.html"Melkor" < melkor@...> wrote:
> I would let that beef go. Even the first timeline can never be
"our"
> timeline because Taylor launches his ship in 1972. The TV series
is
> ruled out because they launch in 1980, but the cartoon universe is
still
> open if you want to go with that.
Is it ever established that the TV series ship launched in 1980? I
know there is a date on the opening credits, but isn't it perfectly
plausible that, like the film spacecraft before them, they had already
been adrift for some time?
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18642 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Truth About Cats & Dogs |
.html"Jeff & Susan Stringer" < stringe@...> wrote:
> Then why is there a dog in the first episode of the Apes tv
series...?
Possible explanations:
1) They were genetically engineered or even cloned a la Jurassic Park
not long after the plague, and began to breed again.
2) There may have been some surviving dogs left somewhere (in a remote
part of the countryside, a sheltered valley, whatever) and once the
plague died out (like the great Spanish Flu epidemic) they were able
to restart the species again.
3) The writers decided that the TV series is not meant to take place
in film continuity.
4) It was a sloppy mistake.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18643 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Truth About Cats & Dogs |
.html"Melkor" < melkor@...> wrote:
> > Then why is there a dog in the first episode of the Apes tv
series...?
>
> So that people would not try to fit the TV series into the movie
series.
Didn't work, did it...?
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18644 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Lawgiver |
.html"james611102" < JamesA1102@...> wrote:
> Agreed the one in Battle lived 100 years before the one mentioned in
> Planet.
Is it not possible that they are the same one and that history is
simply a bit blurry? Given that hundreds of years have passed and the
apes' recorded history isn't exactly stored in the most exact manner,
I'd think it's very possible that this is simply a slight historical
inaccuracy.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18645 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues (OT) |
.html"Melkor" < melkor@...> wrote:
> It takes millions of years for continents to move even half way
across
> the globe. Your Pole-Shifted Australia jumps all the way in a
century or
> two because of a nuclear war.
>
> Lets take a look at your greatest hits so far. And who knows how
many
> of your great ideas we missed.
Let's not bother.
Feel free to dismiss some or all of Patrick's ideas. You think they're
far fetched? Fair enough. Certainly there are a few that I find too
implausible to buy into. But let's give it a rest with the constant
Patrick-bashing. It's becoming tired and cliched, and I thought we'd
seen the last of it.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18646 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Mutants |
.html"patrickmichaeltilton" < patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
> ...It makes much more sense that the Mutants
> make their masks in order to satisfy their need to perceive
themselves
> as different from each other; without their masks, they all look
> hideously alike--you can't even tell any racial differences. But
with
> the masks on, not only can you tell that "Negro" is a black man, but
> that the robe-clad Albina is a female (with a wig of blonde hair, to
> make her more feminine).
This raises a couple of questions I've never thought about before...
1) Who makes these masks? And how?
2) If all the mutants look the way we see them in the film, how do
they choose their "identity"? If all mutants look like this, there is
no longer any such thing as a "white man" or a "black man" or
whatever. Following on from this, is a possible explanation that they
have moulded the masks' images into the forms of their long-dead
ancestors, and in turn their kids will take on the same mask?
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18647 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Zira |
.html.html
I say Romanesque only because of Zira; did Boulle invent her name, or did it exist previously?
Zira is not an invented name. Though it is more common on the other side of the world, particularly in the Moslem/Hebrew region. There a some alternate spellings as well, such as, Zirah or Zerah. No matter what language these variations appear whether Japanese, Chinese or Swedish, it always means Princess, or Flower, or Dawn, with the exception of Basque where its a variation of Madonna. It's also some word in Turkish I have yet to figure out. Zira.com is, or was a computer systems company. There used to be a German brand of cigarettes called Zira. And people still collect silks from them with the Zira Girls on them. You can find them on eBay. A search of old census records nearly always turns up a Zira or two. And there is a small town in the region of India that is now Pakistan near Lahore named, Zira. Zira has gained recent popularity as a name in the punk rock community, and also as a pet name. And it was
most recently used in the Disney film The Lion King. I hope that answers your question. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18648 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.html.html
is where we got the "us"es: Cornelius, Zauis, Lucius.
Perhaps it started that way, but in the book the simian civilization was a mirror of our own. But since the film tends to primitize things a bit, with the firearms being the most advanced thing on the planet, the names aren't the only thing that seem Roman. The culture as well seems to be borrowed from the Romans/Greeks, as was ours. But it hasn't advanced much with them. Especially in the TV series where they even call the leaders Prefects.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18649 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
|
.html What is Planet of the Apes to me?
Well, I was amazed by it when it first came out. After all, what's cooler
than talking monkeys? So when they made Beneath I was right there. Then,
they blew it up. But then came Escape. Then they killed them off. Then
came Conquest. Sure it had some of the old cast, but I was always a big Kim
Hunter fan. Not to take anything away from Trundy and Bonham-Carter, but
they can't hold a candle to Kim Hunter. Still there's something about taking
a hot chick and making a monkey out of her. Perhaps that hand an influence
on a lot of my interracial dating. There's something about a girl that is
'different' that say hot monkey love! POTA probably shaped a lot of my
political leanings, such as they are for a punk rocker, as well. Like some
others on the group. An Independent with Libertarian leanings. Socially
liberal, fiscally conservative. But keep your stinking paws off my guns you
damned dirty ape! Remember the cry, "Death to the Extremists!" Well, that's
a bit extreme. No! Not me! Aaaaarrrggghhhh . . . Anyway, I started with
just some ad clippings from movie section. Then my folk got a set of lobby
cards from Fox. Then I rode the wave of merchandise -- lost most in my teens
to garage sales -- and started almost from scratch in the 90s after reading
Kim's book and contacting her. Then I discovered eBay. God help me! I try
not to look so I don't buy. I don't have the money or the space. Someday,
when I suss out this web-hosting thing, I'll put the www.kimhunter.com museum
online, maybe sell some of the collection, and get some of my money back.
Then I can spend that on my growing Anime collection. I need to stop
collecting and start selling things. At least until I get a bigger place.
Now we just need to find out if the gal on the POTA Fanfic group really knows
Zanuck! I'd like to tell him What POTA is -- because apparently he doesn't
know! I still can't figure out why he had Burton make Gorilliator without a
single drop of blood in it. It's a far cry from Sleepy Hollow! If there was
an MTV Award for lame fight scenes . . . Well, at least they nominated Thade
for best villain. Still. Damn I'm rambling like Patrick. I'd better wrap
it up before people's eye wear out. If they got this far, and I haven't
bored them into unconsciousness. I know . . . too late. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18650 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues (OT) |
.html.html But let's give it a rest with the constant Patrick-bashing. It's becoming tired and cliched, and I thought we'd seen the last of it.
I'll give it a rest if he will. I just can't spend all day reading his crackpot theories. Even if he can spend all day writing them. I know, some in the group enjoy his posts. I enen try and get through a few myself. But most of the time my brain glazes over about midway and begins to run out my ears. Perhaps he can write a book for me not to buy. Or start a website. www.patrickskookieconcepts.com It won't lack for content. That's for sure! <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18651 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Zira |
.html> say Romanesque only because of Zira; did Boulle invent her name, or did it
>> exist previously?
>
>Zira is not an invented name. Though it is more common on the other side of
>the world, particularly in the Moslem/Hebrew region. There a some alternate
>spellings as well, such as, Zirah or Zerah. No matter what language these
>variations appear whether Japanese, Chinese or Swedish, it always means
>Princess, or Flower, or Dawn, with the exception of Basque where its a
>variation of Madonna. It's also some word in Turkish I have yet to figure
>out. Zira.com is, or was a computer systems company. There used to be a
>German brand of cigarettes called Zira. And people still collect silks from
>them with the Zira Girls on them. You can find them on eBay. A search of
>old census records nearly always turns up a Zira or two. And there is a
>small town in the region of India that is now Pakistan near Lahore named,
>Zira. Zira has gained recent popularity as a name in the punk rock
>community, and also as a pet name. And it was most recently used in the
>Disney film The Lion King. I hope that answers your question.
I had never heard of "Zira" either. It sounds like a cat name. I wonder
where Boulle got "Zorum" and "Zanum".
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18652 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Re: Milo |
.html
.html
Kassidy,
Were
you waiting on a Power Records cassette tape from me?
Michael
< He's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship in
Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a spaceship and
were going to fly it away who would you take with you, friends or
strangers?>
If I were going to get into that previously water-logged alien spaceship, I'd
take whoever I thought knew the most about flying the thing. Even if I
hated them.
I had the impression that they seemed to be friends, but maybe not
GREAT friends. Like collegues who found they get along really well
together. Why? No real reason. Maybe their reaction at his
death?
Kassidy
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18653 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues (OT) |
|
.html He's a theory for you Patrick. If you could get through all the higher
mathematics without your brain seizing up, you find out that creation can't
possibly work. The numbers are just so astronomically high so that Patrick
doesn't find God's flubs. Hows that for a theoy, eh? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18654 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlI agree. Not that other possibilities could not be entertained, but one
would think that if they knew of the ship it should have been mentioned in
Beneath otherwise.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melkor [melkor@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 0:32
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
>
>
> >I had the impression that they seemed to be friends, but maybe not GREAT
> >friends. Like collegues who found they get along really well together.
>
> That sounds about right to me. On the other hand they did name their son
> after Milo. (Why did Armando rename him Caesar?) Any interpretation would
> work here.
>
> Another question is when does Milo tell Cornelius and Zira about
> the Icarus?
> The way I pictured it is that Milo comes to visit them about 30 minutes
> after Zira's last appearance in BENEATH. There is some urgency
> to leave ape
> city for awhile because they don't know what the result of the
> war will be.
>
> -Tom
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18655 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlI was kidding about the twins Jeff, but I guess they will be needing a pair
og young babies (although I bet they are after slightly younger or older).
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: veetus@... [veetus@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 2:22
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
>
>
> That's true, there's a lot of viariables. I'm closer to people
> I've met in
> the '90's then to some I've known all my life. On the other hand there's
> something about people dying you've known all your life that
> really gets to
> me.
> Congrats on your twins' gig. Make sure Lucas gives you script approval.
> Etc. - - - Jeff
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <whitty@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
>
>
> > Yeah I know, they named their son after him. This intensity of
> > feelings towards him could also be explained by the fact that they
> > are the only 3 of their kind to be around. I do agree they have
> > intense feelings for him, but it is still arguable that this is from
> > the amount of time they have had together. It is possible that
> > someone who thinks as they do (and this is obvious) and who obviously
> > shares their dangerous knowledge would have become a close friend
> > very quickly, not necessarily over time.
> >
> > I just want to be clear here that it is not totally unacceptable and
> > ridiculous to avoid concluding that they have known each other for a
> > long time.
> >
> > Hey, I haven't known you long and I called both my twins T (well,
> > they are identical, so I gave them identical names).
> >
> > By the way, guess who will be starring as the Skywalker twins in SW3?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > --- LordTZer0@... wrote:
> > >
> > > > Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but not as
> > > > intense as when they speak about Milo
> > >
> > > Hey, they named their son after him!
> > > That about says it all.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18656 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlThis is good but we need something dirty to happen - it sounds like a
college flick so let's see some breasts OK? And some practical jokes.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: james611102 [JamesA1102@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 2:40
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
>
>
> Milo & Cornelius were college roommates. But after Milo used
> Cornelius' bong for an experiment that blew up the room; Dean Zaius
> evicted them both. There were rooms available at the Chimpette dorm;
> so they dressed up as females, calling themselves Lola & Mimi, to
> enrolled there. The plan worked perfectly until Cornelius met and
> fell in love with Zira.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18657 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Zira |
.html
.html
No
kidding, when I was 10 I had a puppy called Zira.
Michael
I say Romanesque only because of Zira; did Boulle invent her
name, or did it exist previously?
Zira is not an
invented name. Though it is more common on the other side of the
world, particularly in the Moslem/Hebrew region. There a some
alternate spellings as well, such as, Zirah or Zerah. No matter what
language these variations appear whether Japanese, Chinese or Swedish, it
always means Princess, or Flower, or Dawn, with the exception of Basque
where its a variation of Madonna. It's also some word in Turkish I
have yet to figure out. Zira.com is, or was a computer systems
company. There used to be a German brand of cigarettes called
Zira. And people still collect silks from them with the Zira Girls on
them. You can find them on eBay. A search of old census records
nearly always turns up a Zira or two. And there is a small town in the
region of India that is now Pakistan near Lahore named, Zira. Zira has
gained recent popularity as a name in the punk rock community, and also as a
pet name. And it was most recently used in the Di Your use of
Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18658 |
From: sand_hill_school |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlIt seems to me that if Cornelius and Zira had known Dr. Milo well,
they would not always refer to him as "Dr. Milo." Even privately,
they refer to him as "Dr. Milo." As if maybe he has some sort of
authority? Maybe a teacher?
--Helen
--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> No, I get the feeling they've known each other because of the
intensity of
> their feelings. Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but
not as
> intense as when they speak about Milo (true, he was killed horribly
but
> still, they talk about him like an old friend).
> - - Jeff
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <whitty@c...>
> To: <pota@y...>
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
>
>
> > I agree they are friends and I think that is undenyable, but it
does
> > not mean there has been a LONG relationship necessarily, does it?
> >
> > Zira and Cornelius befriend Taylor very quickly (and Stevie &
Lewis,
> > and Armando).
> >
> > I am just wondering if it is totally necessary that they have been
> > friends for a long time (again I FEEL they have, but I don't think
> > that feeling is justified by evidence).
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > --- "james611102" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> > > He's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship
in
> > > Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a
> > spaceship
> > > and were going to fly it away who would you take with you,
friends
> > > or strangers?
> > >
> > > --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > > I have a question.
> > > >
> > > > It is assumed by many that Milo has known Zira and/or
Cornelius
> > > for
> > > > years.
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible (within the confines of believability) that
they
> > > have
> > > > not known him for years?
> > > >
> > > > I am looking for inferences/evidence from the movie (Escape,
as I
> > > do
> > > > not believe Milo is mentioned in any of the others, is he?).
> > > >
> > > > I have always thought they were all close but I really don't
know
> > > why.
> > > >
> > > > Looking forward to many varied responses.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------ -----------------
----
> > ~-->
> > > Free $5 Love Reading
> > > Risk Free!
> > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/9_IolB/TM
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
----
> > -~->
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18659 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Lawgiver |
.htmlAnything is possible since their history is very inaccurate. That's
why you can't trust Cornelius and Zira's testimony.
--- In pota@y..., "Alan Maxwell" <alan@a...> wrote:
> Is it not possible that they are the same one and that history is
> simply a bit blurry? Given that hundreds of years have passed and
the
> apes' recorded history isn't exactly stored in the most exact
manner,
> I'd think it's very possible that this is simply a slight
historical
> inaccuracy.
>
> Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18660 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlWell Zaius' lesbian daughter is Zira's roommate and falls for Mimi
(Milo).
--- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> This is good but we need something dirty to happen - it sounds
like a
> college flick so let's see some breasts OK? And some practical
jokes.
>
> Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: james611102 [JamesA1102@a...]
> > Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 2:40
> > To: pota@y...
> > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> >
> >
> > Milo & Cornelius were college roommates. But after Milo used
> > Cornelius' bong for an experiment that blew up the room; Dean
Zaius
> > evicted them both. There were rooms available at the Chimpette
dorm;
> > so they dressed up as females, calling themselves Lola & Mimi, to
> > enrolled there. The plan worked perfectly until Cornelius met and
> > fell in love with Zira.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18661 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlThat might be one way to get Tom Hanks to appear in an "Ape" movie.
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "james611102" <JamesA1102@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:40 AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> Milo & Cornelius were college roommates. But after Milo used
> Cornelius' bong for an experiment that blew up the room; Dean Zaius
> evicted them both. There were rooms available at the Chimpette dorm;
> so they dressed up as females, calling themselves Lola & Mimi, to
> enrolled there. The plan worked perfectly until Cornelius met and
> fell in love with Zira.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18662 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
.htmlCome to think of it, they don't seem to show the films piecemeal anymore.
Sometimes they just show the original, or maybe the original and "Beneath",
but rarely is it, "Oh, they're showing "Conquest" tonight". Usually it's
marathons or theme weeks. Etc. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Maxwell" <alan@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes????
> "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...> wrote:
> > I think this is the best place to start and it is the first question
> we
> > should ask new members to the chat group:
> >
> > WHAT IS PLANET OF THE APES?????
>
> I am always able to view Planet of the Apes as a standalone 1968 film,
> and it's my favourite, that's for sure. But by and large when I think
> of Planet of the Apes I think of the franchise - and I don't just
> think it's because of the collectibles and things either. I think it
> is probably influenced by how I saw the films. Battle was the first
> PotA film I saw, followed by Conquest (a couple of times) and I loved
> them both. The original was actually the third film that I saw in the
> series.
>
> I suspect that has a lot to do with it - who knows, maybe if I'd
> actually seen the original first, I'd be right up there with Rory
> defending the original and mauling the sequels and TV series!
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18663 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Zira |
.html
.html
Patrick? What are you doing at T's place?
Etc. - - - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:
Zira
I say Romanesque only because of Zira; did Boulle invent her
name, or did it exist previously?
Zira is not an invented
name. Though it is more common on the other side of the world,
particularly in the Moslem/Hebrew region. There a some alternate
spellings as well, such as, Zirah or Zerah. No matter what language
these variations appear whether Japanese, Chinese or Swedish, it always means
Princess, or Flower, or Dawn, with the exception of Basque where its a
variation of Madonna. It's also some word in Turkish I have yet to
figure out. Zira.com is, or was a computer systems company. There
used to be a German brand of cigarettes called Zira. And people still
collect silks from them with the Zira Girls on them. You can find them
on eBay. A search of old census records nearly always turns up a Zira or
two. And there is a small town in the region of India that is now
Pakistan near Lahore named, Zira. Zira has gained recent popularity as a
name in the punk rock community, and also as a pet name. And it was most
recently used in the Disney film The Lion King. I hope that answers your
question.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18664 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
.htmlAction Max & Thiller Max show them piecemeal all the time. Escape is
on tomorrow at 2PM, Battle is on Monday at 6:30AM, Beneath is on
Wednesday at 10AM and Conquest is on Thursday at 6AM. Plus the Fox
movie channel is showing Treachery & Greed several times over the
next week.
--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> Come to think of it, they don't seem to show the films piecemeal
anymore.
> Sometimes they just show the original, or maybe the original
and "Beneath",
> but rarely is it, "Oh, they're showing "Conquest" tonight".
Usually it's
> marathons or theme weeks. Etc. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alan Maxwell" <alan@a...>
> To: <pota@y...>
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 12:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes????
>
>
> > "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > I think this is the best place to start and it is the first
question
> > we
> > > should ask new members to the chat group:
> > >
> > > WHAT IS PLANET OF THE APES?????
> >
> > I am always able to view Planet of the Apes as a standalone 1968
film,
> > and it's my favourite, that's for sure. But by and large when I
think
> > of Planet of the Apes I think of the franchise - and I don't just
> > think it's because of the collectibles and things either. I
think it
> > is probably influenced by how I saw the films. Battle was the
first
> > PotA film I saw, followed by Conquest (a couple of times) and I
loved
> > them both. The original was actually the third film that I saw
in the
> > series.
> >
> > I suspect that has a lot to do with it - who knows, maybe if I'd
> > actually seen the original first, I'd be right up there with Rory
> > defending the original and mauling the sequels and TV series!
> >
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18665 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Zira |
|
.html .htmlPatrick? What are you doing at T's place? Etc. - - - - - Jeff
Hey, Pat may know a thing or two about bad science.
But if there's one thing I know, it's Zira.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18666 |
From: Jeff & Susan Stringer |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Truth About Cats & Dogs |
.htmlMy money's on #4.
Gristle P.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Maxwell" <alan@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Truth About Cats & Dogs
> "Jeff & Susan Stringer" <stringe@...> wrote:
> > Then why is there a dog in the first episode of the Apes tv
> series...?
>
> Possible explanations:
>
> 1) They were genetically engineered or even cloned a la Jurassic Park
> not long after the plague, and began to breed again.
>
> 2) There may have been some surviving dogs left somewhere (in a remote
> part of the countryside, a sheltered valley, whatever) and once the
> plague died out (like the great Spanish Flu epidemic) they were able
> to restart the species again.
>
> 3) The writers decided that the TV series is not meant to take place
> in film continuity.
>
> 4) It was a sloppy mistake.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18667 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is Planet of the Apes???? |
.htmlIn a message dated 6/28/02 8:20:04 PM, veetus@... writes:
<< Come to think of it, they don't seem to show the films piecemeal anymore.
Sometimes they just show the original, or maybe the original and "Beneath",
but rarely is it, "Oh, they're showing "Conquest" tonight". Usually it's
marathons or theme weeks. Etc. >>
They have been showing the original lately on Cinemax, followed by the Burton
film. It was on a couple of nights ago at 6:00 pm when I got home from work.
Despite the fact that I can watch this film anytime I want in glorious DVD
and surround sound, there is something nostalgic about seeing it
non-letterboxed on regular TV, because that's the way I first saw it as a kid.
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18668 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.html.html In a message dated 6/28/2002 11:26:38 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Maybe the name was changed so the authorities
wouldn't get wise about a chimp being named after one of the ape-o-nauts.
Etc.
This statement is what I've always guessed as the reason for the "new name" too. In my mind, it works...<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18669 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.html.html In a message dated 6/28/2002 11:38:10 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
There doesn't seem to
be a distinction, the writers use names from both the ancient Greek and
Roman. Etc.
True... And I know you're not the one who brought this subject up, so I'm not meaning this too sound as if I'm saying you left anything out, but don't forget, they also used a Latin word / name URSUS. At least I believe it's Latin in origin, if not, well, I stand corrected.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18670 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.html
.html
Didn't that come from Boulle as well? In his
script "Planet of the Men" it's Urus. That'd be an interesting thing to track
down, who came up with all these names.
Etc.
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:
Milo
In a message dated
6/28/2002 11:38:10 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
There doesn't seem to be a distinction, the writers use
names from both the ancient Greek and Roman. Etc.
True... And I know you're not the
one who brought this subject up, so I'm not meaning this too sound as if I'm
saying you left anything out, but don't forget, they also used a Latin word /
name URSUS. At least I believe it's Latin in origin, if not, well, I stand
corrected. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18671 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlHe'll probably just CG the twins. He doesn't want to hassle with real
babies. Etc. - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 3:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> I was kidding about the twins Jeff, but I guess they will be needing a
pair
> og young babies (although I bet they are after slightly younger or older).
>
> Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: veetus@... [veetus@...]
> > Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 2:22
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> >
> >
> > That's true, there's a lot of viariables. I'm closer to people
> > I've met in
> > the '90's then to some I've known all my life. On the other hand there's
> > something about people dying you've known all your life that
> > really gets to
> > me.
> > Congrats on your twins' gig. Make sure Lucas gives you script
approval.
> > Etc. - - - Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <whitty@...>
> > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> >
> >
> > > Yeah I know, they named their son after him. This intensity of
> > > feelings towards him could also be explained by the fact that they
> > > are the only 3 of their kind to be around. I do agree they have
> > > intense feelings for him, but it is still arguable that this is from
> > > the amount of time they have had together. It is possible that
> > > someone who thinks as they do (and this is obvious) and who obviously
> > > shares their dangerous knowledge would have become a close friend
> > > very quickly, not necessarily over time.
> > >
> > > I just want to be clear here that it is not totally unacceptable and
> > > ridiculous to avoid concluding that they have known each other for a
> > > long time.
> > >
> > > Hey, I haven't known you long and I called both my twins T (well,
> > > they are identical, so I gave them identical names).
> > >
> > > By the way, guess who will be starring as the Skywalker twins in SW3?
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > --- LordTZer0@... wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but not as
> > > > > intense as when they speak about Milo
> > > >
> > > > Hey, they named their son after him!
> > > > That about says it all.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18672 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlBetter.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: james611102 [JamesA1102@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 9:47
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
>
>
> Well Zaius' lesbian daughter is Zira's roommate and falls for Mimi
> (Milo).
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > This is good but we need something dirty to happen - it sounds
> like a
> > college flick so let's see some breasts OK? And some practical
> jokes.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: james611102 [JamesA1102@a...]
> > > Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 2:40
> > > To: pota@y...
> > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> > >
> > >
> > > Milo & Cornelius were college roommates. But after Milo used
> > > Cornelius' bong for an experiment that blew up the room; Dean
> Zaius
> > > evicted them both. There were rooms available at the Chimpette
> dorm;
> > > so they dressed up as females, calling themselves Lola & Mimi, to
> > > enrolled there. The plan worked perfectly until Cornelius met and
> > > fell in love with Zira.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18673 |
From: Anthony B. McElveen |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo |
.htmlRoman names ARE Latin.
On Friday, June 28, 2002, at 10:35 PM, mlccougar@... wrote:
> True... And I know you're not the one who brought this subject up, so
> I'm not meaning this too sound as if I'm saying you left anything out,
> but don't forget, they also used a Latin word / name URSUS. At least I
> believe it's Latin in origin, if not, well, I stand corrected. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18674 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Milo (conclusion) |
.htmlVery good point Helen.
I don't think anything anyone has said here is hard evidence that Zira and
Cornelius knew Milo for a long time, so I would conclude that it is not
unreasonable to go either way so long as it is assumed that they are very
close.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sand_hill_school [sand_hill_school@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 9:01
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
>
>
>
> It seems to me that if Cornelius and Zira had known Dr. Milo well,
> they would not always refer to him as "Dr. Milo." Even privately,
> they refer to him as "Dr. Milo." As if maybe he has some sort of
> authority? Maybe a teacher?
>
> --Helen
>
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > No, I get the feeling they've known each other because of the
> intensity of
> > their feelings. Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but
> not as
> > intense as when they speak about Milo (true, he was killed horribly
> but
> > still, they talk about him like an old friend).
> > - - Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <whitty@c...>
> > To: <pota@y...>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> >
> >
> > > I agree they are friends and I think that is undenyable, but it
> does
> > > not mean there has been a LONG relationship necessarily, does it?
> > >
> > > Zira and Cornelius befriend Taylor very quickly (and Stevie &
> Lewis,
> > > and Armando).
> > >
> > > I am just wondering if it is totally necessary that they have been
> > > friends for a long time (again I FEEL they have, but I don't think
> > > that feeling is justified by evidence).
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > --- "james611102" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> > > > He's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship
> in
> > > > Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a
> > > spaceship
> > > > and were going to fly it away who would you take with you,
> friends
> > > > or strangers?
> > > >
> > > > --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > > > I have a question.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is assumed by many that Milo has known Zira and/or
> Cornelius
> > > > for
> > > > > years.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it possible (within the confines of believability) that
> they
> > > > have
> > > > > not known him for years?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am looking for inferences/evidence from the movie (Escape,
> as I
> > > > do
> > > > > not believe Milo is mentioned in any of the others, is he?).
> > > > >
> > > > > I have always thought they were all close but I really don't
> know
> > > > why.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking forward to many varied responses.
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------ -----------------
> ----
> > > ~-->
> > > > Free $5 Love Reading
> > > > Risk Free!
> > > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/9_IolB/TM
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > > -~->
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18675 |
From: Ken and Heather Taylor |
Date: 6/29/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Milo (conclusion) |
.htmlChances are that Roddy McDowall and Sal Mineo would have known each other
pretty well.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 8:23 AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Milo (conclusion)
> Very good point Helen.
>
> I don't think anything anyone has said here is hard evidence that Zira and
> Cornelius knew Milo for a long time, so I would conclude that it is not
> unreasonable to go either way so long as it is assumed that they are very
> close.
>
> Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sand_hill_school [sand_hill_school@...]
> > Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 9:01
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> >
> >
> >
> > It seems to me that if Cornelius and Zira had known Dr. Milo well,
> > they would not always refer to him as "Dr. Milo." Even privately,
> > they refer to him as "Dr. Milo." As if maybe he has some sort of
> > authority? Maybe a teacher?
> >
> > --Helen
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > > No, I get the feeling they've known each other because of the
> > intensity of
> > > their feelings. Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but
> > not as
> > > intense as when they speak about Milo (true, he was killed horribly
> > but
> > > still, they talk about him like an old friend).
> > > - - Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <whitty@c...>
> > > To: <pota@y...>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:44 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> > >
> > >
> > > > I agree they are friends and I think that is undenyable, but it
> > does
> > > > not mean there has been a LONG relationship necessarily, does it?
> > > >
> > > > Zira and Cornelius befriend Taylor very quickly (and Stevie &
> > Lewis,
> > > > and Armando).
> > > >
> > > > I am just wondering if it is totally necessary that they have been
> > > > friends for a long time (again I FEEL they have, but I don't think
> > > > that feeling is justified by evidence).
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > --- "james611102" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> > > > > He's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship
> > in
> > > > > Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a
> > > > spaceship
> > > > > and were going to fly it away who would you take with you,
> > friends
> > > > > or strangers?
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > > > > I have a question.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is assumed by many that Milo has known Zira and/or
> > Cornelius
> > > > > for
> > > > > > years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is it possible (within the confines of believability) that
> > they
> > > > > have
> > > > > > not known him for years?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am looking for inferences/evidence from the movie (Escape,
> > as I
> > > > > do
> > > > > > not believe Milo is mentioned in any of the others, is he?).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have always thought they were all close but I really don't
> > know
> > > > > why.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looking forward to many varied responses.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------ -----------------
> > ----
> > > > ~-->
> > > > > Free $5 Love Reading
> > > > > Risk Free!
> > > > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/9_IolB/TM
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> > > > -~->
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18676 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Milo (conclusion) |
|
.html Chances are that Roddy McDowall and Sal Mineo would have known each other
pretty well.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Stop, you're killin' me! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18677 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Milo (conclusion) |
.htmlNot at all sweet lips.
Gosh, now I know what gets you to "come out" and play Ken!
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken and Heather Taylor [ktaylor@...]
> Sent: Sunday, 30 June 2002 8:34
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Milo (conclusion)
>
>
> Chances are that Roddy McDowall and Sal Mineo would have known each other
> pretty well.
> Not that there's anything wrong with that.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 8:23 AM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Milo (conclusion)
>
>
> > Very good point Helen.
> >
> > I don't think anything anyone has said here is hard evidence
> that Zira and
> > Cornelius knew Milo for a long time, so I would conclude that it is not
> > unreasonable to go either way so long as it is assumed that
> they are very
> > close.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: sand_hill_school [sand_hill_school@...]
> > > Sent: Saturday, 29 June 2002 9:01
> > > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems to me that if Cornelius and Zira had known Dr. Milo well,
> > > they would not always refer to him as "Dr. Milo." Even privately,
> > > they refer to him as "Dr. Milo." As if maybe he has some sort of
> > > authority? Maybe a teacher?
> > >
> > > --Helen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > > > No, I get the feeling they've known each other because of the
> > > intensity of
> > > > their feelings. Their goodbye with Louis and Stevey is touching but
> > > not as
> > > > intense as when they speak about Milo (true, he was killed horribly
> > > but
> > > > still, they talk about him like an old friend).
> > > > - - Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <whitty@c...>
> > > > To: <pota@y...>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:44 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Milo
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I agree they are friends and I think that is undenyable, but it
> > > does
> > > > > not mean there has been a LONG relationship necessarily, does it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Zira and Cornelius befriend Taylor very quickly (and Stevie &
> > > Lewis,
> > > > > and Armando).
> > > > >
> > > > > I am just wondering if it is totally necessary that they have been
> > > > > friends for a long time (again I FEEL they have, but I don't think
> > > > > that feeling is justified by evidence).
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael
> > > > >
> > > > > --- "james611102" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> > > > > > He's never mentioned in Planet or Beneath but the relationship
> > > in
> > > > > > Escape seems to be that of friends. Besides if you found a
> > > > > spaceship
> > > > > > and were going to fly it away who would you take with you,
> > > friends
> > > > > > or strangers?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > > > > > I have a question.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is assumed by many that Milo has known Zira and/or
> > > Cornelius
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > years.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is it possible (within the confines of believability) that
> > > they
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > not known him for years?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am looking for inferences/evidence from the movie (Escape,
> > > as I
> > > > > > do
> > > > > > > not believe Milo is mentioned in any of the others, is he?).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have always thought they were all close but I really don't
> > > know
> > > > > > why.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Looking forward to many varied responses.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------ -----------------
> > > ----
> > > > > ~-->
> > > > > > Free $5 Love Reading
> > > > > > Risk Free!
> > > > > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/9_IolB/TM
> > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----
> > > > > -~->
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18678 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Believability of rival scenarios... |
.html--- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> But this is after he gets off the ship Patrick.
>
> You can't accept that Taylor could be in shock, or at least a little
> disorientated, at that point where he wakes up on a sinking ship?
*** A "little disorientated," sure. But in "shock"? I don't think so.
Review what happens from the moment he wakes up and afterwards. He
asks the unsteady-on-his-feet Landon (who'd just jumped down from his
upper bunk), "You alright?" He notices their beards, and feels his
own, taking into account--obviously--the fact that he's been in
hibernation-sleep long enough to grow a beard (he didn't have one when
he put himself into hibernation, remember). Then he asks for Stewart,
but doesn't get an answer... so he and the others get up and over to
look at her dessicated corpse: and Taylor reacts the way any human
being would--appalled and sickened. After all, he had "just seen her"
twelve Ship-Time months earlier (his last memories prior to
hibernation), and she'd looked beautiful then.
Then the water bursts into the cabin and Taylor--not panicking--says
matter-of-factly: "We're in the soup! She's sinking! Dodge--read the
atmosphere! Landon--get out a last signal!" ["What signal?"] "To
EARTH, that we've landed!"
And then Taylor proceeds to do some task himself, on the port side
cockpit console--probably an attempt to "read the tapes", which Landon
mentions later he'd not had enough time to do.
Taylor knows that the "primary" power of the ship is kaput, since when
Dodge yells that "The air's OK!", Taylor yells back, "Blow the hatch,
before we lose auxiliary power!"
Does anybody else here think that there's any indication that Taylor
is in shock? If he IS in some kind of shock, it isn't the type which
incapacitates him in any way, since he's "all action" in this exciting
scene. And once they get out of the ship and are safely in the
liferaft, from that point on Taylor is laid back and nonchalant, as
his dialogue with Landon during the raft ride shows.
> This isn't a game where there has to be a winner or a loser.
>
> You come up with the most unbelievable ways to explain these "flubs", but you almost certainly dismiss anything anybody else says. Is this because you need to show how thoroughly you have thought things through or do you just have to take a contrary stance?
*** I only "dismiss" what others say if the details given in the POTA
saga contradict what someone says in particular. I agree with plenty
of what is posted here by others; I may not always chime in with a
"hey, I agree with ya" posting, but I still do agree occasionally with
what others talk about. I do try to thoroughly think things through
before posting an opinion--or, especially, with some aspect of my
epic's plot/scenario, since that is most liable to be objected to by
some (like yourself, for instance).
>
> Again your reasoning is unsound Patrick. Just because Taylor plays it cool for a lot of the movie, it does not mean he is not human.
[*** When did I ever accuse Taylor of not being human?]
For example when he finds Liberty....is he cool about that? Does he
calmly say "it's a madhouse"? No. It certainly is not unbelievable
in any way that he is in shock when the ship is sinking.
*** Define "shock". Remember in JAWS, when Chief Brody's son almost is
munched by the shark, which had swum just past him after munching that
guy in the boat? Brody takes his son to the hospital--the kid is
suffering from shock; he has "frozen up", not responding normally due
to extreme fear.
Does Taylor even remotely act in a similar fashion in the "ship
sinking" scene? Nope. During the course of his adventures later on, he
experiences some rather shocking moments--such as finding Dodge
stuffed in Zaius' museum, and finding that Landon has been
lobotomized. Taylor reacts to these shocking revelations--but he is
not incapacitated by them. A near-miss by a gorilla's bullet snaps him
out of his moment of shock in the museum, and his anger at Zaius spurs
him to act after finding Landon lobotomized--but he doesn't just curl
up into a ball and shut out the world from his senses.
>
> I am getting a little frustrated with your posts Patrick but I am trying not to be insulting. I do however need to make these points in hope that you will think about what I am saying. Please don't be offended, but please try to "listen".
>
> Michael
>
*** Not only do I "listen" to and think about what you say, but I make
a point of responding to your comments. Just because I don't always
see eye-to-eye with you doesn't mean that I'm purposely trying to take
"a contrary stance". Different people respond differently to the same
work of art doesn't necessarily mean that both are invalid, even IF
they are irreconcilable with each other. Kubrick's 2001 generated all
sorts of talk, with those who believe in God having certain kinds of
responses, unbelievers having wholly different ones, etc. Kubrick's
film was, perhaps, more open to interpretation, but he did not tell
one group "You're wrong" and another "You're right": he wanted to let
each viewer interpret it for him/herself. POTA works on many levels
for all sorts of different people, and your interpretation will work
for you better than it'll work for me, and vice versa. My
interpretation of the "facts" of the Saga serve a different purpose:
I've plotted out one huge epic story which subsumes and incorporates
into it the 5 films and 14 episodes--a modus operandi which requires
that I "make sense" out of the sometimes sloppy details/mistakes/
"flubs". I don't want to arbitrarily throw out details that already
exist in the "canon" just so that I can interpret the remaining
details in ONE way: I want to incorporate ALL the details, if
possible, in a scenario which CAN make sense of them--hence my
"unflubbing" of the "mistakes", turning them into non-mistakes. But
I've said a number of times before, that MY interpretation is in no
way binding on any other POTA fan. The only time I'll jump in and
criticize another interpretation is if there are "canonical" details
which contradict the interpretation, or if what I see as "common
sense" dictates against it.
It doesn't bother me that you feel my scenario is "unbelievable"--but
that doesn't convince me to abandon it: you have to show me WHY it
cannot be believed, WHY it is impossible. Sci-fi as a genre routinely
presents scenarios that are outlandish (most Twilight Zone episodes
did just that) and "unbelievable", yet there's that old adage that
"Reality is stranger than Fiction". I saw a photo a couple years ago
of a laboratory mouse with a HUMAN EAR growing out of its back; a
century ago nobody would have believed it possible for such a thing to
ever occur. But it did. "Unbelievably."
Patrick Michael Tilton
EARTH-TIME 6-30-2002 <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18679 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Planet of the Apes] Timeline issues |
.html--- In pota@y..., "Melkor" <melkor@m...> wrote:
> >Who is to say that it is not possible that a month after the final Battle scene the Lawgiver's attitudes and subsequent writings changed?
> >
> >Maybe there is a series of Lawgivers.
>
> Both of these go against the writers intentions. They called their character "Lawgiver" in BATTLE because the original movie had established that the "greatest ape of all" was called that. They made the Lawgiver look very old in BATTLE to establish that he didn't change his views back to what they are in PLANET later in life.
*** I'd like to know how YOU know what the writers' intentions were
with such certitude. Can you, like the Mutants, read peoples' minds,
too?
As for the "name" LAWGIVER, I've mentioned before (months back) that
this word seems to be a title. The character Caesar was, himself, a
"lawgiver": it was he who forbade traveling to the Forbidden City ("I
know," he tells Aldo, "I forbade it.")--in other words, he made it a
LAW that no one go there. Where did the Apes get their "most sacred
LAW": "Ape shall never kill Ape"? Where did the "first LAW" ("A human
may never again say "No" to an Ape") come from? CAESAR made those
laws; HE was the first "lawgiver". If an orangutan living in 2670 A.D.
also has that title, it shows that there never really was ONLY one
"lawgiver". However, one particular "lawgiver" was later on deemed by
posterity to be "the greatest ape of all". He was referred to as "our
Lawgiver" and as "the Lawgiver"--sort of the "culmination" of the line
of Lawgivers, just as Jesus is thought by Christians to be the
culmination of the line of David: THE Messiah. There were other
"messiahs", other "christs"/"anointed ones" before Jesus--but HE is
considered by his followers to be THE Christ, THE Messiah. Christians
don't recognize anybody else AFTER Jesus to qualify for that title of
"Messiah"/"Christ", just as Zaius' group seems to think that only THE
Lawgiver deserves--from that point on--to be called by that title.
And, remember, the John Huston character is already a wizened old
orangutan Lawgiver circa 2670 A.D., whereas a century later is when
the anti-human version of the "Sacred Scrolls" is penned, according to
Zaius ("1200 years ago" from 3955/3978 would put it circa 2755/2778).
Hence, the writers of BATTLE left open the distinct possibility that
there WOULD be a change of perspective in the Apes: from human-
tolerating to human-hating. That hair-pulling incident, followed by
Caesar's statue's symbolic shedded tear, hints that the conflict WILL
continue, in spite of Caesar's noble efforts to "change lanes". Did
Caesar have the power to set into motion historical forces which would
undeniably solve the thorny problem of race hatred? What did Christ
preach, and how successful was HIS ministry of preaching peace and
love? The example followed by Christ's followers over the last 2000
years should give us all pause to be so confident that a simian savior
could succeed where a "god-man" didn't.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18680 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Taylor's Final Report |
.html*** Taylor's "final report" isn't a mere "Dear Diary" entry. He
addresses an audience ("...you who are reading me now...") which he
knows cannot be his own crew, since he talks about that crew to his
intended listeners ("...I've tucked my crew in for the long sleep...),
differentiating between the "crew" and "you who are reading me now".
Taylor's unknown "audience" has to be those back on planet Earth--yet
not those who were alive in 1972 when he launched from Cape Kennedy:
"...this much is probably true: the men who sent us on this journey
are long since dead and gone... YOU WHO ARE READING ME NOW ARE A
DIFFERENT BREED--I hope a better one."
This line doesn't make any sense unless his message is being broadcast
back towards the Earth, to the descendants of the dead men who were
alive before the SHIP-TIME and EARTH-TIME chronometers began to
diverge from their original synchronized date. The EARTH-TIME clock
has clicked ahead to 2673 A.D., and will continue to click ahead to
11-25-3978 due to "Dr. Hasslein's theory of Time in a vehicle
travelling nearly the speed of light". That effect of Time Dilation
has kept Taylor and his crew alive for over 700 years of Earth-Time,
and Taylor DOES NOT KNOW how things progressed on Earth during that
span of time, hence his "hope" that whomever MAY end up listening to
his message has been an improvement on 20th Century Mankind--"a better
...breed".
When Taylor says to his probably non-existent audience "Tell me,
though...", he is pretending to be having a conversation with
"somebody". He doesn't know if anybody on Earth in the far future will
be on the lookout for his periodic reports, hence his line "...IF
ANYBODY'S LISTENING, THAT IS..." If this were some "Captain's Log"
diary entry that he intended as a sort of report ON the Mission TO the
same Mission, would he say this? It wouldn't make any sense for him to
do so. He's asking rhetorical questions of an audience he doesn't know
is even out there listening anymore, philosophical questions about how
Mankind progressed; did that "marvel, that glorious paradox" go on to
even greater things... or did it still wallow in the ditches, making
war and promulgating famine in neighboring countries. He asks this
question of those who know the answer, yet cannot answer him back.
--- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> I don't know how you draw the conclusion that anything you say here clinches anything.
>
> What you say here is evidence that Taylor believes they are "in the future".
>
> The reference to whether anyone is listening certainly IMPLIES a "live" broadcast, but could also mean that Taylor thinks mankind has destroyed itself and there is nobody left to listen.
>
> Give me some evidence that his recording could not be a "Captain's Log" - ie a ship's log that would stay with the ship.
>
> Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@y...]
> > Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 2:26
> > To: pota@y...
> > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Hatch of the ship
> >
> >
> > --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > I always thought Taylor's report was simply a recording that stayed on the ship, just as civil servants make and file reports all the time and as trekkies do in their "Captain's Log". Is there any evidence that these reports were being sent anywhere?
>
> Michael
> >
> > *** Taylor, speaking to whomever will eventually hear his "final
> > report" says, "You who are reading me now are a different breed--I
> > hope a better one. I leave the Twentieth Century with no regrets. But, one more thing... if anybody's listening that is..."
> >
> > Later on, Taylor tells Landon, "Even if you COULD get back [i.e. to the planet Earth], they'd think you were something that fell out of a tree."
> >
> > I don't think it's likely that Taylor would address anybody on his own crew (after another 12 months of Ship-Time hibernating) as "a different breed" whom he hopes will be "a better one" than the breed of humanity he left behind in the 20th Century. He, knowing that "almost 700 years" have gone by on Earth, can only be sending out a report to whomever is still there on planet Earth, centuries ahead of the time he left it, in 1972.
> >
> > I think that clinches it.
> >
> > Patrick Michael Tilton
> > EARTH-TIME 6-26-2002 <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18681 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
.html--- In pota@y..., "james611102" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> Of course you're assuming that Cornelius would be very precise every
> time he spoke. Maybe Dead Lake was just a name he gave the inland
> sea and maybe he used a simple term in front of the commission as to
> not waste time on a long explaination.
*** Yeah, I am assuming it, but I think it's a valid assumption.
Cornelius is a professional scientist: he's not only an archaeologist,
but also a cartographer (he tells Lewis Dixon "I can even draw one"--a
map). The term "seashore" would, I should think, be differentiated
from "lakeshore", much as the word "river" would be differentiated
from "stream". The word "sea" tends to mean a larger body of water
than a lake--hence the term "the Seven Seas" to refer to the Oceans.
Granted, there are some bodies of water that are called "seas" which
are smaller than some lakes out there (for instance, the "Sea of
Galilee" is smaller than Lake Superior), but that is generally because
they were named in Antiquity, when the locals didn't know of any
larger bodies of water. In those ancient languages, too, the same word
would sometimes be used to tranlate "lake" and "sea" (e.g. Hebrew
"YaM" for "sea").
If Cornelius meant to tell the Commission that Milo had found Taylor's
ship in a body of water that he previously (and consistently) referred
to as a lake, then why not just say: "Milo found it IN A LAKE, washed
up on shore"? I've taken advantage of Cornelius' consistent
differentiation of "lake" and "sea" to postulate that Milo indeed
found the "third ship" on the beach of the Ocean, the "seaboard". It
fits the facts, and helps to differentiate the obviously different
ship from the sunken ship from PLANET.
Feel free to interpret it all your own way, though.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18682 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues |
.html> Patrick, do you really think that Cornelius thought there were other
> english speaking apes at the time? I thought all 3 apes realised
> that the apes of the time were the equivalent of humans in the
> future - not speaking and not evolved in their intellect. This may
> just be something I have assumed though.
>
> Michael
*** Milo says that "apes, at this instant in Time, cannot yet speak; I
suggest we follow their example". However, it may be that Milo doesn't
know as much about their ancient "prehistory" as does Cornelius.
I think it's not only possible, but PROBABLE, that Cornelius did
indeed know that there were English-speaking Apes on Earth about 2000
years prior to his own time. He straightforwardly says this to the
Commission when he is asked about "English".
Cornelius knows more about his era's past than most, due to his
archaeological findings and his exposure to the "secret scrolls" kept
hidden from the masses. Let's assume that among those mysterious
scrolls are various versions (even several irreconcilable ones, sort
of "mythic" re-tellings from cultic viewpoints) of the "origins" of
the Simian kinds (Chimp, Gorilla, Orang). Perhaps he even has read a
later version of the scroll the Lawgiver reads from in BATTLE, which
depicts the critical moment when "God sent the World a Savior" who had
been "miraculously born" from parents that came "from Earth's own
future"--perhaps a later version referred to that Future as "the Time
of the End", as REVELATION refers to the "Latter Days", the "End
Times", etc.
Cornelius, as a student of mythic stories relevant to his study of the
Past, might have thought that just as there was once supposed to have
been a God-created FIRST COUPLE (male and female) to start the
bloodlines of Simians (which, somehow, branched off into 3 main
populations: Gorillas, Chimps, Orangutans), so too would there be at
the End of Time ANOTHER, "last couple". In GENESIS, you have Adam and
Eve; in REVELATION, you have the "two witnesses" who are killed and
miraculously resurrected prior to the Second Coming. The symmetry of
an initial "pair" and a final "pair" might be thought of as a sort of
"literary motif" in cultic/mythic literature. Jesus tells his
disciples that the Judgment would be just like "in the time of Noah"
(although the divine punishment would not be a Flood--but a Fire),
connecting the "history" of the BEGINNING with the prophetic "future
history" of the END.
However, after having Time-traveled back from 3955 to 1973, perhaps
Cornelius rethinks his assumptions about that strange old "secret
scroll" which told of a "savior" whose parents came from "Earth's own
future": perhaps it dawns on him that HE AND ZIRA actually ARE those
"mythic characters" who were supposed to have been present at the End
of the World. Having actually seen "the Earth... destroyed" (as he
tells Dixon & Branton), perhaps he re-evaluates the validity of those
crazy old myths... and realizes that that supposedly mythic character
from the "secret scrolls"--"Caesar"--is actually his own unborn SON.
Why, then, doesn't he insist on naming his son "Caesar" after it is
born? When the baby chimp is born, Cornelius asks, "What shall we
name...?" Dixon, realizing that Cornelius was wondering about the
child's gender, says, "Him." And Zira says, "Milo." She wants to name
the kid after their genius friend. Cornelius assents to this, perhaps
thinking that a SECOND child might then be named "Caesar". Hell, maybe
Cornelius--knowing that he and Zira are doomed, and that Zira is going
to switch babies with Heloise's child--secretly tells Armando (who
knows about the switch, as his dialogue with the inspecting cops
shows) to re-name their changeling child "Caesar".
Granted, this is all speculative. But that's half the fun.
Patrick Michael Tilton
EARTH-TIME 6-30-2002 <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18683 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: The Logic of Number, etc. |
.html--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> I agree James.
>
> And Patrick, now I understand why you feel it is necessary to be so
> thorough.
>
> I agree that there is a lot of sloppy sci-fi out there and it is
> annoying, but I would not take it quite as far as you do because that
> is being extreme on the other end of the scale (but that is your
> choice and power to you). I honestly thought you might be trying to
> isolate your audience with an equation or to. I am a public (civil)
> servant and I see false authority daily and it bugs me more than
> sloppy sci-fi! Sorry if I read you wrong.
>
> Also, doesn't it bother you how, by absolute coincidence, there is a
> mathematical formula to prove something that was never intended to be
> proven? It frightens me!
>
> Michael
*** It doesn't "bother" me--it ASTOUNDS me! It IS sheer coincidence
that the Taylor & Virgil "retrotemporal" dates and the corresponding
Distances-in-LightYears are in such close proportion. It is the
luckiest coincidence I could have ever hoped for, and I've taken
advantage of that to do what I think is the most satisfying
"unflubbing" of them all--to reconcile the two different dates (3978
and 3955), which I will be the first to admit began as a careless,
stupid, sloppy MISTAKE on the part of Paul Dehn. You would not believe
the feeling of "Eureka!" I had then, or the shiver that went down my
spine when I first stumbled across it. It felt as if I had "squared
the circle"... or at least found a way to fit a square peg into a
round hole without bludgeoning it with a sledgehammer!
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18684 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: She's a witch...BURN HER!! |
.html--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Yes mathematics can be your friend, but you are dry raping it here
> Patrick, not being friendly.
>
> You are applying logic to prove a coincidence and that is not
> logical. What you are doing is trying to logically prove how a
> coincidence ocurred. This is either unnecessary (eg a car crashes
> into another and you explain how this happens by reverting to the
> speed the cars were travelling at and the distance they covered) or
> contrived (eg you try to prove someone is a witch by weighing them
> against a duck - I'm sure you know what I'm talking about from Monty
> Python and the Holy Grail).
>
> A lot of your arguments remind me of that "Witch Hunt" scene in Holy
> Grail, mathematical or otherwise (ie they wanted to prove she was a
> witch so they could burn her, so they did just that).
>
> Michael
*** Mike, aren't you forgetting something? The gal should've
outweighed the duck and tipped the scales easily... but the scales
showed that she did indeed "weigh the same as a duck", which proved to
the crowd that she was "a witch!" She herself admits that it's "a fair
cop"--that their verdict of "She's a witch!" is indeed a just one, as
opposed to the allegation of it, which the demonstration was intended
to test.
Patrick
P.S. Was that fuzzy little rodent actually a "killer rabbit"? It may
not have seemed so at first, but... "LOOK AT THE BONES!" <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18685 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Rival Scenarios |
.html--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> I don't have a scenario Patrick.
>
> I explore a variety of scenarios and all of them have flaws, as do
> yours (eg the Mothership Earth scenario - I would not be the first to say that this is the LAST scenario would offer, would I?).
>
> You however seem to think that the scenario you offer is the only
> one, and that bothers me (so I hope I am wrong).
>
> I wonder if you think we are "battling" over whose scenario is best. I hope not, because they are all crap! I do wish however that instead of using your energy to disprove others' theories you would instead look at ways they might work and stop being so competitive (and a bit co-operative) about it. The fact that you so consistently stick to dismissing everything but your take reaaly concerns me as to your motives.
>
> Michael
*** I think you're being unfair here. Did I not offer some buttressing
arguments to a theory I personally DON'T agree with--the theory that
Taylor's ship didn't really sink, but it was all a Mutant illusion,
just to "look at ways [it] might work"? I went even further along that
line of speculation, proferring that Stewart's corpse may also have
been an illusion--that she was still vivaciously ALIVE--and that the
Mutants wanted the male astronauts to vamoose, thinking they were
leaving behind a dead chick.
Mind you, now, in my scenario Stewart really IS dead, and the sinking
of the ship is NOT just an illusion... but I liked the idea
regardless.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18686 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Timeline issues |
.html> On the first level of the cave in PLANET Cornelius finds "an early ape creature, in a stage of primitive barbarism". On the next lowest level Cornelius found "carniverous gorillas". The next lowest level he finds the human artifacts. The Forbidden Zone was not forbidden until the Lawgiver declared it so. The cave was only a few days from ape city and I don't see any "primitive barbarism" at the end of BATTLE.
>
> It looks obvious to me that the PLANET timeline doesn't have 700 years of "humans and apes living in peace and harmony". That is an extraordinary achievement -- completely unlike anything even hinted at in any of the earlier movies. How the heck could they achieve 700 years of peace with carniverous gorillas only a few days away from their capital? Any society that can achieve 700 YEARS of "peace and harmony" like they did in BATTLE is doing a hell of a lot better than we are, so I wouldn't worry too much about what happens later.
>
*** You're forgetting the previous debate over the location of Breck's
unnamed city and Caesar's tree-house "Ape City" relative to the
location of the "Ape City" from PLANET and BENEATH. There are those
who insist that Caesar's people live in the SAME territory that is
later occupied by Cornelius & Zira, etc.: the "New York/New Jersey"
area.
I have a different view. In my scenario, Breck's city is on the West
Coast, a "futuristic" arcology set up about halfway between San
Francisco and Los Angeles. Eventually, this initial simian society
develops into the one we see in the TV series, which is undeniably set
in the mid-California area (San Francisco and Oakland are the settings
for the episodes "The Trap" and "The Legacy", respectively). In my
scenario, AFTER the time of Virdon and Burke, there is a migration of
at least a good chunk of this simian civilization from the California
region to the old New York region, where they INTRODUCED civilization
where it had not existed since the Nuclear War some 1100 years
earlier; the reason that the now-NY-based Apes have an Army is because
they had to fight wars against the savage bands of "carnivorous
gorillas" who dwelt in that area. Although "Ape shall not kill ape",
when a band of perhaps cannibalistic savage apes are trying to munch
on you, self defense is an exception to that "most sacred law".
So, then, at the same time that the nicey-nice Lawgiver from BATTLE is
telling the tale of Caesar to his congregation--in California--there
are tribes of carnivorous gorillas dwelling thousands of miles away in
the area that was once New York/New Jersey. In my scenario, at any
rate.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18687 |
From: JamesA1102@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
.htmlHe only refered to it once as "Dead Lake". As you see by the attached it wasn't a lake at all. Technically is was a bay. So Cornelius' terminolagy is not that exact.
--- In pota@y..., "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...> wrote:
> If Cornelius meant to tell the Commission that Milo had found Taylor's
> ship in a body of water that he previously (and consistently) referred
> to as a lake, then why not just say: "Milo found it IN A LAKE, washed
> up on shore"? I've taken advantage of Cornelius' consistent
> differentiation of "lake" and "sea" to postulate that Milo indeed
> found the "third ship" on the beach of the Ocean, the "seaboard". It
> fits the facts, and helps to differentiate the obviously different
> ship from the sunken ship from PLANET. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18688 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: What? |
.html--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Agreed, but it is a bit of a stretch for you to claim that they
> definitely did because they could. I am not saying they didn't. I
> am saying that offering a possibility is not proving a scenario.
> Agreed?
>
> Michael
*** We're picking nits, here, but STRICTLY SPEAKING, sure. I WOULD
claim, however, that not only COULD they test Hasslein's theory by
some observational means, but since the success of their mission
depends upon that theory being accurate, they most certainly WOULD do
such a test. Before the U.S. nuked Hiroshima, "the gadget" was first
tested at Alamogordo, NM. It would have been somewhat foolish to just
ASSUME that it would work; how many military weapons systems are put
in use "in the field" without some sort of prior testing? None. Since
this ANSA mission is under the aegis of the military (Taylor's a
"colonel", etc.), then it's a fair assumption that the Hasslein theory
would be tested at SOME point, either before Taylor's ship launches
from Cape Kennedy or at some convenient opportunity AFTER the launch.
Patrick
>
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Theoretical Clocks
> --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
>
> Because "Taylor and his crew could easily estimate the validity of
> Hasslein's theory just by observing how the stars move about
> relative to each other and to their ship", it does not follow that
> they did this and there is nothing in the story that suggests they
> did***.
>
> Michael
>
> *** ...and there is nothing in the story that suggests that they did
> not.
>
> Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18689 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: What? |
.html--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> I don't like your (implied) tone here.
>
> Who knows what they did for the first 6 months?
>
> And to suggest that they had to be doing what is logical for them to
> do is to ignore the fact that there is a whole lot of stuff going on
> in the story that makes no sense.
>
> C'mon yourself Patrick. If they had proven Hasslein's theory, why
> don't they ever refer to the fact that they had proven it?
*** Taylor: "It's a FACT, Landon; buy it--you'll sleep better."
I ask you: on what grounds does Taylor have to declare the "theory" to
be "a fact"? There must be SOME experimental evidence which at least
does not contradict the theory. I think that this line implies that
the theory had been tested, to Taylor's satisfaction if not to
Landon's. If Taylor were aware of any experimental data which flatly
disproved the theory, he would not be able to be sure of it being
anywhere near "a fact". Maybe whatever experiments were done didn't
DISPROVE the theory; this would not "prove" the theory to be true--
merely that SO FAR the evidence had not ruled it out. To give an
example from the "theory" of Evolution: there are all sorts of ways in
which the theory could be "proven" false; for instance, if HUMAN
remains were to be found in a stratum of pre-Mesozoic rock, then one
could not claim anymore that humans ONLY existed after the Age of
Dinosaurs. Aside from some clumsy hoaxes, there isn't a shred of
evidence placing humans and dinosaurs in the same layer of sedimentary
rock; if there was even ONE piece of evidence showing this,
evolutionists would have to re-evaluate their ideas regarding their
dating methods, etc. So far, the evidence supports the "theory" of
Evolution; serious scientists still admit that it is "just" a theory
(as Landon says of Hasslein's theory), but it is a theory which is
USEFUL because it makes sense of the FACTS, which SO FAR do not
contradict the theory.
Maybe there were, say, SEVEN specific "tests" of the Hasslein
Hypothesis which the ANSA astronauts were given in order to verify
that their ship was zipping along as Hasslein predicted it would.
Perhaps they only did TWO of the seven tests, finding that those two
tests matched the anticipated results so perfectly that any further
testing was deemed unnecessary. Landon could STILL argue, later on,
that MAYBE the 3rd, or the 5th, or the 6th of the seven tests WOULD
have come up differently, thus invalidating the Hasslein Hypothesis.
But as far as Taylor was concerned, ENOUGH TESTING HAD BEEN DONE to
"prove" the Hasslein Hypothesis to his satisfaction, thus giving him
the grounds to refer to it as "a fact". In other words, Taylor knows
that Landon is just being stubborn because he doesn't WANT to believe
that Hasslein's "theory" is actually a "fact", because with Stewart
dead (etc.) he now has NO HOPE of ever begetting children, who could
carry on his name, or his memory...
Patrick
> Again I conclude there is little point in conversation with you
> because your beliefs are unshakeable.
>
> Whether you believe it or not, your scenarios are impaired, just like everybody else's, and your "logic" has some very presumptuous foundations.
>
> Michael
>
> *** ...and there is nothing in the story that suggests that they did
> not. And, c'mon! Answer me this: what the hell ELSE did they have to
> do during that 6 month period between Liftoff and Hibernation? Don't
> you think that they would have had as one of their priorities the
> TESTING of "Hasslein's hypothesis"? Christ Almighty! but the success
> or failure of that very theory is at the HEART of their mission. I
> should think that the most responsible thing for them to do--at the
> earliest possible & convenient time--is to do just such a test of
> Hasslein's theory, just in case what Hasslein THOUGHT would probably
> happen (in accordance with what he'd theorized would happen) was
> drastically DIFFERENT from what the astronauts could perceive to be
> happening... merely by looking out the damn front window! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18690 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Planet of the Apes] Timeline issues |
.html> The one I read looks a lot milder than that. I think they were showing the obvious: that individual prejudice still exists and will always exist. They were also throwing Jacobs a bone. But the Corrington's took away Zaius' whole reason to hate Taylor which pretty much erases PLANET.
*** I disagree. The reason Zaius hates and fears Taylor (and all other
destructively intelligent humans) is because "the Forbidden Zone was
once a Paradise: YOUR BREED MADE A DESERT OF IT, ages ago."
As long as there's a "Zaius" around, who knows the terrible secret of
the Past, and how Mankind annihilated his own civilization, there will
ALWAYS be a reason for SOME Apes to lump ALL humans into the
stereotype role of "destructive-when-intelligent". As long as humans
are kept docile and non-clever (the situation during the TV show, in
3085), they are tolerated as a lowest class of slaves. But when they
start to show initiative... to develop their intellect... they become
DANGEROUS. It is THEN that Zaius (and his cronies) promulgate what
they perceive to be a necessary evil: Race War.
Perhaps, some time after 2670, there comes someone who remembers what
humans once did; he looks out at that blasted desert and remembers his
father's voice telling him: "This was once a paradise... a green,
living, vibrant Garden... and MAN defiled it with his Wars..."
And, that ape might speculate, what's to prevent Man from doing the
same thing to the remaining green areas? Nothing... except us Apes,
who must "cull the herd" and keep the humans' numbers low--and their
intellectual capacities at a bare minimal level."
Otherwise... "Destruction is not fantasy, Galen!"
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18691 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Reasons for Cornelius' few untruths... |
.html--- In pota@y..., mlccougar@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 6/26/2002 10:10:55 AM Central Standard Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
>
>
> > they knew that the Plague would strike in only 10 years time (i.e.
> > 1973 + 10 = 1983),
>
> The plague in "Conquest" would have already happened, and ended by the alleged 1983 date. Doesn't Armando tell Caesar about the plague at the pet monument which was dated 1982? It would have already happened and ended by the 1983 date you're trying to make a story out of. After all,the monument says "In Memory 1982" doesn't it?
*** Nope: in a pan-&-scan copy I bought years before the letterboxed
versions came out, it clearly says "1983" (the letterboxed versions
cut off the bottommost part of the image, but it can still be seen to
read "1983"); I believe that John Jakes' novelization might have had
"1982", but it also has Armando stating that the Plague was "nine
years ago", whereas the actual movie has him saying "eight years ago"
and "within a month". So, then, since CONQUEST takes place in 1991,
and 8 years before puts it at 1983 (as the actual movie has it), then
the year the Plague hits is 1983, and it lasts only about one month
before "every dog and cat on Earth" is dead.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18692 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
.html--- In pota@y..., mlccougar@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 6/26/2002 1:36:45 PM Central Standard Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
>
>
> > But what matters most, here, is what CORNELIUS says. It is Cornelius who mapped the Forbidden Zone;
>
> Where and when is it ever said Cornelius is the one who mapped it? Just because he owns a map, doesn't mean he was the one that laid it out. And, yes, I know "he can even draw one.." Still, that doesn't prove he is the mapper of the Zone.
*** Oh, c'mon! It's a reasonable inference. The desert is called "the
Forbidden Zone" because ever since the Lawgiver instituted his
"ancient taboo" the Apes are FORBIDDEN to go there. Cornelius had to
get a permit to travel on his prior archaeological expedition... and
he purposely BROKE THE LAW, "he exceeded his orders" as Zaius says.
Not even the President of the Assembly knew of Cornelius' previous
trip to the Zone, since he unbelievingly asks "YOU entered the
Forbidden Zone?" (Gasp!)
Do the Apes sell maps of the Forbidden Zone? That would imply that
some ape had actually gone INTO it and mapped it beforehand. Yet it is
a FORBIDDEN zone, so no ape could possibly have gotten permission to
do this. Cornelius did NOT have permission to travel there... but he
risked it, and went there anyway. Cornelius is the ONLY ape who
possibly COULD have mapped the Forbidden Zone (at least, as far as we
can know, given that no other ape is mentioned as having been there,
excepting whomever may have accompanied him on his trip).
Remember when Cornelius--after Zaius mentions Taylor supposedly
landing in a ship in "an inland sea of our eastern desert"--says to
the Tribunal, "...he comes from somewhere in the Forbidden Zone; he's
described the region to us accurately for... I have been there."
What does this line imply? Cornelius knows the Zone's terrain because
he had been there. He knows how to draw maps--hence, he wouldn't need
to bring along a map-making accomplice to do the job FOR him. As an
archaeologist, he would make a point of mapping that uncharted
territory which Zaius tells Taylor has "never been explored"--hence,
never COULD have been mapped previously. Not until CORNELIUS went
there...
This may not be "proof" enough for you, but to conclude otherwise is
just, well, plain silly. Maybe you'd rather believe that there's some
other ape--perhaps named "Mishalinn"--who just HAPPENED to be able to
create maps of an unexplored area, and that Cornelius got his maps
from him. Yeesh!
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18693 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc |
.html--- In pota@y..., "Melkor" <melkor@m...> wrote:
> >that even die-hard conservatives who advocated a firm stance against Communism did so out of motives that--in their own way--were as pure as the so-called liberal "good guys". The foundations of Communist philosophy are a recipe for disaster--for endless class warfare (the
>
> Patrick, are you aware that people tend to glaze over your stuff because so much of it seems to be either irrelevent or far-fetched? [*** So, when did you acquire the authority to speak on behalf of the "people"? You speak for everybody else? Did I miss the "election" when all the other Yahoo POTA members elected you fuhrer? Yeesh!]
You missed the point completely. This is not a discussion on the pros
and cons of the Vietnam war or of Communism. There are plenty of
better places on the internet for that and I would encourage you to
search for them.
> You seem like you spend all your spare time making a bunch of 10 page post to POTA. But how about looking for some other Yahoo groups or Usenet newsgroups and start reading them and spreading around some of your ideas to other places besides just POTA? I bet that would benefit both you and the group.
*** In case you hadn't figured it out yet, the POTA films are
POLITICAL films, which means that a discussion about Politics--whether
it be of Cold War era or Present Day--is always relevant. And the
"point" I was making had nothing to do with the "pros and cons of
Vietnam" etc.: I was pointing out that the different perspectives of
people on different ends of the ideological spectrum are often open to
misrepresentation. Case in point: the word "conservative". When people
who call THEMSELVES "conservatives" use the word, they do NOT define
it as a class of people who want to keep things exactly the way they
are (as your Zira quote goes). Conservatives see THEMSELVES as people
who advocate LESS GOVERNMENT, as opposed to their ideological
opposites--the "liberals"--who want MORE government intruding where it
is not constitutionally sanctioned to do so. So-called "liberals" view
conservatives NOT as people advocating "less government" but, rather,
as those who seek to perpetuate the "status quo".
> >> In case anyone in the audience still couldn't figure out that the
> bad guys are conservatives BENEATH is even more blunt. Zira says
> about Zaius "He has but one motive. To keep things exactly the way
> they have always been". Which is the very definition of
> "conservative".
*** The LIBERAL definition of a Conservative--NOT the definition that
a Conservative would agree with.
>
> >[*** Actually, the word "conservative" refers more to
> >the idea of LESS-government; a "conservative" approach means that
> >which involves a MINIMUM of effort/input. Zira states that Zaius
> >wants to keep the "status quo"--where he and the other "top
> >orangutans" are in control of the government
>
> Get a dictionary and look up the word "conservative". What Zira says about Zaius -- "He has but one motive. To keep things exactly the way they have always been" -- fits the definition EXACTLY. Instead of doing that you'll post 10 pages of off topic 1980's style political propaganda which was nonsensical right from the start. BENEATH and PLANET were written a long time before the "conservatives" of the 1980's, and Dr. Zaius EXACTLY fits the definition of a real conservative. Zaius says NOTHING about the size of government, but it is obvious that the conservative authoritarian government in POTA is too big and repressive BECAUSE it is too conservative. (Also true in CONQUEST).
*** What Zira says about Zaius fits the LIBERAL definition exactly.
Muslim fanatics tend to refer to Jews and Christians as "infidels",
even though the term means "faithless": ask the average Jew or
Christian if he/she has or doesn't have a "faith" in which he/she
believes. The word "infidel" implies a lack of religion--whereas they
SHOULD, perhaps, use a word that specifies a belief in a DIFFERENT
religion. This is all a question of semantics, and the game of
Politics is overflowing with it. Opposing groups identify themselves
and their opponents DIFFERENTLY than their "enemies" do. As in "We're
GOOD... they're EVIL"; from "their" perspective it is THEY who are
"good" and WE who are "evil". Even Hitler considered his side to be
the "good" side.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18694 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: OT: God's flubs... |
.html--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> Here's a theory for you Patrick. If you could get through all the higher mathematics without your brain seizing up, you find out that creation can't possibly work. The numbers are just so astronomically high so that Patrick doesn't find God's flubs. Hows that for a theory, eh?
*** A lot of cosmologists who believe in the Big Bang theory tend to
use words like "creation" etc. One Bible-believer wrote a book called
"Genesis and the Big Bang", trying to reconcile the myth of Genesis 1
to Big Bang cosmology.
However, ever since reading Eric Lerner's book "THE BIG BANG NEVER
HAPPENED", I've had my doubts about that theory. Lerner's book does 2
things: 1.) it airs the "dirty laundry" of inconvenient facts which
tend to disprove the Big Bang theory, and 2.) it proposes Nobel prize
winner Dr. Hannes Alfven's "Plasma Cosmology" theory, which makes a
hell of a lot more sense to me, quite frankly.
Both the Bible and the Big Bang theory maintain that there WAS a
"beginning"--but the Plasma Cosmology theory is that the Universe has
ALWAYS existed, and that there never WAS a primordial "singularity"
out of which all Spacetime (and the Matter/Energy within it) were
"created".
In other words, far from proven, the Big Bang theory is NOT the only
scientific theory of Cosmology, and this particular rival theory is
anathema to those who want their Bible to somehow be "scientific". If
the Universe had no beginning, then there was no "god" to jump-start
it in the "first" place.
By the way, no number is "astronomically high": just draw the number 8
sideways, and you get Infinity...
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18695 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Believability of rival scenarios... |
.html.html In a message dated 6/30/2002 8:01:16 AM Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** I only "dismiss" what others say if the details given in the POTA
saga contradict what someone says in particular.
A lot of what you say has absolutely no mention (or possibility of actuality) in as you (Fox, and some others) call it "the saga." Nowhere do those movies ever mention The Roswell Incident, a Mothership "Earth", Whitty's homeland becoming "New America" and being colonized 500 years from now, or many of the other home made "details" created by you. Now those "facts" of your's contradict everything that is said in the films. If there are any "details" that should be dismissed, its those mentioned above.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18696 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Planet of the Apes] Timeline issues |
.html.html In a message dated 6/30/2002 8:20:54 AM Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** I'd like to know how YOU know what the writers' intentions were
with such certitude. Can you, like the Mutants, read peoples' minds,
too?
This is one of the most hypocritical statements to EVER hit this message board. This from the man who supposedly knows what every nuance of every line ever mentioned in any Apes movie "really" meant.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18697 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
.html.html In a message dated 6/30/2002 9:53:13 AM Central Standard Time, JamesA1102@... writes:
He only referred to it once as "Dead Lake." As you see by the attached it wasn't a lake at all. Technically is was a bay. So Cornelius' terminology is not that exact.
This isn't what Patrick said. He said that Cornelius "consistently" refers to it as a lake, so it must be. We who dare to even think otherwise are always wrong, always. I'm sure you'll be getting an essay on where you're attachment is wrong too. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18698 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Locations |
.html.html In a message dated 6/30/2002 10:01:59 AM Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
In my scenario, Breck's city is on the West
Coast, a "futuristic" arcology set up about halfway between San
Francisco and Los Angeles. Eventually, this initial simian society
develops into the one we see in the TV series, which is undeniably set
in the mid-California area (San Francisco and Oakland are the settings
for the episodes "The Trap" and "The Legacy", respectively).
Well, I have to say... I agree with your scenario as far as this part goes. As for the rest of it, the migration, etc., there I don't.. But this much, yeah.. I agree with you.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18699 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Hatred of Humanity |
.html.html In a message dated 6/30/2002 10:23:50 AM Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** I disagree. The reason Zaius hates and fears Taylor (and all other
destructively intelligent humans) is because "the Forbidden Zone was
once a Paradise: YOUR BREED MADE A DESERT OF IT, ages ago."
As long as there's a "Zaius" around, who knows the terrible secret of
the Past, and how Mankind annihilated his own civilization, there will
ALWAYS be a reason for SOME Apes to lump ALL humans into the
stereotype role of "destructive-when-intelligent". As long as humans
are kept docile and non-clever (the situation during the TV show, in
3085), they are tolerated as a lowest class of slaves. But when they
start to show initiative... to develop their intellect... they become
DANGEROUS. It is THEN that Zaius (and his cronies) promulgate what
they perceive to be a necessary evil: Race War.
Perhaps, some time after 2670, there comes someone who remembers what
humans once did; he looks out at that blasted desert and remembers his
father's voice telling him: "This was once a paradise... a green,
living, vibrant Garden... and MAN defiled it with his Wars..."
And, that ape might speculate, what's to prevent Man from doing the
same thing to the remaining green areas? Nothing... except us Apes,
who must "cull the herd" and keep the humans' numbers low--and their
intellectual capacities at a bare minimal level."
Otherwise... "Destruction is not fantasy, Galen!"
Patrick
This has to be some kind of record... I agree with you twice in one day.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18700 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc (OT) |
.htmlThis is a fiction. Total conservative propaganda. Liberals don't
want more government. They don't want government encouraging people
to marry or subsidizing religious schools. All Liberals want is that
the government look out for the welfare of all the people. Not just
rich CEOs but for everyone regardless of age, race, religion or sex.
--- In pota@y..., "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
wrote:
> Conservatives see THEMSELVES as people
> who advocate LESS GOVERNMENT, as opposed to their ideological
> opposites--the "liberals"--who want MORE government intruding
where it
> is not constitutionally sanctioned to do so. So-called "liberals"
view
> conservatives NOT as people advocating "less government" but,
rather,
> as those who seek to perpetuate the "status quo". <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18701 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
.htmlThe term consistantly suggests that he said it more than once.
--- In pota@y..., mlccougar@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 6/30/2002 9:53:13 AM Central Standard Time,
> JamesA1102@a... writes:
>
>
> > He only referred to it once as "Dead Lake." As you see by the
attached it
> > wasn't a lake at all. Technically is was a bay. So Cornelius'
terminology
> > is not that exact.
> >
>
> This isn't what Patrick said. He said that
Cornelius "consistently" refers to
> it as a lake, so it must be. We who dare to even think otherwise
are always
> wrong, always. I'm sure you'll be getting an essay on where you're
attachment
> is wrong too. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18702 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Timeline issues |
.htmlThis is why the circular timeline theory is derided so much. Thanks
to Marvel's ridiculous timeline and those that have adopted it.
There are more holes in that theory than in the Titanic.
First, while Breck's city is unidentified and could be anywhere in
the US, the events of Battle firmly establish that city is New York.
While I can buy a cross country Ape migration, the thought of the
mutants doing the same with the bomb in tow is ludicrous. Also, the
ape settlement in the films is consistently refered to as "Ape City"
while the one in the TV series is consistently called "Central
City". Also, in the course of the TV series Virdon & Burke travel
from the San Francisco/Oakland area to Paradise Cove north of LA.
Why is it they never came upon the ruins of Breck's city? How come
there is never any large desert or place called the "Forbbiden City"
encoutered in their travels?
--- In pota@y..., "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
wrote:
>
> *** You're forgetting the previous debate over the location of
Breck's
> unnamed city and Caesar's tree-house "Ape City" relative to the
> location of the "Ape City" from PLANET and BENEATH. There are
those
> who insist that Caesar's people live in the SAME territory that is
> later occupied by Cornelius & Zira, etc.: the "New York/New
Jersey"
> area.
> I have a different view. In my scenario, Breck's city is on the
West
> Coast, a "futuristic" arcology set up about halfway between San
> Francisco and Los Angeles. Eventually, this initial simian society
> develops into the one we see in the TV series, which is undeniably
set
> in the mid-California area (San Francisco and Oakland are the
settings
> for the episodes "The Trap" and "The Legacy", respectively). In my
> scenario, AFTER the time of Virdon and Burke, there is a migration
of
> at least a good chunk of this simian civilization from the
California
> region to the old New York region, where they INTRODUCED
civilization
> where it had not existed since the Nuclear War some 1100 years
> earlier; the reason that the now-NY-based Apes have an Army is
because
> they had to fight wars against the savage bands of "carnivorous
> gorillas" who dwelt in that area. Although "Ape shall not kill
ape",
> when a band of perhaps cannibalistic savage apes are trying to
munch
> on you, self defense is an exception to that "most sacred law".
>
> So, then, at the same time that the nicey-nice Lawgiver from
BATTLE is
> telling the tale of Caesar to his congregation--in California--
there
> are tribes of carnivorous gorillas dwelling thousands of miles
away in
> the area that was once New York/New Jersey. In my scenario, at any
> rate.
>
> Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18703 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Believability of rival scenarios... |
.html.html Taylor reacts to these shocking revelations--but he is not incapacitated by them.
Yeah, a pretty steady character for a guy who's been thrust into a MADHOUSE! About the only thing that does send him into shock it realizing the earth's been blown up. I don't think that shock can account for Wahlberg's wooden performance though. He either doesn't care, can't act, or doesn't care about acting. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18704 |
From: Jeff & Susan Stringer |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
.htmlThen again, we could all just sit back and enjoy the movies at face value.
Gristle P.
----- Original Message -----
From: <mlccougar@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you....
> In a message dated 6/30/2002 9:53:13 AM Central Standard Time,
> JamesA1102@... writes:
>
>
> > He only referred to it once as "Dead Lake." As you see by the attached
it
> > wasn't a lake at all. Technically is was a bay. So Cornelius'
terminology
> > is not that exact.
> >
>
> This isn't what Patrick said. He said that Cornelius "consistently" refers
to
> it as a lake, so it must be. We who dare to even think otherwise are
always
> wrong, always. I'm sure you'll be getting an essay on where you're
attachment
> is wrong too.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18705 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT: God's flubs... |
|
.html By the way, no number is "astronomically high":
I think you must be astronomically high. Answer me this. If the universe
has always existed. And the universe is not only expanding, but
accelerating. Then why isn't it further apart then it is now? It's been
doing it forever! And it's had all the time in the world. Please keep your
answer down to three pages, and no complicated math. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18706 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc (OT) |
.html.html All Liberals want is that the government look out for the welfare of all the people. Not just rich CEOs but for everyone regardless of age, race, religion or sex.
Sounds like Socialism to me. You know...
Communism's slightly more attractive cousin.
I'm all for looking out for the less fortunate.
But only support programs that work.
Don't throw good money after bad.
The government could get by on less then
half of what they're getting. That's if you can
trim the pork! Waste! That's what I'm against!
Government's only there to manage things.
And they're do it badly. I only hope that the
guys from Enron, World Com and Anderson
don't go into politics! That's all we need, feh! <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18707 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "Sea", I told you.... |
.html.html
Then again, we could all just sit back and enjoy the movies at face value.
Amen to that brother!
This is making me timesick.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18708 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc (OT) |
.htmlAgree with you here. More money goes to wasteful Corporate welfare
programs like the recent farm bill that benefits millionares more
than middle class family owned farms.
--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> I'm all for looking out for the less fortunate.
> But only support programs that work.
> Don't throw good money after bad.
> The government could get by on less then
> half of what they're getting. That's if you can
> trim the pork! Waste! That's what I'm against! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18709 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA, politics, propaganda, etc (OT) |
.htmlThey're already in politics and live & work in the White House.
--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> I only hope that the
> guys from Enron, World Com and Anderson
> don't go into politics! That's all we need, feh! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18710 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Taylor's Final Report |
.htmlI know, and it makes no sense for them to be referring to the PLANET earth
either.
I still can't tune in to your logic, and I am wasting my energy trying. You
think it is OK to have a mothership earth, but Taylor MUST be making a
broadcast, not a log entry, because otherwise it doesn't "make sense (like
much of the movies don't make sense, but who's counting?).
I know now that you are just trying to win a debate here Patrick and this is
not a debate. And this is getting tiresome (I'm sure you have heard that
before).
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Sunday, 30 June 2002 23:43
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Taylor's Final Report
>
>
> *** Taylor's "final report" isn't a mere "Dear Diary" entry. He
> addresses an audience ("...you who are reading me now...") which he
> knows cannot be his own crew, since he talks about that crew to his
> intended listeners ("...I've tucked my crew in for the long sleep...),
> differentiating between the "crew" and "you who are reading me now".
> Taylor's unknown "audience" has to be those back on planet Earth--yet
> not those who were alive in 1972 when he launched from Cape Kennedy:
> "...this much is probably true: the men who sent us on this journey
> are long since dead and gone... YOU WHO ARE READING ME NOW ARE A
> DIFFERENT BREED--I hope a better one."
> This line doesn't make any sense unless his message is being broadcast
> back towards the Earth, to the descendants of the dead men who were
> alive before the SHIP-TIME and EARTH-TIME chronometers began to
> diverge from their original synchronized date. The EARTH-TIME clock
> has clicked ahead to 2673 A.D., and will continue to click ahead to
> 11-25-3978 due to "Dr. Hasslein's theory of Time in a vehicle
> travelling nearly the speed of light". That effect of Time Dilation
> has kept Taylor and his crew alive for over 700 years of Earth-Time,
> and Taylor DOES NOT KNOW how things progressed on Earth during that
> span of time, hence his "hope" that whomever MAY end up listening to
> his message has been an improvement on 20th Century Mankind--"a better
> ...breed".
> When Taylor says to his probably non-existent audience "Tell me,
> though...", he is pretending to be having a conversation with
> "somebody". He doesn't know if anybody on Earth in the far future will
> be on the lookout for his periodic reports, hence his line "...IF
> ANYBODY'S LISTENING, THAT IS..." If this were some "Captain's Log"
> diary entry that he intended as a sort of report ON the Mission TO the
> same Mission, would he say this? It wouldn't make any sense for him to
> do so. He's asking rhetorical questions of an audience he doesn't know
> is even out there listening anymore, philosophical questions about how
> Mankind progressed; did that "marvel, that glorious paradox" go on to
> even greater things... or did it still wallow in the ditches, making
> war and promulgating famine in neighboring countries. He asks this
> question of those who know the answer, yet cannot answer him back.
>
> --- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > I don't know how you draw the conclusion that anything you say
> here clinches anything.
> >
> > What you say here is evidence that Taylor believes they are "in
> the future".
> >
> > The reference to whether anyone is listening certainly IMPLIES
> a "live" broadcast, but could also mean that Taylor thinks
> mankind has destroyed itself and there is nobody left to listen.
> >
> > Give me some evidence that his recording could not be a
> "Captain's Log" - ie a ship's log that would stay with the ship.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@y...]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2002 2:26
> > > To: pota@y...
> > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Hatch of the ship
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > > > I always thought Taylor's report was simply a recording
> that stayed on the ship, just as civil servants make and file
> reports all the time and as trekkies do in their "Captain's Log".
> Is there any evidence that these reports were being sent anywhere?
> >
> > Michael
> > >
> > > *** Taylor, speaking to whomever will eventually hear his "final
> > > report" says, "You who are reading me now are a different breed--I
> > > hope a better one. I leave the Twentieth Century with no
> regrets. But, one more thing... if anybody's listening that is..."
> > >
> > > Later on, Taylor tells Landon, "Even if you COULD get back
> [i.e. to the planet Earth], they'd think you were something that
> fell out of a tree."
> > >
> > > I don't think it's likely that Taylor would address anybody
> on his own crew (after another 12 months of Ship-Time
> hibernating) as "a different breed" whom he hopes will be "a
> better one" than the breed of humanity he left behind in the 20th
> Century. He, knowing that "almost 700 years" have gone by on
> Earth, can only be sending out a report to whomever is still
> there on planet Earth, centuries ahead of the time he left it, in 1972.
> > >
> > > I think that clinches it.
> > >
> > > Patrick Michael Tilton
> > > EARTH-TIME 6-26-2002
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18711 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues |
.htmlOh dear (shakes his head).
We are going to have to update the greatest hits.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Monday, 1 July 2002 0:18
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re:Timeline issues
>
>
> > Patrick, do you really think that Cornelius thought there were other
> > english speaking apes at the time? I thought all 3 apes realised
> > that the apes of the time were the equivalent of humans in the
> > future - not speaking and not evolved in their intellect. This may
> > just be something I have assumed though.
> >
> > Michael
>
> *** Milo says that "apes, at this instant in Time, cannot yet speak; I
> suggest we follow their example". However, it may be that Milo doesn't
> know as much about their ancient "prehistory" as does Cornelius.
> I think it's not only possible, but PROBABLE, that Cornelius did
> indeed know that there were English-speaking Apes on Earth about 2000
> years prior to his own time. He straightforwardly says this to the
> Commission when he is asked about "English".
> Cornelius knows more about his era's past than most, due to his
> archaeological findings and his exposure to the "secret scrolls" kept
> hidden from the masses. Let's assume that among those mysterious
> scrolls are various versions (even several irreconcilable ones, sort
> of "mythic" re-tellings from cultic viewpoints) of the "origins" of
> the Simian kinds (Chimp, Gorilla, Orang). Perhaps he even has read a
> later version of the scroll the Lawgiver reads from in BATTLE, which
> depicts the critical moment when "God sent the World a Savior" who had
> been "miraculously born" from parents that came "from Earth's own
> future"--perhaps a later version referred to that Future as "the Time
> of the End", as REVELATION refers to the "Latter Days", the "End
> Times", etc.
> Cornelius, as a student of mythic stories relevant to his study of the
> Past, might have thought that just as there was once supposed to have
> been a God-created FIRST COUPLE (male and female) to start the
> bloodlines of Simians (which, somehow, branched off into 3 main
> populations: Gorillas, Chimps, Orangutans), so too would there be at
> the End of Time ANOTHER, "last couple". In GENESIS, you have Adam and
> Eve; in REVELATION, you have the "two witnesses" who are killed and
> miraculously resurrected prior to the Second Coming. The symmetry of
> an initial "pair" and a final "pair" might be thought of as a sort of
> "literary motif" in cultic/mythic literature. Jesus tells his
> disciples that the Judgment would be just like "in the time of Noah"
> (although the divine punishment would not be a Flood--but a Fire),
> connecting the "history" of the BEGINNING with the prophetic "future
> history" of the END.
> However, after having Time-traveled back from 3955 to 1973, perhaps
> Cornelius rethinks his assumptions about that strange old "secret
> scroll" which told of a "savior" whose parents came from "Earth's own
> future": perhaps it dawns on him that HE AND ZIRA actually ARE those
> "mythic characters" who were supposed to have been present at the End
> of the World. Having actually seen "the Earth... destroyed" (as he
> tells Dixon & Branton), perhaps he re-evaluates the validity of those
> crazy old myths... and realizes that that supposedly mythic character
> from the "secret scrolls"--"Caesar"--is actually his own unborn SON.
> Why, then, doesn't he insist on naming his son "Caesar" after it is
> born? When the baby chimp is born, Cornelius asks, "What shall we
> name...?" Dixon, realizing that Cornelius was wondering about the
> child's gender, says, "Him." And Zira says, "Milo." She wants to name
> the kid after their genius friend. Cornelius assents to this, perhaps
> thinking that a SECOND child might then be named "Caesar". Hell, maybe
> Cornelius--knowing that he and Zira are doomed, and that Zira is going
> to switch babies with Heloise's child--secretly tells Armando (who
> knows about the switch, as his dialogue with the inspecting cops
> shows) to re-name their changeling child "Caesar".
>
> Granted, this is all speculative. But that's half the fun.
>
> Patrick Michael Tilton
> EARTH-TIME 6-30-2002
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 18712 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/30/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: She's a witch...BURN HER!! |
.htmlAnd you didn't conclude that the scales were rigged?
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Monday, 1 July 2002 0:32
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: She's a witch...BURN HER!!
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Yes mathematics can be your friend, but you are dry raping it here
> > Patrick, not being friendly.
> >
> > You are applying logic to prove a coincidence and that is not
> > logical. What you are doing is trying to logically prove how a
> > coincidence ocurred. This is either unnecessary (eg a car crashes
> > into another and you explain how this happens by reverting to the
> > speed the cars were travelling at and the distance they covered) or
> > contrived (eg you try to prove someone is a witch by weighing them
> > against a duck - I'm sure you know what I'm talking about from Monty
> > Python and the Holy Grail).
> >
> > A lot of your arguments remind me of that "Witch Hunt" scene in Holy
> > Grail, mathematical or otherwise (ie they wanted to prove she was a
> > witch so they could burn her, so they did just that).
> >
> > Michael
>
> *** Mike, aren't you forgetting something? The gal should've
> outweighed the duck and tipped the scales easily... but the scales
> showed that she did indeed "weigh the same as a duck", which proved to
> the crowd that she was "a witch!" She herself admits that it's "a fair
> cop"--that their verdict of "She's a witch!" is indeed a just one, as
> opposed to the allegation of it, which the demonstration was intended
> to test.
>
> Patrick
>
> P.S. Was that fuzzy little rodent actually a "killer rabbit"? It may
> not have seemed so at first, but... "LOOK AT THE BONES!"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
|
|