|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46323 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46324 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46325 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46326 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Begins |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46327 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Begins |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46328 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46329 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Mysterious SIMIANCHAT group home page picture! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46330 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46331 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46332 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 9/19/2007 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46333 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/20/2007 |
| Subject: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46334 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/20/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46335 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/21/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46336 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 9/21/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46337 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/21/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46338 |
From: Melinda G Kettler |
Date: 9/21/2007 |
| Subject: POTA Blog Entry |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46339 |
From: Melinda G Kettler |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Picture of Nova |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46340 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46341 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46342 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46343 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46344 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46345 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46346 |
From: Ty Templeton |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46347 |
From: PofTAfan@aol.com |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46348 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Mr. Comics' Big Max |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46349 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46350 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46351 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46352 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46353 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46354 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Meet the Hot Tub's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46355 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet the Hot Tub's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46356 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46357 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46358 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46359 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46360 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46361 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46362 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46363 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46364 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46365 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46366 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46367 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46368 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46369 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46370 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46371 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46372 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46373 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's nerds |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46374 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46375 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46376 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46377 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46378 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46379 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46380 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meeting the Krueger nerd head on |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46381 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46382 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46383 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Editing on the POTA |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46384 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46385 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Chequing Theories |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46386 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meeting the Krueger nerd head on |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46387 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46388 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: How did BATTLE happen? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46389 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46390 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46391 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46392 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46393 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46394 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meeting the Krueger nerd head on |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46395 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Editing on the POTA |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46396 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46397 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Chequing Theories |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46398 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46399 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Editing on the POTA |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46400 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46401 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46402 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46403 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46404 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meeting Cougar's boyfriend |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46405 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46406 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46407 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: [PotaDG) Bill sez |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46408 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Jeffery William Greene... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46409 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Jeffery William Greene... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46410 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Jeffery William Greene... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46411 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Ten Cents |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46412 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Christopher Percival Lawless |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46413 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46414 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ten Cents |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46415 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46416 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Jeffery William Greene... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46417 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ten Cents |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46418 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46419 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ten Cents |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46420 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46421 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ten Cents |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46422 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46323 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
.html.html
I’m fairly sure someone (Greg
Plonowski?) did mention this and I’m fairly sure they said it has a few
pages on POTA.
Thanks for sharing Rory.
You forgot to cross post!
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2007
7:59 AM
To: potaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Comics Gone Ape!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46324 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
.htmlThe amazon.com description at the link provided mentions that it
contains "behind-the-scenes looks at Planet of the Apes" among other things.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 6:48 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Comics Gone Ape!
> I'm fairly sure someone (Greg Plonowski?) did mention this and I'm
> fairlysure they said it has a few pages on POTA.
>
>
>
> Thanks for sharing Rory.
>
>
>
> You forgot to cross post!
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of
> Haristas@...
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2007 7:59 AM
> To: potaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Comics Gone Ape!
>
>
>
> Anybody checked out this book yet?
>
>
> <http://www.amazon.com/Comics-Gone-Ape-Michael-
> Eury/dp/1893905624/ref=sr_1_1/105-7429563-
> 2450844?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190152553&sr=1-1>
> http://www.amazon.com/Comics-Gone-Ape-Michael-
> Eury/dp/1893905624/ref=sr_1_1/105-7429563-
> 2450844?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190152553&sr=1-1
>
> -- Rory
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46325 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
.html.html
Yeah it sounds good but not cheap. I
think Greg mentioned it and I asked about scanning it for Hunter’s site?
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2007
9:16 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] Comics
Gone Ape!
The amazon.com description at the link provided mentions that it
contains "behind-the- scenes looks at Planet of the Apes" among
other things.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.com>
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 6:48 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Comics Gone Ape!
> I'm fairly sure someone (Greg Plonowski?) did mention this and I'm
> fairlysure they said it has a few pages on POTA.
>
>
>
> Thanks for sharing Rory.
>
>
>
> You forgot to cross post!
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups. com]
On
> Behalf Of
> Haristas@aol. com
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2007 7:59 AM
> To: potaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Comics Gone Ape!
>
>
>
> Anybody checked out this book yet?
>
>
> <http://www.amazon. com/Comics- Gone-Ape- Michael-
> Eury/dp/1893905624/ ref=sr_1_ 1/105-7429563-
> 2450844?ie=UTF8& s=books&qid= 1190152553& sr=1-1>
> http://www.amazon. com/Comics- Gone-Ape- Michael-
> Eury/dp/1893905624/ ref=sr_1_ 1/105-7429563-
> 2450844?ie=UTF8& s=books&qid= 1190152553& sr=1-1
>
> -- Rory
>
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46326 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Begins |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/17/2007 9:14:52 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
Not only is this set years before PLANET but it's in AUSTRALIA so anything can (and does!) happen really.
*** Does that mean that you're gonna throw anothe chimp on the barbee?
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46327 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Begins |
.html.html
That’s actually pretty funny Mike!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2007
11:26 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: POTA Begins
In
a message dated 9/17/2007 9:14:52 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com
writes:
Not only is this set
years before PLANET but it’s in AUSTRALIA
so anything can (and does!) happen really.
*** Does that mean that you're gonna throw anothe chimp on the barbee?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46328 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
.html
.html
Message
-- It has a
chapter on POTA comics apparently:
Neil-----Original Message----- From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Michael & Sally Whitty Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007
8:49 AM To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [PotaDG]
Comics Gone Ape!
I’m fairly sure
someone (Greg Plonowski?) did mention this and I’m fairly sure they said it
has a few pages on
POTA.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46329 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Mysterious SIMIANCHAT group home page picture! |
.html.html
The caption says “what Lord T places
on his hand”…. J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2007
12:09 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Mysterious
SIMIANCHAT group home page picture!
It's what
you get when you cross a Pokemon with a Samurai and Zira.
A Zirpokurai.
DS
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.com>
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:01 am
Subject: [PotaDG] Mysterious SIMIANCHAT group home page picture!
> OK what's THIS?!?!?!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups. com]
On
> Behalf Of
> Neil Foster
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2007 10:41 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Mysterious SIMIANCHAT group
>
>
>
> -- If it is what I think it is you wouldn't have a chance mate!
>
>
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups. com]
On
> Behalf Of
> Michael & Sally Whitty
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 10:37 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Mysterious SIMIANCHAT group
>
> Ahhh.so I probably shouldn't try to join then? :-)
>
> .
>
>
> <http://geo.yahoo. com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId= 8605785/grpspId= 1705021437/ msgId
> =46310/stime= 1190075885/ nc1=3858796/ nc2=3848627/ nc3=4776369>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46330 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
.html
.html
Where’d you get that from Neil?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2007
9:00 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Comics Gone
Ape!
-- It has a chapter on POTA comics apparently:
Neil
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of Michael & Sally
Whitty
Sent: Wednesday, September 19,
2007 8:49 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Comics Gone
Ape!
I’m fairly sure someone (Greg Plonowski?) did mention this
and I’m fairly sure they said it has a few pages on POTA.

<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46331 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/18/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Comics Gone Ape! |
.htmlMichael,
On the Amazon URL, click or just hover your mouse icon over "Search
Inside", then click "Table of Contents".
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 6:59 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Comics Gone Ape!
> -- It has a chapter on POTA comics apparently:
>
>
>
> Neil-----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf
> Of Michael & Sally Whitty
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 8:49 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Comics Gone Ape!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm fairly sure someone (Greg Plonowski?) did mention this and I'm
> fairly sure they said it has a few pages on POTA.
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=46323/stime=1190155797/nc1=3858794/nc2=3848627/nc3=4725795>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46332 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 9/19/2007 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46333 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/20/2007 |
| Subject: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
.html
.html
Message
Pretty
cool:
Neil
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46334 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/20/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
.htmlVery.
Description says it's wood & resin so I assume only the base is wood.
The seller has a whole bunch of SF movie/tv ship models. All nice.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:46 pm
Subject: [PotaDG] Ansa Icarus Wood Model
> Pretty cool:
>
>
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/Planet-of-the-Apes-Ansa-Icarus-
> Model_W0QQitemZ270167553882QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item270167553882
>
> Neil
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46335 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/21/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
.html
.html
So how accurate do you all think this is?
Do you think everything’s in the
right sopt?
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Friday, 21 September 2007
12:47 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Ansa Icarus Wood
Model
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46336 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 9/21/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 9/21/2007 7:21:58 AM Eastern Standard Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
So how accurate do you all think this is?
Do you think everything's in the right sopt?
Michael
The flag decals are in the right "sopt" but they're on the wrong way. I also notice the outer curves of the flat parts in front of the windows aren't as they should be, but it's overall the
model's not bad.
-- Rory
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46337 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/21/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ansa Icarus Wood Model |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/21/2007 8:31:08 AM Central Daylight Time, Haristas@... writes:
The flag decals are in the right "sopt" but they're on the wrong way. I also notice the outer curves of the flat parts in front of the windows aren't as they should be, but it's overall
the model's not bad.
*** I'd agree with that as well... It's something I'd buy if the price was right...
I'm sure nobody will ever tackle it, but I'd like to see a bigger model of the ship... What we have here is more like that "ship" in the TV series... I'd like a larger ship to show more of the
ship in PLANET, because as we all know, the ship in PLANET "is" supposed to be bigger than just the front cone which was made as a prop for the film...
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46338 |
From: Melinda G Kettler |
Date: 9/21/2007 |
| Subject: POTA Blog Entry |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46339 |
From: Melinda G Kettler |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Picture of Nova |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46340 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
.html
.html
About "Tron" beating "Revolution" in
sales - - "Tron" has become popular thanks to it's place in early CG and
computer history. It's kind of a legend with techies. Maybe that says something
about why POTA doesn't have popularity these days (besides POTA2001 killing off
interest). "Star Trek", "Star Wars", "Battlestar Galactica"...these are all
techie things. It's a techie world and welcome to it. By it's nature POTA is the
opposite. We love the Icarus but POTA is not a collection of spaceships.
Probably a disadvantage in today's world. When POTA was at it's most popular
"Star Wars" had yet to revolutionize (if you'll pardon the expression)
sci-fi. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 5:01
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Revolution Sales
Figures.
3000 is really
something I think is indicative of the fan base – and of that 3000 I think
1000 or so would be Tom Fowler fans, Ty Templeton fans, people who just like
the look of the coversÂ….etc.
Yeah – how does TRON
beat it?
That sounds
rudeÂ…
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Graham Hill Sent: Monday, 3 September 2007 8:33
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Official Fan
Club
---
In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com , "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...>
wrote:
> >It would be nice to get some figures > on the
sales of some recent Apes stuff such as the Revolution comics, > that
way we would get some sort of idea of the true size of the fan >
base. > > Neil > > Here's some sales figures on the last issue of
Revolution.
http://www.icv2. com/articles/ home/9470..html"
#6 comes in at number
223.
The series started slightly higher but
was pretty consistent towards the latter issues.
Now with all comic "sales"figures these
don't show the whole picture (sales to the UK for
instance aren't record with these) but Icv2 have a good
rep'
The interesting thing with the comic was
at the time I did try and keep track of the sales and was quite surprised to
see that a couple of months thinks like Tron outsold it (I think it was the
first issue Apes was above 3000 copies but Tron was something like 8000,I 've
had to much southern comfort to go back and check.)
Best,
Graham.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46341 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
.html
.html
Hi Michael,
I'm getting caught up on posts. Bill is
still looking for old publicity material in good condition.
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 7:36
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cornelius'
needs
Hey
Jeff - how did this turn out?
Did
Bill get any photos?
Michael
Thanks, Michael. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:41
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cornelius'
needs
I'll pass this on to a couple of collectors.
Michael
Bill Blake is looking
for any and all ORIGINAL publicity photos/press- kit materials,
etc., from his 1970's "Meet Zira and Cornelius" live
show-tours/personal appearances, especially Bill's 'before and
after' photo captioned "William Blake as Cornelius" (an
edited/cropped version of which can be seen on pg. 34 of Marvel's POTA
Magazine # 12). Those who have any of these materials (Remember,
ORIGINALS ONLY, and in VG to Excellent Condition), please contact me at
veetus@earthlink. net .
Thanks! Jeff"
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46342 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
.html
.html
Paula played the woman in the cage in
"Battle". She has a close-up hugging the child when Aldo threatens to shoot the
humans. Bill filmed a scene for the TV show that was cut from "The
Interrogation". They also rotoscoped over his picture for the "passage of time"
montage in the animated episode "Mission of Mercy".
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 8:26
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cornelius'
needs
-- So what parts
did they play in the 'movies and T.V. Series' as stated on this
flyer?
Neil
Is this Bill looking for this
.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46343 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
.html
.html
Bill Blake has one of the best memories
around. Cynicougar doesn't know what he's talking about. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 7:40
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Meet Cornelius'
needs
OK – be
nice!
He could have a fake
memory.
I have vivid memories
of things that never happened! Serious!
Michael
In a message dated 9/3/2007
7:12:38 PM Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@bigpond. com writes:
--
So he wasn't technically an 'original actor from the movie and tv series',
as the flyer states then?
*** Bill Blake told Jeff that Ron Stein played
Roddy's stunt double, which he didn't... He lied to Jeff about that, so
he probably made the whole "I was in a deleted scene" thing too to try to
impress JK, the same way he tried to impress him with his highly mistaken
"facts" about the TV series...
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46344 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
.html
.html
I never got to see Bill and Paula live but
their interview in Marvel was my favorite article, even before I knew Bill
personally. I thought it was unique that someone could duplicate the makeup so
accurately (Bill was trained by John Chambers himself) and bring it to the
people. It was unique and people remember it. It's not just slapping on a mask.
They studied ape movements and worked hard on the presentation. I don't know why
Cougar is so down on Bill but I can guarantee he speaks the truth about the lost
scene.
And yes, the Adventure comics are part of
"Ape history". Or is "Ape history only the stuff Cougar likes? If so, he better
give us a list of what we're supposed to like. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:46
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cornelius'
needs
In a message dated
9/5/2007 7:22:07 AM Central Daylight Time, apefan23@yahoo. com writes:
Why all the
Bill Blake bashing??? He is a part of POTA history...he was featured in
the Marvel magazine...that should be enough!
** No bashing, just really saying that
he doesn't know all he claims to... As far as being part of the APES history,
how so? As mentioned, the guys in the UK rodeo aren't getting their due: After
all, they made live appearances too AND had a show going on while doing it...
And if being in the magazine means being part of their history, where
do you draw the line? Does a one sentence blurb about APES in a TV guide count
for you? Do the ADVENTURE comics in all their glory really need to be included
too?
************ ********* ********* ******** Get
a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover. aol.com/memed/ aolcom30tour
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46345 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 9/23/2007 9:49:26 AM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Bill Blake has one of the best memories around. Cynicougar doesn't know what he's talking
about. Jeff
That reminds me.... Ron Stein, always wearing one of those red jumpsuits, played a crew member of the Seaview in "Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea." He rarely had a line, but starting in season three you
can spot him in almost every episode. When he played a human in one episode of the POTA TV show his hair was curly, but in VTTBOTS he's got one of those jet black, Frankie Avalon "hair helmets."
-- Rory
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46346 |
From: Ty Templeton |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
.htmlGuys, Re: POTA vs TRON
I can't stress enough that the biggest problem with our series' sales was our publisher, and not the market, and not the fans. We probably would have done about 10,000 in sales if our publisher had
taken out ads, had supported the book with promotion and convention appearances, and direct mail/email messages to retailers, just like other publishers do. He was very new to the biz, and had none of the basic
skills in place to do well. Basically, we printed the thing and hoped people found out about it, which is foolish marketing to say the least. I asked for more promotion, and went out to generate promotion on my
own, but it was hardly enough.
I'm convinced that the very same series, with the same art and story would have done more than twenty-five thousand if we'd come out under a Dark Horse or DC banner and a PR dept. that knew what it was
doing. This isn't sour grapes, or misplaced optimism, but a considered professional opinion of someone who knows far more about the comix biz than our publisher did. Someday, I'll tell you all about
the strange disasters of marketing that was Mr. Comics' Big Max.
Marketing, Marketing. Ty the Guy On 9/23/07, Jeff K. <
veetus@...> wrote:
About "Tron" beating "Revolution" in
sales - - "Tron" has become popular thanks to it's place in early CG and
computer history. It's kind of a legend with techies. Maybe that says something
about why POTA doesn't have popularity these days (besides POTA2001 killing off
interest). "Star Trek", "Star Wars", "Battlestar Galactica"...these are all
techie things. It's a techie world and welcome to it. By it's nature POTA is the
opposite. We love the Icarus but POTA is not a collection of spaceships.
Probably a disadvantage in today's world. When POTA was at it's most popular
"Star Wars" had yet to revolutionize (if you'll pardon the expression)
sci-fi. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 5:01
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Revolution Sales
Figures.
3000 is really
something I think is indicative of the fan base – and of that 3000 I think
1000 or so would be Tom Fowler fans, Ty Templeton fans, people who just like
the look of the covers….etc.
Yeah – how does TRON
beat it?
That sounds
rude…
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Graham Hill
Sent: Monday, 3 September 2007 8:33
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Official Fan
Club
---
In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...>
wrote:
> >It would be nice to get some figures > on the
sales of some recent Apes stuff such as the Revolution comics, > that
way we would get some sort of idea of the true size of the fan >
base. > > Neil > > Here's some sales figures on the last issue of
Revolution.
http://www.icv2.com/articles/home/9470.html
#6 comes in at number
223.
The series started slightly higher but
was pretty consistent towards the latter issues.
Now with all comic "sales"figures these
don't show the whole picture (sales to the UK for
instance aren't record with these) but Icv2 have a good
rep'
The interesting thing with the comic was
at the time I did try and keep track of the sales and was quite surprised to
see that a couple of months thinks like Tron outsold it (I think it was the
first issue Apes was above 3000 copies but Tron was something like 8000,I 've
had to much southern comfort to go back and check.)
Best,
Graham.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46347 |
From: PofTAfan@aol.com |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
.htmlI have to agree with Ty. Promoting a new comic is very important. I
have friends who worked at several comic book publishing and they do
some are very aggresive
promotion in getting their comic seen by the public. if Revolution had
backing from Oni Press, Dark Horse and Virgin Comics ( who has some
millionaire named Branson behind them)
and Fantagraphics, and other major comic book publishers ,the comic
might have a larger fan base. The artist of Revolution had nothing to
do with the poor sales, the PR department
and the publisher were at fault. i congratulate Ty for bring Apes back
for all of the Ape fans out there, and if he find another publisher
that will agressively go out and promote the book.
Thanks Ty
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Ty Templeton < tybunny@...>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:32 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Revolution Sales Figures.
Guys,
Re: POTA vs TRON
I can't stress enough that the biggest problem with our series' sales
was our publisher, and not the market, and not the fans. We probably
would have done about 10,000 in sales if our publisher had taken out
ads, had supported the book with promotion and convention appearances,
and direct mail/email messages to retailers, just like other publishers
do. He was very new to the biz, and had none of the basic skills in
place to do well. Basically, we printed the thing and hoped people
found out about it, which is foolish marketing to say the least. I
asked for more promotion, and went out to generate promotion on my own,
but it was hardly enough.
I'm convinced that the very same series, with the same art and story
would have done more than twenty-five thousand if we'd come out under a
Dark Horse or DC banner and a PR dept. that knew what it was doing.
This isn't sour grapes, or misplaced optimism, but a considered
professional opinion of someone who knows far more about the comix biz
than our publisher did. Someday, I'll tell you all about the strange
disasters of marketing that was Mr. Comics' Big Max.
Marketing, Marketing.
Ty the Guy
On 9/23/07, Jeff K. <veetus@...> wrote:
About "Tron" beating "Revolution" in
sales - - "Tron" has become popular thanks to it's place in early CG
and
computer history. It's kind of a legend with techies. Maybe that says
something
about why POTA doesn't have popularity these days (besides POTA2001
killing off
interest). "Star Trek", "Star Wars", "Battlestar Galactica"...these are
all
techie things. It's a techie world and welcome to it. By it's nature
POTA is the
opposite. We love the Icarus but POTA is not a collection of
spaceships.
Probably a disadvantage in today's world. When POTA was at it's most
popular
"Star Wars" had yet to revolutionize (if you'll pardon the expression)
sci-fi. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From:
Michael
& Sally Whitty
To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 5:01
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Revolution Sales
Figures.
3000 is really
something I think is indicative of the fan base – and of that 3000 I
think
1000 or so would be Tom Fowler fans, Ty Templeton fans, people who
just like
the look of the covers….etc.
Yeah – how does TRON
beat it?
That sounds
rude…
Michael
------------------------------------------------------------
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Graham Hill
Sent: Monday, 3 September 2007 8:33
AM
To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Official Fan
Club
---
In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...>
wrote:
>
>It would be nice to get some figures
> on the
sales of some recent Apes stuff such as the Revolution comics,
> that
way we would get some sort of idea of the true size of the fan
>
base.
>
> Neil
>
>
Here's some sales figures on the last issue of
Revolution.
http://www.icv2.com/articles/home/9470.html"
#6 comes in at number
223.
The series started slightly higher but
was pretty consistent towards the latter issues.
Now with all comic "sales"figures these
don't show the whole picture (sales to the UK for
instance aren't record with these) but Icv2 have a good
rep'
The interesting thing with the comic was
at the time I did try and keep track of the sales and was quite
surprised to
see that a couple of months thinks like Tron outsold it (I think it
was the
first issue Apes was above 3000 copies but Tron was something like
8000,I 've
had to much southern comfort to go back and check.)
Best,
Graham.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46348 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Mr. Comics' Big Max |
.html.html
I’d love to hear about that Ty…..when you’re
ready!
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Ty Templeton
Sent: Monday, 24 September 2007
1:32 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Revolution
Sales Figures.
Guys,
Re: POTA vs TRON
I can't stress enough that the biggest problem with our series' sales was our
publisher, and not the market, and not the fans. We probably would have
done about 10,000 in sales if our publisher had taken out ads, had supported the
book with promotion and convention appearances, and direct mail/email messages
to retailers, just like other publishers do. He was very new to the biz,
and had none of the basic skills in place to do well. Basically, we printed the
thing and hoped people found out about it, which is foolish marketing to say
the least. I asked for more promotion, and went out to generate promotion
on my own, but it was hardly enough.
I'm convinced that the very same series, with the same art and story
would have done more than twenty-five thousand if we'd come out under a Dark
Horse or DC banner and a PR dept. that knew what it was doing. This isn't
sour grapes, or misplaced optimism, but a considered professional opinion of
someone who knows far more about the comix biz than our publisher did.
Someday, I'll tell you all about the strange disasters of marketing that was
Mr. Comics' Big Max.
Marketing, Marketing.
Ty the Guy
On 9/23/07, Jeff K.
<veetus@earthlink. net> wrote:
About "Tron"
beating "Revolution" in sales - - "Tron" has become popular
thanks to it's place in early CG and computer history. It's kind of a legend
with techies. Maybe that says something about why POTA doesn't have popularity
these days (besides POTA2001 killing off interest). "Star Trek",
"Star Wars", "Battlestar Galactica"...these are all techie
things. It's a techie world and welcome to it. By it's nature POTA is the
opposite. We love the Icarus but POTA is not a collection of spaceships. Probably
a disadvantage in today's world. When POTA was at it's most popular "Star
Wars" had yet to revolutionize (if you'll pardon the expression)
sci-fi. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Sunday,
September 02, 2007 5:01 PM
Subject:
[PotaDG]
Revolution Sales Figures.
3000 is really something
I think is indicative of the fan base – and of that 3000 I think 1000 or so
would be Tom Fowler fans, Ty Templeton fans, people who just like the look of
the covers….etc.
Yeah – how does TRON beat
it?
That sounds rude…
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
>It would be nice to get some figures
> on the sales of some recent Apes stuff such as the Revolution comics,
> that way we would get some sort of idea of the true size of the fan
> base.
>
> Neil
>
>
Here's some sales figures on the last issue of Revolution.
http://www.icv2. com/articles/ home/9470..html
#6 comes in at number 223.
The series started slightly higher but was
pretty consistent towards the latter issues.
Now with all comic "sales"figures
these don't show the whole picture (sales to the
UK for instance aren't record with
these) but Icv2 have a good rep'
The interesting thing with the comic was at
the time I did try and keep track of the sales and was quite surprised to see
that a couple of months thinks like Tron outsold it (I think it was the first
issue Apes was above 3000 copies but Tron was something like 8000,I 've had to
much southern comfort to go back and check.)
Best, Graham.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46349 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/23/2007 8:09:31 AM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
They also rotoscoped over his picture for the "passage of time" montage in the animated episode
"Mission of Mercy".
*** And for that, they owe him zillions of dollars.... Nevermind it was a FOX property, regardless of who had the picture taken...***
**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46350 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/23/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cornelius' needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/23/2007 9:15:32 AM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
I don't know why Cougar is so down on Bill but I can guarantee he speaks the truth about the lost
scene.
***Let me ask you: If you didn't "know" Bill, would you be so quick to believe it? You have offered NO evidence that it ever existed at all, anywhere (film or script)... You've also failed to answer
any direct, questions either. Your argument: "It happened"... Well, here is an open invitation to you: Can you answer any of the following questions to prove it was shot and suddenly cut. (Why would a show on
a tight budget cut ANYTHING?)
I've said it once, I'll say it again: If such a scene existed, why isn't there any proof of it? Not a photo has surfaced, and I don't recall it ever being in any script either... Also, as
mentioned in that Ron Harper interview from years back, he said how the show often "ran short" and that's why they always had such long shots of them running into, or away from, the action, etc. I do not
believe that a show that often ran short would cut scenes.
And, as I asked, why would they have hired someone who was supposed to be a "dead ringer" for Roddy? Why would any show on TV hire someone who could have been "confused" for the STAR of the show?
And yes, the Adventure comics are part of "Ape history". Or is "Ape history only the stuff
Cougar likes? If so, he better give us a list of what we're supposed to like.
*** No, APES history is not just what I like... If so, the bulk ALL the comics wouldn't exist, nor would the majority of the items either...BATTLE would have been a totally different film, and the TV series and
RETURN wouldn't be what they are either...
And hangers-on of would-be "experts" wouldn't be allowed to post their non-APES related posts on here....
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46351 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
.html
.html
In a message dated 9/23/2007 7:54:31 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
veetus@... writes:
It's
kind of a legend with techies. Maybe that says something about why POTA
doesn't have popularity these days (besides POTA2001 killing off interest).
"Star Trek", "Star Wars", "Battlestar Galactica".. .these are all techie
things.
That's because it's set in a primitive society.
My script isn't that way at all, though there
are what might be considered talking monkeys.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46352 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution Sales Figures. |
.htmlNot sure if anyone here reads the articles on Comic Book Resources,
but Steve Grant's weekly series "Permanent Damage" are always
interesting. Along with each weeks article, Grant posts 5 or six comic
covers and each week readers are tasked to identify the common link
between the comics. It could be anything, a common artist, a theme,
ANYTHING.
As luck would have it, the march ROPOTA is one of this weeks covers.
And to make things even more interesting, this weeks article discusses
the 'make or break' vagaries of indie comic publishing. Something that
falls right into the lap of the ROPOTA publishing story.
So if you are interested in such matters, check it out:
http://www.comicbookresources.com/columns/?column=10
As an added bonus, play the game and see if you can find the link with
the ROPOTA and the others shown.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Ty Templeton <tybunny@...>
Date: Sunday, September 23, 2007 11:32 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Revolution Sales Figures.
> Guys,
>
> Re: POTA vs TRON
>
> I can't stress enough that the biggest problem with our series'
> sales was
> our publisher, and not the market, and not the fans. We probably
> would have
> done about 10,000 in sales if our publisher had taken out ads, had
> supportedthe book with promotion and convention appearances, and
> direct mail/email
> messages to retailers, just like other publishers do. He was very
> new to
> the biz, and had none of the basic skills in place to do well.
> Basically, we
> printed the thing and hoped people found out about it, which is
> foolishmarketing to say the least. I asked for more promotion,
> and went out to
> generate promotion on my own, but it was hardly enough.
>
> I'm convinced that the very same series, with the same art and
> story would
> have done more than twenty-five thousand if we'd come out under a
> Dark Horse
> or DC banner and a PR dept. that knew what it was doing. This
> isn't sour
> grapes, or misplaced optimism, but a considered professional
> opinion of
> someone who knows far more about the comix biz than our publisher
did.
> Someday, I'll tell you all about the strange disasters of
> marketing that was
> Mr. Comics' Big Max.
>
> Marketing, Marketing.
>
> Ty the Guy
>
> On 9/23/07, Jeff K. <veetus@...> wrote:
> >
> > About "Tron" beating "Revolution" in sales - - "Tron" has
> become> popular thanks to it's place in early CG and computer
> history. It's kind of
> > a legend with techies. Maybe that says something about why POTA
> doesn't have
> > popularity these days (besides POTA2001 killing off interest).
> "Star Trek",
> > "Star Wars", "Battlestar Galactica"...these are all techie
> things. It's a
> > techie world and welcome to it. By it's nature POTA is the
> opposite. We love
> > the Icarus but POTA is not a collection of spaceships. Probably a
> > disadvantage in today's world. When POTA was at it's most
> popular "Star
> > Wars" had yet to revolutionize (if you'll pardon the expression)
> sci-fi.
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > *From:* Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...>
> > *To:* PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > *Sent:* Sunday, September 02, 2007 5:01 PM
> > *Subject:* [PotaDG] Revolution Sales Figures.
> >
> > 3000 is really something I think is indicative of the fan base
> – and of
> > that 3000 I think 1000 or so would be Tom Fowler fans, Ty
> Templeton fans,
> > people who just like the look of the covers….etc.
> >
> > Yeah – how does TRON beat it?
> >
> > That sounds rude…
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
]
> *On Behalf
> > Of *Graham Hill
> > *Sent:* Monday, 3 September 2007 8:33 AM
> > *To:* PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > *Subject:* [PotaDG] Re: Official Fan Club
> >
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >It would be nice to get some figures
> > > on the sales of some recent Apes stuff such as the Revolution
> comics,> > that way we would get some sort of idea of the true
> size of the fan
> > > base.
> > >
> > > Neil
> > >
> > >
> > Here's some sales figures on the last issue of Revolution.
> >
> > http://www.icv2.com/articles/home/9470.html"
> >
> > #6 comes in at number 223.
> >
> > The series started slightly higher but was pretty consistent
> towards the
> > latter issues.
> >
> > Now with all comic "sales"figures these don't show the whole
picture
> > (sales to the UK for instance aren't record with these) but Icv2
> have a good
> > rep'
> >
> > The interesting thing with the comic was at the time I did try
> and keep
> > track of the sales and was quite surprised to see that a couple
> of months
> > thinks like Tron outsold it (I think it was the first issue Apes
> was above
> > 3000 copies but Tron was something like 8000,I 've had to much
> southern> comfort to go back and check.)
> >
> > Best, Graham.
> >
> >
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46353 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
It's BECAUSE I "know" Bill that I
believe it. If you know someone and you've shared adventures together then
either you trust them or you don't. You'll never know 100% if someone is
truthful about everything but you get a good idea based on common experiences.
I have seen a photo of Bill in the scene
taken by the actor who played the gorilla (Lee Delano, who often played gorillas
on the show; he also makes convention appearances, so if someone wants to ask
him I'm sure he'd confirm it). Bill doesn't have the picture any more but I've
seen it (Bill in ape makeup on the TV show set) so if you want to call me a liar
too, fine.
John Roche sent me a scene that was not
filmed from that very episode, with Urko and Zauis in a hot tub (a la
"Beneath"). It was written but Booth Colman says he never saw the scene before,
so they must have decided at the last minute to shelve it. Makes sense to me
they would do Bill's scene as a last minute replacement (no guest stars, just a
short scene between Bill and Lee). Bill is pleased to be the only ape actor on
the show to apply his own makeup. That would be a hollow achievement if it was
based on a lie. I guess they decided to cut it for time since it didn't advance
the story. But Bill received residuals so he assumed it was shown in Europe or
something (I think he mentions that in Marvel magazine).
They probably had Bill do it because of his
skills playing an ape and his abilities with makeup. If I needed a last minute
scene that's who I'd hire. Maybe you're right, maybe they decided at the last
minute he was a "dead ringer" for Roddy and that's why it was cut.
No, Bill was not Roddy's 2nd
cousin, he just got hired for a scene because of his skills like most
actors do. But he played an ape on camera and that's what he publicized in the
'70's. Roddy wasn't going around meeting the kids. Bill provided some
Hollywood magic to kids and what's wrong with that?
Believe him, don't, doesn't matter. Bill
knows he did it and no one can take away the memories. Well, except maybe
Alzheimer's or something. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 7:10
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cornelius'
needs
In a message dated
9/23/2007 9:15:32 AM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
I don't know
why Cougar is so down on Bill but I can guarantee he speaks the truth about
the lost scene.
***Let me ask you: If you didn't
"know" Bill, would you be so quick to believe it? You have offered NO evidence
that it ever existed at all, anywhere (film or script)... You've also failed
to answer any direct, questions either. Your argument: "It happened"... Well,
here is an open invitation to you: Can you answer any of the following
questions to prove it was shot and suddenly cut. (Why would a show on a tight
budget cut ANYTHING?)
I've said it once, I'll say it again: If such a
scene existed, why isn't there any proof of it? Not a photo has
surfaced, and I don't recall it ever being in any script either... Also, as
mentioned in that Ron Harper interview from years back, he said how the show
often "ran short" and that's why they always had such long shots of them
running into, or away from, the action, etc. I do not believe that a show that
often ran short would cut scenes.
And, as I asked, why would they have
hired someone who was supposed to be a "dead ringer" for Roddy? Why would any
show on TV hire someone who could have been "confused" for the STAR of the
show?
And yes, the
Adventure comics are part of "Ape history". Or is "Ape history only the
stuff Cougar likes? If so, he better give us a list of what we're supposed
to like.
*** No, APES history is not just what I
like... If so, the bulk ALL the comics wouldn't exist, nor would the majority
of the items either...BATTLE would have been a totally different film, and the
TV series and RETURN wouldn't be what they are either... And hangers-on of
would-be "experts" wouldn't be allowed to post their non-APES related posts on
here....
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46354 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Meet the Hot Tub's needs |
.html.html
Hey Jeff – this is a WRITTEN scene right,
which was ditched….not a filmed scene of course?
Michael
PS This is the same John Roach who said
George Lazenby starred in various filmed episodes of a second series of the
POTA TV Show that was never released? J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2007
2:07 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
John Roche sent me a scene that was not filmed from that very
episode, with Urko and Zauis in a hot tub (a la "Beneath"). It was
written but Booth Colman says he never saw the scene before, so they must have
decided at the last minute to shelve it. Makes sense to me they would do Bill's
scene as a last minute replacement (no guest stars, just a short scene between
Bill and Lee).
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46355 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet the Hot Tub's needs |
.html
.html
Yeah, it was never filmed. Booth Colman
never even heard of it. Roche sent me the scene and wanted Booth to record it
when I interviewed him, but I couldn't bring myself to request it.
I haven't checked, I assume it's in the
"Interrogation" script at Hunter's site? I guess the correct term would be
"sauna". "Hot tub" sounds a little kinky. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 3:59
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Meet the Hot Tub's
needs
Hey Jeff – this is a
WRITTEN scene right, which was ditchedÂ….not a filmed scene of
course?
Michael
PS This is the same
John Roach who said George Lazenby starred in various filmed episodes of a
second series of the POTA TV Show that was never released?
J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K. Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2007 2:07
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
John Roche sent me a scene that was not filmed
from that very episode, with Urko and Zauis in a hot tub (a la "Beneath"). It
was written but Booth Colman says he never saw the scene before, so they must
have decided at the last minute to shelve it. Makes sense to me they would do
Bill's scene as a last minute replacement (no guest stars, just a short scene
between Bill and Lee).
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46356 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/24/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Hey, Lee's picture is up at Kassidy Rae's
site. Bill Blake took this picture of Lee during the filming of their scene, and
Lee took Bill's picture (now lost). Anyway, this is what Lee looked like during
the lost scene. Behind him is Bill's "house". https://pota.v.kassidyrae.com/ss/fv59.htm
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:06
AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
It's BECAUSE I "know" Bill that I
believe it. If you know someone and you've shared adventures together then
either you trust them or you don't. You'll never know 100% if someone is
truthful about everything but you get a good idea based on common experiences.
I have seen a photo of Bill in the scene
taken by the actor who played the gorilla (Lee Delano, who often played
gorillas on the show; he also makes convention appearances, so if someone
wants to ask him I'm sure he'd confirm it). Bill doesn't have the picture any
more but I've seen it (Bill in ape makeup on the TV show set) so if you want
to call me a liar too, fine.
John Roche sent me a scene that was not
filmed from that very episode, with Urko and Zauis in a hot tub (a la
"Beneath"). It was written but Booth Colman says he never saw the scene
before, so they must have decided at the last minute to shelve it. Makes sense
to me they would do Bill's scene as a last minute replacement (no guest stars,
just a short scene between Bill and Lee). Bill is pleased to be the only ape
actor on the show to apply his own makeup. That would be a hollow achievement
if it was based on a lie. I guess they decided to cut it for time since it
didn't advance the story. But Bill received residuals so he assumed it was
shown in Europe or something (I think he mentions that in Marvel magazine).
They probably had Bill do it because of
his skills playing an ape and his abilities with makeup. If I needed a last
minute scene that's who I'd hire. Maybe you're right, maybe they decided at
the last minute he was a "dead ringer" for Roddy and that's why it was cut.
No, Bill was not Roddy's 2nd
cousin, he just got hired for a scene because of his skills like most
actors do. But he played an ape on camera and that's what he publicized in the
'70's. Roddy wasn't going around meeting the kids. Bill provided some
Hollywood magic to kids and what's wrong with that?
Believe him, don't, doesn't matter. Bill
knows he did it and no one can take away the memories. Well, except maybe
Alzheimer's or something. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 7:10
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cornelius'
needs
In a message dated
9/23/2007 9:15:32 AM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
I don't
know why Cougar is so down on Bill but I can guarantee he speaks the truth
about the lost scene.
***Let me ask you: If
you didn't "know" Bill, would you be so quick to believe it? You have
offered NO evidence that it ever existed at all, anywhere (film or
script)... You've also failed to answer any direct, questions either. Your
argument: "It happened"... Well, here is an open invitation to you: Can you
answer any of the following questions to prove it was shot and suddenly cut.
(Why would a show on a tight budget cut ANYTHING?)
I've said it
once, I'll say it again: If such a scene existed, why isn't there any
proof of it? Not a photo has surfaced, and I don't recall it ever being in
any script either... Also, as mentioned in that Ron Harper interview from
years back, he said how the show often "ran short" and that's why they
always had such long shots of them running into, or away from, the action,
etc. I do not believe that a show that often ran short would cut scenes.
And, as I asked, why would they have hired someone who was supposed
to be a "dead ringer" for Roddy? Why would any show on TV hire someone who
could have been "confused" for the STAR of the show?
And yes,
the Adventure comics are part of "Ape history". Or is "Ape history only
the stuff Cougar likes? If so, he better give us a list of what we're
supposed to like.
*** No, APES history is not
just what I like... If so, the bulk ALL the comics wouldn't exist, nor would
the majority of the items either...BATTLE would have been a totally
different film, and the TV series and RETURN wouldn't be what they are
either... And hangers-on of would-be "experts" wouldn't be allowed to
post their non-APES related posts on here....
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46357 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
*** This is all very interesting, but it still fails to show any "proof" of the existence of such a scene...
Okay, you made yourself clear as to why you believe him (he's your pal), but as far as answering if there is a script with such a scene it, it falls short. The bit about the scripted Zaius/Urko scene is it's
own topic really, it doesn't cover the scene in question.
In a message dated 9/24/2007 10:58:49 AM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
I have seen a photo of Bill in the scene taken by the actor who played the gorilla (Lee Delano, who
often played gorillas on the show; he also makes convention appearances, so if someone wants to ask him I'm sure he'd confirm it). Bill doesn't have the picture any more but I've seen it (Bill in ape
makeup on the TV show set) so if you want to call me a liar too, fine.
John Roche sent me a scene that was not filmed from that very episode, with Urko and Zauis in a hot tub (a la "Beneath"). It was written but Booth Colman says he never saw the scene before, so they
must have decided at the last minute to shelve it. Makes sense to me they would do Bill's scene as a last minute replacement (no guest stars, just a short scene between Bill and Lee). Bill is pleased to be the only
ape actor on the show to apply his own makeup. That would be a hollow achievement if it was based on a lie. I guess they decided to cut it for time since it didn't advance the story. But Bill received residuals so
he assumed it was shown in Europe or something (I think he mentions that in Marvel magazine).
They probably had Bill do it because of his skills playing an ape and his abilities with makeup. If I needed a last minute scene that's who I'd hire. Maybe you're right, maybe they decided at the
last minute he was a "dead ringer" for Roddy and that's why it was cut.
No, Bill was not Roddy's 2nd cousin, he just got hired for a scene because of his skills like most actors do. But he played an ape on camera and that's what he publicized in the '70's. Roddy
wasn't going around meeting the kids. Bill provided some Hollywood magic to kids and what's wrong with that?
Believe him, don't, doesn't matter. Bill knows he did it and no one can take away the memories. Well, except maybe Alzheimer's or something. Jeff
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46358 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Well, sorry, that's all there is for now.
Hopefully Bill will eventually get a copy of the scene from the monolithic Fox
(which it wasn't back then before our happy world of corporate domination) or it
will turn up from someone's old copy from another country.
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 10:11
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
*** This is all very
interesting, but it still fails to show any "proof" of the existence of such a
scene...
Okay, you made yourself clear as to why you believe him (he's
your pal), but as far as answering if there is a script with such a scene it,
it falls short. The bit about the scripted Zaius/Urko scene is it's own topic
really, it doesn't cover the scene in question.
In a message
dated 9/24/2007 10:58:49 AM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net
writes:
I have
seen a photo of Bill in the scene taken by the actor who played the gorilla
(Lee Delano, who often played gorillas on the show; he also makes convention
appearances, so if someone wants to ask him I'm sure he'd confirm it). Bill
doesn't have the picture any more but I've seen it (Bill in ape makeup on
the TV show set) so if you want to call me a liar too, fine. John
Roche sent me a scene that was not filmed from that very episode, with Urko
and Zauis in a hot tub (a la "Beneath"). It was written but Booth Colman
says he never saw the scene before, so they must have decided at the last
minute to shelve it. Makes sense to me they would do Bill's scene as a last
minute replacement (no guest stars, just a short scene between Bill and
Lee). Bill is pleased to be the only ape actor on the show to apply his own
makeup. That would be a hollow achievement if it was based on a lie. I guess
they decided to cut it for time since it didn't advance the story. But Bill
received residuals so he assumed it was shown in Europe or something (I
think he mentions that in Marvel magazine). They probably had Bill
do it because of his skills playing an ape and his abilities with makeup. If
I needed a last minute scene that's who I'd hire. Maybe you're right, maybe
they decided at the last minute he was a "dead ringer" for Roddy and that's
why it was cut. No, Bill was not Roddy's 2nd cousin, he just got
hired for a scene because of his skills like most actors do. But he played
an ape on camera and that's what he publicized in the '70's. Roddy wasn't
going around meeting the kids. Bill provided some Hollywood magic to kids
and what's wrong with that? Believe him, don't, doesn't matter.
Bill knows he did it and no one can take away the memories. Well, except
maybe Alzheimer's or something. Jeff
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46359 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Message
-- This bit I
don't understand at all. Why would they bother putting
together different a version of an episode for outside the US? It just
makes no sense at all and I personally don't believe it happened.
Has anyone who saw
the shows outside the US ever mentioned viewing different scenes? I don't ever
recall anyone saying so.
Neil
But Bill
received residuals so he assumed it was shown in Europe or something (I think
he mentions that in Marvel magazine).
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46360 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
I don’t think there’s any
tangible evidence about this.
That’s not to say it didn’t
happen – just that there’s no evidence.
It would be a wonderful POTA mystery to
resolve….
I don’t think Jeff is saying they
put together a different on for other countries, I think he’s saying they
cut some scenes from the USA
version. Like the UK got a different CONQUEST comic (well a panel or 2)
and Japan somehow got an un-cut BATTLE.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
9:23 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
-- This bit I don't understand at all. Why would they
bother putting together different a version of an episode for
outside the US ?
It just makes no sense at all and I personally don't believe it happened.
Has anyone who saw the shows outside the
US ever
mentioned viewing different scenes? I don't ever recall anyone saying so.
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 2:07
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
But Bill received residuals so he assumed it was shown
in Europe or something (I think he mentions
that in Marvel magazine).

<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46361 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Message
-- The question
remains though- if they did cut scenes for the US but not overseas, then WHY did
they do it???
Neil
I don’t think Jeff is
saying they put together a different on for other countries, I think he’s
saying they cut some scenes from the USA version.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46362 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.htmlActually there are plenty of precendents and the reason is very simple.
Countries have different 'standards' (for lack of a better word) for the
amount of actual screen time of an episode versus the
commercial/advertizing content time. If the UK 1/2 hour shows were
running say 25 'show' minutes and the US was showing 24, then the UK
version of the same show would have 1 minute of extra footage.
American (and Canadian :) ) Ultraman fans who buy the DVDs of the
original shows now have the 'missing footage' that was filmed and shown
in Japan, but never here. (The downside of this was that in the Ultraman
case, they only dubbed English for what was actually needed, so those
missing minutes are now shown with subs on the DVD sets.)
The time 'standards' also fluctuate with time. That is why when an older
show gets rebroadcast nowadays (and they do not make a special allotment
for the difference) the rebroadcast shows are are slightly edited to
make room for more commercials.
Not saying that this is necessarily the case here, but certainly a
possibility.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:30 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
> -- The question remains though- if they did cut scenes for the US but
> not overseas, then WHY did they do it???
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf
> Of Michael & Sally Whitty
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:27 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I don't think Jeff is saying they put together a different on for
> othercountries, I think he's saying they cut some scenes from the USA
> version.
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=46360/stime=1190762887/nc1=3858794/nc2=3848618/nc3=4699087>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46363 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/25/2007 6:23:01 PM Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
-- This bit I don't understand at all. Why would they bother putting together different a version of an
episode for outside the US? It just makes no sense at all and I personally don't believe it happened.
*** The thing is, they wouldn't... It would involve having to re-edit the show to put that scene in and cutting of other material... It makes no sense in my eyes either...
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46364 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/25/2007 6:28:30 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
I don't think Jeff is saying they put together a different one for other countries, I think he's
saying they cut some scenes from the USA version.
*** Whitty,
In order to have that "scene" in a different version, then they would have had to cut something else to fit the allotted time... Even in 1974, I'm sure foreign networks were only allowed so much time
for programing to advertising per hour...
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46365 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/25/2007 6:31:29 PM Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
-- The question remains though- if they did cut scenes for the US but not overseas, then WHY did they do
it???
*** As I asked previously, if a show like APES was always trying to pad itself out with extended "action scenes" (ie running into or away from the camera), why would they cut a dialog scene... I'm not
making this up about if they ran short, they added running footage... Ron Harper himself said they did this in that interview with him that appeared in that TV magazine, plus, if you read the article from TV Guide that
Whitty just posted the link to a few days ago, it's also hinted at in there...
Anyway, "The Interrogation" certainly is an episode that has more running than needed... If they wanted to add the brief scene in question, they could have... The could have easily cut that beginning
sequence down, or make a few cuts off the scene where it shows Galen and Virdon running, then stopping to say why they are running...
**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46366 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
*** Well, I've looked at the script on Hunter's sight... It is the "Final" script for The Interrogation", so apparently that would mean that there were not going to be any scenes
added to it, maybe there was some rewriting of a few things, but nothing additional is to be added from what I understand...
Anyway, I looked at the "Final" script and there was nothing closely resembling the scene in question. Yes, the Zaius/Urko sauna scene is in there, but as this was the final script, they probably just
decided to cut it entirely... Same with the additional scenes of Burke being interrogated in his past life, but there was nothing of a farmer being questioned by the police... The scene of the fugitives acquisition was
different in that they didn't hijack a cart at all, but simply asked for help, BUT the dialog after that, with the gorillas is pretty much the same ("What's your business here?"... "Delivering hay
for the troopers horses", etc.) so maybe they just altered the scene a bit to add some excitement by having them hijack a gorilla, and so Roddy could ham it up (after all, he is on record as saying how he loved to
play a character inside the character, so they might have let him go in drag to satisfy that?) In any case, no farmer being hijacked, and no questioning by gorillas of said farmer...
Maybe we will all get to see the scene when it appears... It's probably on the Japanese DVD set of the TV series... I think I heard it's on the same disc as the blooper reel showing Roddy in a bad mood that
was mentioned by that guy on "the other group"...
In a message dated 9/25/2007 8:38:29 AM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
Well, sorry, that's all there is for now. Hopefully Bill will eventually get a copy of the scene
from the monolithic Fox (which it wasn't back then before our happy world of corporate domination) or it will turn up from someone's old copy from another country. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: mlccougar@...
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
*** This is all very interesting, but it still fails to show any "proof" of the existence of such a scene...
Okay, you made yourself clear as to why you believe him (he's your pal), but as far as answering if there is a script with such a scene it, it falls short. The bit about the scripted Zaius/Urko scene is it's
own topic really, it doesn't cover the scene in question.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46367 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Some countries don't have commercials,
like the UK, I guess. It's possible they needed a few minutes more of program.
In the Marvel interview over 30 years ago, Bill said he received residuals and
thought maybe the scene was shown somewhere. Maybe he received residuals for
filming the program even if it wasn't used. But he didn't receive residuals for
a scene that didn't exist. If he's lying he's been keeping it up for a long
time. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 4:26
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
I donÂ’t think thereÂ’s
any tangible evidence about this.
ThatÂ’s not to say it
didn’t happen – just that there’s no evidence.
It would be a
wonderful POTA mystery to resolveÂ….
I donÂ’t think Jeff is
saying they put together a different on for other countries, I think heÂ’s
saying they cut some scenes from the USA version.
Like the UK got a different CONQUEST comic (well a panel or 2) and Japan
somehow got an un-cut BATTLE.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007 9:23
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
-- This bit I don't understand
at all. Why would they bother putting together different a version
of an episode for outside the US ? It just makes no
sense at all and I personally don't believe it happened.
Has anyone who saw the shows
outside the US ever mentioned viewing different scenes?
I don't ever recall anyone saying so.
Neil
-----Original
Message----- From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K. Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 2:07
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
But Bill received
residuals so he assumed it was shown in Europe or something (I
think he mentions that in Marvel magazine).

<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46368 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Bill was with me when I got the POTA TV show
DVD. He anxiously looked to see if the scene was included in the "uncut" DVD
(maybe only the "uncut" American versions). I see with my own eyes what Bill is
going through on this. He's not friggin' lying. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 4:56
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
In a message dated 9/25/2007 6:23:01 PM Central
Daylight Time, ntfoster@bigpond. com writes:
-- This bit I
don't understand at all. Why would they bother putting together different a
version of an episode for outside the US? It just makes no sense at all and
I personally don't believe it happened.
*** The thing is, they
wouldn't... It would involve having to re-edit the show to put that scene in
and cutting of other material... It makes no sense in my eyes
either...
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46369 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/25/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Who knows what goes through editors' heads?
That's why directors always want "final cut".
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 5:08
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
In a message dated 9/25/2007 6:31:29 PM Central
Daylight Time, ntfoster@bigpond. com writes:
-- The
question remains though- if they did cut scenes for the US but not overseas,
then WHY did they do it???
*** As I asked previously,
if a show like APES was always trying to pad itself out with extended "action
scenes" (ie running into or away from the camera), why would they cut a dialog
scene... I'm not making this up about if they ran short, they added running
footage... Ron Harper himself said they did this in that interview with him
that appeared in that TV magazine, plus, if you read the article from TV Guide
that Whitty just posted the link to a few days ago, it's also hinted at in
there...
Anyway, "The Interrogation" certainly is an episode that has
more running than needed... If they wanted to add the brief scene in question,
they could have... The could have easily cut that beginning sequence down, or
make a few cuts off the scene where it shows Galen and Virdon running, then
stopping to say why they are
running...
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46370 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/25/2007 6:52:47 PM Central Daylight Time, darios@... writes:
If the UK 1/2 hour shows were running say 25 'show' minutes and the US was showing 24, then the UK
version of the same show would have 1 minute of extra footage.
*** Are you saying that any US made show shown in the UK has an extra minute added to it? It may be that shows made in the
UK, for UK consumption are "25 minutes" in length, but US shows shown over there do not have an extra minute of footage filmed, scored, etc. just to satisfy an overseas market... If that was the case, going by
your time estimates, then a show like APES would have "2 minutes" extra per episode for the UK market, being that APES was a "50 minute" show... I don't see this happening... APES was on a tight
budget, and while it was being filmed, they would not have known that it was going to become a UK phenomenon... As a matter of fact, who is to say that they would have known it was going to be shown anywhere outside of
the US... That being said, I certainly do not see them filming scenes just on the chance that a foreign distributor "might" decide to air it overseas...
American (and Canadian :) ) Ultraman fans who buy the DVDs of the
original shows now have the 'missing footage' that was filmed and shown
in Japan, but never here. (The downside of this was that in the Ultraman
case, they only dubbed English for what was actually needed, so those
missing minutes are now shown with subs on the DVD sets.)
*** The ULTRAMAN series was made in Japan, for the Japanese market, so it would be created according to their standards. It's not as though ULTRAMAN is/was an American series, and suddenly it was being exported
so they created extra minutes.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46371 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/25/2007 10:58:52 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
Bill said he received residuals and thought maybe the scene was shown somewhere. Maybe he received
residuals for filming the program even if it wasn't used. But he didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass here... But have you ever seen any of these residual checks... APES still airs quite frequently over in the UK, so if there is anything being shown there, wouldn't he receive
checks today when it airs? ("Even if it wasn't used", as you're supposing... And I'm guessing that "even if it wasn't used then, if he received any residuals, wouldn't he receive them
now days too?)
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46372 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/25/2007 11:06:05 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
Who knows what goes through editors' heads? That's why directors always want "final
cut."
*** Yeah, but this was a US television series... "The Industry" sees TV as the bastard child of films... TV doesn't "count" when it comes to the director wanting their "final cut"...
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46373 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's nerds |
.html
.html
No, the idea is they are certain
length and then trimmed for the U.S. They can cut it down to any length they
want. Maybe it didn't happen that way but it was a theory as to why Bill got a
residual check. He might have got the check just for filming the episode,
whether the scene was shown or not.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:00
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
In a message dated
9/25/2007 6:52:47 PM Central Daylight Time, darios@... writes:
If the UK 1/2
hour shows were running say 25 'show' minutes and the US was showing 24,
then the UK version of the same show would have 1 minute of extra footage.
*** Are you saying that any US made show shown in the UK has an
extra minute added to it? It may be that shows made in the UK, for UK
consumption are "25 minutes" in length, but US shows shown over there do not
have an extra minute of footage filmed, scored, etc. just to satisfy an
overseas market... If that was the case, going by your time estimates, then a
show like APES would have "2 minutes" extra per episode for the UK market,
being that APES was a "50 minute" show... I don't see this happening... APES
was on a tight budget, and while it was being filmed, they would not have
known that it was going to become a UK phenomenon.. . As a matter of fact,
who is to say that they would have known it was going to be shown anywhere
outside of the US... That being said, I certainly do not see them filming
scenes just on the chance that a foreign distributor "might" decide to air it
overseas...
American
(and Canadian :) ) Ultraman fans who buy the DVDs of the original shows
now have the 'missing footage' that was filmed and shown in Japan, but
never here. (The downside of this was that in the Ultraman case, they
only dubbed English for what was actually needed, so those missing
minutes are now shown with subs on the DVD sets.)
*** The ULTRAMAN
series was made in Japan, for the Japanese market, so it would be created
according to their standards. It's not as though ULTRAMAN is/was an American
series, and suddenly it was being exported so they created extra minutes.
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46374 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
I don't want to talk about Bill's
business matters but the residuals did continue. Even Booth Colman gets very
little in residuals from the show these days, if anything. The payments are less
and less over the years.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:04
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
In a message dated
9/25/2007 10:58:52 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Bill said he
received residuals and thought maybe the scene was shown somewhere. Maybe he
received residuals for filming the program even if it wasn't used. But he
didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't
exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass here... But have you ever
seen any of these residual checks... APES still airs quite frequently over in
the UK, so if there is anything being shown there, wouldn't he receive checks
today when it airs? ("Even if it wasn't used", as you're supposing... And I'm
guessing that "even if it wasn't used then, if he received any residuals,
wouldn't he receive them now days
too?)
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46375 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
The point is everybody has their own ideas
about what makes a show flow. There could be many reasons why they would choose
to cut a whole scene and just show them running, which is more managable
time-wise. It was a short scene so maybe it was the perfect length to cut for
the right time total. Or maybe the scene sucked to them. Or maybe Bill was
brilliant and they were afraid of upstaging Roddy. Could be
anything.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:07
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
In a message dated
9/25/2007 11:06:05 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Who
knows what goes through editors' heads? That's why directors always want
"final cut."
*** Yeah, but this was a US television
series... "The Industry" sees TV as the bastard child of films... TV doesn't
"count" when it comes to the director wanting their "final
cut"...
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46376 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Message
-- It was shown on
ITV in England. They had commercials, the BBC (the only other channel at the
time didn't.)
Neil
Some countries don't have
commercials, like the UK, I guess. It's possible they needed a few minutes
more of program.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46377 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.htmlI'm not saying anything conclusively. The 1/2 hour, 24 vs 25 minute
numbers were just examples to express my point.
I'm just saying that if extra footage was available (ie, something
that was 'cut') then, conceivably, it could have been used to lengthen
a US show for a foreign market which had longer actual show times.
The only certainty is that different countries did and (still do) have
different show times.
I don't think that it would be a big deal at all to do the editing.
Country to country selling of TV shows is big business and it always
has been. The ability to sell a show already being made for a host
country is a huge financial bonus and tacking on an extra minute is
not a big deal especially when it is known that it will be required.
Even if a show is not shown at the same time in a foreign country, it
may have been 'pre-sold' which happens all the time between Canada and
the US, and it was a practice that was in place well before the 70's.
Pretty sure that the UK would figure into these types of deals as
well. The fact that POTA was an expensive show to begin with means
that it would have been all the more targetted for a pre-production
deal.
Again, if this really was the case with POTA is purely conjecture, but
certainly a possibility.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: mlccougar@...
Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:00 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
> In a message dated 9/25/2007 6:52:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
> darios@...
> writes:
>
>
> > If the UK 1/2 hour shows were running say 25 'show' minutes and
> the US was
> > showing 24, then the UK version of the same show would have 1
> minute of extra
> > footage.
>
> *** Are you saying that any US made show shown in the UK has an
> extra minute
> added to it? It may be that shows made in the UK, for UK
> consumption are "25
> minutes" in length, but US shows shown over there do not have an
> extra minute
> of footage filmed, scored, etc. just to satisfy an overseas
> market... If that
> was the case, going by your time estimates, then a show like APES
> would have "2
> minutes" extra per episode for the UK market, being that APES was
> a "50
> minute" show... I don't see this happening... APES was on a tight
> budget, and while
> it was being filmed, they would not have known that it was going
> to become a
> UK phenomenon... As a matter of fact, who is to say that they
> would have known
> it was going to be shown anywhere outside of the US... That being
> said, I
> certainly do not see them filming scenes just on the chance that a
> foreign
> distributor "might" decide to air it overseas...
>
>
> >
> > American (and Canadian :) ) Ultraman fans who buy the DVDs of the
> > original shows now have the 'missing footage' that was filmed
> and shown
> > in Japan, but never here. (The downside of this was that in the
> Ultraman> case, they only dubbed English for what was actually
> needed, so those
> > missing minutes are now shown with subs on the DVD sets.)
> >
> > *** The ULTRAMAN series was made in Japan, for the Japanese
> market, so it
> > would be created according to their standards. It's not as
> though ULTRAMAN
> > is/was an American series, and suddenly it was being exported so
> they created
> > extra minutes.
>
> <BR><BR>**************************************<BR> See what's new
> at http://www.aol.com</HTML>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46378 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Probably not as many as the United States of
Commercials.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:01
AM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
-- It was shown
on ITV in England. They had commercials, the BBC (the only other channel at
the time didn't.)
Neil
Some countries don't have
commercials, like the UK, I guess. It's possible they needed a few minutes
more of program.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46379 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
In a message dated 9/26/2007 12:26:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
veetus@... writes:
I
don't want to talk about Bill's business matters but the residuals did
continue.
Talking about Bill's residuals may seem boring
but it's more interesting that the usual fare on
the other group. How about the ratings for
TV? <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46380 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meeting the Krueger nerd head on |
.html.html
*** A simple "yes" or "no" isn't talking about his business matters... Nobody asked how much it was or anything... Sounds like more sidestepping.
In a message dated 9/26/2007 12:26:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
I don't want to talk about Bill's business matters but the residuals did continue.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46381 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.htmlRight! Shows on ITV would have fewer commercial breaks (about 3 in a
1-hour show), but longer than in the US, so it should balance
out 'more-or-less'. Just thinking of my TV show DVDs, with their
option of French dialogue. Presumably they use the same visuals with
different soundtracks? But anyway, does that suggest they were only
shown in the UK and France (and Japan)?
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
>
> Probably not as many as the United States of Commercials.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Neil Foster
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:01 AM
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
>
>
>
> -- It was shown on ITV in England. They had commercials, the BBC
(the only other channel at the time didn't.)
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On
Behalf Of Jeff K.
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:07 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
>
>
>
> Some countries don't have commercials, like the UK, I guess.
It's possible they needed a few minutes more of program.
> .
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46382 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Message
-- No probably not
but another thing just occurred to me. We are talking about a scene that was
(allegedly) filmed but then cut and replaced with the Roddy etc. scene aren't
we? If so wouldn't just replacing a scene with the other one make little or no
difference to the total running time of the episode anyway?
Neil
Probably not as many as the United States
of Commercials.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007
1:01 AM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
-- It was
shown on ITV in England. They had commercials, the BBC (the only other
channel at the time didn't.)
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46383 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Editing on the POTA |
.html.html
I think Jeff is saying there’s
possibly a longer version of the show (by a minute or two) that is cut for the
US showing.
The problem is – if this is right,
then shouldn’t there be extra footage for ALL the shows?
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
3:00 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
In a message dated 9/25/2007 6:52:47 PM Central
Daylight Time, darios@... writes:
If the UK
1/2 hour shows were running say 25 'show' minutes and the
US was showing 24, then the
UK version of
the same show would have 1 minute of extra footage.
*** Are you saying that any US
made show shown in the UK
has an extra minute added to it? It may be that shows made in the UK, for UK
consumption are "25 minutes" in length, but US shows shown over there
do not have an extra minute of footage filmed, scored, etc. just to satisfy an
overseas market... If that was the case, going by your time estimates, then a
show like APES would have "2 minutes" extra per episode for the UK
market, being that APES was a "50 minute" show... I don't see this
happening... APES was on a tight budget, and while it was being filmed, they
would not have known that it was going to become a
UK phenomenon.. . As a matter
of fact, who is to say that they would have known it was going to be shown
anywhere outside of the US ...
That being said, I certainly do not see them filming scenes just on the chance
that a foreign distributor "might" decide to air it overseas...
American (and Canadian :) ) Ultraman fans who buy the DVDs of the
original shows now have the 'missing footage' that was filmed and shown
in Japan ,
but never here. (The downside of this was that in the Ultraman
case, they only dubbed English for what was actually needed, so those
missing minutes are now shown with subs on the DVD sets.)
*** The ULTRAMAN series was made in
Japan , for the Japanese market, so
it would be created according to their standards. It's not as though ULTRAMAN
is/was an American series, and suddenly it was being exported so they created
extra minutes.
************ ********* ********* ********
See what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46384 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
Mike I think Jeff’s saying he
believes Bill so I can’t see Jeff saying “show me the Cheque”.
MIchael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
3:04 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
In a message dated 9/25/2007 10:58:52 PM Central
Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Bill said he received residuals and thought maybe the scene
was shown somewhere. Maybe he received residuals for filming the program even
if it wasn't used. But he didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't
exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass here... But have you ever seen any of these
residual checks... APES still airs quite frequently over in the
UK , so if there
is anything being shown there, wouldn't he receive checks today when it airs?
("Even if it wasn't used", as you're supposing... And I'm guessing
that "even if it wasn't used then, if he received any residuals, wouldn't
he receive them now days too?)
************ ********* ********* ********
See what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46385 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Chequing Theories |
.html.html
Jeff I think this one makes more sense!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
3:28 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's nerds
He might have got the check just for filming the episode,
whether the scene was shown or not.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46386 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meeting the Krueger nerd head on |
.html
.html
What sidestepping? Yes, Simple Simon, he got
more residuals. Is that yes or no enough for you?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 4:05
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meeting the Krueger
nerd head on
*** A simple "yes" or
"no" isn't talking about his business matters... Nobody asked how much it was
or anything... Sounds like more sidestepping.
In a message
dated 9/26/2007 12:26:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net
writes:
I don't want to talk about Bill's business matters but the
residuals did continue.
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46387 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
What "Roddy, etc" scene are you referring
to? All they did was cut a (alleged) scene.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 5:12
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
-- No probably
not but another thing just occurred to me. We are talking about a scene that
was (allegedly) filmed but then cut and replaced with the Roddy etc. scene
aren't we? If so wouldn't just replacing a scene with the other one make
little or no difference to the total running time of the episode
anyway?
Neil
Probably not as many as the United
States of Commercials.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007
1:01 AM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
-- It was
shown on ITV in England. They had commercials, the BBC (the only other
channel at the time didn't.)
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46388 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: How did BATTLE happen? |
.html.html
We should also ask ourselves here how
BATTLE happened to show up in Japan with all the extra bits, but never hailed
as anything different in the publicity.
Is it possible that Fox sent the wrong
movie to Japan ?
I know I sometimes sent the wrong page of
a comic (eg Beware the Beast) after mods had been made to change it. This was
an ERROR on my part.
Was the release of the fuller version of
Battle an error?
Michael
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46389 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
T – just say NO!
Aldo did!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Thursday, 27 September 2007
4:10 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
In a message dated 9/26/2007 12:26:47
A.M. Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
I don't want to talk about Bill's
business matters but the residuals did continue.
Talking about Bill's residuals may seem
boring
but it's more interesting that the
usual fare on
the other group. How about the
ratings for TV?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46390 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
Oh!
I thought the scene was replaced.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Thursday, 27 September 2007
11:17 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
What "Roddy, etc" scene are you referring
to? All they did was cut a (alleged) scene.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday,
September 26, 2007 5:12 PM
Subject:
RE: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
-- No probably not but another thing just occurred to me.
We are talking about a scene that was (allegedly) filmed but then cut and
replaced with the Roddy etc. scene aren't we? If so wouldn't just replacing a
scene with the other one make little or no difference to the total running time
of the episode anyway?
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007
1:09 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
Probably not as many as the United States of
Commercials.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday,
September 26, 2007 1:01 AM
Subject:
RE: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
-- It was shown on ITV in
England . They had commercials, the
BBC (the only other channel at the time didn't.)

<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46391 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.htmlIt gets even more complicated than that. Nowadays there are multiple
versions of shows dubbed in french. Canadian french shows are dubbed in
Canada and those shown in France are done there. Presumably there could
also be a difference in show (actual) times between France and here, as
we've pretty much adopted the US timing of commercials.
Not sure if that was the case in the 70's though.
Don't laugh. As a kid I never got to see the Outer Limits in english as
the local English networks did not air OL. But it was on in french at
11pm on saturday nights.
For a while, before I came to recognize any of the actors, I though that
it WAS a french show.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: nlmoxham <neilmoxham@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 7:22 pm
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Meet Cougar's needs
> Right! Shows on ITV would have fewer commercial breaks (about 3 in
> a
> 1-hour show), but longer than in the US, so it should balance
> out 'more-or-less'. Just thinking of my TV show DVDs, with their
> option of French dialogue. Presumably they use the same visuals
> with
> different soundtracks? But anyway, does that suggest they were only
> shown in the UK and France (and Japan)?
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
> >
> > Probably not as many as the United States of Commercials.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Neil Foster
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:01 AM
> > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
> >
> >
> >
> > -- It was shown on ITV in England. They had commercials, the
> BBC
> (the only other channel at the time didn't.)
> >
> > Neil
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
]
> On
> Behalf Of Jeff K.
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:07 PM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
> >
> >
> >
> > Some countries don't have commercials, like the UK, I
> guess.
> It's possible they needed a few minutes more of program.
> > .
> >
>
>
>
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46392 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
.html
.html
I doubt they accidently sent the uncut
"Battle". It probably wasn't just sitting around someplace. As a matter of fact,
they had to borrow Bill Blake's copy because they couldn't find their own. At
least that's what Bill told me. >Joking<
I think the Japanese have a history of being
giddy about POTA so maybe they figured they'd appreciate it more than other
countries. Though it was shown on U.S. TV.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:07
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] How did BATTLE
happen?
We should also ask
ourselves here how BATTLE happened to show up in Japan with all the extra
bits, but never hailed as anything different in the
publicity.
Is it possible that
Fox sent the wrong movie to
Japan ?
I know I sometimes
sent the wrong page of a comic (eg Beware the Beast) after mods had been made
to change it. This was an ERROR on my part.
Was the release of
the fuller version of Battle an
error?
Michael
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46393 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 9/26/2007 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46394 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meeting the Krueger nerd head on |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/26/2007 8:08:21 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
What sidestepping?
*** What sidestepping you ask: I asked you if you personally ever seen any type of evidence from him that he was indeed paid... All you said was that you aren't gonna discuss his business matters... Odd, since
it's this business matter of being paid for a non-existing scene that you some adamantly brought up...
Another bit of sidestepping: When asked "Where is that scene in the Final script" there was no reply... Even the written but unused sauna scene exists in script form, yet NOTHING concerning a farmer chimp
and the Gorilla Police is anywhere to be seen. If such a scene was filmed, wouldn't it be/shouldn't it be in the FINAL shooting script...
And one more thing, even the unused/deleted scenes from the films have some sort of photographic AND scripted proof to show they were at least attempted (even if only rehearsed...) There is neither such evidence
concerning "The Interrogation" and Mr. Blake.
If you go back and read my posts, I asked many questions/things to be questioned, etc., and there are very few clear-cut answers to anything.... (At least in my opinion.)
I'd vote for you when you run for office, but I could not recommend you for a defense lawyer.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46395 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Editing on the POTA |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/26/2007 8:03:33 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
I think Jeff is saying there's possibly a longer version of the show (by a minute or two) that is cut for
the US showing.
The problem is – if this is right, then shouldn't there be extra footage for ALL the shows?
*** And if you read my post, I did ask that question, just not as directly...
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007 3:00 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
If that was the case, going by your time estimates, then a show like APES would have "2 minutes" extra per
episode for the UK market, being that APES was a "50 minute" show...
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46396 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/26/2007 8:04:20 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
Mike I think Jeff's saying he believes Bill so I can't see Jeff saying "show me the Cheque".
*** Perhaps, BUT, if Mr. Blake is so adamantly talking to Jeff about this, I could hypothetically see a coversation arising in which Bill would say to Jeffery "Damnit Jeff, I just don't understand this at
all... Look, look at this... They sent me a check for this and yet they can't find this scene... It's right here, look... Pay to the order of William Blake... It makes no sense to me..."
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46397 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Chequing Theories |
.html.html
** It makes NO SENSE to me... I am pretty sure that an actor will get paid while the film/show is being produced for the work they did that day of filming or whatever, BUT,
once the show hits the market, they are not paid residuals if their stuff ended up on the cutting room floor...
In a message dated 9/26/2007 8:05:37 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
Jeff I think this one makes more sense!
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007 3:28 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's nerds
He might have got the check just for filming the episode, whether the scene was shown or not.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46398 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/26/2007 8:08:54 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
Was the release of the fuller version of Battle an error?
*** I think when they were doing the Laser Disc they probably wanted to use the best (cleanest) print available... The "TV version" of BATTLE probably suited their needs...
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46399 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Editing on the POTA |
.html.html
Yes I think we can discount this theory.
Again, not to call Bill a liar but I can’t
see this theory panning out.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Thursday, 27 September 2007
3:20 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Editing on
the POTA
In
a message dated 9/26/2007 8:03:33 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com
writes:
I think Jeff is saying
there’s possibly a longer version of the show (by a minute or two) that is cut
for the US
showing.
The problem is – if this is right, then shouldn’t there be
extra footage for ALL the shows?
*** And if you read my post, I did ask that question, just not as directly...
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of mlccougar@aol. com
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
3:00 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
If that was the case, going by your time estimates, then a
show like APES would have "2 minutes" extra per episode for the UK market,
being that APES was a "50 minute" show...
************ ********* ********* ********
See what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46400 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
.html.html
Oh! I thought Battle
was always show in Japan
as the extended version…???
MIchael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Thursday, 27 September 2007
3:30 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did
BATTLE happen?
In
a message dated 9/26/2007 8:08:54 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com
writes:
Was the release of the
fuller version of Battle
an error?
*** I think when they were doing the Laser Disc they probably wanted to use the
best (cleanest) print available... The "TV version" of
BATTLE probably suited
their needs...
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46401 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/27/2007 1:32:27 AM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
Oh! I thought Battle was always show in Japan as the extended version…???
*** Theatrically? No...
Nope, the Japanese got the same version we got... the one that was clipped down in editing just so they could squeeze another showing out of it... Well, at least that's the theory as to why that film was cut...
(See James ar the pota group for pinpoint accuracy on this...)
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46402 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
Message
-- That's what I
thought too. Wasn't it 'replaced' with the Roddy hamming it up as a woman
scene?
Neil
Oh!
I thought the scene
was replaced.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K. Sent: Thursday, 27 September 2007 11:17
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
What "Roddy, etc" scene are
you referring to? All they did was cut a (alleged) scene.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, September 26, 2007 5:12 PM
Subject:
RE:
[PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
-- No probably not but another
thing just occurred to me. We are talking about a scene that was (allegedly)
filmed but then cut and replaced with the Roddy etc. scene aren't we? If so
wouldn't just replacing a scene with the other one make little or no
difference to the total running time of the episode
anyway?
Neil
-----Original
Message----- From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K. Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007
1:09 AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
Probably not as many as
the United States of Commercials.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:01 AM
Subject:
RE:
[PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
-- It was shown on ITV in
England . They had commercials, the BBC (the only
other channel at the time didn't.)

<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46403 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: How did BATTLE happen? |
.html.html
I hope you are being sarcastic Cougar
because James saying this is one of the more absurd things he has said and has
far less basis in fact that what Jeffis saying!
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Thursday, 27 September 2007
4:36 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did
BATTLE happen?
In
a message dated 9/27/2007 1:32:27 AM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com
writes:
Oh! I thought
Battle was always show in
Japan as the extended version…???
*** Theatrically? No...
Nope, the Japanese got the same version we got... the one that was clipped down
in editing just so they could squeeze another showing out of it... Well, at
least that's the theory as to why that film was cut... (See James ar the pota
group for pinpoint accuracy on this...)
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46404 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meeting Cougar's boyfriend |
.html
.html
Listen Chuck, you never asked me if I saw a
check stub for residuals (I haven't, because it's a waste of my time because I
believe him; not only believe him, I know it's true). Check your
posts!
Second, I brought up the residuals because
HE brought up the residuals 30 years ago so it's fair game. But how much, how
many residuals, that's nobody's business.
A "final" script doesn't always mean a final
script if they add something at the last minute, improvise, whatever. If it's
the "final" script and the sauna scene is in it, how come the sauna scene isn't
in the episode? It's the final script! As I said, my idea is they decided to
cancel the sauna scene and Bill's scene might have been a replacement. Bill saw
the script on Hunter's site and was disappointed the scene wasn't in it. He said
to me, "My history has been erased". He had a script, too, that unfortunately is
lost. He's had some bad luck recently. If this was 10 years ago he could've
given you all the proof you needed. As it stands you can say, "He doesn't have
the script, bla, bla, bla", who cares. Bill (and I) don't owe you an
explanation. If the footage turns up we'll provide you with ketchup or mustard
so you can eat it.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 10:14
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meeting the Krueger
nerd head on
In a message dated
9/26/2007 8:08:21 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
What
sidestepping?
*** What sidestepping you ask: I asked
you if you personally ever seen any type of evidence from him that he was
indeed paid... All you said was that you aren't gonna discuss his business
matters... Odd, since it's this business matter of being paid for a
non-existing scene that you some adamantly brought up...
Another bit
of sidestepping: When asked "Where is that scene in the Final script" there
was no reply... Even the written but unused sauna scene exists in script form,
yet NOTHING concerning a farmer chimp and the Gorilla Police is anywhere to be
seen. If such a scene was filmed, wouldn't it be/shouldn't it be in the FINAL
shooting script...
And one more thing, even the unused/deleted scenes
from the films have some sort of photographic AND scripted proof to show they
were at least attempted (even if only rehearsed... ) There is neither such
evidence concerning "The Interrogation" and Mr. Blake.
If you go back
and read my posts, I asked many questions/things to be questioned, etc., and
there are very few clear-cut answers to anything.... (At least in my opinion.)
I'd vote for you when you run for office, but I could not recommend you
for a defense
lawyer.
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46405 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html
.html
OK, Cougar did ask if I saw a residual
check. My bad. No, I haven't. I haven't seen Booth Colman's either but I believe
him when he says he once got one for 10 cents. I don't go around constantly
checking to see if people are lying unless they give me a reason to. Bill and
Booth are good, honest folks. Believe it or not. I don't have to prove
anything. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:04
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
In a message dated
9/25/2007 10:58:52 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Bill said he
received residuals and thought maybe the scene was shown somewhere. Maybe he
received residuals for filming the program even if it wasn't used. But he
didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't
exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass here... But have you ever
seen any of these residual checks... APES still airs quite frequently over in
the UK, so if there is anything being shown there, wouldn't he receive checks
today when it airs? ("Even if it wasn't used", as you're supposing... And I'm
guessing that "even if it wasn't used then, if he received any residuals,
wouldn't he receive them now days
too?)
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46406 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Meet Cougar's needs |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/27/2007 2:33:51 AM Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
-- That's what I thought too. Wasn't it 'replaced' with the Roddy hamming it up as a woman
scene?
*** Well, from looking at the script on Hunter's sight, there was never a scene involving a farmer chimp, a wagon, and being interrogated by the police...
However, there is the scene where Virdon and Galen get help from a human driving a wagon, and he is talked to by the police as he is approached by the police. This scene, as scripted, has the dialog between the
human and the troopers as it was in the show... The dialog is there "What's your business here" "Delivering hay for thr troopers horse" "Okay, drop the hay and come right out..." etc.
BUT rather than being a human dealing with the gorillas as scripted, they changed it up to being the disguised Galen...
The scene was never a replacement scene, it was always there... It's just the characters playing it out that changed... It's on Hunter's sight if you'd like to check it out.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46407 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: [PotaDG) Bill sez |
.html
.html
Bill sez he has a clipping from
"Daily Variety" from back in the day which includes him in the cast from the
episode. He recently found out that SAG had accumulated residuals for him from
video releases of the show (so he gets paid for the episode even though his
scene was cut). The next time I see him I will look at the check stub to confirm
it, Inspector Cougar. He also said any one is free to question Lee Delano, his
costar, about the scene, as I said. Fin. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:37
AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
OK, Cougar did ask if I saw a residual
check. My bad. No, I haven't. I haven't seen Booth Colman's either but I
believe him when he says he once got one for 10 cents. I don't go around
constantly checking to see if people are lying unless they give me a reason
to. Bill and Booth are good, honest folks. Believe it or not. I don't have to
prove anything. Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:04
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
In a message dated
9/25/2007 10:58:52 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Bill said
he received residuals and thought maybe the scene was shown somewhere.
Maybe he received residuals for filming the program even if it wasn't
used. But he didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't
exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass here... But have you
ever seen any of these residual checks... APES still airs quite frequently
over in the UK, so if there is anything being shown there, wouldn't he
receive checks today when it airs? ("Even if it wasn't used", as you're
supposing... And I'm guessing that "even if it wasn't used then, if he
received any residuals, wouldn't he receive them now days
too?)
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46408 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Jeffery William Greene... |
.html.html
So, I never asked you if you seen any check stubs huh?... Okay, forgive me for not saying check "stub", but look below and you'll what I asked you... I highlighted it for your blind eyes, but
I asked you...
----- Original Message -----
From: mlccougar@...
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
In a message dated 9/25/2007 10:58:52 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
Bill said he received residuals and thought maybe the scene was shown somewhere. Maybe he received
residuals for filming the program even if it wasn't used. But he didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass here... But have you ever seen any of these residual checks...
APES still airs quite frequently over in the UK, so if there is anything being shown there, wouldn't he receive checks today when it airs? ("Even if
it wasn't used", as you're supposing... And I'm guessing that "even if it wasn't used then, if he received any residuals, wouldn't he receive them now days too?)
You're just pissed off that you have been proven wrong, or rather that nobody believes the (lack of any solid) proof that you tried putting forward.
Another of your stories to try looking important has been shot down... You want to keep these people all to yourself, that's fine, it just shows what a hanger-on you are... You may like APES, but what you
like more is the small bit of attention you get from it... You seem to enjoy being looked at as an authority of sorts because you know a few of the actors and a few of the fakers.
I'm sure even if Bill had everything all lined up there ready to show the world that this story isn't false, you wouldn't show it... We could ask you if you'd have Bill "stop by" to share it
and you'd have some convoluted story of "He's too busy" or "He doesn't have the internet", when you yourself could write what he told you and post it... Kinda like the time when
Whitty asked if you could have the world famous Eric Greene join the group or post comments from time to time and you were like "Eric doesn't have a access to a computer" which of course was a lie,
because if it wasn't then please explain how he was constantly bidding on eBay?
In a message dated 9/27/2007 11:24:35 AM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
Listen Chuck, you never asked me if I saw a check stub for residuals (I haven't, because it's a
waste of my time because I believe him; not only believe him, I know it's true). Check your posts!
Second, I brought up the residuals because HE brought up the residuals 30 years ago so it's fair game. But how much, how many residuals, that's nobody's business.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46409 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Jeffery William Greene... |
.html
.html
Cougar, you are so full of shit I don't know
why I waste my time. I didn't bring up Bill in the first place...YOU did,
calling him a liar and me deluded. So don't give me any BS about me flaunting my
friends.
As for Eric Greene, I invited him to show up
on these groups, he said he'd "try" and he didn't do it. At the time, maybe
still, he DIDN'T have his own computer. He used the computer at work. If he used
that for ebay, I don't know. So don't start calling me a liar too or I'll kick
your teeth in.
Best, Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:04
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Jeffery William
Greene...
So, I never asked you
if you seen any check stubs huh?... Okay, forgive me for not saying check
"stub", but look below and you'll what I asked you... I highlighted it for
your blind eyes, but I asked you...
-----
Original Message ----- From: mlccougar@aol. com To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:04 PM Subject:
Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's needs
In a message dated 9/25/2007
10:58:52 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Bill said
he received residuals and thought maybe the scene was shown somewhere.
Maybe he received residuals for filming the program even if it wasn't
used. But he didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't
exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass here... But
have you ever seen any of these residual checks... APES
still airs quite frequently over in the UK, so if there is anything being
shown there, wouldn't he receive checks today when it airs? ("Even if it
wasn't used", as you're supposing... And I'm guessing that "even if it wasn't
used then, if he received any residuals, wouldn't he receive them now days
too?)
You're just pissed off that you have been proven wrong,
or rather that nobody believes the (lack of any solid) proof that you tried
putting forward.
Another of your stories to try looking
important has been shot down... You want to keep these people all to yourself,
that's fine, it just shows what a hanger-on you are... You may like APES, but
what you like more is the small bit of attention you get from it... You seem
to enjoy being looked at as an authority of sorts because you know a few of
the actors and a few of the fakers.
I'm sure even if Bill had
everything all lined up there ready to show the world that this story isn't
false, you wouldn't show it... We could ask you if you'd have Bill "stop by"
to share it and you'd have some convoluted story of "He's too busy" or
"He doesn't have the internet", when you yourself could write what he told you
and post it... Kinda like the time when Whitty asked if you could have
the world famous Eric Greene join the group or post comments from time to time
and you were like "Eric doesn't have a access to a computer" which of course
was a lie, because if it wasn't then please explain how he was constantly
bidding on eBay?
In a message dated
9/27/2007 11:24:35 AM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Listen Chuck,
you never asked me if I saw a check stub for residuals (I haven't, because
it's a waste of my time because I believe him; not only believe him, I know
it's true). Check your posts! Second, I brought up the residuals
because HE brought up the residuals 30 years ago so it's fair game. But how
much, how many residuals, that's nobody's
business.
************ ********* ********* ******** See
what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46410 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Jeffery William Greene... |
.html
.html
Message
-- I know I have
bid against him on at least 2 or 3 occasions so he must have been
using a work computer, the naughty boy.
Neil
He used the computer at work. If he used
that for ebay, I don't know.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46411 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Ten Cents |
.html.html
Fellas,
Cougar – you have every right to
question Jeff. However, you really should not say he’s lying or that
Bill is lying. You may conclude that, but the evidence that anyone is lying is
not there. If you find genuine evidence that a lie has been told it’s a
different story but at the moment it’s just that you don’t believe
a claim. That’s your right – not everyone just blindly believes
what they are told. No good journalist believes anything without evidence.
Jeff – you have every right to
choose to believe Bill. But please don’t try to force us to agree
because you say Bill’s a good guy. There are lots of “good honest
people” who will sell you a beautiful (rat infested) house or a perfect
(rusted frame) car – they are trained to be nice and “believable”
but often it’s these very people who are indeed full of shit. Everyone
here has a perfect right to question what you say and to ask for evidence. I
mean, so far it’s like an episode of the X-FILES where every tiny shred
of evidence is non-existent! No wonder Cougar keeps asking because there is NO
evidence!
Neither of you has a scrap of evidence to
say yay or nay.
This is a genuine POTA mystery and I’d
like us to stick to the facts without any more shit slinging or name calling.
Jeff – I’m sure you didn’t really mean to say you would
someone’s teeth in if they call you a name?
Mike – if you did accuse Jeff of
lying please apologise. Think what you like – please don’t accuse
him of lying on this group.
Now let’s get back to the facts,
because I have totally lost my place (see my next post please).
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Friday, 28 September 2007
10:15 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Jeffery
William Greene...
Cougar, you are so full of shit I don't know why I
waste my time. I didn't bring up Bill in the first place...YOU did, calling him
a liar and me deluded. So don't give me any BS about me flaunting my friends.
As for Eric Greene, I invited him to show up on these
groups, he said he'd "try" and he didn't do it. At the time, maybe
still, he DIDN'T have his own computer. He used the computer at work. If he
used that for ebay, I don't know. So don't start calling me a liar too or I'll
kick your teeth in.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday,
September 27, 2007 1:04 PM
Subject:
[PotaDG] Re:
Jeffery William Greene...
So, I never asked you if you seen any check stubs
huh?... Okay, forgive me for not saying check "stub", but look below
and you'll what I asked you... I highlighted it for your blind eyes, but I
asked you...
----- Original Message -----
From: mlccougar@aol. com
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007
10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
In a message dated 9/25/2007 10:58:52 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Bill said he received residuals and thought maybe the scene
was shown somewhere. Maybe he received residuals for filming the program even
if it wasn't used. But he didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't
exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass
here... But have you ever seen any of these residual checks... APES
still airs quite frequently over in the
UK , so if there is anything being
shown there, wouldn't he receive checks today when it airs? ("Even if it
wasn't used", as you're supposing... And I'm guessing that "even if
it wasn't used then, if he received any residuals, wouldn't he receive them now
days too?)
You're just pissed off that you have been proven wrong, or rather that nobody
believes the (lack of any solid) proof that you tried putting forward.
Another of your stories to try looking important has been shot down...
You want to keep these people all to yourself, that's fine, it just shows what
a hanger-on you are... You may like APES, but what you like more is the small
bit of attention you get from it... You seem to enjoy being looked at as an
authority of sorts because you know a few of the actors and a few of the fakers.
I'm sure even if Bill had everything all lined up there ready to show the world
that this story isn't false, you wouldn't show it... We could ask you if you'd
have Bill "stop by" to share it and you'd have some convoluted story
of "He's too busy" or "He doesn't have the internet",
when you yourself could write what he told you and post it... Kinda like the
time when Whitty asked if you could have the world famous Eric Greene
join the group or post comments from time to time and you were like "Eric
doesn't have a access to a computer" which of course was a lie, because if
it wasn't then please explain how he was constantly bidding on eBay?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46412 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Christopher Percival Lawless |
.html.html
If Chris Lawless finds out about this….and
he hates Eric ALMOST as much as he hates me….but not quite as much as he
hates Russo….!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Friday, 28 September 2007
10:36 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Jeffery
William Greene...
-- I know I have bid against him on at least 2 or
3 occasions so he must have been using a work computer, the naughty boy.
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On
Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007
10:15 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Jeffery
William Greene...
He used the computer at work. If he used that for
ebay, I don't know.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46413 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
.html.html
Fact #1.
Bill Blake has mentioned in an interview (Planet of
the Apes Curtis Magazine #?) that he filmed a scene for THE INTERROGATION that
was never used.
Can someone please provide me with the number if the
issue and maybe a scan of the interview or at least any relevant lines that
relate to this scene?
MIchael
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46414 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ten Cents |
.html
.html
Fine, then let's just drop it. It's a fact,
Landon, but this liar's done.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:47
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Ten Cents
Fellas,
Cougar – you have
every right to question Jeff. However, you really should not say heÂ’s
lying or that Bill is lying. You may conclude that, but the evidence
that anyone is lying is not there. If you find genuine evidence that a
lie has been told itÂ’s a different story but at the moment itÂ’s just that you
don’t believe a claim. That’s your right – not everyone just blindly
believes what they are told. No good journalist believes anything
without evidence.
Jeff – you have every
right to choose to believe Bill. But please donÂ’t try to force us to
agree because you say Bill’s a good guy. There are lots of “good honest
people” who will sell you a beautiful (rat infested) house or a perfect
(rusted frame) car – they are trained to be nice and “believable” but often
itÂ’s these very people who are indeed full of shit. Everyone here has a
perfect right to question what you say and to ask for evidence. I mean,
so far itÂ’s like an episode of the X-FILES where every tiny shred of evidence
is non-existent! No wonder Cougar keeps asking because there is NO
evidence!
Neither of you has a
scrap of evidence to say yay or nay.
This is a genuine
POTA mystery and IÂ’d like us to stick to the facts without any more shit
slinging or name calling. Jeff – I’m sure you didn’t really mean to say
you would someoneÂ’s teeth in if they call you a name?
Mike – if you did
accuse Jeff of lying please apologise. Think what you like – please
donÂ’t accuse him of lying on this group.
Now letÂ’s get back to
the facts, because I have totally lost my place (see my next post
please).
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Jeff K. Sent: Friday, 28 September 2007 10:15
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Jeffery William
Greene...
Cougar, you are so full of
shit I don't know why I waste my time. I didn't bring up Bill in the first
place...YOU did, calling him a liar and me deluded. So don't give me any BS
about me flaunting my friends.
As for Eric Greene, I
invited him to show up on these groups, he said he'd "try" and he didn't do
it. At the time, maybe still, he DIDN'T have his own computer. He used the
computer at work. If he used that for ebay, I don't know. So don't start
calling me a liar too or I'll kick your teeth in.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:04 PM
Subject:
[PotaDG] Re: Jeffery William Greene...
So, I never asked you if you
seen any check stubs huh?... Okay, forgive me for not saying check "stub",
but look below and you'll what I asked you... I highlighted it for your
blind eyes, but I asked you...
----- Original Message -----
From: mlccougar@aol. com To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tuesday, September
25, 2007 10:04 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet Cougar's
needs
In a message dated 9/25/2007 10:58:52 PM Central
Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Bill said he received
residuals and thought maybe the scene was shown somewhere. Maybe he
received residuals for filming the program even if it wasn't used. But he
didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't
exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass
here... But have you ever seen any of these residual checks...
APES still airs quite frequently over in the UK ,
so if there is anything being shown there, wouldn't he receive checks today
when it airs? ("Even if it wasn't used", as you're supposing... And I'm
guessing that "even if it wasn't used then, if he received any residuals,
wouldn't he receive them now days too?)
You're just pissed
off that you have been proven wrong, or rather that nobody believes the
(lack of any solid) proof that you tried putting forward.
Another
of your stories to try looking important has been shot down... You
want to keep these people all to yourself, that's fine, it just shows what a
hanger-on you are... You may like APES, but what you like more is the small
bit of attention you get from it... You seem to enjoy being looked at as an
authority of sorts because you know a few of the actors and a few of the
fakers.
I'm sure even if Bill had everything all lined up there
ready to show the world that this story isn't false, you wouldn't show it...
We could ask you if you'd have Bill "stop by" to share it and you'd have
some convoluted story of "He's too busy" or "He doesn't have the
internet", when you yourself could write what he told you and post it...
Kinda like the time when Whitty asked if you could have the world
famous Eric Greene join the group or post comments from time to time and you
were like "Eric doesn't have a access to a computer" which of course was a
lie, because if it wasn't then please explain how he was constantly bidding
on eBay?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46415 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
.html
.html
Issue # 12, Pg. 40.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 5:52
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] POTA Mystery #1 - Bill
Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1.
Fact #1.
Bill Blake has mentioned in an
interview (Planet of the Apes Curtis Magazine #?) that he filmed a scene for
THE INTERROGATION that was never used.
Can someone please provide me with
the number if the issue and maybe a scan of the interview or at least any
relevant lines that relate to this
scene?
MIchael
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46416 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Jeffery William Greene... |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/27/2007 7:06:35 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
I didn't bring up Bill in the first place...YOU did, calling him a liar and me deluded.
*** I didn't bring him up first at all... If you recall, you started the whole "Meet Cornelius' Needs" thread...
It was after Whitty ( I think) asked something where I stated my opinions, but I did not start the thread.
Have fun stalking the stars....
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46417 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ten Cents |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/27/2007 7:51:34 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
That's your right – not everyone just blindly believes what they are told. No good journalist
believes anything without evidence
*** And at least for now, I'll just finish with this:
"One can say anything Daku, that does NOT make it true.. All we know about Octavio is what he says about himself..."
**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46418 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
.html.html
Thanks Jeff.
I’m going to go search for it to
scan but if anyone else here beats me to it (likely!) I’ll be very happy.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
K.
Sent: Friday, 28 September 2007
11:36 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] POTA Mystery
#1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday,
September 27, 2007 5:52 PM
Subject:
[PotaDG] POTA
Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1.
Fact
#1.
Bill
Blake has mentioned in an interview (Planet of the Apes Curtis Magazine #?)
that he filmed a scene for THE INTERROGATION that was never used.
Can
someone please provide me with the number if the issue and maybe a scan of the
interview or at least any relevant lines that relate to this scene?
MIchael
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46419 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ten Cents |
.html.html
Jeff I don’t want to drop it.
I want to pursue it with FACTS and let’s
just drop the emotions and accusations.
Let the facts speak.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Friday, 28 September 2007
11:35 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Ten Cents
Fine, then let's just drop it. It's a fact, Landon,
but this liar's done.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday,
September 27, 2007 5:47 PM
Subject:
[PotaDG] Ten Cents
Fellas,
Cougar – you have every right to question Jeff.
However, you really should not say he’s lying or that Bill is
lying. You may conclude that, but the evidence that anyone is lying is
not there. If you find genuine evidence that a lie has been told
it’s a different story but at the moment it’s just that you
don’t believe a claim. That’s your right – not everyone
just blindly believes what they are told. No good journalist believes
anything without evidence.
Jeff – you have every right to choose to believe
Bill. But please don’t try to force us to agree because you say
Bill’s a good guy. There are lots of “good honest
people” who will sell you a beautiful (rat infested) house or a perfect
(rusted frame) car – they are trained to be nice and
“believable” but often it’s these very people who are indeed
full of shit. Everyone here has a perfect right to question what you say
and to ask for evidence. I mean, so far it’s like an episode of the
X-FILES where every tiny shred of evidence is non-existent! No wonder
Cougar keeps asking because there is NO evidence!
Neither of you has a scrap of evidence to say yay or nay.
This is a genuine POTA mystery and I’d like us to
stick to the facts without any more shit slinging or name calling. Jeff
– I’m sure you didn’t really mean to say you would
someone’s teeth in if they call you a name?
Mike – if you did accuse Jeff of lying please
apologise. Think what you like – please don’t accuse him of
lying on this group.
Now let’s get back to the facts, because I have
totally lost my place (see my next post please).
Michael
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com]
On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Friday, 28 September 2007
10:15 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Jeffery
William Greene...
Cougar, you are so full of shit I don't know why I waste my time. I didn't bring
up Bill in the first place...YOU did, calling him a liar and me deluded. So
don't give me any BS about me flaunting my friends.
As
for Eric Greene, I invited him to show up on these groups, he said he'd
"try" and he didn't do it. At the time, maybe still, he DIDN'T have
his own computer. He used the computer at work. If he used that for ebay, I
don't know. So don't start calling me a liar too or I'll kick your teeth
in.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 1:04 PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Jeffery William Greene...
So,
I never asked you if you seen any check stubs huh?... Okay, forgive me for not
saying check "stub", but look below and you'll what I asked you... I
highlighted it for your blind eyes, but I asked you...
----- Original
Message -----
From: mlccougar@aol. com
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007
10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Meet
Cougar's needs
In a message dated 9/25/2007 10:58:52 PM Central Daylight Time, veetus@earthlink. net writes:
Bill said he
received residuals and thought maybe the scene was shown somewhere. Maybe he
received residuals for filming the program even if it wasn't used. But he
didn't receive residuals for a scene that didn't exist.
*** Not trying to be a smartass
here... But have you ever seen any of these residual checks... APES
still airs quite frequently over in the
UK , so if there is
anything being shown there, wouldn't he receive checks today when it airs?
("Even if it wasn't used", as you're supposing... And I'm guessing
that "even if it wasn't used then, if he received any residuals, wouldn't
he receive them now days too?)
You're just pissed off that you have been proven wrong, or rather that nobody
believes the (lack of any solid) proof that you tried putting forward.
Another of your stories to try looking important has been shot down...
You want to keep these people all to yourself, that's fine, it just shows what
a hanger-on you are... You may like APES, but what you like more is the small
bit of attention you get from it... You seem to enjoy being looked at as an
authority of sorts because you know a few of the actors and a few of the
fakers.
I'm sure even if Bill had everything all lined up there ready to show the world
that this story isn't false, you wouldn't show it... We could ask you if you'd
have Bill "stop by" to share it and you'd have some convoluted story
of "He's too busy" or "He doesn't have the internet",
when you yourself could write what he told you and post it... Kinda like the
time when Whitty asked if you could have the world famous Eric Greene
join the group or post comments from time to time and you were like "Eric
doesn't have a access to a computer" which of course was a lie, because if
it wasn't then please explain how he was constantly bidding on eBay?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46420 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/27/2007 9:10:00 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
I'm going to go search for it to scan but if anyone else here beats me to it (likely!) I'll be very
happy.
*** I have that issue, so it's not a question of my thinking he didn't "say" it...
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46421 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: Ten Cents |
.html.html
In a message dated 9/27/2007 9:11:15 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
I want to pursue it with FACTS
*** On my behalf, I pretty much DID stick with the facts... A little overzealous because things did not add up at all, but every "question" I posed had validity to it... I didn't just make up wild
things..
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 46422 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 9/27/2007 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Mystery #1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1. |
.html.html
I understand that Mike, but it’s important
to look at what he says and to look closely at it.
Then we will look closely, bit by bit, at
other things he has said to Jeff.
A scientific approach is my suggestion
rather than us talking about believing people because we like them…just looking
at facts.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Friday, 28 September 2007
12:11 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] POTA Mystery
#1 - Bill Blake's Missing Scene. Fact #1.
In
a message dated 9/27/2007 9:10:00 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com
writes:
I’m going to go search
for it to scan but if anyone else here beats me to it (likely!) I’ll be very
happy.
*** I have that issue, so it's not a question of my thinking he didn't
"say" it...
************ ********* ********* ********
See what's new at http://www.aol. com
<.html
<.html
|
|
|
|