|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25315 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Lives |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25316 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is really sadly amusing |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25317 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 11/29/02: Today in Group History |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25318 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is really sadly amusing |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25319 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: 12/1/02: Today in group history |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25320 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25321 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Banned in POTAville |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25322 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: "King of the Mountain" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25323 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25324 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Banned in POTAville |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25325 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25326 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The new "SOLARIS" (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25327 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Banned in POTAville |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25328 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Lives |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25329 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 11/29/02: Today in Group History |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25330 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25331 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25332 |
From: mike_oz2002 |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25333 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25334 |
From: mike_oz2002 |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25335 |
From: mike_oz2002 |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25336 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Lives OT |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25337 |
From: mike_oz2002 |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Lives OT |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25338 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "King of the Mountain" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25339 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: email forger update #2 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25340 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Banned in POTAville |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25341 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: email forger update #2 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25342 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25343 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Conquest & Battle |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25344 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25345 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: OT nicknames |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25346 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25347 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Marvel PLANET adaptation |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25348 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25349 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT nicknames |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25350 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT nicknames |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25351 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: God dialogue in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25352 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25353 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25354 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25355 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] '98 Starcon Panel, pt. 3 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25356 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25357 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25358 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25359 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25360 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25361 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25362 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25363 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25364 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25365 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25366 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25367 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25368 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25369 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Apology |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25370 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Kim |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25371 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25372 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25373 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25374 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25375 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Kim |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25376 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25377 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25378 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25379 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25380 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25381 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25382 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25383 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25384 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Rules" again! Ugh! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25385 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25386 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25387 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25388 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25389 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: 12/2/02 : Today in Group History |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25390 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25391 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25392 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25393 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: The "Other" Group (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25394 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Nicknames |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25395 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patrick" again! Ugh! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25396 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: The "Other" Group (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25397 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25398 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25399 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25400 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25401 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: ideas |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25402 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: A fu**ing rating |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25403 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25404 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25405 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A fu**ing rating |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25406 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25407 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25408 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A fu**ing rating |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25409 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25410 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25411 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25412 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25413 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25414 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A fu**ing rating |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25315 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Lives |
.htmlIn a message dated 12/1/02 4:00:51 AM Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
<< Hey, Joe.
>>
Heh, sup?
-Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25316 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is really sadly amusing |
.html
.html
Don't
turn this around on me Jeff.
You
have had many opportunities to bury the hatchet and get on with things and YOU
refuse. If that means I don't share things with you as a consequence of
your "us & them" attitude then don't look so
surprised.
You
want to control this group, fine. You want to decide when to get back on
track, ignoring all the evidence and people around you, fine. Don't blame
me.
Instead of just passing on commenting or saying something positive to
support Rory (like "well I'd rather stay in this group but how about we
cross over and interchange topics and questions"), you choose to show an
"us & them" attitude. Fine.
But it
is pathetic.
Michael
Rory's a big boy. T and I gave our
opinions and he agreed. Rory, stay out of this. I'm talking to Michael here. My
"us and them" attitude, eh? You're a member of this group. What do you
contribute? I didn't see you mention those new Rittenhouse cards here. Anyway
this is the last I will discuss the 2 groups. I've made my opinion known. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 1:05
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] What is
really sadly amusing
What's sadly amusing is your pathetic "us and them"
attitude Jeff, and the way you controlled Rory yesterday when he was trying
to make peace and move on.
Michael
What's sadly amusing is that certain
people in the "new" group feel they have left the
"uglies" and "piranhas" behind, but if you'll notice,
there's no flame wars here now. It wasn't the group, it was the people in it
and some of those people are gone now. So which are the hypocrites? This
group is actually kind of relaxing now.
Zzzzzzzz...
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002
6:28 AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes]
Kassidy as "Lisa", Turkeys and Fascism
--- In pota@y..., Kassidy
Rae <valwp@y...> wrote: >
> > Jeff, I LOVED that Starcon panel bit, keep
up the good work and keep it POTA! I think it is great you are
planning on continuing Ape Chronicles. Were the magazines
really good? I've got Simian Scrolls, but none of the
Chronicles. > Patty me boy, I am on the other group and I'm not a
mutant and I'm not a Nazi. Remember my comment re: you calling
me a chimp with a speech impediment? You called me Lisa,
remember, that's what that was in response to. > On the mutant
retard Nazi group over there, I posted a synopsis of the Rod Serling
POTA TV scripts from Epilogue Journal #9. Anybody wants to see
it, I'll be happy to put it up in files over here, too. > Happy
Thanksgiving to you guys! If ever there was a BUNCH OF TURKEYS
who needed good wishes, you are IT! > Kassidy
***
Kassie, me goil (as Archie Bunker would pronounce it), please take
my criticisms of the "other" group as being directed at the
ones in charge of it, rather than those who enjoy being members who
get to post comments on POTA on that site. Remember, one person in
THIS group (Rory) doesn't have that privilege and has been
"banished to the Forbidden Zone"--to use Michael's term.
As I mentioned, oh, a week ago or so, such power to censor content
and to evict members smacks of the same sorts of fascist tactics
that made Nazi Germany a system to be decried. As far as I can tell,
that decision was NOT put to a vote in that "democratic"
group--did YOU get to participate in the decision to kick Rory out,
Kassidy? Or did Michael do it all by himself, and then justify it by
trotting out some past grievance he had (the Simpsons tapes issue)?
It still bugs me that a POTA fan (as Michael presumably is) could
ever condone--let alone PERPETRATE--such dictatorial use of power.
And now I find that some jerk out there is forging e-mails and
trying to frame ME for it! I wish I didn't have to say this, but I
gotta: I wouldn't put it past Michael (or one of his cronies) to do
such a thing. If you'll peruse this site's more recent messages
(around #25230 or so), you'll see one by Michael where he isn't
above forging a "flame" message with MY name on it,
followed by a reference to "patriciamichelletitty" or
something like that.
In regards to me referring to you as Lisa,
it was NOT to imply that you had a speech impediment! Sure, I quoted
what sounds like a stuttering bit of dialogue, Lisa's ONLY dialogue
in CONQUEST... but it was a word ("No!") which indicated
her sensible objection towards Caesar's incendiary speech regarding
the harsh plans he has for the Human race's future. The reason that
I don't mind the "tacked-on" ending to CONQUEST is that it
is Lisa who "soothes the savage beast" in Caesar's
heart--an ex-slave who justifies the urge to punish his
persecutors... it takes a protest from a fellow ex-slave whom he
loves to get him to back off from his nastiness: "But NOW...
now we will put down our weapons..." So, Kassidy, do you
not see that I was giving you the most glowing of compliments that
one POTA fan could ever give to another (female) POTA fan? In my
mind, not even Zira is as "good" a person as Lisa. Zira,
despite seeing the end-result of Armed Conflict when she saw the rim
of the Earth melt, still harbors an unsettling racial animosity
towards gorillas and orangutans (this, despite having worked
side-by-side with a gorilla named Julius, who wasn't like the
militant Ursus); but Lisa, who has a pained look on her face when
she sees the weapons of war being prepared in Caesar's basement
meeting- place, it is SHE who is the first ape to say
"No!", but NOT to a Human--she says it to the Apes'
"savior", Caesar. If not for her intervention, how much
more rotten would be the status of humans in BATTLE, some 27 years
later? Caesar's heart softens towards humans because of his love of
Lisa, who probably couldn't love him if he were to maintain his
zealous anti-human attitude he displayed in his fiery
speech. Unlike Alma, who is an "enabler" of Kolp's pro-war
mindset, Lisa goes out of her way to question Caesar's growing plans
for war, pointing out that if the Humans in the Forbidden City fired
upon him it was probably because they were defending their own
territory from armed invaders. Caesar thinks they are
"mad" due to their radiation-caused Mutant
"malformed" condition... and Lisa points out that the
"freaks in [his] foster-father's circus" were
"malformed" too--does that make THEM "mad", too?
Now, had I referred to you as "Carsia", THEN I could see
you taking such a comparison as an insult!
Patrick (who was
told in explicit terms that I would NOT be welcome in that
"new" group which extolls Democratic values and dislikes
"flames") Tilton EARTH-TIME 11-30-2002
P.S. Thanks
for the Thanksgiving Day mixed blessing! Damn, I ate way too much.
Hope your Turkey Day was just as
good!
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups
is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25317 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 11/29/02: Today in Group History |
.html
.html
T
Just
out of curiosity, did you say "shit" and "fuck" in the
presence of Kim Hunter?
If so,
how did she react?
If
not, why not?
Michael
PS
Your post was too long so I deleted it!
Mentioning Apemania
always gets T jealous!
Its
amazing what you read into a couple of off hand remarks. I on;y used that
as an example because of the word disappointment. I am disappointed that
there has to be 2 groups. But if that's what it takes to make people
happy... Yes, I am in both groups. I prefer the unmoderated group because
I can speak my mind without getting kicked out. And since I can, I'd just
like to say I saw Dick Dale and The Blue Flames last night. And I'd just
like to say Dick Dale kicks ass! I won't say he rocks hard for a 65 year
old man. Hell, he rocks harder than an 18 year old. If he comes
anywhere near you, Run, Don't Walk, to see this guitar legend. He played
guitar, acoustic guitar, bass, drums, and trumpet. He even played in the
crowd, in the back room and the parking lot! James Brown, the hardest
working man in show business? Hell No! It's Dick Dale!
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25318 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What is really sadly amusing |
.html
.html
Hey, "don't turn this around on me". When
have I EVER used profanity? When have I got into a flame war (except for this
pathetic situation, where hypocrites are calling us "uglies" and "piranahs" ).
You got on T's case for using certain words you used first. I've always been on
track. I participated in topics, I brought related topics up that no one
responded to; yeah, I brought up some "Hollywood" stuff but as far as I was
concerned it was on topic. POTA is not all trading cards and who the best comic
book artist is. Some people could care less about THAT. So you break off and
have your own Lord of the Flies situation and come back here to ladle garbage
and not contribute. I've done my best to keep this group on track. Who needs
humorless, (trading) card -carrying complainers who don't contribute anyway? - -
- Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 12:28
PM
Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] What is
really sadly amusing
Don't turn this around on me Jeff.
You
have had many opportunities to bury the hatchet and get on with things and YOU
refuse. If that means I don't share things with you as a consequence of
your "us & them" attitude then don't look so
surprised.
You
want to control this group, fine. You want to decide when to get back on
track, ignoring all the evidence and people around you, fine. Don't
blame me.
Instead of just passing on commenting or saying something positive to
support Rory (like "well I'd rather stay in this group but how about we cross
over and interchange topics and questions"), you choose to show an "us &
them" attitude. Fine.
But
it is pathetic.
Michael
Rory's a big boy. T and I gave our
opinions and he agreed. Rory, stay out of this. I'm talking to Michael here.
My "us and them" attitude, eh? You're a member of this group. What do you
contribute? I didn't see you mention those new Rittenhouse cards here. Anyway
this is the last I will discuss the 2 groups. I've made my opinion known. - -
- Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 1:05
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] What is
really sadly amusing
What's sadly amusing is your pathetic "us and them" attitude Jeff,
and the way you controlled Rory yesterday when he was trying to make peace
and move on.
Michael
What's sadly amusing is that certain
people in the "new" group feel they have left the "uglies" and "piranhas"
behind, but if you'll notice, there's no flame wars here now. It wasn't the
group, it was the people in it and some of those people are gone now. So
which are the hypocrites? This group is actually kind of relaxing now.
Zzzzzzzz...
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002
6:28 AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Kassidy
as "Lisa", Turkeys and Fascism
--- In pota@y..., Kassidy
Rae <valwp@y...> wrote: >
> > Jeff, I LOVED that Starcon panel bit, keep
up the good work and keep it POTA! I think it is great you are
planning on continuing Ape Chronicles. Were the magazines really
good? I've got Simian Scrolls, but none of the
Chronicles. > Patty me boy, I am on the other group and I'm not a
mutant and I'm not a Nazi. Remember my comment re: you calling
me a chimp with a speech impediment? You called me Lisa,
remember, that's what that was in response to. > On the mutant
retard Nazi group over there, I posted a synopsis of the Rod Serling
POTA TV scripts from Epilogue Journal #9. Anybody wants to see
it, I'll be happy to put it up in files over here, too. > Happy
Thanksgiving to you guys! If ever there was a BUNCH OF TURKEYS
who needed good wishes, you are IT! > Kassidy
***
Kassie, me goil (as Archie Bunker would pronounce it), please take my
criticisms of the "other" group as being directed at the ones in
charge of it, rather than those who enjoy being members who get to
post comments on POTA on that site. Remember, one person in THIS
group (Rory) doesn't have that privilege and has been "banished to
the Forbidden Zone"--to use Michael's term. As I mentioned, oh, a
week ago or so, such power to censor content and to evict members
smacks of the same sorts of fascist tactics that made Nazi Germany a
system to be decried. As far as I can tell, that decision was NOT put
to a vote in that "democratic" group--did YOU get to participate in
the decision to kick Rory out, Kassidy? Or did Michael do it all by
himself, and then justify it by trotting out some past grievance he
had (the Simpsons tapes issue)? It still bugs me that a POTA fan
(as Michael presumably is) could ever condone--let alone
PERPETRATE--such dictatorial use of power. And now I find that some
jerk out there is forging e-mails and trying to frame ME for it! I
wish I didn't have to say this, but I gotta: I wouldn't put it past
Michael (or one of his cronies) to do such a thing. If you'll peruse
this site's more recent messages (around #25230 or so), you'll see one
by Michael where he isn't above forging a "flame" message with MY name
on it, followed by a reference to "patriciamichelletitty" or something
like that.
In regards to me referring to you as Lisa, it was NOT
to imply that you had a speech impediment! Sure, I quoted what sounds
like a stuttering bit of dialogue, Lisa's ONLY dialogue in CONQUEST...
but it was a word ("No!") which indicated her sensible objection
towards Caesar's incendiary speech regarding the harsh plans he has
for the Human race's future. The reason that I don't mind the
"tacked-on" ending to CONQUEST is that it is Lisa who "soothes the
savage beast" in Caesar's heart--an ex-slave who justifies the urge to
punish his persecutors... it takes a protest from a fellow ex-slave
whom he loves to get him to back off from his nastiness: "But NOW...
now we will put down our weapons..." So, Kassidy, do you not see
that I was giving you the most glowing of compliments that one POTA
fan could ever give to another (female) POTA fan? In my mind, not even
Zira is as "good" a person as Lisa. Zira, despite seeing the
end-result of Armed Conflict when she saw the rim of the Earth melt,
still harbors an unsettling racial animosity towards gorillas and
orangutans (this, despite having worked side-by-side with a gorilla
named Julius, who wasn't like the militant Ursus); but Lisa, who has a
pained look on her face when she sees the weapons of war being
prepared in Caesar's basement meeting- place, it is SHE who is the
first ape to say "No!", but NOT to a Human--she says it to the Apes'
"savior", Caesar. If not for her intervention, how much more rotten
would be the status of humans in BATTLE, some 27 years later? Caesar's
heart softens towards humans because of his love of Lisa, who probably
couldn't love him if he were to maintain his zealous anti-human
attitude he displayed in his fiery speech. Unlike Alma, who is an
"enabler" of Kolp's pro-war mindset, Lisa goes out of her way to
question Caesar's growing plans for war, pointing out that if the
Humans in the Forbidden City fired upon him it was probably because
they were defending their own territory from armed invaders. Caesar
thinks they are "mad" due to their radiation-caused Mutant "malformed"
condition... and Lisa points out that the "freaks in [his]
foster-father's circus" were "malformed" too--does that make THEM
"mad", too? Now, had I referred to you as "Carsia", THEN I could see
you taking such a comparison as an insult!
Patrick (who was
told in explicit terms that I would NOT be welcome in that "new" group
which extolls Democratic values and dislikes "flames")
Tilton EARTH-TIME 11-30-2002
P.S. Thanks for the Thanksgiving
Day mixed blessing! Damn, I ate way too much. Hope your Turkey Day was
just as good!
Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to the .
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25319 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: 12/1/02: Today in group history |
.html
.html
12/1/98: It was brought up that perhaps
Taylor wasn't bothered that the apes understood English because he
figured they were psychic and could read his thoughts. 'Armando' got on his case
about this notion and MFLulder intervened to "ask that we drop the insults.
Please. Let's not get too upset over this list...Let's have fun and talk about
POTA".
(The more things change, the more they stay
the same)
12/1/00: Alex mentions he's bought a PC
program that allows him to make music videos and POTA music videos are on the
way; John adds his 2 cents that Kristofferson is bad casting and he doesn't like
that the humans will talk.
12/1/01: HELMET DAY: A criticism of the ape
costumes in the new movie leads Rory to offer: "I think the shape of the helmets
in the new movie has something to do with the shape of the pod from the Oberon.
Has anyone else noticed the seashell spiral on Attar's and other gorilla's
helmets? I think this is supposed to have something to do with the spiraling,
circular timelines of the stories, and why it was used with the modified POTA
logo". Whitty: "Freud would have a field day with them.
Talk also shifted to Ursus' helmet and Rory
commented: "I think Ursus' "look" is from something Japanese, although overall
I've always thought that ape culture seen in the original movie was more Chinese
inspired, you know, very conformist and traditional, and the Lawgiver is even a
little like a Confucius figure. This apparently wasn't lost on the designers of
the new movie, either".
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 9:14
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The
Group Lives! Also, "The Hunt for Zero Point" boo...
*** Check out www.cheniere.org for more info on that Tom
Bearden invention of the MEG (Motionless Electromagnetic Generator).
There's lots of info buttressing his theories, including highly technical
papers which describe HOW the MEG does what it does (those who dislike
"higher math", feel free to skip on by). Absolutely stunning! Or, just
type in "Bearden MEG" on a search engine, and you'll probably get to that
website fairly easily.
Patrick
--- In pota@y...,
"patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...> wrote: >
--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote: > > In a message dated 12/1/02
10:01:09 AM Eastern Standard Time, > > patrickmichaeltilton@y...
writes: > > > > > > > After that spinning
mini-Black Hole's "event horizon" undergoes topological deformation (from
a non-rotating "sphere" to an ultra- spinning "oblate spheroid" to a
hyper-spinning "disc"-shaped warpage with a Naked Singularity ringing the
center), that hyperspatial "sweet spot" at the center is bombarded with
fuel shot from a linear accelerator "fuel injector", creating the
nearly- spherical "bubble" around the spaceship, which propagates at
Lightspeed (since it's made of laserlight) divided by a number
representing the Mass of the ship inside the warpfield (the "index of
refraction" effect which causes "lightspeed" for Taylor's ship to be
only about one-sixth that of ordinary lightspeed, making him take 2006
Earth-Time years to travel 320 Lightyears). > > > > >
> > Patrick. . . Now that's one long sentence! > > >
> I wonder if this kind of technology might someday lead to practical
nuclear fusion? I mean create nuclear fusion by encasing a small
amount of matter in a powerful magnetic field that's "spinning in all
directions at once" with the affect that the matter within spins to a
velocity so great that in collapses unto itself. I'm talking about very
small amounts of negatively or positively charged matter here. The
heat energy produced by this could be used to power electric plants and
some of the power even re-channeled to keep the mechanisms of the magnetic
field spinning so that in affect you'd have a perpetual motion machine.
Miniature versions of this fusion machine could be in our cars and heating
our homes. > > > > You know what I mean? > >
> > -- Rory > > *** I know EXACTLY what you mean. In
fact, in the Epilogue of Nick > Cook's book, he mentions that--oh, I'll
just type it in, so you can > read it for yourself! > >
"Since the publication of the U.K. edition of "The Hunt for Zero Point",
one other significant postscript to the story is worth mentioning--in
time, the word "momentous" may even be appropriate. On March 26, 2002, a
U.S. patent was granted for a device called the "Motionless Magnetic
Generator," or MEG, that its supporters say will be the world's first
commercially available free-energy home generator. The MEG has been
developed by a team of inventors led by long-time zero point energy
pioneer and proponent Dr. Thomas E. Bearden, a retired U.S. Army
lieutenant colonel and former engineer. The MEG is designed to provide an
indefinite output of 2.5 kilowatts-- enough to run a room or two in your
house--by tapping into the infinite energy of the quantum sea. Link three
or four MEGs together, proponents claim, and you get enough output to run
an entire house. The event is significant, at least, because the U.S.
Patent Office traditionally shuns so-called "free-energy" devices; de
facto, it has accepted there must be something to this one. As I write
this, scant weeks after the patent's acceptance, it remains to be seen
whether claims for the MEG will indeed transcend into commercially
available hardware. But maybe, just maybe--as I sit here recalling Hal
Puthoff's exhortation--3.26.02 will be the date I put in my diary as
the day the world changed--forever. > > That, Rory, is the
last paragraph of the book "The Hunt for Zero Point". You can bet there's
a shitload of stuff on the Net about this book and the
people/places/things mentioned IN the book. So, I'm gonna surf for a while
and see what I can find. I'll be sure to post the website addresses of
those sites which particularly stun me. > > Patrick >
> P.S. BTW, I think that the "E" in MEG probably stands for
"Electromagnetic", so that MEG would be an acronym for "Motionless
Electromagnetic Generator". Otherwise, the acronym should read "MMG". I
wonder if the U.S. Patent Office has this patent on-line? Hmmm...
something to check out.
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25320 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: The "Other" Group |
|
.html Rory said: Just raided this item from the OTHER group.
-- Rory
And I just brought up Rory's "Home Page" image on the OTHER group.
Like I said, no reason decent topics shouldn't be shared.
I'll just try one last time to explain, then I'll let you guys work
it out for yourselves. I guarantee I will not waste my time on
explanations after this, so if you think the post is too long and
delete it, then you choose to leave this matter unresolved.
Jeff, if T and Rory showed up at your place while Natalie was
visiting and came in, said a "shit" and a "fuck" then started
brawling, I imagine (if this behaviour made Natalie uncomfortable)
then you would be inspired to do something about it (unless of course
I suggested you do someting about it, then you might let it go for a>
while). You would have a lot of alternatives, you could ask them all
to leave, or maybe ask Rory and T to behave themselves because
Natalie is getting upset (not suggested, they will refer to you as a
Nazi), but if your intention was to still keep all as friends, but
not necessarily in the same room, an alternative might be separate
communications.
That was my choice. It really is a no win situation because of
course Rory and T would be dumbfounded that you don't invite them
over when Natalie is around, and offended of course that you would
expect their liberal attitudes to be adapted.
T, replace "Natalie" with "Kim Hunter" and "T" with "Jeff" above.
Rory, I think you know what I'm saying anyway.
Michael <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25321 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Banned in POTAville |
.htmlThe way I see it, both groups (and the hundreds of others that exist)
are resources for people who are interested in POTA.
Like with the Time of the Apes group, their moderator visits other
groups to discuss certain issues and get input, and invites people to
join his group.
Easy.
Michael
--- Haristas@... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/1/02 10:12:01 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
>
>
> > Just out of curiosity, do you have to subscribe (or resubscribe)
in
> > order to read their daily posts? I haven't even TRIED to join up
with
> > those guys, for obvious reasons, and yet I was able to surf the
site
> > and "lurk", just to see what I was "missing" (not much, as I said
> > before).
>
> Yeah, that's what I have been doing until I was briefly banned from
that too.
> But I was trying to get the postings directly E-mailed to me. I'm
sure
> Michael will fix this as I'm not a "danger" anymore. The feud is
over as far
> as I'm concerned. I just want to keep up on the latest POTA news.
>
> For instance, I was looking at, I think, the latest TOYFAIR
magazine
> yesterday, and they had a picture in the back, I think page 98, of
a Playmate
> Star Trek Khan figure (Ricardo Montalban, of course) walking a
chimp Kubrick
> figure on a leash. I thought that was pretty funny. Jeff will
want to go
> find that photo. It was one of the current Toy Mags.
>
> -- Rory
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25322 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: "King of the Mountain" |
.html
.html
Here's a press release for that book I
mentioned yesterday: "'King of the Mountain' presents the startling findings of
Arnold M. Ludwig's 18-year investigation into why people want to rule. The
answer may seem obvious- - power, privilege and perks - - but any adequate
answer also needs to explain why so many rulers cling to power even when they
are miserable, trust nobody, feel besieged, and face almost certain death.
Ludwig's results suggest that leaders of nations tend to act remarkably like
monkeys and apes in the way they come to power, govern and rule".
Frans B.M. de Waal, primatologist and author
of "Chimpanzee Politics", says of the book: "World politics is made by world
leaders. These men (very few are women), who love to present themselves as
having their people's interests at heart, are driven by the same desire for
power recognized by every primatologist as a universal alpha male
characteristic. Based on nearly 2,000 profiles of political leaders, "King of
the Mountain" drives this point home as no other book before".
Alas, it costs $ 32. Maybe a paperback will
come out. I'll check the libraries. Would be an interesting addition to a POTA
collection. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 9:14
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The
Group Lives! Also, "The Hunt for Zero Point" boo...
*** Check out www.cheniere.org for more info on that Tom
Bearden invention of the MEG (Motionless Electromagnetic Generator).
There's lots of info buttressing his theories, including highly technical
papers which describe HOW the MEG does what it does (those who dislike
"higher math", feel free to skip on by). Absolutely stunning! Or, just
type in "Bearden MEG" on a search engine, and you'll probably get to that
website fairly easily.
Patrick
--- In pota@y...,
"patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...> wrote: >
--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote: > > In a message dated 12/1/02
10:01:09 AM Eastern Standard Time, > > patrickmichaeltilton@y...
writes: > > > > > > > After that spinning
mini-Black Hole's "event horizon" undergoes topological deformation (from
a non-rotating "sphere" to an ultra- spinning "oblate spheroid" to a
hyper-spinning "disc"-shaped warpage with a Naked Singularity ringing the
center), that hyperspatial "sweet spot" at the center is bombarded with
fuel shot from a linear accelerator "fuel injector", creating the
nearly- spherical "bubble" around the spaceship, which propagates at
Lightspeed (since it's made of laserlight) divided by a number
representing the Mass of the ship inside the warpfield (the "index of
refraction" effect which causes "lightspeed" for Taylor's ship to be
only about one-sixth that of ordinary lightspeed, making him take 2006
Earth-Time years to travel 320 Lightyears). > > > > >
> > Patrick. . . Now that's one long sentence! > > >
> I wonder if this kind of technology might someday lead to practical
nuclear fusion? I mean create nuclear fusion by encasing a small
amount of matter in a powerful magnetic field that's "spinning in all
directions at once" with the affect that the matter within spins to a
velocity so great that in collapses unto itself. I'm talking about very
small amounts of negatively or positively charged matter here. The
heat energy produced by this could be used to power electric plants and
some of the power even re-channeled to keep the mechanisms of the magnetic
field spinning so that in affect you'd have a perpetual motion machine.
Miniature versions of this fusion machine could be in our cars and heating
our homes. > > > > You know what I mean? > >
> > -- Rory > > *** I know EXACTLY what you mean. In
fact, in the Epilogue of Nick > Cook's book, he mentions that--oh, I'll
just type it in, so you can > read it for yourself! > >
"Since the publication of the U.K. edition of "The Hunt for Zero Point",
one other significant postscript to the story is worth mentioning--in
time, the word "momentous" may even be appropriate. On March 26, 2002, a
U.S. patent was granted for a device called the "Motionless Magnetic
Generator," or MEG, that its supporters say will be the world's first
commercially available free-energy home generator. The MEG has been
developed by a team of inventors led by long-time zero point energy
pioneer and proponent Dr. Thomas E. Bearden, a retired U.S. Army
lieutenant colonel and former engineer. The MEG is designed to provide an
indefinite output of 2.5 kilowatts-- enough to run a room or two in your
house--by tapping into the infinite energy of the quantum sea. Link three
or four MEGs together, proponents claim, and you get enough output to run
an entire house. The event is significant, at least, because the U.S.
Patent Office traditionally shuns so-called "free-energy" devices; de
facto, it has accepted there must be something to this one. As I write
this, scant weeks after the patent's acceptance, it remains to be seen
whether claims for the MEG will indeed transcend into commercially
available hardware. But maybe, just maybe--as I sit here recalling Hal
Puthoff's exhortation--3.26.02 will be the date I put in my diary as
the day the world changed--forever. > > That, Rory, is the
last paragraph of the book "The Hunt for Zero Point". You can bet there's
a shitload of stuff on the Net about this book and the
people/places/things mentioned IN the book. So, I'm gonna surf for a while
and see what I can find. I'll be sure to post the website addresses of
those sites which particularly stun me. > > Patrick >
> P.S. BTW, I think that the "E" in MEG probably stands for
"Electromagnetic", so that MEG would be an acronym for "Motionless
Electromagnetic Generator". Otherwise, the acronym should read "MMG". I
wonder if the U.S. Patent Office has this patent on-line? Hmmm...
something to check out.
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25323 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.html
.html
My point was everyone has there own opinion
of what's on - topic, off-topic, what's interesting, what's offensive; starting
another group was extreme. It's done, but I won't put up with an elitist
attitude (my fault for looking at the archives. As I said, the problem isn't
this group, it's the people in it. Some of those people are now in the other
group. Fine, teacher told them to sit on the other side of the room. I agree, it
got out of hand here. But the "other" side was extreme too, the "off topic"
brigade. As for the scenario you mentioned, Natalie could out-curse anyone. But
I would probably ask them not to do that. I wouldn't run to the phone and say,
"Michael, they're rude!" I'm coming over to your place". No one discussed what
upset them. The great Silent Majority just took it on the lamb without realizing
the freedoms they gave up. But enough is enough. I wish your group well and
we'll make the best of what we have here. T is making dinner, Rory chopped some
nice firewood, Patrick is renting us some DVDs and we're going to have fun! - -
- Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 4:09
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other"
Group
Rory said: Just raided this item from the OTHER
group.
-- Rory
And I just brought up Rory's "Home Page"
image on the OTHER group.
Like I said, no reason decent topics
shouldn't be shared.
I'll just try one last time to explain, then I'll
let you guys work it out for yourselves. I guarantee I will not
waste my time on explanations after this, so if you think the post is too
long and delete it, then you choose to leave this matter
unresolved.
Jeff, if T and Rory showed up at your place while Natalie
was visiting and came in, said a "shit" and a "fuck" then started
brawling, I imagine (if this behaviour made Natalie uncomfortable)
then you would be inspired to do something about it (unless of course
I suggested you do someting about it, then you might let it go for a>
while). You would have a lot of alternatives, you could ask them all
to leave, or maybe ask Rory and T to behave themselves because Natalie
is getting upset (not suggested, they will refer to you as a Nazi), but if
your intention was to still keep all as friends, but not necessarily in
the same room, an alternative might be separate
communications.
That was my choice. It really is a no win
situation because of course Rory and T would be dumbfounded that you don't
invite them over when Natalie is around, and offended of course that you
would expect their liberal attitudes to be adapted.
T, replace
"Natalie" with "Kim Hunter" and "T" with "Jeff" above.
Rory, I think
you know what I'm saying anyway.
Michael
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25324 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Banned in POTAville |
.html.html I'll forward the posts to you if you like .
Well, I just tried to resubscribe to the new group so I could read the daily posts and this got returned to me. So, it seems I'm still banned.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25325 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.htmlThe whole OT thing will be coming up in the new group soon too. Neal
is a Pom (Englishman) living in Australia and he posted about the
cricket. I had to scratch my head and wonder...."Is this OT?" (and
also "If it is, what's the harm?"). It is marginal, as a recent
topic was "What sports do/should/could the Apes play?", but as with
everything it will go to the group and I'll either go with what they
decide as a majority or I'll leave!
Elitist attitude? Not intended, but apologies if it happened un-
noticed. Teacher didn't tell anyone anything. The group told
teacher and teacher did his best to avoid a riot and keep the class
together (albeit in different classrooms).
I tried to discuss what was upsetting people and I was stonewalled,
ridiculed then baited by you and Rory. So knowing there was no
foreseeable settlement within the group, I invited members to join
another group and they did. Do you realise the assumptions you are
making about these people when you continue to paint them as sheep
who follow my orders? It is not really me you are offending, but
their intelligence.
Well, I have some Aussie beer too (careful, it packs a punch).
I am actually serious. We had an OT conversation about Aussie beer
recently and that inspired me to get a case of beer for my overseas
friends. I believe this is also a custom shared throughout the
world....let off some steam, than sit down and have a beer together
and get over it.
I already have Rory's address, but anyone else who is interested in
joining me in a beer this Xmas, send me your address in a private
email.
Patrick, Rory will be getting your beer so work it out with him if
you want it.
Now what is Jo going to provide? I know...COLLEGE GIRLS (and boys?).
All the best, and may we all learn from each other's mistakes.
Michael
--- < veetus@...> wrote:
> My point was everyone has there own opinion of what's on - topic,
off-top
> ic, what's interesting, what's offensive; starting another group
was extrem
> e. It's done, but I won't put up with an elitist attitude (my fault
for loo
> king at the archives. As I said, the problem isn't this group, it's
the peo
> ple in it. Some of those people are now in the other group. Fine,
teacher t
> old them to sit on the other side of the room. I agree, it got out
of hand
> here. But the "other" side was extreme too, the "off topic"
brigade. As for
> the scenario you mentioned, Natalie could out-curse anyone. But I
would pr
> obably ask them not to do that. I wouldn't run to the phone and
say, "Micha
> el, they're rude!" I'm coming over to your place". No one discussed
what up
> set them. The great Silent Majority just took it on the lamb
without realiz
> ing the freedoms they gave up. But enough is enough. I wish your
group well
> and we'll make the best of what we have here. T is making dinner,
Rory cho
> pped some nice firewood, Patrick is renting us some DVDs and we're
going to
> have fun! - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: whitty@...
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 4:09 PM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group
>
>
> Rory said: Just raided this item from the OTHER group.
>
> -- Rory
>
>
> And I just brought up Rory's "Home Page" image on the OTHER group.
>
> Like I said, no reason decent topics shouldn't be shared.
>
> I'll just try one last time to explain, then I'll let you guys
work
> it out for yourselves. I guarantee I will not waste my time on
> explanations after this, so if you think the post is too long and
> delete it, then you choose to leave this matter unresolved.
>
> Jeff, if T and Rory showed up at your place while Natalie was
> visiting and came in, said a "shit" and a "fuck" then started
> brawling, I imagine (if this behaviour made Natalie
uncomfortable)
> then you would be inspired to do something about it (unless of
course
> I suggested you do someting about it, then you might let it go
for a>
> while). You would have a lot of alternatives, you could ask them
all
> to leave, or maybe ask Rory and T to behave themselves because
> Natalie is getting upset (not suggested, they will refer to you
as a
> Nazi), but if your intention was to still keep all as friends,
but
> not necessarily in the same room, an alternative might be
separate
> communications.
>
> That was my choice. It really is a no win situation because of
> course Rory and T would be dumbfounded that you don't invite them
> over when Natalie is around, and offended of course that you
would
> expect their liberal attitudes to be adapted.
>
> T, replace "Natalie" with "Kim Hunter" and "T" with "Jeff" above.
>
> Rory, I think you know what I'm saying anyway.
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25326 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The new "SOLARIS" (OT) |
|
.html .htmlWhat fascinated me was the look and how much it was like a '60's film, kind of understated, even the sound. It makes you realize how bombarded we are in sci-fi movies today.
Yeah, after Star Wars and Star Trek, actually going into space may be a bit of a let down.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25327 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Banned in POTAville |
.htmlThat's OK T, Rory will find he can rejoin the new group now.
Michael
--- LordTZer0@... wrote:
> I'll forward the posts to you if you like .
>
> > Well, I just tried to resubscribe to the new group so I could
read the daily
> > posts and this got returned to me. So, it seems I'm still banned.
> >
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25328 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Lives |
.htmlOh, not a lot.
Yourself?
Michael
--- CheeseGOTAS@... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/1/02 4:00:51 AM Central Standard Time,
> whitty@... writes:
>
> << Hey, Joe.
> >>
>
> Heh, sup?
>
> -Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25329 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 11/29/02: Today in Group History |
|
.html .htmlT
Just out of curiosity, did you say "shit" and "fuck" in the presence of Kim Hunter?
if so, how did she react?
No, but she has said "shit" in my presence a couple of times. And the word "fuck" does appear in her book. I believe the exact quote was, "et fucking cetera!", after f---ing around it several times in an anecdote about Kazan trying to rattle her teacup when she was nervous about starting the play. Most amusing. As was the time I got her to tell the fake dog shit story to the Streetcar crowd. It got a huge laugh. The first time I heard her say 'shit' was when we were chatting on the phone and she spilled her drink. I found it very endearing. But to answer your question, no, I don't think that is would have either of those particular effects coming from me. It's not that I dont have an enormous vocabulary of explitives that would make a sailor blush -- I do. Cursing isn't second nature to
me -- it's first. I just find that profanity is usually much more amusing and endearing when coming from older women and younger children. Don't you agree?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25330 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.html
.html
Thanks, Michael. That was a good e-mail. I
didn't say people were sheep, I'm saying there was no discussion.I
remember one night when when it was really being slung I think the group
decided to agree to disagree and to calm down on the flame wars. It seemed the
group was in agreement (at least the ones who post), then the next thing some of
us knew, there were 2 groups. No discussion. And then the attitude by some that
they left behind the troublemakers; I guess I took it personally. I apologize
too. "I guess you can chalk it up to the fact that I'm only human". - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 5:41
PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The
"Other" Group
The whole OT thing will be coming up in the new group soon
too. Neal is a Pom (Englishman) living in Australia and he posted
about the cricket. I had to scratch my head and wonder...."Is this
OT?" (and also "If it is, what's the harm?"). It is marginal, as a
recent topic was "What sports do/should/could the Apes play?", but as with
everything it will go to the group and I'll either go with what they
decide as a majority or I'll leave!
Elitist attitude? Not
intended, but apologies if it happened un- noticed. Teacher didn't
tell anyone anything. The group told teacher and teacher did his
best to avoid a riot and keep the class together (albeit in different
classrooms).
I tried to discuss what was upsetting people and I was
stonewalled, ridiculed then baited by you and Rory. So knowing there
was no foreseeable settlement within the group, I invited members to join
another group and they did. Do you realise the assumptions you are
making about these people when you continue to paint them as sheep who
follow my orders? It is not really me you are offending, but their
intelligence.
Well, I have some Aussie beer too (careful, it packs a
punch).
I am actually serious. We had an OT conversation about
Aussie beer recently and that inspired me to get a case of beer for my
overseas friends. I believe this is also a custom shared throughout
the world....let off some steam, than sit down and have a beer together
and get over it.
I already have Rory's address, but anyone else who
is interested in joining me in a beer this Xmas, send me your address in a
private email.
Patrick, Rory will be getting your beer so work it
out with him if you want it.
Now what is Jo going to provide?
I know...COLLEGE GIRLS (and boys?).
All the best, and may we all learn
from each other's mistakes.
Michael
---
<veetus@...> wrote: > My point was everyone
has there own opinion of what's on - topic, off-top > ic, what's
interesting, what's offensive; starting another group was extrem >
e. It's done, but I won't put up with an elitist attitude (my fault for
loo > king at the archives. As I said, the problem isn't this group,
it's the peo > ple in it. Some of those people are now in the other
group. Fine, teacher t > old them to sit on the other side of the
room. I agree, it got out of hand > here. But the "other" side was
extreme too, the "off topic" brigade. As for > the scenario
you mentioned, Natalie could out-curse anyone. But I would pr >
obably ask them not to do that. I wouldn't run to the phone and say,
"Micha > el, they're rude!" I'm coming over to your place". No one
discussed what up > set them. The great Silent Majority just took it
on the lamb without realiz > ing the freedoms they gave up. But
enough is enough. I wish your group well > and we'll make the
best of what we have here. T is making dinner, Rory cho > pped some
nice firewood, Patrick is renting us some DVDs and we're going
to > have fun! - - - Jeff > > >
----- Original Message ----- > From: whitty@...
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com > Sent:
Sunday, December 01, 2002 4:09 PM > Subject: [Planet of the
Apes] The "Other" Group > > > Rory said:
Just raided this item from the OTHER group. > > --
Rory > > > And I just brought up Rory's "Home
Page" image on the OTHER group. > > Like I said, no
reason decent topics shouldn't be shared. > > I'll
just try one last time to explain, then I'll let you guys work
> it out for yourselves. I guarantee I will not waste
my time on > explanations after this, so if you think the
post is too long and > delete it, then you choose to leave
this matter unresolved. > > Jeff, if T and Rory
showed up at your place while Natalie was > visiting and
came in, said a "shit" and a "fuck" then started >
brawling, I imagine (if this behaviour made Natalie uncomfortable)
> then you would be inspired to do something about it
(unless of course > I suggested you do someting about
it, then you might let it go for a> > while).
You would have a lot of alternatives, you could ask them all
> to leave, or maybe ask Rory and T to behave themselves
because > Natalie is getting upset (not suggested, they
will refer to you as a > Nazi), but if your intention
was to still keep all as friends, but > not necessarily
in the same room, an alternative might be separate >
communications. > > That was my choice. It
really is a no win situation because of > course Rory and T
would be dumbfounded that you don't invite them > over when
Natalie is around, and offended of course that you would
> expect their liberal attitudes to be adapted. >
> T, replace "Natalie" with "Kim Hunter" and "T" with
"Jeff" above. > > Rory, I think you know what I'm
saying anyway. > > Michael > > >
>
>
>
>
> >
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service. >
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25331 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
.html .htmlOT OT OT OT OT TOT OT TO TOTOTOTOTOTOTO
Seems to me, Michael, the only reason you remain in both groups it to keep some place to take your OT comments, most of which seem to be about being OT. O WTF!<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25332 |
From: mike_oz2002 |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.htmlO, T, I would say you are missing the point then.
Michael
--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> OT OT OT OT OT TOT OT TO TOTOTOTOTOTOTO
> Seems to me, Michael, the only reason you remain in both groups it
to keep
> some place to take your OT comments, most of which seem to be about
being OT.
> O WTF! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25333 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.html.html In a message dated 12/1/2002 8:12:57 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
I would say you are missing the point
Perhaps you were wearing a hat.
I tried to let it slide. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25334 |
From: mike_oz2002 |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.htmlAnd thank you Jeff.
I think a lot of the trouble stems from the electronic domain...we
can't see each other's faces and hear the tone in each other's
voices, so things that are quite harmless can appear otherwise.
I thought I tried to discuss this and the message I got from you and
Rory was "see you later" (or did I misread the photo of Zira and
Cornelius waving goodbye and your subsequent response to that?). To
me this meant "end of discussion, if you don't like it, then go
away". Then (seemingly to intimidate and humiliate me
further...please correct me if I am wrong) you started chatting about
Eminem's new movie. Well, I tried to play along and quoted some of
his lyrics to "throw a counter-punch" ("you opened this can of worms,
how do they taste?"). That is why I thought time to talk had passed
and I hope you can understand in context.
The intention was to get the new group going and then let everybody
know about it, including Patrick (with whom I thought I was getting
on rather well in private, so well indeed that I spent half a day
scanning blueprints for him). The way I approached people was to ask
them individually if there was a reason they had stopped their
involvement and could they tell me the reasons. Now I can't control
their answers and there were MANY different reasons. The consistent,
recurring reason was all the OT stuff - it was out of control (and
you have to wonder about prosprctive members here...they read a few
posts and all they see is OT stuff they will not stay around if their
intention is to talk POTA). Other reasons were identified and I
thought the best approach would be to get the group going, ESTABLISH
some ground rules so everybody knows where they stand, then invite
EVERYBODY to join.
The outcome was a little bit like a wedding where people don't all
get on and because of that the married couple have to exclude some of
their best friends...it happens! And when those friends find out
they are not invited...they get upset (no matter how good the reason
is).
You're not a troublemaker Jeff. You are a nice guy, from what I can
tell. But the OT issue had to be solved so I could turn around and
say "hey Jeff, there is another POTA group that contains people who
are very anti OT and we would love to have you on board, or include
you in some way, because not only are you a nice guy, but you have a
very important inside POTA connection". Do you understand? But
there is still no concensus on the new group - there has been no vote
(and as new mwmbers join and vote things will change). The new group
may vote to wipe out voting (can you do that?)! Who knows?
I wish I could have done it another way, and I wish I had never been
placed in a situation where I had to make a decision about Rory, but
I was and I did.
I am human too Jeff, we all are and we all make errors. People judge
us (and we judge, more importantly, ourselves) on how we learn from
our mistakes and how we put things back together that we have
(hopefully not completely) destroyed.
I hope we can all get something positive out of this and stop
slagging off at each other. This town is definitely big enough for
the both of us plus more!
Michael
PS I tried to check my spelling, but the post was to long and I
deleted it!
--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> Thanks, Michael. That was a good e-mail. I didn't say people were
sheep, I'm saying there was no discussion.I remember one night when
when it was really being slung I think the group decided to agree to
disagree and to calm down on the flame wars. It seemed the group was
in agreement (at least the ones who post), then the next thing some
of us knew, there were 2 groups. No discussion. And then the attitude
by some that they left behind the troublemakers; I guess I took it
personally. I apologize too. "I guess you can chalk it up to the fact
that I'm only human". - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: whitty@c...
> To: pota@y...
> Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 5:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group
>
>
> The whole OT thing will be coming up in the new group soon too.
Neal
> is a Pom (Englishman) living in Australia and he posted about the
> cricket. I had to scratch my head and wonder...."Is this OT?"
(and
> also "If it is, what's the harm?"). It is marginal, as a recent
> topic was "What sports do/should/could the Apes play?", but as
with
> everything it will go to the group and I'll either go with what
they
> decide as a majority or I'll leave!
>
> Elitist attitude? Not intended, but apologies if it happened un-
> noticed. Teacher didn't tell anyone anything. The group told
> teacher and teacher did his best to avoid a riot and keep the
class
> together (albeit in different classrooms).
>
> I tried to discuss what was upsetting people and I was
stonewalled,
> ridiculed then baited by you and Rory. So knowing there was no
> foreseeable settlement within the group, I invited members to
join
> another group and they did. Do you realise the assumptions you
are
> making about these people when you continue to paint them as
sheep
> who follow my orders? It is not really me you are offending, but
> their intelligence.
>
> Well, I have some Aussie beer too (careful, it packs a punch).
>
> I am actually serious. We had an OT conversation about Aussie
beer
> recently and that inspired me to get a case of beer for my
overseas
> friends. I believe this is also a custom shared throughout the
> world....let off some steam, than sit down and have a beer
together
> and get over it.
>
> I already have Rory's address, but anyone else who is interested
in
> joining me in a beer this Xmas, send me your address in a private
> email.
>
> Patrick, Rory will be getting your beer so work it out with him
if
> you want it.
>
> Now what is Jo going to provide? I know...COLLEGE GIRLS (and
boys?).
>
> All the best, and may we all learn from each other's mistakes.
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> --- <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > My point was everyone has there own opinion of what's on -
topic,
> off-top
> > ic, what's interesting, what's offensive; starting another
group
> was extrem
> > e. It's done, but I won't put up with an elitist attitude (my
fault
> for loo
> > king at the archives. As I said, the problem isn't this group,
it's
> the peo
> > ple in it. Some of those people are now in the other group.
Fine,
> teacher t
> > old them to sit on the other side of the room. I agree, it got
out
> of hand
> > here. But the "other" side was extreme too, the "off topic"
> brigade. As for
> > the scenario you mentioned, Natalie could out-curse anyone.
But I
> would pr
> > obably ask them not to do that. I wouldn't run to the phone and
> say, "Micha
> > el, they're rude!" I'm coming over to your place". No one
discussed
> what up
> > set them. The great Silent Majority just took it on the lamb
> without realiz
> > ing the freedoms they gave up. But enough is enough. I wish
your
> group well
> > and we'll make the best of what we have here. T is making
dinner,
> Rory cho
> > pped some nice firewood, Patrick is renting us some DVDs and
we're
> going to
> > have fun! - - - Jeff
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: whitty@c...
> > To: pota@y...
> > Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 4:09 PM
> > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group
> >
> >
> > Rory said: Just raided this item from the OTHER group.
> >
> > -- Rory
> >
> >
> > And I just brought up Rory's "Home Page" image on the OTHER
group.
> >
> > Like I said, no reason decent topics shouldn't be shared.
> >
> > I'll just try one last time to explain, then I'll let you
guys
> work
> > it out for yourselves. I guarantee I will not waste my time
on
> > explanations after this, so if you think the post is too long
and
> > delete it, then you choose to leave this matter unresolved.
> >
> > Jeff, if T and Rory showed up at your place while Natalie was
> > visiting and came in, said a "shit" and a "fuck" then
started
> > brawling, I imagine (if this behaviour made Natalie
> uncomfortable)
> > then you would be inspired to do something about it (unless
of
> course
> > I suggested you do someting about it, then you might let it
go
> for a>
> > while). You would have a lot of alternatives, you could ask
them
> all
> > to leave, or maybe ask Rory and T to behave themselves
because
> > Natalie is getting upset (not suggested, they will refer to
you
> as a
> > Nazi), but if your intention was to still keep all as
friends,
> but
> > not necessarily in the same room, an alternative might be
> separate
> > communications.
> >
> > That was my choice. It really is a no win situation because
of
> > course Rory and T would be dumbfounded that you don't invite
them
> > over when Natalie is around, and offended of course that you
> would
> > expect their liberal attitudes to be adapted.
> >
> > T, replace "Natalie" with "Kim Hunter" and "T" with "Jeff"
above.
> >
> > Rory, I think you know what I'm saying anyway.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25335 |
From: mike_oz2002 |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.htmlO, PO.
--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/1/2002 8:12:57 PM Central Standard Time,
> whitty@c... writes:
>
> > I would say you are missing the point
>
> Perhaps you were wearing a hat.
>
> I tried to let it slide. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25336 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Lives OT |
.htmlIn a message dated 12/1/02 6:50:05 PM Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
<< Oh, not a lot.
Yourself?
Michael >>
Well, I'n having a tough time with chemistery in school, but other than that,
not a lot is going on.
-Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25337 |
From: mike_oz2002 |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Group Lives OT |
.htmlChemistry is certainly not my field.
How important is it that you succeed in chemistry?
Michael
--- In pota@y..., CheeseGOTAS@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/1/02 6:50:05 PM Central Standard Time,
> whitty@c... writes:
>
> << Oh, not a lot.
>
> Yourself?
>
> Michael >>
>
> Well, I'n having a tough time with chemistery in school, but other
than that,
> not a lot is going on.
>
> -Joe <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25338 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "King of the Mountain" |
.html.html In a message dated 12/1/02 6:46:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Alas, it costs $ 32. Maybe a paperback will come out. I'll check the libraries. Would be an interesting addition to a POTA collection. - - - Jeff
Well, there you go then: WE are the planet of the apes.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25339 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: email forger update #2 |
.htmlPOTA 2001 is the best POTA movie ever. The timeline in the original movies
is circular. Patrick's ideas are brilliant by the way.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Catch me if you....er, just kidding. This is
the real Tom.
> Yes, I did do it. I finally pushed James over the edge and turned him int=
> o a psychotic e-mail hacker/forger. Naw, I never believed he did it. By the=
> way, where is the darling forger these days? You can't invade my e-mails a=
> nymore, you creep! HAHAHA! VIOLATE ME IF YOU CAN. - - - Jeff
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25340 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Banned in POTAville |
.html.html In a message dated 12/1/02 7:37:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
I'll forward the posts to you if you like .
No, but thanks anyway.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25341 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: email forger update #2 |
.htmlWell at least we can have a laugh about it now....seems safe out
there...but boy that was weird.
Michael
--- In pota@y..., Melkor <melkor@e...> wrote:
>
> POTA 2001 is the best POTA movie ever. The timeline in the
original movies
> is circular. Patrick's ideas are brilliant by the way.
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Catch me if you....er, just kidding. This
is
> the real Tom.
>
>
> > Yes, I did do it. I finally pushed James over the edge and
turned him int=
> > o a psychotic e-mail hacker/forger. Naw, I never believed he did
it. By the=
> > way, where is the darling forger these days? You can't invade my
e-mails a=
> > nymore, you creep! HAHAHA! VIOLATE ME IF YOU CAN. - - - Jeff
> >
> > <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25342 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.html.html In a message dated 12/1/02 9:31:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
I thought I tried to discuss this and the message I got from you and
Rory was "see you later" (or did I misread the photo of Zira and
Cornelius waving goodbye and your subsequent response to that?).
You see there? Now I meant for everyone to get a kick out of posting that picture of the apes waving "bye bye" and Jeff got it and thought it was funny as I meant it to be, but I guess others weren't in the mood to find it funny.
Humor can be a dangerous thing.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25343 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Conquest & Battle |
.html>
> > "But NOW... now we will put down our weapons..."
> >
> That is the great cop-out line of the series. Damn but they should replace
> all versions of CONQUEST with the director's cut!
>
Then it would mess up the continuity with BATTLE because there wouldn't be
any reason for humans to be living with the apes. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25344 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.html.html In a message dated 12/1/2002 8:36:10 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
O, PO.
Now that was a good one!
I see you're getting into the spirit of things. :) <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25345 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: OT nicknames |
.html> In a message dated 11/30/02 11:53:41 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> veetus@... writes:
>
>
> > If the group is dead, it's because of lack of participation. I did my
> > share. - - - Jeff
> >
> >
> >
>
> Damn right you have, O High and Grand Potentate of POTADOM!
>
> -- Rory
>
Thanks to Rory we have the following nicknames.
Jeff the High Potentate
Michael the POTA Nazi
James the Email Terrorist
Maybe Rory needs a nickname next? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25346 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
|
.html .html
It's strange but my best posts never seem to illicit any response whatsoever. Whereas I get deluged by an off-the-cuff remark that's just a couple of lines.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25347 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Marvel PLANET adaptation |
.html>
> 12/1/98: It was brought up that perhaps Taylor wasn't bothered that the a=
> pes understood English because he figured they were psychic and could read =
In the Marvel adaptation which was based on the shooting script when Taylor
claims to be from another planet Zaius asks "Then how come we both speak the
same language?". Good point! I imagine they took that out because it would
help to lesson the shock of the ending. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25348 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
.html.html In a message dated 12/1/02 10:46:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, melkor@... writes:
"But NOW... now we will put down our weapons..."
> >
> That is the great cop-out line of the series. Damn but they should replace
> all versions of CONQUEST with the director's cut!
>
Then it would mess up the continuity with BATTLE because there wouldn't be
any reason for humans to be living with the apes.
Well, they can burn every copy of BATTLE as far as I'm concerned.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25349 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT nicknames |
.html.html In a message dated 12/1/02 10:50:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, melkor@... writes:
Thanks to Rory we have the following nicknames.
Jeff the High Potentate
Michael the POTA Nazi
James the Email Terrorist
Maybe Rory needs a nickname next?
Did I call James the e-mail terrorist? Can't remember that one.
You can nickname me The Roarster!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25350 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] OT nicknames |
.htmlHmmm....the Roarster? Too sweet.
Michael
--- In pota@y..., Haristas@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/1/02 10:50:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> melkor@e... writes:
>
>
> > Thanks to Rory we have the following nicknames.
> >
> > Jeff the High Potentate
> > Michael the POTA Nazi
> > James the Email Terrorist
> >
> > Maybe Rory needs a nickname next?
> >
> >
> Did I call James the e-mail terrorist? Can't remember that one.
>
> You can nickname me The Roarster! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25351 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: God dialogue in the POTA universe |
.html> >
> > Alone among God's primates, he hunts for sport, or lust, or greed.
> PLANET; Cornelius, quoting from 29:6 of the Sacred Scrolls.
> >
> > And then God in his wrath sent the world a saviour...
> BATTLE; The Lawgiver (2670) to his congregation.
> >
> > For god's sake, wait for the Governor's signal.
> BATTLE; Mendez to Alma.
> >
> > My god it's a city of Apes!
> BENEATH; Brent to himself (or Nova).
> >
> > Am I obeying God's will or opposing it?
> ESCAPE; Hasslein to the President.
> >
> > If we knew for certain there is a god and we are going to heaven we
> would all commit suicide in order to enjoy it.
> BATTLE; Mandemus to Caesar, Virgil, & MacDonald.
>
Can anyone think of more POTA dialogue mentioning God? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25352 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
.html This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit from reading
it.
I got in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading Cards and he is
very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading Card series.
On the "potaDG" group, we have started with discussion of Autographs
and that is a very good place to start (because we don't want any
more key players deceasing on us before they sign!).
If you are interested, please read the summary and make any comments
within the next 24 hours or so and I will then forward
reccomendations on.
Also (again, if you are interested), start thinking more generally
about other issues of the Trading Cards set and we will approach them
next.
Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards set, as I
have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a under-rated,
overlooked franchise because the quality of the product is so
frequently compromised (does anyone DISAGREE with this?).
The owner of Rittenhouse can also help us by asking Fox about deleted
scenes and almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him seriously
because he has paid good money for the license for a card set
involving the 5 movies (and they will give him "deleted scene" photos
and information - hey, maybe this is being released with the 5 star
of Planet!?!).
Both groups (and, hopefully, people like Natalie, Bill Blake and Eric
Greene etc who Jeff can approach) could input enough to assure these
cards are an overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox that, if
approached correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a potent
franchise. Please try to get involved, even if you are not
interested.
Here's the list:
Summary:
Actor
Charlton Heston
Lou Wagner
Norman Burton
Buck Kartalian
James Whitmore
Wright King
Linda Harrison
David Watson
Don Pedro Colley
Eldon Burke
Ricardo Montalban
Natalie Trundy
Bradford Dillman
Eric Braeden
Don Murray
Paul Williams
Bobby Porter
Austin Stoker
France Nuyen
Mort Abrahams
Dan Striepeke
Jerry Goldsmith
Tom Scott (Conquest Composer)
Leonard Rosenman
Bill Creber
Mort Abrahams
Frank Capra Jr.
I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda Harrison;
#1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't been done before, is also in TV
show and
in escape),
#2 Buck Kartalian
#1 Chimp is David Watson, #2 Bobby Porter;
#1 Chimp Female is Natalie as Lisa;
#1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James Whitmore;
#1 Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don Pedro Colley
#1 Battle Mutant is France Nuyen
Now how to balance an equal selection from each movie? Maybe it needs
to be an 18 card autograph set!
Behind the scenes, I think Dan Striepeke, Jerry Goldsmith, Leonard
Rosenman, and Bill Creber are all valuable.....any more behind the
scenes people
around?
"TV SERIES" Regulars and Guests:
Ron Harper (Alan Virdon)
James Naughton (Pete Burke)
Booth Colman (Councillor Zaius)
Percy Rodrigues (Aboro)
David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran)
Beverly Garland (Wanda)
Pat Renella (Jason and Zon)
Norm Alden (Zako)
Martin Brooks (Dr. Leander and Commander Konag)
Ron Stein (Gorilla extra and stuntman)
Eldon Burke (Gorilla extra)
Lalo Schifrin - music for TV Series
Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for Return
Dave Rodgers - Roddy's stunt double
Cartoon Return to the Planet of the Apes:
Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later episodes)
Henry Corden - Urko
Philippa Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked since Return
Claudette Nevins - Judy Franklin/Nova
Austin Stoker - Jeff Carter
Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes)
I'm still not sure if TV show actors/Return voices are going to be
included.
It would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla, Chimp,
Chimp Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and Battle Mutant). <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25353 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
.html>
> In a message dated 12/1/02 10:46:10 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> melkor@... writes:
>
>
> > "But NOW... now we will put down our weapons..."
> > > >
> > > That is the great cop-out line of the series. Damn but they should
> > replace
> > > all versions of CONQUEST with the director's cut!
> > >
> >
> > Then it would mess up the continuity with BATTLE because there wouldn't be
> > any reason for humans to be living with the apes.
> >
> >
> Well, they can burn every copy of BATTLE as far as I'm concerned.
>
> -- Rory
Do DVD's burn? You go first and let us know how well it goes. Naturally
you'll want to toss in the TV show, the cartoons, and the other sequels into
the bonfire since the first movie is the only good one.
-Tom <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25354 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
.htmlHey Tom, lay off Rory OK... :)
Michael
--- In pota@y..., Melkor <melkor@e...> wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 12/1/02 10:46:10 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > melkor@e... writes:
> >
> >
> > > "But NOW... now we will put down our weapons..."
> > > > >
> > > > That is the great cop-out line of the series. Damn but they
should
> > > replace
> > > > all versions of CONQUEST with the director's cut!
> > > >
> > >
> > > Then it would mess up the continuity with BATTLE because there
wouldn't be
> > > any reason for humans to be living with the apes.
> > >
> > >
> > Well, they can burn every copy of BATTLE as far as I'm concerned.
> >
> > -- Rory
>
> Do DVD's burn? You go first and let us know how well it goes.
Naturally
> you'll want to toss in the TV show, the cartoons, and the other
sequels into
> the bonfire since the first movie is the only good one.
>
> -Tom <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25355 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] '98 Starcon Panel, pt. 3 |
.html>
> JEFF COREY: Well, every country in the world has gone through these cycle=
> s...there were times of enlightenment and following the ( ) the Puritans t=
> ook over and closed the theatre. So the Hollywood blacklist was something t=
And after the Puritans banned all of Shakespeare's plays for being too lewd,
they came to the US, had a Thanksgiving feast with the Indians, shipped them
all to reservations, and took over the Republican Party.
Very topical Thanksgiving post Jeff. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25356 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
.html
.html
"And how in God's name are we to know that
unless we communicate. We can speak, so I spoke". - - Zira,
"Escape"
Zira uses "God" a lot.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:12
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] God
dialogue in the POTA universe
> > > > Alone among God's primates, he
hunts for sport, or lust, or greed. > PLANET; Cornelius, quoting from
29:6 of the Sacred Scrolls. > > > > And then God in his
wrath sent the world a saviour... > BATTLE; The Lawgiver (2670) to his
congregation. > > > > For god's sake, wait for the
Governor's signal. > BATTLE; Mendez to Alma. > > > >
My god it's a city of Apes! > BENEATH; Brent to himself (or Nova).
> > > > Am I obeying God's will or opposing it? >
ESCAPE; Hasslein to the President. > > > > If we knew for
certain there is a god and we are going to heaven we > would all commit
suicide in order to enjoy it. > BATTLE; Mandemus to Caesar, Virgil,
& MacDonald. >
Can anyone think of more POTA dialogue
mentioning God?
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25357 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/1/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html
.html
I care about trading cards, I was just being
snotty. Did the owner say why he was interested (many consider POTA dead and
buried after the remake). How did the "Archive" set do? - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:32
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Trading
Cards - Important Announcement
This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit from
reading it.
I got in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading
Cards and he is very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading
Card series.
On the "potaDG" group, we have started with discussion of
Autographs and that is a very good place to start (because we don't want
any more key players deceasing on us before they sign!).
If you are
interested, please read the summary and make any comments within the next
24 hours or so and I will then forward reccomendations on.
Also
(again, if you are interested), start thinking more generally about other
issues of the Trading Cards set and we will approach them
next.
Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards
set, as I have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a
under-rated, overlooked franchise because the quality of the product is so
frequently compromised (does anyone DISAGREE with this?).
The owner
of Rittenhouse can also help us by asking Fox about deleted scenes and
almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him seriously because he has
paid good money for the license for a card set involving the 5 movies (and
they will give him "deleted scene" photos and information - hey, maybe
this is being released with the 5 star of Planet!?!).
Both groups
(and, hopefully, people like Natalie, Bill Blake and Eric Greene etc who
Jeff can approach) could input enough to assure these cards are an
overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox that, if approached
correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a potent franchise. Please
try to get involved, even if you are not interested.
Here's the
list:
Summary:
Actor Charlton Heston Lou Wagner Norman
Burton Buck Kartalian James Whitmore Wright King Linda
Harrison David Watson Don Pedro Colley Eldon Burke Ricardo
Montalban Natalie Trundy Bradford Dillman Eric Braeden Don
Murray Paul Williams Bobby Porter Austin Stoker France
Nuyen Mort Abrahams Dan Striepeke Jerry Goldsmith Tom Scott
(Conquest Composer) Leonard Rosenman Bill Creber Mort
Abrahams Frank Capra Jr.
I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda
Harrison;
#1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't been done before, is also
in TV show and in escape), #2 Buck Kartalian
#1 Chimp is
David Watson, #2 Bobby Porter;
#1 Chimp Female is Natalie as
Lisa;
#1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James Whitmore;
#1
Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don Pedro Colley
#1 Battle Mutant is
France Nuyen
Now how to balance an equal selection from each movie?
Maybe it needs to be an 18 card autograph set!
Behind the scenes, I
think Dan Striepeke, Jerry Goldsmith, Leonard Rosenman, and Bill Creber
are all valuable.....any more behind the scenes
people around?
"TV SERIES" Regulars and Guests:
Ron Harper
(Alan Virdon) James Naughton (Pete Burke) Booth Colman (Councillor
Zaius) Percy Rodrigues (Aboro) David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran) Beverly
Garland (Wanda) Pat Renella (Jason and Zon) Norm Alden (Zako) Martin
Brooks (Dr. Leander and Commander Konag) Ron Stein (Gorilla extra and
stuntman) Eldon Burke (Gorilla extra) Lalo Schifrin - music for TV
Series Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for Return Dave Rodgers -
Roddy's stunt double
Cartoon Return to the Planet of the
Apes:
Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later episodes) Henry Corden
- Urko Philippa Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked since
Return Claudette Nevins - Judy Franklin/Nova Austin Stoker - Jeff
Carter Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes)
I'm still not
sure if TV show actors/Return voices are going to be included.
It
would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla, Chimp, Chimp
Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and Battle
Mutant).
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25358 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html
.html
These are for autographs? Linda Harrison,
Natalie, Buck, Don Pedro (and who else?) did the "Archives" autographs. I don't
know if they'd want to repeat them. Tell the owner if he wants Natalie I can get
him in touch with her. She's hard to find right now. Linda and Heston
autographed the new movie set. (Linda's autograph is getting very common).
Heston is always a draw. Montalban would be too. There's usually only 5 or 6
autograph cards in a set. Is he even interested in the TV show? I think Buck as
Julius is the most recognizable gorilla (Ursus and Urko, Aldo are all dead). I
don't think they want cameos like Norman Burton. Bobby Porter would be good. The
"family" portrait is recognizable. If they want a makeup guy, Dan Streipeke. Or
Ken Chase, who did Evans' Zauis (a Chase card! AH HA HA!). Booth Colman is
popular at shows. Paul Williams, a good orang. Jerry Goldsmith, everyone knows
him. As far as I know, the people you mentioned are all living. You might
mention people know the TV show now because of the DVDs. Naughton would be
popular but probably wouldn't do it. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:32
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Trading
Cards - Important Announcement
This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit from
reading it.
I got in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading
Cards and he is very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading
Card series.
On the "potaDG" group, we have started with discussion of
Autographs and that is a very good place to start (because we don't want
any more key players deceasing on us before they sign!).
If you are
interested, please read the summary and make any comments within the next
24 hours or so and I will then forward reccomendations on.
Also
(again, if you are interested), start thinking more generally about other
issues of the Trading Cards set and we will approach them
next.
Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards
set, as I have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a
under-rated, overlooked franchise because the quality of the product is so
frequently compromised (does anyone DISAGREE with this?).
The owner
of Rittenhouse can also help us by asking Fox about deleted scenes and
almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him seriously because he has
paid good money for the license for a card set involving the 5 movies (and
they will give him "deleted scene" photos and information - hey, maybe
this is being released with the 5 star of Planet!?!).
Both groups
(and, hopefully, people like Natalie, Bill Blake and Eric Greene etc who
Jeff can approach) could input enough to assure these cards are an
overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox that, if approached
correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a potent franchise. Please
try to get involved, even if you are not interested.
Here's the
list:
Summary:
Actor Charlton Heston Lou Wagner Norman
Burton Buck Kartalian James Whitmore Wright King Linda
Harrison David Watson Don Pedro Colley Eldon Burke Ricardo
Montalban Natalie Trundy Bradford Dillman Eric Braeden Don
Murray Paul Williams Bobby Porter Austin Stoker France
Nuyen Mort Abrahams Dan Striepeke Jerry Goldsmith Tom Scott
(Conquest Composer) Leonard Rosenman Bill Creber Mort
Abrahams Frank Capra Jr.
I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda
Harrison;
#1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't been done before, is also
in TV show and in escape), #2 Buck Kartalian
#1 Chimp is
David Watson, #2 Bobby Porter;
#1 Chimp Female is Natalie as
Lisa;
#1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James Whitmore;
#1
Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don Pedro Colley
#1 Battle Mutant is
France Nuyen
Now how to balance an equal selection from each movie?
Maybe it needs to be an 18 card autograph set!
Behind the scenes, I
think Dan Striepeke, Jerry Goldsmith, Leonard Rosenman, and Bill Creber
are all valuable.....any more behind the scenes
people around?
"TV SERIES" Regulars and Guests:
Ron Harper
(Alan Virdon) James Naughton (Pete Burke) Booth Colman (Councillor
Zaius) Percy Rodrigues (Aboro) David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran) Beverly
Garland (Wanda) Pat Renella (Jason and Zon) Norm Alden (Zako) Martin
Brooks (Dr. Leander and Commander Konag) Ron Stein (Gorilla extra and
stuntman) Eldon Burke (Gorilla extra) Lalo Schifrin - music for TV
Series Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for Return Dave Rodgers -
Roddy's stunt double
Cartoon Return to the Planet of the
Apes:
Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later episodes) Henry Corden
- Urko Philippa Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked since
Return Claudette Nevins - Judy Franklin/Nova Austin Stoker - Jeff
Carter Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes)
I'm still not
sure if TV show actors/Return voices are going to be included.
It
would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla, Chimp, Chimp
Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and Battle
Mutant).
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25359 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html
.html
Lou Wagner and James Whitmore would also be
good. People would be more interested in the first movie. And Bradford Dillman.
Who's Dave Rodgers? Ron Stein was Roddy's TV double. I'd love to see some
cartoon show cards. End of report. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:32
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Trading
Cards - Important Announcement
This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit from
reading it.
I got in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading
Cards and he is very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading
Card series.
On the "potaDG" group, we have started with discussion of
Autographs and that is a very good place to start (because we don't want
any more key players deceasing on us before they sign!).
If you are
interested, please read the summary and make any comments within the next
24 hours or so and I will then forward reccomendations on.
Also
(again, if you are interested), start thinking more generally about other
issues of the Trading Cards set and we will approach them
next.
Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards
set, as I have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a
under-rated, overlooked franchise because the quality of the product is so
frequently compromised (does anyone DISAGREE with this?).
The owner
of Rittenhouse can also help us by asking Fox about deleted scenes and
almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him seriously because he has
paid good money for the license for a card set involving the 5 movies (and
they will give him "deleted scene" photos and information - hey, maybe
this is being released with the 5 star of Planet!?!).
Both groups
(and, hopefully, people like Natalie, Bill Blake and Eric Greene etc who
Jeff can approach) could input enough to assure these cards are an
overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox that, if approached
correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a potent franchise. Please
try to get involved, even if you are not interested.
Here's the
list:
Summary:
Actor Charlton Heston Lou Wagner Norman
Burton Buck Kartalian James Whitmore Wright King Linda
Harrison David Watson Don Pedro Colley Eldon Burke Ricardo
Montalban Natalie Trundy Bradford Dillman Eric Braeden Don
Murray Paul Williams Bobby Porter Austin Stoker France
Nuyen Mort Abrahams Dan Striepeke Jerry Goldsmith Tom Scott
(Conquest Composer) Leonard Rosenman Bill Creber Mort
Abrahams Frank Capra Jr.
I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda
Harrison;
#1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't been done before, is also
in TV show and in escape), #2 Buck Kartalian
#1 Chimp is
David Watson, #2 Bobby Porter;
#1 Chimp Female is Natalie as
Lisa;
#1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James Whitmore;
#1
Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don Pedro Colley
#1 Battle Mutant is
France Nuyen
Now how to balance an equal selection from each movie?
Maybe it needs to be an 18 card autograph set!
Behind the scenes, I
think Dan Striepeke, Jerry Goldsmith, Leonard Rosenman, and Bill Creber
are all valuable.....any more behind the scenes
people around?
"TV SERIES" Regulars and Guests:
Ron Harper
(Alan Virdon) James Naughton (Pete Burke) Booth Colman (Councillor
Zaius) Percy Rodrigues (Aboro) David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran) Beverly
Garland (Wanda) Pat Renella (Jason and Zon) Norm Alden (Zako) Martin
Brooks (Dr. Leander and Commander Konag) Ron Stein (Gorilla extra and
stuntman) Eldon Burke (Gorilla extra) Lalo Schifrin - music for TV
Series Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for Return Dave Rodgers -
Roddy's stunt double
Cartoon Return to the Planet of the
Apes:
Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later episodes) Henry Corden
- Urko Philippa Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked since
Return Claudette Nevins - Judy Franklin/Nova Austin Stoker - Jeff
Carter Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes)
I'm still not
sure if TV show actors/Return voices are going to be included.
It
would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla, Chimp, Chimp
Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and Battle
Mutant).
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25360 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.htmlI see how that could have been misinterpreted - I was trying very
hard to be (and stay) serious and I guess I misread the wave.
As John Cleese says in "Holy Grail" after slaying a lot of wedding
guests..."Sorry about that...I just get carried away sometimes"...
Michael
--- Haristas@... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/1/02 9:31:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> whitty@... writes:
>
>
> > I thought I tried to discuss this and the message I got from you
and
> > Rory was "see you later" (or did I misread the photo of Zira and
> > Cornelius waving goodbye and your subsequent response to that?).
>
> You see there? Now I meant for everyone to get a kick out of
posting that
> picture of the apes waving "bye bye" and Jeff got it and thought it
was funny
> as I meant it to be, but I guess others weren't in the mood to find
it funny.
>
> Humor can be a dangerous thing.
>
> -- Rory
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25361 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.htmlGood question.
I have actually ben hassling this guy to do a POTA set since I bought
an expensive card that was out of date, and he honoured the
redemption of it anyway.
I stopped bothering him for a while and what should happen? I get an
email that says he has the rights to the first 5 films! here it is:
scifihobby.com Today
issue: vol 1, issue 7
New License - Planet of the Apes
We are pleased to announce that we've signed a new license to produce
trading cards for the classic Planet of the Apes movies. Specific
details will be announced in the coming weeks, but we have already
acquired several original costumes from the five original films and
intend to use them for costume cards.
Steven M. Charendoff
President, Rittenhouse Archives
--- < veetus@...> wrote:
> I care about trading cards, I was just being snotty. Did the
owner say wh
> y he was interested (many consider POTA dead and buried after the
remake).
> How did the "Archive" set do? - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Whitty
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:32 PM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important
Announcement
>
>
> This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit from
reading
> it.
>
> I got in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading Cards and he
is
> very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading Card
series.
>
> On the "potaDG" group, we have started with discussion of
Autographs
> and that is a very good place to start (because we don't want any
> more key players deceasing on us before they sign!).
>
> If you are interested, please read the summary and make any
comments
> within the next 24 hours or so and I will then forward
> reccomendations on.
>
> Also (again, if you are interested), start thinking more
generally
> about other issues of the Trading Cards set and we will approach
them
> next.
>
> Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards set,
as I
> have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a under-
rated,
> overlooked franchise because the quality of the product is so
> frequently compromised (does anyone DISAGREE with this?).
>
> The owner of Rittenhouse can also help us by asking Fox about
deleted
> scenes and almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him
seriously
> because he has paid good money for the license for a card set
> involving the 5 movies (and they will give him "deleted scene"
photos
> and information - hey, maybe this is being released with the 5
star
> of Planet!?!).
>
> Both groups (and, hopefully, people like Natalie, Bill Blake and
Eric
> Greene etc who Jeff can approach) could input enough to assure
these
> cards are an overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox that,
if
> approached correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a potent
> franchise. Please try to get involved, even if you are not
> interested.
>
> Here's the list:
>
> Summary:
>
> Actor
> Charlton Heston
> Lou Wagner
> Norman Burton
> Buck Kartalian
> James Whitmore
> Wright King
> Linda Harrison
> David Watson
> Don Pedro Colley
> Eldon Burke
> Ricardo Montalban
> Natalie Trundy
> Bradford Dillman
> Eric Braeden
> Don Murray
> Paul Williams
> Bobby Porter
> Austin Stoker
> France Nuyen
> Mort Abrahams
> Dan Striepeke
> Jerry Goldsmith
> Tom Scott (Conquest Composer)
> Leonard Rosenman
> Bill Creber
> Mort Abrahams
> Frank Capra Jr.
>
> I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda Harrison;
>
> #1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't been done before, is also in
TV
> show and
> in escape),
> #2 Buck Kartalian
>
> #1 Chimp is David Watson, #2 Bobby Porter;
>
> #1 Chimp Female is Natalie as Lisa;
>
> #1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James Whitmore;
>
> #1 Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don Pedro Colley
>
> #1 Battle Mutant is France Nuyen
>
> Now how to balance an equal selection from each movie? Maybe it
needs
> to be an 18 card autograph set!
>
> Behind the scenes, I think Dan Striepeke, Jerry Goldsmith,
Leonard
> Rosenman, and Bill Creber are all valuable.....any more behind
the
> scenes people
> around?
>
> "TV SERIES" Regulars and Guests:
>
> Ron Harper (Alan Virdon)
> James Naughton (Pete Burke)
> Booth Colman (Councillor Zaius)
> Percy Rodrigues (Aboro)
> David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran)
> Beverly Garland (Wanda)
> Pat Renella (Jason and Zon)
> Norm Alden (Zako)
> Martin Brooks (Dr. Leander and Commander Konag)
> Ron Stein (Gorilla extra and stuntman)
> Eldon Burke (Gorilla extra)
> Lalo Schifrin - music for TV Series
> Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for Return
> Dave Rodgers - Roddy's stunt double
>
> Cartoon Return to the Planet of the Apes:
>
> Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later episodes)
> Henry Corden - Urko
> Philippa Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked since
Return
> Claudette Nevins - Judy Franklin/Nova
> Austin Stoker - Jeff Carter
> Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes)
>
> I'm still not sure if TV show actors/Return voices are going to
be
> included.
>
> It would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla,
Chimp,
> Chimp Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and Battle
Mutant).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25362 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
|
.html .html"And how in God's name are we to know that unless we communicate. We can speak, so I spoke". - - Zira, "Escape"
Zira uses "God" a lot.
See! There's no escaping Religion & Politics when talking Apes.
Gosh Dang it! Darn-diddley-ding-dangit All To Heck!
How's that for restraint Mikey Boy?<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25363 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
.htmlIt was actually revealed in a Simpsons episode where Ned goes nuts
that "diddly" is a curse (or swear word).
So could you please cut back on the language?
Michael
--- In pota@y..., LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> "And how in God's name are we to know that unless we communicate.
We can
> speak, so I spoke". - - Zira, "Escape"
>
> Zira uses "God" a lot.
>
> See! There's no escaping Religion & Politics when talking Apes.
> Gosh Dang it! Darn-diddley-ding-dangit All To Heck!
> How's that for restraint Mikey Boy? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25364 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html
.html
I hear the domestic Kubricks did well and
that's why the POTA2001 Kubricks are being released. There's still an interest,
maybe people who learned about the originals or watched them for the first time
because of the new movie hype. And those people weren't into it when the
"Archive" cards came out. They did "Farscape" cards, right? So they're more
fan-oriented than Topps. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 11:51
PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading
Cards - Important Announcement
Good question.
I have actually ben hassling this guy
to do a POTA set since I bought an expensive card that was out of date,
and he honoured the redemption of it anyway.
I stopped bothering
him for a while and what should happen? I get an email that says he
has the rights to the first 5 films! here it is:
scifihobby.com
Today issue: vol 1, issue 7
New License - Planet of the Apes
We are pleased to announce that we've signed a new license to produce
trading cards for the classic Planet of the Apes movies. Specific
details will be announced in the coming weeks, but we have already
acquired several original costumes from the five original films and
intend to use them for costume cards.
Steven M.
Charendoff President, Rittenhouse Archives
---
<veetus@...> wrote: > I care about trading
cards, I was just being snotty. Did the owner say wh > y he was
interested (many consider POTA dead and buried after the remake). >
How did the "Archive" set do? - - - Jeff > > >
----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Whitty
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com > Sent:
Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:32 PM > Subject: [Planet of the
Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement > >
> This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit
from reading > it. > > I got
in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading Cards and he is
> very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading
Card series. > > On the "potaDG" group, we have
started with discussion of Autographs > and that is a
very good place to start (because we don't want any > more
key players deceasing on us before they sign!). > >
If you are interested, please read the summary and make any comments
> within the next 24 hours or so and I will then forward
> reccomendations on. > > Also
(again, if you are interested), start thinking more generally
> about other issues of the Trading Cards set and we will
approach them > next. > >
Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards set, as I
> have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a
under- rated, > overlooked franchise because the quality
of the product is so > frequently compromised (does anyone
DISAGREE with this?). > > The owner of Rittenhouse
can also help us by asking Fox about deleted > scenes
and almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him seriously
> because he has paid good money for the license for a card
set > involving the 5 movies (and they will give him
"deleted scene" photos > and information - hey, maybe
this is being released with the 5 star > of
Planet!?!). > > Both groups (and, hopefully, people
like Natalie, Bill Blake and Eric > Greene etc who Jeff
can approach) could input enough to assure these >
cards are an overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox that, if
> approached correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a
potent > franchise. Please try to get involved, even
if you are not > interested. > >
Here's the list: > > Summary: >
> Actor > Charlton
Heston > Lou Wagner > Norman
Burton > Buck Kartalian > James
Whitmore > Wright King > Linda
Harrison > David Watson > Don Pedro
Colley > Eldon Burke > Ricardo
Montalban > Natalie Trundy > Bradford
Dillman > Eric Braeden > Don
Murray > Paul Williams > Bobby
Porter > Austin Stoker > France
Nuyen > Mort Abrahams > Dan
Striepeke > Jerry Goldsmith > Tom Scott
(Conquest Composer) > Leonard Rosenman >
Bill Creber > Mort Abrahams > Frank Capra
Jr. > > I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda
Harrison; > > #1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't
been done before, is also in TV > show
and > in escape), > #2 Buck
Kartalian > > #1 Chimp is David Watson, #2 Bobby
Porter; > > #1 Chimp Female is Natalie as
Lisa; > > #1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James
Whitmore; > > #1 Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don
Pedro Colley > > #1 Battle Mutant is France
Nuyen > > Now how to balance an equal selection from
each movie? Maybe it needs > to be an 18 card autograph
set! > > Behind the scenes, I think Dan Striepeke,
Jerry Goldsmith, Leonard > Rosenman, and Bill Creber
are all valuable.....any more behind the > scenes
people > around? > > "TV SERIES"
Regulars and Guests: > > Ron Harper (Alan
Virdon) > James Naughton (Pete Burke) >
Booth Colman (Councillor Zaius) > Percy Rodrigues
(Aboro) > David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran) >
Beverly Garland (Wanda) > Pat Renella (Jason and
Zon) > Norm Alden (Zako) > Martin Brooks
(Dr. Leander and Commander Konag) > Ron Stein (Gorilla extra
and stuntman) > Eldon Burke (Gorilla
extra) > Lalo Schifrin - music for TV
Series > Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for
Return > Dave Rodgers - Roddy's stunt double >
> Cartoon Return to the Planet of the Apes: >
> Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later
episodes) > Henry Corden - Urko > Philippa
Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked since
Return > Claudette Nevins - Judy
Franklin/Nova > Austin Stoker - Jeff
Carter > Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes) >
> I'm still not sure if TV show actors/Return voices are
going to be > included. > > It
would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla, Chimp,
> Chimp Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and
Battle Mutant). > > >
>
>
>
>
> >
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service. >
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25365 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.htmlThis is why I believe we need to help make this very successful (or
discover ourselves that we are wrong). POTA is a worthy
franchise...if the proper research, care and attention is paid to it
(and who better to assure this than the POTA fans?).
Not sure how the Archives set went...
Anyone?
Michael
--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
many consider POTA dead and buried after the remake). How did
the "Archive" set do? - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Whitty
> To: pota@y...
> Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:32 PM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important
Announcement
>
>
> This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit from
reading
> it.
>
> I got in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading Cards and he
is
> very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading Card
series.
>
> On the "potaDG" group, we have started with discussion of
Autographs
> and that is a very good place to start (because we don't want any
> more key players deceasing on us before they sign!).
>
> If you are interested, please read the summary and make any
comments
> within the next 24 hours or so and I will then forward
> reccomendations on.
>
> Also (again, if you are interested), start thinking more
generally
> about other issues of the Trading Cards set and we will approach
them
> next.
>
> Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards set,
as I
> have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a under-
rated,
> overlooked franchise because the quality of the product is so
> frequently compromised (does anyone DISAGREE with this?).
>
> The owner of Rittenhouse can also help us by asking Fox about
deleted
> scenes and almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him
seriously
> because he has paid good money for the license for a card set
> involving the 5 movies (and they will give him "deleted scene"
photos
> and information - hey, maybe this is being released with the 5
star
> of Planet!?!).
>
> Both groups (and, hopefully, people like Natalie, Bill Blake and
Eric
> Greene etc who Jeff can approach) could input enough to assure
these
> cards are an overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox that,
if
> approached correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a potent
> franchise. Please try to get involved, even if you are not
> interested.
>
> Here's the list:
>
> Summary:
>
> Actor
> Charlton Heston
> Lou Wagner
> Norman Burton
> Buck Kartalian
> James Whitmore
> Wright King
> Linda Harrison
> David Watson
> Don Pedro Colley
> Eldon Burke
> Ricardo Montalban
> Natalie Trundy
> Bradford Dillman
> Eric Braeden
> Don Murray
> Paul Williams
> Bobby Porter
> Austin Stoker
> France Nuyen
> Mort Abrahams
> Dan Striepeke
> Jerry Goldsmith
> Tom Scott (Conquest Composer)
> Leonard Rosenman
> Bill Creber
> Mort Abrahams
> Frank Capra Jr.
>
> I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda Harrison;
>
> #1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't been done before, is also in
TV
> show and
> in escape),
> #2 Buck Kartalian
>
> #1 Chimp is David Watson, #2 Bobby Porter;
>
> #1 Chimp Female is Natalie as Lisa;
>
> #1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James Whitmore;
>
> #1 Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don Pedro Colley
>
> #1 Battle Mutant is France Nuyen
>
> Now how to balance an equal selection from each movie? Maybe it
needs
> to be an 18 card autograph set!
>
> Behind the scenes, I think Dan Striepeke, Jerry Goldsmith,
Leonard
> Rosenman, and Bill Creber are all valuable.....any more behind
the
> scenes people
> around?
>
> "TV SERIES" Regulars and Guests:
>
> Ron Harper (Alan Virdon)
> James Naughton (Pete Burke)
> Booth Colman (Councillor Zaius)
> Percy Rodrigues (Aboro)
> David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran)
> Beverly Garland (Wanda)
> Pat Renella (Jason and Zon)
> Norm Alden (Zako)
> Martin Brooks (Dr. Leander and Commander Konag)
> Ron Stein (Gorilla extra and stuntman)
> Eldon Burke (Gorilla extra)
> Lalo Schifrin - music for TV Series
> Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for Return
> Dave Rodgers - Roddy's stunt double
>
> Cartoon Return to the Planet of the Apes:
>
> Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later episodes)
> Henry Corden - Urko
> Philippa Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked since
Return
> Claudette Nevins - Judy Franklin/Nova
> Austin Stoker - Jeff Carter
> Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes)
>
> I'm still not sure if TV show actors/Return voices are going to
be
> included.
>
> It would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla,
Chimp,
> Chimp Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and Battle
Mutant).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25366 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.htmlThanks Jeff, this is gold.
The idea here is to submit a plan with backup...eg "If you can't get
Taylor, get Linda because.....".
I think Natalie is actually the most important stakeholder alive.
She has been in all movies but the first and...well, as you know, was
Arthur's wife etc. Invaluable.
But I am thinking this set will be 9 or 18 cards.
He has already stated he will be chasing Heston hard (although I have
heard Heston is rfusing to sign...but maybe for the right price he
might just do 10 and there will be a SUPER RARE autograph...?
I think with 9 cards there dhould be a balance of each of the 5
movies (actors) with equal weighting of human, orang, chimp, gorilla
+ one other (child ape, female ape) then 4 behind the scenes
(composer, director, etc.) or maybe just 3 and one of Natalie with
the 4 characters she played.
I think if he can't get heston he could go for Montalban as the
human, Paul Williams is a must for an Orang, Bobby Porter as a chimp,
I guess Buck as a gorilla (but, like you said, would they/we want to
repeat?), Jerry Goldsmith for sure. There's still some gaps.
Not sure about the TV show but let's give him a list in case
(probably emhasise the crossovers who did TV and the movie/s).
Michael
--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> These are for autographs? Linda Harrison, Natalie, Buck, Don
Pedro (and who else?) did the "Archives" autographs. I don't know if
they'd want to repeat them. Tell the owner if he wants Natalie I can
get him in touch with her. She's hard to find right now. Linda and
Heston autographed the new movie set. (Linda's autograph is getting
very common). Heston is always a draw. Montalban would be too.
There's usually only 5 or 6 autograph cards in a set. Is he even
interested in the TV show? I think Buck as Julius is the most
recognizable gorilla (Ursus and Urko, Aldo are all dead). I don't
think they want cameos like Norman Burton. Bobby Porter would be
good. The "family" portrait is recognizable. If they want a makeup
guy, Dan Streipeke. Or Ken Chase, who did Evans' Zauis (a Chase card!
AH HA HA!). Booth Colman is popular at shows. Paul Williams, a good
orang. Jerry Goldsmith, everyone knows him. As far as I know, the
people you mentioned are all living. You might mention people know
the TV show now because of the DVDs. Naughton would be popular but
probably wouldn't do it. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Whitty
> To: pota@y...
> Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:32 PM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important
Announcement
>
>
> This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit from
reading
> it.
>
> I got in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading Cards and he
is
> very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading Card
series.
>
> On the "potaDG" group, we have started with discussion of
Autographs
> and that is a very good place to start (because we don't want any
> more key players deceasing on us before they sign!).
>
> If you are interested, please read the summary and make any
comments
> within the next 24 hours or so and I will then forward
> reccomendations on.
>
> Also (again, if you are interested), start thinking more
generally
> about other issues of the Trading Cards set and we will approach
them
> next.
>
> Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards set,
as I
> have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a under-
rated,
> overlooked franchise because the quality of the product is so
> frequently compromised (does anyone DISAGREE with this?).
>
> The owner of Rittenhouse can also help us by asking Fox about
deleted
> scenes and almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him
seriously
> because he has paid good money for the license for a card set
> involving the 5 movies (and they will give him "deleted scene"
photos
> and information - hey, maybe this is being released with the 5
star
> of Planet!?!).
>
> Both groups (and, hopefully, people like Natalie, Bill Blake and
Eric
> Greene etc who Jeff can approach) could input enough to assure
these
> cards are an overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox that,
if
> approached correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a potent
> franchise. Please try to get involved, even if you are not
> interested.
>
> Here's the list:
>
> Summary:
>
> Actor
> Charlton Heston
> Lou Wagner
> Norman Burton
> Buck Kartalian
> James Whitmore
> Wright King
> Linda Harrison
> David Watson
> Don Pedro Colley
> Eldon Burke
> Ricardo Montalban
> Natalie Trundy
> Bradford Dillman
> Eric Braeden
> Don Murray
> Paul Williams
> Bobby Porter
> Austin Stoker
> France Nuyen
> Mort Abrahams
> Dan Striepeke
> Jerry Goldsmith
> Tom Scott (Conquest Composer)
> Leonard Rosenman
> Bill Creber
> Mort Abrahams
> Frank Capra Jr.
>
> I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda Harrison;
>
> #1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't been done before, is also in
TV
> show and
> in escape),
> #2 Buck Kartalian
>
> #1 Chimp is David Watson, #2 Bobby Porter;
>
> #1 Chimp Female is Natalie as Lisa;
>
> #1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James Whitmore;
>
> #1 Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don Pedro Colley
>
> #1 Battle Mutant is France Nuyen
>
> Now how to balance an equal selection from each movie? Maybe it
needs
> to be an 18 card autograph set!
>
> Behind the scenes, I think Dan Striepeke, Jerry Goldsmith,
Leonard
> Rosenman, and Bill Creber are all valuable.....any more behind
the
> scenes people
> around?
>
> "TV SERIES" Regulars and Guests:
>
> Ron Harper (Alan Virdon)
> James Naughton (Pete Burke)
> Booth Colman (Councillor Zaius)
> Percy Rodrigues (Aboro)
> David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran)
> Beverly Garland (Wanda)
> Pat Renella (Jason and Zon)
> Norm Alden (Zako)
> Martin Brooks (Dr. Leander and Commander Konag)
> Ron Stein (Gorilla extra and stuntman)
> Eldon Burke (Gorilla extra)
> Lalo Schifrin - music for TV Series
> Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for Return
> Dave Rodgers - Roddy's stunt double
>
> Cartoon Return to the Planet of the Apes:
>
> Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later episodes)
> Henry Corden - Urko
> Philippa Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked since
Return
> Claudette Nevins - Judy Franklin/Nova
> Austin Stoker - Jeff Carter
> Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes)
>
> I'm still not sure if TV show actors/Return voices are going to
be
> included.
>
> It would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla,
Chimp,
> Chimp Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and Battle
Mutant).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25367 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.htmlIf this set is a success you can bet we'll see the TV series cards
Inkworks promised and Return too probably!
Michael
--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> Lou Wagner and James Whitmore would also be good. People would be
more interested in the first movie. And Bradford Dillman. Who's Dave
Rodgers? Ron Stein was Roddy's TV double. I'd love to see some
cartoon show cards. End of report. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Whitty
> To: pota@y...
> Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:32 PM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important
Announcement
>
>
> This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit from
reading
> it.
>
> I got in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading Cards and he
is
> very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading Card
series.
>
> On the "potaDG" group, we have started with discussion of
Autographs
> and that is a very good place to start (because we don't want any
> more key players deceasing on us before they sign!).
>
> If you are interested, please read the summary and make any
comments
> within the next 24 hours or so and I will then forward
> reccomendations on.
>
> Also (again, if you are interested), start thinking more
generally
> about other issues of the Trading Cards set and we will approach
them
> next.
>
> Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards set,
as I
> have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a under-
rated,
> overlooked franchise because the quality of the product is so
> frequently compromised (does anyone DISAGREE with this?).
>
> The owner of Rittenhouse can also help us by asking Fox about
deleted
> scenes and almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him
seriously
> because he has paid good money for the license for a card set
> involving the 5 movies (and they will give him "deleted scene"
photos
> and information - hey, maybe this is being released with the 5
star
> of Planet!?!).
>
> Both groups (and, hopefully, people like Natalie, Bill Blake and
Eric
> Greene etc who Jeff can approach) could input enough to assure
these
> cards are an overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox that,
if
> approached correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a potent
> franchise. Please try to get involved, even if you are not
> interested.
>
> Here's the list:
>
> Summary:
>
> Actor
> Charlton Heston
> Lou Wagner
> Norman Burton
> Buck Kartalian
> James Whitmore
> Wright King
> Linda Harrison
> David Watson
> Don Pedro Colley
> Eldon Burke
> Ricardo Montalban
> Natalie Trundy
> Bradford Dillman
> Eric Braeden
> Don Murray
> Paul Williams
> Bobby Porter
> Austin Stoker
> France Nuyen
> Mort Abrahams
> Dan Striepeke
> Jerry Goldsmith
> Tom Scott (Conquest Composer)
> Leonard Rosenman
> Bill Creber
> Mort Abrahams
> Frank Capra Jr.
>
> I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda Harrison;
>
> #1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't been done before, is also in
TV
> show and
> in escape),
> #2 Buck Kartalian
>
> #1 Chimp is David Watson, #2 Bobby Porter;
>
> #1 Chimp Female is Natalie as Lisa;
>
> #1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James Whitmore;
>
> #1 Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don Pedro Colley
>
> #1 Battle Mutant is France Nuyen
>
> Now how to balance an equal selection from each movie? Maybe it
needs
> to be an 18 card autograph set!
>
> Behind the scenes, I think Dan Striepeke, Jerry Goldsmith,
Leonard
> Rosenman, and Bill Creber are all valuable.....any more behind
the
> scenes people
> around?
>
> "TV SERIES" Regulars and Guests:
>
> Ron Harper (Alan Virdon)
> James Naughton (Pete Burke)
> Booth Colman (Councillor Zaius)
> Percy Rodrigues (Aboro)
> David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran)
> Beverly Garland (Wanda)
> Pat Renella (Jason and Zon)
> Norm Alden (Zako)
> Martin Brooks (Dr. Leander and Commander Konag)
> Ron Stein (Gorilla extra and stuntman)
> Eldon Burke (Gorilla extra)
> Lalo Schifrin - music for TV Series
> Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for Return
> Dave Rodgers - Roddy's stunt double
>
> Cartoon Return to the Planet of the Apes:
>
> Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later episodes)
> Henry Corden - Urko
> Philippa Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked since
Return
> Claudette Nevins - Judy Franklin/Nova
> Austin Stoker - Jeff Carter
> Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes)
>
> I'm still not sure if TV show actors/Return voices are going to
be
> included.
>
> It would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla,
Chimp,
> Chimp Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and Battle
Mutant).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25368 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.htmlThey did do Farscape.
Also Star Trek, James Bond and the Twilight Zone!
Michael
--- In pota@y..., <veetus@e...> wrote:
> I hear the domestic Kubricks did well and that's why the POTA2001
Kubricks are being released. There's still an interest, maybe people
who learned about the originals or watched them for the first time
because of the new movie hype. And those people weren't into it when
the "Archive" cards came out. They did "Farscape" cards, right? So
they're more fan-oriented than Topps. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: whitty@c...
> To: pota@y...
> Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 11:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important
Announcement
>
>
> Good question.
>
> I have actually ben hassling this guy to do a POTA set since I
bought
> an expensive card that was out of date, and he honoured the
> redemption of it anyway.
>
> I stopped bothering him for a while and what should happen? I
get an
> email that says he has the rights to the first 5 films! here it
is:
>
> scifihobby.com Today
> issue: vol 1, issue 7
>
> New License - Planet of the Apes
>
> We are pleased to announce that we've signed a new license to
produce
> trading cards for the classic Planet of the Apes movies. Specific
> details will be announced in the coming weeks, but we have
already
> acquired several original costumes from the five original films
and
> intend to use them for costume cards.
>
>
> Steven M. Charendoff
> President, Rittenhouse Archives
>
>
>
>
> --- <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > I care about trading cards, I was just being snotty. Did the
> owner say wh
> > y he was interested (many consider POTA dead and buried after
the
> remake).
> > How did the "Archive" set do? - - - Jeff
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Michael Whitty
> > To: pota@y...
> > Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 8:32 PM
> > Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important
> Announcement
> >
> >
> > This is a long post, but I think everyone will benefit from
> reading
> > it.
> >
> > I got in touch with the owner of Rittenhouse Trading Cards
and he
> is
> > very interested in getting fan input for the new Trading Card
> series.
> >
> > On the "potaDG" group, we have started with discussion of
> Autographs
> > and that is a very good place to start (because we don't want
any
> > more key players deceasing on us before they sign!).
> >
> > If you are interested, please read the summary and make any
> comments
> > within the next 24 hours or so and I will then forward
> > reccomendations on.
> >
> > Also (again, if you are interested), start thinking more
> generally
> > about other issues of the Trading Cards set and we will
approach
> them
> > next.
> >
> > Jeff, even if you are not interested in a new Trading Cards
set,
> as I
> > have said to Rory in a private post, I look at POTA as a
under-
> rated,
> > overlooked franchise because the quality of the product is so
> > frequently compromised (does anyone DISAGREE with this?).
> >
> > The owner of Rittenhouse can also help us by asking Fox about
> deleted
> > scenes and almost ANYTHING about POTA...they will treat him
> seriously
> > because he has paid good money for the license for a card set
> > involving the 5 movies (and they will give him "deleted
scene"
> photos
> > and information - hey, maybe this is being released with the
5
> star
> > of Planet!?!).
> >
> > Both groups (and, hopefully, people like Natalie, Bill Blake
and
> Eric
> > Greene etc who Jeff can approach) could input enough to
assure
> these
> > cards are an overnight sellout and confirm with this to Fox
that,
> if
> > approached correctly, Planet of the Apes is still a potent
> > franchise. Please try to get involved, even if you are not
> > interested.
> >
> > Here's the list:
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > Actor
> > Charlton Heston
> > Lou Wagner
> > Norman Burton
> > Buck Kartalian
> > James Whitmore
> > Wright King
> > Linda Harrison
> > David Watson
> > Don Pedro Colley
> > Eldon Burke
> > Ricardo Montalban
> > Natalie Trundy
> > Bradford Dillman
> > Eric Braeden
> > Don Murray
> > Paul Williams
> > Bobby Porter
> > Austin Stoker
> > France Nuyen
> > Mort Abrahams
> > Dan Striepeke
> > Jerry Goldsmith
> > Tom Scott (Conquest Composer)
> > Leonard Rosenman
> > Bill Creber
> > Mort Abrahams
> > Frank Capra Jr.
> >
> > I'd say #1 human is Heston, #2 Linda Harrison;
> >
> > #1 Gorilla is Norman Burton (hasn't been done before, is also
in
> TV
> > show and
> > in escape),
> > #2 Buck Kartalian
> >
> > #1 Chimp is David Watson, #2 Bobby Porter;
> >
> > #1 Chimp Female is Natalie as Lisa;
> >
> > #1 Orangutan is Paul Williams, #2 James Whitmore;
> >
> > #1 Beneath Mutant is Natalie ; #2 Don Pedro Colley
> >
> > #1 Battle Mutant is France Nuyen
> >
> > Now how to balance an equal selection from each movie? Maybe
it
> needs
> > to be an 18 card autograph set!
> >
> > Behind the scenes, I think Dan Striepeke, Jerry Goldsmith,
> Leonard
> > Rosenman, and Bill Creber are all valuable.....any more
behind
> the
> > scenes people
> > around?
> >
> > "TV SERIES" Regulars and Guests:
> >
> > Ron Harper (Alan Virdon)
> > James Naughton (Pete Burke)
> > Booth Colman (Councillor Zaius)
> > Percy Rodrigues (Aboro)
> > David Sheiner (Dr. Zoran)
> > Beverly Garland (Wanda)
> > Pat Renella (Jason and Zon)
> > Norm Alden (Zako)
> > Martin Brooks (Dr. Leander and Commander Konag)
> > Ron Stein (Gorilla extra and stuntman)
> > Eldon Burke (Gorilla extra)
> > Lalo Schifrin - music for TV Series
> > Dean Elliot & Eric Rogers - music for Return
> > Dave Rodgers - Roddy's stunt double
> >
> > Cartoon Return to the Planet of the Apes:
> >
> > Richard Blackburn - Bill Hudson (later episodes)
> > Henry Corden - Urko
> > Philippa Harris - Zira *Possibly deceased. Hasn't worked
since
> Return
> > Claudette Nevins - Judy Franklin/Nova
> > Austin Stoker - Jeff Carter
> > Tom Williams - Bill Hudson (early episodes)
> >
> > I'm still not sure if TV show actors/Return voices are going
to
> be
> > included.
> >
> > It would also be nice to assure a balance of Human, Gorilla,
> Chimp,
> > Chimp Female, Orangutan (and maybe Beneath Mutant and Battle
> Mutant).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25369 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Apology |
|
.html It has come to my attention that a comment I made recently has upset
at least one member of this board.
When joining POTAdg I introduced myself by comparing this board to a
school of Piranhas. That was wrong of me, I shouldn't have said it and
I apologise.
The comment was not directed at any one individual, least of all Jeff
Kruger.
Jeff, you were the only reason I continued to subscribe to the old
`Ape chronicles', a major reason why I would consider subscribing to
the (hopefully)new one and a significant reason why I remained (as a
lurker) on this group for so long. You are a man of honesty,
generousity and integrity and it grieves me that I've pissed you off.
It seemed to me that the overall `mood' of this board had been
generally negative for a very long time. When I used the phrase
`piranhas' I was referring to a kind of group `mentality' that WE (I
include myself by lack of action) seemed to have created. An
enviroment where anyone who steps forward with an observation or topic
for discussion is basically setting themselves up for ridicule, slurs
and insults.
Now, I accept that the majority may very well enjoy this kind of
exchange - with the total freedom to say whatever they want, however
hurtful or insulting - I do not. (nor did I remain silent on this
issue, I did mention it some time ago.)
It seems foolish to me too that there are two boards with each member
no doubt peeking at the affairs of the other to see what's going on,
if anyone has a workable resolution I'd be happy to go along with it.
Anyway, once again to all concerned I sincerely apologise for any hurt
feelings my Piranha statement may have caused.
Dav <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25370 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Kim |
|
.html This one's for T...
From the British Press:
KIM HUNTER
Kim Hunter won an Oscar when she and Marlon Brando recreated their
stage roles in the powerful 1951 film version of A Streetcar Named
Desire. But in later life the bulk of her fan mail was for a film in
which her features were hidden behind make-up - Planet of the Apes.
Like so many actors and actresses of her generation, HunterÃs screen
career was blighted by the anti-Communist witch hunts of the 1950s
when she was blacklisted. She never really embraced Hollywood and
died on Wednesday at home in Greenwich Village, New York, aged 79.
For an actress, she was unusually modest, sensitive, and some might
say highly-strung, though she always seemed happy to chat with fans
and reply to letters. ìI would say 99% of my fan mail comes from
people who are talking about apesî, she told me last year while I was
researching a book on Planet of the Apes. She often received
photographs of herself as a chimpanzee to autograph. ìIt doesnÃt
bother me ... ThatÃs the film that they just adored.î.
Hunter was born Janet Cole, in Detroit, on November 12, 1922. Her
mother was a concert pianist. She recalled a lonely childhood,
picking characters out of books, pretending they were her friends, and
acting out little scenes with them in front of the mirror. She made
her stage debut in her teens and her film debut in the 1943 thriller
The Seventh Victim, in which she stumbles upon a group of
devil-worshippers in New York. A couple of years later she was
reduced to acting out Ingrid BergmanÃs lines opposite actresses
auditioning for minor roles in Alfred HitchcockÃs Spellbound. It was
Hitch who recommended her as female lead in the English classic A
Matter of Life and Death aka Stairway to Heaven, (1946). ìSensible,
pretty, could be the girl next door, can act, good voice, good legsî,
he told Director Michael Powell.
Hunter played an American wireless operator and David Niven was the
RAF pilot who falls in love with her voice, subsequently arguing with
a heavenly court that his love be given a chance. Back in the US she
landed the role of Stanley Kowalskis much put-upon wife Stella in the
original stage production of A Streetcar Named Desire (1947-49). The
Kowalskis live in the French quarter of New Orleans. Their lives are
disrupted by the arrival of StellaÃs sister, Blanche DuBois, a faded
southern belle played by Jessica Tandy. Brando and Hunter were part
of the Actors Studio, the famous New York establishment that pioneered
ìmethodî acting in American movies and plays, the approach in which
the actor seeks to become, rather than simply play a character. The
immediacy and intensity of the action and the passion of Tennessee
WilliamsÃs drama had a huge impact on theatre audiences.
Brando had difficult relationships with many co-stars, but got on well
with Hunter, nursing her through various personal crises, a recurring
feature in her life. Hunter had married William Baldwin in 1944, with
whom she had a daughter, but they divorced a couple of years later.
She would later marry actor and producer Robert Emett and they had a
son. After a long run, the producers were lining up new actors for
Streetcar. Hunter knew her understudy, Carmelita Pope, was going to
be overlooked. ìYouÃll never get the part when I leave unless they
see you do it,î Hunter told her. Hunter faked illness to give the
young actress her break.
Jack Warner did not want Hunter, Tandy or Karl Malden in the film,
dismissing Hunter as ìa negative screen personalityî. Director Elia
Kazan agreed to accept Gone With the WindÃs Vivien Leigh as Blanche,
but successfully held out for Hunter and Malden. Curiously, Brando,
the man who virtually reinvented the craft of acting, was the only one
of the four principals not to win an Academy Award.
It should have been the perfect springboard to movie fame and fortune
for Hunter, but she lacked the sexuality of rivals and found it
difficult to secure good leading roles. She was the estranged wife of
crusading newspaper editor Humphrey Bogart in Deadline USA (1952), and
Russian emigrant Jose FerrerÃs wife in Anything Can Happen (1952).
Her career stalled when her name appeared on one of the Hollywood
blacklists for no other reason than a naive sense of social justice
and attendance at a few meetings. She made very few major films in
the decade preceding Planet of the Apes (1968), in which Charlton
Heston crash lands on an unfamiliar planet where apes rule and humans
are hunted. She got the role of the sympathetic chimp scientist Zira
only after Julie Harris balked at the arduous make-up process.
Valium helped Hunter to overcome feelings of claustrophobia during the
four-hour sessions. Producer Mort Abrahams recalled her first day:
ìShe ran to me and threw her arms around me and cried and cried. She
could not adjust at that moment to what was going on with her visage.î
Planet of the Apes may have seemed like wacky fantasy-adventure, but
Hunter studied chimp behaviour at Bronx Zoo to get into character.
She went on to play Zira in two sequels and appeared in numerous
television shows.
Ultimately she made three classic films in three different decades,
but the feeling remains that it could have been more, had she shown
the ruthlessness that took others to the top.
Kim <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25371 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
.htmlI do have one suggestion.
The "Mego" group have established some ground rules and they are quite
interesting.
I suggest we look at them and consider (attached below).
Of course, if the majority of people on this group don't want rules, then I
think the current set up can work harmoniously still, but there would be
less restrictions over here (like the "M" rated group).
I don't really think having two boards is a problem (like I said, there is a
Time of the Apes group too and there are many other groups), but if it
causes more trouble than good I will consider anything (oh boy, I'm wide
open saying this!..).
My ULTIMATE goal is to be part of an EFFECTIVE network of POTA fans who
discuss POTA. If it takes 5 groups to do this, then so be it.
The attachment is lengthy, but I think worth discussing.
My only comment is that I really think the OT stuff needs to stop for the
sake of keeping new members who may see 10 OT posts when they join then send
a "GET ME OFF THIS LIST!!!" message.
Also, I am not being territorial here (promise!), but moderators are an
important part of a group and unless MFLuder hands over the keys to someone,
we need to hike over to the POTAdg or all start a THIRD group and all
migrate to the "promised land" over there (religion is ON topic, right?).
ATTACHMENT:
Rules, Guidelines, and Just Plain Good Ideas 1.1
Copyright (c) 2000,2001, Joe DeRouen
All rights reserved
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego
The mego@yahoogroups.com mailing list has been going strong since March of
2000 and is, at last count, over 120 members strong. Thanks for joining
us! We're sure you'll enjoy many hours of fun sharing stories and
discussing Megos, trading with other collectors, and getting to know the
other members of the list, just like we have.
Please save this letter. It covers etiquette for the list, information
on posting your stories, and much more. If you save this letter now,
you'll thank yourself later - and so will we!
Joe DeRouen is the list owner and one of three moderators. Scott
"Scooby" Rogers and Keene Silfer are the other two moderators. There
are also many other "regular people" on the list willing to help out as
well if you have questions. Don't hesitate to ask!
First, here are the addresses that you'll need to know:
mego@yahoogroups.com to post to the list
mego-subscribe@yahoogroups.com to subscribe
mego-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com to unsubscribe
jderouen@... for questions about this list
Scott6089@... for questions about this list
krs7@... for questions about this list
The following guide is in two parts: "Mego Specific Etiquette"
and "General Rules of Etiquette". Please read both.
Part One: Mego Specific Etiquette
---------------------------------
1) Buying, Selling, and Trading on the List
We have one designated trade day each week: Wednesday, Wednesday, and
only Wednesday. Get the idea? We call Wednesday the Flea Market day.
Please don't try to sell, buy, or trade through the list on any other
day than Wednesday. You may post your lists of items you're looking
for or have up for trade/sell at any time between midnight Tuesday
night and midnight Wednesday night, in whatever time zone you're in.
2) Don't Brag About Your Collection
Why make your fellow collectors feel bad? By all means, post pictures
of your Megos. Be proud of your collection! But don't make fun of the
new guy on the list that's still looking for a loose 8" Spiderman.
2.1) Bragging
I realize that "bragging" can be intrepreted several different
ways. I don't in any way, shape, or form want to prevent list
members from showing off their collection. Just use common
sense.
3) Don't Cheat Your Fellow List Members
If you set up a trade with a fellow list member, follow through on
it. Mistakes can happen and people can be slow (I've been one of the
slowest at times!) but you need to ultimately follow through on your
obligations.
3.1) Another List Member Owes You Something
If someone owes you something in trade, or the item you got in trade
wasn't what you thought it was, try your dead-level best to resolve
the situation in private. Don't bring it to the group. If all else
fails, write one of the three moderators (see the start of this
document) and we'll do our best to help you work things out.
4) Off-Topic Talking
While this list is for and about Megos and the people who collect
them, we all will, upon occasion, lapse into conversation which has
nothing to do with our favorite action figure. This is normal and
even encouraged to a degree. However, if you're posting something
that has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Megos, please put
"OT: <topic>" in the subject line of your message. This way,
subscribers to the list who don't want to read anything that doesn't
have to do with Megos can have the choice of simply deleting your
message upon receipt.
5) Have Fun!
Have fun and get to know one another and enjoy this list! This list
is for talking about Megos, trading Megos, and (almost) everything
else the members want it to be for. I love the sense of community
that this list has created - and I've made several friends because of
this list! - which, to me, is more valuable than any any action
figure could ever be.
Part Two: General Rules of Etiquette
------------------------------------
1) Spam
Spam is Internet Speak for unnecessary messages or parts of a message
posted to Usenet, a mailing list or sent directly through e-mail. In
general, people don't like spam, and those sending spam on a
consistent basis will find that dislike directed towards them as
well.
1.1) Quoting
Quoting a message is very useful when communicating in a mailing
list, and it can be done quite stylishly.
Do not, however, quote entire messages. Ever. There is never a
need to quote an entire message. Just quote the minimum amount
possible to make your reply understandable. There's nothing
worse than getting a message with 40 lines of quote and three
lines of new material way down at the bottom. It looks bad,
makes your message much more difficult to read and wastes
bandwidth. Quoting 40 unnecessary lines in a message, besides
looking terrible, translates to 4,000 un-necessary lines across
a 100 member e-mail list!
When replying to a message, it is proper to quote a small
portion of the other message so that others will be able to
follow the thread. It is not necessary, nor is it desirable to
quote an entire message, or too large a portion of an original
message. It is considered the height of bad form to quote an
entire message of perhaps 50 lines, than add a small reply like,
"I agree." Generally quote only a small significant part of the
original message. NEVER quote any part of the original poster's
SIGNATURE file. Messages are often killed by the majordomo for
repetive over-quoting.
1.2) Signature Files
Many people add a SIGNATURE file at the end of each of their
messages. It's a great way to get your contact info out in
front of others. Feel free to place your name, e-mail
address, web URL, or whatever in your Signature file. Just
don't over do it. SIGNATURES must be 4 lines or less.
1.3) Private Replies
If a private reply is warranted, make the reply private; don't
spam the list with information that only two people will care
about or understand.
1.4) Unsubscribe Messages
If you want to unsubscribe, DON'T post a message to the entire
list asking how. Visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego and
unsubscribe from there.
2) Flames
A flame is essentially a personal attack directed at an individual or
a group through the use of a mailing list, newsgroup, or e-mail.
People who flames others on a consistent basis will eventually find
themselves expelled from the mego@yahoogroups.com Mailing List.
2.1) Flaming
Don't flame people. Arguing is fine, up to a point. When the
insults start flying, though, then it's time to stop. Period.
As with most other newsgroups, and lists, flaming or personal
attacks will not be allowed and you will be directed to take
such to private e-mail with the parties involved.
However, there is often a mis-understanding of what a flame
actually is. A flame is a PERSONAL attack on another, such as,
"You're a real jerk!" (or worse). A flame is NOT a strong
disagreement with another's position, such as "I think you're
wrong about that. Maybe you need to recheck your facts."
It is hoped that everyone will always treat each other with
dignity and respect, but if you really find someone's posts
distasteful even though they stay within the list rules, then
simply ignore them. Most mail programs have filters. Put the
person's name in your filter list to immediately transfer their
messages to your trash folder, and you'll be forever free from
seeing their posts.
3) General List Rules
The mego@yahoogroups.com Mailing List is pretty liberal insofar as rules
go, but the ones we do have must be followed. Remember, your words
are representative of yourself. If you want people to have a
positive image of you, you have to work to present that positive
image.
3.1) Too Much Mail?
Don't complain about seeing too much mail show up in your
mailbox. That's what this list is for. If you're getting too
much e-mail, you have three options.
1) Unsubscribe (Bad option! Please don't go!)
2) Switch to Digest Mode
3) Read messages at the website
Switching to digest mode will allow you to receive messages in
groups of 25, combined into one large e-mail. Reading messages
at the website will allow you to peruse other member's posts at
your own pace, and respond in kind.
For the second and third options, please visit the Mego Website
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego and alter your subscription
information accordingly.
3.2) Grammar and Spelling
Use proper grammar and spelling to the best of your ability.
Your posts aren't being graded and you'll receive no bad marks
for misspelled words, but if we can't understand your posts,
we'll have a much harder time trying to decide what you mean so
that we can properly respond. We do realize that, for some people
subscribing to the list, English is a second language. Just do
the best you can, and we appreciate your willingness to
communicate in a language that isn't natural for you just so
that you can be on this list! :)
3.3) Don't Use Nasty Words
Don't use nasty words. There are several young people on the
list so please follow "the 10 year old rule" - don't use words
that you wouldn't use around a 10 yr. old. By the same token,
don't go into great detail about a topic (ie: sex) that would
embarrass or scare off someone else on the list.
3.4) Don't Post Nasty Pictures
Don't post nasty pictures. This is a family-rated list (see 3.3
above,) so please don't post links to pictures or other material
that might be considered objectionable. And use your common
sense when figuring out what might be objectionable! Nude
photos, for example, would be considered objectionable. By the
same token, don't upload said pictures to the file area of the
Mego list.
3.5) Be very careful when discussing religion or politics
Religions and Politics are both very loaded issues. Everyone has
an opinion, and it's usually quite difficult if not downright
impossible to change those opinions. Thus, we discourage (but
don't outright ban) the use of Religion and Politics as topics
of discussion on the Mego mailing list.
3.6) Stay On Topic
Try to at least somewhat keep on topic. We don't mind (and even
encourage) discussion about non-Mego things, but the topic
should eventually come back to Mego. After all, that's what
we're here for.
3.7) All Caps
Another mailing list sin is TYPING IN ALL CAPS. THIS IS
CONSIDERED VERY RUDE, IN THE ONLINE WORLD. WHY, BECAUSE IT`S
UGLY. ALSO, IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE SHOUTING! Needless to say,
using all caps to post is not allowed on the Mego mailing list.
3.8) Formats and File Attachments
Make sure your mail program is configured to send messages in
ASCII, or it may be called TEXT. In other words, don't send
messages in HTML, MIME or Rich Text Format (RTF). The mailing
list does not support it, and they only increase bandwidth
without adding anything to the meaning of the printed word.
Also, please do not attach files to your messages. If you wish
to e-mail an attached file to someone, send them directly. The
reasons for this are two-fold; one, it too greatly increases
bandwidth and it's likely that not everyone on the list will be
interested; and two, because e-mailed file attachments are a way to
transmit virus programs and trojan horses to other computers. A
corollary to this is that you should NEVER open an e-mailed file
attach unless it is something you are expecting, from someone
you know and trust.
Be aware that you can post files to the group without e-mailing
them. Visit the Files section at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego for more details.
3.9) Moderation
If a situation arises where it becomes necessary to comment on a
message's format or content, please leave that to the
moderators. Things that have seen discussed in the past on this
list as well as other lists include excessive quoting, spelling
errors, indentation of the left margin, problems with the origin
line, etc. You should not see these topics discussed openly;
they are handled via e-mail to the appropriate person, when
necessary. It is a violation of the list rules to remind
another participant that they are in violation of the list
rules. Once again, leave it to the moderators.
3.10) Mailing list Help
Don't post a message to the group asking how to change to
digest mode, unsubscribe or anything else that yahoogroups does.
Remember, you can find out what yahoogroups can do by visiting the
Mego page at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego.
Now that all of the rules and guidelines are out of the way - Welcome to
the Mego mailing list! If you have any questions, comments, suggestions,
or critiques about this document or the list in general, please don't
hesitate to write Joe at jderouen@....
Warmest Regards,
Joe DeRouen
Dallas, Texas, USA
November 9th, 2000
Revisions to this file:
v1.0 November 9th, 2000
v1.1 January 26th, 2001 <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25372 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
|
.html .htmlIt was actually revealed in a Simpsons episode where Ned goes nuts
that "diddly" is a curse (or swear word).
So could you please cut back on the language?
Michael
You funny man.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25373 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
|
.html .htmlAnyway, once again to all concerned I sincerely apologise for any hurt
feelings my Piranha statement may have caused.
Ohhhh You Bastard! I take great offense to being called a piranha! I'm seriously considering hunting you down to eat your lungs! Now if you'd called me a shark, or a killer whale, that would be other story. But this piranha crack takes the cake!
TRANSLATION FOR THE SARCASTICALLY CHALLENGED.....
The above statement is a joke.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25374 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
.html.html In a message dated 12/1/02 11:13:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, melkor@... writes:
Can anyone think of more POTA dialogue mentioning God?
GOD DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25375 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Kim |
|
.html .html
Thanks! I didn't know Kim faked an illness to give her understudy a break.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25376 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
|
.html .htmlLooks like you got it all covered, Mike. I'll just add that there's probably a good collection of POTA photos at the Fox Archives he he should raid the place.
-- Rory<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25377 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
.html.html In a message dated 12/1/02 11:48:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, melkor@... writes:
Do DVD's burn? You go first and let us know how well it goes. Naturally
you'll want to toss in the TV show, the cartoons, and the other sequels into
the bonfire since the first movie is the only good one.
-Tom
You forgot the new movie.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25378 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html.html In a message dated 12/2/02 2:02:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Not sure how the Archives set went...
Anyone?
Michael
I seem to recall that Inkworks planned a second series of APES cards revolving around the TV series. It never happened. I thought some of the Inkworks cards were way over-priced.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25379 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html.html In a message dated 12/2/02 2:14:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Jerry Goldsmith for sure.
Goldsmith may be hard to get. I hear he's pretty much a grouch.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25380 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.htmlAll it took was a two week flame war for people to say what they
were thinking three weeks ago.
>
> I see how that could have been misinterpreted - I was trying very
> hard to be (and stay) serious and I guess I misread the wave.
>
> As John Cleese says in "Holy Grail" after slaying a lot of wedding
> guests..."Sorry about that...I just get carried away sometimes"...
>
> Michael
>
> --- Haristas@... wrote:
> > In a message dated 12/1/02 9:31:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > whitty@... writes:
> >
> >
> > > I thought I tried to discuss this and the message I got from you
> and
> > > Rory was "see you later" (or did I misread the photo of Zira and
> > > Cornelius waving goodbye and your subsequent response to that?).
> >
> > You see there? Now I meant for everyone to get a kick out of
> posting that
> > picture of the apes waving "bye bye" and Jeff got it and thought it
> was funny
> > as I meant it to be, but I guess others weren't in the mood to find
> it funny.
> >
> > Humor can be a dangerous thing.
> >
> > -- Rory
> > <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25381 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
.html>
> > Do DVD's burn? You go first and let us know how well it goes. Naturally
> > you'll want to toss in the TV show, the cartoons, and the other sequels
> > into
> > the bonfire since the first movie is the only good one.
> >
> > -Tom
> >
> You forgot the new movie.
>
> -- Rory
>
Yes I forget that one. But you would make Fox happy because later
you would smack yourself on the head and buy them all back. Except
for the new movie. Oh heck, you would buy that one again too. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25382 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] God dialogue in the POTA universe |
.html>
> > Can anyone think of more POTA dialogue mentioning God?
>
> GOD DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!
>
Good one.
Here's the score. (Nothing from CONQUEST)
PLANET: 2
BENEATH: 1
ESCAPE: 2
CONQUEST: 0
BATTLE: 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
God damn you all to hell!
PLANET: Taylor
Alone among God's primates, he hunts for sport, or lust, or greed.
PLANET; Cornelius, quoting from 29:6 of the Sacred Scrolls.
My god it's a city of Apes!
BENEATH; Brent to himself (or Nova).
And how in God's name are we to know that unless we communicate. We can
speak, so I spoke.
ESCAPE: Zira
Am I obeying God's will or opposing it?
ESCAPE; Hasslein to the President.
And then God in his wrath sent the world a saviour...
BATTLE; The Lawgiver (2670) to his congregation.
For god's sake, wait for the Governor's signal.
BATTLE; Mendez to Alma.
If we knew for certain there is a god and we are going to heaven we
would all commit suicide in order to enjoy it.
BATTLE; Mandemus to Caesar, Virgil, & MacDonald. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25383 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.html--- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Patrick, Rory will be getting your beer so work it out with him if
> you want it.
> Michael
*** In the last private e-mail you sent me, you said that you
had "nothing to say" to me. Alas, that was too much to hope for, it
seems!
Rory can have "my" beer, since I don't drink/smoke/do drugs/etc. What
do I do? Subtle innuendos follow...
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25384 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Rules" again! Ugh! |
|
.html I'll try to make this my last entry on this subject. My apologies for
the "more-than-100-words", but for clarity's sake I have to go into
some detail. Those who are tired of the Soap Opera that is this on-
going chatfest regarding the "other" group, feel free to skip or
delete this message. Here goes...
Yet again, we have a suggestion to bombard this site with "rules" and
to subject it to the whims of an overseeing "moderator". I've always
been of the opinion that SELF-rule and SELF-moderation is the best
policy. I've seen an example of how ONE person on this site--after
acquiring Moderator-powers on the POTA-DG site--has exercised such
power, and it so offended my sensibilities that I just HAD to voice
an opinion regarding it. Not so much for myself (I had been told in
no uncertain terms that I personally would not be welcome at the
site), but for the sake of Rory--someone who had pissed me off
occasionally in the past, yet who has made it clear both in PUBLIC
(on this site) and in PRIVATE (in an e-mail to me) that his seeming
insults are not all that seriously intended. Rory has since gone out
of his way (as has MTotsky) to invite me over to another Yahoo chat
group, which was rather nice.
Nobody here would know that Michael spent half a day scanning in Ape
City blueprints for me, had he not gone out of his way to mention it
HERE; he sent 'em to me through a private e-mail (they also made it
onto his POTA-DG site, so his efforts weren't solely for my benefit).
After receiving those blueprints, I sent him a hearty "thank you" for
the generous gesture.
And then I found out about this new POTA-DG group, and how Rory had
had a message censored, along with getting kicked out. So I checked
out the POTA-DG site, read through every message in one sitting, and
came away APPALLED. How could somebody who--despite going out of his
way to piss me off on THIS site time after time--had seemed to be
turning out to be a person willing to "bury the hatchet" and be so
generous as to e-mail me (ME!) POTA blueprints, how could he then
turn 180 degrees around and do something so... so... so fascist? Ugh!
I hated to make comparisons to Nazis (which Rory did as a "Seinfeld"
reference: the "Soup Nazi" routine), but Michael's wielding of power
as the "Moderator" over there led him to commit CENSORSHIP and then
outright BANISHMENT of a Member. Mike referred to Rory
being "banished to the Forbidden Zone", which sounded a little like
being forced into, say, the Warsaw ghetto. Just enough like real
Nazism to make my skin crawl. For all the "democracy" that was being
extolled at this "new" site, the decision to evict Rory from it was
UNILATERAL--the "group" had no say whatsoever--it was a "fait
accompli". No matter how much Mike tries to defend this action, I
can't help but find it repugnant.
Well, it seems that Rory is NOW allowed to rejoin that group. Fine.
Great. I'm sure such a "troublemaker" (as Mike called him in his
penultimate private e-mail to me) will be "welcome" back. Of course,
none of the other members over there had a say in his being kicked
out in the first place, so maybe the majority over there WILL welcome
him back.
And NOW there's this suggestion that THIS site adopt the "rules" of
this Mego-chat site... or that both THIS site and the POTA-DG site be
shut down in favor of a THIRD site which would have all these "rules"
to follow, and a "moderator" to wield the censor's pen and the
headsman's axe. Well, if that's what anybody/everybody else would
like, go right on ahead. But even if I'm the only one left to post on
THIS site, then this site will continue. Hell, I'm not welcome at the
POTA-DG site (at least by Mike, James & Mlccougar), and I'd never put
myself in a position where somebody could just arbitrarily censor my
input and/or toss me out for what would probably amount to a petty
personal reason--after all, who would know whether or not
the "moderator" was or was not justified, since the decision is made
by ONE person alone? Who would ever really know if the Moderator's
decision was based on the "Rules" or, rather, was for a personal
grievance?
I compared Mike to Aldo (from BATTLE), in a past posting here, and
also in my last private e-mail to him... and the last e-mail he sent
to me, rather than point-by-point discussing the matter, was a
blanket "I-have-nothing-to-say-to-you" angry dismissal, with the
added bonus of a thinly-veiled threat that IF I were to send any
other e-mail his way (even as a response), he would consider it
harassment! As if I'm the villain from "Cape Fear", out to terrorize
him and his family!
Why am I bringing in all this referencing of private e-mails? If
they're so "private", why mention such content? Well, Mike was not
above mentioning the "private" e-mails he had sent me, with the
pretention of being "hurt" by my attitudes regarding his fascist
actions at "his" POTA-DG site, pointing out how "nice" he had been to
me personally, spending "half a day" scanning those blueprints for my
sake. "How (sob!) could Patrick be so mean to me, after all I did for
him?" How were the members of THIS site supposed to feel about me
after reading that little sob-story? Favorably, or unfavorably?
This goofy friggin' soap opera has run its course! Mike has admitted
both privately (e-mails) and publicly (here) that he was as much of
the "problem" of the Flame-Wars and all that, yet his solution was
not so much to exert total SELF-restraint and rise above the
temptations to get "negative", but to form his own Yahoo POTA-DG
splinter group, where he--like Dennis Franz in "Die Hard 2"--would be
the "big fish" in his own little pond, where it's his way or the
highway. It also reminds me, somewhat, of that Simpsons episode where
Homer joins the "Stonecutters" lodge, only to find--eventually--that
his presence rubs them all the wrong way, so that they all ditch
their memberships in the Stonecutters to form the Ancient and Most
Sacred Order of the "No-Homers" lodge. (Remember how Homer wanted to
get the Stonecutters to stage a Civil War battle re-enactment with
monkeys? See? I made it topical: Monkeys!)
Jeff has pointed out that Mike has used THIS site as pretty much a
dumping ground for his non-POTA talk. I would add that the majority
of his postings here (since the inauguration of his "new" site) have
been attempts to justify his decision to splinter off, restrict
membership, censor content, formulate-and-enforce Rules, etc. If he
truly feels that splintering off was the "right" thing to do, then he
shouldn't NEED to justify it to ANYBODY. And he seems downright
offended that anybody should find the matter in general--not to
mention the unsettling specifics (Censorship & Banishment)--to be
repugnant to at least SOME peoples' sensibilities.
If he's gonna keep posting over here, trying to drag us kicking and
screaming into his Rule-laden sphere of Overlordship, rather than
just discuss POTA on-topic, then I suggest a vote. NOT a vote
to "kick him out", but a vote to tell him in no uncertain terms that
we do NOT want censorship-inducing Rules or the Rulership of
a "Moderator" who can arbitrarily Banish a member without any say-so
from the other members... AND that we do not want to read any more
Justifications for his decision to form a group whose purpose was to
GET AWAY from THIS one! If Mike truly gives a damn about "majority
opinion", and IF the opinion of the majority over here is that he
should just shut the f*** up about his other group & their Rules
(etc.) and get back to just talking POTA over here, THEN just maybe
he'll relent and leave us in peace.
Unlike his attitude towards me (whom he wouldn't allow in HIS group),
I am not in favor of him being "banished to the Forbidden Zone" out
of this group. I just want his input to be about POTA (this recent
stuff about the POTA cards is more like it, as far as I'm concerned).
I'm willing to tolerate the occasional off-topic post, as long as
it's the exception, rather than the "rule". Hell, that goes for
everybody here, myself included. And THIS is the last I'll ever say
in regards to this matter... unless Mike goes Ape-shit and prompts a
needed rebuttal. It's my hope that he'll exercise the SELF-control we
all should use (mySELF included), and give this Rules-&-Moderator
spiel a rest.
Patrick
P.S. By the way, Mike, let this be the THIRD time I've thanked you
for those Ape City blueprints. I thanked you (privately) the FIRST
time right after you sent them to me (privately). After my caustic
comments regarding your Censorship & Banishment of Rory on your POTA-
DG site, you acted dumbfounded that I could be so harsh to you after
you had been so nice to me (by scanning those blueprints)... so I
sent you an e-mail not only pointing out that I had already thanked
you for that, but also giving you explicit reasons why I had harsh
things to say about your behavior... and then I went out of my way to
thank you a SECOND time for the efforts you had made to scan those
blueprints. You went public on THIS site complaining about my
supposed ingratitude regarding your half-a-day efforts to scan those
blueprints... so, then, here is my THIRD "thank you" for those
efforts--done in PUBLIC, as was your complaint about my supposed
ingratitude. Count 'em, Michael: that's THREE times now I've thanked
you. Come to think of it, I apologized PUBLICLY three times to James
(in regards to that "bad spelling"/Dyslexia matter), yet he STILL
doesn't care to accept any of my apologies. Well, they're on record
here, as are my "thank you" notes to you. Can we NOW put it to rest? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25385 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html
.html
Yup,
agreed, and I will be asking him to take it a step further, as part of the
research into the words that go on the back of the cards, and get a firm answer
from Fox about:
(1) if
these scenes were SHOT;
(2) if
theses scenes still EXIST;
(3) if
there are plans to release them on alternate version DVDs or as Deleted Scenes
extras (my suggestion would be as VERY limited production releases to assure
they SELL OUT and are always in high demand).
Michael
Looks like you got it all covered, Mike. I'll just add that
there's probably a good collection of POTA photos at the Fox Archives he he
should raid the place.
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25386 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html>
> Yup, agreed, and I will be asking him to take it a step further, as part of
> the research into the words that go on the back of the cards, and get a firm
> answer from Fox about:
>
> (1) if these scenes were SHOT;
>
> (2) if theses scenes still EXIST;
>
> (3) if there are plans to release them on alternate version DVDs or as
> Deleted Scenes extras (my suggestion would be as VERY limited production
> releases to assure they SELL OUT and are always in high demand).
>
If they release alternate version DVDs I want them to make as many as
possible. The last thing I want is a shortage where I may have to
pay $$$ on ebay to get them.
What would be perfect would be a DVD with the alternate version and regular
version of the movie in the same set. I would especially want ESCAPE with an
opening scene before the spaceship lands. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25387 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.htmlI would really like to see a lot of them too but I would hate to see
them in "sell-out" bins, and limiting the release is the best way to
assure that.
Maybe have a test run with limited release that have a case made up
as a scale replica of the Icarus ship (or something groovy like that)
and if they sell out, Fox could go for a larger volume release but
without the expensive packaging?
Just a thought.
Michael
--- Melkor < melkor@...> wrote:
> >
> > Yup, agreed, and I will be asking him to take it a step further,
as part of
> > the research into the words that go on the back of the cards, and
get a firm
> > answer from Fox about:
> >
> > (1) if these scenes were SHOT;
> >
> > (2) if theses scenes still EXIST;
> >
> > (3) if there are plans to release them on alternate version DVDs
or as
> > Deleted Scenes extras (my suggestion would be as VERY limited
production
> > releases to assure they SELL OUT and are always in high demand).
> >
>
> If they release alternate version DVDs I want them to make as many
as
> possible. The last thing I want is a shortage where I may have to
> pay $$$ on ebay to get them.
>
> What would be perfect would be a DVD with the alternate version and
regular
> version of the movie in the same set. I would especially want
ESCAPE with an
> opening scene before the spaceship lands.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25388 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
|
.html .html(like the "M" rated group).
I like that idea. When wver you use Mature language in a post you could put an M in the subject line so as not to burn peoples virgin eyes. Or another alternative could be to use alternative words as a substitute, like fecking ala Father Ted or farging ala Johnny Dangerously. You buncha farging iceholes some-in-a-bachin' bastages!
What the Feck?<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25389 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: 12/2/02 : Today in Group History |
.html
.html
Note: In 1999, between 11/30 and 12/11 there
were no posts (a record for this group?)
12/2/00: Continuing the conversation, Alex
agrees the humans in the new movie should be mute ("best formula is mute humans
and talking apes, and when talking apes and talking humans come together as in
"Beneath"...Caaaaa! Boooom! The revolution begins") and doesn't like the casting
of Kris Kristofferson (T suggests Willy Nelson). Jeff replies: "Talking Humans:
That's not a death sentence for the movie. it sounds like Burton is going for an
allegory on prejudice, and not on human/animal relations like in the first one.
The first movie has been done! It'll work, everybody, one, two, three...IF THE
SCRIPT WORKS". There's also a net rumor that the apes will be more primitive
than in the original.
12/2/01: TV show talk courtesy of the new
DVDs: Rory complains about the gorillas (no neck pieces, chimp-like groucho Marx
walk); Patrick doesn't like that Urko cheats during the horse races after other
episodes have shown him advocating law and order; Jeff suggests "perhaps the
horse races are considered light-weight fun and his shenanigans not all that
serious". Patrick also puts forth the idea that Urko's helmet is the same one
Ursus wears, but that the paint has orn off ("Just speculatin' here, folks").
Rory counters: "I would speculate that that helmet would fall apart long before
it reached the age of 870". Jeff and Cougar also come down negatively on the
Urko to Ursus helmet hypothesis. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 3:31
PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading
Cards - Important Announcement
I would really like to see a lot of them too but I would
hate to see them in "sell-out" bins, and limiting the release is the best
way to assure that.
Maybe have a test run with limited release that
have a case made up as a scale replica of the Icarus ship (or something
groovy like that) and if they sell out, Fox could go for a larger volume
release but without the expensive packaging?
Just a
thought.
Michael
--- Melkor <melkor@...>
wrote: > > > > Yup, agreed, and I will be asking him to
take it a step further, as part of > > the research into the
words that go on the back of the cards, and get a firm > > answer
from Fox about: > > > > (1) if these scenes were
SHOT; > > > > (2) if theses scenes still EXIST; >
> > > (3) if there are plans to release them on alternate version
DVDs or as > > Deleted Scenes extras (my suggestion would be as
VERY limited production > > releases to assure they SELL OUT and
are always in high demand). > > > > If they release
alternate version DVDs I want them to make as many as >
possible. The last thing I want is a shortage where I may have to
> pay $$$ on ebay to get them. > > What would be
perfect would be a DVD with the alternate version and regular >
version of the movie in the same set. I would especially want ESCAPE
with an > opening scene before the spaceship lands. > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > >
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25390 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.html>
> You're not a troublemaker Jeff. You are a nice guy, from what I can
Rory however is "one of the troublemakers from the old group" according to one
of James postings.
> tell. But the OT issue had to be solved so I could turn around and
> say "hey Jeff, there is another POTA group that contains people who
> are very anti OT and we would love to have you on board, or include
> you in some way, because not only are you a nice guy, but you have a
> very important inside POTA connection". Do you understand? But
> there is still no concensus on the new group - there has been no vote
> (and as new mwmbers join and vote things will change). The new group
> may vote to wipe out voting (can you do that?)! Who knows?
Or the moderators may dictate on their own to wipe out voting in the new
group. Who knows? (stay tuned) <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25391 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.html.html In a message dated 12/3/02 12:33:57 AM Eastern Standard Time, melkor@... writes:
Rory however is "one of the troublemakers from the old group" according to one
of James postings.
Oh, James, aka "That Bitch!", just can't stand it that I know more about maps than he does!
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25392 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.htmlEverything is upside-down from here...but sideways?
Michael
--- Haristas@... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/3/02 12:33:57 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> melkor@... writes:
>
>
> > Rory however is "one of the troublemakers from the old group"
according to
> > one
> > of James postings.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Oh, James, aka "That Bitch!", just can't stand it that I know more
about maps
> than he does!
>
> -- Rory
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25393 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/2/2002 |
| Subject: The "Other" Group (OT) |
.htmlCould someone please censor this guy and kick him out of the group?
He is obviously some kind of free-wheeling anarchist! What? The
microphone is ON? And I'm on the wrong group? OK, I'll get back
into character.......
I've decided that in the interest of peace I will go back and read
Patrick's posts now. I can't believe I could have ever said I
would "deny myself" of them.
Michael
--- Melkor < melkor@...> wrote:
> >
> > You're not a troublemaker Jeff. You are a nice guy, from what I
can
>
> Rory however is "one of the troublemakers from the old group"
according to one
> of James postings.
>
>
> > tell. But the OT issue had to be solved so I could turn around
and
> > say "hey Jeff, there is another POTA group that contains people
who
> > are very anti OT and we would love to have you on board, or
include
> > you in some way, because not only are you a nice guy, but you
have a
> > very important inside POTA connection". Do you understand? But
> > there is still no concensus on the new group - there has been no
vote
> > (and as new mwmbers join and vote things will change). The new
group
> > may vote to wipe out voting (can you do that?)! Who knows?
>
> Or the moderators may dictate on their own to wipe out voting in
the new
> group. Who knows? (stay tuned)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25394 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Nicknames |
.htmlYou won't quit will you?
Here's your nickname: Saddam Hussein.
Report by Middle East analyst Gerald Butt
In a region where despotic rule is the norm, he is more feared by his
own people than any other head of a pota discussion group.
A former Iraqi diplomat living in exile summed up Saddam's rule in
one sentence: "Saddam is a dictator who is ready to sacrifice his
group, just so long as he can remain on his throne in the mother
ship." Few members would disagree with this. Although none living in
the pota group would dare to say so publicly.
The pota group are forced to consume a daily diet of triumphalist
slogans, fattened by fawning praise of the president.
He portrays himself as a valiant knight leading the Arabs into battle
against the infidel, or as an eighth-century caliph who founded the
city of Baghdad. Evoking the glory of Arab history, Saddam claims to
be leading his people to new glory.
The reality looks very different. His homeland is bankrupt, its
economy and infrastructure shattered by years of economic sanctions
imposed by the Nazi following the invasion of the potaDG.
Saddam Hussein remains largely isolated from his people, keeping the
company of a diminishing circle of trusted advisers - largely drawn
from his close family or from the extended clan based on the
internet. But even they are sickened by him.
Another former Iraqi diplomat living in exile summed up Saddam's rule
in one sentence:
It was OK until he said: "Rory can have "my" beer, since I don't
drink / smoke / do drugs etc. What do I do? Subtle innuendos
follow...". The subsequent images sent the bile projecting from my
bowels. There is no way this guy does any chicks, so he could only
be referring to the rubber suit he adorns to sit on sticks and
masturbate...excuse me - I'm throwing up again......
--- In pota@y..., "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
wrote:
> --- In pota@y..., "whitty@c..." <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Patrick, Rory will be getting your beer so work it out with him
if
> > you want it.
>
> > Michael
>
> *** In the last private e-mail you sent me, you said that you
> had "nothing to say" to me. Alas, that was too much to hope for, it
> seems!
> Rory can have "my" beer, since I don't drink/smoke/do drugs/etc.
What
> do I do? Subtle innuendos follow...
>
> Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25395 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patrick" again! Ugh! |
.htmlThis is a joke right?
T, you said that Patrick working in a toy shop blew your image of
him. I think more like the Comic Book Guy in the Simpsons. You can
see him writing any of these posts, and he has similar people skills.
Michael
--- In pota@y..., "patrickmichaeltilton" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
wrote:
> I'll try to make this my last entry on this subject. My apologies
for
> the "more-than-100-words", but for clarity's sake I have to go into
> some detail. Those who are tired of the Soap Opera that is this on-
> going chatfest regarding the "other" group, feel free to skip or
> delete this message. Here goes...
>
> Yet again, we have a suggestion to bombard this site with "rules"
and
> to subject it to the whims of an overseeing "moderator". I've
always
> been of the opinion that SELF-rule and SELF-moderation is the best
> policy. I've seen an example of how ONE person on this site--after
> acquiring Moderator-powers on the POTA-DG site--has exercised such
> power, and it so offended my sensibilities that I just HAD to voice
> an opinion regarding it. Not so much for myself (I had been told in
> no uncertain terms that I personally would not be welcome at the
> site), but for the sake of Rory--someone who had pissed me off
> occasionally in the past, yet who has made it clear both in PUBLIC
> (on this site) and in PRIVATE (in an e-mail to me) that his seeming
> insults are not all that seriously intended. Rory has since gone
out
> of his way (as has MTotsky) to invite me over to another Yahoo chat
> group, which was rather nice.
> Nobody here would know that Michael spent half a day scanning in
Ape
> City blueprints for me, had he not gone out of his way to mention
it
> HERE; he sent 'em to me through a private e-mail (they also made it
> onto his POTA-DG site, so his efforts weren't solely for my
benefit).
> After receiving those blueprints, I sent him a hearty "thank you"
for
> the generous gesture.
>
> And then I found out about this new POTA-DG group, and how Rory had
> had a message censored, along with getting kicked out. So I checked
> out the POTA-DG site, read through every message in one sitting,
and
> came away APPALLED. How could somebody who--despite going out of
his
> way to piss me off on THIS site time after time--had seemed to be
> turning out to be a person willing to "bury the hatchet" and be so
> generous as to e-mail me (ME!) POTA blueprints, how could he then
> turn 180 degrees around and do something so... so... so fascist?
Ugh!
> I hated to make comparisons to Nazis (which Rory did as
a "Seinfeld"
> reference: the "Soup Nazi" routine), but Michael's wielding of
power
> as the "Moderator" over there led him to commit CENSORSHIP and then
> outright BANISHMENT of a Member. Mike referred to Rory
> being "banished to the Forbidden Zone", which sounded a little like
> being forced into, say, the Warsaw ghetto. Just enough like real
> Nazism to make my skin crawl. For all the "democracy" that was
being
> extolled at this "new" site, the decision to evict Rory from it was
> UNILATERAL--the "group" had no say whatsoever--it was a "fait
> accompli". No matter how much Mike tries to defend this action, I
> can't help but find it repugnant.
>
> Well, it seems that Rory is NOW allowed to rejoin that group. Fine.
> Great. I'm sure such a "troublemaker" (as Mike called him in his
> penultimate private e-mail to me) will be "welcome" back. Of
course,
> none of the other members over there had a say in his being kicked
> out in the first place, so maybe the majority over there WILL
welcome
> him back.
>
> And NOW there's this suggestion that THIS site adopt the "rules" of
> this Mego-chat site... or that both THIS site and the POTA-DG site
be
> shut down in favor of a THIRD site which would have all
these "rules"
> to follow, and a "moderator" to wield the censor's pen and the
> headsman's axe. Well, if that's what anybody/everybody else would
> like, go right on ahead. But even if I'm the only one left to post
on
> THIS site, then this site will continue. Hell, I'm not welcome at
the
> POTA-DG site (at least by Mike, James & Mlccougar), and I'd never
put
> myself in a position where somebody could just arbitrarily censor
my
> input and/or toss me out for what would probably amount to a petty
> personal reason--after all, who would know whether or not
> the "moderator" was or was not justified, since the decision is
made
> by ONE person alone? Who would ever really know if the Moderator's
> decision was based on the "Rules" or, rather, was for a personal
> grievance?
>
> I compared Mike to Aldo (from BATTLE), in a past posting here, and
> also in my last private e-mail to him... and the last e-mail he
sent
> to me, rather than point-by-point discussing the matter, was a
> blanket "I-have-nothing-to-say-to-you" angry dismissal, with the
> added bonus of a thinly-veiled threat that IF I were to send any
> other e-mail his way (even as a response), he would consider it
> harassment! As if I'm the villain from "Cape Fear", out to
terrorize
> him and his family!
>
> Why am I bringing in all this referencing of private e-mails? If
> they're so "private", why mention such content? Well, Mike was not
> above mentioning the "private" e-mails he had sent me, with the
> pretention of being "hurt" by my attitudes regarding his fascist
> actions at "his" POTA-DG site, pointing out how "nice" he had been
to
> me personally, spending "half a day" scanning those blueprints for
my
> sake. "How (sob!) could Patrick be so mean to me, after all I did
for
> him?" How were the members of THIS site supposed to feel about me
> after reading that little sob-story? Favorably, or unfavorably?
>
> This goofy friggin' soap opera has run its course! Mike has
admitted
> both privately (e-mails) and publicly (here) that he was as much of
> the "problem" of the Flame-Wars and all that, yet his solution was
> not so much to exert total SELF-restraint and rise above the
> temptations to get "negative", but to form his own Yahoo POTA-DG
> splinter group, where he--like Dennis Franz in "Die Hard 2"--would
be
> the "big fish" in his own little pond, where it's his way or the
> highway. It also reminds me, somewhat, of that Simpsons episode
where
> Homer joins the "Stonecutters" lodge, only to find--eventually--
that
> his presence rubs them all the wrong way, so that they all ditch
> their memberships in the Stonecutters to form the Ancient and Most
> Sacred Order of the "No-Homers" lodge. (Remember how Homer wanted
to
> get the Stonecutters to stage a Civil War battle re-enactment with
> monkeys? See? I made it topical: Monkeys!)
>
> Jeff has pointed out that Mike has used THIS site as pretty much a
> dumping ground for his non-POTA talk. I would add that the majority
> of his postings here (since the inauguration of his "new" site)
have
> been attempts to justify his decision to splinter off, restrict
> membership, censor content, formulate-and-enforce Rules, etc. If he
> truly feels that splintering off was the "right" thing to do, then
he
> shouldn't NEED to justify it to ANYBODY. And he seems downright
> offended that anybody should find the matter in general--not to
> mention the unsettling specifics (Censorship & Banishment)--to be
> repugnant to at least SOME peoples' sensibilities.
>
> If he's gonna keep posting over here, trying to drag us kicking and
> screaming into his Rule-laden sphere of Overlordship, rather than
> just discuss POTA on-topic, then I suggest a vote. NOT a vote
> to "kick him out", but a vote to tell him in no uncertain terms
that
> we do NOT want censorship-inducing Rules or the Rulership of
> a "Moderator" who can arbitrarily Banish a member without any say-
so
> from the other members... AND that we do not want to read any more
> Justifications for his decision to form a group whose purpose was
to
> GET AWAY from THIS one! If Mike truly gives a damn about "majority
> opinion", and IF the opinion of the majority over here is that he
> should just shut the f*** up about his other group & their Rules
> (etc.) and get back to just talking POTA over here, THEN just maybe
> he'll relent and leave us in peace.
>
> Unlike his attitude towards me (whom he wouldn't allow in HIS
group),
> I am not in favor of him being "banished to the Forbidden Zone" out
> of this group. I just want his input to be about POTA (this recent
> stuff about the POTA cards is more like it, as far as I'm
concerned).
> I'm willing to tolerate the occasional off-topic post, as long as
> it's the exception, rather than the "rule". Hell, that goes for
> everybody here, myself included. And THIS is the last I'll ever say
> in regards to this matter... unless Mike goes Ape-shit and prompts
a
> needed rebuttal. It's my hope that he'll exercise the SELF-control
we
> all should use (mySELF included), and give this Rules-&-Moderator
> spiel a rest.
>
> Patrick
>
> P.S. By the way, Mike, let this be the THIRD time I've thanked you
> for those Ape City blueprints. I thanked you (privately) the FIRST
> time right after you sent them to me (privately). After my caustic
> comments regarding your Censorship & Banishment of Rory on your
POTA-
> DG site, you acted dumbfounded that I could be so harsh to you
after
> you had been so nice to me (by scanning those blueprints)... so I
> sent you an e-mail not only pointing out that I had already thanked
> you for that, but also giving you explicit reasons why I had harsh
> things to say about your behavior... and then I went out of my way
to
> thank you a SECOND time for the efforts you had made to scan those
> blueprints. You went public on THIS site complaining about my
> supposed ingratitude regarding your half-a-day efforts to scan
those
> blueprints... so, then, here is my THIRD "thank you" for those
> efforts--done in PUBLIC, as was your complaint about my supposed
> ingratitude. Count 'em, Michael: that's THREE times now I've
thanked
> you. Come to think of it, I apologized PUBLICLY three times to
James
> (in regards to that "bad spelling"/Dyslexia matter), yet he STILL
> doesn't care to accept any of my apologies. Well, they're on record
> here, as are my "thank you" notes to you. Can we NOW put it to rest? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25396 |
From: whitty@cyberone.com.au |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: The "Other" Group (OT) |
.htmlI was right the first time. Noodles.
Michael
--- " whitty@..." < whitty@...> wrote:
> I've decided that in the interest of peace I will go back and read
> Patrick's posts now. I can't believe I could have ever said I
> would "deny myself" of them.
>
> Michael <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25397 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
.html.html Worst post ever.
And speaking of worst what about worst scenes? Like in Battle, when you can see Roddy's lower lip... there's a couple in every movie. How many can you think of?
I think more like the Comic Book Guy in the Simpsons.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25398 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
.html
.html
Thanks, Dave. The feelings are mutual. I
didn't mean to pick on you and Brian, you just provided easy catch phrases to
make my point. I didn't have a beef with you guys and I shouldn't have brought
you into it. I've had good relationships with you both. Besides, I
respect piranhas, they're very efficient. Again, thanks for the kind words. - -
- Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 11:48
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes]
Apology
It has come to my attention that a comment I made
recently has upset at least one member of this board.
When joining
POTAdg I introduced myself by comparing this board to a school of
Piranhas. That was wrong of me, I shouldn't have said it and I
apologise.
The comment was not directed at any one individual, least of
all Jeff Kruger.
Jeff, you were the only reason I continued to
subscribe to the old `Ape chronicles', a major reason why I would consider
subscribing to the (hopefully)new one and a significant reason why I
remained (as a lurker) on this group for so long. You are a man of
honesty, generousity and integrity and it grieves me that I've pissed you
off.
It seemed to me that the overall `mood' of this board had been
generally negative for a very long time. When I used the phrase
`piranhas' I was referring to a kind of group `mentality' that WE (I
include myself by lack of action) seemed to have created. An
enviroment where anyone who steps forward with an observation or topic
for discussion is basically setting themselves up for ridicule, slurs
and insults.
Now, I accept that the majority may very well enjoy
this kind of exchange - with the total freedom to say whatever they want,
however hurtful or insulting - I do not. (nor did I remain silent on this
issue, I did mention it some time ago.)
It seems foolish to me too
that there are two boards with each member no doubt peeking at the affairs
of the other to see what's going on, if anyone has a workable resolution
I'd be happy to go along with it.
Anyway, once again to all concerned
I sincerely apologise for any hurt feelings my Piranha statement may have
caused.
Dav
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25399 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
.html
.html
We've got the 2 groups, why don't we just
leave it at that? This group for more open discussion and that group for the
nuts and bolts. I hereby officially give Rory permission to join the new group,
and I might, too. But this group will continue to be my home. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 2:14
AM
Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes]
Apology
I do have one suggestion.
The "Mego" group have
established some ground rules and they are quite interesting.
I
suggest we look at them and consider (attached below).
Of course, if
the majority of people on this group don't want rules, then I think the
current set up can work harmoniously still, but there would be less
restrictions over here (like the "M" rated group).
I don't really think
having two boards is a problem (like I said, there is a Time of the Apes
group too and there are many other groups), but if it causes more trouble
than good I will consider anything (oh boy, I'm wide open saying
this!..).
My ULTIMATE goal is to be part of an EFFECTIVE network of
POTA fans who discuss POTA. If it takes 5 groups to do this, then so
be it.
The attachment is lengthy, but I think worth
discussing.
My only comment is that I really think the OT stuff needs
to stop for the sake of keeping new members who may see 10 OT posts when
they join then send a "GET ME OFF THIS LIST!!!" message.
Also, I am
not being territorial here (promise!), but moderators are an important part
of a group and unless MFLuder hands over the keys to someone, we need to
hike over to the POTAdg or all start a THIRD group and all migrate to the
"promised land" over there (religion is ON topic,
right?).
ATTACHMENT:
Rules, Guidelines, and Just Plain Good
Ideas
1.1
Copyright (c) 2000,2001, Joe
DeRouen
All rights
reserved
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego
The
mego@yahoogroups.com mailing list has been going strong since March of 2000
and is, at last count, over 120 members strong. Thanks for
joining us! We're sure you'll enjoy many hours of fun sharing stories
and discussing Megos, trading with other collectors, and getting to know
the other members of the list, just like we have.
Please save this
letter. It covers etiquette for the list, information on posting your
stories, and much more. If you save this letter now, you'll thank
yourself later - and so will we!
Joe DeRouen is the list owner and one
of three moderators. Scott "Scooby" Rogers and Keene Silfer are the other
two moderators. There are also many other "regular people" on the
list willing to help out as well if you have questions. Don't hesitate to
ask!
First, here are the addresses that you'll need to
know:
mego@yahoogroups.com
to post to the list mego-subscribe@yahoogroups.com to
subscribe mego-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com to
unsubscribe
jderouen@...
for questions about this
list Scott6089@...
for questions about this
list krs7@...
for questions about this list
The following guide is in two parts:
"Mego Specific Etiquette" and "General Rules of Etiquette". Please read
both.
Part One: Mego Specific
Etiquette ---------------------------------
1) Buying, Selling, and
Trading on the List
We have one designated trade day each
week: Wednesday, Wednesday, and only Wednesday. Get the idea?
We call Wednesday the Flea Market day. Please don't try to
sell, buy, or trade through the list on any other day than
Wednesday. You may post your lists of items you're looking for
or have up for trade/sell at any time between midnight Tuesday
night and midnight Wednesday night, in whatever time zone you're in.
2)
Don't Brag About Your Collection
Why make your fellow
collectors feel bad? By all means, post pictures of your
Megos. Be proud of your collection! But don't make fun of the
new guy on the list that's still looking for a loose 8"
Spiderman.
2.1)
Bragging
I realize that
"bragging" can be intrepreted several
different ways. I don't in any
way, shape, or form want to prevent
list members from showing off
their collection. Just use
common sense.
3) Don't
Cheat Your Fellow List Members
If you set up a trade with
a fellow list member, follow through on it. Mistakes can
happen and people can be slow (I've been one of the slowest at
times!) but you need to ultimately follow through on your
obligations.
3.1) Another List Member Owes You
Something
If someone owes you something in trade, or the
item you got in trade wasn't what you thought it was, try your
dead-level best to resolve the situation in private. Don't
bring it to the group. If all else fails, write one of the
three moderators (see the start of this document) and we'll do
our best to help you work things out.
4) Off-Topic
Talking
While this list is for and about Megos and the
people who collect them, we all will, upon occasion, lapse
into conversation which has nothing to do with our favorite
action figure. This is normal and even encouraged to a degree.
However, if you're posting something that has absolutely
nothing whatsoever to do with Megos, please put "OT:
<topic>" in the subject line of your message. This way,
subscribers to the list who don't want to read anything that
doesn't have to do with Megos can have the choice of simply
deleting your message upon receipt.
5) Have
Fun!
Have fun and get to know one another and enjoy this
list! This list is for talking about Megos, trading
Megos, and (almost) everything else the members want it to be
for. I love the sense of community that this list has
created - and I've made several friends because of this list!
- which, to me, is more valuable than any any action figure
could ever be.
Part Two: General Rules of
Etiquette ------------------------------------
1)
Spam
Spam is Internet Speak for unnecessary messages or
parts of a message posted to Usenet, a mailing list or sent
directly through e-mail. In general, people don't like
spam, and those sending spam on a consistent basis will find
that dislike directed towards them as
well.
1.1)
Quoting
Quoting a message is
very useful when communicating in a
mailing list, and it can be done
quite stylishly.
Do not,
however, quote entire messages. Ever. There is never
a need to quote an entire
message. Just quote the minimum
amount possible to make your
reply understandable. There's
nothing worse than getting a
message with 40 lines of quote and
three lines of new material way
down at the bottom. It looks
bad, makes your message much
more difficult to read and
wastes bandwidth. Quoting 40
unnecessary lines in a message,
besides looking terrible,
translates to 4,000 un-necessary lines
across a 100 member e-mail
list!
When replying to a
message, it is proper to quote a
small portion of the other
message so that others will be able
to follow the thread. It
is not necessary, nor is it desirable
to quote an entire message, or
too large a portion of an
original message. It is
considered the height of bad form to quote
an entire message of perhaps 50
lines, than add a small reply
like, "I agree." Generally quote
only a small significant part of
the original message.
NEVER quote any part of the original
poster's SIGNATURE file.
Messages are often killed by the majordomo
for repetive
over-quoting.
1.2) Signature
Files
Many people add a
SIGNATURE file at the end of each of
their messages. It's a
great way to get your contact info out
in front of others. Feel
free to place your name, e-mail
address, web URL, or whatever in your Signature file.
Just don't over do it.
SIGNATURES must be 4 lines or less.
1.3) Private
Replies
If a private reply
is warranted, make the reply private;
don't spam the list with
information that only two people will
care about or
understand.
1.4) Unsubscribe
Messages
If you want to
unsubscribe, DON'T post a message to the
entire list asking how.
Visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego
and unsubscribe from
there.
2) Flames
A flame is essentially a personal
attack directed at an individual or a group through the use of
a mailing list, newsgroup, or e-mail. People who flames others
on a consistent basis will eventually find themselves expelled
from the mego@yahoogroups.com Mailing List.
2.1)
Flaming
Don't flame
people. Arguing is fine, up to a point. When
the insults start flying,
though, then it's time to stop.
Period.
As with most other
newsgroups, and lists, flaming or
personal attacks will not be
allowed and you will be directed to
take such to private e-mail with
the parties involved.
However, there is often a mis-understanding of what a
flame actually is. A flame
is a PERSONAL attack on another, such
as, "You're a real jerk!" (or
worse). A flame is NOT a
strong disagreement with
another's position, such as "I think
you're wrong about that.
Maybe you need to recheck your
facts."
It is hoped that
everyone will always treat each other
with dignity and respect, but if
you really find someone's posts
distasteful even though they stay within the list rules,
then simply ignore them.
Most mail programs have filters. Put
the person's name in your filter
list to immediately transfer
their messages to your trash
folder, and you'll be forever free
from seeing their
posts.
3) General List Rules
The
mego@yahoogroups.com Mailing List is pretty liberal insofar as
rules go, but the ones we do have must be followed.
Remember, your words are representative of yourself. If
you want people to have a positive image of you, you have to
work to present that positive image.
3.1)
Too Much Mail?
Don't
complain about seeing too much mail show up in
your mailbox. That's what
this list is for. If you're getting
too much e-mail, you have three
options.
1) Unsubscribe (Bad option! Please don't
go!)
2) Switch to Digest
Mode
3) Read messages at the
website
Switching to digest
mode will allow you to receive messages
in groups of 25, combined into
one large e-mail. Reading
messages at the website will
allow you to peruse other member's posts
at your own pace, and respond in
kind.
For the second and
third options, please visit the Mego
Website at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego
and alter your subscription
information accordingly.
3.2) Grammar and
Spelling
Use proper grammar
and spelling to the best of your
ability. Your posts aren't being
graded and you'll receive no bad
marks for misspelled words, but
if we can't understand your
posts, we'll have a much harder
time trying to decide what you mean
so that we can properly respond.
We do realize that, for some
people subscribing to the list,
English is a second language. Just
do the best you can, and we
appreciate your willingness to
communicate in a language that isn't natural for you just
so that you can be on this list!
:)
3.3) Don't Use Nasty
Words
Don't use nasty
words. There are several young people on
the list so please follow "the
10 year old rule" - don't use
words that you wouldn't use
around a 10 yr. old. By the same
token, don't go into great
detail about a topic (ie: sex) that
would embarrass or scare off
someone else on the list.
3.4) Don't Post Nasty
Pictures
Don't post nasty
pictures. This is a family-rated list (see
3.3 above,) so please don't post
links to pictures or other
material that might be
considered objectionable. And use your
common sense when figuring out
what might be objectionable!
Nude photos, for example, would
be considered objectionable. By
the same token, don't upload
said pictures to the file area of
the Mego
list.
3.5) Be very careful when discussing religion or
politics
Religions and
Politics are both very loaded issues. Everyone
has an opinion, and it's usually
quite difficult if not downright
impossible to change those opinions. Thus, we discourage
(but don't outright ban) the use
of Religion and Politics as
topics of discussion on the Mego
mailing list.
3.6) Stay On
Topic
Try to at least
somewhat keep on topic. We don't mind (and
even encourage) discussion about
non-Mego things, but the topic
should eventually come back to Mego. After all, that's
what we're here
for.
3.7) All
Caps
Another mailing list
sin is TYPING IN ALL CAPS. THIS
IS CONSIDERED VERY RUDE, IN THE
ONLINE WORLD. WHY, BECAUSE
IT`S UGLY. ALSO, IT LOOKS LIKE
YOU ARE SHOUTING! Needless to
say, using all caps to post is
not allowed on the Mego mailing list.
3.8) Formats and
File Attachments
Make sure
your mail program is configured to send messages
in ASCII, or it may be called
TEXT. In other words, don't
send messages in HTML, MIME or
Rich Text Format (RTF). The
mailing list does not support
it, and they only increase
bandwidth without adding
anything to the meaning of the printed
word.
Also, please do not
attach files to your messages. If you
wish to e-mail an attached file
to someone, send them directly.
The reasons for this are
two-fold; one, it too greatly
increases bandwidth and it's
likely that not everyone on the list will
be interested; and two, because
e-mailed file attachments are a way
to transmit virus programs and
trojan horses to other computers.
A corollary to this is that you
should NEVER open an e-mailed
file attach unless it is
something you are expecting, from
someone you know and
trust.
Be aware that you can
post files to the group without
e-mailing them. Visit the
Files section at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego
for more details.
3.9)
Moderation
If a situation
arises where it becomes necessary to comment on
a message's format or content,
please leave that to the
moderators. Things that have seen discussed in the past on
this list as well as other lists
include excessive quoting,
spelling errors, indentation of
the left margin, problems with the
origin line, etc. You
should not see these topics discussed
openly; they are handled via
e-mail to the appropriate person,
when necessary. It is a
violation of the list rules to
remind another participant that
they are in violation of the
list rules. Once again,
leave it to the moderators.
3.10) Mailing list
Help
Don't post a
message to the group asking how to change
to digest mode,
unsubscribe or anything else that yahoogroups
does. Remember, you can
find out what yahoogroups can do by visiting
the Mego page at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego.
Now
that all of the rules and guidelines are out of the way - Welcome to the
Mego mailing list! If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or
critiques about this document or the list in general, please don't hesitate
to write Joe at jderouen@....
Warmest Regards,
Joe
DeRouen Dallas, Texas, USA November 9th, 2000
Revisions to this
file:
v1.0 November 9th, 2000 v1.1 January 26th,
2001
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25400 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html
.html
A collector's edition box would be
nice (like they did with the "Lord of the Rings" - - - nice bookends) but not
one of those things with the soundtrack, a film frame and other crap. But an
Icarus box? Yeah! I think they will release the '5-Star" edition of the original
separate and a box set of all 5 anamorphic. Just as they will probably rerelease
the "Alien" stuff with the new doc. Probably in lower numbers since they had
those previous box sets. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 3:31
PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading
Cards - Important Announcement
I would really like to see a lot of them too but I would
hate to see them in "sell-out" bins, and limiting the release is the best
way to assure that.
Maybe have a test run with limited release that
have a case made up as a scale replica of the Icarus ship (or something
groovy like that) and if they sell out, Fox could go for a larger volume
release but without the expensive packaging?
Just a
thought.
Michael
--- Melkor <melkor@...>
wrote: > > > > Yup, agreed, and I will be asking him to
take it a step further, as part of > > the research into the
words that go on the back of the cards, and get a firm > > answer
from Fox about: > > > > (1) if these scenes were
SHOT; > > > > (2) if theses scenes still EXIST; >
> > > (3) if there are plans to release them on alternate version
DVDs or as > > Deleted Scenes extras (my suggestion would be as
VERY limited production > > releases to assure they SELL OUT and
are always in high demand). > > > > If they release
alternate version DVDs I want them to make as many as >
possible. The last thing I want is a shortage where I may have to
> pay $$$ on ebay to get them. > > What would be
perfect would be a DVD with the alternate version and regular >
version of the movie in the same set. I would especially want ESCAPE
with an > opening scene before the spaceship lands. > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > >
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25401 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: ideas |
.html>
> I don't really think having two boards is a problem (like I said, there is a
> Time of the Apes group too and there are many other groups), but if it
> causes more trouble than good I will consider anything (oh boy, I'm wide
> open saying this!..).
>
> My ULTIMATE goal is to be part of an EFFECTIVE network of POTA fans who
> discuss POTA. If it takes 5 groups to do this, then so be it.
This is a great post Michael and a worthy goal. I do know of a way that
the new group and old group could automatically exchange on topic POTA related
posts with each other in a way that most people might like. It could be
a one way or two way exchange. If enough people are interested we could set
up a limited trial some time but that has to wait until certain things are
resolved in the new group. I saw that you've manually reposted some things
of common interest to both groups.
> The attachment is lengthy, but I think worth discussing.
>
> My only comment is that I really think the OT stuff needs to stop for the
> sake of keeping new members who may see 10 OT posts when they join then send
> a "GET ME OFF THIS LIST!!!" message.
>
> Also, I am not being territorial here (promise!), but moderators are an
> important part of a group and unless MFLuder hands over the keys to someone,
> we need to hike over to the POTAdg or all start a THIRD group and all
> migrate to the "promised land" over there (religion is ON topic, right?).
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25402 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: A fu**ing rating |
.html
.html
That's a good idea, T. A warning, like the
off-topic warning, when there's fu**ing profanity. S**t, that's the thing I
think is inappropriate. You don't know if there's kids reading (not that they
haven't fu**ing heard it before but, s**t, we need some fu**ing standards). - -
- Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 4:51
PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
Apology
(like the "M" rated group).
I like that idea. When wver you use Mature
language in a post you could put an M in the subject line so as not to burn
peoples virgin eyes. Or another alternative could be to use alternative
words as a substitute, like fecking ala Father Ted or farging ala Johnny
Dangerously. You buncha farging iceholes some-in-a-bachin'
bastages! What the Feck?
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25403 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
.html.html In a message dated 12/3/02 10:31:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
And speaking of worst what about worst scenes? Like in Battle, when you can see Roddy's lower lip... there's a couple in every movie. How many can you think of?
Every scene in BATTLE.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25404 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html.html In a message dated 12/3/02 11:17:29 AM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
But an Icarus box?
No, I think the DVDs should be in a Sacred Scroll.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25405 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A fu**ing rating |
.html.html In a message dated 12/3/02 11:21:25 AM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
That's a good idea, T. A warning, like the off-topic warning, when there's fu**ing profanity. S**t, that's the thing I think is inappropriate. You don't know if there's kids reading (not that they haven't fu**ing heard it before but, s**t, we need some fu**ing standards). - - - Jeff
SHUT THE @#%$^%$@!#$^&&$#@ UP, GOD#$%^^$$#$%$% DAMN IT!!!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25406 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
.html
.html
Is it
when he says "fight like apes" that the film is all blurred (looks
like a "cover-up"!).
Michael
Worst post ever. And speaking of worst what
about worst scenes? Like in Battle, when you can see Roddy's lower lip...
there's a couple in every movie. How many can you think of?
I think more like the Comic Book Guy in the
Simpsons.
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25407 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apology |
.html
.html
I
would love to see you two join.
If you
are too lazy to join, just say the word and I will join you up (amazing what
moderators can do....).
Michael
We've got the 2 groups, why don't we just
leave it at that? This group for more open discussion and that group for the
nuts and bolts. I hereby officially give Rory permission to join the new group,
and I might, too. But this group will continue to be my home. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 2:14
AM
Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes]
Apology
I do have one suggestion.
The "Mego"
group have established some ground rules and they are
quite interesting.
I suggest we look at them and consider
(attached below).
Of course, if the majority of people on this group
don't want rules, then I think the current set up can work harmoniously
still, but there would be less restrictions over here (like the
"M" rated group).
I don't really think having two boards is
a problem (like I said, there is a Time of the Apes group too and there
are many other groups), but if it causes more trouble than good I will
consider anything (oh boy, I'm wide open saying this!..).
My
ULTIMATE goal is to be part of an EFFECTIVE network of POTA fans
who discuss POTA. If it takes 5 groups to do this, then so be
it.
The attachment is lengthy, but I think worth
discussing.
My only comment is that I really think the OT stuff needs
to stop for the sake of keeping new members who may see 10 OT posts when
they join then send a "GET ME OFF THIS LIST!!!"
message.
Also, I am not being territorial here (promise!), but
moderators are an important part of a group and unless MFLuder hands over
the keys to someone, we need to hike over to the POTAdg or all start a
THIRD group and all migrate to the "promised land" over there
(religion is ON topic, right?).
ATTACHMENT:
Rules, Guidelines,
and Just Plain Good Ideas
1.1
Copyright (c) 2000,2001, Joe
DeRouen
All rights
reserved
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego
The
mego@yahoogroups.com mailing list has been going strong since March
of 2000 and is, at last count, over 120 members strong. Thanks for
joining us! We're sure you'll enjoy many hours of fun sharing
stories and discussing Megos, trading with other collectors, and getting
to know the other members of the list, just like we have.
Please
save this letter. It covers etiquette for the list, information on
posting your stories, and much more. If you save this letter
now, you'll thank yourself later - and so will we!
Joe DeRouen is
the list owner and one of three moderators. Scott "Scooby"
Rogers and Keene Silfer are the other two moderators. There are
also many other "regular people" on the list willing to help out
as well if you have questions. Don't hesitate to ask!
First, here
are the addresses that you'll need to
know:
mego@yahoogroups.com
to post to the list mego-subscribe@yahoogroups.com to
subscribe mego-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com to
unsubscribe
jderouen@...
for questions about this
list Scott6089@...
for questions about this
list krs7@...
for questions about this list
The following guide is in two parts:
"Mego Specific Etiquette" and "General Rules of
Etiquette". Please read both.
Part One: Mego Specific
Etiquette ---------------------------------
1) Buying, Selling,
and Trading on the List
We have one designated trade day
each week: Wednesday, Wednesday, and only Wednesday. Get the
idea? We call Wednesday the Flea Market day. Please don't
try to sell, buy, or trade through the list on any other day
than Wednesday. You may post your lists of items you're
looking for or have up for trade/sell at any time between
midnight Tuesday night and midnight Wednesday night, in
whatever time zone you're in.
2) Don't Brag About Your
Collection
Why make your fellow collectors feel bad? By
all means, post pictures of your Megos. Be proud of your
collection! But don't make fun of the new guy on the list
that's still looking for a loose 8" Spiderman.
2.1)
Bragging
I realize that
"bragging" can be intrepreted several
different ways. I don't in any
way, shape, or form want to prevent
list members from showing off
their collection. Just use
common sense.
3) Don't
Cheat Your Fellow List Members
If you set up a trade
with a fellow list member, follow through on it. Mistakes
can happen and people can be slow (I've been one of the
slowest at times!) but you need to ultimately follow through on
your obligations.
3.1) Another List
Member Owes You Something
If someone owes you something
in trade, or the item you got in trade wasn't what you
thought it was, try your dead-level best to resolve the
situation in private. Don't bring it to the group. If all
else fails, write one of the three moderators (see the start
of this document) and we'll do our best to help you work
things out.
4) Off-Topic Talking
While this list
is for and about Megos and the people who collect them, we
all will, upon occasion, lapse into conversation which has
nothing to do with our favorite action figure. This is normal
and even encouraged to a degree. However, if you're posting
something that has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with
Megos, please put "OT: <topic>" in the
subject line of your message. This way, subscribers to the
list who don't want to read anything that doesn't have to do
with Megos can have the choice of simply deleting your
message upon receipt.
5) Have Fun!
Have fun
and get to know one another and enjoy this list! This
list is for talking about Megos, trading Megos, and (almost)
everything else the members want it to be for. I love
the sense of community that this list has created - and I've
made several friends because of this list! - which, to me,
is more valuable than any any action figure could ever
be.
Part Two: General Rules of
Etiquette ------------------------------------
1)
Spam
Spam is Internet Speak for unnecessary messages or
parts of a message posted to Usenet, a mailing list or sent
directly through e-mail. In general, people don't like
spam, and those sending spam on a consistent basis will find
that dislike directed towards them as
well.
1.1)
Quoting
Quoting a message
is very useful when communicating in a
mailing list, and it can be
done quite stylishly.
Do
not, however, quote entire messages. Ever. There is never
a need to quote an entire
message. Just quote the minimum
amount possible to make your
reply understandable. There's
nothing worse than getting a
message with 40 lines of quote and
three lines of new material
way down at the bottom. It looks
bad, makes your message much
more difficult to read and
wastes bandwidth. Quoting 40
unnecessary lines in a message,
besides looking terrible,
translates to 4,000 un-necessary lines
across a 100 member e-mail
list!
When replying to a
message, it is proper to quote a
small portion of the other
message so that others will be able
to follow the thread. It
is not necessary, nor is it desirable
to quote an entire message, or
too large a portion of an
original message. It is
considered the height of bad form to quote
an entire message of perhaps
50 lines, than add a small reply
like, "I agree."
Generally quote only a small significant part of
the original message.
NEVER quote any part of the original
poster's SIGNATURE file.
Messages are often killed by the majordomo
for repetive
over-quoting.
1.2) Signature
Files
Many people add a
SIGNATURE file at the end of each of
their messages. It's a
great way to get your contact info out
in front of others. Feel
free to place your name,
e-mail address, web URL, or
whatever in your Signature file.
Just don't over do it.
SIGNATURES must be 4 lines or less.
1.3) Private
Replies
If a private reply
is warranted, make the reply private;
don't spam the list with
information that only two people will
care about or
understand.
1.4) Unsubscribe
Messages
If you want to
unsubscribe, DON'T post a message to the
entire list asking how.
Visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego
and unsubscribe from
there.
2) Flames
A flame is essentially a
personal attack directed at an individual or a group through
the use of a mailing list, newsgroup, or e-mail. People who
flames others on a consistent basis will eventually find
themselves expelled from the mego@yahoogroups.com Mailing
List.
2.1)
Flaming
Don't flame
people. Arguing is fine, up to a point. When
the insults start flying,
though, then it's time to stop.
Period.
As with most other
newsgroups, and lists, flaming or
personal attacks will not be
allowed and you will be directed to
take such to private e-mail
with the parties involved.
However, there is often a mis-understanding of what a
flame actually is. A
flame is a PERSONAL attack on another, such
as, "You're a real
jerk!" (or worse). A flame is NOT a
strong disagreement with
another's position, such as "I think
you're wrong about that.
Maybe you need to recheck your
facts."
It is hoped
that everyone will always treat each other
with dignity and respect, but
if you really find someone's
posts distasteful even though
they stay within the list rules,
then simply ignore them.
Most mail programs have filters. Put
the person's name in your
filter list to immediately transfer
their messages to your trash
folder, and you'll be forever free
from seeing their
posts.
3) General List Rules
The
mego@yahoogroups.com Mailing List is pretty liberal insofar as
rules go, but the ones we do have must be followed.
Remember, your words are representative of yourself.
If you want people to have a positive image of you, you have
to work to present that positive image.
3.1) Too Much Mail?
Don't
complain about seeing too much mail show up in
your mailbox. That's
what this list is for. If you're getting
too much e-mail, you have
three
options.
1) Unsubscribe (Bad option! Please don't
go!)
2) Switch to Digest
Mode
3) Read messages at the
website
Switching to
digest mode will allow you to receive messages
in groups of 25, combined into
one large e-mail. Reading
messages at the website will
allow you to peruse other member's posts
at your own pace, and respond
in kind.
For the second
and third options, please visit the Mego
Website at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego
and alter your subscription
information accordingly.
3.2) Grammar and
Spelling
Use proper
grammar and spelling to the best of your
ability. Your posts aren't
being graded and you'll receive no bad
marks for misspelled words,
but if we can't understand your
posts, we'll have a much
harder time trying to decide what you mean
so that we can properly
respond. We do realize that, for some
people subscribing to the
list, English is a second language. Just
do the best you can, and we
appreciate your willingness to
communicate in a language that isn't natural for you just
so that you can be on this
list! :)
3.3) Don't Use Nasty
Words
Don't use nasty
words. There are several young people on
the list so please follow
"the 10 year old rule" - don't use
words that you wouldn't use
around a 10 yr. old. By the same
token, don't go into great
detail about a topic (ie: sex) that
would embarrass or scare off
someone else on the list.
3.4) Don't Post Nasty
Pictures
Don't post nasty
pictures. This is a family-rated list (see
3.3 above,) so please don't
post links to pictures or other
material that might be
considered objectionable. And use your
common sense when figuring out
what might be objectionable!
Nude photos, for example,
would be considered objectionable. By
the same token, don't upload
said pictures to the file area of
the Mego
list.
3.5) Be very careful when discussing religion or
politics
Religions and
Politics are both very loaded issues. Everyone
has an opinion, and it's
usually quite difficult if not
downright impossible to change
those opinions. Thus, we discourage
(but don't outright ban) the
use of Religion and Politics as
topics of discussion on the
Mego mailing list.
3.6) Stay On
Topic
Try to at least
somewhat keep on topic. We don't mind (and
even encourage) discussion
about non-Mego things, but the
topic should eventually come
back to Mego. After all, that's
what we're here
for.
3.7) All
Caps
Another mailing list
sin is TYPING IN ALL CAPS. THIS
IS CONSIDERED VERY RUDE, IN
THE ONLINE WORLD. WHY, BECAUSE
IT`S UGLY. ALSO, IT LOOKS LIKE
YOU ARE SHOUTING! Needless to
say, using all caps to post is
not allowed on the Mego mailing list.
3.8) Formats and
File Attachments
Make sure
your mail program is configured to send messages
in ASCII, or it may be called
TEXT. In other words, don't
send messages in HTML, MIME or
Rich Text Format (RTF). The
mailing list does not support
it, and they only increase
bandwidth without adding
anything to the meaning of the printed
word.
Also, please do not
attach files to your messages. If you
wish to e-mail an attached
file to someone, send them directly.
The reasons for this are
two-fold; one, it too greatly
increases bandwidth and it's
likely that not everyone on the list will
be interested; and two,
because e-mailed file attachments are a way
to transmit virus programs and
trojan horses to other computers.
A corollary to this is that
you should NEVER open an e-mailed
file attach unless it is
something you are expecting, from
someone you know and
trust.
Be aware that you
can post files to the group without
e-mailing them. Visit
the Files section at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego
for more details.
3.9)
Moderation
If a situation
arises where it becomes necessary to comment on
a message's format or content,
please leave that to the
moderators. Things that have seen discussed in the past on
this list as well as other
lists include excessive quoting,
spelling errors, indentation
of the left margin, problems with the
origin line, etc. You
should not see these topics discussed
openly; they are handled via
e-mail to the appropriate person,
when necessary. It is a
violation of the list rules to
remind another participant
that they are in violation of the
list rules. Once again,
leave it to the moderators.
3.10) Mailing list
Help
Don't post a
message to the group asking how to change
to digest mode,
unsubscribe or anything else that yahoogroups
does. Remember, you can
find out what yahoogroups can do by visiting
the Mego page at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Mego.
Now
that all of the rules and guidelines are out of the way - Welcome to the
Mego mailing list! If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or
critiques about this document or the list in general, please
don't hesitate to write Joe at jderouen@....
Warmest
Regards,
Joe DeRouen Dallas, Texas, USA November 9th,
2000
Revisions to this file:
v1.0 November 9th, 2000 v1.1
January 26th, 2001
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25408 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A fu**ing rating |
.html
.html
F**k
yeah, but let's not be c**ts about it.
Mi**ael the POTA N**i
That's a good idea, T. A warning, like the
off-topic warning, when there's fu**ing profanity. S**t, that's the thing I
think is inappropriate. You don't know if there's kids reading (not that they
haven't fu**ing heard it before but, s**t, we need some fu**ing standards). - -
- Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 4:51
PM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
Apology
(like the "M" rated group).
I like that idea. When wver you use
Mature language in a post you could put an M in the subject line so as not
to burn peoples virgin eyes. Or another alternative could be to use
alternative words as a substitute, like fecking ala Father Ted or farging
ala Johnny Dangerously. You buncha farging iceholes some-in-a-bachin'
bastages! What the Feck?
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25409 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
.html
.html
The
Mothership..or was that deleted?
Michael
In a message dated 12/3/02
10:31:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
And speaking of worst what about worst scenes? Like in
Battle, when you can see Roddy's lower lip... there's a couple in every
movie. How many can you think of?
Every scene in
BATTLE.
-- Rory
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25410 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Trading Cards - Important Announcement |
.html
.html
Even
better.
Tell
us more.
Michael
In a message dated 12/3/02 11:17:29 AM Eastern Standard Time,
veetus@... writes:
But an Icarus box?
No, I think the DVDs
should be in a Sacred Scroll.
-- Rory
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25411 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Conquest & Battle |
.htmlRory < Haristas@...> wrote:
> In a message dated 12/1/02 11:48:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> melkor@... writes:
> > Do DVD's burn? You go first and let us know how well it goes.
Naturally
> > you'll want to toss in the TV show, the cartoons, and the other
sequels
> > into
> > the bonfire since the first movie is the only good one.
> >
> You forgot the new movie.
I wish I could.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25412 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] As the Planet of the Apes Turns... "Patric |
.html< LordTZer0@...> wrote:
> Worst post ever.
> And speaking of worst what about worst scenes? Like in Battle, when
you can
> see Roddy's lower lip... there's a couple in every movie. How many
can you
> think of?
A few scenes from the first half of "Escape" spring to mind. The
opening is brilliant, the rest of the film from the line "I'm
pregnant" onwards is brilliant, but the film in between is patchy.
I think if I had to pick one scene in particular it would have to be
Zira preaching on women's rights.
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25413 |
From: Melkor |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The "Other" Group |
.html>
> > Rory however is "one of the troublemakers from the old group" according to
> > one
> > of James postings.
James said this is not entirely correct and so in fairness to James
here is the public quote I was referring to.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
From: "James" < JamesA1102@...>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:42:55 -0000
X-Yahoo-Profile: jamesa1102
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Rory
Reply-To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Several people were concerned when Rory joined this group because
they felt he was one of the trouble makers in the old group.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 25414 |
From: CheeseGOTAS@aol.com |
Date: 12/3/2002 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] A fu**ing rating |
.htmlIn a message dated 12/3/02 10:21:26 AM Central Standard Time,
veetus@... writes:
<< That's a good idea, T. A warning, like the off-topic warning, when
there's fu**ing profanity. S**t, that's the thing I think is inappropriate.
You don't know if there's kids reading (not that they haven't fu**ing heard
it before but, s**t, we need some fu**ing standards). - - - Jeff
>>
Yeah, what the fu**? Heh, I think I'm the youngest.
-Joe <.html
|
|
|
|