Yahoo! pota group — Messages 1703–1802

Dates: 2000-07-27 through 2000-08-07

Messages in pota group. Page 18 of 764.
Index Prev  Next


Group: pota Message: 1703 From: Philip Nobile Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Roth and Giamatti sign up
Group: pota Message: 1704 From: hew kwong wee Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: shirts
Group: pota Message: 1705 From: Hunter Goatley Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
Group: pota Message: 1706 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Adventure comics
Group: pota Message: 1707 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Roth and Giamatti sign up
Group: pota Message: 1708 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
Group: pota Message: 1709 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
Group: pota Message: 1710 From: Woodyjoo@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [ the remake
Group: pota Message: 1711 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Roth and Giamatti sign up
Group: pota Message: 1712 From: Philip Nobile Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
Group: pota Message: 1713 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
Group: pota Message: 1714 From: Ken & Heather Taylor Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Figures
Group: pota Message: 1715 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
Group: pota Message: 1716 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
Group: pota Message: 1717 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Roth and Giamatti sign up
Group: pota Message: 1718 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Re: [ the remake
Group: pota Message: 1719 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Roth and Giamatti sign up
Group: pota Message: 1720 From: Dave Ballard Date: 7/28/2000
Subject: (no subject)
Group: pota Message: 1721 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/28/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] (unknown)
Group: pota Message: 1722 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/30/2000
Subject: StarShip
Group: pota Message: 1723 From: Mark Gould Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
Group: pota Message: 1724 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
Group: pota Message: 1725 From: Philip Nobile Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: More casting
Group: pota Message: 1726 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
Group: pota Message: 1727 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
Group: pota Message: 1728 From: Michael Whitty Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
Group: pota Message: 1729 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
Group: pota Message: 1730 From: lawford42@juno.com Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Adventure comics
Group: pota Message: 1731 From: atetrack@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: remake
Group: pota Message: 1732 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
Group: pota Message: 1733 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
Group: pota Message: 1734 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] remake
Group: pota Message: 1735 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
Group: pota Message: 1736 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 8/1/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] remake
Group: pota Message: 1737 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 8/1/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
Group: pota Message: 1738 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/1/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
Group: pota Message: 1739 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/1/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] remake
Group: pota Message: 1740 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 8/1/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] remake
Group: pota Message: 1741 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/1/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] remake
Group: pota Message: 1742 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/1/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] remake
Group: pota Message: 1743 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/1/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] remake
Group: pota Message: 1744 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/2/2000
Subject: Pics for yer monkey asses
Group: pota Message: 1745 From: Pterosaur3@aol.com Date: 8/2/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Pics for yer monkey asses
Group: pota Message: 1746 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/2/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Pics for yer monkey asses
Group: pota Message: 1747 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/2/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Pics for yer monkey asses
Group: pota Message: 1748 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/2/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Pics for yer monkey asses
Group: pota Message: 1749 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Story from Corona
Group: pota Message: 1750 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Ursus closeup
Group: pota Message: 1751 From: Ken & Heather Taylor Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
Group: pota Message: 1752 From: Brian Dumont Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
Group: pota Message: 1753 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Some more on casting (moron casting?)
Group: pota Message: 1754 From: 90-CORVETTE Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Computer Game
Group: pota Message: 1755 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
Group: pota Message: 1756 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Computer Game
Group: pota Message: 1757 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1758 From: JSe3689836@aol.com Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1759 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/3/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1760 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1761 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1762 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1763 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1764 From: 90-CORVETTE Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1765 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1766 From: 90-CORVETTE Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1767 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1768 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1769 From: Jack Krueger Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Modem Times
Group: pota Message: 1770 From: Pterosaur3@aol.com Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1771 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1772 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: More Apes droppings
Group: pota Message: 1773 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1774 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Modem Times
Group: pota Message: 1775 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] More Apes droppings
Group: pota Message: 1776 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1777 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1778 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1779 From: Jack Krueger Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: "Battle" lines
Group: pota Message: 1780 From: Mark Gould Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Ape shapes and faces
Group: pota Message: 1781 From: Dave Ballard Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Escape Prologue
Group: pota Message: 1782 From: tinarosa Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Escape Prologue
Group: pota Message: 1783 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Escape Prologue
Group: pota Message: 1784 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Escape Prologue
Group: pota Message: 1785 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
Group: pota Message: 1786 From: Dave Ballard Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Escape prologue
Group: pota Message: 1787 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Escape prologue
Group: pota Message: 1788 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/5/2000
Subject: New Deleted Scenes
Group: pota Message: 1789 From: Kevin J. Greenland Date: 8/6/2000
Subject: That's where you all are !
Group: pota Message: 1790 From: becker0715@aol.com Date: 8/6/2000
Subject: Apes stickers?
Group: pota Message: 1791 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/6/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Apes stickers?
Group: pota Message: 1792 From: becker0715@aol.com Date: 8/6/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Apes stickers?
Group: pota Message: 1793 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/6/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Apes stickers?
Group: pota Message: 1794 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 8/6/2000
Subject: casting
Group: pota Message: 1795 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 8/6/2000
Subject: casting
Group: pota Message: 1796 From: dan piercy Date: 8/7/2000
Subject: web sites
Group: pota Message: 1797 From: Mark Gould Date: 8/7/2000
Subject: Re: Casting
Group: pota Message: 1798 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/7/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] web sites
Group: pota Message: 1799 From: dan piercy Date: 8/7/2000
Subject: www.prophecysite.com
Group: pota Message: 1800 From: tinarosa Date: 8/7/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] www.prophecysite.com
Group: pota Message: 1801 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 8/7/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] RE: Casting
Group: pota Message: 1802 From: Kevin J. Greenland Date: 8/7/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] RE: Casting



Group: pota Message: 1703 From: Philip Nobile Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Roth and Giamatti sign up
.html
From Cinescape Online:

Roth Goes 'Apes'

After a week or two of speculation it appears that British actor Tim Roth
(Resevoir Dogs) has signed on to the Tim Burton remake of Planet of the
Apes, says Hollywood Reporter this morning.

Rumor had Roth considered for major roles in both Apes and the still-casting
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, the latter helmed by Chris
Columbus. Although the rumors concerning Roth and Potter were never
officially confirmed it seems a moot point as scheduling conflicts would
make Roth's appearance in both films highly unlikely. Variety's Michael
Fleming last week reported that Roth's role would be that of "the prime
primate who enslaves [Mark] Wahlberg's character."

Paul Giamatti is also set to join the Apes project, ready to take on the
part of "Limbo," a slave-trading ape who sympathizes with the humans'
plight.

Directed by Tim Burton, shooting from a script by William Boyles, Jr.,
filming is set to begin this fall with a targeted release date of July 4,
2000. Rick Baker, who worked with Burton transforming Martin Landau into
Bela Lugosi for the film Ed Wood, will be providing special effects makeup.


____________
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1704 From: hew kwong wee Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: shirts
.html
hi , i am from Malaysia and i think i am the first malaysian who mail you .
i like pota very very much .
i do collect the figures . many of them too .

i am looking for pota t-shirts with pota label tag on the back collar .
i see in eBay which is an auction site , they are selling those pota shirt
but the tag is Hanes or Changes .
do you have idea where i can get those apes shirt with the apes tag ?

please reply . i need your help .
thanks and thanks~~~
____________
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1705 From: Hunter Goatley Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
.html
I'm on the digest, so I don't know if this has been posted yet or not.
Army Archerd's column today includes this info:

Michael Clarke Duncan, who was nominated for a supporting actor Oscar
for his performance in "The Green Mile" will costar in 20th's new
"Planet of the Apes" remake.

Duncan plays one of the good guys (excuse it, apes) to their
villainous leader, Tim Roth. The film, produced by Richard Zanuck and
directed by Tim Burton, starts filming Oct. 23, with "planet"
locations in Hawaii as well as the desert.

Hunter
------
Hunter Goatley, Process Software, http://www.process.com/
<goathunter@...> http://www.goatley.com/hunter/
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1706 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Adventure comics
.html
In a message dated 7/26/00 9:56:33 PM, lawford42@... writes:

<< The Adventure comics were- on the whole- fairly awful, with the exception
of Urchak's Folly. Ape City was clearly the worst though. Baboonjas??
Punk Biker Apes?? >>

I hated those Adventure Comics one's too. If you can get the first 30 issues
of marvels Planet of the Apes magazine, they adapted all the movies. The
Battle Adaptation is intersting because it's done from the less child
friendly original script. The only thing that stunk was the art on the POTA
adapatation. They used this guy George Tuska, who stunk!
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1707 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Roth and Giamatti sign up
.html
In a message dated 7/27/00 10:08:47 AM, soylentphil@... writes:

<< Paul Giamatti is also set to join the Apes project, ready to take on the
part of "Limbo," a slave-trading ape who sympathizes with the humans'
plight. >>

I'm really unhappy with the entire idea of an Apes remake. The only idea I
like is Rick Baker doing the effects. He and Michael Westmore (all the Star
Treks) are about the two best in Hollywood and Tom Burman isn't a skank in
that dept either!
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1708 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
.html
> I'm on the digest, so I don't know if this has been posted yet or not.
> Army Archerd's column today includes this info:
>
> Michael Clarke Duncan, who was nominated for a supporting actor Oscar
> for his performance in "The Green Mile" will costar in 20th's new
> "Planet of the Apes" remake.
>
> Duncan plays one of the good guys (excuse it, apes) to their
> villainous leader, Tim Roth. The film, produced by Richard Zanuck and
> directed by Tim Burton, starts filming Oct. 23, with "planet"
> locations in Hawaii as well as the desert.
>
> Hunter

Wow!
Excellent actor! And one excellent voice!
I hope he plays a gorilla, he would be perfect for such a role.
He's got that Ursus type voice!

Alex
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1709 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
.html
In a message dated 7/27/00 1:52:17 PM, goathunter@... writes:

<< Duncan plays one of the good guys (excuse it, apes) to their
villainous leader, Tim Roth. The film, produced by Richard Zanuck and
directed by Tim Burton, starts filming Oct. 23, with "planet"
locations in Hawaii as well as the desert >>

How about some interaction here? Whose in favor of the remake? Whose against?
Put me down for undecided. I think the original is perfect and should never
be touched.
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1710 From: Woodyjoo@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [ the remake
.html
<< How about some interaction here >>

I'm in favor the remake. What have we to lose? If it's good, that makes
just one more good flick. If it sucks, well so be it ... at the least, we
may get some good action dollys. :)

JW (Oregon)
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1711 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Roth and Giamatti sign up
.html
> In a message dated 7/27/00 10:08:47 AM, soylentphil@... writes:
>
> << Paul Giamatti is also set to join the Apes project, ready to take on
the
> part of "Limbo," a slave-trading ape who sympathizes with the humans'
> plight. >>
>
> I'm really unhappy with the entire idea of an Apes remake. The only idea I
> like is Rick Baker doing the effects. He and Michael Westmore (all the
Star
> Treks) are about the two best in Hollywood and Tom Burman isn't a skank in
> that dept either!

How ever this remake turns out, it will never effect the originals.
So as an ape fan, I welcome it.
I'm sure you don't like the idea, but I'm also sure you will pay to see it.

So just sit back and enjoy it.

Alex
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1712 From: Philip Nobile Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
.html
>Excellent actor! And one excellent voice!
>I hope he plays a gorilla, he would be perfect for such a role.
>He's got that Ursus type voice!

Ursus always sounded like a cranky police inspector to me . . .
____________
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1713 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
.html
> Ursus always sounded like a cranky police inspector to me . . .

That was after he shaved himself down . . .
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1714 From: Ken & Heather Taylor Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Figures
.html
These figures are custom made by a guy in California called Polo Moreno. He makes
them to order. I bought an "Ursus" from him about three years ago ( it was
considerably cheaper than the current price) way before the Hasbro 12 inch line.
For a custom effort, it's pretty good. i had intended to buy more until I heard
about the Hasbro figures were being released. And I think we've all covered the
subject of disappointment w/ the line on the group a few times over. Too bad
Medicom aren't doing a 12 inch line...not that anyone could afford them.
Best,
KEN

90-CORVETTE wrote:

> I'm not talking about the Medicom figures... $30 is CHEAP
> compared to these:
> http://www.apejoe.com/Planet_of_the_Apes/planet_of_the_apes.html"
> These are in the $200 each range!
> Again, does anyone have any experience with these particular
> figures (not the Medicom ones)?
>
> Stewart Rales wrote:
>
> > The medicom figures are very pricey (around $30 each). So far six have been
> > released ( Two gorillas, General Ursus, Cornelius, Zira and Lucius). In
> > August Dr. Zaius and Taylor will be released. They are all around 6" tall
> > and are much better detailed than the Hasbro 7" ones (which I thought were
> > terrible. I've gotten my figures through Justbetoys.com. Go on their
> > website and find were you can e-mail them and ask what they have.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "90-CORVETTE" <jpctqm@...>
> > To: <pota@egroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 8:34 PM
> > Subject: [pota] Figures
> >
> > > I've seen the Medicom figures... but have never seen these before:
> > >
> > > http://www.apejoe.com/Planet_of_the_Apes/planet_of_the_apes.html"
> > >
> > > VERY PRICY! Does anyone have any info on them?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1715 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
.html
In a message dated 7/27/0 2:37:46 PM, Mithril1960@... writes:
<< I think the original is perfect and should never be touched.>>


Was hoping they'd release "Planet of the Apes: The Special Edition", you
know, with extra scenes featuring Jabba the Hutt and Boba Fett. And Ursus
can shoot Franciscus first. That sort of thing.
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1716 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Michael Clarke Duncan in the remake
.html
In a message dated 7/27/0 3:24:02 PM, soylentphil@... writes:

<< Ursus always sounded like a cranky police inspector to me . . . >>


Yeah. Abe Vigoda.
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1717 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Roth and Giamatti sign up
.html
In a message dated 7/27/00 3:55:57 PM, byruiz@... writes:

<< How ever this remake turns out, it will never effect the originals.
So as an ape fan, I welcome it.
I'm sure you don't like the idea, but I'm also sure you will pay to see it.
>>

Incorrect. I don't go to see even a quarter of the amount of movies I used
to. If it doesn't look good in the trailer or buzz from friends of mine in
the industry is negative, I'll just wait.
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1718 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Re: [ the remake
.html
In a message dated 7/27/00 4:22:11 PM, Woodyjoo@... writes:

<< I'm in favor the remake. >>

Fortunately, they're not calling it a remake but a rethinking. My thought is,
since there are so many fine SF novels out there, why not make something new?
Once upon a time, I would have liked to see them do Monkey Planet as it was
written. I wonder how high a level of technology the Ape civilization will
have? That bit of curiosity may drag me in. But I still feel pessimistic.
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1719 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/27/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] Roth and Giamatti sign up
.html
> Incorrect. I don't go to see even a quarter of the amount of movies I used
> to. If it doesn't look good in the trailer or buzz from friends of mine
in
> the industry is negative, I'll just wait.

Yeah, and I'm Charlton Heston.
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1720 From: Dave Ballard Date: 7/28/2000
Subject: (no subject)
.html
Hi Everyone,

Found this today... It doesn't tell us anything we don't know already
but it could bear watching.

http://www.zipworld.com.au/~adandnat/burton/apesnews.htm
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1721 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/28/2000
Subject: Re: [pota] (unknown)
.html
Thanks for the scoop Dave.
I've just linked them to my POTA site and have notified them.

Thanks again.
Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Ballard <dballard@...>
To: <pota@egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 12:49 PM
Subject: [pota] (unknown)


> Hi Everyone,
>
> Found this today... It doesn't tell us anything we don't know already
> but it could bear watching.
>
> http://www.zipworld.com.au/~adandnat/burton/apesnews.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
Group: pota Message: 1722 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/30/2000
Subject: StarShip
.html
Attachments :
    .html
    For those who haven't seen the site that Dave told us about, here is a pic from the site that according to the webmaster, is the new POTA starship.
     
    Alex
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1723 From: Mark Gould Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
    .html
    .html Shades of a white stealth fighter it seems....
     

    M
     
     
     
     

    Alexander Ruiz wrote:

    For those who haven't seen the site that Dave told us about, here is a pic from the site that according to the webmaster, is the new POTA starship. Alex

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1724 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
    .html
    .html
    Yeah, it does look a little like the original.
    But it does go to show that production is now headed full steam!
     
    Great!
     
    Alex
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Mark Gould
    Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 2:36 PM
    Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip

    Shades of a white stealth fighter it seems....
     

    M
     
     
     
     

    Alexander Ruiz wrote:

    For those who haven't seen the site that Dave told us about, here is a pic from the site that according to the webmaster, is the new POTA starship. Alex

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1725 From: Philip Nobile Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: More casting
    .html
    http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=6579

    Harry's usually full of shit, but this is the second time I've heard Helena
    Bonham Carter's name. Hopefully she'll follow in Kim Hunter's footsteps and
    play the freaky mom in a remake of "Bad Ronald".
    ____________
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1726 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
    .html
    In a message dated 7/31/00 3:36:45 PM, soylentphil@... writes:

    << Harry's usually full of shit, but this is the second time I've heard
    Helena
    Bonham Carter's name. Hopefully she'll follow in Kim Hunter's footsteps and
    play the freaky mom in a remake of "Bad Ronald". >>

    I read in todays paper that Helena Bonham Carter (Daily News, NYC) has
    signed. But there may be a writer's strike, so Zanuck is really pushing to
    get the movie in progress.
    There were two other names, but I forget them. Sorry.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1727 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
    .html
    > play the freaky mom in a remake of "Bad Ronald". >>
    >
    > I read in todays paper that Helena Bonham Carter (Daily News, NYC) has
    > signed. But there may be a writer's strike, so Zanuck is really pushing to
    > get the movie in progress.
    > There were two other names, but I forget them. Sorry.

    How can a writer's strike effect a script that has already been written and
    copywrited by 20th Century Fox?
    Just wondering, as I'm not too bright in the ways of planet-hollywood.

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1728 From: Michael Whitty Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
    .html
    You're weird, Ronald - and so is your Mom!!!

    Michael

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Philip Nobile [soylentphil@...]
    Sent: Tuesday, 1 August 2000 5:35
    To: pota@egroups.com
    Subject: [pota] More casting

    http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=6579

    Harry's usually full of shit, but this is the second time I've heard Helena
    Bonham Carter's name. Hopefully she'll follow in Kim Hunter's footsteps and
    play the freaky mom in a remake of "Bad Ronald".
    ____________
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1729 From: Mithril1960@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
    .html
    In a message dated 7/31/00 5:16:54 PM, byruiz@... writes:

    << How can a writer's strike effect a script that has already been written and
    copywrited by 20th Century Fox?
    Just wondering, as I'm not too bright in the ways of planet-hollywood.
    >>

    I'm at a loss. But the paper mentioned that Zanuck is struggling to get three
    films before the cameras before the strike hits. Perhaps other guilds will
    support a writers strike and strike as well? Prinicpal photography for Apes
    won't start until October. I am very skeptical of the film being 'teen
    friendly' and am annoyed at that phrase. Don't adults and older adults go to
    the movies? I'm watching the development of this film with keen intrest and
    just because it's an Apes film, if I think it's gonna bite, I'll wait till it
    comes out on tape and pay 2$ rather than waste 8$. The original film is only
    32 years old, I still don't see a need to remake it.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1730 From: lawford42@juno.com Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Adventure comics
    .html
    On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:22:17 EDT Mithril1960@... writes:

    << The Adventure comics were- on the whole- fairly awful, with the
    exception of Urchak's Folly. Ape City was clearly the worst though.
    Baboonjas??
    Punk Biker Apes?? >>


    >I hated those Adventure Comics one's too. If you can get the first 30
    >issues of marvels Planet of the Apes magazine, they adapted all the
    movies.
    >The Battle Adaptation is interesting because it's done from the less
    child
    >friendly original script. The only thing that stunk was the art on
    >the POTA adaptation. They used this guy George Tuska, who stunk!


    I thought the original Marvel stories were pretty cool too, especially
    Terror on the Planet of the Apes. I even thought the Future History
    Chronicles storyline was pretty good, and it had some fairly surreal
    artwork as I recall. Definitely worth searching out for those of you
    who've never read them.

    Unless you're looking for ridiculous stories about the killer ghost of
    Governor Breck...


    Chris L.

    ____
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1731 From: atetrack@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: remake
    .html
    I think weather you admit it or not EVERYONE who's a fan wants to see
    this remake finally finished, for better or worse. I remember the
    1st time I read about one of the original remake rumor ( yes the
    ARNOLD one ) I was in a doctors office waiting to see an ultrasound
    of my unborn son, now he's 6 and can't wait to see this movie and
    either can I. I'm still real leary about the cast probably cause I
    was spoiled w/ the original cast- Chuck & Co. I'm sure it won't be
    that much of an embarrassment and maybe we'll all be surprised.
    Looks like the "new" apes will lok a lot like the ones from the
    Island of Dr. Morrow (sp.) w/ Val Kilmer and the Fat Man. Much less
    make up than the original, which is another reason it was so good (
    as long as they didn't show the "half ass make up job" on some of
    them).
    In all I want the remake, as long as we don't see the apes in
    Hawaiian shirts on the beaches of Hawaii.........................

    LET'S GET CHUCK A ROLE- SCREW ZANUCK.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1732 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
    .html
    > I'm at a loss. But the paper mentioned that Zanuck is struggling to get
    three
    > films before the cameras before the strike hits. Perhaps other guilds will
    > support a writers strike and strike as well? Prinicpal photography for
    Apes
    > won't start until October. I am very skeptical of the film being 'teen
    > friendly' and am annoyed at that phrase. Don't adults and older adults go
    to
    > the movies? I'm watching the development of this film with keen intrest
    and
    > just because it's an Apes film, if I think it's gonna bite, I'll wait till
    it
    > comes out on tape and pay 2$ rather than waste 8$. The original film is
    only
    > 32 years old, I still don't see a need to remake it.

    Well, I see your reason as there are those on the e-group who like yourself
    feel the same way. But I on the other hand am an ape fan as yourself and
    everyone else on this e-group, and the truth is I have spent $8 on movies
    that I have hated when leaving the theatre. So if I spend $8 on a film that
    I am a fan of, it won't be so bad if the film isn't great, for at least
    this film will contain a subject matter that I have been a fan of all my
    life.

    For God knows that watching a movie on a video tape, is nothing compared as
    seeing it on the big screen. Good or Bad.
    So I will be there opening night.
    But just remember one thing, that if this film turns out be less than great,
    perhaps a sequal won't be, but if no one bothers to watch it, there will be
    no sequal.

    And so the headlines will read:
    Planet of the Apes died with Arthur P. Jacobs.
    And I as a fan will not let that happen.

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1733 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
    .html
    In a message dated 7/31/0 2:36:54 PM, soylentphil@... writes:
    << Hopefully she'll follow in Kim Hunter's footsteps and play the freaky mom
    in a remake of "Bad Ronald". >>


    But Kim Hunter looked better in the make-up.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1734 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] remake
    .html
    In a message dated 7/31/0 8:48:23 PM, atetrack@... writes:

    << In all I want the remake, as long as we don't see the apes in Hawaiian
    shirts on the beaches of Hawaii......................... >>


    I heard Tim Roth insisted on doing a new "POTA" scene while wearing an ice
    bucket on his head. Such an artist.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1735 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 7/31/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
    .html
    In a message dated 7/31/0 4:16:46 PM, byruiz@... writes:
    << How can a writer's strike effect a script that has already been written and
    copywrited by 20th Century Fox? >>

    Ruined the first "Batman" film -- guild called a strike the summer '88 just
    beforefilming began in England. WB ordered screenwriter Sam Hamm to London
    but Hamm honored the strike, which was why his script was mangled to shit.
    Third act was still iffy, Hamm was supposed to kick it in the ass while
    cameras were rolling because they were more than a month behind before they
    began. Rewrites were done by Warren Skaaran and a former Monty Python writer
    (played the Lime character in "Brazil") instead of Hamm, whole thing fell
    apart. Out of control.

    Sometimes when a bigger-budget film's finally greenlighted the script still
    needs tweaking. You need somebody good, really good, for daily rewrites and
    a strike severely narrows the field for a production needing a kick in the
    ass.

    Two quick tangents:

    In defense of Hamm's "POTA" script -- he was handed a treatment and told to
    write the script from it. Most plot points already were there. He was
    married to elements the producers wanted, specifically the ending. (With the
    first "Batman" script he was given a much broader latitude, all the suits
    required was the Bat, Robin and the Joker along with a sequence with Batman
    on a horse! .....seemed they liked the part in Frank Miller's "Dark Knight
    Returns" comic with horses. For those who've read the original "Batman"
    script, you know Robin is totally shoe-horned into the ending but the horse
    sequence is sort of clever. Have a feeling Hamm would've done better on the
    "POTA" project without a severely detailed treatment. Also think he would've
    cracked the third act of "Batman" had there not been a strike, or at least
    the film would've been better in lots of ways.)

    Secondly, success of the first "Batman" movie was due almost entirely to a
    bizarre wave of hype, not on the (dubious) strengths of the film. During
    summer of '88 the Adam West "Batman" television show aired in Britain for the
    first time and was a serious hit. Limeys thought it was hysterical, big
    ratings and cult popularity just like in the states during the '60s. Word
    leaked a feature was underway at Elstree or Pinewood or wherever they hell it
    was rolling and anticipation became high. The Brit popularity spread across
    the Atlantic like Beatle-mania, the wave of hype the film rode in one was
    unprecedented. Bottom line was it didn't have to be good, just had to show
    up. (Second two enjoyed descending waves of hype, last one was hypeless and
    hopeless.) Ad Week magazine did an autopsy on the phenom about a year or so
    later.

    The point? If I were Zanuck, the "POTA" films and teevee series would be
    running nonstop on Limey television this fall. Ya never know.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1736 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 8/1/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] remake
    .html
    <atetrack@...> wrote:
    >I think weather you admit it or not EVERYONE who's a fan wants to see
    >this remake finally finished, for better or worse.

    Not me! I don't want to see a remake at all. What I'd like to see is some
    original films being made instead. Everything seems to be "a remake of" or
    "a live action version of" or "the movie of the tv series" these days.

    Alan
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1737 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 8/1/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
    .html
    <nextnexus@...> wrote:
    >Secondly, success of the first "Batman" movie was due almost entirely to a
    >bizarre wave of hype, not on the (dubious) strengths of the film. During
    >summer of '88 the Adam West "Batman" television show aired in Britain for
    the
    >first time and was a serious hit. Limeys thought it was hysterical, big
    >ratings and cult popularity just like in the states during the '60s.

    "Limeys" certainly find it hysterical, and indeed there was a lot of hype,
    but the old Batman series had been seen many times in Britain long before
    1988.

    Alan
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1738 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/1/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More casting
    .html
    In a message dated 8/1/0 3:29:06 PM, alan@... writes:

    << "Limeys" certainly find it hysterical, and indeed there was a lot of hype,
    but the old Batman series had been seen many times in Britain long before
    1988. >>

    Tell Ad Week, they'd appreciat it.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1739 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/1/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] remake
    .html
    In a message dated 8/1/0 3:29:50 PM, alan@... writes:
    <<I don't want to see a remake at all. What I'd like to see is some original
    films being made instead.>>

    Damn straight, my British cousin (sorry for the "Limey" crack, by the way;
    we're fast and loose over here in the colonies....).

    The hoax pitch posted on the CA site attributed to Cameron (i.e. tweaking
    the first 10 minutes of "POTA" with Chuck and co. treking into a CGI jungle
    instead of desert....modern ape city....time travelers, temporal
    paradoxes....Taylor "alive" and showing up at the end as the 75-year-old
    progenitor of intelligent humans/president of NRA) sounded much cooler than
    "fairy tales", "princesses" and Tim Burton in general.

    Dumping the first five films is a mistake in my book. A seriously good film
    would cull a compelling narrative with nods to previous continuity instead of
    chucking it all (so to speak) for yet another bloated Burton conceit. (Tim,
    if you're still on the list, next time instead of ruining a decent script
    just walk out to Melrose Ave and wank publicly, capice?)

    Only good thing to say right now is the apes casting, if it's legit, sounds
    inspired. Expecting nothing from the film so it won't disappoint. Probably
    won't.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1740 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 8/1/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] remake
    .html
    <nextnexus@...> wrote:
    >Damn straight, my British cousin (sorry for the "Limey" crack, by the way;
    >we're fast and loose over here in the colonies....).


    No need to apologise, I'm not offended in the slightest by that sort of
    thing. But what the hell is Ad Week?

    >The hoax pitch posted on the CA site attributed to Cameron (i.e. tweaking
    >the first 10 minutes of "POTA" with Chuck and co. treking into a CGI jungle
    >instead of desert....modern ape city....time travelers, temporal
    >paradoxes....Taylor "alive" and showing up at the end as the 75-year-old
    >progenitor of intelligent humans/president of NRA) sounded much cooler than
    >"fairy tales", "princesses" and Tim Burton in general.


    Funnily enough - as much as I hate the idea of a remake I've always said
    that if they are dead set on making it, Tim Burton would be one of the few
    people I'd trust to do something interesting with it. James Cameron I could
    do without.

    Alan
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1741 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/1/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] remake
    .html
    >James Cameron I could do without.

    I'd have to agree with you there.
    Cameron is great director, but he would take forever and a day to make a
    sequal.

    Go Tim Go!

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1742 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/1/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] remake
    .html
    In a message dated 8/1/0 6:06:54 PM, alan@... writes:

    << But what the hell is Ad Week?>>

    Advertising and marketing mag that deconstructs successful campaigns, etc.
    Endlessly fascinating at times, especially when they're able to figure out
    sociological and economic reasons behind the popularity or failure of
    something. ("Batman" was a particularly good one.....WB brass really thought
    they had a turkey on their hands, box office ended up proving differently for
    reasons that had nothing to do with the quality of the film.)

    <<James Cameron I could do without. >>

    I'd be willing to trust the writer/director of "Aliens" and "Terminator 2:
    Judgement Day" before trusting the 'auteur' of "Mars Attacks", "Sleepy
    Hollow" and espeically "Batman Returns". One of them knows how to make a
    compelling sequel, the other dresses in black.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1743 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/1/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] remake
    .html
    In a message dated 8/1/0 6:52:54 PM, byruiz@... writes:

    << Cameron is great director, but he would take forever and a day to make a
    sequal.
    Go Tim Go! >>

    Can't argue that logic -- "I want it crappy and NOW." Ill-conceived, but
    fast. Yeah, baby.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1744 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/2/2000
    Subject: Pics for yer monkey asses
    .html
    For the collectors - all others may disregard.

    Here are some tight shots of the Medicom figures, in case you guys have been
    on the fence about them. They rule.

    http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/group.JPG
    http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/zira2.JPG
    http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/lucius1.JPG
    http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/zaius.JPG

    The gorillas are dark, so harder to shoot (on the cheap-ass free earthlink
    webcam, anyway). More to come.

    ____________
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1745 From: Pterosaur3@aol.com Date: 8/2/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Pics for yer monkey asses
    .html
    Thanks Phil....I've managed to get (4) of them, Ursus, Zira, Cornelius and
    Lucius...And have the (3) set on order. I think they're fantastic. They are a
    little pricey, But as a collector of "Ape" merchandise, They are well worth
    it.
    Thanks Rob in Philadelphia
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1746 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/2/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Pics for yer monkey asses
    .html
    > For the collectors - all others may disregard.
    >
    > Here are some tight shots of the Medicom figures, in case you guys have
    been
    > on the fence about them. They rule.

    I think their really great in detail.
    I just can't get over the size, their so damn tiny.
    I wish they would make them at least 10 to 12 inches.
    Now that would really rock, and I would gladly pay double the price.

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1747 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/2/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Pics for yer monkey asses
    .html
    Alexander Ruiz wrote:
    >
    > I think their really great in detail.
    > I just can't get over the size, their so damn tiny.

    I thought that at first, but when you consider that there's going to be
    19 of them, the size becomes acceptable. I have no room for 19 12"
    figures. Plus, you can use the Addar bases in your displays. Mira:

    http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/beneath2.jpg
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1748 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/2/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Pics for yer monkey asses
    .html
    > Alexander Ruiz wrote:
    > >
    > > I think their really great in detail.
    > > I just can't get over the size, their so damn tiny.
    >
    > I thought that at first, but when you consider that there's going to be
    > 19 of them, the size becomes acceptable. I have no room for 19 12"
    > figures. Plus, you can use the Addar bases in your displays. Mira:
    >
    > http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/beneath2.jpg

    Wow! That is so cool!
    I think I'm soon going to get hooked on these little guys.
    Well, there goes a good chunk of my savings account.

    Thanks, they do look cool.
    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1749 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Story from Corona
    .html
    August 2, 2000... Well, mark this one as a strange scoop -- although one
    not entirely outside the realm of possibility. According to our latest
    scooper (who heard this from Morning Movie beat's movie reporter Ralph
    Garman on Los Angeles' 106.7 KROQ), Johnny Depp has come in and done
    several make-up tests for Tim Burton, and is now the one rumored to
    portray a Cornelius-like chimp in the Apes remake. "Ralph Garman is
    usually very accurate in his reporting," adds our scooper. "He reported
    Mark Wahlberg AND Gary Oldman's involvement before anything was
    announced. He's been following the Ape project for some time now, and
    has been accurate every time."

    What sets the warning light off for us is that, last we heard, Depp was
    in Prague filming the Hughes' brothers From Hell picture, so it's kinda
    hard to be in L.A. for makeup tests and also across the world filming
    another picture. That said, it isn't entirely outside the realm of
    feasibility -- although it would have to mean Depp isn't filming scenes
    right now in Prague. Anyone else out there with a little more inside
    access to either one of these shows could help sort this mess out, if
    they were willing to oblige.

    The scooper also says Paul Reubens, who had earlier been linked to the
    Cornelius-like role and had completed make-up tests, would not be
    starring in the film. "Whether or not it was his decision, or Burton's,
    I do not know," writes the scooper.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1750 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Ursus closeup
    .html
    Here's Medicom's Ursus figure.

    http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/ursus4.jpg

    Anyone know anything about when the next wave is coming, and what held
    up Heston this time?
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1751 From: Ken & Heather Taylor Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
    .html
    It's pretty unlikely that this ship would be from the new "Apes" movie.
    As Star Wars is currently occupying every available studio at Fox
    Studios Australia, it's possible that it could a ship from that
    production. Depending on when the photo was taken, it could also
    possibly be from either the movie "Red Planet" starring Val Kilmer, OR
    from the Sci-Fi network series "Farscape".
    Both productions where filmed here six to eight months ago.
    Best,
    KEN
    .
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1752 From: Brian Dumont Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
    .html
    Thanx Ken. Too much dis-info going on about the new apes these days. Let's
    keep it straight as we can.

    Brian

    Ken & Heather Taylor wrote:

    > It's pretty unlikely that this ship would be from the new "Apes" movie.
    > As Star Wars is currently occupying every available studio at Fox
    > Studios Australia, it's possible that it could a ship from that
    > production. Depending on when the photo was taken, it could also
    > possibly be from either the movie "Red Planet" starring Val Kilmer, OR
    > from the Sci-Fi network series "Farscape".
    > Both productions where filmed here six to eight months ago.
    > Best,
    > KEN
    > .
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1753 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Some more on casting (moron casting?)
    .html
    HOLLYWOOD (Variety) - Helena Bonham Carter (''Fight Club'') is set to put on
    the makeup as an ape princess in 20th Century Fox's update of ``Planet of
    the Apes.''

    She joins Mark Wahlberg, who's starring in the picture for director Tim
    Burton, as well as Michael Clarke Duncan, Tim Roth, Paul Giamatti and
    Estella Warren.

    Fox hopes to begin shooting the film in the fall and is aiming to make it a
    high-profile release for next summer.


    ____________
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1754 From: 90-CORVETTE Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Computer Game
    .html
    My son got a computer game catalog in the mail yesterday and
    came running to me saying, "Look, they've gone ape!" There is
    a listing for a game that is scheduled to come out in November
    for $39 called "Planet of the Apes." I'd seen mention of a game
    before, but understood it to be for Dreamcast or something...
    This one is on PC CD-ROM for your computer!

    90
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1755 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] StarShip
    .html
    > It's pretty unlikely that this ship would be from the new "Apes" movie.
    > As Star Wars is currently occupying every available studio at Fox
    > Studios Australia, it's possible that it could a ship from that
    > production. Depending on when the photo was taken, it could also
    > possibly be from either the movie "Red Planet" starring Val Kilmer, OR
    > from the Sci-Fi network series "Farscape".
    > Both productions where filmed here six to eight months ago.
    > Best,
    > KEN

    Yeah, most likely it may be.
    But it does bare a great likeness to Heston's Ship.
    And bit too much of an old Stelf fashion for Star Wars.
    I hope that it is, for it does look pretty awesome.

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1756 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Computer Game
    .html
    > My son got a computer game catalog in the mail yesterday and
    > came running to me saying, "Look, they've gone ape!" There is
    > a listing for a game that is scheduled to come out in November
    > for $39 called "Planet of the Apes." I'd seen mention of a game
    > before, but understood it to be for Dreamcast or something...
    > This one is on PC CD-ROM for your computer!
    >
    > 90

    Wow! Sounds great.
    I hope that it's make in the tradition of King's Quest.
    I love those adventure type games.
    I would also love to see a planet of the apes chess game for PC, like they
    did for star wars.

    Apes vs. Mendez.

    Ursus: King Piece
    Zauis: Queen Piece

    Mendez: King Piece
    Alpha-Omega Bomb: Queen Piece
    And so on.

    Now that would really rock!

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1757 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Medicom
    .html
    .html
    Does anyone have a link to a site that sells the Planet of the Apes Medicom figures?
     
    Alex
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1758 From: JSe3689836@aol.com Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    Check out www.justbetoys.com. They have Apes & other cool stuff. Enjoy, John
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1759 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/3/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    Thanks John.

    Alex

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <JSe3689836@...>
    To: <pota@egroups.com>
    Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 8:35 PM
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom


    > Check out www.justbetoys.com. They have Apes & other cool stuff. Enjoy,
    John
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1760 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    >Does anyone have a link to a site that sells the Planet of the Apes Medicom
    >figures?
    >
    >Alex

    Bwahahhaha. And so it begins . . .

    ____________
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1761 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    > >Does anyone have a link to a site that sells the Planet of the Apes
    Medicom
    > >figures?
    > >
    > >Alex
    >
    > Bwahahhaha. And so it begins . . .

    Tell me about it, you got me hooked. . .
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1762 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    > > Bwahahhaha. And so it begins . . .
    >
    >Tell me about it, you got me hooked. . .

    No thanks needed. You can return the favor by putting up more deleted
    scenes on your site! When's the next update?

    ____________
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1763 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    > > > Bwahahhaha. And so it begins . . .
    > >
    > >Tell me about it, you got me hooked. . .
    >
    > No thanks needed. You can return the favor by putting up more deleted
    > scenes on your site! When's the next update?

    Well, what I need to do now is finish off the last three films, Escape,
    Conquest ands Battle. As for deleted scenes there really isn't any left, sad
    to say.
    The only released scenes that were ever deleted was from Battle for the
    Planet of the Apes. The rest of the films are the same compared to my
    Japanese Laser Disc Set.
    That is of course if any special scenes may be released on the DVD version,
    I'll have to see what will be the final cut on those.

    But right now I'm about to get hooked up with a ISDN high speed modem access
    for the internet, it will be a huge boost for me once the new release comes
    along and I have to upload huge MPEG files covering the new release.
    Interviews, trailers, commercials, specials and so on.

    So what you see now on the site, I asure you, you haven't seen anything yet.
    So stay tuned ape fans, same ape time, same ape channel. (Batman Spoof) :o)

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1764 From: 90-CORVETTE Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    I've lost (?) my link to your site, Alexander. Mind sharing it
    with us all again? Thanks!

    90

    Alexander Ruiz wrote:

    > So what you see now on the site, I asure you, you haven't seen anything yet.
    > So stay tuned ape fans, same ape time, same ape channel. (Batman Spoof) :o)
    >
    > Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1765 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    Sure 90.

    It's at: www.prophecysite.com
    Enjoy.

    Alex

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: 90-CORVETTE <jpctqm@...>
    To: <pota@egroups.com>
    Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 8:51 PM
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom


    > I've lost (?) my link to your site, Alexander. Mind sharing it
    > with us all again? Thanks!
    >
    > 90
    >
    > Alexander Ruiz wrote:
    >
    > > So what you see now on the site, I asure you, you haven't seen anything
    yet.
    > > So stay tuned ape fans, same ape time, same ape channel. (Batman Spoof)
    :o)
    > >
    > > Alex
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1766 From: 90-CORVETTE Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    Awesome site! You rock, you damn dirty ape!!!

    90


    Alexander Ruiz wrote:

    > Sure 90.
    >
    > It's at: www.prophecysite.com
    > Enjoy.
    >
    > Alex
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: 90-CORVETTE <jpctqm@...>
    > To: <pota@egroups.com>
    > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 8:51 PM
    > Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    >
    > > I've lost (?) my link to your site, Alexander. Mind sharing it
    > > with us all again? Thanks!
    > >
    > > 90
    > >
    > > Alexander Ruiz wrote:
    > >
    > > > So what you see now on the site, I asure you, you haven't seen anything
    > yet.
    > > > So stay tuned ape fans, same ape time, same ape channel. (Batman Spoof)
    > :o)
    > > >
    > > > Alex
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1767 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    > Awesome site! You rock, you damn dirty ape!!!
    >
    > 90

    Thats funny.
    Thanks 90, that lets me know I'm doing something right.

    For anyone else who wishes to vist the site just log on to:
    www.prophecysite.com
    The Planet of the Apes Multimedia Site.

    Enjoy.

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1768 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    In a message dated 8/4/0 10:18:14 AM, soylentphil@... writes:

    << Bwahahhaha. And so it begins . . . >>

    Mission accomplished. Meet you back on the satellite.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1769 From: Jack Krueger Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Modem Times
    .html
    Hey, I'm back in town. Here's my thoughts on recent e-mails...

    Alex, you're website is incredible. From now on it's going to be my first
    stop.

    The Adventure comic books were often wretched, sometimes alot of fun, but
    for me back in the early '90's they were an event. There was nothing "Planet
    of the Apes" around, a video rerelease of the films and the first rumors of
    a new movie (which sounded like a quicky knockoff). There wasn't even a fan
    community like there is now. So I have fond memories of those comics,
    perhaps more than fans today would understand. I wasn't even a comics reader
    but they inspired me to read the old Marvel "Apes" stuff for the first time.

    Likewise, this new movie is an event for me and even if I get a bad
    feeling about it, I will probably be there opening day. If it sucks, at
    least I will know from firsthand experience and not just assume it does ( I
    often miss out on a good movie and catch up to it on video, wishing I had
    seen it in a theatre). At the moment I'm pleased with the casting even
    though I'm not very familiar with them. It seems to me they are casting
    accomplished actors, not stunt casting (and the accompaning high salaries).
    They have good actors and are spending the money on the movie, not the
    bullshit. I don't like the cating synopsis I read and that the trades
    apparently are using (the princess, the comic relief slave trader, etc.) but
    it's possible that's a smoke screen. All I know is that people who've read
    the script really like it.

    I remember seeing that "star ship" somewhere else, I think it IS an
    "Episode II" ship. Reportedly the main character is a pilot, not an
    astronaut, whatever that means. Yes, the guy who first tried to do a new
    "Apes" (Adam Rifkin) and the guy who did the recent comics (Charles
    Marshall) are different guys. I've read Rifkin's script and could easily
    have been one of Marshall's comics; I just thank God it wasn't a movie. My
    favorite choice for an "Apes" director would have been Oliver Stone. James
    Cameron would have been good but I think his ego was too pumped up from
    "Titanic". At least Burton has had some recent humbling ("Mars Attacks");
    perhaps he will serve the piece.

    Yes, Zanuck's remark that there is "no part for Heston" seems to have hit
    a nerve. It seems like they are going to extreme lengths to separate
    themselves from the originals and avoid comparisons. Ironically, Zanuck was
    the one who had to plead with Heston to be in "Beneath". With all the
    skepticism do we really want new actors portraying beloved characters like
    Zira or Nova? Remember, one of the hallmarks of the original films was that
    time kept moving and no characters were in all of them. "Planet of the Apes"
    is about a concept, not a set of characters. I'm more concerned that Burton
    will abandon the mind - bending science fiction surprises that "Apes"
    excelled at. I think it was actually BURTON who was inspired by Dr. Seuss!

    I got to see the new "Apes" game at E3. It seemed to follow the original
    film but BIGGER. I was more impressed by the settings than the characters.
    However, it's not like "Star Wars" were fans can pick and choose which game
    title to play. If you want an "Apes" computer game, this is all there is.


    Best, Jeff Krueger
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Philip Nobile" <pjn1209@...>
    To: <pota@egroups.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 10:56 PM
    Subject: [pota] Ursus closeup


    > Here's Medicom's Ursus figure.
    >
    > http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/ursus4.jpg
    >
    > Anyone know anything about when the next wave is coming, and what held
    > up Heston this time?
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1770 From: Pterosaur3@aol.com Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    Hey Guys...I just the new set of Medicom figures...One question....The new
    soldier Ape has a sticker on the front stating "Includes different costume"
    does anyone know if they're doing variations of all the soldiers? Thanks Rob
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1771 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    Pterosaur3@... wrote:
    >
    > Hey Guys...I just the new set of Medicom figures...One question....The new
    > soldier Ape has a sticker on the front stating "Includes different costume"
    > does anyone know if they're doing variations of all the soldiers? Thanks Rob

    Soldier Ape 1: Standard ape rifle
    Soldier Ape 2: Different head sculpt, machine gun rifle seen in Beneath
    Soldier Ape 3: Same mold as SA 1, face painted brown, stupid silver M on
    chest, as seen only in the TV series.

    They're also doing Ursus, Urko, and Aldo, all very accurae to their
    appearance in the films/series.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1772 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: More Apes droppings
    .html
    From Cinescape: (And how about some friggin' discussion, beyond "this
    will/will not suck"?)

    'Apes' Make-Up Hints?

    Though it's still a bit vague, there's been some bit of information on how
    different the apes make-up will be in Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes than
    from the 1968 original. In a New York Times article about make up maestro
    Rick Baker, info on the new apes is provided. The Times describes models of
    Baker's apes that are in his studio. They are described as being
    "musclebound" and looking more like something out of Conan the Barbarian
    than John Chamber's classic interpretations.


    I personally think Baker has tons of ape models in his studio, and that
    these may not even be from the remake.




    ____________
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1773 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    >Well, what I need to do now is finish off the last three films, Escape,
    >Conquest ands Battle. As for deleted scenes there really isn't any left,
    >sad
    >to say.

    You may want to look at Battle again. Some scenes are longer. Even if it's
    minor, we'd love to see them up there! I can point you to which scenes are
    extended, if you like.


    ____________
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1774 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Modem Times
    .html
    In a message dated 8/4/0 7:20:51 PM, williejoe@... writes:

    << With all the skepticism do we really want new actors portraying beloved
    characters like Zira or Nova? >>


    Oooh, good point. If "The Visitor" or whatever they're calling it this week
    isn't a continuation of the original films, we certainly don't need a
    straight remake. Might as well "reimagine" the concept, only other way to go.

    Whether it sucks or not, is there a fourth option after considering a sequel,
    remake or "reimagining"? (We now live in a world with words such as
    "reimagining".) I mean BESIDES leaving it the hell alone.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1775 From: nextnexus@aol.com Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] More Apes droppings
    .html
    In a message dated 8/4/0 8:28:53 PM, soylentphil@... writes:

    << I personally think Baker has tons of ape models in his studio, and that
    these may not even be from the remake. >>


    Probably in his bedroom, too. The freak.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1776 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/4/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    > You may want to look at Battle again. Some scenes are longer. Even if
    it's
    > minor, we'd love to see them up there! I can point you to which scenes are
    > extended, if you like.

    Well, I do know of two extented scenes:
    1>Aldo and Ceasar in the final tree conflict.
    2>Aldo chasing the teacher at the beginning of the film.

    And if I'm not mistaken, the intro of the film when Aldo rides into ape
    city, it does seem a bit extended as well.

    I only hope Chris Lawford dosn't see this e-mail. (hi chris)
    Because the other day we were talking about this, but I felt that fans
    wouldn't be interested in these minor extended scenes. But he felt that fans
    would be.
    I can see his e-mail now:
    I told you!

    I'll work on these scenes this weekend, for as they say, two heads are
    better than one.

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1777 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    Alexander Ruiz wrote:
    >
    > > You may want to look at Battle again. Some scenes are longer. Even if
    > it's
    > > minor, we'd love to see them up there! I can point you to which scenes are
    > > extended, if you like.
    >
    > Well, I do know of two extented scenes:
    > 1>Aldo and Ceasar in the final tree conflict.
    > 2>Aldo chasing the teacher at the beginning of the film.

    Another comes to mind -

    Virgil, Caesar, and MacDonald wandering through Ape city.

    And some conversations between MacDonald and Caesar are extended.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1778 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    Philip Nobile wrote:
    >
    > Virgil, Caesar, and MacDonald wandering through Ape city.

    Should have read "the mutants' city".
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1779 From: Jack Krueger Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: "Battle" lines
    .html
    Yeah, someone sent me a VHS copy of the extended "Battle" from the
    Japanese laser disc. The new scenes I remember are the ones with the Alpha
    Omega bomb (the bomb was eliminated from the regular cut, Aldo on top of the
    bus rallying his troops and many miscellaneous lines and exchanges of
    dialogue. One of Kolp's men is called Sergent York, who isn't referred to in
    the original cut. Also there's several shots of the mutants falling to the
    ground emphazing their radiation sickness, including when they are marching
    to Ape City. Perhaps they took it out of the other version because it made
    the mutants less menacing. But I found it added some reality to the movie,
    that they can't just go through a nuclear war and be hunky dory. Does the
    added stuff make it a better movie? Maybe slightly, but it's the weakest
    sequel. Why won't Fox include this cut in their much hyped DVDs? And how
    about finally releasing J. Lee Thompson's original cut of "Conquest", and
    anamorphic versions of all the movies! That's what DVD is for. Why do the
    Japanese get the best stuff, toys and otherwise? I'm depressed. - - - Jeff
    Krueger
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Philip Nobile" <pjn1209@...>
    To: <pota@egroups.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 10:15 PM
    Subject: [pota] Story from Corona


    > August 2, 2000... Well, mark this one as a strange scoop -- although one
    > not entirely outside the realm of possibility. According to our latest
    > scooper (who heard this from Morning Movie beat's movie reporter Ralph
    > Garman on Los Angeles' 106.7 KROQ), Johnny Depp has come in and done
    > several make-up tests for Tim Burton, and is now the one rumored to
    > portray a Cornelius-like chimp in the Apes remake. "Ralph Garman is
    > usually very accurate in his reporting," adds our scooper. "He reported
    > Mark Wahlberg AND Gary Oldman's involvement before anything was
    > announced. He's been following the Ape project for some time now, and
    > has been accurate every time."
    >
    > What sets the warning light off for us is that, last we heard, Depp was
    > in Prague filming the Hughes' brothers From Hell picture, so it's kinda
    > hard to be in L.A. for makeup tests and also across the world filming
    > another picture. That said, it isn't entirely outside the realm of
    > feasibility -- although it would have to mean Depp isn't filming scenes
    > right now in Prague. Anyone else out there with a little more inside
    > access to either one of these shows could help sort this mess out, if
    > they were willing to oblige.
    >
    > The scooper also says Paul Reubens, who had earlier been linked to the
    > Cornelius-like role and had completed make-up tests, would not be
    > starring in the film. "Whether or not it was his decision, or Burton's,
    > I do not know," writes the scooper.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1780 From: Mark Gould Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Ape shapes and faces
    .html
    The basic problem is how to make the human form 'ape like', which
    despite the fact that humans are a variety of ape, their arms are too
    short, legs too long, faces are flat, and regarding muscle-bound - well
    a chimpanzee is typically seven to eight times stronger than a human of
    the same height/weight/build. That's what made me laugh so much about
    the portrayal of the apes both in the films and the TV series (a laugh
    anyway), they'd be able to hold off a human no problem. And they are
    very boisterous players.

    Enough rambling

    M



    In a message dated 8/4/0 8:28:53 PM, soylentphil@... writes:

    >'Apes' Make-Up Hints?
    >
    >Though it's still a bit vague, there's been some bit of information on
    how
    >different the apes make-up will be in Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes
    than
    >from the 1968 original. In a New York Times article about make up
    maestro
    >Rick Baker, info on the new apes is provided. The Times describes
    models of
    >Baker's apes that are in his studio. They are described as being
    >"musclebound" and looking more like something out of Conan the
    Barbarian
    >than John Chamber's classic interpretations.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1781 From: Dave Ballard Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Escape Prologue
    .html
    Over the years there have been many rumors and rumblings of the
    missing prologue sequence from Escape featuring the three Ape-o-nauts
    inside Taylors ship.

    I know the sequence was scripted, I know the sets were built but does
    anyone have any concrete evidence that any part of it was ever filmed?

    I thought I'd laid this ghost to rest but the case was "re-opened"
    when I read an interview with Kim Hunter in which She says she
    "Thinks" she remembered filming the scenes. Furthermore the
    interviewer says that he had seen a photo of the three apes at the
    controls of the ship.

    Has anyone else seen any photos like this?

    I personally suspect that Kim Hunters memory is confused and that the
    interviewer actually remembers panels from Marvels comic adaption
    although I would be thrilled if any of you could prove me wrong.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1782 From: tinarosa Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Escape Prologue
    .html
    Hi, Dave!

    Hi, Ape friends!

    Kim Hunter send a letter tome (August 24, 1999) about this question:

    "I do remember that someof the bits we shot indsidethe spaceship never made
    the completed film".

    Adami



    Dave Ballard escreveu:

    > Over the years there have been many rumors and rumblings of the
    > missing prologue sequence from Escape featuring the three Ape-o-nauts
    > inside Taylors ship.
    >
    > I know the sequence was scripted, I know the sets were built but does
    > anyone have any concrete evidence that any part of it was ever filmed?
    >
    > I thought I'd laid this ghost to rest but the case was "re-opened"
    > when I read an interview with Kim Hunter in which She says she
    > "Thinks" she remembered filming the scenes. Furthermore the
    > interviewer says that he had seen a photo of the three apes at the
    > controls of the ship.
    >
    > Has anyone else seen any photos like this?
    >
    > I personally suspect that Kim Hunters memory is confused and that the
    > interviewer actually remembers panels from Marvels comic adaption
    > although I would be thrilled if any of you could prove me wrong.
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1783 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Escape Prologue
    .html
    Dave Ballard wrote:
    >
    > Over the years there have been many rumors and rumblings of the
    > missing prologue sequence from Escape featuring the three Ape-o-nauts
    > inside Taylors ship.
    >
    > the
    > interviewer says that he had seen a photo of the three apes at the
    > controls of the ship.
    >
    > Has anyone else seen any photos like this?

    Sure, in both Eric Greene's book and teh recent trading card set. It was
    indeed filmed.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1784 From: Philip Nobile Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Escape Prologue
    .html
    Dave Ballard wrote:
    >
    > I personally suspect that Kim Hunters memory is confused and that the
    > interviewer actually remembers panels from Marvels comic adaption
    > although I would be thrilled if any of you could prove me wrong.

    I'll try to rescan these at some point, but here are two webcam grabs
    showing the scene (sorry for the crap quality):

    http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/escape1.jpg

    http://www.geocities.com/terminallunch/escape2.jpg

    The first is from Greene's book, and he features at least one shot from
    every film that's not in the film, I think. The second is from the card
    set, which features scenes cut from Taylor's chase (hiding in the water
    surrounding Ape Cityt, crouching behind the Lawgiver statue), a test
    shot of teh human/ape child from Beneath, the shot included here, and
    Breck lying next to a pile of dead, bloody humans from Conquest.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1785 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Medicom
    .html
    > Another comes to mind -
    >
    > Virgil, Caesar, and MacDonald wandering through Ape city.
    >
    > And some conversations between MacDonald and Caesar are extended.

    The difference between both versions is 10 min.
    U.S. version is 86 min.
    Japanese version is 96 min.
    So while there are many scenes, there really isn't that many.
    But I'll take a look.

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1786 From: Dave Ballard Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Escape prologue
    .html
    Thanks for the images Phil... At least now I know the scenes were
    shot, I was never sure until today.

    Another myth that crops up from time to time is that there was a
    British version of the movie that contained the prologue... That one,
    I can assure you all is nonsense.

    Dave B
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1787 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Escape prologue
    .html
    .html
    Thanks for the images Phil... At least now I know the scenes were shot, I was never sure until today.

    Another myth that crops up from time to time is that there was a British version of the movie that contained the prologue... That one, I can assure you all is nonsense.

    Dave B
     
    Yeah, that is the big problem.
    Niether the deleted scenes of Escape nor Conquest were never released on any POTA version world wide.
    So it would be imposible to ever see them, the last hope was DVD, but I doubt very much that it would be there.
    What a major let down by 20th Century Fox. :-(
     
    Alex
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1788 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/5/2000
    Subject: New Deleted Scenes
    .html
    .html
    Phil.
    I've just finished placing two more scenes of Battle in the deleted scenes section.
    These are the extended scenes.
     
    If you come across any others let me know, I'm pretty I've now covered them all. But if you find any, just through me a few quotes and I'll look them up.
     
    Alex
     
     
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1789 From: Kevin J. Greenland Date: 8/6/2000
    Subject: That's where you all are !
    .html
    I thought the other groups were a bit dead. I've crossed over thanks to
    DrEvil (is that your name) taking pity on us mutants on the other group !

    Why the mass exodus anyway ?

    A few q's just in case I've missed something. I don't want to leaf through
    all your old messages as there are too many.

    1) What's the latest casting news ?
    2) Is Charlton going to star ? Maybe just for ten seconds . . .
    pleeeeeeeese say he is
    3) Best sites at the moment (I've never really looked for anything pota
    related before - wash my mouth out !)

    I think that's all I need to know at the moment. Sorry if this has been
    covered like a trillion times before !

    Btw what's all this about "selecting a name" ? I have one already and it's
    "gerbil"

    Kevin the gerbil xxx
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1790 From: becker0715@aol.com Date: 8/6/2000
    Subject: Apes stickers?
    .html
    I have a PT Cruiser on order, and want the theme of car to be ape related.
    Does anyone know any website or store that sells any type of ape stickers,
    license plates/holders, etc?
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1791 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/6/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Apes stickers?
    .html
    I do know there are some ape stickers up for auction on e-bay.
    They are MEGO ape stickers.

    Alex

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <becker0715@...>
    To: <pota@egroups.com>
    Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 3:30 PM
    Subject: [pota] Apes stickers?


    > I have a PT Cruiser on order, and want the theme of car to be ape related.
    > Does anyone know any website or store that sells any type of ape stickers,
    > license plates/holders, etc?
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1792 From: becker0715@aol.com Date: 8/6/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Apes stickers?
    .html
    In a message dated 08/06/2000 2:34:28 PM Central Daylight Time,
    byruiz@... writes:

    > I do know there are some ape stickers up for auction on e-bay.
    > They are MEGO ape stickers.

    I really didn't have in mind the original, tiny,
    come-in-the-plastic-bubble-from-the-vending-machine ones. Hasn't anyone made
    any type of new, after-market apes stickers or premium items?

    If I wait for the new movie, the apes will be different. I'm sure Tim Burton
    is going to have the standard Taco Bell tie-in promotion, though. Buy a
    burrito, get a collectible Ullyses plastic tumbler.....
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1793 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/6/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] Apes stickers?
    .html
    > I really didn't have in mind the original, tiny,
    > come-in-the-plastic-bubble-from-the-vending-machine ones.

    I didn't think you did, but you did say stickers.

    > If I wait for the new movie, the apes will be different. I'm sure Tim
    Burton
    > is going to have the standard Taco Bell tie-in promotion, though. Buy a
    > burrito, get a collectible Ullyses plastic tumbler.....

    I'll take two to go!
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1794 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 8/6/2000
    Subject: casting
    .html
    Casting choices:


    Taylor: Liam Nieson, Mel Gibson

    Zira: Felicity Kendal, Penelope Keith, Kim Hunter . . . Why not, she's still
    working.

    Cornelius: Johnny Depp . . . After all, it is a Tim Burton film.

    Zaius: Tim Roth . . . Good choice

    President of the Assembly: Gary Oldman . . . Good Choice

    Maximus: John Hurt, The Elephant Man . . . Good voice & has make-up
    experience.

    Landon: Mark Wahlberg . . . I wish the bloody baboons would cut up his
    brain!!!!!

    Dodge: Samuel L. Jackson Come on . . . Who else? Denzel Washington maybe.

    Nova: Mira Sorvino, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Jennifer Lopez, Selma
    Hayek..ect...etc..

    Stewart: Pamala Lee . . . Not much make-up needed to age her.
    Making her look younger may require
    more.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1795 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 8/6/2000
    Subject: casting
    .html
    Casting choices:


    Taylor: Liam Nieson, Mel Gibson

    Zira: Felicity Kendal, Penelope Keith, Kim Hunter . . . Why not, she's still
    working.

    Cornelius: Johnny Depp . . . After all, it is a Tim Burton film.

    Zaius: Tim Roth . . . Good choice

    President of the Assembly: Gary Oldman . . . Good Choice

    Maximus: John Hurt, The Elephant Man . . . Good voice & has make-up
    experience.

    Landon: Mark Wahlberg . . . I wish the bloody baboons would cut up his
    brain!!!!!

    Dodge: Samuel L. Jackson Come on . . . Who else? Denzel Washington maybe.

    Nova: Mira Sorvino, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Jennifer Lopez, Selma
    Hayek..ect...etc..

    Stewart: Pamala Lee . . . Not much make-up needed to age her.
    Making her look younger may require
    more.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1796 From: dan piercy Date: 8/7/2000
    Subject: web sites
    .html
    greetings,

    I was reading thru the POTA archives last night and came across a
    very nicely done website and the URL escapes me at the moment. It had
    Cornelius reading the "Beware the beast man..." as intro text and a
    wav file and had a lot of cool multimedia stuff. Anyone know the URL
    offhand? Also anyone who know of any great POTA websites, I'd love to
    know the addresses. I've seen most of the more popular ones that come
    up in title searches.

    thanks!
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1797 From: Mark Gould Date: 8/7/2000
    Subject: Re: Casting
    .html
    Following on from recent references to Whoopi Goldberg as being the
    model for a certain Zira cast..... I think she has the kind of guts (she
    is good at serious stuff don't forget) and voice to do the part justice

    My feeling is Mr Burton is (a la Mars Attacks) send up the whole genre
    of men-in makeup films. I just get the feeling that there is going to be
    more than a little comedy in the film.

    Either that or it's going to be a very /*very*/ dark film.

    M
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1798 From: Alexander Ruiz Date: 8/7/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] web sites
    .html
    > greetings,
    >
    > I was reading thru the POTA archives last night and came across a
    > very nicely done website and the URL escapes me at the moment. It had
    > Cornelius reading the "Beware the beast man..." as intro text and a
    > wav file and had a lot of cool multimedia stuff. Anyone know the URL
    > offhand? Also anyone who know of any great POTA websites, I'd love to
    > know the addresses. I've seen most of the more popular ones that come
    > up in title searches.
    >
    > thanks!

    That's my web site: www.prophecysite.com
    There you will find links to many others.

    Alex
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1799 From: dan piercy Date: 8/7/2000
    Subject: www.prophecysite.com
    .html
    Yes thanks Alex!
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1800 From: tinarosa Date: 8/7/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] www.prophecysite.com
    .html
    Dan,

    please, look at:

    www.mcanet.com.br/lostinspace/apes/apes.htmlbr>
    The Planet of the Apes Brazilian Fan Club web site!

    Adami

    tinarosa@...

    dan piercy escreveu:

    > Yes thanks Alex!
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1801 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 8/7/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] RE: Casting
    .html
    In a message dated 08/07/2000 10:12:14 AM Central Daylight Time,
    mark.gould@... writes:

    << Following on from recent references to Whoopi Goldberg as being the
    model for a certain Zira cast..... I think she has the kind of guts (she
    is good at serious stuff don't forget) and voice to do the part justice
    >>

    She doesn't have the eyes. Zira was the only ape with very expressive hazel
    eyes.
    I disagree about the voice too.
    <.html
    Group: pota Message: 1802 From: Kevin J. Greenland Date: 8/7/2000
    Subject: Re: [pota] RE: Casting
    .html
    No No No - Joanna Lumley for Zira defo - she can do her Patsy darling
    sweetie darling if she gets hold of any grape juice plus !

    Can they super-impose Felicity Kendal's bum ? It may be a tad saggy by now
    though !

    Kevin the gerbil xxx

    COME ON YOU SPURS !!!
    -----Original Message-----
    From: LordTZer0@... <LordTZer0@...>
    To: pota@egroups.com <pota@egroups.com>
    Date: 07 August 2000 16:43
    Subject: Re: [pota] RE: Casting


    >In a message dated 08/07/2000 10:12:14 AM Central Daylight Time,
    >mark.gould@... writes:
    >
    ><< Following on from recent references to Whoopi Goldberg as being the
    > model for a certain Zira cast..... I think she has the kind of guts (she
    > is good at serious stuff don't forget) and voice to do the part justice
    > >>
    >
    >She doesn't have the eyes. Zira was the only ape with very expressive
    hazel
    >eyes.
    >I disagree about the voice too.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    <.html


    Copyright © 2026, Hunter Goatley. All rights reserved.
    Last updated 2026-03-31 10:42.