|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25015 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25016 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: New Group? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25017 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25018 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Response to Tom. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25019 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25020 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: The New Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25021 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Oh boy! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25022 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Oh Girl! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25023 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25024 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25025 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25026 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25027 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Great Moments in Group History |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25028 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Michael! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25029 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Oh Natalie! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25030 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25031 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25032 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25033 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25034 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25035 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25036 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25037 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25038 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25039 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: God in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25040 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25041 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Breaking Silence |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25042 |
From: Stuart Drucker |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25043 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25044 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Breaking Silence (as opposed to breaking wind) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25045 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25046 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25047 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25048 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Breaking Silence |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25049 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25050 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25051 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25052 |
From: Stuart Drucker |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25053 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Mama |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25054 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25055 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Breaking Silence |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25056 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25057 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Breaking Silence (as opposed to breaki |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25058 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25059 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25060 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: "N" is for "Neil" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25061 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Moments in History, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25062 |
From: Neil |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: "N" is for "Neil" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25063 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Mikey Likey |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25064 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "N" is for "Neil" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25065 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25066 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25067 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25068 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Moderator |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25069 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: God in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25070 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Moments in History, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25071 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25072 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25073 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: The Group Speaks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25074 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Patrick in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25075 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Statistics and Lies |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25076 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Name Calling |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25077 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Reacting |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25078 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25079 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25080 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Rules for Patrick |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25081 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Emotions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25082 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Sabotage |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25083 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Sanity |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25084 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Something to say |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25085 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Eminem |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25086 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: How bizarre |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25087 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25088 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Boring |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25089 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Topics |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25090 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25091 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25092 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25093 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25094 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Reacting |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25095 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Rules for Patrick |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25096 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Emotions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25097 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sabotage |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25098 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sanity |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25099 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to say |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25100 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Eminem |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25101 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25102 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Topics |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25103 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Boring |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25104 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25105 |
From: sgizrzugyspd |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: check this out... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25106 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25107 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25108 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Vanessa |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25109 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Changing Lanes |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25110 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25111 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25112 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Rules for Patrick |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25113 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Boring |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25114 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sanity |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25015 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi |
.htmlMaybe it was me that you said sucked then!
I was only kidding with that comment Ken...Rory understands.
But my Mom really does think he sux (are you out there mom?).
Hope your foot gets better...honey.
Michael
--- "Ken and Heather Taylor" < ktaylor@...> wrote:
> Just for the record, I didn't say that you 'sucked' Rory and I'd
appreciate
> it Michael if you didn't use my name to perpetuate your
antagonistic email
> wars. So you've started a new group, good for you, I hope it goes
well. Bu
> t remember, you'll catch more flies with honey.
> Best,
> KEN
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Whitty
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:54 PM
> Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi
>
>
> Hey that's funny - I just spoke to Ken and he thinks you suk! He
says fo
> r you to stop saying you are "with" him - he is not gay!
>
> But hey, it's all in fun remember?
>
> A hahahahaha
>
> Michael Nazi Boy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haristas@... [Haristas@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 November 2002 21:54
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi
>
>
> In a message dated 11/20/02 1:44:25 AM Eastern Standard Time,
whitty@cy
> berone.com.au writes:
>
>
>
> I'm staying Rory...but I have a strange feeling you have been
> rejected from the new group because you attempted to start up
more
> flame wars....are you crying down under?
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> Not when I know I'm dealing with a kook like you! I'm with Ken
Tayor -
> - it's over. I like Matt's Film Emporium group better now anyway.
>
> You mean Aussie POTA Nazi!
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25016 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: New Group? |
.htmlMichael: Can you stop flaming the old group please? Let it go. It makes both
you and your new group look bad. Most people in the new group still read the
old group and they see it, and even for the ones who don't there are lots of
ways a flame war here can spill over into the other group, moderated or not.
Remember the lesson taught in BENEATH when the war destroyed BOTH groups?
Also, by staying in this group aren't you defeating the whole purpose of
creating a new group? You're still seeing all of the same posts that you
didn't want to see before starting a new group. In many ways the new group is
an improvement, but Jeff and Rory are pretty knowledgable about POTA and the
people involved with it and so the old group will remain too. Or if people get
too disgusted maybe someone will create a POTA Usenet newsgroup which is easy
to do.
Thanks,
-Tom
> Just making a point Matt (and probably don't need to continue making
> it but I have chosen to anyway). Rory has stated that it is OK to
> spew garbage on this group, so that's what I'll do. Then, just like
> Rory, I'll remind you all that it is "just for fun".
>
> I already said I'm compromising on the other group so you're not
> breaking any news there. The aim of the other group is to keep
> members active and engaged. If people on this group want to belittle
> the other group you can bet I'll defend it.
>
> So now I'M at the root of it...OK!
>
> Well, I'll tell you what, I'll stop spewing garbage when you have all
> finished dumping it on me and the new group.
>
> Michael
>
> --- "mtotsky" <MTotsky@...> wrote:
> > In a message dated 11/19/02 11:48:16 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > whitty@c... writes:
> > Michael,
> >
> > It seems to me that YOU are once again at the root of the problem.
> You
> > wanted an all "on-topic" Apes group and you got it. I personally
> liked the
> > off-topic posts, so I took it upon myself to start a new group
> dedicated to that.
> > That's great. I joined the new group because I was invitied and I
> will lurk and
> > post there at my leisure. There are some great people in that group
> and I
> > would like to maintain communications with them.
> >
> > Now we still have the "Apes Classic" group and I would like to
> maintain my
> > membership there as well because of some of the online friendships
> I started
> > there. You on the other hand seem to think that this is your forum
> for spewing
> > garbage, getting that out of your system here so you can "play
> nice" at the new
> > group. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25017 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi |
.htmlThat was meant to be delivered with tongue-in-cheek Ken, further
supported by the "he says to stop saying you are with him"
bit (which I don't imagine anyone would believe you actually said),
but go ahead and take it seriously if you like. That's the problem
with emails, the intention is not always clear.
Rory understands coz he's always saying similar thing in fun...aren't
you Rory?
Michael.
--- "Ken and Heather Taylor" < ktaylor@...> wrote:
> Just for the record, I didn't say that you 'sucked' Rory and I'd
appreciate
> it Michael if you didn't use my name to perpetuate your
antagonistic email
> wars. So you've started a new group, good for you, I hope it goes
well. Bu
> t remember, you'll catch more flies with honey.
> Best,
> KEN
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Whitty
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:54 PM
> Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi
>
>
> Hey that's funny - I just spoke to Ken and he thinks you suk! He
says fo
> r you to stop saying you are "with" him - he is not gay!
>
> But hey, it's all in fun remember?
>
> A hahahahaha
>
> Michael Nazi Boy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haristas@... [Haristas@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 November 2002 21:54
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi
>
>
> In a message dated 11/20/02 1:44:25 AM Eastern Standard Time,
whitty@cy
> berone.com.au writes:
>
>
>
> I'm staying Rory...but I have a strange feeling you have been
> rejected from the new group because you attempted to start up
more
> flame wars....are you crying down under?
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> Not when I know I'm dealing with a kook like you! I'm with Ken
Tayor -
> - it's over. I like Matt's Film Emporium group better now anyway.
>
> You mean Aussie POTA Nazi!
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25018 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Response to Tom. |
.htmlMichael: Can you stop flaming the old group please? Let it go. It
makes both you and your new group look bad.
> I have stopped, but I will continue to respond to being called a
Rabid Drooling Nazi...I think you would too.
Most people in the new group still read the old group
> and so do I , and so shall I.
and they see it, and even for the ones who don't there are lots of
ways a flame war here can spill over into the other group, moderated
or not.
> from what I have interpreted from this group, flame wars, name
calling etc are permitted. They are totally liberal and don't want
any rules, nor do they care who gets offended. Just playing by the
rules, Tom.
Remember the lesson taught in BENEATH when the war destroyed BOTH
groups?
> Yes I do, and I see your point, and like I said I've made my point
so I shall now limit my responses to Rory's name calling. If Rory
prefers we could take it private, but he will not be denied his
audience (he's actually nice as pie to me in his privates).
Also, by staying in this group aren't you defeating the whole purpose
of creating a new group?
> Not really. The new group is there so people stay in it (which was
what I would have preferred to see happen in THIS group, but it was
decided that you could "sling zingers" in THIS group, so I'm
slinging!).
You're still seeing all of the same posts that you didn't want to see
before starting a new group.
> But, as you said, Jeff and Rory (and Patrick) often have
interesting, ON topic POTA chat. I would hate to miss that.
In many ways the new group is an improvement, but Jeff and Rory are
pretty knowledgable about POTA and the people involved with it and so
the old group will remain too.
> So it should, and as you know Rory joined the "new" group, then
started insulting people because they were discussing policy
on "lurkers" (this email was deleted because it was only insulting
and the "new" group has been very specific that they do not want
insults). He followed that with choice cuts from some of the
comments I have made on THIS group (you know, the one where you CAN
hurl zingers, so I DO!!!) in an attempt to start a flame war there
and as a result he has been removed from the new group (that's when
his name calling an hissy fits started over her).
Or if people get too disgusted maybe someone will create a POTA
Usenet newsgroup which is easy to do.
> I really would be a nazi if I objected to this! Tom, I like OT
posts, I swear, I am a bit sexist and I will throw back an insult as
good as (if not better than) the one/s throwm at me. The idea of the
other group is that these things, identified as turn offs, will not
come in to play. Over here, I am just giving as good as I get.
Hope that clarifies, and like I said, I have stopped...have THEY?
Michael
PS I would say we might be better off continuing this privately, your
choice. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25019 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The POTA Nazi |
.html.html In a message dated 11/20/02 3:15:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, ktaylor@... writes:
Just for the record, I didn't say that you 'sucked' Rory and I'd appreciate it Michael if you didn't use my name to perpetuate your antagonistic email wars. So you've started a new group, good for you, I hope it goes well. But remember, you'll catch more flies with honey.
Best,
KEN
I'm no longer sure what's real and what's an illusion, I'm just ignoring you-know-who. Take care Ken, and good luck.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25020 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: The New Group |
|
.html .htmlI wasn't trying to start a Flame War in the new group, I was just trying to let everybody know the fascistic mentality behind the founding of the group.
Anyway, I've decided the new group is boring and since I know more about POTA than anybody else, especially James, I have nothing more to say except to act as a POTA reference book.
It's boring. I'd rather just stay here and be irreverent.
-- Rory<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25021 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Oh boy! |
|
.html .htmlOn another level, he has been taping episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap of VHS tapes and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
I am absolutely shattered by this event.
Michael
Now, this is the reason I cannot allow myself to anything to do with the new group (where I lifted this post).
I have privately e-mail this person that I will honor my commitment and send him his tapes when the three cassettes he sent me are filled. This will take another 9 weeks, more if shows are repeated and I have to wait for new episodes!
Boy, somebody really needs help around here -- and it ain't me!
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25022 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Oh Girl! |
|
.html Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't believe you
will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in order to get
some shock waves going over there (but, because I had the insight to
guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you were thrown out
on your ass - which is what this is really about).
Stop being a nazi, Rory.
From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
Subject: Re: Rory
Several people were concerned when Rory joined this group because
they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old group. Michael
warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he would be
banned. After making several posts that were attempts to start flame
wars here (because the group is moderated they were deleted before
they could go out to the group as a whole) it was decided that for
the good of the group Rory should be banned.
From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory intended -
causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By the way,
that's a suggestion, not an order.
But let it be known that anyone, including James and myself and any
other moderators (there was a call for another moderator form
James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate should they
decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules (which is why
we need to get these down). If you think that makes me a nazi or
control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to build a group
that will stay together and be effective (which is why I am
accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to serve the
majority, NOT to serve myself).
Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was up there with
the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On a personal
level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that friendhip (what
kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has been taping
episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap of VHS tapes
and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
I am absolutely shattered by this event.
Michael <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25023 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh! |
.htmlThe entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of what Rory was
pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his commitment; he could
just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of effort. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
>
> Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't believe you
> will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in order to get
> some shock waves going over there (but, because I had the insight to
> guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you were thrown out
> on your ass - which is what this is really about).
>
> Stop being a nazi, Rory.
>
> From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> Subject: Re: Rory
>
> Several people were concerned when Rory joined this group because
> they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old group. Michael
> warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he would be
> banned. After making several posts that were attempts to start flame
> wars here (because the group is moderated they were deleted before
> they could go out to the group as a whole) it was decided that for
> the good of the group Rory should be banned.
>
> From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
>
> Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory intended -
> causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By the way,
> that's a suggestion, not an order.
>
> But let it be known that anyone, including James and myself and any
> other moderators (there was a call for another moderator form
> James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate should they
> decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules (which is why
> we need to get these down). If you think that makes me a nazi or
> control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to build a group
> that will stay together and be effective (which is why I am
> accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to serve the
> majority, NOT to serve myself).
>
> Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was up there with
> the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On a personal
> level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that friendhip (what
> kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has been taping
> episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap of VHS tapes
> and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
>
> I am absolutely shattered by this event.
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25024 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh! |
.htmlYou can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send something
FAR from that.
I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
$20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these topics be
dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine you would
be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory should
run "your" group?
Michael
--- < veetus@...> wrote:
> The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of what Rory
was
> pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his commitment;
he could
> just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of effort. - -
- Jeff
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <whitty@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
>
>
> > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> >
> > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't believe you
> > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in order to
get
> > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had the insight
to
> > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you were thrown
out
> > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> >
> > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> >
> > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > Subject: Re: Rory
> >
> > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this group because
> > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old group.
Michael
> > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he would be
> > banned. After making several posts that were attempts to start
flame
> > wars here (because the group is moderated they were deleted before
> > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was decided that for
> > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> >
> > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> >
> > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory intended -
> > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By the way,
> > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> >
> > But let it be known that anyone, including James and myself and
any
> > other moderators (there was a call for another moderator form
> > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate should
they
> > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules (which is
why
> > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me a nazi or
> > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to build a
group
> > that will stay together and be effective (which is why I am
> > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to serve the
> > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> >
> > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was up there
with
> > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On a personal
> > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that friendhip
(what
> > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has been taping
> > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap of VHS
tapes
> > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> >
> > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25025 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh! |
.htmlThe topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no reason to
believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm sure you'll tell
us about it. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send something
> FAR from that.
>
> I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
>
> $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
>
> Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these topics be
> dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine you would
> be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory should
> run "your" group?
>
> Michael
>
>
> --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of what Rory
> was
> > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his commitment;
> he could
> > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of effort. - -
> - Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <whitty@...>
> > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> >
> >
> > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > >
> > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't believe you
> > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in order to
> get
> > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had the insight
> to
> > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you were thrown
> out
> > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > >
> > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > >
> > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > >
> > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this group because
> > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old group.
> Michael
> > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he would be
> > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts to start
> flame
> > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were deleted before
> > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was decided that for
> > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > >
> > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > >
> > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory intended -
> > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By the way,
> > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > >
> > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and myself and
> any
> > > other moderators (there was a call for another moderator form
> > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate should
> they
> > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules (which is
> why
> > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me a nazi or
> > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to build a
> group
> > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why I am
> > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to serve the
> > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > >
> > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was up there
> with
> > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On a personal
> > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that friendhip
> (what
> > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has been taping
> > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap of VHS
> tapes
> > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > >
> > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25026 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh! |
.htmlYour continuing to publicly comment on it is pointless and, if I have
been reading the postings from other members in "your" group
properly, not wanted (come on guys, tell him...be fair!).
I know you're just standing up for your buddy and that is admirable
(if not misguided - he does not offer the same support for you,
believe me), but, like I said, this, and the previous email, don't
need public forum and I am willing to discuss it privately if you are.
However, if you want to continue the public forum I am also willing.
Also, I won't tell you anything about whether he honors his
commitment. The only reason I mentioned that was to let people know
that I had nothing to gain, and much to lose (frankly, more
importantly, what I thought was a friend - and this is the important
bit that Rory left out of his "choice cuts" and also how showing the
entire post changes things) by showing Rory the door.
Michael
--- < veetus@...> wrote:
> The topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no
reason to
> believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm sure
you'll tell
> us about it. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <whitty@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
>
>
> > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send something
> > FAR from that.
> >
> > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> >
> > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> >
> > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these topics be
> > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine you
would
> > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory should
> > run "your" group?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of what
Rory
> > was
> > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his
commitment;
> > he could
> > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of
effort. - -
> > - Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > >
> > >
> > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > >
> > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't believe
you
> > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in
order to
> > get
> > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had the
insight
> > to
> > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you were
thrown
> > out
> > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > >
> > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > >
> > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > >
> > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this group
because
> > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old group.
> > Michael
> > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he would be
> > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts to start
> > flame
> > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were deleted
before
> > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was decided
that for
> > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > >
> > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > >
> > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory
intended -
> > > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By the
way,
> > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > >
> > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and myself
and
> > any
> > > > other moderators (there was a call for another moderator form
> > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate should
> > they
> > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules (which
is
> > why
> > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me a nazi
or
> > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to build a
> > group
> > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why I am
> > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to serve
the
> > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > >
> > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was up
there
> > with
> > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On a
personal
> > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that friendhip
> > (what
> > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has been
taping
> > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap of VHS
> > tapes
> > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > >
> > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25027 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Great Moments in Group History |
.htmlWith all this talk about new groups, I was inspired to look into the
archives back to when this group began. This actually might a good thing to
dip into from time to time, maybe even a "this date in group history"
segment. Our rich tradition should not be ignored.
The founding of this group is listed as Aug. 31 1998, by MFLulder. Who's
that? They were into screen names based on POTA. MFLulder picked 'Caesar' as
his. His first official post was Sept. 12 1998, in which he announced the
group was open and suggested people pick screen names.
It wasn't until Sept. 19 that there was a responding post. This was by
BlakerG (Chris, the "Ape Man"), who asked where he could find a good POTA
timeline. ('Caesar' suggested spleenworld.com). Also joining around then was
Sam Rosenthal, who wanted to write a novel based on POTA and queried who he
should contact at Fox. Early Oct. found Alex Ruiz (who plugged his new
website, prophecysite.com, started 2 months earlier) and Ross T.
("smoothness is all...").
Around this time the conversation centered around how Aldo could go from a
villain in "Battle" to a revered figure in ape history. But this group's
inception barely predated Roddy's death. A post on Sept. 20 announced that
Roddy was dying. On the 21st an address was given where cards could be sent.
And on Oct. 5 Sam Rosenthal transmitted a newspaper obituary for the actor,
who had died on Oct. 3. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <veetus@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> The topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no reason to
> believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm sure you'll
tell
> us about it. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <whitty@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
>
>
> > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send something
> > FAR from that.
> >
> > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> >
> > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> >
> > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these topics be
> > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine you would
> > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory should
> > run "your" group?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of what Rory
> > was
> > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his commitment;
> > he could
> > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of effort. - -
> > - Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > >
> > >
> > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > >
> > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't believe you
> > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in order to
> > get
> > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had the insight
> > to
> > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you were thrown
> > out
> > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > >
> > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > >
> > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > >
> > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this group because
> > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old group.
> > Michael
> > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he would be
> > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts to start
> > flame
> > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were deleted before
> > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was decided that for
> > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > >
> > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > >
> > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory intended -
> > > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By the way,
> > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > >
> > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and myself and
> > any
> > > > other moderators (there was a call for another moderator form
> > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate should
> > they
> > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules (which is
> > why
> > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me a nazi or
> > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to build a
> > group
> > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why I am
> > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to serve the
> > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > >
> > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was up there
> > with
> > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On a personal
> > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that friendhip
> > (what
> > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has been taping
> > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap of VHS
> > tapes
> > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > >
> > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25028 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Michael! |
.htmlYou keep insinuating what Rory tells you behind closed doors, but you
were wrong about what Ken "said". Whatever. That's between you and Rory.
I've already tried to move on and start a new beginning with a post. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> Your continuing to publicly comment on it is pointless and, if I have
> been reading the postings from other members in "your" group
> properly, not wanted (come on guys, tell him...be fair!).
>
> I know you're just standing up for your buddy and that is admirable
> (if not misguided - he does not offer the same support for you,
> believe me), but, like I said, this, and the previous email, don't
> need public forum and I am willing to discuss it privately if you are.
>
> However, if you want to continue the public forum I am also willing.
>
> Also, I won't tell you anything about whether he honors his
> commitment. The only reason I mentioned that was to let people know
> that I had nothing to gain, and much to lose (frankly, more
> importantly, what I thought was a friend - and this is the important
> bit that Rory left out of his "choice cuts" and also how showing the
> entire post changes things) by showing Rory the door.
>
> Michael
>
>
> --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > The topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no
> reason to
> > believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm sure
> you'll tell
> > us about it. - - - Jeff
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <whitty@...>
> > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> >
> >
> > > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send something
> > > FAR from that.
> > >
> > > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> > >
> > > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> > >
> > > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these topics be
> > > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine you
> would
> > > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory should
> > > run "your" group?
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of what
> Rory
> > > was
> > > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his
> commitment;
> > > he could
> > > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of
> effort. - -
> > > - Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't believe
> you
> > > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in
> order to
> > > get
> > > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had the
> insight
> > > to
> > > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you were
> thrown
> > > out
> > > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > > >
> > > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > > >
> > > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > > >
> > > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this group
> because
> > > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old group.
> > > Michael
> > > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he would be
> > > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts to start
> > > flame
> > > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were deleted
> before
> > > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was decided
> that for
> > > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > > >
> > > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory
> intended -
> > > > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By the
> way,
> > > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > > >
> > > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and myself
> and
> > > any
> > > > > other moderators (there was a call for another moderator form
> > > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate should
> > > they
> > > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules (which
> is
> > > why
> > > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me a nazi
> or
> > > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to build a
> > > group
> > > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why I am
> > > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to serve
> the
> > > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was up
> there
> > > with
> > > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On a
> personal
> > > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that friendhip
> > > (what
> > > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has been
> taping
> > > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap of VHS
> > > tapes
> > > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25029 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Oh Natalie! |
.htmlI'l explain privately and you can tell the group if the content of
that email could have come from anyone else.
Michael
--- < veetus@...> wrote:
> You keep insinuating what Rory tells you behind closed doors,
but you
> were wrong about what Ken "said". Whatever. That's between you and
Rory.
> I've already tried to move on and start a new beginning with a
post. - - -
> Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <whitty@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
>
>
> > Your continuing to publicly comment on it is pointless and, if I
have
> > been reading the postings from other members in "your" group
> > properly, not wanted (come on guys, tell him...be fair!).
> >
> > I know you're just standing up for your buddy and that is
admirable
> > (if not misguided - he does not offer the same support for you,
> > believe me), but, like I said, this, and the previous email, don't
> > need public forum and I am willing to discuss it privately if you
are.
> >
> > However, if you want to continue the public forum I am also
willing.
> >
> > Also, I won't tell you anything about whether he honors his
> > commitment. The only reason I mentioned that was to let people
know
> > that I had nothing to gain, and much to lose (frankly, more
> > importantly, what I thought was a friend - and this is the
important
> > bit that Rory left out of his "choice cuts" and also how showing
the
> > entire post changes things) by showing Rory the door.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > The topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no
> > reason to
> > > believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm sure
> > you'll tell
> > > us about it. - - - Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > >
> > >
> > > > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send
something
> > > > FAR from that.
> > > >
> > > > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> > > >
> > > > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these topics
be
> > > > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine you
> > would
> > > > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory should
> > > > run "your" group?
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of
what
> > Rory
> > > > was
> > > > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his
> > commitment;
> > > > he could
> > > > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of
> > effort. - -
> > > > - Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't
believe
> > you
> > > > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in
> > order to
> > > > get
> > > > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had the
> > insight
> > > > to
> > > > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you were
> > thrown
> > > > out
> > > > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this group
> > because
> > > > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old
group.
> > > > Michael
> > > > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he
would be
> > > > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts to
start
> > > > flame
> > > > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were
deleted
> > before
> > > > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was decided
> > that for
> > > > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory
> > intended -
> > > > > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By
the
> > way,
> > > > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and
myself
> > and
> > > > any
> > > > > > other moderators (there was a call for another moderator
form
> > > > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate
should
> > > > they
> > > > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules
(which
> > is
> > > > why
> > > > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me a
nazi
> > or
> > > > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to
build a
> > > > group
> > > > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why I
am
> > > > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to
serve
> > the
> > > > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was up
> > there
> > > > with
> > > > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On a
> > personal
> > > > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that
friendhip
> > > > (what
> > > > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has been
> > taping
> > > > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap
of VHS
> > > > tapes
> > > > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25030 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
.htmlYou there Jeff?
--- " whitty@..." < whitty@...> wrote:
> I'l explain privately and you can tell the group if the content of
> that email could have come from anyone else.
>
> Michael
>
> --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > You keep insinuating what Rory tells you behind closed doors,
> but you
> > were wrong about what Ken "said". Whatever. That's between you
and
> Rory.
> > I've already tried to move on and start a new beginning with a
> post. - - -
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <whitty@...>
> > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:14 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> >
> >
> > > Your continuing to publicly comment on it is pointless and, if
I
> have
> > > been reading the postings from other members in "your" group
> > > properly, not wanted (come on guys, tell him...be fair!).
> > >
> > > I know you're just standing up for your buddy and that is
> admirable
> > > (if not misguided - he does not offer the same support for you,
> > > believe me), but, like I said, this, and the previous email,
don't
> > > need public forum and I am willing to discuss it privately if
you
> are.
> > >
> > > However, if you want to continue the public forum I am also
> willing.
> > >
> > > Also, I won't tell you anything about whether he honors his
> > > commitment. The only reason I mentioned that was to let people
> know
> > > that I had nothing to gain, and much to lose (frankly, more
> > > importantly, what I thought was a friend - and this is the
> important
> > > bit that Rory left out of his "choice cuts" and also how
showing
> the
> > > entire post changes things) by showing Rory the door.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > The topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no
> > > reason to
> > > > believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm
sure
> > > you'll tell
> > > > us about it. - - - Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send
> something
> > > > > FAR from that.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> > > > >
> > > > > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these
topics
> be
> > > > > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine
you
> > > would
> > > > > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory
should
> > > > > run "your" group?
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of
> what
> > > Rory
> > > > > was
> > > > > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his
> > > commitment;
> > > > > he could
> > > > > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of
> > > effort. - -
> > > > > - Jeff
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > > > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't
> believe
> > > you
> > > > > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in
> > > order to
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had
the
> > > insight
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you
were
> > > thrown
> > > > > out
> > > > > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this
group
> > > because
> > > > > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old
> group.
> > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he
> would be
> > > > > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts
to
> start
> > > > > flame
> > > > > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were
> deleted
> > > before
> > > > > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was
decided
> > > that for
> > > > > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory
> > > intended -
> > > > > > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By
> the
> > > way,
> > > > > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and
> myself
> > > and
> > > > > any
> > > > > > > other moderators (there was a call for another
moderator
> form
> > > > > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate
> should
> > > > > they
> > > > > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules
> (which
> > > is
> > > > > why
> > > > > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me
a
> nazi
> > > or
> > > > > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to
> build a
> > > > > group
> > > > > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why
I
> am
> > > > > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to
> serve
> > > the
> > > > > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was
up
> > > there
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On
a
> > > personal
> > > > > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that
> friendhip
> > > > > (what
> > > > > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has
been
> > > taping
> > > > > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap
> of VHS
> > > > > tapes
> > > > > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------ ---------------------
~-->
> Shop for Posters and Prints @ Art.com with state-of-the-art Custom
Framing!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/lAE0qB/adBFAA/_ZuFAA/9_IolB/TM
> -------------------------------------- <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25031 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
.htmlYeah, you're right, Michael. Rory has a big mouth. Congrats. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
> You there Jeff?
>
> --- "whitty@..." <whitty@...> wrote:
> > I'l explain privately and you can tell the group if the content of
> > that email could have come from anyone else.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > You keep insinuating what Rory tells you behind closed doors,
> > but you
> > > were wrong about what Ken "said". Whatever. That's between you
> and
> > Rory.
> > > I've already tried to move on and start a new beginning with a
> > post. - - -
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:14 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > >
> > >
> > > > Your continuing to publicly comment on it is pointless and, if
> I
> > have
> > > > been reading the postings from other members in "your" group
> > > > properly, not wanted (come on guys, tell him...be fair!).
> > > >
> > > > I know you're just standing up for your buddy and that is
> > admirable
> > > > (if not misguided - he does not offer the same support for you,
> > > > believe me), but, like I said, this, and the previous email,
> don't
> > > > need public forum and I am willing to discuss it privately if
> you
> > are.
> > > >
> > > > However, if you want to continue the public forum I am also
> > willing.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I won't tell you anything about whether he honors his
> > > > commitment. The only reason I mentioned that was to let people
> > know
> > > > that I had nothing to gain, and much to lose (frankly, more
> > > > importantly, what I thought was a friend - and this is the
> > important
> > > > bit that Rory left out of his "choice cuts" and also how
> showing
> > the
> > > > entire post changes things) by showing Rory the door.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > The topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no
> > > > reason to
> > > > > believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm
> sure
> > > > you'll tell
> > > > > us about it. - - - Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send
> > something
> > > > > > FAR from that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these
> topics
> > be
> > > > > > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine
> you
> > > > would
> > > > > > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory
> should
> > > > > > run "your" group?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of
> > what
> > > > Rory
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his
> > > > commitment;
> > > > > > he could
> > > > > > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of
> > > > effort. - -
> > > > > > - Jeff
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't
> > believe
> > > > you
> > > > > > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > > > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in
> > > > order to
> > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had
> the
> > > > insight
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you
> were
> > > > thrown
> > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > > > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this
> group
> > > > because
> > > > > > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old
> > group.
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he
> > would be
> > > > > > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts
> to
> > start
> > > > > > flame
> > > > > > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were
> > deleted
> > > > before
> > > > > > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was
> decided
> > > > that for
> > > > > > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > > > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory
> > > > intended -
> > > > > > > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By
> > the
> > > > way,
> > > > > > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and
> > myself
> > > > and
> > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > other moderators (there was a call for another
> moderator
> > form
> > > > > > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate
> > should
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules
> > (which
> > > > is
> > > > > > why
> > > > > > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me
> a
> > nazi
> > > > or
> > > > > > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to
> > build a
> > > > > > group
> > > > > > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why
> I
> > am
> > > > > > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to
> > serve
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was
> up
> > > > there
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On
> a
> > > > personal
> > > > > > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that
> > friendhip
> > > > > > (what
> > > > > > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has
> been
> > > > taping
> > > > > > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap
> > of VHS
> > > > > > tapes
> > > > > > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ ---------------------
> ~-->
> > Shop for Posters and Prints @ Art.com with state-of-the-art Custom
> Framing!
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/lAE0qB/adBFAA/_ZuFAA/9_IolB/TM
> > --------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25032 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/20/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
.htmlBut so do you. Beware the beast Apefan, for he is the devil's pawn. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
> You there Jeff?
>
> --- "whitty@..." <whitty@...> wrote:
> > I'l explain privately and you can tell the group if the content of
> > that email could have come from anyone else.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > You keep insinuating what Rory tells you behind closed doors,
> > but you
> > > were wrong about what Ken "said". Whatever. That's between you
> and
> > Rory.
> > > I've already tried to move on and start a new beginning with a
> > post. - - -
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:14 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > >
> > >
> > > > Your continuing to publicly comment on it is pointless and, if
> I
> > have
> > > > been reading the postings from other members in "your" group
> > > > properly, not wanted (come on guys, tell him...be fair!).
> > > >
> > > > I know you're just standing up for your buddy and that is
> > admirable
> > > > (if not misguided - he does not offer the same support for you,
> > > > believe me), but, like I said, this, and the previous email,
> don't
> > > > need public forum and I am willing to discuss it privately if
> you
> > are.
> > > >
> > > > However, if you want to continue the public forum I am also
> > willing.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I won't tell you anything about whether he honors his
> > > > commitment. The only reason I mentioned that was to let people
> > know
> > > > that I had nothing to gain, and much to lose (frankly, more
> > > > importantly, what I thought was a friend - and this is the
> > important
> > > > bit that Rory left out of his "choice cuts" and also how
> showing
> > the
> > > > entire post changes things) by showing Rory the door.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > The topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no
> > > > reason to
> > > > > believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm
> sure
> > > > you'll tell
> > > > > us about it. - - - Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send
> > something
> > > > > > FAR from that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these
> topics
> > be
> > > > > > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine
> you
> > > > would
> > > > > > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory
> should
> > > > > > run "your" group?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of
> > what
> > > > Rory
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his
> > > > commitment;
> > > > > > he could
> > > > > > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of
> > > > effort. - -
> > > > > > - Jeff
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't
> > believe
> > > > you
> > > > > > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > > > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in
> > > > order to
> > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had
> the
> > > > insight
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you
> were
> > > > thrown
> > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > > > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this
> group
> > > > because
> > > > > > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old
> > group.
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he
> > would be
> > > > > > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts
> to
> > start
> > > > > > flame
> > > > > > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were
> > deleted
> > > > before
> > > > > > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was
> decided
> > > > that for
> > > > > > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > > > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory
> > > > intended -
> > > > > > > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By
> > the
> > > > way,
> > > > > > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and
> > myself
> > > > and
> > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > other moderators (there was a call for another
> moderator
> > form
> > > > > > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate
> > should
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules
> > (which
> > > > is
> > > > > > why
> > > > > > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me
> a
> > nazi
> > > > or
> > > > > > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to
> > build a
> > > > > > group
> > > > > > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why
> I
> > am
> > > > > > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to
> > serve
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was
> up
> > > > there
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On
> a
> > > > personal
> > > > > > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that
> > friendhip
> > > > > > (what
> > > > > > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has
> been
> > > > taping
> > > > > > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap
> > of VHS
> > > > > > tapes
> > > > > > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ ---------------------
> ~-->
> > Shop for Posters and Prints @ Art.com with state-of-the-art Custom
> Framing!
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/lAE0qB/adBFAA/_ZuFAA/9_IolB/TM
> > --------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25033 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
.htmlSo do I what?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: veetus@... [veetus@...]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 16:36
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
>
>
> But so do you. Beware the beast Apefan, for he is the devil's
> pawn. - - -
> Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <whitty@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
>
>
> > You there Jeff?
> >
> > --- "whitty@..." <whitty@...> wrote:
> > > I'l explain privately and you can tell the group if the content of
> > > that email could have come from anyone else.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > You keep insinuating what Rory tells you behind closed doors,
> > > but you
> > > > were wrong about what Ken "said". Whatever. That's between you
> > and
> > > Rory.
> > > > I've already tried to move on and start a new beginning with a
> > > post. - - -
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:14 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Your continuing to publicly comment on it is pointless and, if
> > I
> > > have
> > > > > been reading the postings from other members in "your" group
> > > > > properly, not wanted (come on guys, tell him...be fair!).
> > > > >
> > > > > I know you're just standing up for your buddy and that is
> > > admirable
> > > > > (if not misguided - he does not offer the same support for you,
> > > > > believe me), but, like I said, this, and the previous email,
> > don't
> > > > > need public forum and I am willing to discuss it privately if
> > you
> > > are.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, if you want to continue the public forum I am also
> > > willing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, I won't tell you anything about whether he honors his
> > > > > commitment. The only reason I mentioned that was to let people
> > > know
> > > > > that I had nothing to gain, and much to lose (frankly, more
> > > > > importantly, what I thought was a friend - and this is the
> > > important
> > > > > bit that Rory left out of his "choice cuts" and also how
> > showing
> > > the
> > > > > entire post changes things) by showing Rory the door.
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > The topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no
> > > > > reason to
> > > > > > believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm
> > sure
> > > > > you'll tell
> > > > > > us about it. - - - Jeff
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send
> > > something
> > > > > > > FAR from that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these
> > topics
> > > be
> > > > > > > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine
> > you
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory
> > should
> > > > > > > run "your" group?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of
> > > what
> > > > > Rory
> > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his
> > > > > commitment;
> > > > > > > he could
> > > > > > > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of
> > > > > effort. - -
> > > > > > > - Jeff
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > > > > > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't
> > > believe
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > > > > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in
> > > > > order to
> > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had
> > the
> > > > > insight
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you
> > were
> > > > > thrown
> > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > > > > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this
> > group
> > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old
> > > group.
> > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he
> > > would be
> > > > > > > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts
> > to
> > > start
> > > > > > > flame
> > > > > > > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were
> > > deleted
> > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was
> > decided
> > > > > that for
> > > > > > > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > > > > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory
> > > > > intended -
> > > > > > > > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By
> > > the
> > > > > way,
> > > > > > > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and
> > > myself
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > other moderators (there was a call for another
> > moderator
> > > form
> > > > > > > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate
> > > should
> > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules
> > > (which
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > why
> > > > > > > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me
> > a
> > > nazi
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to
> > > build a
> > > > > > > group
> > > > > > > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why
> > I
> > > am
> > > > > > > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to
> > > serve
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was
> > up
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On
> > a
> > > > > personal
> > > > > > > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that
> > > friendhip
> > > > > > > (what
> > > > > > > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has
> > been
> > > > > taping
> > > > > > > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap
> > > of VHS
> > > > > > > tapes
> > > > > > > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------ ---------------------
> > ~-->
> > > Shop for Posters and Prints @ Art.com with state-of-the-art Custom
> > Framing!
> > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/lAE0qB/adBFAA/_ZuFAA/9_IolB/TM
> > > --------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25034 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Moments in history, etc. |
.html My take on this guys is to get over this shit. This is ridiculous. You know I won't fight over this, this AIN'T REAL LIFE, this is what you do for fun. No more points to be made here. You are destroying the groups.
Mr. Jeff, that was a great post. Who is MFLUDER or whoever, and is he still around? What happened to him, do you know? Did you guys think Roddy really looked so sick in Behind the POTA? Because I thought he looked wonderful. Not so much in health, maybe, but so dignified. I thought he was admirable. But I always have, how could I not, when he loved the apes so much?
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25035 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie! |
.htmlI emailed you privately. I'm through with dragging the group through
this. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
> So do I what?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: veetus@... [veetus@...]
> > Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 16:36
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
> >
> >
> > But so do you. Beware the beast Apefan, for he is the devil's
> > pawn. - - -
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <whitty@...>
> > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:42 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
> >
> >
> > > You there Jeff?
> > >
> > > --- "whitty@..." <whitty@...> wrote:
> > > > I'l explain privately and you can tell the group if the content of
> > > > that email could have come from anyone else.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > You keep insinuating what Rory tells you behind closed doors,
> > > > but you
> > > > > were wrong about what Ken "said". Whatever. That's between you
> > > and
> > > > Rory.
> > > > > I've already tried to move on and start a new beginning with a
> > > > post. - - -
> > > > > Jeff
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:14 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Your continuing to publicly comment on it is pointless and, if
> > > I
> > > > have
> > > > > > been reading the postings from other members in "your" group
> > > > > > properly, not wanted (come on guys, tell him...be fair!).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know you're just standing up for your buddy and that is
> > > > admirable
> > > > > > (if not misguided - he does not offer the same support for you,
> > > > > > believe me), but, like I said, this, and the previous email,
> > > don't
> > > > > > need public forum and I am willing to discuss it privately if
> > > you
> > > > are.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, if you want to continue the public forum I am also
> > > > willing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, I won't tell you anything about whether he honors his
> > > > > > commitment. The only reason I mentioned that was to let people
> > > > know
> > > > > > that I had nothing to gain, and much to lose (frankly, more
> > > > > > importantly, what I thought was a friend - and this is the
> > > > important
> > > > > > bit that Rory left out of his "choice cuts" and also how
> > > showing
> > > > the
> > > > > > entire post changes things) by showing Rory the door.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > > The topic was brought up, I just commented on it. I have no
> > > > > > reason to
> > > > > > > believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm
> > > sure
> > > > > > you'll tell
> > > > > > > us about it. - - - Jeff
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send
> > > > something
> > > > > > > > FAR from that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these
> > > topics
> > > > be
> > > > > > > > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine
> > > you
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory
> > > should
> > > > > > > > run "your" group?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and substance of
> > > > what
> > > > > > Rory
> > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his
> > > > > > commitment;
> > > > > > > > he could
> > > > > > > > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of
> > > > > > effort. - -
> > > > > > > > - Jeff
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > > > > > > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't
> > > > believe
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > > > > > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group, seemingly in
> > > > > > order to
> > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had
> > > the
> > > > > > insight
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you
> > > were
> > > > > > thrown
> > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > > > > > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this
> > > group
> > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old
> > > > group.
> > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he
> > > > would be
> > > > > > > > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts
> > > to
> > > > start
> > > > > > > > flame
> > > > > > > > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were
> > > > deleted
> > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was
> > > decided
> > > > > > that for
> > > > > > > > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the effect Rory
> > > > > > intended -
> > > > > > > > > > causing off topic bickering and starting flame wars. By
> > > > the
> > > > > > way,
> > > > > > > > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and
> > > > myself
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > other moderators (there was a call for another
> > > moderator
> > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the same fate
> > > > should
> > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules
> > > > (which
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > why
> > > > > > > > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me
> > > a
> > > > nazi
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to
> > > > build a
> > > > > > > > group
> > > > > > > > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why
> > > I
> > > > am
> > > > > > > > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to
> > > > serve
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the group was
> > > up
> > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in my life. On
> > > a
> > > > > > personal
> > > > > > > > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that
> > > > friendhip
> > > > > > > > (what
> > > > > > > > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has
> > > been
> > > > > > taping
> > > > > > > > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent him a heap
> > > > of VHS
> > > > > > > > tapes
> > > > > > > > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------ ---------------------
> > > ~-->
> > > > Shop for Posters and Prints @ Art.com with state-of-the-art Custom
> > > Framing!
> > > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/lAE0qB/adBFAA/_ZuFAA/9_IolB/TM
> > > > --------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25036 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.html
.html
Kassidy, did you see the intros Roddy did on
AMC? They're hard to watch; he could barely move his arms. But it's hard not to
admire him. He gave of himself to the very end. He was the one who got Naughton
to do the doc, etc. His commitment to "Apes" is uncontested, even if he didn't
remember "Battle". - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:37
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in
history, etc.
My take on this guys is to get over this shit. This is
ridiculous. You know I won't fight over this, this AIN'T REAL
LIFE, this is what you do for fun. No more points to be made here.
You are destroying the groups.
Mr. Jeff, that was a great post. Who is MFLUDER or whoever, and is he
still around? What happened to him, do you know? Did you guys
think Roddy really looked so sick in Behind the POTA? Because I thought
he looked wonderful. Not so much in health, maybe, but so
dignified. I thought he was admirable. But I always have, how could I not,
when he loved the apes so much?
Kassidy
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25037 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
|
.html My favorite moment in the history of this group is when Brian from Apemania
left his automated reply on his email when he went out of town and the thing
kept replying to his automated response, therefore flooding our email boxes.
That was a hoot.
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25038 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.html--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> Kassidy, did you see the intros Roddy did on AMC? They're hard to
watch; he could barely move his arms. But it's hard not to admire
him. He gave of himself to the very end. He was the one who got
Naughton to do the doc, etc. His commitment to "Apes" is uncontested,
even if he didn't remember "Battle". - - - Jeff
Nope, I don't think I even had cable then, Jeff. I went on cable
strike for some years (bad local company). That sounds sad, and now
I have to confess to being morbidly curious. And what do you mean he
didn't remember Battle? Tell. And you didn't answer, who is the
group owner, or do you know?
Yeah, J. Naughton said the only reason he did the documentary is
because Roddy was his friend. I got a card from Ron Harper two weeks
ago about the website. Cool, huh? He likes it.
Kassidy <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25039 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: God in the POTA universe |
.html--- In pota@y..., Melkor <melkor@e...> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a "god" in the fictional POTA universe, as there is in
> > the "Lord of the Rings" universe? Absolutely NOT. At the end of
>
> I think this is true only if you look at the first two movies. The
> last three movies do contain hints that a "god" character exists in
> the fictional POTA universe, although certainly not the one Zaius is
> the Chief Defender of in PLANET.
>
>
> > BENEATH, the planet Earth "is now dead". Not "mostly dead"...
> > not "partially still breathing"... it's DEAD. Would a "god"
("...if there IS a god...") sit idly by and allow His precious
creation--the planet and all those whom He had created in His image--
to be
>
>
> God DIDN'T allow the Earth to be destroyed. The latter three movies
parallel the New Testament in which God sent Caesar/Christ to save
the Earth from Aldo's/Adam's Original Sin. There are Caesar/Christ
parallels in BATTLE, ESCAPE, and as you yourself once pointed out to
me, in CONQUEST too. The presence of a Christ-like character in the
POTA universe implies the presence of an unseen God character.
Caesar's whole purpose in life was to stop Aldo's Original Sin and
thereby prevent at the original source the whole chain of events that
led to the Earth's destruction in BENEATH. God accomplished this not
by suspending free will (except for Milo maybe) but by sending a
saviour in the right place at the right time.
>
>
> And Then God sent the world a Saviour...
> -The Lawgiver
>
> The Lawgiver's quote is the whole key to understanding what
happened in BATTLE. God sent "the world" a saviour, not the apes a
saviour. God didn't need to send Caesar to save the apes, because
Aldo would have done that anyway. Caesar was sent by God to literally
save "the world".
>
> Maybe the real Christ also started an altered timeline, and maybe
in the real world the Earth was also destroyed in the original
timeline.
*** You have an interesting "take" on this topic, although I must say
that I respectfully disagree with your conclusions.
The "Ape-onauts" were not sent back in Time by God--the destruction
of the Earth (via Taylor's detonation of the Doomsday Bomb) created
the "tornado in the sky" which somehow caused the Timewarp through
which those 3 chimps travelled from 3955 to 1973. Just flying that
ANSA ship into orbit didn't get them on a Retro-timewarp--they needed
the Earth to be blown to bits by the Alpha Omega bomb to create the
warpage of spacetime (the "shockwave" Milo mentions) which sends them
back to their Past. God doesn't "save the World" by first (?)
destroying it in the dead-end Future of 3955: that would make God out
to be the equivalent of the Vietnam-era soldiers who "had to destroy
the village in order to save it"!
The Lawgiver's quote also says that the "savior" was "miraculously
born". This is a misrepresentation of the truth, a kind of lie.
Sure, "Baby Milo"/"Caesar" is conceived in the 40th Century and born
in the 20th Century, but only because of the Man-made "miracle" of
the Timewarp experienced by the Ape-onauts, a "miracle" which happens
as a result of Taylor's detonation of the Earth-destroying Bomb. Yet
there was NOTHING truly "miraculous" about Caesar's birth; amazing,
yes, but NOT a miracle.
Is Caesar a "Christ" figure? To a certain degree, yes. That is, both
Caesar and Christ (and about a hundred other mythic personages) have
a life-pattern which is echoed throughout the mythic literature of
the world. There's something about their Birth that is extraordinary
(like Christ's incarnation from a Male God impregnating a Female
Virgin Human, or Aeneas being the son of the goddess Aphrodite/Venus
and the mortal man Anchises)... just as Caesar's birth literally
predates his conception (due to Dehn's ingenious use of the science
fictional "timewarp").
But is there anything SUPERNATURAL in the Caesar story? Nope. The
gospels portray Christ as literally dying on the Cross; the "Aeneid"
has Aeneas literally descending into the pagan Underworld with the
Golden Bough to talk with the ghost of his father; but Caesar's
science fictional variation on these mythic prototypes are NOT
supernatural/magical/divine. When Caesar "dies" on the shock-table
(in CONQUEST: "...but I saw you DIE!"), he doesn't literally lose his
life and then resurrect from the dead: MacDonald covertly cut the
power to the shock-table and Caesar FAKED his death.
He "symbolically" died, to satisfy the mythic prototype, but he
didn't literally come back from the Dead. Also, his trip to "hell" is
NOT to a literal Underworld where the literal ghosts/spirits of the
Damned are punished by God for their sins--MacDonald refers to the
nuked "forbidden city" as "the hell my forefathers used to preach
about"... but he says this to satisfy the mythic archetypes; NOWHERE
did MacDonald's ancestors ever preach that Hell was a man-made
creation, the destroyed remnants of his own man-made cities--rather,
Hell is created by God as a place in which to imprison the Fallen
Angels and the wretched sinners of Mankind (The inscription on the
Gate of Hell, in Dante's "Inferno", Canto 3, says that "Justice moved
my High Maker; / I was made by the Power divine, / the Highest Wisdom
and the Primal Love": in other words, GOD made Hell, not Man... yet
the symbolic "Hell" in BATTLE was once a "paradise" turned into a
Wasteland/Desert BY MAN.
Dehn (and, presumably, the Corringtons) have MacDonald refer to the
ruined city as "hell" because they want the audience to make the
mythic connections with the story told in Dante's "Inferno", where
the Pilgrim, Dante, is led by the spirit of the long-dead Roman poet
Virgil on a journey through Hell, up the mountain of Purgatory, and
then (with Beatrice replacing Virgil at the top of the Mountain of
Purgatory) through the celestial spheres of Paradise to
the "Celestial Rose" where God, the Angels, and the Saved dwell for
all eternity. That's why Paul Williams plays an orangutan with the
name VIRGIL--he symbolizes the wisdom available to anyone, short of
divine intervention (symbolized by Beatrice).
But the orangutan Virgil is not a ghost from the distant past, as was
Dante's guide. And the bombed-out city is NOT a literal Hell--it's
the SF symbolic equivalent. And when Caesar goes into that Underworld
to discover the Fate of his own people from the testimony of his dead
parents (as Aeneas does from his father Anchises' ghost), his parents
aren't really there, conscious of him and communicating with him:
only their pre-recorded images and voices are there, on tape.
And what is the Fate that Caesar's parents describe to him? The
destruction of the World.
For Caesar to SUCCEED at changing the Future, that would require him
doing what no epic hero ever did: Avoid the personal Fate which "God"
has decreed for him. Aeneas learns of his Fate from his father's
ghost: to found the race of Romans who will eventually rule the world
(in the poet Virgil's time)--and Aeneas does NOT have the ability to
avoid that Fate. Not even the goddess Juno/Hera, his nemesis who
wishes she COULD change that Fate, has the power to prevent Aeneas
from planting the seed which will culminate in Augustus' Empire.
And Christ? After His death and resurrection, He supposedly ascended
into Heaven, is seated at the right hand of His Father, and WILL COME
AGAIN in glory to judge the Living and the Dead. Caesar is, to a
certain extent, a Christ-figure, like all sorts of other mythic
heroes, but he does NOT have the supernatural ability to come back to
the World centuries after his REAL death, and personally use any
divine power to prevent Doomsday.
The ONLY thing which Caesar's community has to go on, they think, is
HOPE for the Future. Virgil says, at the end, "The greatest danger of
all is that Danger is never over," to Mandemus, who wants to destroy
the Guns. And Caesar says, "So we must be patient and wait..." ...and
we flash forward to the Lawgiver in 2670 A.D., who says: "We still
wait" but "with hope for the future." Hope. Not DIVINE ASSURANCE.
Just Hope. Why can't they be SURE that Doomsday won't happen? Because
God has not eradicated all hatred from the World--the last image we
see before the camera pans over to the WEEPING statue of Caesar is of
a boy chimp pulling the ponytail of a girl human, who violently
pushes him away: they're FIGHTING. Not "play" fighting, like young
Cornelius and his human friend playing "War"; but REAL fighting. And
that Doomsday Bomb has NOT been dismantled--it still exists, in
the "care" of Mendez & Alma, and the community of mutating humans who
will come to revere it as their God, bringing the Timeline full
circle to the way things are in BENEATH.
So, does this mean that I--by not seeing any "God" in the POTA
universe--am a pessimistic nihilist? Nope. And the reason that I
consider the TV series to be just as important a part of the POTA
saga as the 5 films has to do with the THEME of the show, as
articulated by Virdon:
GRUNDIG: "Do you believe humans and apes are equal?"
VIRDON: "In this world or ours?"
PROTO: "In any world."
VIRDON: "I don't know about ANY world, but I believe all creatures of
equal intelligence should learn to live and work with each other as
equals."
[note: this dialogue is taken from the script for "Escape from
Tomorrow", which is slightly different from what Ron Harper actually
spoke--he didn't say the words "of equal intelligence" from the
script when the cameras were rolling.]
But it isn't enough to "live and work" with equality--you have to
work towards a Goal. Even if Taylor never detonates that Bomb in
3955, there are still any of a number of things which will eventually
happen to wipe out Intelligent life on Earth, such as "a natural
catastrophe... a storm of meteors" (as Taylor suggests to Zaius), or
a comet strike, or a (relatively) nearby supernova, or the Sun going
nova. Granted, the Sun won't go nova for about 5 billion years, but
it eventually WILL. And if Earth's intelligent life does NOT get its
ass off the planet and into outer space, then that's all she wrote!
The ONLY hope humanity (or intelligent simiankind) has, is to develop
SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, towards peaceful ends. Only if we become a
spacefaring species will we survive the death of our Sun (or the
meteor/comet/asteroid smashing of the Earth). That's why the Heroes
of the POTA TV show are AMERICAN SCIENTIST/ASTRONAUTS. Their
Americanism is voiced in Virdon's belief in Equality between
intelligent creatures; and in virtually every episode Virdon and
Burke use their Scientific and Technical know-how to IMPROVE the
living conditions of both Humans and Apes. Unfortunately, it's an
uphill battle, because the Ape society is gripped by an intense Fear
of Technology, due to the mis-use of Technology for the purposes of
War--the Nuclear War which had wiped out America and the rest of the
civilized world. Zaius & Urko, in throwing out the "bathwater" (ALL
higher technology) have also thrown out the "baby" (peacefully-used
good high-tech). Just as Lot and his family have to get their asses
out of Sodom before God rains down fire and brimstone on it, so too
does Humanity have to get its ass off the Earth before Taylor
detonates that God-bomb. Lot had forewarning--and so, too, does
Caesar's community; Caesar and Virgil and MacDonald heard with their
own ears the voice of Zira tell them that the Earth's destruction was
in the year "Thirty-Nine... Fifty--" (the "something" Zira also said
isn't preserved on the tape, and the "Five" was not mentioned by
her). So Caesar, Virgil, and MacDonald have reason enough to believe
that the planet has just about 1,932 years left to it (if, as I
conclude, BATTLE takes place in 2018, due to Mandemus' line about
guarding Caesar's Armory for 27 years, since 1991). If the World has
a little over 19 centuries to get its act together, then there should
be no problem. But IF there is no "cure" for interracial hatred (Ape
vs. Human, Orangutan & Gorilla vs. Chimpanzee, Ape vs. Mutant, etc.),
then wouldn't it make sense to seek a path which leads to the
survival of their peoples: off-planet spacefaring? For Pete's sake,
Caesar's community lives in a non-technical "city" made of tree-
forts! Their backwards hospital isn't good enough to save the life of
Caesar's injured heir. The ONLY higher technology the Apes retain are
the Guns (and a geiger counter!). Not the refridgerators. Not the x-
ray machines, or the table-saws, or the television, or even simple
radio... NOTHING. Just as Caesar has restricted the human diet to
vegetarian fare ("now we chew nuts, at our Master's command..."), so
too has this ape King restricted his community to a pre-technological
level--a step BACKWARD. Are things much better 6 or 7 centuries
later, when the Lawgiver tells Caesar's story to the 'harmonious'
Apes and Humans? After 600 years and more... and they STILL are in
the pre-techno level! There is no evidence of striving for the
industrial betterment of their meager civilization. It's easy to see
the situation remaining virtually the same over the course of another
400 years, when Zaius and Urko are running the show, actively
destroying any remnants of "dangerous" human technology (like the
cache of computers in "The Legacy").
Just as it was Man who created the symbolic "Hell" of the nuked city
in BATTLE, and not God, so too does Man have to concoct his own
salvation, which he CAN achieve if he makes use of his Intelligence
to create a high-tech, industrial civilization geared towards
extending a Human presence permanently outside the bounds of the
cradle of planet Earth. In outer space. Man is "that marvel of the
universe, that glorious paradox" who sent Taylor "to the stars".
Unfortunately, Taylor wound up back on "a world upside-down" and in
bitterness for the loss of Nova (the only woman who, it seems, ever
loved him), he triggers the world-destroying souvenir from the 20th
century. Before 3955, Caesar (or Virgil, or MacDonald) should work
towards sending OTHER intelligent Earth creatures "to the stars", so
that at least a REMNANT of Earth intelligence can survive the End of
the World.
As long as the Zaiuses and Urkos are in charge... as long as guys
like Leuric are persecuted for being technologically innovative...
the world is DOOMED. But if Virdon and Burke can prove to Ape and
Human alike that Technology--as dangerous as it can be (and, sadly,
had been proven to be when misused in the Past)--is still the ONLY
hope any of us has to perpetuate our civilization, which is
ultimately the supreme goal listed in the preamble of the
Constitution of the United States: "...to secure the blessings of
liberty for ourselves AND OUR POSTERITY..." If the world is wiped out
in 3955, and we KNOW it's coming, then for the sake of our posterity,
we must get our butts off "terra firma". The technophobic, luddite
Apes are doomed--the innovators (like Cornelius & Zira) are
persecuted, rather than encouraged. But IF people (even Apes and
Humans, together) are willing to live and work together as equals, as
Virdon says, THEN maybe there's a chance.
"God" isn't the answer to the dilemma facing Apes and Humans on the
Planet of the Apes: it's US. We are both the Problem AND the
Solution. We have to be "our better selves" (to paraphrase Cornelius'
admonition to Zira). God ain't gonna intervene at the last second to
keep Taylor's paw off the Doomsday Bomb's trigger. We can't rely on
divine intervention--we have to save ourselves.
At least, that's how I see it.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25040 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.html>
> My take on this guys is to get over this shit. This is ridiculous. You know I won't fight over this, this AIN'T REAL LIFE, this is what you do for fun. No more points to be made here. You are destroying the groups.
I agree completely with Kassidy. People talk about POTA for fun.
It's not real life! And I hope that EVERYONE involved will be able
to restrain themselves before launching flames. If nothing else
think about the irony of POTA fans not being able to peacefully
coexist with each other. It would be a big shame for people to
watch the POTA films over and over like many of us have and not
learn anything from watching them.
> Mr. Jeff, that was a great post. Who is MFLUDER or whoever, and is he still around? What happened to him, do you know? Did you guys think Roddy really looked so sick in Behind the POTA? Because I thought he looked wonderful. Not so much in health, maybe, but so dignified. I thought he was admirable. But I always have, how could I not, when he loved the apes so much?
I never noticed Roddy looking sick there. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25041 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Breaking Silence |
.html--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> I am speaking on behalf of the members in the new group because I
> have listened to the members of the new group and this is what they
> have said. I then took it a step further and have tried to offer
> people what they want...and this will be based on setting Ground
> Rules and agreeing on the consequences of breaking those rules.
> Unlike a Nazi dictator, the group votes on the rules.
*** Unlike a Nazi dictator? Hitler was democratically elected, and
under that "majority rules" society the minority Jews were mass-
murdered! Unlike Nazi Germany, the U.S.A. is a REPUBLIC, where ALL
people, even those in the Minority, have EQUAL RIGHTS, and an EQUAL
SAY in things. Does this "new group" democratically vote to toss out
the undesirables? I don't think I'd WANT to be in such a group! So,
if some of the folks in that group joined to get away from my
(horrors!) lengthy posts, then good riddance! At least HERE they are
free to put in their 2 cents. When they rub enough of their fellow
groupers the wrong way, they'll get shown the door, though, it sounds
like. Then they can come crawling back here where Rory might make fun
of 'em for a bit, but at least their input will be welcome! Even if
it is over 100 words long!
> I wish you guys the best in this group, and I will stay a member so
I can continue to post off topic stuff about Eminem etc (which would
be out of place in the movie emporium group).
>
> Michael
*** If you (and all those disenchanted others out there) are so fed
up with off-topic posts, why be the hypocrite by posting it HERE?! Do
you think we WANT you to poke your head in here every so often just
to tell us about Eminem (or whomever/whatever), cluttering up OUR
group? This is a POTA discussion board, whose members may
occasionally post off-topic stuff, but if you're gonna be primarily
devoted to that new group, don't treat this one as your garbage dump
for off-topic crap. Don't be sighing rapturously about how your new
group "rocks" because it DOESN'T have off-topic junk in it--junk that
you STILL want to post, so you intend so HERE. If you're
predominantly against off-topic stuff, then either stay and post on-
topic (and you're still welcome to do so--even from ME), or find an
Eminem Yahoo group to post on.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25042 |
From: Stuart Drucker |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
.htmlHi there,
I've been lurking on the list for about a month, since I did a Yahoo search
and stumbled into the group. I've been following POTA since I was a kid in
the early 70s, and remember the excitement (and subsequent disappointment)
over the POTA TV show. Like you, I've spent too much time pondering the
consequences of the POT timeline. It's nice to see that somebody else is
fascinated by the Biblical allegory implicit in the series. I've also
enjoyed your (Patrick's) attempt to bring together the POT movies and TV
with an ingenuous timeline, even in the midst of discontinuity by the
writers.
By trade, I'm a marketing scientist, and science fiction is my escape from
the client-driven consulting world.
Anyway, a few points about your post:
> POTA universe implies the presence of an unseen God character.
> Caesar's whole purpose in life was to stop Aldo's Original Sin and
> thereby prevent at the original source the whole chain of events that
> led to the Earth's destruction in BENEATH. God accomplished this not
> by suspending free will (except for Milo maybe) but by sending a
> saviour in the right place at the right time.
Yup, because free will brought the world to nuclear war and would lead to
the apes repeating humanity's history. His "Ape shall never kill Ape" was an
unconscious attempt to do this, beefore he heard his parent's tape in the
Dead City.
> >
> >
> > And Then God sent the world a Saviour...
> > -The Lawgiver
I always liked the "God in his wrath" preamble to this.
> > The Lawgiver's quote is the whole key to understanding what
> happened in BATTLE. God sent "the world" a saviour, not the apes a
> saviour.
Without it, it's simply a condensed history lesson. It implies that Caesar's
vision of a peaceful world with human/ape cooperation lived into the late
27th century, at least. Otherwise it would have indeed been "the apes". The
Lawgiver wouldn't have mentioned the destruction of the world's greatest
(human) cities if he were consciously trying to suppress all knowledge of
human history.
> The Lawgiver's quote also says that the "savior" was "miraculously
> born". This is a misrepresentation of the truth, a kind of lie.
> Sure, "Baby Milo"/"Caesar" is conceived in the 40th Century and born
> in the 20th Century, but only because of the Man-made "miracle" of
> the Timewarp experienced by the Ape-onauts, a "miracle" which happens
> as a result of Taylor's detonation of the Earth-destroying Bomb. Yet
> there was NOTHING truly "miraculous" about Caesar's birth; amazing,
> yes, but NOT a miracle.
>
That's why Paul Williams plays an orangutan with the
> name VIRGIL--he symbolizes the wisdom available to anyone, short of
> divine intervention (symbolized by Beatrice).
> But the orangutan Virgil is not a ghost from the distant past, as was
> Dante's guide. And the bombed-out city is NOT a literal Hell--it's
> the SF symbolic equivalent. And when Caesar goes into that Underworld
> to discover the Fate of his own people from the testimony of his dead
> parents (as Aeneas does from his father Anchises' ghost), his parents
> aren't really there, conscious of him and communicating with him:
> only their pre-recorded images and voices are there, on tape.
I was a little surprised that Armando never mentioned to Caesar some of the
things that his parents experienced on Earth, like interrogation by the
gov't, getting tape recorded, etc. You'd think they'd have had time (or the
two animal scientists would have) to fill him in, while they were waiting
for their child to be born at Armando's circus. It would have been likely
for Armando to tell him _something_ about his parents, beyond that they
"came from the future". You'd think Caesar would have asked.
About Virgil, he sure knew about technology, probably one of the few apes
(except for Caesar and possibly Mandemus) that had any scientific
knowledge.If Mandemus were supposedly his teacher, and Virgil was either a
child or born after the events of Conquest, that implies even more that
there was an extended period before the Nuclear War where the apes from
Breck's City had awareness of human technology while they were free of
servitude.
>
> The ONLY thing which Caesar's community has to go on, they think, is
> HOPE for the Future. Virgil says, at the end, "The greatest danger of
> all is that Danger is never over," to Mandemus, who wants to destroy
> the Guns. And Caesar says, "So we must be patient and wait..." ...and
> we flash forward to the Lawgiver in 2670 A.D., who says: "We still
> wait" but "with hope for the future." Hope. Not DIVINE ASSURANCE.
> Just Hope. Why can't they be SURE that Doomsday won't happen? Because
> God has not eradicated all hatred from the World--the last image we
> see before the camera pans over to the WEEPING statue of Caesar is of
> a boy chimp pulling the ponytail of a girl human, who violently
> pushes him away: they're FIGHTING. Not "play" fighting, like young
> Cornelius and his human friend playing "War"; but REAL fighting. And
> that Doomsday Bomb has NOT been dismantled--it still exists, in
> the "care" of Mendez & Alma, and the community of mutating humans who
> will come to revere it as their God, bringing the Timeline full
> circle to the way things are in BENEATH.
Before I read the backstory about Dehn's script in POTA Revisited, I always
thought that the ending implied that events weren't going full circle to
Beneath, but that Caesar had changed the timeline up to the point of the
Lawgiver's time. Beyond that, it was still up to the free will of the apes,
humans, and mutants. The fight between the boy chimp and girl human would
seem to imply that the danger indeed _never_ ends, even if the timeline was
altered. Likewise, that the Dead City humans would embrace the bomb so they
could find a new purpose other than hatred and spiritless survival, because
it could destroy them if they didn't build a new future for their branch of
humanity.
The Dehn comments, of course, implied that events were completely headed
full circle regardless of the best attempts of human or ape. That's his
opinion, not canon in a strict sense.
> Are things much better 6 or 7 centuries
> later, when the Lawgiver tells Caesar's story to the 'harmonious'
> Apes and Humans? After 600 years and more... and they STILL are in
> the pre-techno level! There is no evidence of striving for the
> industrial betterment of their meager civilization. It's easy to see
> the situation remaining virtually the same over the course of another
> 400 years, when Zaius and Urko are running the show, actively
> destroying any remnants of "dangerous" human technology (like the
> cache of computers in "The Legacy").
You'd think, but we're only talking about one community from a nameless city
in California and maybe its offshoot in the Northeast. We'll never know
about the rest of the world. The problem is that we can prove anything with
a strong enough argument. I could even argue (with no evidence) that the
Lawgiver's school was implicitly in a non-technological setting for
religious reasons (like the way that observant Jews study parchment copies
of the Torah and avoid direct use of electricity on the Sabbath), but that
it's still possible that higher tech was used in other aspects of the
ape/human communitiy's life. We'll never know.
Then again, maybe in the Secret Scrolls and his unproven secret library of
human history, Zaius has some books about technology, enough to give Milo a
blueprint for refurbishing a sunken spacecraft with its power source and
computers probably destroyed while it was under water. I'd think that
blowing the hatch would have flooded the passenger compartment when the ship
originally sunk. Did anyone ever wonder about _how_ he was able to launch
that ship, without booster rockets??? No way does the spaceship take off by
itself, not the way it looked onscreen. We're assuming that the spaceship
the ape-o-nauts used was Taylor's. Maybe it wasn't, and they lied? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25043 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.html--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> Okay, here's an on topic, non offensive, thread. What do you feel
are the underlying main themes of the Apes saga? Patrick, please
allow the others to contribute before laying your Magnum Opus on us.
It will also give you valuable tying time. Sorry, that may have been
offensive to Pat. Jump in any time Pratick. Sorry again, that
misspelling of Particks name was unintentional, but so humorous, at
least to me, that I decided to explain, rather than correct it.
Again, I meant no fooence. Ha! I did it again, twice! oh
well...remember that gal who had no spell checker, it reminds me of
her posts. Sorry, I'm getting off topic again. Just ignore the
rest, like Pat's post. Sorry! Sorry Pat. I really do enjoy at
least 15% of each of your posts.
*** Prior to reading this "thread", I posted a lengthy reply to
Melkor (I think it was) concerning the "God" who is either present or
absent in the POTA universe, and I go into plenty of detail regarding
MY take on the "underlying theme" of the saga. So, consider my input
put in!
By the way, T, it's an amazing coincidence that I enjoyed at least
15% of THIS post of yours! Will wonders never cease?
And it isn't fair... it's rather impossible to misspell "T"! As I
recall, I once called you "LardTZilchO" way back when, but that was
before we became such great pals. Now you're making fun of me! >Sob!<
I think I'll hafta pick up my toys and leave and form my OWN Yahoo
POTA group, like Mikey, in which there will be NO place for those who
whine like puppies whenever I type a post longer than 100 words...
except to serve MY ends! See? I can be just as retributive as Caesar
and Mikey! At least we have Kassidy to be our Lisa: "No! N-n-n-!"
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25044 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: Breaking Silence (as opposed to breaking wind) |
.html--- In pota@y..., "munkeyman63au" <nfoster@h...> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I thought it was about time i said hello. I joined this group about
a month ago, right in the middle of the big slanging matches that
were going on, so I wasn't too sure what I'd stumbled into but
thought I'd give it a go as Apes has had such a great effect on my
life since I fell in love with the concept after seeing Escape on the
big screen as a kid way back in '72.
>
> I stuck around and read the posts and am glad to see that they seem
to be getting almost normal?, so I decided to stay.
>
> Must say though, I totally agree with the comments made by Alan in
an earlier post and I will probably make some enemies straight off by
revealing that I agree with some of Patrick's theories about the Apes
(sorry but you'll have to put me into the agreeing with the
Mothership theory, as It seems to be the one that would be most
plausible) but hey, thats my choice!
*** And what a SENSIBLE choice it is, Munkeyman!
Welcome to the POTA group that's worth your while. It's nice to know
that you agree with "some of" my theories about POTA; feel free to
disagree with some of the others I cook up, too--hell, I don't mind!
As for the posts "getting almost normal"... geez, I was gone for a
day or two and there's this shitstorm flying around with Mikey using
our group as his off-topic outhouse, lauding HIS group as a paragon
of virtue! Yeesh! Where does Mikey get all the time to continue
posting garbage to THIS site, when he's got that OTHER site to drool
over?
Don't let all that hoo-hah get you down, buddy. And don't let all
that whining about my "lengthy" posts bother you, either; if we were
to add up all the whiny, pissy, ranty, frothy, interminable dreck
that cluttered up the last couple of days' posts, then MY single,
singular posts are short by comparison. After all, at least when I
post a magnum opus-length message here, it's invariably about POTA,
or at least a topic which POTA deals with thematically. What WAS the
point of all those annoying fart-posts coming from "down under"
during the last couple days? "My group's better than THIS group, nyah
nyah nyah... because I SAY so! And Rory's mean to me, so INTO THE
OVENS WITH HIM!"
Or am I interpreting this a tad too blatantly?
Patrick
P.S. When I first went through this site (from Post #1 on upward), I
forgot to adopt a "screen name", as the guy who started this site
(according to Jeff) recommended. I'm not the type who goes out of his
way to obscure my identity--in POTA, such hiding behind false
personae is out of necessity, as when Caesar pretends to be part of a
shipment of primitive apes, or when Brent heeds Cornelius' advice to
not speak while near a gorilla. But, had I chosen to adopt a screen
name, what name would I have picked? One of my favorite POTA
characters is from MARVEL's "Terror" series: Lightsmith. I'd probably
have chosen "Lightsmith" for my screen name; but, hell, I've been
posting as "Patrick" for so long now that there'd be no point in
changing ways this far into the game.
Welcome, again, Munkeyman! By the way, your email address
is "nfoster@" etc. I assume that "Foster" is your last name. What
might "N" stand for (or would you rather keep it hush hush?)? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25045 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/02 10:28:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Kassidy, did you see the intros Roddy did on AMC? They're hard to watch; he could barely move his arms. But it's hard not to admire him. He gave of himself to the very end. He was the one who got Naughton to do the doc, etc. His commitment to "Apes" is uncontested, even if he didn't remember "Battle". - - - Jeff
His last public appearance was at the LA Zoo to promote the AMC POTA weekend at the Ape House.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25046 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/02 12:23:42 PM Eastern Standard Time, valwp@... writes:
. And what do you mean he didn't remember Battle? Tell.
This has to do with the BEHIND Special Edition DVD and the two hour interview with Roddy on it. Don't you have that, Kassidio? If not I can make you a copy on VHS. I got a few extra tapes!!! HA! HA! Just kidding -- those go for Simpsons.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25047 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/02 1:02:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
At least, that's how I see it.
Patrick
Could you repeat that?<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25048 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Breaking Silence |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/02 1:20:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** Unlike a Nazi dictator? Hitler was democratically elected, and
under that "majority rules" society the minority Jews were mass-
murdered! Unlike Nazi Germany, the U.S.A. is a REPUBLIC, where ALL
people, even those in the Minority, have EQUAL RIGHTS, and an EQUAL
SAY in things. Does this "new group" democratically vote to toss out
the undesirables? I don't think I'd WANT to be in such a group!
Patrick
I wish everybody felt this way. I'm especially disappointed in Cougar. He's become a POTA Nazi too. (and just for the record, "POTA Nazi" refers to the "Soup Nazi" from Sienfeld -- a nice Jewish boy!)
-- Rory
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25049 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.html.html In a message dated 11/21/02 1:20:12 PM Eastern Standard Time, melkor@... writes:
If nothing else think about the irony of POTA fans not being able to peacefully
coexist with each other.
Things weren't too happy in the POTA world. No one got along.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25050 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.html.html No, you don't have to go any where. I'm becoming a lurker. I only post now because no one seems to notice I haven't posted. I never realized the gang didn't find my whittycisms (no offense Michael) amusing. So I figured for the good of the group I'd just clam up. I told Mike I wouldn't post if I could join his group. Kind of pointless really, since their voting to kick lurkers out. I'll go back to being a scilent partner now.
By the way, T, it's an amazing coincidence that I enjoyed at least
15% of THIS post of yours! Will wonders never cease?
And it isn't fair... it's rather impossible to misspell "T"! As I
recall, I once called you "LardTZilchO" way back when, but that was
before we became such great pals. Now you're making fun of me! >Sob!<
I think I'll hafta pick up my toys and leave and form my OWN Yahoo
POTA group, like Mikey, in which there will be NO place for those who
whine like puppies whenever I type a post longer than 100 words...
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25051 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
.html--- In pota@y..., "Stuart Drucker" <sdrucker@p...> wrote:
> Hi there,
> I've been lurking on the list for about a month, since I did a
Yahoo search and stumbled into the group. I've been following POTA
since I was a kid in the early 70s, and remember the excitement (and
subsequent disappointment) over the POTA TV show. Like you, I've
spent too much time pondering the consequences of the POTA timeline.
It's nice to see that somebody else is fascinated by the Biblical
allegory implicit in the series. I've also enjoyed your (Patrick's)
attempt to bring together the POT movies and TV with an ingenuous
timeline, even in the midst of discontinuity by the writers.
>
> By trade, I'm a marketing scientist, and science fiction is my
escape from the client-driven consulting world.
*** Welcome to THE group, Stuart! Not to be a nitpicker about
spelling... but did you say my POTA films-&-TV timeline
is "ingenuous"? Did you mean "ingenious", perchance? Just wondering!
>
> Anyway, a few points about your post:
>
>
>
> > POTA universe implies the presence of an unseen God character.
Caesar's whole purpose in life was to stop Aldo's Original Sin and
thereby prevent at the original source the whole chain of events that
led to the Earth's destruction in BENEATH. God accomplished this not
by suspending free will (except for Milo maybe) but by sending a
saviour in the right place at the right time.
>
> Yup, because free will brought the world to nuclear war and would
lead to the apes repeating humanity's history. His "Ape shall never
kill Ape" was an unconscious attempt to do this, before he heard his
parent's tape in the Dead City.
>
> > >
> > >
> > > And Then God sent the world a Saviour...
> > > -The Lawgiver
>
> I always liked the "God in his wrath" preamble to this.
>
> > > The Lawgiver's quote is the whole key to understanding what
happened in BATTLE. God sent "the world" a saviour, not the apes a
saviour.
>
> Without it, it's simply a condensed history lesson. It implies that
Caesar's vision of a peaceful world with human/ape cooperation lived
into the late 27th century, at least. Otherwise it would have indeed
been "the apes". The Lawgiver wouldn't have mentioned the destruction
of the world's greatest (human) cities if he were consciously trying
to suppress all knowledge of human history.
*** In my scenario, the BATTLE Lawgiver is NOT the same one who
writes the Sacred Scrolls from which Cornelius reads "Beware the
beast Man..."; rather, the "nice" Lawgiver in BATTLE (c. 2670 A.D.)
writes (and reads from) some of the "history scrolls that were kept
hidden from the masses" (mentioned by Cornelius to Hasslein in
ESCAPE, the "Secret Scrolls"). A little less than a century later,
circa 2755 A.D. (1,200 years before 3955), a "mean" Lawgiver writes
the Sacred Scrolls which--like the "canonical" scriptures of the
Roman Church vs. the "heretical" scriptures of rival belief systems
[eg. Gnostics]--render every previous "scripture" a heretical version
of Ape history, fit to be burned. It is in the later "Sacred Scrolls"
where a more false version of history is promulgated, with "God
creating the Ape in His image" (etc.) and where the Human past is
suppressed. The BATTLE Lawgiver's "scripture" is less false than the
later anti-human Scrolls, but that doesn't mean that his inclusion
of "God" in the story is valid. This nice Lawgiver (and probably a
whole string of Lawgivers leading back to Caesar's time) interpret
their experiences in the light of a religious belief that God had
something to do with it. But that doesn't mean that there IS a God,
or that He/She/It actually DID the things this scripture purports.
ANYBODY can write "scripture": Mohammed did it... Joseph Smith did
it... there are probably hundreds of goofy bastards right at this
very moment scribbling their "divinely-inspired" Word of God in
spiral notebooks--or, equally bad, re-interpreting cryptic
apocalyptic literature, as David Koresh did before the Waco tragedy.
One thing I wonder about... the "flashback" which is the bulk of
BATTLE ("this is his story, in those far off days") includes scenes
with Kolp & Mendez & Alma. Obviously, THOSE scenes wouldn't be a part
of the "story" told by the Lawgiver to his congregation, since
neither Caesar nor anybody else in his group was privy to those
scenes (especially the edited-out scenes of the Doomsday Bomb). Thus,
the "Hope" which Caesar's posterity community clings to is based, to
a certain extent, on IGNORANCE OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE DOOMSDAY BOMB.
Caesar doesn't KNOW about the Bomb. He doesn't know Mendez's group is
beginning to venerate it, after the "battle" Kolp wages and loses. He
only knows that his parents barely escaped the destruction of the
Earth which was brought about by "the gorillas' war" in the year 3950
(what he hears, not knowing about the "five" after the "fifty"). In
order to be the "savior" of the entire World, Caesar needs to change
the war-making tendencies (and human-hating tendencies) of the
gorillas... and, though I've mentioned it here before, I'm gonna have
to mention it again: THERE ARE NO GORILLAS IN THE CONGREGATION WHICH
THE NICE LAWGIVER PREACHES TO. In the end shots of BATTLE, in between
the Lawgiver and the Statue of Caesar, there are Humans, Chimps and
Orangs... but NO Gorillas. Why not? Could it be that gorillas don't
like to be reminded that the first Ape-who-killed-Ape was Aldo, a
gorilla? Imagine little gorilla boys, during previous re-tellings of
this story, enduring the sneering looks of young chimps and orangs
(and even humans), when the story turns to how Aldo murdered an ape
child! Look how easy it is for Zira, in BENEATH, to spout anti-
gorilla jargon ("they're cruel because they're stupid: all bone and
no brain", and "We should wet-nurse their babies with the milk of
chimpanzees... the milk of kindness; at least OUR child, when it's
born, won't be breast-fed on bile!")--and she's a "liberal"
responsible adult citizen! Would CHILDREN be less bigoted than her?
>
> > The Lawgiver's quote also says that the "savior"
was "miraculously born". This is a misrepresentation of the truth, a
kind of lie. Sure, "Baby Milo"/"Caesar" is conceived in the 40th
Century and born in the 20th Century, but only because of the Man-
made "miracle" of the Timewarp experienced by the Ape-onauts,
a "miracle" which happens as a result of Taylor's detonation of the
Earth-destroying Bomb. Yet there was NOTHING truly "miraculous" about
Caesar's birth; amazing, yes, but NOT a miracle.
> That's why Paul Williams plays an orangutan with the name VIRGIL--
he symbolizes the wisdom available to anyone, short of divine
intervention (symbolized by Beatrice). But the orangutan Virgil is
not a ghost from the distant past, as was Dante's guide. And the
bombed-out city is NOT a literal Hell--it's the SF symbolic
equivalent. And when Caesar goes into that Underworld to discover the
Fate of his own people from the testimony of his dead parents (as
Aeneas does from his father Anchises' ghost), his parents aren't
really there, conscious of him and communicating with him: only their
pre-recorded images and voices are there, on tape.
>
> I was a little surprised that Armando never mentioned to Caesar
some of the things that his parents experienced on Earth, like
interrogation by the gov't, getting tape recorded, etc. You'd think
they'd have had time (or the two animal scientists would have) to
fill him in, while they were waiting for their child to be born at
Armando's circus. It would have been likely for Armando to tell him
_something_ about his parents, beyond that they "came from the
future". You'd think Caesar would have asked.
>
> About Virgil, he sure knew about technology, probably one of the
few apes (except for Caesar and possibly Mandemus) that had any
scientific knowledge.If Mandemus were supposedly his teacher, and
Virgil was either a child or born after the events of Conquest, that
implies even more that there was an extended period before the
Nuclear War where the apes from Breck's City had awareness of human
technology while they were free of servitude.
>
> >
> > The ONLY thing which Caesar's community has to go on, they think,
is HOPE for the Future. Virgil says, at the end, "The greatest danger
of all is that Danger is never over," to Mandemus, who wants to
destroy the Guns. And Caesar says, "So we must be patient and
wait..." ...and we flash forward to the Lawgiver in 2670 A.D., who
says: "We still wait" but "with hope for the future." Hope. Not
DIVINE ASSURANCE. Just Hope. Why can't they be SURE that Doomsday
won't happen? Because God has not eradicated all hatred from the
World--the last image we see before the camera pans over to the
WEEPING statue of Caesar is of a boy chimp pulling the ponytail of a
girl human, who violently pushes him away: they're FIGHTING.
Not "play" fighting, like young Cornelius and his human friend
playing "War"; but REAL fighting. And that Doomsday Bomb has NOT been
dismantled--it still exists, in the "care" of Mendez & Alma, and the
community of mutating humans who will come to revere it as their God,
bringing the Timeline full circle to the way things are in BENEATH.
>
> Before I read the backstory about Dehn's script in POTA Revisited,
I always thought that the ending implied that events weren't going
full circle to Beneath, but that Caesar had changed the timeline up
to the point of the Lawgiver's time. Beyond that, it was still up to
the free will of the apes, humans, and mutants. The fight between the
boy chimp and girl human would seem to imply that the danger indeed
_never_ ends, even if the timeline was altered. Likewise, that the
Dead City humans would embrace the bomb so they could find a new
purpose other than hatred and spiritless survival, because it could
destroy them if they didn't build a new future for their branch of
humanity.
>
> The Dehn comments, of course, implied that events were completely
headed full circle regardless of the best attempts of human or ape.
That's his opinion, not canon in a strict sense.
*** True, but it does literally come "full circle", since the opening
scene of PLANET is during EARTH-TIME 2673, just 3 years after the
Lawgiver scenes of BATTLE, in 2670. Just moments of "ship-time" after
Lawgiver mentions his "hope" for the Future, we--who have seen PLANET-
-know that IN their Future a man named Taylor will arrive, a man of
whom Zaius says: "All my life I've awaited your coming, and DREADED
it... like DEATH itself!" And Taylor's giving his Final Report before
going into hibernation just as the Lawgiver is wrapping up his story-
time with the kiddies. "Does Man, that marvel of the universe, that
glorious paradox who sent me to the stars... still make war against
his brother? keep his neighbour's children starving?" We might also
ask, Do ALL the apes--even the Gorillas and Orangutans--have it in
their hearts and minds to FORGIVE the human race for turning Paradise
into a Desert? Even if there's only a small, festering minority of
human-haters in 2670, that "bad seed" is all it takes to flower into
a weed-choked Garden.
I guess the disagreements we all have regarding whether or not BATTLE
represents a changed lane to a "saved" Future or a "vicious circle"
depends on how we interpret the very last image on screen: a weeping
statue of Caesar. Tears of Joy? Tears of Sadness? As long as that
Doomsday Bomb lurks out there, kept functional by religious fanatics
in a ruined Cathedral, I can't help but feel that Caesar didn't have
the power to change EVERYTHING. He knew what he wanted to change...
but did he have the power to effect that change? Undoubtedly, on his
deathbed, he died HOPING he had made the critical difference... but
only Time would tell. MacDonald says that it's POSSIBLE--not that it
is inevitable, or a foregone conclusion.
> > Are things much better 6 or 7 centuries later, when the Lawgiver
tells Caesar's story to the 'harmonious' Apes and Humans? After 600
years and more... and they STILL are in the pre-techno level! There
is no evidence of striving for the industrial betterment of their
meager civilization. It's easy to see the situation remaining
virtually the same over the course of another 400 years, when Zaius
and Urko are running the show, actively destroying any remnants
of "dangerous" human technology (like the cache of computers in "The
Legacy").
>
> You'd think, but we're only talking about one community from a
nameless city in California and maybe its offshoot in the Northeast.
We'll never know about the rest of the world. The problem is that we
can prove anything with a strong enough argument. I could even argue
(with no evidence) that the Lawgiver's school was implicitly in a non-
technological setting for religious reasons (like the way that
observant Jews study parchment copies of the Torah and avoid direct
use of electricity on the Sabbath), but that it's still possible that
higher tech was used in other aspects of the ape/human community's
life. We'll never know.
>
> Then again, maybe in the Secret Scrolls and his unproven secret
library of human history, Zaius has some books about technology,
enough to give Milo a blueprint for refurbishing a sunken spacecraft
with its power source and computers probably destroyed while it was
under water. I'd think that blowing the hatch would have flooded the
passenger compartment when the ship originally sunk. Did anyone ever
wonder about _how_ he was able to launch that ship, without booster
rockets??? No way does the spaceship take off by itself, not the way
it looked onscreen. We're assuming that the spaceship the ape-o-nauts
used was Taylor's. Maybe it wasn't, and they lied?
*** Ah, the ship Milo finds! I won't go into it here, cuz I've done
so a bunch of times before... but the ship Milo finds is NOT the same
one that sank in the lake! For my take on this, peruse my past posts;
if you sorta liked my timeline, you might dig that, too.
Again, welcome to the group, Stuart! By the way, are you related to
the magnificent MAD artist Mort Drucker, who drew "The Milking of the
Planet That Went Ape" (as well as hundreds of other movie parodies)?
God, but I wish MAD would reprint that in color, like they're doing
to a lot of their past masterpieces!
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25052 |
From: Stuart Drucker |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
.html----- Original Message -----
From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
*** Welcome to THE group, Stuart! Not to be a nitpicker about
> spelling... but did you say my POTA films-&-TV timeline
> is "ingenuous"? Did you mean "ingenious", perchance? Just wondering!
I did, but I accidentally hit "cancel" while running the Outlook Express
spellchecker. Apparently the ghost of Aldo was involved, because I
inadvertedly changed POTA to POT a couple of times. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25053 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Mama |
.htmlAgreed, and sorry to you and the rest.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: veetus@... [veetus@...]
> Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 2:19
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
>
>
> I emailed you privately. I'm through with dragging the group through
> this. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:48 PM
> Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
>
>
> > So do I what?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: veetus@... [veetus@...]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 16:36
> > > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
> > >
> > >
> > > But so do you. Beware the beast Apefan, for he is the devil's
> > > pawn. - - -
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:42 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Natalie!
> > >
> > >
> > > > You there Jeff?
> > > >
> > > > --- "whitty@..." <whitty@...> wrote:
> > > > > I'l explain privately and you can tell the group if the content of
> > > > > that email could have come from anyone else.
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael
> > > > >
> > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > You keep insinuating what Rory tells you behind
> closed doors,
> > > > > but you
> > > > > > were wrong about what Ken "said". Whatever. That's between you
> > > > and
> > > > > Rory.
> > > > > > I've already tried to move on and start a new beginning with a
> > > > > post. - - -
> > > > > > Jeff
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:14 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your continuing to publicly comment on it is pointless and, if
> > > > I
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > been reading the postings from other members in "your" group
> > > > > > > properly, not wanted (come on guys, tell him...be fair!).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I know you're just standing up for your buddy and that is
> > > > > admirable
> > > > > > > (if not misguided - he does not offer the same
> support for you,
> > > > > > > believe me), but, like I said, this, and the previous email,
> > > > don't
> > > > > > > need public forum and I am willing to discuss it privately if
> > > > you
> > > > > are.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > However, if you want to continue the public forum I am also
> > > > > willing.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also, I won't tell you anything about whether he honors his
> > > > > > > commitment. The only reason I mentioned that was to
> let people
> > > > > know
> > > > > > > that I had nothing to gain, and much to lose (frankly, more
> > > > > > > importantly, what I thought was a friend - and this is the
> > > > > important
> > > > > > > bit that Rory left out of his "choice cuts" and also how
> > > > showing
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > entire post changes things) by showing Rory the door.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > The topic was brought up, I just commented on it.
> I have no
> > > > > > > reason to
> > > > > > > > believe Rory won't honor his commitment. If he doesn't, I'm
> > > > sure
> > > > > > > you'll tell
> > > > > > > > us about it. - - - Jeff
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 PM
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl! Ohh! Ohh!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You can bet he'll either just keep them (my bet) or send
> > > > > something
> > > > > > > > > FAR from that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm over it. I want NOTHING from him.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > $20 is cheap to learn who your friends are.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Anyway Jeff, others in your group are suggesting these
> > > > topics
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > dropped and/or taken private. I'm willing, but I imagine
> > > > you
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > > be quite offended that someone suggest how you and Rory
> > > > should
> > > > > > > > > run "your" group?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- <veetus@...> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > The entire post doesn't change the sum and
> substance of
> > > > > what
> > > > > > > Rory
> > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > pointing out. I think it's nice that he's honoring his
> > > > > > > commitment;
> > > > > > > > > he could
> > > > > > > > > > just send the tapes and the money back and save a lot of
> > > > > > > effort. - -
> > > > > > > > > - Jeff
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > > From: <whitty@...>
> > > > > > > > > > To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Oh Girl!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Censorship Rory? You Nazi!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Now, let's see the whole post, and I absolutely don't
> > > > > believe
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > will honur your "deal", because you have already lied
> > > > > > > > > > > about "behaving" yourself in the new group,
> seemingly in
> > > > > > > order to
> > > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > > some shock waves going over there (but, because I had
> > > > the
> > > > > > > insight
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > guess your agenda, your attempts were blocked and you
> > > > were
> > > > > > > thrown
> > > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > > > on your ass - which is what this is really about).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Stop being a nazi, Rory.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > From: "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
> > > > > > > > > > > Date: Wed Nov 20, 2002 11:42 pm
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Rory
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Several people were concerned when Rory joined this
> > > > group
> > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > > they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old
> > > > > group.
> > > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > > > > warned him that if he tried to cause trouble here he
> > > > > would be
> > > > > > > > > > > banned. After making several posts that were attempts
> > > > to
> > > > > start
> > > > > > > > > flame
> > > > > > > > > > > wars here (because the group is moderated they were
> > > > > deleted
> > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > > > they could go out to the group as a whole) it was
> > > > decided
> > > > > > > that for
> > > > > > > > > > > the good of the group Rory should be banned.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > From: "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...>
> > > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:56 am
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Let's not dwell on this or it will have the
> effect Rory
> > > > > > > intended -
> > > > > > > > > > > causing off topic bickering and starting
> flame wars. By
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > way,
> > > > > > > > > > > that's a suggestion, not an order.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > But let it be known that anyone, including James and
> > > > > myself
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > other moderators (there was a call for another
> > > > moderator
> > > > > form
> > > > > > > > > > > James...anyone want the job?) will suffer the
> same fate
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > decide to cause trouble and/or ignore the ground rules
> > > > > (which
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > why
> > > > > > > > > > > we need to get these down). If you think that makes me
> > > > a
> > > > > nazi
> > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > > control freak or whatever, I'm sorry....I am trying to
> > > > > build a
> > > > > > > > > group
> > > > > > > > > > > that will stay together and be effective (which is why
> > > > I
> > > > > am
> > > > > > > > > > > accumulating as much feedback as possible in order to
> > > > > serve
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > majority, NOT to serve myself).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Let me also say that throwing Rory out of the
> group was
> > > > up
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > the most difficult decisions I have made in
> my life. On
> > > > a
> > > > > > > personal
> > > > > > > > > > > level, he was a friend and I have now dissolved that
> > > > > friendhip
> > > > > > > > > (what
> > > > > > > > > > > kind of friend does that?). On another level, he has
> > > > been
> > > > > > > taping
> > > > > > > > > > > episodes of "the Simpsons" for me and I sent
> him a heap
> > > > > of VHS
> > > > > > > > > tapes
> > > > > > > > > > > and $20 cash for postage that I will never see.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I am absolutely shattered by this event.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25054 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.html
.html
His
dignity and commitment to working through until the end was nigh reminds me
sadly of Freddie Mercury who kept his chin up until he could not manage to lift
it.
Michael
Kassidy, did you see the intros Roddy did on
AMC? They're hard to watch; he could barely move his arms. But it's hard not to
admire him. He gave of himself to the very end. He was the one who got Naughton
to do the doc, etc. His commitment to "Apes" is uncontested, even if
he didn't remember "Battle". - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:37
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Moments
in history, etc.
My take on this guys is to get over this shit. This is
ridiculous. You know I won't fight over this, this AIN'T REAL
LIFE, this is what you do for fun. No more points to be made
here. You are destroying the groups.
Mr. Jeff, that was a great post. Who is MFLUDER or whoever, and is
he still around? What happened to him, do you know? Did you guys
think Roddy really looked so sick in Behind the POTA? Because I
thought he looked wonderful. Not so much in health, maybe, but so
dignified. I thought he was admirable. But I always have, how could I not,
when he loved the apes so much?
Kassidy
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25055 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Breaking Silence |
.htmlPatrick
I think everyone is being encourage to take their flaming away from the
group.
I will send you a private response to this when I have time, but I have
decided (again!!!) not to continue boring this group with flame.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 5:19
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Breaking Silence
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > I am speaking on behalf of the members in the new group because I
> > have listened to the members of the new group and this is what they
> > have said. I then took it a step further and have tried to offer
> > people what they want...and this will be based on setting Ground
> > Rules and agreeing on the consequences of breaking those rules.
> > Unlike a Nazi dictator, the group votes on the rules.
>
> *** Unlike a Nazi dictator? Hitler was democratically elected, and
> under that "majority rules" society the minority Jews were mass-
> murdered! Unlike Nazi Germany, the U.S.A. is a REPUBLIC, where ALL
> people, even those in the Minority, have EQUAL RIGHTS, and an EQUAL
> SAY in things. Does this "new group" democratically vote to toss out
> the undesirables? I don't think I'd WANT to be in such a group! So,
> if some of the folks in that group joined to get away from my
> (horrors!) lengthy posts, then good riddance! At least HERE they are
> free to put in their 2 cents. When they rub enough of their fellow
> groupers the wrong way, they'll get shown the door, though, it sounds
> like. Then they can come crawling back here where Rory might make fun
> of 'em for a bit, but at least their input will be welcome! Even if
> it is over 100 words long!
>
>
> > I wish you guys the best in this group, and I will stay a member so
> I can continue to post off topic stuff about Eminem etc (which would
> be out of place in the movie emporium group).
> >
> > Michael
>
> *** If you (and all those disenchanted others out there) are so fed
> up with off-topic posts, why be the hypocrite by posting it HERE?! Do
> you think we WANT you to poke your head in here every so often just
> to tell us about Eminem (or whomever/whatever), cluttering up OUR
> group? This is a POTA discussion board, whose members may
> occasionally post off-topic stuff, but if you're gonna be primarily
> devoted to that new group, don't treat this one as your garbage dump
> for off-topic crap. Don't be sighing rapturously about how your new
> group "rocks" because it DOESN'T have off-topic junk in it--junk that
> you STILL want to post, so you intend so HERE. If you're
> predominantly against off-topic stuff, then either stay and post on-
> topic (and you're still welcome to do so--even from ME), or find an
> Eminem Yahoo group to post on.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25056 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.htmlLike I said Patrick (can I speak on behalf of the group here), this is
boring everyone.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 5:57
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> >
> > Okay, here's an on topic, non offensive, thread. What do you feel
> are the underlying main themes of the Apes saga? Patrick, please
> allow the others to contribute before laying your Magnum Opus on us.
> It will also give you valuable tying time. Sorry, that may have been
> offensive to Pat. Jump in any time Pratick. Sorry again, that
> misspelling of Particks name was unintentional, but so humorous, at
> least to me, that I decided to explain, rather than correct it.
> Again, I meant no fooence. Ha! I did it again, twice! oh
> well...remember that gal who had no spell checker, it reminds me of
> her posts. Sorry, I'm getting off topic again. Just ignore the
> rest, like Pat's post. Sorry! Sorry Pat. I really do enjoy at
> least 15% of each of your posts.
>
> *** Prior to reading this "thread", I posted a lengthy reply to
> Melkor (I think it was) concerning the "God" who is either present or
> absent in the POTA universe, and I go into plenty of detail regarding
> MY take on the "underlying theme" of the saga. So, consider my input
> put in!
> By the way, T, it's an amazing coincidence that I enjoyed at least
> 15% of THIS post of yours! Will wonders never cease?
> And it isn't fair... it's rather impossible to misspell "T"! As I
> recall, I once called you "LardTZilchO" way back when, but that was
> before we became such great pals. Now you're making fun of me! >Sob!<
> I think I'll hafta pick up my toys and leave and form my OWN Yahoo
> POTA group, like Mikey, in which there will be NO place for those who
> whine like puppies whenever I type a post longer than 100 words...
> except to serve MY ends! See? I can be just as retributive as Caesar
> and Mikey! At least we have Kassidy to be our Lisa: "No! N-n-n-!"
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25057 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Breaking Silence (as opposed to breaki |
.htmlBoring
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 6:26
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Breaking Silence (as opposed to
> breaking wind)
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., "munkeyman63au" <nfoster@h...> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > I thought it was about time i said hello. I joined this group about
> a month ago, right in the middle of the big slanging matches that
> were going on, so I wasn't too sure what I'd stumbled into but
> thought I'd give it a go as Apes has had such a great effect on my
> life since I fell in love with the concept after seeing Escape on the
> big screen as a kid way back in '72.
> >
> > I stuck around and read the posts and am glad to see that they seem
> to be getting almost normal?, so I decided to stay.
> >
> > Must say though, I totally agree with the comments made by Alan in
> an earlier post and I will probably make some enemies straight off by
> revealing that I agree with some of Patrick's theories about the Apes
> (sorry but you'll have to put me into the agreeing with the
> Mothership theory, as It seems to be the one that would be most
> plausible) but hey, thats my choice!
>
> *** And what a SENSIBLE choice it is, Munkeyman!
> Welcome to the POTA group that's worth your while. It's nice to know
> that you agree with "some of" my theories about POTA; feel free to
> disagree with some of the others I cook up, too--hell, I don't mind!
>
> As for the posts "getting almost normal"... geez, I was gone for a
> day or two and there's this shitstorm flying around with Mikey using
> our group as his off-topic outhouse, lauding HIS group as a paragon
> of virtue! Yeesh! Where does Mikey get all the time to continue
> posting garbage to THIS site, when he's got that OTHER site to drool
> over?
>
> Don't let all that hoo-hah get you down, buddy. And don't let all
> that whining about my "lengthy" posts bother you, either; if we were
> to add up all the whiny, pissy, ranty, frothy, interminable dreck
> that cluttered up the last couple of days' posts, then MY single,
> singular posts are short by comparison. After all, at least when I
> post a magnum opus-length message here, it's invariably about POTA,
> or at least a topic which POTA deals with thematically. What WAS the
> point of all those annoying fart-posts coming from "down under"
> during the last couple days? "My group's better than THIS group, nyah
> nyah nyah... because I SAY so! And Rory's mean to me, so INTO THE
> OVENS WITH HIM!"
>
> Or am I interpreting this a tad too blatantly?
>
> Patrick
>
> P.S. When I first went through this site (from Post #1 on upward), I
> forgot to adopt a "screen name", as the guy who started this site
> (according to Jeff) recommended. I'm not the type who goes out of his
> way to obscure my identity--in POTA, such hiding behind false
> personae is out of necessity, as when Caesar pretends to be part of a
> shipment of primitive apes, or when Brent heeds Cornelius' advice to
> not speak while near a gorilla. But, had I chosen to adopt a screen
> name, what name would I have picked? One of my favorite POTA
> characters is from MARVEL's "Terror" series: Lightsmith. I'd probably
> have chosen "Lightsmith" for my screen name; but, hell, I've been
> posting as "Patrick" for so long now that there'd be no point in
> changing ways this far into the game.
> Welcome, again, Munkeyman! By the way, your email address
> is "nfoster@" etc. I assume that "Foster" is your last name. What
> might "N" stand for (or would you rather keep it hush hush?)?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25058 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.html
.html
Shoot
my gal, I'll blow up the world.
In a message dated 11/21/02 1:20:12 PM Eastern Standard Time,
melkor@... writes:
If nothing else think about the irony of POTA fans not being
able to peacefully coexist with each other.
Things weren't too happy in the POTA world. No
one got along.
-- Rory
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25059 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.html
.html
Vote
has not been counted and it is very close!
No, you don't have to go any
where. I'm becoming a lurker. I only post now because no one seems
to notice I haven't posted. I never realized the gang didn't find my
whittycisms (no offense Michael) amusing. So I figured for the good of the
group I'd just clam up. I told Mike I wouldn't post if I could join his
group. Kind of pointless really, since their voting to kick lurkers out.
I'll go back to being a scilent partner now.
By the way, T, it's an amazing coincidence that I enjoyed at
least 15% of THIS post of yours! Will wonders never cease? And it
isn't fair... it's rather impossible to misspell "T"! As I
recall, I once called you "LardTZilchO" way back when, but
that was before we became such great pals. Now you're making fun of me!
>Sob!< I think I'll hafta pick up my toys and leave and form my
OWN Yahoo POTA group, like Mikey, in which there will be NO place for
those who whine like puppies whenever I type a post longer than 100
words...
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25060 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: "N" is for "Neil" |
|
.html "N" is for Neil.
He is a Pom living in Australia - tell him about "New America" before
he mentions the cricket score.
Michael
I assume that "Foster" is your last name. What might "N" stand for
(or would you rather keep it hush hush?)? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25061 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Moments in History, etc. |
.html
This has to do with the BEHIND Special Edition DVD and the two hour interview with Roddy on it. Don't you have that, Kassidio? If not I can make you a copy on VHS. I got a few extra tapes!!! HA! HA! Just kidding -- those go for Simpsons.
-- Rory
No, Rory, I don't have it, haven't seen it. Mikey won't mind if you use one of his tapes, he likes me. But I'm scared to give you my address, I've heard you are a stalker.
Patty me boy, you are calling me a chimp with a speech impediment. Ah well, I've been called worse.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25062 |
From: Neil |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: "N" is for "Neil" |
.html--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> "N" is for Neil.
>
> He is a Pom living in Australia - tell him about "New America"
before
> he mentions the cricket score.
>
> Michael
>
> I assume that "Foster" is your last name. What might "N" stand for
> (or would you rather keep it hush hush?)?
Sorry, haven't been reading the posts since I last posted, as Michael
pointed out the N stands for Neil (I've since been playing around
with my profile so it should show up now)
And after this mornings gutless display by the English batsmen I have
absolutly no desire to mention the cricket score!
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25063 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Mikey Likey |
|
.html I sure do, you are lovely.
And "Mikey" from you sound so endearing.
Michael
From: Kassidy Rae <valwp@y...>
Date: Fri Nov 22, 2002 2:59 am
Subject: Re: [Moments in History, etc.
"Mikey won't mind ..., he likes me." <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25064 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "N" is for "Neil" |
.htmlThey are doing all right. It will be a long time before the world
sees a better team than the current Aussies, but the Poms are the
closest to taking them on.
Even though they are riddled with injuries, the Poms are showing some
balls (get the pun Neil?).
I predicted this morning they would either go "ape" (staying on topic
here) or get out around 350.
They will bat again on Monday...hang in there! :)
Michael
--- "Neil" < nfoster@...> wrote:
> --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > "N" is for Neil.
> >
> > He is a Pom living in Australia - tell him about "New America"
> before
> > he mentions the cricket score.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > I assume that "Foster" is your last name. What might "N" stand
for
> > (or would you rather keep it hush hush?)?
>
> Sorry, haven't been reading the posts since I last posted, as
Michael
> pointed out the N stands for Neil (I've since been playing around
> with my profile so it should show up now)
> And after this mornings gutless display by the English batsmen I
have
> absolutly no desire to mention the cricket score!
>
> Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25065 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.htmlNo, Kass, I don't know who MFLulder is. I asked the group. I don't think
anyone's still around who was here in the beginning. Alex would probably
know. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kassidy Rae" <valwp@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc.
> --- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > Kassidy, did you see the intros Roddy did on AMC? They're hard to
> watch; he could barely move his arms. But it's hard not to admire
> him. He gave of himself to the very end. He was the one who got
> Naughton to do the doc, etc. His commitment to "Apes" is uncontested,
> even if he didn't remember "Battle". - - - Jeff
>
> Nope, I don't think I even had cable then, Jeff. I went on cable
> strike for some years (bad local company). That sounds sad, and now
> I have to confess to being morbidly curious. And what do you mean he
> didn't remember Battle? Tell. And you didn't answer, who is the
> group owner, or do you know?
> Yeah, J. Naughton said the only reason he did the documentary is
> because Roddy was his friend. I got a card from Ron Harper two weeks
> ago about the website. Cool, huh? He likes it.
> Kassidy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25066 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 11/21/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.htmlI'm sure he appeared once during a flame war with Alex and told us
all to behave.
Michael
--- < veetus@...> wrote:
> No, Kass, I don't know who MFLulder is. I asked the group. I
don't think
> anyone's still around who was here in the beginning. Alex would
probably
> know. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kassidy Rae" <valwp@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc.
>
>
> > --- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > > Kassidy, did you see the intros Roddy did on AMC? They're
hard to
> > watch; he could barely move his arms. But it's hard not to admire
> > him. He gave of himself to the very end. He was the one who got
> > Naughton to do the doc, etc. His commitment to "Apes" is
uncontested,
> > even if he didn't remember "Battle". - - - Jeff
> >
> > Nope, I don't think I even had cable then, Jeff. I went on cable
> > strike for some years (bad local company). That sounds sad, and
now
> > I have to confess to being morbidly curious. And what do you
mean he
> > didn't remember Battle? Tell. And you didn't answer, who is the
> > group owner, or do you know?
> > Yeah, J. Naughton said the only reason he did the documentary is
> > because Roddy was his friend. I got a card from Ron Harper two
weeks
> > ago about the website. Cool, huh? He likes it.
> > Kassidy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------ ---------------------
~-->
> Shop for Posters and Prints @ Art.com with state-of-the-art Custom
Framing!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/lAE0qB/adBFAA/_ZuFAA/9_IolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-~->
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25067 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc. |
.htmlIsn't MFLulder the moderator? If not who is?
>
> No, Kass, I don't know who MFLulder is. I asked the group. I don't think
> anyone's still around who was here in the beginning. Alex would probably
> know. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kassidy Rae" <valwp@...>
> To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc.
>
>
> > --- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > > Kassidy, did you see the intros Roddy did on AMC? They're hard to
> > watch; he could barely move his arms. But it's hard not to admire
> > him. He gave of himself to the very end. He was the one who got
> > Naughton to do the doc, etc. His commitment to "Apes" is uncontested,
> > even if he didn't remember "Battle". - - - Jeff
> >
> > Nope, I don't think I even had cable then, Jeff. I went on cable
> > strike for some years (bad local company). That sounds sad, and now
> > I have to confess to being morbidly curious. And what do you mean he
> > didn't remember Battle? Tell. And you didn't answer, who is the
> > group owner, or do you know?
> > Yeah, J. Naughton said the only reason he did the documentary is
> > because Roddy was his friend. I got a card from Ron Harper two weeks
> > ago about the website. Cool, huh? He likes it.
> > Kassidy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25068 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Moderator |
.htmlHe is, but like I said Tom, he ain't out there (and nor, I suspect, are many
of the other "lurkers" here).
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melkor [melkor@...]
> Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 17:43
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Moments in history, etc.
>
>
>
> Isn't MFLulder the moderator? If not who is? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25069 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: God in the POTA universe |
.html--- In pota@y..., "Stuart Drucker" <sdrucker@p...> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
>
>
>
> *** Welcome to THE group, Stuart! Not to be a nitpicker about
> > spelling... but did you say my POTA films-&-TV timeline
> > is "ingenuous"? Did you mean "ingenious", perchance? Just
wondering!
>
> I did, but I accidentally hit "cancel" while running the Outlook
Express spellchecker. Apparently the ghost of Aldo was involved,
because I inadvertedly changed POTA to POT a couple of times.
*** I doubt if your spellchecker would have caught it,
since "ingenuous" is also a word--though it has a different meaning
than "ingenious", of course. Spellcheckers only seem to "work" when
there's no known word with that particular spelling (such as bizarre
character names, like "Attar" or "Zaius", or acronyms like "POTA").
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25070 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Moments in History, etc. |
.html--- In pota@y..., Kassidy Rae <valwp@y...> wrote:
>
>
> This has to do with the BEHIND Special Edition DVD and the two
hour interview with Roddy on it. Don't you have that, Kassidio? If
not I can make you a copy on VHS. I got a few extra tapes!!! HA!
HA! Just kidding -- those go for Simpsons.
>
> -- Rory
>
> No, Rory, I don't have it, haven't seen it. Mikey won't mind if
you use one of his tapes, he likes me. But I'm scared to give you my
address, I've heard you are a stalker.
>
> Patty me boy, you are calling me a chimp with a speech impediment.
Ah well, I've been called worse.
>
> Kassiddissiddiddissido
*** Kassidy, are you confusing me with Rory? Twas Rory who called you
Kassidio, kiddo.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25071 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.html--- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Like I said Patrick (can I speak on behalf of the group here), this
is boring everyone.
>
> Michael
*** No, Michael, you may NOT speak on behalf of the group here; as
always, it is the epitome of arrogance to even attempt to do so. And
why would you WANT to, when you've got your own little group of self-
congratulators to oversee?
Good God (not that there IS one, but I say it as an expletive)! but I
just waded through the 320 posts on your little offshoot POTA-DG
site, and what do I see? At least HALF of the posts there are about
the "rules" and whether or not "lurkers" should be "dealt with" via
warnings and the like. Rory was on-target when he called you a "POTA-
Nazi", and even though he meant it as a reference to Seinfeld's "Soup-
Nazi", the impression that I got was more along the lines of literal
Hitlerism. I can see that Rory was "shown the door", shipped off on a
train to Auschwitz for not being "Planet of the Aryans" enough for
you. Breck had his "Achilles List", and you dudes have YOUR list...
and it's refreshing to know that I'm on that list.
Talk about "flame wars"--it was nice to see a not-so-covert reference
to THIS group as "uglies" by one of your members. My, my, my! The
sheer "beauty" of such a bunch of separatists... I can't wait for the
masks to come off, when you all "reveal your inmost selves" over
there! Even Albina looked pretty hot before her mask came off!
You said, didn't you Mike, that the members of your new group joined
up, in part, in order to "get away" from me (and, presumably, other
unwelcome folks over here, like Rory) and my "too long" posts, right?
And right off the bat the "rules" you and James (and whoever) cook up
put the LENGTH of the desired posts as a major criterion which will
get potential members either "talked to" (warned) first and
ultimately kicked out if they don't tow the line. In other words,
amidst all those cheery "welcome!" messages, there's none planned for
ME, right?
Having waded through 320 posts over there, I'm not of a mind to even
WANT to join up. Be glad, Mike! I'm doing you a favor! You don't want
me there, and I ain't gonna even ATTEMPT it. You should be ecstatic!
If I WERE to join up, you could just toss me out and make up any
excuse whatsoever--after all, I never DID see the supposedly
offensive post that got Rory kicked out over there. We only have your
honest word that it was too horrible for innocent eyes to see... and
you, like all censorship-promoting types, saw fit to just cut Rory
(and his "offensive" post) out... out of sight, out of mind. Well,
SOMEBODY's outta his mind!
And I couldn't help noticing that in order to kick-start a couple "on-
topic" POTA discussions over there, that messages posted to THIS site
were "borrowed", so you folks could have SOMETHING to talk about. And
WHOSE messages were borrowed? Hmmm... lemme see... one was about the
lack of female orangutans and gorillas in the POTA movies... hmmm...
who wrote that one? And the other one... the one about "God" in the
POTA universe... who was the one who wrote THAT message? Hey! I just
realized--it was ME! I--one of "the uglies" over at THIS "old group"--
who isn't even WELCOME over with the "beautiful people" at the
glorious NEW group--I wrote the on-topic POTA posts that you needed
to kick some life into your rule-laden bastion of iniquity! Imagine
that!
Not that EVERYBODY at your group is a lil' stormtrooper, mind you.
Some of the semi-regular posters over there still post here... and
NOT their off-topic plugs of Eminem's newest CD. Never let it be said
that I thought ill of ALL those who may have happened to chime in
with a message over at your site. I like Kassidy & Helen, and Neil
seems nice, and there's probably one or two others there that I'm
okay with. Hell, I even occasionally agree with some of those there
who we all know do NOT particularly care for my postings (James,
Cougar, etc.). For the record, James, we agree the Timeline is
circular, but the 2503 pic was a DRAWING that is intended to be taken
as a PHOTOGRAPH, as (finally!) someone over there got around to
pointing out by quoting Virdon's line ("... this picture was
TAKEN..."). Oh, I forgot... he was GROGGY! We all must've missed it
when he yawwwwwwnnned, while rubbing the sleep outta his eyes!
Have fun with your new group, Mike. You're welcome to it. And if you
have any on-topic nuggets of POTA joy to share, feel free to post a
message here, so that we "uglies" can get a whiff of it. But a one-
word declaration of "Boring" hardly cuts the mustard, pal.
Patrick
P.S. Rory, I don't know if you've bothered to wade through that other
group's posts (the ones posted AFTER you got kicked out), but you can
take my word for it that you ain't missin' much! And you can bet that
when their noodles dry up and they need something interesting to
discuss (POTA-wise), they'll just cut-n-paste one of the good ones
from THIS site. They've set the precedent--TWICE. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25072 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 2:09:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Patrick
P.S. Rory, I don't know if you've bothered to wade through that other
group's posts (the ones posted AFTER you got kicked out), but you can
take my word for it that you ain't missin' much! And you can bet that
when their noodles dry up and they need something interesting to
discuss (POTA-wise), they'll just cut-n-paste one of the good ones
from THIS site. They've set the precedent--TWICE.
Wait, I'm still laughing at your post, Patrick.
OK, I know I'm not missing a thing, especially since the POTA Nazi has banned me from even looking at what's posted there. But are you shitting me that they're taking posts from here and putting them up of there? HA!
Well, I've got some things planned for this group that should be entertaining, so to hell with that "other" POTA group. They can obsess on lurkers until their sanity comes back, meanwhile I'm gonna just keep on truckin.'
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25073 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: The Group Speaks |
.htmlThen maybe the group needs to send Patrick a clear message.
I have been sent a very clear message stating a preference to stop
squabbling.
Kassidy, Tom, Matt, Jeff - have I interpreted your intentions correctly.
However, to encourage balance, I hope those who want to see more flaming
will also state your preference. Be honest now.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
>
> --- In pota@y..., "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Like I said Patrick (can I speak on behalf of the group here), this
> is boring everyone.
> >
> > Michael
>
> *** No, Michael, you may NOT speak on behalf of the group here; as
> always, it is the epitome of arrogance to even attempt to do so. And
> why would you WANT to, when you've got your own little group of self-
> congratulators to oversee? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25074 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Patrick in the POTA universe |
.htmlNow I'm really reaping the rewards of staying on this group.
Thanks Patrick!!!
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 4:43
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe
>
>
> --- In pota@y..., "Stuart Drucker" <sdrucker@p...> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
> >
> >
> >
> > *** Welcome to THE group, Stuart! Not to be a nitpicker about
> > > spelling... but did you say my POTA films-&-TV timeline
> > > is "ingenuous"? Did you mean "ingenious", perchance? Just
> wondering!
> >
> > I did, but I accidentally hit "cancel" while running the Outlook
> Express spellchecker. Apparently the ghost of Aldo was involved,
> because I inadvertedly changed POTA to POT a couple of times.
>
> *** I doubt if your spellchecker would have caught it,
> since "ingenuous" is also a word--though it has a different meaning
> than "ingenious", of course. Spellcheckers only seem to "work" when
> there's no known word with that particular spelling (such as bizarre
> character names, like "Attar" or "Zaius", or acronyms like "POTA").
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25075 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Statistics and Lies |
.htmlPatrick,
My statistics (that I compile daily) are completely different to your.
However, I invited you in a private email to identify the following on THIS
group and compile the appropriate statistics into relevant sub-headings to
clear up for you the reason I identified an issue with off-topic posts:
..."the OCCASIONAL chat on "your" group is ABOUT Planet of the Apes. I
could be wrong here, but you are a scientist so compile the statistics for
the last month and categorise into: Flame Wars, Smart ass Comments,
Ridiculing Patrick (I have been guilty too, but I am ashamed of myself, not
proud of it and dismissing it with "all-in-fun" lies), Freeze Frames from
the Movie, Hollywood Reports, Insults, Profanities, ramblings by T...need I
go on? Now, the reaction to my identifying these problems (as a result of
valuable people like Brian and Helen leaving the group in disgust) was to
suggest a better way where we could encourage more POTA talk and less stupid
dribble from Rory and T (and me). If that makes me a Nazi the "Hial
(spelling?) Hitler".
Your post here is not really analysing true etatitics, it is lying to
encourage further flaming.
By the way, the "little" offshot group has 12 contributing members - suppose
that makes this group a "tiny" burnt out group? I think the true statistics
speak for themselves.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
>
> Good God (not that there IS one, but I say it as an expletive)! but I just
waded through the 320 posts on your little offshoot POTA-DG site, and what
do I see? At least HALF of the posts there are about the "rules" and whether
or not "lurkers" should be "dealt with" via warnings and the like. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25076 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Name Calling |
.htmlWell you would know, since you have been the subject of most of Rory's most
memorable name calling exercises.
I thought your insult (when I told you I had been on the set of an Aussie
made porno) suggesting I was the guy who kept the gay male actors going
between takes (what name is attributed to this role again?) was far more
entertaining!
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> Rory was on-target when he called you a "POTA-> Nazi" <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25077 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Reacting |
.htmlYou are just childishly reacting to being unwelcome in the new group. This
is a classic example of why you are unwelcome, and I now have absolutely no
sympathy left for you.
Rory was shipped off to the forbidden zone and I have explained this to you
privately as well:
"Read this in a passive tone because I am not attempting to intimidate or
upset you. If I state some facts that do upset you, then sorry in advance.
You are far too clever to really think my starting a new group equated me to
a Nazi.
The new group has ground rules and the consequences of breaking them are a
warning and subsequent expulsion if that warning is ignored. Much like
anything...if you piss on the floor in a courtroom, you will be thrown out
(with NO warning)...if you rape a nun in a church, you will be removed (with
NO warning). Very simple...there are rules (AND THEY ARE CLEARLY DEFINED
AND AGREED UPON IN A DEMOCRATIC MANNER). Are there any rules in the "old"
group? If so, what are they and I will attempt to strictly adhere."
Rory entered a group with clear intentions and rules. He chose (and I think
maliciously and with intent) to break the rules with insulting posts to the
group and another post attempting to drag the new group down. These posts
were filtered because the group has promoted a PG rating, not to empower me
to attempt genocide (but you are the master of taking reality and injecting
motherships, so I can see how you could take it on as a project to PROVE I
am a Nazi!). As a consequence he was ejected as promised.
Now go down to your local store and pull a gun on the shopkeeper then call
him a Nazi when he has you arrested.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> and even though he meant it as a reference to Seinfeld's "Soup- Nazi", the
impression that I got was more along the lines of literal Hitlerism. I can
see that Rory was "shown the door", shipped off on a train to Auschwitz for
not being "Planet of the Aryans" enough for you. Breck had his "Achilles
List", and you dudes have YOUR list...and it's refreshing to know that I'm
on that list. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25078 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.htmlThat was Brian, remember him? Your group sent him packing.
Take it up with him.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> Talk about "flame wars"--it was nice to see a not-so-covert reference to
THIS group as "uglies" by one of your members. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25079 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.htmlKassidy, is he talking about you here?
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
My, my, my! The sheer "beauty" of such a bunch of separatists... I can't
wait for the masks to come off, when you all "reveal your inmost selves"
over there! Even Albina looked pretty hot before her mask came off! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25080 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Rules for Patrick |
.htmlThese were suggested rules and are yet to be voted on and set in concrete.
The suggestion came from a scientific, statistical analysis of the
identified problems with the "old" group.
Some stated they did not like your posts and I sought clarification. I did
not think it was good enough - it is like saying you don't like a person,
but do not know why, and allowing yourself to get away with it (not good
enough).
On further investigation, it developed that you turn people off with your
long postings (ie they scroll down, see the length of it and delete it).
First impressions - sad, but true.
Have you heard the term "user-friendly"? That's what common people want.
Also, requiring a dictionary, a degree, a spellchecker and an interpreter
and a lot of patience to read a post is not a "turn-on".
So when the group throws around some way to invite you into an environment
where you know what is expected of you and the consequences of making others
suffer, we'll let you know and you can choose.
I felt it unfair that you missed out on the blueprints I laboured around 4
hours of scanning at your request, so I sent them to you privately.
The intention was to include you at the right time.
Your behaviour in this group makes me wonder why I bothered.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> there! Even Albina looked pretty hot before her mask came off!
>
> You said, didn't you Mike, that the members of your new group joined up,
in part, in order to "get away" from me (and, presumably, other unwelcome
folks over here, like Rory) and my "too long" posts, right? And right off
the bat the "rules" you and James (and whoever) cook up put the LENGTH of
the desired posts as a major criterion which will get potential members
either "talked to" (warned) first and ultimately kicked out if they don't
tow the line. In other words, amidst all those cheery "welcome!" messages,
there's none planned for ME, right? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25081 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Emotions |
.htmlNo, but I am relieved.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
>
> Having waded through 320 posts over there, I'm not of a mind to even WANT
to join up. Be glad, Mike! I'm doing you a favor! You don't want me there,
and I ain't gonna even ATTEMPT it. You should be ecstatic! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25082 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Sabotage |
.htmlThat defeats the purpose. Promoting and displaying the attempted sabotage
(that Rory has not denied, and has admitted but tried to explain another way
as he does) would be dragging the new group down.
We have called for more moderators and rules on moderators to attempt to
make the process even more effective.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> If I WERE to join up, you could just toss me out and make up any
> excuse whatsoever--after all, I never DID see the supposedly
> offensive post that got Rory kicked out over there. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25083 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Sanity |
.htmlIndeed.
I have a certificate that states it is not me, thankfully (and sadly that's
about all one can base it on...what the sign says..."sane" or "insane").
As I have explained before, you might want to look for some cues.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> SOMEBODY's outta his mind! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25084 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Something to say |
.htmlFor every 20 000 words you come up with, Patrick, at least 5 of them are
worthy of publishing.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
>
>
> And I couldn't help noticing that in order to kick-start a couple "on->
topic" POTA discussions over there, that messages posted to THIS site > were
"borrowed", so you folks could have SOMETHING to talk about. And > WHOSE
messages were borrowed? Hmmm... lemme see... one was about the > lack of
female orangutans and gorillas in the POTA movies... hmmm...
> who wrote that one? And the other one... the one about "God" in the > POTA
universe... who was the one who wrote THAT message? Hey! I just >
realized--it was ME! I--one of "the uglies" over at THIS "old group"--> who
isn't even WELCOME over with the "beautiful people" at the
> glorious NEW group--I wrote the on-topic POTA posts that you needed > to
kick some life into your rule-laden bastion of iniquity! Imagine > that! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25085 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Eminem |
.htmlAs I explained privately, with the intention of avoiding a public showdown:
"You are also intelligent enough to work out the relevance of the Eminem
statement...instead of listening to the points I was making (and this did
not include a direct reference to you, just a wish to stop flame wars and to
addresss issues that were turning people off the group), Jeff and Rory took
it personally and started baiting me by doing the exact opposite and
starting up a conversation about Eminem. So my (rather childish) response
was to illustrate that I too can talk about Eminem in a way that would bait
them. Childish, but at least I admit it."
A creative way of making a point: You can say you are liberal, but at some
point you will find you need to establish rules about what is acceptable or
you cannot criticise my words.
By the way, many would find my Eminem post far less abhorrent than some of
yours!
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> Not that EVERYBODY at your group is a lil' stormtrooper, mind you.
> Some of the semi-regular posters over there still post here... and
> NOT their off-topic plugs of Eminem's newest CD. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25086 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: How bizarre |
| Group: pota |
Message: 25087 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.htmlGood to know you base your reason on who you "like".
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
>
>
Never let it be said that I thought ill of ALL those who may have happened
to chime in
> with a message over at your site. I like Kassidy & Helen, and Neil
> seems nice, and there's probably one or two others there that I'm
> okay with. Hell, I even occasionally agree with some of those there
> who we all know do NOT particularly care for my postings (James,
> Cougar, etc.). For the record, James, we agree the Timeline is
> circular, but the 2503 pic was a DRAWING that is intended to be taken
> as a PHOTOGRAPH, as (finally!) someone over there got around to
> pointing out by quoting Virdon's line ("... this picture was
> TAKEN..."). Oh, I forgot... he was GROGGY! We all must've missed it
> when he yawwwwwwnnned, while rubbing the sleep outta his eyes! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25088 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Boring |
.htmlThat was the group that said "boring" - not me.
What I said was:
Patrick,
Read this in a passive tone because I am not attempting to intimidate or
upset you. If I satate some facts that do upset you, then sorry in advance.
You are far too clever to really think my starting a new group equated me to
a Nazi.
The new group has ground rules and the consequences of breaking them are a
warning and subsequent expulsion if that warning is ignored. Much like
anything...if you piss on the floor in a courtroom, you will be thrown out
(with NO warning)...if you rape a nun in a church, you will be removed (with
NO warning). Very simple...there are rules (AND THEY ARE CLEARLY DEFINED
AND AGREED UPON IN A DEMOCRATIC MANNER). Are there any rules in the "old"
group? If so, what are they and I will attempt to strictly adhere.
I understand you wouldn't want to be in the group and I find it equally as
offensive as my honesty with you in saying you are (at the moment) not being
invited to the group - not offensive at all. Take offence if you wish.
You are also intelligent enough to work out the relevance of the Eminem
statement...instead of listening to the points I was making (and this did
not include a direct reference to you, just a wish to stop flame wars and to
addresss issues that were turning people off the group), Jeff and Rory took
it personally and started baiting me by doing the exact opposite and
starting up a conversation about Eminem. So my (rather childish) response
was to illustrate that I too can talk about Eminem in a way that would bait
them. Childish, but at least I admit it.
Also, the OCCASIONAL chat on "your" group is ABOUT Planet of the Apes. I
could be wrong here, but you are a scientist so compile the statistics for
the last month and categorise into: Flame Wars, Smart ass Comments,
Ridiculing Patrick (I have been guilty too, but I am ashamed of myself, not
proud of it and dismissing it with "all-in-fun" lies), Freeze Frames from
the Movie, Hollywood Reports, Insults, Profanities, ramblings by T...need I
go on? Now, the reaction to my identifying these problems (as a result of
valuable people like Brian and Haelen leaving the group in disgust) was to
suggest a better way where we could encourage more POTA talk and less stupid
dribble from Rory and T (and me). If that makes me a Nazi the "Hial
(spelling?) Hitler".
I didn't mention the group to you for a couple of reasons:
(1) I thought you and I had finally decided to try to sort things out
privately in an adult manner;
(2) Some of the members in the new group had mentioned that they had
problems with your posts (and I was going to get a concencus on agreed
length of emails before inviting you over to make everyone happier);
(3) I wanted to see how the new group goes, inviting a few new members at a
time and not setting up a feeling in the "old" group of "hey, why can't I
play?".
Rory knew this and his "announcement" of the new group was an act of
sabotage. I sent him an email asking him to "behave" and then he started
sending insults to the new group and another post that was an obvious
attempt to reduce the new group to flame wars. His intention was also to
get you and I at each others throats - I explained to him that we were
sorting things out and he did not like that at all. Let him win that one if
you want.
It is nice to be able to hurl abuse at people then explain it as "all in
fun", don't you think? I really thought you would see through that. Rory
is a trouble maker. If you want to let him cause trouble, go ahead. At
least I will tell you the truth - that the insults I hurled at you were in
anger, not always deserved, and I am ashamed at myself for being so
destructive.
I won't treat "your" group like a garbage dump, but if you choose to
continue baiting me publicly I will probably reach the point where I engage.
I would expect the same from you (from experience!).
You can call me "Mikey" as much as you want, and you'll probably be thriving
on actually having one or two "supporters" right now, so good for you, but
if you keep it up you will contribute to the demise of all. Remember, YOU
are the one who has said you HATE people varying your name...T remembers
that all to well, but now it is funny? Whatever. I think you are being
played here Patrick. I have (finally) chosen not to keep going, let me know
when you decide. Don't think I am blowing my horn, I should never have
started and I know that.
Personally, I'm not a hypocrite because I don't have the same problem with a
lot of the OT stuff. Others do, so I make sacrifices on the new group and
the quality of chat speaks for itself. The "old" group promotes it so why
should I stop? Again, if there is a policy please draw my attention to it.
I made the mistake of trying to form a policy on the matter and look what
happened.
You telling me to stay on the "old" group and stay ON topic is hypocritical
- you say you have no problems with OT posts. Try to fair and objective
Patrick and I will do the same.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
>
> Have fun with your new group, Mike. You're welcome to it. And if you
> have any on-topic nuggets of POTA joy to share, feel free to post a
> message here, so that we "uglies" can get a whiff of it. But a one-
> word declaration of "Boring" hardly cuts the mustard, pal. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25089 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Topics |
.htmlI encourage you all to decide for yourselves.
Anyone can join, but there are rules (and we try to steer away from
genocide).
Thank you for the free advertising, Patrick.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> P.S. Rory, I don't know if you've bothered to wade through that other
> group's posts (the ones posted AFTER you got kicked out), but you can
> take my word for it that you ain't missin' much! And you can bet that
> when their noodles dry up and they need something interesting to
> discuss (POTA-wise), they'll just cut-n-paste one of the good ones
> from THIS site. They've set the precedent--TWICE. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25090 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.html
.html
About
time you get some new topics going....you must be Rory's live in lover (a ha ha
ha) because some other guy recently used your name to say the topics are dried
up and boring anyway.
Unlike
you and your new pal Patrick (talk about wait till I finish laughing!), I think
both groups can exist harmoniously.
Michael
In a message
dated 11/22/02 2:09:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@...
writes:
Patrick
P.S. Rory, I don't know if you've bothered to
wade through that other group's posts (the ones posted AFTER you got
kicked out), but you can take my word for it that you ain't missin'
much! And you can bet that when their noodles dry up and they need
something interesting to discuss (POTA-wise), they'll just cut-n-paste
one of the good ones from THIS site. They've set the
precedent--TWICE.
Wait, I'm still laughing at your post, Patrick.
OK, I
know I'm not missing a thing, especially since the POTA Nazi has banned me from
even looking at what's posted there. But are you shitting me that
they're taking posts from here and putting them up of there?
HA!
Well, I've got some things planned for this group that should be
entertaining, so to hell with that "other" POTA group. They can
obsess on lurkers until their sanity comes back, meanwhile I'm gonna just keep
on truckin.'
-- Rory
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25091 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: God in the POTA universe |
.htmlI'll respond to this later but in the meantime can you elaborate further
on this?
>
> --- In pota@y..., Melkor <melkor@e...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a "god" in the fictional POTA universe, as there is in
> > > the "Lord of the Rings" universe? Absolutely NOT. At the end of
> >
> > I think this is true only if you look at the first two movies. The
> > last three movies do contain hints that a "god" character exists in
> > the fictional POTA universe, although certainly not the one Zaius is
> > the Chief Defender of in PLANET.
> >
> >
> > > BENEATH, the planet Earth "is now dead". Not "mostly dead"...
> > > not "partially still breathing"... it's DEAD. Would a "god"
> ("...if there IS a god...") sit idly by and allow His precious
> creation--the planet and all those whom He had created in His image--
> to be
> >
> >
> > God DIDN'T allow the Earth to be destroyed. The latter three movies
> parallel the New Testament in which God sent Caesar/Christ to save
> the Earth from Aldo's/Adam's Original Sin. There are Caesar/Christ
> parallels in BATTLE, ESCAPE, and as you yourself once pointed out to
> me, in CONQUEST too. The presence of a Christ-like character in the
> POTA universe implies the presence of an unseen God character.
> Caesar's whole purpose in life was to stop Aldo's Original Sin and
> thereby prevent at the original source the whole chain of events that
> led to the Earth's destruction in BENEATH. God accomplished this not
> by suspending free will (except for Milo maybe) but by sending a
> saviour in the right place at the right time.
> >
> >
> > And Then God sent the world a Saviour...
> > -The Lawgiver
> >
> > The Lawgiver's quote is the whole key to understanding what
> happened in BATTLE. God sent "the world" a saviour, not the apes a
> saviour. God didn't need to send Caesar to save the apes, because
> Aldo would have done that anyway. Caesar was sent by God to literally
> save "the world".
> >
> > Maybe the real Christ also started an altered timeline, and maybe
> in the real world the Earth was also destroyed in the original
> timeline.
>
> *** You have an interesting "take" on this topic, although I must say
> that I respectfully disagree with your conclusions.
> The "Ape-onauts" were not sent back in Time by God--the destruction
> of the Earth (via Taylor's detonation of the Doomsday Bomb) created
> the "tornado in the sky" which somehow caused the Timewarp through
> which those 3 chimps travelled from 3955 to 1973. Just flying that
> ANSA ship into orbit didn't get them on a Retro-timewarp--they needed
> the Earth to be blown to bits by the Alpha Omega bomb to create the
> warpage of spacetime (the "shockwave" Milo mentions) which sends them
> back to their Past. God doesn't "save the World" by first (?)
> destroying it in the dead-end Future of 3955: that would make God out
> to be the equivalent of the Vietnam-era soldiers who "had to destroy
> the village in order to save it"!
> The Lawgiver's quote also says that the "savior" was "miraculously
> born". This is a misrepresentation of the truth, a kind of lie.
> Sure, "Baby Milo"/"Caesar" is conceived in the 40th Century and born
> in the 20th Century, but only because of the Man-made "miracle" of
> the Timewarp experienced by the Ape-onauts, a "miracle" which happens
> as a result of Taylor's detonation of the Earth-destroying Bomb. Yet
> there was NOTHING truly "miraculous" about Caesar's birth; amazing,
> yes, but NOT a miracle.
>
> Is Caesar a "Christ" figure? To a certain degree, yes. That is, both
> Caesar and Christ (and about a hundred other mythic personages) have
> a life-pattern which is echoed throughout the mythic literature of
> the world. There's something about their Birth that is extraordinary
> (like Christ's incarnation from a Male God impregnating a Female
> Virgin Human, or Aeneas being the son of the goddess Aphrodite/Venus
> and the mortal man Anchises)... just as Caesar's birth literally
> predates his conception (due to Dehn's ingenious use of the science
> fictional "timewarp").
> But is there anything SUPERNATURAL in the Caesar story? Nope. The
> gospels portray Christ as literally dying on the Cross; the "Aeneid"
> has Aeneas literally descending into the pagan Underworld with the
> Golden Bough to talk with the ghost of his father; but Caesar's
> science fictional variation on these mythic prototypes are NOT
> supernatural/magical/divine. When Caesar "dies" on the shock-table
> (in CONQUEST: "...but I saw you DIE!"), he doesn't literally lose his
> life and then resurrect from the dead: MacDonald covertly cut the
> power to the shock-table and Caesar FAKED his death.
> He "symbolically" died, to satisfy the mythic prototype, but he
> didn't literally come back from the Dead. Also, his trip to "hell" is
> NOT to a literal Underworld where the literal ghosts/spirits of the
> Damned are punished by God for their sins--MacDonald refers to the
> nuked "forbidden city" as "the hell my forefathers used to preach
> about"... but he says this to satisfy the mythic archetypes; NOWHERE
> did MacDonald's ancestors ever preach that Hell was a man-made
> creation, the destroyed remnants of his own man-made cities--rather,
> Hell is created by God as a place in which to imprison the Fallen
> Angels and the wretched sinners of Mankind (The inscription on the
> Gate of Hell, in Dante's "Inferno", Canto 3, says that "Justice moved
> my High Maker; / I was made by the Power divine, / the Highest Wisdom
> and the Primal Love": in other words, GOD made Hell, not Man... yet
> the symbolic "Hell" in BATTLE was once a "paradise" turned into a
> Wasteland/Desert BY MAN.
> Dehn (and, presumably, the Corringtons) have MacDonald refer to the
> ruined city as "hell" because they want the audience to make the
> mythic connections with the story told in Dante's "Inferno", where
> the Pilgrim, Dante, is led by the spirit of the long-dead Roman poet
> Virgil on a journey through Hell, up the mountain of Purgatory, and
> then (with Beatrice replacing Virgil at the top of the Mountain of
> Purgatory) through the celestial spheres of Paradise to
> the "Celestial Rose" where God, the Angels, and the Saved dwell for
> all eternity. That's why Paul Williams plays an orangutan with the
> name VIRGIL--he symbolizes the wisdom available to anyone, short of
> divine intervention (symbolized by Beatrice).
> But the orangutan Virgil is not a ghost from the distant past, as was
> Dante's guide. And the bombed-out city is NOT a literal Hell--it's
> the SF symbolic equivalent. And when Caesar goes into that Underworld
> to discover the Fate of his own people from the testimony of his dead
> parents (as Aeneas does from his father Anchises' ghost), his parents
> aren't really there, conscious of him and communicating with him:
> only their pre-recorded images and voices are there, on tape.
>
> And what is the Fate that Caesar's parents describe to him? The
> destruction of the World.
> For Caesar to SUCCEED at changing the Future, that would require him
> doing what no epic hero ever did: Avoid the personal Fate which "God"
> has decreed for him. Aeneas learns of his Fate from his father's
> ghost: to found the race of Romans who will eventually rule the world
> (in the poet Virgil's time)--and Aeneas does NOT have the ability to
> avoid that Fate. Not even the goddess Juno/Hera, his nemesis who
> wishes she COULD change that Fate, has the power to prevent Aeneas
> from planting the seed which will culminate in Augustus' Empire.
>
> And Christ? After His death and resurrection, He supposedly ascended
> into Heaven, is seated at the right hand of His Father, and WILL COME
> AGAIN in glory to judge the Living and the Dead. Caesar is, to a
> certain extent, a Christ-figure, like all sorts of other mythic
> heroes, but he does NOT have the supernatural ability to come back to
> the World centuries after his REAL death, and personally use any
> divine power to prevent Doomsday.
>
> The ONLY thing which Caesar's community has to go on, they think, is
> HOPE for the Future. Virgil says, at the end, "The greatest danger of
> all is that Danger is never over," to Mandemus, who wants to destroy
> the Guns. And Caesar says, "So we must be patient and wait..." ...and
> we flash forward to the Lawgiver in 2670 A.D., who says: "We still
> wait" but "with hope for the future." Hope. Not DIVINE ASSURANCE.
> Just Hope. Why can't they be SURE that Doomsday won't happen? Because
> God has not eradicated all hatred from the World--the last image we
> see before the camera pans over to the WEEPING statue of Caesar is of
> a boy chimp pulling the ponytail of a girl human, who violently
> pushes him away: they're FIGHTING. Not "play" fighting, like young
> Cornelius and his human friend playing "War"; but REAL fighting. And
> that Doomsday Bomb has NOT been dismantled--it still exists, in
> the "care" of Mendez & Alma, and the community of mutating humans who
> will come to revere it as their God, bringing the Timeline full
> circle to the way things are in BENEATH.
>
> So, does this mean that I--by not seeing any "God" in the POTA
> universe--am a pessimistic nihilist? Nope. And the reason that I
> consider the TV series to be just as important a part of the POTA
> saga as the 5 films has to do with the THEME of the show, as
> articulated by Virdon:
> GRUNDIG: "Do you believe humans and apes are equal?"
> VIRDON: "In this world or ours?"
> PROTO: "In any world."
> VIRDON: "I don't know about ANY world, but I believe all creatures of
> equal intelligence should learn to live and work with each other as
> equals."
>
> [note: this dialogue is taken from the script for "Escape from
> Tomorrow", which is slightly different from what Ron Harper actually
> spoke--he didn't say the words "of equal intelligence" from the
> script when the cameras were rolling.]
>
> But it isn't enough to "live and work" with equality--you have to
> work towards a Goal. Even if Taylor never detonates that Bomb in
> 3955, there are still any of a number of things which will eventually
> happen to wipe out Intelligent life on Earth, such as "a natural
> catastrophe... a storm of meteors" (as Taylor suggests to Zaius), or
> a comet strike, or a (relatively) nearby supernova, or the Sun going
> nova. Granted, the Sun won't go nova for about 5 billion years, but
> it eventually WILL. And if Earth's intelligent life does NOT get its
> ass off the planet and into outer space, then that's all she wrote!
> The ONLY hope humanity (or intelligent simiankind) has, is to develop
> SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, towards peaceful ends. Only if we become a
> spacefaring species will we survive the death of our Sun (or the
> meteor/comet/asteroid smashing of the Earth). That's why the Heroes
> of the POTA TV show are AMERICAN SCIENTIST/ASTRONAUTS. Their
> Americanism is voiced in Virdon's belief in Equality between
> intelligent creatures; and in virtually every episode Virdon and
> Burke use their Scientific and Technical know-how to IMPROVE the
> living conditions of both Humans and Apes. Unfortunately, it's an
> uphill battle, because the Ape society is gripped by an intense Fear
> of Technology, due to the mis-use of Technology for the purposes of
> War--the Nuclear War which had wiped out America and the rest of the
> civilized world. Zaius & Urko, in throwing out the "bathwater" (ALL
> higher technology) have also thrown out the "baby" (peacefully-used
> good high-tech). Just as Lot and his family have to get their asses
> out of Sodom before God rains down fire and brimstone on it, so too
> does Humanity have to get its ass off the Earth before Taylor
> detonates that God-bomb. Lot had forewarning--and so, too, does
> Caesar's community; Caesar and Virgil and MacDonald heard with their
> own ears the voice of Zira tell them that the Earth's destruction was
> in the year "Thirty-Nine... Fifty--" (the "something" Zira also said
> isn't preserved on the tape, and the "Five" was not mentioned by
> her). So Caesar, Virgil, and MacDonald have reason enough to believe
> that the planet has just about 1,932 years left to it (if, as I
> conclude, BATTLE takes place in 2018, due to Mandemus' line about
> guarding Caesar's Armory for 27 years, since 1991). If the World has
> a little over 19 centuries to get its act together, then there should
> be no problem. But IF there is no "cure" for interracial hatred (Ape
> vs. Human, Orangutan & Gorilla vs. Chimpanzee, Ape vs. Mutant, etc.),
> then wouldn't it make sense to seek a path which leads to the
> survival of their peoples: off-planet spacefaring? For Pete's sake,
> Caesar's community lives in a non-technical "city" made of tree-
> forts! Their backwards hospital isn't good enough to save the life of
> Caesar's injured heir. The ONLY higher technology the Apes retain are
> the Guns (and a geiger counter!). Not the refridgerators. Not the x-
> ray machines, or the table-saws, or the television, or even simple
> radio... NOTHING. Just as Caesar has restricted the human diet to
> vegetarian fare ("now we chew nuts, at our Master's command..."), so
> too has this ape King restricted his community to a pre-technological
> level--a step BACKWARD. Are things much better 6 or 7 centuries
> later, when the Lawgiver tells Caesar's story to the 'harmonious'
> Apes and Humans? After 600 years and more... and they STILL are in
> the pre-techno level! There is no evidence of striving for the
> industrial betterment of their meager civilization. It's easy to see
> the situation remaining virtually the same over the course of another
> 400 years, when Zaius and Urko are running the show, actively
> destroying any remnants of "dangerous" human technology (like the
> cache of computers in "The Legacy").
> Just as it was Man who created the symbolic "Hell" of the nuked city
> in BATTLE, and not God, so too does Man have to concoct his own
> salvation, which he CAN achieve if he makes use of his Intelligence
> to create a high-tech, industrial civilization geared towards
> extending a Human presence permanently outside the bounds of the
> cradle of planet Earth. In outer space. Man is "that marvel of the
> universe, that glorious paradox" who sent Taylor "to the stars".
> Unfortunately, Taylor wound up back on "a world upside-down" and in
> bitterness for the loss of Nova (the only woman who, it seems, ever
> loved him), he triggers the world-destroying souvenir from the 20th
> century. Before 3955, Caesar (or Virgil, or MacDonald) should work
> towards sending OTHER intelligent Earth creatures "to the stars", so
> that at least a REMNANT of Earth intelligence can survive the End of
> the World.
> As long as the Zaiuses and Urkos are in charge... as long as guys
> like Leuric are persecuted for being technologically innovative...
> the world is DOOMED. But if Virdon and Burke can prove to Ape and
> Human alike that Technology--as dangerous as it can be (and, sadly,
> had been proven to be when misused in the Past)--is still the ONLY
> hope any of us has to perpetuate our civilization, which is
> ultimately the supreme goal listed in the preamble of the
> Constitution of the United States: "...to secure the blessings of
> liberty for ourselves AND OUR POSTERITY..." If the world is wiped out
> in 3955, and we KNOW it's coming, then for the sake of our posterity,
> we must get our butts off "terra firma". The technophobic, luddite
> Apes are doomed--the innovators (like Cornelius & Zira) are
> persecuted, rather than encouraged. But IF people (even Apes and
> Humans, together) are willing to live and work together as equals, as
> Virdon says, THEN maybe there's a chance.
> "God" isn't the answer to the dilemma facing Apes and Humans on the
> Planet of the Apes: it's US. We are both the Problem AND the
> Solution. We have to be "our better selves" (to paraphrase Cornelius'
> admonition to Zira). God ain't gonna intervene at the last second to
> keep Taylor's paw off the Doomsday Bomb's trigger. We can't rely on
> divine intervention--we have to save ourselves.
>
> At least, that's how I see it.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25092 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.html> And I couldn't help noticing that in order to kick-start a couple "on-
> topic" POTA discussions over there, that messages posted to THIS site
> were "borrowed", so you folks could have SOMETHING to talk about. And
> WHOSE messages were borrowed? Hmmm... lemme see... one was about the
> lack of female orangutans and gorillas in the POTA movies... hmmm...
> who wrote that one? And the other one... the one about "God" in the
> POTA universe... who was the one who wrote THAT message? Hey! I just
> realized--it was ME! I--one of "the uglies" over at THIS "old group"--
"God in the POTA universe" was my post and I reposted it to the other group
at the request of James. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25093 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
|
.html .htmlBe honest now.
To quote Captain Sensible, I couldn't care less mate. You can have the "Flame Free" POTA gourp and this can be the "Free Fire Zone" POTA group. When the posts get old on one there's always the other, unless you get kicked out. You may have notices I've cut back quite a bit on the flippant remarks, as well as posts in general. To be honest I can't be bothered. I hope this doesn't start another battle.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25094 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Reacting |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 4:03:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Now go down to your local store and pull a gun on the shopkeeper then call
him a Nazi when he has you arrested.
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25095 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Rules for Patrick |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 4:17:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Your behaviour in this group makes me wonder why I bothered.
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25096 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Emotions |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 4:26:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
No, but I am relieved.
Michael
now go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25097 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sabotage |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 4:27:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
We have called for more moderators and rules on moderators to attempt to
make the process even more effective.
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25098 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sanity |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 4:29:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
As I have explained before, you might want to look for some cues.
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25099 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Something to say |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 4:33:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
For every 20 000 words you come up with, Patrick, at least 5 of them are
worthy of publishing.
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25100 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Eminem |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 4:44:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
By the way, many would find my Eminem post far less abhorrent than some of
yours!
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25101 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 4:58:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Good to know you base your reason on who you "like".
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25102 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Topics |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 5:05:32 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Thank you for the free advertising, Patrick.
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25103 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Boring |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 5:06:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
You telling me to stay on the "old" group and stay ON topic is hypocritical
- you say you have no problems with OT posts. Try to fair and objective
Patrick and I will do the same.
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25104 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 5:11:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Unlike you and your new pal Patrick (talk about wait till I finish laughing!), I think both groups can exist harmoniously.
Michael
only if you go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25105 |
From: sgizrzugyspd |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: check this out... |
| Group: pota |
Message: 25106 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
.html
.html
T,
Is it
killing you to be in the "new" group?
Michael
Be
honest now.
To quote Captain Sensible, I couldn't care less
mate. You can have the "Flame Free" POTA gourp and this can
be the "Free Fire Zone" POTA group. When the posts get old
on one there's always the other, unless you get kicked out. You may
have notices I've cut back quite a bit on the flippant remarks, as well as
posts in general. To be honest I can't be bothered. I hope this
doesn't start another battle. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25107 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
.html
.html
So I
guess this is a vote to have a "Zinger Slinging" group
here?
That's
how I imagined you, Rory and Patrick would vote, and I predict others will
either vote against you or just not respond.
Let's
see.
Michael
Be
honest now.
To quote Captain Sensible, I couldn't care less
mate. You can have the "Flame Free" POTA gourp and this can
be the "Free Fire Zone" POTA group. When the posts get old
on one there's always the other, unless you get kicked out. You may
have notices I've cut back quite a bit on the flippant remarks, as well as
posts in general. To be honest I can't be bothered. I hope this
doesn't start another battle. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25108 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Vanessa |
.html
.html
Well, this
certainly has been an interesting time with the POTA e-group. Not much
talking about APES going on I've noticed.
I think Vanessa should tell
the name of the member she seems to think is a problem. I say this
because I can't call for this person to just quit the group.
You
see, I too am guilty of contacting privately another female member of this
group. I won't say who it is, but I've exchanged several e-mails with
her, and I offered to send her a photocopy of the PLANET pressbook so she
could see what the original ads looked like. She sent me an address --
a P.O. box -- and I sent her the pressbook. I've made sure I've been
nothing but a perfect gentleman with her.
I think that if Vanessa
just gets this matter out into the open then she'll have nothing to worry
about. Maybe, Vanessa, just talking about APES for a change
would help? You mentioned that after all these years since you were a
kid you now see the sequels as kind of silly and cheesy. Since I was
the first person here to welcome you to the group, I thought that was a
pleasant coincidence because I can certainly relate. I kind of have
the same view. Funny, isn't it, Vanessa?
Perhaps we can start
a discussion here in the group of what's wrong with the sequels?
I'll bet this will probably bore the other members who've heard
enough from me on the subject, but I think they'd love to read your views.
So, what have you got to say, Vanessa? This is certainly the
place for POTA talk -- if that's why you subscribed?
--
Rory
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25109 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Changing Lanes |
.html
.html
Anyone
here seen "Changing Lanes"?
Michael <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25110 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
.html.html
T,
Is it killing you to be in the "new" group?
Michael
I don't know what you're talking about. I am in the new group. I don't find it particularly more interesting, or boring, than this group. I actually enjoyed one of Pat's posts for a change. POTA Nazi? No, I think you're more of a POTA Commie. Not that I have anything against you. As we say in the Punk Rock biz, Fuck a bunch of rules! Why regulate everything? It's Cyberspace! The Final Frontier! It is a shame though that some people stray so far off, or drag out petty squabbles, that they have to be reminded that this is a POTA group -- but so be it. I think you take it all a little too seriously. But you're not the only one. I don't care if I get kicked out of both groups. I may save you the trouble an unsubscribe from both. I have more to do than sifting through a bunch or two line flames, or a bunch of on-topic posts that either make wild speculation of arcane
plot points on a loosely written fiction, or don't have anything new to offer that hasn't been hashed to death in the last five years. So, killing me? On the contrary -- I never felt freeer, if, in fact, that is a word. Kim's gone. Fuck a bunch of apes. I could drop both groups and never glance back. To quote a Christopher Walken line, "I have better fish to fry."
T<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25111 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 11/22/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Speaks |
.html.html In a message dated 11/22/02 10:29:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
So I guess this is a vote to have a "Zinger Slinging" group here?
That's how I imagined you, Rory and Patrick would vote, and I predict others will either vote against you or just not respond.
Let's see.
Michael
go away<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25112 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Rules for Patrick |
.htmlThe thing is, some people like Patrick's posts. Sometimes I'm not in the
mood and save them for later, but I read them. For those who delete them,
that's a valid choice. But should I be denied the posts because some don't
like them, even if it's a majority? Sounds like commercial TV to me, or
lowest common denominator, and we get enough of that in the "real
world". - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:08 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Rules for Patrick
> These were suggested rules and are yet to be voted on and set in concrete.
>
> The suggestion came from a scientific, statistical analysis of the
> identified problems with the "old" group.
>
> Some stated they did not like your posts and I sought clarification. I
did
> not think it was good enough - it is like saying you don't like a person,
> but do not know why, and allowing yourself to get away with it (not good
> enough).
>
> On further investigation, it developed that you turn people off with your
> long postings (ie they scroll down, see the length of it and delete it).
> First impressions - sad, but true.
>
> Have you heard the term "user-friendly"? That's what common people want.
>
> Also, requiring a dictionary, a degree, a spellchecker and an interpreter
> and a lot of patience to read a post is not a "turn-on".
>
> So when the group throws around some way to invite you into an environment
> where you know what is expected of you and the consequences of making
others
> suffer, we'll let you know and you can choose.
>
> I felt it unfair that you missed out on the blueprints I laboured around 4
> hours of scanning at your request, so I sent them to you privately.
>
> The intention was to include you at the right time.
>
> Your behaviour in this group makes me wonder why I bothered.
>
> Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> > Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> > there! Even Albina looked pretty hot before her mask came off!
> >
> > You said, didn't you Mike, that the members of your new group joined up,
> in part, in order to "get away" from me (and, presumably, other unwelcome
> folks over here, like Rory) and my "too long" posts, right? And right off
> the bat the "rules" you and James (and whoever) cook up put the LENGTH of
> the desired posts as a major criterion which will get potential members
> either "talked to" (warned) first and ultimately kicked out if they don't
> tow the line. In other words, amidst all those cheery "welcome!" messages,
> there's none planned for ME, right?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25113 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Boring |
.htmlThat e-mail was too long, Michael, so I deleted it. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:57 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Boring
> That was the group that said "boring" - not me.
>
> What I said was:
>
> Patrick,
>
> Read this in a passive tone because I am not attempting to intimidate or
> upset you. If I satate some facts that do upset you, then sorry in
advance.
>
> You are far too clever to really think my starting a new group equated me
to
> a Nazi.
>
> The new group has ground rules and the consequences of breaking them are a
> warning and subsequent expulsion if that warning is ignored. Much like
> anything...if you piss on the floor in a courtroom, you will be thrown out
> (with NO warning)...if you rape a nun in a church, you will be removed
(with
> NO warning). Very simple...there are rules (AND THEY ARE CLEARLY DEFINED
> AND AGREED UPON IN A DEMOCRATIC MANNER). Are there any rules in the "old"
> group? If so, what are they and I will attempt to strictly adhere.
>
> I understand you wouldn't want to be in the group and I find it equally as
> offensive as my honesty with you in saying you are (at the moment) not
being
> invited to the group - not offensive at all. Take offence if you wish.
>
> You are also intelligent enough to work out the relevance of the Eminem
> statement...instead of listening to the points I was making (and this did
> not include a direct reference to you, just a wish to stop flame wars and
to
> addresss issues that were turning people off the group), Jeff and Rory
took
> it personally and started baiting me by doing the exact opposite and
> starting up a conversation about Eminem. So my (rather childish) response
> was to illustrate that I too can talk about Eminem in a way that would
bait
> them. Childish, but at least I admit it.
>
> Also, the OCCASIONAL chat on "your" group is ABOUT Planet of the Apes. I
> could be wrong here, but you are a scientist so compile the statistics for
> the last month and categorise into: Flame Wars, Smart ass Comments,
> Ridiculing Patrick (I have been guilty too, but I am ashamed of myself,
not
> proud of it and dismissing it with "all-in-fun" lies), Freeze Frames from
> the Movie, Hollywood Reports, Insults, Profanities, ramblings by T...need
I
> go on? Now, the reaction to my identifying these problems (as a result of
> valuable people like Brian and Haelen leaving the group in disgust) was to
> suggest a better way where we could encourage more POTA talk and less
stupid
> dribble from Rory and T (and me). If that makes me a Nazi the "Hial
> (spelling?) Hitler".
>
> I didn't mention the group to you for a couple of reasons:
>
> (1) I thought you and I had finally decided to try to sort things out
> privately in an adult manner;
>
> (2) Some of the members in the new group had mentioned that they had
> problems with your posts (and I was going to get a concencus on agreed
> length of emails before inviting you over to make everyone happier);
>
> (3) I wanted to see how the new group goes, inviting a few new members at
a
> time and not setting up a feeling in the "old" group of "hey, why can't I
> play?".
>
> Rory knew this and his "announcement" of the new group was an act of
> sabotage. I sent him an email asking him to "behave" and then he started
> sending insults to the new group and another post that was an obvious
> attempt to reduce the new group to flame wars. His intention was also to
> get you and I at each others throats - I explained to him that we were
> sorting things out and he did not like that at all. Let him win that one
if
> you want.
>
> It is nice to be able to hurl abuse at people then explain it as "all in
> fun", don't you think? I really thought you would see through that. Rory
> is a trouble maker. If you want to let him cause trouble, go ahead. At
> least I will tell you the truth - that the insults I hurled at you were in
> anger, not always deserved, and I am ashamed at myself for being so
> destructive.
>
> I won't treat "your" group like a garbage dump, but if you choose to
> continue baiting me publicly I will probably reach the point where I
engage.
> I would expect the same from you (from experience!).
>
> You can call me "Mikey" as much as you want, and you'll probably be
thriving
> on actually having one or two "supporters" right now, so good for you, but
> if you keep it up you will contribute to the demise of all. Remember, YOU
> are the one who has said you HATE people varying your name...T remembers
> that all to well, but now it is funny? Whatever. I think you are being
> played here Patrick. I have (finally) chosen not to keep going, let me
know
> when you decide. Don't think I am blowing my horn, I should never have
> started and I know that.
>
> Personally, I'm not a hypocrite because I don't have the same problem with
a
> lot of the OT stuff. Others do, so I make sacrifices on the new group and
> the quality of chat speaks for itself. The "old" group promotes it so why
> should I stop? Again, if there is a policy please draw my attention to
it.
> I made the mistake of trying to form a policy on the matter and look what
> happened.
>
> You telling me to stay on the "old" group and stay ON topic is
hypocritical
> - you say you have no problems with OT posts. Try to fair and objective
> Patrick and I will do the same.
>
> Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: patrickmichaeltilton [patrickmichaeltilton@...]
> > Sent: Saturday, 23 November 2002 5:37
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Silence of the Clams
> >
> > Have fun with your new group, Mike. You're welcome to it. And if you
> > have any on-topic nuggets of POTA joy to share, feel free to post a
> > message here, so that we "uglies" can get a whiff of it. But a one-
> > word declaration of "Boring" hardly cuts the mustard, pal.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25114 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 11/23/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sanity |
.html
.html
Rory, I think you're proving his point! - -
- Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:16
PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
Sanity
In a message dated 11/22/02 4:29:37
PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@...
writes:
As I have explained before, you might want to look for some
cues.
Michael
go away
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
|
|