|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26015 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/28/2003 |
| Subject: Re: POTA tech, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26016 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/28/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26017 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26018 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26019 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26020 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26021 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26022 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26023 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26024 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26025 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26026 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26027 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: Neutrino telescope |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26028 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26029 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26030 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26031 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26032 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26033 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 1/31/2003 |
|
| Subject: Apes' Languages |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26034 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: What The Fox? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26035 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What The Fox? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26036 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes' Languages |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26037 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: The Apes were supposed to be Apes |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26038 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Apes were supposed to be Apes |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26039 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes were supposed to be Apes |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26040 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Apes were supposed to be Apes |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26041 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/2/2003 |
|
| Subject: Ape language, speaking ability, etc. Also, "simius sapiens" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26042 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Ape language, speaking ability, etc. Also, |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26043 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Ape language, speaking ability, etc. Also, |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26044 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainment / News |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26045 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26046 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26047 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26048 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26049 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26050 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26051 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26052 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26053 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/3/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1549 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26054 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/4/2003 |
|
| Subject: A few responses |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26055 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/4/2003 |
| Subject: "I, Robot" (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26056 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Responding to a few responses |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26057 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Posting help? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26058 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26059 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26060 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26061 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26062 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26063 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Montalban "Biography" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26064 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/6/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Montalban "Biography" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26065 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/6/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Montalban "Biography" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26066 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/6/2003 |
| Subject: Naughton news |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26067 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/6/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Naughton news |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26068 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/7/2003 |
| Subject: JNaughton interview |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26069 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/8/2003 |
|
| Subject: Re: Montalban "Biography" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26070 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/8/2003 |
|
| Subject: Re: Posting help? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26071 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/8/2003 |
|
| Subject: Re: "I, Robot" (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26072 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: What the...? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26073 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "I, Robot" (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26074 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26075 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1549 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26076 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Montalban "Biography" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26077 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 35 and counting! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26078 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26079 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26080 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 35 and counting! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26081 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26082 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 35 and counting! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26083 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26084 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 35 and counting! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26085 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26086 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26087 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26088 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '98: the Conclusion |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26089 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: testing |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26090 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '96, Pt. 1 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26091 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '96, Pt. 2 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26092 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26093 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: favorite moments and Robinson Crusoe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26094 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26095 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Hey |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26096 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] favorite moments and Robinson Crusoe |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26097 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Hey |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26098 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Zira J-Lo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26099 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26100 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Zira J-Lo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26101 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26102 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/10/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26103 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/10/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '96, Pt. 3 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26104 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/10/2003 |
| Subject: Happy Birthday! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26105 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/10/2003 |
|
| Subject: Favorite "Apes" fan moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26106 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/10/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Apes" fan moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26107 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/11/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '96, pt. 4 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26108 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/11/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Zira |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26109 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/11/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Favorite "Ape" Moment |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26110 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: "modern womanhood" (aka kiss off) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26111 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "modern womanhood" (aka kiss off) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26112 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "modern womanhood" (aka kiss off) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26113 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: Booth Coleman on "Frasier" last night |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26114 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: Viva le Difference |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26015 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/28/2003 |
| Subject: Re: POTA tech, etc. |
.htmlThanks Patrick for your reply. The first thing I would like to do is
say "Thank You Haristas". I am not very good at communicating and I'm
very grateful for your understanding as well as Patrick's. ZeroT, let
me tell you about the word ADVISE. I know, wihtout even so much as
looking in my dictionary that 'advise' is a verb and 'advice' is a
noun. My advice to you is, don't go knocking someone who hasn't had
the instruction and help you have with your learning disabilities.
Back in my day, most called me stupid, slow or lazy. I was put in
what they called the stupid class, which held me back for years in
both my abilities and confidence. I wasn't lucky like you nor have I
opprotunity to go to school like you have. Although I can't write a
clear, smooth flowing sentence, I am a talented writer like you.
Right now I'm working hard on my grammar. Be patient and help those
who are not as fortunate as you are.
As for my reading Patrick. Yes I read. These days I read books to
help me with my research and grammar. Because I'm writing, I am not
reading novels as I have uncanny habit of picking up the author's
style. Years ago I use to read a lot of Arthor Clark's books and
others like him. Because I've am aspiring children's book author, I
have been reading a lot of young adult like Harry Potter and so on.
(you write what you read.)
Okay now for POTA. Lisa being able to talk already is really
interestng and might ring true. But if the apes could talk, why was
Breck so concerned over an ape that can talk? An ape being able to
talk - to think is unique to those who can't thus giving Caesar the
leverage he needs to lead the apes. I suspect that the gathering apes
were speaking a language Dr.Goodall and Dr. Roger Fouts has
discovered studying and working with the Chimps. Although the
chimpanzees' language is just a combination of gestures, expressions,
and body langauge, it is far more complex and is perhaps proof in how
our humans ancestors started communicate millions of years ago
(Chimpanzee culture rocks!) In "Conquest" there is true indication
that the apes' intelligence is increasing through perhaps the
expriences gathered from their enslavement. Their show of defiance is
the end result. If so then they are developing their own language -
Simian Language which isn't verbal on human levels. I beleive there
are a combination of reasons why Lisa is able to talk in the end.
One, she spoke the word she has heard over and over; much like a two
year old hears it from his/her parents. Beleive me, I've expreienced
the terrible twos not only with my son but with pre-schoolers. Two,
her vocal cords had moved to the right position. If you study the
vocal development of a human being from its infancy and on up you
will find that the vocal cords start out further down the throat.(as
is an ape's) As the infant matures the cords move into a vocal
position. For Lisa and the other apes this might have been the case.
Third, she had been around Caesar who not only shows her how it is
done but helps her gain the confidence to express herself where as
most of the time she oppressed. As result of all these
circumastances, she speaks out in a time of need.
In Myth I really touch upon these issues. I've done a lot research,
even visiting Washoe and her bunch. I very intrigue with the apes
that can communicate with their hands. In the Spring I plan on taking
a class at the Human and Chimpanzee Cummuniction Institute. I not
sure if Dr. Fouts will be intructing the class. To be there brings
tears to my eyes - tears of joy. It's funny that I am interested in
ape communication . Maybe I know how it feels to be an ape that is
not understood.
I would like to send you the chapter privately at first as I feel
more comfortable. Thank you.
Talk to you soon.
Wendy
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "patrickmichaeltilton
<patrickmichaeltilton@y...>" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...> wrote:
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "libraryape <toosexy4u54@h...>"
> <toosexy4u54@h...> wrote:
> > Thank you Patrick. This is great. I agree that Conquest is the
best
> out all of them. Years ago I read the book and find that somehow
some
> of it has stuck in my memory banks. The only one that is still on
the
> library shelves is "Battle" done my David Gerrold. I have met this
> guy, who advised me to write my own stuff. Funny to hear that
coming
> from a guy who broke into the business with "Trouble with
Tribbles".
> Anyway, he was getting drunk by the moment so I didn't take his
> advice too seriously until I about year ago, heard him during a
panel
> say the same thing. When will I ever learn?
> >
> > Hover cars huh? Cool. Now I'm free to hover all I want. If there
> is any indication of other technologies let me know. I could use
all
> the help I can muster until I can get my hands on the book.
Although
> there are hover cars, air travel is still used, right? I ask this
> because one of main characters in my book is a pilot.
>
> *** Yeah, air travel is still used, considering that Armando &
Caesar
> arrive at Breck's city via helicopter. I would guess that airplanes
> are still in use, too, since the safety record of airline travel
> (despite "9-11") is far better than automobile travel.
> As for "other technologies", there's a scene in CONQUEST which is
> kind of hard to make out the dialogue, but in Jakes' novelization
it
> goes like this:
>
> ----------(from Chapter 3, pages 27-28)-----------
>
> He [Caesar] put down a flyer, moved to the next table. Two
> obviously prosperous black men sat talking, oblivious to the white-
> jacketed captain preparing crepes suzette on his cart. Beside the
> captain stood a young chimp busboy, studiously watching the human
> hands manipulate the chafing dish.
> "--real future's in hydroponic farming," one of the men was
> saying. "I was telling my son last night--"
> "Oh, for God's sake, Harry, why steer him into something like
> that? The big money's in synthetic alloys--"
> Caesar laid a handbill between them. The first man picked it up,
> gave it one look, tossed it aside as his friend argued. "IF you're
> selling to the government. But look what's happened to the space
> program. Cut to the bone."
> "It'll come back."
> "Oh? That's what you said about the supersonic transport, Harry."
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> This background chatter gives a slight hint at what's going on in
the
> outside world. Here you got these two businessmen who are
interested
> in "the big money" (Capitalism at its worst, a Socialist would
say!),
> and their concerns don't seem to be in exploiting any technology
for
> the sake of bettering the Human condition. It's all about making
> the "big money", buying stock in companies which produce Product
> which will Sell--and make them Rich.
> There's also more than a hint that the Government has been exerting
> an undue influence on Business, contrary to a truly "Free Market"
> economy. The "space program" one of them mentions has been "cut to
> the bone" by the Government--and, evidently, there isn't any
(known)
> Civilian space program, run by business entrepreneurs. And the same
> Government probably has enough influence to "shelve" a more
advanced
> form of aviation: the "supersonic transport". Rather than advancing
> technology ("building a better mousetrap"), the oppressive
Government
> has stifled innovation, keeping airplane technology at
the "subsonic"
> level (no "Concorde" jets flyin' in the skies here, folks).
>
> The "hydroponic farming" Harry mentions suggests that the "family
> farm" has all but died out as an American way of life. With the
State
> controlling the way Food is mass-produced, they have a metaphorical
> choke-hold on the People. People with money to invest are being
> steered into putting it into those businesses which make more food
> for more people in CONTROLLED environments--hydroponics. As the
> average family farm--which can't compete against Government-
> subsidized food production programs--goes "belly-up", that means
that
> the Citizenry will literally have to toe-the-line when the State
> wants them to conform, since it's either "obey or starve".
>
> One other "technology" which is new (in the POTA universe) is
> the "Authenticator", which is the ultimate Lie-detector: not only
can
> it somehow ascertain that the subject submitting to it IS telling a
> lie... it can also FORCE that person to tell the truth--as when
> Armando, answering Kolp's question (as to whether or not he told
the
> truth regarding the Ape-onauts), whispers a reluctant "No."
> As Kolp tells Armando, the Authenticator "makes people tell the
> truth". Before that, right before the auction where Breck purchases
> Caesar, there are a couple of paragraphs describing the ongoing
> interrogation of Armando:
>
> ------------(page 82)-----------
>
> Kolp had stopped in, haggard. He'd reported that, after days of
> interrogation--twice interrupted when Armando had to be rushed to
the
> infirmary for injections to repair the ravages of the questioning--
> the circus owner still persisted in telling his original story.
Kolp
> and Hoskyns were now asking for the governor's signed permission to
> employ the Authenticator.
> Signed permission indeed! The pretense of civil liberties was a
> farce, but Kolp and Hoskyns were shrewd enough not to use the
device
> without higher authority.
> Breck had dodged the issue. Although widely used by police
> departments, the Authenticator was, in the view of the forty
jurists
> who sat on the Most Supreme Court in Washington, an instrument of
> coercion and, therefore, illegal except in matters of national
> security.
> It would be Breck's decision. The situation didn't qualify; and
> yet, he had a deep-seated worry that perhaps, in a peculiar way, it
> did...
>
> --------------------------
>
> The first thing one should wonder is: Why doesn't Breck have CAESAR
> strapped to that chair under the Authenticator, rather than
strapped
> to an electroshock table, when he wants to find out whether or not
he
> IS the "talking ape" child of Zira? Why not subject Caesar to the
> Authenticator, which can MAKE him tell the truth against his own
will?
>
> Perhaps Breck has a cruel streak; he WANTS Caesar to suffer that
> horrid form of "electrical conditioning" which he had escaped
during
> his brief time at Ape Management. Also, from a symbolic standpoint,
> they needed Caesar to be "crucified" like Christ--tortured by
> the "Roman"-like authorities and then Executed... an Execution from
> which Caesar could "miraculously" be "Resurrected" (since he never
> really died). "The King is dead... LONG LIVE THE KING!"
>
> One off-shoot technology I've speculated on could use the
scientific
> principle of the Authenticator as a beneficial invention. The
> Authenticator is a machine that can somehow "read" brainwaves and
> then impose another brainwave pattern onto the person being
scanned;
> when used by Kolp, it does so against the will of the person. But
> imagine somebody who just has a hard time understanding a
particular
> subject (like, say, Calculus), being shown an educational film
about
> the subject... and a "brainwave" pattern which denotes the "Eureka"
> feeling of somebody who "gets it" (like a symbolic "lightbulb"
> lighting up above someone's head) is then superimposed on the
> student's mind. Might not such a "Teacher" machine be a way to
boost
> Human intelligence? Imagine if a human mind--even an INFANT mind--
> could be FORCED to understand something, even a subject as
difficult
> as Differential Calculus, or a foreign language like Chinese or
> ancient Sumerian! Remember in "THE MATRIX", when Neo's
> mind "downloads" the Knowledge of Kung Fu, or how to fly that
> military helicopter? Maybe the Authenticator is just one type of
> invention amongst a whole host of other inventions which utilize
the
> same principle: Studying a human brainwave pattern and then
> superimposing upon that brain ANOTHER pattern.
> Maybe the Government is secretly studying how to use this principle
> to control unruly crowds (or enemy armies), by forcing a
> docile "state-of-mind" into the brains of people in anti-Government
> rallies, that sort of thing.
> The possibilities are, seemingly, endless...
>
> >
> > Another thing I wanted to ask Patrick, can I send you a chapter
> that mainly centers on Breck? It took me over three months to get a
> handle on his character. With only the movie to go on, I don't have
> much. In my mind the civic center has just been recently built. I'm
> wondering if this relevant. Unlike my writing e-mail, this chapter
> has been grammar checked with a grammar thumb of my friend and is
> tightened to the hilt.
>
> *** If you'd like to send it to me, sure: my e-mail address is
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... (although you might want to just send
> it to this website, so that everybody else--including "T", who's
> giving you grief about your spelling--can see it, too).
Incidentally,
> I should point out that one of my pet peeves is bad
spelling/grammar/
> etc., but after I was critical of the bad spelling (etc.) of a guy
> who used to post to this site (a guy who since has formed his own
> POTA Yahoo group, and shuns us like the Plague), he eventually
> mentioned that he was dyslexic--in other words, his "bad spelling"
> was something he had an excuse for. I apologized, but I think he
> still holds a grudge. I don't know if your spelling is due to
> dyslexia (or something similar), but I'd rather assume it IS, for
> now, rather than "dis" you about it. I find that people who do a
LOT
> of reading tend to acquire better and better spelling skills... as
> long as they don't read the lyric sheets of Rap albums, which have
> the WORST spellings imaginable, since they're INTENTIONALLY not
> accurate.
>
> >
> > As for Lisa. Yeah, her name is Lisa. I think you and Cozad did a
> great job in filling in the details. I now know that my character
> sees her first hand in the Command Post. This is the only
appearance
> Lisa will make in my tangent. Mrs. Riley huh? Bad girl. It's too
bad
> Lisa can't talk yet or Mrs. Riley is in a whoooole lot of trouble.
> What a fine example to give an ape in regards to maritail (sp?)
bliss.
>
> *** Is it that Lisa CAN'T talk yet... or has been purposely
> SUPPRESSING her ability to vocalize like a human?
> Obviously, given her complete fluency in BATTLE, Lisa must have had
> the physiognomical ability to talk like a human AT BIRTH; she
didn't
> just magically "acquire" the ability at the end of CONQUEST! She--
> like all the other "POTA"-like slave apes in CONQUEST--is NOT just
> a "mute" animal... but CAN speak. However, they all CHOOSE not to
> speak, since they must somehow know that to do so is a Death
> Sentence. But recall that every so often there are loudspeaker
> announcements by "the Watch Commander" reporting "unauthorized ape
> gatherings"... what are these apes doing when they "gather" in an
> unauthorized way? Since the TALKING apes of BATTLE are the SAME
apes
> who were once enslaved in Breck's city, then perhaps they get
> together illicitly to talk to one another... in hushed whispers, of
> course. MacDonald (from BATTLE) mentions that the security cameras
> were installed "to forestall ape conspiracies". The apes, in order
> to "conspire", would have to communicate in some way; granted,
Caesar
> was able to instill a fair level of Civil Disobedience with a non-
> vocal "look" (like when that shoe-shining ape starts smearing the
> stuff on that human's sock), but given the physical ability to
speak
> (which is established beyond doubt not only in BATTLE, but at the
end
> of CONQUEST, when Lisa speaks), I contend that those "conspiring"
> apes were probably whispering to one another--probably in a
language
> other than English, since they all were shipped to America from
> Africa, Borneo, etc. In other words: the Apes possessed not only
the
> physical ability to speak prior to their enslavement (during which
> they pretended to be Mute, out of fear), but also a LANGUAGE OF
THEIR
> OWN. Cornelius tells the Presidential Commission that English had
> been the language of his ancestors going back "2000 years,
roughly",
> but that does NOT mean that it was the ONLY language his people had
> ever spoken. Perhaps those "glyph" symbols on the simian clothing
> are, like cuneiform and hieroglyphics, phonetic-based
representations
> in an earlier "original" Ape language, which they set aside in
favor
> of the language of Caesar (their Savior) and of the later-enslaved
> Humans (whom they might not have wished to learn the Ape language,
to
> keep it "pure" perhaps).
>
> >
> > Okay, least but not last, what would you as both a writer and a
fan
> think if I created a character that is related to Taylor? I know he
> didn't have anything tying him down as he explains in the movie,
but
> he must have family. I'm thinking also to have a character that is
> related to Stewart - the female Astronaut that didn't make it. A
son
> maybe ...?
>
> *** Taylor didn't have a Mate ("... so I left, because there was
> nobody to hold me there..."), but he probably did have family. I'd
> guess nephews/nieces & cousins, in all likelihood.
> I doubt if Stewart would've left a son behind, though that might
just
> be a wishful bias on my part; after all, Brent's "Skipper" had a
wife
> & two daughters he left behind, so why not Stewart?
> Taylor refers to Stewart when he tells Nova that "she was to be
> the 'New Eve'... with our hot and eager help, of course..." In
other
> words, Stewart's role on the mission was to bear children as part
of
> a long-term colonization of their destination. Some people think
it's
> ludicrous that 3 men and 1 woman would be a "base" for a potential
> colonizing program, yet Taylor suggests an even more limited one in
> BENEATH: "Where in hell do we go from here? Why don't we just stop
> off and found a human colony? All the kids'll learn to talk... sure
> they will..." Just him and Nova, founding a colony of "talking
> humans", with their first kids perhaps growing to adulthood and
> practicing inevitable incest in order to breed more & more, unless
> Taylor's sons and/or daughters interbreed with other "mute" humans,
> passing along the ability...
>
> But, hey, as far as your interest in inventing a character (or
> several) related to established characters in the POTA saga--go for
> it. After all, that's exactly what Paul Dehn did, when he
> invented "Baby Milo"/"Caesar" and his son, named "Cornelius" after
> his grandfather. Dehn took established characters (from PLANET) and
> invented new ones. The precedent is there for anybody to do the
same
> sort of thing. I know that I--for one--am making use of it for my
> project.
>
> Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26016 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/28/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
.html.html
Be patient and help those who are not as fortunate as you are.
That's what I thought I was doing. Forgive my rough style. It's how I was raised. Yes, I too hated being called stupid in school. I still do. So now I usually beat them to the punch, writing BAKA, BAKA, BAKA on my Japanese compositions, to which my teacher will write in reply, No! No! No! But she's aware of my disabilities. One thing I really can't stand is all the times my Dad would correct my English in mid-sentence! But it worked. Though I may not always speak "Gooood Englich" especially if I'm doing a character as a bit, at least I know the difference. So, though deriding someone's deficiencies may not be the kindest of techniques, it does work. I think if my folks make fun of my middle-aged spread one more time, I'll start that workout program I've been putting off. To quote the great Nick Lowe, "You gotta be cruel to be kind."
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26017 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
.html I know this is a bit late, but here's my ideas for a new "Apes" TV series:
"Day of the Apes"
Keifer Sutherland and Lou Diamond Phillips star as astronauts Alan Burke
and Pete Virdon respectively. Each episode is shot in real time and the ent=
ire
season makes up an entire day on the Planet of the Apes. What sets this apa=
rt
from Sutherland's previous series ("24") is that there are 30 hours in a da=
y on
the Planet (due to a nuclear war centuries earlier). This makes for 6 extra=
episodes for fans of the real-time format.
The plot is as follows: Burke and Virdon crash land on a strange planet whe=
re
apes rule and humans are slaves. They are captured and a series of
conspiracies come into play and the pair is left wondering who they can tru=
st.
They later escape, but soon find themselves racing against the clock to sto=
p a
band of mutated humans from destroying the Earth with a doomsday bomb.
Dennis Hopper cameos as Mendez. Dennis Haysbert plays the sympathetic
ape, Senator Cornelius.
"Everybody Loves Taylor"
Ray Romano stars as astronaut George Taylor, a man who finds himself on a
planet where apes rule and humans are slaves. In a break from the tradition=
al
apes format, this series is a sitcom and promises hijinks and hilarity as T=
aylor
tries to fit into the ape culture. Patricia Heaton stars as Dr. Zora, Brad =
Garrett
plays the oafish gorilla soldier Orko and Peter Boyle and Doris Roberts pla=
y
Mr. and Mrs. Zaius, an overbearing orangutan couple.
"Survivor: Forbidden Zone"
After exhausting the exotic locales around the world, the producer's of
"Survivor" decide to stay home and film the latest installment of their hit=
reality
series in California. But this time, they have added a twist.
The show starts with sixteen Americans being selected as Survivors. They ar=
e
then divided into two teams and informed by host Jeff Probst that one team =
will be playing apes and the other will be humans. The humans are given
skimpy costumes consisting of loincloths and bikinis made of tree bark. The=
y
are also informed that they are not allowed to speak for the remainder of t=
he
series, unless they are informed otherwise.
The other team are then sent to the studios of Apemania and fitted for
elaborate costumes and makeup that make them look like various gorillas,
chimps, and orangutans. They are informed by Probst that they will be
allowed to speak, but must wear their costumes and stay in character for th=
e
remainder of the series.
Challenges include having the human tribe locked in cages and trying to
escape while the apes try to stop them using nothing but high pressure wate=
r
hoses. There is also a hunt challenge where the humans try to get food whil=
e
the apes hunt them down on horseback. The team that loses the challenge is =
sent to a "tribal council" in a setting made to look like the courtroom fro=
m the
original "POTA" movie. One by one the teams vote out their weakest members =
until only one is left standing. Will the ultimate Survivor be a human or a=
n
ape? Who is the dominant class? Only time will tellÂ…..
Comments?
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26018 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
.html.html In a message dated 1/29/03 1:24:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, MTotsky@... writes:
Keifer Sutherland and Lou Diamond Phillips
CAN'T STAND EITHER OF THEM!!!!!!
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26019 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
<<CAN'T STAND EITHER OF THEM!!!!!!>>
Thanks Rory. I knew I could count on you for an in-depth critical analysis of my
post!
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26020 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
.htmlI agree. But there is a fine line in correcting someone. You must
remember that I am an old dog learning new tricks. I'm sorry that I'm
grammar deaf. It's hard to keep in tune, especailly if you grew up
around people who spoke worse English than you did ---- including, in
some cases, the media.
Example: You've got mail. (I wrote this letter on MS word and the
gammar checker didn't even catch this redundant error.)
The only thing I have going for me is my determination and
imagination. Unfortunately it takes words for me to express the
images I have in my head - words and sentences that escape through
the clutched fingers of my mind. I guess the reason why I seem more
inadequate on this site is because I know I'm conversing with some
really intelligent people. You are one of the Tzero. And yeah, I'm
nervouse.
I want so much to be a part of this group and share my views and
knowledge. All I ask of you and everyone here is not to snub me. I
carry a lot scars from people who are grammer snobs. Please feel free
to correct me but with a constructive heart. Thanks :0) --- In
pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> > Be patient and help those who are not as fortunate as you are.
> >
> That's what I thought I was doing. Forgive my rough style. It's
how I was
> raised. Yes, I too hated being called stupid in school. I still
do. So now
> I usually beat them to the punch, writing BAKA, BAKA, BAKA on my
Japanese
> compositions, to which my teacher will write in reply, No! No! No!
But she's
> aware of my disabilities. One thing I really can't stand is all
the times my
> Dad would correct my English in mid-sentence! But it worked.
Though I may
> not always speak "Gooood Englich" especially if I'm doing a
character as a
> bit, at least I know the difference. So, though deriding someone's
> deficiencies may not be the kindest of techniques, it does work. I
think if
> my folks make fun of my middle-aged spread one more time, I'll
start that
> workout program I've been putting off. To quote the great Nick
Lowe, "You
> gotta be cruel to be kind." <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26021 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
.html.html
All I ask of you and everyone here is not to snub me.
My bad. I've was picked on so much when I was little it kinda rubbed off on me. Also being a punk rocker, where embarrassment is a way of life, the Piss Take, aka Taking The Mickey Out Of someone, is a form of recreation, and a source of humor with my crowd. So I often forget most people haven't developed a thick skin about that kind of thing. Also my screenwriting Prof. will get on your tits if you have a lot of typos, because he knows that if you try and sell something that unpolished in Hollywood, chances are the script readers for the suits will shitcan it no matter how good the ideas are, and the higher ups will never even see it. Again, my bad. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26022 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
.html<I want so much to be a part of this group and share my views and
> knowledge. All I ask of you and everyone here is not to snub me. I
> carry a lot scars from people who are grammer snobs. Please feel
free
> to correct me but with a constructive heart. Thanks :0)>
Hey Ms. Libraryape,
for someone who has trouble with grammar, you still know how to
express yourself in a very gracious way.
Kassidy
PS These guys are no-holds barred - been that way a long, long time. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26023 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 1/29/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "mtotsky <MTotsky@a...>" <MTotsky@a...>
wrote:
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
>
> <<CAN'T STAND EITHER OF THEM!!!!!!>>
>
> Thanks Rory. I knew I could count on you for an in-depth critical
analysis of my
> post!
>
> Matt
Dear Matt,
Please don't take this the wrong way, but I couldn't get past Lou
Diamond Philips and Keifer Sutherland either. Blech!
Kassidy <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26024 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
.html.html In a message dated 1/29/03 5:09:12 PM Eastern Standard Time, valwp@... writes:
Dear Matt,
Please don't take this the wrong way, but I couldn't get past Lou
Diamond Philips and Keifer Sutherland either. Blech!
Kassidy
HA!
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26025 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
>
>
> Also my screenwriting Prof.
> will get on your tits if you have a lot of typos, because he knows
that if
> you try and sell something that unpolished in Hollywood, chances
are the
> script readers for the suits will shitcan it no matter how good the
ideas
> are, and the higher ups will never even see it.
I know this TZero. That's what editors are for. I've been sending
manuscripts out for years. I've always had someone go over them with
a fine red pen. This might cost me bucks but HEY my work is worth the
investment. As Bruce Coville told me once, grammar is much easier to
fix than a poor plot line. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26026 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA tech, etc. |
.htmlThank you Kassidy. You really made my day. :0)--- In
pota@yahoogroups.com, "Kassidy Rae <valwp@y...>" <valwp@y...> wrote:
> <I want so much to be a part of this group and share my views and
> > knowledge. All I ask of you and everyone here is not to snub me.
I
> > carry a lot scars from people who are grammer snobs. Please feel
> free
> > to correct me but with a constructive heart. Thanks :0)>
>
> Hey Ms. Libraryape,
> for someone who has trouble with grammar, you still know how to
> express yourself in a very gracious way.
> Kassidy
>
> PS These guys are no-holds barred - been that way a long, long time. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26027 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: Neutrino telescope |
.htmlHey Jeff, talking about neutrinos have you ever heard of the Philip
Pulllman's Dark Materials series . . . "The Golden Compass" etc.??? -
-- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> Scientists at U. C. Irvine (where some of "Conquest" was shot)
are scheduled to announce today that they have had the first
successful test run of a new kind of telescope that looks for
neutrinos - - microscopic particles that could lead to "proof" of
other dimensions (perhaps the alternate universe Cornelius and Zira
started by going back in the ship?). I don't have time to go into it
now, but it's perhaps a red-letter day for science, the dawn of a new
Zira, er, era. No, I'm not drunk! Just ask Pat. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Haristas@a...
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 7:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Lisa, slave of Mrs. Riley
AND of the State... Al...
>
>
> In a message dated 1/26/03 9:58:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
veetus@e... writes:
>
>
>
> I think she means the books. Hey, come to think of
it, "Planet" is the best there, too. "Conquest" is the best
novelization of the sequels. - - - Jeff
>
>
>
>
> Oh, I see. Yeah, I would say the novelizations of ESCAPE and
CONQUEST were the best and I tend to lean toward ESCAPE, but it's
been over twenty-five years since I read them.
>
> -- Rory
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26028 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
|
.html --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Kassidy Rae <valwp@y...>" <valwp@y...>
wrote:
<< Please don't take this the wrong way, but I couldn't get past Lou Diamond
Philips and Keifer Sutherland either. Blech!>>
Obviously, you guys know I am kidding right? In this instance, I was just doing
a parody of "Apes" and the show "24." Keifer is the star of that show and
Phillips had a cameo role in it for a few episodes last season. That's why I
used their names. I was just goofing around.
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26029 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
.htmlI was just goofing around.
>
> Matt
Sure you were. Of course. Righty-o :)
Kass <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26030 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
.html.html In a message dated 1/30/03 2:12:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, MTotsky@... writes:
. I was just goofing around.
Matt
Oh yeah. . . suuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrreeeeeee.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26031 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series |
.htmlHey, that's RORY'S excuse - find an original one!
-----Original Message-----
From: mtotsky < MTotsky@...> [ MTotsky@...]
Sent: Friday, 31 January 2003 6:12 AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] My Ideas for a new Apes TV Series
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Kassidy Rae <valwp@y...>" <valwp@y...>
wrote:
<< Please don't take this the wrong way, but I couldn't get past Lou
Diamond
Philips and Keifer Sutherland either. Blech!>>
Obviously, you guys know I am kidding right? In this instance, I was
just doing
a parody of "Apes" and the show "24." Keifer is the star of that show
and
Phillips had a cameo role in it for a few episodes last season. That's
why I
used their names. I was just goofing around.
Matt
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26032 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 1/30/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
.html
.html
Sorry, Too Sexy, I haven't read, or even
heard, of Philip Pullman's work. They deal with neutrinos? - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:50
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re:
Neutrino telescope
Hey Jeff, talking about neutrinos have you ever heard of
the Philip Pulllman's Dark Materials series . . . "The Golden Compass"
etc.??? - -- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote: >
Scientists at U. C. Irvine (where some of "Conquest" was shot) are
scheduled to announce today that they have had the first successful test
run of a new kind of telescope that looks for neutrinos - - microscopic
particles that could lead to "proof" of other dimensions (perhaps the
alternate universe Cornelius and Zira started by going back in the ship?).
I don't have time to go into it now, but it's perhaps a red-letter day for
science, the dawn of a new Zira, er, era. No, I'm not drunk! Just ask Pat.
- - - Jeff > > > ----- Original Message -----
> From: Haristas@a... > To:
pota@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 7:10
PM > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Lisa, slave of
Mrs. Riley AND of the State... Al... > > >
In a message dated 1/26/03 9:58:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@e...
writes: > > > >
I think she means the books. Hey, come to think of it, "Planet" is the
best there, too. "Conquest" is the best novelization of the sequels. - - -
Jeff > > > > > Oh, I
see. Yeah, I would say the novelizations of ESCAPE and
CONQUEST were the best and I tend to lean toward ESCAPE, but it's been
over twenty-five years since I read them. > > -- Rory
>
>
>
>
> >
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26033 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 1/31/2003 |
|
| Subject: Apes' Languages |
.html> Okay now for POTA. Lisa being able to talk already is really
> interesting and might ring true. But if the apes could talk, why
was Breck so concerned over an ape that can talk? An ape being able
to talk - to think is unique to those who can't, thus giving Caesar
the leverage he needs to lead the apes.
*** The way I see it, Caesar wasn't the first "talking ape" that ever
made an appearance in Breck's city: virtually ALL of the Apes which
had been transported overseas to be slaves, from Africa & Indonesia
to America, were NOT the "primitive" apes we see in National
Geographic specials or in zoos & circuses; rather, the Apes in
CONQUEST were newer, hybrid species of "Simius Sapiens" (to borrow a
term from Pierre Boulle's book). If you compare the physiognomy of
the Chimpanzees, Orangutans, & Gorillas in CONQUEST & BATTLE with
that of REAL apes, you'll see that there is a notable difference--one
being, especially, that the shapes of the heads of the Chimps in
CONQUEST look like the heads of the Chimps in PLANET & BENEATH,
rather than like those of REAL chimpanzees. And no knuckle-walking
African gorilla like the kind Dian Fossey studied could ever ride a
horse the way Aldo and his friends end up doing--the Gorillas in
CONQUEST and BATTLE are not as massive... which is good for the
horse!
Let's face it: regardless of the real abilities of "primitive" Apes
to communicate via ASL, the communicative abilities of the Apes in
CONQUEST--who are the same the citizens of Caesar's "Ape City" in
BATTLE--are equal to those of us humans. Even if you could somehow
alter a "primitive" ape's vocal chords, so that he/she could vocalize
like a human, the brain of such an ape would not necessarily be
advanced enough to equip such a creature with the ability to converse
on an intellectual basis.
But that's the problem, here: an Orangutan named Mandemus--who is
portrayed, by Lew Ayres, as OLDER than Caesar--has a mind "as sharp
as a razor" according to MacDonald. He has a human-level intellect in
his "evolved-orangutan" anatomy. How did he get that intellectual
ability--which, remember, he had to have been BORN with, well before
the birth of Caesar in 1973?
Why don't the enslaved apes in Breck's city audibly use their
speaking abilities? They probably do so for the same reason that
Cornelius urges Brent (in BENEATH) "never to speak": they FEAR what
will happen to them if the oppressive humans learn that they have the
ability to talk. In their own language(s), prior to their capture in
Africa and Indonesia by Slavers, they probably told each other that
IF they were to be caught by Humans they should pretend that they
were no different from the still-primitive Apes living around them.
Milo cautions Zira & Cornelius to keep quiet until they learn who
their Friends are and who their Enemies are... but the Apes who wind
up being shipped over to America (and to wherever else Ape Slavery is
practiced on "the five continents") already KNOW that the Humans who
are enslaving them are their Enemies, since forcible enslavement is
hardly the act of a Friend!
Caesar, who has been sheltered from the harsh realities of the world
outside the closed confines of Armando's circus, hasn't had the self-
protective speech-taboo drilled into his mind long enough for it to
have the lasting effect Armando had hoped, resulting in him blurting
out "Lousy Human bastard!" after seeing a chimpanzee courier (named
Aldo) being beaten. It is THIS outburst which is the first one by an
Ape overheard by Humans which prompts Breck to speculate that
Armando's chimp might be the changeling child of the Ape-onauts;
Breck doesn't know that all the other Ape slaves in his city ALSO
have the same vocalizing ability, since the slave-Apes keep their
mouths shut: the first use of vocal language by any of them which a
Human overhears is Lisa's protesting "No!" at the end of CONQUEST.
Whatever vocal languages these "evolved" apes spoke prior to their
enslavement, it most probably wouldn't have been English. It may have
shared certain vocal sounds which the still-primitive apes used
(the "hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo-HAH-HAH-HAH!!!" cry, etc.), as well as certain
handsigns (like the hand-wave "Come over here" signal, which chimps
use), but the human-like larynx, voice-box, etc., as well as the
human-like BRAIN adaptations would give them greater abilities--
abilities which would make them as different from primitive Apes as
the Ape-onauts were from the gorilla in the next cage.
In my scenario, Mandemus is one of the first--if not THE first--ape
to be born with transgenically-altered DNA, having been gifted with
the human-like ability to think and talk like a human... and his
birth is in December of 1947. Since CONQUEST is dated at 1991, and
Mandemus became the guardian of Caesar's Armory (and Conscience) for
a period of 27 years, that places BATTLE in the year 2018, making
Mandemus (who, remember, is portrayed as "old") to be about 71 years
old during the events of BATTLE.
CONQUEST takes place only 8 years after the Pet Plague (according to
Armando), and the first several years after the death of the Dogs &
Cats resulted in only the domestication of monkeys and apes as PETS--
it was later that those pets were turned into slaves. I'd guess that
the enslavement of the Apes had been going on for only about 5 years
by the time CONQUEST takes place, so that there could not be nearly
enough time for "selective breeding" to create the TALKING apes who
wind up being subjects of their King, Caesar. Yeah, there IS
a "Breeding Annex" where superior male apes are brought to inseminate
newly-arrived female apes, but Lisa cannot have been bred that way,
since she had to have been born YEARS before the Pet Plague, before
there were any "Ape Management" facilities and all that. She had the
vocal apparatus--AND the cranial capacity--to communicate like a
Human being, or like the "evolved apes" Cornelius and Zira, and she
could only have been BORN with that capacity.
So, in my estimation, the slave Apes in CONQUEST are not
mere "primitive" apes, like the gorilla who kills Milo in ESCAPE;
they are physiognomically and COGNITIVELY different--"evolved"
through a purposeful tampering with their original genomes by
somebody or some group who had the ability to do this way back in the
late 1940's. Their abilities to eventually speak the English language
fluently, and to express highly-developed intellectual concepts (as
Mandemus & Virgil do), make them to be essentially three DIFFERENT
species of Chimpanzee, Orangutan, & Gorilla.
My scenario, of course, is intended to provide a scientifically
plausible explanation for the observed qualities of the Apes in
CONQUEST and BATTLE. Granted, the movies were primarily satires and
allegories about different RACES of humans... but since they
use "science fiction" as a way of addressing those social issues,
then the SCIENCE in the SF should at the very least be adequate. For
my money, the ONLY way to create the talking Apes that proliferate in
CONQUEST & BATTLE is through intentional transgenic manipulation of
the simian genomes by some mysterious "meddler(s)" who have an agenda
of their own prompting them to do this. My mega-POTA project's Plot
is designed to delve into this Mystery...
Patrick
P.S. Be sure to keep us informed about your class on "HUMAN AND
CHIMPANZEE COMMUNICATION"! If you ask your teacher what he thinks of
the POTA "talking apes" scenario, though, don't be surprised if he
rolls his eyes and mutters under his breath...
>I suspect that the gathering apes were speaking a language
Dr.Goodall and Dr. Roger Fouts has discovered studying and working
with the Chimps. Although the chimpanzees' language is just a
combination of gestures, expressions, and body langauge, it is far
more complex and is perhaps proof in how our humans ancestors started
communicate millions of years ago (Chimpanzee culture rocks!)
In "Conquest" there is true indication that the apes' intelligence is
increasing through perhaps the experiences gathered from their
enslavement. Their show of defiance is the end result. If so then
they are developing their own language - Simian Language which isn't
verbal on human levels. I beleive there are a combination of reasons
why Lisa is able to talk in the end. One, she spoke the word she has
heard over and over; much like a two year old hears it from his/her
parents. Believe me, I've experienced the terrible twos not only with
my son but with pre-schoolers. Two, her vocal cords had moved to the
right position. If you study the vocal development of a human being
from its infancy and on up you will find that the vocal cords start
out further down the throat.(as is an ape's) As the infant matures
the cords move into a vocal position. For Lisa and the other apes
this might have been the case.
> Third, she had been around Caesar who not only shows her how it is
done but helps her gain the confidence to express herself where as
most of the time she oppressed. As result of all these
circumastances, she speaks out in a time of need.
>
> In Myth I really touch upon these issues. I've done a lot research,
even visiting Washoe and her bunch. I very intrigue with the apes
that can communicate with their hands. In the Spring I plan on taking
a class at the Human and Chimpanzee Cummunication Institute. I'm not
sure if Dr. Fouts will be instructing the class. To be there brings
tears to my eyes - tears of joy. It's funny that I am interested in
ape communication . Maybe I know how it feels to be an ape that is
not understood.
>
> I would like to send you the chapter privately at first as I feel
more comfortable. Thank you.
>
> Talk to you soon.
>
> Wendy
> *** Is it that Lisa CAN'T talk yet... or has been purposely
SUPPRESSING her ability to vocalize like a human? Obviously, given
her complete fluency in BATTLE, Lisa must have had the physiognomical
ability to talk like a human AT BIRTH; she didn't just
magically "acquire" the ability at the end of CONQUEST! She--like all
the other "POTA"-like slave apes in CONQUEST--is NOT just a "mute"
animal... but CAN speak. However, they all CHOOSE not to speak, since
they must somehow know that to do so is a Death Sentence. But recall
that every so often there are loudspeaker announcements by "the Watch
Commander" reporting "unauthorized ape gatherings"... what are these
apes doing when they "gather" in an unauthorized way? Since the
TALKING apes of BATTLE are the SAME apes who were once enslaved in
Breck's city, then perhaps they get together illicitly to talk to one
another... in hushed whispers, of course. MacDonald (from BATTLE)
mentions that the security cameras were installed "to forestall ape
conspiracies". The apes, in order to "conspire", would have to
communicate in some way; granted, Caesar was able to instill a fair
level of Civil Disobedience with a non-vocal "look" (like when that
shoe-shining ape starts smearing the stuff on that human's sock), but
given the physical ability to speak (which is established beyond
doubt not only in BATTLE, but at the end of CONQUEST, when Lisa
speaks), I contend that those "conspiring" apes were probably
whispering to one another--probably in a language other than English,
since they all were shipped to America from Africa, Borneo, etc. In
other words: the Apes possessed not only the physical ability to
speak prior to their enslavement (during which they pretended to be
Mute, out of fear), but also a LANGUAGE OF THEIR OWN. Cornelius tells
the Presidential Commission that English had been the language of his
ancestors going back "2000 years, roughly", but that does NOT mean
that it was the ONLY language his people had ever spoken. Perhaps
those "glyph" symbols on the simian clothing are, like cuneiform and
hieroglyphics, phonetic-based representations in an
earlier "original" Ape language, which they set aside in favor of the
language of Caesar (their Savior) and of the later-enslaved Humans
(whom they might not have wished to learn the Ape language, to keep
it "pure" perhaps). <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26034 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: What The Fox? |
| Group: pota |
Message: 26035 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] What The Fox? |
.html.html In a message dated 2/1/03 3:20:47 AM Eastern Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
Bad news for POTA DVD owners.
A bad case of DVD rot eats into movie collections - smh.com.au
Hey! This news SUCKS! BIG TIME!
I'm listening to CNN on my TV right now and they're reporting that NASA has lost contact with the Space Shuttle. Mmmmmmmm, I wonder what's happened to it?
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26036 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Apes' Languages |
.html.html In a message dated 1/31/03 11:23:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
the Apes in CONQUEST were newer, hybrid species of "Simius Sapiens" (to borrow a term from Pierre Boulle's book)
Where in the book is that, Patrick? I'd like to look that up.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26037 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: The Apes were supposed to be Apes |
.html.html From: "patrickmichaeltilton <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
Date: Fri Jan 31, 2003 10:22 pm
Subject: Apes' Languages
*** The way I see it, Caesar wasn't the first "talking ape" that ever made an appearance in Breck's city: virtually ALL of the Apes which had been transported overseas to be slaves, from Africa & Indonesia to America, were NOT the "primitive" apes we see in National Geographic specials or in zoos & circuses; rather, the Apes in CONQUEST were newer, hybrid species of "Simius Sapiens" (to borrow a term from Pierre Boulle's book). If you compare the physiognomy of the Chimpanzees, Orangutans, & Gorillas in CONQUEST & BATTLE with that of REAL apes, you'll see that there is a notable difference--one being, especially, that the shapes of the heads of the Chimps in
CONQUEST look like the heads of the Chimps in PLANET & BENEATH, rather than like those of REAL chimpanzees. And no knuckle-walking African gorilla like the kind Dian Fossey studied could ever ride a horse the way Aldo and his friends end up doing--the Gorillas in CONQUEST and BATTLE are not as massive ... which is good for the horse!
It's your scenario, but let me just point out one thing: Did it ever occur to you that the differences in the Apes in the films and the real primates can be explained by the fact that human beings were made up with facial appliances to give them a simian appearance? That also explains the differences in the body structure.
John Chambers himself said that he designed the Apes "look" to make them more aesthetically appealing... That's why they have an appearance of apes, but they aren't "dead on" in appearance... As to what you said later in the post (about the differences in appearance between Zira and Cornelius and that gorilla in the next cage,) that can be explained by the fact that the guy that "played" the Gilligan's Island ape also was the ESCAPE "primitive" and he supposedly insisted on using his own ugly-a*s costume. I really wish FOX woulda made up the ESCAPE primitives to have the same "look" as the Ape-o-nauts, but they didn't.
In any case, they were all supposed to be Apes, not some hybrid that could talk, (but "shhhhh" when the humans are around). If they were supposed to be this hybrid, then how is it they are running wild being captured and sold into slavery like the other primitive apes? If they were hybrids, they'd more than likely be bred in captivity and raised there for eventual sale... They wouldn't even be arriving naked, because they'd probably have been conditioned from day one. There'd be no need to capture wild apes when there are these wonderous ("talking") apes around. Why go thru the trouble of conditioning a wild ape when you can just take one of these hybrids into your home? Oh yeah, that's right... They're running wild with the lowland gorillas... Guess ya better catch 'em...
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26038 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Apes were supposed to be Apes |
.html.html In a message dated 2/1/03 10:55:16 AM Eastern Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
If they were supposed to be this hybrid, then how is it they are running wild being captured and sold into slavery like the other primitive apes?
There's nothing CONQUEST that says the apes are being captured in the wild. Since there aren't that many apes in the wild I've always assumed that in CONQUEST the apes are being bred in Africa and Borneo for export throughout the world. I think that it's a failing of the original series that an indication that the apes were a product of genetic engineering wasn't given since they don't at all look like real apes.
-- Rory <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26039 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes were supposed to be Apes |
.html.html
From: Haristas@a...
Date: Sat Feb 1, 2003 1:46 pm
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Apes were supposed to be Apes
In a message dated 2/1/03 10:55:16 AM Eastern Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
If they were supposed to be this hybrid, then how is it they are running wild being captured and sold into slavery like the other primitive apes?
There's nothing CONQUEST that says the apes are being captured in the wild. Since there aren't that many apes in the wild I've always assumed that in CONQUEST the apes are being bred in Africa and Borneo for export throughout the world. I think that it's a failing of the original series that an indication that the apes were a product of genetic engineering wasn't given since they don't at all look like real apes.
-- Rory
That's sorta what I was getting at. However, you'd think that by the time the Ape slave trade was in full gear, the US would have had it's own breeding annexes (bigger than just what is at Ape-Management) and would be having their own "inventory" bred here Stateside and not have to be relying on imports. However, what I said in my last post, and to which you replied, is questioning Patrick's post... Here is what he said about these "talking/hybrid" Apes:
Why don't the enslaved apes in Breck's city audibly use their speaking abilities? They probably do so for the same reason that Cornelius urges Brent (in BENEATH) "never to speak": they FEAR what will happen to them if the oppressive humans learn that they have the ability to talk. In their own language(s), prior to their capture in
Africa and Indonesia by Slavers, they probably told each other that IF they were to be caught by Humans they should pretend that they were no different from the still-primitive Apes living around them.
He is the one that said these Apes are running wild with the others... I simply stated that if such an Ape were to exist, it'd have been "created" by Man's genetically manipulating them... As such, they'd be in Man's hands already and would be captives, NOT running with the jungle Apes. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26040 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/1/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: The Apes were supposed to be Apes |
.html.html In a message dated 2/1/03 3:13:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
However, what I said in my last post, and to which you replied, is questioning Patrick's post... Here is what he said about these "talking/hybrid" Apes:
Why don't the enslaved apes in Breck's city audibly use their speaking abilities? They probably do so for the same reason that Cornelius urges Brent (in BENEATH) "never to speak": they FEAR what will happen to them if the oppressive humans learn that they have the ability to talk. In their own language(s), prior to their capture in
Africa and Indonesia by Slavers, they probably told each other that IF they were to be caught by Humans they should pretend that they were no different from the still-primitive Apes living around them.
Well, that's Patrick for you! This is the same as his humans in PLANET not talking because they don't want to.
He's the silliest of POTA fans, that Patrick!
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26041 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/2/2003 |
|
| Subject: Ape language, speaking ability, etc. Also, "simius sapiens" |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 2/1/03 3:13:35 PM Eastern Standard Time,
mlccougar@a... writes:
>
>
> > However, what I said in my last post, and to which you replied,
is questioning Patrick's post... Here is what he said about
these "talking/hybrid" Apes:
> >
> > Why don't the enslaved apes in Breck's city audibly use their
speaking abilities? They probably do so for the same reason that
Cornelius urges Brent (in BENEATH) "never to speak": they FEAR what
will happen to them if the oppressive humans learn that they have the
ability to talk. In their own language(s), prior to their capture in
Africa and Indonesia by Slavers, they probably told each other that
IF they were to be caught by Humans they should pretend that they
were no different from the still-primitive Apes living around them.
> >
> >
>
> Well, that's Patrick for you! This is the same as his humans in
PLANET not talking because they don't want to.
>
> He's the silliest of POTA fans, that Patrick!
>
> -- Rory
*** First off, I'm sure you all know by now that the Space Shuttle
COLUMBIA disintegrated during re-entry over Texas. I'm not going to
say anything more here about that, since I think it's fair to say
that we all feel just awful about it and there isn't much to say
except that it's a tragedy.
But to get back to the conversation regarding the Apes in CONQUEST;
it's evident that the SAME apes we see in CONQUEST are seen later, in
BATTLE (the citizens of Caesar's tree-fort "Ape City", who have since
bred another generation of Ape children, whom "Teacher" is teaching
alongside adult gorillas who have a hard time with the "Three R's").
The "apes" in question CAN TALK. They can speak fluent English, as
evidenced by the fact that in BATTLE they all speak it. Remember that
chant that ALL the Apes drone on & on: "Ape has killed Ape! Ape has
killed Ape!"? EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THESE APES CAN TALK. They're all
intelligent and they can talk.
Ordinary Chimpanzees, Orangutans, and Gorillas are absolutely
incapable of intelligent speech, incapable of ANY kind of
communication outside the occasional SIGN LANGUAGE use of gorillas
like Koko, or chimps like Washoe and Nim Chimpsky. But nobody in
their right mind would attribute to a REAL ape the ability to vocally
discuss theories of Relativity or Theology (like Virgil with his
pupils and then with Mandemus).
The abilities of the Apes in BATTLE (the SAME apes who remembered
being slaves in Breck's city in CONQUEST) are beyond those of REAL
apes, and can ONLY be the result of an extreme change in their
nature. I contend that the only plausible scientific explanation for
the appearance--the SUDDEN appearance--of these talking, "evolved"
apes is purposeful genetic manipulation of the simian genomes by
beings who had this ability back in the late 1940's or so (I base
this timeline on the fact that Mandemus clues us in to the date of
BATTLE, "27 years" after CONQUEST--or, 2018 A.D.--and that he is
portrayed as "old": old in comparison to Caesar, Virgil & MacDonald).
Since human beings (as far as anybody knows) did NOT have the ability
to tamper with the genomes of any species (let alone the 3 main
simian species), then the "beings" who DID tamper with the Apes' DNA
had to be intelligent NON-HUMAN creatures... and in my scenario, the
creatures in question are Alien. Why do they create a hybrid race of
intelligent, talking Apes? That's a good question, and I'd like to
give away the whole plot of my POTA novel here, but I'd rather not
spoil the surprise!
So, then, since it ain't humans who are genetically engineering these
talking Apes (through transgenic procedures), then when humans
involved in the "acquisition" of Apes for sale as Pets (at first) and
then as Slaves (later on) actually "acquire" them (by hunting them,
of course), they think of these hybrids as nothing more than animals,
since they still look like apes--although physiognomically different,
to a certain degree, from actual Apes. Perhaps a given percentage of
the Apes who are captured by the Slave-traders are real, unevolved
Apes, and the rest are the able-to-talk "evolved" Apes: for example,
the cage full of Orangutans into which Caesar sneaks seems to be a
bunch of unevolved Apes. But the chimpanzee named "Aldo" (the
messenger being beaten in the Civic Center), Lisa, and most of the
rest of the Apes seem to be "evolved" Apes who don't reveal their
ability to speak until that moment when Lisa utters the word "No!" at
the end of CONQUEST.
The Lawgiver, in the screenplay, refers to how Caesar "survived, to
grow to adulthood. And he rose up an army of Apes and gave them
speech, and won freedom from their oppressors."
Caesar "gave them speech"? That's how an Ape theologian, almost 700
years later, interprets the sudden ability of Apes to speak English.
But we all know that Caesar--whatever his abilities may be as a
revolutionary and a leader--does not (and did not) have the magical
ability to bestow the power of Speech on the Apes in CONQUEST. That's
ludicrous! Yet it isn't a surprise that, hundreds of years later,
this "savior" would be thought of as someone "sent by God" with the
magical, perhaps "God-given" ability to turn primitive apes
into "evolved" TALKING apes.
But that cannot be the ACTUAL way that these Apes came to be. From a
scientific standpoint, there has to be another explanation in order
to lend it at least the semblance of plausibility.
My scenario suggests that the DNA of primitive apes was used to
produce 3 sets of altered simian genomes, so that a transgenically-
produced hybrid population could be created, capable of producing
more "evolved" apes via interbreeding either with other hybrids or
with primitive apes, passing the "dominant" altered genes on to the
next generation.
These "apes" were different than wild, primitive apes, though their
genes (prior to being altered) came from them. They had the physical
ability--unlike primitive apes--to speak like a human, and the
cognitive ability--again, unlike primitive apes--to think like a
human... even so far as to understand Relativistic Time Dilation
effects, and how to interpret the readings on a Geiger counter.
But these Apes--although they COULD speak--did not reveal their
ability to speak until they had the upper hand, when Caesar had led
them to victory over Breck's forces. And since they were assumed to
be nothing more than "wild animals", they obviously weren't taught
the English language--which they eventually DO learn, since they
speak it in BATTLE. Maybe the did speak a language before their
capture by Slave-traders. Maybe they didn't. What counts is that they
DID have the physical ability to do so. Individuals don't just
suddenly "acquire" the ability to speak fluent English later in life
after a childhood spent without that ability--that's just nuts. Aldo
(the gorilla, in BATTLE), despite his poor ability to write with a
pencil, is able to do so, and he can speak English well enough--and
he is old enough to react viscerally to Teacher's blurted-out: "No,
Aldo, no!" Aldo had suffered "electrical conditioning" at Ape
Management; he had been a slave in Breck's city. Back then, in 1991,
not knowing any English (since he came to America from Africa, on one
of those shipments), he probably did no more than roar & bellow...
but his LATER ability to speak intelligently means that he also had
the potential to speak back then, and before--since birth, in fact.
That's my take on it, anyway. By the way, Rory, if you'll recall, I
said that the humans in PLANET and BENEATH don't talk because their
ancestors learned that it was dangerous to talk: the Apes
will "dissect" and then "kill" any human caught talking. It isn't
that they don't WANT to talk--they FEAR the consequences. They've
feared it for CENTURIES so intensely that the "speech centers" in
their brains have atrophied through lack of use. Their non-speaking
is an on-going COGNITIVE choice--as Zira said, it's "in the brain",
and NOT in their "speech organs" (larynx, voice box, etc.), which she
said "are adequate".
Similarly, the transgenically-altered "evolved" Apes which show up in
CONQUEST don't speak while in captivity probably because they have a
similar fear of the consequences. What would ape-enslaving Humans do
to an ape who could actually talk? After the "revelations" about the
Future given by the Ape-onauts, humans would react with Fear and
Hatred, not wishing for the Future which Zira & Cornelius described
to come to pass. So, then, whoever it was who created the populations
of hybrid talking Apes also conveyed to them the importance of NOT
revealing their ability to talk while in the presence of a human who
was in a position to harm them... which is why it isn't until Breck's
forces are defeated that we first hear one of these apes (Lisa) dare
to divulge this ability to talk.
But when the Apes, enslaved in Breck's city, are relatively alone
amongst their own kind (in an "unauthorized ape gathering"), perhaps
they whisper to one another in a non-English language they spoke
prior to their capture by Slave-traders. Perhaps. In my scenario,
they actually DO speak in an "ape" language that isn't English, and
it is from this language that the non-Latin/Greek names come from.
Names like "Zako", "Elta", "Kira", "Zira", "Zaius", "Grundig", etc.
Some of the ape names are from the Latin (names
like "Cornelius", "Honorius", "Julius", "Lucius", "Ursus", etc.), and
some are common names like "Lisa", "Zelda", etc. Even an Italian
name, like "Aldo". But a lot of the names of Ape characters in the
POTA saga are not derived from English, Latin, Greek, Italian,
whatever; I'm suggesting that these "other" names are remnants of a
language these apes used to speak--a language given to them by
their "creators"--a language which they stopped using at first
because they eschewed the use of ANY language, while in slavery, and
then later on because they adopted the language spoken by
their "savior" Caesar--a language they needed to learn how to speak
in order to be able to give orders to their former masters. In my
scenario, the Apes don't reveal their original language to their now-
enslaved former masters, because they don't want humans to "defile"
that "sacred tongue" by speaking it with human lips; this "holy
language" is reserved for Apes only. Since the "glyph" symbols appear
on Ape clothing in BATTLE, I'm also suggesting that the glyphs are--
like hieroglyphs--representative of phonemes in this "Ape language".
Of course, this is all just interpretation on my part. It
ain't "canon" that anybody else MUST accept as "true". It's just my
scenario... as silly as it might be to monkey-boys like Rory!
Patrick
P.S. By the way, Boulle's use of the term "simius sapiens" is in "LA
PLANETE DES SINGES", part 2, chapter 2 (Chapter 19 in the US
version). In that chapter, Zira draws an evolutionary diagram for
Ulysse Merou:
At my request she drew the genealogical tree of the ape, in so far as
the best specialist had determined it. This bore a close resemblance
to the diagrams that with us represent the evolutionary process. From
a single trunk, whose roots faded away at the base into the unknown,
various limbs branched out in succession: vegetables, unicellular
organisms, then coelenterata and echinoderms; higher up one arrived
at fish, reptiles, and finally mammals. The tree was extended to
include a class analogous to our anthropoids, and at this point a new
limb branched out: that of men. This branch stopped short, whereas
the central stem went on rising, giving birth to different species of
prehistoric apes with barbaric names, to culminate eventually in
SIMIUS SAPIENS, forming the three extreme points of evolution: the
chimpanzee, the gorilla, and the orangutan. It was absolutely clear.
The term "Simius sapiens" means, in Latin, "Wise Simian" or "Thinking
Ape". Presumably, the 3 branches would result in the three
species "Pan sapiens", "Gorilla sapiens", and "Pongo sapiens",
since "Pan", "Gorilla" and "Pongo" are the Latin terms we use
for "Chimpanzee", "Gorilla" and "Orangutan". However, since real apes
are not "sapiens"-types, we call them "Pan paniscus" & "Pan
troglodytes" (the 2 types of chimps); "Gorilla gorilla"; and "Pongo
pygmaeus" (the orangutan). <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26042 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Ape language, speaking ability, etc. Also, |
.html.html In a message dated 2/2/03 10:29:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
P.S. By the way, Boulle's use of the term "simius sapiens" is in "LA
PLANETE DES SINGES", part 2, chapter 2 (Chapter 19 in the US
version). In that chapter, Zira draws an evolutionary diagram for
Ulysse Merou:
At my request she drew the genealogical tree of the ape, in so far as
the best specialist had determined it. This bore a close resemblance
to the diagrams that with us represent the evolutionary process. From
a single trunk, whose roots faded away at the base into the unknown,
various limbs branched out in succession: vegetables, unicellular
organisms, then coelenterata and echinoderms; higher up one arrived
at fish, reptiles, and finally mammals. The tree was extended to
include a class analogous to our anthropoids, and at this point a new
limb branched out: that of men. This branch stopped short, whereas
the central stem went on rising, giving birth to different species of
prehistoric apes with barbaric names, to culminate eventually in
SIMIUS SAPIENS, forming the three extreme points of evolution: the
chimpanzee, the gorilla, and the orangutan. It was absolutely clear.
The term "Simius sapiens" means, in Latin, "Wise Simian" or "Thinking
Ape". Presumably, the 3 branches would result in the three
species "Pan sapiens", "Gorilla sapiens", and "Pongo sapiens",
since "Pan", "Gorilla" and "Pongo" are the Latin terms we use
for "Chimpanzee", "Gorilla" and "Orangutan". However, since real apes
are not "sapiens"-types, we call them "Pan paniscus" & "Pan
troglodytes" (the 2 types of chimps); "Gorilla gorilla"; and "Pongo
pygmaeus" (the orangutan).
Thanks, Patrick!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26043 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Ape language, speaking ability, etc. Also, |
.html.html In a message dated 2/2/03 10:29:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
then the "beings" who DID tamper with the Apes' DNA
had to be intelligent NON-HUMAN creatures... and in my scenario, the
creatures in question are Alien.
Patrick, YOU'RE an alien!!!!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26044 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainment / News |
| Group: pota |
Message: 26045 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
.html.html
But I thought there were
only very few fans????
-----Original Message-----
From: Haristas@...
[Haristas@...]
Sent: Monday, 3 February 2003 5:03
AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Planet of the Apes]
Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainment / News
This article is an oldie
but goody.
Click here: Boston.com / Arts & Entertainment / News
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26046 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
.html.html From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...>
Date: Sun Feb 2, 2003 2:30 pm
Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainment / News
But I thought there were only very few fans????
Whitty, with quotes like the one from this guy (below) it's looking like there really may only be few...
"I have the movie at home and I watch from time to time," he adds. "I just love to watch the apes talking, it's just so fun. The movie is so overdramatic, there's definitely a campy appeal to it."
We've covered this ground before, but with "fans" that say stuff like this guy said, it's no wonder APES is still kept at arm's length by FOX... I HATE when people say it's "campy" or "cheesy" and all that other sh*t, and truthfully, I'd rather not even have them counted in... If that type of talk is what they think we all are saying, it's no wonder they pawn crap and don't give APES the treatment it deserves. Why would they {FOX} go thru the trouble of doing a Special Edition with all the extras when (after reading quotes like that guy said) they think that the public at large is just interested in "the fun talking Apes"? Anything worth including in a SE of APES would just be overlooked by those with that "It's campy" attitude...
And as for some of the other stuff in that article, like the beret wearing Cornelius... Same thing goes for that too... I have no use for that stuff. It's not cute, it's not funny, and it brings APES down in my opinion... I KNOW I am alone in that one, just the fact that so many seem to like that SIMPSONS parody show me that, but I can't help it... To ME (personally) things like that cheapen APES and make it look "campy" when it's NOT.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26047 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
.html.html In a message dated 2/2/2003 2:34:30 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
But I thought there were only very few fans????
Actually there are a lot, thogh some won't admit it.
A lot less will admit it after Burton's botch.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26048 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
.html.html In a message dated 2/2/03 5:58:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
I HATE when people say it's "campy" or "cheesy" and all that other sh*t
I do too, but I really think you have the TV show to blame for this. Some of those episodes got very silly. It's all Fox's fault. They milked the Planet of the Apes for all it was worth, and that attitude continues.
This is why I say, There really only is the original. It's the classic.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26049 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
.htmlYes, in a sense it does - calling particals Dust which has a lot to
do with parallel universes. When I read "The Golden Compass",which
was well over four hundred pages, I was up well into the night as I
couldn't put the book down. Beleive me Pullman will knock your socks
off. By the way, could you please call me Libraryape or willowape?
Toosexy is my daughter's hotmail site. When I joined this site I
tried to change my e-mail name but Yahoo didn't comply to my request.
I'm hardly sexy --- believe me, with every thing going south on me,
I'm hardly Linda Harrison. lol. --- In pota@yahoogroups.com,
<veetus@e...> wrote:
> Sorry, Too Sexy, I haven't read, or even heard, of Philip
Pullman's work. They deal with neutrinos? - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: libraryape <toosexy4u54@h...>
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:50 AM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope
>
>
> Hey Jeff, talking about neutrinos have you ever heard of the
Philip
> Pulllman's Dark Materials series . . . "The Golden Compass"
etc.??? -
> -- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > Scientists at U. C. Irvine (where some of "Conquest" was
shot)
> are scheduled to announce today that they have had the first
> successful test run of a new kind of telescope that looks for
> neutrinos - - microscopic particles that could lead to "proof" of
> other dimensions (perhaps the alternate universe Cornelius and
Zira
> started by going back in the ship?). I don't have time to go into
it
> now, but it's perhaps a red-letter day for science, the dawn of a
new
> Zira, er, era. No, I'm not drunk! Just ask Pat. - - - Jeff
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Haristas@a...
> > To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 7:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Lisa, slave of Mrs.
Riley
> AND of the State... Al...
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 1/26/03 9:58:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> veetus@e... writes:
> >
> >
> >
> > I think she means the books. Hey, come to think of
> it, "Planet" is the best there, too. "Conquest" is the best
> novelization of the sequels. - - - Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Oh, I see. Yeah, I would say the novelizations of ESCAPE
and
> CONQUEST were the best and I tend to lean toward ESCAPE, but it's
> been over twenty-five years since I read them.
> >
> > -- Rory
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26050 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
.html.html
By the way, could you please call me Libraryape or willowape?
Toosexy is my daughter's hotmail site. When I joined this site
How about Sexy Ape?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26051 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
.html
.html
I agree with Cougar about the Campy camp,
though I do like the satirical stuff ("Simpsons", Kubricks). That's what brought
down the new movie. They were probably thinking, "How seriously should we take
this?" If it was too serious would they be laughed off the screen. Some people
have trouble accepting talking monkeys, it takes visionaries like Franklin
Schaffner and Michael Wilson to bite the bullet and do it right. Certainly
Richard Zanuck didn't take it seriously, then or now. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 2:57
PM
Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] Check
out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainment / News
From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> Date: Sun Feb
2, 2003 2:30 pm Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] Check
out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainment / News
But I thought there were
only very few fans????
Whitty, with quotes like the one from this guy
(below) it's looking like there really may only be few...
"I have
the movie at home and I watch from time to time," he adds. "I just love to
watch the apes talking, it's just so fun. The movie is so overdramatic,
there's definitely a campy appeal to it."
We've covered this
ground before, but with "fans" that say stuff like this guy said, it's no
wonder APES is still kept at arm's length by FOX... I HATE when people say
it's "campy" or "cheesy" and all that other sh*t, and truthfully, I'd rather
not even have them counted in... If that type of talk is what they think we
all are saying, it's no wonder they pawn crap and don't give APES the
treatment it deserves. Why would they {FOX} go thru the trouble of doing a
Special Edition with all the extras when (after reading quotes like that guy
said) they think that the public at large is just interested in "the fun
talking Apes"? Anything worth including in a SE of APES would just be
overlooked by those with that "It's campy" attitude...
And as for some
of the other stuff in that article, like the beret wearing Cornelius... Same
thing goes for that too... I have no use for that stuff. It's not cute, it's
not funny, and it brings APES down in my opinion... I KNOW I am alone in that
one, just the fact that so many seem to like that SIMPSONS parody show me
that, but I can't help it... To ME (personally) things like that cheapen APES
and make it look "campy" when it's NOT.
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26052 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/2/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
.html.html
Some people have trouble accepting talking monkeys
That's why I like about films like Prophecy and Buckaroo Bonzai. In them, we are the talking monkeys. Gives you a sense of, perspective.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26053 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/3/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1549 |
.html
<Whitty, with quotes like the one from this guy (below) it's looking like there really may only be few...
"I have the movie at home and I watch from time to time," he adds. "I just love to watch the apes talking, it's just so fun. The movie is so overdramatic, there's definitely a campy appeal to it." >
Like it or not, part of the appeal for some fans is EXACTLY that. If you choose not to take the serious meanings behind the story to heart, you are left with talking apes. And that can be appealing, on it's own. I can understand Cougar's dislike of it, but RORY! Your usual hard-headed point is completely off the mark as far as fans like this go, unless the first POTA had NARY a talking ape in it? And I say it yet AGAIN, yes the tv series had funny, over the top moments, but if you don't think the ORIGINAL movie did as well, you are full of it! There are people out there like me who love the tv series (not to mention the blitz of Apes collectibles we were on the receiving end of, thanks to the TV SERIES).
I am getting TIRED of your elitist rhetoric! LONG LIVE THE TV SHOW!!!!!!
(Now I see why Patrick uses caps occasionally; the emphasis can be very satisfying as you are typing.)
KASSIDY!!!!!!!!!!
We've covered this ground before, but with "fans" that say stuff like this guy said, it's no wonder APES is still kept at arm's length by FOX... I HATE when people say it's "campy" or "cheesy" and all that other sh*t, and truthfully, I'd rather not even have them counted in... If that type of talk is what they think we all are saying, it's no wonder they pawn crap and don't give APES the treatment it deserves. Why would they {FOX} go thru the trouble of doing a Special Edition with all the extras when (after reading quotes like that guy said) they think that the public at large is just interested in "the fun talking Apes"? Anything worth including in a SE of APES would just be overlooked by those with that "It's campy" attitude...
And as for some of the other stuff in that article, like the beret wearing
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26054 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/4/2003 |
|
| Subject: A few responses |
.html> (Now I see why Patrick uses caps occasionally; the emphasis can be
very satisfying as you are typing.)
>
> KASSIDY!!!!!!!!!!
*** The only reason I use caps occasionally is because I can't quite
figure out how to do italics on this DELL keyboard while doing
postings on Yahoo sites. So, when I want to STRESS something, I type
a word in caps, hoping that whoever reads it "hears" me giving the
word (or phrase) an extra emphasis, or "oomph!" And, sure, there are
times when a little yelling & ranting & raving is called for... but
10 exclamation marks, Kassidy? Ain't that a bit MUCH, girl??????????
Was POTA "milked"? Sure, you betcha. Remember MAD magazine's
parody, "The Milking of the Planet That Went Ape"? Sure, FOX milked
the bejeezus out of it. But POTA was a "cash cow" that had so much
milk in it that needed to get milked out of it, that we're all better
off for it. Contrast that with other movies that have been hashed, re-
hashed, and over-hashed after modest success... and--in contrast to
POTA--they're more like the "dry heaves" after all the barf & bile
has already been hawked up & out!
---------------
By the way, Rory, you're welcome (regarding the "Simius sapiens" bit
from Boulle)... and, given how f***ed up our Human species has
been/is/ever shall be, I'll take it as a compliment that you think
I'm an Alien. At least I don't have acid for blood, though. And I
don't have any interest in "probing" anybody's orifices, either!
----------------
One other thing: I once made reference to the fact that the plotline
of the TV episode "The Legacy" owes a hell of a lot to Isaac Asimov's
classic novel(s) "FOUNDATION", where Virdon & Pals come across a
holographic projector's message from an old "Scientist" who tells of
how all the scientific knowledge of Man's civilization had been
safeguarded in certain places, prior to the imminent destruction of
Western Civilization... just like Asimov's psychohistorian Hari
Seldon established a "Foundation" on a remote planet (Terminus) where
the scientific wisdom of 20,000 years of Galactic history has been
safeguarded in an "Encyclopedia Galactica" project, as the imminent
(and foreseen) Fall of the Galactic Empire approaches, and his long-
dead holographic recordings periodically appear to his successors,
telling them about how "the Selden Plan" is unfolding...
First off, if you haven't read Asimov's "FOUNDATION" novels, shame on
you! He wrote 7 of 'em, in all, and each one is nowhere near as thick
as a Stephen King shelf-buster. Go and read 'em, dammit! Also, go
read his ROBOT novels and his GALACTIC EMPIRE novels, too: his later
novels in the series tie 'em all together in a magnificent Saga of
future history.
Secondly, 3 "new" FOUNDATION novels (the "Second Foundation
Trilogy"), by Gregory Benford, Greg Bear, and David Brin (the "3
B's") is also well worth reading.
In the 1st of these 3 other books (Benford's--"FOUNDATION'S FEAR"),
there's a cool chapter about how an assassination attempt is made on
Hari Seldon, the Prime Minister of the Galactic Emperor, during his
vacation on a planet where non-human primates ("pans") are kept, as a
sort of nature preserve. While there, Hari and his partner/guardian
Dors Venabili get "hooked in" to a gizmo which is sorta like the
thing in "THE MATRIX" which people are enmeshed from the get-go...
but instead of a Virtual World of cyberspatial "reality", Hari & Dors
have their minds cybernetically transferred into the heads of two of
the Pans (or, Chimps) as their bodies rest in a machine-induced coma
state. Of course, it's while their minds are "dwelling" inside the
non-human bodies--experiencing Life through the sensory organs of
Chimps--that an attempt is made on his life... when they find that
they somehow can't "log out" (so to speak) of the apparatus.
Hari Selden--who, at this part of the story, is still trying to
figure out how to devise his exotic and prophetic branch of
Mathematics (Psychohistory)--wanted to get a better understanding of
Human behavior & motivations by understanding the more basic
behaviors & motivations of Humanity's nearest genetic relative: the
Pans/Chimps. Only by understanding such Primate behaviors can he hope
to devise overall "laws" of behavior in large groups.
Anyway, if you're an Asimov fan (as I am), then you'll probably dig
this book; and, since we're all POTA fans, you'll at least probably
dig this particular chapter... but read the entire book, please! It's
a good read, and the next 2 books (by Bear & Brin) are even better.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26055 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/4/2003 |
| Subject: "I, Robot" (OT) |
.html
.html
By the way, Patrick, I mentioned on the film
group that Fox has staked out July 3 2004 for their film of "I, Robot", starring
Will Smith. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:37
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] A few
responses
> (Now I see why Patrick uses caps occasionally; the
emphasis can be very satisfying as you are typing.) > >
KASSIDY!!!!!!!!!!
*** The only reason I use caps occasionally is
because I can't quite figure out how to do italics on this DELL keyboard
while doing postings on Yahoo sites. So, when I want to STRESS something,
I type a word in caps, hoping that whoever reads it "hears" me giving the
word (or phrase) an extra emphasis, or "oomph!" And, sure, there are
times when a little yelling & ranting & raving is called for...
but 10 exclamation marks, Kassidy? Ain't that a bit MUCH,
girl??????????
Was POTA "milked"? Sure, you betcha. Remember MAD
magazine's parody, "The Milking of the Planet That Went Ape"? Sure, FOX
milked the bejeezus out of it. But POTA was a "cash cow" that had so much
milk in it that needed to get milked out of it, that we're all better
off for it. Contrast that with other movies that have been hashed,
re- hashed, and over-hashed after modest success... and--in contrast to
POTA--they're more like the "dry heaves" after all the barf & bile
has already been hawked up & out!
---------------
By the
way, Rory, you're welcome (regarding the "Simius sapiens" bit from
Boulle)... and, given how f***ed up our Human species has been/is/ever
shall be, I'll take it as a compliment that you think I'm an Alien. At
least I don't have acid for blood, though. And I don't have any interest
in "probing" anybody's orifices, either!
----------------
One
other thing: I once made reference to the fact that the plotline of the TV
episode "The Legacy" owes a hell of a lot to Isaac Asimov's classic
novel(s) "FOUNDATION", where Virdon & Pals come across a holographic
projector's message from an old "Scientist" who tells of how all the
scientific knowledge of Man's civilization had been safeguarded in certain
places, prior to the imminent destruction of Western Civilization... just
like Asimov's psychohistorian Hari Seldon established a "Foundation" on a
remote planet (Terminus) where the scientific wisdom of 20,000 years of
Galactic history has been safeguarded in an "Encyclopedia Galactica"
project, as the imminent (and foreseen) Fall of the Galactic Empire
approaches, and his long- dead holographic recordings periodically appear
to his successors, telling them about how "the Selden Plan" is
unfolding...
First off, if you haven't read Asimov's "FOUNDATION"
novels, shame on you! He wrote 7 of 'em, in all, and each one is nowhere
near as thick as a Stephen King shelf-buster. Go and read 'em, dammit!
Also, go read his ROBOT novels and his GALACTIC EMPIRE novels, too: his
later novels in the series tie 'em all together in a magnificent Saga of
future history.
Secondly, 3 "new" FOUNDATION novels (the "Second
Foundation Trilogy"), by Gregory Benford, Greg Bear, and David Brin (the
"3 B's") is also well worth reading. In the 1st of these 3 other books
(Benford's--"FOUNDATION'S FEAR"), there's a cool chapter about how an
assassination attempt is made on Hari Seldon, the Prime Minister of the
Galactic Emperor, during his vacation on a planet where non-human primates
("pans") are kept, as a sort of nature preserve. While there, Hari and his
partner/guardian Dors Venabili get "hooked in" to a gizmo which is sorta
like the thing in "THE MATRIX" which people are enmeshed from the
get-go... but instead of a Virtual World of cyberspatial "reality", Hari
& Dors have their minds cybernetically transferred into the heads of
two of the Pans (or, Chimps) as their bodies rest in a machine-induced
coma state. Of course, it's while their minds are "dwelling" inside the
non-human bodies--experiencing Life through the sensory organs of
Chimps--that an attempt is made on his life... when they find that
they somehow can't "log out" (so to speak) of the apparatus. Hari
Selden--who, at this part of the story, is still trying to figure out how
to devise his exotic and prophetic branch of Mathematics
(Psychohistory)--wanted to get a better understanding of Human behavior
& motivations by understanding the more basic behaviors &
motivations of Humanity's nearest genetic relative: the Pans/Chimps. Only
by understanding such Primate behaviors can he hope to devise overall
"laws" of behavior in large groups. Anyway, if you're an Asimov fan (as I
am), then you'll probably dig this book; and, since we're all POTA fans,
you'll at least probably dig this particular chapter... but read the
entire book, please! It's a good read, and the next 2 books (by Bear &
Brin) are even better.
Patrick
Your use of
Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26056 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Responding to a few responses |
|
.html .htmlLike it or not, part of the appeal for some fans is EXACTLY that. If you choose not to take the serious meanings behind the story to heart, you are left with talking apes. And that can be appealing, on it's own. I can understand Cougar's dislike of it...
I can see it from their perspective IF they look at them like "Wow, these are cool movies" (visually, story wise, etc...) But to look at them as just cute (campy) 70's flicks or otherwise, forget it... Don't even waste my time, and don't call yourself an APES fan of any sort... But back to what I just said, yeah, there have been times I even thought to myself "These are just cool" and I didn't take the "serious meanings" into consideration, just the film itself...
But RORY! Your usual hard-headed point is completely off the mark as far as fans like this go, unless the first POTA had NARY a talking ape in it? And I say it yet AGAIN, yes the tv series had funny, over the top moments, but if you don't think the ORIGINAL movie did as well, you are full of it! There are people out there like me who love the tv series (not to mention the blitz of Apes collectibles we were on the receiving end of, thanks to the TV SERIES).
I am in your group as far as really liking the TV series AND the collectibles it's debut helped spawn... That said, I have to say I agree with Rory... I mean as far as PLANET being "the" APES movie, and the one with the most depth, meaning, and all around importance, I certainly have to agree with him there... PLANET is "it" & it can't be topped. It is the best of them all, and I'd say it's my movie # 1... Rory once asked something like "If there were no collectibles, no sequels, none of that, would you still be an APES fan" (or something like that anyway...) To which I said "YES"... PLANET would still be my favorite movie, regardless if any of what followed was or wasn't... Meaning yes, I'd still be an APES fan if there were no sequels, series, etc...
I am getting TIRED of your elitist rhetoric!
I wouldn't quite call it "an elitist" attitude, I'd just call it hardcore, but I can understand his point of view on that one... I don't go as far as writing off all PLANET gave us in terms of the rest of the canon... I really like all that followed, but in terms of the original film, I can see his point and to a certain extent, I agree with it.
LONG LIVE THE TV SHOW!!!!!!
Though I agree with Rory's hardcoreness on PLANET, I gotta say I agree with your statement here too... It's just too bad those a*ses at CBS cancelled it so soon...
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26057 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Posting help? |
.html.html From: "patrickmichaeltilton <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>" <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
Date: Tue Feb 4, 2003 2:37 pm
Subject: A few responses
*** The only reason I use caps occasionally is because I can't quite figure out how to do italics on this DELL keyboard while doing postings on Yahoo sites. So, when I want to STRESS something, I type a word in caps***
Ok, I don't know your whole computer situation and all, but as far as posting goes, maybe you could do what I do... If I want to reply (or post) with the font of my choice, I simply write a new email... Like let's say I want to reply to something you said, I'd simply cut 'n paste it into my new email (that way I can have what I am replying to in the font of choice as well). Just an idea...
As far as if I just reply to a post via the egroup itself, then I too get stuck with that writing style, which really isn't too great, that's why I usually email (or reply) via my own and not through the egroup's reply function.<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26058 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
.htmlBlush--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> > By the way, could you please call me Libraryape or willowape?
> > Toosexy is my daughter's hotmail site. When I joined this site
>
> How about Sexy Ape? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26059 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "libraryape <toosexy4u54@h...>"
<toosexy4u54@h...> wrote:
> Blush--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> >
> > > By the way, could you please call me Libraryape or willowape?
> > > Toosexy is my daughter's hotmail site. When I joined this site
> >
> > How about Sexy Ape?
Blush! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26060 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
.htmlI take the Planet of the Apes very seriously. It might have its comic
moments but POTA conveys a very strong message. There is nothing
campy about that. --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> I agree with Cougar about the Campy camp, though I do like the
satirical stuff ("Simpsons", Kubricks). That's what brought down the
new movie. They were probably thinking, "How seriously should we take
this?" If it was too serious would they be laughed off the screen.
Some people have trouble accepting talking monkeys, it takes
visionaries like Franklin Schaffner and Michael Wilson to bite the
bullet and do it right. Certainly Richard Zanuck didn't take it
seriously, then or now. - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mlccougar@a...
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 2:57 PM
> Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts &
Entertainment / News
>
>
> From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...>
> Date: Sun Feb 2, 2003 2:30 pm
> Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts &
Entertainment / News
>
> But I thought there were only very few fans????
>
> Whitty, with quotes like the one from this guy (below) it's
looking like there really may only be few...
>
> "I have the movie at home and I watch from time to time," he
adds. "I just love to watch the apes talking, it's just so fun. The
movie is so overdramatic, there's definitely a campy appeal to it."
>
> We've covered this ground before, but with "fans" that say stuff
like this guy said, it's no wonder APES is still kept at arm's length
by FOX... I HATE when people say it's "campy" or "cheesy" and all
that other sh*t, and truthfully, I'd rather not even have them
counted in... If that type of talk is what they think we all are
saying, it's no wonder they pawn crap and don't give APES the
treatment it deserves. Why would they {FOX} go thru the trouble of
doing a Special Edition with all the extras when (after reading
quotes like that guy said) they think that the public at large is
just interested in "the fun talking Apes"? Anything worth including
in a SE of APES would just be overlooked by those with that "It's
campy" attitude...
>
> And as for some of the other stuff in that article, like the
beret wearing Cornelius... Same thing goes for that too... I have no
use for that stuff. It's not cute, it's not funny, and it brings APES
down in my opinion... I KNOW I am alone in that one, just the fact
that so many seem to like that SIMPSONS parody show me that, but I
can't help it... To ME (personally) things like that cheapen APES and
make it look "campy" when it's NOT.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26061 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Neutrino telescope |
.html.html In a message dated 2/5/2003 1:39:54 PM Central Standard Time, toosexy4u54@... writes:
Blush--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
>>By the way, could you please call me Libraryape or willowape?
>>Toosexy is my daughter's hotmail site. When I joined this site
>
>How about Sexy Ape?
Are ya? You're a hot little minky, aren't ya? You know you are. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26062 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Check out Boston.com / Arts & Entertainmen |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "libraryape <toosexy4u54@h...>"
<toosexy4u54@h...> wrote:
> I take the Planet of the Apes very seriously. It might have its
comic
> moments but POTA conveys a very strong message. There is nothing
> campy about that. ---
RIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26063 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/5/2003 |
| Subject: Montalban "Biography" |
.html
.html
A & E 's "Biography" tonight is Ricardo
Montalban. It's on at 9 PM Pacific, maybe Midnight Eastern. - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:39
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re:
Neutrino telescope
Blush--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote: > > > By
the way, could you please call me Libraryape or willowape? > >
Toosexy is my daughter's hotmail site. When I joined this site >
> How about Sexy Ape?
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26064 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/6/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Montalban "Biography" |
.html.html In a message dated 2/5/03 10:26:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
A & E 's "Biography" tonight is Ricardo Montalban. It's on at 9 PM Pacific, maybe Midnight Eastern. - - Jeff
I watched it at 8 p.m. Eastern. They had coverage of both ESCAPE and CONQUEST, but that shouldn't have come as a surprise since the program was produced by Fox.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26065 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/6/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Montalban "Biography" |
.html
.html
It was appropriate since POTA was one of the
few jobs Montalban could get at the time because of his outspokenness for Latino
causes. Basically the only interview they showed with Ricardo was from "Behind
the POTA" so there's stuff that was cut from the doc. I'll put that up later. -
- - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:23
AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
Montalban "Biography"
In a message dated 2/5/03 10:26:07
PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@...
writes:
A & E 's "Biography" tonight is Ricardo Montalban. It's on
at 9 PM Pacific, maybe Midnight Eastern. - - Jeff
I watched it at 8 p.m. Eastern. They had
coverage of both ESCAPE and CONQUEST, but that shouldn't have come as a
surprise since the program was produced by Fox.
-- Rory
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26066 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/6/2003 |
| Subject: Naughton news |
.html.html Here's some interesting news for Kassidy!
Newman in 'Our Town' Coming to TV
The Broadway production of Our Town starring Paul Newman -- his first appearance on Broadway in 38 years -- is being filmed by Showtime and PBS for presentation on Masterpiece Theatre's American Collection later this year. The play ended a nine-week limited run on Jan. 26 at the Booth Theatre in New York, where it is being filmed this week. James Naughton
, who directed the stage version, is directing the television version as well. Newman made his first television appearance as The Boy in a 1955 musical version of the Thornton Wilder play, which co-starred Frank Sinatra as The Stage Manager and Eva Marie Saint as The Girl.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26067 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/6/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Naughton news |
.html
.html
Naughton costarred with Newman in the movie
version of "The Glass Menagerie", and there's even a book about it's production.
But I think Kassidy would prefer Naughton in front of the camera. Also, I have
an autographed script from Ron Harper when he understudied Newman back in the
'60's (can't think of the title). - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:36
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Naughton
news
Here's some interesting news for
Kassidy!
Newman in 'Our Town' Coming
to TV
The
Broadway production of Our Town starring Paul Newman -- his first appearance on Broadway in 38 years -- is
being filmed by Showtime and PBS for presentation on Masterpiece Theatre's
American Collection later this year. The play ended a nine-week limited
run on Jan. 26 at the Booth Theatre in New York, where it is being filmed this
week. James
Naughton, who directed the stage version, is
directing the television version as well. Newman made his first television
appearance as The Boy in a 1955 musical version of the Thornton
Wilder play, which co-starred Frank Sinatra as The Stage Manager and Eva Marie
Saint as The Girl.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26068 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/7/2003 |
| Subject: JNaughton interview |
.html"I admit I was hesitant to ask Naughton about one of his TV roles, an ill-fated series that people barely remember, "The wonderful thing about Planet of the Apes -the only wonderful thing about it was that it led to a lifelong friendship with Roddy McDowall. I wasn't dying to do that show but I was living in LA and had a $400 rent payment that was about two weeks overdue, which was a lot of money at the time. I had two children, I was in my twenties and I had said no to this project three times. Finally, another week went by and I said, 'I guess I better say yes.' But with the money I made I bought the house I was renting." Well, at least he had a happier ending than the show did. "
the rest of the interview (along with a POTA pic) is at:
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26069 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/8/2003 |
|
| Subject: Re: Montalban "Biography" |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> A & E 's "Biography" tonight is Ricardo Montalban. It's on at 9
PM Pacific, maybe Midnight Eastern. - - Jeff
*** I saw it--it was good. One thing sorta bothered me, though: when
talking about his role of Armando, he lamented that they
(Dehn) "killed him off"--evidently, he would have liked to perform
the role in however many more POTA movies they were inclined to do.
However, the killing of Armando (or, the driving-to-suicide of
Armando) is necessary to the plot of CONQUEST and crucial to the
further development of the character of Caesar. Until Armando dies,
Caesar has every reason to hope that somehow he and his "foster
father" can somehow escape from Breck's city and go back to the
Circus... but when Armando dies, Caesar channels his rage into his
Ape Revolution activities.
And in BATTLE, he struggles with the morality of whether or not is is
Right or Wrong to kill that which is evil, so that Good can prevail.
He specifically mentions (in the script, at any rate) how Armando had
told him that "we must all live together in peace, or DIE", before
lamenting further that his REAL father (Cornelius) had died too soon
to impart such wisdom... wisdom he needs to be a "good and wise king"
to his people.
When Caesar makes slurs against the dwellers in the Forbidden City--
calling them "malformed... they're mutants... and they're MAD..."--
Lisa provokes him with a reminder of "the freaks in [his] foster-
father's circus". Were THEY mad, too?
BATTLE is the story of an Orphan who needs to find wisdom that only
his dead parents can give to him (or so he believes)... wisdom that
he needs to govern fairly over a mixed-species population. He can
never forget that he owes his life to a kind human (Armando) who
raised him, and to another kind human who twice saved his life
(MacDonald in CONQUEST). He cannot subject all humans to brutality
(as Aldo would like) because of the "exceptions" to the "rule"
that "humans won't be kind until we FORCE them". Armando HAD to die
in order for Caesar to have the need to go on his quest with Virgil
and MacDonald to the Archives. Had Armando lived, somehow, then
undoubtedly Caesar would have deferred these nagging questions about
Morality to Armando, who would have given him advice that he couldn't
help but respect--even more so than the dissenting voices of those
Apes who want nothing but revenge against Man for his crimes against
Apes and against the World.
But, yeah, I can see how Montalban--who wasn't getting much work at
the time--would have wanted to continue acting in POTA sequels. It
was a good part to play, and it helped keep him "on the map" when
they were fishing for talent to star in "Fantasy Island".
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26070 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/8/2003 |
|
| Subject: Re: Posting help? |
.html> Ok, I don't know your whole computer situation and all, but as far
as posting goes, maybe you could do what I do... If I want to reply
(or post) with the font of my choice, I simply write a new email...
Like let's say I want to reply to something you said, I'd simply
cut 'n paste it into my new email (that way I can have what I am
replying to in the font of choice as well).
> Just an idea...
>
> As far as if I just reply to a post via the egroup itself, then I
too get stuck with that writing style, which really isn't too great,
that's why I usually email (or reply) via my own and not through the
egroup's reply function.
*** Thanks for the suggestion, but with this Yahoo group and the
several others I post to, I prefer hitting the "Reply" button and
typing away. I don't want humongous amounts of Yahoo postings sent to
my already burgeoning e-mail address--I'd rather just go to the Site
and pick up where I left off, reading the postings in bunches
(the "Expand Messages" function), where I can click onto a specific
posting when I feel the need to reply. It's just a lot easier. Of
course, if/when I ever figure out how to scan in pics (hmmm... I need
to pick up a Scanner) and all that, I'll need to figure out how to
send 'em over to this site. That's all on my "thing-to-do" list.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26071 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/8/2003 |
|
| Subject: Re: "I, Robot" (OT) |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> By the way, Patrick, I mentioned on the film group that Fox has
staked out July 3 2004 for their film of "I, Robot", starring Will
Smith. - - - Jeff
*** After the "family-friendly" botch of "BICENTENNIAL MAN" (the
Robin Williams flick), I'm gritting my teeth at the idea of Will
Smith ruining another movie based on something I dig.
I absolutely LOVE Isaac Asimov's stories/novels in his Saga of future
history: his ROBOTS, GALACTIC EMPIRE, and FOUNDATION books. I suspect
that the Will Smith project is actually "The Caves of Steel", where
he would probably play the Elijah Bailey role--unless, that is, Fox
is doing a film version of Harlan Ellison's screenplay "I, Robot"
(based somewhat loosely on Asimov's short story collection).
Regardless... I'm not thrilled with the prospect of having Will Smith
in ANY film. Some people detest Ben Affleck (though even some Affleck
haters are giving him good reviews for "Daredevil")... but I'd rather
see Affleck as Elijah Bailey than Will Smith. And keep Mark Wahlberg
away, too, goddammit!
Actually, I think that Harrison Ford would be a better choice for
Bailey... though after doing "BLADE-RUNNER", another movie about
robots ("replicants") and a detective, he might not be inclined to do
it. At any rate, he would lend an air of "gravitas" to the role which
a younger actor just couldn't.
Will Smith should just stick to doing crap like "Bad Boys". He
should've had the sense to turn down the offer to be in "Wild Wild
West"... but he didn't and it STANK and he's pissed off enough people
to not want to see him in ANYTHING else ever again.
Hmmm... maybe as a zombie in the up-coming remake of "DAWN OF THE
DEAD"--he could be staggering around for a few seconds on-screen
before a shotgun blast sends his brains all over the window of a
store in whatever mall they're gonna film it...
Now THAT I'd pay to see!
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26072 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: What the...? |
.html
.html
No one has brought up that today is the 35th
Anniversary of one of Charlton Heston's best films? As the High Potentate I
proclaim today a day of celebration! Today I will finish off the Starcon '98
panel, give the belated results of our "best film" poll and present the Starcon
'96 panel (Eric Greene, Bill Blake, Austin Stoker, Booth Colman, Bobby Porter,
Buck Kartalian). At midnight I watched POTA. Two things struck me. First of all,
that it's still as powerful as ever. Being part of the fan network, I've heard
all the film's faults; what's wrong with this shot, that shot, scientifically
what's B.S., etc. It doesn't matter. After all this time, the film hasn't lost
it's meaning for me. This time I also noticed...that's a pretty cool wagon they
escaped in. Happy Anniversary to the fans! - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 8:31
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re:
Montalban "Biography"
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote: > A &
E 's "Biography" tonight is Ricardo Montalban. It's on at 9 PM Pacific,
maybe Midnight Eastern. - - Jeff
*** I saw it--it was good. One thing
sorta bothered me, though: when talking about his role of Armando, he
lamented that they (Dehn) "killed him off"--evidently, he would have liked
to perform the role in however many more POTA movies they were inclined to
do. However, the killing of Armando (or, the driving-to-suicide of
Armando) is necessary to the plot of CONQUEST and crucial to the
further development of the character of Caesar. Until Armando dies,
Caesar has every reason to hope that somehow he and his "foster
father" can somehow escape from Breck's city and go back to the
Circus... but when Armando dies, Caesar channels his rage into his Ape
Revolution activities. And in BATTLE, he struggles with the morality of
whether or not is is Right or Wrong to kill that which is evil, so that
Good can prevail. He specifically mentions (in the script, at any rate)
how Armando had told him that "we must all live together in peace, or
DIE", before lamenting further that his REAL father (Cornelius) had died
too soon to impart such wisdom... wisdom he needs to be a "good and wise
king" to his people. When Caesar makes slurs against the dwellers in
the Forbidden City-- calling them "malformed... they're mutants... and
they're MAD..."-- Lisa provokes him with a reminder of "the freaks in [his]
foster- father's circus". Were THEY mad, too? BATTLE is the story of an
Orphan who needs to find wisdom that only his dead parents can give to him
(or so he believes)... wisdom that he needs to govern fairly over a
mixed-species population. He can never forget that he owes his life to a
kind human (Armando) who raised him, and to another kind human who twice
saved his life (MacDonald in CONQUEST). He cannot subject all humans to
brutality (as Aldo would like) because of the "exceptions" to the "rule"
that "humans won't be kind until we FORCE them". Armando HAD to die in
order for Caesar to have the need to go on his quest with Virgil and
MacDonald to the Archives. Had Armando lived, somehow, then undoubtedly
Caesar would have deferred these nagging questions about Morality to
Armando, who would have given him advice that he couldn't help but
respect--even more so than the dissenting voices of those Apes who want
nothing but revenge against Man for his crimes against Apes and against
the World.
But, yeah, I can see how Montalban--who wasn't getting much
work at the time--would have wanted to continue acting in POTA sequels. It
was a good part to play, and it helped keep him "on the map" when they
were fishing for talent to star in "Fantasy Island".
Patrick
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26073 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "I, Robot" (OT) |
.html
.html
www.comingsoon.net says "I, Robot" will be
based on 9 Asimov short stories aand that the title character will be acted and
then CGed over ( a la Gollum in "Lord of the Rings"). This "Mad Max" are the
sci-fi films Fox is doing in what should be the year of POTA2 ( on
average, big sequels come out 3 years after the previous
installment). POTA2? AH HA HA HA! - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 8:48
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "I,
Robot" (OT)
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote: > By the
way, Patrick, I mentioned on the film group that Fox has staked out July 3
2004 for their film of "I, Robot", starring Will Smith. - - -
Jeff
*** After the "family-friendly" botch of "BICENTENNIAL MAN" (the
Robin Williams flick), I'm gritting my teeth at the idea of Will Smith
ruining another movie based on something I dig.
I absolutely LOVE
Isaac Asimov's stories/novels in his Saga of future history: his ROBOTS,
GALACTIC EMPIRE, and FOUNDATION books. I suspect that the Will Smith
project is actually "The Caves of Steel", where he would probably play the
Elijah Bailey role--unless, that is, Fox is doing a film version of Harlan
Ellison's screenplay "I, Robot" (based somewhat loosely on Asimov's short
story collection).
Regardless... I'm not thrilled with the prospect of
having Will Smith in ANY film. Some people detest Ben Affleck (though even
some Affleck haters are giving him good reviews for "Daredevil")... but
I'd rather see Affleck as Elijah Bailey than Will Smith. And keep Mark
Wahlberg away, too, goddammit! Actually, I think that Harrison Ford
would be a better choice for Bailey... though after doing "BLADE-RUNNER",
another movie about robots ("replicants") and a detective, he might not be
inclined to do it. At any rate, he would lend an air of "gravitas" to the
role which a younger actor just couldn't.
Will Smith should just
stick to doing crap like "Bad Boys". He should've had the sense to turn
down the offer to be in "Wild Wild West"... but he didn't and it STANK and
he's pissed off enough people to not want to see him in ANYTHING else ever
again.
Hmmm... maybe as a zombie in the up-coming remake of "DAWN OF
THE DEAD"--he could be staggering around for a few seconds on-screen
before a shotgun blast sends his brains all over the window of a store
in whatever mall they're gonna film it...
Now THAT I'd pay to
see!
Patrick
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26074 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html
.html
Here's a topic for the 35th Anniversary:
what is your favorite POTA moment as a fan? I've been lucky to go to some
incredible events and know some of the POTA folks, and I was going to pick one
of those. But thinking about it, I chose this moment. I think (besides when I
first saw the productions) my favorite "Apes" moment was when I first saw
"Behind the POTA". The day the 30th Anniversary VHS box set came out, after work
I went to my local "Suncoast" to buy it. The deal was, buy the box set and send
away for the doc. But the first box sets included the doc. So I watched the doc
that day; this was before it had even been on TV. I was just blown away.
Longtime "Ape" fans know how neglected the stuff was while "Star Trek" and "Star
Wars" were celebrated ad infinitum. I'd heard about this doc being made from
Eric Greene and others, but that didn't prepare me for how detailed it was, and
how many participants there were. And hearing how dead on and wonderful their
comments were. POTA or not, few film docs are of this quality both in the
production and the writing. To me, part of that is Eric Greene's comments, which
added a thoughtful element one wouldn't expect. And knowing Eric made the doc
seem almost 3D. I couldn't believe how much he was in it. After I watched it I
called him, but he didn't want to know anything about the doc until he saw it
for himself. I think I literally thanked God for the documentary. What came
after, the Medicoms, going to the official Fox party, all the hype over the
remake, was great but by then I could expect it. But seeing that doc for the
first time was when I realized this 2nd coming was for real. Complain all you
want about the remake, I don't think this doc would've happened without it. So
to the remake and Fox I will be eternally grateful.
What's your favorite POTA fan moment? - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 11:42
AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "I,
Robot" (OT)
www.comingsoon.net says "I, Robot" will
be based on 9 Asimov short stories aand that the title character will be acted
and then CGed over ( a la Gollum in "Lord of the Rings"). This "Mad Max" are
the sci-fi films Fox is doing in what should be the year of POTA2 ( on
average, big sequels come out 3 years after the previous
installment). POTA2? AH HA HA HA! - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 8:48
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "I,
Robot" (OT)
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote: > By the
way, Patrick, I mentioned on the film group that Fox has staked out July
3 2004 for their film of "I, Robot", starring Will Smith. - - -
Jeff
*** After the "family-friendly" botch of "BICENTENNIAL MAN" (the
Robin Williams flick), I'm gritting my teeth at the idea of Will
Smith ruining another movie based on something I dig.
I
absolutely LOVE Isaac Asimov's stories/novels in his Saga of future
history: his ROBOTS, GALACTIC EMPIRE, and FOUNDATION books. I suspect
that the Will Smith project is actually "The Caves of Steel", where
he would probably play the Elijah Bailey role--unless, that is, Fox
is doing a film version of Harlan Ellison's screenplay "I, Robot"
(based somewhat loosely on Asimov's short story collection).
Regardless... I'm not thrilled with the prospect of having Will
Smith in ANY film. Some people detest Ben Affleck (though even some
Affleck haters are giving him good reviews for "Daredevil")... but I'd
rather see Affleck as Elijah Bailey than Will Smith. And keep Mark
Wahlberg away, too, goddammit! Actually, I think that Harrison Ford
would be a better choice for Bailey... though after doing
"BLADE-RUNNER", another movie about robots ("replicants") and a
detective, he might not be inclined to do it. At any rate, he would lend
an air of "gravitas" to the role which a younger actor just couldn't.
Will Smith should just stick to doing crap like "Bad Boys". He
should've had the sense to turn down the offer to be in "Wild Wild
West"... but he didn't and it STANK and he's pissed off enough people
to not want to see him in ANYTHING else ever again.
Hmmm... maybe
as a zombie in the up-coming remake of "DAWN OF THE DEAD"--he could be
staggering around for a few seconds on-screen before a shotgun blast
sends his brains all over the window of a store in whatever mall they're
gonna film it...
Now THAT I'd pay to
see!
Patrick
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26075 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Digest Number 1549 |
.html.html In a message dated 2/3/03 7:55:50 AM Eastern Standard Time, valwp@... writes:
I am getting TIRED of your elitist rhetoric! LONG LIVE THE TV SHOW!!!!!!
KASSIDY!!!!!!!!!!
Did you ever watch ROBINSON CRUSOE ON MARS, Kassidy?<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26076 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Montalban "Biography" |
.html.html In a message dated 2/8/03 11:31:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
. One thing sorta bothered me, though: when
talking about his role of Armando, he lamented that they
(Dehn) "killed him off"--evidently, he would have liked to perform
the role in however many more POTA movies they were inclined to do.
I'd have liked to have seen an old Armando in BATTLE. It would have been nice.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26077 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 35 and counting! |
.html.html In a message dated 2/8/03 2:22:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
No one has brought up that today is the 35th Anniversary of one of Charlton Heston's best films? As the High Potentate I proclaim today a day of celebration! Today I will finish off the Starcon '98 panel, give the belated results of our "best film" poll and present the Starcon '96 panel (Eric Greene, Bill Blake, Austin Stoker, Booth Colman, Bobby Porter, Buck Kartalian). At midnight I watched POTA. Two things struck me. First of all, that it's still as powerful as ever. Being part of the fan network, I've heard all the film's faults; what's wrong with this shot, that shot, scientifically what's B.S., etc. It doesn't matter. After all this time, the film hasn't lost it's meaning for me. This time I also noticed...that's a pretty cool wagon they escaped in. Happy Anniversary to the fans! - - - Jeff
You beat me to it, O High and Mighty! I was planning to mention it along with the fact that I will be viewing PLANET tonight.
Some of you may be interested in knowing that I got the Region 2 copy of the POTA films from someone in Britian last month. I can now confirm that the Dolby Digital 5.1 mix for PLANET's soundtrack is much better on this edition. All the movies are in anamorphic transfers too, although for some reason ESCAPE doesn't look that good. I now have a DVD player that will not only play all regions, but has component output and progressive scan, so I'll truly be enjoying looking at PLANET again tonight.
I can't believe it's 35 years old.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26078 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html.html In a message dated 2/8/03 3:28:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
when I first saw "Behind the POTA". The day the 30th Anniversary VHS box set came out, after work I went to my local "Suncoast" to buy it.
I did the same thing at my local Suncoast store!!!!!!
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26079 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html.html In a message dated 2/8/03 3:28:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
What's your favorite POTA fan moment? - - - Jeff
First seeing PLANET in '68, of course!
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26080 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 35 and counting! |
.html.html
So Rory, are you saying
the UK DVD Box Set has superior sound?
Or is this VHS you are talking about?
-----Original Message-----
From: Haristas@...
[Haristas@...]
Sent: Sunday, 9 February 2003 7:50
AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
35 and counting!
In a message dated 2/8/03 2:22:36 PM
Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
No one has brought up that today is the 35th
Anniversary of one of Charlton Heston's best films? As the High Potentate I
proclaim today a day of celebration! Today I will finish off the Starcon '98
panel, give the belated results of our "best film" poll and present
the Starcon '96 panel (Eric Greene, Bill Blake, Austin Stoker, Booth Colman,
Bobby Porter, Buck Kartalian). At midnight I watched POTA. Two things struck
me. First of all, that it's still as powerful as ever. Being part of the fan
network, I've heard all the film's faults; what's wrong with this shot, that
shot, scientifically what's B.S., etc. It doesn't matter. After all this time,
the film hasn't lost it's meaning for me. This time I also noticed...that's a
pretty cool wagon they escaped in. Happy Anniversary to the fans! - - - Jeff
You beat me to it, O High and Mighty! I was planning to mention it along
with the fact that I will be viewing PLANET tonight.
Some of you may be interested in knowing that I got the Region 2 copy of the
POTA films from someone in Britian last month. I can now confirm that the
Dolby Digital 5.1 mix for PLANET's soundtrack is much better on this
edition. All the movies are in anamorphic transfers too, although for
some reason ESCAPE doesn't look that good. I now have a DVD player that
will not only play all regions, but has component output and progressive scan,
so I'll truly be enjoying looking at PLANET again tonight.
I can't believe it's 35 years old.
-- Rory
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26081 |
From: Alan Maxwell |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.htmlJeff < veetus@...> wrote:
> What's your favorite POTA fan moment? - - - Jeff
I've thought for ages about this and I can't come up with a definitive
answer - you could ask me again next week and I'll probably tell you
something different!
So here are a few:
Discovering the Marvel magazine in a back issue bin of an old comics
stockist; Finally seeing Beneath after bloody ages; Seeing the
original in the cinema (quality wasn't great, but it was the original!
In a cinema!); Discovering Intrada's soundtrack CD; Varese & FSM's CD
releases; the Behind doc; picking up a few issues of Adventure's comic
and, unlike most other fans it would appear, absolutely loving it; my
first few issues of Ape Chronicles - this was the first notion I had
that there were other fans who were as dedicated/sad as me; and the
time that the guy who runs the local pub quiz threw in about 3 or 4
PotA questions to the quiz one night just for me (everyone else
probably though I was sad, but I loved it all the same); and seeing
the TV series for the first time.
That'll do for now I think!
Alan <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26082 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 35 and counting! |
.html.html In a message dated 2/8/03 4:34:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
So Rory, are you saying the UK DVD Box Set has superior sound? Or is this VHS you are talking about?
I'm talking about the UK DVD Box Set -- and I'm onlt talking about PLANET. You in Australia, I believe, are Region 4 and have the better picture and sound too, but you have to be able to decode Dolby Digital 5.1 and to enjoy the anamorphic picture you need a 16X9 TV.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26083 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html.html In a message dated 2/8/03 5:15:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, alan@... writes:
Discovering Intrada's soundtrack CD
I seem to remember just "discovering" that too one day while I was in a CD store. It was an incredible discovery (the Intrada cover is still my favorite) and I couldn't wait to rush home and listen to "The Hunt."
The day I read the news in FSM that Varese would release the complete score was a very exciting day too.
-- Rory<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26084 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 35 and counting! |
.html.html
I will have to
re-view. I have a high quality DTS/Dolby
5.1 set up (except I am yet to invest in a sub-woofer).
I would still like to experience the sound
the way you described the cinema you originally saw the film at.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Haristas@...
[Haristas@...]
Sent: Sunday, 9 February 2003
11:51 AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
35 and counting!
In a message dated 2/8/03 4:34:15 PM
Eastern Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
So Rory,
are you saying the UK DVD Box Set has superior sound? Or is this VHS you
are talking about?
I'm talking about the UK DVD Box Set -- and I'm onlt talking about
PLANET. You in Australia, I believe, are Region 4 and have the better
picture and sound too, but you have to be able to decode Dolby Digital 5.1 and
to enjoy the anamorphic picture you need a 16X9 TV.
-- Rory
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26085 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html.html
One of them was stumbling
across an internet site that mentioned Cameron was doing a sequel with Arnie in
a lead role. I don’t think
those 2 have combined on anything that flopped. I thought this would be the start of a
new era and would really put POTA back on the map.
-----Original Message-----
From: Haristas@...
[Haristas@...]
Sent: Sunday, 9 February 2003 7:58
AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
Favorite "Ape" Moment
In a message dated 2/8/03 3:28:13 PM
Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
What's
your favorite POTA fan moment? - - - Jeff
First seeing PLANET in '68, of course!
-- Rory
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26086 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html
.html
Oliver Stone being involved in the remake
was an exciting time for me. He was the first big gun to take it on and he's
also a favorite. Cameron was a heady choice, since "Titanic" was burning up the
record books at the time. I was even happy when Burton was announced. Much ado
about nothing. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:33
PM
Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes]
Favorite "Ape" Moment
One of them was
stumbling across an internet site that mentioned Cameron was doing a sequel
with Arnie in a lead role. I
donÂ’t think those 2 have combined on anything that flopped. I thought this would be the start of a
new era and would really put POTA back on the
map.
-----Original
Message----- From: Haristas@... [Haristas@...]
Sent: Sunday, 9 February
2003 7:58 AM To:
pota@yahoogroups.com Subject:
Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment
In
a message dated 2/8/03 3:28:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@...
writes:
What's
your favorite POTA fan moment? - - - Jeff
First
seeing PLANET in '68, of course!
-- Rory Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26087 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html
.html
I had heard a rumour about Stone being involved from the same person who told me there
was a new POTA book coming out that mentioned the script having Zira in a dominatrix role!
But it all seemed real when I found that
web site then went to an Arnie site that actually
listed POTA as his next film in a filmography. And we all had so much faith that they would
get it right….well, except Cougar that is…..
-----Original Message-----
From: veetus@... [veetus@...]
Sent: Sunday, 9 February 2003
12:52 PM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
Favorite "Ape" Moment
Oliver Stone being involved
in the remake was an exciting time for me. He was the first big gun to take it
on and he's also a favorite. Cameron was a heady choice, since
"Titanic" was burning up the record books at the time. I was even happy
when Burton was announced. Much ado about nothing. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday,
February 08, 2003 5:33 PM
Subject: RE: [Planet
of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment
One of them was stumbling across an internet site that mentioned
Cameron was doing a sequel with Arnie in a lead role. I don’t think those 2 have combined on
anything that flopped. I thought this
would be the start of a new era and would really put POTA back on the map.
-----Original Message-----
From: Haristas@... [Haristas@...]
Sent: Sunday, 9 February 2003 7:58
AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes]
Favorite "Ape" Moment
In a message dated 2/8/03 3:28:13 PM
Eastern Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
What's
your favorite POTA fan moment? - - - Jeff
First seeing PLANET in '68, of course!
-- Rory
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26088 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '98: the Conclusion |
.html
.html
Whoops! Better finish this off. The rest is
in the archives: Pt. 1 - 11/28/02
Pt. 2 - 11/29/02
Pt.
3 - 11/30/02
Pt. 4 - 12/08/02
And now, on with the show:
ERIC GREENE: Any other questions from
the floor? Alright, I've got another question then. This is for Buck: Being that
you're the only one on stage that actually played an ape in the series, having
played it twice, the gorilla Julius in "Planet of the Apes" and also a gorilla
named Frank in "Conquest of the Planet of the Apes", describe what it's like
going to play a gorilla and how it differs from how you would play a part as a
human.
BUCK KARTALIAN: Well, sometimes I act (more)
like a gorilla than a human. Yeah, I do. I act like an animal sometimes. That's
what my wife says. You know, it's interesting. They say children are the best
actors, because you can't really teach them acting, they know. They know how to
play act. And I feel like a child when I'm doing a role, I really do. I feel
like a little kid and I'm play acting. And I said, "Well, I'm a gorilla". OK,
and then I think about how does a gorilla walk? Yeah, I almost walk like a
gorilla myself. And so I try to walk in a different way. I just feel I'm doing
as much as I can with my own personality and my physicalness, my physicality to
produce a character. And I know it's going to be mostly me myself. And the rest
is whatever I can get and use, I'm going to do.
It's a strange thing. I'm going to tell you
something, I've never told this to anyone before. Because I feel I know you guys
a lot better now. It's interesting, when I did the film, when it was over, I got
a call at my agent's office and they said they wanted to know if they could dub
(over) my voice, you know. And I said, "Wow, what are you going to do that for?"
They said, "I don't know. They want to know if it's alright with you". I said,
"Well, if that's what they want to do, let 'em dub (over) my voice". It's
strange, because I was in the part, I was a gorilla. So what happened is, John
Chambers told me about this later; after a couple of weeks they called me in and
I went to see if John Chambers was there, and he asked me, he said, "Buck, you
know what they did? They called about 15 actors in and they all dubbed your
voice. And when they were through, they looked at one another and said, "Let's
get Buck back". So I came back and said, "What'd you do all this for?" They
said, "Well, you didn't sound like a gorilla". I said, "Well, what does a
gorilla sound like when he talks?!" He just looked at me. I mean, it's me, I'm a
gorilla! So OK, I dubbed my own voice in again. So that's kinda the inside
story, which I haven't told everyone. Only you guys! Anyway, it was a great
experience and I enjoyed it. And thank you for being such wonderful fans and
good friends. We really appreciate it. And I want to say that Linda looks as
gorgeous as ever. (applause)
LINDA HARRISON: Thank you...
ERIC GREENE: That's a Starcon scoop. One name
hasn't been mentioned up here yet, and we'd be remiss if we didn't bring this
name up. That's Arthur P. Jacobs, who was the man who, more than any other
individual, was responsible for the whole "Apes" phenomenon. Arthur Jacobs found
a copy of "Planet of the Apes" written by Pierre Boulle when it was still an
unpublished manuscript and worked very hard for a number of years to get it to
the motion picture screen. Probably for about 4 or 5 years of going from studio
to studio, trying to work out deals, trying to work out budgets, and it was
really his courage and his vision and commitmentthat finally produced "Planet of
the Apes" and all the sequels and all the television series that everyone likes
so much today. And I would like to open it up to any of you all that worked with
him that have any recollections of Arthur Jacobs as a producer, as a man, as a
friend. Just to give us a sense of who the man behind the apes really
was.
LINDA HARRISON: Arthur was a promoter,
instinctually a promoter. I mean, any idea that would come in his mind, it would
be to further the promotion. It was like tunnel vision. And he just had an
incredible enthusiasm and excitement about "Apes". He just took on the whole
role of "Planet of the Apes"; he lived it, he ate it, you know. I'm sure Natalie
(Trundy) could tell us incredible stories. It was every hour of the day. And it
took that kind of producer/promoter for a film like "Planet of the Apes" to get
launched.
DON PEDRO COLLEY: When I met Mr. Jacobs, I
concur with what Linda said. He was not like you would think a producer would
be; you know, somebody sitting on high in a big office that you don't connect
with. This guy was down on the set. He would come to me and say, "Don, how's it
going today? Listen, what do you think? How would you like to approach this
thing?" Wow. He's asking me? "Well, it has these qualities and this element.
Maybe if we work from this condition you'll get what you're looking for, and I'm
going to try and give it to you the best I can from this level". He says,
"That's great, that's great. Go away, we've got it covered". And he would be off
somewhere, he was constantly moving around. He didn't stay too long on the set,
but whenever he came it was like, you know, he was the father figure of the
whole idea. I didn't meet him, of course, until the second film and they already
had such great success and, as you know, so many sequels in Hollywood fall
terribly, horribly, miserably on their face. but somehow or another we were
going into another level and, fortunately, apparently it worked because they
seem to run "Beneath the POTA" almost more than any of the other four all
together. So God bless him.
AUDIENCE: I just wanted to know, to Don, if
there was any feedback from religious groups, because it's kind of blasphemous,
you know, what the mutants were doing.If you'd heard anything, if there were any
letters or anything like that.
DON PEDRO COLLEY: No, it seemed as if it was
a totally accepted film in every way. They loved the fight scenes, they loved
the action, they loved the concept. It's a marvelous thing, I've never seen or
heard of an adverse reaction at all.
ERIC GREENE: Actually, something that came up
in my research for the book, which Don probably wouldn't know about, is that
there was actually some concern about the scenes you're talking about in
"Beneath the POTA", those scenes, because they were afraid there was a large
Catholic population in Latin America, that it would be too controversial. So
when you see how the "Apes" films, even though they were made for an American
audience, traveled across the globe, there was definitely different reactions in
different places.
When the TV series was run in Indonesia,
there was a hate mail campaign to the television station because a lot of people
were offended thinking that humans, being God's greatest creation, could never
fall into the domination of apes. They found that to be a blasphemous notion.
The government in South Africa banned the "Apes" films for a number of
yearsbecause they didn't like the political implications of it, so definitely as
the "Apes" films traveled around the world you saw different reactions to them,
different sensibilities. Thank you very much for joining us for the anniversary
on the "Planet of the Apes".
- - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 5:33
PM
Subject: RE: [Planet of the Apes]
Favorite "Ape" Moment
One of them was
stumbling across an internet site that mentioned Cameron was doing a sequel
with Arnie in a lead role. I
donÂ’t think those 2 have combined on anything that flopped. I thought this would be the start of a
new era and would really put POTA back on the
map.
-----Original
Message----- From: Haristas@... [Haristas@...]
Sent: Sunday, 9 February
2003 7:58 AM To:
pota@yahoogroups.com Subject:
Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment
In
a message dated 2/8/03 3:28:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, veetus@...
writes:
What's
your favorite POTA fan moment? - - - Jeff
First
seeing PLANET in '68, of course!
-- Rory Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26089 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: testing |
.html
.html
Preparing for the Starcon '96 broadcast. - -
- Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26090 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '96, Pt. 1 |
.html
.html
Hi. Happy 35th anniversary, honey. You look
lovely.
This is a panel that took place at the
Starcon convention on June 29th, 1996. Participants were:
ERIC GREENE - author; moderator
BILL BLAKE - stage
Cornelius
BOOTH COLMAN - TV's Zauis
BUCK KARTALIAN - Julius; Frank
BOBBY PORTER - Cornelius
Jr.
AUSTIN STOKER - MacDonald # 2
ERIC GREENE: Hello. Thanks for coming, y'all.
My name is Eric Greene. And, as some of you know, I'm the writer of a new book
about POTA called "POTA as American Myth", which is a book that looks at how the
POTA television shows and movies dealt with and confronted the political
conflict of the '60's and '70's, and addressed racial conflict, Vietnam, the
civil rights movement, the Watts riot and a lot of the social and political
unrest that was going through the country at the time. And I'm joined on this
panel by the people that actually made POTA happen. And I want to introduce them
amd then they'll say a few words about their experience with the apes and take
questions. And I'm available to answer questions too if anyone has any about the
"Apes" films or TV shows or the book or myself or the weather conditions outside
or anything else on your mind...(Introduces the panel). We're all available to
take questions and I guess I'd like to ask the first one of Buck Kartalian: What
was it like to beat up on Charlton Heston? We'd probably all like to do it on
occasion, but you got the opportunity.
BUCK KARTALIAN: Uh, I enjoyed
it.
ERIC: Good man, good man!
BUCK: In fact, he complained to the director that I
wasn't hitting him hard enough.
ERIC: Is that right?
BUCK: Yeah. I hit him harder.
ERIC: Well, if everyone'd like to just start with
Austin and go down the line and just say a few words, the most memorable thing
that comes to your mind about working on the "Apes" shows, and what you'd like
to start with. So we'll begin with Austin.
AUSTIN STOKER: Well, the thing that I always
remember is Paul Williams, the singer/songwriter who played Virgil, the
know-it-all orangutan. And being a performer, singer and everything, he loved to
do practical jokes. He was sent one day to the Fox ranch out there to do some
scenes and it was the scene, the meeting of the council (in "Battle"). And all
of the apes are down here, the below level, and the orangutans are up there on
the ledge, the crest. And when the director is ready to shoot the scene, he's
from England, J. Lee Thompson, he says (Austin does a thick English accent): "Is
everybody ready? Ac-tion!" And when he said that, all the orangutans stood up in
Paul Williams' direction and started doing the Supremes. I never forgot that - -
"Shoo Be Doo", they started singing. Of course everyone laughed, they had to
stop shooting for about 10 minutes, everybody's cracking up. And that's my most
memorable thing. To see these guys in monkey suits doing the Supremes was
hysterical.
ERIC: Booth?
BOOTH COLMAN: Well, I think I got the job because
Maurice Evans' clothes fit me. I'd been in his (theatre) company in New York,
he'd had nothing to do with this of course. But I remember exchanging notes with
him about that. I can't remember any really terrific things happening except
that I had to get up about 3:30 in the morning to be at the studio by 5 o'clock
to be ready by 8. Frank Westmore made me up every day I worked. Is there any
questions that you might have that I could try to answer?
ERIC: Actually, I have a question about that. What
kind of advice or suggestions did Maurice Evans pass on about playing
Zauis?
BOOTH: He just said have a good breakfast before
you go. You couldn't eat very much lunch, lunch through a straw. But they got
very good at it (the makeup) and I usually was through by
lunchtime.
ERIC: Buck, how about you?
BUCK: Oh, that's me. Hello. What can I tell you?
Uh, yeah, it took us 4 hours every morning to put our makeup on and because we
were the principals we had our own "appliances", around the eye, the nose, the
chin and the teeth. It all had to be exactly matted together with little hairs
all around. And it took 4 hours. And it was like top secret. No one was allowed
on the set, "No! It's a closed set!" You couldn't go there. And the appliances,
they got rid of them right afterwards, like, you know, it was top secret, big
secret government work, you know? And eh, it's just another picture we're doing,
we didn't know what we were doing. And Franklin Schaffner was the director and I
read for him. He hired me, partly because I was short. Because they wanted short
actors! (Bobby Porter indicates his own size) Of course, there's a lot of short
actors in Hollywood. I find that out today, when I go out (on auditions), they
come out of the woodwork, you know? And I've lost a lot of parts because I was
short! I've gotten a few parts because I was short, but I've lost a lot of parts
because I was short. And I wanna tell you, I'm not short for anything but a
professional basketball player! Right? (mimes an inappropriate gesture at an
imaginary casting director) Aay! But they don't understand, these casting
people.
Anyway, let me tell you, there was a very
interesting experience for me. I remember working, I worked 2 weeks inside, I
was never outdoors. And of course we couldn't eat, we drank through a straw
'cause you couldn't risk taking the makeup off, the appliances. And he was a
strange director, Franklin Schaffner. He directed "Patton". He directed many
good pictures and he knew the camera well. But he didn't like to talk to actors
too much, you know? And some character actors say, "Tell me! Am I good? Am I
doing well? What do you want me to do?" With him you've gotta do something and
that's it! And I guess if it was bad he'd tell you, but he never told anyone
anything. Anyway, just the one time we were ready to shoot this scene. He says:
"Alright, we're opening up on Julius", I don't think he knew my name was Buck.
And then I said, "Oh, I've got an idea". I said, "Mr. Schaffner, since your
camera is going to open up on me in this scene, why don't I smoke a cigar?" And
he looked at me and gave me a dirty look! Eh, alright. The way I look at it, I'm
an actor and if I have an idea I tell the director. If he doesn't listen to me,
I keep my mouth shut the rest of the time. Because, hey, if it's good and he
lets me do it he's gonna get credit for it, you know? So I kept quiet, didn't
say anything. We had two rehearsals and he said, "Alright, we're gonna shoot the
scene now! The camera's ready. Somebody get Buck a cigar". So I got the cigar!
(laughs)
And the wonderful thing about being in an
ape's costume, there are some nice, interesting aspects of it. You notice so
much, it's incredible. You think no one else can see you but you can see
everything. It's like you're hiding behind something. And you observe more,
you're so aware of things. My wife's sitting there but I'm going to say it
anyway...(laughs) There was a lady who understudies Kim Hunter. And, as I said,
there were a lot of apes and they were all about my size, they used to come in,
all the gorillas, extras and everything. And one day she stopped and sat with
the apes and she was talking to me. So we chatted a little bit and the next day
I came in and she came right over to me. I said, "How did you know it was me?"
She said, "I could tell from your eyes". The only thing showing is my eyes, they
were mine, everything else was covered. I thought, 'Oh, that's interesting". We
talked and we talked. And you know what? After a couple of days, she started to
like me! You know that? She was falling in love with a gorilla! So all you ugly
guys out there, remember: beauty is only skin deep. She always swore she never
knew what I looked like and I never wanted her to. I wanted her to know me the
way I really was - - a gorilla!
BOBBY PORTER: And Buck? I suppose she was the
gorilla your dreams, wasn't she? (apologetic) It was just sittin' there, I had
to!
ERIC: Bobby, I'm just glad you made that pun and
not me.
BOBBY: Yeah, well. I was next in line. I got credit
for it.
To be continued! - - - Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26091 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/8/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '96, Pt. 2 |
.html
.html
BOBBY: Um, I guess the most memorable thing about
POTA I have to share is the fact that 23 years later we're all still talking
about it. Look at you! You're sitting there talking to a bunch of old farts
about what we did 23 years ago. And I'm not the oldest fart here, you know. This
is amazing. I really appreciate all of you taking the time to make certain that
people don't forget all the hard work that we did so many years ago. I've worked
on harder shows. And I've been very blessed that in 25 years I've been doing a
lot of costumed character work and it's just amazing to me that people still
cling to these kinds of projects that we worked really, really hard at. We just
figured the producers would make some money and they'd sell a couple of toys and
off we'd go to the next deal, the next job. No one ever expected this kind of a
show would end up creating people that I knew years later writing books about it
and conventions about it. It boggles my mind.
So, I do have one little experience to share
about "Battle". On the very last day of the show, it took us 3, 4 hours to get
into the makeup. It took an hour to get out of it unless we were really in a
hurry. So on the very last day of the show we were at the 20th Century-Fox
ranch, just south of Malibu Canyon. And I was doing a stage play, I was a
college kid. I was a guy who was over 18 who could play roles of children and
get around the child labor laws. And we had to get back to rehearsal that
evening to do the dress rehersal for a show called "Rosencrantz &
Gildenstern". It was a Shakespeare spoof. So I decided to take the makeup with
me rather than take the extra hour to get out of the makeup. I would just get
into my street clothes and drive home. Well, I had to drive from Malibu Canyon
to Newport Beach with an ape face on. And I probably caused about 3 or 4
accidents on the way home. But by the time the 5th movie had come around, you
know, Southern California had kind of gotten used to apes, and went, 'Oh yeah,
that's just one of those ape guys". So I got to the theatre at U.C. Irvine and
the lights had already dimmed and we were 5 minutes into the dress rehearsal. I
played the King, a very dramatic part and we were all actors playing actors in
the play. And I, at that point in time, had forgotten that I had come with the
ape makeup on. So I run to the theatre, get backstage, I hear my cue and I walk
onstage. I start delivering my Shakespearean lines and all of a sudden everyone
just starts cracking up. And I went, "This is serious stuff! What are you
laughing at me for?" And I went, 'Oh, yeah. It's still on".
So then I figured I'd better make some fun
of this. And after the rehearsal, which was a complete waste of time, I went
around to all the girls' dorms (clears his throat suggestively) and started
climbing trees and knocking on windows. And I got a few dirty looks, too. Didn't
fall in love with any of them, though. And so the day had been very long, I'd
gotten up at 2:30 in the morning and gone to work and come home. By now it's
nearly 24 hours that I've been wearing this makeup. It's pretty permanent by
now. And I got home, I was living at home at the time, and we had Dutch doors in
the house. And I looked around and I had lost my keys to the house for some
reason. So I figured I had to wake somebody up in the house and I had to wake my
mother up. So I'm knockin' and knockin' on the door. She finally comes out. She
doesn't do well the first 15 minutes after she wakes up anyway, she still
doesn't. She opens up the top of this Dutch door and all she sees is this ape
staring at her and she falls straight back onto the couch, dead unconscious. It
just freaks her out. So, it was a face even my mother couldn't love. But I guess
you did for 23 years and I really appreciate your support. If you have any
questions when we're done here, make certain that you ask the question you came
here to ask. Thanks a lot.
BILL BLAKE: Thanks everybody. You know, I have a
sort of very strange position on this panel because I came to POTA first as a
fan, so I've gotten to see this on two sides. And I was struck by this at a
very, very sensitive age when you're learning things in high school and you're
looking for a craft for a life profession. I was 16 years old when this came out
(the original POTA) and I was completely struck down in a very positive way by
this picture. It just completely engrossed me and I wanted to know more about
it. So, I was already heading toward a career in the motion picture industry, I
think, because I was doing these little films when I was 10 with the family 8mm
camera. And something said that I was going to be successful if I wrote to John
Chambers, creator of the makeup, that he would answer my letter. Like a lot of
kids do. And you know what? He did. And I showed him some proof pictures of work
I'd attempted and he wrote back and sent me appliances from the movie. And I've
told some people in this cast here that the reason I'm here is because they did
a very positive thing for me at an impressionable age. I didn't know it at the
time but just a few years later I had a part on the POTA television series and
went on to promote POTA under license from 20th Century- Fox all across the
country in the mid-'70's. And it was one of the most successful roadshow
promotions that had been done, with just the two of us, a young lady, Paula
Crist, and myself. Just going around and doing this POTA thing. So, as I said, I
got to see this thing from two different levels: sitting down there (in the
audience) or sitting at my television or movie screen, and, suddenly, sitting up
here. And I feel like now the chain is complete. To this day I have young people
coming up to me from 20 years ago and telling me, "We saw you, I saw you on
stage when I was 10 years old and now I'm in the business thanks to you". So (to
the panelists) gentlemen, I tip my hat to you and the chain has now continued
one generation further down the line. (audience applauds)
ERIC: Actually, I think I can contend that there's
been yet another link in the chain, because I was inspired as a kid watching all
these folks in the movies and the television series and just loved POTA. And
then was inspired by seeing Bill and all his work. And, actually, I met Bill
when I was about 10 at a science-fiction convention and I met a lot of my
friends through Bill that were also going to conventionsat the time. So everyone
here inspired Bill and Bill inspired me and I just got a call from a student at
Cal State Long Beach who is working on a paper about POTA and wanted to consult
me about it. So now there's another generation of people we've passed the "Ape"
torch to.
BILL: Sorry people, but we're never going to go
away.
Yes we are, but only for a short spell. To
be continued! - - - Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26092 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html.html
who told me there was a new POTA book coming out that mentioned the script having Zira in a dominatrix role!
And did she look ... something like . . . THIS! . . .

<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26093 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: favorite moments and Robinson Crusoe |
.htmlHey Rory glad to see you arise from the dead, especially after you didn't respond to my "elitist" jab. No dear heart I didn't see "Robinson C on Mars" because I forgot you sent it to me. But I'll amend that oversight shortly and get back to you.
Favorite POTA moments: When the tv series first came on, naturally. I would have killed anyone in the family who tried to watch something else (I was pretty fierce at that age).
Let's see, they had a weekend run of the POTA movies, one per weekend, at the Bijou Theater (a very old and lovely place). I had to ride a bus to get downtown, and I went religiously.
Of course, they had a run on television too and so I had my best friend Rhonda over for that which was great.
And then when I finally got the original POTA on video and sat around with my girlfriends, giggling and eating junk food and stopping the tape at opportune moments to giggle a little more.
And OF COURSE when the tv series came out on dvd -- I could NOT believe it! (I bought 2 in case one got messed up). And then I found the friends_and_fugitives group and made some friends. They're pretty quiet over there now but it was fun while it lasted. And I wrote some fan fic which was LOADS of fun.
The other times I told you about before -- when you first see the apes in the original movie, and how I thrilled to that distinctive POTA music (and I still love the music in the tv series, although some would disagree with me there). WOW!
I was excited when I heard James Cameron was in on the new POTA, and disappointed when I heard about Tim Burton. I never liked Tim. Still I give that movie credit for a great opening and good make-up (although the noses looked a bit too much like plastic upholstery). It did have its merits -- the problem was that it couldn't live up to the legend.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26094 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html.html 
Nice picture, but am I the only one that sees a kind of racist comment going on here with Zira given human feet and a J-Lo big butt?
-- Rory <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26095 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Hey |
.htmlNot to get mushy over you weirdos but to commemorate the anniversary I have to say I am glad to find there are others out there who have an enduring fascination for POTA. We must be strange. HAH OF COURSE WE'RE STRANGE!
It goes to show, there is SOMETHING about POTA that will live on forever -- the perfect combination of social commentary, satire, dire warnings about human civilization (and the threat we are to Earth itself), etc. etc., and of course APES RULE! HUMANS DROOL! sort of thing. Long live apes!
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26096 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] favorite moments and Robinson Crusoe |
.html.html In a message dated 2/9/03 10:34:06 AM Eastern Standard Time, valwp@... writes:
Hey Rory glad to see you arise from the dead, especially after you didn't respond to my "elitist" jab.
I didn't respond to your "elitist" jab because I know damn well that I'm RIGHT!
That's not being elitist, it's just being the smart guy that I am.
AH, HA HA HA !!!
-- Rory
P.S.
Watch that movie and let me know if you wish you had a Wholly Monkey.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26097 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Hey |
.html.html In a message dated 2/9/03 10:41:55 AM Eastern Standard Time, valwp@... writes:
It goes to show, there is SOMETHING about POTA that will live on forever -- the perfect combination of social commentary, satire, dire warnings about human civilization (and the threat we are to Earth itself), etc. etc., and of course APES RULE! HUMANS DROOL! sort of thing. Long live apes!
Kass
Yeah, I watched PLANET last night, then watched parts of it again. I was up until 1:30. I guess it'll still be my favorite movie when or if I get to be 100.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26098 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Zira J-Lo |
|
.html I don't see anything racist about it, just the (un)usual male
creepazoid attraction for a female POTA monkey. Is there anything
you won't ---- never mind.
Kassidy
But seriously it is kind of a cross between a center girl and Zira
which is always a little weird to me.
PS Anybody have any cheesecake photos of Roddy in full ape do? (Don't
answer that if you do cuz you're scaring me)
Kassiopeia <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26099 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html.html In a message dated 2/9/2003 9:44:31 AM Central Standard Time, Haristas@... writes:
Nice picture, but am I the only one that sees a kind of racist comment going on here
Yup! Just you.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26100 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Zira J-Lo |
.html.html
PS Anybody have any cheesecake photos of Roddy in full ape do? (Don't
answer that if you do cuz you're scaring me)
Kassiopeia
Me thinks the Lady doth protest too much. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26101 |
From: libraryape |
Date: 2/9/2003 |
| Subject: Re: Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.htmlMy favorite "ape" moment was when Roddy McDowall appeared on the
Carol Burnett show as his usual ape self. Anyone remember??? (This
was in honor of the TV show) They sang a song which I think was
called "Happy we would be" It was so funny when Carol pointed out
that Roddy looked a little different. Roddy having spent the week
before in Palm Springs, he thinks she's referring to his tan instead
of the ape make-up. I wrote Carol about how much I loved the show or
skit. Being the great person she is, she wrote back. Today I still
have this letter and many others as we kept in touch for about two
years. When Roddy past on, I happened to come across this particular
letter when going through my collectibles and started to cry. I don't
know if this is my favorite moment since it left me grieving. Maybe
this a more profound moment than favorite for me ---next to seeing
Zira for the first time on my black and white tv screen. --- In
pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> Here's a topic for the 35th Anniversary: what is your favorite
POTA moment as a fan? I've been lucky to go to some incredible events
and know some of the POTA folks, and I was going to pick one of
those. But thinking about it, I chose this moment. I think (besides
when I first saw the productions) my favorite "Apes" moment was when
I first saw "Behind the POTA". The day the 30th Anniversary VHS box
set came out, after work I went to my local "Suncoast" to buy it. The
deal was, buy the box set and send away for the doc. But the first
box sets included the doc. So I watched the doc that day; this was
before it had even been on TV. I was just blown away. Longtime "Ape"
fans know how neglected the stuff was while "Star Trek" and "Star
Wars" were celebrated ad infinitum. I'd heard about this doc being
made from Eric Greene and others, but that didn't prepare me for how
detailed it was, and how many participants there were. And hearing
how dead on and wonderful their comments were. POTA or not, few film
docs are of this quality both in the production and the writing. To
me, part of that is Eric Greene's comments, which added a thoughtful
element one wouldn't expect. And knowing Eric made the doc seem
almost 3D. I couldn't believe how much he was in it. After I watched
it I called him, but he didn't want to know anything about the doc
until he saw it for himself. I think I literally thanked God for the
documentary. What came after, the Medicoms, going to the official Fox
party, all the hype over the remake, was great but by then I could
expect it. But seeing that doc for the first time was when I realized
this 2nd coming was for real. Complain all you want about the remake,
I don't think this doc would've happened without it. So to the remake
and Fox I will be eternally grateful.
> What's your favorite POTA fan moment? - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: veetus@e...
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 11:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "I, Robot" (OT)
>
>
> www.comingsoon.net says "I, Robot" will be based on 9 Asimov
short stories aand that the title character will be acted and then
CGed over ( a la Gollum in "Lord of the Rings"). This "Mad Max" are
the sci-fi films Fox is doing in what should be the year of POTA2 (
on average, big sequels come out 3 years after the previous
installment). POTA2? AH HA HA HA! - - - Jeff
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton <patrickmichaeltilton@y...>
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 8:48 AM
> Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: "I, Robot" (OT)
>
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > By the way, Patrick, I mentioned on the film group that Fox
has
> staked out July 3 2004 for their film of "I, Robot", starring
Will
> Smith. - - - Jeff
>
> *** After the "family-friendly" botch of "BICENTENNIAL MAN"
(the
> Robin Williams flick), I'm gritting my teeth at the idea of
Will
> Smith ruining another movie based on something I dig.
>
> I absolutely LOVE Isaac Asimov's stories/novels in his Saga of
future
> history: his ROBOTS, GALACTIC EMPIRE, and FOUNDATION books. I
suspect
> that the Will Smith project is actually "The Caves of Steel",
where
> he would probably play the Elijah Bailey role--unless, that is,
Fox
> is doing a film version of Harlan Ellison's screenplay "I,
Robot"
> (based somewhat loosely on Asimov's short story collection).
>
> Regardless... I'm not thrilled with the prospect of having Will
Smith
> in ANY film. Some people detest Ben Affleck (though even some
Affleck
> haters are giving him good reviews for "Daredevil")... but I'd
rather
> see Affleck as Elijah Bailey than Will Smith. And keep Mark
Wahlberg
> away, too, goddammit!
> Actually, I think that Harrison Ford would be a better choice
for
> Bailey... though after doing "BLADE-RUNNER", another movie
about
> robots ("replicants") and a detective, he might not be inclined
to do
> it. At any rate, he would lend an air of "gravitas" to the role
which
> a younger actor just couldn't.
>
> Will Smith should just stick to doing crap like "Bad Boys". He
> should've had the sense to turn down the offer to be in "Wild
Wild
> West"... but he didn't and it STANK and he's pissed off enough
people
> to not want to see him in ANYTHING else ever again.
>
> Hmmm... maybe as a zombie in the up-coming remake of "DAWN OF
THE
> DEAD"--he could be staggering around for a few seconds on-
screen
> before a shotgun blast sends his brains all over the window of
a
> store in whatever mall they're gonna film it...
>
> Now THAT I'd pay to see!
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26102 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/10/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html
.html
That's a nice story. I didn't see the Carol
Burnett episode, though there was a clip from it on the McDowall episode of
"Biography". From what I understand, the episode is available in the "Carol
Burnett Show" collection from Columbia House, but I haven't got around to
ordering it. If they do a special edition DVD of POTA I'd love it if they'd do a
collection of the talk show appearances. Apparently more than just Roddy
appeared on shows in ape makeup. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 4:56
PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re:
Favorite "Ape" Moment
My favorite "ape" moment was when Roddy McDowall appeared
on the Carol Burnett show as his usual ape self. Anyone remember??? (This
was in honor of the TV show) They sang a song which I think was called
"Happy we would be" It was so funny when Carol pointed out that Roddy
looked a little different. Roddy having spent the week before in Palm
Springs, he thinks she's referring to his tan instead of the ape make-up.
I wrote Carol about how much I loved the show or skit. Being the great
person she is, she wrote back. Today I still have this letter and many
others as we kept in touch for about two years. When Roddy past on,
I happened to come across this particular letter when going through my
collectibles and started to cry. I don't know if this is my favorite
moment since it left me grieving. Maybe this a more profound moment than
favorite for me ---next to seeing Zira for the first time on my black and
white tv screen. --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...>
wrote: > Here's a topic for the 35th Anniversary: what is
your favorite POTA moment as a fan? I've been lucky to go to some
incredible events and know some of the POTA folks, and I was going to pick
one of those. But thinking about it, I chose this moment. I think (besides
when I first saw the productions) my favorite "Apes" moment was when I
first saw "Behind the POTA". The day the 30th Anniversary VHS box set came
out, after work I went to my local "Suncoast" to buy it. The deal was, buy
the box set and send away for the doc. But the first box sets included the
doc. So I watched the doc that day; this was before it had even been on
TV. I was just blown away. Longtime "Ape" fans know how neglected the
stuff was while "Star Trek" and "Star Wars" were celebrated ad infinitum.
I'd heard about this doc being made from Eric Greene and others, but that
didn't prepare me for how detailed it was, and how many participants there
were. And hearing how dead on and wonderful their comments were. POTA or
not, few film docs are of this quality both in the production and the
writing. To me, part of that is Eric Greene's comments, which added a
thoughtful element one wouldn't expect. And knowing Eric made the doc seem
almost 3D. I couldn't believe how much he was in it. After I watched
it I called him, but he didn't want to know anything about the doc
until he saw it for himself. I think I literally thanked God for the
documentary. What came after, the Medicoms, going to the official Fox
party, all the hype over the remake, was great but by then I could
expect it. But seeing that doc for the first time was when I realized
this 2nd coming was for real. Complain all you want about the remake,
I don't think this doc would've happened without it. So to the remake
and Fox I will be eternally grateful. > What's your
favorite POTA fan moment? - - - Jeff > > >
----- Original Message ----- > From: veetus@e...
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com > Sent:
Saturday, February 08, 2003 11:42 AM > Subject: Re: [Planet
of the Apes] Re: "I, Robot" (OT) > >
> www.comingsoon.net says "I, Robot" will be
based on 9 Asimov short stories aand that the title character will be
acted and then CGed over ( a la Gollum in "Lord of the Rings"). This "Mad
Max" are the sci-fi films Fox is doing in what should be the year of POTA2
( on average, big sequels come out 3 years after the previous
installment). POTA2? AH HA HA HA! - - - Jeff > >
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: patrickmichaeltilton
<patrickmichaeltilton@y...> > To:
pota@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, February
08, 2003 8:48 AM > Subject: [Planet of the Apes]
Re: "I, Robot" (OT) > > > --- In
pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...>
wrote: > > By the way, Patrick, I
mentioned on the film group that Fox has >
staked out July 3 2004 for their film of "I, Robot", starring Will
> Smith. - - - Jeff >
> *** After the "family-friendly" botch of
"BICENTENNIAL MAN" (the > Robin Williams
flick), I'm gritting my teeth at the idea of Will
> Smith ruining another movie based on
something I dig. > > I absolutely LOVE
Isaac Asimov's stories/novels in his Saga of future
> history: his ROBOTS, GALACTIC EMPIRE, and
FOUNDATION books. I suspect > that the Will
Smith project is actually "The Caves of Steel", where
> he would probably play the Elijah Bailey
role--unless, that is, Fox > is doing a
film version of Harlan Ellison's screenplay "I, Robot"
> (based somewhat loosely on Asimov's short
story collection). > > Regardless... I'm
not thrilled with the prospect of having Will Smith
> in ANY film. Some people detest Ben Affleck
(though even some Affleck > haters are
giving him good reviews for "Daredevil")... but I'd rather
> see Affleck as Elijah Bailey than Will Smith.
And keep Mark Wahlberg > away, too,
goddammit! > Actually, I think that Harrison
Ford would be a better choice for >
Bailey... though after doing "BLADE-RUNNER", another movie about
> robots ("replicants") and a detective, he
might not be inclined to do > it. At any
rate, he would lend an air of "gravitas" to the role which
> a younger actor just couldn't. >
> Will Smith should just stick to doing crap
like "Bad Boys". He > should've had the sense
to turn down the offer to be in "Wild Wild
> West"... but he didn't and it STANK and he's
pissed off enough people > to not want to
see him in ANYTHING else ever again. > >
Hmmm... maybe as a zombie in the up-coming remake of "DAWN OF THE
> DEAD"--he could be staggering around for a
few seconds on- screen > before a shotgun
blast sends his brains all over the window of a
> store in whatever mall they're gonna film
it... > > Now THAT I'd pay to
see! > > Patrick > >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > >
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26103 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/10/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '96, Pt. 3 |
.html
.html
ERIC GREENE: There is something about POTA. I mean,
look at a lot of the stuff from the '60's and '70's, it doesn't hold up all that
well. And I'm sure this'll be the case in 20 years for the '80's and '90's.
Special effects technology has advanced but, you know, the stories aren't as
good. But the "Apes" films and the "Apes" series for the most part hold up very
well. They were very intelligently made, there was a lot of craftsmanship in the
acting, the writing, the production design and the direction. And they still
work very well. Truthfully, I wouldn't have wasted much of my time and a lot of
my energy to write a book about these films and these shows had they just been
kind of cheesy "B" movies that didn't stand the test of time. I was just at a
film festival up in Berkeley with 300 POTA fans, and the response was very
positive. People still laugh at all the right jokes and they still really
enjoyed it. And, you know, it's 23 years since the last "Apes" film and 21 years
since the cartoon series and television series were over and there's a big
resurgence of popularity. And the craftsmanship and the quality and the care
that was taken decades ago still rings true today. So I don't know if anyone has
specific questions they would like to ask or if you'd like me to ask the
questions, but if anyone has anything on their mind, now's the time to speak
up.
THE EARLIER FILMS AS BACKGROUND
AUDIENCE: This question is for Mr. Stoker, Mr.
Colman and Mr. Porter: prior to "Battle for the POTA" did you see the movies and
what was your opinion of them before you got the jobs?
AUSTIN STOKER: OK, I'll go first. Uh, no, I had not
seen the movies prior to the one that I was in. I knew of them but for some
reason I was always, like even now, I go to the movies only after it's taken an
effort to go. I'm always so busy and my wife ia always after me, "Let's go see
so and so! Let's go see so and so!" So I didn't really get to see any of them.
And when I finally got the job to be in "Battle for the POTA" I said to the
producer, "Well, can I see at least one of the movies? Maybe the one that
proceeds this one you're going to do now, so I can see what this is all about".
Because I'd only heard from word of mouth what they were about. So they
screened...what was the one just before "Battle"?
ERIC GREENE: "Conquest of the POTA".
AUSTIN STOKER: So they screened that for me in a
screening room at 20th Century - Fox. And I sat there in the room, just by
myself, in Century City watching the film. I'd never seen the film before. I
watched the movie to get an idea of sort of the chronology or the transitions or
whatever from one story to the next, to see where my character would fit in. And
I was a little bit confused because I didn't understand whether it was the
present or the future or the past. (laughs) And that was the whole point, to
find out. I said, "You know, I'm going to forget about this, just get my script,
learn the script and just do it!" And that's what I did.
AUDIENCE: In observing the film and being in the
film, were you tuned into any of the social implications or the political
implications like Eric talks about in his book? Did any of that hit you
then?
AUSTIN STOKER: Oh yeah, I was quite aware that
there were social implications. I didn't get into it detailed, like "Aha! This
is what it's about!". They were quite apparent to me. But I looked at it purely
from the standpoint of the filmmaking and the art of it and the entertainment
part of it. And, you know, the acting part of it. I didn't go into the
analytical part, the social aspects or anything. You know, the militancy and the
civil rights thing and all that. I could see that. But that was like a different
study.
ERIC GREENE: Bobby and Booth, how 'bout you? Did
you see the films beforehand?
BOOTH COLMAN: I saw the original picture and, uh,
what year was that?
BUCK KARTALIAN: '67.
BILL BLAKE: '68.
BUCK: It was made in '67.
BILL: It came out in like March '68.
BOOTH: And it made quite an impression on me. It
was an excellent picture, of course. And I saw none of the others until the
series came out. That came out of the blue as far as I was concerned. So I
hadn't seen any of that. I remembered it, I remembered Evans in the part they
were interested in me for. I've still not seen all of them. I think I've seen
two.
BOBBY PORTER: Yeah, I'd seen the original and it
made a big impression on me. I was in high school at the time and, you know,
obviously most of us remember the Statue of Liberty scene at the end of the
original. And I went, "Wow, this is pretty cool". It was groundbreaking in it's
makeup. Johnny Chambers obviously has been very well documented for what he did
with this. He took existing technology to another level and I've been blessed in
that since that time I've been steadily employed in this business, and because I
either double children doing stunts or I play costumed character roles, I've
been blessed by this anonymity that I maintain. But I've seen the metamorphosis
of special effects makeup since that point in time and I remember...I have a
photograph that I brought with me today where Jimmy Phillips, God rest his soul,
was making me up and I remember in that same room that day were people like Stan
Winston and Tommy Burman and others who have become millionaires in their
crafts. And had Jimmy not been killed in a plane crash a few months later, he
probably would have been among them. There were 5 really talented makeup artists
on that film and my stunt double and his father were also on that plane. I lost
a number of friends. I should have been sitting on that plane next to
him...
BILL BLAKE: The Wolper? (Note: the plane was
for the a David Wolper TV production, I think "Primal Man" or something; I'll
have to look it up. Bobby Porter, Bill Blake and Paula Crist were all
technically supposed to be on that plane but for last minute change of
fortunes)
BOBBY PORTER: The Wolper plane crash that killed 36
people. I should have actually been on that plane but I was working for a Disney
film at the time and missed that particular call. Um, I had seen the original
and I had seen a couple of the others and I had actually been working at school
when the 4rth film, "Conquest" was being filmed, because they actually used U.C.
Irvine as a background. And I remember looking out my Organic Chemistry lab and
seeing a film crew drive up; I turned to my partner and said, "You finish. I've
got someplace to go". And I walked down and I had just done a film prior to that
called "The Poseidon Adventure" and it was the same crew, same guys from Fox who
were putting this film together. And I was invited to lunch and I met J. Lee
Thompson at lunch as a college kid. You know, pre-med college kid. And I didn't
have any idea that a year later I'd be working under him as Cornelius. Plain
luck, being at the right place at the right time. I've literally gotten jobs in
this business because, like some of the others, I was just standing at the right
place at the right time. That was one of those situations.
To
be continued! - - - Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26104 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 2/10/2003 |
| Subject: Happy Birthday! |
.html.html Today, February 10th, is Jerry Goldsmith's 74th birthday. I hope he's around for many more.
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26105 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton
| Date: 2/10/2003 |
|
| Subject: Favorite "Apes" fan moment |
|
.html I'd have to say that of all the great POTA moments, the 1st best one
is when they FINALLY released the 5 movies on VHS & Beta. I hadn't
seen ESCAPE, CONQUEST, or BATTLE since the late 1970's (on the CBS
late-nite movie), so it was almost the first time I'd seen them. And
I could then watch them as many times as I wanted to! Yeah, baby!
There was one problem, though. The literal "soundtrack" on BENEATH
was outta whack during the "Lawgiver statue Illusion" scene; I knew
this because the first videotape I'd ever gotten of any POTA product
was a Betamax print of BENEATH, and I compared the two versions a
bunch of times. I don't know how they messed up that first VHS tape
version of BENEATH, and I was probably the only guy who rented it who
noticed (I rented the flicks before buying them--it was a number of
years before any store in the area actually sold movies on tape!).
Does anybody else know about that "glitch"-in-the-soundtrack version
of BENEATH? After Zaius gallops into the "vision" which is "a lie",
the illusory Lawgiver statue falls onto him and then with a "whoosh"
all the fire & everything just vanishes, and there's silence... but
in the glitched version the sound of the fire (and all that) is
delayed and when it SHOULD be silent there's all this noise of the
statue falling over (about 20 seconds after it already did!) and the
fire going "whoosh", etc.
One other thing I noticed then... and it's STILL in every version
I've seen (the widescreen tapes, the laserdiscs, the DVDs, etc.)...
is a curious noise during CONQUEST. When Caesar yells out "Lousy
human bastards!" and then eventually goes a-runnin' away, Armando &
he go into a stairwell and discuss their options... and at one moment
there's this goofy-sounding "MEEP!" noise that comes out of nowhere.
You'd have thought that they would've digitally removed it by now,
but it's there on the DVD too! Am I the only one who hears this
annoying glitch? Am I going (or have I already gone) mad?
It's a madhouse... a MADHOUSE!!!
Other than that, the next best POTA moments (as a fan) would have to
be the release of the POTA flicks in widescreen format, the TV series
on DVD, and when I got an article published in the second issue
of "APESFAN".
Oh, and finding out about this Yahoo POTA site... despite the
occasional flame-wars & the bullshit, it's still a testament to the
on-going enduring fascination that POTA still holds for me/us.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26106 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/10/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Apes" fan moment |
.htmlPatrick, are you talking about the Playhouse Video versions? John
Mermigas, a friend of mine whose very into the sound aspect of home video
says those are the best sound, particularly "Planet" and "Conquest". I think
he said they had the original soundtracks, that were later lost. There's
some sound FX in "Conquest" you don't hear in later versions. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 6:30 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Favorite "Apes" fan moment
> I'd have to say that of all the great POTA moments, the 1st best one
> is when they FINALLY released the 5 movies on VHS & Beta. I hadn't
> seen ESCAPE, CONQUEST, or BATTLE since the late 1970's (on the CBS
> late-nite movie), so it was almost the first time I'd seen them. And
> I could then watch them as many times as I wanted to! Yeah, baby!
>
> There was one problem, though. The literal "soundtrack" on BENEATH
> was outta whack during the "Lawgiver statue Illusion" scene; I knew
> this because the first videotape I'd ever gotten of any POTA product
> was a Betamax print of BENEATH, and I compared the two versions a
> bunch of times. I don't know how they messed up that first VHS tape
> version of BENEATH, and I was probably the only guy who rented it who
> noticed (I rented the flicks before buying them--it was a number of
> years before any store in the area actually sold movies on tape!).
>
> Does anybody else know about that "glitch"-in-the-soundtrack version
> of BENEATH? After Zaius gallops into the "vision" which is "a lie",
> the illusory Lawgiver statue falls onto him and then with a "whoosh"
> all the fire & everything just vanishes, and there's silence... but
> in the glitched version the sound of the fire (and all that) is
> delayed and when it SHOULD be silent there's all this noise of the
> statue falling over (about 20 seconds after it already did!) and the
> fire going "whoosh", etc.
>
> One other thing I noticed then... and it's STILL in every version
> I've seen (the widescreen tapes, the laserdiscs, the DVDs, etc.)...
> is a curious noise during CONQUEST. When Caesar yells out "Lousy
> human bastards!" and then eventually goes a-runnin' away, Armando &
> he go into a stairwell and discuss their options... and at one moment
> there's this goofy-sounding "MEEP!" noise that comes out of nowhere.
> You'd have thought that they would've digitally removed it by now,
> but it's there on the DVD too! Am I the only one who hears this
> annoying glitch? Am I going (or have I already gone) mad?
>
> It's a madhouse... a MADHOUSE!!!
>
> Other than that, the next best POTA moments (as a fan) would have to
> be the release of the POTA flicks in widescreen format, the TV series
> on DVD, and when I got an article published in the second issue
> of "APESFAN".
>
> Oh, and finding out about this Yahoo POTA site... despite the
> occasional flame-wars & the bullshit, it's still a testament to the
> on-going enduring fascination that POTA still holds for me/us.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26107 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/11/2003 |
| Subject: Starcon '96, pt. 4 |
.html
.html
ARTHUR JACOBS
ERIC GREENE: Can any of you speak of the memories
you have of Arthur Jacobs, who was the man that produced the 5 "Apes" films and
that, really, it was his hard work and tenacity that got the original film made.
Because he went around the studios for years trying to get POTA made and no one
wanted to take the project, they didn't want to risk a lot of money on some
crazy movie about talking apes. No one was willing to do it. And Jacobs kept
pushing and he put together a team with Rod Serling, Franklin Schaffner and
Charlton Heston. And it really was his determination that eventually got it
happening. And he spearheaded that one and watched over the other sequels as
they were made. He passed away right after "Battle". But I'm wondering if any of
you have any memories of working with him and what he was like, since he was so
much a part of the spirit of getting this movie made and making it
successful.
BOBBY PORTER: Well, Arthur was like a father to me
because Natalie Trundy played my mom and she was his wife. So I guess I'm part
of the family. And he was also a man who was courageous enough to let a young
stuntman become an actor, and I'm very grateful for that, because it was the
first speaking role I had in this business and I'm still doing it after 25
years. So I'm very grateful to him. Anyone else?
AUSTIN STOKER: Well, I met him after I was cast in
the film, at his office in the studio; spoke with him briefly and met his wife.
And didn't realize his wife was also in the film, until we showed up to do the
film and she was there. I said, "Didn't I meet you before?" She said, "Yes, I'm
Natalie Trundy". I said,"Oh, are you in the movie? You're an actress". She said,
"Yes". "Oh, I didn't know that". (laughs) A moment of embarrassment. But I met
Arthur on just one occasion. He was a very nice, very gentle man, welcomed us
and all that. Then, the next thing I knew, he passed away. Didn't see him except
that one time. He was always in and out, in and out.
To be continued! - - - Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26108 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/11/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Zira |
.html.html
The attraction isn't physical. The fact that her attraction transcends the specieal barrier is both a testament to her personality and a statement on how pathetic modern womanhood has become, that it forces us to have shows like Joe Millionaire.
Interesting that the girl with the best personality is named Zora. Zora -- Zira. But he doesn't look like the brightest bulb in the box, so he'll probably pick the S & M web mistress. In any case, Zira is certainly more attractive physically than any Klingon broad on Star Trek, and most of the females of other species in that space opera -- with the possible exception of Vulcan dames. Something about pointed ears. I think Liv Tyler should have her ears bobbed. Very sexy ears in LOTR. Don't you agree?
just the (un)usual male creepazoid attraction for a female POTA monkey. Is there anything you won't ---- never mind.
Kassidy
But seriously it is kind of a cross between a center girl and Zira
which is always a little weird to me
<<We must be strange. HAH OF COURSE WE'RE STRANGE!>> <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26109 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/11/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Favorite "Ape" Moment |
.html.html In a message dated 2/10/2003 7:06:49 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
I didn't see the Carol Burnett episode
Yes, I did.
It was very cool.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26110 |
From: Kassidy Rae |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: "modern womanhood" (aka kiss off) |
.htmlThe fact that her attraction transcends the specieal barrier is both a testament to her personality and a statement on how pathetic modern womanhood has become, that it forces us to have shows like Joe Millionaire.
Zira is attractive because she's Zira, but some people take it to the point that I think it is weird. To each his own, though. As far as tv, nobody forces you to have shows like Joe Millionaire. They are an element of trash tv that some people will watch. Like Jerry Springer. Modern womanhood has not become pathetic, but there are always elements that you can point to to try and prove what you're saying. If I were to take Michael Jackson, a cross-dresser and a WWW participant and say "these are examples of how pathetic modern manhood has become" that would not make me right (I think). Maybe it does. Aren't those three all the same people?
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26111 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "modern womanhood" (aka kiss off) |
.html
.html
Men and women come in all different stripes
and persuasions so it's hard to make blanket statements about them. I don't
think an attraction to Zira is a statement against real women. Tim Burton was
apparently attracted to Zira and he does alright with the ladies. i'm not really
sure what "Joe Millionaire" is, but they have those kinds of shows for both
sexes, so everyone is pathetic. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:27
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] "modern
womanhood" (aka kiss off)
The fact that her attraction transcends the specieal barrier is both a
testament to her personality and a statement on how pathetic modern
womanhood has become, that it forces us to have shows like Joe
Millionaire.
Zira is attractive because she's Zira, but some people take it to the point
that I think it is weird. To each his own, though. As far as
tv, nobody forces you to have shows like Joe Millionaire. They are an
element of trash tv that some people will watch. Like Jerry
Springer. Modern womanhood has not become pathetic, but there are
always elements that you can point to to try and prove what you're
saying. If I were to take Michael Jackson, a cross-dresser and a WWW
participant and say "these are examples of how pathetic modern manhood has
become" that would not make me right (I think). Maybe it
does. Aren't those three all the same people?
Kassidy
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26112 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "modern womanhood" (aka kiss off) |
.html
.html
Oh, "Joe Millionaire" is the one where they
think the guy is rich but he isn't? Isn't there one of those shows where a woman
is the prize? Maybe Zira? - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:36
AM
Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] "modern
womanhood" (aka kiss off)
Men and women come in all different
stripes and persuasions so it's hard to make blanket statements about them. I
don't think an attraction to Zira is a statement against real women. Tim
Burton was apparently attracted to Zira and he does alright with the ladies.
i'm not really sure what "Joe Millionaire" is, but they have those kinds of
shows for both sexes, so everyone is pathetic. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:27
AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] "modern
womanhood" (aka kiss off)
The fact that her attraction transcends the specieal barrier is both
a testament to her personality and a statement on how pathetic modern
womanhood has become, that it forces us to have shows like Joe
Millionaire.
Zira is attractive because she's Zira, but some people take it to the
point that I think it is weird. To each his own, though.
As far as tv, nobody forces you to have shows like Joe Millionaire.
They are an element of trash tv that some people will watch. Like
Jerry Springer. Modern womanhood has not become pathetic, but
there are always elements that you can point to to try and prove what you're
saying. If I were to take Michael Jackson, a cross-dresser and a WWW
participant and say "these are examples of how pathetic modern manhood has
become" that would not make me right (I think). Maybe it
does. Aren't those three all the same people?
Kassidy
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26113 |
From: mtotsky |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: Booth Coleman on "Frasier" last night |
|
.html Did anyone catch TV's Dr. Zaius on last night's episode of "Frasier?" He had a
bit part, playing an art restorer that's working on one of Nile's damaged
paintings.
It's always cool to see the Ape actors outside of the makeup...
Best,
Matt <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 26114 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 2/12/2003 |
| Subject: Viva le Difference |
|
.html .htmlI think one of the things most attractive about her is her acceptance of the different. Which is certainly one of the major themes in POTA. Look at Helena Bonham-Carter and Tim Burton -- he's certainly different. Then again, could he get someone like her if he was still painting vans and not a rich and powerful director? Certainly not, she wouldn't give him a second glance. But look at all the trouble Zira's kind heartedness got her husband into. Nobody's perfect. Then again if she had just dissected Taylor the moment she got her hands on him, it'd have been a very be a short story indeed.
<.html <.html
|
|
|
|