|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50249 |
From: scott bosco |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Update on new Caesar film |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50250 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: HDMI CABLES |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50251 |
From: Robert Murt |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: timeline of the planet of the apes |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50252 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50253 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: FW: Google Alert - "planet of the apes" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50254 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: extra footage of conquest and battle movies |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50255 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The Planet of the Apes Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50256 |
From: softparadeband |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Your next stop... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50257 |
From: Marshall |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The Planet of the Apes Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50258 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Your next stop... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50259 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50260 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Fwd: Discovery Channel - 2009: 'Year of the Gorilla' |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50261 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: apes tv series box set |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50262 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 4287 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50263 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50264 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: MySpace |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50265 |
From: drhasslein |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Update on new Caesar film |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50266 |
From: Marshall |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: KUDOS TO TIMELINE OF POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50267 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: apes tv series box set |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50268 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: KUDOS TO TIMELINE OF POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50269 |
From: zasco1957 |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50270 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: apes tv series box set |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50271 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: KUDOS TO TIMELINE OF POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50272 |
From: Marshall |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: KUDOS TO TIMELINE OF POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50273 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: apes tv series box set |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50274 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50275 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: more things I noticed during the Channel of the Apes Marathon |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50276 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50277 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50278 |
From: smagelowitz |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50279 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Scott Frank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50280 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: apes tv series box set |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50281 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50282 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50283 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: dissecting the original cut of CONQUEST |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50284 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50285 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50286 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50287 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50288 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Apes Opera |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50289 |
From: James |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50290 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU_RAY Timeline??? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50291 |
From: James |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: dissecting the original cut of CONQUEST |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50292 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: New poll for pota |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50293 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: New poll for pota |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50294 |
From: James |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: FW: Google Alert - "planet of the apes" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50295 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50296 |
From: softparadeband |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: APES timeline myth |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50297 |
From: jose ramon |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Opera |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50298 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50299 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50300 |
From: Stuart Drucker |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50301 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 4289 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50302 |
From: sparkytb2005 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50303 |
From: sparkytb2005 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: dissecting the original cut of CONQUEST |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50304 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: dissecting the original cut of CONQUEST |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50305 |
From: Troy Rawlings |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Layer Transistions on Return to the Planet of the Apes DVD set |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50306 |
From: branchbrood |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: False Alarm and Ape Feet |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50307 |
From: James |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: APES timeline myth |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50308 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Layer Transistions on Return to the Planet of the Apes DVD set |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50309 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50310 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Opera |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50311 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Apemania hits London! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50312 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50313 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: False Alarm and Ape Feet |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50314 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50315 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: a Power (Records) trip |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50316 |
From: sparkytb2005 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50317 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50318 |
From: James |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: FW: Google Alert - "planet of the apes" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50319 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Ape Heaven! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50320 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50321 |
From: Troy Rawlings |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Layer Transistions on Return to the Planet of the Apes DVD set |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50322 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: a Power (Records) trip |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50323 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: a Power (Records) trip |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50324 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50325 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: a Power (Records) trip |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50326 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50327 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50328 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Working hard on POTA, very hard. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50329 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50330 |
From: Scott Raile |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50331 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50332 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50333 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50334 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50335 |
From: scott bosco |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50336 |
From: James |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50337 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50338 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50339 |
From: John |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50340 |
From: branchbrood |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: False Alarm and Ape Feet |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50341 |
From: branchbrood |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50342 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50343 |
From: James |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50344 |
From: James |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50345 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50346 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/5/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50347 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/5/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50348 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/5/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50249 |
From: scott bosco |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Update on new Caesar film |
.htmlI love the way people today liberally take from a already made concept and then have gaul to called "New", "Original", "Fresh". Bullsh*t. These no talent hacks can't think of a real original story so build upon something which already exists. Common! Out of all the names he could have used he has to use "Caesar" This is another re-bout.
- Scott --- On Mon, 12/1/08, Rich Handley <handleyr@...> wrote:
From: Rich Handley <handleyr@...> Subject: [pota] Update on new Caesar film To: potadg@yahoogroups.com, pota@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, December 1, 2008, 4:58 PM
From CHUD:
SCOTT FRANK TELLS CHUD "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF THE PLANET OF THE APES!"
For the last month I've been on the heels of a story that has excited me: Fox has been developing a new Planet of the Apes film, a prequel. There were a lot of rumors. We heard from sources close to Fox that the film (which we were told was called Planet of the Apes: Genesis or Genesis: Apes) was a remake of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes. It would tell the story of Caesar, the chimpanzee who led the apes in rebellion, conquering humanity and creating a planet where apes ruled and humans served. As we learned this weekend, things have changed in the previous months. Fox is still excited about this property, and now they've put the film into the hands of writer/director Scott Frank. The film is now called Caesar. But what about the rest of the info? Was any of it true? If so, does it still apply now that Frank is on the
project? I went to the source and this morning spoke to Scott Frank himself. Caesar is not a remake of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes. This is a fact that Frank can't stress to you enough - his film will not feature talking monkeys, and it will not end with chimpanzees running wild in the streets, taking over the world. But it isn't entirely divorced from the world of Planet of the Apes, either. In fact, Frank sees his movie as the opening chapter in a saga that could span the thousand years between today and a world where apes rule. What's most exciting about Caesar is that Frank is committed to telling a hard science fiction story. The science that creates a hyper-intelligent chimpanzee is based on current real world research - this film would just take
that science one step further. He's also committed to telling a story based on character, not antic ape action. His plan for Caesar is one where you come to really feel for this ape, even as the final act sees him taking actions that may be hard for us to agree with. But getting Caesar to be a real character on the page is just one of the challenges still facing Frank. He is right now just in the beginning phases of rewriting the script, and even if he is able to nail the story, he still has to figure out if he can bring Caesar to life on screen. Since he doesn't want to have people running around in monkey suits, Frank is doing lots of research into the state of effects today - can he create a photoreal chimpanzee (one who is facially modified by the genetic engineering that grants him his intelligence) who will be the main character for this film? Can he create a character who is completely expressive through his face, eyes, and gestures
(including sign language) without speaking a word of dialogue? Fox seems convinced Frank can make it work. Caesar excites the writer/director because it's something so outside of his wheelhouse*, but he's adamant that he wants to get it right, and he says that the studio feels the same way. This is a film that needs to be grounded in character and science, and then made to feel real. While we didn't get into details, what Frank told me made Caesar sound like it would also continue the Apes tradition of tackling social issues, something sorely lacking in Tim Burton's stillborn re-imagining. Frank was audibly excited about the movie as he told me about it, but he was also very cautious to say that he wouldn't know if the film would be going ahead until at least February. It does sound like Fox is eager to get this franchise restarted, so I hope that Frank feels comfortable with his script and the FX, since I'd rather see a guy who can
write (and direct, judging by the criminally underseen The Lookout) on this film than a guy whose commercial background convinces the suits he can shoot action that will look cool in a trailer. As a lifelong fan of the Apes series, Frank's take on this material has me excited in a way that I wouldn't have thought possible. The great thing about each of the original Apes sequels is that they did something new and unexpected, and there are many elements in Frank's concept that fit right in that tradition. His story is one that will work as a standalone thriller, as a science fiction thinker and as the beginning of a larger, grander saga. Hopefully Caesar will continue moving forward. If it does, expect us to be at the forefront of its evolution, bringing you all the latest news. * Although it's worth noting that Frank has been involved in thoughtful scifi before, namely Minority Report.
|
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50250 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: HDMI CABLES |
.htmlYes. I got the Blue Ray set about 2 weeks ago. I bought it from Deep DVD Discount. It was around $68... I have to watch them... Look forward t seeing you r collection on the POTA show. I DVRed them..
DAve. --- On Tue, 12/2/08, Tim "apefan" <apefan23@...> wrote:
From: Tim "apefan" <apefan23@...> Subject: Re: [pota] HDMI CABLES To: pota@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2008, 7:22 AM
Hey Dave,,....I don't know much about them ........I did read somewhere the better the cables , the better picture but that's about all I know...I'm sure the ones you got will be fine...Did you get the Bluray POTA set yet? --- On Sun, 11/30/08, David Giwner < bikergator25@ yahoo.com> wrote: > From: David Giwner < bikergator25@ yahoo.com> > Subject: [pota] HDMI CABLES > To: "Pota" < pota@yahoogroups. com> > Date: Sunday, November 30, 2008, 9:06 PM > Rory and Tim these are the HDMi cables I purchased for my > Blue Ray player.. I opted for the Sony BDP 350. I got it > at Best Buy for $199.. I bought the monster cables for $80
> and my friend emailed this
site for these cables.. I ordered > them and will return the monster cables back to Best Buy.. > I thought I was doing the right thing by buying the > monster cables... What do you think?? > NYC DAVE... > > http://www.monopric e.com/products/ subdepartment. asp?c_id= 102&cp_id= 10242 |
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50251 |
From: Robert Murt |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: timeline of the planet of the apes |
|
.html I just got my book yesterday and at first glance, I would say it looks and reads great. Wonderful cover art and easy to read timeline. A fine looking project overall.
B <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50252 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
.htmlYou might want to take a look at this: https://pota.goatley.com/scripts/pota_teachguide.pdf
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "smagelowitz" <smagelowitz@...> wrote: > > Hey all, I am new to this forum, but it's got a ton of great > information on Planet of the Apes, which is exactly what I am looking > for. I need to write a paper for my rhetorical criticism class on > planet of the apes and the lens I chose to use was metaphorical > criticism. Does anyone have any ideas for me? Basically, I need to > use the metaphors in this movie to come up with an idea that will be > the length of 15 pages. I am currently thinking of relating it to the > idea that a lot of the metaphors represent the African American > struggle in the U.S. society in the 60s and onward. Thanks a lot for > taking your time, I appreciate any advice. > > -Steve >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50253 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: FW: Google Alert - "planet of the apes" |
.html.html
Google News
Alert for: “planet of the apes”
|
'Planet
of the Apes' Prequel Gets Scott Frank as Director
AceShowbiz - USA
'The Lookout' director/writer, Scott Frank, has been rumored to take the
helming part of 'Planet of the Apes' prequel film, which
is reported to be ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
‘Planet
of the Apes’ Remake Prequel Reboot Do Over is Finding
Traction
RopeofSilicon.com -
Seattle,WA,USA
The film would supposedly be along the lines of the origin story told in
1972’s Conquest of the Planet of the Apes and was
described as a story centering on ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
Rumor:
Scott Frank Directing New Planet of the Apes Movie?
First Showing - Colorado
Springs,CO,USA
by Alex Billington A lot has been happening with Planet of the Apes
over the last few weeks. Maybe it's the sales number associated with the new
Blu-Ray box ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
A
Planet of the Apes prequel--How The Apes took
over
Frankly My Dear . . . -
Orlando,FL,USA
Talk of a Planet of the Apes prequel, almost certainly
quicker, dirtier and lacking the input of Tim Burton, is out and about. CHUD
is pushing this as some ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
Official
Word On Returning To Planet Of The Apes
Cinema Blend - USA
By Rafe Telsch: 2008-11-30 16:54:12 There’s been buzz going around
about a possible Planet of the Apes sequel/prequel
project possibility, titled Genesis: ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
PLANET
OF THE APES Prequel Invades Fox
Mania - Los Angeles,CA,USA
... you probably would have been flipping channels this weekend and
seen the channel airing a Planet of the Apes marathon
for the past few days. ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
Planet
Of The Apes returns
Den Of Geek - London,UK
We can’t be alone in the thinking that the recent
‘reimagining’ of the Planet Of The Apes
franchise, with Tim Burton at the helm, had all but killed off any ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
Planet
of the Apes Prequel Coming
MoviesOnline -
Toronto,Ontario,Canada
This go around Planet of the Apes is getting the remake
treatment in a prequel to Tim Burtons remake ( of sorts ) From
HorrorMovies.ca comes word that the ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
'Planet
of the Apes' prequel rumours get some legs
Examiner.com - USA
by Jason Roestel, Movie Examiner Do we really need another Planet of
the Apes flick? I think we do, especially since Burton's artistic
nightmare never did ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
For the movie
junkie
San Jose Mercury News - CA, USA
In the case of the James Bond and "Planet of the Apes"
sets on Blu-ray, it's the chance to see some of Hollywood's frothiest fantasy
franchises with the ...
See all stories on this topic
|
|
Planet of
the Apes Prequel
By Dustin Rowles
and it's actually kind of a remake of Conquest of the Planet of Apes, which
was the last of the original Planet of the Apes
franchise. There will apparently be no talking monkeys in this movie, and it
will be set in 2009. ...
Pajiba -
http://www.pajiba.com/
|
|
The
Planet of the Apes Movie that Never Was and the Movie
that Will Be
By Peggy(Peggy)
Since the first Planet of the Apes movie was released in
1968, there have been four sequels and a short-lived television series. Tim
Burton made a reimagined version of the original in 2001. In all of those
versions, the intelligent ...
Biology
in Science Fiction - http://sciencefictionbiology.blogspot.com/
|
|
Resurrection
of the Planet of the Apes?
By Scott Weinberg
Yes, Devin is a HUGE Planet of the Apes fan, so he was
elated to see the "unseen cut" of J. Lee Thompson's Conquest of the
Planet of the Apes. Mega-geeked, in fact. So when it
comes to new info on this long-running franchise, ...
Cinematical -
http://www.cinematical.com/
|
|
Scott
Frank’s Planet of the Apes Prequel
By orfilms@...
(slashfilm.com)
So what’s going on with the proposed Planet of the Apes
sequel/prequel? 20th Century Fox has hired writer/director Scott Frank (The
Lookout) to develop a new film based on the Planet of the Apes
film property. ...
/Film -
http://www.slashfilm.com/
|
|
When
a 'Planet of the Apes' Remake Is Not a 'Planet of
the Apes ...
By Colin Boyd
As a guy who relies on Damn Dirty Apes as the very basis of his movie review
system, news about Planet of the Apes will always
interest me, even if - as in this case - it's not strictly speaking about Planet
of the Apes. ...
Get
The Big Picture - http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/
|
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50254 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: extra footage of conquest and battle movies |
.htmlAll of the changes in Conquest are in the last third of the movie during the ape revolt. Most of the changes make the film more violent such as apes and at least one human guard getting shot in the face.
In one scene as the apes are breaking into the command center Breck shoots a gorilla in the face.
The end is different. Lisa doesn't say no and the second half of Caesar's speech doesn't happen. Instead the Apes beat Breck to death. (Or presumably to death since it is hard to image he survived.)
As far as Battle it was the same extended version available in the legacy collection. A list of all the additions is here: http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/Battle%20Uncut.doc
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "ronnie2467" <ronnie2467@...> wrote: > > > I missed most of last weekends conquest and battle movies.I did see > some extra footage of conquest with the cut violence.what else did I > miss from conquest? Plus how much extra footage of battle? > > Ron >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50255 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The Planet of the Apes Chronicles |
.htmlNot a lot. They are only discussed in final chapter of the book, most of which is dedicated to episode guides of each series.
However, I would still recommend the book to POTA fans. It contains several reprints of interviews and articles from the early 70s when the films were being produced.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Marshall" <mgreythorne@...> wrote: > > > > 2 messages in a day, must be a full moon. > > > > The book synopsis says there is discussion on the animated series and > comics. Can anyone advise the degree of depth. > > > > Ta > > > > MG >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50256 |
From: softparadeband |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Your next stop... |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "drhasslein" <drhasslein@...> wrote:
>For what it's worth, Mort Abrahams told me the statue of
liberty/"deli" story circa 1983 during our interviews for POTA
REVISITED. At that time, APES was "dead" and there was so public
interest or impetus to put a spin on the truth for personal glory.
The public at large didn't care at the time, and there was virtually
no media attention at all.APES is MUCH more relevant and popular NOW
than it was when we were researching PLANET OF THE APES REVISITED.
Even the principles were suprised anyone was crazy enough to care
about doing an actual book on the series. It was sooo "over" by then.
But like Frankenstein's monster, the APES franchise has been "killed
off" and then revitalized time and again.
> I haven't seen the doc, but good to know it was finally
> acknowledged... I never bought the APJAC & Blake Edwards deli
story,
> everyone always wants to take credit for a great idea.
>
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Chris Lawless <lawford42@> wrote:
> >
> > Believed to have inspired Serling to come up with the ending to
> PLANET,
> > though of course there are others who claim credit as well.
> Interesting
> > that this was included in the 'Evolution of the Apes' documentary.
> >
> > Chris L.
> >
> >
> >
> > "drhasslein" <drhasslein@> wrote:
> >
> > >>My second favorite episode, the first season's "I Shot an Arrow
> into
> > the Air" doesn't have POTA actors, but has the POTA twist... <<
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50257 |
From: Marshall |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The Planet of the Apes Chronicles |
.html.html
Thank you James
From: pota@yahoogroups.com
[pota@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of James
Sent: Wednesday, 3 December 2008 3:23 AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [pota] Re: The Planet of the Apes Chronicles
Not a lot. They are
only discussed in final chapter of the book, most of which is dedicated to
episode guides of each series.
However, I would
still recommend the book to POTA fans. It contains several reprints of
interviews and articles from the early 70s when the films were being produced.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Marshall" <mgreythorne@...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> 2 messages in a day, must be a full moon.
>
>
>
> The book synopsis says there is discussion on the animated series and
> comics. Can anyone advise the degree of depth.
>
>
>
> Ta
>
>
>
> MG
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50258 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Your next stop... |
.html
.html
In a message dated 12/2/2008 11:36:04 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
softparadeband@... writes:
For
what it's worth, Mort Abrahams told me the statue of liberty/"deli" story
circa 1983 during our interviews for POTA REVISITED.
Well, I read from someone else that Abrahams insisted, "The concept was
Rod's."
Then there's the story that one of the early conceptual artists that Jacobs
hired to help sell the project told the British writer of that "other" book
about POTA that he came up with the idea in one of his paintings.
-- Rory <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50259 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
| Group: pota |
Message: 50260 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Fwd: Discovery Channel - 2009: 'Year of the Gorilla' |
| Group: pota |
Message: 50261 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: apes tv series box set |
|
.html I still have not got the apes tv series box set.Is all the footage
shown last weekend on the fox movie channel on it?,or are those movies
not on the dvd box set? Help? I was watching those movies for the first
time,except for "back to the planet of the apes" that one has been on
tv now and then.I really enjoyed watching some of the other 4 apes tv
series movies.It was like watching a brand new apes film.I don't
remember seeing them as a kid.I am going to finally buy the set this
week!!!
Ronnie <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50262 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 4287 |
.html>Posted by: "Robert Murt" deady08520@... deady08520
>I just got my book yesterday and at first glance, I would say it
>looks and reads great. Wonderful cover art and easy to read
>timeline. A fine looking project overall.
Thanks, man! Much appreciated.
I finally received my own copies today as well. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50263 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
.htmlLOL! Thanks, Bill. I just hope you're still that enthusiastic after
receiving it. :)
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Hollweg" <billhollweg@...> wrote:
>
> THIS is gonna be a GREAT CHRISTMAS!!!
>
> --
> Bill Hollweg
> Have Sword...
> Will Slay...
> Barbarian in need of Ale...
> Check out my fantasy Audio Drama-
> Bill Hollweg
> Lord of Design for BrokenSea Audio
> www.brokensea.net
> The Saga of the Grog and Gryphon @
> http://www.brokensea.com and
> http://www.westlakefilms.co.uk
> Planet of the Apes at
> http://www.brokensea.com and
> Ulysses-Galactic Guides & Bounty Hunting
> http://www.brokensea.com and
> CONAN the Audio Book and Audio Drama
> http://brokensea.com/conan/
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50264 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: MySpace |
.htmlHi, folks,
This is an open invitation--if anyone here has a MySpace account and
is interested in being added as a "friend" to the MySpace page for
Hasslein Book ( http://www.myspace.com/hasslein), feel free to send me
an invite. All are welcome as friend-adds.
Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50265 |
From: drhasslein |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Update on new Caesar film |
.htmlAlthough I respect Frank's work, I will be rooting against this coming
to fruition. At least Burton made an attempt (although failed) to
remain somewhat true to original concept.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, scott bosco <digitalcinema@...> wrote:
>
> I love the way people today liberally take from a already made
concept and then have gaul to called "New", "Original", "Fresh".
Bullsh*t. These no talent hacks can't think of a real original story
so build upon something which already exists. Common! Out of all the
names he could have used he has to use "Caesar" This is another re-
bout.
> - Scott
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50266 |
From: Marshall |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: KUDOS TO TIMELINE OF POTA |
.html.html
Ordered on Nov 26
Received confirmation of shipping on Dec 2
Received at doorstep in Australia on Dec 3.
It looks like a fantastic book and I look forward to reading it.
I love its presentation
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50267 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: apes tv series box set |
.htmlThe boxset has all 14 episodes from the TV series in their original episode form. Since the TV movies were edited from the original episodes it contains all the footage plus anything that was cut when they cobbled together the TV movies.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "ronnie2467" <ronnie2467@...> wrote: > > I still have not got the apes tv series box set.Is all the footage > shown last weekend on the fox movie channel on it?,or are those movies > not on the dvd box set? Help? I was watching those movies for the first > time,except for "back to the planet of the apes" that one has been on > tv now and then.I really enjoyed watching some of the other 4 apes tv > series movies.It was like watching a brand new apes film.I don't > remember seeing them as a kid.I am going to finally buy the set this > week!!! > > Ronnie >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50268 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: KUDOS TO TIMELINE OF POTA |
.htmlThanks so much, Marshall!
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Marshall" <mgreythorne@...> wrote:
>
> Ordered on Nov 26
>
>
>
> Received confirmation of shipping on Dec 2
>
>
>
> Received at doorstep in Australia on Dec 3.
>
>
>
> It looks like a fantastic book and I look forward to reading it.
>
>
>
> I love its presentation
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50269 |
From: zasco1957 |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
.html.html
| Hi, James and my fellow Apesters...I haven't been online for three weeks, I had to get a new monitor in the last day or so. I'm still trying to get a copy of the Timeline...can anyone direct me to the right place where I could order one? Thanks...Zach -------Original Message-------
Date: 12/2/2008 9:58:34 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: [pota] Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper You might want to take a look at this: https://pota. goatley.com/ scripts/pota_ teachguide. pdf
--- In pota@yahoogroups. com, "smagelowitz" <smagelowitz@ ...> wrote: > > Hey all, I am new to this forum, but it's got a ton of great > information on Planet of the Apes, which is exactly what I am looking > for. I need to write a paper for my rhetorical criticism class on
> planet of the apes and the lens I chose to use was metaphorical > criticism. Does anyone have any ideas for me? Basically, I need to > use the metaphors in this movie to come up with an idea that will be > the length of 15 pages. I am currently thinking of relating it to the > idea that a lot of the metaphors represent the African American > struggle in the U.S. society in the 60s and onward. Thanks a lot for > taking your time, I appreciate any advice. > > -Steve >
|
 <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50270 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: apes tv series box set |
.htmlThanks for info.I will buy it this week(apes tv series box set)what
does everyone think about the tv series? Why did it last just 14
episods?
Ron
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
>
>
> The boxset has all 14 episodes from the TV series in their original
> episode form. Since the TV movies were edited from the original
episodes
> it contains all the footage plus anything that was cut when they
cobbled
> together the TV movies.
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "ronnie2467" <ronnie2467@> wrote:
> >
> > I still have not got the apes tv series box set.Is all the footage
> > shown last weekend on the fox movie channel on it?,or are those
movies
> > not on the dvd box set? Help? I was watching those movies for the
> first
> > time,except for "back to the planet of the apes" that one has
been on
> > tv now and then.I really enjoyed watching some of the other 4
apes tv
> > series movies.It was like watching a brand new apes film.I don't
> > remember seeing them as a kid.I am going to finally buy the set
this
> > week!!!
> >
> > Ronnie
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50271 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: KUDOS TO TIMELINE OF POTA |
.htmlDoes this book deal with a timeline of the whole apes sags from
present time to 3955? Or does it deal with 1968-present?
Ron
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Marshall" <mgreythorne@...> wrote:
>
> Ordered on Nov 26
>
>
>
> Received confirmation of shipping on Dec 2
>
>
>
> Received at doorstep in Australia on Dec 3.
>
>
>
> It looks like a fantastic book and I look forward to reading it.
>
>
>
> I love its presentation
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50272 |
From: Marshall |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: KUDOS TO TIMELINE OF POTA |
.html.html
The book covers from 1 bil BC (under section ‘Before 1972) to ‘After
3979’.
I get your meaning on 1968 and the answer to that would be yes.
Trying to not give too much away, ‘1968 characters’ have personal histories
pre-1968 and that is covered.
From: pota@yahoogroups.com
[pota@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ronnie2467
Sent: Wednesday, 3 December 2008 12:08 PM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [pota] Re: KUDOS TO TIMELINE OF POTA
Does this book deal with a timeline of the
whole apes sags from
present time to 3955? Or does it deal with 1968-present?
Ron
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com,
"Marshall" <mgreythorne@...> wrote:
>
> Ordered on Nov 26
>
>
>
> Received confirmation of shipping on Dec 2
>
>
>
> Received at doorstep in Australia on Dec 3.
>
>
>
> It looks like a fantastic book and I look forward to reading it.
>
>
>
> I love its presentation
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50273 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: apes tv series box set |
.htmlEssentially low ratings. Also the network cited poor demograghics too. The audience was mainly children and teens with hardly any viewers over 50. If anyone saw Boston Legal last night, oh how the world has changed.
BTW Did anyone note the POTA connection in last night's episode?
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "ronnie2467" <ronnie2467@...> wrote: > > Thanks for info.I will buy it this week(apes tv series box set)what > does everyone think about the tv series? Why did it last just 14 > episods? > Ron > >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50274 |
From: James |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
.htmlHere is the link to Lulu: http://www.lulu.com/content/4923702
Definitely a must have book for all POTA fans.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "zasco1957" <Zasco1957@...> wrote: > > Hi, James and my fellow Apesters...I haven't been online for three weeks, I > had to get a new monitor in the last day or so. > > > > I'm still trying to get a copy of the Timeline...can anyone direct me to the > right place where I could order one? > > > > Thanks...Zach > > > > -------Original Message------- > > > > From: James > > Date: 12/2/2008 9:58:34 AM > > To: pota@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [pota] Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper > > > > You might want to take a look at this: https://pota.goatley > com/scripts/pota_teachguide.pdf > > > > --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "smagelowitz" smagelowitz@ wrote: >
> > > > > Hey all, I am new to this forum, but it's got a ton of great > > > information on Planet of the Apes, which is exactly what I am looking > > > for. I need to write a paper for my rhetorical criticism class on > > > planet of the apes and the lens I chose to use was metaphorical > > > criticism. Does anyone have any ideas for me? Basically, I need to > > > use the metaphors in this movie to come up with an idea that will be > > > the length of 15 pages. I am currently thinking of relating it to the > > > idea that a lot of the metaphors represent the African American > > > struggle in the U.S. society in the 60s and onward. Thanks a lot for > > > taking your time, I appreciate any advice. > > > > > > -Steve > > > >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50275 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: more things I noticed during the Channel of the Apes Marathon |
.html
.html
Thanks Tim. Actually, I've also got a post coming about the original
version of CONQUEST. Let's see if we hit any of the same points...
Chris L.
>>All interesting thoughts Chris! I made a list of thoughts while
watching the new(old?) Conquest and will try and post them tonight...
<<<.html
____________________________________________________________
Click here to find the satellite television package that meets your needs. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50276 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest |
| Group: pota |
Message: 50277 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "zasco1957" <Zasco1957@...> wrote:
> I'm still trying to get a copy of the Timeline...can anyone direct
me to the right place where I could order one?
Hi, Zach,
The book is available at http://www.hassleinbooks.com
Thanks for your interest in it!
Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50278 |
From: smagelowitz |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Metaphor Criticism Paper |
.htmlThank you very much. Very helpful stuff. =)
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
>
> You might want to take a look at this:
> https://pota.goatley.com/scripts/pota_teachguide.pdf
> <https://pota.goatley.com/scripts/pota_teachguide.pdf>
>
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "smagelowitz" <smagelowitz@> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all, I am new to this forum, but it's got a ton of great
> > information on Planet of the Apes, which is exactly what I am looking
> > for. I need to write a paper for my rhetorical criticism class on
> > planet of the apes and the lens I chose to use was metaphorical
> > criticism. Does anyone have any ideas for me? Basically, I need to
> > use the metaphors in this movie to come up with an idea that will be
> > the length of 15 pages. I am currently thinking of relating it to the
> > idea that a lot of the metaphors represent the African American
> > struggle in the U.S. society in the 60s and onward. Thanks a lot for
> > taking your time, I appreciate any advice.
> >
> > -Steve
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50279 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Scott Frank |
.html.html So far everything I'm hearing from Scott Frank is great.
Not a Conquest remake but rather a whole new saga. If all goes well, this thing may just turn out to be as big as another Star Wars type saga.
An entire storyline layed out to be issued in many films. A trilogy or possibly 2 trilogies (at least this is my impression).
I'm really glad that to see that Fox is looking at the long run and not just one story, one movie.
And with Scott being a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, it makes it even better.
It's all good.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50280 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: apes tv series box set |
.html
.html
Plus the DVDs have 4 episodes that weren't
made into TV movies.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:52
PM
Subject: [pota] Re: apes tv series box
set
The boxset has all 14 episodes from the TV
series in their original episode form. Since the TV movies were edited from
the original episodes it contains all the footage plus anything that was cut
when they cobbled together the TV movies.
--- In pota@yahoogroups. com,
"ronnie2467" <ronnie2467@. ..> wrote: > > I still have
not got the apes tv series box set.Is all the footage > shown last
weekend on the fox movie channel on it?,or are those movies > not on the
dvd box set? Help? I was watching those movies for the first >
time,except for "back to the planet of the apes" that one has been on >
tv now and then.I really enjoyed watching some of the other 4 apes tv >
series movies.It was like watching a brand new apes film.I don't >
remember seeing them as a kid.I am going to finally buy the set this >
week!!! > > Ronnie >
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50281 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/2/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
.html
.html
I agree, give the guy a chance. Sounds like
he wants to do right by POTA. And it seems like he's pumped to get started. He's
the Obama of POTA. Change we can believe in.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:11
PM
Subject: [pota] Scott Frank
So far everything I'm hearing from Scott Frank is great.
Not a Conquest remake but rather a whole new saga. If all goes well, this
thing may just turn out to be as big as another Star Wars type
saga.
An entire storyline layed out to be issued in many films. A trilogy or
possibly 2 trilogies (at least this is my impression).
I'm really glad that to see that Fox is looking at the long run and not
just one story, one movie.
And with Scott being a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, it makes it even
better.
It's all good.
Al
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50282 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
.htmlwhere did you here this?I think it would be great to have a pota
trilogy,why not! I whole new generation for the apes films.I
agree,not just one apes film.That's the thing about the apes
films,you can't just make one film.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
>
> I agree, give the guy a chance. Sounds like he wants to do right
by POTA. And it seems like he's pumped to get started. He's the Obama
of POTA. Change we can believe in.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alex Ruiz
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:11 PM
> Subject: [pota] Scott Frank
>
>
>
> So far everything I'm hearing from Scott Frank is great.
> Not a Conquest remake but rather a whole new saga. If all goes
well, this thing may just turn out to be as big as another Star Wars
type saga.
> An entire storyline layed out to be issued in many films. A
trilogy or possibly 2 trilogies (at least this is my impression).
>
> I'm really glad that to see that Fox is looking at the long run
and not just one story, one movie.
> And with Scott being a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, it makes
it even better.
>
> It's all good.
>
> Al
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50283 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: dissecting the original cut of CONQUEST |
.html
.html
Some different thoughts that came to mind while watching the original cut
of CONQUEST, presented here in simple, bullet point form because I'm too lazy to
put them all into a cohesive paragraph...
* Probably the most noticeable thing (to me, anyway) is the lack of pacing
in the third act of the original version. The consensus seems to be that it
was never intended to be the final edit, but the version that ultimately came
out is much more polished and has a better flow to the story. Most notably
during the revolt. In the theatrical version, you get the impression that the
apes were systematically working through the city, section by section, towards
the Command Post and there was a clear sense of tension being built. In the
original cut, it felt more like shootout, ambush, shootout, ambush, ambush,
riot, then BOOM- they're cutting the door down.
* Speaking of which, the background crowd noise during the scenes where
1) Ape Management is being attacked, and 2) the apes are attacking the
police, is pretty thin. You'd expect a lot more noise from people being knifed
and beaten to death as well as the apes doing the knifing and beating.
* Much as I enjoyed Tom Scott's score, I'm beginning to see why they opted
for silence during a lot of the scenes. One thing that struck
me repeatedly was that 60's sounding mutated organ loop that you heard as
the command post was near to being attacked and the door cut through.
While effective in it's own right, it really didn't work there.
* One thing that's PAINFULLY missing from the original cut is
that great final long shot of Caesar standing at the top of the stairs with the
apes screaming and jumping below him, MacDonald off to the right, and all the
buildings burning in the background. You do still see this shot in the original
version, but the final shot here is the slow close-up to Caesar's
face/quick cut to black. Weird that the credits don't start from the bottom of
the screen either but rather they fade in already scrolling halfway to the
top.
* Noticeable edits (now that I know what was originally there):
- the cut after the gorilla jumps on the guy with the flamethrower
- "Just massacre the lot!!" after "Well don't plead with them you
idiot!"
- during the final scene outside, there's a much longer pause between the
two times MacDonald calls Caesar's name in the original version than in the one
we know. Right before he starts with "This was not how it was to be".
* As far as the repeated face shooting goes, the scene that struck me
the most was the one in the command post where Breck shoots a gorilla point
blank in the face. To me, that was pure 70's violence exploitation
cinema. It was just SO over the top, even down to the fear reaction in the
gorilla's face and his (almost) shaking his head no, pleading with Breck. Then a
close up to the gun, Breck goes out of focus, and BLAM!! If you get right
down to it, the gorilla shouldn't have even known what a gun was. The entire
scene was both gratuitous and unnecessary.
BTW, a split second of the first chimp getting shot in the face still
remains in the theatrical version. I never noticed it before until- again- I
knew what was there originally.
I also looked at the oft discussed scene from the theatrical version
where the blood spurts out from the one guards face/head. I'm about 100%
sure it's because the chimp hit him in the face with a rifle butt. There
were gunshots going on in the background, and one happened to coincide with the
guards head jerking. Otherwise, why make a point of showing the chimp hit him in
the face in the first place.
From my comments yesterday:
>>During the scenes where the apes are gathering their weapons in
that underground storage room, Lou Wagner's Busboy character is the
one sorting everything and putting it all in (what appears to be) an
oil drum... So at least there's some evidence intact of
his original role in the film. Unless his character only appears in the
original cut of CONQUEST and that's why I never noticed him there before.
I'll have to dig out a DVD and check. <<
It's in both versions. I just never noticed before.
>> Ditto for the scene after Caesar find out about Armando and
he's looking at the flyer posted in the one storefront window. I remember
him putting his finger up to the poster, but not tapping on the glass.
A minor point, obviously, but if the scene is different between the
two films then someone had to make a conscious decision to change it.
<<
Again, both versions, I just didn't remember that part.
>>I also never remembered the scene where- after the first armed
attack on the apes (where the one chimp gets shot in the face) you see
the guards callously laughing afterwards. Again, this could be unique to
the original cut. <<
This was unique to the original cut. After the shooting, you see a group
shot of the guards reacting, but then they cut in a close up of them callously
laughing afterwards. More from that same close-up shot is seen shortly
thereafter (in both versions) when the group lead by Caesar is approaching
and they just start looking at each other with a "Here we go again"
attitude.
* Breck getting beaten to death brings up an old discussion which- to my
knowledge- has never been resolved. In the original version he dies, but in the
reedited version he lives. When the Corrington's are writing their
treatment for what was then called EPIC OF THE PLANET OF THE APES,
both Breck and the MacDonald from CONQUEST are in it. But a little more than
three months later, it's Kolp and the second MacDonald with two lines from Kolp
explaining the changes ("If the bomb hadn't killed the old Governor..." and "The
black man in the brother of my predecessors' personal assistant...") although
the first MacDonald's absence is never fully explained.
Presumably when CONQUEST was being filmed there were no definite plans for
a fifth film, and certainly not to have the character of Breck continue on.
So after the film gets changed to what we know as the theatrical version, Breck
was still a viable character and was used in the EPIC OF THE PLANET OF THE APES
screenplay. Going by Hunter's site, EPIC (which featured Breck and the first
MacDonald) was dated 9/4/72 and BATTLE (which featured Kolp and the second
MacDonald) was dated 12/29/72. But there had to be one in between because
the Marvel adaptation (which was based on a screenplay supplied by Fox) featured
the same story we see in the filmed version of BATTLE but with Breck
instead of Kolp. So at what point was a fifth film decided on, and then when/why
were Breck and the first MacDonald written out?
As an aside, does anyone remember if the MacDonald in Marvel's BATTLE
adaptation was the brother (like in BATTLE) or the same person from
CONQUEST (like in EPIC)? Also, it occurs to me that the original version of
CONQUEST would essentially negate the entire story told in REVOLUTION, although
(in my opinion, anyway) Breck's claiming to have created the Alpha-Omega bomb
already puts that out of continuity because Taylor (who had left Earth almost 20
years prior) already knew about the bomb, and in the early 70's (or late 60's
when you really think about it) there's no logical way that Breck's
character could have done that. Figuring him to be in his 40's at the time of
CONQUEST, he would have still been in college when Taylor left Earth.
Ultimately it was interesting to see the original version, but I'm
probably always going to think of it as a work in progress as opposed to the
*actual* version of CONQUEST.
Chris L. <.html
____________________________________________________________
Click to become a master chef, own a restaurant and make millions. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50284 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest |
.html
.html
Well you're going along like it's the same movie
you'd seem dozens of times before and then
Breck whips out a pistol and shoots a gorilla.
And not just in the chest or the head, but
right in the face! It looks like they got
some of that Dracula Blood from an
old Hammer film to do it too!
In a message dated 12/2/2008 8:27:37 P.M. Central Standard Time,
lawford42@... writes:
How
so? <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50285 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
.html
.html
I think Al is referring to that interview
(which was posted here by Rich) with Frank that said, to wit: "Frank sees his
movie as the opening chapter in a saga that could span the thousand years
between today and a world where apes rule".
So this one, "Caesar", would be set in
modern day with realistic apes (presumably CG) causing a ruckus. That would be
good for one movie and then they could move on to something else farther in the
future. Don't know if that would be makeup or CG. Also don't know if it would
ever include astronauts. It's wide open.
Or maybe Fox will turn it down when Frank
finishes his script and they move onto someone else.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:52
PM
Subject: [pota] Re: Scott Frank
where did you here this?I think it would be great to have a pota
trilogy,why not! I whole new generation for the apes films.I agree,not
just one apes film.That's the thing about the apes films,you can't just
make one film.
--- In pota@yahoogroups. com, "Jeff K."
<veetus@...> wrote: > > I agree, give the guy a chance.
Sounds like he wants to do right by POTA. And it seems like he's pumped to
get started. He's the Obama of POTA. Change we can believe in. >
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alex Ruiz > To: pota@yahoogroups. com >
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:11 PM > Subject: [pota] Scott
Frank > > > > So far everything I'm hearing from
Scott Frank is great. > Not a Conquest remake but rather a whole new
saga. If all goes well, this thing may just turn out to be as big as
another Star Wars type saga. > An entire storyline layed out to be
issued in many films. A trilogy or possibly 2 trilogies (at least this is
my impression). > > I'm really glad that to see that Fox is
looking at the long run and not just one story, one movie. > And
with Scott being a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, it makes it even
better. > > It's all good. > >
Al >
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50286 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
.html.html Correct.
And if so, I'll be counting down for years to come. :o)
Al
From: Jeff K. <veetus@...> To: pota@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 2:56:18 AM Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Scott Frank
I think Al is referring to that interview (which was posted here by Rich) with Frank that said, to wit: "Frank sees his movie as the opening chapter in a saga that could span the thousand years between today and a world where apes rule".
So this one, "Caesar", would be set in modern day with realistic apes (presumably CG) causing a ruckus. That would be good for one movie and then they could move on to something else farther in the future. Don't know if that would be makeup or CG. Also don't know if it would ever include astronauts. It's wide open.
Or maybe Fox will turn it down when Frank finishes his script and they move onto someone else.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:52 PM
Subject: [pota] Re: Scott Frank
where did you here this?I think it would be great to have a pota trilogy,why not! I whole new generation for the apes films.I agree,not just one apes film.That's the thing about the apes films,you can't just make one film.
--- In pota@yahoogroups. com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote: > > I agree, give the guy a chance. Sounds like he wants to do right by POTA. And it seems like he's pumped to get started. He's the Obama of POTA. Change we can believe in. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alex Ruiz > To: pota@yahoogroups. com > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:11 PM > Subject: [pota] Scott Frank > > > > So far everything
I'm hearing from Scott Frank is great. > Not a Conquest remake but rather a whole new saga. If all goes well, this thing may just turn out to be as big as another Star Wars type saga. > An entire storyline layed out to be issued in many films. A trilogy or possibly 2 trilogies (at least this is my impression). > > I'm really glad that to see that Fox is looking at the long run and not just one story, one movie. > And with Scott being a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, it makes it even better. > > It's all good. > > Al >
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50287 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
.htmlI'm always insanely excited to have any whiff of news about an Apes
movie.I don't know much about Scott Frank, but if guys like Alex and
Jeff are fine with him, I'm fine with him too.I'm terrified of CGI
and I ache with frustration when you think what a Tim Roth Caesar
could have been like.Personally, I think a Conquest scenario is a
great place to start--I've always thought Jakes' novel gave the story
a sweep and scale that budget restrictions didn't allow for in the
movie.My plea is let's have proper make-up, a la Chambers, with
minimal CGI and maximum script.It's suddenly VERY exciting being an
Apesfan.John, Scrolls.
>
> I agree, give the guy a chance. Sounds like he wants to do right
by POTA. And it seems like he's pumped to get started. He's the Obama
of POTA. Change we can believe in.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alex Ruiz
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:11 PM
> Subject: [pota] Scott Frank
>
>
>
> So far everything I'm hearing from Scott Frank is great.
> Not a Conquest remake but rather a whole new saga. If all goes
well, this thing may just turn out to be as big as another Star Wars
type saga.
> An entire storyline layed out to be issued in many films. A
trilogy or possibly 2 trilogies (at least this is my impression).
>
> I'm really glad that to see that Fox is looking at the long run
and not just one story, one movie.
> And with Scott being a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, it makes
it even better.
>
> It's all good.
>
> Al
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50288 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Apes Opera |
|
.html Anyone remember a couple of years ago there were some pics floating around of a production of "rigoletto" done in bavaria and it seemed to be set on the Planet of the Apes? Does anyone have any of those pics? I did a google search and can only find one small one....
I'd appreciate it!
Tim <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50289 |
From: James |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Scott Frank |
.htmlJust as an FYI here is Scott Frank's wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Frank He does have an impressive list of writing credits.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "shanter2002" <john@...> wrote: > > I'm always insanely excited to have any whiff of news about an Apes > movie.I don't know much about Scott Frank, but if guys like Alex and > Jeff are fine with him, I'm fine with him too.I'm terrified of CGI > and I ache with frustration when you think what a Tim Roth Caesar > could have been like.Personally, I think a Conquest scenario is a > great place to start--I've always thought Jakes' novel gave the story > a sweep and scale that budget restrictions didn't allow for in the > movie.My plea is let's have proper make-up, a la Chambers, with > minimal CGI and maximum script.It's suddenly VERY exciting being an > Apesfan.John, Scrolls. > > > > I agree, give the guy a chance. Sounds like he wants to do right
> by POTA. And it seems like he's pumped to get started. He's the Obama > of POTA. Change we can believe in. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Alex Ruiz > > To: pota@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 5:11 PM > > Subject: [pota] Scott Frank > > > > > > > > So far everything I'm hearing from Scott Frank is great. > > Not a Conquest remake but rather a whole new saga. If all goes > well, this thing may just turn out to be as big as another Star Wars > type saga. > > An entire storyline layed out to be issued in many films. A > trilogy or possibly 2 trilogies (at least this is my impression). > > > > I'm really glad that to see that Fox is looking at the long run > and not just one story, one movie.
> > And with Scott being a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, it makes > it even better. > > > > It's all good. > > > > Al > > >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50290 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU_RAY Timeline??? |
.html
.html
In a message dated 11/30/2008 11:07:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
peter_karsten63@... writes:
I just
can't believe it when I saw 3955 as the year that Taylor landed, or are
eyes deceiving me, everybody knows it's 3978 and the earth blew up in 3979,
mean to say, has'it 20th century fox and those people responsible for the
DVD release got it right yet! What is
their problem?
Peter.
For Fox, APES is just one big "saga," which drives me nuts. This is
just part of the "PLANET revisionism" that so many indulge in.
-- Rory
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50291 |
From: James |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: dissecting the original cut of CONQUEST |
.htmlVery interesting points Chris.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Chris Lawless <lawford42@...> wrote: > > > > * Probably the most noticeable thing (to me, anyway) is the lack of > pacing in the third act of the original version. The consensus seems to > be that it was never intended to be the final edit, but the version that > ultimately came out is much more polished and has a better flow to the > story. Most notably during the revolt. In the theatrical version, you get > the impression that the apes were systematically working through the > city, section by section, towards the Command Post and there was a clear > sense of tension being built. In the original cut, it felt more like
> shootout, ambush, shootout, ambush, ambush, riot, then BOOM- they're > cutting the door down. >
Agreed. It does not look as polished as the theatrical cut of the film. I believe this was the version tested in Phoenix and it is rare that the cut made for a test screening is the same cut released to theaters. Even if a test screening has a very positive response they always do some final tweaking.
> > * Much as I enjoyed Tom Scott's score, I'm beginning to see why they > opted for silence during a lot of the scenes. One thing that struck me > repeatedly was that 60's sounding mutated organ loop that you heard as > the command post was near to being attacked and the door cut through. > While effective in it's own right, it really didn't work there. >
Again, agreed. The music during that scene is rather intrusive.
> > * As far as the repeated face shooting goes, the scene that struck me the > most was the one in the command post where Breck shoots a gorilla point > blank in the face. To me, that was pure 70's violence exploitation > cinema. It was just SO over the top, even down to the fear reaction in > the gorilla's face and his (almost) shaking his head no, pleading with > Breck. Then a close up to the gun, Breck goes out of focus, and BLAM!! If > you get right down to it, the gorilla shouldn't have even known what a > gun was. The entire scene was both gratuitous and unnecessary.
One thing I noticed in that scene is when the gorilla is shot his blood splatters on to the shirt of the guard hold him. Yet when the guard gets up and turns to line up with the other guards to confront the remaining apes his shirt is clean. > > > Presumably when CONQUEST was being filmed there were no definite plans > for a fifth film, and certainly not to have the character of Breck > continue on. So after the film gets changed to what we know as the > theatrical version, Breck was still a viable character and was used in > the EPIC OF THE PLANET OF THE APES screenplay. Going by Hunter's site, > EPIC (which featured Breck and the first MacDonald) was dated 9/4/72 and > BATTLE (which featured Kolp and the second MacDonald) was dated 12/29/72. > But there had to be one in between because the Marvel adaptation (which
> was based on a screenplay supplied by Fox) featured the same story we see > in the filmed version of BATTLE but with Breck instead of Kolp. So at > what point was a fifth film decided on, and then when/why were Breck and > the first MacDonald written out?
I believe they were written out (and please correct if I am wrong) because Don Murray and Hari Rhodes were unavailable. There is an article in the Battle Herald (available on the group website: http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/Misc./Stuff/Battle.htm) about the casting of Austin Stoker which according to the article was very last minute. > > As an aside, does anyone remember if the MacDonald in Marvel's BATTLE > adaptation was the brother (like in BATTLE) or the same person from > CONQUEST (like in EPIC)?
The MacDonald in the Marvel adaption is supposed to be the same character as in Conquest.
> > > Ultimately it was interesting to see the original version, but I'm > probably always going to think of it as a work in progress as opposed to > the *actual* version of CONQUEST. > > > Chris L.
I wonder which version most fans will now consider canon. Most fans now consider the extended version of Battle as the official version of that film. I wonder if the same will be true of Conquest.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50292 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: New poll for pota |
.htmlEnter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
pota group:
Now that the Director's Cut of Conquest has been released, which version do you now consider as the official version or canon?
o The Director's Cut
o The Theatrical Version
To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/surveys?id=2798072
Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.
Thanks! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50293 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: New poll for pota |
.htmlEnter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
pota group:
Do you intend to buy a Blu-Ray player now that the POTA films have been realeased in that format?
o Yes, can't wait to see the Apes in High Definition.
o Not in my budget right now and am happy with the DVD set I already have.
o I already have a Blu-Ray player.
o I still haven't upgraded from Betamax.
To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/surveys?id=2798059
Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.
Thanks! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50294 |
From: James |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: FW: Google Alert - "planet of the apes" |
.html.html
Google News
Alert for: "planet of the apes"
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50295 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
| Group: pota |
Message: 50296 |
From: softparadeband |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: APES timeline myth |
|
.html I wish more fans would realize that the APES films were never produced
with a pre-conceived timeline in mind. They were made one at a time,
dictated by the sucess of the previous entry, and as they were
greenlighted by the studio, screenwriters like Paul Dehn were trying to
cobble together a coherent explaination to tie the overall story points
together. Thus all the gaps and inconsistancies. I doubt it will ever
become one long linear timeline without twisting, revamping and
revisionist theorizing--JR <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50297 |
From: jose ramon |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Opera |
.html|
JR --- On Wed, 12/3/08, Tim "apefan" <apefan23@...> wrote:
From: Tim "apefan" <apefan23@...> Subject: [pota] Apes Opera To: "POTA" <pota@yahoogroups.com>, "POTA DG" <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com> Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 8:06 AM
Anyone remember a couple of years ago there were some pics floating around of a production of "rigoletto" done in bavaria and it seemed to be set on the Planet of the Apes? Does anyone have any of those pics? I did a google search and can only find one small one.... I'd appreciate it! Tim
|
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50298 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Hollweg" <billhollweg@...> wrote:
>When's the new Simian Scrolls due out?
Hmmmmmmmmm...
Right...about...NOW!
Crossing the pond as we speak - stay tuned!
Dave B <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50299 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
| Group: pota |
Message: 50300 |
From: Stuart Drucker |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
.html.html
I just got my copy yesterday, and I’d
say that Rich did an impressive job knitting together all the different stories
across the various sources, and even tied in potential plotlines that were
under consideration but never made it into publication (such as “The
Believer” in the Revolution series). Way to go! If only Empire of the
Planet of the Apes had gotten published, we really could have fleshed out the
post-Battle TL. There’s definitely something for everyone in his
book, even the most jaded POTA fan.
On a different subject, are there any
plans to do a Broken Sea Beneath production?
Stuart
From:
pota@yahoogroups.com [ pota@yahoogroups.com ]
On Behalf Of Bill Hollweg
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008
11:34 AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Just order
Rich's TIMELINE BOOK!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50301 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 4289 |
.html>Posted by: "Stuart Drucker" sdrucker@... stuartdruc
>I just got my copy yesterday, and I'd say that Rich did an impressive job
>knitting together all the different stories across the various sources, and
>even tied in potential plotlines that were under consideration but never
>made it into publication (such as "The Believer" in the Revolution series).
>Way to go! If only Empire of the Planet of the Apes had gotten published, we
>really could have fleshed out the post-Battle TL. There's definitely
>something for everyone in his book, even the most jaded POTA fan.
Thanks very much, Stuart! I appreciate the kind words.
>Posted by: "softparadeband" softparadeband@... softparadeband
>I wish more fans would realize that the APES films were never produced
>with a pre-conceived timeline in mind. They were made one at a time,
>dictated by the sucess of the previous entry, and as they were
>greenlighted by the studio, screenwriters like Paul Dehn were trying to
>cobble together a coherent explaination to tie the overall story points
>together. Thus all the gaps and inconsistancies. I doubt it will ever
>become one long linear timeline without twisting, revamping and
>revisionist theorizing--JR
Actually, that's one of the main points of my book. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50302 |
From: sparkytb2005 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
| Group: pota |
Message: 50303 |
From: sparkytb2005 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: dissecting the original cut of CONQUEST |
.htmlIt's called editing, which is what I do for a living.
Sometimes the studios screw things up sometimes they don't.
Even though I'm bursting to see this version, things are done for a
reason. Look at the DVD version of Donner's Superman II. Sucks.
Mark.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Chris Lawless <lawford42@...> wrote:
>
> Some different thoughts that came to mind while watching the
original cut
> of CONQUEST, presented here in simple, bullet point form because
I'm too
> lazy to put them all into a cohesive paragraph...
>
>
> * Probably the most noticeable thing (to me, anyway) is the lack of
> pacing in the third act of the original version. The consensus
seems to
> be that it was never intended to be the final edit, but the version
that
> ultimately came out is much more polished and has a better flow to
the
> story. Most notably during the revolt. In the theatrical version,
you get
> the impression that the apes were systematically working through the
> city, section by section, towards the Command Post and there was a
clear
> sense of tension being built. In the original cut, it felt more like
> shootout, ambush, shootout, ambush, ambush, riot, then BOOM- they're
> cutting the door down.
>
>
> * Speaking of which, the background crowd noise during the scenes
where
> 1) Ape Management is being attacked, and 2) the apes are attacking
the
> police, is pretty thin. You'd expect a lot more noise from people
being
> knifed and beaten to death as well as the apes doing the knifing and
> beating.
>
>
> * Much as I enjoyed Tom Scott's score, I'm beginning to see why they
> opted for silence during a lot of the scenes. One thing that struck
me
> repeatedly was that 60's sounding mutated organ loop that you heard
as
> the command post was near to being attacked and the door cut
through.
> While effective in it's own right, it really didn't work there.
>
>
> * One thing that's PAINFULLY missing from the original cut is that
great
> final long shot of Caesar standing at the top of the stairs with
the apes
> screaming and jumping below him, MacDonald off to the right, and
all the
> buildings burning in the background. You do still see this shot in
the
> original version, but the final shot here is the slow close-up to
> Caesar's face/quick cut to black. Weird that the credits don't
start from
> the bottom of the screen either but rather they fade in already
scrolling
> halfway to the top.
>
>
> * Noticeable edits (now that I know what was originally there):
>
> - the cut after the gorilla jumps on the guy with the flamethrower
>
> - "Just massacre the lot!!" after "Well don't plead with them you
idiot!"
>
> - during the final scene outside, there's a much longer pause
between the
> two times MacDonald calls Caesar's name in the original version
than in
> the one we know. Right before he starts with "This was not how it
was to
> be".
>
>
> * As far as the repeated face shooting goes, the scene that struck
me the
> most was the one in the command post where Breck shoots a gorilla
point
> blank in the face. To me, that was pure 70's violence exploitation
> cinema. It was just SO over the top, even down to the fear reaction
in
> the gorilla's face and his (almost) shaking his head no, pleading
with
> Breck. Then a close up to the gun, Breck goes out of focus, and
BLAM!! If
> you get right down to it, the gorilla shouldn't have even known
what a
> gun was. The entire scene was both gratuitous and unnecessary.
>
> BTW, a split second of the first chimp getting shot in the face
still
> remains in the theatrical version. I never noticed it before until-
> again- I knew what was there originally.
>
>
> I also looked at the oft discussed scene from the theatrical version
> where the blood spurts out from the one guards face/head. I'm about
100%
> sure it's because the chimp hit him in the face with a rifle butt.
There
> were gunshots going on in the background, and one happened to
coincide
> with the guards head jerking. Otherwise, why make a point of
showing the
> chimp hit him in the face in the first place.
>
>
> From my comments yesterday:
>
> >>During the scenes where the apes are gathering their weapons in
that
> underground storage room, Lou Wagner's Busboy character is the one
> sorting everything and putting it all in (what appears to be) an oil
> drum... So at least there's some
> evidence intact of his original role in the film. Unless his
character
> only appears in the original cut of CONQUEST and that's why I never
> noticed him there before. I'll have to dig out a DVD and check. <<
>
> It's in both versions. I just never noticed before.
>
>
> >> Ditto for the scene after Caesar find out about Armando and he's
> looking at the flyer posted in the one storefront window. I
remember him
> putting his finger up to the poster, but not tapping on the glass. A
> minor point, obviously, but if the scene is different between the
two
> films then someone had to make a conscious decision to change it. <<
>
> Again, both versions, I just didn't remember that part.
>
>
> >>I also never remembered the scene where- after the first armed
attack
> on the apes (where the one chimp gets shot in the face) you see the
> guards callously laughing afterwards. Again, this could be unique
to the
> original cut. <<
>
> This was unique to the original cut. After the shooting, you see a
group
> shot of the guards reacting, but then they cut in a close up of them
> callously laughing afterwards. More from that same close-up shot is
seen
> shortly thereafter (in both versions) when the group lead by Caesar
is
> approaching and they just start looking at each other with a "Here
we go
> again" attitude.
>
>
> * Breck getting beaten to death brings up an old discussion which-
to my
> knowledge- has never been resolved. In the original version he
dies, but
> in the reedited version he lives. When the Corrington's are writing
their
> treatment for what was then called EPIC OF THE PLANET OF THE APES,
both
> Breck and the MacDonald from CONQUEST are in it. But a little more
than
> three months later, it's Kolp and the second MacDonald with two
lines
> from Kolp explaining the changes ("If the bomb hadn't killed the old
> Governor..." and "The black man in the brother of my predecessors'
> personal assistant...") although the first MacDonald's absence is
never
> fully explained.
>
> Presumably when CONQUEST was being filmed there were no definite
plans
> for a fifth film, and certainly not to have the character of Breck
> continue on. So after the film gets changed to what we know as the
> theatrical version, Breck was still a viable character and was used
in
> the EPIC OF THE PLANET OF THE APES screenplay. Going by Hunter's
site,
> EPIC (which featured Breck and the first MacDonald) was dated
9/4/72 and
> BATTLE (which featured Kolp and the second MacDonald) was dated
12/29/72.
> But there had to be one in between because the Marvel adaptation
(which
> was based on a screenplay supplied by Fox) featured the same story
we see
> in the filmed version of BATTLE but with Breck instead of Kolp. So
at
> what point was a fifth film decided on, and then when/why were
Breck and
> the first MacDonald written out?
>
> As an aside, does anyone remember if the MacDonald in Marvel's
BATTLE
> adaptation was the brother (like in BATTLE) or the same person from
> CONQUEST (like in EPIC)? Also, it occurs to me that the original
version
> of CONQUEST would essentially negate the entire story told in
REVOLUTION,
> although (in my opinion, anyway) Breck's claiming to have created
the
> Alpha-Omega bomb already puts that out of continuity because Taylor
(who
> had left Earth almost 20 years prior) already knew about the bomb,
and in
> the early 70's (or late 60's when you really think about it)
there's no
> logical way that Breck's character could have done that. Figuring
him to
> be in his 40's at the time of CONQUEST, he would have still been in
> college when Taylor left Earth.
>
>
> Ultimately it was interesting to see the original version, but I'm
> probably always going to think of it as a work in progress as
opposed to
> the *actual* version of CONQUEST.
>
>
> Chris L.
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50304 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: dissecting the original cut of CONQUEST |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "sparkytb2005" <sparkytb@...> wrote:
> Even though I'm bursting to see this version, things are done for a
> reason. Look at the DVD version of Donner's Superman II. Sucks.
I have to agree--that was pretty dire. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50305 |
From: Troy Rawlings |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Layer Transistions on Return to the Planet of the Apes DVD set |
|
.html Does anyone know the exact time interval for the layer transistion(s)
on the two discs in the Return to the Planet of the Apes DVD set?
Usually I can tell because my DVD player will flip from the "play" sign
to the "pause" sign and then back again for a second or two, but when I
was watching the "Tunnel of Fear" episode on Disc 1, about halfway
through, there was a pause in the image but no flip in the signs. Just
want to make sure the disc isn't defective.
There is no noticeable pause anywhere on Disc 2.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Troy <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50306 |
From: branchbrood |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: False Alarm and Ape Feet |
|
.html Well I'll be a Monkey's Uncle.. It would appear I was a lil' hastey
in screaming that I couldn't find my Posting I just needed to give
our talented Mods the chance to get the blasted thing on the
site...sorry.
Well now I still have this burning Question, What happened to the Ape-
Like Toe that was simulated on ALL the Simian Boot/Shoes in the First
Three and Last Films? I mean in "Conquest" Ceasar & Co. are wearing
nuthin more than these Canvas Slip on Deck Shoes(I've got the same
kind in Black $5.99 "Shop Smart Shop S-Mart" lol) Anyhoo,It's not
that I have a foot fetish see,It's just things like this Bug me! Like
the good folks over at Paramount with the Star Trek Franchise,I mean
nobodys ever tried to explain why All Klingons after 1979 have that
Brine Shrimp running up their foreheads!?! I mean WHAT HAPPENED to
the ol' Swarmy lookin' Dudes!?! But I Digress lol I'm just wondering
about this I'm thinking, to expand upon the comparrasions between the
Human/Ape Society of "Conquest" and Race relations at the Time of the
Films release in Real Life, Perhaps Govenor Breck had "Ape
Management" Chop the Toe off all apes being Conditioned to keep them
from Climbing away al'a Kuta Ken-Ty in "Roots"? I dunno. Oh speakin'
of Ape/Human Politics, I just wanted to say To Mr. Greene I had
always wanted your Book Since I first seen you on the AMC "Behind The
POTA" the ONLY copy I'd ever found was about $50 online. THEN a few
weeks ago I go to a Book Sale at a Public Library here in Florida and
Like Discovering the Ark Of The Covenent I found your Book for only
$2.00!! I hate to be Cheap but I got three little Mutants to take
care of and one Nova that = $$$ lol Anyhoo it's got that hard Boring
Library Binding on it I wondered what the Original cover looked like?
Well I'll leave you folks to ponder these Questions and debate what
drugs I might be on lol But Thanks for your time
Best,
John B. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50307 |
From: James |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: APES timeline myth |
.html
That's very true. When they made each film they thought it would be the last. Plus they were made before the advent of home video so I guess they assumed most moviegoers wouldn't notice any inconsistencies from the previous film they saw a year or two earlier. Hell, when I first saw Battle I didn't realize it was a different actor playing MacDonald nor did I realize that Roddy wasn't in Beneath until reading a review for Conquest.
Personally I think most of the discrepancies are fairly inconsequential and focusing on them fails to see the forest for the trees. But I do give credit to Paul Dehn for at least making an attempt to keep at least the overall big picture consistant. In a 1972 interview he said:
"I have a complete chronology of the time circle mapped out, and when I start a new script, I check every supposition I make against the chart to see if it is correct to use it."
Dehn wasn't perfect but at least he tried.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "softparadeband" <softparadeband@...> wrote: > > I wish more fans would realize that the APES films were never produced > with a pre-conceived timeline in mind. They were made one at a time, > dictated by the sucess of the previous entry, and as they were > greenlighted by the studio, screenwriters like Paul Dehn were trying to > cobble together a coherent explaination to tie the overall story points > together. Thus all the gaps and inconsistancies. I doubt it will ever > become one long linear timeline without twisting, revamping and > revisionist theorizing--JR >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50308 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Layer Transistions on Return to the Planet of the Apes DVD set |
.htmlHey Troy,
I know the pause when the layer changes on DVD's that you are talking
about but I don't have any of this on my Return DVD's. Sounds like you
may have a bad disc.
John
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Troy Rawlings" <troyyortus@...> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know the exact time interval for the layer transistion(s)
> on the two discs in the Return to the Planet of the Apes DVD set?
> Usually I can tell because my DVD player will flip from the "play"
sign
> to the "pause" sign and then back again for a second or two, but when
I
> was watching the "Tunnel of Fear" episode on Disc 1, about halfway
> through, there was a pause in the image but no flip in the signs. Just
> want to make sure the disc isn't defective.
>
> There is no noticeable pause anywhere on Disc 2.
>
>
> Thanks in advance for any assistance.
>
> Troy
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50309 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
.html.html That would be excellent news. I look forward to seeing some official news on that soon.
Thanks for the scoop.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50310 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Opera |
.htmlThanks JR..I saw that....I remember though seeing pics of the production, not just the curtain call...thanks though!!
--- On Wed, 12/3/08, jose ramon <joseramonruizdiez@...> wrote:
> From: jose ramon <joseramonruizdiez@...>
> Subject: Re: [pota] Apes Opera
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 11:11 AM
> http://intermezzo.typepad.com/intermezzo/2007/07/rigoletto-in-mu.html"
>
> JR
>
> --- On Wed, 12/3/08, Tim "apefan"
> <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> From: Tim "apefan" <apefan23@...>
> Subject: [pota] Apes Opera
> To: "POTA" <pota@yahoogroups.com>,
> "POTA DG" <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 8:06 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anyone remember a couple of years ago there were some pics
> floating around of a production of "rigoletto"
> done in bavaria and it seemed to be set on the Planet of the
> Apes? Does anyone have any of those pics? I did a google
> search and can only find one small one....
> I'd appreciate it!
> Tim <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50311 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Apemania hits London! |
| Group: pota |
Message: 50312 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
.html
.html
Screenwriters are very low on the totem pole.
They also think they should be welcome on the
set. Often they are not. It's not right. Just how it is.
In a message dated 12/3/2008 4:09:49 P.M. Central Standard Time,
sparkytb@... writes:
A
hollywood screenwriter friend of mine texted me this morning to say that
Fox has greenlit this
project.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50313 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: False Alarm and Ape Feet |
.htmlI'm sure the shoe change was merely a budget thing....The slippers were a lot cheaper than the custom made boots....
--- On Wed, 12/3/08, branchbrood <branchbrood@...> wrote:
> From: branchbrood <branchbrood@...>
> Subject: [pota] False Alarm and Ape Feet
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 6:39 PM
> Well I'll be a Monkey's Uncle.. It would appear I
> was a lil' hastey
> in screaming that I couldn't find my Posting I just
> needed to give
> our talented Mods the chance to get the blasted thing on
> the
> site...sorry.
> Well now I still have this burning Question, What happened
> to the Ape-
> Like Toe that was simulated on ALL the Simian Boot/Shoes in
> the First
> Three and Last Films? I mean in "Conquest" Ceasar
> & Co. are wearing
> nuthin more than these Canvas Slip on Deck Shoes(I've
> got the same
> kind in Black $5.99 "Shop Smart Shop S-Mart" lol)
> Anyhoo,It's not
> that I have a foot fetish see,It's just things like
> this Bug me! Like
> the good folks over at Paramount with the Star Trek
> Franchise,I mean
> nobodys ever tried to explain why All Klingons after 1979
> have that
> Brine Shrimp running up their foreheads!?! I mean WHAT
> HAPPENED to
> the ol' Swarmy lookin' Dudes!?! But I Digress lol
> I'm just wondering
> about this I'm thinking, to expand upon the
> comparrasions between the
> Human/Ape Society of "Conquest" and Race
> relations at the Time of the
> Films release in Real Life, Perhaps Govenor Breck had
> "Ape
> Management" Chop the Toe off all apes being
> Conditioned to keep them
> from Climbing away al'a Kuta Ken-Ty in
> "Roots"? I dunno. Oh speakin'
> of Ape/Human Politics, I just wanted to say To Mr. Greene I
> had
> always wanted your Book Since I first seen you on the AMC
> "Behind The
> POTA" the ONLY copy I'd ever found was about $50
> online. THEN a few
> weeks ago I go to a Book Sale at a Public Library here in
> Florida and
> Like Discovering the Ark Of The Covenent I found your Book
> for only
> $2.00!! I hate to be Cheap but I got three little Mutants
> to take
> care of and one Nova that = $$$ lol Anyhoo it's got
> that hard Boring
> Library Binding on it I wondered what the Original cover
> looked like?
> Well I'll leave you folks to ponder these Questions and
> debate what
> drugs I might be on lol But Thanks for your time
> Best,
> John B. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50314 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
.htmlGreat news.I'm Irish, so I get easily confused---who are Rick Jaffa and
Amanda Silver, mentioned in that article? I had thought Scott Frank was
scripting? I hope to Semos we're not already in the 'multiple scripters
mess' most modern films seem to fall into? John, Scrolls.
>
> A hollywood screenwriter friend of mine texted me this morning to say
> that Fox has greenlit this project.
>
> Prepare for Planet of the Apes: Genesis.
>
> For more:
>
> http://chud.com/articles/articles/16881/1/IS-PLANET-OF-THE-APES-
GETTING-REBOOTED-AGAIN/Page1.htmlbr>
>
> You heard it from Mark first. Jump up and down and scream!!!!!
>
> X
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50315 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: a Power (Records) trip |
.html
.html
So this past Saturday, I took my yearly jaunt down to Philadelphia to a
music expo. Aside from the scenery, the three hour trip allows for a
good stretch of music listening, but I opted to bring a long a recent
eBay purchase of the 8 Power Records POTA stories (on one disc) and give
them a listen as I hadn't heard the first four in years and- in fact- had
never heard the four TV series stories. To this day, I remain impressed with how
well the four movies were adapted. Compressing movies that run from anywhere
between 90-120 minutes down to just 12 would lead one to believe that there
would be major gaps in the storytelling, but in fact the four of them hit all
the key elements from the respective films. And the changes that are made i.e.
removing Zaius from BENEATH, or Cornelius from BATTLE, isn't even noticeable as
far as the story is concerned. Interesting though with both those versions that
the characters of Zaius and Cornelius apper of the respective front covers.
Other minor changes- like Brent falling through the ground in the Forbidden
Zone and discovering that he's back on Earth and Mendez
activating the bomb- don't detract from the story in the slightest. I will say
though that the cover for BENEATH still has the strangest interpretation of the
Alpha Omega bomb I've seen.
One minor gripe about ESCAPE: Zira saying "Wheee!! What luxury!!" Just a
tad bit out of character there...
One thing that came to mind when listening to BATTLE (which I didn't
actually own when I was small and only heard once before) is that
you get the impression that the source material for that adaptation is as
epic as the source material for, say, PLANET. What I mean that when you compare
how the adaptations stack up to the films, the Power BATTLE is as good as the
Power PLANET (or BENEATH and ESCAPE for that matter). In that sense, BATTLE
comes across as a lot more substantive that it's given credit for. And I'm not
trashing the film, because I've certainly said before here that I really do
enjoy it. I'm certainly aware of it's shortcomings, but that doesn't stop me
from enjoying it though.
There's also one line in particular that seemed to address a noticeable
problem in BATTLE: the rather small army that attacked Ape City. Here, the
narrator says "An army that would be pathetic were it not for it's deadly
intent sets out across the desert" and that almost validates the problem from
the source material because you've addressed what comes across as the obvious
problem but at the same time qualified the mutant army as an actual
threat. Interesting how that was done.
The TV series stories were all well done, and in fact there seemed to be a
deliberate (and obviously, necessary) attempt to completely convey the story
with the audio track because there was no accompanying book. For example, if you
hadn't seen the book for BATTLE, I don't know if you'd realize that Kolp was
using a flamethrower at one point. The only thing that made me wince a bit was
the need to work all four story titles into the dialog at one point:
"And this is the very mysterious MOUNTAIN OF THE DELPHI."
"It's the BATTLE OF TWO WORLDS, alright."
"How can we pass up the chance to see something as beautiful as a sunrise?
The new DAWN OF THE TREE PEOPLE".
"Unlike the humans of 2000 years ago, I believe my fellow apes will see the
precipice ahead and pull back in time. I think they will learn the lesson of the
VOLCANO."
Yeesh.
The only thing that struck me weird was how in MOUNTAIN OF THE DELPHI,
Virdon says that he and Pete come from another planet called Earth yet at
the end of the story are aware that they're on Earth. I had thought for a second
that discovering the Liberty Bell was going to be their Statute of
Liberty/Queensborough Plaza moment, but by the end of the story I got the
impression that they already knew where they were. There also seemed to
be a deliberate nod to the TV series inasmuch as between Virdon and Burke
that had experience in just about every job and craft imaginable. In DAWN OF THE
TREE PEOPLE, Virdon adds alligator wrestling to his resume.
Nice touch: the voice actors for Brent and Taylor doing the
voices for Virdon and Burke, respectively.
All in all, it was a pleasant distraction that ate up a good chunk of
travel time. It also got me thinking that it'd be an interesting fan
project to try and do a book and record adaptation of CONQUEST in the same
manner as the other four films were done. Sounds effects, needle drop music, and
12 minutes long. For the sake of simplicity, we could make the audio an MP3 as
opposed to getting a 7" vinyl disc pressed.
Just a thought...
Chris L. <.html
____________________________________________________________
Click here for free information on how to reduce your debt by filing for bankruptcy. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50316 |
From: sparkytb2005 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: UTTER BOMBSHELL |
.htmlEr.... Are you Don Simpson resurrected?
Mark
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@... wrote:
>
>
> Screenwriters are very low on the totem pole.
> They also think they should be welcome on the
> set. Often they are not. It's not right. Just how it is.
>
>
> In a message dated 12/3/2008 4:09:49 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> sparkytb@... writes:
>
> A hollywood screenwriter friend of mine texted me this morning to
say
> that Fox has greenlit this project.
>
>
> **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email,
and
> favorite sites in one place. Try it now.
> (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-
dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50317 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
|
.html Timeline of the Planet of the Apes:The Definitive Chronology
THE GOOD
Whilst reading, I was undecided if this was the work of a genius or a
maniac
So I decided to settle for it being the work of a maniacal
genius.
If you're the kind of person who complains that books are too long
then you're probably a reader of Stephen King, if not, then be warned
this is HUGE. I guess any book that covers so many years of
imaginary history has to be.
Be assured that with very few exceptions there's nothing here that
shouldn't be. One might question the validity of including references
to swimming coaches and bicycle thieves but when such occurrences
account for a tiny, almost infinitesimal fraction of the overall text
it's no biggie.
Just as the actors personalities managed to `bleed through' John
Chambers incredible make up, author, Rich's personality bleeds through
every word, sentence and paragraph. This book is a celebration, an
unashamed love-letter and an invitation to share in his passion and
enthusiasm for Planet of the Apes. The distance between his approach
and that of someone delivering a dry lecture to an audience that
doesn't really care is about as wide as the universe he has chosen to
explore.
Different readers, depending upon their perspective, will enjoy some
sections of the book more than others - If I put my hand on my heart
and reveal that he somehow manages to make even the events surrounding
Tim Burton's re-imagining sound interesting then that might give you a
good idea of what to expect.
A truly stunning cover wrapped around a clear, eye-pleasing layout,
Timeline of the Planet of the Apes: The Definitive Chronology, proves
once again that anything of worth in the future of the APES franchise
is in the hands of its fans.
THE BAD
For obvious reasons the use of images is somewhat limited. What images
there are, are functional but aren't likely to rock your world My
advice; read this and at the same time marvel at the images in that
free book given away with the new Blu Rays!
THE UGLY
There's no picture of the author anywhere I therefore conclude that
Rich Handley is very ugly :0)
Dave B <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50318 |
From: James |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: FW: Google Alert - "planet of the apes" |
.html.html
Google News
Alert for: "planet of the apes"
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50319 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Ape Heaven! |
|
.html I'm in a state of Ape Sensory overload.Rich's Timeline book is
stunning, the Megos are back, Simian Scrolls #15 is done and there's a
new movie on the way.And today I had in my Blu Ray box set.I know that
buying a set you can never play is nerdish to the point of insanity,
but I just had to have the book.And what a book! This is a lavish,
sumptuous trip through the five movies, with stills I've never seen and
glossy ,rich coloured shots that leap off the page.It's worth buying
for the book alone and I don't remember Apes ever being as hot as it is
lately.John, Scrolls. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50320 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
.htmlThanks for the review, Dave! It brought a smile to me ol' face.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Dave B" <smugster2000@...> wrote:
> Whilst reading, I was undecided if this was the work of a
> genius or a maniac
So I decided to settle for it being
> the work of a maniacal genius.
Then I'd say you were spot on--I am, in fact, a maniacal genius.
> If you're the kind of person who complains that books
> are too long then you're probably a reader of Stephen
> King, if not, then be warned - this is HUGE. I guess
> any book that covers so many years of imaginary history
> has to be.
I did wonder if I'd made it too long, yeah. I hope it wasn't
distractingly so.
> Be assured that with very few exceptions there's nothing
> here that shouldn't be. One might question the validity
> of including references to swimming coaches and bicycle
> thieves but when such occurrences account for a tiny,
> almost infinitesimal fraction of the overall text
it's
> no biggie.
LOL--yeah, I knew those would raise some eyebrows. I kept them in to
be consistent with the "everything goes" approach I took to the book.
> Just as the actors personalities managed to `bleed through'
> John Chambers incredible make up, author, Rich's personality
> bleeds through every word, sentence and paragraph.
I couldn't ask for a more complimentary analogy. Thanks, man! (Of
course, that means if someone thinks my personality stinks, they
should probably buy that Steven King novel instead.)
> This book is a celebration, an unashamed love-letter
> and an invitation to share in his passion and enthusiasm
> for Planet of the Apes. The distance between his approach
> and that of someone delivering a dry lecture to an
> audience that doesn't really care is about as wide as
> the universe he has chosen to explore.
{{{humbled}}}
> Different readers, depending upon their perspective,
> will enjoy some sections of the book more than others -
Definitely. I keep waiting for the hate mail to arrive regarding the
Burton film entries. :)
> If I put my hand on my heart and reveal that he somehow
> manages to make even the events surrounding Tim Burton's
> re-imagining sound interesting then that might give you a
> good idea of what to expect.
Woo-hooo! Then my work here is done. (Well, not really...I've
already begun the next book.)
> A truly stunning cover wrapped around a clear, eye-
> pleasing layout, Timeline of the Planet of the Apes:
> The Definitive Chronology, proves once again that
> anything of worth in the future of the APES franchise
> is in the hands of its fans.
Great--so, to whom did you say I should make that check out again?
> THE BAD
Bad??? My book has no bad!!! It-- oh, um, never mind.
> For obvious reasons the use of images is somewhat limited.
> What images there are, are functional but aren't likely
> to rock your world
Sad, but true. We were worried about copyright infringement, so we
stuck to the covers. And there are a ton of covers used...but they're
still just covers, nonetheless. I hope we made good use of them. We
may be a bit more risk-taking with the next book, in terms of pictures.
> My advice; read this and at the same time marvel at the
> images in that free book given away with the new Blu Rays!
A sensible approach! And listen to the soundtracks while you're doing so.
> THE UGLY
> There's no picture of the author anywhere I therefore
> conclude that Rich Handley is very ugly :0)
Damn you, Ballard--damn you all to hell! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50321 |
From: Troy Rawlings |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Layer Transistions on Return to the Planet of the Apes DVD set |
.htmlJohn:
Thanks for the response.
Troy
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "luke_the_drifter52" <JLKINSER1970@...>
wrote:
>
> Hey Troy,
> I know the pause when the layer changes on DVD's that you are
talking
> about but I don't have any of this on my Return DVD's. Sounds like
you
> may have a bad disc.
> John
>
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Troy Rawlings" <troyyortus@> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know the exact time interval for the layer transistion
(s)
> > on the two discs in the Return to the Planet of the Apes DVD set?
> > Usually I can tell because my DVD player will flip from
the "play"
> sign
> > to the "pause" sign and then back again for a second or two, but
when
> I
> > was watching the "Tunnel of Fear" episode on Disc 1, about
halfway
> > through, there was a pause in the image but no flip in the signs.
Just
> > want to make sure the disc isn't defective.
> >
> > There is no noticeable pause anywhere on Disc 2.
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any assistance.
> >
> > Troy
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50322 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: a Power (Records) trip |
.htmlThanks for the great overview of the entire series. Very insightful
and another POV that supports the high quality put into these records
despite being targeted for kids.
I have most of the records, but never really gave them a good listen
although I've been wanting to do that for a long time. I too have
always wanted to put them all together for a good listen during a long
trip, but you beat me to it.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Lawless <lawford42@...>
Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008 1:54 am
Subject: [pota] a Power (Records) trip
> So this past Saturday, I took my yearly jaunt down to Philadelphia
> to a
> music expo. Aside from the scenery, the three hour trip allows for
> a good
> stretch of music listening, but I opted to bring a long a recent eBay
> purchase of the 8 Power Records POTA stories (on one disc) and
> give them
> a listen as I hadn't heard the first four in years and- in fact- had
> never heard the four TV series stories. To this day, I remain
> impressedwith how well the four movies were adapted. Compressing
> movies that run
> from anywhere between 90-120 minutes down to just 12 would lead
> one to
> believe that there would be major gaps in the storytelling, but in
> factthe four of them hit all the key elements from the respective
> films. And
> the changes that are made i.e. removing Zaius from BENEATH, or
> Corneliusfrom BATTLE, isn't even noticeable as far as the story is
> concerned.Interesting though with both those versions that the
> characters of Zaius
> and Cornelius apper of the respective front covers. Other minor
> changes-
> like Brent falling through the ground in the Forbidden Zone and
> discovering that he's back on Earth and Mendez activating the bomb-
> don't
> detract from the story in the slightest. I will say though that
> the cover
> for BENEATH still has the strangest interpretation of the Alpha Omega
> bomb I've seen.
>
> One minor gripe about ESCAPE: Zira saying "Wheee!! What luxury!!"
> Just a
> tad bit out of character there...
>
> One thing that came to mind when listening to BATTLE (which I didn't
> actually own when I was small and only heard once before) is that
> you get
> the impression that the source material for that adaptation is as
> epic as
> the source material for, say, PLANET. What I mean that when you
> comparehow the adaptations stack up to the films, the Power BATTLE
> is as good as
> the Power PLANET (or BENEATH and ESCAPE for that matter). In that
> sense,BATTLE comes across as a lot more substantive that it's
> given credit for.
> And I'm not trashing the film, because I've certainly said before
here
> that I really do enjoy it. I'm certainly aware of it's
> shortcomings, but
> that doesn't stop me from enjoying it though.
>
> There's also one line in particular that seemed to address a
> noticeableproblem in BATTLE: the rather small army that attacked
> Ape City. Here,
> the narrator says "An army that would be pathetic were it not for
it's
> deadly intent sets out across the desert" and that almost
> validates the
> problem from the source material because you've addressed what comes
> across as the obvious problem but at the same time qualified the
> mutantarmy as an actual threat. Interesting how that was done.
>
> The TV series stories were all well done, and in fact there seemed
> to be
> a deliberate (and obviously, necessary) attempt to completely
> convey the
> story with the audio track because there was no accompanying book.
For
> example, if you hadn't seen the book for BATTLE, I don't know if
you'd
> realize that Kolp was using a flamethrower at one point. The only
> thingthat made me wince a bit was the need to work all four story
> titles into
> the dialog at one point:
>
> "And this is the very mysterious MOUNTAIN OF THE DELPHI."
>
> "It's the BATTLE OF TWO WORLDS, alright."
>
> "How can we pass up the chance to see something as beautiful as a
> sunrise? The new DAWN OF THE TREE PEOPLE".
>
> "Unlike the humans of 2000 years ago, I believe my fellow apes
> will see
> the precipice ahead and pull back in time. I think they will learn
the
> lesson of the VOLCANO."
>
> Yeesh.
>
> The only thing that struck me weird was how in MOUNTAIN OF THE
DELPHI,
> Virdon says that he and Pete come from another planet called Earth
> yet at
> the end of the story are aware that they're on Earth. I had
> thought for a
> second that discovering the Liberty Bell was going to be their
> Statute of
> Liberty/Queensborough Plaza moment, but by the end of the story I
> got the
> impression that they already knew where they were. There also
> seemed to
> be a deliberate nod to the TV series inasmuch as between Virdon
> and Burke
> that had experience in just about every job and craft imaginable.
> In DAWN
> OF THE TREE PEOPLE, Virdon adds alligator wrestling to his resume.
>
> Nice touch: the voice actors for Brent and Taylor doing the voices
for
> Virdon and Burke, respectively.
>
> All in all, it was a pleasant distraction that ate up a good chunk of
> travel time. It also got me thinking that it'd be an interesting fan
> project to try and do a book and record adaptation of CONQUEST in the
> same manner as the other four films were done. Sounds effects, needle
> drop music, and 12 minutes long. For the sake of simplicity, we could
> make the audio an MP3 as opposed to getting a 7" vinyl disc pressed.
>
> Just a thought...
>
>
> Chris L.
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50323 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: a Power (Records) trip |
.htmlExcellent review of the Power Records stories. I get such a chuckle
out of these recordings--they're just so silly, and the stories are
rather wonky at times. But they're fun to listen to now and again.
You're right about how jarring it is, though, to hear the titles
worked into the dialog.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Chris Lawless <lawford42@...> wrote:
>
> So this past Saturday, I took my yearly jaunt down to Philadelphia to a
> music expo. Aside from the scenery, the three hour trip allows for a
good
> stretch of music listening, but I opted to bring a long a recent eBay
> purchase of the 8 Power Records POTA stories (on one disc) and give them
> a listen as I hadn't heard the first four in years and- in fact- had
> never heard the four TV series stories. To this day, I remain impressed
> with how well the four movies were adapted. Compressing movies that run
> from anywhere between 90-120 minutes down to just 12 would lead one to
> believe that there would be major gaps in the storytelling, but in fact
> the four of them hit all the key elements from the respective films. And
> the changes that are made i.e. removing Zaius from BENEATH, or Cornelius
> from BATTLE, isn't even noticeable as far as the story is concerned.
> Interesting though with both those versions that the characters of Zaius
> and Cornelius apper of the respective front covers. Other minor changes-
> like Brent falling through the ground in the Forbidden Zone and
> discovering that he's back on Earth and Mendez activating the bomb-
don't
> detract from the story in the slightest. I will say though that the
cover
> for BENEATH still has the strangest interpretation of the Alpha Omega
> bomb I've seen.
>
> One minor gripe about ESCAPE: Zira saying "Wheee!! What luxury!!" Just a
> tad bit out of character there...
>
> One thing that came to mind when listening to BATTLE (which I didn't
> actually own when I was small and only heard once before) is that
you get
> the impression that the source material for that adaptation is as
epic as
> the source material for, say, PLANET. What I mean that when you compare
> how the adaptations stack up to the films, the Power BATTLE is as
good as
> the Power PLANET (or BENEATH and ESCAPE for that matter). In that sense,
> BATTLE comes across as a lot more substantive that it's given credit
for.
> And I'm not trashing the film, because I've certainly said before here
> that I really do enjoy it. I'm certainly aware of it's shortcomings, but
> that doesn't stop me from enjoying it though.
>
> There's also one line in particular that seemed to address a noticeable
> problem in BATTLE: the rather small army that attacked Ape City. Here,
> the narrator says "An army that would be pathetic were it not for it's
> deadly intent sets out across the desert" and that almost validates the
> problem from the source material because you've addressed what comes
> across as the obvious problem but at the same time qualified the mutant
> army as an actual threat. Interesting how that was done.
>
> The TV series stories were all well done, and in fact there seemed to be
> a deliberate (and obviously, necessary) attempt to completely convey the
> story with the audio track because there was no accompanying book. For
> example, if you hadn't seen the book for BATTLE, I don't know if you'd
> realize that Kolp was using a flamethrower at one point. The only thing
> that made me wince a bit was the need to work all four story titles into
> the dialog at one point:
>
> "And this is the very mysterious MOUNTAIN OF THE DELPHI."
>
> "It's the BATTLE OF TWO WORLDS, alright."
>
> "How can we pass up the chance to see something as beautiful as a
> sunrise? The new DAWN OF THE TREE PEOPLE".
>
> "Unlike the humans of 2000 years ago, I believe my fellow apes will see
> the precipice ahead and pull back in time. I think they will learn the
> lesson of the VOLCANO."
>
> Yeesh.
>
> The only thing that struck me weird was how in MOUNTAIN OF THE DELPHI,
> Virdon says that he and Pete come from another planet called Earth
yet at
> the end of the story are aware that they're on Earth. I had thought
for a
> second that discovering the Liberty Bell was going to be their
Statute of
> Liberty/Queensborough Plaza moment, but by the end of the story I
got the
> impression that they already knew where they were. There also seemed to
> be a deliberate nod to the TV series inasmuch as between Virdon and
Burke
> that had experience in just about every job and craft imaginable. In
DAWN
> OF THE TREE PEOPLE, Virdon adds alligator wrestling to his resume.
>
> Nice touch: the voice actors for Brent and Taylor doing the voices for
> Virdon and Burke, respectively.
>
> All in all, it was a pleasant distraction that ate up a good chunk of
> travel time. It also got me thinking that it'd be an interesting fan
> project to try and do a book and record adaptation of CONQUEST in the
> same manner as the other four films were done. Sounds effects, needle
> drop music, and 12 minutes long. For the sake of simplicity, we could
> make the audio an MP3 as opposed to getting a 7" vinyl disc pressed.
>
> Just a thought...
>
>
> Chris L.
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50324 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
.html> Definitely. I keep waiting for the hate mail to arrive regarding the
> Burton film entries. :)
I decided to keep my mouth shut and just ignore those.... ;-)
> > THE UGLY
> > There's no picture of the author anywhere I therefore
> > conclude that Rich Handley is very ugly :0)
> Damn you, Ballard--damn you all to hell!
I had looked for the photo, too. However, since it was missing, I had
assumed he was on the lam or something....
Hunter <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50325 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: a Power (Records) trip |
.html> Thanks for the great overview of the entire series. Very insightful
> and another POV that supports the high quality put into these records
> despite being targeted for kids.
> I have most of the records, but never really gave them a good listen
> although I've been wanting to do that for a long time. I too have
> always wanted to put them all together for a good listen during a long
> trip, but you beat me to it.
Just a reminder that MP3s of all the Apes Power Records, plus flash
files, can be found on my site:
https://pota.goatley.com/powerrecords.html"
Hunter <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50326 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
.htmlAt 09:14 AM 12/4/2008, Hunter Goatley wrote:
> > Definitely. I keep waiting for the hate mail to arrive regarding the
> > Burton film entries. :)
>I decided to keep my mouth shut and just ignore those.... ;-)
LOL--yeah, well, I'm sure not everyone will be so kind.
> > > THE UGLY
> > > There's no picture of the author anywhere I therefore
> > > conclude that Rich Handley is very ugly :0)
> > Damn you, Ballard--damn you all to hell!
>I had looked for the photo, too. However, since it was missing, I had
>assumed he was on the lam or something....
My photo is on the cover--I'm the guy pleasuring the Alpha-Omega Bomb. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50327 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
.html> My photo is on the cover--I'm the guy pleasuring the Alpha-Omega Bomb.
Nice. Now I'll never be able to look at that cover again without
thinking of that. 8-)
Hunter <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50328 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Working hard on POTA, very hard. |
|
.html Okay okay okay. Since there's an EVIDENT resurgence in the POTA
mythos/popularity worldwide, since there's a new movie(?) in the
making, since the BLU-RAY set is truly amazing and stunning (excellent
restoration and remastering), since there's a new incredible book on
the shelves... I will work even harder on my APELINES.
We're still far from perfection.
I ONLY miss a complete restoration of the TV series...
And I must say this: some time ago, I approached the 'PHANTASM' fan
following (I created a successful message board called 'SPHERE WARS'
for them) but I realized they were just bad people who didn't deserve
my efforts. In the end, they also sabotaged my board. Terrible people.
Thanks God, APE-HEADS are fantastic... I feel totally "in family" here.
HUGE thanks.
Tiziano Caliendo <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50329 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
|
.html Essentially... what discrepancies does the Director's Cut 'CONQUEST'
create? What differences plot-wise? I'm puzzled.
Thanks...
Tiziano Caliendo. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50330 |
From: Scott Raile |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.htmlapecalypsenow wrote:
>
> Essentially... what discrepancies does the Director's Cut 'CONQUEST'
> create? What differences plot-wise? I'm puzzled.
>
> .
The one discontinuity that I noticed was that, in the Director's Cut,
it's pretty obvious that the gorillas beat Breck to death. But in
BATTLE, there's some sort of dialogue between Caesar and McDonald that
references Breck's survival (sorry I can't be more precise; I'm at work
now without a Blu-Ray player!).
Speaking of McDonald, does anyone know why they bothered to mention that
the McDonald in CONQUEST was the brother of the one in BATTLE? I know
it's a different actor, but what would have been the problem of having
another actor play the same character? It just seems like sort of a
superfluous remark to excuse the fact that it's a different guy;
distracting for no real purpose.
Scott <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50331 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.htmlPrimarily, the changes are just increased violence during the riot
scene, from what I hear. The only plot difference really seems to be
that the gorillas beat Breck to death, and that Caesar doesn't deliver
his tacked-on "simian-human love-in" speech.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@...> wrote:
>
> Essentially... what discrepancies does the Director's Cut 'CONQUEST'
> create? What differences plot-wise? I'm puzzled.
>
> Thanks...
>
>
> Tiziano Caliendo.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50332 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.html
.html
More scenes of ape/human violence, Governor Breck is killed (Kolp
states in BATTLE that the "bomb" killed the old governor), and Cesar's
speech about ape and human unity at the end is cut...This actually poses another
continuity issue as Lisa refers to Cesar's pledge in BATTLE.
In a message dated 12/4/2008 11:49:35 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
apecalypsenow@... writes:
Essentially. .. what discrepancies does the Director's Cut
'CONQUEST' create? What differences plot-wise? I'm
puzzled.
Thanks...
Tiziano
Caliendo. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50333 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.htmlI think the reference to the Brother of McDonald was to show some passage of time, I am at work as well and going off memory here-LOL
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Scott Raile <raile@...> wrote:
apecalypsenow wrote: > > Essentially... what discrepancies does the Director's Cut 'CONQUEST' > create? What differences plot-wise? I'm puzzled. >
> .
The one discontinuity that I noticed was that, in the Director's Cut, it's pretty obvious that the gorillas beat Breck to death. But in BATTLE, there's some sort of dialogue between Caesar and McDonald that
references Breck's survival (sorry I can't be more precise; I'm at work now without a Blu-Ray player!). Speaking of McDonald, does anyone know why they bothered to mention that the McDonald in CONQUEST was the brother of the one in BATTLE? I know
it's a different actor, but what would have been the problem of having another actor play the same character? It just seems like sort of a superfluous remark to excuse the fact that it's a different guy;
distracting for no real purpose. Scott
-- Bill Hollweg Have Sword...
Will Slay... Barbarian in need of Ale... Check out my fantasy Audio Drama- Bill Hollweg Lord of Design for BrokenSea Audio www.brokensea.net The Saga of the Grog and Gryphon @
http://www.brokensea.com and http://www.westlakefilms.co.uk Planet of the Apes at http://www.brokensea.com and
Ulysses-Galactic Guides & Bounty Hunting http://www.brokensea.com and CONAN the Audio Book and Audio Drama http://brokensea.com/conan/
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50334 |
From: Bill Hollweg |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.htmlLike a Yonger brother I think- though I could be wrong.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Bill Hollweg <billhollweg@...> wrote:
I think the reference to the Brother of McDonald was to show some passage of time, I am at work as well and going off memory here-LOL
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Scott Raile <raile@...> wrote:
apecalypsenow wrote: > > Essentially... what discrepancies does the Director's Cut 'CONQUEST' > create? What differences plot-wise? I'm puzzled. >
> . The one discontinuity that I noticed was that, in the Director's Cut,
it's pretty obvious that the gorillas beat Breck to death. But in BATTLE, there's some sort of dialogue between Caesar and McDonald that references Breck's survival (sorry I can't be more precise; I'm at work
now without a Blu-Ray player!). Speaking of McDonald, does anyone know why they bothered to mention that the McDonald in CONQUEST was the brother of the one in BATTLE? I know it's a different actor, but what would have been the problem of having
another actor play the same character? It just seems like sort of a superfluous remark to excuse the fact that it's a different guy; distracting for no real purpose. Scott
-- Bill Hollweg
Have Sword... Will Slay... Barbarian in need of Ale... Check out my fantasy Audio Drama- Bill Hollweg Lord of Design for BrokenSea Audio www.brokensea.net
The Saga of the Grog and Gryphon @ http://www.brokensea.com and http://www.westlakefilms.co.uk
Planet of the Apes at http://www.brokensea.com and Ulysses-Galactic Guides & Bounty Hunting http://www.brokensea.com and
CONAN the Audio Book and Audio Drama http://brokensea.com/conan/
-- Bill Hollweg Have Sword... Will Slay...
Barbarian in need of Ale... Check out my fantasy Audio Drama- Bill Hollweg Lord of Design for BrokenSea Audio www.brokensea.net The Saga of the Grog and Gryphon @
http://www.brokensea.com and http://www.westlakefilms.co.uk Planet of the Apes at http://www.brokensea.com and
Ulysses-Galactic Guides & Bounty Hunting http://www.brokensea.com and CONAN the Audio Book and Audio Drama http://brokensea.com/conan/
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50335 |
From: scott bosco |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.htmlHaving Governor Breck killed goes against the line of dialog in BATTLE that mentions he died from the bomb. Now, I suppose it might MIGHT be possible he survived the pummeling at the end of the "director's cut", perhaps as a veggie, but I doubt it. Then again, it's no worse than Taylor's ship being used by the apes, , hell, even Nova actually remembering how to go across the wasteland to Ape city like she's done it numerous times. Not to mention how she knew where Cornelius & Zira lived. But hell, that's entertainment.
- Scott --- On Thu, 12/4/08, apecalypsenow <apecalypsenow@...> wrote:
From: apecalypsenow <apecalypsenow@...> Subject: [pota] Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? To: pota@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 10:11 AM
Essentially. .. what discrepancies does the Director's Cut 'CONQUEST' create? What differences plot-wise? I'm puzzled.
Thanks...
Tiziano Caliendo.
|
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50336 |
From: James |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.htmlOr Kolp may have just assumed that Breck was killed by the bomb.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, scott bosco <digitalcinema@...> wrote:
>
> Having Governor Breck killed goes against the line of dialog in BATTLE
that mentions he died from the bomb. Now, I suppose it might MIGHT
be possible he survived the pummeling at the end of the "director's
cut", perhaps as a veggie, but I doubt it. Then again, it's no worse
than Taylor's ship being used by the apes, , hell, even Nova actually
remembering how to go across the wasteland to Ape city like she's done
it numerous times. Not to mention how she knew where Cornelius &
Zira lived. But hell, that's entertainment.
> - Scott
>
> --- On Thu, 12/4/08, apecalypsenow apecalypsenow@... wrote:
>
> From: apecalypsenow apecalypsenow@...
> Subject: [pota] Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"?
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 10:11 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Essentially. .. what discrepancies does the Director's Cut 'CONQUEST'
> create? What differences plot-wise? I'm puzzled.
>
> Thanks...
>
> Tiziano Caliendo.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50337 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
|
.html The article I read from the new google alert noted that the new apes
saga will deal with the 1000 year time period between 2009 till I take
it the lawgivers speech in battle,am I right about this? There is so
much gap that thay can make a prequel like star wars.I bet thay are
going to do a prequel of the new star trek movie also.
I wonder at what time peroid this movie will start out? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50338 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.htmlNo WAIT, you're all talking like the Director's Cut is the
NEW 'Conquest'.
At this point, since it contradicts BATTLE... it can't be!
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
>
> Or Kolp may have just assumed that Breck was killed by the bomb.
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, scott bosco <digitalcinema@> wrote:
> >
> > Having Governor Breck killed goes against the line of dialog in
BATTLE
> that mentions he died from the bomb. Now, I suppose it might MIGHT
> be possible he survived the pummeling at the end of the "director's
> cut", perhaps as a veggie, but I doubt it. Then again, it's no
worse
> than Taylor's ship being used by the apes, , hell, even Nova
actually
> remembering how to go across the wasteland to Ape city like she's
done
> it numerous times. Not to mention how she knew where Cornelius &
> Zira lived. But hell, that's entertainment.
> > - Scott
> >
> > --- On Thu, 12/4/08, apecalypsenow apecalypsenow@ wrote:
> >
> > From: apecalypsenow apecalypsenow@
> > Subject: [pota] Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"?
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 10:11 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Essentially. .. what discrepancies does the Director's
Cut 'CONQUEST'
> > create? What differences plot-wise? I'm puzzled.
> >
> > Thanks...
> >
> > Tiziano Caliendo.
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50339 |
From: John |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Just order Rich's TIMELINE BOOK! |
.html> There's no picture of the author anywhere I therefore conclude that
> Rich Handley is very ugly :0)
>
> Dave B
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50340 |
From: branchbrood |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: False Alarm and Ape Feet |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> I'm sure the shoe change was merely a budget thing....The slippers
were a lot cheaper than the custom made boots....
>
>
> --- On Wed, 12/3/08, branchbrood <branchbrood@...> wrote:
>
> > From: branchbrood <branchbrood@...>
> > Subject: [pota] False Alarm and Ape Feet
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 6:39 PM
> > Well I'll be a Monkey's Uncle.. It would appear I
> > was a lil' hastey
> > in screaming that I couldn't find my Posting I just
> > needed to give
> > our talented Mods the chance to get the blasted thing on
> > the
> > site...sorry.
> > Well now I still have this burning Question, What happened
> > to the Ape-
> > Like Toe that was simulated on ALL the Simian Boot/Shoes in
> > the First
> > Three and Last Films? I mean in "Conquest" Ceasar
> > & Co. are wearing
> > nuthin more than these Canvas Slip on Deck Shoes(I've
> > got the same
> > kind in Black $5.99 "Shop Smart Shop S-Mart" lol)
> > Anyhoo,It's not
> > that I have a foot fetish see,It's just things like
> > this Bug me! Like
> > the good folks over at Paramount with the Star Trek
> > Franchise,I mean
> > nobodys ever tried to explain why All Klingons after 1979
> > have that
> > Brine Shrimp running up their foreheads!?! I mean WHAT
> > HAPPENED to
> > the ol' Swarmy lookin' Dudes!?! But I Digress lol
> > I'm just wondering
> > about this I'm thinking, to expand upon the
> > comparrasions between the
> > Human/Ape Society of "Conquest" and Race
> > relations at the Time of the
> > Films release in Real Life, Perhaps Govenor Breck had
> > "Ape
> > Management" Chop the Toe off all apes being
> > Conditioned to keep them
> > from Climbing away al'a Kuta Ken-Ty in
> > "Roots"? I dunno. Oh speakin'
> > of Ape/Human Politics, I just wanted to say To Mr. Greene I
> > had
> > always wanted your Book Since I first seen you on the AMC
> > "Behind The
> > POTA" the ONLY copy I'd ever found was about $50
> > online. THEN a few
> > weeks ago I go to a Book Sale at a Public Library here in
> > Florida and
> > Like Discovering the Ark Of The Covenent I found your Book
> > for only
> > $2.00!! I hate to be Cheap but I got three little Mutants
> > to take
> > care of and one Nova that = $$$ lol Anyhoo it's got
> > that hard Boring
> > Library Binding on it I wondered what the Original cover
> > looked like?
> > Well I'll leave you folks to ponder these Questions and
> > debate what
> > drugs I might be on lol But Thanks for your time
> > Best,
> > John B.
>
WELL THANKS TIM. Now about those KLINGONS! lol
John <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50341 |
From: branchbrood |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
>
> Or Kolp may have just assumed that Breck was killed by the bomb.
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, scott bosco <digitalcinema@> wrote:
> >
> > Having Governor Breck killed goes against the line of dialog in
BATTLE
> that mentions he died from the bomb. Now, I suppose it might MIGHT
> be possible he survived the pummeling at the end of the "director's
> cut", perhaps as a veggie, but I doubt it. Then again, it's no
worse
> than Taylor's ship being used by the apes, , hell, even Nova
actually
> remembering how to go across the wasteland to Ape city like she's
done
> it numerous times. Not to mention how she knew where Cornelius &
> Zira lived. But hell, that's entertainment.
> > - Scott
> >
> > --- On Thu, 12/4/08, apecalypsenow apecalypsenow@ wrote:
> >
> > From: apecalypsenow apecalypsenow@
> > Subject: [pota] Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"?
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 10:11 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Essentially. .. what discrepancies does the Director's
Cut 'CONQUEST'
> > create? What differences plot-wise? I'm puzzled.
> >
> > Thanks...
> >
> > Tiziano Caliendo.
> >
>Or How Brent knew Nova's Name WAS NOVA!?! or hee heee What happened
to the Apes' Extra Toe? just Kidding on the toe thing
John <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50342 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
.htmlWait... that means it's NOT a reboot, but proper PART of the Apeline
Beta (Two) continuity. Magnificent.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "ronnie2467" <ronnie2467@...> wrote:
>
> The article I read from the new google alert noted that the new apes
> saga will deal with the 1000 year time period between 2009 till I
take
> it the lawgivers speech in battle,am I right about this? There is so
> much gap that thay can make a prequel like star wars.I bet thay are
> going to do a prequel of the new star trek movie also.
> I wonder at what time peroid this movie will start out?
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50343 |
From: James |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.htmlBrent heard Cornelius and Zira call her Nova.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "branchbrood" <branchbrood@...> wrote: > > >Or How Brent knew Nova's Name WAS NOVA!?! or hee heee What happened > to the Apes' Extra Toe? just Kidding on the toe thing > John >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50344 |
From: James |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
.htmlDon't get your hopes up. From everything that is currently out that about this it sounds like a total reboot that has nothing to do with the classic films for even Burton's remake.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@...> wrote: > > Wait... that means it's NOT a reboot, but proper PART of the Apeline > Beta (Two) continuity. Magnificent. > > --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "ronnie2467" ronnie2467@ wrote: > > > > The article I read from the new google alert noted that the new apes > > saga will deal with the 1000 year time period between 2009 till I > take > > it the lawgivers speech in battle,am I right about this? There is so > > much gap that thay can make a prequel like star wars.I bet thay are > > going to do a prequel of the new star trek movie also. > > I wonder at what time peroid this movie will start out? > > >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50345 |
From: ronnie2467 |
Date: 12/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
.htmlthe 2001 planet of the apes was not succesful due to a different
storyline.I personaly did not like movie too much.I am hoping that
this new apes movie or trilogy would deal with the original story
line and go from there.
Ron
-- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
>
>
> Don't get your hopes up. From everything that is currently out that
> about this it sounds like a total reboot that has nothing to do
with the
> classic films for even Burton's remake.
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@> wrote:
> >
> > Wait... that means it's NOT a reboot, but proper PART of the
Apeline
> > Beta (Two) continuity. Magnificent.
> >
> > --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "ronnie2467" ronnie2467@ wrote:
> > >
> > > The article I read from the new google alert noted that the new
apes
> > > saga will deal with the 1000 year time period between 2009 till
I
> > take
> > > it the lawgivers speech in battle,am I right about this? There
is so
> > > much gap that thay can make a prequel like star wars.I bet thay
are
> > > going to do a prequel of the new star trek movie also.
> > > I wonder at what time peroid this movie will start out?
> > >
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50346 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/5/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "ronnie2467" <ronnie2467@...> wrote:
> The article I read from the new google alert noted that
> the new apes saga will deal with the 1000 year time
> period between 2009 till I take it the lawgivers speech
> in battle,am I right about this?
Well, actually, there's only a gap of 600+ years between now and the
end of Battle, but the real answer is that this film will not take
place in the same continuity as either of the previous film
versions--it's its own animal, so to speak. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50347 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/5/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Director's Cut CONQUEST: new "continuity"? |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "branchbrood" <branchbrood@...> wrote:
>Or How Brent knew Nova's Name WAS NOVA!?!
He heard Zira call her that. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 50348 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 12/5/2008 |
| Subject: Re: 1000 years -from 2009 to the lawgivers speech |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@...> wrote:
> Wait... that means it's NOT a reboot, but proper PART of the Apeline
> Beta (Two) continuity. Magnificent.
Nope--it's its own continuity. <.html
|
|
|
|