|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13208 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Books |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13209 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Books |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13210 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: "Cure"iouser and curiouser |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13211 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13212 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Books |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13213 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13214 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Ape Day! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13215 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13216 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: By goly I have it! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13217 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13218 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Special features on the Tv DVD |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13219 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Special features on the Tv DVD |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13220 |
From: Lynne Miller |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13221 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13222 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13223 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13224 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13225 |
From: Lynne Miller |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Game |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13226 |
From: Lynne Miller |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13227 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13228 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13229 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13230 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13231 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13232 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13233 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13234 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: "Cure"iouser and curiouser |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13235 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13236 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13237 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13238 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Special features on the Tv DVD |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13239 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13240 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13241 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: POTA Game - WooHoo! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13242 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13243 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13244 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13245 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13246 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13247 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: "Cure"iouser and curiouser |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13248 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13249 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: "Cure"iouser and curiouser |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13250 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Use your regionimagination! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13251 |
From: Mez Downes |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13252 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13253 |
From: Lynne Miller |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Un-used scripts |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13254 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13255 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13256 |
From: ryanc_873@hotmail.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Happy Thanksgiving and Planet of the Apes Board |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13257 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13258 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13259 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13260 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13261 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13262 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13263 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13264 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13265 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Oh-hio! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13266 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Caesar model |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13267 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Caesar model |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13268 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13269 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13270 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13271 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13272 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13273 |
From: locutusatwolf359@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13274 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13275 |
From: mystic4ever |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Rick Baker article |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13276 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13277 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13278 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13279 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: POTA Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13280 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13281 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13282 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13283 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13284 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Taking a Long break. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13285 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Taking a Long break. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13286 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13287 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13288 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13289 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Taking a Long break. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13290 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13291 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13292 |
From: danpiercy@yahoo.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed & TV series DVDs |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13293 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13294 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13295 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13296 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13297 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13298 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13299 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Taking a Long break. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13300 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13301 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13302 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed & TV series DVDs |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13303 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13304 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: If somethings off topic... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13305 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: New Movie |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13306 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: New Movie |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13307 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: If somethings off topic... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13208 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Books |
.htmlRory < Haristas@...> wrote:
> I've seen it -- of course, I've damn near seen everything -- it's weak but
> not all that bad. Vincent Price is no Charlton Heston, though. If you
can
> find the book it's well worth reading, and I'm sure they'll f*** it up
will
> Will Smith as the star. Good God!
The book was re-released in the UK not so long ago, as part of the "SF
Masterworks" series, so shouldn't be too hard to find.
But back to Planet of the Apes - I meant to mention this ages ago, but
forgot. I just wanted to mention how cool it is that Boulle's novel is now
available as a "Penguin Classic" and also that the cover is more in keeping
with its status as a "classic novel" rather than a film-related book. The
cover is just a picture of an ape, rather than anything from or inspired by
the film.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13209 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Books |
| Group: pota |
Message: 13210 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: "Cure"iouser and curiouser |
.htmlJeff < veetus@...> wrote:
> I'm noticing other things too, like Roddy's gloves, the extensive use of
> his double and some truly shoddy makeup. These were shot for the TVs of
the
> day and I'm sure they had no idea the shows would be "collected" and
> scrutinized on DVD ("whatever that is").
I seem to remember reading somewhere an interview with Ray Harryhausen
concerning laserdiscs, in which he pointed out that yes, you can see matte
lines and whatever else, but that these films were meant to be watched and
enjoyed, not scrutinised frame by frame.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13211 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
.htmlThere was one movie Bay was going to do called "Phone Booth". It was his
way of doing a "small" movie and proving he's an "artist". In fact it was a
Fox movie and that's how he almost went on to "Apes". It was even going to
star Will Smith (I guess he mentally casts Smith in everything). Anyway, it
was supposed to take place just in a phone booth with a sniper ready to kill
the guy when he steps out of it. But Bay wanted to cut away from the booth
to other locations and "open up" the film. Eventually he left Fox over
"creative differences" and scuttled his "Apes" project. I can imagine "I Am
Legend" ending up the same way, starting as a gritty, small film before
getting overblown again.
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Maxwell" <alan@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [pota] Use your reimagination!
> Rory <Haristas@...> wrote:
> > "I Am Legend" is an excellent book. I can imagine it being filmed
> > faithfully, but they won't do it. Filmed faithfully I see it as a black
> and
> > white movie, very much like a Twilight Zone episode.
>
> Yep, Twilight Zone indeed. But it's not easy to see them making a film in
> which the main character would primarily have to talk to himself (they'd
> have to introduce something like the bust Heston spoke to in The Omega
Man).
>
> One thing's for certain, it's not the sort of film you'll get from Michael
> Bay, that's for sure.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13212 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Books |
.htmlThe publisher said a while back that now that the Boulle book was back in
print as a tie-in to Burton's movie they were going to keep it in print as a
classic in it's own right. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Maxwell" <alan@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:06 PM
Subject: [pota] Books
> Rory <Haristas@...> wrote:
> > I've seen it -- of course, I've damn near seen everything -- it's weak
but
> > not all that bad. Vincent Price is no Charlton Heston, though. If you
> can
> > find the book it's well worth reading, and I'm sure they'll f*** it up
> will
> > Will Smith as the star. Good God!
>
> The book was re-released in the UK not so long ago, as part of the "SF
> Masterworks" series, so shouldn't be too hard to find.
>
> But back to Planet of the Apes - I meant to mention this ages ago, but
> forgot. I just wanted to mention how cool it is that Boulle's novel is now
> available as a "Penguin Classic" and also that the cover is more in
keeping
> with its status as a "classic novel" rather than a film-related book. The
> cover is just a picture of an ape, rather than anything from or inspired
by
> the film.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13213 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
.html.html In a message dated 11/20/2001 9:47:53 PM Central Standard Time, Haristas@... writes:
Could you please tell a cool Bill Blake story (I know you must have a few)? I was IMing with Mlccougar and he was wondering who this Bill Blake is.
Rory,
I AM aware who Bill Blake is, you must not have read in our IM, because I said something like "..Other than playing Cornelius at car shows....." Then right after I typed that, you had your reply typed saying he was Cornelius at car shows in the 70's... So we both basically said it, but mine hit the screen first. Anyway, that;s beside the point here...BUT if there are any good stories to tell, then yes, I hope Jeff will share them with the group...<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13214 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Ape Day! |
.html.html In a message dated 11/20/2001 9:48:28 PM Central Standard Time, Haristas@... writes:
Let's get those cards and letters to Fox about a director's cut of "Conquest" and "Battle"; and the cartoons. They've gotta have product for 2003!
Hell with waiting 'til 2003 , these should be out "now"....<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13215 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
.html.html In a message dated 11/20/2001 10:42:16 PM Central Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
I was IMing with Mlccougar and he was wondering who this Bill Blake is.
I'm guessing he's never heard of Paula Christ either.
Yes I did.....Hell I even brought those two (and their interview/article from POTA magazine) up before in these postings...I mentioned them, and their thought on the subject when I tried to get the discussion going as to whether or not the Apes hieroglyphics had any meanings (as in can they be read.)
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13216 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: By goly I have it! |
.html
.html
Just picked it up at Best Buy for
$39.99
Thanks Couger.
This is really great!
And the quality is fantastic, I only wish they had
special features. But on the other hand, having all 14 episodes on DVD is a
special feature in itself. Never thought I'd see the day.
Best.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13217 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
.html.html In a message dated 11/20/2001 11:01:39 PM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Bill watched some of the TV eps on DVD with me and gave me a lot of tid bits as we watched. He pointed out when Roddy's double, Ron Stein, was on screen, which was a lot (including full face and even a word or two).
I do not knowthe man's name, but I am pretty sure Ron Stein was not McDowall's double. For one, Stein is stockier than that chimp double that is used in the Galen "action" scenes (running, etc..). Stein was a gorilla in many episodes, including "The Trap", which coincidentally has both Stein and the Galen double in it. Now how can he be McDowall's double and a gorilla at the same time?? I am not saying I am right or anything here, but I am pretty sure Ron wasn't Roddy's double.
But, it is certain that Stein was an Ape and a human. He was, as you say, "fulll face" in "The Surgeon" episode as Lafer...<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13218 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Special features on the Tv DVD |
.html
.html
Looks like there is something.
Two trailers on the last disc.
Original POTA Cross Trailer. Very Nice! Veeery
Nice!
And the POTA 2001 Trailer. The Trailer with the
cool freaky music. :o)
Best.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13219 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Special features on the Tv DVD |
.htmlIn a message dated 11/21/01 8:20:25 PM Central Standard Time,
prophecysite@... writes:
<< And the POTA 2001 Trailer. The Trailer with the cool freaky music. :o) >>
Yeah, the music is great. :)
-Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13220 |
From: Lynne Miller |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
.html.html
Me, too! I really can't remember seeing them in the theatre at this time....all I remember is seeing Escape on TV. Why couldn't they have released them before the new one came out? I'm wondering who is doing the marketing for this now..the toys are crap, there was absolutely no tie-ins to clutter my shelf...Harry Potter is getting more tie-ins, and has been for months!
Lynne (feeling cheated..or should I?)
>From: mlccougar@...
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [pota] POTA 2?
>Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:05:28 EST
>
>In a message dated 11/15/2001 1:42:37 PM Central Standard Time,
>Artessatwork@... writes:
>
>
> > So, why not just rerelease the original POTA, all 5, if necessary?.
> >
>
>I'm with you on this one........
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13221 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
.html
.html
Me, too! I really can't remember seeing them in the theatre at
this time....all I remember is seeing Escape on TV. Why couldn't they have
released them before the new one came out? I'm wondering who is doing the
marketing for this now..the toys are crap, there was absolutely no tie-ins to
clutter my shelf...Harry Potter is getting more tie-ins, and has been for
months!
Lynne (feeling cheated..or should I?)
Believe me you should feel cheated. Fox needs a new marketing staff.
Hell, even I did a better job than thier internet staff did. Now that's
really sad. %90 of my incoming e-mails was telling me that everyday.
Best.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13222 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
.html
.html
Look sir, Bill used to hang around on the
set and he SAW Ron do the Galen dirty work. Footage would be shot at different
times or different days and be intercut. They could probably cut all of Ron's
footage together and create his own episode. The chimp costume isn't a good
indicator of body shape. I've seen that at Bill's demonstrations.
As for Bill stories, I'll think about
it.
-
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:14
PM
Subject: Re: [pota] Hey Veetus!
In a message dated 11/20/2001 11:01:39 PM Central Standard
Time, veetus@... writes:
Bill watched some of the TV eps on DVD with me and gave me a lot
of tid bits as we watched. He pointed out when Roddy's double, Ron Stein,
was on screen, which was a lot (including full face and even a word or
two).
I do not knowthe
man's name, but I am pretty sure Ron Stein was not McDowall's double. For one,
Stein is stockier than that chimp double that is used in the Galen "action"
scenes (running, etc..). Stein was a gorilla in many episodes, including
"The Trap", which coincidentally has both Stein and the Galen double in it.
Now how can he be McDowall's double and a gorilla at the same time?? I am not
saying I am right or anything here, but I am pretty sure Ron wasn't Roddy's
double.
But, it is certain that Stein was an Ape and a human. He was,
as you say, "fulll face" in "The Surgeon" episode as Lafer...
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13223 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
.html
.html
The public is not really responding well to
ape product, or at least the stores aren't ordering (a la the TV Show) so why
should they go out of their way to put them in theatres (though I'd like to see
them too).
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:30
PM
Subject: Re: [pota] POTA 2?
Me, too! I really can't remember seeing them in the theatre at this
time....all I remember is seeing Escape on TV. Why couldn't they have
released them before the new one came out? I'm wondering who is doing
the marketing for this now..the toys are crap, there was absolutely no tie-ins
to clutter my shelf...Harry Potter is getting more tie-ins, and has been for
months!
Lynne (feeling cheated..or should I?)
>From: mlccougar@...
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [pota] POTA 2?
>Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:05:28 EST
>
>In a message dated 11/15/2001 1:42:37 PM Central Standard Time,
>Artessatwork@... writes:
>
>
> > So, why not just rerelease the original POTA, all 5, if
necessary?.
> >
>
>I'm with you on this one........
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13224 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
.html
.html
Ron Harper told me that in "The Legacy" the
"castle" where they store Virdon was the set of "Young Frankenstein. So, between
that and the "Earthquake" city at Universal, 'The Legacy" is the most epic of
the episodes.
The box for the Burton VHS says to go to the
website if you're confused by the ending. Of course there you'll find the pat
answer that drove Alex crazy. Talk about spin doctoring. That's like having to
explain a joke. Whatever the sequel is like, I think they're going to play it
safe with the ending next time. Too bad. Fox, we don't need "feel good" endings,
just good ones.
- - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:50
AM
Subject: Re: [pota] Hey Veetus!
In a message dated 11/21/01 12:01:53 AM
Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Bill watched some of the TV eps on DVD with me and gave me
a lot of tid bits as we watched. He pointed out when Roddy's double, Ron
Stein, was on screen, which was a lot (including full face and even a word
or two). He's familiar with the Fox Ranch and pointed out when the rock
where Caesar had the council meeting in "Battle" was in the background. Most
of the episodes had the same village redressed but the "Good Seeds" farm was
separate. Bill had a field day with the farm apes' makeup because of the
varied quality. He pointed out that the BART set in "The Trap" had set
pieces from the 'Ape Management' in "Conquest" and "Battle". The ship
was boiler plate metal not "plywood" (a pet peeve of his). In "The
Gladiator" it's the same arena used in the first 2 flicks which stayed
around until the late '70's. The series added to it including the holding
area for the combatants and an arch in the front. The arena was also used as
the entrance to the 'Mountain City' in the 1977 pilot to the "Logan's Run"
TV show. They went to Universal to shoot the destroyed city in "The Trap"
'cause that's where they had filmed "Earthquake". The brown insert on Roddy's
chimp suit wasn't leather like the other chimps', it was vinyl (Roddy
McDowall #1).
-
- - - Jeff
Excellent inside info
there. Fox should have hired him to do a running commentary for each
episode. (Cheap Fox bastards!) I remember being able to spot
Roddy's double all the time on the TV show AND in BATTLE. Roddy also
refused most of the time during the show to have his hands made up, so you'll
notice he's wearing hairy gloves. I can't believe that the arena part of
Ape City stood from 1967 until the late seventies. I wish it was still
there. Has Bill seen the Bank America commercial that's currently
running that shows a bunch of kids at the rock pool where Taylor took his dip
in PLANET? Anyone else here spotted it?
-- Rory
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13225 |
From: Lynne Miller |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Game |
.html.html
WooHoo Michael!!!!Congrats!!!!
Lynne
>From: "Michael Whitty"
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: [pota] POTA Game
>Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:17:20 +1100
>
>Oh yeah,
>
>Speaking of the game, guess what?
>
>Here is a link to a newspaper article from last week where it is reviewed
>and a competition is mentioned (I find the opening comment that the new
>movie and the game are based on the...oh you read it!).
>
>http://users.cyberone.com.au/whitty/POTAgameCT1.jpg
>
>And here is my letter to say I won one!!!!
>
>http://users.cyberone.com.au/whitty/POTAgame2.jpg
>
>YAY!
>
>Michael
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: LordTZer0@... [LordTZer0@...]
>
>It would have been interesting if they had done what the game writers did
>and borrow ideas from both the movie and the book.
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13226 |
From: Lynne Miller |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
.html.html
That got me thinking....Lady Liberty with a chimps face....and I still hate the ending...Thades face on the Memorial....All I can see on the new one is EGO. The original, they were afraid of being laughed at, the reimagining...I don't think the thought ever entered the picture. They were going for the almighty dollar no matter how many people they ticked off. It was made to be a block-buster summer attractions movie, nothing more, I don't think. I do have both the movie and the tv series, got them both yesterday...love all the extras....and haven't gotten much sleep...
Lynne
>From: "Michael Whitty"
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: [pota] Ending
>Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:39:26 +1100
>
>Yeah, and it is silly.
>
>And the original would have been silly if Liberty had a chimp face too.
>
>I mean, how did the chimp face get there?
>
>Is it just a coincidence that Thade wore the same clothes as Lincoln and
>somebody decided to erect a monument in the same place with all the same
>Washington landmark coincidentally built by apes. What a crock!
>
>I'm still struggling to allow that to make sense.
>
>I guess if Thade landed in a post germ warfare earth and took over from
>there it could work but nothing much else in the film was explained, so I
>doubt they will explain this any better.
>
>The ending is silly (but I hope, as usual, that I am proven wrong).
>
>Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: LordTZer0@... [LordTZer0@...]
> > Sent: Saturday, 17 November 2001 19:10
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [pota] Re: POTA 2?
> >
> >
> > Hmm... I didn't feel that way. I thought it was a good ending,
> > either way.
> > I knew it was going to be something jarring, but I didn't make
> > any connection
> >
> > to the book until AFTER I saw the ending, and I had already gone
> > through the
> > surprise
> >
> > Well, then you're lucky. I heard Michael Clark Duncan saying on
> > the special
> > you're gonna be so surprise. And then when I saw it I was like, Oh, the
> > ending from the book. So the only surprise was that they went for that
> > ending whenI thought they were going to do something off the
> > wall. It's not
> > a bad ending. It just didn't have the impact on me that the
> > first movie did.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13227 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
.html
.html
Hey, speaking of the TV series, what's
up with
Mez?
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:43
PM
Subject: Re: [pota] Ending
That got me thinking....Lady Liberty with a chimps face....and I
still hate the ending...Thades face on the Memorial....All I can see on the
new one is EGO. The original, they were afraid of being laughed
at, the reimagining...I don't think the thought ever entered the
picture. They were going for the almighty dollar no matter how many
people they ticked off. It was made to be a block-buster summer
attractions movie, nothing more, I don't think. I do have both the movie
and the tv series, got them both yesterday...love all the extras....and
haven't gotten much sleep...
Lynne
>From: "Michael Whitty"
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: [pota] Ending
>Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:39:26 +1100
>
>Yeah, and it is silly.
>
>And the original would have been silly if Liberty had a chimp
face too.
>
>I mean, how did the chimp face get there?
>
>Is it just a coincidence that Thade wore the same clothes as
Lincoln and
>somebody decided to erect a monument in the same place with all
the same
>Washington landmark coincidentally built by apes. What a crock!
>
>I'm still struggling to allow that to make sense.
>
>I guess if Thade landed in a post germ warfare earth and took
over from
>there it could work but nothing much else in the film was
explained, so I
>doubt they will explain this any better.
>
>The ending is silly (but I hope, as usual, that I am proven
wrong).
>
>Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: LordTZer0@... [LordTZer0@...]
> > Sent: Saturday, 17 November 2001 19:10
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [pota] Re: POTA 2?
> >
> >
> > Hmm... I didn't feel that way. I thought it was a good
ending,
> > either way.
> > I knew it was going to be something jarring, but I didn't
make
> > any connection
> >
> > to the book until AFTER I saw the ending, and I had
already gone
> > through the
> > surprise
> >
> > Well, then you're lucky. I heard Michael Clark Duncan
saying on
> > the special
> > you're gonna be so surprise. And then when I saw it I was
like, Oh, the
> > ending from the book. So the only surprise was that they
went for that
> > ending whenI thought they were going to do something off
the
> > wall. It's not
> > a bad ending. It just didn't have the impact on me that
the
> > first movie did.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13228 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/21/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
|
.html .htmlI'm guessing he's never heard of Paula Christ either.
Yes I did.....Hell I even brought those two (and their interview/article from POTA magazine) up before in these postings...
Yes, for those of you who don't know she was the one who presented Tim Burton with the money and a kiss for wining the van painting competition, She and Bill did a lot of car shows as Zira and Cornelius. I wish I'd see them. I'm not sure what Apes has to do with cars. Batman I can understand. He had a cool car. But on the planet it was all horses. I guess someone had the same idea about the glyphs. In the POTA issue of MAD one of the background ones says E=MC2. I remember someone mentioned it before. I think it was Brian.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13229 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
.html.html
Lynne (feeling cheated..or should I?)
Yes Lynne, you should. The toys are crap. I wanted to buy them but I just can't The Band-Aids I found were stuck on the top shelf where no kid will ever see them. Which does come in handy when I want more since no one knows they're there. And the soaper sponges? I never did see them in stores, though I think I've tracked the down on the net. Did anyone ever see any collector cups? I never did though I would have like one. This whole thing hat been botched from the get go. It as if they pulled the plug on the merchandise the minute the mixed reviews hit the newsstand. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13230 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
.htmlIn a message dated 11/22/01 12:15:35 AM Central Standard Time,
LordTZer0@... writes:
<< Did anyone ever see any
collector cups? >>
I saw the shot glasses.
-Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13231 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
.html.html
I saw the shot glasses.
It's just not the same. I wanted my Ape meal w/fries. And an Ape drink!
Although whenever I think how they wussed out and made a half-assed PG-13 Apes movie It does make me want to drink. How about an Apes cocktail shaker?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13232 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
.html
.html
The Japanese got some nice bottle caps for
their Pepsi. They have all the luck. We Americans only get generic
crap.
- - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:27
PM
Subject: Re: [pota] POTA 2?
I saw the shot glasses.
It's just not the
same. I wanted my Ape meal w/fries. And an Ape drink! Although
whenever I think how they wussed out and made a half-assed PG-13 Apes movie It
does make me want to drink. How about an Apes cocktail
shaker?
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13233 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA 2? |
.html
.html
Yeah, the Japanese seem to be the only ones to make an event movie out
of POTA 2001, with premiums and a variety of merchandise. The Jun Planning
figures are pretty cool. Much better detailed than the Hasbro ones. Although,
I quite like the electronic Attar as a figure. I think the smaller Hasbro
figures were a bit hit and miss, the 2nd wave is more consistent. It's
like they didn't even design them with kids in mind as they have no 'play-abilty'
compared to other boys' action figures on the market. I guess retail has
been burned too many times with the likes of Godzilla, ID-4, SW:Ep1 and
Jurassic Park and approach movie liscencing with caution. POTA 2001 did
seem to have a decent amount of liscenced products though. Here in Australia,
the film did quite well box office wise ( by comparison) but certainly
wasn't the EVENT movie that was originally anticipated. By the way, hardly
any of the new products were distributed down under other than the Hasbro
figures which were a Toys R Us exclusive and extremely expensive. I don't
think they've sold ANY since they were released in July. And Toys R Us
hardly EVER discount their slow sellers to clear the shelves as they like
to keep their shelves looking well stocked. They still have 'A Bug's Life'
action figures at the price they were released at.
Best,
KEN
veetus@... wrote:
The Japanese got some nice bottle caps for their Pepsi. They have all the
luck. We Americans only get generic crap.
- - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001
10:27 PM
Subject: Re: [pota] POTA 2?
I
saw the shot glasses.
It's just not the same.
I wanted my Ape meal w/fries. And an Ape drink!
Although whenever I think
how they wussed out and made a half-assed PG-13 Apes movie It does make
me want to drink. How about an Apes cocktail shaker?
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the .
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13234 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: "Cure"iouser and curiouser |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/01 5:53:49 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
I'm noticing other things too, like Roddy's gloves, the extensive use of
his double and some truly shoddy makeup. These were shot for the TVs of the
day and I'm sure they had no idea the shows would be "collected" and
scrutinized on DVD ("whatever that is"). - - -
Jeff
I think one of the reasons you see so much of Roddy's double is because the show was shot in the summer. It must have been miserably hot. The shoddy makeup was because first they didn't have budgets big enough, though the show was the most expensive on the air at the time, and they didn't have time to do lifemasks and sculpt appliances for each actor. A guy playing an orangutan could have on James Whitmore's nose and Woodrow Parfrey's chin. However, every so often there'd be a great makeup. Check out Jay Robinson's 'Bandor' in "Tomorrow's Tide."
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13235 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Hey Veetus! |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/01 5:55:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Bill says most likely the model was fiberglass, since they used metal and fiberglass in those days for movie ships. - - - Jeff
Well, as far as I know the model still exists and Bill Creber has it.
It's been shown at one convention, I think.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13236 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/01 6:14:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, alan@... writes:
Jeff <veetus@...> wrote:
> It's anamorphic? That's cool. You're referring to the DVD anamorphic and
> not "scope", right?
No idea, I don't own them myself, I just read it somewhere recently and was
sure that the US set wasn't anamorphic.
Alan
No, the US set isn't anamorphic, but I understand Region 4 DVDs of APES are, and now I guess is the region that Britian is in. It's all mote if you don't have a 16X9 set, but as soon as I can get PLANET in anamorphic here in the US, a 16X9 TV will become a must. That's why I don't mind that in might not be until 2003 that Fox puts it out in anamorphic here -- hopefully the TVs will be less!
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13237 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/01 6:33:53 AM Eastern Standard Time, Haristas@... writes:
It's all mote if you don't have a 16X9 set.
I think I meant 'moot' there.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13238 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Special features on the Tv DVD |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/01 9:20:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, prophecysite@... writes:
Looks like there is something.
Two trailers on the last disc.
Original POTA Cross Trailer. Very Nice! Veeery Nice!
And the POTA 2001 Trailer. The Trailer with the cool freaky music. :o)
Best.
Al
That POTA cross trailer is also on the BATMAN: the Movie DVD.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13239 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/01 11:45:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Hey, speaking of the TV series, what's up with Mez? - - - Jeff
Yeah, I've been wondering that, too.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13240 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: New Movie Blues |
|
.html .htmlWell, because my younger bother hadn't seen POTA 2001 yet, I had to show him it on DVD last night. So, now I've seen it again. My opinion of it hasn't changed one bit -- a bad movie. I also thought there was too much music in it this time, and the Ari makeup. . . . what a mistake, but just one among many.
Oh well, the extras look cool, I guess. I still need to listen to the Burton commentary.
Tonight I'll watch the original again and wash the new movie from my mind. Happy turkey day everybody!
-- Rory<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13241 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: POTA Game - WooHoo! |
.html
.html
Yeah
thanks Lynne - I was waiting for someone to say that.
They
are all just jealous!
Is it
OK if I say "dick", Lynne?
Michael
WooHoo Michael!!!!Congrats!!!!
Lynne
>From: "Michael Whitty"
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: [pota] POTA Game
>Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:17:20 +1100
>
>Oh yeah,
>
>Speaking of the game, guess what?
>
>Here is a link to a newspaper article from last week where it is
reviewed
>and a competition is mentioned (I find the opening comment that
the new
>movie and the game are based on the...oh you read it!).
>
>http://users.cyberone.com.au/whitty/POTAgameCT1.jpg
>
>And here is my letter to say I won one!!!!
>
>http://users.cyberone.com.au/whitty/POTAgame2.jpg
>
>YAY!
>
>Michael
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: LordTZer0@... [LordTZer0@...]
>
>It would have been interesting if they had done what the game
writers did
>and borrow ideas from both the movie and the book.
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13242 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
.htmlRory < Haristas@...> wrote:
> No, the US set isn't anamorphic, but I understand Region 4 DVDs of APES
are,
> and now I guess is the region that Britian is in.
Nope, Britain's Region 2, but I guess that if they are anamorphic then all
zones will probably use these versions from now on, including the 2003
rerelease.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13243 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html.html
the Ari makeup. . . . what a mistake, but just one among many.
Ari? What about Leta? Who the hell approved that? Were they out of chin pieces that day or what!?! You know a movie's got some serious problems when they let stuff like that slide. You know everything one the screen goes through umpteen people first. And why were Lisa Marie's teeth so big?<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13244 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/2001 7:00:29 AM Central Standard Time, alan@... writes:
Nope, Britain's Region 2
Region 4 must be Japan then. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13245 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/01 11:42:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
In a message dated 11/22/2001 7:00:29 AM Central Standard Time, alan@... writes:
Nope, Britain's Region 2
Region 4 must be Japan then.
I think Region 4 is South America because where I read this was when someone in Argentina was saying they have it in anamorphic. I think I read it in one of the reviews for POTA posted on IMDB.COM.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13246 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
.htmlRory < Haristas@...> wrote:
> I think Region 4 is South America because where I read this was when
someone
> in Argentina was saying they have it in anamorphic. I think I read it in
one
> of the reviews for POTA posted on IMDB.COM.
South America it is. If anyone's interested:
http://www.blackstar.co.uk/help/help_dvd_regions
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13247 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: "Cure"iouser and curiouser |
.html
.html
Bill told me that Roddy had a strict 8hour a
day contract and to work longer than that caused trouble with the unions, etc.
So probably they would shoot his dialogue first and whatever actions were left
over the double did. Probably the worst I've seen is in "Up Above the World So
High". Check out when they are building the glider. They even ZOOM IN on the
double. That's a no - no, it draws attention as though it were a plot point
(Look! Galen is gone, who is this imposter?). Roddy had had a cyst problem on
"Conquest" (he talks about it on the DVD interview and that's why the limited
hours and also insuring his face for $1
million.
- - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 3:23
AM
Subject: Re: [pota] "Cure"iouser and
curiouser
In a message dated 11/21/01 5:53:49 PM
Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
I'm noticing other things too, like
Roddy's gloves, the extensive use of his double and some truly shoddy
makeup. These were shot for the TVs of the day and I'm sure they had no
idea the shows would be "collected" and scrutinized on DVD ("whatever
that is").
-
- - Jeff
I think one of the
reasons you see so much of Roddy's double is because the show was shot in the
summer. It must have been miserably hot. The shoddy makeup was
because first they didn't have budgets big enough, though the show was the
most expensive on the air at the time, and they didn't have time to do
lifemasks and sculpt appliances for each actor. A guy playing an
orangutan could have on James Whitmore's nose and Woodrow Parfrey's chin.
However, every so often there'd be a great makeup. Check out Jay
Robinson's 'Bandor' in "Tomorrow's Tide."
-- Rory
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13248 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Use your reimagination! |
.html
.html
Australia and New Zealand are 'Region 4' also.
Best,
KEN
LordTZer0@... wrote:
In a message
dated 11/22/2001 7:00:29 AM Central Standard Time, alan@...
writes:
Nope,
Britain's Region 2
Region 4 must be Japan then.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13249 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: "Cure"iouser and curiouser |
.html.html
Roddy had had a cyst problem on "Conquest" (he talks about it on the DVD interview and that's why the limited hours and also insuring his face for $1 million.
Kim had a similar problem during the champagne scene in Escape. They put a lip on the champagne glass so she could drink it without it getting it in the appliance. Somehow it would anyway and they had to keep regluing it. She ended up with a sore by her mouth which was treated with creams and antibiotics and in the end part of the appliance had to be cut away and they would shoot around it so it didn't show in the shots.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13250 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Use your regionimagination! |
.html
.html
Australia is region 4.
Dunno
who else is.
Michael
In a message
dated 11/22/01 11:42:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
In a message dated 11/22/2001 7:00:29 AM Central Standard Time,
alan@... writes:
Nope, Britain's Region 2
Region 4 must be Japan then.
I think
Region 4 is South America because where I read this was when someone in
Argentina was saying they have it in anamorphic. I think I read it in one
of the reviews for POTA posted on IMDB.COM.
-- Rory
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13251 |
From: Mez Downes |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
.htmlHappy Thanksgiving, fellow Yanks!
A little birdie (uncooked) told me my name was being bandied about
here. Sorry for my long absence. I'm still waiting for my TV DVDs to
show up, but I can wait as the DVD player ain't coming till Xmas.
Meanwhile, couldn't see this posted here yet -- Ain't It Cool News
has a rather in-depth review of the collection that's worth the read
(I laughed, I cried):
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=10799
Someone pointed me to it because my site and I get a mention. Wahoo,
my 5 minutes of fame!
As for the 2001 ending, I have one word: fluff.
Hope y'all are well, I'll try to interject more often! /Mez <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13252 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/01 6:28:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, mdownes@... writes:
Happy Thanksgiving, fellow Yanks!
A little birdie (uncooked) told me my name was being bandied about
here. Sorry for my long absence. I'm still waiting for my TV DVDs to
show up, but I can wait as the DVD player ain't coming till Xmas.
Meanwhile, couldn't see this posted here yet -- Ain't It Cool News
has a rather in-depth review of the collection that's worth the read
(I laughed, I cried):
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=10799
Someone pointed me to it because my site and I get a mention. Wahoo,
my 5 minutes of fame!
As for the 2001 ending, I have one word: fluff.
Hope y'all are well, I'll try to interject more often! /Mez
Hi Mez, welcome back. I steered everyone (who cares) to that article that mentions you days ago, but I'm glad you're here to talk about it yourself.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13253 |
From: Lynne Miller |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Un-used scripts |
.html.html
I know!! I have exactly 1/2 hour every day to try to settle things down!! And I really like to visit this group, so sometimes things don't get done! This was a major move for me, from MI to FL..probably won't ever finish! Apes related? I just found my bins full of Apes stuff!!!!
Lynne
>From: Haristas@...
>Reply-To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>To: pota@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [pota] Un-used scripts
>Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:01:20 EST
>
>In a message dated 11/19/01 12:11:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>cosmicraye@... writes:
>
>
> > A life? Well, not really something remotely near that...but with still no
> > computer (it's still in the closet packed, along with just about everything
> > else!), I'm stuck either at work, the library (UGH), or at my sister's
> > house on hers...and I really thing her memory is going, too, because I can
> > no longer get into the official site without the thing freezing on me, so
> > I'll have to check that out tonight. But just to let you all know, I read
> > every one of the posts,....and if it wasn't for this list what life I do
> > have would be very boring indeed!!!!!
> > Lynne
> >
> >
> >
>
>Lynne, you always seem to be in a state of unpacking that never gets done.
>Why don't you get things settled!! Settle down, Lynne! Make a nest!! It's
>the nonhuman great ape thing to do!
>
>-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13254 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Ending |
.htmlPretty funny review of the TV series , I thought. Although I think she was
digging a little deep to identify the double entendres relating to Roddy's
(alternate?) lifestyle. Still within keeping with the tone of the site, I
guess.
Best,
KEN
Mez Downes wrote:
> Happy Thanksgiving, fellow Yanks!
>
> A little birdie (uncooked) told me my name was being bandied about
> here. Sorry for my long absence. I'm still waiting for my TV DVDs to
> show up, but I can wait as the DVD player ain't coming till Xmas.
> Meanwhile, couldn't see this posted here yet -- Ain't It Cool News
> has a rather in-depth review of the collection that's worth the read
> (I laughed, I cried):
>
> http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=10799
>
> Someone pointed me to it because my site and I get a mention. Wahoo,
> my 5 minutes of fame!
>
> As for the 2001 ending, I have one word: fluff.
>
> Hope y'all are well, I'll try to interject more often! /Mez
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13255 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.htmlIn a message dated 11/22/01 5:55:34 AM Central Standard Time,
Haristas@... writes:
<< Well, because my younger bother hadn't seen POTA 2001 yet, I had to show
him
it on DVD last night. >>
How did he like it?
-Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13256 |
From: ryanc_873@hotmail.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Happy Thanksgiving and Planet of the Apes Board |
| Group: pota |
Message: 13257 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/01 11:09:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, CheeseGOTAS@... writes:
<< Well, because my younger bother hadn't seen POTA 2001 yet, I had to show
him
it on DVD last night. >>
How did he like it?
-Joe
He was five years old when we both saw the original in 'Ape'ril of 1968 (I was eight). His reaction was pretty much that it was no where near as good as the original, and that it had no depth or point to it. He liked some of the music.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13258 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html
.html
He was
five years old when we both saw the original in 'Ape'ril of 1968 (I was eight).
His reaction was pretty much that it was no where near as good as the
original, and that it had no depth or point to it. He liked some of the
music.
-- Rory
Well since we're on the issue of
brothers.
My brother (3 years older than me) and I both
grew up as Planet of the Apes Fans. And while I continued being a fan, he since
has grown away from it. But I'll tell you how
he felt about POTA 2001. He hated it, like you
wouldn't believe. And felt insulted as a one time POTA fan.
The only thing he liked about it?
Talking Apes. That was it.
:o)
When he first saw the trailer leading to the
release, his reaction was...Where's Zira and Cornileus? Why is that human
talking? What is this crap!?
I must admit, it was a funny moment.
Best.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13259 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html.html
that it had no depth
That's the word I was looking for!
DEPTH!
It has the superficiality of a cable movie.
Anyone would think that Ted Turner was involved.
Or a Spielberg and Hanks production.
Showtime goes Ape.
So much for Burton being an auteur.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13260 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html.html
Well since we're on the issue of brothers.
My brother never was much of an Apes fan. He like the original but didn't think much of the sequels, though he thinks Nova's a hottie, no augment there. He thought POTAY2K1 was lame. There seems to be a consensus forming here. Are you listening FOX? Apes fans didn't want your Gorilliator! We can think! We can reason.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13261 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html
.html
Hey! Burton has feelings too!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 8:26
AM
Subject: Re: [pota] New Movie Blues
that it had no depth
That's the word I was looking
for!
DEPTH!
It has the superficiality of a cable movie.
Anyone would think that Ted Turner was involved. Or a Spielberg and
Hanks production. Showtime goes Ape. So much for Burton being an
auteur.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13262 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html.html
Hey! Burton has feelings too!
Yes, feeling . . .
But no brains...like a little girl.
Like a little girlyman.
Okay enough ripping on him.
I like a lot of his stuff.
just not all the way through.
Strange, eh?<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13263 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.htmlIn a message dated 11/23/01 10:13:16 AM Central Standard Time,
prophecysite@... writes:
<< Well since we're on the issue of brothers. >>
My brothers, being 13 years older than me and 16 years older (Yowch) were Ape
fans when they were little. My middle brother has grown away from it, but he
said he thought the movie was alright. My oldest brother saw it twice, said
it was great, but nothing fantastic.
-Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13264 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.htmlIn a message dated 11/23/01 11:31:12 AM Central Standard Time,
CheeseGOTAS@... writes:
<< but he
said he thought the movie was alright. My oldest brother saw it twice, said
it was great, but nothing fantastic.
>>
2001, of course.
-Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13265 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Oh-hio! |
.htmlDan Vernaet tells me there's a convention in Columbus, Ohio this weekend.
If anyone is going he asks that they e-mail him at BOTH his work and home
addresses: dvernaet@... and mystic4ever@... .
nks. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Maxwell" <alan@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [pota] Use your reimagination!
> Rory <Haristas@...> wrote:
> > I think Region 4 is South America because where I read this was when
> someone
> > in Argentina was saying they have it in anamorphic. I think I read it
in
> one
> > of the reviews for POTA posted on IMDB.COM.
>
> South America it is. If anyone's interested:
>
> http://www.blackstar.co.uk/help/help_dvd_regions
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13266 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Caesar model |
|
.html .htmlDoes anyone have a "junk" Caesar model kit they would be willing to sell? I basically only need the model kit's head (and if possible, the arms/hands as well,) so the rest of the kit doesn't matter.
If you have one you'd be willing to sell, please contact me (privately) with the info, such as price, etc....Thank you.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13267 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Caesar model |
.html
.html
The old Addar Caesar kit is becoming one of the harder ones to find, like
the Gorilla Soldier on Stallion. It very rarely shows up on Ebay and the
last one that did went for well over $100. The 'General Aldo' kit seems
to be the most common of the set.
Good luck finding one, what are you going to do with it?
Best,
KEN
mlccougar@... wrote:
Does anyone
have a "junk" Caesar model kit they would be willing to sell? I basically
only need the model kit's head (and if possible, the arms/hands as well,)
so the rest of the kit doesn't matter.
If you have one you'd be
willing to sell, please contact me (privately) with the info, such as price,
etc....Thank you.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13268 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html.html In a message dated 11/23/01 11:13:16 AM Eastern Standard Time, prophecysite@... writes:
But I'll tell you how he felt about POTA 2001. He hated it, like you wouldn't believe. And felt insulted as a one time POTA fan.
I believe it.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13269 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html.html In a message dated 11/23/01 12:14:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
Hey! Burton has feelings too!
Just no feeling for how to do an APES film right.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13270 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html
.html
Just no feeling for how to do an APES film right.
-- Rory
I loved his concept of Wahlberg and the
lake.
He says in his comentary that the scene with
Wahlberg and the egg shaped pod is like being reborn in a new
world.
Like a child being born for the first
time.
Listen to the comentary and you'll learn A LOT
about the movie and his vision.
But that concept of Wahlberg coming out of an egg
and sheding his skin (removing his jacket) is mind blowing. That dude is
DEEP!
And so much more about talking apes and talking
humans.
What a great comentary.
Best.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13271 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html.html
But that concept of Wahlberg coming out of an egg and sheding his skin (removing his jacket) is mind blowing. That dude is DEEP!
His jacket seemed way too shredded!
I'm looking at it an I'm thinking . . . okay, he got a few things burning the outer jacket so he takes it off, and underneath he got his stylishly pre-ripped punk rock one.
Puuuullease!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13272 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
.html .htmlOkay, so I've now watched POTA 2001 for a second time on DVD, this time alone in my apartment with my surround sound and 32" TV. You guys probably aren't going to believe this, but I find this movie improving each time I see it. It's still not what I wanted Fox to do, and it's not great, but it's not as bad as I thought the first time. I'm noticing subtleties of performance and picking up lines dialogue I missed the first couple of times that make it play much better.
I put the DVD on thinking I'll only get a few minutes into this thing then just jump over to listen to Burton's commentary, but instead I just watched the whole through -- and was reasonably entertained. You know it wouldn't have taken much to make this film a lot better; more sophisticated dialogue on the nature of man and his society, and a lot of work on the internal logic of the story, plus a stronger third act. But I must admit now it's not the complete disaster I thought it was. But it's no where near the original, that's for sure. I also think Burton did as good a job of directing it as the script would allow. The script was the problem here, AND the female chimp look. Now I need to go listen to Burton's commentary.
I watched the original last night. When I first put it on I thought for some reason, "Oh God, I can't watch this right now -- I've seen it so many times." But I just let it run and before I knew it I was totally into it again. Now there's a great movie.
Well, at least I know I can look at this new movie from now on without throwing up. I can't say how many times I'm going to want to watch this thing, but whatever. Let's hope if there's a sequel it's much better.
I was also in a Blockbuster today. They had 28 copies of POTA 2001 on DVD. All except three were checked-out. But, they must have had 50 VHS copies and nearly all of those were not checked- out. I think that may say something about the growing popularity of DVDs.
-- Rory <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13273 |
From: locutusatwolf359@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
|
.html I went to my video store today, taking back some movies, and I asked about
the POTA 2001 banner they had hanging up. The clerk said I could have it. So
I now own a sweet looking POTA banner. The only problem was that the people
who hung it up used super glue or something to stick it to the counter and
parts were ripped while taking it off. I'm going to my other store in town
tomorrow and ask if I can have their banner and hopefully it won't be glued
and rip. You guys should all try to do the same if you are interested in it.
Both video stores here are locally owned and aren't branchs so I don't know
if Blockbuster or Hollywood video would give them away.
Loc <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13274 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.html.html
You guys probably aren't going to believe this, but I find this movie improving each time I see it.
Duck & Cover! Olswami bent Ladle must have nukes! Rory likes the new movie! Hell has frozen over and the world is coming to an end!
Nah, the one thing I like most about the new movie . . . is it's new.
When I've seen it as many times as the old one, we'll see what I think of it then.
My feelings for the moment remain the same. It's not bad. It's just not great.
I still think a little editing could help alot. Cut Heston and cut Limbo's one liners.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13275 |
From: mystic4ever |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Rick Baker article |
.html
.html
This is from today's London Free Press
newspaper. In the same section were favourable reviews of both the Burton
DVD and the TV series DVDs!
Dan
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13276 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.html.html In a message dated 11/23/01 8:34:32 PM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
Duck & Cover! Olswami bent Ladle must have nukes! Rory likes the new movie! Hell has frozen over and the world is coming to an end!
Nah, the one thing I like most about the new movie . . . is it's new.
When I've seen it as many times as the old one, we'll see what I think of it then.
My feelings for the moment remain the same. It's not bad. It's just not great.
I still think a little editing could help alot. Cut Heston and cut Limbo's one liners.
I didn't say I like it as much as I said I don't hate it. I HATED IT before, now, seeing it reduced to just another movie on DVD it's not so bad, but like you said, it's not great. It definately has problems. I think what eventually will be my opinion of it is that it's boring. I started listening to the Burton commentary and I could see where large parts of it will become dull with repeated viewings. There isn't enough to sustain interest over, say, thirty years, as with the original. One thing I was thinking about it the first time I watched the DVD is how much the movie is like "Planet of the Apes meets The Wizard of OZ." Now I hear Burton say in his commentary that for his hunt scene the flying monkeys scene in "Oz" was very much on his mind. It figures.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13277 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html
.html
His jacket seemed way too shredded! I'm
looking at it an I'm thinking . . . okay, he got a few things burning the outer
jacket so he takes it off, and underneath he got his stylishly pre-ripped punk
rock one. Puuuullease!
T, please.
We're talking concept here.
C-O-N-C-E-P-T
Best
Al <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13278 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.html
.html
I didn't
say I like it as much as I said I don't hate it. I HATED IT before, now,
seeing it reduced to just another movie on DVD it's not so bad, but like you
said, it's not great. It definately has problems. I think what
eventually will be my opinion of it is that it's boring. I started
listening to the Burton commentary and I could see where large parts of it will
become dull with repeated viewings. There isn't enough to sustain interest
over, say, thirty years, as with the original. One thing I was thinking
about it the first time I watched the DVD is how much the movie is like "Planet
of the Apes meets The Wizard of OZ." Now I hear Burton say in his
commentary that for his hunt scene the flying monkeys scene in "Oz" was very
much on his mind. It figures.
-- Rory
Another thing that Burton says is that the apes
in this movie are still in a state of evolution. And that's why we see that
these apes have more animal behavior than in the original. And that the humas
are still in a state of de-evoluion and that's why they don't seem very bright
and don't say much.
Burton says in the end, in another 500 to 1000
years, this world will become as it is in the original (a complete reversal)
Apes more like man, man more like apes.
Now for me, I think that's pretty clever. And a
whole new aproach in creating something new. This comentary you'll find in the
scene where Thade is about to put the human brand mark on Ari in the
tent.
In my opinion, this film is now where near nor
better than the original. But a very well and thought out film. And with great
visuals as Wahlberg and egg. I'ts a very cool!
Best.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13279 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: POTA Chronicles |
|
.html .htmlI just wanted to say the the local Barnes and Noble had this book in stock. I did pick it up, but haven't read it (I haven't really even gotten into reading the Russo book yet.) Anyway, the little bit I did glance at was interesting, so I'll say Rory, you are right, this probably will be a good read. <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13280 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.htmlIn a message dated 11/23/01 7:00:20 PM Central Standard Time,
locutusatwolf359@... writes:
<< I went to my video store today, taking back some movies, and I asked about
the POTA 2001 banner they had hanging up. The clerk said I could have it. So
I now own a sweet looking POTA banner. >>
Ha, I think I have the same one, except I snatched it off Video Update's
walls without asking on my way out of the store. Lucky me.
-Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13281 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.html.html In a message dated 11/23/2001 10:30:14 PM Central Standard Time, CheeseGOTAS@... writes:
Ha, I think I have the same one, except I snatched it off Video Update's
walls without asking on my way out of the store. Lucky me.
-Joe
"Natural born thieves, aren't they" Julius<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13282 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
.html.html In a message dated 11/23/01 11:24:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
I just wanted to say the the local Barnes and Noble had this book in stock. I did pick it up, but haven't read it (I haven't really even gotten into reading the Russo book yet.) Anyway, the little bit I did glance at was interesting, so I'll say Rory, you are right, this probably will be a good read.
The POTA Chronicles? What are we talking about here? I have't seen this POTA Chronicles, and I don't think I know what it is. I'm confused.
-- Rory
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13283 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.html.html In a message dated 11/23/01 11:36:54 PM Eastern Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
CheeseGOTAS@... writes:
Ha, I think I have the same one, except I snatched it off Video Update's
walls without asking on my way out of the store. Lucky me.
-Joe
"Natural born thieves, aren't they" Julius
HA!!! I was just thinking the same! Humans!
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13284 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/23/2001 |
| Subject: Taking a Long break. |
.html
.html
Hey gang.
Just droping you all a line and letting you all
know that I'll be taking a long break from the web and hosting and for a
while.
I'll be back towards the end of 2002 for an all new
POTA site, and countdown. I really do need the break.
See ya all soon.
Best.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13285 |
From: Alexander Ruiz |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Taking a Long break. |
.html
.html
Hey gang.
Just droping you all a line and letting you
all know that I'll be taking a long break from the web and hosting and for
a while.
I'll be back towards the end of 2002 for an
all new POTA site, and countdown. I really do need the
break.
See ya all soon.
Best.
Al
Oh, P.S. I will have the DVD recorded in January - Feburary so I will post
a message here on the group for those interested. I'll have complete
details then.
And sorry, but I'm really burned out right now and need some time away to
better focus on personal matters.
See you all soon.
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13286 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
.html The POTA Chronicles? What are we talking about here? I have't seen this POTA Chronicles, and I don't think I know what it is. I'm confused.
-- Rory
Really? Then I made a mistake. I guess I thought you mentioned this book...Maybe you did, but said it was worthless. Damnit, I'm confused now... I guess I just got you and someone else mixed up, sorry 'bout that. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13287 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.html
.html
I saw the hunt scene as "a Wizard of Oz"
nightmare the first time I saw it. And even the Thade makeup tests, what, a year
ago, reminded me of that. I think Burton's mind is a big culture processor that
takes things in and weaves them into his own thing. I don't think even he knows
all the things his work references. His gift is rearranging what others
originate.
I think the problem with the movie is there's
no dramatic tension. There is in the opening scenes and from Ape City on he
undermines himself. Even Wahlberg doesn't seem all that worried. It's one of
those "greatest hits" albums. It's 'Planet of the Apes' greatest hits instead of
a legit album. You know how you're waiting for a band's new album and instead
they come out with a compilation, maybe remastered, sounding better than ever,
but old ground.
- - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 7:20
PM
Subject: Re: [pota] New Movie
Reaccessed
In a message dated 11/23/01 8:34:32 PM
Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
Duck & Cover! Olswami bent Ladle must have nukes!
Rory likes the new movie! Hell has frozen over and the world is
coming to an end!
Nah, the one thing I like most about the new movie
. . . is it's new. When I've seen it as many times as the old one, we'll
see what I think of it then. My feelings for the moment remain the same.
It's not bad. It's just not great. I still think a little
editing could help alot. Cut Heston and cut Limbo's one liners.
I didn't say I like it as
much as I said I don't hate it. I HATED IT before, now, seeing it
reduced to just another movie on DVD it's not so bad, but like you said, it's
not great. It definately has problems. I think what eventually
will be my opinion of it is that it's boring. I started listening to the
Burton commentary and I could see where large parts of it will become dull
with repeated viewings. There isn't enough to sustain interest over,
say, thirty years, as with the original. One thing I was thinking about
it the first time I watched the DVD is how much the movie is like "Planet of
the Apes meets The Wizard of OZ." Now I hear Burton say in his
commentary that for his hunt scene the flying monkeys scene in "Oz" was very
much on his mind. It figures.
-- Rory
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13288 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
.html
.html
It's mostly a rehash of old articles. You're
better off getting "The Unofficial Companion", which has great
pictures.
- - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 8:23
PM
Subject: [pota] POTA Chronicles
I just wanted to
say the the local Barnes and Noble had this book in stock. I did pick it up,
but haven't read it (I haven't really even gotten into reading the Russo book
yet.) Anyway, the little bit I did glance at was interesting, so I'll say
Rory, you are right, this probably will be a good read.
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13289 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Taking a Long break. |
.html
.html
Bye Alex. Enjoy all the "Star Wars" trailers
you won't be bringing
us.
- - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 10:01
PM
Subject: [pota] Re: Taking a Long
break.
Hey gang.
Just droping you all a line and letting
you all know that I'll be taking a long break from the web and hosting
and for a while.
I'll be back towards the end of 2002 for
an all new POTA site, and countdown. I really do need the
break.
See ya all soon.
Best.
Al
Oh, P.S. I will have the DVD recorded in January - Feburary so I will
post a message here on the group for those interested. I'll have complete
details then.
And sorry, but I'm really burned out right now and need some time away to
better focus on personal matters.
See you all soon.
Al
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13290 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html.html In a message dated 11/23/2001 9:33:51 PM Central Standard Time, prophecysite@... writes:
We're talking concept here.
C-O-N-C-E-P-T
Al, please.
We're talking conjob here.
C-O-N-J-O-B <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13291 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
.html It's mostly a rehash of old articles. You're better off getting "The Unofficial Companion", which has great pictures.
Well, I also have that book, and truthfully, I didn't think it was anything to write home about either.
Glancing at the "POTA Chronicles" a little more, I can see why you weren't too impressed with it, but still, it's better than "The Unofficial Companion". Talk about grasping at straws...I mean look at that book, chapter 9 ("There's no business like monkey business")is one of the biggest wastes of paper I have ever seen in a book that's supposed to be about Apes. Chapter 8 and 11 are no picnic either...and the whole text in the movies section is basically all rehash too, too many old reviews etc...and what isn't rehashed basically is very, very amatuerish writing..I mean c'mon,"The Quotable Apes"!?(By the way, "rehashed" lines from the films...what a bunch of crap.)
And you mentioned the good pictures in the "Unofficial" book. Again, nothing to write home about. I know the author wasn't allowed access to Fox's archives or whatever, but still, he probably could have gotten his hands on some better Apes photos, not just the unmade up actors pics. He might as well not have had any pics in it at all. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13292 |
From: danpiercy@yahoo.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed & TV series DVDs |
|
.html I still like to watch the new movie cause it's fun. Aside from the
obvious problems of horrible editing, bad script and bad female
chimp make up. The set in the forests and Ape City just make me
cringe because they look so much like studio sets. The
cinematography and action is so much better in the desert scenes
when the apes attack.
I know a lot of you must have had the TV series on bootlegged VHS
copies, but I am enjoying the *hell* out of the new DVD release. I
only vaguely remember seeing these as a kid so I was thrilled to get
to watch the episodes again. They are heavy handed and dumb but in an
entertaining way. My fav episode so far is "The Good Seed." <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13293 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.html.html In a message dated 11/24/01 1:38:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
I saw the hunt scene as "a Wizard of Oz" nightmare the first time I saw it. And even the Thade makeup tests, what, a year ago, reminded me of that. I think Burton's mind is a big culture processor that takes things in and weaves them into his own thing. I don't think even he knows all the things his work references. His gift is rearranging what others originate.
I think the problem with the movie is there's no dramatic tension. There is in the opening scenes and from Ape City on he undermines himself. Even Wahlberg doesn't seem all that worried. It's one of those "greatest hits" albums. It's 'Planet of the Apes' greatest hits instead of a legit album. You know how you're waiting for a band's new album and instead they come out with a compilation, maybe remastered, sounding better than ever, but old ground.
- - - - Jeff
Totally agree, whatever dramatic tension it might develop gets undercut again and again by the less-than-serious approach and too rapid pacing, also, in another "Oz" reference, Wahlberg's Leo Davidson can be looked at as Dorothy in that all he wants to do is get home.
I really hope that Burton doesn't do the sequel. I can see that what we have here is pretty much his 'take' on the material, and it isn't really successful. I hope the 'brains' at Fox are thinking, "Ok, we've done this, now for the sequel let's try a completely different approach." And hopefully that will mean someone else getting a stab at it.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13294 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
.html"POTA Chronicles" doesn't have any pictures at all. Half the book is a
straight reprint of "Cinefantastique" (which is good if you don't have that
issue but not exactly inventive). And what little writing the author does is
bland and uninvolving. At least "Unofficial" is actually by the author and
he shows some enthusiasm for the subject. There are some mistakes but they
all have those, including Russo's. "Unofficial" is well organized,
comprehensive and fun. Russo's is the best, then "Unoficial", then
"Chronicles". I still haven't found the book Rory raved about ("Tales of the
POTA"?). - - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <mlccougar@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [pota] POTA Chronicles
> It's mostly a rehash of old articles. You're better off getting "The
Unofficial Companion", which has great pictures.
>
> Well, I also have that book, and truthfully, I didn't think it was
anything to write home about either.
>
> Glancing at the "POTA Chronicles" a little more, I can see why you weren't
too impressed with it, but still, it's better than "The Unofficial
Companion". Talk about grasping at straws...I mean look at that book,
chapter 9 ("There's no business like monkey business")is one of the biggest
wastes of paper I have ever seen in a book that's supposed to be about Apes.
Chapter 8 and 11 are no picnic either...and the whole text in the movies
section is basically all rehash too, too many old reviews etc...and what
isn't rehashed basically is very, very amatuerish writing..I mean c'mon,"The
Quotable Apes"!?(By the way, "rehashed" lines from the films...what a bunch
of crap.)
>
> And you mentioned the good pictures in the "Unofficial" book. Again,
nothing to write home about. I know the author wasn't allowed access to
Fox's archives or whatever, but still, he probably could have gotten his
hands on some better Apes photos, not just the unmade up actors pics. He
might as well not have had any pics in it at all.
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13295 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.html
.html
Yes, originally I was thinking, "Well,
unless he's totally isolated (probably not considering the comments he made
against Fox) he knows the criticisms and will correct in the sequel. Give him
another shot". But listening to his commentary I don't think he CAN do it
differently. The point of the first one was to see what a Burton "Apes" would
look like, and we've seen that. Let them segue with Burton as producer and get a
guy in there who can do sci-fi. Of course, there's the possibility the next guy
will be worse (or Joel Shumacher). Judging from the commentary it doesn't sound
like Burton even wants to do the sequel. They don't even need Wahlberg. Give him
a cameo in the beginning as we establish the New Earth and the "surprise ending"
finishes his story arc. Focus on new characters and do Boulle's novel for the
40th anniversary.
- - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 6:49
AM
Subject: Re: [pota] New Movie
Reaccessed
In a message dated 11/24/01 1:38:28 AM
Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
I saw the hunt scene as "a Wizard of Oz" nightmare the
first time I saw it. And even the Thade makeup tests, what, a year ago,
reminded me of that. I think Burton's mind is a big culture processor that
takes things in and weaves them into his own thing. I don't think even he
knows all the things his work references. His gift is rearranging what
others originate.
I think the problem with the movie is there's no
dramatic tension. There is in the opening scenes and from Ape City on he
undermines himself. Even Wahlberg doesn't seem all that worried. It's one of
those "greatest hits" albums. It's 'Planet of the Apes' greatest hits
instead of a legit album. You know how you're waiting for a band's new album
and instead they come out with a compilation, maybe remastered, sounding
better than ever, but old ground.
-
- - - Jeff
Totally agree, whatever
dramatic tension it might develop gets undercut again and again by the
less-than-serious approach and too rapid pacing, also, in another "Oz"
reference, Wahlberg's Leo Davidson can be looked at as Dorothy in that all he
wants to do is get home.
I really hope that Burton doesn't do the
sequel. I can see that what we have here is pretty much his 'take' on
the material, and it isn't really successful. I hope the 'brains' at Fox
are thinking, "Ok, we've done this, now for the sequel let's try a completely
different approach." And hopefully that will mean someone else getting a
stab at it.
-- Rory
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13296 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
.html.html In a message dated 11/24/2001 10:25:35 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes
Half the book is a straight reprint of "Cinefantastique" (which is good if you don't have that issue but not exactly inventive). And what little writing the author does is
bland and uninvolving. At least "Unofficial" is actually by the author and
he shows some enthusiasm for the subject. I cannot agree. To me "Unofficial" is just a slapped together attempt to cash in and make a quick buck (I'm getting the feeling you feel that way about "POTA Chronicles", and I can't say I'd disagree with you on that one.) However, if you think reading about "Magilla Gorilla" or "Lancelot Link" is better than reading McDowall's (reprinted) interview, more power to you. And as far as enthusiasm by Hofstede, I certainly don't see it. To me the book reads as if he were given an assignment in school, and this is what he came up with. It's a cash in on the hype book all the way. There are some mistakes but they
all have those, including Russo's. "Unofficial" is well organized,
comprehensive and fun. Well, it's not anything earth shattering, and it sure doesn't say anything that hasn't been written before. I know you'll say "Neither does 'Chronicles' ", and I did give you that point already. Both books are what they are, and neither is anything great. By the way, you mentioned that "At least 'Unofficial' had pictures in it..." Are you so enthused by those pictures because you're featured in some of them??J/K!!! Russo's is the best, then "Unoficial", then "Chronicles". I'd switch "Chronicles" and "Unofficial" around, but yeah, I'll agree with you that of the lot, Russo's is the best.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13297 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Blues |
.html"Alexander Ruiz" < prophecysite@...> wrote:
>Like a child being born for the first time.
>Listen to the comentary and you'll learn A
>LOT about the movie and his vision.
Call me old fashioned, but I'd like to think that a movie shouldn't need the
aid of a commentary to get its point across! It's a bit like knowing the
world's funniest joke but having to explain the punchline to everyone.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13298 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.htmlRory < Haristas@...> wrote:
> Okay, so I've now watched POTA 2001 for a second time on DVD, this time
alone
> in my apartment with my surround sound and 32" TV. You guys probably
aren't
> going to believe this, but I find this movie improving each time I see it.
I believe you, Rory! One thing that struck me about the film was that it
would probably improve slightly (though still be extremely flawed) on repeat
viewings. Of course, the ending still won't make any sense...
> I'm noticing subtleties of performance and
> picking up lines dialogue I missed the first couple of times that make it
> play much better.
I can't say I spotted any subtleties of performance the one time that I did
see it, but as I've said on this list before - one of the things that the
ending has in its favour is that for the first time in the whole film
Wahlberg actually looks genuinely shocked and scared. Shame it took until
the final scene to do so, most people probably didn't care by then.
> I also think Burton did as good a job of directing it as
> the script would allow. The script was the problem here, AND the female
> chimp look.
That's my opinion too. Script was the biggest flaw, female make-up was poor
(but then I wasn't that impressed with any of the make-up to be honest) and
as was just pointed out, the soundstage sets looked like exactly that -
soundstages.
There was definitely too much interference - seems that the bigwigs wanted
Burton to make their film, but not make a Burton film. Pointless.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13299 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: Taking a Long break. |
.html"Alexander Ruiz" < prophecysite@...> wrote:
>Just droping you all a line and letting you all know
>that I'll be taking a long break from the web and hosting
>and for a while.
Yeah, right! Expect us to believe that, do you, Alex?!?
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13300 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
|
.html The book Rory liked was neither Chronicles or Unofficial Companion, it was
"Legend of the Planet of the Apes - or How Hollywood Turned Darwin Upside
Down".
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13301 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed |
.html
.html
Haristas@... wrote:
One thing I was thinking about it the first time I watched the DVD
is how
much the movie is like "Planet of the Apes meets The Wizard of OZ."
Now I hear Burton say in his commentary that for his hunt scene
the flying monkeys scene in "Oz" was very much on his mind. It
figures.
"I'll get you and your little chimp too!"
-Thade.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13302 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: New Movie Reaccessed & TV series DVDs |
.htmldanpiercy@... wrote:
The set in the forests and Ape City just make me
cringe because they look so much like studio sets.
Yeah, that lagoon scene. When Leo dives into the water, I was expecting to
here Gilligan's voice yelling:
" I'll save you Skip-perrrrr!" If Daena was Ginger and Ari was Mary Anne, who
was Lovey? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13303 |
From: Ken & Heather Taylor |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: Re: POTA Chronicles |
.htmlYeah, I'm STILL waiting for my copy to show up from Amazon. But I do have the
other books. I agree with most of the comments posted already. I think
overall, Russo's book is the most professional of the bunch so far, obviously
a labour of love and some amazing pictures. The Unofficial companion ( brought
to you by the author of 'The Dukes of Hazard Unofficial companion"..and that
should be your first warning ) is O.K but there are too many mistakes and
using a shot of Heston between takes on Ben Hur and saying it was from POTA is
just inexcusable. Also, the type is spread out as to make the book thicker. It
probably could have been half that size. I guess they have to make it a
certain amount of pages to justify the cover price? I can't complain too much,
as the author did send me a complimentary copy as I responded to his questions
in the fandom section. Ape Chronicles has a nice illustrated cover but really
doesn't offer anything new.
Best,
KEN
Alan Maxwell wrote:
> The book Rory liked was neither Chronicles or Unofficial Companion, it was
> "Legend of the Planet of the Apes - or How Hollywood Turned Darwin Upside
> Down".
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13304 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: If somethings off topic... |
|
.html .htmlI belong to another egroup, (non Apes related,) and in there, they ask that if you are going to post something that is outside the topic of the group, (yet it may be of interest to some in the group,) to type OT and then the subject. That way, those that don't want to read it, can just delete it, knowing it's not the subject of the group.
While I'm not sure if anything like that is stated in this groups guidelines, I think it'd be a fairly good idea to follow. I mean, personally, I really don't care to read about SW Episode 2, or the debates about evolution that we had in here awhile back.
But the only trouble with doing that in this group is that I tend to see replies attached to subjects that have nothing to do with the subject that was originally being discussed. Example would be lets say the subject was Apes on DVD or something like that...Then there will be someone's comments attached to that subject, yet it will be for a totally different subject. I guess I would like to see the comments made being attached to the subject being discussed in the post, and not something that isn't in line with the subject header.
I am certainly not trying to tell anyone how to post... These are just my thoughs on this subject, and I'd like to know how others in here feel about it. But, I know from now on, I'm going to try to post in the way I just said above. It seems to be working well in the other egroup I'm in, and I think it would work well in here.
One more thing in the other egroups guidelines, they ask that when you post a reply, to actually show what you're replying to. I'm all for that one for sure. It really makes no sense sometimes when you'll get a one line posting, and you have no idea what the posted line is in reference to. <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13305 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: New Movie |
.htmlYes, and excuse me if I say "who gives a toss?" about the imagery - the
final cut stinks. It doesn't take a genius to represent new life with an
egg - my kids do that every Easter. Burton should have spent more time on
what matters - plot and a GENUINE shock ending.
I hope the sequel incorporates "thriller" themes or is just a version of
Boulle's book.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Maxwell [alan@...]
> Sent: Sunday, 25 November 2001 6:00
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [pota] Re: New Movie Blues
>
>
> "Alexander Ruiz" <prophecysite@...> wrote:
> >Like a child being born for the first time.
> >Listen to the comentary and you'll learn A
> >LOT about the movie and his vision.
>
> Call me old fashioned, but I'd like to think that a movie
> shouldn't need the
> aid of a commentary to get its point across! It's a bit like knowing the
> world's funniest joke but having to explain the punchline to everyone.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13306 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: New Movie |
.html>... female make-up was poor (but then I wasn't that impressed with any of
the make-up to be honest) and as was just pointed out, the soundstage sets
looked like exactly that - soundstages.
Alan
I wonder if explaining the female makeup in the Burton film will be similar
to Trekkies explaining the whole "Klingon" thing....
Michael <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 13307 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/24/2001 |
| Subject: If somethings off topic... |
.html
.html
I belong to another egroup,
(non Apes related,) and in there, they ask that if you are going to post
something that is outside the topic of the group, (yet it may be of interest to
some in the group,) to type OT and then the subject.
But the only trouble
with doing that in this group is that I tend to see replies attached to subjects
that have nothing to do with the subject that was originally being
discussed .
One more thing in the other
egroups guidelines, they ask that when you post a reply, to actually show what
you're replying to. I'm all for that one for sure. It really makes no sense
sometimes when you'll get a one line posting, and you have no idea what the
posted line is in reference to.
I
certainly agree.
I
usually attempt to:
(1)
edit the text I am responding to so it consists of the part of that text I am
referring to;
(2)
change the title so it makes sense (you are so right Mr Cougar - most of the
time this group can go for weeks with the heading "POTA 2001" while
the topic has changed more than once!!!).
Obviously, there will be times I am too tired or busy to do this but I
agree it is something we should all attempt to do.
Michael <.html <.html
|
|
|
|