|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32734 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32735 |
From: James |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32736 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32737 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32738 |
From: JamesA1102@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32739 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: wait a moment! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32740 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32741 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Reminder - Conquest premiered this day in 1972 ... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32742 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA in Kong? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32743 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: The Face of Kong |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32744 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: wait a moment! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32745 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment!james! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32746 |
From: James |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment!james! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32747 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment!james! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32748 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment!james! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32749 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32750 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32751 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Face of Kong |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32752 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Face of Kong |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32753 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Kong's vitals |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32754 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: New poll about nuclear war |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32755 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Madagascar |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32756 |
From: John |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Madagascar |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32757 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to pota |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32758 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: HUMANOID APES |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32759 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: New poll about nuclear war |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32760 |
From: JamesA1102@aol.com |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: July Calendar/Lessons from the Lawgiver/Contest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32761 |
From: Mark |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Conquest contest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32762 |
From: James |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest contest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32763 |
From: Mark |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest contest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32764 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest contest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32765 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] July Calendar/Lessons from the Lawgiver/Co |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32766 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Madagascar |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32767 |
From: Sturi |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Escape Ending |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32768 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Escape Ending |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32769 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to pota |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32770 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] New file uploaded to pota |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32771 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Conquest versions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32772 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] New file uploaded to pota |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32773 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] New file uploaded to pota |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32774 |
From: simianhistorian |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest versions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32775 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Taylor for President? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32776 |
From: James |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver/Conquest Contest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32777 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest versions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32778 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32779 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to pota |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32780 |
From: James |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32781 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: [Planet of the Apes] 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32782 |
From: Mark |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32783 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32784 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: [Planet of the Apes] 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32785 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32786 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions-deleted scenes? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32787 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32788 |
From: James |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32789 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32790 |
From: James |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32791 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Just FYI... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32792 |
From: Mark |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32793 |
From: simianhistorian |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest versions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32794 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions-deleted scenes? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32795 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: 4th of July long ago |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32796 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32797 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Just FYI... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32798 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Just FYI... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32799 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32800 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32801 |
From: Lovely_Pudding |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Newbie |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32802 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: miccougar-conquest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32803 |
From: James |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Re: miccougar-conquest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32804 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] miccougar-conquest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32805 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] miccougar-conquest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32806 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] miccougar-conquest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32807 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Superman Dog Tags (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32808 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Newbie |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32809 |
From: bikergator25 |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32810 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Newbie |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32811 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32812 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32813 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32814 |
From: James |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32815 |
From: James |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32816 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32817 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32818 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32819 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32820 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32821 |
From: James |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver/Conquest Contest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32822 |
From: James |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32823 |
From: James |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32824 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32825 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32826 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32827 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32828 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32829 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32830 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Lesson from the Lawgiver/Conquest Contest |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32831 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32832 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32833 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32734 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
.htmldehn said that one year before battle, you should take care that in
battle there's a new purpose.
nuclear war wipes out every space travel project, and with no
space travel i just don't see how the plague comes on earth
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...>
wrote:
> True but that doesn't really address the issue. If there are two
> timelines why does the nuclear war have to take place in
conjuntion
> with the Ape revolt/takeover. Just because the chain of events
shown in
> Conquest was Plague/Ape Revolt/Nuclear War doesn't mean
they happened
> way in another timeline. The chain of events there could have
been
> Nuclear War/Plague/Ape Takeover.
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@a... wrote:
> >
> > That doesn't mean the bomb wasn't around in the 20th
Century and
> preserved
> > all those centuries, including after the 26th Century
destruction...
> The bomb
> > may have been from the 20th Century, but it was never
detonated in
> the centuries
> > following it because it was known to be "The Ultimate
Weapon"... As
> such,
> > other nukes may have been set off, but the final bomb wasn't,
and
> after the
> > "downfall" of Humanity, it came to be worshipped by the
surviving
> humans (mutants).
> > Remember, the Alpha-Omega bomb was made to last, and it
lasted from
> the time
> > it was made up until the 40th Century... <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32735 |
From: James |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@y...>
wrote:
> dehn said that one year before battle, you should take care that in
> battle there's a new purpose.
>
True, Battle can be looked at as the fork in the road. But if a new
timeline was created, it was in Battle by Caesar's actions, not by his
mere existance.
>
> nuclear war wipes out every space travel project, and with no
> space travel i just don't see how the plague comes on earth
>
It could have been a spaceship that was lauched prior to the war and
returned after it was over. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32736 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
.htmlwhat's about the tv series? what did virdon and burke discover
about earth's past?
- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow"
<apecalypsenow@y...>
> wrote:
> > dehn said that one year before battle, you should take care
that in
> > battle there's a new purpose.
> >
>
> True, Battle can be looked at as the fork in the road. But if a new
> timeline was created, it was in Battle by Caesar's actions, not by
his
> mere existance.
>
> >
> > nuclear war wipes out every space travel project, and with no
> > space travel i just don't see how the plague comes on earth
> >
>
> It could have been a spaceship that was lauched prior to the war
and
> returned after it was over. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32737 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 6/28/2005 5:20:01 AM Central Standard Time, JamesA1102@... writes:
If there are two timelines why does the nuclear war have to take place in conjuntion
with the Ape revolt/takeover.
That's true enough... I'd say your point that an apes revolt and a nuclear war don't have to go hand in hand is probably true... <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32738 |
From: JamesA1102@aol.com |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
.html
.html
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com,
mlccougar@a...
wrote: >
> That's true enough...
I'd say your point that an apes revolt and a nuclear
> war don't have to
go hand in hand is probably true...
Wow Cougar agrees with me.
Now look what you caused;-)
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32739 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: wait a moment! |
.htmlYour argument proves the 3955 date in BTPOTA is wrong...The date in
POTA, 3978, is correct -- and 2000 years previous brings us to 1978 --
5-6 years after Taylor and Brent left...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@y...> wrote:
> james,
>
> so did those humans die in 1955? because 3955-2000=1955. the
> answer is no. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32740 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
.htmlHow about if Carl Denham asks, "I wonder how Kong would score on the
Hopkins Manual Dexterity test?"
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> Here's a way to bring this around on topic. Let's hear some ideas
about how Peter Jackson could put a POTA moment in the movie. Since he
also loves POTA, how could he do it without taking people out of the
movie? (By the way, I liked in the trailer when Kong said, "Bow your
heads!"). This thread just occurred to me so I don't have anything to
start it with, but if I think of something I'll post it. - - - Jeff <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32741 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Reminder - Conquest premiered this day in 1972 ... |
|
.html We would like to remind you of this upcoming event.
Conquest premiered this day in 1972� �
Date: Wednesday, June 29, 2005
Time: All Day <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32742 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA in Kong? |
.htmlJackson definitely wants to use the Empire State Building like the
original. I thought of Kong starting to climb the Statue of Liberty and
someone off screen says, "Damn it to hell! He's going up the statue!" but
Kong doesn't like climbing it and moves on.
Arthur Jacobs was a kid in 1933. I thought of a kid reading an ape comic
book )of course POTA didn't exist back then but an ape on the cover wearing
clothes. And someone says, 'Hey Arthur, look at that!" and they see Kong
being destructive. Hee hee hee! - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "James" <JamesA1102@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:17 AM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: POTA in Kong?
> MAybe Kong climbing the Statue of Liberty;-)
>
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > Here's a way to bring this around on topic. Let's hear some ideas
> about how Peter Jackson could put a POTA moment in the movie. Since he
> also loves POTA, how could he do it without taking people out of the
> movie? (By the way, I liked in the trailer when Kong said, "Bow your
> heads!"). This thread just occurred to me so I don't have anything to
> start it with, but if I think of something I'll post it. - - - Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the Group's Internal Website
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/MainPage.htm for Original POTA One
Sheets & Lobby Cards, Trailers & Rare Videos, Trading Cards and much, much
more...
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32743 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: The Face of Kong |
| Group: pota |
Message: 32744 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: wait a moment! |
.html-it seems to me that the 3955 date was confirmed in escape.
-- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "hotscheetz" <HotScheetz@a...>
wrote:
> Your argument proves the 3955 date in BTPOTA is wrong...The
date in
> POTA, 3978, is correct -- and 2000 years previous brings us to
1978 --
> 5-6 years after Taylor and Brent left...
>
> G
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow"
<apecalypsenow@y...> wrote:
> > james,
> >
> > so did those humans die in 1955? because 3955-2000=1955.
the
> > answer is no. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32745 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment!james! |
.htmli'm starting to follow your scheme of thought...but...one thing is
still out of place...
cornelius talk abou istituzionaled enslavement in escape...200
years after a nuclear war???
-- In pota@yahoogroups.com, JamesA1102@a... wrote:
> --- In _pota@yahoogroups.com_
(mailto:pota@yahoogroups.com) , _mlccougar@a_
> (mailto:mlccougar@a) ... wrote:
> >
> > That's true enough... I'd say your point that an apes revolt
and a nuclear
> > war don't have to go hand in hand is probably true...
>
> Wow Cougar agrees with me.
>
> Now look what you caused;-) <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32746 |
From: James |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment!james! |
.htmlCornelius never said when the nuclear war was. He didn't say it was
before nor did he say it was after.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@y...> wrote:
> i'm starting to follow your scheme of thought...but...one thing is
> still out of place...
>
> cornelius talk abou istituzionaled enslavement in escape...200
> years after a nuclear war???
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32747 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment!james! |
.htmlyeah, but if we assume the war happened in 1992 in both the lines,
then the enslavement of the apes happened in the following 200
years. ape menagement belongs to apeline 2...it should be so.
another question: what's about the original caesar of apeline one?
was him an orangutan as showed in pota68?
-- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> Cornelius never said when the nuclear war was. He didn't say it
was
> before nor did he say it was after.
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@y...>
wrote:
> > i'm starting to follow your scheme of thought...but...one thing is
> > still out of place...
> >
> > cornelius talk abou istituzionaled enslavement in escape...200
> > years after a nuclear war???
> > <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32748 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment!james! |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 6/29/2005 7:29:17 AM Central Standard Time, apecalypsenow@... writes:
another question: what's about the original caesar of apeline one?
was him an orangutan as showed in pota68?
The original ape to speak was an ape named Aldo... They never mention what species of ape he was...
The orangutan they show in PLANET is a statue of their Lawgiver. The Lawgiver is not the ape who started the original revolt, he is the ape who wrote the Sacred Scrolls. <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32749 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.htmlMarvel UK issue 37, continuing the Beneath adaptation, is now available to download from Hunter's site. Like last issue, there are some pictures from the TV series on the final page.
Next week y'all are on your own to find your way to Hunter's site when issue 38 is posted, as I'll be building sandcastles with my nephews on the beach.
Greg
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32750 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: wait a moment! |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 6/29/2005 4:56:46 AM Central Standard Time, apecalypsenow@... writes:
-It seems to me that the 3955 date was confirmed in escape.
That's one of the only things that Dehn was consistent with, but it really should have been 3978 because that is the date from PLANET, and that film is the first one. <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32751 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Face of Kong |
.html> Aintitcool has a NICE hi-res pic of Kong's face, I guess from the
> trailer. He's one battle damaged dude!
Thanks for the pointer! They look incredible!
Hunter <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32752 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] The Face of Kong |
.html
.html
I do see the Wallace Beery resemblance.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32753 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Kong's vitals |
.htmlRight, again, LT...Here's the lyrics:
King Kong,
You know the name of,
King Kong,
You know the fame of,
King Kong,
Ten times as big as a man.
Throughout the land,
You've heard about this wonder;
Listen closely now,
And you will hear the thunder!
Of this mighty ape,
And he's a friend of man,
So goes the legend,
The legend of:
King Kong,
You know the name of,
King Kong,
You know the fame of,
King Kong,
Ten times as big as a man.
One day a boy,
Too young to know the danger;
Made a friend,
Of this giant fearsome creature!
And the life they led,
On their island home became a legend,
The legend of:
King Kong,
You know the name of,
King Kong,
You know the fame of,
King Kong,
Ten times as big as a man.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> As I recall Kong went
>
> King Kong you know the name of
> King Kong you know the fame of
> King Kong
> Ten times as big as a man <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32754 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: New poll about nuclear war |
|
.html APE-ONAUTS,
There's a new poll. James let all my polls "open" in the months to
come, they are extremely important! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32755 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Madagascar |
|
.html .html
I saw the movie Madagascar and loved the pota reference. I knew a pota reference was coming in the movie but was surprised by the way it was done. Did anyone else see the movie? Elaine<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32756 |
From: John |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Madagascar |
.htmlMe and my son were laughing so hard.... my Wife just shook her head
and covered her face. :)
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, taebokitti@a... wrote:
> I saw the movie Madagascar and loved the pota reference. I knew a
pota
> reference was coming in the movie but was surprised by the way it
was done. Did
> anyone else see the movie? Elaine <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32757 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to pota |
| Group: pota |
Message: 32758 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: HUMANOID APES |
|
.html It seems to me obvious now that the AUTHORS of the last 3 POTA
movies (DEHN) imply that the "humanoid APES" were still present on
Earth scattered in the remote places of Africa, Indonesia and God
knows WHERE!
If you think about that, In ESCAPE (1973) there's an incredible
reaction to Cornelius and Zira JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE ABLE TO SPEAK!
Nobody pointed at the fact their cranium is different
from "primitive" Apes, or that their physical structure is obviously
human-like. Even ARMANDO is not that much surprised, and he's the
owner of two "common"/primitive chimps.
Since it's estabilished CONQUEST is set in 1991 (GOSH!), I barely
can conceive genetic manipulation or enzimal development can bring
to thousands of Humanoid Apes in such short amount of time.
I figure those "Humanoid Apes" (a spontaneous mutation) appeared in
the beginning of the 1900, and were secretly imprisoned and scanned
by American government in the '50ies and '60ies. That would explain
MANDEMUS's presence in BATTLE - he was one of the first "hominides"
to have been proper attentions by the scientific communities in some
sort of AREA 51.
In APELINE ONE the nuclear war could have happened in 1992 (as
Apeline TWO). If it's really so, then the Humans managed
to "enslave" the Apes in the following 2 CENTURIES. The APE
MANAGEMENT seems to have never appeared in such timeline, so I bet
nature provided APELINE ONE humans of their Humanoid Apes. The
mutation appeared spontaneously. In APELINE TWO, they managed to
hunt and enslave the Humanoid Apes scattered throughout the World -
it was a well-planned scheme.
Anyway, from Cornelius's speech, it seems that there were still
HOMES or GROCERIES in the infamous "5 Centuries" of APE enslavement,
so this could be seen as evidence that the nuclear war - in Apeline
One - happened in the 26th century.
As far as concerned Apeline two, maybe the nuclear war happened 500
years before because the PRESIDENT and AMERICA's SOCIETY were hugely
different. Maybe Hasslein's killing and a probable associated
President's fall are the REASONS? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32759 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: New poll about nuclear war |
.htmlPlease, I re-edited the poll, so PLEASE re-cast your vote. Ther poll
is now temporary and I refined the choices.
Many thanks to everyone!
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@y...>
wrote:
> APE-ONAUTS,
>
> There's a new poll. James let all my polls "open" in the months to
> come, they are extremely important! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32760 |
From: JamesA1102@aol.com |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: July Calendar/Lessons from the Lawgiver/Contest |
.html
.html
Happy Friday everyone!
Well better late than never, the July 2005 calendar has been
uploaded to the Files Section:
This month the anniversary of the 2001 remake is
celebrated.
Also, since it is a holiday weekend in the US it seems fitting to
kick it off with a contribution from our friend in the 'mother country' Dave
Ballard. Today's "Lesson from the Lawgiver" is Dave's very funny spoof of our
weekly feature. Just click on the banner on the Yahoo Home page or use this
link: http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/LFTL.htm
And since it is a holiday come back on Monday for another special
holiday Lesson.
Finally, to celebrate the holiday and Conquest's anniversary we're
having a little contest and the prize is a Medicom Conquest Caesar and the
latest copy of Simian Scrolls.
Now all you have to do to win is identify a major continuity error
within Conquest. This is not a script or story error but a mistake by the
Director. And it occurs during Caesar's time at Ape Management. First person to
post the error, wins.
Good luck. <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32761 |
From: Mark |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Conquest contest |
|
.html Tough one because of all the continuity errors in this film. I'm gonna say the scene where
Caesar breaks off banana pieces; the banana changes hands as he breaks off the pieces. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32762 |
From: James |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest contest |
.htmlNo that's not what I was looking for. This is a much bigger mistake.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <rkid67@y...> wrote:
> Tough one because of all the continuity errors in this film. I'm
gonna say the scene where
> Caesar breaks off banana pieces; the banana changes hands as he
breaks off the pieces. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32763 |
From: Mark |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest contest |
.htmlWhen the recording of the president is playing, the aspect ratio changes three times.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> No that's not what I was looking for. This is a much bigger mistake.
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <rkid67@y...> wrote:
> > Tough one because of all the continuity errors in this film. I'm
> gonna say the scene where
> > Caesar breaks off banana pieces; the banana changes hands as he
> breaks off the pieces. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32764 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest contest |
.htmlIs it where they croped off the 1983 date on the dog and cat memorial
on the DVD release?
In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <rkid67@y...> wrote:
> When the recording of the president is playing, the aspect ratio
changes three times.
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> > No that's not what I was looking for. This is a much bigger
mistake.
> >
> > --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <rkid67@y...> wrote:
> > > Tough one because of all the continuity errors in this film.
I'm
> > gonna say the scene where
> > > Caesar breaks off banana pieces; the banana changes hands as he
> > breaks off the pieces. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32765 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] July Calendar/Lessons from the Lawgiver/Co |
|
.html .html
Great job, Dave on this week's lesson! Love it! My type of humor. Elaine<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32766 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Madagascar |
.html.html
In a message dated 6/30/2005 5:17:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
Me and my son were laughing so hard.... my Wife just shook her head and covered her face. :)
I was pretty hysterical with laughter. I recommend the movie, loved the lemurs. Elaine <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32767 |
From: Sturi |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Escape Ending |
|
.html Hey all,
Just joined this site, recently bought the boxset from Ebay - just
waiting on it being sent out :) Anyway, I recently watched Escape..on
TV and have a question about the ending. Why would Zera throw her
baby in the sea?
I can see the point of the baby-swapping, quite a clever ending. But
why did she throw it in the sea? Surely if the police caught up with
them, they'd find Cornelius dead, Zera and the baby alive. They'd
think this was their baby, and probably kill it and her. So why throw
it in the sea? It is because if they ran tests or whatever they'd be
able to know this 'baby' was a normal ape(and that Zera had switched
somehow)? Surely they wouldn't have the medical ability to do this?
Even still - Cornelius and Zera's baby might look/act/talk/be
medically identical to a 'normal' chimp. Since 1970s America hasn't
saw anything like these chimps before, there's no way they could know
what Zera's baby would be like, there's no guarauntee it would be
intelligent at all.
If anyone could clear this up for me I'd most appriciate it. Maybe I'm
thinking about it too much! Perhaps will become clearer on repeated
viewings, I've only saw the film twice and the original time was years
ago.
Cheers
Stu <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32768 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Escape Ending |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/2/2005 9:19:31 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
campbellstp@... writes:
Even
still - Cornelius and Zera's baby might look/act/talk/be medically
identical to a 'normal' chimp. Since 1970s America hasn't saw anything like
these chimps before, there's no way they could know what Zera's baby would
be like, there's no guarauntee it would be intelligent at
all.
Even still? Hasn't saw? Ouch Stu!
You're going to cause another tsunami
by making all those dead English teachers
roll over in their graves simultaneously like that.
And the correct spelling is Zira with an I BTW.
Anyway to answer your question, I'm quite sure it wasn't a
"You want the baby so bad then have him!" sort of move.
I think it was more to get rid of any evidence of the switch.
Forensics didn't have any DNA testing back in the 70's.
You may have noticed that in the past 10 or 15 years a lot
of people have been vindicated of the accusations that sent
them to prison and set free because only now can they check
the DNA. And Zira's understanding of even 1970's tech was
limited to say the least. (See picture at the bottom of post)
<<Surely if the police caught up with them, they'd find Cornelius
dead, Zera and the baby alive.>>
No way. I think it extremely unlikely that and infant chimp
could
take 3 slugs from a .38 and live. He was dead before he ever hit
the water, and most likely before the second bullet -- killed
instantly.
Zira died shortly after reaching Cornelius, and even if she didn't,
we're
talking 70's medical technology again, she's have to have the will to
live, and I really doubt that at that point. Good question though,
I'm
sure the Stevie was thinking "Why did she do that?" as well.
In this deleted scene Zira wonders just how
to brush her hair with a hairbrush this small.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32769 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to pota |
| Group: pota |
Message: 32770 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] New file uploaded to pota |
| Group: pota |
Message: 32771 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Conquest versions |
|
.html I'd probably read the comic and novel adaptations of Conquest at least,
say, a zillion times before I ever saw Conquest on the television and
that, no doubt,colours my judgement.I've always thought that John Jakes
did an amazing job on the novel.Caesar is a real military leader and
the evolution of the Ape Rebellion is, even though necessarily
telescpoed in time,convincingly logical.I've always thought the
Moench/Alcala comics adaptation was the best adaptation and is a really
classy piece of work. I've always been really disappointed with the
movie.For me, Montalban is the best thing in it and I really wonder
just how badly the censor damaged the film--it doesn't seem to have a
staedy pace like the others.The story is my favourite Apes story---the
movie is my least favourite of the five.Imagine Cameron directing
Conquest---that would have been something!John, Scrolls. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32772 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] New file uploaded to pota |
.html> But I didn't give him a hi-res version. What's
> the point of having rare pics if everyone has 'em?
So when you die and your family throws them out, no one will ever see
them again? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32773 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] New file uploaded to pota |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/3/2005 9:30:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
goathunter@... writes:
So when
you die and your family throws them out, no one will ever see them
again?
Oh hell no!
In the unlikely event of my untimely demise my family has
been given strict orders to sell my collection on eBay, piecemeal.
I've even been thinking of marking them with an opening bid, a
reserve.
and a list of groups with likely collectors to notify for each item.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32774 |
From: simianhistorian |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest versions |
.htmlI agree that the book is a lot better than the film, but I still love the
movie! Heck it's my third favorite film of all time!
I'm sure, as mentioned in the 'Behind The Planet Of The Apes'
documentary) that had they not been forced to edit so much of
the film it would've probably been much better. But when you
think about it, except for 'Conquest' all the POTA films were rated
'G', which by today's standard's, a 'G' rating for them would never
fly. And giving 'Conquest' a 'PG' wouldn't go well in this day and
age either, I think.
I loved the Armando character, the significant reason the Apes
ruled the planet in the end. Had it not been for his allowing
Caesar to live, and then exposing him to the slavery that had
become of Caesar's kind, the 'revolt of the apes' might never had
happened.
Anyway, I love 'Conquest', and watch it probably more than the
other films. Caesar rules (literally!)
cornelius
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "shanter2002" <mail@m...>
wrote:
> I'd probably read the comic and novel adaptations of Conquest
at least,
> say, a zillion times before I ever saw Conquest on the
television and
> that, no doubt,colours my judgement.I've always thought that
John Jakes
> did an amazing job on the novel.Caesar is a real military
leader and
> the evolution of the Ape Rebellion is, even though necessarily
> telescpoed in time,convincingly logical.I've always thought the
> Moench/Alcala comics adaptation was the best adaptation and
is a really
> classy piece of work. I've always been really disappointed with
the
> movie.For me, Montalban is the best thing in it and I really
wonder
> just how badly the censor damaged the film--it doesn't seem to
have a
> staedy pace like the others.The story is my favourite Apes
story---the
> movie is my least favourite of the five.Imagine Cameron
directing
> Conquest---that would have been something!John, Scrolls. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32775 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Taylor for President? |
|
.html Am I right in thinking that one of the signatories to the Declaration
of Independence was a certain George Taylor? I read somewhere that he
was one of four Irishmen who signed it. Taylor for President makes
sense, as you'd have a non speaking First Lady.The gun law debate would
also be over. John, Scrolls.PS,yes I have been waiting until toay o
post this one! <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32776 |
From: James |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver/Conquest Contest |
.htmlWell as promised today there is a special and very humorous new
Lesson to celebrate the holiday. Thanks to Elaine for her
contribution.
To access the Lesson just click the banner on the Yahoo Home Page or
use this link:
http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/LFTL.htm
The Conquest contest has had some interesting answers but not what
we are looking for. Remember that error is:
- Not a story or script error, but one made by the director during
the filming.
- Takes place during Caesar's time at Ape Management.
And I'll add one more clue:
- Look carefully at the extras.
The winner will get a Medicom Conquest Caesar and the latest issue
of Simian Scrolls for the correct answer.
Good Luck. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32777 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest versions |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/3/05 11:23:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, cornelius@... writes:
except for 'Conquest' all the POTA films were rated
'G', which by today's standard's, a 'G' rating for them would never
fly. And giving 'Conquest' a 'PG' wouldn't go well in this day and
age either, I think.
Actually PLANET was released in February 1968 and MPAA movie rating system didn't get launched until November of '68. PLANET was still in some theatres that late and I remember seeing some ads in the newspaper that slapped an "M" rating on it. That's what "PG" and later "PG-13" used to be and it stood for "Mature Audiences." But in May 1969 I saw PLANET again in a re-issue with THOSE MAGNIFICENT MEN IN THEIR FLYING MACHINES (The ad announced: "The Perfect Mates - Apes and Men") and it had a "G" rating.
If re-released to theatres today, I'm sure all the APES films would be rated "G," even CONQUEST.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32778 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: 4th of July long ago |
|
.html .html.htmlHere's an ad I found months ago in The New York Times for the 4th of July holiday back in 1968. This is what 20th Century-Fox had to offer at movie theatres in NYC.<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32779 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to pota |
| Group: pota |
Message: 32780 |
From: James |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
.htmlThanks Rory. I uploaded the pic to the files section for all to see.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/Rory%27s%20Scans/4JulyTimes.jpg
Interesting that the movie 'The Detective' was included. Does anyone
know what film is considered the unoffcial sequel to 'The Detective'
and what connection it has to POTA?
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> Here's an ad I found months ago in The New York Times for the 4th of
July
> holiday back in 1968. This is what 20th Century-Fox had to offer at
movie
> theatres in NYC. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32781 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: [Planet of the Apes] 4th of July long ago |
.htmlThat should read "GOOD Dr. D" not god!!!
Tim
--- "Tim \"apefan\"" < apefan23@...> wrote:
> I want to see "Prudence and the Pill"!......
> Were these all playing on the same bill? Odd that
> the
> god Dr. D was in there amongst the more adult fare
>
> Tim
>
> --- Haristas@... wrote:
>
> > Here's an ad I found months ago in The New York
> > Times for the 4th of July
> > holiday back in 1968. This is what 20th
> Century-Fox
> > had to offer at movie
> > theatres in NYC.
> >
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32782 |
From: Mark |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
.htmlThe unofficial sequel was 'Die Hard'. I just bought The Detective along with the Tony Rome
films. I don't know the Apes connection though.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> Interesting that the movie 'The Detective' was included. Does anyone
> know what film is considered the unoffcial sequel to 'The Detective'
> and what connection it has to POTA? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32783 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] 4th of July long ago |
.htmlI want to see "Prudence and the Pill"!......
Were these all playing on the same bill? Odd that the
god Dr. D was in there amongst the more adult fare
Tim
--- Haristas@... wrote:
> Here's an ad I found months ago in The New York
> Times for the 4th of July
> holiday back in 1968. This is what 20th Century-Fox
> had to offer at movie
> theatres in NYC.
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32784 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: [Planet of the Apes] 4th of July long ago |
.html
.html
POTA made the Offbeat Film groups list . . .
1. City Of God (2002) - 100% + 2. American Beauty (1999) - 98% 3. The
Wild Bunch (1969) - 97.5% + 4. The People Vs. Larry Flynt (1996) - 97.5%
+ 5. Toy Story 2 (1999) - 96% + 6. Far From Heaven (2002) - 95% + 7.
Raise The Red Lantern (1991) - 95% + 8. L.A. Confidential (1997) - 94% 9.
Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb (1964) -
94% + 10. O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000) - 94% + 11. The Haunting
(1963) - 94% + 12. The Day The Earth Stood Still (1951) - 94% + 13.
Mulholland Drive (2001) - 93% + 14. The Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The
King (2003) - 93% 15. Metropolis (1926) - 93% + 16. Leaving Las Vegas
(1995) - 93% + 17. The Good, The Bad And The Ugly (1966) - 93% + 18.
Princess Mononoke (1997) - 93% + 19. The Hudsucker Proxy (1994) - 93%
+ 20. Crimes And Misdemeanors (1989) - 92.5% + 21. Boogie Nights (1997) -
92.5% + 22. The Long Good Friday (1979) - 92.5% + 23. Get Carter (1971) -
92.5% + 24. Repulsion (1965) - 92.5% + 25. Toy Story (1995) - 92% + 26.
A Clockwork Orange (1971) - 92% + 27. The City Of Lost Children (1995) - 92%
+ 28. The Piano (1993) - 92% + 29. Dogtown And Z-Boys (2001) - 92%
+ 30. Raging Bull (1980) - 91% + 31. Welcome To The Dollhouse (1995) - 91%
+ 32. The Straight Story (1999) - 91% + 33. The Usual Suspects (1995) -
90.5% 34. The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring (2001) -
90% 35. Amores Perros (Love's A Bitch) (2001) - 90% 36. This Is Spinal Tap
(1984) - 90% 37. Being John Malkovich (1999) - 90% 38. Bowling For
Columbine (2002) - 90% 39. Memento (2001) - 90% 40. The Lord Of The
Rings: The Two Towers (2002) - 90% + 41. Touch Of Evil (1958) - 90% + 42.
Spirited Away (2002) - 90% + 43. The Thing (1982) - 90% + 44. The Fly
(1986) - 90% + 45. The Truman Show (1998) - 90% + 46. Hedwig And The
Angry Inch (2001) - 90% + 47. You Can Count On Me (2000) - 90% + 48. The
Last Temptation Of Christ (1988) - 90% + 49. Arsenic And Old Lace (1944) -
90% + 50. If... (1969) - 90% + 51. Igby Goes Down (2002) - 90% + 52. Do
The Right Thing (1989) - 90% + 53. Delicatessen (1991) - 90% + 54. Monty
Python And The Holy Grail (1975) - 89% 55. Monster (2003) - 89% + 56.
Happiness (1998) - 89% + 57. Mean Streets (1973) - 89% + 58. The Matrix
(1999) - 89% + 59. Million Dollar Baby (2004) - 89% + 60. Ed Wood (1994) -
89% + 61. Shrek 2 (2004) - 89% + 62. Phone Booth (2003) - 88.5% 63.
Unforgiven (1992) - 88% 64. Dawn Of The Dead (1979) - 88% 65. Network
(1976) - 88% + 66. Who's Afraid Of Virginia Woolf? (1966) - 88% + 67.
Traffic (2000) - 88% + 68. Snatch (2000) - 88% + 69. Naked (1993) - 88%
+ 70. Y Tu Mama Tambien (2001) - 88% + 71. Italian For Beginners (2002) -
88% + 72. The Last Seduction (1994) - 88% + 73. Pulp Fiction (1994) -
87.5% + 74. Monsoon Wedding (2001) - 87.5% + 75. Heavenly Creatures (1994)
- 87% 76. Planet Of The Apes (1968) - 87% + 77. Alfie (1966) - 87%
+ 78. A Fistful Of Dollars (1965) – 87% + 79. Fight Club (1999) - 87%
+ 80. Sin City (2005) - 87% + 81. Man Bites Dog (1992) - 87% + 82. 21
Grams (2003) - 87% + 83. Sonatine (1993) - 87% + 84. Under The Sand (2000)
- 87% + 85. Thirteen (2003) - 87% + 86. Queen Margot (1994) - 87% + 87.
Life Is Sweet (1991) - 87% + 88. Brazil (1985) - 86.5% 89. Blood Simple
(1984) - 86.5% 90. Amelie (2001) - 86% 91. Reservoir Dogs (1992) - 86%
92. The Manchurian Candidate (1962) - 86% + 93. Some Like It Hot (1959) -
86% + 94. Spider-Man (2002) - 86% + 95. A Fish Called Wanda (1988) - 86%
+ 96. Monty Python's Life Of Brian (1979) - 86% + 97. The Sweet Hereafter
(1997) - 86% + 98. Spider-Man 2 (2004) - 86% + 99. In The Bedroom (2001) -
86% + 100. Seconds (1966) - 86% + 101. Lost In Translation (2003) - 86%
+ 102. Mystery Train (1989) - 86% + 103. Monsters, Inc. (2001) -
85% 104. The Man Who Wasn't There (2001) - 85% 105. Secretary (2002) - 85%
+ 106. Robocop (1987) - 85% + 107. The Others (2001) - 85% + 108. Sid
& Nancy (1986) - 85% + 109. Breathless (1959) - 85% + 110. Mr. And
Mrs. Smith (2005) - 85% + 111. The Ice Storm (1997) - 85% + 112. Husbands
And Wives (1992) - 85% + 113. Picnic At Hanging Rock (1975) - 85% + 114.
Buffalo Soldiers (2003) - 85% + 115. Master And Commander: The Far Side Of
The World (2003) - 85% + 116. 25th Hour (2002) - 85% + 117. To Die For
(1995) - 85% + 118. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000) - 84.5% 119.
Mystic River (2003) - 84% 120. Trainspotting (1996) - 84% 121. Taxi Driver
(1976) - 84% 122. Edward Scissorhands (1990) - 84% 123. Harry Potter And
The Chamber Of Secrets (2002) - 84% + 124. Evil Dead 2: Dead By Dawn (1987) -
84% + 125. Wonder Boys (2000) - 84% + 126. Swingers (1996) - 84% + 127.
Hero (2003) - 84% + 128. Enter The Dragon (1973) - 84% + 129. Solaris
(1972) - 84% + 130. Shrek (2001) - 83.5% 131. Donnie Darko (2001) -
83.5% 132. Easy Rider (1969) - 83.5% 133. Excalibur (1981) - 83% 134.
Fargo (1996) - 83% 135. Short Cuts (1993) - 83% + 136. Dark Star (1974) -
83% + 137. Miller's Crossing (1990) - 83% + 138. Lantana (2001) - 83%
+ 139. Roger & Me (1989) - 83% + 140. Magnolia (1999) - 83% + 141.
Hate (1995) - 83% + 142. Safe (1995) - 83% + 143. Death And The Maiden
(1994) - 83% + 144. Waiting For Guffman (1996) - 83% + 145. Clerks (1994)
- 82.5% 146. Roger Dodger (2002) - 82.5% + 147. Croupier (1998) - 82.5% +
148. Chungking Express (1994) - 82.5% + 149. Strictly Ballroom (1992) -
82.5% + 150. Don't Look Now (1973) - 82% <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32785 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/4/2005 10:36:52 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
Haristas@... writes:
I
remember seeing some ads in the newspaper that slapped an "M" rating on
it. That's what "PG" and later "PG-13" used to be and it stood for
"Mature Audiences." But in May 1969 I saw PLANET again in a re-issue
with THOSE MAGNIFICENT MEN IN THEIR FLYING MACHINES (The ad announced: "The
Perfect Mates - Apes and Men") and it had a "G"
rating.
That sounds like the same titillation advertising as the "Forced Mating"
campaign. But I don't remember the M in the 60's and early 70's
But apparently there was such a rating. I do remember GP. It was
later changed to PG, maybe because that actually make sense.
Original ratings
The original movie ratings consisted of:
- Rated G – Suggested For GENERAL Audiences (including children).
- Rated M – Suggested For MATURE Audiences: Parental Discretion
Advised.
- Rated R – RESTRICTED: Children under 17 (originally 16) not
admitted unless accompanied by a parent or adult guardian; some theater chains
specifically stated that the "adult guardian" must be at least 21.
- Rated
X – Children Under 18 Not Admitted; the notation "Age limit may vary
in certain areas" was sometimes added.
Many parents thought films rated M contained more adult content than
those that were rated R; this confusion led to its replacement in 1970
by GP:
- Rated GP – General audiences/Parental guidance suggested.
In 1972 GP was changed
to PG – Parental guidance suggested.
From the adoption of the system through the mid-1970s, it was not uncommon
for mainstream films such as Airport, Planet
of the Apes, The Odd Couple, and
2001: A Space
Odyssey to be released with G ratings, but by 1978, that rating
had become increasingly associated with films, often poorly made, intended
specifically for children, while the PG rating became increasingly common
for "family" films, with the G rating increasingly stigmatized by a
public perception that a film so rated was a "dumb movie rated G for kids." This
led to the PG rating becoming overloaded with everything from family
films "spiced up" to avoid a G to very mature films that were "toned
down" to avoid R ratings. It also led to the somewhat waggish public connotation (never intended
by the MPAA) of PG as "Pretty Good."
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32786 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions-deleted scenes? |
.htmlcan you describe those deleted scene?
i have other 2 conquest-related questions:
1- in battle, the c&z top secret footage caesar was searching for
was archived in ape management in 1995. so ape management
was still running. are the events in conquest covering a 1991-95
span?
2-the final caesar speech, why was it changed?
-- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/4/2005 10:36:52 A.M. Central Daylight
Time,
> Haristas@a... writes:
>
> I remember seeing some ads in the newspaper that slapped an
"M" rating on
> it. That's what "PG" and later "PG-13" used to be and it stood
for "Mature
> Audiences." But in May 1969 I saw PLANET again in a re-issue
with THOSE
> MAGNIFICENT MEN IN THEIR FLYING MACHINES (The ad
announced: "The Perfect Mates -
> Apes and Men") and it had a "G" rating.
>
>
>
> That sounds like the same titillation advertising as the "Forced
Mating"
> campaign. But I don't remember the M in the 60's and early 70's
But apparently
> there was such a rating. I do remember GP. It was later
changed to PG,
> maybe because that actually make sense.
> Here's Wikipedia's explanation -- It even mentions POTA's
unusual G rating..
> You can read the full article at . . ._MPAA film rating system -
Wikipedia,
> the free encyclopedia_
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_film_rating_system)
>
>
>
> Original ratings
> The original movie ratings consisted of:
> * Rated G â" Suggested For GENERAL Audiences
(including children).
> * Rated M â" Suggested For MATURE Audiences:
Parental Discretion
> Advised.
> * Rated R â" RESTRICTED: Children under 17 (originally
16) not admitted
> unless accompanied by a parent or adult guardian; some
theater chains
> specifically stated that the "adult guardian" must be at least 21.
> * _Rated X_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rated_X) â"
Children Under
> 18 Not Admitted; the notation "Age limit may vary in certain
areas" was
> sometimes added.
> Many parents thought films rated M contained more adult
content than those
> that were rated R; this confusion led to its replacement in
_1970_
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970_in_film) by GP:
> * Rated GP â" General audiences/Parental guidance
suggested.
> In _1972_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_in_film) GP was
changed to PG â"
> Parental guidance suggested.
> From the adoption of the system through the mid-1970s, it was
not uncommon
> for mainstream films such as _Airport_
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airport_(movie)) , _Planet of the
Apes_
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_of_the_Apes_(1968_movie)) ,
_The Odd Couple_
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Odd_Couple) , and _2001: A
Space Odyssey_
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001:_A_Space_Odyssey) to be
released with G ratings, but by 1978, that rating had become
> increasingly associated with films, often poorly made, intended
specifically
> for children, while the PG rating became increasingly common
for "family"
> films, with the G rating increasingly stigmatized by a public
perception that a
> film so rated was a "dumb movie rated G for kids." This led to
the PG rating
> becoming overloaded with everything from family films "spiced
up" to avoid a
> G to very mature films that were "toned down" to avoid R
ratings. It also
> led to the somewhat waggish public _connotation_
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connotation) (never intended by
the MPAA) of PG as "Pretty Good." <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32787 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/4/05 1:22:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, rkid67@... writes:
The unofficial sequel was 'Die Hard'. I just bought The Detective along with the Tony Rome
films. I don't know the Apes connection though.
The books THE DETECTIVE and DIE HARD were written by the same guy, but I think James is referring to what would have been another Frank Sinatra cop movie, but he ended up not starring in it.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32788 |
From: James |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
.htmlYou're right. The book on which Die Hard was based was a sequel to the
novel 'The Detective'. The POTA connection is Collen Camp who appeared
in Die Hard 3 and in Battle.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <rkid67@y...> wrote:
> The unofficial sequel was 'Die Hard'. I just bought The Detective
along with the Tony Rome
> films. I don't know the Apes connection though. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32789 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/4/05 5:21:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time, JamesA1102@... writes:
The POTA connection is Collen Camp who appeared
in Die Hard 3 and in Battle.
Who was she in BATTLE and where does she appear in DIE HARD 3?
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32790 |
From: James |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
.htmlShe was Lisa's helper in Battle and she was the female NYPD detective
in Die Hard 3.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
>
> Who was she in BATTLE and where does she appear in DIE HARD 3?
>
> -- Rory <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32791 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Just FYI... |
|
.html Here in Southern California we have a cable TV company called
Adelphia...They are currently running a typical "cutesy girl slams dumb
boyfriend" ad...While she's lauding the benefits to having Adelphia's
pre-programming options, one of her lines is, "Why, yes, that is
the "Planet of the Apes" on the SciFi channel -- that you always
miss!"...
G <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32792 |
From: Mark |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: 4th of July long ago |
.htmlThanks for the info James. I read about The Detective/Die Hard connection a while ago in a
book about Sinatra.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> You're right. The book on which Die Hard was based was a sequel to the
> novel 'The Detective'. The POTA connection is Collen Camp who appeared
> in Die Hard 3 and in Battle. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32793 |
From: simianhistorian |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Conquest versions |
.htmlSorry, I have to disagree.
I'm sure that the POTA films might appear to be somewhat tame
(where violence is concerned) compared to today's films, but I'm
sure than any film showing people (and / or apes) getting shot,
electrocuted, beaten, etc., would not be considered 'G'.
To be honest, if I had to give a rating to each using today's
standards, they'd be:
'Planet Of The Apes' - rated 'PG'
'Beneath The Planet Of The Apes' - rated 'PG'
'Escape From The Planet Of The Apes' - rated 'PG' (sorry, but the
murder of the baby chimp is not what I'd call 'Ideal Family
Entertainment')
'Conquest Of The Planet Of The Apes' - rated 'R' (I might go with
a 'PG-13' rating)
'Battle For The Planet Of The Apes' - rated 'PG'*
- * Japanese extended version would have a 'PG-13'.
Just my opinion.
cornelius
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 7/3/05 11:23:09 PM Eastern Daylight
Time,
> cornelius@e... writes:
>
>
> > except for 'Conquest' all the POTA films were rated
> > 'G', which by today's standard's, a 'G' rating for them would
never
> > fly. And giving 'Conquest' a 'PG' wouldn't go well in this day
and
> > age either, I think.
> >
>
> Actually PLANET was released in February 1968 and MPAA
movie rating system
> didn't get launched until November of '68. PLANET was still in
some theatres
> that late and I remember seeing some ads in the newspaper
that slapped an "M"
> rating on it. That's what "PG" and later "PG-13" used to be and
it stood for
> "Mature Audiences." But in May 1969 I saw PLANET again in a
re-issue with THOSE
> MAGNIFICENT MEN IN THEIR FLYING MACHINES (The ad
announced: "The Perfect
> Mates - Apes and Men") and it had a "G" rating.
>
> If re-released to theatres today, I'm sure all the APES films
would be rated
> "G," even CONQUEST.
>
> -- Rory <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32794 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions-deleted scenes? |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/4/2005 4:06:57 PM Central Standard Time, apecalypsenow@... writes:
1- in battle, the c&z top secret footage caesar was searching for
was archived in ape management in 1995.
Where do they say this in the film?
2-the final caesar speech, why was it changed?
The bullsh*t ending was tacked onto it to give the film a more upbeat ending...<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32795 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: 4th of July long ago |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/4/2005 4:07:20 PM Central Standard Time, Haristas@... writes:
I think James is referring to what would have been another Frank Sinatra cop movie, but he ended up not starring in it.
Dirty Harry?<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32796 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/4/2005 6:37:08 PM Central Standard Time, cornelius@... writes:
'Conquest Of The Planet Of The Apes' - rated 'R' (I might go with
a 'PG-13' rating)
Why rate that one an "R" by today's standards? There is as much violence in the first two films, and their tone is just as dark as CONQUEST... I'm guessing a lot of people still view CONQUEST as darkest because that is how it was described/viewed, and that might stick in their heads...
'Battle For The Planet Of The Apes' - rated 'PG'*
- * Japanese extended version would have a 'PG-13'.
EVEN with the few extra minutes added to it, it sure wouldn't raise that film up to a PG-13 from a PG... The overall movie is not made more violent, etc. because of the Kolp & Alma scenes... All they do is talk, they don't do any destruction in the extra scenes... The only bit of extra bloodshed is when Aldo and his troops take out the school bus and it's passengers... <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32797 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/4/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Just FYI... |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/4/05 6:51:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, HotScheetz@... writes:
Here in Southern California we have a cable TV company called
Adelphia...They are currently running a typical "cutesy girl slams dumb
boyfriend" ad...While she's lauding the benefits to having Adelphia's
pre-programming options, one of her lines is, "Why, yes, that is
the "Planet of the Apes" on the SciFi channel -- that you always
miss!"...
G
Cute, but really....
Get the damn DVD!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32798 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Just FYI... |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/4/2005 9:59:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
Haristas@... writes:
Get the damn DVD!
Planet of the Apes 35th Anversary Edition
DVD is in Amazons Sci-fi Sale.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32799 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/4/2005 7:15:41 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mlccougar@... writes:
Why
rate that one an "R" by today's standards?
They all should have been R's.
Ramp up the violence, everything.
It's because they were reduced to
Kiddie Matinees that they began
to suck. They only wanted to
make money, not spend any.
If they were made seriously
they would have gotten better,
no worse.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32800 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Conquest versions |
.html.html
In a message dated 7/3/2005 8:23:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, cornelius@... writes:
I agree that the book is a lot better than the film, but I still love the movie! Heck it's my third favorite film of all time!
I'm sure, as mentioned in the 'Behind The Planet Of The Apes' documentary) that had they not been forced to edit so much of the film it would've probably been much better. But when you think about it, except for 'Conquest' all the POTA films were rated 'G', which by today's standard's, a 'G' rating for them would never fly. And giving 'Conquest' a 'PG' wouldn't go well in this day and age either, I think.
I loved the Armando character, the significant reason the Apes ruled the planet in the end. Had it not been for his allowing Caesar to live, and then exposing him to the slavery that had
become of Caesar's kind, the 'revolt of the apes' might never had happened.
Anyway, I love 'Conquest', and watch it probably more than the other films. Caesar rules (literally!)
cornelius
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "shanter2002" <mail@m...> wrote: > I'd probably read the comic and novel adaptations of Conquest at least, > say, a zillion times before I ever saw Conquest on the television and > that, no doubt,colours my judgement.I've always thought that John Jakes > did an amazing job on the novel.Caesar is a real military leader and > the evolution of the Ape Rebellion is, even though necessarily > telescpoed in time,convincingly logical.I've always thought the > Moench/Alcala comics adaptation was the best adaptation and is a really > classy piece of work. I've always been really disappointed with the
> movie.For me, Montalban is the best thing in it and I really wonder > just how badly the censor damaged the film--it doesn't seem to have a > staedy pace like the others.The story is my favourite Apes story---the > movie is my least favourite of the five.Imagine Cameron directing > Conquest---that would have been something!John, Scrolls.
Conquest was the first apes movie I saw at a drive-in when I was a kid. Despite it's flaws, I was hooked and became an apes' fan. Elaine
Be sure to visit the Group's Internal Website http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/MainPage.htm for Original POTA One Sheets & Lobby Cards, Trailers & Rare Videos, Trading Cards and much, much more... Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
pota-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32801 |
From: Lovely_Pudding |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Newbie |
|
.html Hi folks,
I was just sorting out my old POTA comics (a strange mix of US mags
and UK reprints) and I thought I really needed a good chat about all
these great Ape things I've been into for all these years.
So 'hi' to everyone. It looks pretty lively here, the files section is
massive for a start!
I'm Adrian, living in the UK. I remember seeing the Escape and POTA
double bill in the cinema in the mid-70s and watching the TV series.
I enjoyed the new movie (except the last 10 minutes) but what I really
love are the comics... Terror on POTA by Doug Moench and Mike Ploog.
Fantastic.
Anyway, hi. Hope to have some good chat soon,
Adrian <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32802 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: miccougar-conquest |
.htmlmic,
in the sequence where caesar, macdonald and virgil are searching
for the recording of cornelius and zira. according to virgil, the
footage was "acquired" by the ape management in 1995, so the place
was still running by that specific time.
so it looks like conquest cover a major timespan, which seems to me
plausible.
i have another question for you. why were the apes in apeline one so
dumb, since they required 500 years to evolute? maybe in apeline 2 the
scientists synthetized a sierum thanks to cornelius and zira's gland
system. what do you think about?
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 7/4/2005 4:06:57 PM Central Standard Time,
> apecalypsenow@y... writes:
>
> > 1- in battle, the c&z top secret footage caesar was searching for
> > was archived in ape management in 1995.
>
> Where do they say this in the film?
>
>
> >
> > 2-the final caesar speech, why was it changed?
>
> The bullsh*t ending was tacked onto it to give the film a more
upbeat
> ending... <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32803 |
From: James |
Date: 7/5/2005 |
| Subject: Re: miccougar-conquest |
.htmlMaybe it was due to a bad translation but Virgil never says anything
about 1995. When he finds the tape of C&Z, Virgil does mention the date
of the tape, 1973.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "apecalypsenow" <apecalypsenow@y...> wrote:
> mic,
>
> in the sequence where caesar, macdonald and virgil are searching
> for the recording of cornelius and zira. according to virgil, the
> footage was "acquired" by the ape management in 1995, so the place
> was still running by that specific time.
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32804 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] miccougar-conquest |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/5/2005 6:15:31 PM Central Standard Time, apecalypsenow@... writes:
why were the apes in apeline one so dumb, since they required 500 years to evolute? maybe in apeline 2 the scientists synthetized a sierum thanks to cornelius and zira's gland system. what do you think about?
I would not say the apes in the original timeline were dumber than the others... It took time to evolve their intelligence, as they were bred for slavery, they must have bred the superior apes and superior gene pools to increase their intelligence etc. While 500 years isn't a realistic number, at least it's more real than 8 years for all that to happen...
I really don't think the scientists in the second timeline developed any type of a serum (from Zira and Cornelius) to increase apes intelligence... The reason that the apes intelligence jumped up so fast in the second timeline is this: They just moved everything up for story continuity... They had the child from ESCAPE, and rather than go with a more realistice story/scenario, they just had him involved in everything so they could quickly continue the story... <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32805 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] miccougar-conquest |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/5/2005 6:15:31 PM Central Standard Time, apecalypsenow@... writes:
according to virgil, the footage was "acquired" by the ape management in 1995, so the place was still running by that specific time.
I checked it and did not see anywhere that Virgil says that... As a matter of fact, the footage they were looking for was in the Archives Section, not in the hands of Ape Management... The only date Virgil mentions in "1973" which he read off of the container holding the Zira and Cornelius footage... <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32806 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] miccougar-conquest |
.htmlmic and james,
okay, it was the italian version.
i think corny and zira's biology had to do with the further evolution
of the still-living humanoid apes... take care, mandemus is at least 3o
years older than caesar.
i know it was paul dehn's fault, but that doesn't change the fact
the movies are masterpieces and we pota fans have the special task
to fill the gaps.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 7/5/2005 6:15:31 PM Central Standard Time,
> apecalypsenow@y... writes:
>
> > according to virgil, the footage was "acquired" by the ape
management in
> > 1995, so the place was still running by that specific time.
> >
>
> I checked it and did not see anywhere that Virgil says that... As a
matter of
> fact, the footage they were looking for was in the Archives
Section, not in
> the hands of Ape Management... The only date Virgil mentions in
"1973" which he
> read off of the container holding the Zira and Cornelius footage... <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32807 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Superman Dog Tags (OT) |
|
.html Apart from the dog tags thing, I can't find an Apes connection for
this.We can buy, for $10, a set of Superman dog tags that benefit the
Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation. They look mega cool and you can
always shout 'Taylor!?' when you grab 'em! Available by following the
links at www.christopherreeve.org . John, Scrolls. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32808 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Newbie |
|
.html Hi Adrian in the UK, and welcome.This is John in the UK (if Wales
counts)and I have yet to find a UK Apes fan who doesn't love the
comics.Some of us met Ploog in Bristol in May and we all came away with
Apes sketches by the great man.He's attending the Brighton Comic Expo
in November and is well worth the trip.We interviewed Mike in the
current issue of Simian Scrolls (£3 incl p+p from me if you're
interested!).Good to have you in here! John, Scrolls. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32809 |
From: bikergator25 |
Date: 7/6/2005 |
| Subject: POTA CARTOON |
|
.html Does anyone know if the cartoon series was released on DVD? I saw two
different art covers for it, but cannot find it anywhere..... Thanks. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32810 |
From: apecalypsenow |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Newbie |
.htmlis the simian scroll mag still running? have i a chance to afford it ? i
live in italy...
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "shanter2002" <mail@m...> wrote:
> Hi Adrian in the UK, and welcome.This is John in the UK (if Wales
> counts)and I have yet to find a UK Apes fan who doesn't love the
> comics.Some of us met Ploog in Bristol in May and we all came away
with
> Apes sketches by the great man.He's attending the Brighton Comic
Expo
> in November and is well worth the trip.We interviewed Mike in the
> current issue of Simian Scrolls (£3 incl p+p from me if you're
> interested!).Good to have you in here! John, Scrolls. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32811 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
| Group: pota |
Message: 32812 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
|
.html .html
Hoping our friends in London are okay. My thoughts and prayers are with you. Elaine<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32813 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/7/2005 8:07:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
goathunter@... writes:
>
Does anyone know if the cartoon series was released on DVD?
It has
never been officially released.
That reminds me, how's the quality on the DVD's?
My video copy is poor at best. I was thinking
about getting the DVD's if it's a good transfer.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32814 |
From: James |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
.htmlThanks Elaine. We all hope John, Dave, Mark et al are OK.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, taebokitti@a... wrote:
> Hoping our friends in London are okay. My thoughts and prayers are
with you.
> Elaine <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32815 |
From: James |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> That reminds me, how's the quality on the DVD's?
> My video copy is poor at best. I was thinking
> about getting the DVD's if it's a good transfer.
I'd rate them good to very good. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32816 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 7/7/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
.htmlIs everyone alright there?...Your families?...Friends?...
Our good wishes and prayers are with you all...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
We all hope John, Dave, Mark et al are OK. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32817 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.htmlThanks for the info. Someone from the group has a friend who can bootleg the series... On DVD.. Have a good one... Dave. LordTZer0@... wrote:
In a message dated 7/7/2005 8:07:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time, goathunter@... writes:
> Does anyone know if the cartoon series was released on DVD?
It has never been officially released.
That reminds me, how's the quality on the DVD's?
My video copy is poor at best. I was thinking
about getting the DVD's if it's a good transfer.
Be sure to visit the Group's Internal Website http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/MainPage.htm for Original POTA One Sheets & Lobby Cards, Trailers & Rare Videos, Trading Cards and much, much more...
Sell on Yahoo! Auctions - No fees. Bid on great items. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32818 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
.htmlI and mine are all okay.
My son's school is closed for the day as many students rely on public transport, which, as
you can imagine, is in chaos right now - and today I'll be car sharing, using my car to help
three strangers to work and back home again. Other than that I was mercifully
unnaffected.
Dave B
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "hotscheetz" <HotScheetz@a...> wrote:
> Is everyone alright there?...Your families?...Friends?...
>
> Our good wishes and prayers are with you all...
>
> G
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> We all hope John, Dave, Mark et al are OK. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32819 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.html> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> >
> > That reminds me, how's the quality on the DVD's?
> > My video copy is poor at best. I was thinking
> > about getting the DVD's if it's a good transfer.
> I'd rate them good to very good.
I'll also go out on a limb here and say that you probably won't find
better quality. When I did the project, I spent a year gathering
together six different sources from members of this list. The quality
ranged from unwatchable (literally) to very good. You can see samples
from four of the sources here:
http://www.goatley.com/pota/dvd/toons/
The two I didn't share captures from were even worse than the worst of
these, and that included a set of discs purchased via eBay.
The Greg P. Sci-Fi versions were the cleanest, but they also had
overly-vibrant colors (looks like some color-enhancement done by
sci-fi), had the Sci-Fi logo in the corner, and they were edited. The
final source I used was unedited and looks great---considering that
the original sources used for the broadcast weren't that great to
begin with. On top of that, I did some considerable audio cleanup,
making the final DVDs sound much better than the VHS source sounded.
Hunter <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32820 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
| Group: pota |
Message: 32821 |
From: James |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver/Conquest Contest |
.htmlThis week's lesson has been posted and is ready to view. Thanks to all
that contributed. You can view the Lesson by clicking the banner on
the Yahoo Home page or directly via this link:
http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/LFTL.htm
Also, the Conquest Anniversary contest ends tomorrow. I'll be
revealing the answer then. I still can't believe no one caught the
error, it is so blatant. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32822 |
From: James |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
.htmlGlad to hear that you're OK. I heard from John and he is unharmed as
well. Has anyone heard from Mark?
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Dave B" <dave@4...> wrote:
> I and mine are all okay.
>
> My son's school is closed for the day as many students rely on
public transport, which, as
> you can imagine, is in chaos right now - and today I'll be car
sharing, using my car to help
> three strangers to work and back home again. Other than that I was
mercifully
> unnaffected.
>
> Dave B
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32823 |
From: James |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.htmlYou're not going out on a limb at all Hunter. You did a fantastic
job on the Toons just as you did on the uncut version of Battle.
Can't wait for the raraties DVD that you're putting together.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Hunter Goatley <goathunter@g...> wrote:
> I'll also go out on a limb here and say that you probably won't
find
> better quality. When I did the project, I spent a year gathering
> together six different sources from members of this list. The
quality
> ranged from unwatchable (literally) to very good. You can see
samples
> from four of the sources here:
>
> http://www.goatley.com/pota/dvd/toons/
>
> The two I didn't share captures from were even worse than the
worst of
> these, and that included a set of discs purchased via eBay.
>
> The Greg P. Sci-Fi versions were the cleanest, but they also had
> overly-vibrant colors (looks like some color-enhancement done by
> sci-fi), had the Sci-Fi logo in the corner, and they were edited.
The
> final source I used was unedited and looks great---considering that
> the original sources used for the broadcast weren't that great to
> begin with. On top of that, I did some considerable audio cleanup,
> making the final DVDs sound much better than the VHS source
sounded.
>
> Hunter <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32824 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
.htmlWe're glad about that, Dave! Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave B" <dave@...>
To: <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:41 PM
Subject: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Terrorist attacks (OT)
> I and mine are all okay.
>
> My son's school is closed for the day as many students rely on public
transport, which, as
> you can imagine, is in chaos right now - and today I'll be car sharing,
using my car to help
> three strangers to work and back home again. Other than that I was
mercifully
> unnaffected.
>
> Dave B
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "hotscheetz" <HotScheetz@a...> wrote:
> > Is everyone alright there?...Your families?...Friends?...
> >
> > Our good wishes and prayers are with you all...
> >
> > G
> >
> > --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> > We all hope John, Dave, Mark et al are OK.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the Group's Internal Website
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/MainPage.htm for Original POTA One
Sheets & Lobby Cards, Trailers & Rare Videos, Trading Cards and much, much
more...
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32825 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Terrorist attacks (OT) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/7/2005 3:47:25 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
taebokitti@... writes:
Hoping
our friends in London are okay. My thoughts and prayers are with you. Elaine
Mine are in Manchester, but they go to London on business.
And though I haven't heard from them, they use the computer
at work. And since they're in television and they don't go to
work in between projects, not hearing from them for long
stretches is not usual. Odds are they're alright.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32826 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/8/2005 4:21:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
dave@... writes:
Other
than that I was mercifully unnaffected.
Do you think London was targeted for being in the coalition?
Or as a symbol of capitalism that you would have been
targeted eventually anyway.
And do you think the timing was based on the G-8 summit
in Scotland, or the announcement of the Olympic Games.
You never know, eh? The French & the Russians may
have been pissed!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32827 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/8/2005 8:08:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
goathunter@... writes:
> I'd
rate them good to very good.
I'll also go out on a limb here and say
that you probably won't find better quality.
Does Terry accept Paypal?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32828 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.htmli completely agree.
i dont think the official release (if it ever happens) will look any better. i am confident in that.
rob/ron
James <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
You're not going out on a limb at all Hunter. You did a fantastic job on the Toons just as you did on the uncut version of Battle. Can't wait for the raraties DVD that you're putting together.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Hunter Goatley <goathunter@g...> wrote:
> I'll also go out on a limb here and say that you probably won't find > better quality. When I did the project, I spent a year gathering > together six different sources from members of this list. The quality > ranged from unwatchable (literally) to very good. You can see samples > from four of the sources here: > > http://www.goatley.com/pota/dvd/toons/ >
> The two I didn't share captures from were even worse than the worst of > these, and that
included a set of discs purchased via eBay. > > The Greg P. Sci-Fi versions were the cleanest, but they also had > overly-vibrant colors (looks like some color-enhancement done by > sci-fi), had the Sci-Fi logo in the corner, and they were edited. The > final source I used was unedited and looks great---considering that > the original sources used for the broadcast weren't that great to > begin with. On top of that, I did some considerable audio cleanup, > making the final DVDs sound much better than the VHS source sounded. > > Hunter
Be sure to visit the Group's Internal Website http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/MainPage.htm for Original POTA One Sheets & Lobby Cards, Trailers & Rare Videos, Trading Cards and much, much more...
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!  Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32829 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.html> Does Terry accept Paypal?
You'll have to ask Terry. His email address is on his web page for
the 'toons.
Hunter <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32830 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Lesson from the Lawgiver/Conquest Contest |
|
.html .html
I watched Conquest the other night and still could not find the error. One thing I did observe was that Caesar got into the cage with the arriving Orangutans, when he was let out, they announced he was from Cameroon, I think and then the orangs before were announced as from Indonesia. It is just funny that Caesar wasn't caught sooner. The workers who let Caesar and the orangs out of the cage didn't think it was odd that a chimp was in with three orangs. Elaine<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32831 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 7/8/2005 12:46:19 PM Central Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
Does Terry accept Paypal?
Yes<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32832 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Terrorist attacks (OT) |
.htmlGlad to hear it Dave...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Dave B" <dave@4...> wrote:
> I and mine are all okay.
>
> My son's school is closed for the day as many students rely on
public transport, which, as
> you can imagine, is in chaos right now - and today I'll be car
sharing, using my car to help
> three strangers to work and back home again. Other than that I was
mercifully
> unnaffected.
>
> Dave B
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "hotscheetz" <HotScheetz@a...> wrote:
> > Is everyone alright there?...Your families?...Friends?...
> >
> > Our good wishes and prayers are with you all...
> >
> > G
> >
> > --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@a...> wrote:
> > We all hope John, Dave, Mark et al are OK. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 32833 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 7/8/2005 |
| Subject: Re: [Planet of the Apes] POTA CARTOON |
.htmlYou won't...Anywhere...I had a good quality DVD from eBay, and it
doesn't hold a candle to Hunters' version, hands down...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Hunter Goatley <goathunter@g...> wrote:
> I'll also go out on a limb here and say that you probably won't find
> better quality. <.html
|
|
|
|