|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23513 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check these out! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23514 |
From: sand_hill_school |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: To be art, or not to be art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23515 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check these out! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23516 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: To Market, To Market. . .to buy a fat Turkey! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23517 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23518 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The mini busts |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23519 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23520 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Arty Farty |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23521 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23522 |
From: thypentacle |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23523 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Reproduced Mona Lisa with Moustache |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23524 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23525 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23526 |
From: kidro85@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23527 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Arty Farty |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23528 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23529 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: More where that came from (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23530 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Der Affen at it! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23531 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23532 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23533 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23534 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23535 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Der Affen at it! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23536 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Der Affen at it! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23537 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: A Tale of Two Planets |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23538 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23539 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Apes IS art! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23540 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: A thingy to ponder |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23541 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes IS art! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23542 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Something to ponder |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23543 |
From: Ken and Heather Taylor |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23544 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23545 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23546 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23547 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23548 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23549 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23550 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to ponder |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23551 |
From: ynwzjrpdlcdz |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: new pictures uploaded... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23552 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23553 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23554 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23555 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Oh please! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23556 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23557 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23558 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23559 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23560 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23561 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23562 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23563 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Zira-O-Lantern |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23564 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: The Medicoms are in da house! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23565 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23566 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to ponder |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23567 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23568 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Zira-O-Lantern |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23569 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23570 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23571 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23572 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23573 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23574 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23575 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23576 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Good Night! (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23577 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23578 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Medium |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23579 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23580 |
From: JamesA1102@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23581 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23582 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23583 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23584 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23585 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23586 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Shiny Things |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23587 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23588 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23589 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23590 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23591 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23592 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23593 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23594 |
From: sand_hill_school |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23595 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Two-Minute Warning |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23596 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23597 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Shiny Things |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23598 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23599 |
From: sand_hill_school |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23600 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Secret Governments on the Planet of the Apes |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23601 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Oh please! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23602 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23603 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1389 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23604 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Pota serious stuff |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23605 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23606 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23607 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Secret Governments on the Planet of the Ap |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23608 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Oh please! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23609 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23610 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Medium |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23611 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23612 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1389 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23513 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check these out! |
.htmlIn a message dated 10/20/2002 10:28:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, < veetus@...> writes:
<<If they can put out new "Dark Crystal" action figures now then "Apes" is far from dead. And "Hogan's Heroes" action figures? >>
The Hogan figure should come with a a betamax machine and a tripod.
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23514 |
From: sand_hill_school |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: To be art, or not to be art |
.html--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/21/02 11:03:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> sand_hill_school@y... writes:
>
>
> > Ok... And was Mozart an artist? Or a genius?
> >
> > If genius begets art.... Is the doomsday bomb art?
> >
> > --Helen
>
> I think MozART was both, and NO I don't think the doomsday bomb was
art, but
> I guess if you found the prop, fixed it up, put it in an art
gallery, then
> some sucker would buy it as an art piece.
>
> Maybe art is just bullsh*t? Modern art seems to be to most.
>
> -- Rory
Agreed. However, according to the National Endowment for the Arts
site http://www.nea.gov/artforms/ they consider the following things
art for the purpose of providing government grants:
Dance
Design
Film, Television, Radio and New Media
Folk & Traditional Arts
Literature
Multidisciplinary Arts
Music
Musical Theater
Opera
Presenting (?)
Theater
Visual Arts
Maybe modern art is determined more by a person's ability to be self-
promoting.
--Helen <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23515 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check these out! |
.html.html In a message dated 10/21/02 11:15:30 AM Eastern Daylight Time, MTotsky@... writes:
The Hogan figure should come with a betamax machine and a tripod.
Matt
AAAAHHHHH!!!! HA! HA! HA! HA!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23516 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: To Market, To Market. . .to buy a fat Turkey! |
.html.html
Hey, maybe the studios will begin to wise up. I wonder how much it cost to market POTA2001? I'll bet the profit margin on APES was so much less than what Fox had hoped that's why nobody is talking sequel.
To Market, To Market -- To Buy a Fat Pig in a Poke?
Marketing experts have begun questioning the wisdom of studio promotional campaigns which often cost more than the films earn at the box office, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday. "It is obscene," Peter Sealey, a marketing professor at UC Berkeley who headed marketing at Columbia in the mid-1980s, told the Times. "There's no excuse for the consistent overspending ... it's close to corporate fraud." The newspaper pointed out that Columbia spent $50 million to promote its $120-million Stuart Little 2, which grossed $63 million. When MGM's $110-million
Windtalkers opened poorly, it noted, the studio's marketing department allocated millions of dollars for "emergency marketing." It didn't work. The film grossed just $41 million, or $1 million less than it cost to market. In 10 years, the Times pointed out, marketing costs for the average movie have risen from $12 million to $31 million.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23517 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art? |
.htmlRory < Haristas@...> wrote:
> I've been thinking some more about this. Just because something
entertains
> you and you think it's good doesn't mean it's art. I believe you
just can't
> go around calling everything art, otherwise the term looses all
meaning. I
> think art has to meet a certain criteria, and I think that criteria
has to be
> set by experts.
And there's the problem - defining what makes an expert in the context
of art is just as difficult as defining what art is.
But anyway, time to move away from this debate. Since we're talking
about the merits of film and all that, did anyone see the list of the
100 most thrilling films of all time published by (I think) the AFI?
It was a surprisingly good list (though the omission of White Heat was
criminal!) and Planet of the Apes is in there. I don't know if they
were compiled in some sort of order, I just saw the list in a
newspaper and it was in alphabetical order.
For folks in the UK, I think there is a 3-hour programme on TV shortly
devoted to it (it might even be this Saturday on Channel 4 if I
remember correctly).
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23518 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The mini busts |
.htmlRory < Haristas@...> wrote:
> Here's the reply I just got back from SOTA about those mini busts
that Jeff
> never thought to tell us about!
I posted details of these in the group back in June - including a
picture and prices!
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23519 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: "Return" Tape |
|
.html James, James, I got my tape! Look at that nice, professional looking
label! And the titles, so neatly done! I've popped the tape in and
watched the first few minutes, then had to run in here and tell you
THANKS! MUCHO THANKS!
Kassidy <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23520 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Arty Farty |
|
.html Hey now, this is my last word on the subject!
But actually Mr. Maxwell just said it. If art is subjective (and it
looks like all of you agree to that, to one degree or another), then
who figures out who the experts are? UTK here had an art show, years
ago, on display at the Candy Factory (never mind), next door to the
Museum of Art. One of the pieces of 'art' was some stick figures
drawn out in some dirt strewn across a hard-wood floor. I was
horrified when the friend who was with me reached over with her toe
across the little roped off area and flicked some of the dirt
around. It was dirt, for God's sakes! On display. Oh well....
Then on the other hand, if you do have some knowledge of the time
period the art was conceived in, and some history of the artist then
you have a better chance of understanding the art and judging its
value, right?
I will close my little ramble by adding that, Jackson Pollock sucks
and Andy Warhol was not more than a commercial artist, don't waste my
time by arguing with me.
And being that art is subjective, I will state that I absolutely
believe that RORY is a work of art. As Rory is so inextricably tied
to the POTA yahoo discussion group, I have successfully kept my
discussion of art from being OT.
No I am not drunk. Etc.
Kassidy
And to tie this to POTA, <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23521 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
.html .html
I got mine today too.
Thanks James! : )
I haven't seen these
since they first aired.
Way cool!
T<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23522 |
From: thypentacle |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
.htmlI got my tape too. Wanted to also thank you. It wouldn't play in my main vcr for some reason, but it works fine on my other one. Thank you very much for sending it. :o)
Thy �very grateful� Pentacle
Kassidy Rae <valwp@...> wrote:
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23523 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Reproduced Mona Lisa with Moustache |
.htmlPoetry!
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sand_hill_school [sand_hill_school@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 0:41
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
>
> Perhaps that could read, "The movie was a collaborative effort of
> artists with all those involved doing so for a paycheck." Don't
> forget that Mozart was paid to write most of his music, Norman
> Rockwell sold his work to Saturday Evening Post (as a result they
> sold more magazines), and Charles Shultz wrote his syndicated Peanuts
> stip for $$$. All of these were artists, and all were paid to
> create. We studied Planet of the Apes (Sand Hill School, school year
> 2001 - 2002) as both art and literature. Although we dismissed POTA
> 2001 (so I may be sidetracked here), I suppose that it could be
> considered "art" much as one would consider their friend's child's
> reproduction of the Mona Lisa (with a mustache) to be art.
>
> --Helen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23524 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
.htmlYou're welcome everyone. Please let me know if any of you has any
playback problems.
--- In pota@y..., thypentacle <thypentacle@y...> wrote:
>
> I got my tape too. Wanted to also thank you. It wouldn't play in
my main vcr for some reason, but it works fine on my other one.
Thank you very much for sending it. :o)
>
> Thy `very grateful' Pentacle
>
> Kassidy Rae <valwp@y...> wrote:James, James, I got my tape! Look
at that nice, professional looking
> label! And the titles, so neatly done! I've popped the tape in
and
> watched the first few minutes, then had to run in here and tell
you
> THANKS! MUCHO THANKS!
> Kassidy
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23525 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art? |
.html.html
I agree with you T. I don't want some "expert" telling me what to
like and what not to like. Too many people don't think for
themselves and allow some critic tell them what's good. And what
real credentials do most of these critics have anyway?
Well, Zagats who has been doing restaurant reviews for years has just published a movie guide. They feel that critics are out of touch with what people actually think is good. They may have a point. Health food may be good for you, but if it tastes like crap who wants to pay to eat it. On they other hand the guide only has 1000 movies in it, and costs well over ten bucks. You do the math. As for Warhol's painting, usually he'd come up with a concept and have some of his flunkies paint it up and he'd sign it. Some of the concepts weren't even his.
Oh, you guys are just egalitarian popularists.
Look, Campbell's tomato soup cans are not art, but an Andy Warhol painting of them is.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23526 |
From: kidro85@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
.html My man James,
Thanks man, nice label job. I really appreciate that .
Thank you thank you thank you
Tony <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23527 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Arty Farty |
.htmlIn a message dated 10/21/02 5:10:17 PM, valwp@... writes:
<< I will close my little ramble by adding that, Jackson Pollock sucks
and Andy Warhol was not more than a commercial artist, don't waste my
time by arguing with me. >>
I can't agree with you there...
Matt (who didn't sleep through art history class) <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23528 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
.htmlI already have the cartoons, James. So just send me some money and I will
buy a VHS I don't have. Thanks. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "james611102" <JamesA1102@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
> You're welcome everyone. Please let me know if any of you has any
> playback problems.
>
> --- In pota@y..., thypentacle <thypentacle@y...> wrote:
> >
> > I got my tape too. Wanted to also thank you. It wouldn't play in
> my main vcr for some reason, but it works fine on my other one.
> Thank you very much for sending it. :o)
> >
> > Thy `very grateful' Pentacle
> >
> > Kassidy Rae <valwp@y...> wrote:James, James, I got my tape! Look
> at that nice, professional looking
> > label! And the titles, so neatly done! I've popped the tape in
> and
> > watched the first few minutes, then had to run in here and tell
> you
> > THANKS! MUCHO THANKS!
> > Kassidy
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23529 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: More where that came from (OT) |
.html
.html
Billy Crudup has joined the cast of Burton's
next feast, "Big Fish". Starts filming in Alabama in Jan. I know, I know, before
you say it, they don't need Billy to crud up that movie; Burton will crud it up
fine without him. AH HA HA HA HA HA he he he! - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:17
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] To Market,
To Market. . .to buy a fat Turkey!
Hey, maybe the studios will
begin to wise up. I wonder how much it cost to market POTA2001?
I'll bet the profit margin on APES was so much less than what Fox had hoped
that's why nobody is talking sequel.
To Market, To Market
-- To Buy a Fat Pig in a Poke?
Marketing experts have begun questioning the wisdom of studio
promotional campaigns which often cost more than the films earn at the box
office, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday. "It is obscene," Peter
Sealey, a marketing professor at UC Berkeley who headed marketing at Columbia
in the mid-1980s, told the Times. "There's no excuse for the consistent
overspending ... it's close to corporate fraud." The newspaper pointed out
that Columbia spent $50 million to promote its $120-million Stuart Little 2, which grossed $63 million. When MGM's $110-million Windtalkers opened poorly, it noted, the studio's marketing department
allocated millions of dollars for "emergency marketing." It didn't work. The
film grossed just $41 million, or $1 million less than it cost to market. In
10 years, the Times pointed out, marketing costs for the average movie
have risen from $12 million to $31 million.
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23530 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/21/2002 |
| Subject: Der Affen at it! |
| Group: pota |
Message: 23531 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
.html .html
The tracking on mine is stripey and the audio garbled, but I can still make it out.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23532 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
.html .html
It's kinda funny.
Everyone sounds like Cylones.
I love the way the themes are explained at a child's level.
Patrick should watch these. Even his giant brain couldn't
misconstrue them. But I'm sure he'll say the writers meant
something else.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23533 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
|
.html .html
It's cleared up some towards the middle.
Maybe in got magnetized or x-rayed.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23534 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
.htmlSure Jeff, email me your address and I'll send you a few bucks. When
you get it don't worry about that white power in the envelope, it's
only talcum powder.
--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> I already have the cartoons, James. So just send me some money
and I will
> buy a VHS I don't have. Thanks. - - - Jeff <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23535 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Der Affen at it! |
.htmlI would say it's the 20th Century Fox logo.
--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> The seller has this German PLANET poster as a 1968 original, but
can anyone
> here spot what gives this away as a reissue poster?
>
> -- Der Rory <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23536 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Der Affen at it! |
.html.html In a message dated 10/22/02 7:12:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, JamesA1102@... writes:
I would say it's the 20th Century Fox logo.
Yeah, that's right. That logo wasn't used until 1973. The BATTLE poster has that logo on it.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23537 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: A Tale of Two Planets |
.html.html I thought I'd reprint this here for the sake of those new who probably haven't read it (like that beautiful work of art -- or is it just "piece of work"? -- Kassidy!).
A Tale of Two Planets by Eric Greene
Planet of the Apes (1968) still courtesy of MPTV.net.
Charleton Heston and Kim Hunter show why the original Apes was more daring than the remake.
The original Planet of the Apes grew out of a time of wrenching conflict that, in the midst of wars abroad and revolutions at home, demanded soul searching. Today, soul searching has been replaced by soulless sloganeering.
About the Author
Eric Greene is a graduate of Stanford Law School and works for the ACLU in Southern California. He is the author of Planet of the Apes As American Myth : Race, Politics, and Popular Culture and can be seen in Behind the Planet of the Apes, a documentary DVD.
In Tim Burton's recent version of Planet of the Apes, human-hating chimpanzee General Thade disrupts a simian dinner party by grabbing a human, forcing open his mouth and growling down his throat "is there a soul in there?" This could have been the heart of the film: a dramatic clash of species in the context of an exploration of humanity's relationship to power and nature, intelligence and spirit. Could have been. Regrettably, Thade's question is rhetorical, only pretense. Here Thade is a perfect, if unintended, stand in for the filmmakers: not truly interested in soul searching, just trying to make a spectacle.
In 1968 Planet of the Apes, produced by Arthur P. Jacobs and based on a novel by Pierre Boulle, delighted critics and audiences alike as both an imaginative science fiction adventure and a sober political commentary. The struggles of the 60s c the fight for racial justice, domestic battles about the Vietnam War, cynicism toward the political and religious establishment — underscored almost every scene, all without losing the excitement, humor and visual splendor that people love in Hollywood epics. "The most fun you could have while thinking about a movie," is how one fan described it to me.
Taking an alternate reality in which human political faults were safely projected onto imaginary apes, spoofed and critiqued, the Apes sequels (Beneath the Planet of the Apes, Escape from the..., Conquest of the..., Battle for the... ) extended and sharpened the racial-political allegory by addressing issues like urban riots and the Black Power movement with varying degrees of subtlety and sympathy. While ostensibly about apes, the real focus was always the survival possibilities of a racially fractured United States. (Franklin Schaffner, the director of the first film, argued that he was trying to make a political film and a social satire more than a science fiction story, and Paul Dehn and J. Lee Thompson, the writer and director of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes acknowledged that the Watts riots provided the inspiration for the slave revolt led by the film's hero).
The studio spin doctors insist on calling this a "re-imagining," not a remake. When Burton does imagine territory beyond the original his film truly comes alive: striking production design and costumes; delightfully bizarre glimpses of ape life (an ape removing his toupee and dentures; an "interracial" orangutan-chimpanzee mating dance; the ape-like movement and mannerisms); excellent performances by Cary Tagawa (Krull), Paul Giamatti (Limbo) and Tim Roth's compelling, if one-note, Thade; and some astonishing make up by Rick Baker and his associates. (If nothing else they deserve an Oscar for Thade and for the marvelous Orangutan senator at the dinner party.) There's enough good stuff in the film that it deserved to be better.
Yet for all this, even without comparison to the original, the movie seems surprisingly lifeless, marred by a weak plot, thematic vacuousness and underdeveloped characters. Had the film-makers risked going further in new directions, the film might have felt like a distinct vision — as opposed to just a distinct look — and succeeded or failed strictly on its own terms. But no one here seems up to the task. In its attempts to "ape" several elements of the first Planet of the Apes, this is ultimately just a remake. And a disappointing one at that.
Both films, for instance, depict apes lording it over humans. But Burton's film invokes slavery without confronting it. Unlike in the first Planet, the human slaves here can talk. Giving them the power of speech opened up a range of story options, yet they have created no culture, no politics, no religion. Why are there no Nat Turners or Underground Railroads? Why no redemption songs? Even the Hebrew slaves in the Bible had prophecies of a deliverer. Why allow the film's humans the power to talk, and give them nothing to say? The only advantage these humans have over the original is better hair.
Schaffner used the animal oppression of humans, as well as the discrimination amongst ape groups (light apes in charge, dark apes on the bottom of social ladder) as allegory to argue that we "civilized" humans were not so civilized after all. Apes and humans in the original series feared and hated each other precisely because, as evolutionary "cousins," each recognized their own brutality in "the other." Their hostility and violence was directly proportional to their need to suppress that recognition. In this year's film, the apes and humans see nothing of themselves in each other. They are enemies only because the story needs a conflict. The struggles are flashy but not organic — and thus not emotionally engaging or even frightening.
Both films feature a sympathetic female chimpanzee who puts herself at real risk to help the male human astronaut. Again, there was some promise for going beyond the earlier movie. The screenplay called for a growing attraction between the human protagonist Leo (Mark Wahlberg) and the chimpanzee human rights activist Ari (Helena Bonham Carter). While not consummated, their affection required them to ask if their shared capacity for consciousness outweighed their physical differences. Rumors abound as to why this subplot was watered down but regardless of the reason, the concept was ruined by the execution. Surely over Rick Baker's objection, Ari's makeup was deliberately designed to make her look more attractive by human standards: mascara, lipstick and a ridiculous Italian designer wig make her look a good deal more like Jennifer Anniston than a chimpanzee. Ironically, while Ari is the most anti-racist character in the movie, her make-up unintentionally delivers a racist
message: trust those who look most like you.
The earlier film established a cross-species empathy between Charlton Heston's character Taylor and chimpanzee Zira, despite their physical difference. When the grateful Heston asks to kiss her goodbye near the film's ending, Zira exclaims, "all right, but you're so damned ugly!" Getting past the physical difference, rather than denying it, was the characters' accomplishment. The characters never pretended that they were not physically "ugly" to each other, but the Apes series interrogated that aversion to difference and used a civil rights-era model to emphasize respect, affection and alliance across species — and, by implication, racial — lines.
The two Planets also differ greatly in their view of "heroism." The first film destabilized white male supremacy by stripping the usually triumphant Charlton Heston of all the benefits of his status — speech, freedom, clothing, weapons — and putting him at the mercy of "lower" animals. In the midst of decolonization, the original Planet used Third World animals to question the ascendance of Western "man." Here Wahlberg is the can-do US Air Force captain, never out of control for too long, winning instant allies and followers. Unlike the ambiguity-ridden Heston of that messy 1968 gestalt, Wahlberg is the unquestioned white male savior in a film much more comfortable with American power. Even the first film's implicit critique of nuclear weapons is transmogrified into a celebration of our nuclear capacity.
This summer's movie, then, is a product of its time — albeit unwittingly — just as surely as the first one was deliberately. The original Planet of the Apes grew out of a time of wrenching conflict that, in the midst of wars abroad and revolutions at home, demanded soul searching. Today, soul searching has been replaced by soulless sloganeering: "Compassionate Conservatism" (or was that "Kinder, Gentler, America?") rules unquestioned.
The original Planet of the Apes films were made with the conviction that a successful movie can both excite the imagination and challenge the conscience. They stood out as an accessible way to explore the roots and results of prejudice with a pop audience. The new film represents a culture that has not only failed to find the answers to its racial problems, it no longer dares to ask the questions.
The tale of two Planets is a cautionary tale about remakes: ironically, Planet of the Apes actually grew out of an aversion to remaking movies. Arthur P. Jacobs had thought about remaking King Kong but decided that one should leave the classics alone. He forced himself to put his creative energy into something new and as a result developed the Apes series. Today's obsession with safe remakes stifles risky innovations.
Of course, there is a place for new versions of old stories. At our best we return to existing mythologies and use them to re-examine new or unresolved questions. At our worst we return to them because we have no new ideas. Much like Dances with Wolves and Unforgiven used the Western genre to explore persistent issues about race, reconciliation and violence, how exciting could it have been if Burton and company had honored the roots of the original Planet of the Apes mythology while adapting it to contemporary concerns? Instead, they did neither. "Is there a soul in there?" Unfortunately, this time the answer is "no."
First published: August 28, 2001
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23538 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Apes in Art |
| Group: pota |
Message: 23539 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Apes IS art! |
| Group: pota |
Message: 23540 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: A thingy to ponder |
.html.html Is this art from art? <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23541 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes IS art! |
.html.html In a message dated 10/22/02 3:48:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Haristas@... writes:
I would have to that these are art.
I forgot to say "say"! SAY! What's up with that?<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23542 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Something to ponder |
| Group: pota |
Message: 23543 |
From: Ken and Heather Taylor |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
.htmlYeah,
I like Shag's stuff, even without Apes. I like his use of colours and that
whole retro cocktail bar feel.
"YEAH BABY"....nothing?, No?....Just trying it on.
----- Original Message -----
From: <MTotsky@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:02 AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
> I've been meaning to post this for awhile.
>
> Is anyone here familiar with the artist Shag? I am a big fan of his
artwork. I love the retro, cartoonish style and subject matter. Apparently
he is an Apes fan because several of his paintings have featured some of our
favorite simians. He had a gallery show here in Detroit last month, which I
attended. I asked him about Apes and he said he has been a big fan since he
was a kid and his favorite character is Zaius. One of the paintings on
display was this piece:
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/drunkcleric.html"
>
> I like the little details on this painting, the fact that the tiki statues
actually look like chimps. I asked how much it was and was told it was not
for sale, that it was already purchased "by the guy who owns the original
Lawgiver statue." I asked if that happened to be Brian from Apemania and was
told that it was. Small world....
>
>
> Here are some other Shag paintings that feature apes:
>
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/Hedonist/trembling.html"
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/Sinners/Zaiusin.html"
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/bananaliq.html"
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/Tryptich.html"
>
>
> I am curious as to what others on this list think of these. Are they art?
I think so...
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23544 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
|
.html .html
It must be art. I went to an art show by this guy. At least I think it was him. If it wasn't then it was someone else in the same vein, or one of them was ripping the other off. Not they the couldn't have come up with it independently, but . . . It was very sixties, lots of apes and fezzes, and there was a tiki bar set up in the back. That's where I spent most of my time at the show. Free beer vs high priced art is no contest. Anyway there was too much Zaius and not enough Zira for my taste.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23545 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Apes in Art |
|
.html Hey Matt and everyone,
Yes I would agree it is art. Definitely.
And by the way, I would even say Jackson Pollock is an artist. I had
art history in college, and I took painting, and graphics, and yada
yada blah blah. You can't just sling paint on a wall and say "I
paint just like JP". It's just that personally I hate that *()@#&&.
And a lot of the pretentious horse hockey that goes with being "an
artist".
A Piece of Work <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23546 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
.htmlVery insightful. I have to agree with Eric on almost everything here.
I like the pun on the Power Records episode too!
Michael
--- Haristas@... wrote:
> I thought I'd reprint this here for the sake of those new who
probably
> haven't read it (like that beautiful work of art -- or is it
just "piece of
>
> work"? -- Kassidy!).
>
> A Tale of Two Planets by Eric Greene
>
> Planet of the Apes (1968) still courtesy of MPTV.net.
>
> Charleton Heston and Kim Hunter show why the original Apes was more
daring
>
> than the remake.
>
> The original Planet of the Apes grew out of a time of wrenching
conflict
> that, in the midst of wars abroad and revolutions at home, demanded
soul
> searching. Today, soul searching has been replaced by soulless
sloganeering
> ..
>
> About the Author
> Eric Greene is a graduate of Stanford Law School and works for the
ACLU in
>
> Southern California. He is the author of Planet of the Apes As
American Myt
> h
> : Race, Politics, and Popular Culture and can be seen in Behind the
Planet
> of
> the Apes, a documentary DVD.
>
>
>
> In Tim Burton's recent version of Planet of the Apes, human-
hating
>
> chimpanzee General Thade disrupts a simian dinner party by grabbing
a human
> ,
> forcing open his mouth and growling down his throat "is there a
soul in
> there?" This could have been the heart of the film: a dramatic
clash of
> species in the context of an exploration of humanity's relationship
to powe
> r
> and nature, intelligence and spirit. Could have been. Regrettably,
Thade's
>
> question is rhetorical, only pretense. Here Thade is a perfect, if
> unintended, stand in for the filmmakers: not truly interested in
soul
> searching, just trying to make a spectacle.
>
> In 1968 Planet of the Apes, produced by Arthur P. Jacobs and based
on a nov
> el
> by Pierre Boulle, delighted critics and audiences alike as both an
> imaginative science fiction adventure and a sober political
commentary. The
>
> struggles of the 60s c the fight for racial justice, domestic
battles about
>
> the Vietnam War, cynicism toward the political and religious
establishment
> ���
> underscored almost every scene, all without losing the excitement,
humor an
> d
> visual splendor that people love in Hollywood epics. "The most fun
you coul
> d
> have while thinking about a movie," is how one fan described it to
me.
>
> Taking an alternate reality in which human political faults were
safely
> projected onto imaginary apes, spoofed and critiqued, the Apes
sequels
> (Beneath the Planet of the Apes, Escape from the..., Conquest of
the...,
> Battle for the... ) extended and sharpened the racial-political
allegory by
>
> addressing issues like urban riots and the Black Power movement
with varyin
> g
> degrees of subtlety and sympathy. While ostensibly about apes, the
real foc
> us
> was always the survival possibilities of a racially fractured
United States
> ..
> (Franklin Schaffner, the director of the first film, argued that he
was
> trying to make a political film and a social satire more than a
science
> fiction story, and Paul Dehn and J. Lee Thompson, the writer and
director o
> f
> Conquest of the Planet of the Apes acknowledged that the Watts
riots provid
> ed
> the inspiration for the slave revolt led by the film's hero).
>
> The studio spin doctors insist on calling this a "re-imagining,"
not a
> remake. When Burton does imagine territory beyond the original his
film tru
> ly
> comes alive: striking production design and costumes; delightfully
bizarre
>
> glimpses of ape life (an ape removing his toupee and dentures; an
> "interracial" orangutan-chimpanzee mating dance; the ape-like
movement and
>
> mannerisms); excellent performances by Cary Tagawa (Krull), Paul
Giamatti
> (Limbo) and Tim Roth's compelling, if one-note, Thade; and some
astonishing
>
> make up by Rick Baker and his associates. (If nothing else they
deserve an
>
> Oscar for Thade and for the marvelous Orangutan senator at the
dinner party
> ..)
> There's enough good stuff in the film that it deserved to be better.
>
> Yet for all this, even without comparison to the original, the
movie seems
>
> surprisingly lifeless, marred by a weak plot, thematic vacuousness
and
> underdeveloped characters. Had the film-makers risked going further
in new
>
> directions, the film might have felt like a distinct vision ��� as
op
> posed to
> just a distinct look ��� and succeeded or failed strictly on its
own
> terms. But
> no one here seems up to the task. In its attempts to "ape" several
elements
>
> of the first Planet of the Apes, this is ultimately just a remake.
And a
> disappointing one at that.
>
> Both films, for instance, depict apes lording it over humans. But
Burton's
>
> film invokes slavery without confronting it. Unlike in the first
Planet, th
> e
> human slaves here can talk. Giving them the power of speech opened
up a ran
> ge
> of story options, yet they have created no culture, no politics, no
religio
> n.
> Why are there no Nat Turners or Underground Railroads? Why no
redemption
> songs? Even the Hebrew slaves in the Bible had prophecies of a
deliverer. W
> hy
> allow the film's humans the power to talk, and give them nothing to
say? Th
> e
> only advantage these humans have over the original is better hair.
>
> Schaffner used the animal oppression of humans, as well as the
discriminati
> on
> amongst ape groups (light apes in charge, dark apes on the bottom
of social
>
> ladder) as allegory to argue that we "civilized" humans were not so
civiliz
> ed
> after all. Apes and humans in the original series feared and hated
each oth
> er
> precisely because, as evolutionary "cousins," each recognized their
own
> brutality in "the other." Their hostility and violence was directly
> proportional to their need to suppress that recognition. In this
year's fil
> m,
> the apes and humans see nothing of themselves in each other. They
are enemi
> es
> only because the story needs a conflict. The struggles are flashy
but not
> organic ��� and thus not emotionally engaging or even frightening.
>
> Both films feature a sympathetic female chimpanzee who puts herself
at real
>
> risk to help the male human astronaut. Again, there was some
promise for
> going beyond the earlier movie. The screenplay called for a growing
> attraction between the human protagonist Leo (Mark Wahlberg) and
the
> chimpanzee human rights activist Ari (Helena Bonham Carter). While
not
> consummated, their affection required them to ask if their shared
capacity
>
> for consciousness outweighed their physical differences. Rumors
abound as t
> o
> why this subplot was watered down but regardless of the reason, the
concept
>
> was ruined by the execution. Surely over Rick Baker's objection,
Ari's make
> up
> was deliberately designed to make her look more attractive by human
> standards: mascara, lipstick and a ridiculous Italian designer wig
make her
>
> look a good deal more like Jennifer Anniston than a chimpanzee.
Ironically,
>
> while Ari is the most anti-racist character in the movie, her make-
up
> unintentionally delivers a racist message: trust those who look
most like
> you.
>
> The earlier film established a cross-species empathy between
Charlton
> Heston's character Taylor and chimpanzee Zira, despite their
physical
> difference. When the grateful Heston asks to kiss her goodbye near
the film
> 's
> ending, Zira exclaims, "all right, but you're so damned ugly!"
Getting past
>
> the physical difference, rather than denying it, was the
characters'
> accomplishment. The characters never pretended that they were not
physicall
> y
> "ugly" to each other, but the Apes series interrogated that
aversion to
> difference and u <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23547 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
.htmlI think they are art.
I like them.
I would love to hear a commentary about them.
Michael
--- MTotsky@... wrote:
> I've been meaning to post this for awhile.
>
> Is anyone here familiar with the artist Shag? I am a big fan of his
artwork. I love the retro, cartoonish style and subject matter.
Apparently he is an Apes fan because several of his paintings have
featured some of our favorite simians. He had a gallery show here in
Detroit last month, which I attended. I asked him about Apes and he
said he has been a big fan since he was a kid and his favorite
character is Zaius. One of the paintings on display was this piece:
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/drunkcleric.html"
>
> I like the little details on this painting, the fact that the tiki
statues actually look like chimps. I asked how much it was and was
told it was not for sale, that it was already purchased "by the guy
who owns the original Lawgiver statue." I asked if that happened to
be Brian from Apemania and was told that it was. Small world....
>
>
> Here are some other Shag paintings that feature apes:
>
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/Hedonist/trembling.html"
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/Sinners/Zaiusin.html"
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/bananaliq.html"
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/Tryptich.html"
>
>
> I am curious as to what others on this list think of these. Are
they art? I think so...
>
> Matt
>
>
> ------------------------ ---------------------
~-->
> Is your business paying to much?
> Affordable insurance and benefits packages for Less.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/jCP0DB/E.mEAA/jd3IAA/9_IolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-~->
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23548 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art? |
.html--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/19/02 9:53:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> veetus@e... writes:
>
>
> > The first definition of "art" in the dictionary I have
is "creative adaptation". Probably they mean "adapting" a flower to a
painting or "adapting" a feeling to a poem or song. But "creative
adaptation" certainly applies to the POTA movie. Probably the def
people think of is:"application of skill to the production of
beautiful things, esp. in painting, sculpture, music, literature,
architecture, and dancing". I've also heard that "Beauty is in the
eye of the beholder". So I guess we could never reach a solid
conclusion of whether POTA is art. Man, this is heavy for a
Saturday! - - - Jeff
>
> The late Pauline Kael, who's opinion I value much higher than
Patrick's, said that "Planet of the Apes" was not art. She included
some other movies along with it. Of course, she was writing in the
era of the film's original release. It takes the passage of some
time to weed out the good from the bad in such matters. In the end
art is whatever people want it to be.
>
> There is a difference between movies as art and, say, paintings or
sculptures as art. Movies tend to be commercial ventures, and that
commercial aspect tends to devalue them as art. When was the last
time you saw a list of the 100 best paintings ever painted, or
statues ever sculpted, or books ever written? Pretty rarely, if
ever. But there's always some damn list of the ten best or one
hundred best movies. That should tell you something.
>
> Movies are art of a certain kind, but not high art. Some,
like "Citizen Kane," have certainly attained a higher level as art
than others, but what idiot would argue that because "Citizen Kane"
is art and a movie, than since "Porky's II" is also a movie, it's art?
>
> Where's Gene Siskel when we need him?
>
> -- Rory
*** If a 'work' has any connection with "commercial ventures" then
that "devalues them as art"? Bullshit! The greatest artists of the
last millennium, Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci had wealthy
patrons who footed their bills. The Pope commissioned Michelangelo to
paint the Sistine Chapel. Yet despite the "commercial" aspect of it,
the money factor, the works of those two artists alone are some of
the most wondrous works of Art ever created.
Tell all the creative people who work on that collaborative artform,
the Movie, that they are "lesser" artists because it involves a
paycheck! What--is it "Art" only if the "Artiste" is either
independently wealthy or starving-yet-devoted to creating?
The ONLY thing which "devalues" any Art is if it is lacking in
TALENT. Most of the pop & rap "music" on the radio, or on MTV, is
mass-produced (sometimes with pre-programmed "sampled" bits created
by other people) and involves no actual playing of instruments--in
short, there's very little real talent involved. All that seems to
matter is the "look" and the dancing choreography anymore, which
appeals to pre-teen girls who couldn't tell a great song from the
sound of Rory's farts. Much of what passes for Art in comics nowadays
is pretty mediocre, or derivative of other artists' styles. But the
GREATS stand tall above all that--and those Greats make their Art as
their livelihood.
It don't matter if there's money involved, though. Even artists need
to pay their monthly bills; if they can earn a living by being
artistically creative, then that's how it should be.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23549 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!" |
.html--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/19/02 7:03:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
>
>
> > Here's where I "wow" you with my acumen, Rory, and it involves an
explication of the meanings of the names of the main character
(Ulysse) and his "fallen" comrade (Antelle). Antelle comes from the
Greek word "antelios" (from "anti" + "helios"), meaning "opposite the
sun" or "against the sun".
>
> The only thing you've "wowed" me with, Patrick, is how much you
sound like the father in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding"!
>
> The name "Ulysse" is the French form of the Latin form (Ulysses--
actually "Ulixes" in Cassell's dictionary) of the Greek
name "Odysseus" (of Homer's "Odyssey"); the name Odysseus comes from
the Greek word "odyssomai", which means "to be grieved" or "to be
wroth at".
>
> You're a riot, Patrick! Go see the movie and you'll know what I
mean. By the way, Merou is supposed to mean a grouper, a lowly
fish. What do you make of the juxtaposition of Ulysse with Merou,
Patrick?
>
> Ulysse--like Ulysses before him--is the type who would eat the
forbidden fruit, acquiring Knowledge EVEN IF IT GETS HIM KICKED OUT
OF THE COZY GARDEN/PRISON. Adam was not fully human until he acquired
Knowledge, which can ONLY be acquired through rebellion against the
dictates of a "master" (God, in GENESIS, the "Orthodoxy" in the Real
World). Do you get it yet, Rory?
>
> Ummmmmm. . . . NO! What is the point here, Patrick? Certainly not
the one on your head, so what the hell are you talking about?
>
> -- Rory the puzzled
*** "... a grouper, a lowly fish..." Ever read "DUNE", Rory? Paul
Atreides adopts the name "Muad'dib" which (if I remember correctly)
means "a little mouse" associated with one of Arrakis' moons (like
our "Man in the Moon"). Jesus is supposed to be the "Lamb of God"--
the Paschal lamb which was slaughtered every Passover, its blood
smeared on the lintel to keep away the Angel of Death.
Ah, the name "Merou". A fish? Just ANY kind of fish? Read up on your
French history, Rory, and you'll discover a bizarre mythic ancestor
to the ancient line of Frankish kings (pre-dating Charlemagne): the
half-man/half-fish "Merovech" or "Merovee", the eponymous king who
founded the Merovingian Dynasty. Read the book "The Holy Blood and
the Holy Grail" by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, & Henry Lincoln
for an astounding hypothesis concerning the supposed connection of
modern day secret societies with the Knights Templar, the
Merovingians (and the potential restoration of their bloodline to
power in post-Modern France), and the "Grail" literature, which some
interpret as having to do with the Davidic Bloodline... through the
historical Jesus, and his consort/wife Mary Magdalene.
The name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably represents
somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest that
this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
community in the Langued'oc region of France.
Hmmm... a voyage across the Mediterranean Sea, connecting the Holy
Land with France... "Merovech" possibly being a symbolic
representation of the Davidic Bloodline of Christ transplanting from
Judea to France (from which the Crusaders marched to reconquer the
Holy Land from the Saracens)... "Merou" being a voyager through
the "sea of space" who ultimately seeks to found a bloodline (through
Nova & their son, Sirius) which will regain their once-proud position
as the "image of God" (etc.)... and the name "Ulysse", based on
Ulysses/Odysseus, who also endured a long voyage back home to his
wife Penelope and their son, Telemachus, to throw out the intruding
suitors...
THAT is what I make of the "juxtaposition" of Ulysse and Merou, you
big ape! I think that Boulle knew his French history better than
what's-his-name who wrote that book about him & his works which you
got that "grouper" interpretation from (offhand, I can't remember the
author or title--I'm sure you'll clue me in). Perhaps Boulle knew a
little something about the secret society discussed in the books by
Baigent, Leigh, & Lincoln: the "Prieure de Sion"/"Priory of Zion",
which allegedly seeks to restore a monarchy to France--an offshoot
branch of the supposedly-sundered Merovingian Dynasty of old.
Nostradamus, among other things, has a couple quatrains about a "half-
man/half-fish" character... was he, too, making connections with the
Merovingian past of France, and their possible survival as a
Bloodline throughout the Carolingian era and beyond?
This is probably over the heads of most of the other guys on this
Discussion Board, and I wouldn't deal with it at all if it didn't
have something to do with the possible intended meanings of the names
Boulle gave his characters in "La Planete des Singes".
And if you can't see the "point" I was getting at, regarding the
cognitive processes at work in a Ulysses-like mind (as opposed to
an "anti-helios"/"Antelle"-like mind), then perhaps you're cross-
eyed, or Marty-Feldman-eyed. Go see an ophthalmologist, pronto!
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23550 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to ponder |
| Group: pota |
Message: 23551 |
From: ynwzjrpdlcdz |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: new pictures uploaded... |
| Group: pota |
Message: 23552 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
.htmlYou just don't like him because he's an Aussie...you RACIST!!!
Michael
--- "Kassidy Rae" < valwp@...> wrote:
> Hey Matt and everyone,
> Yes I would agree it is art. Definitely.
>
> And by the way, I would even say Jackson Pollock is an artist. I
had
> art history in college, and I took painting, and graphics, and yada
> yada blah blah. You can't just sling paint on a wall and say "I
> paint just like JP". It's just that personally I hate that *()
@#&&.
> And a lot of the pretentious horse hockey that goes with being "an
> artist".
>
> A Piece of Work
>
>
> ------------------------ ---------------------
~-->
> Sell a Home with Ease!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/SrPZMC/kTmEAA/jd3IAA/9_IolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-~->
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23553 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!" |
|
.html .htmlThe name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably represents
somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest that
this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
community in the Langued'oc region of France.
Uhhh... true, and though some say that the masonic illuminati's real purpose is to protect the holy bloodline, still others claim that power has been wrested away by satanic lodges, who worship Lucifer as a god, and they, and others are trying to take over the world for their own devilish purposes. What are you thought on this Patrick?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23554 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
.html.html In a message dated 10/22/2002 7:03:52 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
I like the pun on the Power Records episode too!
I must have missed that one.
What was the quote? <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23555 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Oh please! |
.htmlAnother classic PMT posting.
Patrick, read up on modern history and you'll discover a kitten
says "Merou".
Boulle was saying this guy is a pussy.
It also sounds a bit like "merangue", a dessert made from egg
whites. This means Merou is white, and likes eggs.
You are a great competitor in the Conclusions Jump aren't you?
Michael
--- "patrickmichaeltilton" < patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
> --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> > In a message dated 10/19/02 7:03:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
> >
> >
> > > Here's where I "wow" you with my acumen, Rory, and it involves
an
> explication of the meanings of the names of the main character
> (Ulysse) and his "fallen" comrade (Antelle). Antelle comes from the
> Greek word "antelios" (from "anti" + "helios"), meaning "opposite
the
> sun" or "against the sun".
> >
> > The only thing you've "wowed" me with, Patrick, is how much you
> sound like the father in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding"!
> >
> > The name "Ulysse" is the French form of the Latin form (Ulysses--
> actually "Ulixes" in Cassell's dictionary) of the Greek
> name "Odysseus" (of Homer's "Odyssey"); the name Odysseus comes
from
> the Greek word "odyssomai", which means "to be grieved" or "to be
> wroth at".
> >
> > You're a riot, Patrick! Go see the movie and you'll know what I
> mean. By the way, Merou is supposed to mean a grouper, a lowly
> fish. What do you make of the juxtaposition of Ulysse with Merou,
> Patrick?
> >
> > Ulysse--like Ulysses before him--is the type who would eat the
> forbidden fruit, acquiring Knowledge EVEN IF IT GETS HIM KICKED OUT
> OF THE COZY GARDEN/PRISON. Adam was not fully human until he
acquired
> Knowledge, which can ONLY be acquired through rebellion against the
> dictates of a "master" (God, in GENESIS, the "Orthodoxy" in the
Real
> World). Do you get it yet, Rory?
> >
> > Ummmmmm. . . . NO! What is the point here, Patrick? Certainly
not
> the one on your head, so what the hell are you talking about?
> >
> > -- Rory the puzzled
>
> *** "... a grouper, a lowly fish..." Ever read "DUNE", Rory? Paul
> Atreides adopts the name "Muad'dib" which (if I remember correctly)
> means "a little mouse" associated with one of Arrakis' moons (like
> our "Man in the Moon"). Jesus is supposed to be the "Lamb of God"--
> the Paschal lamb which was slaughtered every Passover, its blood
> smeared on the lintel to keep away the Angel of Death.
> Ah, the name "Merou". A fish? Just ANY kind of fish? Read up on
your
> French history, Rory, and you'll discover a bizarre mythic ancestor
> to the ancient line of Frankish kings (pre-dating Charlemagne): the
> half-man/half-fish "Merovech" or "Merovee", the eponymous king who
> founded the Merovingian Dynasty. Read the book "The Holy Blood and
> the Holy Grail" by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, & Henry Lincoln
> for an astounding hypothesis concerning the supposed connection of
> modern day secret societies with the Knights Templar, the
> Merovingians (and the potential restoration of their bloodline to
> power in post-Modern France), and the "Grail" literature, which
some
> interpret as having to do with the Davidic Bloodline... through the
> historical Jesus, and his consort/wife Mary Magdalene.
> The name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
> Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably
represents
> somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
> authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest
that
> this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
> of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
> symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
> the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
> community in the Langued'oc region of France.
> Hmmm... a voyage across the Mediterranean Sea, connecting the Holy
> Land with France... "Merovech" possibly being a symbolic
> representation of the Davidic Bloodline of Christ transplanting
from
> Judea to France (from which the Crusaders marched to reconquer the
> Holy Land from the Saracens)... "Merou" being a voyager through
> the "sea of space" who ultimately seeks to found a bloodline
(through
> Nova & their son, Sirius) which will regain their once-proud
position
> as the "image of God" (etc.)... and the name "Ulysse", based on
> Ulysses/Odysseus, who also endured a long voyage back home to his
> wife Penelope and their son, Telemachus, to throw out the intruding
> suitors...
> THAT is what I make of the "juxtaposition" of Ulysse and Merou, you
> big ape! I think that Boulle knew his French history better than
> what's-his-name who wrote that book about him & his works which you
> got that "grouper" interpretation from (offhand, I can't remember
the
> author or title--I'm sure you'll clue me in). Perhaps Boulle knew a
> little something about the secret society discussed in the books by
> Baigent, Leigh, & Lincoln: the "Prieure de Sion"/"Priory of Zion",
> which allegedly seeks to restore a monarchy to France--an offshoot
> branch of the supposedly-sundered Merovingian Dynasty of old.
> Nostradamus, among other things, has a couple quatrains about
a "half-
> man/half-fish" character... was he, too, making connections with
the
> Merovingian past of France, and their possible survival as a
> Bloodline throughout the Carolingian era and beyond?
>
> This is probably over the heads of most of the other guys on this
> Discussion Board, and I wouldn't deal with it at all if it didn't
> have something to do with the possible intended meanings of the
names
> Boulle gave his characters in "La Planete des Singes".
> And if you can't see the "point" I was getting at, regarding the
> cognitive processes at work in a Ulysses-like mind (as opposed to
> an "anti-helios"/"Antelle"-like mind), then perhaps you're cross-
> eyed, or Marty-Feldman-eyed. Go see an ophthalmologist, pronto!
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
> ------------------------ ---------------------
~-->
> Sell a Home with Ease!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/SrPZMC/kTmEAA/jd3IAA/9_IolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-~->
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23556 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!" |
.htmlOh, T!
You have really opened up a can of boring worms now!
Michael
--- LordTZer0@... wrote:
> The name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
> Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably
represents
> somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
> authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest
that
> this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
> of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
> symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
> the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
> community in the Langued'oc region of France.
>
> Uhhh... true, and though some say that the masonic illuminati's
real purpose
> is to protect the holy bloodline, still others claim that power has
been
> wrested away by satanic lodges, who worship Lucifer as a god, and
they, and
> others are trying to take over the world for their own devilish
purposes.
> What are you thought on this Patrick?
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23557 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
|
.html Dear Michael, I love lots of Aussie's. I like Hugh whats-his-face
and Olivia what's her name. OH ALL RIGHT, YOU'VE CAUGHT ME... where
did you say you are on the map, now? I heard they were going to
rename your home town Kanga-ville.
Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack. You guys
related? Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm
talking about Farrah, aren't I?
Well are you related to Farrah then? Does your hair swish when you
swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head?
Love,
Kassidy <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23558 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
.html.html In a message dated 10/22/02 9:42:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, valwp@... writes:
Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack. You guys
related? Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm
talking about Farrah, aren't I?
Well are you related to Farrah then? Does your hair swish when you
swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head?
Love,
Kassidy
Kassidy, you're a big meanie!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23559 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!" |
.html.html In a message dated 10/22/2002 8:22:56 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
You have really opened up a can of boring worms now!
Yeah, I know. But I can't wait to see just how long a post Patrick can really make. It will resemble the iceberg that sank the Titanic. What you see at the top of the window will only be a fraction of what's hidden beneath. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23560 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
.html"A Tale of Two Planets" is, if my memory is not COMPLETELY shot, the
title of one of the Power Records POTA TV Series stories.
Michael
--- LordTZer0@... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/22/2002 7:03:52 PM Central Standard Time,
> whitty@... writes:
>
> > I like the pun on the Power Records episode too!
> >
>
> I must have missed that one.
> What was the quote?
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23561 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
.html.html In a message dated 10/22/2002 9:05:32 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
"A Tale of Two Planets" is, if my memory is not COMPLETELY shot, the
title of one of the Power Records POTA TV Series stories.
Michael
Actually Mr. Whitty, the name of the story you're thing of is "Battle of Two Worlds."<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23562 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
.html.html In a message dated 10/22/2002 9:05:32 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
"A Tale of Two Planets" is, if my memory is not COMPLETELY shot, the
title of one of the Power Records POTA TV Series stories.
Michael
I better correct my typo here...
Actually Mr. Whitty, the story you're thinking of is "Battle of Two Worlds."<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23563 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Zira-O-Lantern |
| Group: pota |
Message: 23564 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: The Medicoms are in da house! |
.html
.html
Hey, Tower has the Medicoms in, $12.99 each.
Looks like stores are getting the first 2 sets (probably will depend on how
these sell whether they order other sets). I picked up my bro Urko; wouldn't
have bought him at the old price. The ones in this shipment are Cornelius, Zira,
Lucius, Ursus, Urko, TV Soldier, Movie Soldier A (the rare B won't be available;
none of the rare ones will. hang onto them). These may reignite the Ape flame. -
- - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 7:30
AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Der
Affen at it!
In a message dated 10/22/02 7:12:25
AM Eastern Daylight Time, JamesA1102@...
writes:
I would say it's the 20th Century Fox
logo.
Yeah, that's right. That logo wasn't used
until 1973. The BATTLE poster has that logo on it.
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23565 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
.htmlThanks, Matt. There was a freebie magazine here that had the "Banana
Liquier" painting on the cover back in 1999. I sent one to Brian and one to
Booth Colman. Brian said on this very group that he doesn't have the
original Lawgiver. He was outbid. He might have meant Brian Peck of
"Apemania' (and voice of Zauis on the POTA video game). He has the copy made
for Sammy Davis Jr. It's the one at the Chambers tribute and the 30th party.
I've seen some Shag collectibles at Tower (stickers, coasters) but nothing
Apes yet. - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <MTotsky@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
> I've been meaning to post this for awhile.
>
> Is anyone here familiar with the artist Shag? I am a big fan of his
artwork. I love the retro, cartoonish style and subject matter. Apparently
he is an Apes fan because several of his paintings have featured some of our
favorite simians. He had a gallery show here in Detroit last month, which I
attended. I asked him about Apes and he said he has been a big fan since he
was a kid and his favorite character is Zaius. One of the paintings on
display was this piece:
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/drunkcleric.html"
>
> I like the little details on this painting, the fact that the tiki statues
actually look like chimps. I asked how much it was and was told it was not
for sale, that it was already purchased "by the guy who owns the original
Lawgiver statue." I asked if that happened to be Brian from Apemania and was
told that it was. Small world....
>
>
> Here are some other Shag paintings that feature apes:
>
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/Hedonist/trembling.html"
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/Sinners/Zaiusin.html"
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/bananaliq.html"
>
> http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/Tryptich.html"
>
>
> I am curious as to what others on this list think of these. Are they art?
I think so...
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23566 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to ponder |
.html
.html
He's a misanthrope, so he would naturally
assume we destroyed ourselves. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:09
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Something
to ponder
I never thought of this idea, from a message left on
imdb.com. What do you think?
View: thread | flat | inline | nest Prev
Topic | Next
Topic Subject Posted by
Date Taylor Jumping To
Conclusions? *SPOILERS* 
by -
Squrpleboy
(Sat Oct 12 22:56:42) Ignore this
User | Report
Abuse
In the (famous) final scene where
Taylor encounters the decaying, half-buried Statue Of Liberty he drops to his
knees in anguish screaming something to the effect that (amongst other curses)
"they blew it all to Hell". Earlier in the film he stated that it could have
been a natural cataclysm or meteor bombardments that destroyed the geography
of this world. What makes him suddenly realize, or become so sure that it was
MAN that caused the destruction after all? If not for the subsequent sequels
proving him right, I don't know that that is the conclusion he would have
naturally come to, IMO. Any thoughts on this?
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23567 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art |
.htmlHowever, "Brian of Apemania" (Brian Penikas) does collect Shag. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <veetus@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
> Thanks, Matt. There was a freebie magazine here that had the "Banana
> Liquier" painting on the cover back in 1999. I sent one to Brian and one
to
> Booth Colman. Brian said on this very group that he doesn't have the
> original Lawgiver. He was outbid. He might have meant Brian Peck of
> "Apemania' (and voice of Zauis on the POTA video game). He has the copy
made
> for Sammy Davis Jr. It's the one at the Chambers tribute and the 30th
party.
> I've seen some Shag collectibles at Tower (stickers, coasters) but nothing
> Apes yet. - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <MTotsky@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:02 PM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
>
>
> > I've been meaning to post this for awhile.
> >
> > Is anyone here familiar with the artist Shag? I am a big fan of his
> artwork. I love the retro, cartoonish style and subject matter. Apparently
> he is an Apes fan because several of his paintings have featured some of
our
> favorite simians. He had a gallery show here in Detroit last month, which
I
> attended. I asked him about Apes and he said he has been a big fan since
he
> was a kid and his favorite character is Zaius. One of the paintings on
> display was this piece:
> >
> > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/drunkcleric.html"
> >
> > I like the little details on this painting, the fact that the tiki
statues
> actually look like chimps. I asked how much it was and was told it was not
> for sale, that it was already purchased "by the guy who owns the original
> Lawgiver statue." I asked if that happened to be Brian from Apemania and
was
> told that it was. Small world....
> >
> >
> > Here are some other Shag paintings that feature apes:
> >
> >
> > http://www.shag-art.com/Hedonist/trembling.html"
> >
> > http://www.shag-art.com/Sinners/Zaiusin.html"
> >
> > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/bananaliq.html"
> >
> > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/Tryptich.html"
> >
> >
> > I am curious as to what others on this list think of these. Are they
art?
> I think so...
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23568 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Zira-O-Lantern |
.html.html In a message dated 10/22/02 10:17:12 PM Eastern Daylight Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
For those of you who will be attempting a Zira-O-Lantern in the next week here's a site with some tips. PUMPKIN MASTERS - AMERICA'S PUMPKIN CARVING COMPANY
I love baked pumpkin seeds, nice and salty!!! ;)<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23569 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
.html.html In a message dated 10/22/02 10:56:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
Hey, Tower has the Medicoms in, $12.99 each. Looks like stores are getting the first 2 sets (probably will depend on how these sell whether they order other sets). I picked up my bro Urko; wouldn't have bought him at the old price. The ones in this shipment are Cornelius, Zira, Lucius, Ursus, Urko, TV Soldier, Movie Soldier A (the rare B won't be available; none of the rare ones will. hang onto them). These may reignite the Ape flame. - - - Jeff
Well, this is very nice news. Now you can start building up your gorilla army, but as for re-igniting the flame? Why don't we all bend over, stick a bic lighter between our cheeks and let 'em rip?
With all the beers T downs he'll light up all of Texas.
-- Arty Farty
Arty Farty had a party,
everyone in town was there.
Tootie Fruity lit a beauty,
everyone went out for air.
My mother taught me that one.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23570 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
.htmlIn a message dated 10/22/02 11:34:02 PM, Haristas@... writes:
<< Arty Farty had a party,
everyone in town was there.
Tootie Fruity lit a beauty,
everyone went out for air.
My mother taught me that one. >>
That explains alot actually....
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23571 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
.htmlOh yeah talk dirty honey...mmmmm!
Michael
--- Haristas@... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/22/02 9:42:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
valwp@...
> writes:
>
>
> > Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack. You guys
> > related? Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm
> > talking about Farrah, aren't I?
> > Well are you related to Farrah then? Does your hair swish when
you
> > swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head?
> >
> > Love,
> > Kassidy
> >
> >
> >
>
> Kassidy, you're a big meanie!
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23572 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets |
.htmlThanks Mr Cougar. I gotta get some sleep.
Michael
--- mlccougar@... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/22/2002 9:05:32 PM Central Standard Time,
> whitty@... writes:
>
>
> > "A Tale of Two Planets" is, if my memory is not COMPLETELY shot,
the
> > title of one of the Power Records POTA TV Series stories.
> >
> > Michael
>
> I better correct my typo here...
>
> Actually Mr. Whitty, the story you're thinking of is "Battle of Two
Worlds."
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23573 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
.html
.html
The packaging on the domestic Medicoms
are the same, except the originals had a small Medicom flyer/brochure under the
figure's feet that aren't in the new ones. My advice is to keep the originals in
the package. Sounds like small potatoes but "Star Wars" figures can go up $100
or more because of a serial number. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:28
PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The
Medicoms are in da house!
In a message dated 10/22/02
10:56:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@...
writes:
Hey, Tower has the Medicoms in, $12.99 each. Looks like
stores are getting the first 2 sets (probably will depend on how these sell
whether they order other sets). I picked up my bro Urko; wouldn't have
bought him at the old price. The ones in this shipment are Cornelius, Zira,
Lucius, Ursus, Urko, TV Soldier, Movie Soldier A (the rare B won't be
available; none of the rare ones will. hang onto them). These may reignite
the Ape flame. - - - Jeff
Well, this is very nice news. Now you can
start building up your gorilla army, but as for re-igniting the flame?
Why don't we all bend over, stick a bic lighter between our cheeks and let 'em
rip? With all the beers T downs he'll light up all of Texas.
-- Arty
Farty
Arty Farty had a party, everyone in town was there. Tootie
Fruity lit a beauty, everyone went out for air.
My mother taught me
that one.
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23574 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
.htmlUh oh, you said the "al" word! Apologize, Matt, and go home while you
still have a home to go to. I'll put in a good word for you with Rory..
----- Original Message -----
From: <MTotsky@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
>
> In a message dated 10/22/02 11:34:02 PM, Haristas@... writes:
>
> << Arty Farty had a party,
> everyone in town was there.
> Tootie Fruity lit a beauty,
> everyone went out for air.
>
> My mother taught me that one. >>
>
> That explains alot actually....
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23575 |
From: MTotsky@aol.com |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
.htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 12:21:53 AM, veetus@... writes:
<< Uh oh, you said the "al" word! Apologize, Matt, and go home while you
still have a home to go to. I'll put in a good word for you with Rory.. >>
I did that purposely. I know the little things to set Rory off. But you had
to go and blow it for me, didn't you Jeff?
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23576 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Good Night! (OT) |
.htmlI came across a "Newsweek" from last August. It's got a cover story on M.
Night Shyamalan, the director whose metaphysical popcorn pics like "The 6th
Sense" and "Signs" stand toe to toe with the big budget boys. Of 2001, the
year that gave us "POTA2001" he says, "Last year was probably the worst year
for me for moviessince I've been alive. It was the worst. The quality of
movies in general. We don't have to get into specifics. And what that
creates is a starvation in the audience. And, ironically, what THAT creates
is...If they know what they're getting - like a franchise, something
established- the starvation says, "I'll take that. I'll come in droves".
Also included is his list of 10 favorite movies and why. Since we've done
movie lists here, why not?
(No particular order except the first one):
"The Godfather" - - "Best film ever made. End of discussion".
"The Exorcist" - - "Scariest movie ever made".
"Jaws" - - "Balancing act of fear, fun and excitement".
"Raiders of the Lost Ark" - - "Best adventure film ever made" (Night was
offered the chance to write "Indiana Jones 4" and turned it down)
"Silence of the Lambs" - - "Best psychological thriller ever made".
"Rocky" - - "Most inspiring film I've ever seen"
"Dead Poet's Society" - - "The film that best connects with who I am"
"One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" - - "Best dramatic film ever made"
"Star Wars" - - "Best sci-fi film ever made" (D'oh!)
"Psycho" - - "Greatest break in film structure and greatest twist in one
film"
Not exactly shocking choices, eh? Would make a perfect AFI list. But he
makes more money than you do. Actually, he makes more money than your whole
city does. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <MTotsky@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
>
> In a message dated 10/22/02 11:34:02 PM, Haristas@... writes:
>
> << Arty Farty had a party,
> everyone in town was there.
> Tootie Fruity lit a beauty,
> everyone went out for air.
>
> My mother taught me that one. >>
>
> That explains alot actually....
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23577 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house! |
.htmlOh God, Matt! I'm so sorry! Do something else to piss off Rory and I won't
say anything. Ahhh! Now he'll be expecting it! I'm so sorry, Matt. You can
eat your beans with all the ketchup you want, and I won't touch none of it.
G'head! - - - Jeff the Fink
----- Original Message -----
From: <MTotsky@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
>
> In a message dated 10/23/02 12:21:53 AM, veetus@... writes:
>
> << Uh oh, you said the "al" word! Apologize, Matt, and go home while you
> still have a home to go to. I'll put in a good word for you with Rory.. >>
>
> I did that purposely. I know the little things to set Rory off. But you
had
> to go and blow it for me, didn't you Jeff?
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23578 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Medium |
.html
.html
This
article is a little off topic, but it makes a great point about modern movies
and it made me think maybe Apes has a better chance as a TV
Series.
Any
thoughts?
Michael <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23579 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT) |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/02 1:00:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
M. Night Shyamalan
his list of 10 favorite movies and why
"The Godfather" - - "Best film ever made. End of discussion".
"The Exorcist" - - "Scariest movie ever made".
"Jaws" - - "Balancing act of fear, fun and excitement".
"Raiders of the Lost Ark" - - "Best adventure film ever made" (Night was
offered the chance to write "Indiana Jones 4" and turned it down)
"Silence of the Lambs" - - "Best psychological thriller ever made".
"Rocky" - - "Most inspiring film I've ever seen"
"Dead Poet's Society" - - "The film that best connects with who I am"
"One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" - - "Best dramatic film ever made"
"Star Wars" - - "Best sci-fi film ever made" (D'oh!)
"Psycho" - - "Greatest break in film structure and greatest twist in one
film"
A pretty bland list, if you ask me. He's got the same plastic imagination Schpealberg does. Won't be expecting anything great from him. "The Godfather" best film?!!! I was watching some of it the other night, and I've decided that Marlon Brando in it is TERRIBLE!
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23580 |
From: JamesA1102@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz |
.html.html OK can anyone guess where this is from?
 <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23581 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
.htmlKassidy, can't you ever be serious? Love, Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kassidy Rae" <valwp@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:41 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
> Dear Michael, I love lots of Aussie's. I like Hugh whats-his-face
> and Olivia what's her name. OH ALL RIGHT, YOU'VE CAUGHT ME... where
> did you say you are on the map, now? I heard they were going to
> rename your home town Kanga-ville.
>
> Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack. You guys
> related? Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm
> talking about Farrah, aren't I?
> Well are you related to Farrah then? Does your hair swish when you
> swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head?
>
> Love,
> Kassidy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23582 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT) |
.html
.html
They're planning another "Godfather" sequel,
without Puzo. (see www.comingsoon.net ).
And Drew Barrymore is to star in a sequel to "The Wizard of Oz". Crazy town. - -
- Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:35
AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good
Night! (OT)
In a message dated 10/23/02 1:00:50
AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@...
writes:
M. Night Shyamalan his list of 10 favorite movies
and why
"The Godfather" - - "Best film ever made. End of
discussion". "The Exorcist" - - "Scariest movie ever
made". "Jaws" - - "Balancing act of fear, fun and
excitement". "Raiders of the Lost Ark" - - "Best adventure film ever
made" (Night was offered the chance to write "Indiana Jones 4" and turned
it down) "Silence of the Lambs" - - "Best psychological thriller
ever made". "Rocky" - - "Most inspiring film I've ever
seen" "Dead Poet's Society" - - "The film that best connects with
who I am" "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" - - "Best dramatic film
ever made" "Star Wars" - - "Best sci-fi film ever made"
(D'oh!) "Psycho" - - "Greatest break in film structure and greatest
twist in one film" A pretty bland list, if you ask me. He's got the
same plastic imagination Schpealberg does. Won't be expecting anything
great from him. "The Godfather" best film?!!! I was watching some
of it the other night, and I've decided that Marlon Brando in it is
TERRIBLE!
-- Rory
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23583 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz |
.html
.html
I forget which one, but one of the "Star
Wars" films? - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:08
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA
Movie Cap Object Quiz
OK can anyone guess where this is from?
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23584 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi! |
.html--- In pota@y..., "sand_hill_school" <sand_hill_school@y...> wrote:
> It took you long enough to ask....
>
> We are a home school -- a little eccentric, maybe. I would have
changed the moniker, but that is how I signed up with Yahoo! The name
follows me around.
>
>(My phobia is that Patrick is going to start correcting my posts! --
> "Hi Patrick.")
>
> --Helen
*** Is this the face that launched a thousand ships?
Hi, Helen. Don't worry--I learned my "lesson" regarding the
correction of atrocious spelling. Bad spelling is a pet peeve of
mine, one I should think people who READ often enough should also
share. But after pointing out James' spelling errors, he pointed out
(to Michael, not to me directly) that he'd been diagnosed with
dyslexia, which "makes it hard sometimes" (as he said, if I remember
him right). I apologized, since I had no way of knowing of his
dyslexia--and, to be fair to myself, I had been taught that dyslexia
involved a somewhat regular trend of juggling letters around... and
his types of misspellings looked a lot like what I'd seen in merely
infrequent readers/writers. But I apologized for whatever hurt
feelings he may have had, though it doesn't seem as if he's accepted
my apology. The only "correcting" of spelling & grammar I do anymore
is when I reply to somebody: I correct the spelling of what the
original message was prior to responding to it. There were no
misspellings in your message above... although, there SHOULD be a
comma after the word "Hi"... but I'll let it slide. THIS time... :)
By the way, what IS your last name, Helen? I was just guessing above
with "Handbasket" & "Wheels" & "Bakk".
Patrick
>
> --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> > In a message dated 10/19/02 1:24:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > sand_hill_school@y... writes:
> >
> > > Gosh **blush**. You remember me.
> > >
> > > I'm around.
> > >
> > > Helen
> >
> > I've always wondered, Helen, what is the Sand Hill School?
> >
> > -- Rory <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23585 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus! |
.html--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> Since we're on the subject I pulled out the "Starlog" interview
with Burton (the best talk he's given on the subject, including the
DVD commentary, that I've seen or read), and also some quotes
from "The Directors" episode.
> The "Starlog" is #291, October 2001. These are quotes from Burton:
>
> "You would have a better chance of surviving jumping off the
Empire State Building than doing a remake of POTA".
>
> "It's such a classic and it's so much of it's time that there's no
way to simply REMAKE it. Once I realized that's not what the studio
wanted, things started to look possible".
>
> "It's all about reversal. That's what I love about the material;
you're questioning everything. Somehow it's always pulling the rug
out from under you".
>
> "I don't consider (POTA2001) either left or right-wing. To me,
it's more representative of our present fragmented society. Again,
part of what made the first one a classic is that the issues were so
clearly delineated. I could rattle off the issues of the late '60's
in a second. But today's problems aren't as clearly defined.
Globalization, instant access to information - which are good in some
respects - also create a weird kind of fragmentation, and involve
issues that could end up being scary. That's why I threw in so many
cross-references - to portray the way things are now".
>
> "I like people to act like animals. Something about that appeals
to me. I don't know if it's because of the struggle between my
emotional and intellectual life - the primal vs. the intellectual -
which are always at odds with themselves, but I like representations
of animal people".
>
> "The ultimate idea in the POTA mythology is that the apes act
like people and the people act like animals. In our film, you're
looking at an early time where some ape factions want to maintain
their ape-like purity, while others coose to act EXACTLY like humans.
(Thade) supports this purity. Some of the more affluent apes imitate
human behavior...and the humans haven't quite gotten their self-
esteem completely destroyed yet".
>
> "I felt a little something for each character...since the movie
is all about reversals, each character in my mind had a lonely, sad
quality to them - a certain burden to them. I relate to Ari because
she reminds me, in her own culture, of a lost soul, a person who has
strong feelings but hasn't found her place in the world. I call
them 'animal people' - people who respond to animals because they're
sensitive and glean that sensitivity off of animals. There's a
beautiful, sad quality to those people".
>
> "Before movies, people used to listen to weird campfire stories
told by witch doctors. That's what I love about movies - putting
symbols to things so that you can have your own interpretations and
feelings about them, trying to explain the unexplainable or show
things that we all are thinking about or talking about but can come
up with no definitive answer. It's just a beautiful, healthy genre
that way".
>
> OK, "The Directors" series is made by the American Film
Institute and shown on the Encore cable channel (they also regularly
appear on VHS and DVD). Each hour episode profiles a current Ameican
film director with extensive interviews with the subject and actors
who worked with them. The Burton episode looks like it was made
before POTA, since they don't talk about it, but it's been updated
because there's a clip from it and they mention his next movie, "Big
Fish". Here's a few quotes:
>
> Michael Keaton: "He's one of the only people I know, one of the
few people I know, who doesn't HAVE a choice. He just IS an artist.
It's more of a choice for other people. I don't think Tim Burton has
a choice, I think he was born to be an artist. You know, some things
are good, some things are not good, some things are brilliant, some
things are less brilliant, whatever. It all comes from a GENUINELY
artistic, creative source in him.That's just the way it is".
>
> Burton: "I wouldn't know a good script if it bit me in the face. I
really don't think I would. People will say, "Oh, it's a great
script!" and I won't really know. So I've always found that it's
really based on how you feel, and your own personal take on
something. I've often dealt with bad scripts or scripts that aren't
even there, but you get involved because there's something about the
propertyor the energy of it...And I always like to think of it on a
more internal level. Because I find my emotional level is much
clearer than my mental. I find that my mental mind can talk myself in
or out of things (but) if I respond to things on an emotional level
it pretty much stays there".
>
> Keaton: "'Batman' was incredibly difficult and what people don't
realize is...the first 'Batman', you could look at it and say it's
got it's faults, it's not perfect, but I really, really like that
movie. REALLY like that movie; because I KNOW how hard it was to get
that accomplished. And I really like it because it wasn't what
everyone thought it was going to be, and we weren't ever going to
make what everyone thought it was going to be. That wasn't the deal,
so you could've failed. Could've REALLY failed. In a HUGE way. And it
didn't. Not only financially. It just didn't."
>
> Martin Landau: "He's a visionary, and the things that interest him
are things that interest him. And when he has that kind of love for a
piece of material and begins to see it, I know he HAS to see it on a
screen eventually. So he'll fight for it and work towards it and get
it going. And that's terrific. Hollywood...the WORLD needs more
people like that. So, he's an artist working within a system that
tries to confine people or relegate them to certain kinds of things.
And he's refused to allow that to happen to him. And I admire that".
>
> Let's sum up: You hire Burton, you're going to get a Burton
picture, for better or worse. He makes his movies distinctly his,
featuring his concerns and passions. I guess his movies are as close
to art as anyone's. Thanks for your time. - - Patrick M. T.
*** Let it be known throughout all the planet of the talkin' monkeys
that I, Patrick M[ichael]. T[ilton]., did NOT put my imprimatur on
the above passage! Burton's flicks are half-&-half; some I like
("Mars Attacks" & "Sleepy Hollow") and some I'm not all that hyped on
("Batman Returns" & "Planet of the Apes 2K"). Dyslexia, hey, I'll let
that slide... but FORGERY? If we start down that dark road, well, you
don't wanna know what kinds of forgeries I might be capable of! So,
beware, you beast, Veetus, for ye is the Dabble's pawn...
P.M.T. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23586 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Shiny Things |
.html--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> The actual reason the natives took the clothing is probably an
afterthought......the script required Taylor to blend in with the
natives so he needed to be in their garb. The easiest way to do this
was to have some natives steal his clothes.
>
> I'm sure whatever the original reason for suppression of the power
of speech, by then it had degenerated into instinct. Same with the
stealing of clothes, destruction of equipment, etc... Anyone who has
drive through a baboon troop at Lion Country Safari knows that.
*** "... degenerated into instinct." EXACTLY!
Patrick (how's THAT for keepin' it short & sweet?) <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23587 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/02 9:47:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
I forget which one, but one of the "Star Wars" films? - - - Jeff
James, these are too easy. You need to go through sequences a frame at a time to find those ones where you can't really tell what you're looking at. Anyway, this is from the hunt in PLANET. You can see the corn under the horses head on the right. Now, when during the hunt this frame is from is a harder question. At first I thought it might be the two gorillas going after Taylor with their net between them, but I can see that the gorilla horse"man" in the back has one of those poles (whatever they're called), so I don't know. Anyway, thanks for taking the time to capture the frame.

<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23588 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/02 9:39:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
Kassidy, can't you ever be serious? Love, Jeff
Yeah, she never ever talks POTA. All she ever does is just make with the wisecracks! What's her problem?<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23589 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT) |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/02 9:43:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
They're planning another "Godfather" sequel, without Puzo. (see www.comingsoon.net ). And Drew Barrymore is to star in a sequel to "The Wizard of Oz". Crazy town. - - - Jeff
Yeah, I know, O Lord High and Mighty, but why am I not very excited?<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23590 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/02 11:24:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
But after pointing out James' spelling errors, he pointed out
(to Michael, not to me directly) that he'd been diagnosed with
dyslexia, which "makes it hard sometimes" (as he said, if I remember
him right).
Patrick
And you believed that? HA! James is a fibber! If he's dyslexic it must be maps that he sees backwards! HA! HA! HA! (James, you monkey poop, you!)
Anyway, I'm a terrible speller, and so I try to make sure everything is correct before I push "send," but sometimes I miss things. So that's why I've corrected others in the past AND WILL CONTINUE YOU TO! If I take the trouble others can too, especially those who think "a lot" is one work.
-- Rory (who checked his spelling and found he forgot the r in everything! [that's the word everything, not every word with an r in it])<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23591 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/02 11:35:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** Let it be known throughout all the planet of the talkin' monkeys
that I, Patrick M[ichael]. T[ilton]., did NOT put my imprimatur on
the above passage! Burton's flicks are half-&-half; some I like
("Mars Attacks" & "Sleepy Hollow") and some I'm not all that hyped on
("Batman Returns" & "Planet of the Apes 2K"). Dyslexia, hey, I'll let
that slide... but FORGERY? If we start down that dark road, well, you
don't wanna know what kinds of forgeries I might be capable of! So,
beware, you beast, Veetus, for ye is the Dabble's pawn...
P.M.T.
Patrick
Has it ever occurred to you, Patrick, that maybe if you did fool around a little you might be more interesting? But then you've rarely displayed much of an appreciation for mocking as a form of endearment, you stinker!
Anyway, "Mars Attacks"?!!! Yikes! That movie stinks! It's not as boring as POTA 2K, but it's bad just the same.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23592 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
.html--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> It's kinda funny.
> Everyone sounds like Cylones.
> I love the way the themes are explained at a child's level.
> Patrick should watch these. Even his giant brain couldn't
> misconstrue them. But I'm sure he'll say the writers meant
> something else.
*** Cylones? You mean the 'Cylons' from BATTLESTAR GALACTICA?
As for the "Return" series, I didn't get mine from James; I ordered a
set of both the live-action TV show and the animated show from some
guy on Ebay... paid around $50.00 for 'em. Just half a year prior to
the TV show being released on DVD! Drat!
When I was a 10/11-year-old kid watching "Return" on TV, in its
original airing, I wasn't all that impressed with it. It's easier to
animate cars and airplanes than to animate horses... so they went the
cheap route and modernized Ape City, without changing the clothing
styles, though! I don't HATE it, though; they DID try to do a little
bit of surreptitious commentary on the real world in it. Urko,
according to Eric Greene's book, was evocative of Nixon in some ways.
He had "enemies" (like Breck's "Achilles List" a la Nixon's "enemies
list") and wanted to escalate a war against the "third-world humans"
like Nixon in Vietnam.
But, for the LIFE of me, I still don't know that the f*ck they meant
when they referred to "Dr. Stanton's theory of Time Thrust"... WHAT?
Sounds like just a bunch of pseudoscientific gobbledygook; why not
just drag out "Dr Hasslein's theory of Time in a vehicle travelling
nearly the speed of light"? As long as we're talking about Relativity
then I don't have a problem with it--it's the most plausible way
to "jump" a protagonist (or 3) into the Future. But "Time Thrust"?
What is that supposed to be?
Patrick
P.S. My brain isn't as giant as the Gestalt mutants B-1 (etc.) in
Marvel's "TERROR" series. Sometimes Rory gives me a headache that
feels like it could fill such a volume of grey matter, though... <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23593 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/02 12:05:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Sometimes Rory gives me a headache that
feels like it could fill such a volume of grey matter, though...
GOOD!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23594 |
From: sand_hill_school |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
.html--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> -- Rory (who checked his spelling and found he forgot the r in
everything!
> [that's the word everything, not every word with an r in it])
Hi, Rory.
That was funny. Since I have been posting directly to the board, I
have found myself checking my writing less carefully. So those of
you with red ink pens should have a field day with my posts.
--Helen <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23595 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Two-Minute Warning |
.html.html Hey, with all the horrible stuff going on up in a certain area of the country, has anybody else here ever seen this Chuck Heston movie from the seventies? It's not great, but it's not bad either. I haven't seen it in years, so I just picked up a used copy on Amazon.
By the way, have you noticed that the "certain area" where current events are happening is the same area where I say the astronauts crossed the Forbidden Zone in PLANET? Maybe this nut was one of the lurkers here and James and I set him off with our arguing. It's all your fault, James!
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23596 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
.htmlPlease stop calling me a liar.
--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> And you believed that? HA! James is a fibber! If he's dyslexic
it must be
> maps that he sees backwards! HA! HA! HA! (James, you monkey
poop, you!) <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23597 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Shiny Things |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/02 12:10:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** "... degenerated into instinct." EXACTLY!
Patrick (how's THAT for keepin' it short & sweet?)
Isn't that what I was trying to get at? I thought I was, anyway.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23598 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/02 12:19:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, JamesA1102@... writes:
Please stop calling me a liar.
Okay, Mr. There's-a-helicopter-in-PLANET!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23599 |
From: sand_hill_school |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi! |
.html--- In pota@y..., "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
wrote:
> *** Is this the face that launched a thousand ships?
> Hi, Helen.
Hi, Patrick.
I'm old, but I'm probably not quite old enough to be THAT Helen.
--Helen <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23600 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Secret Governments on the Planet of the Apes |
.html--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> The name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably represents
somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest that
this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
community in the Langued'oc region of France.
>
> Uhhh... true, and though some say that the masonic illuminati's
real purpose is to protect the holy bloodline, still others claim
that power has been wrested away by satanic lodges, who worship
Lucifer as a god, and they, and others are trying to take over the
world for their own devilish purposes.
> What are your thoughts on this, Patrick?
*** Our current President, George W. Bush, is a member of the "Skull-
&-Bones" society, just like his daddy was. Those who contend that the
people who tend to acquire positions of enormous power GET that power
by being affiliated with the behind-the-scenes "elite" of secret
societies... there's probably something to it. I've voted for the
Libertarian candidates the last several elections, not because I
thought they had a snowball's chance in Hell of winning, but because
it seems as if the two "choices" we usually get are really getting
money from the same core groups of financial supporters. It takes
MONEY and MEDIA EXPOSURE in order to be a contender in big-time
politics; Perot had his own money, and somehow got the media exposure
to become a "player", but he lost anyway.
As for any possible "satanic" lodges taking over other secret
societies, well, I don't know. People keep secrets for a number of
reasons; sometimes, the Truth has to be kept secret (as Zaius does),
to serve the "better interests" of Society. Sometimes, like in a time
of war, information has to be "classified" lest the Enemy take
advantage of it and win the war. Is the "Priory of Zion" really
keeping a lid on the "true" history of Jesus, concerning an alleged
marriage to Mary Magdalene & the begetting of his dynastic heir,
a "grail" child? Who knows? Well, the "Ones" keeping the secret do...
Frankly, my brand of Americanism is founded on the principles by
which America was founded: that Governments exist NOT by any "divine
right" (as it was all over the world, in 1776) but by the consent of
the governed--the People. The People have a right to establish a
government in order to further their own Rights to Life, Liberty,
Property, Privacy, Pursuit-of-Happiness, etc. The People also have a
right to abolish their government if it has failed to secure those
rights. Jefferson thought it likely that every so often there would
be another Revolutionary war--that the People (Americans) would put
their foot down and "run the bastards outta town" if they attempted
to establish any form of tyranny over them. In the last 10 years or
so, we've seen the Waco tragedy, the Ruby Ridge massacre, etc. and
these abuses of power by the Federal government directly led to
McVeigh's decision to commit mass-murder in Oklahoma City. I hope
that those in positions of power think twice before allowing BATF
types to trample on the rights of the citizens of this nation, since
the backlash against it can be horrific. I don't agree with what
McVeigh did, but it can be thought of as an inevitable response from
the fringe against the monolithic State.
The alleged "holy" bloodline of Jesus, the "grail dynasty"--even if
it DOES exist--never HAD, does NOT have, and never WILL have
the "divine right" to exercise Rule over ANYBODY. Monarchism is
bullshit. Queen Liz II may be a nice lady, but she doesn't "rule" as
Regina Dei Gratia ("Queen by the Grace of God"). There IS no "god" up
in hebbin who grants to favored families the "right" to control other
people. The geniuses who founded America ridiculed this notion
(Thomas Paine, in particular), contending that the People's "creator"
(call it/him "god" or "Jehovah" or "Jesus" or "Allah" or mere NATURE)
gave ALL men (i.e. humans) EQUAL RIGHTS, including the right to
establish a government to serve THEIR interests, not to be the
vassals of a "king" whose interests THEY had to serve.
If the so-called "Grail" heir is reading this... wise up, pal, and
forget that old-hat nonsense. You aren't "special" and deserving of a
place on any throne.
Just to put in a POTA tie-in, here, this is one of the reasons that
BATTLE is an important work in the Saga. At the end of CONQUEST,
Caesar rants to MacDonald & the overthrown Breck that "we [the Apes]
shall found our own armies, our own religion, our own dynasty", and
in BATTLE the dynastic family of Caesar, Lisa, and Cornelius has been
established. For the first time since July 3rd, 1776, a monarchic
form of government rules over (at least a part of) America. Yet by
the end of the film, the heir to the throne is dead; what of Caesar's
monarchic ambitions then? What if Lisa is past the age of child-
bearing? What if there is no blood-heir to Caesar's throne?
MacDonald, in BATTLE, wants his own people to work towards its own
destiny, as EQUALS with Caesar's simian community. Will that be
possible under a monarchy? What sort of government is the best-
equipped to safeguard the inalienable rights of the individual, be
he/she a Man or an Ape?
I think it is a "republican form of government" (Art. IV, Section 4
of the U.S. Constitution) which works the best [by "republican" I do
NOT necessarily mean one comprised of those in the "Republican
Party", since many of them aren't true "republicans"]. A "limited"
government OF/BY/FOR the People, which they can abolish if they so
choose, if it fails to work the way it should. But Caesar is caught
up in the "dichotomy" between HUMAN history and APE history (which
has only just started to be "written", of course)... although the
murder of his son by Aldo symbolically has made the Apes "join the
human race" as MacDonald says.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23601 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Oh please! |
.html--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Another classic PMT posting.
>
> Patrick, read up on modern history and you'll discover a kitten
> says "Merou".
>
> Boulle was saying this guy is a pussy.
>
> It also sounds a bit like "merangue", a dessert made from egg
> whites. This means Merou is white, and likes eggs.
>
> You are a great competitor in the Conclusions Jump aren't you?
>
> Michael
*** Mike, you do NOT want to know what I've concluded about you!
If Boulle were alive today, maybe he'd "clue us in" on any meanings
he may have had regarding the names of his characters. Since he's
dead, and since I can read and make conclusions all by my lonesome,
then I do so. So what? There are those (Dominic Crossan, for one, I
believe) who think that the naming of Jesus' betrayer as "Judas" was
an intention antisemitic addition to the pseudohistorical story told
as "gospel". The name "Judas" is just another form of "Judah", the
eponymous founder of the line of "yehudim"/"Jews", one of the 12 sons
of Jacob/Israel. Thus, "Judah"/"Judas" stands for ALL Jews... and the
one disciple with this name is the villain in the story. What's in a
name? It seems, ONE HELL OF A LOT!
I think comparing/contrasting the name "Merou" with the
ancient "Merovech" (a name a Frenchman might be familiar with, if
most others weren't) is valid. The "fish" connection doesn't just end
there, though. Jesus wanted his disciples to be "fishers of men", and
the symbol of the Fish was a Christian symbol before the Cross was.
The Greek word for fish ["Ichthys"] is also an acronym for "Iesous
CHristos THeou hUiou Soter": "Jesus Christ, of God the Son, Savior".
A descendant of "Ichthys"/Jesus might very well be portrayed as a
half-fish/half-man character. And this "Merovech" character who
arrived at Marseilles in southern Gaul/France, has a name which
Boulle mysteriously echoes with his "Ulysse MEROU" character.
There's a difference between "jumping to conclusions" and seeing
obvious and not-too-obvious parallelisms between different sets of
data.
Patrick
P.S. The naming of "Jesus" is also quite interesting. Linguistically,
it is no different than the name "Joshua", the successor of Moses,
who led the Israelites across the Jordan river and committed mass-
murder against the Canaanites in order to settle the land that
Jehovah had "promised" to their ancestor, Abraham. Joshua's full name
is "Joshua-ben-Nun", Joshua the son of Nun. The word "nun" in Hebrew
means FISH. The letter "nun" in the Hebrew alphabet has a gematria
value of "50", and the father of the "Noah" character from Babylonian
mythology had a name which meant "the number fifty", which would make
Joshua/Jesus a "son of the Fish", a "son of 50", and a Noah-figure
(in whose ship the few survivors of God's judgment will be...) all in
one. The half-man/half-fish "god" named Oannes, according to the
Babylonian myth-historian Berossus, was the one who instructed
Ziusudra (the Babylonian Noah/Utnapishtim) to build the ark. The
duration of the "first age" (the time between the First Man/King and
the Flood) was said to be 432,000 years; the Biblical chronology (in
the Masoretic text) has it at 1,656 years, and both durations are
tied in with the computations of the great cycle of the Precession of
the Equinoxes, thought to be 25,920 years. Every single year, the
Earth precesses (wobbles like a top) back along the Ecliptic fifty
arc-seconds, amounting to 72 years per arc-degree, or 2,160 years (on
average) through each of the Zodiacal "Ages". The Age of Taurus ended
about 2000 B.C., which is why Bull-worship faded away, and the Age of
Aries led to the Ram-gods (and the Lamb); the "Christian" Era,
the "Age of Pisces" we're now in has immense significance for
astrology afficionados... and the up-coming "Age of Aquarius" is just
on the horizon. The "Water Bearer" is set to pour out water (the last
judgment of God, as "in the days of Noah"?) upon the Earth, like
the "bowls of wrath" mentioned in "Revelation". The number of
the "saved" in Revelation, 12,000 from each of the 12 tribes of
Israel, amounts to 144,000 people, which is exactly one-third of
432,000, the # of years Berossus gave for the "First Age" of Man. The
Hebrew number, 1,656 years amounts to 86,400 weeks (the same number
of seconds in a day): 86,400 times 7 divided by 365.2422 equals
1655.887518... the "leap" days have to be "fudged" a bit, but this is
how it all ties together mathematically, folks.
Curiously, it is during the transition from the Age of Pisces to the
Age of Aquarius (sometime around the 27th century) when Mankind on
Earth reverts to an animal, while Ulysse Merou is off on his voyage
there-and-back-again to Soror/Betelgeuse. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23602 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, |
.html--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/23/02 11:35:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
>
>
> > *** Let it be known throughout all the planet of the talkin'
monkeys that I, Patrick M[ichael]. T[ilton]., did NOT put my
imprimatur on the above passage! Burton's flicks are half-&-half;
some I like ("Mars Attacks" & "Sleepy Hollow") and some I'm not all
that hyped on ("Batman Returns" & "Planet of the Apes 2K"). Dyslexia,
hey, I'll let that slide... but FORGERY? If we start down that dark
road, well, you don't wanna know what kinds of forgeries I might be
capable of! So, beware, you beast, Veetus, for ye is the Dabble's
pawn...
> >
> > P.M.T.
> Patrick
>
> Has it ever occurred to you, Patrick, that maybe if you did fool
around a little you might be more interesting? But then you've
rarely displayed much of an appreciation for mocking as a form of
endearment, you stinker!
>
> Anyway, "Mars Attacks"?!!! Yikes! That movie stinks! It's not
as boring as POTA 2K, but it's bad just the same.
>
> -- Rory
*** I thought "Mars Attacks" was a laff-riot. I can remember those
commercials from the 70's of Slim Whitman records allegedly out-
selling the Beatles (!). Where? What backwater hick-country in
Alabammy sold more 45's of Slim than of the Fab Four? The idea that
those yodeling monstrosities are the only way to kill off the
Martians had me screaming with laughter. I admit, I was only one of a
few in the theater who "got" that joke... but, still!
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23603 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1389 |
.html
pota@yahoogroups.com wrote:
------------------------ ---------------------~--> Home Selling? Try Us! http://us.click.yahoo.com/QrPZMC/iTmEAA/jd3IAA/9_IolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
There are 25 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Medium From: "Michael Whitty" 2. Re: Good Night! (OT) From: Haristas@... 3. Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz From: JamesA1102@... 4. Re: Re: Apes in Art From: 5. Re: Good Night! (OT) From: 6. Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz From: 7. Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi! From: "patrickmichaeltilton" 8. Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus! From: "patrickmichaeltilton" 9. Re: Shiny Things From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
10. Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz From: Haristas@... 11. Re: Re: Apes in Art From: Haristas@... 12. Re: Good Night! (OT) From: Haristas@... 13. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk...... From: Haristas@... 14. Re: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus! From: Haristas@... 15. Re: "Return" Tape From: "patrickmichaeltilton" 16. Re: "Return" Tape From: Haristas@... 17. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk...... From: "sand_hill_school" 18. Two-Minute Warning From: Haristas@... 19. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk...... From: "james611102" 20. Re: Shiny Things From: Haristas@... 21. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk...... From: Haristas@... 22. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi! From: "sand_hill_school"
23. Secret Governments on the Planet of the Apes From: "patrickmichaeltilton" 24. Re: Oh please! From: "patrickmichaeltilton" 25. Re: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus! From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:18:12 +1000 From: "Michael Whitty" Subject: Medium
This article is a little off topic, but it makes a great point about modern movies and it made me think maybe Apes has a better chance as a TV Series.
http://users.cyberone.com.au/whitty/LawandOrder.jpg
Any thoughts?
Michael
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
"Dead Poet's Society" - - "The film that best connects with who I am" "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" - - "Best dramatic film ever made" "Star Wars" - - "Best sci-fi film ever made" (D'oh!) "Psycho" - - "Greatest break in film structure and greatest twist in one film"
A pretty bland list, if you ask me. He's got the same plastic imagination Schpealberg does. Won't be expecting anything great from him. "The Godfather" best film?!!! I was watching some of it the other night, and I've decided that Marlon Brando in it is TERRIBLE!
-- Rory
[This message contained attachments]
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:08:50 EDT From: JamesA1102@...
Subject: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
OK can anyone guess where this is from? [Unable to display image]
[This message contained attachments]
Message: 4 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:40:05 -0700 From: Subject: Re: Re: Apes in Art
Kassidy, can't you ever be serious? Love, Jeff
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kassidy Rae" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:41 PM Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
> Dear Michael, I love lots of Aussie's. I like Hugh whats-his-face > and Olivia what's her name. OH ALL RIGHT, YOU'VE CAUGHT ME... where > did you say you are on the map, now? I heard they were going to > rename your home town Kanga-ville. >
> Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack. You guys > related? Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm > talking about Farrah, aren't I? > Well are you related to Farrah then? Does your hair swish when you > swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head? > > Love, > Kassidy > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message: 5 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:44:26 -0700 From: Subject: Re: Good Night! (OT)
They're planning another "Godfather" sequel, without Puzo. (see www.comingsoon.net ). And Drew Barrymore is to star in a sequel to "The Wizard of Oz". Crazy town. - - - Jeff
Message: 6 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:48:30 -0700 From: Subject: Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
I forget which one, but one of the "Star Wars" films? - - - Jeff
----- Original Message ----- From: JamesA1102@... To: pota@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:08 AM Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
OK can anyone guess where this is from?
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[This message contained attachments]
Message: 7 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:15:18 -0000 From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
with "Handbasket" & "Wheels" & "Bakk".
Patrick
> > --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote: > > In a message dated 10/19/02 1:24:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > > sand_hill_school@y... writes: > > > > > Gosh **blush**. You remember me. > > > > > > I'm around. > > > > > > Helen > > > > I've always wondered, Helen, what is the Sand Hill School? > > > > -- Rory
Message: 8 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:33:08 -0000 From: "patrickmichaeltilton" Subject: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
--- In pota@y..., wrote:
Message: 10 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:38:38 EDT From: Haristas@... Subject: Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
In a message dated 10/23/02 9:47:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
> I forget which one, but one of the "Star Wars" films? - - - Jeff > >
James, these are too easy. You need to go through sequences a frame at a time to find those ones where you can't really tell what you're looking at. Anyway, this is from the hunt in PLANET. You can see the corn under the horses head on the right. Now, when during the hunt this frame is from is a harder question. At first I thought it might be the two gorillas going after Taylor with their net between them, but I can see that the gorilla horse"man"
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23604 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Pota serious stuff |
.htmlThere have been a couple of questions as to why I am always joking and a complaint that I don't talk POTA. When I first asked a couple POTA questions to the group in general, I didn't get replies. It took you guys months (for the most part) to even profess the SLIGHTEST interest in my pota tv web site.
Don't get me wrong, we've been down this road and discussed that before. I am merely making a point. I could care less.
Now I don't discuss the minute details of WHY they did this or that in POTA because I think for the most part the writers and producers, etc. did not for the most part give a big hairy WHY. Mostly, if you've found an inconsistency, it's because it is a screw-up. I enjoy the movies, and probably will always. I still have a child-like view of them. But I don't disect it too much. I don't believe in fighting over it. I just love it. I don't know a lot about sci-fi, and I can't tell you shit about the difference between sf and sci-fi.
I read most of your posts here. I rarely watch tv anymore. But the posts keep the movies alive for me.
I'm busy with the children you know, and I'm writing something for a start up business selling e-books that is due to open up probably at the end of the year. I make my choices.
Now I am being serious, and I am talking POTA. Does anyone want me to share my point of view on anything particular in POTA?
Yours eternally,
Kassidy Rae
PS My opinion is, IT'S NOT CIRCULAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23605 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/2002 11:05:51 AM Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** Cylones? You mean the 'Cylons' from BATTLESTAR GALACTICA?
Yes, and I am dslexic. so climb off my back! <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23606 |
From: james611102 |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel |
.htmlGive me a break. You always seem to forget that I emailed you
immediately to let you know I was just kidding.
--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
>
> Okay, Mr. There's-a-helicopter-in-PLANET! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23607 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Secret Governments on the Planet of the Ap |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/2002 12:01:33 PM Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** Our current President, George W. Bush, is a member of the "Skull-
&-Bones" society, just like his daddy was.
Old news Pat. His Skull & Bones nickname is "Temporary" BTW. Sort of ominous considering the times we live in. And both he and Bogey are related to Princess Di for you trivia buffs. As for Elizabeth's divine right to rule. No way. The Windsor's are a bunch of krauts. And before that they virtually wiped the Stuart's from the face of the earth. So if a pack of murdering bastards have a divine right it must come from Satan. Anyway, God is so much more subtle than the 'Man on the Cloud with the white beard' ideal. He's not readily visible but He's there. You have to look at the Big Picture. Tough for a non-theist like yourself Patrick, I know, being so caught up in minutia. It's sort of like one of those eye puzzles. You see Him someday. Whether in the simplicity of the atom or the clockwork complexity of the universe. It reminds me of something
Dave Vainian of The Damned quoted, "Beauty isn't something you see with your eyes. It's something you hunger for with your heart." <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23608 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Oh please! |
|
.html .html
And Patrick thinks that his ability to make these connection is a simple result of genetics end evolution. You may as well say Luck! WHAT IS THE GRAIL? WHOM DOES IT SERVE?<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23609 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... |
.htmlIn all fairness I don't think a lot of us have the time or
inclination to use a spellcheck - I often use a server and CAN'T use
a spellcheck.
I post straight from the heart and that means I write it down and
fire it off. Sometimes the result is a spelling error, and sometimes
a potentially incredibly embarrassing mistake such as that I made
yesterday (muddling up the name of a Power Records track).
With the spelling, I still don't see why, so long as it is clear what
the sender is communicating, anyone should feel they need to correct
that spelling.
With the mistake I made yesterday, Mr Cougar corrected me and I
appreciate that. There was a genuine communication problem if the
correction did not take place. Thankfully nobody made any nasty
comments to make me feel any sillier than I already do...again, what
would be the point? I erred, it was corrected, I realised and on we
went.
I believe we all should feel safe to fire off a post without too much
research - are we a group of academics or a "bunch" of ape fans?
Any idiot can sit down for two days with a dictionary and a few
research books and write something that nobody understands (and
therefore nobody bothers with). The challenge is to COMMUNICATE.
Not to bamboozle. To bamboozle is usually and attempt to establish
false authority.
Michael
--- Haristas@... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/23/02 11:24:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
>
>
> > But after pointing out James' spelling errors, he pointed out
> > (to Michael, not to me directly) that he'd been diagnosed with
> > dyslexia, which "makes it hard sometimes" (as he said, if I
remember
> > him right).
>
> Patrick
>
>
> And you believed that? HA! James is a fibber! If he's dyslexic
it must be
> maps that he sees backwards! HA! HA! HA! (James, you monkey poop,
you!)
>
> Anyway, I'm a terrible speller, and so I try to make sure
everything is
> correct before I push "send," but sometimes I miss things. So
that's why
> I've corrected others in the past AND WILL CONTINUE YOU TO! If I
take the
> trouble others can too, especially those who think "a lot" is one
work.
>
> -- Rory (who checked his spelling and found he forgot the r in
everything!
> [that's the word everything, not every word with an r in it])
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23610 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Medium |
|
.html .html
I can't read the article from The Cucaberra Times. Can you use a OCR program on your scan?<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23611 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... |
.html.html In a message dated 10/23/2002 6:07:31 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
In all fairness I don't think a lot of us have the time or
inclination to use a spellcheck
I use it, but even my spellcheck can't spell Cylons. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 23612 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 10/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1389 |
.htmlWhat the...?????
--- Kassidy Rae < valwp@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> There are 25 messages in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. Medium
> From: "Michael Whitty"
> 2. Re: Good Night! (OT)
> From: Haristas@...
> 3. Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
> From: JamesA1102@...
> 4. Re: Re: Apes in Art
> From:
> 5. Re: Good Night! (OT)
> From:
> 6. Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
> From:
> 7. Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
> From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
>
> 8. Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
> From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
>
> 9. Re: Shiny Things
> From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
>
> 10. Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
> From: Haristas@...
> 11. Re: Re: Apes in Art
> From: Haristas@...
> 12. Re: Good Night! (OT)
> From: Haristas@...
> 13. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
> From: Haristas@...
> 14. Re: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
> From: Haristas@...
> 15. Re: "Return" Tape
> From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
>
> 16. Re: "Return" Tape
> From: Haristas@...
> 17. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
> From: "sand_hill_school"
> 18. Two-Minute Warning
> From: Haristas@...
> 19. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
> From: "james611102"
> 20. Re: Shiny Things
> From: Haristas@...
> 21. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
> From: Haristas@...
> 22. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
> From: "sand_hill_school"
> 23. Secret Governments on the Planet of the Apes
> From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
>
> 24. Re: Oh please!
> From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
>
> 25. Re: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
> From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
>
>
>
>
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
__________
<.html
|
|
|
|