Yahoo! pota group — Messages 23513–23612

Dates: 2002-10-21 through 2002-10-23

Messages in pota group. Page 236 of 764.
Index Prev  Next


Group: pota Message: 23513 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check these out!
Group: pota Message: 23514 From: sand_hill_school Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: To be art, or not to be art
Group: pota Message: 23515 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check these out!
Group: pota Message: 23516 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: To Market, To Market. . .to buy a fat Turkey!
Group: pota Message: 23517 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art?
Group: pota Message: 23518 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The mini busts
Group: pota Message: 23519 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23520 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Arty Farty
Group: pota Message: 23521 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23522 From: thypentacle Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23523 From: Michael Whitty Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Reproduced Mona Lisa with Moustache
Group: pota Message: 23524 From: james611102 Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23525 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art?
Group: pota Message: 23526 From: kidro85@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23527 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Arty Farty
Group: pota Message: 23528 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23529 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: More where that came from (OT)
Group: pota Message: 23530 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Der Affen at it!
Group: pota Message: 23531 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23532 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23533 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23534 From: james611102 Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23535 From: james611102 Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: Der Affen at it!
Group: pota Message: 23536 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Der Affen at it!
Group: pota Message: 23537 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: A Tale of Two Planets
Group: pota Message: 23538 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23539 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Apes IS art!
Group: pota Message: 23540 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: A thingy to ponder
Group: pota Message: 23541 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes IS art!
Group: pota Message: 23542 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Something to ponder
Group: pota Message: 23543 From: Ken and Heather Taylor Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23544 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23545 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23546 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
Group: pota Message: 23547 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23548 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art?
Group: pota Message: 23549 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
Group: pota Message: 23550 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to ponder
Group: pota Message: 23551 From: ynwzjrpdlcdz Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: new pictures uploaded...
Group: pota Message: 23552 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23553 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
Group: pota Message: 23554 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
Group: pota Message: 23555 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Oh please!
Group: pota Message: 23556 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
Group: pota Message: 23557 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23558 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23559 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
Group: pota Message: 23560 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
Group: pota Message: 23561 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
Group: pota Message: 23562 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
Group: pota Message: 23563 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Zira-O-Lantern
Group: pota Message: 23564 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: The Medicoms are in da house!
Group: pota Message: 23565 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23566 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to ponder
Group: pota Message: 23567 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23568 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Zira-O-Lantern
Group: pota Message: 23569 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
Group: pota Message: 23570 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
Group: pota Message: 23571 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23572 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
Group: pota Message: 23573 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
Group: pota Message: 23574 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
Group: pota Message: 23575 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
Group: pota Message: 23576 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Good Night! (OT)
Group: pota Message: 23577 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
Group: pota Message: 23578 From: Michael Whitty Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Medium
Group: pota Message: 23579 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT)
Group: pota Message: 23580 From: JamesA1102@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
Group: pota Message: 23581 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23582 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT)
Group: pota Message: 23583 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
Group: pota Message: 23584 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
Group: pota Message: 23585 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
Group: pota Message: 23586 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Shiny Things
Group: pota Message: 23587 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
Group: pota Message: 23588 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
Group: pota Message: 23589 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT)
Group: pota Message: 23590 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
Group: pota Message: 23591 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME,
Group: pota Message: 23592 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23593 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23594 From: sand_hill_school Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
Group: pota Message: 23595 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Two-Minute Warning
Group: pota Message: 23596 From: james611102 Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
Group: pota Message: 23597 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Shiny Things
Group: pota Message: 23598 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
Group: pota Message: 23599 From: sand_hill_school Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
Group: pota Message: 23600 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Secret Governments on the Planet of the Apes
Group: pota Message: 23601 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: Oh please!
Group: pota Message: 23602 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME,
Group: pota Message: 23603 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1389
Group: pota Message: 23604 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Pota serious stuff
Group: pota Message: 23605 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
Group: pota Message: 23606 From: james611102 Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
Group: pota Message: 23607 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Secret Governments on the Planet of the Ap
Group: pota Message: 23608 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Oh please!
Group: pota Message: 23609 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels...
Group: pota Message: 23610 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Medium
Group: pota Message: 23611 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels...
Group: pota Message: 23612 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/23/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1389



Group: pota Message: 23513 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check these out!
.html
In a message dated 10/20/2002 10:28:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, <veetus@...> writes:

<<If they can put out new "Dark Crystal" action figures now then "Apes" is far from dead. And "Hogan's Heroes" action figures? >>

The Hogan figure should come with a a betamax machine and a tripod.

Matt
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23514 From: sand_hill_school Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: To be art, or not to be art
.html
--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/21/02 11:03:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> sand_hill_school@y... writes:
>
>
> > Ok... And was Mozart an artist? Or a genius?
> >
> > If genius begets art.... Is the doomsday bomb art?
> >
> > --Helen
>
> I think MozART was both, and NO I don't think the doomsday bomb was
art, but
> I guess if you found the prop, fixed it up, put it in an art
gallery, then
> some sucker would buy it as an art piece.
>
> Maybe art is just bullsh*t? Modern art seems to be to most.
>
> -- Rory

Agreed. However, according to the National Endowment for the Arts
site http://www.nea.gov/artforms/ they consider the following things
art for the purpose of providing government grants:

Dance
Design
Film, Television, Radio and New Media
Folk & Traditional Arts
Literature
Multidisciplinary Arts
Music
Musical Theater
Opera
Presenting (?)
Theater
Visual Arts

Maybe modern art is determined more by a person's ability to be self-
promoting.

--Helen
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23515 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check these out!
.html
.htmlIn a message dated 10/21/02 11:15:30 AM Eastern Daylight Time, MTotsky@... writes:


The Hogan figure should come with a betamax machine and a tripod.

Matt


AAAAHHHHH!!!! HA! HA! HA! HA!
<.html
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23516 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: To Market, To Market. . .to buy a fat Turkey!
.html
.html
Hey, maybe the studios will begin to wise up.  I wonder how much it cost to market POTA2001?  I'll bet the profit margin on APES was so much less than what Fox had hoped that's why nobody is talking sequel.

To Market, To Market -- To Buy a Fat Pig in a Poke?
Marketing experts have begun questioning the wisdom of studio promotional campaigns which often cost more than the films earn at the box office, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday. "It is obscene," Peter Sealey, a marketing professor at UC Berkeley who headed marketing at Columbia in the mid-1980s, told the Times. "There's no excuse for the consistent overspending ... it's close to corporate fraud." The newspaper pointed out that Columbia spent $50 million to promote its $120-million Stuart Little 2
, which grossed $63 million. When MGM's $110-million Windtalkers opened poorly, it noted, the studio's marketing department allocated millions of dollars for "emergency marketing." It didn't work. The film grossed just $41 million, or $1 million less than it cost to market. In 10 years, the Times pointed out, marketing costs for the average movie have risen from $12 million to $31 million.



<.html
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23517 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art?
.html
Rory <Haristas@...> wrote:
> I've been thinking some more about this. Just because something
entertains
> you and you think it's good doesn't mean it's art. I believe you
just can't
> go around calling everything art, otherwise the term looses all
meaning. I
> think art has to meet a certain criteria, and I think that criteria
has to be
> set by experts.

And there's the problem - defining what makes an expert in the context
of art is just as difficult as defining what art is.

But anyway, time to move away from this debate. Since we're talking
about the merits of film and all that, did anyone see the list of the
100 most thrilling films of all time published by (I think) the AFI?
It was a surprisingly good list (though the omission of White Heat was
criminal!) and Planet of the Apes is in there. I don't know if they
were compiled in some sort of order, I just saw the list in a
newspaper and it was in alphabetical order.

For folks in the UK, I think there is a 3-hour programme on TV shortly
devoted to it (it might even be this Saturday on Channel 4 if I
remember correctly).

Alan
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23518 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The mini busts
.html
Rory <Haristas@...> wrote:
> Here's the reply I just got back from SOTA about those mini busts
that Jeff
> never thought to tell us about!

I posted details of these in the group back in June - including a
picture and prices!

Alan
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23519 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: "Return" Tape
.html
James, James, I got my tape! Look at that nice, professional looking
label! And the titles, so neatly done! I've popped the tape in and
watched the first few minutes, then had to run in here and tell you
THANKS! MUCHO THANKS!
Kassidy
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23520 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Arty Farty
.html
Hey now, this is my last word on the subject!
But actually Mr. Maxwell just said it. If art is subjective (and it
looks like all of you agree to that, to one degree or another), then
who figures out who the experts are? UTK here had an art show, years
ago, on display at the Candy Factory (never mind), next door to the
Museum of Art. One of the pieces of 'art' was some stick figures
drawn out in some dirt strewn across a hard-wood floor. I was
horrified when the friend who was with me reached over with her toe
across the little roped off area and flicked some of the dirt
around. It was dirt, for God's sakes! On display. Oh well....

Then on the other hand, if you do have some knowledge of the time
period the art was conceived in, and some history of the artist then
you have a better chance of understanding the art and judging its
value, right?

I will close my little ramble by adding that, Jackson Pollock sucks
and Andy Warhol was not more than a commercial artist, don't waste my
time by arguing with me.

And being that art is subjective, I will state that I absolutely
believe that RORY is a work of art. As Rory is so inextricably tied
to the POTA yahoo discussion group, I have successfully kept my
discussion of art from being OT.

No I am not drunk. Etc.
Kassidy

And to tie this to POTA,
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23521 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
.html
.html
I got mine today too.
Thanks James!  : )
I haven't seen these
since they first aired.

Way cool!
T
<.html
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23522 From: thypentacle Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
.html

I got my tape too. Wanted to also thank you. It wouldn't play in my main vcr for some reason, but it works fine on my other one. Thank you very much for sending it. :o)

Thy �very grateful� Pentacle

 

 Kassidy Rae <valwp@...> wrote:

<.html
Group: pota Message: 23523 From: Michael Whitty Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Reproduced Mona Lisa with Moustache
.html
Poetry!

Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sand_hill_school [sand_hill_school@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, 22 October 2002 0:41
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
>
> Perhaps that could read, "The movie was a collaborative effort of
> artists with all those involved doing so for a paycheck." Don't
> forget that Mozart was paid to write most of his music, Norman
> Rockwell sold his work to Saturday Evening Post (as a result they
> sold more magazines), and Charles Shultz wrote his syndicated Peanuts
> stip for $$$. All of these were artists, and all were paid to
> create. We studied Planet of the Apes (Sand Hill School, school year
> 2001 - 2002) as both art and literature. Although we dismissed POTA
> 2001 (so I may be sidetracked here), I suppose that it could be
> considered "art" much as one would consider their friend's child's
> reproduction of the Mona Lisa (with a mustache) to be art.
>
> --Helen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23524 From: james611102 Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
.html
You're welcome everyone. Please let me know if any of you has any
playback problems.

--- In pota@y..., thypentacle <thypentacle@y...> wrote:
>
> I got my tape too. Wanted to also thank you. It wouldn't play in
my main vcr for some reason, but it works fine on my other one.
Thank you very much for sending it. :o)
>
> Thy `very grateful' Pentacle
>
> Kassidy Rae <valwp@y...> wrote:James, James, I got my tape! Look
at that nice, professional looking
> label! And the titles, so neatly done! I've popped the tape in
and
> watched the first few minutes, then had to run in here and tell
you
> THANKS! MUCHO THANKS!
> Kassidy
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23525 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art?
.html
.html
I agree with you T. I don't want some "expert" telling me what to
like and what not to like. Too many people don't think for
themselves and allow some critic tell them what's good. And what
real credentials do most of these critics have anyway?


Well, Zagats who has been doing restaurant reviews for years has just published a movie guide.  They feel that critics are out of touch with what people actually think is good.  They may have a point.  Health food may be good for you, but if it tastes like crap who wants to pay to eat it.  On they other hand the guide only has 1000 movies in it, and costs well over ten bucks.  You do the math.  As for Warhol's painting, usually he'd come up with a concept and have some of his flunkies paint it up and he'd sign it.  Some of the concepts weren't even his.

Oh, you guys are just egalitarian popularists.

Look, Campbell's tomato soup cans are not art, but an Andy Warhol painting of them is.

<.html
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23526 From: kidro85@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
.html
My man James,
Thanks man, nice label job. I really appreciate that .
Thank you thank you thank you
Tony
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23527 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Arty Farty
.html
In a message dated 10/21/02 5:10:17 PM, valwp@... writes:

<< I will close my little ramble by adding that, Jackson Pollock sucks
and Andy Warhol was not more than a commercial artist, don't waste my
time by arguing with me. >>

I can't agree with you there...

Matt (who didn't sleep through art history class)
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23528 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
.html
I already have the cartoons, James. So just send me some money and I will
buy a VHS I don't have. Thanks. - - - Jeff


----- Original Message -----
From: "james611102" <JamesA1102@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape


> You're welcome everyone. Please let me know if any of you has any
> playback problems.
>
> --- In pota@y..., thypentacle <thypentacle@y...> wrote:
> >
> > I got my tape too. Wanted to also thank you. It wouldn't play in
> my main vcr for some reason, but it works fine on my other one.
> Thank you very much for sending it. :o)
> >
> > Thy `very grateful' Pentacle
> >
> > Kassidy Rae <valwp@y...> wrote:James, James, I got my tape! Look
> at that nice, professional looking
> > label! And the titles, so neatly done! I've popped the tape in
> and
> > watched the first few minutes, then had to run in here and tell
> you
> > THANKS! MUCHO THANKS!
> > Kassidy
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23529 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: More where that came from (OT)
.html
.html
  Billy Crudup has joined the cast of Burton's next feast, "Big Fish". Starts filming in Alabama in Jan. I know, I know, before you say it, they don't need Billy to crud up that movie; Burton will crud it up fine without him. AH HA HA HA HA HA he he he! - - Jeff
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:17 AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] To Market, To Market. . .to buy a fat Turkey!


Hey, maybe the studios will begin to wise up.  I wonder how much it cost to market POTA2001?  I'll bet the profit margin on APES was so much less than what Fox had hoped that's why nobody is talking sequel.

To Market, To Market -- To Buy a Fat Pig in a Poke?
Marketing experts have begun questioning the wisdom of studio promotional campaigns which often cost more than the films earn at the box office, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday. "It is obscene," Peter Sealey, a marketing professor at UC Berkeley who headed marketing at Columbia in the mid-1980s, told the Times. "There's no excuse for the consistent overspending ... it's close to corporate fraud." The newspaper pointed out that Columbia spent $50 million to promote its $120-million Stuart Little 2
, which grossed $63 million. When MGM's $110-million Windtalkers opened poorly, it noted, the studio's marketing department allocated millions of dollars for "emergency marketing." It didn't work. The film grossed just $41 million, or $1 million less than it cost to market. In 10 years, the Times pointed out, marketing costs for the average movie have risen from $12 million to $31 million.





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
Group: pota Message: 23530 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/21/2002
Subject: Der Affen at it!
.html
Attachments :
    .htmlThe seller has this German PLANET poster as a 1968 original, but can anyone here spot what gives this away as a reissue poster?

    -- Der Rory



    Click here: eBay item 1572545440 (Ends Oct-28-02 14:08:07 PST ) - PLANET OF THE APES `68 German 1sheet
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 23531 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
    Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
    .html
    .html
    The tracking on mine is stripey and the audio garbled, but I can still make it out.
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 23532 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
    Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
    .html
    .html
    It's kinda funny.
    Everyone sounds like Cylones.
    I love the way the themes are explained at a child's level.
    Patrick should watch these.  Even his giant brain couldn't
    misconstrue them.  But I'm sure he'll say the writers meant
    something else.
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 23533 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
    Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
    .html
    .html
    It's cleared up some towards the middle.
    Maybe in got magnetized or x-rayed.
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 23534 From: james611102 Date: 10/22/2002
    Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
    .html
    Sure Jeff, email me your address and I'll send you a few bucks. When
    you get it don't worry about that white power in the envelope, it's
    only talcum powder.

    --- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
    > I already have the cartoons, James. So just send me some money
    and I will
    > buy a VHS I don't have. Thanks. - - - Jeff
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 23535 From: james611102 Date: 10/22/2002
    Subject: Re: Der Affen at it!
    .html
    I would say it's the 20th Century Fox logo.

    --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
    > The seller has this German PLANET poster as a 1968 original, but
    can anyone
    > here spot what gives this away as a reissue poster?
    >
    > -- Der Rory
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 23536 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
    Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Der Affen at it!
    .html
    .htmlIn a message dated 10/22/02 7:12:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, JamesA1102@... writes:


    I would say it's the 20th Century Fox logo.



    Yeah, that's right.  That logo wasn't used until 1973.  The BATTLE poster has that logo on it.
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 23537 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
    Subject: A Tale of Two Planets
    .html
    .htmlI thought I'd reprint this here for the sake of those new who probably haven't read it (like that beautiful work of art -- or is it just "piece of work"? -- Kassidy!).
     
    A Tale of Two Planets by Eric Greene

    Planet of the Apes (1968) still courtesy of MPTV.net.

    Charleton Heston and Kim Hunter show why the original Apes was more daring than the remake.

    The original Planet of the Apes grew out of a time of wrenching conflict that, in the midst of wars abroad and revolutions at home, demanded soul searching. Today, soul searching has been replaced by soulless sloganeering.

    About the Author
    Eric Greene is a graduate of Stanford Law School and works for the ACLU in Southern California. He is the author of Planet of the Apes As American Myth : Race, Politics, and Popular Culture and can be seen in Behind the Planet of the Apes, a documentary DVD.



    In Tim Burton's recent version of Planet of the Apes, human-hating chimpanzee General Thade disrupts a simian dinner party by grabbing a human, forcing open his mouth and growling down his throat "is there a soul in there?" This could have been the heart of the film: a dramatic clash of species in the context of an exploration of humanity's relationship to power and nature, intelligence and spirit. Could have been. Regrettably, Thade's question is rhetorical, only pretense. Here Thade is a perfect, if unintended, stand in for the filmmakers: not truly interested in soul searching, just trying to make a spectacle.

    In 1968 Planet of the Apes, produced by Arthur P. Jacobs and based on a novel by Pierre Boulle, delighted critics and audiences alike as both an imaginative science fiction adventure and a sober political commentary. The struggles of the 60s c the fight for racial justice, domestic battles about the Vietnam War, cynicism toward the political and religious establishment — underscored almost every scene, all without losing the excitement, humor and visual splendor that people love in Hollywood epics. "The most fun you could have while thinking about a movie," is how one fan described it to me.

    Taking an alternate reality in which human political faults were safely projected onto imaginary apes, spoofed and critiqued, the Apes sequels (Beneath the Planet of the Apes, Escape from the..., Conquest of the..., Battle for the... ) extended and sharpened the racial-political allegory by addressing issues like urban riots and the Black Power movement with varying degrees of subtlety and sympathy. While ostensibly about apes, the real focus was always the survival possibilities of a racially fractured United States. (Franklin Schaffner, the director of the first film, argued that he was trying to make a political film and a social satire more than a science fiction story, and Paul Dehn and J. Lee Thompson, the writer and director of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes acknowledged that the Watts riots provided the inspiration for the slave revolt led by the film's hero).

    The studio spin doctors insist on calling this a "re-imagining," not a remake. When Burton does imagine territory beyond the original his film truly comes alive: striking production design and costumes; delightfully bizarre glimpses of ape life (an ape removing his toupee and dentures; an "interracial" orangutan-chimpanzee mating dance; the ape-like movement and mannerisms); excellent performances by Cary Tagawa (Krull), Paul Giamatti (Limbo) and Tim Roth's compelling, if one-note, Thade; and some astonishing make up by Rick Baker and his associates. (If nothing else they deserve an Oscar for Thade and for the marvelous Orangutan senator at the dinner party.) There's enough good stuff in the film that it deserved to be better.

    Yet for all this, even without comparison to the original, the movie seems surprisingly lifeless, marred by a weak plot, thematic vacuousness and underdeveloped characters. Had the film-makers risked going further in new directions, the film might have felt like a distinct vision — as opposed to just a distinct look — and succeeded or failed strictly on its own terms. But no one here seems up to the task. In its attempts to "ape" several elements of the first Planet of the Apes, this is ultimately just a remake. And a disappointing one at that.

    Both films, for instance, depict apes lording it over humans. But Burton's film invokes slavery without confronting it. Unlike in the first Planet, the human slaves here can talk. Giving them the power of speech opened up a range of story options, yet they have created no culture, no politics, no religion. Why are there no Nat Turners or Underground Railroads? Why no redemption songs? Even the Hebrew slaves in the Bible had prophecies of a deliverer. Why allow the film's humans the power to talk, and give them nothing to say? The only advantage these humans have over the original is better hair.

    Schaffner used the animal oppression of humans, as well as the discrimination amongst ape groups (light apes in charge, dark apes on the bottom of social ladder) as allegory to argue that we "civilized" humans were not so civilized after all. Apes and humans in the original series feared and hated each other precisely because, as evolutionary "cousins," each recognized their own brutality in "the other." Their hostility and violence was directly proportional to their need to suppress that recognition. In this year's film, the apes and humans see nothing of themselves in each other. They are enemies only because the story needs a conflict. The struggles are flashy but not organic — and thus not emotionally engaging or even frightening.

    Both films feature a sympathetic female chimpanzee who puts herself at real risk to help the male human astronaut. Again, there was some promise for going beyond the earlier movie. The screenplay called for a growing attraction between the human protagonist Leo (Mark Wahlberg) and the chimpanzee human rights activist Ari (Helena Bonham Carter). While not consummated, their affection required them to ask if their shared capacity for consciousness outweighed their physical differences. Rumors abound as to why this subplot was watered down but regardless of the reason, the concept was ruined by the execution. Surely over Rick Baker's objection, Ari's makeup was deliberately designed to make her look more attractive by human standards: mascara, lipstick and a ridiculous Italian designer wig make her look a good deal more like Jennifer Anniston than a chimpanzee. Ironically, while Ari is the most anti-racist character in the movie, her make-up unintentionally delivers a racist message: trust those who look most like you.

    The earlier film established a cross-species empathy between Charlton Heston's character Taylor and chimpanzee Zira, despite their physical difference. When the grateful Heston asks to kiss her goodbye near the film's ending, Zira exclaims, "all right, but you're so damned ugly!" Getting past the physical difference, rather than denying it, was the characters' accomplishment. The characters never pretended that they were not physically "ugly" to each other, but the Apes series interrogated that aversion to difference and used a civil rights-era model to emphasize respect, affection and alliance across species — and, by implication, racial — lines.

    The two Planets also differ greatly in their view of "heroism." The first film destabilized white male supremacy by stripping the usually triumphant Charlton Heston of all the benefits of his status — speech, freedom, clothing, weapons — and putting him at the mercy of "lower" animals. In the midst of decolonization, the original Planet used Third World animals to question the ascendance of Western "man." Here Wahlberg is the can-do US Air Force captain, never out of control for too long, winning instant allies and followers. Unlike the ambiguity-ridden Heston of that messy 1968 gestalt, Wahlberg is the unquestioned white male savior in a film much more comfortable with American power. Even the first film's implicit critique of nuclear weapons is transmogrified into a celebration of our nuclear capacity.

    This summer's movie, then, is a product of its time — albeit unwittingly — just as surely as the first one was deliberately. The original Planet of the Apes grew out of a time of wrenching conflict that, in the midst of wars abroad and revolutions at home, demanded soul searching. Today, soul searching has been replaced by soulless sloganeering: "Compassionate Conservatism" (or was that "Kinder, Gentler, America?") rules unquestioned.

    The original Planet of the Apes films were made with the conviction that a successful movie can both excite the imagination and challenge the conscience. They stood out as an accessible way to explore the roots and results of prejudice with a pop audience. The new film represents a culture that has not only failed to find the answers to its racial problems, it no longer dares to ask the questions.

    The tale of two Planets is a cautionary tale about remakes: ironically, Planet of the Apes actually grew out of an aversion to remaking movies. Arthur P. Jacobs had thought about remaking King Kong but decided that one should leave the classics alone. He forced himself to put his creative energy into something new and as a result developed the Apes series. Today's obsession with safe remakes stifles risky innovations.

    Of course, there is a place for new versions of old stories. At our best we return to existing mythologies and use them to re-examine new or unresolved questions. At our worst we return to them because we have no new ideas. Much like Dances with Wolves and Unforgiven used the Western genre to explore persistent issues about race, reconciliation and violence, how exciting could it have been if Burton and company had honored the roots of the original Planet of the Apes mythology while adapting it to contemporary concerns? Instead, they did neither. "Is there a soul in there?" Unfortunately, this time the answer is "no."


    First published: August 28, 2001

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 23538 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
    Subject: Apes in Art
    .html
    I've been meaning to post this for awhile.

    Is anyone here familiar with the artist Shag? I am a big fan of his artwork. I love the retro, cartoonish style and subject matter. Apparently he is an Apes fan because several of his paintings have featured some of our favorite simians. He had a gallery show here in Detroit last month, which I attended. I asked him about Apes and he said he has been a big fan since he was a kid and his favorite character is Zaius. One of the paintings on display was this piece:

    http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/drunkcleric.html"

    I like the little details on this painting, the fact that the tiki statues actually look like chimps. I asked how much it was and was told it was not for sale, that it was already purchased "by the guy who owns the original Lawgiver statue." I asked if that happened to be Brian from Apemania and was told that it was. Small world....


    Here are some other Shag paintings that feature apes:


    http://www.shag-art.com/Hedonist/trembling.html"

    http://www.shag-art.com/Sinners/Zaiusin.html"

    http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/bananaliq.html"

    http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/Tryptich.html"


    I am curious as to what others on this list think of these. Are they art? I think so...

    Matt
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 23539 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
    Subject: Apes IS art!
    .html
    Attachments :
      .htmlWell,…

      I would have to that these are art.  I would have to say that they elicit an emotional response.  I find them amusing, and funny, and I like how they remind me of beatniks and are shaggadelic and all that groovy stuff, like hip cat, daddy O!

      -- I'm Rory, man!









      <.html
      <.html
      Group: pota Message: 23540 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
      Subject: A thingy to ponder
      .html
      Attachments :
        .htmlIs this art from art? <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23541 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes IS art!
        .html
        .htmlIn a message dated 10/22/02 3:48:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Haristas@... writes:


        I would have to that these are art. 


        I forgot to say "say"!   SAY!  What's up with that?
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23542 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Something to ponder
        .html
        .htmlI never thought of this idea, from a message left on imdb.com.  What do you think?


        View: thread | flat
        | inline | nest Prev Topic | Next Topic
        Subject Posted by Date
        Taylor Jumping To Conclusions? *SPOILERS*
        by - Squrpleboy (Sat Oct 12 22:56:42) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

        In the (famous) final scene where Taylor encounters the decaying, half-buried Statue Of Liberty he drops to his knees in anguish screaming something to the effect that (amongst other curses) "they blew it all to Hell". Earlier in the film he stated that it could have been a natural cataclysm or meteor bombardments that destroyed the geography of this world. What makes him suddenly realize, or become so sure that it was MAN that caused the destruction after all? If not for the subsequent sequels proving him right, I don't know that that is the conclusion he would have naturally come to, IMO. Any thoughts on this?



        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23543 From: Ken and Heather Taylor Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
        .html
        Yeah,
        I like Shag's stuff, even without Apes. I like his use of colours and that
        whole retro cocktail bar feel.
        "YEAH BABY"....nothing?, No?....Just trying it on.



        ----- Original Message -----
        From: <MTotsky@...>
        To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
        Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:02 AM
        Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art


        > I've been meaning to post this for awhile.
        >
        > Is anyone here familiar with the artist Shag? I am a big fan of his
        artwork. I love the retro, cartoonish style and subject matter. Apparently
        he is an Apes fan because several of his paintings have featured some of our
        favorite simians. He had a gallery show here in Detroit last month, which I
        attended. I asked him about Apes and he said he has been a big fan since he
        was a kid and his favorite character is Zaius. One of the paintings on
        display was this piece:
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/drunkcleric.html"
        >
        > I like the little details on this painting, the fact that the tiki statues
        actually look like chimps. I asked how much it was and was told it was not
        for sale, that it was already purchased "by the guy who owns the original
        Lawgiver statue." I asked if that happened to be Brian from Apemania and was
        told that it was. Small world....
        >
        >
        > Here are some other Shag paintings that feature apes:
        >
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/Hedonist/trembling.html"
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/Sinners/Zaiusin.html"
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/bananaliq.html"
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/Tryptich.html"
        >
        >
        > I am curious as to what others on this list think of these. Are they art?
        I think so...
        >
        > Matt
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23544 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
        .html
        .html

        It must be art.  I went to an art show by this guy.  At least I think it was him.  If it wasn't then it was someone else in the same vein, or one of them was ripping the other off.  Not they the couldn't have come up with it independently, but . . . It was very sixties, lots of apes and fezzes, and there was a tiki bar set up in the back.  That's where I spent most of my time at the show.  Free beer vs high priced art is no contest.  Anyway there was too much Zaius and not enough Zira for my taste.

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23545 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: Apes in Art
        .html
        Hey Matt and everyone,
        Yes I would agree it is art. Definitely.

        And by the way, I would even say Jackson Pollock is an artist. I had
        art history in college, and I took painting, and graphics, and yada
        yada blah blah. You can't just sling paint on a wall and say "I
        paint just like JP". It's just that personally I hate that *()@#&&.
        And a lot of the pretentious horse hockey that goes with being "an
        artist".

        A Piece of Work
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23546 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
        .html
        Very insightful. I have to agree with Eric on almost everything here.

        I like the pun on the Power Records episode too!

        Michael

        --- Haristas@... wrote:
        > I thought I'd reprint this here for the sake of those new who
        probably
        > haven't read it (like that beautiful work of art -- or is it
        just "piece of
        >
        > work"? -- Kassidy!).
        >
        > A Tale of Two Planets by Eric Greene
        >
        > Planet of the Apes (1968) still courtesy of MPTV.net.
        >
        > Charleton Heston and Kim Hunter show why the original Apes was more
        daring
        >
        > than the remake.
        >
        > The original Planet of the Apes grew out of a time of wrenching
        conflict
        > that, in the midst of wars abroad and revolutions at home, demanded
        soul
        > searching. Today, soul searching has been replaced by soulless
        sloganeering
        > ..
        >
        > About the Author
        > Eric Greene is a graduate of Stanford Law School and works for the
        ACLU in
        >
        > Southern California. He is the author of Planet of the Apes As
        American Myt
        > h
        > : Race, Politics, and Popular Culture and can be seen in Behind the
        Planet
        > of
        > the Apes, a documentary DVD.
        >
        >
        >
        > In Tim Burton's recent version of Planet of the Apes, human-
        hating
        >
        > chimpanzee General Thade disrupts a simian dinner party by grabbing
        a human
        > ,
        > forcing open his mouth and growling down his throat "is there a
        soul in
        > there?" This could have been the heart of the film: a dramatic
        clash of
        > species in the context of an exploration of humanity's relationship
        to powe
        > r
        > and nature, intelligence and spirit. Could have been. Regrettably,
        Thade's
        >
        > question is rhetorical, only pretense. Here Thade is a perfect, if
        > unintended, stand in for the filmmakers: not truly interested in
        soul
        > searching, just trying to make a spectacle.
        >
        > In 1968 Planet of the Apes, produced by Arthur P. Jacobs and based
        on a nov
        > el
        > by Pierre Boulle, delighted critics and audiences alike as both an
        > imaginative science fiction adventure and a sober political
        commentary. The
        >
        > struggles of the 60s c the fight for racial justice, domestic
        battles about
        >
        > the Vietnam War, cynicism toward the political and religious
        establishment
        > ���
        > underscored almost every scene, all without losing the excitement,
        humor an
        > d
        > visual splendor that people love in Hollywood epics. "The most fun
        you coul
        > d
        > have while thinking about a movie," is how one fan described it to
        me.
        >
        > Taking an alternate reality in which human political faults were
        safely
        > projected onto imaginary apes, spoofed and critiqued, the Apes
        sequels
        > (Beneath the Planet of the Apes, Escape from the..., Conquest of
        the...,
        > Battle for the... ) extended and sharpened the racial-political
        allegory by
        >
        > addressing issues like urban riots and the Black Power movement
        with varyin
        > g
        > degrees of subtlety and sympathy. While ostensibly about apes, the
        real foc
        > us
        > was always the survival possibilities of a racially fractured
        United States
        > ..
        > (Franklin Schaffner, the director of the first film, argued that he
        was
        > trying to make a political film and a social satire more than a
        science
        > fiction story, and Paul Dehn and J. Lee Thompson, the writer and
        director o
        > f
        > Conquest of the Planet of the Apes acknowledged that the Watts
        riots provid
        > ed
        > the inspiration for the slave revolt led by the film's hero).
        >
        > The studio spin doctors insist on calling this a "re-imagining,"
        not a
        > remake. When Burton does imagine territory beyond the original his
        film tru
        > ly
        > comes alive: striking production design and costumes; delightfully
        bizarre
        >
        > glimpses of ape life (an ape removing his toupee and dentures; an
        > "interracial" orangutan-chimpanzee mating dance; the ape-like
        movement and
        >
        > mannerisms); excellent performances by Cary Tagawa (Krull), Paul
        Giamatti
        > (Limbo) and Tim Roth's compelling, if one-note, Thade; and some
        astonishing
        >
        > make up by Rick Baker and his associates. (If nothing else they
        deserve an
        >
        > Oscar for Thade and for the marvelous Orangutan senator at the
        dinner party
        > ..)
        > There's enough good stuff in the film that it deserved to be better.
        >
        > Yet for all this, even without comparison to the original, the
        movie seems
        >
        > surprisingly lifeless, marred by a weak plot, thematic vacuousness
        and
        > underdeveloped characters. Had the film-makers risked going further
        in new
        >
        > directions, the film might have felt like a distinct vision ��� as
        op
        > posed to
        > just a distinct look ��� and succeeded or failed strictly on its
        own
        > terms. But
        > no one here seems up to the task. In its attempts to "ape" several
        elements
        >
        > of the first Planet of the Apes, this is ultimately just a remake.
        And a
        > disappointing one at that.
        >
        > Both films, for instance, depict apes lording it over humans. But
        Burton's
        >
        > film invokes slavery without confronting it. Unlike in the first
        Planet, th
        > e
        > human slaves here can talk. Giving them the power of speech opened
        up a ran
        > ge
        > of story options, yet they have created no culture, no politics, no
        religio
        > n.
        > Why are there no Nat Turners or Underground Railroads? Why no
        redemption
        > songs? Even the Hebrew slaves in the Bible had prophecies of a
        deliverer. W
        > hy
        > allow the film's humans the power to talk, and give them nothing to
        say? Th
        > e
        > only advantage these humans have over the original is better hair.
        >
        > Schaffner used the animal oppression of humans, as well as the
        discriminati
        > on
        > amongst ape groups (light apes in charge, dark apes on the bottom
        of social
        >
        > ladder) as allegory to argue that we "civilized" humans were not so
        civiliz
        > ed
        > after all. Apes and humans in the original series feared and hated
        each oth
        > er
        > precisely because, as evolutionary "cousins," each recognized their
        own
        > brutality in "the other." Their hostility and violence was directly
        > proportional to their need to suppress that recognition. In this
        year's fil
        > m,
        > the apes and humans see nothing of themselves in each other. They
        are enemi
        > es
        > only because the story needs a conflict. The struggles are flashy
        but not
        > organic ��� and thus not emotionally engaging or even frightening.
        >
        > Both films feature a sympathetic female chimpanzee who puts herself
        at real
        >
        > risk to help the male human astronaut. Again, there was some
        promise for
        > going beyond the earlier movie. The screenplay called for a growing
        > attraction between the human protagonist Leo (Mark Wahlberg) and
        the
        > chimpanzee human rights activist Ari (Helena Bonham Carter). While
        not
        > consummated, their affection required them to ask if their shared
        capacity
        >
        > for consciousness outweighed their physical differences. Rumors
        abound as t
        > o
        > why this subplot was watered down but regardless of the reason, the
        concept
        >
        > was ruined by the execution. Surely over Rick Baker's objection,
        Ari's make
        > up
        > was deliberately designed to make her look more attractive by human
        > standards: mascara, lipstick and a ridiculous Italian designer wig
        make her
        >
        > look a good deal more like Jennifer Anniston than a chimpanzee.
        Ironically,
        >
        > while Ari is the most anti-racist character in the movie, her make-
        up
        > unintentionally delivers a racist message: trust those who look
        most like
        > you.
        >
        > The earlier film established a cross-species empathy between
        Charlton
        > Heston's character Taylor and chimpanzee Zira, despite their
        physical
        > difference. When the grateful Heston asks to kiss her goodbye near
        the film
        > 's
        > ending, Zira exclaims, "all right, but you're so damned ugly!"
        Getting past
        >
        > the physical difference, rather than denying it, was the
        characters'
        > accomplishment. The characters never pretended that they were not
        physicall
        > y
        > "ugly" to each other, but the Apes series interrogated that
        aversion to
        > difference and u
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23547 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
        .html
        I think they are art.

        I like them.

        I would love to hear a commentary about them.

        Michael

        --- MTotsky@... wrote:
        > I've been meaning to post this for awhile.
        >
        > Is anyone here familiar with the artist Shag? I am a big fan of his
        artwork. I love the retro, cartoonish style and subject matter.
        Apparently he is an Apes fan because several of his paintings have
        featured some of our favorite simians. He had a gallery show here in
        Detroit last month, which I attended. I asked him about Apes and he
        said he has been a big fan since he was a kid and his favorite
        character is Zaius. One of the paintings on display was this piece:
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/drunkcleric.html"
        >
        > I like the little details on this painting, the fact that the tiki
        statues actually look like chimps. I asked how much it was and was
        told it was not for sale, that it was already purchased "by the guy
        who owns the original Lawgiver statue." I asked if that happened to
        be Brian from Apemania and was told that it was. Small world....
        >
        >
        > Here are some other Shag paintings that feature apes:
        >
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/Hedonist/trembling.html"
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/Sinners/Zaiusin.html"
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/bananaliq.html"
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/Tryptich.html"
        >
        >
        > I am curious as to what others on this list think of these. Are
        they art? I think so...
        >
        > Matt
        >
        >
        > ------------------------ ---------------------
        ~-->
        > Is your business paying to much?
        > Affordable insurance and benefits packages for Less.
        > http://us.click.yahoo.com/jCP0DB/E.mEAA/jd3IAA/9_IolB/TM
        > --------------------------------------------------------------------
        -~->
        >
        >
        >
        >

        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23548 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] But is it art?
        .html
        --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
        > In a message dated 10/19/02 9:53:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
        > veetus@e... writes:
        >
        >
        > > The first definition of "art" in the dictionary I have
        is "creative adaptation". Probably they mean "adapting" a flower to a
        painting or "adapting" a feeling to a poem or song. But "creative
        adaptation" certainly applies to the POTA movie. Probably the def
        people think of is:"application of skill to the production of
        beautiful things, esp. in painting, sculpture, music, literature,
        architecture, and dancing". I've also heard that "Beauty is in the
        eye of the beholder". So I guess we could never reach a solid
        conclusion of whether POTA is art. Man, this is heavy for a
        Saturday! - - - Jeff
        >
        > The late Pauline Kael, who's opinion I value much higher than
        Patrick's, said that "Planet of the Apes" was not art. She included
        some other movies along with it. Of course, she was writing in the
        era of the film's original release. It takes the passage of some
        time to weed out the good from the bad in such matters. In the end
        art is whatever people want it to be.
        >
        > There is a difference between movies as art and, say, paintings or
        sculptures as art. Movies tend to be commercial ventures, and that
        commercial aspect tends to devalue them as art. When was the last
        time you saw a list of the 100 best paintings ever painted, or
        statues ever sculpted, or books ever written? Pretty rarely, if
        ever. But there's always some damn list of the ten best or one
        hundred best movies. That should tell you something.
        >
        > Movies are art of a certain kind, but not high art. Some,
        like "Citizen Kane," have certainly attained a higher level as art
        than others, but what idiot would argue that because "Citizen Kane"
        is art and a movie, than since "Porky's II" is also a movie, it's art?
        >
        > Where's Gene Siskel when we need him?
        >
        > -- Rory

        *** If a 'work' has any connection with "commercial ventures" then
        that "devalues them as art"? Bullshit! The greatest artists of the
        last millennium, Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci had wealthy
        patrons who footed their bills. The Pope commissioned Michelangelo to
        paint the Sistine Chapel. Yet despite the "commercial" aspect of it,
        the money factor, the works of those two artists alone are some of
        the most wondrous works of Art ever created.
        Tell all the creative people who work on that collaborative artform,
        the Movie, that they are "lesser" artists because it involves a
        paycheck! What--is it "Art" only if the "Artiste" is either
        independently wealthy or starving-yet-devoted to creating?
        The ONLY thing which "devalues" any Art is if it is lacking in
        TALENT. Most of the pop & rap "music" on the radio, or on MTV, is
        mass-produced (sometimes with pre-programmed "sampled" bits created
        by other people) and involves no actual playing of instruments--in
        short, there's very little real talent involved. All that seems to
        matter is the "look" and the dancing choreography anymore, which
        appeals to pre-teen girls who couldn't tell a great song from the
        sound of Rory's farts. Much of what passes for Art in comics nowadays
        is pretty mediocre, or derivative of other artists' styles. But the
        GREATS stand tall above all that--and those Greats make their Art as
        their livelihood.
        It don't matter if there's money involved, though. Even artists need
        to pay their monthly bills; if they can earn a living by being
        artistically creative, then that's how it should be.

        Patrick
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23549 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
        .html
        --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
        > In a message dated 10/19/02 7:03:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
        > patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
        >
        >
        > > Here's where I "wow" you with my acumen, Rory, and it involves an
        explication of the meanings of the names of the main character
        (Ulysse) and his "fallen" comrade (Antelle). Antelle comes from the
        Greek word "antelios" (from "anti" + "helios"), meaning "opposite the
        sun" or "against the sun".
        >
        > The only thing you've "wowed" me with, Patrick, is how much you
        sound like the father in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding"!
        >
        > The name "Ulysse" is the French form of the Latin form (Ulysses--
        actually "Ulixes" in Cassell's dictionary) of the Greek
        name "Odysseus" (of Homer's "Odyssey"); the name Odysseus comes from
        the Greek word "odyssomai", which means "to be grieved" or "to be
        wroth at".
        >
        > You're a riot, Patrick! Go see the movie and you'll know what I
        mean. By the way, Merou is supposed to mean a grouper, a lowly
        fish. What do you make of the juxtaposition of Ulysse with Merou,
        Patrick?
        >
        > Ulysse--like Ulysses before him--is the type who would eat the
        forbidden fruit, acquiring Knowledge EVEN IF IT GETS HIM KICKED OUT
        OF THE COZY GARDEN/PRISON. Adam was not fully human until he acquired
        Knowledge, which can ONLY be acquired through rebellion against the
        dictates of a "master" (God, in GENESIS, the "Orthodoxy" in the Real
        World). Do you get it yet, Rory?
        >
        > Ummmmmm. . . . NO! What is the point here, Patrick? Certainly not
        the one on your head, so what the hell are you talking about?
        >
        > -- Rory the puzzled

        *** "... a grouper, a lowly fish..." Ever read "DUNE", Rory? Paul
        Atreides adopts the name "Muad'dib" which (if I remember correctly)
        means "a little mouse" associated with one of Arrakis' moons (like
        our "Man in the Moon"). Jesus is supposed to be the "Lamb of God"--
        the Paschal lamb which was slaughtered every Passover, its blood
        smeared on the lintel to keep away the Angel of Death.
        Ah, the name "Merou". A fish? Just ANY kind of fish? Read up on your
        French history, Rory, and you'll discover a bizarre mythic ancestor
        to the ancient line of Frankish kings (pre-dating Charlemagne): the
        half-man/half-fish "Merovech" or "Merovee", the eponymous king who
        founded the Merovingian Dynasty. Read the book "The Holy Blood and
        the Holy Grail" by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, & Henry Lincoln
        for an astounding hypothesis concerning the supposed connection of
        modern day secret societies with the Knights Templar, the
        Merovingians (and the potential restoration of their bloodline to
        power in post-Modern France), and the "Grail" literature, which some
        interpret as having to do with the Davidic Bloodline... through the
        historical Jesus, and his consort/wife Mary Magdalene.
        The name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
        Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably represents
        somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
        authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest that
        this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
        of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
        symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
        the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
        community in the Langued'oc region of France.
        Hmmm... a voyage across the Mediterranean Sea, connecting the Holy
        Land with France... "Merovech" possibly being a symbolic
        representation of the Davidic Bloodline of Christ transplanting from
        Judea to France (from which the Crusaders marched to reconquer the
        Holy Land from the Saracens)... "Merou" being a voyager through
        the "sea of space" who ultimately seeks to found a bloodline (through
        Nova & their son, Sirius) which will regain their once-proud position
        as the "image of God" (etc.)... and the name "Ulysse", based on
        Ulysses/Odysseus, who also endured a long voyage back home to his
        wife Penelope and their son, Telemachus, to throw out the intruding
        suitors...
        THAT is what I make of the "juxtaposition" of Ulysse and Merou, you
        big ape! I think that Boulle knew his French history better than
        what's-his-name who wrote that book about him & his works which you
        got that "grouper" interpretation from (offhand, I can't remember the
        author or title--I'm sure you'll clue me in). Perhaps Boulle knew a
        little something about the secret society discussed in the books by
        Baigent, Leigh, & Lincoln: the "Prieure de Sion"/"Priory of Zion",
        which allegedly seeks to restore a monarchy to France--an offshoot
        branch of the supposedly-sundered Merovingian Dynasty of old.
        Nostradamus, among other things, has a couple quatrains about a "half-
        man/half-fish" character... was he, too, making connections with the
        Merovingian past of France, and their possible survival as a
        Bloodline throughout the Carolingian era and beyond?

        This is probably over the heads of most of the other guys on this
        Discussion Board, and I wouldn't deal with it at all if it didn't
        have something to do with the possible intended meanings of the names
        Boulle gave his characters in "La Planete des Singes".
        And if you can't see the "point" I was getting at, regarding the
        cognitive processes at work in a Ulysses-like mind (as opposed to
        an "anti-helios"/"Antelle"-like mind), then perhaps you're cross-
        eyed, or Marty-Feldman-eyed. Go see an ophthalmologist, pronto!

        Patrick
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23550 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to ponder
        .html
        I think it was just Taylor's assumption based on his experience with
        mankind.

        Michael

        --- Haristas@... wrote:
        > I never thought of this idea, from a message left on imdb.com.
        What do you
        > think?
        >
        >
        > View: thread | <A
        HREF"http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0063442/board/flat/222786">flat</A> |
        <A
        HREF"http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0063442/board/inline/222786">inline</A
        > | <A
        HREF"http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0063442/board/nest/222786">nest</A>
        <A HREF"http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0063442/board/threads/?
        t"2786&nprev&vthread">Prev Topic</A> | <A
        HREF"http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0063442/board/threads/?
        t"2786&nnext&vthread">Next Topic</A>
        > Subject Posted by Date
        > Taylor Jumping To Conclusions? *SPOILERS*
        > by - <A
        HREF"http://us.imdb.com/user/ur1542448/boards/profile/">Squrpleboy
        </A>(Sat Oct 12 22:56:42) <A
        HREF"http://us.imdb.com/user/ur0952921/boards/profile/?
        k42448">Ignore this User</A> | <A
        HREF"http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0063442/board/abuse/222786">Report
        Abuse</A>
        >
        >
        > In the (famous) final scene where Taylor encounters the decaying,
        half-buried
        > Statue Of Liberty he drops to his knees in anguish screaming
        something to the
        > effect that (amongst other curses) "they blew it all to Hell".
        Earlier in the
        > film he stated that it could have been a natural cataclysm or
        meteor
        > bombardments that destroyed the geography of this world. What makes
        him
        > suddenly realize, or become so sure that it was MAN that caused the
        > destruction after all? If not for the subsequent sequels proving
        him right, I
        > don't know that that is the conclusion he would have naturally come
        to, IMO.
        > Any thoughts on this?
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23551 From: ynwzjrpdlcdz Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: new pictures uploaded...
        .html<.html
        Group: pota Message: 23552 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
        .html
        You just don't like him because he's an Aussie...you RACIST!!!

        Michael

        --- "Kassidy Rae" <valwp@...> wrote:
        > Hey Matt and everyone,
        > Yes I would agree it is art. Definitely.
        >
        > And by the way, I would even say Jackson Pollock is an artist. I
        had
        > art history in college, and I took painting, and graphics, and yada
        > yada blah blah. You can't just sling paint on a wall and say "I
        > paint just like JP". It's just that personally I hate that *()
        @#&&.
        > And a lot of the pretentious horse hockey that goes with being "an
        > artist".
        >
        > A Piece of Work
        >
        >
        > ------------------------ ---------------------
        ~-->
        > Sell a Home with Ease!
        > http://us.click.yahoo.com/SrPZMC/kTmEAA/jd3IAA/9_IolB/TM
        > --------------------------------------------------------------------
        -~->
        >
        >
        >
        >

        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23553 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
        .html
        .htmlThe name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
        Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably represents
        somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
        authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest that
        this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
        of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
        symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
        the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
        community in the Langued'oc region of France.

        Uhhh... true, and though some say that the masonic illuminati's real purpose is to protect the holy bloodline, still others claim that power has been wrested away by satanic lodges, who worship Lucifer as a god, and they, and others are trying to take over the world for their own devilish purposes.  What are you thought on this Patrick? 

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23554 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
        .html
        .htmlIn a message dated 10/22/2002 7:03:52 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

        I like the pun on the Power Records episode too!


        I must have missed that one.
        What was the quote?
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23555 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Oh please!
        .html
        Another classic PMT posting.

        Patrick, read up on modern history and you'll discover a kitten
        says "Merou".

        Boulle was saying this guy is a pussy.

        It also sounds a bit like "merangue", a dessert made from egg
        whites. This means Merou is white, and likes eggs.

        You are a great competitor in the Conclusions Jump aren't you?

        Michael


        --- "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
        > --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
        > > In a message dated 10/19/02 7:03:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
        > > patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
        > >
        > >
        > > > Here's where I "wow" you with my acumen, Rory, and it involves
        an
        > explication of the meanings of the names of the main character
        > (Ulysse) and his "fallen" comrade (Antelle). Antelle comes from the
        > Greek word "antelios" (from "anti" + "helios"), meaning "opposite
        the
        > sun" or "against the sun".
        > >
        > > The only thing you've "wowed" me with, Patrick, is how much you
        > sound like the father in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding"!
        > >
        > > The name "Ulysse" is the French form of the Latin form (Ulysses--
        > actually "Ulixes" in Cassell's dictionary) of the Greek
        > name "Odysseus" (of Homer's "Odyssey"); the name Odysseus comes
        from
        > the Greek word "odyssomai", which means "to be grieved" or "to be
        > wroth at".
        > >
        > > You're a riot, Patrick! Go see the movie and you'll know what I
        > mean. By the way, Merou is supposed to mean a grouper, a lowly
        > fish. What do you make of the juxtaposition of Ulysse with Merou,
        > Patrick?
        > >
        > > Ulysse--like Ulysses before him--is the type who would eat the
        > forbidden fruit, acquiring Knowledge EVEN IF IT GETS HIM KICKED OUT
        > OF THE COZY GARDEN/PRISON. Adam was not fully human until he
        acquired
        > Knowledge, which can ONLY be acquired through rebellion against the
        > dictates of a "master" (God, in GENESIS, the "Orthodoxy" in the
        Real
        > World). Do you get it yet, Rory?
        > >
        > > Ummmmmm. . . . NO! What is the point here, Patrick? Certainly
        not
        > the one on your head, so what the hell are you talking about?
        > >
        > > -- Rory the puzzled
        >
        > *** "... a grouper, a lowly fish..." Ever read "DUNE", Rory? Paul
        > Atreides adopts the name "Muad'dib" which (if I remember correctly)
        > means "a little mouse" associated with one of Arrakis' moons (like
        > our "Man in the Moon"). Jesus is supposed to be the "Lamb of God"--
        > the Paschal lamb which was slaughtered every Passover, its blood
        > smeared on the lintel to keep away the Angel of Death.
        > Ah, the name "Merou". A fish? Just ANY kind of fish? Read up on
        your
        > French history, Rory, and you'll discover a bizarre mythic ancestor
        > to the ancient line of Frankish kings (pre-dating Charlemagne): the
        > half-man/half-fish "Merovech" or "Merovee", the eponymous king who
        > founded the Merovingian Dynasty. Read the book "The Holy Blood and
        > the Holy Grail" by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, & Henry Lincoln
        > for an astounding hypothesis concerning the supposed connection of
        > modern day secret societies with the Knights Templar, the
        > Merovingians (and the potential restoration of their bloodline to
        > power in post-Modern France), and the "Grail" literature, which
        some
        > interpret as having to do with the Davidic Bloodline... through the
        > historical Jesus, and his consort/wife Mary Magdalene.
        > The name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
        > Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably
        represents
        > somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
        > authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest
        that
        > this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
        > of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
        > symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
        > the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
        > community in the Langued'oc region of France.
        > Hmmm... a voyage across the Mediterranean Sea, connecting the Holy
        > Land with France... "Merovech" possibly being a symbolic
        > representation of the Davidic Bloodline of Christ transplanting
        from
        > Judea to France (from which the Crusaders marched to reconquer the
        > Holy Land from the Saracens)... "Merou" being a voyager through
        > the "sea of space" who ultimately seeks to found a bloodline
        (through
        > Nova & their son, Sirius) which will regain their once-proud
        position
        > as the "image of God" (etc.)... and the name "Ulysse", based on
        > Ulysses/Odysseus, who also endured a long voyage back home to his
        > wife Penelope and their son, Telemachus, to throw out the intruding
        > suitors...
        > THAT is what I make of the "juxtaposition" of Ulysse and Merou, you
        > big ape! I think that Boulle knew his French history better than
        > what's-his-name who wrote that book about him & his works which you
        > got that "grouper" interpretation from (offhand, I can't remember
        the
        > author or title--I'm sure you'll clue me in). Perhaps Boulle knew a
        > little something about the secret society discussed in the books by
        > Baigent, Leigh, & Lincoln: the "Prieure de Sion"/"Priory of Zion",
        > which allegedly seeks to restore a monarchy to France--an offshoot
        > branch of the supposedly-sundered Merovingian Dynasty of old.
        > Nostradamus, among other things, has a couple quatrains about
        a "half-
        > man/half-fish" character... was he, too, making connections with
        the
        > Merovingian past of France, and their possible survival as a
        > Bloodline throughout the Carolingian era and beyond?
        >
        > This is probably over the heads of most of the other guys on this
        > Discussion Board, and I wouldn't deal with it at all if it didn't
        > have something to do with the possible intended meanings of the
        names
        > Boulle gave his characters in "La Planete des Singes".
        > And if you can't see the "point" I was getting at, regarding the
        > cognitive processes at work in a Ulysses-like mind (as opposed to
        > an "anti-helios"/"Antelle"-like mind), then perhaps you're cross-
        > eyed, or Marty-Feldman-eyed. Go see an ophthalmologist, pronto!
        >
        > Patrick
        >
        >
        >
        > ------------------------ ---------------------
        ~-->
        > Sell a Home with Ease!
        > http://us.click.yahoo.com/SrPZMC/kTmEAA/jd3IAA/9_IolB/TM
        > --------------------------------------------------------------------
        -~->
        >
        >
        >
        >

        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23556 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
        .html
        Oh, T!

        You have really opened up a can of boring worms now!

        Michael

        --- LordTZer0@... wrote:
        > The name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
        > Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably
        represents
        > somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
        > authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest
        that
        > this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
        > of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
        > symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
        > the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
        > community in the Langued'oc region of France.
        >
        > Uhhh... true, and though some say that the masonic illuminati's
        real purpose
        > is to protect the holy bloodline, still others claim that power has
        been
        > wrested away by satanic lodges, who worship Lucifer as a god, and
        they, and
        > others are trying to take over the world for their own devilish
        purposes.
        > What are you thought on this Patrick?
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23557 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
        .html
        Dear Michael, I love lots of Aussie's. I like Hugh whats-his-face
        and Olivia what's her name. OH ALL RIGHT, YOU'VE CAUGHT ME... where
        did you say you are on the map, now? I heard they were going to
        rename your home town Kanga-ville.

        Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack. You guys
        related? Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm
        talking about Farrah, aren't I?
        Well are you related to Farrah then? Does your hair swish when you
        swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head?

        Love,
        Kassidy
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23558 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
        .html
        .htmlIn a message dated 10/22/02 9:42:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, valwp@... writes:


        Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack.  You guys
        related?  Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm
        talking about Farrah, aren't I?
        Well are you related to Farrah then?  Does your hair swish when you
        swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head?

        Love,
        Kassidy




        Kassidy, you're a big meanie!
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23559 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Cripple fight!"
        .html
        .htmlIn a message dated 10/22/2002 8:22:56 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

        You have really opened up a can of boring worms now!

        Yeah, I know.  But I can't wait to see just how long a post Patrick can really make.  It will resemble the iceberg that sank the Titanic.  What you see at the top of the window will only be a fraction of what's hidden beneath.
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23560 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
        .html
        "A Tale of Two Planets" is, if my memory is not COMPLETELY shot, the
        title of one of the Power Records POTA TV Series stories.

        Michael

        --- LordTZer0@... wrote:
        > In a message dated 10/22/2002 7:03:52 PM Central Standard Time,
        > whitty@... writes:
        >
        > > I like the pun on the Power Records episode too!
        > >
        >
        > I must have missed that one.
        > What was the quote?
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23561 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
        .html
        .htmlIn a message dated 10/22/2002 9:05:32 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


        "A Tale of Two Planets" is, if my memory is not COMPLETELY shot, the
        title of one of the Power Records POTA TV Series stories.

        Michael


        Actually Mr. Whitty, the name of the story you're thing of is "Battle of Two Worlds."
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23562 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
        .html
        .htmlIn a message dated 10/22/2002 9:05:32 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


        "A Tale of Two Planets" is, if my memory is not COMPLETELY shot, the
        title of one of the Power Records POTA TV Series stories.

        Michael


        I better correct my typo here...

        Actually Mr. Whitty, the story you're thinking of is "Battle of Two Worlds."
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23563 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Zira-O-Lantern
        .html
        .html
        For those of you who will be attempting a Zira-O-Lantern in the next week here's a site with some tips.   PUMPKIN MASTERS - AMERICA'S PUMPKIN CARVING COMPANY
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23564 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: The Medicoms are in da house!
        .html
        .html
          Hey, Tower has the Medicoms in, $12.99 each. Looks like stores are getting the first 2 sets (probably will depend on how these sell whether they order other sets). I picked up my bro Urko; wouldn't have bought him at the old price. The ones in this shipment are Cornelius, Zira, Lucius, Ursus, Urko, TV Soldier, Movie Soldier A (the rare B won't be available; none of the rare ones will. hang onto them). These may reignite the Ape flame. - - - Jeff
         
         
        ----- Original Message -----
        Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 7:30 AM
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Der Affen at it!

        In a message dated 10/22/02 7:12:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, JamesA1102@... writes:


        I would say it's the 20th Century Fox logo.



        Yeah, that's right.  That logo wasn't used until 1973.  The BATTLE poster has that logo on it.


        Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23565 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
        .html
        Thanks, Matt. There was a freebie magazine here that had the "Banana
        Liquier" painting on the cover back in 1999. I sent one to Brian and one to
        Booth Colman. Brian said on this very group that he doesn't have the
        original Lawgiver. He was outbid. He might have meant Brian Peck of
        "Apemania' (and voice of Zauis on the POTA video game). He has the copy made
        for Sammy Davis Jr. It's the one at the Chambers tribute and the 30th party.
        I've seen some Shag collectibles at Tower (stickers, coasters) but nothing
        Apes yet. - - Jeff


        ----- Original Message -----
        From: <MTotsky@...>
        To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
        Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:02 PM
        Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art


        > I've been meaning to post this for awhile.
        >
        > Is anyone here familiar with the artist Shag? I am a big fan of his
        artwork. I love the retro, cartoonish style and subject matter. Apparently
        he is an Apes fan because several of his paintings have featured some of our
        favorite simians. He had a gallery show here in Detroit last month, which I
        attended. I asked him about Apes and he said he has been a big fan since he
        was a kid and his favorite character is Zaius. One of the paintings on
        display was this piece:
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/drunkcleric.html"
        >
        > I like the little details on this painting, the fact that the tiki statues
        actually look like chimps. I asked how much it was and was told it was not
        for sale, that it was already purchased "by the guy who owns the original
        Lawgiver statue." I asked if that happened to be Brian from Apemania and was
        told that it was. Small world....
        >
        >
        > Here are some other Shag paintings that feature apes:
        >
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/Hedonist/trembling.html"
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/Sinners/Zaiusin.html"
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/bananaliq.html"
        >
        > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/Tryptich.html"
        >
        >
        > I am curious as to what others on this list think of these. Are they art?
        I think so...
        >
        > Matt
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23566 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to ponder
        .html
        .html
          He's a misanthrope, so he would naturally assume we destroyed ourselves. - - - Jeff
         
         
        ----- Original Message -----
        Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:09 PM
        Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Something to ponder

        I never thought of this idea, from a message left on imdb.com.  What do you think?


        View: thread | flat
        | inline | nest Prev Topic | Next Topic
        Subject Posted by Date
        Taylor Jumping To Conclusions? *SPOILERS*
        by - Squrpleboy (Sat Oct 12 22:56:42) Ignore this User | Report Abuse

        In the (famous) final scene where Taylor encounters the decaying, half-buried Statue Of Liberty he drops to his knees in anguish screaming something to the effect that (amongst other curses) "they blew it all to Hell". Earlier in the film he stated that it could have been a natural cataclysm or meteor bombardments that destroyed the geography of this world. What makes him suddenly realize, or become so sure that it was MAN that caused the destruction after all? If not for the subsequent sequels proving him right, I don't know that that is the conclusion he would have naturally come to, IMO. Any thoughts on this?





        Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23567 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
        .html
        However, "Brian of Apemania" (Brian Penikas) does collect Shag. - - - Jeff


        ----- Original Message -----
        From: <veetus@...>
        To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
        Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:07 PM
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art


        > Thanks, Matt. There was a freebie magazine here that had the "Banana
        > Liquier" painting on the cover back in 1999. I sent one to Brian and one
        to
        > Booth Colman. Brian said on this very group that he doesn't have the
        > original Lawgiver. He was outbid. He might have meant Brian Peck of
        > "Apemania' (and voice of Zauis on the POTA video game). He has the copy
        made
        > for Sammy Davis Jr. It's the one at the Chambers tribute and the 30th
        party.
        > I've seen some Shag collectibles at Tower (stickers, coasters) but nothing
        > Apes yet. - - Jeff
        >
        >
        > ----- Original Message -----
        > From: <MTotsky@...>
        > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
        > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:02 PM
        > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Apes in Art
        >
        >
        > > I've been meaning to post this for awhile.
        > >
        > > Is anyone here familiar with the artist Shag? I am a big fan of his
        > artwork. I love the retro, cartoonish style and subject matter. Apparently
        > he is an Apes fan because several of his paintings have featured some of
        our
        > favorite simians. He had a gallery show here in Detroit last month, which
        I
        > attended. I asked him about Apes and he said he has been a big fan since
        he
        > was a kid and his favorite character is Zaius. One of the paintings on
        > display was this piece:
        > >
        > > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/drunkcleric.html"
        > >
        > > I like the little details on this painting, the fact that the tiki
        statues
        > actually look like chimps. I asked how much it was and was told it was not
        > for sale, that it was already purchased "by the guy who owns the original
        > Lawgiver statue." I asked if that happened to be Brian from Apemania and
        was
        > told that it was. Small world....
        > >
        > >
        > > Here are some other Shag paintings that feature apes:
        > >
        > >
        > > http://www.shag-art.com/Hedonist/trembling.html"
        > >
        > > http://www.shag-art.com/Sinners/Zaiusin.html"
        > >
        > > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/bananaliq.html"
        > >
        > > http://www.shag-art.com/leisureprinciple/Tryptich.html"
        > >
        > >
        > > I am curious as to what others on this list think of these. Are they
        art?
        > I think so...
        > >
        > > Matt
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >

        > >
        > >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23568 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Zira-O-Lantern
        .html
        .htmlIn a message dated 10/22/02 10:17:12 PM Eastern Daylight Time, LordTZer0@... writes:


        For those of you who will be attempting a Zira-O-Lantern in the next week here's a site with some tips.   PUMPKIN MASTERS - AMERICA'S PUMPKIN CARVING COMPANY



        I love baked pumpkin seeds, nice and salty!!!  ;)
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23569 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
        .html
        .htmlIn a message dated 10/22/02 10:56:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:


          Hey, Tower has the Medicoms in, $12.99 each. Looks like stores are getting the first 2 sets (probably will depend on how these sell whether they order other sets). I picked up my bro Urko; wouldn't have bought him at the old price. The ones in this shipment are Cornelius, Zira, Lucius, Ursus, Urko, TV Soldier, Movie Soldier A (the rare B won't be available; none of the rare ones will. hang onto them). These may reignite the Ape flame. - - - Jeff



        Well, this is very nice news.  Now you can start building up your gorilla army, but as for re-igniting the flame?  Why don't we all bend over, stick a bic lighter between our cheeks and let 'em rip?
        With all the beers T downs he'll light up all of Texas.

        -- Arty Farty

        Arty Farty had a party,
        everyone in town was there.
        Tootie Fruity lit a beauty,
        everyone went out for air.

        My mother taught me that one.
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23570 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
        .html
        In a message dated 10/22/02 11:34:02 PM, Haristas@... writes:

        << Arty Farty had a party,
        everyone in town was there.
        Tootie Fruity lit a beauty,
        everyone went out for air.

        My mother taught me that one. >>

        That explains alot actually....

        Matt
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23571 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
        .html
        Oh yeah talk dirty honey...mmmmm!

        Michael

        --- Haristas@... wrote:
        > In a message dated 10/22/02 9:42:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
        valwp@...
        > writes:
        >
        >
        > > Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack. You guys
        > > related? Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm
        > > talking about Farrah, aren't I?
        > > Well are you related to Farrah then? Does your hair swish when
        you
        > > swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head?
        > >
        > > Love,
        > > Kassidy
        > >
        > >
        > >
        >
        > Kassidy, you're a big meanie!
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23572 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A Tale of Two Planets
        .html
        Thanks Mr Cougar. I gotta get some sleep.

        Michael

        --- mlccougar@... wrote:
        > In a message dated 10/22/2002 9:05:32 PM Central Standard Time,
        > whitty@... writes:
        >
        >
        > > "A Tale of Two Planets" is, if my memory is not COMPLETELY shot,
        the
        > > title of one of the Power Records POTA TV Series stories.
        > >
        > > Michael
        >
        > I better correct my typo here...
        >
        > Actually Mr. Whitty, the story you're thinking of is "Battle of Two
        Worlds."
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23573 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
        .html
        .html
           The packaging on the domestic Medicoms are the same, except the originals had a small Medicom flyer/brochure under the figure's feet that aren't in the new ones. My advice is to keep the originals in the package. Sounds like small potatoes but "Star Wars" figures can go up $100 or more because of a serial number. - - - Jeff
         
         
        ----- Original Message -----
        Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:28 PM
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!

        In a message dated 10/22/02 10:56:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:


          Hey, Tower has the Medicoms in, $12.99 each. Looks like stores are getting the first 2 sets (probably will depend on how these sell whether they order other sets). I picked up my bro Urko; wouldn't have bought him at the old price. The ones in this shipment are Cornelius, Zira, Lucius, Ursus, Urko, TV Soldier, Movie Soldier A (the rare B won't be available; none of the rare ones will. hang onto them). These may reignite the Ape flame. - - - Jeff



        Well, this is very nice news.  Now you can start building up your gorilla army, but as for re-igniting the flame?  Why don't we all bend over, stick a bic lighter between our cheeks and let 'em rip?
        With all the beers T downs he'll light up all of Texas.

        -- Arty Farty

        Arty Farty had a party,
        everyone in town was there.
        Tootie Fruity lit a beauty,
        everyone went out for air.

        My mother taught me that one.


        Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23574 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
        .html
        Uh oh, you said the "al" word! Apologize, Matt, and go home while you
        still have a home to go to. I'll put in a good word for you with Rory..


        ----- Original Message -----
        From: <MTotsky@...>
        To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
        Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:44 PM
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!


        >
        > In a message dated 10/22/02 11:34:02 PM, Haristas@... writes:
        >
        > << Arty Farty had a party,
        > everyone in town was there.
        > Tootie Fruity lit a beauty,
        > everyone went out for air.
        >
        > My mother taught me that one. >>
        >
        > That explains alot actually....
        >
        > Matt
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23575 From: MTotsky@aol.com Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
        .html
        In a message dated 10/23/02 12:21:53 AM, veetus@... writes:

        << Uh oh, you said the "al" word! Apologize, Matt, and go home while you
        still have a home to go to. I'll put in a good word for you with Rory.. >>

        I did that purposely. I know the little things to set Rory off. But you had
        to go and blow it for me, didn't you Jeff?

        Matt
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23576 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Good Night! (OT)
        .html
        I came across a "Newsweek" from last August. It's got a cover story on M.
        Night Shyamalan, the director whose metaphysical popcorn pics like "The 6th
        Sense" and "Signs" stand toe to toe with the big budget boys. Of 2001, the
        year that gave us "POTA2001" he says, "Last year was probably the worst year
        for me for moviessince I've been alive. It was the worst. The quality of
        movies in general. We don't have to get into specifics. And what that
        creates is a starvation in the audience. And, ironically, what THAT creates
        is...If they know what they're getting - like a franchise, something
        established- the starvation says, "I'll take that. I'll come in droves".
        Also included is his list of 10 favorite movies and why. Since we've done
        movie lists here, why not?
        (No particular order except the first one):

        "The Godfather" - - "Best film ever made. End of discussion".
        "The Exorcist" - - "Scariest movie ever made".
        "Jaws" - - "Balancing act of fear, fun and excitement".
        "Raiders of the Lost Ark" - - "Best adventure film ever made" (Night was
        offered the chance to write "Indiana Jones 4" and turned it down)
        "Silence of the Lambs" - - "Best psychological thriller ever made".
        "Rocky" - - "Most inspiring film I've ever seen"
        "Dead Poet's Society" - - "The film that best connects with who I am"
        "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" - - "Best dramatic film ever made"
        "Star Wars" - - "Best sci-fi film ever made" (D'oh!)
        "Psycho" - - "Greatest break in film structure and greatest twist in one
        film"
        Not exactly shocking choices, eh? Would make a perfect AFI list. But he
        makes more money than you do. Actually, he makes more money than your whole
        city does. - - - Jeff


        ----- Original Message -----
        From: <MTotsky@...>
        To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
        Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:44 PM
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!


        >
        > In a message dated 10/22/02 11:34:02 PM, Haristas@... writes:
        >
        > << Arty Farty had a party,
        > everyone in town was there.
        > Tootie Fruity lit a beauty,
        > everyone went out for air.
        >
        > My mother taught me that one. >>
        >
        > That explains alot actually....
        >
        > Matt
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23577 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/22/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!
        .html
        Oh God, Matt! I'm so sorry! Do something else to piss off Rory and I won't
        say anything. Ahhh! Now he'll be expecting it! I'm so sorry, Matt. You can
        eat your beans with all the ketchup you want, and I won't touch none of it.
        G'head! - - - Jeff the Fink


        ----- Original Message -----
        From: <MTotsky@...>
        To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
        Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:28 PM
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Medicoms are in da house!


        >
        > In a message dated 10/23/02 12:21:53 AM, veetus@... writes:
        >
        > << Uh oh, you said the "al" word! Apologize, Matt, and go home while you
        > still have a home to go to. I'll put in a good word for you with Rory.. >>
        >
        > I did that purposely. I know the little things to set Rory off. But you
        had
        > to go and blow it for me, didn't you Jeff?
        >
        > Matt
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23578 From: Michael Whitty Date: 10/23/2002
        Subject: Medium
        .html
        .html
        This article is a little off topic, but it makes a great point about modern movies and it made me think maybe Apes has a better chance as a TV Series.
         
         
        Any thoughts?
         
        Michael
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23579 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
        Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT)
        .html
        .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 1:00:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:


        M. Night Shyamalan

        his list of 10 favorite movies and why

        "The Godfather" - - "Best film ever made. End of discussion".
          "The Exorcist" - - "Scariest movie ever made".
          "Jaws" - - "Balancing act of fear, fun and excitement".
          "Raiders of the Lost Ark" - - "Best adventure film ever made" (Night was
        offered the chance to write "Indiana Jones 4" and turned it down)
          "Silence of the Lambs" - - "Best psychological thriller ever made".
          "Rocky" - - "Most inspiring film I've ever seen"
          "Dead Poet's Society" - - "The film that best connects with who I am"
          "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" - - "Best dramatic film ever made"
          "Star Wars" - - "Best sci-fi film ever made" (D'oh!)
          "Psycho" - - "Greatest break in film structure and greatest twist in one
        film"
         
        A pretty bland list, if you ask me.  He's got the same plastic imagination Schpealberg does.  Won't be expecting anything great from him.  "The Godfather" best film?!!!  I was watching some of it the other night, and I've decided that Marlon Brando in it is TERRIBLE!

        -- Rory

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: pota Message: 23580 From: JamesA1102@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
        Subject: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
        .html
        Attachments :
          .htmlOK can anyone guess where this is from?
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: pota Message: 23581 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/23/2002
          Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
          .html
          Kassidy, can't you ever be serious? Love, Jeff


          ----- Original Message -----
          From: "Kassidy Rae" <valwp@...>
          To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
          Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:41 PM
          Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art


          > Dear Michael, I love lots of Aussie's. I like Hugh whats-his-face
          > and Olivia what's her name. OH ALL RIGHT, YOU'VE CAUGHT ME... where
          > did you say you are on the map, now? I heard they were going to
          > rename your home town Kanga-ville.
          >
          > Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack. You guys
          > related? Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm
          > talking about Farrah, aren't I?
          > Well are you related to Farrah then? Does your hair swish when you
          > swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head?
          >
          > Love,
          > Kassidy
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          <.html
          Group: pota Message: 23582 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/23/2002
          Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT)
          .html
          .html
            They're planning another "Godfather" sequel, without Puzo. (see www.comingsoon.net ). And Drew Barrymore is to star in a sequel to "The Wizard of Oz". Crazy town. - - - Jeff
           
           
          ----- Original Message -----
          Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:35 AM
          Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT)

          In a message dated 10/23/02 1:00:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:


          M. Night Shyamalan

          his list of 10 favorite movies and why

          "The Godfather" - - "Best film ever made. End of discussion".
            "The Exorcist" - - "Scariest movie ever made".
            "Jaws" - - "Balancing act of fear, fun and excitement".
            "Raiders of the Lost Ark" - - "Best adventure film ever made" (Night was
          offered the chance to write "Indiana Jones 4" and turned it down)
            "Silence of the Lambs" - - "Best psychological thriller ever made".
            "Rocky" - - "Most inspiring film I've ever seen"
            "Dead Poet's Society" - - "The film that best connects with who I am"
            "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" - - "Best dramatic film ever made"
            "Star Wars" - - "Best sci-fi film ever made" (D'oh!)
            "Psycho" - - "Greatest break in film structure and greatest twist in one
          film"
           
          A pretty bland list, if you ask me.  He's got the same plastic imagination Schpealberg does.  Won't be expecting anything great from him.  "The Godfather" best film?!!!  I was watching some of it the other night, and I've decided that Marlon Brando in it is TERRIBLE!

          -- Rory



          Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: pota Message: 23583 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 10/23/2002
          Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
          .html
          Attachments :
            .html
              I forget which one, but one of the "Star Wars" films? - - - Jeff
             
             
            ----- Original Message -----
            Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:08 AM
            Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz

            OK can anyone guess where this is from?


            Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: pota Message: 23584 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
            Subject: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
            .html
            --- In pota@y..., "sand_hill_school" <sand_hill_school@y...> wrote:
            > It took you long enough to ask....
            >
            > We are a home school -- a little eccentric, maybe. I would have
            changed the moniker, but that is how I signed up with Yahoo! The name
            follows me around.
            >
            >(My phobia is that Patrick is going to start correcting my posts! --
            > "Hi Patrick.")
            >
            > --Helen

            *** Is this the face that launched a thousand ships?
            Hi, Helen. Don't worry--I learned my "lesson" regarding the
            correction of atrocious spelling. Bad spelling is a pet peeve of
            mine, one I should think people who READ often enough should also
            share. But after pointing out James' spelling errors, he pointed out
            (to Michael, not to me directly) that he'd been diagnosed with
            dyslexia, which "makes it hard sometimes" (as he said, if I remember
            him right). I apologized, since I had no way of knowing of his
            dyslexia--and, to be fair to myself, I had been taught that dyslexia
            involved a somewhat regular trend of juggling letters around... and
            his types of misspellings looked a lot like what I'd seen in merely
            infrequent readers/writers. But I apologized for whatever hurt
            feelings he may have had, though it doesn't seem as if he's accepted
            my apology. The only "correcting" of spelling & grammar I do anymore
            is when I reply to somebody: I correct the spelling of what the
            original message was prior to responding to it. There were no
            misspellings in your message above... although, there SHOULD be a
            comma after the word "Hi"... but I'll let it slide. THIS time... :)
            By the way, what IS your last name, Helen? I was just guessing above
            with "Handbasket" & "Wheels" & "Bakk".

            Patrick

            >
            > --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
            > > In a message dated 10/19/02 1:24:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
            > > sand_hill_school@y... writes:
            > >
            > > > Gosh **blush**. You remember me.
            > > >
            > > > I'm around.
            > > >
            > > > Helen
            > >
            > > I've always wondered, Helen, what is the Sand Hill School?
            > >
            > > -- Rory
            <.html
            Group: pota Message: 23585 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
            Subject: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
            .html
            --- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
            > Since we're on the subject I pulled out the "Starlog" interview
            with Burton (the best talk he's given on the subject, including the
            DVD commentary, that I've seen or read), and also some quotes
            from "The Directors" episode.
            > The "Starlog" is #291, October 2001. These are quotes from Burton:
            >
            > "You would have a better chance of surviving jumping off the
            Empire State Building than doing a remake of POTA".
            >
            > "It's such a classic and it's so much of it's time that there's no
            way to simply REMAKE it. Once I realized that's not what the studio
            wanted, things started to look possible".
            >
            > "It's all about reversal. That's what I love about the material;
            you're questioning everything. Somehow it's always pulling the rug
            out from under you".
            >
            > "I don't consider (POTA2001) either left or right-wing. To me,
            it's more representative of our present fragmented society. Again,
            part of what made the first one a classic is that the issues were so
            clearly delineated. I could rattle off the issues of the late '60's
            in a second. But today's problems aren't as clearly defined.
            Globalization, instant access to information - which are good in some
            respects - also create a weird kind of fragmentation, and involve
            issues that could end up being scary. That's why I threw in so many
            cross-references - to portray the way things are now".
            >
            > "I like people to act like animals. Something about that appeals
            to me. I don't know if it's because of the struggle between my
            emotional and intellectual life - the primal vs. the intellectual -
            which are always at odds with themselves, but I like representations
            of animal people".
            >
            > "The ultimate idea in the POTA mythology is that the apes act
            like people and the people act like animals. In our film, you're
            looking at an early time where some ape factions want to maintain
            their ape-like purity, while others coose to act EXACTLY like humans.
            (Thade) supports this purity. Some of the more affluent apes imitate
            human behavior...and the humans haven't quite gotten their self-
            esteem completely destroyed yet".
            >
            > "I felt a little something for each character...since the movie
            is all about reversals, each character in my mind had a lonely, sad
            quality to them - a certain burden to them. I relate to Ari because
            she reminds me, in her own culture, of a lost soul, a person who has
            strong feelings but hasn't found her place in the world. I call
            them 'animal people' - people who respond to animals because they're
            sensitive and glean that sensitivity off of animals. There's a
            beautiful, sad quality to those people".
            >
            > "Before movies, people used to listen to weird campfire stories
            told by witch doctors. That's what I love about movies - putting
            symbols to things so that you can have your own interpretations and
            feelings about them, trying to explain the unexplainable or show
            things that we all are thinking about or talking about but can come
            up with no definitive answer. It's just a beautiful, healthy genre
            that way".
            >
            > OK, "The Directors" series is made by the American Film
            Institute and shown on the Encore cable channel (they also regularly
            appear on VHS and DVD). Each hour episode profiles a current Ameican
            film director with extensive interviews with the subject and actors
            who worked with them. The Burton episode looks like it was made
            before POTA, since they don't talk about it, but it's been updated
            because there's a clip from it and they mention his next movie, "Big
            Fish". Here's a few quotes:
            >
            > Michael Keaton: "He's one of the only people I know, one of the
            few people I know, who doesn't HAVE a choice. He just IS an artist.
            It's more of a choice for other people. I don't think Tim Burton has
            a choice, I think he was born to be an artist. You know, some things
            are good, some things are not good, some things are brilliant, some
            things are less brilliant, whatever. It all comes from a GENUINELY
            artistic, creative source in him.That's just the way it is".
            >
            > Burton: "I wouldn't know a good script if it bit me in the face. I
            really don't think I would. People will say, "Oh, it's a great
            script!" and I won't really know. So I've always found that it's
            really based on how you feel, and your own personal take on
            something. I've often dealt with bad scripts or scripts that aren't
            even there, but you get involved because there's something about the
            propertyor the energy of it...And I always like to think of it on a
            more internal level. Because I find my emotional level is much
            clearer than my mental. I find that my mental mind can talk myself in
            or out of things (but) if I respond to things on an emotional level
            it pretty much stays there".
            >
            > Keaton: "'Batman' was incredibly difficult and what people don't
            realize is...the first 'Batman', you could look at it and say it's
            got it's faults, it's not perfect, but I really, really like that
            movie. REALLY like that movie; because I KNOW how hard it was to get
            that accomplished. And I really like it because it wasn't what
            everyone thought it was going to be, and we weren't ever going to
            make what everyone thought it was going to be. That wasn't the deal,
            so you could've failed. Could've REALLY failed. In a HUGE way. And it
            didn't. Not only financially. It just didn't."
            >
            > Martin Landau: "He's a visionary, and the things that interest him
            are things that interest him. And when he has that kind of love for a
            piece of material and begins to see it, I know he HAS to see it on a
            screen eventually. So he'll fight for it and work towards it and get
            it going. And that's terrific. Hollywood...the WORLD needs more
            people like that. So, he's an artist working within a system that
            tries to confine people or relegate them to certain kinds of things.
            And he's refused to allow that to happen to him. And I admire that".
            >
            > Let's sum up: You hire Burton, you're going to get a Burton
            picture, for better or worse. He makes his movies distinctly his,
            featuring his concerns and passions. I guess his movies are as close
            to art as anyone's. Thanks for your time. - - Patrick M. T.

            *** Let it be known throughout all the planet of the talkin' monkeys
            that I, Patrick M[ichael]. T[ilton]., did NOT put my imprimatur on
            the above passage! Burton's flicks are half-&-half; some I like
            ("Mars Attacks" & "Sleepy Hollow") and some I'm not all that hyped on
            ("Batman Returns" & "Planet of the Apes 2K"). Dyslexia, hey, I'll let
            that slide... but FORGERY? If we start down that dark road, well, you
            don't wanna know what kinds of forgeries I might be capable of! So,
            beware, you beast, Veetus, for ye is the Dabble's pawn...

            P.M.T.
            <.html
            Group: pota Message: 23586 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
            Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Shiny Things
            .html
            --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
            >
            > The actual reason the natives took the clothing is probably an
            afterthought......the script required Taylor to blend in with the
            natives so he needed to be in their garb. The easiest way to do this
            was to have some natives steal his clothes.
            >
            > I'm sure whatever the original reason for suppression of the power
            of speech, by then it had degenerated into instinct. Same with the
            stealing of clothes, destruction of equipment, etc... Anyone who has
            drive through a baboon troop at Lion Country Safari knows that.

            *** "... degenerated into instinct." EXACTLY!

            Patrick (how's THAT for keepin' it short & sweet?)
            <.html
            Group: pota Message: 23587 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
            Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
            .html
            Attachments :
              .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 9:47:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:


                I forget which one, but one of the "Star Wars" films? - - - Jeff




              James, these are too easy.  You need to go through sequences a frame at a time to find those ones where you can't really tell what you're looking at.  Anyway, this is from the hunt in PLANET.  You can see the corn under the horses head on the right.  Now, when during the hunt this frame is from is a harder question.  At first I thought it might be the two gorillas going after Taylor with their net between them, but I can see that the gorilla horse"man" in the back has one of those poles (whatever they're called), so I don't know.  Anyway, thanks for taking the time to capture the frame.
                









              <.html
              <.html
              Group: pota Message: 23588 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
              Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art
              .html
              .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 9:39:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:


              Kassidy, can't you ever be serious? Love, Jeff




              Yeah, she never ever talks POTA.  All she ever does is just make with the wisecracks!  What's her problem?
              <.html
              <.html
              Group: pota Message: 23589 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
              Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Good Night! (OT)
              .html
              .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 9:43:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:


                They're planning another "Godfather" sequel, without Puzo. (see www.comingsoon.net
              ). And Drew Barrymore is to star in a sequel to "The Wizard of Oz". Crazy town. - - - Jeff



              Yeah, I know, O Lord High and Mighty, but why am I not very excited?
              <.html
              <.html
              Group: pota Message: 23590 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
              Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
              .html
              .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 11:24:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:


              But after pointing out James' spelling errors, he pointed out
              (to Michael, not to me directly) that he'd been diagnosed with
              dyslexia, which "makes it hard sometimes" (as he said, if I remember
              him right).


              Patrick


              And you believed that?  HA!  James is a fibber!  If he's dyslexic it must be maps that he sees backwards!  HA! HA! HA!  (James, you monkey poop, you!)

              Anyway, I'm a terrible speller, and so I try to make sure everything is correct before I push "send," but sometimes I miss things.  So that's why I've corrected others in the past AND WILL CONTINUE YOU TO!  If I take the trouble others can too, especially those who think "a lot" is one work.

              -- Rory (who checked his spelling and found he forgot the r in everything! [that's the word everything, not every word with an r in it])
              <.html
              <.html
              Group: pota Message: 23591 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
              Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME,
              .html
              .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 11:35:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:


              *** Let it be known throughout all the planet of the talkin' monkeys
              that I, Patrick M[ichael]. T[ilton]., did NOT put my imprimatur on
              the above passage! Burton's flicks are half-&-half; some I like
              ("Mars Attacks" & "Sleepy Hollow") and some I'm not all that hyped on
              ("Batman Returns" & "Planet of the Apes 2K"). Dyslexia, hey, I'll let
              that slide... but FORGERY? If we start down that dark road, well, you
              don't wanna know what kinds of forgeries I might be capable of! So,
              beware, you beast, Veetus, for ye is the Dabble's pawn...

              P.M.T.

              Patrick

              Has it ever occurred to you, Patrick, that maybe if you did fool around a little you might be more interesting?  But then you've rarely displayed much of an appreciation for mocking as a form of endearment, you stinker!

              Anyway, "Mars Attacks"?!!!   Yikes!  That movie stinks!  It's not as boring as POTA 2K, but it's bad just the same.

              -- Rory
              <.html
              <.html
              Group: pota Message: 23592 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
              Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
              .html
              --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
              >
              > It's kinda funny.
              > Everyone sounds like Cylones.
              > I love the way the themes are explained at a child's level.
              > Patrick should watch these. Even his giant brain couldn't
              > misconstrue them. But I'm sure he'll say the writers meant
              > something else.

              *** Cylones? You mean the 'Cylons' from BATTLESTAR GALACTICA?
              As for the "Return" series, I didn't get mine from James; I ordered a
              set of both the live-action TV show and the animated show from some
              guy on Ebay... paid around $50.00 for 'em. Just half a year prior to
              the TV show being released on DVD! Drat!
              When I was a 10/11-year-old kid watching "Return" on TV, in its
              original airing, I wasn't all that impressed with it. It's easier to
              animate cars and airplanes than to animate horses... so they went the
              cheap route and modernized Ape City, without changing the clothing
              styles, though! I don't HATE it, though; they DID try to do a little
              bit of surreptitious commentary on the real world in it. Urko,
              according to Eric Greene's book, was evocative of Nixon in some ways.
              He had "enemies" (like Breck's "Achilles List" a la Nixon's "enemies
              list") and wanted to escalate a war against the "third-world humans"
              like Nixon in Vietnam.
              But, for the LIFE of me, I still don't know that the f*ck they meant
              when they referred to "Dr. Stanton's theory of Time Thrust"... WHAT?
              Sounds like just a bunch of pseudoscientific gobbledygook; why not
              just drag out "Dr Hasslein's theory of Time in a vehicle travelling
              nearly the speed of light"? As long as we're talking about Relativity
              then I don't have a problem with it--it's the most plausible way
              to "jump" a protagonist (or 3) into the Future. But "Time Thrust"?
              What is that supposed to be?

              Patrick

              P.S. My brain isn't as giant as the Gestalt mutants B-1 (etc.) in
              Marvel's "TERROR" series. Sometimes Rory gives me a headache that
              feels like it could fill such a volume of grey matter, though...
              <.html
              Group: pota Message: 23593 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
              Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
              .html
              .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 12:05:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:


              Sometimes Rory gives me a headache that
              feels like it could fill such a volume of grey matter, though...


              GOOD!
              <.html
              <.html
              Group: pota Message: 23594 From: sand_hill_school Date: 10/23/2002
              Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
              .html
              --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:

              > -- Rory (who checked his spelling and found he forgot the r in
              everything!
              > [that's the word everything, not every word with an r in it])

              Hi, Rory.

              That was funny. Since I have been posting directly to the board, I
              have found myself checking my writing less carefully. So those of
              you with red ink pens should have a field day with my posts.

              --Helen
              <.html
              Group: pota Message: 23595 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
              Subject: Two-Minute Warning
              .html
              Attachments :
                .htmlHey, with all the horrible stuff going on up in a certain area of the country, has anybody else here ever seen this Chuck Heston movie from the seventies?  It's not great, but it's not bad either.  I haven't seen it in years, so I just picked up a used copy on Amazon.

                By the way, have you noticed that the "certain area" where current events are happening is the same area where I say the astronauts crossed the Forbidden Zone in PLANET?  Maybe this nut was one of the lurkers here and James and I set him off with our arguing.  It's all your fault, James!

                -- Rory

                <.html
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23596 From: james611102 Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
                .html
                Please stop calling me a liar.

                --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
                > And you believed that? HA! James is a fibber! If he's dyslexic
                it must be
                > maps that he sees backwards! HA! HA! HA! (James, you monkey
                poop, you!)
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23597 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Shiny Things
                .html
                .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 12:10:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:


                *** "... degenerated into instinct." EXACTLY!

                Patrick (how's THAT for keepin' it short & sweet?)


                Isn't that what I was trying to get at?  I thought I was, anyway.
                <.html
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23598 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
                .html
                .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/02 12:19:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, JamesA1102@... writes:


                Please stop calling me a liar.



                Okay, Mr. There's-a-helicopter-in-PLANET!
                <.html
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23599 From: sand_hill_school Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
                .html
                --- In pota@y..., "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
                wrote:
                > *** Is this the face that launched a thousand ships?
                > Hi, Helen.

                Hi, Patrick.

                I'm old, but I'm probably not quite old enough to be THAT Helen.

                --Helen
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23600 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Secret Governments on the Planet of the Apes
                .html
                --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
                > The name "Merou" has these sorts of historical connotations--to a
                Frenchman, if not you. The mythic merman Merovech probably represents
                somebody who came to France from across the Mediterranean; the
                authors of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (the American title) suggest that
                this connects the fall of Jerusalem (circa 70 A.D.) and the fleeing
                of the Royal Family (Mary Magdalene and her "holy child" by Jesus:
                symbolically, the "grail"--the fruit of her womb/chalice, carrying
                the Blood[line] of Jesus in it) to a safe haven, a Jewish diaspora
                community in the Langued'oc region of France.
                >
                > Uhhh... true, and though some say that the masonic illuminati's
                real purpose is to protect the holy bloodline, still others claim
                that power has been wrested away by satanic lodges, who worship
                Lucifer as a god, and they, and others are trying to take over the
                world for their own devilish purposes.
                > What are your thoughts on this, Patrick?

                *** Our current President, George W. Bush, is a member of the "Skull-
                &-Bones" society, just like his daddy was. Those who contend that the
                people who tend to acquire positions of enormous power GET that power
                by being affiliated with the behind-the-scenes "elite" of secret
                societies... there's probably something to it. I've voted for the
                Libertarian candidates the last several elections, not because I
                thought they had a snowball's chance in Hell of winning, but because
                it seems as if the two "choices" we usually get are really getting
                money from the same core groups of financial supporters. It takes
                MONEY and MEDIA EXPOSURE in order to be a contender in big-time
                politics; Perot had his own money, and somehow got the media exposure
                to become a "player", but he lost anyway.
                As for any possible "satanic" lodges taking over other secret
                societies, well, I don't know. People keep secrets for a number of
                reasons; sometimes, the Truth has to be kept secret (as Zaius does),
                to serve the "better interests" of Society. Sometimes, like in a time
                of war, information has to be "classified" lest the Enemy take
                advantage of it and win the war. Is the "Priory of Zion" really
                keeping a lid on the "true" history of Jesus, concerning an alleged
                marriage to Mary Magdalene & the begetting of his dynastic heir,
                a "grail" child? Who knows? Well, the "Ones" keeping the secret do...
                Frankly, my brand of Americanism is founded on the principles by
                which America was founded: that Governments exist NOT by any "divine
                right" (as it was all over the world, in 1776) but by the consent of
                the governed--the People. The People have a right to establish a
                government in order to further their own Rights to Life, Liberty,
                Property, Privacy, Pursuit-of-Happiness, etc. The People also have a
                right to abolish their government if it has failed to secure those
                rights. Jefferson thought it likely that every so often there would
                be another Revolutionary war--that the People (Americans) would put
                their foot down and "run the bastards outta town" if they attempted
                to establish any form of tyranny over them. In the last 10 years or
                so, we've seen the Waco tragedy, the Ruby Ridge massacre, etc. and
                these abuses of power by the Federal government directly led to
                McVeigh's decision to commit mass-murder in Oklahoma City. I hope
                that those in positions of power think twice before allowing BATF
                types to trample on the rights of the citizens of this nation, since
                the backlash against it can be horrific. I don't agree with what
                McVeigh did, but it can be thought of as an inevitable response from
                the fringe against the monolithic State.

                The alleged "holy" bloodline of Jesus, the "grail dynasty"--even if
                it DOES exist--never HAD, does NOT have, and never WILL have
                the "divine right" to exercise Rule over ANYBODY. Monarchism is
                bullshit. Queen Liz II may be a nice lady, but she doesn't "rule" as
                Regina Dei Gratia ("Queen by the Grace of God"). There IS no "god" up
                in hebbin who grants to favored families the "right" to control other
                people. The geniuses who founded America ridiculed this notion
                (Thomas Paine, in particular), contending that the People's "creator"
                (call it/him "god" or "Jehovah" or "Jesus" or "Allah" or mere NATURE)
                gave ALL men (i.e. humans) EQUAL RIGHTS, including the right to
                establish a government to serve THEIR interests, not to be the
                vassals of a "king" whose interests THEY had to serve.
                If the so-called "Grail" heir is reading this... wise up, pal, and
                forget that old-hat nonsense. You aren't "special" and deserving of a
                place on any throne.

                Just to put in a POTA tie-in, here, this is one of the reasons that
                BATTLE is an important work in the Saga. At the end of CONQUEST,
                Caesar rants to MacDonald & the overthrown Breck that "we [the Apes]
                shall found our own armies, our own religion, our own dynasty", and
                in BATTLE the dynastic family of Caesar, Lisa, and Cornelius has been
                established. For the first time since July 3rd, 1776, a monarchic
                form of government rules over (at least a part of) America. Yet by
                the end of the film, the heir to the throne is dead; what of Caesar's
                monarchic ambitions then? What if Lisa is past the age of child-
                bearing? What if there is no blood-heir to Caesar's throne?
                MacDonald, in BATTLE, wants his own people to work towards its own
                destiny, as EQUALS with Caesar's simian community. Will that be
                possible under a monarchy? What sort of government is the best-
                equipped to safeguard the inalienable rights of the individual, be
                he/she a Man or an Ape?
                I think it is a "republican form of government" (Art. IV, Section 4
                of the U.S. Constitution) which works the best [by "republican" I do
                NOT necessarily mean one comprised of those in the "Republican
                Party", since many of them aren't true "republicans"]. A "limited"
                government OF/BY/FOR the People, which they can abolish if they so
                choose, if it fails to work the way it should. But Caesar is caught
                up in the "dichotomy" between HUMAN history and APE history (which
                has only just started to be "written", of course)... although the
                murder of his son by Aldo symbolically has made the Apes "join the
                human race" as MacDonald says.

                Patrick
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23601 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: Oh please!
                .html
                --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
                > Another classic PMT posting.
                >
                > Patrick, read up on modern history and you'll discover a kitten
                > says "Merou".
                >
                > Boulle was saying this guy is a pussy.
                >
                > It also sounds a bit like "merangue", a dessert made from egg
                > whites. This means Merou is white, and likes eggs.
                >
                > You are a great competitor in the Conclusions Jump aren't you?
                >
                > Michael

                *** Mike, you do NOT want to know what I've concluded about you!

                If Boulle were alive today, maybe he'd "clue us in" on any meanings
                he may have had regarding the names of his characters. Since he's
                dead, and since I can read and make conclusions all by my lonesome,
                then I do so. So what? There are those (Dominic Crossan, for one, I
                believe) who think that the naming of Jesus' betrayer as "Judas" was
                an intention antisemitic addition to the pseudohistorical story told
                as "gospel". The name "Judas" is just another form of "Judah", the
                eponymous founder of the line of "yehudim"/"Jews", one of the 12 sons
                of Jacob/Israel. Thus, "Judah"/"Judas" stands for ALL Jews... and the
                one disciple with this name is the villain in the story. What's in a
                name? It seems, ONE HELL OF A LOT!
                I think comparing/contrasting the name "Merou" with the
                ancient "Merovech" (a name a Frenchman might be familiar with, if
                most others weren't) is valid. The "fish" connection doesn't just end
                there, though. Jesus wanted his disciples to be "fishers of men", and
                the symbol of the Fish was a Christian symbol before the Cross was.
                The Greek word for fish ["Ichthys"] is also an acronym for "Iesous
                CHristos THeou hUiou Soter": "Jesus Christ, of God the Son, Savior".
                A descendant of "Ichthys"/Jesus might very well be portrayed as a
                half-fish/half-man character. And this "Merovech" character who
                arrived at Marseilles in southern Gaul/France, has a name which
                Boulle mysteriously echoes with his "Ulysse MEROU" character.
                There's a difference between "jumping to conclusions" and seeing
                obvious and not-too-obvious parallelisms between different sets of
                data.

                Patrick

                P.S. The naming of "Jesus" is also quite interesting. Linguistically,
                it is no different than the name "Joshua", the successor of Moses,
                who led the Israelites across the Jordan river and committed mass-
                murder against the Canaanites in order to settle the land that
                Jehovah had "promised" to their ancestor, Abraham. Joshua's full name
                is "Joshua-ben-Nun", Joshua the son of Nun. The word "nun" in Hebrew
                means FISH. The letter "nun" in the Hebrew alphabet has a gematria
                value of "50", and the father of the "Noah" character from Babylonian
                mythology had a name which meant "the number fifty", which would make
                Joshua/Jesus a "son of the Fish", a "son of 50", and a Noah-figure
                (in whose ship the few survivors of God's judgment will be...) all in
                one. The half-man/half-fish "god" named Oannes, according to the
                Babylonian myth-historian Berossus, was the one who instructed
                Ziusudra (the Babylonian Noah/Utnapishtim) to build the ark. The
                duration of the "first age" (the time between the First Man/King and
                the Flood) was said to be 432,000 years; the Biblical chronology (in
                the Masoretic text) has it at 1,656 years, and both durations are
                tied in with the computations of the great cycle of the Precession of
                the Equinoxes, thought to be 25,920 years. Every single year, the
                Earth precesses (wobbles like a top) back along the Ecliptic fifty
                arc-seconds, amounting to 72 years per arc-degree, or 2,160 years (on
                average) through each of the Zodiacal "Ages". The Age of Taurus ended
                about 2000 B.C., which is why Bull-worship faded away, and the Age of
                Aries led to the Ram-gods (and the Lamb); the "Christian" Era,
                the "Age of Pisces" we're now in has immense significance for
                astrology afficionados... and the up-coming "Age of Aquarius" is just
                on the horizon. The "Water Bearer" is set to pour out water (the last
                judgment of God, as "in the days of Noah"?) upon the Earth, like
                the "bowls of wrath" mentioned in "Revelation". The number of
                the "saved" in Revelation, 12,000 from each of the 12 tribes of
                Israel, amounts to 144,000 people, which is exactly one-third of
                432,000, the # of years Berossus gave for the "First Age" of Man. The
                Hebrew number, 1,656 years amounts to 86,400 weeks (the same number
                of seconds in a day): 86,400 times 7 divided by 365.2422 equals
                1655.887518... the "leap" days have to be "fudged" a bit, but this is
                how it all ties together mathematically, folks.
                Curiously, it is during the transition from the Age of Pisces to the
                Age of Aquarius (sometime around the 27th century) when Mankind on
                Earth reverts to an animal, while Ulysse Merou is off on his voyage
                there-and-back-again to Soror/Betelgeuse.
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23602 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME,
                .html
                --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
                > In a message dated 10/23/02 11:35:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
                > patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
                >
                >
                > > *** Let it be known throughout all the planet of the talkin'
                monkeys that I, Patrick M[ichael]. T[ilton]., did NOT put my
                imprimatur on the above passage! Burton's flicks are half-&-half;
                some I like ("Mars Attacks" & "Sleepy Hollow") and some I'm not all
                that hyped on ("Batman Returns" & "Planet of the Apes 2K"). Dyslexia,
                hey, I'll let that slide... but FORGERY? If we start down that dark
                road, well, you don't wanna know what kinds of forgeries I might be
                capable of! So, beware, you beast, Veetus, for ye is the Dabble's
                pawn...
                > >
                > > P.M.T.
                > Patrick
                >
                > Has it ever occurred to you, Patrick, that maybe if you did fool
                around a little you might be more interesting? But then you've
                rarely displayed much of an appreciation for mocking as a form of
                endearment, you stinker!
                >
                > Anyway, "Mars Attacks"?!!! Yikes! That movie stinks! It's not
                as boring as POTA 2K, but it's bad just the same.
                >
                > -- Rory

                *** I thought "Mars Attacks" was a laff-riot. I can remember those
                commercials from the 70's of Slim Whitman records allegedly out-
                selling the Beatles (!). Where? What backwater hick-country in
                Alabammy sold more 45's of Slim than of the Fab Four? The idea that
                those yodeling monstrosities are the only way to kill off the
                Martians had me screaming with laughter. I admit, I was only one of a
                few in the theater who "got" that joke... but, still!

                Patrick
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23603 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1389
                .html

                 

                 pota@yahoogroups.com wrote:

                ------------------------ ---------------------~-->
                Home Selling? Try Us!
                http://us.click.yahoo.com/QrPZMC/iTmEAA/jd3IAA/9_IolB/TM
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

                There are 25 messages in this issue.

                Topics in this digest:

                1. Medium
                From: "Michael Whitty"
                2. Re: Good Night! (OT)
                From: Haristas@...
                3. Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
                From: JamesA1102@...
                4. Re: Re: Apes in Art
                From:
                5. Re: Good Night! (OT)
                From:
                6. Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
                From:
                7. Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
                From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                8. Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
                From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                9. Re: Shiny Things
                From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                10. Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
                From: Haristas@...
                11. Re: Re: Apes in Art
                From: Haristas@...
                12. Re: Good Night! (OT)
                From: Haristas@...
                13. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
                From: Haristas@...
                14. Re: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
                From: Haristas@...
                15. Re: "Return" Tape
                From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                16. Re: "Return" Tape
                From: Haristas@...
                17. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
                From: "sand_hill_school"
                18. Two-Minute Warning
                From: Haristas@...
                19. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
                From: "james611102"
                20. Re: Shiny Things
                From: Haristas@...
                21. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
                From: Haristas@...
                22. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
                From: "sand_hill_school"
                23. Secret Governments on the Planet of the Apes
                From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                24. Re: Oh please!
                From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                25. Re: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
                From: "patrickmichaeltilton"


                Message: 1
                Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:18:12 +1000
                From: "Michael Whitty"
                Subject: Medium

                This article is a little off topic, but it makes a great point about modern
                movies and it made me think maybe Apes has a better chance as a TV Series.

                http://users.cyberone.com.au/whitty/LawandOrder.jpg

                Any thoughts?

                Michael


                [This message contained attachments]



                ________________________________________________________________________
                "Dead Poet's Society" - - "The film that best connects with who I am"
                "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" - - "Best dramatic film ever made"
                "Star Wars" - - "Best sci-fi film ever made" (D'oh!)
                "Psycho" - - "Greatest break in film structure and greatest twist in one
                film"

                A pretty bland list, if you ask me. He's got the same plastic imagination
                Schpealberg does. Won't be expecting anything great from him. "The
                Godfather" best film?!!! I was watching some of it the other night, and I've
                decided that Marlon Brando in it is TERRIBLE!

                -- Rory


                [This message contained attachments]



                Message: 3
                Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:08:50 EDT
                From: JamesA1102@...
                Subject: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz

                OK can anyone guess where this is from?
                [Unable to display image]

                [This message contained attachments]



                Message: 4
                Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:40:05 -0700
                From:
                Subject: Re: Re: Apes in Art

                Kassidy, can't you ever be serious? Love, Jeff


                ----- Original Message -----
                From: "Kassidy Rae"
                To:
                Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:41 PM
                Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Apes in Art


                > Dear Michael, I love lots of Aussie's. I like Hugh whats-his-face
                > and Olivia what's her name. OH ALL RIGHT, YOU'VE CAUGHT ME... where
                > did you say you are on the map, now? I heard they were going to
                > rename your home town Kanga-ville.
                >
                > Actually I love all Aussie's except you and Pollack. You guys
                > related? Do you get naked and roll around on canvas? Oops, I'm
                > talking about Farrah, aren't I?
                > Well are you related to Farrah then? Does your hair swish when you
                > swing your head? Or is that the sound of your empty head?
                >
                > Love,
                > Kassidy
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                >
                >
                >




                Message: 5
                Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:44:26 -0700
                From:
                Subject: Re: Good Night! (OT)

                They're planning another "Godfather" sequel, without Puzo. (see www.comingsoon.net ). And Drew Barrymore is to star in a sequel to "The Wizard of Oz". Crazy town. - - - Jeff

                Message: 6
                Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:48:30 -0700
                From:
                Subject: Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz

                I forget which one, but one of the "Star Wars" films? - - - Jeff


                ----- Original Message -----
                From: JamesA1102@...
                To: pota@yahoogroups.com
                Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:08 AM
                Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz


                OK can anyone guess where this is from?








                Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


                [This message contained attachments]



                Message: 7
                Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:15:18 -0000
                From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                with "Handbasket" & "Wheels" & "Bakk".

                Patrick

                >
                > --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
                > > In a message dated 10/19/02 1:24:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
                > > sand_hill_school@y... writes:
                > >
                > > > Gosh **blush**. You remember me.
                > > >
                > > > I'm around.
                > > >
                > > > Helen
                > >
                > > I've always wondered, Helen, what is the Sand Hill School?
                > >
                > > -- Rory



                Message: 8
                Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:33:08 -0000
                From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                Subject: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!

                --- In pota@y..., wrote:
                Message: 10
                Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:38:38 EDT
                From: Haristas@...
                Subject: Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz

                In a message dated 10/23/02 9:47:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
                veetus@... writes:


                > I forget which one, but one of the "Star Wars" films? - - - Jeff
                >
                >

                James, these are too easy. You need to go through sequences a frame at a
                time to find those ones where you can't really tell what you're looking at.
                Anyway, this is from the hunt in PLANET. You can see the corn under the
                horses head on the right. Now, when during the hunt this frame is from is a
                harder question. At first I thought it might be the two gorillas going after
                Taylor with their net between them, but I can see that the gorilla horse"man"
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23604 From: Kassidy Rae Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Pota serious stuff
                .html

                There have been a couple of questions as to why I am always joking and a complaint that I don't talk POTA.  When I first asked a couple POTA questions to the group in general, I didn't get replies.   It took you guys months (for the most part) to even profess the SLIGHTEST interest in my pota tv web site. 

                Don't get me wrong, we've been down this road and discussed that before.  I am merely making a point.  I could care less.

                Now I don't discuss the minute details of WHY they did this or that in POTA because I think for the most part the writers and producers, etc. did not for the most part give a big hairy  WHY.  Mostly, if you've found an inconsistency, it's because it is a screw-up.  I enjoy the movies, and probably will always.  I still have a child-like view of them.  But I don't disect it too much.  I don't believe in fighting over it. I just love it.  I don't know a lot about sci-fi, and I can't tell you shit about the difference between sf and sci-fi. 

                I read most of your posts here.  I rarely watch tv anymore. But the posts keep the movies alive for me. 

                I'm busy with the children you know, and I'm writing something for a start up business selling e-books that is due to open up probably at the end of the year.  I make my choices.

                Now I am being serious, and I am talking POTA.  Does anyone want me to share my point of view on anything particular in POTA? 

                Yours eternally,

                Kassidy Rae 

                PS  My opinion is, IT'S NOT CIRCULAR!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23605 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "Return" Tape
                .html
                .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/2002 11:05:51 AM Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:

                *** Cylones? You mean the 'Cylons' from BATTLESTAR GALACTICA?


                Yes, and I am dslexic. so climb off my back!
                <.html
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23606 From: james611102 Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Hel
                .html
                Give me a break. You always seem to forget that I emailed you
                immediately to let you know I was just kidding.

                --- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
                >
                > Okay, Mr. There's-a-helicopter-in-PLANET!
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23607 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Secret Governments on the Planet of the Ap
                .html
                .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/2002 12:01:33 PM Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:

                *** Our current President, George W. Bush, is a member of the "Skull-
                &-Bones" society, just like his daddy was.


                Old news Pat.  His Skull & Bones nickname is "Temporary" BTW.  Sort of ominous considering the times we live in.  And both he and Bogey are related to Princess Di for you trivia buffs.  As for Elizabeth's divine right to rule.  No way.  The Windsor's are a bunch of krauts.  And before that they virtually wiped the Stuart's from the face of the earth.  So if a pack of murdering bastards have a divine right it must come from Satan.  Anyway, God is so much more subtle than the 'Man on the Cloud with the white beard' ideal.  He's not readily visible but He's there.  You have to look at the Big Picture.  Tough for a non-theist like yourself Patrick, I know, being so caught up in minutia.  It's sort of like one of those eye puzzles.  You see Him someday.  Whether in the simplicity of the atom or the clockwork complexity of the universe.  It reminds me of something Dave Vainian of The Damned quoted, "Beauty isn't something you see with your eyes.  It's something you hunger for with your heart."
                <.html
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23608 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Oh please!
                .html
                .html
                And Patrick thinks that his ability to make these connection is a simple result of genetics end evolution.  You may as well say Luck!  WHAT IS THE GRAIL?  WHOM DOES IT SERVE?
                <.html
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23609 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels...
                .html
                In all fairness I don't think a lot of us have the time or
                inclination to use a spellcheck - I often use a server and CAN'T use
                a spellcheck.

                I post straight from the heart and that means I write it down and
                fire it off. Sometimes the result is a spelling error, and sometimes
                a potentially incredibly embarrassing mistake such as that I made
                yesterday (muddling up the name of a Power Records track).

                With the spelling, I still don't see why, so long as it is clear what
                the sender is communicating, anyone should feel they need to correct
                that spelling.

                With the mistake I made yesterday, Mr Cougar corrected me and I
                appreciate that. There was a genuine communication problem if the
                correction did not take place. Thankfully nobody made any nasty
                comments to make me feel any sillier than I already do...again, what
                would be the point? I erred, it was corrected, I realised and on we
                went.

                I believe we all should feel safe to fire off a post without too much
                research - are we a group of academics or a "bunch" of ape fans?

                Any idiot can sit down for two days with a dictionary and a few
                research books and write something that nobody understands (and
                therefore nobody bothers with). The challenge is to COMMUNICATE.
                Not to bamboozle. To bamboozle is usually and attempt to establish
                false authority.

                Michael

                --- Haristas@... wrote:
                > In a message dated 10/23/02 11:24:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
                > patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
                >
                >
                > > But after pointing out James' spelling errors, he pointed out
                > > (to Michael, not to me directly) that he'd been diagnosed with
                > > dyslexia, which "makes it hard sometimes" (as he said, if I
                remember
                > > him right).
                >
                > Patrick
                >
                >
                > And you believed that? HA! James is a fibber! If he's dyslexic
                it must be
                > maps that he sees backwards! HA! HA! HA! (James, you monkey poop,
                you!)
                >
                > Anyway, I'm a terrible speller, and so I try to make sure
                everything is
                > correct before I push "send," but sometimes I miss things. So
                that's why
                > I've corrected others in the past AND WILL CONTINUE YOU TO! If I
                take the
                > trouble others can too, especially those who think "a lot" is one
                work.
                >
                > -- Rory (who checked his spelling and found he forgot the r in
                everything!
                > [that's the word everything, not every word with an r in it])
                >
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23610 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Medium
                .html
                .html
                I can't read the article from The Cucaberra Times.  Can you use a OCR program on your scan?
                <.html
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23611 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels...
                .html
                .htmlIn a message dated 10/23/2002 6:07:31 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

                In all fairness I don't think a lot of us have the time or
                inclination to use a spellcheck


                I use it, but even my spellcheck can't spell Cylons.
                <.html
                <.html
                Group: pota Message: 23612 From: whitty@cyberone.com.au Date: 10/23/2002
                Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1389
                .html
                What the...?????

                --- Kassidy Rae <valwp@...> wrote:
                >
                >
                >
                > There are 25 messages in this issue.
                >
                > Topics in this digest:
                >
                > 1. Medium
                > From: "Michael Whitty"
                > 2. Re: Good Night! (OT)
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 3. Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
                > From: JamesA1102@...
                > 4. Re: Re: Apes in Art
                > From:
                > 5. Re: Good Night! (OT)
                > From:
                > 6. Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
                > From:
                > 7. Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
                > From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                >
                > 8. Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
                > From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                >
                > 9. Re: Shiny Things
                > From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                >
                > 10. Re: Re: POTA Movie Cap Object Quiz
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 11. Re: Re: Apes in Art
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 12. Re: Good Night! (OT)
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 13. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 14. Re: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 15. Re: "Return" Tape
                > From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                >
                > 16. Re: "Return" Tape
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 17. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
                > From: "sand_hill_school"
                > 18. Two-Minute Warning
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 19. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
                > From: "james611102"
                > 20. Re: Shiny Things
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 21. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk......
                > From: Haristas@...
                > 22. Re: Helen A. Handbasket... Helen Wheels... Helen Bakk... Hi!
                > From: "sand_hill_school"
                > 23. Secret Governments on the Planet of the Apes
                > From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                >
                > 24. Re: Oh please!
                > From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                >
                > 25. Re: Don't pin this pro-Burton love-fest on ME, veetus!
                > From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
                >
                >
                >
                >
                __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________
                <.html


                Copyright © 2026, Hunter Goatley. All rights reserved.
                Last updated 2026-03-31 10:42.