Yahoo! potadg group — Messages 34473–34572

Dates: 2005-12-31 through 2006-01-03

Messages in potadg group. Page 158 of 451.
Index Prev  Next


Group: potadg Message: 34473 From: John Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Happy New Year!
Group: potadg Message: 34474 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: APES Promos
Group: potadg Message: 34475 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Mr. T vs POTA
Group: potadg Message: 34476 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1)
Group: potadg Message: 34477 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1)
Group: potadg Message: 34478 From: Michael Whitty Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34479 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34480 From: Michael Whitty Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34481 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34482 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34483 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow
Group: potadg Message: 34484 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34485 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34486 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34487 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34488 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34489 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34490 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34491 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 34492 From: Neil T Foster Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #60
Group: potadg Message: 34493 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Speaking of BANANAS.......
Group: potadg Message: 34494 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34495 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34496 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: The Width of a Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34497 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: The Icarus
Group: potadg Message: 34498 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: "Revolution on the POTA"
Group: potadg Message: 34499 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow
Group: potadg Message: 34500 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34501 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34502 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Width of a Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34503 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34504 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Speaking of BANANAS.......
Group: potadg Message: 34505 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Icarus
Group: potadg Message: 34506 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The sequel DVDs
Group: potadg Message: 34507 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34508 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The sequel DVDs
Group: potadg Message: 34509 From: Neil Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34510 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 34511 From: Neil Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow
Group: potadg Message: 34512 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34513 From: Neil Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34514 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow
Group: potadg Message: 34515 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34516 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Icarus
Group: potadg Message: 34517 From: ron kenner Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34518 From: Ty Templeton Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Icarus
Group: potadg Message: 34519 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34520 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Icarus
Group: potadg Message: 34521 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 34522 From: John Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: "Revolution on the POTA"
Group: potadg Message: 34523 From: John Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34524 From: John Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 34525 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: The Circle JERK!
Group: potadg Message: 34526 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 34527 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 34528 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34529 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Birthday Reminder
Group: potadg Message: 34530 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Caesar's Breeding Annex chimpette
Group: potadg Message: 34531 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34532 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34533 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34534 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34535 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34536 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34537 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34538 From: ron kenner Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
Group: potadg Message: 34539 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
Group: potadg Message: 34540 From: ron kenner Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34541 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Bizarro Apes
Group: potadg Message: 34542 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34543 From: taebokitti@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34544 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34545 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
Group: potadg Message: 34546 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34547 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34548 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34549 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34550 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 34551 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34552 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Bizarro Apes
Group: potadg Message: 34553 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
Group: potadg Message: 34554 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
Group: potadg Message: 34555 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
Group: potadg Message: 34556 From: Neil T Foster Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #61
Group: potadg Message: 34557 From: Neet-O-Rama Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34558 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Gun Control
Group: potadg Message: 34559 From: Neil T Foster Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Revolution #1 comments.
Group: potadg Message: 34560 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #61
Group: potadg Message: 34561 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34562 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34563 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34564 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34565 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/2/2006
Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 34566 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
Subject: Re: OT "Oxfordian"
Group: potadg Message: 34567 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
Subject: Re: JFK, etc
Group: potadg Message: 34568 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
Subject: Re: Tunnels
Group: potadg Message: 34569 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
Subject: Re: The Icarus
Group: potadg Message: 34570 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
Group: potadg Message: 34571 From: Patrick Tilton Date: 1/3/2006
Subject: Re: Bizarro Apes
Group: potadg Message: 34572 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/3/2006
Subject: Re: OT "Oxfordian"



Group: potadg Message: 34473 From: John Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Happy New Year!
.html
Happy New Year to all my fellow sci-fi fanboys. Captian Picard was a
P*ssy!!!
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34474 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: APES Promos
.html
I just have the Beneath spots......no Musical Journey
but I do have the "musak" version with the Star trek
theme....



Tim

--- mlccougar@... wrote:

> As mentioned months ago, I am trying to help another
> group member compile all
> of the APES radio spots, promos, etc...
>
> So far he has radio spots for BENEATH, ESACPE,
> CONQUEST, and BATTLE... There
> has been no luck in finding them for PLANET
> though...
>
> If anyone out there has any radio spots or other
> APES audio (such as POTA: A
> Musical Journey), let us know... If you can add
> anything to what he has
> compiled right now, you will receive a CD of it when
> completed...
>




__________________________________________
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34475 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Mr. T vs POTA
.html
Sheesh!....funny!

--- LordTZer0@... wrote:

>
> I had forgotten all about this.
> It's amazing the things you'll find
> trying to make room on your bookmarks.
>
> _Mr.T vs. POTA page 1_
> (http://www.adam.belsky.com/mrt/T_vs_pota1.htm)
>
>
>
>





__________________________________
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34476 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1)
.html
.html.html In a message dated 12/31/05 4:59:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:


Holy crap Rory. I thought Patrick had written this long winded post.
He must be getting to ya.


Patrick got to me a loooooong time ago.....




and they put me in a madhouse!  A MADHOUUUUUUSSSSSEEEE!!!!!
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34477 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1)
.html
.html.html In a message dated 12/31/2005 3:49:53 PM Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:

These stories were written for kids.


Not entirely true... BATTLE was defininately aimed at kids, but PLANET surely wasn't, and I can't say that BENEATH was entirely either... At worst you could say that they were aimed at the "family audience" in which there were things for all members to enjoy... But kid's films, no...
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34478 From: Michael Whitty Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Ape - EAL
.html
.html

I would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2006 12:53 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1)

 

In a message dated 12/31/2005 3:49:53 PM Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:


These stories were written for kids.



Not entirely true... BATTLE was defininately aimed at kids, but PLANET surely wasn't, and I can't say that BENEATH was entirely either... At worst you could say that they were aimed at the "family audience" in which there were things for all members to enjoy... But kid's films, no...

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34479 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
.html
.html.html In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:45 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

I would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..

Only the later films...

PLANET was never intended as a "kid's film"... Just by watching it, that much is obvious...
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34480 From: Michael Whitty Date: 12/31/2005
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
.html
.html

Agreed, again.

 

But from Beneath on the kid appeal is THERE!  J

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2006 1:36 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL

 

In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:45 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


I would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..



Only the later films...

PLANET was never intended as a "kid's film"... Just by watching it, that much is obvious...

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34481 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
.html
.html
In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
These stories were written for kids.
 
Of course . . .
 
Once upon a time . . .
there was a planet ruled by Apes
And Men were enslaved.  And they
cut out your brain and cut off your
balls.  Then it blew up.  The End.
Pleasant dreams.
 
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34482 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
.html
.html.html In a message dated 12/31/05 8:56:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


I would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..




Michael



What's certainly true is that as the years passed in the early seventies APES came to appeal mostly to kids.  Which is one of the reason's I, as I was growing older, came to dislike APES as it moved along.  I wanted the level of PLANET with each film and instead I got BATTLE, then the TV show, then -- horror of horrors -- a cartoon series.  Then it was just comics.  Then it was over.

Is it any wonder why I came to worship the original and despise the sequels?

-- Rory
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34483 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Mithril1960@a... wrote:
>
>
>
> In a message dated 12/30/2005 16:46:14 Eastern Standard Time,
> PotaDG@yahoogroups.com writes:
>
> Well, that makes no sense. Are we to accept that the mutants in
BATTLE are supposed to be living in the ruins of San Diego?!! And
that they somehow got the Alpha/Omega bomb to the ruins of New York
by the 40th century? How did they transport it, in that vehicle from
DAMNATION ALLEY, or are there supposed to be tunnels crisscrossing
the country as in Roddenberry's "Genesis II"?
>
> Look, just keep it simple. CONQUEST and BATTLE take place
somewhere on the East coast.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34484 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: The Circle
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 12/30/2005 8:07:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> veetus@e... writes:
>
> I understand that Arthur Jacobs wanted the end of "Battle" to be
left open to interpretation. Will Caesar change the future (a new
timeline) or is the future set (circular, fate)?
>
>
>
> That's the thing. The timeline has been changed but is it enough?
> Who knows? That was the last line. It reminds me of the time
> travel episodes of The Simpsons & Red Dwarf. Some times the
> smallest thing can just make it worse, and then it takes a lot to
> fix it. On the other had, how does it get worse than World
> destruction. I guess, at least from Taylor's point of view
> anyway, a World run by apes is worse than that.
>
*** The timeline didn't change. Cornelius told the Presidential
Commission that English had been the language of his ancestors
for "nearly two thousand years". He time-traveled back from the year
3955, and "nearly 2,000 years" before that Doomsday date puts Apes-
Speaking-English smack dab in the late 20th Century.

When Cornelius LATER tells Hasslein that the first ape to speak was
named "Aldo" and that this event supposedly happened 3 centuries after
the Apes were enslaved (the slavery beginning about 2 centuries after
the Plague), he is LYING. Just as Zira lies her ass off when she says
that the word she hadn't finished saying in her testimony to the
Commission [... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ...] was just her
having the hiccups. It suits these talking monkeys to lie when they
feel the need to do so.

They have an overwhelming compulsion to lie about this so-called 500-
year period: they don't want Hasslein to think that in just 18 years
the Ape Revolt is gonna precipitate the Nuke War that'll wipe out Man's
civilization. They don't want him to know that the leader of that
revolt will NOT be an ape named "Aldo" living some 500 years in the
Future, but will instead be an ape named "Caesar" who is currently
gestating in Zira's womb. In order to protect their unborn son, they
lie about the half-a-millennium that Man supposedly has left to lord it
over their soon-to-be enslaved Ape lessers. And Cornelius names "Aldo"
as the Ape to be watched out for because he doesn't want his own
grandson to be murdered by him. Cornelius wants to change that one
thing about the Future -- the fate of his eponymous grandson -- but he
doesn't want the prevent the Fall of Man and the Rise of the Apes,
a "historical" event that he now WANTS to happen, since his own family
will be the RULING family of that original Ape society.

Cornelius could only hope that Hasslein had forgotten all about
that "nearly 2,000 years" line earlier. How can the 1st talking ape
show up 500 years into the Future -- which is only 1,500 years or so
before the 3955 year of Doomsday -- if English had been handed down
from father-to-son for "nearly 2,000 years"?

Cornelius knew damned well that talking apes would "turn the tables" on
Man in the next generation -- NOT as far away as 500 years later. But
he and Zira wanted Hasslein to falsely believe they had that much time
left.

"How much time has the world got?!" Hasslein later rants. If he only
remembered Cornelius' testimony to the Commission and subtracted
that "nearly 2,000 years" period from the EARTH-TIME "date meter"
record of "3955" ("A.D., presumably"), then he would have a pretty good
idea of how much time the world had left before Apes took over the
reins of civilization from Man.

NOT NEARLY ENOUGH!

The timeline did NOT change. Cornelius lied about it, just as Zira lied
about her 'hiccups'. Just as he had lied earlier, when he claimed he
hadn't known Colonel Taylor. He's not above lying when he has a
compelling reason to do so. Those who insist on a "changed" timeline
believe Cornelius would NEVER EVER EVER tell a lie, like he's George
Freakin' Washington twiddlin' his thumbs by the chopped-down cherry
tree, and they're just plain wrong. The facts -- the details --
of "ESCAPE" prove otherwise.

And Dehn himself never was into this changing-of-timelines notion,
either. He has Hasslein CLAIMING that it's possible -- even if ever
more improbable, if action isn't taken -- to change the Future, to
change lanes on that Freeway of Time. But Dehn ended "ESCAPE" knowing
that there would undoubtedly be a 4th Apes film, and he purposely
arranged it so that the son of Cornelius and Zira would be the
protagonist of that story -- a story which would see the fulfilment of
the major details of the Future History that Cornelius laid out for
Hasslein (the Plague... Apes as Pets... Apes as Slaves... the Apes
turning the tables... an ape named "Aldo"...), but NOT in the 500-year
period Cornelius and Zira had lied about. Rather, Apes become enslaved
and wage their Revolt LESS THAN A DECADE after the Plague wipes out the
dogs and cats. That alone proves that Cornelius was either knowingly
LYING about the Future's timeline or he was unwittingly MISTAKEN about
it (as Ty implies). I think the irreconcilable discrepancy between
Cornelius' TWO timelines given in "ESCAPE" prove that he had to have
known that ONE of those two was bogus. The unfolding of the story
of "CONQUEST" proves that it was the later timeframe (500-years) that
was the bogus one.

The existence of other talking apes -- apes unrelated to the Ape-
onauts -- proves that there were talking apes on Earth even as
Cornelius and Zira were publicly believed to be the only ones able to
do so. Mandemus was OLDER than Caesar; he had to have been conceived
YEARS before the Ape-onauts landed off the coast of California.
Hasslein was worried about the possibility of Cornelius and Zira and
their unborn child interbreeding with primitive apes and producing the
race of intelligent apes that would one day flourish (and wage a war
culminating in Doomsday by 3955). But he was short-sighted. Cornelius
and Zira referred to the gorillas and orangutans in their testimony to
the Commission. Zira referred to gorillas during her sodium pentothal-
induced testimony at Camp Eleven. Did Hasslein think that Cornelius and
Zira (and their unborn child) would go gallivanting around,
impregnating (or being impregnated by) gorillas and orangutans, as well
as chimpanzees? How does Hasslein account for the existence of talking
gorillas and orangutans in the Future? He DOESN'T. He fixates on these
talking chimpanzees, and foolishly hopes that by killing THEM he'll be
preventing ALL apes from ever superceding Mankind as King of the Heap.
Hasslein, in his own way, was a short-sighted fool.

Dehn was making a SINGLE circular timeline -- the final screenplay
of "BATTLE" includes his final touches, the Corringtons
notwithstanding. Dehn knew that Cornelius and Zira were lying about
that 500-year period; he himself wrote Cornelius' earlier line, "nearly
2,000 years". His intention was to make it a vicious circle, with only
the "hope" that the circle could be broken. Definitely not the
CERTAINTY that it either COULD or WAS broken.

Patrick
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34485 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 9:12:45 A.M. Central Standard Time, Haristas@... writes:
Is it any wonder why I came to worship the original and despise the sequels?

-- Rory
 
Well, I don't feel as strongly as Rory does.
But I do agree that it did degenerate into
monkey movies.  Not the direction I was
hoping for.  That's why I had such hope for
the new one, and that's why the betrayal
was so painful.  More Monkey Movies...
But it will get better, if I have to make
them myself.  No makeup this time
though.  It's will be CG.  That's the
only way to get full range of motion
and it's improving every year.  I
will not disappoint.  Except for
Whitty.  Because the kids
won't be able to get it.
Well, by the time I
do them they may
be old enough.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34486 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 12:00:36 P.M. Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** The timeline didn't change. Cornelius is LYING
 
Yeah, sorry . . . I don't buy it.  I didn't read
the rest, because it started as crap, and I
can only assume it only got deeper.  You
are of in Lala Land with your wild
substantiated guesses and I
for one refuse to wallow in
this drivel.  You have
absolutely no way
to prove they were
not telling the truth,
you circle-ist!
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34487 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
.html
.html
In a message dated 1/1/2006 1:56:16 P.M. Central Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
substantiated guesses
Should have read, Unsubstantiated.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34488 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
.html
.html
   That's because kids are more accepting of the big truths than adults are. Adults don't want to be reminded. They want soap operas and "reality" TV. Adult, yes. Grown-up, no.  - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 5:55 PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL

I would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Sunday, 1 January 2006 12:53 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Revolution on the Planet of the Apes (Issue 1)

 

In a message dated 12/31/2005 3:49:53 PM Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:


These stories were written for kids.



Not entirely true... BATTLE was defininately aimed at kids, but PLANET surely wasn't, and I can't say that BENEATH was entirely either... At worst you could say that they were aimed at the "family audience" in which there were things for all members to enjoy... But kid's films, no...

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34489 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
.html
.html
  Yeah, but have you ever listened to the words of "Rock A Bye Baby"?! - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL

In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
These stories were written for kids.
 
Of course . . .
 
Once upon a time . . .
there was a planet ruled by Apes
And Men were enslaved.  And they
cut out your brain and cut off your
balls.  Then it blew up.  The End.
Pleasant dreams.
 
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34490 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Re: The Circle
.html
Blah! Blah! Blah! You'll never convince me. - - - Jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 9:55 AM
Subject: [PotaDG] The Circle


> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 12/30/2005 8:07:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > veetus@e... writes:
> >
> > I understand that Arthur Jacobs wanted the end of "Battle" to be
> left open to interpretation. Will Caesar change the future (a new
> timeline) or is the future set (circular, fate)?
> >
> >
> >
> > That's the thing. The timeline has been changed but is it enough?
> > Who knows? That was the last line. It reminds me of the time
> > travel episodes of The Simpsons & Red Dwarf. Some times the
> > smallest thing can just make it worse, and then it takes a lot to
> > fix it. On the other had, how does it get worse than World
> > destruction. I guess, at least from Taylor's point of view
> > anyway, a World run by apes is worse than that.
> >
> *** The timeline didn't change. Cornelius told the Presidential
> Commission that English had been the language of his ancestors
> for "nearly two thousand years". He time-traveled back from the year
> 3955, and "nearly 2,000 years" before that Doomsday date puts Apes-
> Speaking-English smack dab in the late 20th Century.
>
> When Cornelius LATER tells Hasslein that the first ape to speak was
> named "Aldo" and that this event supposedly happened 3 centuries after
> the Apes were enslaved (the slavery beginning about 2 centuries after
> the Plague), he is LYING. Just as Zira lies her ass off when she says
> that the word she hadn't finished saying in her testimony to the
> Commission [... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ...] was just her
> having the hiccups. It suits these talking monkeys to lie when they
> feel the need to do so.
>
> They have an overwhelming compulsion to lie about this so-called 500-
> year period: they don't want Hasslein to think that in just 18 years
> the Ape Revolt is gonna precipitate the Nuke War that'll wipe out Man's
> civilization. They don't want him to know that the leader of that
> revolt will NOT be an ape named "Aldo" living some 500 years in the
> Future, but will instead be an ape named "Caesar" who is currently
> gestating in Zira's womb. In order to protect their unborn son, they
> lie about the half-a-millennium that Man supposedly has left to lord it
> over their soon-to-be enslaved Ape lessers. And Cornelius names "Aldo"
> as the Ape to be watched out for because he doesn't want his own
> grandson to be murdered by him. Cornelius wants to change that one
> thing about the Future -- the fate of his eponymous grandson -- but he
> doesn't want the prevent the Fall of Man and the Rise of the Apes,
> a "historical" event that he now WANTS to happen, since his own family
> will be the RULING family of that original Ape society.
>
> Cornelius could only hope that Hasslein had forgotten all about
> that "nearly 2,000 years" line earlier. How can the 1st talking ape
> show up 500 years into the Future -- which is only 1,500 years or so
> before the 3955 year of Doomsday -- if English had been handed down
> from father-to-son for "nearly 2,000 years"?
>
> Cornelius knew damned well that talking apes would "turn the tables" on
> Man in the next generation -- NOT as far away as 500 years later. But
> he and Zira wanted Hasslein to falsely believe they had that much time
> left.
>
> "How much time has the world got?!" Hasslein later rants. If he only
> remembered Cornelius' testimony to the Commission and subtracted
> that "nearly 2,000 years" period from the EARTH-TIME "date meter"
> record of "3955" ("A.D., presumably"), then he would have a pretty good
> idea of how much time the world had left before Apes took over the
> reins of civilization from Man.
>
> NOT NEARLY ENOUGH!
>
> The timeline did NOT change. Cornelius lied about it, just as Zira lied
> about her 'hiccups'. Just as he had lied earlier, when he claimed he
> hadn't known Colonel Taylor. He's not above lying when he has a
> compelling reason to do so. Those who insist on a "changed" timeline
> believe Cornelius would NEVER EVER EVER tell a lie, like he's George
> Freakin' Washington twiddlin' his thumbs by the chopped-down cherry
> tree, and they're just plain wrong. The facts -- the details --
> of "ESCAPE" prove otherwise.
>
> And Dehn himself never was into this changing-of-timelines notion,
> either. He has Hasslein CLAIMING that it's possible -- even if ever
> more improbable, if action isn't taken -- to change the Future, to
> change lanes on that Freeway of Time. But Dehn ended "ESCAPE" knowing
> that there would undoubtedly be a 4th Apes film, and he purposely
> arranged it so that the son of Cornelius and Zira would be the
> protagonist of that story -- a story which would see the fulfilment of
> the major details of the Future History that Cornelius laid out for
> Hasslein (the Plague... Apes as Pets... Apes as Slaves... the Apes
> turning the tables... an ape named "Aldo"...), but NOT in the 500-year
> period Cornelius and Zira had lied about. Rather, Apes become enslaved
> and wage their Revolt LESS THAN A DECADE after the Plague wipes out the
> dogs and cats. That alone proves that Cornelius was either knowingly
> LYING about the Future's timeline or he was unwittingly MISTAKEN about
> it (as Ty implies). I think the irreconcilable discrepancy between
> Cornelius' TWO timelines given in "ESCAPE" prove that he had to have
> known that ONE of those two was bogus. The unfolding of the story
> of "CONQUEST" proves that it was the later timeframe (500-years) that
> was the bogus one.
>
> The existence of other talking apes -- apes unrelated to the Ape-
> onauts -- proves that there were talking apes on Earth even as
> Cornelius and Zira were publicly believed to be the only ones able to
> do so. Mandemus was OLDER than Caesar; he had to have been conceived
> YEARS before the Ape-onauts landed off the coast of California.
> Hasslein was worried about the possibility of Cornelius and Zira and
> their unborn child interbreeding with primitive apes and producing the
> race of intelligent apes that would one day flourish (and wage a war
> culminating in Doomsday by 3955). But he was short-sighted. Cornelius
> and Zira referred to the gorillas and orangutans in their testimony to
> the Commission. Zira referred to gorillas during her sodium pentothal-
> induced testimony at Camp Eleven. Did Hasslein think that Cornelius and
> Zira (and their unborn child) would go gallivanting around,
> impregnating (or being impregnated by) gorillas and orangutans, as well
> as chimpanzees? How does Hasslein account for the existence of talking
> gorillas and orangutans in the Future? He DOESN'T. He fixates on these
> talking chimpanzees, and foolishly hopes that by killing THEM he'll be
> preventing ALL apes from ever superceding Mankind as King of the Heap.
> Hasslein, in his own way, was a short-sighted fool.
>
> Dehn was making a SINGLE circular timeline -- the final screenplay
> of "BATTLE" includes his final touches, the Corringtons
> notwithstanding. Dehn knew that Cornelius and Zira were lying about
> that 500-year period; he himself wrote Cornelius' earlier line, "nearly
> 2,000 years". His intention was to make it a vicious circle, with only
> the "hope" that the circle could be broken. Definitely not the
> CERTAINTY that it either COULD or WAS broken.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34491 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
.html
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
group.

File : /Within the Planet of the Apes/WPOTA 60.gif
Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
Description :

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Within%20the%20Planet%20of%20the%20Apes/WPOTA%2060.gif

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 34492 From: Neil T Foster Date: 1/1/2006
Subject: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #60
.html
Attachments :
    .html Message
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34493 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Speaking of BANANAS.......
    .html
    .html

    HAPPY NEW YEAR!

    And….is that a banana in your trousers or are you just loathing and detesting me?!?!?!?

    Zira

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of patrickmichaeltilton
    Sent:
    Monday, 2 January 2006 4:12 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow

     

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Mithril1960@a... wrote:
    >


    > In a message dated
    12/30/2005 16:46:14 Eastern Standard Time, 
    > PotaDG@yahoogroups.com writes:
    >
    > Well, that makes no sense.  Are we to accept that the mutants in
    BATTLE are supposed to be living in the ruins of San Diego ?!!  And
    that they somehow got the Alpha/Omega bomb to the ruins of
    New York
    by the 40th century? How did they transport it, in that vehicle from
    DAMNATION  ALLEY, or are there supposed to be tunnels crisscrossing
    the country as in  Roddenberry's "Genesis II"?
    >
    > Look, just keep it simple.  CONQUEST and
    BATTLE take place
    somewhere on the East coast.
    >
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Well, there are several answers;

    > 1 - Yes there are tunnels, at least according to Marvel's nicely
    done Timeline (available at the site or at other sites).

    > 2 - We never really know where the later apes films take place,
    other than Escape and isn't that
    Los Angeles ? So how they switched to
    San Diego is a mystery. Still the story in Revolution is done
    decently unlike other Apes revivals.

    > 3 - There is always the option that the Ape City from Planet wasn't
    founded by Ceasar, but is another founded by other apes brought about
    by the Ape Revolution. But then how would the uncut
    Battle fit in,
    since they had the Doomsday bomb?

    > 4 - Just go with the suggestion above - it's the east coast. (ha!)

    ____________________________________________________________________

    *** Here's some more grist for the mill.

    THE TUNNELS - In "BENEATH" Brent and Nova walk through subway tunnels
    built in the 20th Century from Queensboro Plaza... but that route
    ends where they find the circular, cylindrical tunnel in that
    underground cavern, with the metal rungs leading up to it.

    Who made that tunnel, and when did they make it?

    The MUTANTS made that tunnel, and they made it AFTER the Nuclear War
    had wrecked the world. That tunnel extends from that cavern -- where
    the air from the outside world is being sucked into the subterranean
    city -- to the foot of the steps on the east side of the NEW YORK
    PUBLIC LIBRARY. We see Brent and Nova leave that cylindrical tunnel
    on street-level: that tunnel HAD to have been delved after the street
    level in
    New York had partially filled in with rock and/or
    solidifying magma.

    Who's to say that the Mutants in "
    BATTLE " didn't eventually make use
    of Tunneling Machines, then? They HAD to have made use of them while
    in
    New York City 's ruins -- we can SEE the results of their work. The
    next big question is: Might they not have TUNNELED their way to
    New
    York City
    from some other region? Even one as far away as California ?

    Why not?

    I would suppose that there were at least SOME pre-existing tunnels,
    delved by the Army Corps of Engineers, to connect various Defense
    Department bases throughout the continental
    U.S.A. I have little
    doubt that such tunnels currently exist.

    If the Mutants -- who somehow acquired the ALPHA OMEGA bomb -- also
    acquired detailed maps of the United States' D.O.D. tunnel system,
    and if they had access to tunneling machines, then they COULD have
    made use of such D.O.D. tunnels to get most of the way from a
    California "Breck City" to New York City, perhaps using some
    tunneling machines of their own (or, ones left around by the Army
    Corps of Engineers after their tunnels had been dug) to dig their way
    through un-tunneled areas.

    The book "OATH OF FEALTY" co-written by Larry Niven and "ESCAPE"
    novelizer Jerry Pournelle owes part of its plot to the use of these
    tunneling machines. A scene in "TOTAL RECALL" involves the use of a
    tunneling machine on Mars. These devices are not "science fiction" --
    they are science FACT. They're being used as we speak. They were used
    to dig the tunnel across the
    English Channel -- the "Chunnel". If
    follows that such devices would be available for the use of a pre-
    Nuke War U.S. military to connect their bases through solid bedrock,
    unobserved from orbiting enemy spy satellites... and those same
    tunneling machines would be available for Mendez (or one of his
    successors) to lead his people on a transcontinental trek, through
    some previously delved military tunnels and -- perhaps -- through
    tunnels they themselves dig while en route to their final destination
    in New York City, where they use those machines to dig the
    ventilation shafts through which Brent and Nova (and, later, Ursus'
    army) walk.

    ------------

    One other thing (unrelated to the tunnels, but as concerns the East
    Coast vs West Coast location of "CONQUEST" and "
    BATTLE ".

    In the scene where MacDonald tells Caesar about the tapes, there is a
    basket of what appears to be either
    ORANGES or GRAPEFRUIT. Later,
    when Kolp's scouts return to tell him about what they found, the
    scout Captain tells him: "This [pointing at his map] is a gorilla
    outpost. Below is a valley, with orchards and vineyards, enough to
    feed hundreds. Here is
    Ape City ."

    In the final screenplay this last line reads:

    CAPTAIN (indicating) "This is a gorilla outpost. Below is this
    valley, planted with orchards and vineyards, an orange grove and
    young banana palms.* [(* We need not have seen all these.)] Enough to
    feed thousands." (tapping map) "Their city is here."

    In David Gerrold's novelization it reads:

    The captain laid the map on a table. He began pointing. "There's a
    gorilla outpost here. Below that is a valley; it's planted with
    orchards and vineyards. There are orange groves and banana palms
    here. Enough to feed thousands." He tapped the map, "Their city is
    here."

    Gerrold followed the screenplay faithfully, for the most part,
    including those non-filmed references to one or more
    ORANGE GROVES
    and BANANA PALMS.

    If it didn't make it into any filmed version (by which I include the
    foreign versions, like the Japanese Laserdisc version), then it's not
    strictly canon, as far as I'm concerned. But it IS interesting that
    in the final screenplay there were originally references to ORANGE
    GROVES and to BANANA PALMS -- both of which fit in geographically to
    the
    CALIFORNIA region, but NOT to the NEW YORK / NEW JERSEY region.
    California is famous for its orange groves, and bananas are a
    TROPICAL fruit.

    I can already hear the arguments: Zira's first words to the humans
    testing them at the L.A. ZOO are "Because I loathe bananas!" That
    means that she -- who had lived in the
    New York / New Jersey vicinity
    in the 3900s -- had to have known what bananas tasted like.

    I would argue that bananas -- being imported to the NYC / NJ area,
    having been grown further south -- had to have been INTRODUCED to the
    NYC / NJ region, so that they BECOME indigenous to that area later
    on. One scenario that would fit this would be if Apes living in the
    California region were to make a trek across the continent of North
    America, eastward, they would bring with them foodstuffs -- and
    especially the SEEDS of those dietary staples -- on their journey
    from the California region to wherever they might go. We know that
    the Ape civilization circa 3085 dwells in the
    California region, and
    it's fairly obvious that Chief Councillor Zaius is related in some
    way -- most probably familially -- to Dr. Zaius, who lived some 870
    years later, on the other side of the continent. If a trans-American
    trek of at least a fairly sizeable portion of the Apes from Galen's
    time DID happen, it would have involved the House of Zaius traveling
    with them, at the very least.

    I can see such a migration happening, perhaps in the 32nd Century or
    so. Perhaps to join up with the descendants of others who had
    ventured eastward hundreds of years earlier. Those migrating Apes
    would have brought along the seeds of their edible plants --
    including
    ORANGES and BANANAS -- transplanting them from their
    California climes to the Northeastern USA territory.

    Granted, that line about "orange groves" and "banana palms" didn't
    make it into the final version(s) of "
    BATTLE ", but there IS a basket
    of citrus-type fruit on a table in Caesar and Lisa's home when
    MacDonald tells him about the Tapes. At the very least, the inclusion
    of the references to "orange groves" and "banana palms" in the final
    screenplay hints that Dehn was placing the events of "CONQUEST"
    and "
    BATTLE " somewhere where those fruits are cultivated. There ARE
    some East Coast places where that could be applicable, such as
    Florida and Georgia, but as far north as New Jersey and New York is
    unlikely.

    Patrick

    P.S. Happy New Year. Only 1,949 more to go until Doomsday. And this
    year, 2006, is the year my POTA chronology has for the Nuclear War,
    based on Mandemus' line hinting that "BATTLE" takes place 27 years
    after "CONQUEST" (i.e. in 2018) and Mendez' line that Kolp's actions
    against Caesar will break 12 years of peace. Twelve years before 2018
    is 2006 -- this year. And how many battles would the human survivors
    of Breck's/Kolp's city have had to deal with after the Nuclear War?
    So, I've dated "
    BATTLE " at 2018 and the 12-years-before incident
    Mendez alludes to will be the Nuke War (in my scenario). Given the
    sabre-rattling of the Iranian President regarding "wiping
    Israel off
    the map" and their Nuke program, it wouldn't surprise me all that
    much if a WMD were to be detonated somewhere in the
    Middle East.
    Whether that WMD is an Iranian nuke hitting Tel Aviv or an Israeli
    nuke doing a pre-emptive strike on
    Tehran ... that's anybody's guess.

    Happy Nuke Year!






    --
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34494 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Ape - EAL
    .html
    .html

    Do you think “resent” might be a more accurate word than “despise” Rory?

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
    Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 2:12 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Ape - EAL

     

    In a message dated 12/31/05 8:56:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:



    I would agree that most of the APPEAL was to kids though…..



    Michael



    What's certainly true is that as the years passed in the early seventies APES came to appeal mostly to kids.  Which is one of the reason's I, as I was growing older, came to dislike APES as it moved along.  I wanted the level of PLANET with each film and instead I got BATTLE, then the TV show, then -- horror of horrors -- a cartoon series.  Then it was just comics.  Then it was over.

    Is it any wonder why I came to worship the original and despise the sequels?

    -- Rory

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34495 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
    .html
    .html

    Yes – VERY soothing stuff (if you want your baby to have nightmares about falling from a tree!).

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
    Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 8:10 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL

     

      Yeah, but have you ever listened to the words of "Rock A Bye Baby"?! - - - Jeff

     

    ----- Original Message -----

    Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 3:37 AM

    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL

     

    In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

    These stories were written for kids.

     

    Of course . . .

     

    Once upon a time . . .

    there was a planet ruled by Apes

    And Men were enslaved.  And they

    cut out your brain and cut off your

    balls.  Then it blew up.  The End.

    Pleasant dreams.


    -- <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34496 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: The Width of a Circle
    .html
    .html

    Looks like somebody’s off the Christmas list Patrick!  J

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
    Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 8:13 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle

     

      Blah! Blah! Blah! You'll never convince me. - - - Jeff

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
    To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 9:55 AM
    Subject: [PotaDG] The Circle


    > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
    > >
    > > 
    > > In a message dated 12/30/2005 8:07:26 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
    > > veetus@e... writes:
    > >
    > > I  understand that Arthur Jacobs wanted the end of "Battle" to be
    > left open to interpretation. Will Caesar change the future (a new
    > timeline) or is the future set (circular, fate)?
    > >
    > >
    > > 
    > > That's the thing. The timeline has been changed but is it enough?
    > > Who knows? That was the last line. It reminds me of the time
    > > travel episodes of The Simpsons & Red Dwarf. Some times the
    > > smallest thing can just make it worse, and then it takes a lot to
    > > fix it. On the other had, how does it get worse than World
    > > destruction. I guess, at least from Taylor's point of view
    > > anyway, a World run by apes is worse than that.
    > >
    > *** The timeline didn't change. Cornelius told the Presidential
    > Commission that English had been the language of his ancestors
    > for "nearly two thousand years". He time-traveled back from the year
    > 3955, and "nearly 2,000 years" before that Doomsday date puts Apes-
    > Speaking-English smack dab in the late 20th Century.
    >
    > When Cornelius LATER tells Hasslein that the first ape to speak was
    > named "Aldo" and that this event supposedly happened 3 centuries after
    > the Apes were enslaved (the slavery beginning about 2 centuries after
    > the Plague), he is LYING. Just as Zira lies her ass off when she says
    > that the word she hadn't finished saying in her testimony to the
    > Commission [... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ... "dissec-" ...] was just her
    > having the hiccups. It suits these talking monkeys to lie when they
    > feel the need to do so.
    >
    > They have an overwhelming compulsion to lie about this so-called 500-
    > year period: they don't want Hasslein to think that in just 18 years
    > the Ape Revolt is gonna precipitate the Nuke War that'll wipe out Man's
    > civilization. They don't want him to know that the leader of that
    > revolt will NOT be an ape named "Aldo" living some 500 years in the
    > Future, but will instead be an ape named "Caesar" who is currently
    > gestating in Zira's womb. In order to protect their unborn son, they
    > lie about the half-a-millennium that Man supposedly has left to lord it
    > over their soon-to-be enslaved Ape lessers. And Cornelius names "Aldo"
    > as the Ape to be watched out for because he doesn't want his own
    > grandson to be murdered by him. Cornelius wants to change that one
    > thing about the Future -- the fate of his eponymous grandson -- but he
    > doesn't want the prevent the Fall of Man and the Rise of the Apes,
    > a "historical" event that he now WANTS to happen, since his own family
    > will be the RULING family of that original Ape society.
    >
    > Cornelius could only hope that Hasslein had forgotten all about
    > that "nearly 2,000 years" line earlier. How can the 1st talking ape
    > show up 500 years into the Future -- which is only 1,500 years or so
    > before the 3955 year of Doomsday -- if English had been handed down
    > from father-to-son for "nearly 2,000 years"?
    >
    > Cornelius knew damned well that talking apes would "turn the tables" on
    > Man in the next generation -- NOT as far away as 500 years later. But
    > he and Zira wanted Hasslein to falsely believe they had that much time
    > left.
    >
    > "How much time has the world got?!" Hasslein later rants. If he only
    > remembered Cornelius' testimony to the Commission and subtracted
    > that "nearly 2,000 years" period from the EARTH-TIME "date meter"
    > record of "3955" ("A.D., presumably"), then he would have a pretty good
    > idea of how much time the world had left before Apes took over the
    > reins of civilization from Man.
    >
    > NOT NEARLY ENOUGH!
    >
    > The timeline did NOT change. Cornelius lied about it, just as Zira lied
    > about her 'hiccups'. Just as he had lied earlier, when he claimed he
    > hadn't known Colonel Taylor. He's not above lying when he has a
    > compelling reason to do so. Those who insist on a "changed" timeline
    > believe Cornelius would NEVER EVER EVER tell a lie, like he's George
    > Freakin' Washington twiddlin' his thumbs by the chopped-down cherry
    > tree, and they're just plain wrong. The facts -- the details --
    > of "ESCAPE" prove otherwise.
    >
    > And Dehn himself never was into this changing-of-timelines notion,
    > either. He has Hasslein CLAIMING that it's possible -- even if ever
    > more improbable, if action isn't taken -- to change the Future, to
    > change lanes on that Freeway of Time. But Dehn ended "ESCAPE" knowing
    > that there would undoubtedly be a 4th Apes film, and he purposely
    > arranged it so that the son of Cornelius and Zira would be the
    > protagonist of that story -- a story which would see the fulfilment of
    > the major details of the Future History that Cornelius laid out for
    > Hasslein (the Plague... Apes as Pets... Apes as Slaves... the Apes
    > turning the tables... an ape named "Aldo"...), but NOT in the 500-year
    > period Cornelius and Zira had lied about. Rather, Apes become enslaved
    > and wage their Revolt LESS THAN A DECADE after the Plague wipes out the
    > dogs and cats. That alone proves that Cornelius was either knowingly
    > LYING about the Future's timeline or he was unwittingly MISTAKEN about
    > it (as Ty implies). I think the irreconcilable discrepancy between
    > Cornelius' TWO timelines given in "ESCAPE" prove that he had to have
    > known that ONE of those two was bogus. The unfolding of the story
    > of "CONQUEST" proves that it was the later timeframe (500-years) that
    > was the bogus one.
    >
    > The existence of other talking apes -- apes unrelated to the Ape-
    > onauts -- proves that there were talking apes on Earth even as
    > Cornelius and Zira were publicly believed to be the only ones able to
    > do so. Mandemus was OLDER than Caesar; he had to have been conceived
    > YEARS before the Ape-onauts landed off the coast of California.
    > Hasslein was worried about the possibility of Cornelius and Zira and
    > their unborn child interbreeding with primitive apes and producing the
    > race of intelligent apes that would one day flourish (and wage a war
    > culminating in Doomsday by 3955). But he was short-sighted. Cornelius
    > and Zira referred to the gorillas and orangutans in their testimony to
    > the Commission. Zira referred to gorillas during her sodium pentothal-
    > induced testimony at Camp Eleven. Did Hasslein think that Cornelius and
    > Zira (and their unborn child) would go gallivanting around,
    > impregnating (or being impregnated by) gorillas and orangutans, as well
    > as chimpanzees? How does Hasslein account for the existence of talking
    > gorillas and orangutans in the Future? He DOESN'T. He fixates on these
    > talking chimpanzees, and foolishly hopes that by killing THEM he'll be
    > preventing ALL apes from ever superceding Mankind as King of the Heap.
    > Hasslein, in his own way, was a short-sighted fool.
    >
    > Dehn was making a SINGLE circular timeline -- the final screenplay
    > of "BATTLE" includes his final touches, the Corringtons
    > notwithstanding. Dehn knew that Cornelius and Zira were lying about
    > that 500-year period; he himself wrote Cornelius' earlier line, "nearly
    > 2,000 years". His intention was to make it a vicious circle, with only
    > the "hope" that the circle could be broken. Definitely not the
    > CERTAINTY that it either COULD or WAS broken.
    >
    >
    Patrick


    -- <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34497 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: The Icarus
    .html
    .html

    I have a model of the POTA ship (quite rare – the first one ever sold) named ICARUS.

     

    I know there is a web site dedicated to the ship that uses the name ICARUS.

     

    Where does this name come from?!?!?!

    Michael

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34498 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: "Revolution on the POTA"
    .html
    .html
      H  A  P  P  Y     N  E  W     Y  E  A  R  !  !  !
     
      No better way to start a year than to have an ape revolution. Hope it's a real revolution and not a skirmish. That depends how much attention this comic book gets, and it won't be easy. My local comic shop ordered it for me but they decided not to order any extras because they didn't think it would sell. Of all things, the owner is an "Apes" fan. He grew up making the model kits. But he only orders extras if at least 4 of his subscribers order the book (one subscriber did). He said he was looking forward to the Tim Burton movie but it was terrible and killed the franchise (but the poor sales of the POTA2001 comic didn't seem to weigh in the decision).
      Well, that's not good. The only way this comic is going to build is if there's copies in stores for people to see, maybe look at, and buy. I NEVER buy comic books, except POTA ones. They just don't interest me. But I do visit comic shops for other things - - magazines, collectibles. If I wasn't part of these groups I wouldn't know this comic existed, and I certainly wouldn't know it from visiting a comic shop. I think this comic's audience is more POTA fans, movie fans, sci-fi fans, and pop culture fans than comic book fans (the talk in the shop was the new issue of "Wolverine", go figure). How to get the word around? And how to get POTA out of the dumps? Dunno. I'm considering buying some extra issues and just giving them to the store to display and sell. But that could start a bad precedent (no George W., I'm not talking about you). Ultimately, why should I be doing Fox's job for them? They don't know how to run their own franchise, they're too busy promoting, well, Wolverine.
      Anyway, on to the comic book. Maybe it's coming at a good time as Fox releases the sequels on DVD early this year. It picks up right where "Conquest" left off. In fact there's two separate stories here, both "Conquest" based. I enjoyed both and I think most fans will, except for small details that will divide them. Some fans are already complaining that it sets "Conquest" in San Diego (why? Don't know. Maybe because it's the home of the Mother of comic cons; that's one way to score points with the comic book crowd). The "Conquest" novelization set it in San Fran. Some fans think it should be set on the East Coast. Personally, I can just go with the flow.
      Another thing is the creators come down squarely on a "circular" timeline. I'm with the folks who think "Escape" sets in motion a new timeline, that things won't go in a circle with things ending up as they did in the first two movies. Again, I can go with the flow while enjoying this comic. There's nothing in this issue that specifically lauds a circle but that's the creators' stated opinion and it might become more defined later (actually, exploring this might make a good topic for a comic book story) . I did like that the issue begins by explaining what happened in the first four movies to bring newbies up to date, with pictures of Zira and Taylor's ship to remind us of the iconic value of the story. Also, Taylor's ship is called the Icarus. I think that's the first time that name has been used in an "official" story (whether this story is "canon" is up to each fan but it is official). That's fine, that's what it's come to be called but it's a controversial name. Some might notice the comic begins by misquoting Caesar (inverts "fire" and "smoke" in a famous line; a minor quibble).
      One last thing that might divide fans is the use of "in jokes". Some feel that detracts from a story; it was a big complaint with POTA2001. People like Arthur Jacobs, Natalie Trundy, MacDonald actor Hari Rhodes get tributes here. The President wears the initials P.O.T.U.S (President of the United States) which reminds of POTA. And Breck gets a first name that might not be to everyone's tastes (I don't remember if he had a first name elsewhere). I don't mind these tributes but there seemed to be too many in one issue. Ultimately it's the creators' comic and it must be their vision. We're along for the ride so give them a break.
      The important thing is the main storytelling. Does it hold up? Hard to tell. It's just getting started. It reminded me a lot of the Adventure comics (gulp!) in story and artwork. That's not necessarily a bad thing, there were good Adventure stories too, in my opinion. They even did a "Conquest" story. It's too soon to tell where this is going to go, there's just enough time to get us up to speed on what happened in "Conquest". As a first issue I enjoyed it. I can see where this could go well with current politics. A president who has the media under his thumb, who's using his position to further his own agenda? Couldn't happen. It's just a start but I'm excited by what a new POTA comic could be. For myself, the best part was the mysterious nature of new characters like Chris Leung and Dr. Reich.
      There's also a few pages of a journal by Caesar, my favorite part of Issue # 1, which brings up the docile nature of gorillas and how they are different in POTA. There's also a short "back up" story that's good. I especially enjoyed the unique artwork of this story, which reminded me of the classic "Dark Knight Returns" (told you my comic book expertise was limited). I like that the comic is giving a mix of writers and artists even in one issue. That's a good idea.
      And a little plug for the publisher, Mr. Comics. I enjoyed the ads for their upcoming titles. I assume their character "Hoverboy" is new but their ad pretends he's been around a while, even showing him in a mock up of an old "Gold Key" comic. And they have an upcoming comic called "Big Max", about a gorilla superhero, it looks like. Appropriate.
      Finally, they already have a 2 page letter column. Good stuff. It says Ed Gross wrote a book called "Inside the POTA". Never heard of it. Is it upcoming?
      I've got my nitpicks like everyone else, but I had a blast with issue # 1 of "Revolution" and I thank Mr. Comics and Ty for picking up the 'Apes" ball and running with it. I hope it works out.  - - - Jeff
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34499 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 12:13:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:


    Who's to say that the Mutants in "BATTLE" didn't eventually make use
    of Tunneling Machines, then? They HAD to have made use of them while
    in New York City's ruins -- we can SEE the results of their work. The
    next big question is: Might they not have TUNNELED their way to New
    York City from some other region? Even one as far away as California?

    Why not?


    Why not?  Because it's stupid!

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34500 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 1:00:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:


    The timeline didn't change.


    YES, IT DID!!!!  Stop pulling a Cornelius here, Patrick, and telling lies!

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34501 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 4:36:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


    Do you think "resent" might be a more accurate word than "despise" Rory?




    You're right, "resent" is a better word.  I plan to watch all the sequels again in a marathon after they come out on DVD at the end of March, but I'm not sure how much I'll enjoy them.

    It'll be sort of like when I ever watch an episode of the POTA TV show -- which is damn rarely.  I just have to divorce it from the original film and think of it as something totally separate, otherwise they just bug me too much.

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34502 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Width of a Circle
    .html
    .html.html Dehn was making a SINGLE circular timeline -- the final screenplay of "BATTLE" includes his final touches, the Corringtons notwithstanding. Dehn knew that Cornelius and Zira were lying about that 500-year period; he himself wrote Cornelius' earlier line, "nearly 2,000 years". His intention was to make it a vicious circle, with only the "hope" that the circle could be broken. Definitely not the CERTAINTY that it either COULD or WAS broken.
    Patrick


    You're just a stuck-in-a-loop "Dehnophile," Patrick!
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34503 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    .html
    In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:10:13 P.M. Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
      Blah! Blah! Blah! You'll never convince me.
     
    Word
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34504 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: Speaking of BANANAS.......
    .html
    .html
    In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:33:34 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
    And….is that a banana in your trousers or are you just loathing and detesting me?!?!?!?
     
    Should be the other way around.
     
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34505 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Icarus
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 4:39:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


    I know there is a web site dedicated to the ship that uses the name ICARUS.




    Where does this name come from?!?!?!

    Michael




    I don't know, it's all Greek to me!

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34506 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The sequel DVDs
    .html
     .html
     Since there hasn't been much word on the new DVDs I have a feeling they'll be the same old ones we already have - - maybe anamorphic - - released individually, since they've only been available in the box set before. If that's the case I'll just skip them and do what Rory says: Think 40th. - - - Jeff
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 2:40 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Ape - EAL

    In a message dated 1/1/06 4:36:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


    Do you think "resent" might be a more accurate word than "despise" Rory?




    You're right, "resent" is a better word.  I plan to watch all the sequels again in a marathon after they come out on DVD at the end of March, but I'm not sure how much I'll enjoy them.

    It'll be sort of like when I ever watch an episode of the POTA TV show -- which is damn rarely.  I just have to divorce it from the original film and think of it as something totally separate, otherwise they just bug me too much.

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34507 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 5:48:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:


    In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:10:13 P.M. Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:

      Blah! Blah! Blah! You'll never convince me.




    Word


    I just thought of another one...

    Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!   Ha! Ha! Ha!

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34508 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The sequel DVDs
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 5:56:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:


    Since there hasn't been much word on the new DVDs I have a feeling they'll be the same old ones we already have - - maybe anamorphic - - released individually, since they've only been available in the box set before. If that's the case I'll just skip them and do what Rory says: Think 40th. - - - Jeff


    Oh, if they're not anamorphic then Fox better not plan on selling many.  I'm pretty sure they'll be anamorphic, which doesn't mean anything if you haven't gotten a 16x9 TV yet, but I'm not holding my breath for many extras -- if any.

    I'm still "Thinking 40th" though, and my thinking now is that the 40th Anniversary DVD box set will by High Definition DVDs, probably for Christmas 2008.  Start saving your money.

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34509 From: Neil Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Haristas@a... wrote:
    > I just thought of another one...
    > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!! Ha! Ha! Ha!

    -- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
    have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.

    For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
    the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
    see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
    timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?

    Neil.
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34510 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
    .html
    Hello,

    This email message is a notification to let you know that
    a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
    group.

    File : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 18.jpg
    Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
    Description : Scroll 18

    You can access this file at the URL:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%20Musings/UMM%2018.jpg

    To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
    http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

    Regards,

    munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34511 From: Neil Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow
    .html
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Haristas@a... wrote:
    > Why not? Because it's stupid!

    -- Didn't they use tunnels under the city for all the ground transport
    and deliveries in Conquest?

    Neil
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34512 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 6:55:44 PM Eastern Standard Time, nfoster@... writes:


    For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
    the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
    see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
    timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?

    Neil.


    You believe in a circular timeline too?!!!!   Oh, my God, the plague is spreading.  It's a walking pestilence!
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34513 From: Neil Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Haristas@a... wrote:
    >You believe in a circular timeline too?!!!! Oh, my God, the plague
    is spreading. It's a walking pestilence!

    -- Yep! I also like to tie the TV series into the same (circular)
    timeline as the movies. (gulp!) ;-)

    Neil
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34514 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: Tunnels and Ape Chow
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 7:12:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, nfoster@... writes:


    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
    > Why not?  Because it's stupid!

    -- Didn't they use tunnels under the city for all the ground transport
    and deliveries in Conquest?

    Neil


    It's one thing to talk about tunnels that are there before the Great Nuke War, it's another to propose that the mutants constructed vast tunnels after everything was destroyed.  I would think mutants had enough problems just being mutants much less getting involved in urban planning.  Jeez!!!

    Let's keep it real and not go the way of Roswell Aliens.

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34515 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 7:18:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, nfoster@... writes:


    -- Yep! I also like to tie the TV series into the same (circular)
    timeline as the movies. (gulp!) ;-)

    Neil


    And don't forget the cartoon series and those original Marvel comics stories, and of course POTA2001.  It's all part of THE GREAT LOOP!

    Where's an Alpha/Omega bomb when I really need one?

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34516 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Icarus
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:39:42 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

    Where does this name come from?!?!?!


    Didn't some fan give it that tag in the 70's?
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34517 From: ron kenner Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    hi-
    the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
    rob/ron

    Neil <nfoster@...> wrote:
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
    > I just thought of another one...
    > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!   Ha! Ha! Ha!

    -- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
    have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.

    For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
    the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
    see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
    timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?

    Neil.





    SPONSORED LINKS
    Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction book club
    Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science fiction



    Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
     
     
    go vegetarian!


    Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less

    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34518 From: Ty Templeton Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Icarus
    .html
    I had the model myself, called the Icarus.  That's where I got the name.  I seem to remember it mentioned in the novelization of Beneath, but that might be my mind playing tricks, it's been years since I read the novelization.

    Anyway, I always called it the Icarus because of a model I had as a kid.  It might not be mentioned in the movies, but I always thought it was the official name.

    Ty the Guy

    On 1/1/06, mlccougar@... < mlccougar@...> wrote:
    In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:39:42 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

    Where does this name come from?!?!?!


    Didn't some fan give it that tag in the 70's?


    YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34519 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 8:23:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, brindlepit2002@... writes:


    hi-
    the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
    rob/ron



    Hey, somebody else here has more than just monkeys on the brain!

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34520 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Icarus
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 9:12:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, tybunny@... writes:


    Anyway, I always called it the Icarus because of a model I had as a kid.  It might not be mentioned in the movies, but I always thought it was the official name.

    Ty the Guy


    It's the official "unofficial" name.  Nuff said.

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34521 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
    .html
    .html
    In a message dated 1/1/2006 5:57:22 P.M. Central Standard Time, PotaDG@yahoogroups.com writes:
    Uncle Manny's Musings
     
    I must disagree.
    For a copy of my
    award winning paper
    on the F word email me,
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34522 From: John Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: "Revolution on the POTA"
    .html
    Good Lord Patrick, you are quite the trend setter. Everyone is
    posting pages of dribble. Now if I can just get you all fighting and
    calling each other names. Mr. Spock was based on the sterotypical "in-
    the-closet" homosexual afraid to show his feelings and be thrown out
    of the starfleet away from his precious Captian Kirk. Don't ask,
    don't tell.



    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
    >
    > H A P P Y N E W Y E A R ! ! !
    >
    > No better way to start a year than to have an ape revolution.
    Hope it's a real revolution and not a skirmish. That depends how much
    attention this comic book gets, and it won't be easy. My local comic
    shop ordered it for me but they decided not to order any extras
    because they didn't think it would sell. Of all things, the owner is
    an "Apes" fan. He grew up making the model kits. But he only orders
    extras if at least 4 of his subscribers order the book (one
    subscriber did). He said he was looking forward to the Tim Burton
    movie but it was terrible and killed the franchise (but the poor
    sales of the POTA2001 comic didn't seem to weigh in the decision).
    > Well, that's not good. The only way this comic is going to build
    is if there's copies in stores for people to see, maybe look at, and
    buy. I NEVER buy comic books, except POTA ones. They just don't
    interest me. But I do visit comic shops for other things - -
    magazines, collectibles. If I wasn't part of these groups I wouldn't
    know this comic existed, and I certainly wouldn't know it from
    visiting a comic shop. I think this comic's audience is more POTA
    fans, movie fans, sci-fi fans, and pop culture fans than comic book
    fans (the talk in the shop was the new issue of "Wolverine", go
    figure). How to get the word around? And how to get POTA out of the
    dumps? Dunno. I'm considering buying some extra issues and just
    giving them to the store to display and sell. But that could start a
    bad precedent (no George W., I'm not talking about you). Ultimately,
    why should I be doing Fox's job for them? They don't know how to run
    their own franchise, they're too busy promoting, well, Wolverine.
    > Anyway, on to the comic book. Maybe it's coming at a good time as
    Fox releases the sequels on DVD early this year. It picks up right
    where "Conquest" left off. In fact there's two separate stories here,
    both "Conquest" based. I enjoyed both and I think most fans will,
    except for small details that will divide them. Some fans are already
    complaining that it sets "Conquest" in San Diego (why? Don't know.
    Maybe because it's the home of the Mother of comic cons; that's one
    way to score points with the comic book crowd). The "Conquest"
    novelization set it in San Fran. Some fans think it should be set on
    the East Coast. Personally, I can just go with the flow.
    > Another thing is the creators come down squarely on a "circular"
    timeline. I'm with the folks who think "Escape" sets in motion a new
    timeline, that things won't go in a circle with things ending up as
    they did in the first two movies. Again, I can go with the flow while
    enjoying this comic. There's nothing in this issue that specifically
    lauds a circle but that's the creators' stated opinion and it might
    become more defined later (actually, exploring this might make a good
    topic for a comic book story) . I did like that the issue begins by
    explaining what happened in the first four movies to bring newbies up
    to date, with pictures of Zira and Taylor's ship to remind us of the
    iconic value of the story. Also, Taylor's ship is called the Icarus.
    I think that's the first time that name has been used in
    an "official" story (whether this story is "canon" is up to each fan
    but it is official). That's fine, that's what it's come to be called
    but it's a controversial name. Some might notice the comic begins by
    misquoting Caesar (inverts "fire" and "smoke" in a famous line; a
    minor quibble).
    > One last thing that might divide fans is the use of "in jokes".
    Some feel that detracts from a story; it was a big complaint with
    POTA2001. People like Arthur Jacobs, Natalie Trundy, MacDonald actor
    Hari Rhodes get tributes here. The President wears the initials
    P.O.T.U.S (President of the United States) which reminds of POTA. And
    Breck gets a first name that might not be to everyone's tastes (I
    don't remember if he had a first name elsewhere). I don't mind these
    tributes but there seemed to be too many in one issue. Ultimately
    it's the creators' comic and it must be their vision. We're along for
    the ride so give them a break.
    > The important thing is the main storytelling. Does it hold up?
    Hard to tell. It's just getting started. It reminded me a lot of the
    Adventure comics (gulp!) in story and artwork. That's not necessarily
    a bad thing, there were good Adventure stories too, in my opinion.
    They even did a "Conquest" story. It's too soon to tell where this is
    going to go, there's just enough time to get us up to speed on what
    happened in "Conquest". As a first issue I enjoyed it. I can see
    where this could go well with current politics. A president who has
    the media under his thumb, who's using his position to further his
    own agenda? Couldn't happen. It's just a start but I'm excited by
    what a new POTA comic could be. For myself, the best part was the
    mysterious nature of new characters like Chris Leung and Dr. Reich.
    > There's also a few pages of a journal by Caesar, my favorite part
    of Issue # 1, which brings up the docile nature of gorillas and how
    they are different in POTA. There's also a short "back up" story
    that's good. I especially enjoyed the unique artwork of this story,
    which reminded me of the classic "Dark Knight Returns" (told you my
    comic book expertise was limited). I like that the comic is giving a
    mix of writers and artists even in one issue. That's a good idea.
    > And a little plug for the publisher, Mr. Comics. I enjoyed the
    ads for their upcoming titles. I assume their character "Hoverboy" is
    new but their ad pretends he's been around a while, even showing him
    in a mock up of an old "Gold Key" comic. And they have an upcoming
    comic called "Big Max", about a gorilla superhero, it looks like.
    Appropriate.
    > Finally, they already have a 2 page letter column. Good stuff. It
    says Ed Gross wrote a book called "Inside the POTA". Never heard of
    it. Is it upcoming?
    > I've got my nitpicks like everyone else, but I had a blast with
    issue # 1 of "Revolution" and I thank Mr. Comics and Ty for picking
    up the 'Apes" ball and running with it. I hope it works out. - - -
    Jeff
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34523 From: John Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    Neil, you big jerk! Stop being rational and call Rory some kind
    of "schoolyard kid" name and join in the fun. You adults are no fun
    at all. Stop growing up and regress with the rest of us. You big
    hippy doo doo head.



    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil" <nfoster@h...> wrote:
    >
    > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
    > > I just thought of another one...
    > > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!! Ha! Ha! Ha!
    >
    > -- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
    > have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.
    >
    > For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
    > the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really
    don't
    > see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
    > timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?
    >
    > Neil.
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34524 From: John Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
    .html
    Neil!!! I'm shocked ...and very proud of you, er. uh. Uncle Manny.



    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, PotaDG@yahoogroups.com wrote:
    >
    >
    > Hello,
    >
    > This email message is a notification to let you know that
    > a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
    > group.
    >
    > File : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 18.jpg
    > Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@h...>
    > Description : Scroll 18
    >
    > You can access this file at the URL:
    > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%
    20Musings/UMM%2018.jpg
    >
    > To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
    > http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > munkeyman63au <nfoster@h...>
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34525 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: The Circle JERK!
    .html
    .html

    Oh who cares – tell me anyway!

     

    Is it a group of guys getting in a circle and wanking?

     

    We have a version of this party trick in Australia that involves SAO biscuits!  These are like water crackers… sorta….

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron kenner
    Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The Circle

     

    hi-

    the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.

    rob/ron

    Neil <nfoster@...> wrote:

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
    > I just thought of another one...
    > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!   Ha! Ha! Ha!

    -- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
    have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.

    For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
    the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
    see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
    timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?

    Neil.


    -- <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34526 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
    .html
    .html

    Bring it on Uncle Manny!

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
    Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 1:25 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] New file uploaded to PotaDG

     

    In a message dated 1/1/2006 5:57:22 P.M. Central Standard Time, PotaDG@yahoogroups.com writes:

    Uncle Manny's Musings

     

    I must disagree.

    For a copy of my

    award winning paper

    on the F word email me,

     

     


    --
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34527 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
    .html
    .html

    No shit?

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
    Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 1:56 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG

     

    Neil!!! I'm shocked ...and very proud of you, er. uh. Uncle Manny.



    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, PotaDG@yahoogroups.com wrote:
    >
    >
    > Hello,
    >
    > This email message is a notification to let you know that
    > a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
    > group.
    >
    >   File        : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 18.jpg
    >   Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@h...>
    >   Description : Scroll 18
    >
    > You can access this file at the URL:
    > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%
    20Musings/UMM%2018.jpg
    >
    > To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
    > http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    >
    munkeyman63au <nfoster@h...>


    -- <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34528 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
    .html
    .html
    In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:59:11 A.M. Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
    Three hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver
    Stone's "JFK" have I seen a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen
    movies that are only 1 and a half to 2 hours long seem to take
    forever to end. Not this one, though.
     
    Okay, now I know time is relative.  There must be a movie goers hell  
    where Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first
    mates speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the
    captain vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying this.
     
    Oh, and you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?
    Jim Garrison was a crackpot.  And even though Kim's career
    suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
    McCarthy to keep the commies in check.  I swear, at the height
    of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
    WWII.  I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34529 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Birthday Reminder
    .html
    .html
    Birthday Reminder from the Calendar of PotaDG
    Jason Evers' Birthday

    Monday January 2, 2006
    All Day
    This event repeats every year.

    Notes:
    Happy Birthday Jason!

    Yahoo! Greetings
    Send a Yahoo! Greeting
    Find Gifts
    Browse Yahoo! Shopping's Gift Guide

    click here


    Copyright ©  2006  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34530 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: Caesar's Breeding Annex chimpette
    .html
    .html
    In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:12:24 A.M. Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
    Oxfordian
    Oxfordian? 
     
    Raison d'etre?
     
    Here's a $10 word for you . . . Pretentious
     
    Interviewer:  Beavis, what is you raison d'etre?
     
    Beavis:  Uhhhhh . . . It's in my pants. hehehehe
     
     
     
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34531 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Communism (OT)
    .html
    .html

    Communism is really very similar to Christianity you know…..

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
    Sent:
    Monday, 2 January 2006 3:46 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)

     

    In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:59:11 A.M. Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:

    Three hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver
    Stone's "JFK" have I seen a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen
    movies that are only 1 and a half to 2 hours long seem to take
    forever to end. Not this one, though.

     

    Okay, now I know time is relative.  There must be a movie goers hell  

    where Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first

    mates speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the

    captain vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying this.

     

    Oh, and you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?

    Jim Garrison was a crackpot.  And even though Kim's career

    suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like

    McCarthy to keep the commies in check.  I swear, at the height

    of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during

    WWII.  I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.

     

     


    --
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34532 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
    .html
    .html
    In a message dated 1/1/2006 11:33:42 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

    Communism is really very similar to Christianity you know…..

     
    In what way?
    Oh, you mean millions killed in the name of a lofty ideal?
    Yeah, I guess it is.
     
    Write us a Pat length post on Marxism, Mike.
     
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34533 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/1/2006
    Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
    .html
    .html

    Nah – I was thinking ideology.

     

    You know – share the wealth, everyone gets something…..

     

    It is flawed, as is capitalism.

     

    I wonder if you could have voluntary Communism – that might be nice – or is that called being a hippy?

     

    Or maybe anarchy?

    Michael

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
    Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 4:50 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Communism (OT)

     

    In a message dated 1/1/2006 11:33:42 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

    Communism is really very similar to Christianity you know…..

     

    In what way?

    Oh, you mean millions killed in the name of a lofty ideal?

    Yeah, I guess it is.

     

    Write us a Pat length post on Marxism, Mike.


    -- <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34534 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
    Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
    .html
    .html
    In a message dated 1/1/2006 11:57:57 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

    Nah – I was thinking ideology.

     

    You know – share the wealth, everyone gets something…..

    Yes, if you're a party official.
    Then you get a big house and a big car.
    Of course to support you in that lifestyle
    a few thousand of the "people" must eat
    sawdust.  But what the hell. you can't have
    the "officials" looking bad in front of the capitalists.
     

    It is flawed, as is capitalism.

    And capitalism is flawed, how exactly?
    You have something better, maybe?
    Personally, I can't really think of a
    better way then letting the market
    decide what things are worth.
    However I think I did get ripped
    off on some of my POTA stuff.
    But I was willing to pay it, so . . .
    My bad.

    I wonder if you could have voluntary Communism – that might be nice – or is that called being a hippy?

     Yes, the commune . . . where the lice are free!  From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.  Oh and I need a big house and a big car, and I'm not able to do anything to earn it, so I need the rest of you to work for it for me.  Thanks!  I know there are a lot of liberals on this group.  But unless you insist on going through life with blinders on, you need to read a book called "Do As I Say" and see just what folks like Teddy and Babs are really up to.  For example, Michael Moore owns stock in Halliburton.

     

    Or maybe anarchy?

    I like anarchy.  Another great idea -- which, like communism, doesn't work in the real world.
     
     
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34535 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
    Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/1/06 11:47:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:


    And even though Kim's career
    suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
    McCarthy to keep the commies in check.  I swear, at the height
    of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
    WWII.  I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.


    Oh no!  Here comes crazy, right-wing T out of the cornfield!  Shoot him fast.

    Joe McCarthy was a creep and a monster.  Watch James Gregory play his type of moron in THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE.  You should be ashamed of yourself, T.  Kim Hunter is spinning in her grave!

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34536 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
    Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/2/06 12:33:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


    Communism is really very similar to Christianity you know…..






    Yeah, they're both for morons!

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34537 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
    Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/2/06 4:33:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:


    And capitalism is flawed, how exactly?

    Take a look at our consumer-driven economy, T.  The message: Be happy and consume.  Consume, consume.

    If everyone stopped consuming, our economy would collapse, you right-winger, T!

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34538 From: ron kenner Date: 1/2/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
    .html
    it doesnt need to be a perfect circle, but yes, a group "wank."

    Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:
    Oh who cares – tell me anyway!
     
    Is it a group of guys getting in a circle and wanking?
     
    We have a version of this party trick in Australia that involves SAO biscuits!  These are like water crackers…sorta….
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron kenner
    Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The Circle
     
    hi-
    the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
    rob/ron

    Neil <nfoster@...> wrote:
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
    > I just thought of another one...
    > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!   Ha! Ha! Ha!

    -- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
    have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.

    For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
    the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
    see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
    timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?

    Neil.


    Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
     
     
    go vegetarian!


    Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34539 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 1/2/06 10:20:14 AM Eastern Standard Time, brindlepit2002@... writes:


    it doesnt need to be a perfect circle, but yes, a group "wank."



    Much like Patrick's posts, masturbatory.

    -- Rory
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34540 From: ron kenner Date: 1/2/2006
    Subject: Re: The Circle
    .html
    well, sometimes my monkey is bad and must be spanked

    Haristas@... wrote:
    In a message dated 1/1/06 8:23:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, brindlepit2002@... writes:


    hi-
    the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
    rob/ron



    Hey, somebody else here has more than just monkeys on the brain!

    -- Rory



    Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
     
     
    go vegetarian!


    Yahoo! Shopping
    Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 34541 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 1/2/2006
    Subject: Bizarro Apes
    .html
    Attachments :
      Been meaning to post this for a while....independent
      comic strip "Bizarro"......

      Tim



      __________________________________________
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34542 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
      .html
      .html
         Yeah, communists. Just like there's a "terrorist" under every rock now. Maybe even...T! I always wondered about him. If you're a real American, let me hear you sing the "Star Spangled Banner". No, right now! No cheating. - - - a Real American
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 8:46 PM
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)

      In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:59:11 A.M. Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
      Three hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver
      Stone's "JFK" have I seen a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen
      movies that are only 1 and a half to 2 hours long seem to take
      forever to end. Not this one, though.
       
      Okay, now I know time is relative.  There must be a movie goers hell  
      where Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first
      mates speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the
      captain vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying this.
       
      Oh, and you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?
      Jim Garrison was a crackpot.  And even though Kim's career
      suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
      McCarthy to keep the commies in check.  I swear, at the height
      of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
      WWII.  I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34543 From: taebokitti@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:42:43 AM Pacific Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
      In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
      These stories were written for kids.
       
      Of course . . .
       
      Once upon a time . . .
      there was a planet ruled by Apes
      And Men were enslaved.  And they
      cut out your brain and cut off your
      balls.  Then it blew up.  The End.
      Pleasant dreams.
       
      But the world wasn't totally destoyed, a group of apes and humans who survived the bombing, decided to live in peace together. They combined their meager resources and intelligence. As the centuries progressed, many cures for diseases were discovered through apes and humans working together. Eventually, a utopian society was formed and when a race of hostile aliens invaded the planet, the apes and humans kicked the shit out of them. Okay, who is next? Elaine
       


      YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34544 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
      .html
      .html
        Our economy has already collapsed. The only thing propping us up is loans from Japan. Plus they have the best POTA stuff. - - - Jeff
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:01 AM
      Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Communism (OT)

      In a message dated 1/2/06 4:33:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:


      And capitalism is flawed, how exactly?

      Take a look at our consumer-driven economy, T.  The message: Be happy and consume.  Consume, consume.

      If everyone stopped consuming, our economy would collapse, you right-winger, T!

      -- Rory
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34545 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
      .html
      .html
        Really? I thought it was guys in a circle watching Steve Martin movies. - - - Jeff
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: ron kenner
      Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:14 AM
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle JERK!

      it doesnt need to be a perfect circle, but yes, a group "wank."

      Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:
      Oh who cares – tell me anyway!
       
      Is it a group of guys getting in a circle and wanking?
       
      We have a version of this party trick in Australia that involves SAO biscuits!  These are like water crackers…sorta….
       
      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron kenner
      Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23 PM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The Circle
       
      hi-
      the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
      rob/ron

      Neil <nfoster@...> wrote:
      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
      > I just thought of another one...
      > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!   Ha! Ha! Ha!

      -- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
      have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.

      For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
      the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
      see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
      timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?

      Neil.


      --
      Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
       
       
      go vegetarian!


      Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34546 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 1/2/2006 8:53:45 A.M. Central Standard Time, Haristas@... writes:
      Joe McCarthy was a creep and a monster.
       
      Kim, God love her, was a bit of a free spirit. And her politics were whatever the norm was for actors, leaning left, mostly.  The one thing you could say for Joe McCarthy is you knew where he stood.  What I don't like is people who pretend to be something other than what they are.  And I'm not right-wing.  I'm independent.  But one thing I'm not in unamerican. And most leftist, though they won't admit it, even to themselves, are.  Here's why . . . .
       
      They profess ideals that, if forced on them, they would consider oppressive.  They do not practice what they preach, quite the opposite, in fact.  And their stance on these issues is the height of hypocrisy. Here's an example: Rosie O'Donnell is for gun control. So much so that she wanted to have actors dressed as Zira and Cornelius picket outside Heston's
      house.  And yet her bodyguards carry firearms.  In other words she wants to have something that  she would deny to the average citizen.  Just like the communist, she preaches one thing but practices something wholly other. That's something I hate.  And it's not limited to the far left.  The far right is just as bad.  They thump their bibles and profess to be "good Christians" and yet they judge people and judge them harshly.  And yet one of the main rules is Judge Not Lest Ye Be Judged, etc . . . Did anyone see that crazy lady on Wife Swap?  Then you know what I mean.  I think anyone should be allowed to spout whatever shite pops into their heads, but . . . and this is the test, they have to back up what they say with logic and facts -- and not made up statistics and bad science.  An your rights end where the next person's begin. 
       
      Remember, I'm not right-wing.   I'm a Radical Moderate.  Death To Extremists!  But perhaps that's too extreme.  ; )
       
      I practice Tiiism.  Or rather I try to.  There are only four rules . . .
       
      Rule # 1.  Drink More Tea
      Rule # 2. Treat Your Planet Like You Brush Your Teeth With It, because you do.
      Rule # 3. Treat Others Like They Are Your Relatives, because they are.
      And last but not least . . .
      Rule # 4.  You Do NOT Talk About Fight Club.
       
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34547 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 1/2/2006 9:09:55 A.M. Central Standard Time, Haristas@... writes:
      you right-winger, T!
      And you don't consume? You hypocrite, Rory.
       
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34548 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
      .html
      .html

      And go visit those poor homeless bastards on the street.

       

      I bet if they weren’t brainwashed about “the C word” they would think communism is just fine!

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
      Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 2:01 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Communism (OT)

       

      In a message dated 1/2/06 4:33:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:



      And capitalism is flawed, how exactly?


      Take a look at our consumer-driven economy, T.  The message: Be happy and consume.  Consume, consume.

      If everyone stopped consuming, our economy would collapse, you right-winger, T!

      -- Rory

      --
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34549 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: The Circle
      .html
      .html

      Well, y’know, if it gets outta line, then you gotta do……this is getting very silly!

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron kenner
      Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 3:39 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The Circle

       

      well, sometimes my monkey is bad and must be spanked

      Haristas@... wrote:

      In a message dated 1/1/06 8:23:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, brindlepit2002@... writes:



      hi-
      the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.
      rob/ron



      Hey, somebody else here has more than just monkeys on the brain!

      -- Rory

       

       

      Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:

       

       

      go vegetarian!


      Yahoo! Shopping
      Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping


      --
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34550 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
      .html
      Hello,

      This email message is a notification to let you know that
      a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
      group.

      File : /Within the Planet of the Apes/WPOTA 61.gif
      Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
      Description :

      You can access this file at the URL:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Within%20the%20Planet%20of%20the%20Apes/WPOTA%2061.gif

      To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
      http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

      Regards,

      munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34551 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
      .html
      .html

      We just brand Aussies so we can tell if they are real!

       

      If they are not branded, they need to be beer swilling racists.  The rest are just potential commies and terrorists!  You hear that BUSH!?

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
      Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 3:52 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)

       

         Yeah, communists. Just like there's a "terrorist" under every rock now. Maybe even...T! I always wondered about him. If you're a real American, let me hear you sing the "Star Spangled Banner". No, right now! No cheating. - - - a Real American

      ----- Original Message -----

      Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 8:46 PM

      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)

       

      In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:59:11 A.M. Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:

      Three hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver
      Stone's "JFK" have I seen a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen
      movies that are only 1 and a half to 2 hours long seem to take
      forever to end. Not this one, though.

       

      Okay, now I know time is relative.  There must be a movie goers hell  

      where Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first

      mates speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the

      captain vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying this.

       

      Oh, and you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?

      Jim Garrison was a crackpot.  And even though Kim's career

      suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like

      McCarthy to keep the commies in check.  I swear, at the height

      of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during

      WWII.  I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.

       


      --
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34552 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: Bizarro Apes
      .html
      .html

      Nice one Tim – THANKS!

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
      Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 3:48 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [PotaDG] Bizarro Apes

       

      Been meaning to post this for a while....independent
      comic strip "Bizarro"......

      Tim


      -- <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34553 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
      .html
      .html

      Hey – my Hillary Duff loving teenagers think Steve is just FINE!

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
      Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 4:07 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle JERK!

       

        Really? I thought it was guys in a circle watching Steve Martin movies. - - - Jeff

       

      ----- Original Message -----

      From: ron kenner

      Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:14 AM

      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle JERK!

       

      it doesnt need to be a perfect circle, but yes, a group "wank."

      Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:

      Oh who cares – tell me anyway!

       

      Is it a group of guys getting in a circle and wanking?

       

      We have a version of this party trick in Australia that involves SAO biscuits!  These are like water crackers…sorta….

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron kenner
      Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23 PM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The Circle

       

      hi-

      the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.

      rob/ron

      Neil <nfoster@...> wrote:

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
      > I just thought of another one...
      > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!   Ha! Ha! Ha!

      -- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
      have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.

      For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
      the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
      see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
      timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?

      Neil.



      --

       

       

      Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:

       

       

      go vegetarian!


      Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less


      --
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34554 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: Ape - EAL
      .html
      .html

      Ha ha ha ha !  You said “shit”!

      Butthead

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of taebokitti@...
      Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 3:59 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ape - EAL

       

      In a message dated 1/1/2006 3:42:43 AM Pacific Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:

      In a message dated 12/31/2005 7:56:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

      These stories were written for kids.

       

      Of course . . .

       

      Once upon a time . . .

      there was a planet ruled by Apes

      And Men were enslaved.  And they

      cut out your brain and cut off your

      balls.  Then it blew up.  The End.

      Pleasant dreams.

       

      But the world wasn't totally destoyed, a group of apes and humans who survived the bombing, decided to live in peace together. They combined their meager resources and intelligence. As the centuries progressed, many cures for diseases were discovered through apes and humans working together. Eventually, a utopian society was formed and when a race of hostile aliens invaded the planet, the apes and humans kicked the shit out of them. Okay, who is next? Elaine

       


      --
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34555 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Re: The Circle JERK!
      .html
      .html

      Or at least they will when they hit their teens!

       

      I really should read my posts before I send them……maybe I’m a communist!

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Whitty
      Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 7:48 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [PotaDG] The Circle JERK!

       

      Hey – my Hillary Duff loving teenagers think Steve is just FINE!

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
      Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 4:07 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle JERK!

       

        Really? I thought it was guys in a circle watching Steve Martin movies. - - - Jeff

       

      ----- Original Message -----

      From: ron kenner

      Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:14 AM

      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The Circle JERK!

       

      it doesnt need to be a perfect circle, but yes, a group "wank."

      Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:

      Oh who cares – tell me anyway!

       

      Is it a group of guys getting in a circle and wanking?

       

      We have a version of this party trick in Australia that involves SAO biscuits!  These are like water crackers…sorta….

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ron kenner
      Sent: Monday, 2 January 2006 12:23 PM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: The Circle

       

      hi-

      the term "circle jerk" is a play on words. what it means is likely not suitable for this list and may not have any meaning to non-american members.

      rob/ron

      Neil <nfoster@...> wrote:

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
      > I just thought of another one...
      > Patrick's just a circle jerk!!!   Ha! Ha! Ha!

      -- Gee that's nice. I too believe it is a circular timeline, always
      have. I don't consider myself a jerk though.

      For someone who has publicly admitted they don't very much like
      the 'sequels' and prefers Planet as a stand alone movie I really don't
      see why you would bother one way or the other with what sort of
      timeline is involved, it shouldn't really matter should it?

      Neil.



      --

       

       

      Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:

       

       

      go vegetarian!


      Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less


      --
      --
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 34556 From: Neil T Foster Date: 1/2/2006
      Subject: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #61
      .html
      Attachments :
        .html Message
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 34557 From: Neet-O-Rama Date: 1/2/2006
        Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
        .html
        .html
        >>>Here's an example: Rosie O'Donnell is for gun control.  And yet her bodyguards carry firearms.  In other words she wants to
        >>>have something that she would deny to the average
        citizen. 
         
        That is not hypocrisy that is honest to goodness reality.  That's right,  I want bodyguards and soldiers and police to have guns. In other words people who are not only versed and possess trained skills in handling a weapon but whose occupation actually necessitates these weapons. My goodness, you wouldn't hand an acetylene tank and torch to someone not skilled in welding would you? I do not want you or the average citizen to have a gun.  But if YOU insist on this bogus "right" to bear arms then I want some sort of government control over it.  I don't think any nabob with a thousand dollars in his pocket should be able to buy a gun anonymously! This is a no-brainer.  Every police commissioner of every municipality in America has called out for gun-control-- why is that?
         
        Why is OK to have control over who gets to drive in this nation but none exerted on guns?
         
        Sasha
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 34558 From: Michael Whitty Date: 1/2/2006
        Subject: Gun Control
        .html
        .html

        Sasha,

         

        You will NEVER sell T on guns my friend – he has all the answers his (extremist) friends at the NRA have laboured long and hard to provide.

         

        Michael

         

        -----Original Message-----
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neet-O-Rama
        Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2006 8:04 AM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)

         

        >>>Here's an example: Rosie O'Donnell is for gun control.  And yet her bodyguards carry firearms.  In other words she wants to >>>have something that she would deny to the average citizen. 

         

        That is not hypocrisy that is honest to goodness reality.  That's right,  I want bodyguards and soldiers and police to have guns. In other words people who are not only versed and possess trained skills in handling a weapon but whose occupation actually necessitates these weapons. My goodness, you wouldn't hand an acetylene tank and torch to someone not skilled in welding would you? I do not want you or the average citizen to have a gun.  But if YOU insist on this bogus "right" to bear arms then I want some sort of government control over it.  I don't think any nabob with a thousand dollars in his pocket should be able to buy a gun anonymously! This is a no-brainer.  Every police commissioner of every municipality in America has called out for gun-control-- why is that?

         

        Why is OK to have control over who gets to drive in this nation but none exerted on guns?

         

        Sasha


        -- <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 34559 From: Neil T Foster Date: 1/2/2006
        Subject: Revolution #1 comments.
        .html
        .html Message
        Anyone who has already read the first issue and is looking to send feedback apparently the email link given in the comic doesn't work. I just got this from the Mr. Comics web site:
         
        "Revolution went on sale yesterday, all over North America (and with luck, around the world) and now it's time for you guys to start yelling at us.
        Opinions, opinions, thoughts, and rants, are all welcome. Come one, come all. But here's the minor problem, the email address mentioned in the issue itself (mrcomics@...) is completely not working, and any mail sent there falls off the face of the Earth, into the cosmic ether. So for the meanwhile, posting to our message boards, or sending mail to:

        tybunny@...

        or

        ty@...

        gets directly into my email box, and I'll answer pretty well any and all letters personally.

        Can't wait to hear what you guys think of our work. It's been in our brains for months now, and we're dying to hear back.

        Ty the Guy."
         
        Just thought we might like to know this before we bombard them with emails telling them how much we love the new comic!
         
        Neil
         
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 34560 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
        Subject: Re: Within the Planet of the Apes strip #61
        .html
        Attachments :
          .html.html I wish I knew what was going on here.  When will this story be completed.  I'd rather wait and read the whole thing than have it in tiny bits.

          <.html
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34561 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
          Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
          .html
          .html.html In a message dated 1/2/06 2:56:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:


          The one thing you could say for Joe McCarthy is you knew where he stood.


          Yeah, in a huge pile of shit!  He was an alcoholic, wholly unethical political opportunist, and a creep!
          <.html
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34562 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
          Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
          .html
          .html
          In a message dated 1/2/2006 2:44:17 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
          I bet if they weren't brainwashed about "the C word" they would think communism is just fine
           
          There isn't a single communist government in the entire world.
          Viet Nam is close, but what Russia and China practice is not communism.
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34563 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/2/2006
          Subject: Re: King Kong 2005 (OT)
          .html
          .html
          In a message dated 1/2/2006 3:23:31 P.M. Central Standard Time, neetstuff@... writes:
          That is not hypocrisy that is honest to goodness reality.  That's right,  I want bodyguards and soldiers and police to have guns.
           
          I can't afford bodyguards.  I have to guard my own body. 
          Now if I want a permit to carry in public I have to take
          classes.  But just because you're trained doesn't mean
          your judgment is sound. I hear about police officers taking
          the law into their own hands, and even committing murder,
          all the time.  But you're never going to get all the guns out
          of the hands of people who should not  have them.  In fact
          if you try, you end up disarming more the law abiding citizens
          than criminals and lunatics.  So as long  as they're armed
          I intend to be for my own protection.  You may not have
          time for the police to protect you.  You may only have
          seconds, not minutes.  Ultimately, unless you have
          bodyguards, you are responsible for the safety of
          you and yours.   Of course that doesn't mean
          just because you have protection you will be
          safe.  Cornelius had a gun, but he wasn't
          security conscious and Zira was killed.
           
           
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34564 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 1/2/2006
          Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
          .html
          You're forgetting Cuba and North Korea which the latter is totally
          communist.

          -----Original Message-----
          From: LordTZer0@...
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Sent: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:29:11 EST
          Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Communism (OT)

          In a message dated 1/2/2006 2:44:17 P.M. Central Standard Time,
          whitty@... writes:
          I bet if they weren't brainwashed about "the C word" they would think
          communism is just fine


          There isn't a single communist government in the entire world.
          Viet Nam is close, but what Russia and China practice is not communism.



          SPONSORED LINKS
          Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction
          book club
          Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science
          fiction

          --------
          YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

          * Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.

          * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
          PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

          * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

          --------
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34565 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 1/2/2006
          Subject: Re: Communism (OT)
          .html
          North Korea isn't communist, it's psycho. Like POTA said, we'll destroy
          ourselves. Just give us time. - - - Jeff

          ----- Original Message -----
          From: <PofTAfan@...>
          To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
          Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 8:33 PM
          Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Communism (OT)


          > You're forgetting Cuba and North Korea which the latter is totally
          > communist.
          >
          > -----Original Message-----
          > From: LordTZer0@...
          > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          > Sent: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:29:11 EST
          > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Communism (OT)
          >
          > In a message dated 1/2/2006 2:44:17 P.M. Central Standard Time,
          > whitty@... writes:
          > I bet if they weren't brainwashed about "the C word" they would think
          > communism is just fine
          >
          >
          > There isn't a single communist government in the entire world.
          > Viet Nam is close, but what Russia and China practice is not communism.
          >
          >
          >
          > SPONSORED LINKS
          > Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction
          > book club
          > Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science
          > fiction
          >
          > --------
          > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
          >
          > * Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.
          >
          > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
          > PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
          >
          > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
          >
          > --------
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > Yahoo! Groups Links
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34566 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
          Subject: Re: OT "Oxfordian"
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , LordTZer0@A... wrote:
          >
          >
          > In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:12:24 A.M. Central Standard Time,
          > patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
          >
          > Oxfordian
          >
          >
          > Oxfordian?
          >
          > Raison d'etre?
          >
          > Here's a $10 word for you . . . Pretentious
          >
          > Interviewer: Beavis, what is you raison d'etre?
          >
          > Beavis: Uhhhhh . . . It's in my pants. hehehehe

          *** What the hell's "pretentious" about the word "Oxfordian", T?

          If you know anything about the Shakespeare Authorship Controversy,
          you know that those who believe that the guy who was born and who
          died in Stratford-on-Avon -- named William Shaksper -- is thought to
          be the same "William Shake-Speare" who wrote "HAMLET" (etc) by
          STRATFORDIANS. People who believe(d) that Francis Bacon wrote the
          Canon of Shakespeare are called BACONIANS. People who believe(d) that
          Christopher Marlowe wrote the works are called MARLOVIANS. And people
          (like me) who believe that Edward de Vere, the XVIIth Earl of Oxford,
          wrote the works are called OXFORDIANS. There's nothing pretentious at
          all about the term, T. It's like calling Jesse Helms a REPUBLICAN or
          Hilary Clinton a DEMOCRAT, or somebody else a LIBERTARIAN or whatever
          the hell political party they belong to.

          Patrick
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34567 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
          Subject: Re: JFK, etc
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , LordTZer0@A... wrote:
          >
          >
          > In a message dated 12/28/2005 7:59:11 A.M. Central Standard Time,
          > patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
          >
          > Three hours just flew by, I thought. Not since Oliver
          Stone's "JFK" have I seen a 3-hour film go by so fast. I've seen
          movies that are only 1 and a half to 2 hours long seem to take
          forever to end. Not this one, though.
          >
          >
          > Okay, now I know time is relative. There must be a movie goers
          hell where Pat will have to sit through endless scenes of the first
          mates speeches, and the cabin boy reading his book, and the captain
          vacillating over whether or not to pack it in, for saying this.

          *** None of those scenes you consider "endless" seemed that way to
          me. The movie wouldn't have suffered all that much, granted, if
          Jackson had cut 'em for time. However, we get to know the ship's crew
          in Jackson's film much more than we ever did in the original, and so,
          when each of these guys dies on Skull Island it isn't just some
          nameless 'extra' who is killed -- it's somebody we got to know at
          least a little bit. That goes for Denham's cameraman, too -- the guy
          who gets munched by a V-Rex (offscreen).

          If you found all the extra exposition to be "endless", that's your
          loss. It didn't bother me one bit, and I can't wait for the DVD
          version -- which is sure to be probably another hour longer! For
          instance, in the scene where the movie star ditches the others, they
          are at the shore of what appears to be an inland lake... and I'm
          willing to bet that they filmed a scene where they make a raft and
          try to cross it, and get attacked by a plesiosaur, like in the
          original. That scene was probably filmed and then edited out for
          time. But it'll be in the DVD version, I'm fairly certain. As well as
          many more exposition scenes. And if you won't be diggin' it, well,
          those of us who weren't bored during any part of Jackson's movie WILL
          be diggin' it. To each their own, though.

          >
          > Oh, and you do know that JFK is not historically accurate, right?
          > Jim Garrison was a crackpot. And even though Kim's career
          > suffered a serious set back, thank God for a rabid zealot like
          > McCarthy to keep the commies in check. I swear, at the height
          > of the Cold War we had more Communist than Nazi Spies during
          > WWII. I'm not entirely sure that Clooney himself isn't one.

          *** Stone's film "JFK" takes some artistic liberties, but his
          annotated script goes above-and-beyond to show the evidence that led
          him to make his film. For example, certain characters -- like the one
          played by Kevin Bacon -- are COMPOSITES based on two or more other
          real people: rather than have a larger cast, Stone combined some real
          people into a single 'fictional' character. As for "historical
          accuracy", Stone's film is far more accurate than the scenario
          trumped up by the Warren Report, with its "Magic Bullet" theory and
          all that hogwash.

          Jim Garrison was more right than wrong about the JFK assassination,
          T. Photographic proof of an Oswald/Shaw/Ferrie association surfaced
          AFTER the acquittal of Clay Shaw -- and the jury itself said that
          Garrison PROVED to them that a conspiracy had killed JFK, but that
          they found Clay Shaw "not guilty" because they weren't sure that he
          had played a part in it. If they had seen that photograph, maybe that
          alone would've gotten them to vote "guilty". And, don't forget, a
          Grand Jury found that Garrison had enough of a case to go to trial
          with BEFORE the actual trial of Clay Shaw: Garrison had to present
          evidence to that Grand Jury in order to get the go-ahead to take Shaw
          to trial.

          To call him a crackpot is character assassination, T, and I should
          think you -- living in the Dallas, Texas area, where the
          assassination transpired -- would hesitate to characterize him as
          such. Many people, after the assassination of JFK, thought ill of
          Texans in general, thinking of 'em all as a bunch of rabid gun-nuts.
          Especially with all those anti-JFK handbills pasted up around Dallas
          during his visit, claiming that he was a "traitor" and all that. Some
          welcome he got -- the back of his skull blown out, so that his wife
          had to crawl onto the back of an accelerating limousine in order to
          retrieve a chunk of his brains.

          Garrison had the cojones to be the ONLY District Attorney in the
          U.S.A. willing to expose the conspiracy that caused that to happen in
          a public trial; the Federal Government had washed its hands of JFK
          with its ludicrous "Warren Report" and its foregone conclusion that
          a "lone nut" named Oswald had committed the murder. If Garrison
          failed, it's because the Federal Government -- instead of trying to
          assist him in convicting those who conspired to murder their
          President -- actively sabotaged his case, by planting
          false 'witnesses' for Garrison to put on the stand, who then were
          easily impeached by the defense attorneys. They used a "straw man"
          approach, and at times Garrison fell for it. There was a conspiracy
          to screw up the Clay Shaw trial, to make sure that NOBODY ever went
          to jail for the JFK killing, because if ONE person were to be
          convicted as a conspirator in that event, then the door would be wide
          open for others to face the music.

          JFK's killers got away with it, and the minority of people who
          actually believe that Oswald alone did it got their way. The vast
          majority of Americans (and, it should be mentioned, people in foreign
          countries) have never believed in the Warren Report's conclusions. A
          coup d'etat ended the Kennedy presidency, and those who engineered it
          profited from it, without being brought to justice, leaving in their
          wake the bodies of hundreds of 'conveniently' dead witnesses of the
          event and of events surrounding it. Garrison had the nerve to go
          after them, and for that he should be admired.

          As for McCarthy and Clooney... T, you should see Clooney's film "GOOD
          NIGHT AND GOOD LUCK", about McCarthy's bullshit and the courage of
          Edward R. Murrow and the CBS network for holding him to account for
          his unamerican persecution of Americans for being "unamerican". I
          think it's one of the best films of 2005, and if it won the Oscar for
          Best Picture (... Director, Actor, etc), I wouldn't be surprised.

          Clooney admits to being a "leftie" -- but that doesn't make him a
          Communist, any more than it makes anybody who is leery of the far-
          Right nonsense of the current Administration an "enemy" of the
          country. It's too bad that Americans are polarized into the Left and
          Right (or, the Far Left and the Far Right) extremes, the fringes. The
          Libertarian view -- which I sympathize with -- is the voice of
          moderation between those extremes, but they'll never win a major
          election in this country. The average American is ill-informed about
          politics and American history in general; too many people affiliate
          themselves with one of the fringes and read ONLY those books that are
          either in the Conservative Book Club or its polar opposite. I've read
          both sides and can see both the pluses and minuses of each side's
          agengas. Both of the extremes have their share of bullshit, and it
          angers me that the only two viable choices in a Presidential election
          are between the leftward-tending Democrat and the rightward-tending
          Republican.

          Offhand, I must admit that the B.S. on the Right -- which includes
          the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive War based on 'intelligence' known to
          be bogus... the Evangelical war on Reason, with its touting of so-
          called "Intelligent Design" 'theory' opposing Darwinian Evolution...
          and the unfair-and-unbalanced politics-driven agenda of Fox News --
          it all seems far more dangerous to America and the world than the
          B.S. on the Left. It angered me that the Democrats put Al Gore in the
          running in 2000, and John Kerry in 2004 -- the Dems should've known
          that neither would appeal to moderates. Bush's camp effectively
          polarized the electorate with an anti-gay agenda -- so that people
          going to the polls would vote not only for the next President in
          2004, but also on "Gay Marriage" issues. Enough Christian bigots got
          their dander up to go to the polls to vote against the gays to offset
          any anti-Bush sentiment that had been growing during the increasing
          body count of the Iraq War.

          Oh, and let's not forget the character assassination of Kerry by
          those "Swift Boat Veterans" who never served on HIS swift boat with
          him -- those who DID unequivocally supporting him and the official
          Navy history of the incidents Kerry was involved in during Vietnam.
          Right-Wing radio pundits like Laura Ingraham and Michael Savage spent
          thousands of hours of radio time making bullshit allegations about
          Kerry's Vietnam record... and yet the FCC didn't find any fault with
          that -- yet they DO go apeshit whenever Janet Jackson flashes a
          nipple or what's-her-name from "DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES" does a racy
          commercial with a football player. Under Bush, the FCC was a tool, a
          weapon in a war against "indecency", but not against Libel and
          Slander, it seems, if it could aid the Republicans in the 2004
          election.

          All the pro-Bush fanatics should ask themselves a question: if a
          Democrat president had gotten our country into a war
          over 'intelligence' KNOWN to be bogus... if the Abu Ghraib scandal
          and the use of Torture were to happen during a Democrat president's
          tenure... if war profiteers like Halliburton had ties to a Democrat
          Vice President... would the Right Wing-controlled Congress have stood
          idly by? No... they would've had impeachment proceedings and not
          rested until the Democrat President (and his entire administration)
          had been not only thrown out of office, but imprisoned. They went
          after Bill Clinton because he lied about a goddamned blowjob. They
          weren't above abusing the Impeachment powers of Congress for such
          paltry reasons -- they certainly would've gone after a Dem president
          for the things the Bushies have done in office.

          Patrick

          P.S. Ah, it's fun to rant once in a while. Now I get to hear more
          B.S. from the pro-Bush crowd, as they gallop in for his defense...
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34568 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
          Subject: Re: Tunnels
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Haristas@a... wrote:
          >
          > In a message dated 1/1/06 12:13:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
          > patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
          >
          >
          > > Who's to say that the Mutants in "BATTLE" didn't eventually make
          use of Tunneling Machines, then? They HAD to have made use of them
          while in New York City's ruins -- we can SEE the results of their
          work. The next big question is: Might they not have TUNNELED their
          way to New York City from some other region? Even one as far away as
          California?
          > >
          > > Why not?
          > >
          >
          > Why not? Because it's stupid!
          >
          > -- Rory

          *** Whether you like it or not, Rory, there's evidence that the
          Mutants DID make use of tunneling machines -- look at the poster
          of "BENEATH" and you'll see the famous image of Brent and Nova as
          they emerge from that cylindrical ventilation shaft, the one
          connecting the subway system cavern with the steps of the NEW YORK
          PUBLIC LIBRARY. Sometime after the Nuke War the city had been
          partially filled in with debris -- probably solidified magma and
          dust -- and SOMETHING had burrowed through it, to produce those
          cylindrical shafts through which Brent and Nova walk, and through
          which the Gorilla Army later makes its way.

          Where the f*** did those cylindrical paths come from, if not by the
          Mutants purposely delving them??? Look at the goddamned BUS that is
          lodged in the rubble of that same mass of material through which the
          tunnels were delved. The Mutants BURROWED through that stuff, so that
          they could connect the hollow part of their underground city with the
          OUTSIDE AIR. Brent and Nova go through a VENTILATION system -- as
          evidenced by Brent's line: "Well, they breathe air, whoever -- or
          whatever -- it is that's guiding us." He knows that air is rushing
          INTO the underground city from the outside world, from not only the
          Queensboro Plaza cave but perhaps from other places which connect the
          outside world to that subway system. Brent and Nova headed in the
          direction of that hum, but they could just as easily have gone in
          some other direction, down a different subway track, and probably
          found other cave entrances to the surface. Maybe even the
          same "outlet" where Taylor was captured, when he confronted the
          illusory wall of rock, leaving Nova behind.

          The Mutants in "BENEATH" had burrowed holes in the rubble, as
          evidenced by those post-War cylindrical ventilation tunnels. If they
          could burrow THOSE tunnels WITHIN their city, they could just as
          easily have burrowed tunnels TO that city from someplace else.

          Patrick
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34569 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
          Subject: Re: The Icarus
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Haristas@a... wrote:
          >
          > In a message dated 1/1/06 4:39:43 PM Eastern Standard Time,
          > whitty@c... writes:
          >
          >
          > > I know there is a web site dedicated to the ship that uses the
          name ICARUS.
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > > Where does this name come from?!?!?!
          > >
          > > Michael
          > >
          > >
          >
          > I don't know, it's all Greek to me!
          >
          > -- Rory

          *** Enough about your sex life, you dahhhhling!

          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34570 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 1/3/2006
          Subject: Re: The Circle
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Haristas@a... wrote:
          >
          > In a message dated 1/1/06 1:00:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,
          > patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
          >
          >
          > > The timeline didn't change.
          >
          > YES, IT DID!!!! Stop pulling a Cornelius here, Patrick, and
          telling lies!
          >
          > -- Rory

          *** In the words of Dr. Milo:

          "And Earth will be destroyed – just as we saw it. Only, since seeing
          it, we have passed through a.... backward disturbance in time – did
          you notice the Date Meter clicking down after the shock wave hit our
          ship? – and we have returned to Earth almost two thousand years
          before its destruction." (solemnly) "That is another reason for
          keeping silence. Our human captors would not be edified to know that,
          one day, their world will crack like an egg and fry to a cinder,
          because of an Ape war of aggression."

          Milo knows it, Rory, and you'd better wise up and learn it, too!
          Caesar's followers, living some 600 years after his death, only live
          in the HOPE that the Future MIGHT be changed -- not in the CERTAINTY
          that it had been changed. And that ponytail-yanking chimp proves that
          Ape-versus-Human violent tendency hadn't been bred out of 'em, nor
          the Human-versus-Ape tendency to push back and fight. No wonder
          Caesar's statue symbolically weeps!

          Mendez didn't dismantle that Doomsday Bomb, Rory, and because of that
          the world will continue to be threatened by possible -- probable --
          annihilation. All it would take is for the eventual "Ape war of
          aggression" cited by Milo to trigger it.

          Round 'n' round the POTA timeline goes... in a CIRCLE. "Spinnin'
          wheel got ta go 'round..."

          Patrick
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34571 From: Patrick Tilton Date: 1/3/2006
          Subject: Re: Bizarro Apes
          .html
          Hmmm... billions of people (not to mention other
          lifeforms) annihilated in a worldwide catastrophe, and
          God seems rather nonchalant about it.

          A laff riot!

          Patrick


          --- "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:

          > Been meaning to post this for a while....independent
          > comic strip "Bizarro"......
          >
          > Tim
          >
          >
          >
          > __________________________________________
          __________________________________
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 34572 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 1/3/2006
          Subject: Re: OT "Oxfordian"
          .html
          .html
          In a message dated 1/3/2006 1:13:42 A.M. Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
          What the hell's "pretentious" about the word "Oxfordian", T?
          I had to throw something in with raison d'etre
          to balance it and it stuck out.
           
           
          <.html
          <.html


          Copyright © 2026, Hunter Goatley. All rights reserved.
          Last updated 2026-03-31 10:43.