|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34473 |
From: John |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Happy New Year! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34474 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: APES Promos |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34475 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr. T vs POTA |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34476 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34477 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34478 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34479 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34480 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34481 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34482 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34483 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34484 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34485 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34486 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34487 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34488 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34489 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34490 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34491 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34492 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #60 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34493 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Speaking of BANANAS....... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34494 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34495 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34496 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: The Width of a Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34497 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: The Icarus |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34498 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: "Revolution on the POTA" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34499 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34500 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34501 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34502 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Width of a Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34503 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34504 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Speaking of BANANAS....... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34505 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34506 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The sequel DVDs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34507 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34508 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The sequel DVDs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34509 |
From: Neil |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34510 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34511 |
From: Neil |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34512 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34513 |
From: Neil |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34514 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34515 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34516 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34517 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34518 |
From: Ty Templeton |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34519 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34520 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34521 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34522 |
From: John |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: "Revolution on the POTA" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34523 |
From: John |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34524 |
From: John |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34525 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: The Circle JERK! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34526 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34527 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34528 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34529 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34530 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Caesar's Breeding Annex chimpette |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34531 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34532 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34533 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34534 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34535 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34536 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34537 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34538 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34539 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34540 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34541 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Bizarro Apes |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34542 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34543 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34544 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34545 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34546 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34547 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34548 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34549 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34550 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34551 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34552 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Bizarro Apes |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34553 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34554 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34555 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34556 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #61 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34557 |
From: Neet-O-Rama |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34558 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Gun Control |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34559 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Revolution #1 comments. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34560 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #61 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34561 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34562 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34563 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34564 |
From: PofTAfan@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34565 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34566 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: OT "Oxfordian" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34567 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: JFK, etc |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34568 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34569 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34570 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34571 |
From: Patrick Tilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Bizarro Apes |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34572 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: OT "Oxfordian" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34473 |
From: John |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Happy New Year! |
|
.html Happy New Year to all my fellow sci-fi fanboys. Captian Picard was a
P*ssy!!! <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34474 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: APES Promos |
.htmlI just have the Beneath spots......no Musical Journey
but I do have the "musak" version with the Star trek
theme....
Tim
--- mlccougar@... wrote:
> As mentioned months ago, I am trying to help another
> group member compile all
> of the APES radio spots, promos, etc...
>
> So far he has radio spots for BENEATH, ESACPE,
> CONQUEST, and BATTLE... There
> has been no luck in finding them for PLANET
> though...
>
> If anyone out there has any radio spots or other
> APES audio (such as POTA: A
> Musical Journey), let us know... If you can add
> anything to what he has
> compiled right now, you will receive a CD of it when
> completed...
>
__________________________________________
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34475 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr. T vs POTA |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34476 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1) |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 12/31/05 4:59:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
Holy crap Rory. I thought Patrick had written this long winded post.
He must be getting to ya.
Patrick got to me a loooooong time ago.....
and they put me in a madhouse! A MADHOUUUUUUSSSSSEEEE!!!!!<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34477 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1) |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 12/31/2005 3:49:53 PM Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
These stories were written for kids.
Not entirely true... BATTLE was defininately aimed at kids, but PLANET surely wasn't, and I can't say that BENEATH was entirely either... At worst you could say that they were aimed at the "family
audience" in which there were things for all members to enjoy... But kid's films, no... <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34478 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Ape - EAL |
.html.html
I
would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2006 12:53
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1)
In a message dated 12/31/2005
3:49:53 PM Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
These stories were written for kids.
Not entirely true... BATTLE was defininately aimed at kids, but PLANET surely
wasn't, and I can't say that BENEATH was entirely either... At worst you could
say that they were aimed at the "family audience" in which there were
things for all members to enjoy... But kid's films, no...
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34479 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:45 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
I would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..
Only the later films...
PLANET was never intended as a "kid's film"... Just by watching it, that much is obvious...<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34480 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/31/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html.html
Agreed, again.
But from Beneath
on the kid appeal is THERE! J
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2006 1:36
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL
In a message dated 12/31/2005
7:56:45 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
I would agree that most
of the APPEAL was to kids though…..
Only the later films...
PLANET was never intended as a "kid's film"... Just by watching it,
that much is obvious...
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34481 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html
.html
In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
These
stories were written for kids.
Of course . . .
Once upon a time . . .
there was a planet ruled by Apes
And Men were enslaved. And they
cut out your brain and cut off your
balls. Then it blew up. The End.
Pleasant dreams.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34482 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 12/31/05 8:56:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
I would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..
Michael
What's certainly true is that as the years passed in the early seventies APES came to appeal mostly to kids. Which is one of the reason's I, as I was growing older, came to dislike APES as it moved
along. I wanted the level of PLANET with each film and instead I got BATTLE, then the TV show, then -- horror of horrors -- a cartoon series. Then it was just comics. Then it was over.
Is it any wonder why I came to worship the original and despise the sequels?
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34483 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Mithril1960@a... wrote:
>
>
>
> In a message dated 12/30/2005 16:46:14 Eastern Standard Time,
> PotaDG@yahoogroups.com writes:
>
> Well, that makes no sense. Are we to accept that the mutants in
BATTLE are supposed to be living in the ruins of San Diego?!! And
that they somehow got the Alpha/Omega bomb to the ruins of New York
by the 40th century? How did they transport it, in that vehicle from
DAMNATION ALLEY, or are there supposed to be tunnels crisscrossing
the country as in Roddenberry's "Genesis II"?
>
> Look, just keep it simple. CONQUEST and BATTLE take place
somewhere on the East coast.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34484 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: The Circle |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 12/30/2005 8:07:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> veetus@e... writes:
>
> I understand that Arthur Jacobs wanted the end of "Battle" to be
left open to interpretation. Will Caesar change the future (a new
timeline) or is the future set (circular, fate)?
>
>
>
> That's the thing. The timeline has been changed but is it enough?
> Who knows? That was the last line. It reminds me of the time
> travel episodes of The Simpsons & Red Dwarf. Some times the
> smallest thing can just make it worse, and then it takes a lot to
> fix it. On the other had, how does it get worse than World
> destruction. I guess, at least from Taylor's point of view
> anyway, a World run by apes is worse than that.
>
*** The timeline didn't change. Cornelius told the Presidential
Commission that English had been the language of his ancestors
for "nearly two thousand years". He time-traveled back from the year
3955, and "nearly 2,000 years" before that Doomsday date puts Apes-
Speaking-English smack dab in the late 20th Century.
When Cornelius LATER tells Hasslein that the first ape to speak was
named "Aldo" and that this event supposedly happened 3 centuries after
the Apes were enslaved (the slavery beginning about 2 centuries after
the Plague), he is LYING. Just as Zira lies her ass off when she says
that the word she hadn't finished saying in her testimony to the
Commission [... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ...] was just her
having the hiccups. It suits these talking monkeys to lie when they
feel the need to do so.
They have an overwhelming compulsion to lie about this so-called 500-
year period: they don't want Hasslein to think that in just 18 years
the Ape Revolt is gonna precipitate the Nuke War that'll wipe out Man's
civilization. They don't want him to know that the leader of that
revolt will NOT be an ape named "Aldo" living some 500 years in the
Future, but will instead be an ape named "Caesar" who is currently
gestating in Zira's womb. In order to protect their unborn son, they
lie about the half-a-millennium that Man supposedly has left to lord it
over their soon-to-be enslaved Ape lessers. And Cornelius names "Aldo"
as the Ape to be watched out for because he doesn't want his own
grandson to be murdered by him. Cornelius wants to change that one
thing about the Future -- the fate of his eponymous grandson -- but he
doesn't want the prevent the Fall of Man and the Rise of the Apes,
a "historical" event that he now WANTS to happen, since his own family
will be the RULING family of that original Ape society.
Cornelius could only hope that Hasslein had forgotten all about
that "nearly 2,000 years" line earlier. How can the 1st talking ape
show up 500 years into the Future -- which is only 1,500 years or so
before the 3955 year of Doomsday -- if English had been handed down
from father-to-son for "nearly 2,000 years"?
Cornelius knew damned well that talking apes would "turn the tables" on
Man in the next generation -- NOT as far away as 500 years later. But
he and Zira wanted Hasslein to falsely believe they had that much time
left.
"How much time has the world got?!" Hasslein later rants. If he only
remembered Cornelius' testimony to the Commission and subtracted
that "nearly 2,000 years" period from the EARTH-TIME "date meter"
record of "3955" ("A.D., presumably"), then he would have a pretty good
idea of how much time the world had left before Apes took over the
reins of civilization from Man.
NOT NEARLY ENOUGH!
The timeline did NOT change. Cornelius lied about it, just as Zira lied
about her 'hiccups'. Just as he had lied earlier, when he claimed he
hadn't known Colonel Taylor. He's not above lying when he has a
compelling reason to do so. Those who insist on a "changed" timeline
believe Cornelius would NEVER EVER EVER tell a lie, like he's George
Freakin' Washington twiddlin' his thumbs by the chopped-down cherry
tree, and they're just plain wrong. The facts -- the details --
of "ESCAPE" prove otherwise.
And Dehn himself never was into this changing-of-timelines notion,
either. He has Hasslein CLAIMING that it's possible -- even if ever
more improbable, if action isn't taken -- to change the Future, to
change lanes on that Freeway of Time. But Dehn ended "ESCAPE" knowing
that there would undoubtedly be a 4th Apes film, and he purposely
arranged it so that the son of Cornelius and Zira would be the
protagonist of that story -- a story which would see the fulfilment of
the major details of the Future History that Cornelius laid out for
Hasslein (the Plague... Apes as Pets... Apes as Slaves... the Apes
turning the tables... an ape named "Aldo"...), but NOT in the 500-year
period Cornelius and Zira had lied about. Rather, Apes become enslaved
and wage their Revolt LESS THAN A DECADE after the Plague wipes out the
dogs and cats. That alone proves that Cornelius was either knowingly
LYING about the Future's timeline or he was unwittingly MISTAKEN about
it (as Ty implies). I think the irreconcilable discrepancy between
Cornelius' TWO timelines given in "ESCAPE" prove that he had to have
known that ONE of those two was bogus. The unfolding of the story
of "CONQUEST" proves that it was the later timeframe (500-years) that
was the bogus one.
The existence of other talking apes -- apes unrelated to the Ape-
onauts -- proves that there were talking apes on Earth even as
Cornelius and Zira were publicly believed to be the only ones able to
do so. Mandemus was OLDER than Caesar; he had to have been conceived
YEARS before the Ape-onauts landed off the coast of California.
Hasslein was worried about the possibility of Cornelius and Zira and
their unborn child interbreeding with primitive apes and producing the
race of intelligent apes that would one day flourish (and wage a war
culminating in Doomsday by 3955). But he was short-sighted. Cornelius
and Zira referred to the gorillas and orangutans in their testimony to
the Commission. Zira referred to gorillas during her sodium pentothal-
induced testimony at Camp Eleven. Did Hasslein think that Cornelius and
Zira (and their unborn child) would go gallivanting around,
impregnating (or being impregnated by) gorillas and orangutans, as well
as chimpanzees? How does Hasslein account for the existence of talking
gorillas and orangutans in the Future? He DOESN'T. He fixates on these
talking chimpanzees, and foolishly hopes that by killing THEM he'll be
preventing ALL apes from ever superceding Mankind as King of the Heap.
Hasslein, in his own way, was a short-sighted fool.
Dehn was making a SINGLE circular timeline -- the final screenplay
of "BATTLE" includes his final touches, the Corringtons
notwithstanding. Dehn knew that Cornelius and Zira were lying about
that 500-year period; he himself wrote Cornelius' earlier line, "nearly
2,000 years". His intention was to make it a vicious circle, with only
the "hope" that the circle could be broken. Definitely not the
CERTAINTY that it either COULD or WAS broken.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34485 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 9:12:45 A.M. Central Standard Time,
Haristas@... writes:
Is it any wonder why I came
to worship the original and despise the sequels?
-- Rory
Well, I don't feel as strongly as Rory does.
But I do agree that it did degenerate into
monkey movies. Not the direction I was
hoping for. That's why I had such hope for
the new one, and that's why the betrayal
was so painful. More Monkey Movies...
But it will get better, if I have to make
them myself. No makeup this time
though. It's will be CG. That's the
only way to get full range of motion
and it's improving every year. I
will not disappoint. Except for
Whitty. Because the kids
won't be able to get it.
Well, by the time I
do them they may
be old enough.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34486 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 12:00:36 P.M. Central Standard Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** The
timeline didn't change. Cornelius is LYING
Yeah, sorry . . . I don't buy it. I didn't read
the rest, because it started as crap, and I
can only assume it only got deeper. You
are of in Lala Land with your wild
substantiated guesses and I
for one refuse to wallow in
this drivel. You have
absolutely no way
to prove they were
not telling the truth,
you circle-ist!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34487 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 1:56:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,
LordTZer0@... writes:
substantiated guesses
Should have read, Unsubstantiated.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34488 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html
.html
That's because kids are more accepting
of the big truths than adults are. Adults don't want to be reminded. They want
soap operas and "reality" TV. Adult, yes. Grown-up, no. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 5:55
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL
I
would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids
though
..
Michael
-----Original
Message----- From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of mlccougar@... Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2006 12:53
PM To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Subject:
Re: [PotaDG] Re: Revolution on
the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1)
In a message dated 12/31/2005
3:49:53 PM Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
These stories were written for
kids.
Not entirely true... BATTLE was
defininately aimed at kids, but PLANET surely wasn't, and I can't say that
BENEATH was entirely either... At worst you could say that they were aimed at
the "family audience" in which there were things for all members to enjoy...
But kid's films, no...
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34489 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html
.html
Yeah, but have you ever listened to the words of "Rock A Bye Baby"?!
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 3:37
AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL
In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
These
stories were written for kids.
Of course . . .
Once upon a time . . .
there was a planet ruled by Apes
And Men were enslaved. And they
cut out your brain and cut off your
balls. Then it blew up. The End.
Pleasant dreams.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34490 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.htmlBlah! Blah! Blah! You'll never convince me. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 9:55 AM
Subject: [PotaDG] The Circle
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 12/30/2005 8:07:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > veetus@e... writes:
> >
> > I understand that Arthur Jacobs wanted the end of "Battle" to be
> left open to interpretation. Will Caesar change the future (a new
> timeline) or is the future set (circular, fate)?
> >
> >
> >
> > That's the thing. The timeline has been changed but is it enough?
> > Who knows? That was the last line. It reminds me of the time
> > travel episodes of The Simpsons & Red Dwarf. Some times the
> > smallest thing can just make it worse, and then it takes a lot to
> > fix it. On the other had, how does it get worse than World
> > destruction. I guess, at least from Taylor's point of view
> > anyway, a World run by apes is worse than that.
> >
> *** The timeline didn't change. Cornelius told the Presidential
> Commission that English had been the language of his ancestors
> for "nearly two thousand years". He time-traveled back from the year
> 3955, and "nearly 2,000 years" before that Doomsday date puts Apes-
> Speaking-English smack dab in the late 20th Century.
>
> When Cornelius LATER tells Hasslein that the first ape to speak was
> named "Aldo" and that this event supposedly happened 3 centuries after
> the Apes were enslaved (the slavery beginning about 2 centuries after
> the Plague), he is LYING. Just as Zira lies her ass off when she says
> that the word she hadn't finished saying in her testimony to the
> Commission [... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ...] was just her
> having the hiccups. It suits these talking monkeys to lie when they
> feel the need to do so.
>
> They have an overwhelming compulsion to lie about this so-called 500-
> year period: they don't want Hasslein to think that in just 18 years
> the Ape Revolt is gonna precipitate the Nuke War that'll wipe out Man's
> civilization. They don't want him to know that the leader of that
> revolt will NOT be an ape named "Aldo" living some 500 years in the
> Future, but will instead be an ape named "Caesar" who is currently
> gestating in Zira's womb. In order to protect their unborn son, they
> lie about the half-a-millennium that Man supposedly has left to lord it
> over their soon-to-be enslaved Ape lessers. And Cornelius names "Aldo"
> as the Ape to be watched out for because he doesn't want his own
> grandson to be murdered by him. Cornelius wants to change that one
> thing about the Future -- the fate of his eponymous grandson -- but he
> doesn't want the prevent the Fall of Man and the Rise of the Apes,
> a "historical" event that he now WANTS to happen, since his own family
> will be the RULING family of that original Ape society.
>
> Cornelius could only hope that Hasslein had forgotten all about
> that "nearly 2,000 years" line earlier. How can the 1st talking ape
> show up 500 years into the Future -- which is only 1,500 years or so
> before the 3955 year of Doomsday -- if English had been handed down
> from father-to-son for "nearly 2,000 years"?
>
> Cornelius knew damned well that talking apes would "turn the tables" on
> Man in the next generation -- NOT as far away as 500 years later. But
> he and Zira wanted Hasslein to falsely believe they had that much time
> left.
>
> "How much time has the world got?!" Hasslein later rants. If he only
> remembered Cornelius' testimony to the Commission and subtracted
> that "nearly 2,000 years" period from the EARTH-TIME "date meter"
> record of "3955" ("A.D., presumably"), then he would have a pretty good
> idea of how much time the world had left before Apes took over the
> reins of civilization from Man.
>
> NOT NEARLY ENOUGH!
>
> The timeline did NOT change. Cornelius lied about it, just as Zira lied
> about her 'hiccups'. Just as he had lied earlier, when he claimed he
> hadn't known Colonel Taylor. He's not above lying when he has a
> compelling reason to do so. Those who insist on a "changed" timeline
> believe Cornelius would NEVER EVER EVER tell a lie, like he's George
> Freakin' Washington twiddlin' his thumbs by the chopped-down cherry
> tree, and they're just plain wrong. The facts -- the details --
> of "ESCAPE" prove otherwise.
>
> And Dehn himself never was into this changing-of-timelines notion,
> either. He has Hasslein CLAIMING that it's possible -- even if ever
> more improbable, if action isn't taken -- to change the Future, to
> change lanes on that Freeway of Time. But Dehn ended "ESCAPE" knowing
> that there would undoubtedly be a 4th Apes film, and he purposely
> arranged it so that the son of Cornelius and Zira would be the
> protagonist of that story -- a story which would see the fulfilment of
> the major details of the Future History that Cornelius laid out for
> Hasslein (the Plague... Apes as Pets... Apes as Slaves... the Apes
> turning the tables... an ape named "Aldo"...), but NOT in the 500-year
> period Cornelius and Zira had lied about. Rather, Apes become enslaved
> and wage their Revolt LESS THAN A DECADE after the Plague wipes out the
> dogs and cats. That alone proves that Cornelius was either knowingly
> LYING about the Future's timeline or he was unwittingly MISTAKEN about
> it (as Ty implies). I think the irreconcilable discrepancy between
> Cornelius' TWO timelines given in "ESCAPE" prove that he had to have
> known that ONE of those two was bogus. The unfolding of the story
> of "CONQUEST" proves that it was the later timeframe (500-years) that
> was the bogus one.
>
> The existence of other talking apes -- apes unrelated to the Ape-
> onauts -- proves that there were talking apes on Earth even as
> Cornelius and Zira were publicly believed to be the only ones able to
> do so. Mandemus was OLDER than Caesar; he had to have been conceived
> YEARS before the Ape-onauts landed off the coast of California.
> Hasslein was worried about the possibility of Cornelius and Zira and
> their unborn child interbreeding with primitive apes and producing the
> race of intelligent apes that would one day flourish (and wage a war
> culminating in Doomsday by 3955). But he was short-sighted. Cornelius
> and Zira referred to the gorillas and orangutans in their testimony to
> the Commission. Zira referred to gorillas during her sodium pentothal-
> induced testimony at Camp Eleven. Did Hasslein think that Cornelius and
> Zira (and their unborn child) would go gallivanting around,
> impregnating (or being impregnated by) gorillas and orangutans, as well
> as chimpanzees? How does Hasslein account for the existence of talking
> gorillas and orangutans in the Future? He DOESN'T. He fixates on these
> talking chimpanzees, and foolishly hopes that by killing THEM he'll be
> preventing ALL apes from ever superceding Mankind as King of the Heap.
> Hasslein, in his own way, was a short-sighted fool.
>
> Dehn was making a SINGLE circular timeline -- the final screenplay
> of "BATTLE" includes his final touches, the Corringtons
> notwithstanding. Dehn knew that Cornelius and Zira were lying about
> that 500-year period; he himself wrote Cornelius' earlier line, "nearly
> 2,000 years". His intention was to make it a vicious circle, with only
> the "hope" that the circle could be broken. Definitely not the
> CERTAINTY that it either COULD or WAS broken.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34491 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34492 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #60 |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34493 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Speaking of BANANAS....... |
.html.html
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
And….is that a banana in your trousers or are you just loathing and
detesting me?!?!?!?
Zira
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of patrickmichaeltilton
Sent:
Monday, 2
January 2006
4:12
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Tunnels and
Ape Chow
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Mithril1960@a... wrote:
>
>
>
> In a message dated
12/30/2005
16:46:14 Eastern Standard
Time,
> PotaDG@yahoogroups.com writes:
>
> Well, that makes no sense. Are we to
accept that the mutants in
BATTLE are supposed to be
living in the ruins of San Diego
?!! And
that they somehow got the Alpha/Omega bomb to the
ruins of New York
by the 40th century? How did they transport it, in
that vehicle from
DAMNATION ALLEY, or are there supposed to be
tunnels crisscrossing
the country as in Roddenberry's
"Genesis II"?
>
> Look, just keep it simple. CONQUEST and
BATTLE take place
somewhere on the East coast.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Well, there are several answers;
>
> 1 - Yes there are tunnels, at least according
to Marvel's nicely
done Timeline (available at the site or at other
sites).
>
> 2 - We never really know where the later apes
films take place,
other than Escape and isn't that Los Angeles
? So how they switched
to
San Diego is a mystery. Still
the story in Revolution is done
decently unlike other Apes revivals.
>
> 3 - There is always the option that the Ape
City from Planet wasn't
founded by Ceasar, but is another founded by other
apes brought about
by the Ape Revolution. But then how would the
uncut Battle fit in,
since they had the Doomsday bomb?
>
> 4 - Just go with the suggestion above - it's
the east coast. (ha!)
____________________________________________________________________
*** Here's some more grist for the mill.
THE TUNNELS - In "BENEATH" Brent and
Nova walk through subway tunnels
built in the 20th Century from Queensboro Plaza...
but that route
ends where they find the circular, cylindrical
tunnel in that
underground cavern, with the metal rungs leading
up to it.
Who made that tunnel, and when did they make it?
The MUTANTS made that tunnel, and they made it
AFTER the Nuclear War
had wrecked the world. That tunnel extends from
that cavern -- where
the air from the outside world is being sucked
into the subterranean
city -- to the foot of the steps on the east side
of the NEW YORK
PUBLIC LIBRARY. We see Brent and Nova leave that
cylindrical tunnel
on street-level: that tunnel HAD to have been
delved after the street
level in New York
had partially filled
in with rock and/or
solidifying magma.
Who's to say that the Mutants in "BATTLE
" didn't
eventually make use
of Tunneling Machines, then? They HAD to have made
use of them while
in New York City
's ruins -- we can SEE
the results of their work. The
next big question is: Might they not have TUNNELED
their way to New
York City from some other
region? Even one as far away as California
?
Why not?
I would suppose that there were at least SOME
pre-existing tunnels,
delved by the Army Corps of Engineers, to connect
various Defense
Department bases throughout the continental U.S.A.
I have little
doubt that such tunnels currently exist.
If the Mutants -- who somehow acquired the ALPHA
OMEGA bomb -- also
acquired detailed maps of the United States'
D.O.D. tunnel system,
and if they had access to tunneling machines, then
they COULD have
made use of such D.O.D. tunnels to get most of the
way from a
California "Breck City" to New York
City, perhaps using some
tunneling machines of their own (or, ones left
around by the Army
Corps of Engineers after their tunnels had been
dug) to dig their way
through un-tunneled areas.
The book "OATH OF FEALTY" co-written by
Larry Niven and "ESCAPE"
novelizer Jerry Pournelle owes part of its plot to
the use of these
tunneling machines. A scene in "TOTAL
RECALL" involves the use of a
tunneling machine on Mars. These devices are not
"science fiction" --
they are science FACT. They're being used as we
speak. They were used
to dig the tunnel across the English Channel
-- the
"Chunnel". If
follows that such devices would be available for
the use of a pre-
Nuke War U.S. military to connect their bases
through solid bedrock,
unobserved from orbiting enemy spy satellites...
and those same
tunneling machines would be available for Mendez
(or one of his
successors) to lead his people on a transcontinental
trek, through
some previously delved military tunnels and --
perhaps -- through
tunnels they themselves dig while en route to
their final destination
in New York City, where they use those machines to
dig the
ventilation shafts through which Brent and Nova
(and, later, Ursus'
army) walk.
------------
One other thing (unrelated to the tunnels, but as
concerns the East
Coast vs West Coast location of
"CONQUEST" and "BATTLE
".
In the scene where MacDonald tells Caesar about
the tapes, there is a
basket of what appears to be either ORANGES
or GRAPEFRUIT. Later,
when Kolp's scouts return to tell him about what
they found, the
scout Captain tells him: "This [pointing at
his map] is a gorilla
outpost. Below is a valley, with orchards and
vineyards, enough to
feed hundreds. Here is Ape
City
."
In the final screenplay this last line reads:
CAPTAIN (indicating) "This is a gorilla
outpost. Below is this
valley, planted with orchards and vineyards, an
orange grove and
young banana palms.* [(* We need not have seen all
these.)] Enough to
feed thousands." (tapping map) "Their
city is here."
In David Gerrold's novelization it reads:
The captain laid the map on a table. He began pointing.
"There's a
gorilla outpost here. Below that is a valley; it's
planted with
orchards and vineyards. There are orange groves
and banana palms
here. Enough to feed thousands." He tapped
the map, "Their city is
here."
Gerrold followed the screenplay faithfully, for
the most part,
including those non-filmed references to one or
more ORANGE
GROVES
and BANANA PALMS.
If it didn't make it into any filmed version (by
which I include the
foreign versions, like the Japanese Laserdisc
version), then it's not
strictly canon, as far as I'm concerned. But it IS
interesting that
in the final screenplay there were originally
references to ORANGE
GROVES and to BANANA PALMS -- both of which fit in
geographically to
the CALIFORNIA
region, but NOT to
the NEW YORK / NEW JERSEY region.
California is famous for its
orange groves, and bananas are a
TROPICAL fruit.
I can already hear the arguments: Zira's first
words to the humans
testing them at the L.A. ZOO are "Because I
loathe bananas!" That
means that she -- who had lived in the New York
/ New Jersey
vicinity
in the 3900s -- had to have known what bananas
tasted like.
I would argue that bananas -- being imported to
the NYC / NJ area,
having been grown further south -- had to have
been INTRODUCED to the
NYC / NJ region, so that they BECOME indigenous to
that area later
on. One scenario that would fit this would be if
Apes living in the
California region were to make a trek across the
continent of North
America, eastward, they would bring with them foodstuffs
-- and
especially the SEEDS of those dietary staples --
on their journey
from the California region to wherever they might
go. We know that
the Ape civilization circa 3085 dwells in the California
region, and
it's fairly obvious that Chief Councillor Zaius is
related in some
way -- most probably familially -- to Dr. Zaius,
who lived some 870
years later, on the other side of the continent.
If a trans-American
trek of at least a fairly sizeable portion of the
Apes from Galen's
time DID happen, it would have involved the House
of Zaius traveling
with them, at the very least.
I can see such a migration happening, perhaps in
the 32nd Century or
so. Perhaps to join up with the descendants of
others who had
ventured eastward hundreds of years earlier. Those
migrating Apes
would have brought along the seeds of their edible
plants --
including ORANGES
and BANANAS --
transplanting them from their
California climes to the
Northeastern USA territory.
Granted, that line about "orange groves"
and "banana palms" didn't
make it into the final version(s) of "BATTLE
", but there IS a
basket
of citrus-type fruit on a table in Caesar and
Lisa's home when
MacDonald tells him about the Tapes. At the very
least, the inclusion
of the references to "orange groves" and
"banana palms" in the final
screenplay hints that Dehn was placing the events
of "CONQUEST"
and "BATTLE
" somewhere where
those fruits are cultivated. There ARE
some East Coast places where that could be applicable,
such as
Florida and
Georgia, but as far north as
New Jersey and
New York is
unlikely.
Patrick
P.S. Happy New Year. Only 1,949 more to go until
Doomsday. And this
year, 2006, is the year my POTA chronology has for
the Nuclear War,
based on Mandemus' line hinting that
"BATTLE" takes place 27 years
after "CONQUEST" (i.e. in 2018) and
Mendez' line that Kolp's actions
against Caesar will break 12 years of peace.
Twelve years before 2018
is 2006 -- this year. And how many battles would
the human survivors
of Breck's/Kolp's city have had to deal with after
the Nuclear War?
So, I've dated "BATTLE
" at 2018 and the
12-years-before incident
Mendez alludes to will be the Nuke War (in my
scenario). Given the
sabre-rattling of the Iranian President regarding
"wiping Israel off
the map" and their Nuke program, it wouldn't
surprise me all that
much if a WMD were to be detonated somewhere in
the Middle East.
Whether that WMD is an Iranian nuke hitting Tel
Aviv or an Israeli
nuke doing a pre-emptive strike on Tehran
... that's anybody's
guess.
Happy Nuke Year!
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34494 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Ape - EAL |
.html.html
Do
you think “resent” might be a more accurate word than “despise” Rory?
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 2:12
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Ape - EAL
In a message dated 12/31/05 8:56:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
I would
agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..
Michael
What's certainly true is that as the years passed in the early seventies APES
came to appeal mostly to kids. Which is one of the reason's I, as I was
growing older, came to dislike APES as it moved along. I wanted the level
of PLANET with each film and instead I got BATTLE, then the TV show, then --
horror of horrors -- a cartoon series. Then it was just comics.
Then it was over.
Is it any wonder why I came to worship the original and despise the sequels?
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34495 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html
.html
Yes – VERY soothing stuff (if you
want your baby to have nightmares about falling from a tree!).
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 8:10
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL
Yeah, but have you ever listened to the words of "Rock A Bye Baby"?!
- - - Jeff
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Sunday, January 01,
2006 3:37 AM
Subject:
Re:
[PotaDG] Ape - EAL
In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
These
stories were written for kids.
there
was a planet ruled by Apes
And Men
were enslaved. And they
cut out
your brain and cut off your
balls.
Then it blew up. The End.
Pleasant dreams.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34496 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: The Width of a Circle |
.html.html
Looks like somebody’s off the Christmas
list Patrick! J
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 8:13
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle
Blah! Blah! Blah!
You'll never convince me. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "patrickmichaeltilton"
<patrickmichaeltilton@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 9:55 AM
Subject: [PotaDG] The Circle
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A...
wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 12/30/2005 8:07:26
P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > veetus@e... writes:
> >
> > I understand that Arthur Jacobs
wanted the end of "Battle" to be
> left open to interpretation. Will Caesar
change the future (a new
> timeline) or is the future set (circular,
fate)?
> >
> >
> >
> > That's the thing. The timeline has been
changed but is it enough?
> > Who knows? That was the last line. It
reminds me of the time
> > travel episodes of The Simpsons &
Red Dwarf. Some times the
> > smallest thing can just make it worse,
and then it takes a lot to
> > fix it. On the other had, how does it
get worse than World
> > destruction. I guess, at least from
Taylor's point of view
> > anyway, a World run by apes is worse
than that.
> >
> *** The timeline didn't change. Cornelius
told the Presidential
> Commission that English had been the language
of his ancestors
> for "nearly two thousand years". He
time-traveled back from the year
> 3955, and "nearly 2,000 years"
before that Doomsday date puts Apes-
> Speaking-English smack dab in the late 20th
Century.
>
> When Cornelius LATER tells Hasslein that the
first ape to speak was
> named "Aldo" and that this event
supposedly happened 3 centuries after
> the Apes were enslaved (the slavery beginning
about 2 centuries after
> the Plague), he is LYING. Just as Zira lies
her ass off when she says
> that the word she hadn't finished saying in
her testimony to the
> Commission [... "dissec-" ...
"dissec-" ... "dissec-" ...] was just her
> having the hiccups. It suits these talking
monkeys to lie when they
> feel the need to do so.
>
> They have an overwhelming compulsion to lie
about this so-called 500-
> year period: they don't want Hasslein to
think that in just 18 years
> the Ape Revolt is gonna precipitate the Nuke
War that'll wipe out Man's
> civilization. They don't want him to know
that the leader of that
> revolt will NOT be an ape named
"Aldo" living some 500 years in the
> Future, but will instead be an ape named
"Caesar" who is currently
> gestating in Zira's womb. In order to protect
their unborn son, they
> lie about the half-a-millennium that Man
supposedly has left to lord it
> over their soon-to-be enslaved Ape lessers.
And Cornelius names "Aldo"
> as the Ape to be watched out for because he
doesn't want his own
> grandson to be murdered by him. Cornelius
wants to change that one
> thing about the Future -- the fate of his
eponymous grandson -- but he
> doesn't want the prevent the Fall of Man and
the Rise of the Apes,
> a "historical" event that he now
WANTS to happen, since his own family
> will be the RULING family of that original
Ape society.
>
> Cornelius could only hope that Hasslein had
forgotten all about
> that "nearly 2,000 years" line
earlier. How can the 1st talking ape
> show up 500 years into the Future -- which is
only 1,500 years or so
> before the 3955 year of Doomsday -- if
English had been handed down
> from father-to-son for "nearly 2,000
years"?
>
> Cornelius knew damned well that talking apes
would "turn the tables" on
> Man in the next generation -- NOT as far away
as 500 years later. But
> he and Zira wanted Hasslein to falsely
believe they had that much time
> left.
>
> "How much time has the world got?!"
Hasslein later rants. If he only
> remembered Cornelius' testimony to the
Commission and subtracted
> that "nearly 2,000 years" period
from the EARTH-TIME "date meter"
> record of "3955" ("A.D.,
presumably"), then he would have a pretty good
> idea of how much time the world had left
before Apes took over the
> reins of civilization from Man.
>
> NOT NEARLY ENOUGH!
>
> The timeline did NOT change. Cornelius lied
about it, just as Zira lied
> about her 'hiccups'. Just as he had lied
earlier, when he claimed he
> hadn't known Colonel Taylor. He's not above
lying when he has a
> compelling reason to do so. Those who insist
on a "changed" timeline
> believe Cornelius would NEVER EVER EVER tell
a lie, like he's George
> Freakin' Washington twiddlin' his thumbs by
the chopped-down cherry
> tree, and they're just plain wrong. The facts
-- the details --
> of "ESCAPE" prove otherwise.
>
> And Dehn himself never was into this
changing-of-timelines notion,
> either. He has Hasslein CLAIMING that it's
possible -- even if ever
> more improbable, if action isn't taken -- to
change the Future, to
> change lanes on that Freeway of Time. But
Dehn ended "ESCAPE" knowing
> that there would undoubtedly be a 4th Apes
film, and he purposely
> arranged it so that the son of Cornelius and
Zira would be the
> protagonist of that story -- a story which
would see the fulfilment of
> the major details of the Future History that
Cornelius laid out for
> Hasslein (the Plague... Apes as Pets... Apes
as Slaves... the Apes
> turning the tables... an ape named
"Aldo"...), but NOT in the 500-year
> period Cornelius and Zira had lied about.
Rather, Apes become enslaved
> and wage their Revolt LESS THAN A DECADE
after the Plague wipes out the
> dogs and cats. That alone proves that
Cornelius was either knowingly
> LYING about the Future's timeline or he was
unwittingly MISTAKEN about
> it (as Ty implies). I think the
irreconcilable discrepancy between
> Cornelius' TWO timelines given in
"ESCAPE" prove that he had to have
> known that ONE of those two was bogus. The
unfolding of the story
> of "CONQUEST" proves that it was
the later timeframe (500-years) that
> was the bogus one.
>
> The existence of other talking apes -- apes
unrelated to the Ape-
> onauts -- proves that there were talking apes
on Earth even as
> Cornelius and Zira were publicly believed to
be the only ones able to
> do so. Mandemus was OLDER than Caesar; he had
to have been conceived
> YEARS before the Ape-onauts landed off the
coast of California.
> Hasslein was worried about the possibility of
Cornelius and Zira and
> their unborn child interbreeding with
primitive apes and producing the
> race of intelligent apes that would one day
flourish (and wage a war
> culminating in Doomsday by 3955). But he was
short-sighted. Cornelius
> and Zira referred to the gorillas and
orangutans in their testimony to
> the Commission. Zira referred to gorillas
during her sodium pentothal-
> induced testimony at Camp Eleven. Did
Hasslein think that Cornelius and
> Zira (and their unborn child) would go
gallivanting around,
> impregnating (or being impregnated by)
gorillas and orangutans, as well
> as chimpanzees? How does Hasslein account for
the existence of talking
> gorillas and orangutans in the Future? He
DOESN'T. He fixates on these
> talking chimpanzees, and foolishly hopes that
by killing THEM he'll be
> preventing ALL apes from ever superceding
Mankind as King of the Heap.
> Hasslein, in his own way, was a short-sighted
fool.
>
> Dehn was making a SINGLE circular timeline --
the final screenplay
> of "BATTLE" includes his final
touches, the Corringtons
> notwithstanding. Dehn knew that Cornelius and
Zira were lying about
> that 500-year period; he himself wrote
Cornelius' earlier line, "nearly
> 2,000 years". His intention was to make
it a vicious circle, with only
> the "hope" that the circle could be
broken. Definitely not the
> CERTAINTY that it either COULD or WAS broken.
>
>
Patrick
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34497 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: The Icarus |
.html.html
I have a model of the POTA ship (quite rare – the first
one ever sold) named ICARUS.
I know there is a web site dedicated to the ship that uses
the name ICARUS.
Where does this name come from?!?!?!
Michael
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34498 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: "Revolution on the POTA" |
.html
.html
H A P P
Y N E W Y
E A R ! ! !
No better way to start a year than to have
an ape revolution. Hope it's a real revolution and not a skirmish. That depends
how much attention this comic book gets, and it won't be easy. My local comic
shop ordered it for me but they decided not to order any extras because they
didn't think it would sell. Of all things, the owner is an "Apes" fan. He grew
up making the model kits. But he only orders extras if at least 4 of his
subscribers order the book (one subscriber did). He said he was looking forward
to the Tim Burton movie but it was terrible and killed the franchise (but the
poor sales of the POTA2001 comic didn't seem to weigh in the decision).
Well, that's not good. The only way this
comic is going to build is if there's copies in stores for people to see, maybe
look at, and buy. I NEVER buy comic books, except POTA ones. They just don't
interest me. But I do visit comic shops for other things - - magazines,
collectibles. If I wasn't part of these groups I wouldn't know this comic
existed, and I certainly wouldn't know it from visiting a comic shop. I think
this comic's audience is more POTA fans, movie fans, sci-fi fans, and pop
culture fans than comic book fans (the talk in the shop was the new issue of
"Wolverine", go figure). How to get the word around? And how to get POTA out of
the dumps? Dunno. I'm considering buying some extra issues and just giving them
to the store to display and sell. But that could start a bad precedent (no
George W., I'm not talking about you). Ultimately, why should I be doing Fox's
job for them? They don't know how to run their own franchise, they're
too busy promoting, well, Wolverine.
Anyway, on to the comic book. Maybe it's
coming at a good time as Fox releases the sequels on DVD early this year. It
picks up right where "Conquest" left off. In fact there's two separate stories
here, both "Conquest" based. I enjoyed both and I think most fans will, except
for small details that will divide them. Some fans are already complaining that
it sets "Conquest" in San Diego (why? Don't know. Maybe because it's the home of
the Mother of comic cons; that's one way to score points with the comic book
crowd). The "Conquest" novelization set it in San Fran. Some fans think it
should be set on the East Coast. Personally, I can just go with the flow.
Another thing is the creators come down
squarely on a "circular" timeline. I'm with the folks who think "Escape" sets in
motion a new timeline, that things won't go in a circle with things ending up as
they did in the first two movies. Again, I can go with the flow while enjoying
this comic. There's nothing in this issue that specifically lauds a circle but
that's the creators' stated opinion and it might become more defined later
(actually, exploring this might make a good topic for a comic book
story) . I did like that the issue begins by explaining what happened in
the first four movies to bring newbies up to date, with pictures of Zira and
Taylor's ship to remind us of the iconic value of the story. Also, Taylor's ship
is called the Icarus. I think that's the first time that name has been used in
an "official" story (whether this story is "canon" is up to each fan but it is
official). That's fine, that's what it's come to be called but it's a
controversial name. Some might notice the comic begins by misquoting Caesar
(inverts "fire" and "smoke" in a famous line; a minor quibble).
One last thing that might divide fans is the
use of "in jokes". Some feel that detracts from a story; it was a big complaint
with POTA2001. People like Arthur Jacobs, Natalie Trundy, MacDonald actor Hari
Rhodes get tributes here. The President wears the initials P.O.T.U.S (President
of the United States) which reminds of POTA. And Breck gets a first name that
might not be to everyone's tastes (I don't remember if he had a first name
elsewhere). I don't mind these tributes but there seemed to be too many in one
issue. Ultimately it's the creators' comic and it must be their vision. We're
along for the ride so give them a break.
The important thing is the main
storytelling. Does it hold up? Hard to tell. It's just getting started. It
reminded me a lot of the Adventure comics (gulp!) in story and artwork. That's
not necessarily a bad thing, there were good Adventure stories too, in my
opinion. They even did a "Conquest" story. It's too soon to tell where this is
going to go, there's just enough time to get us up to speed on what happened in
"Conquest". As a first issue I enjoyed it. I can see where this could go well
with current politics. A president who has the media under his thumb, who's
using his position to further his own agenda? Couldn't happen. It's just a start
but I'm excited by what a new POTA comic could be. For myself, the best part was
the mysterious nature of new characters like Chris Leung and Dr.
Reich.
There's also a few pages of a journal by
Caesar, my favorite part of Issue # 1, which brings up the docile nature of
gorillas and how they are different in POTA. There's also a short "back up"
story that's good. I especially enjoyed the unique artwork of this story, which
reminded me of the classic "Dark Knight Returns" (told you my comic book
expertise was limited). I like that the comic is giving a mix of writers and
artists even in one issue. That's a good idea.
And a little plug for the publisher, Mr.
Comics. I enjoyed the ads for their upcoming titles. I assume their character
"Hoverboy" is new but their ad pretends he's been around a while, even showing
him in a mock up of an old "Gold Key" comic. And they have an upcoming comic
called "Big Max", about a gorilla superhero, it looks like.
Appropriate.
Finally, they already have a 2 page letter
column. Good stuff. It says Ed Gross wrote a book called "Inside the POTA".
Never heard of it. Is it upcoming?
I've got my nitpicks like everyone else, but
I had a blast with issue # 1 of "Revolution" and I thank Mr. Comics and Ty for
picking up the 'Apes" ball and running with it. I hope it works out. - - -
Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34499 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 12:13:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Who's to say that the Mutants in "BATTLE" didn't eventually make use
of Tunneling Machines, then? They HAD to have made use of them while
in New York City's ruins -- we can SEE the results of their work. The
next big question is: Might they not have TUNNELED their way to New
York City from some other region? Even one as far away as California?
Why not?
Why not? Because it's stupid!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34500 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 1:00:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
The timeline didn't change.
YES, IT DID!!!! Stop pulling a Cornelius here, Patrick, and telling lies!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34501 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 4:36:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Do you think "resent" might be a more accurate word than "despise" Rory?
You're right, "resent" is a better word. I plan to watch all the sequels again in a marathon after they come out on DVD at the end of March, but I'm not sure how much I'll enjoy them.
It'll be sort of like when I ever watch an episode of the POTA TV show -- which is damn rarely. I just have to divorce it from the original film and think of it as something totally separate, otherwise they
just bug me too much.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34502 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Width of a Circle |
|
.html .html.html
Dehn was making a SINGLE circular timeline -- the final screenplay of "BATTLE" includes his final touches, the Corringtons notwithstanding. Dehn knew that
Cornelius and Zira were lying about that 500-year period; he himself wrote Cornelius' earlier line, "nearly 2,000 years". His intention was to make it a vicious circle, with only the "hope" that
the circle could be broken. Definitely not the CERTAINTY that it either COULD or WAS broken.
Patrick
You're just a stuck-in-a-loop "Dehnophile," Patrick!<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34503 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:10:13 P.M. Central Standard Time,
veetus@... writes:
Blah! Blah! Blah! You'll never convince me.
Word
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34504 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Speaking of BANANAS....... |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:33:34 P.M. Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
And….is
that a banana in your trousers or are you just loathing and detesting
me?!?!?!?
Should be the other way around.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34505 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 4:39:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
I know there is a web site dedicated to the ship that uses the name ICARUS.
Where does this name come from?!?!?!
Michael
I don't know, it's all Greek to me!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34506 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The sequel DVDs |
.html
.html
Since there hasn't been much word on the new
DVDs I have a feeling they'll be the same old ones we already have - - maybe
anamorphic - - released individually, since they've only been available in the
box set before. If that's the case I'll just skip them and do what Rory says:
Think 40th. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 2:40
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Ape - EAL
In a message dated 1/1/06 4:36:47 PM Eastern
Standard Time, whitty@...
writes:
Do you think "resent" might be a more accurate word than
"despise" Rory?
You're right, "resent" is
a better word. I plan to watch all the sequels again in a marathon after
they come out on DVD at the end of March, but I'm not sure how much I'll enjoy
them.
It'll be sort of like when I ever watch an episode of the POTA TV
show -- which is damn rarely. I just have to divorce it from the
original film and think of it as something totally separate, otherwise they
just bug me too much.
-- Rory <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34507 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 5:48:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:10:13 P.M. Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Blah! Blah! Blah! You'll never convince me.
Word
I just thought of another one...
Patrick's just a circle jerk!!! Ha! Ha! Ha!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34508 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The sequel DVDs |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 5:56:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Since there hasn't been much word on the new DVDs I have a feeling they'll be the same old ones we
already have - - maybe anamorphic - - released individually, since they've only been available in the box set before. If that's the case I'll just skip them and do what Rory says: Think 40th. - - - Jeff
Oh, if they're not anamorphic then Fox better not plan on selling many. I'm pretty sure they'll be anamorphic, which doesn't mean anything if you haven't gotten a 16x9 TV yet, but I'm not
holding my breath for many extras -- if any.
I'm still "Thinking 40th" though, and my thinking now is that the 40th Anniversary DVD box set will by High Definition DVDs, probably for Christmas 2008. Start saving your money.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34509 |
From: Neil |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
> I just thought of another one...
> Patrick's just a circle jerk!!! Ha! Ha! Ha!
-- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.
For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?
Neil. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34510 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34511 |
From: Neil |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
> Why not? Because it's stupid!
-- Didn't they use tunnels under the city for all the ground transport
and deliveries in Conquest?
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34512 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 6:55:44 PM Eastern Standard Time, nfoster@... writes:
For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?
Neil.
You believe in a circular timeline too?!!!! Oh, my God, the plague is spreading. It's a walking pestilence!<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34513 |
From: Neil |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
>You believe in a circular timeline too?!!!! Oh, my God, the plague
is spreading. It's a walking pestilence!
-- Yep! I also like to tie the TV series into the same (circular)
timeline as the movies. (gulp!) ;-)
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34514 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 7:12:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, nfoster@... writes:
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> Why not? Because it's stupid!
-- Didn't they use tunnels under the city for all the ground transport
and deliveries in Conquest?
Neil
It's one thing to talk about tunnels that are there before the Great Nuke War, it's another to propose that the mutants constructed vast tunnels after everything was destroyed. I would think mutants had
enough problems just being mutants much less getting involved in urban planning. Jeez!!!
Let's keep it real and not go the way of Roswell Aliens.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34515 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 7:18:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, nfoster@... writes:
-- Yep! I also like to tie the TV series into the same (circular)
timeline as the movies. (gulp!) ;-)
Neil
And don't forget the cartoon series and those original Marvel comics stories, and of course POTA2001. It's all part of THE GREAT LOOP!
Where's an Alpha/Omega bomb when I really need one?
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34516 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:39:42 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Where does this name come from?!?!?!
Didn't some fan give it that tag in the 70's? <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34517 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.htmlhi-
the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members. rob/ron
Neil <nfoster@...>
wrote:
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote: > I just thought of another one... > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!! Ha! Ha! Ha!
-- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.
For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?
Neil.
SPONSORED LINKS
Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34518 |
From: Ty Templeton |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
.html
I had the model myself, called the Icarus. That's where I got the name. I seem to remember it mentioned in the novelization of Beneath, but that might be my mind playing
tricks, it's been years since I read the novelization.
Anyway, I always called it the Icarus because of a model I had as a kid. It might not be mentioned in the movies, but I always thought it was the official name. Ty the Guy
On 1/1/06, mlccougar@... <
mlccougar@...> wrote:
In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:39:42 PM Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
Where does this name come from?!?!?!
Didn't some fan give it that tag in the 70's?
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34519 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 8:23:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, brindlepit2002@... writes:
hi-
the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
rob/ron
Hey, somebody else here has more than just monkeys on the brain!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34520 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 9:12:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, tybunny@... writes:
Anyway, I always called it the Icarus because of a model I had as a kid. It might not be mentioned in
the movies, but I always thought it was the official name.
Ty the Guy
It's the official "unofficial" name. Nuff said.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34521 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 5:57:22 P.M. Central Standard Time,
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com writes:
Uncle
Manny's Musings
I must disagree.
For a copy of my
award winning paper
on the F word email me,
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34522 |
From: John |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: "Revolution on the POTA" |
.htmlGood Lord Patrick, you are quite the trend setter. Everyone is
posting pages of dribble. Now if I can just get you all fighting and
calling each other names. Mr. Spock was based on the sterotypical "in-
the-closet" homosexual afraid to show his feelings and be thrown out
of the starfleet away from his precious Captian Kirk. Don't ask,
don't tell.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
>
> H A P P Y N E W Y E A R ! ! !
>
> No better way to start a year than to have an ape revolution.
Hope it's a real revolution and not a skirmish. That depends how much
attention this comic book gets, and it won't be easy. My local comic
shop ordered it for me but they decided not to order any extras
because they didn't think it would sell. Of all things, the owner is
an "Apes" fan. He grew up making the model kits. But he only orders
extras if at least 4 of his subscribers order the book (one
subscriber did). He said he was looking forward to the Tim Burton
movie but it was terrible and killed the franchise (but the poor
sales of the POTA2001 comic didn't seem to weigh in the decision).
> Well, that's not good. The only way this comic is going to build
is if there's copies in stores for people to see, maybe look at, and
buy. I NEVER buy comic books, except POTA ones. They just don't
interest me. But I do visit comic shops for other things - -
magazines, collectibles. If I wasn't part of these groups I wouldn't
know this comic existed, and I certainly wouldn't know it from
visiting a comic shop. I think this comic's audience is more POTA
fans, movie fans, sci-fi fans, and pop culture fans than comic book
fans (the talk in the shop was the new issue of "Wolverine", go
figure). How to get the word around? And how to get POTA out of the
dumps? Dunno. I'm considering buying some extra issues and just
giving them to the store to display and sell. But that could start a
bad precedent (no George W., I'm not talking about you). Ultimately,
why should I be doing Fox's job for them? They don't know how to run
their own franchise, they're too busy promoting, well, Wolverine.
> Anyway, on to the comic book. Maybe it's coming at a good time as
Fox releases the sequels on DVD early this year. It picks up right
where "Conquest" left off. In fact there's two separate stories here,
both "Conquest" based. I enjoyed both and I think most fans will,
except for small details that will divide them. Some fans are already
complaining that it sets "Conquest" in San Diego (why? Don't know.
Maybe because it's the home of the Mother of comic cons; that's one
way to score points with the comic book crowd). The "Conquest"
novelization set it in San Fran. Some fans think it should be set on
the East Coast. Personally, I can just go with the flow.
> Another thing is the creators come down squarely on a "circular"
timeline. I'm with the folks who think "Escape" sets in motion a new
timeline, that things won't go in a circle with things ending up as
they did in the first two movies. Again, I can go with the flow while
enjoying this comic. There's nothing in this issue that specifically
lauds a circle but that's the creators' stated opinion and it might
become more defined later (actually, exploring this might make a good
topic for a comic book story) . I did like that the issue begins by
explaining what happened in the first four movies to bring newbies up
to date, with pictures of Zira and Taylor's ship to remind us of the
iconic value of the story. Also, Taylor's ship is called the Icarus.
I think that's the first time that name has been used in
an "official" story (whether this story is "canon" is up to each fan
but it is official). That's fine, that's what it's come to be called
but it's a controversial name. Some might notice the comic begins by
misquoting Caesar (inverts "fire" and "smoke" in a famous line; a
minor quibble).
> One last thing that might divide fans is the use of "in jokes".
Some feel that detracts from a story; it was a big complaint with
POTA2001. People like Arthur Jacobs, Natalie Trundy, MacDonald actor
Hari Rhodes get tributes here. The President wears the initials
P.O.T.U.S (President of the United States) which reminds of POTA. And
Breck gets a first name that might not be to everyone's tastes (I
don't remember if he had a first name elsewhere). I don't mind these
tributes but there seemed to be too many in one issue. Ultimately
it's the creators' comic and it must be their vision. We're along for
the ride so give them a break.
> The important thing is the main storytelling. Does it hold up?
Hard to tell. It's just getting started. It reminded me a lot of the
Adventure comics (gulp!) in story and artwork. That's not necessarily
a bad thing, there were good Adventure stories too, in my opinion.
They even did a "Conquest" story. It's too soon to tell where this is
going to go, there's just enough time to get us up to speed on what
happened in "Conquest". As a first issue I enjoyed it. I can see
where this could go well with current politics. A president who has
the media under his thumb, who's using his position to further his
own agenda? Couldn't happen. It's just a start but I'm excited by
what a new POTA comic could be. For myself, the best part was the
mysterious nature of new characters like Chris Leung and Dr. Reich.
> There's also a few pages of a journal by Caesar, my favorite part
of Issue # 1, which brings up the docile nature of gorillas and how
they are different in POTA. There's also a short "back up" story
that's good. I especially enjoyed the unique artwork of this story,
which reminded me of the classic "Dark Knight Returns" (told you my
comic book expertise was limited). I like that the comic is giving a
mix of writers and artists even in one issue. That's a good idea.
> And a little plug for the publisher, Mr. Comics. I enjoyed the
ads for their upcoming titles. I assume their character "Hoverboy" is
new but their ad pretends he's been around a while, even showing him
in a mock up of an old "Gold Key" comic. And they have an upcoming
comic called "Big Max", about a gorilla superhero, it looks like.
Appropriate.
> Finally, they already have a 2 page letter column. Good stuff. It
says Ed Gross wrote a book called "Inside the POTA". Never heard of
it. Is it upcoming?
> I've got my nitpicks like everyone else, but I had a blast with
issue # 1 of "Revolution" and I thank Mr. Comics and Ty for picking
up the 'Apes" ball and running with it. I hope it works out. - - -
Jeff
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34523 |
From: John |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.htmlNeil, you big jerk! Stop being rational and call Rory some kind
of "schoolyard kid" name and join in the fun. You adults are no fun
at all. Stop growing up and regress with the rest of us. You big
hippy doo doo head.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil" <nfoster@h...> wrote:
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> > I just thought of another one...
> > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!! Ha! Ha! Ha!
>
> -- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
> have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.
>
> For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
> the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really
don't
> see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
> timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?
>
> Neil.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34524 |
From: John |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
.htmlNeil!!! I'm shocked ...and very proud of you, er. uh. Uncle Manny.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, PotaDG@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This email message is a notification to let you know that
> a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
> group.
>
> File : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 18.jpg
> Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@h...>
> Description : Scroll 18
>
> You can access this file at the URL:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%
20Musings/UMM%2018.jpg
>
> To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
> http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
>
> Regards,
>
> munkeyman63au <nfoster@h...>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34525 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: The Circle JERK! |
.html.html
Oh who cares – tell me anyway!
Is it a group of guys getting in a circle
and wanking?
We have a version of this party trick in Australia
that involves SAO biscuits! These are like water crackers…
sorta….
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron
kenner
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The
Circle
the term "circle
jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this
list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
rob/ron
Neil <nfoster@...>
wrote:
--- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> I just thought of another one...
> Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!
Ha! Ha! Ha!
-- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular
timeline, always
have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.
For someone who has publicly admitted they don't
very much like
the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone
movie I really don't
see why you would bother one way or the other with
what sort of
timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter
should it?
Neil.
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34526 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
.html
.html
Bring it on Uncle Manny!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 1:25
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] New file
uploaded to PotaDG
In a
message dated 1/1/2006 5:57:22 P.M. Central Standard Time,
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com writes:
Uncle
Manny's Musings
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34527 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
.html.html
No shit?
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 1:56
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: New file
uploaded to PotaDG
Neil!!! I'm shocked ...and
very proud of you, er. uh. Uncle Manny.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com,
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This email message is a notification to let
you know that
> a file has been uploaded to the Files area of
the PotaDG
> group.
>
>
File : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM
18.jpg
> Uploaded by : munkeyman63au
<nfoster@h...>
> Description : Scroll 18
>
> You can access this file at the URL:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%
20Musings/UMM%2018.jpg
>
> To learn more about file sharing for your
group, please visit:
> http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
>
> Regards,
>
>
munkeyman63au <nfoster@h...>
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34528 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:59:11 A.M. Central Standard Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Three
hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver Stone's "JFK" have I seen
a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen movies that are only 1 and a half
to 2 hours long seem to take forever to end. Not this one,
though.
Okay, now I know time is relative. There must be a movie goers
hell
where Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first
mates speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the
captain vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying
this.
Oh, and you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?
Jim Garrison was a crackpot. And even though Kim's career
suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
McCarthy to keep the commies in check. I swear, at the height
of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
WWII. I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34529 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
.html.html
|
|
Jason Evers' Birthday
Monday January 2, 2006
All Day
This event repeats every year.
Notes:
Happy Birthday Jason!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright ©
2006
Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34530 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Caesar's Breeding Annex chimpette |
.html
.html
In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:12:24 A.M. Central Standard Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Oxfordian
Oxfordian?
Raison d'etre?
Here's a $10 word for you . . . Pretentious
Interviewer: Beavis, what is you raison d'etre?
Beavis: Uhhhhh . . . It's in my pants. hehehehe
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34531 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Communism (OT) |
.html
.html
Communism is really very
similar to Christianity you know…..
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent:
Monday, 2
January 2006
3:46
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: King
Kong 2005 (OT)
In a
message dated 12/28/2005
7:59:11 A.M.
Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Three
hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver
Stone's "JFK" have I seen a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen
movies that are only 1 and a half to 2 hours long seem to take
forever to end. Not this one, though.
Okay,
now I know time is relative. There must be a movie goers hell
where
Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first
mates
speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the
captain
vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying this.
Oh, and
you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?
Jim
Garrison was a crackpot. And even though Kim's career
suffered
a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
McCarthy
to keep the commies in check. I swear, at the height
of the
Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
WWII.
I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34532 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 11:33:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
Communism is really
very similar to Christianity you
know…..
In what way?
Oh, you mean millions killed in the name of a lofty ideal?
Yeah, I guess it is.
Write us a Pat length post on Marxism, Mike.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34533 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/1/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.html
.html
Nah – I was thinking ideology.
You know – share the wealth, everyone gets
something…..
It is flawed, as is capitalism.
I wonder if you could have voluntary
Communism – that might be nice – or is that called being a hippy?
Or maybe anarchy?
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 4:50
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Communism
(OT)
In a
message dated 1/1/2006 11:33:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
Communism is really very similar to
Christianity you know…..
Oh, you
mean millions killed in the name of a lofty ideal?
Write us a Pat length
post on Marxism, Mike.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34534 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 11:57:57 P.M. Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
Nah – I was thinking
ideology.
You know – share the
wealth, everyone gets something…..
Yes, if you're a party official.
Then you get a big house and a big car.
Of course to support you in that lifestyle
a few thousand of the "people" must eat
sawdust. But what the hell. you can't
have
the "officials" looking bad in front of the
capitalists.
It is flawed, as is
capitalism.
And capitalism is flawed, how exactly?
You have something better, maybe?
Personally, I can't really think of a
better way then letting the market
decide what things are worth.
However I think I did get ripped
off on some of my POTA stuff.
But I was willing to pay it, so . . .
My bad.
I wonder if you could
have voluntary Communism – that might be nice – or is that called being a
hippy?
Yes, the commune . . . where the lice are
free! From each according to their ability, to each according to their
need. Oh and I need a big house and a big car, and I'm not able to do
anything to earn it, so I need the rest of you to work for it for me.
Thanks! I know there are a lot of liberals on this group. But unless
you insist on going through life with blinders on, you need to read a book
called "Do As I Say" and see just what folks like Teddy and Babs are really
up to. For example, Michael Moore owns stock in Halliburton.
Or maybe
anarchy?
I like anarchy. Another great idea -- which, like communism, doesn't
work in the real world.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34535 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/1/06 11:47:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
And even though Kim's career
suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
McCarthy to keep the commies in check. I swear, at the height
of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
WWII. I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.
Oh no! Here comes crazy, right-wing T out of the cornfield! Shoot him fast.
Joe McCarthy was a creep and a monster. Watch James Gregory play his type of moron in THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE. You should be ashamed of yourself, T. Kim Hunter is spinning in her grave!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34536 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/2/06 12:33:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Communism is really very similar to Christianity you know…..
Yeah, they're both for morons!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34537 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/2/06 4:33:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
And capitalism is flawed, how exactly?
Take a look at our consumer-driven economy, T. The message: Be happy and consume. Consume, consume.
If everyone stopped consuming, our economy would collapse, you right-winger, T!
-- Rory
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34538 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
.html
it doesnt need to be a perfect circle, but yes, a group "wank." Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:
Oh who cares tell me anyway!
Is it a group of guys getting in a circle and wanking?
We have a version of this party trick in
Australia that involves SAO biscuits!
These are like water crackers
sorta
.
-----Original Message----- From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron kenner Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The Circle
the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
rob/ron
Neil <nfoster@...> wrote:
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> I just thought of another one...
> Patrick's just a circle jerk!!! Ha! Ha! Ha!
-- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.
For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?
Neil.
Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34539 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/2/06 10:20:14 AM Eastern Standard Time, brindlepit2002@... writes:
it doesnt need to be a perfect circle, but yes, a group "wank."
Much like Patrick's posts, masturbatory.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34540 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.htmlwell, sometimes my monkey is bad and must be spanked
Haristas@... wrote:
In a message dated 1/1/06 8:23:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, brindlepit2002@... writes:
hi-
the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members. rob/ron
Hey, somebody else here has more than just monkeys on the brain!
-- Rory
Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at
Yahoo! Shopping <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34541 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Bizarro Apes |
|
.html
Been meaning to post this for a while....independent
comic strip "Bizarro"......
Tim
__________________________________________
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34542 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
.html
.html
Yeah, communists. Just like there's a "terrorist" under every
rock now. Maybe even...T! I always wondered about him. If you're a real
American, let me hear you sing the "Star Spangled Banner". No, right now! No
cheating. - - - a Real American
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 8:46
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: King Kong 2005
(OT)
Three
hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver Stone's "JFK" have I
seen a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen movies that are only 1 and a
half to 2 hours long seem to take forever to end. Not this one,
though.
Okay, now I know time is relative. There must be a movie goers
hell
where Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first
mates speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the
captain vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying
this.
Oh, and you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?
Jim Garrison was a crackpot. And even though Kim's career
suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
McCarthy to keep the commies in check. I swear, at the height
of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
WWII. I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34543 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:42:43 AM Pacific Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
These stories were written for kids.
Of course . . .
Once upon a time . . .
there was a planet ruled by Apes
And Men were enslaved. And they
cut out your brain and cut off your
balls. Then it blew up. The End.
Pleasant dreams.
But the world wasn't totally destoyed, a group of apes and humans who survived the bombing, decided to live in peace together. They combined their meager resources and intelligence. As the centuries progressed,
many cures for diseases were discovered through apes and humans working together. Eventually, a utopian society was formed and when a race of hostile aliens invaded the planet, the apes and humans kicked the shit out of
them. Okay, who is next? Elaine
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34544 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.html
.html
Our economy has already collapsed. The only
thing propping us up is loans from Japan. Plus they have the best POTA stuff. -
- - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:01
AM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Communism
(OT)
In a message dated 1/2/06 4:33:44 AM Eastern
Standard Time, LordTZer0@...
writes:
And capitalism is flawed, how
exactly?
Take a look at our
consumer-driven economy, T. The message: Be happy and consume.
Consume, consume.
If everyone stopped consuming, our economy would
collapse, you right-winger, T!
-- Rory
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34545 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
.html
.html
Really? I thought it was guys in a circle
watching Steve Martin movies. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:14
AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle
JERK!
it doesnt need to be a perfect circle, but yes, a group
"wank." Michael Whitty <whitty@...>
wrote:
Oh who cares tell
me anyway!
Is it a group of
guys getting in a circle and wanking?
We have a version
of this party trick in Australia
that involves SAO
biscuits! These are like water
crackers
sorta
.
-----Original
Message----- From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron kenner Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23
PM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The
Circle
the term "circle jerk" is a play on
words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have
any meaning to non-american members.
rob/ron
Neil
<nfoster@...>
wrote:
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com,
Haristas@a... wrote: > I just thought of another
one... > Patrick's just a
circle jerk!!! Ha! Ha! Ha!
-- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a
circular timeline, always have.
I don't consider myself a jerk though.
For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very
much like the 'sequels' and
prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
see why you would bother one
way or the other with what sort of timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should
it?
Neil.
--
Learn
more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls,
Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Yahoo!
DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34546 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/2/2006 8:53:45 A.M. Central Standard Time,
Haristas@... writes:
Joe
McCarthy was a creep and a monster.
Kim, God love her, was a bit of a free spirit. And her politics were
whatever the norm was for actors, leaning left, mostly. The one thing you
could say for Joe McCarthy is you knew where he stood. What I don't like
is people who pretend to be something other than what they are. And I'm
not right-wing. I'm independent. But one thing I'm not in
unamerican. And most leftist, though they won't admit it, even
to themselves, are. Here's why . . . .
They profess ideals that, if forced on them, they would consider
oppressive. They do not practice what they preach, quite the opposite, in
fact. And their stance on these issues is the height of hypocrisy. Here's
an example: Rosie O'Donnell is for gun control. So much so that she wanted to
have actors dressed as Zira and Cornelius picket outside Heston's
house. And yet her bodyguards carry firearms. In other words
she wants to have something that she would deny to the average
citizen. Just like the communist, she preaches one thing but practices
something wholly other. That's something I hate. And it's not limited to
the far left. The far right is just as bad. They thump their bibles
and profess to be "good Christians" and yet they judge people and judge them
harshly. And yet one of the main rules is Judge Not Lest Ye Be Judged, etc
. . . Did anyone see that crazy lady on Wife Swap? Then you know what I
mean. I think anyone should be allowed to spout whatever shite pops into
their heads, but . . . and this is the test, they have to back up what they say
with logic and facts -- and not made up statistics and bad science. An
your rights end where the next person's begin.
Remember, I'm not right-wing. I'm a Radical Moderate.
Death To Extremists! But perhaps that's too extreme. ; )
I practice Tiiism. Or rather I try to. There are only four
rules . . .
Rule # 1. Drink More Tea
Rule # 2. Treat Your Planet Like You Brush Your Teeth With It, because you
do.
Rule # 3. Treat Others Like They Are Your Relatives, because they
are.
And last but not least . . .
Rule # 4. You Do NOT Talk About Fight Club.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34547 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/2/2006 9:09:55 A.M. Central Standard Time,
Haristas@... writes:
you
right-winger, T!
And you don't consume? You hypocrite, Rory.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34548 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.html.html
And
go visit those poor homeless bastards on the street.
I bet if they weren’t brainwashed
about “the C word” they would think communism is just fine!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 2:01
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Communism
(OT)
In a message dated 1/2/06 4:33:44 AM Eastern Standard Time,
LordTZer0@... writes:
And capitalism is flawed, how exactly?
Take
a look at our consumer-driven economy, T. The message: Be happy and
consume. Consume, consume.
If everyone stopped consuming, our economy would collapse, you right-winger, T!
-- Rory
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34549 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html.html
Well, y’know, if it gets outta line,
then you gotta do……this is getting very silly!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron
kenner
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 3:39
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The
Circle
well, sometimes my monkey
is bad and must be spanked
Haristas@...
wrote:
In a message dated 1/1/06 8:23:56
PM Eastern Standard Time, brindlepit2002@... writes:
hi-
the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely
not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american
members.
rob/ron
Hey, somebody else here has more than just monkeys on the brain!
-- Rory
Learn more about pitbulls at the official
Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at
Yahoo!
Shopping
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34550 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34551 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
.html
.html
We just brand Aussies so we can tell if
they are real!
If they are not branded, they need to be
beer swilling racists. The rest are just
potential commies and terrorists! You
hear that BUSH!?
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 3:52
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: King
Kong 2005 (OT)
Yeah, communists. Just like there's a "terrorist" under every rock
now. Maybe even...T! I always wondered about him. If you're a real American,
let me hear you sing the "Star Spangled Banner". No, right now! No
cheating. - - - a Real American
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Sunday, January 01,
2006 8:46 PM
Subject:
Re:
[PotaDG] Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
Three
hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver
Stone's "JFK" have I seen a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen
movies that are only 1 and a half to 2 hours long seem to take
forever to end. Not this one, though.
Okay,
now I know time is relative. There must be a movie goers hell
where
Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first
mates
speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the
captain
vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying this.
Oh, and
you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?
Jim
Garrison was a crackpot. And even though Kim's career
suffered
a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
McCarthy
to keep the commies in check. I swear, at the height
of the
Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
WWII.
I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34552 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Bizarro Apes |
.html.html
Nice one Tim – THANKS!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim
"apefan"
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 3:48
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Bizarro Apes
Been meaning to post this for
a while....independent
comic strip "Bizarro"......
Tim
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34553 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
.html
.html
Hey – my Hillary Duff loving
teenagers think Steve is just FINE!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 4:07
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle
JERK!
Really? I thought it was guys
in a circle watching Steve Martin movies. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday,
January 02, 2006 7:14 AM
Subject:
Re:
[PotaDG] The Circle JERK!
it doesnt need to be a
perfect circle, but yes, a group "wank."
Michael Whitty <whitty@...>
wrote:
Oh who
cares – tell me anyway!
Is it a
group of guys getting in a circle and wanking?
We have
a version of this party trick in Australia that involves SAO biscuits! These are like water
crackers…sorta….
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron
kenner
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The
Circle
the term "circle
jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this
list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
rob/ron
Neil
<nfoster@...> wrote:
--- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> I just thought of another one...
> Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!
Ha! Ha! Ha!
-- Gee that's
nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.
For someone who has publicly admitted they don't
very much like
the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone
movie I really don't
see why you would bother one way or the other with
what sort of
timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter
should it?
Neil.
--
Learn more about pitbulls at the official
Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Yahoo!
DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34554 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Ape - EAL |
.html.html
Ha ha ha
ha ! You said “shit”!
Butthead
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of taebokitti@...
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 3:59
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL
In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:42:43
AM Pacific Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
These
stories were written for kids.
there
was a planet ruled by Apes
And Men
were enslaved. And they
cut out
your brain and cut off your
balls.
Then it blew up. The End.
But the
world wasn't totally destoyed, a group of apes and humans who survived the
bombing, decided to live in peace together. They combined their meager
resources and intelligence. As the centuries progressed, many cures for
diseases were discovered through apes and humans working together. Eventually,
a utopian society was formed and when a race of hostile aliens invaded the
planet, the apes and humans kicked the shit out of them. Okay, who is next?
Elaine
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34555 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle JERK! |
.html
.html
Or at least they will when they hit their
teens!
I really should read my posts before I
send them……maybe I’m a communist!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Whitty
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 7:48
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] The Circle
JERK!
Hey
– my Hillary Duff loving teenagers think Steve is just FINE!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 4:07
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle
JERK!
Really? I thought it was guys
in a circle watching Steve Martin movies. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday,
January 02, 2006 7:14 AM
Subject:
Re:
[PotaDG] The Circle JERK!
it doesnt need to be a
perfect circle, but yes, a group "wank."
Michael Whitty <whitty@...>
wrote:
Oh who
cares – tell me anyway!
Is it a
group of guys getting in a circle and wanking?
We have a
version of this party trick in Australia that involves SAO biscuits! These are like water
crackers…sorta….
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron
kenner
Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The
Circle
the term "circle
jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this
list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
rob/ron
Neil
<nfoster@...> wrote:
--- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> I just thought of another one...
> Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!
Ha! Ha! Ha!
-- Gee that's
nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.
For someone who has publicly admitted they don't
very much like
the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone
movie I really don't
see why you would bother one way or the other with
what sort of
timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter
should it?
Neil.
--
Learn more about pitbulls at the official
Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Yahoo!
DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less
--
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34556 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #61 |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34557 |
From: Neet-O-Rama |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
.html
.html
>>>Here's
an example: Rosie O'Donnell is for gun control. And yet her bodyguards
carry firearms. In other words she wants to
>>>have something that she would deny to the average
citizen.
That is not hypocrisy that is honest to goodness reality. That's
right, I want bodyguards and soldiers and police to have guns. In other
words people who are not only versed and possess trained skills in handling a
weapon but whose occupation actually necessitates these weapons. My
goodness, you wouldn't hand an acetylene tank and torch to someone not skilled
in welding would you? I do not want you or the average citizen to have a
gun. But if YOU insist on this bogus "right" to bear arms then I want some
sort of government control over it. I don't think any nabob with a
thousand dollars in his pocket should be able to buy a gun anonymously!
This is a no-brainer. Every police commissioner of every municipality in
America has called out for gun-control-- why is that?
Why is OK to have control over who gets to drive in this nation but none
exerted on guns?
Sasha <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34558 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Gun Control |
.html
.html
Sasha,
You will NEVER sell T on guns my friend –
he has all the answers his (extremist) friends at the NRA have laboured long
and hard to provide.
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neet-O-Rama
Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 8:04
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: King
Kong 2005 (OT)
>>>Here's
an example: Rosie O'Donnell is for gun control. And yet her bodyguards carry
firearms. In other words she wants to >>>have something
that she would deny to the average citizen.
That is
not hypocrisy that is honest to goodness reality. That's right, I
want bodyguards and soldiers and police to have guns. In other words people who
are not only versed and possess trained skills in handling a weapon but whose
occupation actually necessitates these weapons. My goodness, you wouldn't
hand an acetylene tank and torch to someone not skilled in welding would
you? I do not want you or the average citizen to have a gun. But if
YOU insist on this bogus "right" to bear arms then I want some sort
of government control over it. I don't think any nabob with a thousand
dollars in his pocket should be able to buy a gun anonymously! This is a
no-brainer. Every police commissioner of every municipality in America
has called out for gun-control-- why is that?
Why is
OK to have control over who gets to drive in this nation but none exerted on
guns?
Sasha
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34559 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Revolution #1 comments. |
.html
.html
Message
Anyone who has
already read the first issue and is looking to send feedback apparently the
email link given in the comic doesn't work. I just got this from the Mr. Comics
web site:
"Revolution went
on sale yesterday, all over North America (and with luck, around the world) and
now it's time for you guys to start yelling at us. Opinions, opinions,
thoughts, and rants, are all welcome. Come one, come all. But here's the
minor problem, the email address mentioned in the issue itself
(mrcomics@...) is completely not working, and any mail sent there
falls off the face of the Earth, into the cosmic ether. So for the meanwhile,
posting to our message boards, or sending mail
to:
tybunny@...
or
ty@...
gets
directly into my email box, and I'll answer pretty well any and all letters
personally.
Can't wait to hear what you guys think of our work. It's been
in our brains for months now, and we're dying to hear back.
Ty the
Guy."
Just thought we
might like to know this before we bombard them with emails telling them how much
we love the new comic!
Neil
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34560 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #61 |
.html
.html .html
I wish I knew what was going on here. When will this story be completed. I'd rather wait and read the whole thing than have it in tiny bits.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34561 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 1/2/06 2:56:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
The one thing you could say for Joe McCarthy is you knew where he stood.
Yeah, in a huge pile of shit! He was an alcoholic, wholly unethical political opportunist, and a creep!<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34562 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/2/2006 2:44:17 P.M. Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
I bet if they weren't
brainwashed about "the C word" they would think communism is just
fine
There isn't a single communist government in the entire world.
Viet Nam is close, but what Russia and China practice is not
communism.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34563 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/2/2006 3:23:31 P.M. Central Standard Time,
neetstuff@... writes:
That is
not hypocrisy that is honest to goodness reality. That's right, I
want bodyguards and soldiers and police to have guns.
I can't afford bodyguards. I have to guard my own body.
Now if I want a permit to carry in public I have to take
classes. But just because you're trained doesn't mean
your judgment is sound. I hear about police officers taking
the law into their own hands, and even committing murder,
all the time. But you're never going to get all the guns out
of the hands of people who should not have them. In fact
if you try, you end up disarming more the law abiding citizens
than criminals and lunatics. So as long as they're armed
I intend to be for my own protection. You may not have
time for the police to protect you. You may only have
seconds, not minutes. Ultimately, unless you have
bodyguards, you are responsible for the safety of
you and yours. Of course that doesn't mean
just because you have protection you will be
safe. Cornelius had a gun, but he wasn't
security conscious and Zira was killed.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34564 |
From: PofTAfan@aol.com |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.htmlYou're forgetting Cuba and North Korea which the latter is totally
communist.
-----Original Message-----
From: LordTZer0@...
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:29:11 EST
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Communism (OT)
In a message dated 1/2/2006 2:44:17 P.M. Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
I bet if they weren't brainwashed about "the C word" they would think
communism is just fine
There isn't a single communist government in the entire world.
Viet Nam is close, but what Russia and China practice is not communism.
SPONSORED LINKS
Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction
book club
Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science
fiction
--------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
-------- <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34565 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/2/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Communism (OT) |
.htmlNorth Korea isn't communist, it's psycho. Like POTA said, we'll destroy
ourselves. Just give us time. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <PofTAfan@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Communism (OT)
> You're forgetting Cuba and North Korea which the latter is totally
> communist.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LordTZer0@...
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:29:11 EST
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Communism (OT)
>
> In a message dated 1/2/2006 2:44:17 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> whitty@... writes:
> I bet if they weren't brainwashed about "the C word" they would think
> communism is just fine
>
>
> There isn't a single communist government in the entire world.
> Viet Nam is close, but what Russia and China practice is not communism.
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction
> book club
> Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science
> fiction
>
> --------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
> --------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34566 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: OT "Oxfordian" |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:12:24 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
>
> Oxfordian
>
>
> Oxfordian?
>
> Raison d'etre?
>
> Here's a $10 word for you . . . Pretentious
>
> Interviewer: Beavis, what is you raison d'etre?
>
> Beavis: Uhhhhh . . . It's in my pants. hehehehe
*** What the hell's "pretentious" about the word "Oxfordian", T?
If you know anything about the Shakespeare Authorship Controversy,
you know that those who believe that the guy who was born and who
died in Stratford-on-Avon -- named William Shaksper -- is thought to
be the same "William Shake-Speare" who wrote "HAMLET" (etc) by
STRATFORDIANS. People who believe(d) that Francis Bacon wrote the
Canon of Shakespeare are called BACONIANS. People who believe(d) that
Christopher Marlowe wrote the works are called MARLOVIANS. And people
(like me) who believe that Edward de Vere, the XVIIth Earl of Oxford,
wrote the works are called OXFORDIANS. There's nothing pretentious at
all about the term, T. It's like calling Jesse Helms a REPUBLICAN or
Hilary Clinton a DEMOCRAT, or somebody else a LIBERTARIAN or whatever
the hell political party they belong to.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34567 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: JFK, etc |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:59:11 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
>
> Three hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver
Stone's "JFK" have I seen a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen
movies that are only 1 and a half to 2 hours long seem to take
forever to end. Not this one, though.
>
>
> Okay, now I know time is relative. There must be a movie goers
hell where Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first
mates speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the captain
vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying this.
*** None of those scenes you consider "endless" seemed that way to
me. The movie wouldn't have suffered all that much, granted, if
Jackson had cut 'em for time. However, we get to know the ship's crew
in Jackson's film much more than we ever did in the original, and so,
when each of these guys dies on Skull Island it isn't just some
nameless 'extra' who is killed -- it's somebody we got to know at
least a little bit. That goes for Denham's cameraman, too -- the guy
who gets munched by a V-Rex (offscreen).
If you found all the extra exposition to be "endless", that's your
loss. It didn't bother me one bit, and I can't wait for the DVD
version -- which is sure to be probably another hour longer! For
instance, in the scene where the movie star ditches the others, they
are at the shore of what appears to be an inland lake... and I'm
willing to bet that they filmed a scene where they make a raft and
try to cross it, and get attacked by a plesiosaur, like in the
original. That scene was probably filmed and then edited out for
time. But it'll be in the DVD version, I'm fairly certain. As well as
many more exposition scenes. And if you won't be diggin' it, well,
those of us who weren't bored during any part of Jackson's movie WILL
be diggin' it. To each their own, though.
>
> Oh, and you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?
> Jim Garrison was a crackpot. And even though Kim's career
> suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
> McCarthy to keep the commies in check. I swear, at the height
> of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
> WWII. I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.
*** Stone's film "JFK" takes some artistic liberties, but his
annotated script goes above-and-beyond to show the evidence that led
him to make his film. For example, certain characters -- like the one
played by Kevin Bacon -- are COMPOSITES based on two or more other
real people: rather than have a larger cast, Stone combined some real
people into a single 'fictional' character. As for "historical
accuracy", Stone's film is far more accurate than the scenario
trumped up by the Warren Report, with its "Magic Bullet" theory and
all that hogwash.
Jim Garrison was more right than wrong about the JFK assassination,
T. Photographic proof of an Oswald/Shaw/Ferrie association surfaced
AFTER the acquittal of Clay Shaw -- and the jury itself said that
Garrison PROVED to them that a conspiracy had killed JFK, but that
they found Clay Shaw "not guilty" because they weren't sure that he
had played a part in it. If they had seen that photograph, maybe that
alone would've gotten them to vote "guilty". And, don't forget, a
Grand Jury found that Garrison had enough of a case to go to trial
with BEFORE the actual trial of Clay Shaw: Garrison had to present
evidence to that Grand Jury in order to get the go-ahead to take Shaw
to trial.
To call him a crackpot is character assassination, T, and I should
think you -- living in the Dallas, Texas area, where the
assassination transpired -- would hesitate to characterize him as
such. Many people, after the assassination of JFK, thought ill of
Texans in general, thinking of 'em all as a bunch of rabid gun-nuts.
Especially with all those anti-JFK handbills pasted up around Dallas
during his visit, claiming that he was a "traitor" and all that. Some
welcome he got -- the back of his skull blown out, so that his wife
had to crawl onto the back of an accelerating limousine in order to
retrieve a chunk of his brains.
Garrison had the cojones to be the ONLY District Attorney in the
U.S.A. willing to expose the conspiracy that caused that to happen in
a public trial; the Federal Government had washed its hands of JFK
with its ludicrous "Warren Report" and its foregone conclusion that
a "lone nut" named Oswald had committed the murder. If Garrison
failed, it's because the Federal Government -- instead of trying to
assist him in convicting those who conspired to murder their
President -- actively sabotaged his case, by planting
false 'witnesses' for Garrison to put on the stand, who then were
easily impeached by the defense attorneys. They used a "straw man"
approach, and at times Garrison fell for it. There was a conspiracy
to screw up the Clay Shaw trial, to make sure that NOBODY ever went
to jail for the JFK killing, because if ONE person were to be
convicted as a conspirator in that event, then the door would be wide
open for others to face the music.
JFK's killers got away with it, and the minority of people who
actually believe that Oswald alone did it got their way. The vast
majority of Americans (and, it should be mentioned, people in foreign
countries) have never believed in the Warren Report's conclusions. A
coup d'etat ended the Kennedy presidency, and those who engineered it
profited from it, without being brought to justice, leaving in their
wake the bodies of hundreds of 'conveniently' dead witnesses of the
event and of events surrounding it. Garrison had the nerve to go
after them, and for that he should be admired.
As for McCarthy and Clooney... T, you should see Clooney's film "GOOD
NIGHT AND GOOD LUCK", about McCarthy's bullshit and the courage of
Edward R. Murrow and the CBS network for holding him to account for
his unamerican persecution of Americans for being "unamerican". I
think it's one of the best films of 2005, and if it won the Oscar for
Best Picture (... Director, Actor, etc), I wouldn't be surprised.
Clooney admits to being a "leftie" -- but that doesn't make him a
Communist, any more than it makes anybody who is leery of the far-
Right nonsense of the current Administration an "enemy" of the
country. It's too bad that Americans are polarized into the Left and
Right (or, the Far Left and the Far Right) extremes, the fringes. The
Libertarian view -- which I sympathize with -- is the voice of
moderation between those extremes, but they'll never win a major
election in this country. The average American is ill-informed about
politics and American history in general; too many people affiliate
themselves with one of the fringes and read ONLY those books that are
either in the Conservative Book Club or its polar opposite. I've read
both sides and can see both the pluses and minuses of each side's
agengas. Both of the extremes have their share of bullshit, and it
angers me that the only two viable choices in a Presidential election
are between the leftward-tending Democrat and the rightward-tending
Republican.
Offhand, I must admit that the B.S. on the Right -- which includes
the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive War based on 'intelligence' known to
be bogus... the Evangelical war on Reason, with its touting of so-
called "Intelligent Design" 'theory' opposing Darwinian Evolution...
and the unfair-and-unbalanced politics-driven agenda of Fox News --
it all seems far more dangerous to America and the world than the
B.S. on the Left. It angered me that the Democrats put Al Gore in the
running in 2000, and John Kerry in 2004 -- the Dems should've known
that neither would appeal to moderates. Bush's camp effectively
polarized the electorate with an anti-gay agenda -- so that people
going to the polls would vote not only for the next President in
2004, but also on "Gay Marriage" issues. Enough Christian bigots got
their dander up to go to the polls to vote against the gays to offset
any anti-Bush sentiment that had been growing during the increasing
body count of the Iraq War.
Oh, and let's not forget the character assassination of Kerry by
those "Swift Boat Veterans" who never served on HIS swift boat with
him -- those who DID unequivocally supporting him and the official
Navy history of the incidents Kerry was involved in during Vietnam.
Right-Wing radio pundits like Laura Ingraham and Michael Savage spent
thousands of hours of radio time making bullshit allegations about
Kerry's Vietnam record... and yet the FCC didn't find any fault with
that -- yet they DO go apeshit whenever Janet Jackson flashes a
nipple or what's-her-name from "DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES" does a racy
commercial with a football player. Under Bush, the FCC was a tool, a
weapon in a war against "indecency", but not against Libel and
Slander, it seems, if it could aid the Republicans in the 2004
election.
All the pro-Bush fanatics should ask themselves a question: if a
Democrat president had gotten our country into a war
over 'intelligence' KNOWN to be bogus... if the Abu Ghraib scandal
and the use of Torture were to happen during a Democrat president's
tenure... if war profiteers like Halliburton had ties to a Democrat
Vice President... would the Right Wing-controlled Congress have stood
idly by? No... they would've had impeachment proceedings and not
rested until the Democrat President (and his entire administration)
had been not only thrown out of office, but imprisoned. They went
after Bill Clinton because he lied about a goddamned blowjob. They
weren't above abusing the Impeachment powers of Congress for such
paltry reasons -- they certainly would've gone after a Dem president
for the things the Bushies have done in office.
Patrick
P.S. Ah, it's fun to rant once in a while. Now I get to hear more
B.S. from the pro-Bush crowd, as they gallop in for his defense... <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34568 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Tunnels |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 1/1/06 12:13:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
>
>
> > Who's to say that the Mutants in "BATTLE" didn't eventually make
use of Tunneling Machines, then? They HAD to have made use of them
while in New York City's ruins -- we can SEE the results of their
work. The next big question is: Might they not have TUNNELED their
way to New York City from some other region? Even one as far away as
California?
> >
> > Why not?
> >
>
> Why not? Because it's stupid!
>
> -- Rory
*** Whether you like it or not, Rory, there's evidence that the
Mutants DID make use of tunneling machines -- look at the poster
of "BENEATH" and you'll see the famous image of Brent and Nova as
they emerge from that cylindrical ventilation shaft, the one
connecting the subway system cavern with the steps of the NEW YORK
PUBLIC LIBRARY. Sometime after the Nuke War the city had been
partially filled in with debris -- probably solidified magma and
dust -- and SOMETHING had burrowed through it, to produce those
cylindrical shafts through which Brent and Nova walk, and through
which the Gorilla Army later makes its way.
Where the f*** did those cylindrical paths come from, if not by the
Mutants purposely delving them??? Look at the goddamned BUS that is
lodged in the rubble of that same mass of material through which the
tunnels were delved. The Mutants BURROWED through that stuff, so that
they could connect the hollow part of their underground city with the
OUTSIDE AIR. Brent and Nova go through a VENTILATION system -- as
evidenced by Brent's line: "Well, they breathe air, whoever -- or
whatever -- it is that's guiding us." He knows that air is rushing
INTO the underground city from the outside world, from not only the
Queensboro Plaza cave but perhaps from other places which connect the
outside world to that subway system. Brent and Nova headed in the
direction of that hum, but they could just as easily have gone in
some other direction, down a different subway track, and probably
found other cave entrances to the surface. Maybe even the
same "outlet" where Taylor was captured, when he confronted the
illusory wall of rock, leaving Nova behind.
The Mutants in "BENEATH" had burrowed holes in the rubble, as
evidenced by those post-War cylindrical ventilation tunnels. If they
could burrow THOSE tunnels WITHIN their city, they could just as
easily have burrowed tunnels TO that city from someplace else.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34569 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Icarus |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 1/1/06 4:39:43 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> whitty@c... writes:
>
>
> > I know there is a web site dedicated to the ship that uses the
name ICARUS.
> >
> >
> >
> > Where does this name come from?!?!?!
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
>
> I don't know, it's all Greek to me!
>
> -- Rory
*** Enough about your sex life, you dahhhhling!
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34570 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Circle |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 1/1/06 1:00:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
>
>
> > The timeline didn't change.
>
> YES, IT DID!!!! Stop pulling a Cornelius here, Patrick, and
telling lies!
>
> -- Rory
*** In the words of Dr. Milo:
"And Earth will be destroyed just as we saw it. Only, since seeing
it, we have passed through a.... backward disturbance in time did
you notice the Date Meter clicking down after the shock wave hit our
ship? and we have returned to Earth almost two thousand years
before its destruction." (solemnly) "That is another reason for
keeping silence. Our human captors would not be edified to know that,
one day, their world will crack like an egg and fry to a cinder,
because of an Ape war of aggression."
Milo knows it, Rory, and you'd better wise up and learn it, too!
Caesar's followers, living some 600 years after his death, only live
in the HOPE that the Future MIGHT be changed -- not in the CERTAINTY
that it had been changed. And that ponytail-yanking chimp proves that
Ape-versus-Human violent tendency hadn't been bred out of 'em, nor
the Human-versus-Ape tendency to push back and fight. No wonder
Caesar's statue symbolically weeps!
Mendez didn't dismantle that Doomsday Bomb, Rory, and because of that
the world will continue to be threatened by possible -- probable --
annihilation. All it would take is for the eventual "Ape war of
aggression" cited by Milo to trigger it.
Round 'n' round the POTA timeline goes... in a CIRCLE. "Spinnin'
wheel got ta go 'round..."
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34571 |
From: Patrick Tilton |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Bizarro Apes |
.htmlHmmm... billions of people (not to mention other
lifeforms) annihilated in a worldwide catastrophe, and
God seems rather nonchalant about it.
A laff riot!
Patrick
--- "Tim \"apefan\"" < apefan23@...> wrote:
> Been meaning to post this for a while....independent
> comic strip "Bizarro"......
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
__________________________________
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 34572 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: OT "Oxfordian" |
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/3/2006 1:13:42 A.M. Central Standard Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
What the
hell's "pretentious" about the word "Oxfordian",
T?
I had to throw something in with raison d'etre
to balance it and it stuck out.
<.html
<.html
|
|
|
|