|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76562 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/13/2017 |
| Subject: R.I.P. Liz Smith |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76563 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/17/2017 |
| Subject: Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Disney) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76564 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/17/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Dis |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76565 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/17/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Dis |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76566 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/17/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Dis |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76567 |
From: George Taylor |
Date: 11/18/2017 |
| Subject: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't i |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76568 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/18/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76569 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/18/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76570 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/18/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76571 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Odd, isn't it? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76572 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76573 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76574 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Odd, isn't it? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76575 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76576 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Odd, isn't it? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76577 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76578 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Don Pedro Colley obituary on THR.com |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76579 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76580 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76581 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76582 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76583 |
From: knightangel314 |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76584 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 11/21/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76585 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/21/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76586 |
From: George Taylor |
Date: 11/23/2017 |
| Subject: Should War for the POTA have been released on discs around Thanksgiv |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76587 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/23/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Should War for the POTA have been released on discs around Thank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76588 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 11/24/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Should War for the POTA have been released on discs around Thank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76589 |
From: James |
Date: 11/24/2017 |
| Subject: FW: Google Alert - "planet of the apes" |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76590 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/27/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Should War for the POTA have been released on discs around Thank |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76591 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/27/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76592 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/27/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76593 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/27/2017 |
| Subject: Merry Apesmas! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76594 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/28/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Merry Apesmas! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76595 |
From: rv.cupp01 |
Date: 11/28/2017 |
| Subject: Didn't like War |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76596 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/28/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Didn't like War |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76597 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/28/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Didn't like War |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76598 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76599 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76600 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76601 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76602 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76603 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76604 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/30/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76605 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/30/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76606 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/30/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76607 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 11/30/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76608 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/1/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76609 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/1/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76610 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/1/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76611 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/1/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76612 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76613 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76614 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76615 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76616 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76617 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76618 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76619 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76620 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76621 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76622 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76623 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76624 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76625 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76626 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76627 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76628 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76629 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76630 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76631 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76632 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76633 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Dizzy Disney talks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76634 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76635 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Dizzy Disney talks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76636 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76637 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76638 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Dizzy Disney talks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76639 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76640 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Dizzy Disney talks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76641 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76642 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76643 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Dizzy Disney talks |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76644 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76645 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76646 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76647 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76648 |
From: Dario |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76649 |
From: Dario |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76650 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a Disney zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76651 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76652 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76653 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76654 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76655 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76656 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76657 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76658 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76659 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: ape night on Nat Geo |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76660 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76661 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76562 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/13/2017 |
| Subject: R.I.P. Liz Smith |
.htmlLiz Smith, a longtime journalist and gossip columnist for various publications in New York, has died at the age of 94.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/12/arts/liz-smith-dead.htmlemc=edit_th_20171113&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=54765500
What does this have to do with PLANET OF THE APES?
Because while she worked for Cosmopolitan magazine back in 1968, her review and assessment of PLANET as a "Blockbuster" was used in countless ads for the film across the country, and for that, I think she deserves mention. Oh, and she was originally from Texas!
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76563 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/17/2017 |
| Subject: Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Disney) |
.html Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Disney):
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/21st-century-fox-shares-soar-reports-comcast-acquisition-1059228
Wouldn't Disney do a better job of making Apes more mainstream, like it has been working to do with Star Wars? But Disney could also make Apes less edgy and more mind-numbing, like it did with the recent Star Wars: The Force Awakens. It sold well due to hype and tradition, but sure was a let-down in my humble opinion.
Anyhow, happy Thanksgiving to all, from Houston...
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76564 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/17/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Dis |
.html.html I offered to just buy POTA but they laughed at me. : ( Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: georgetaylor68@... [pota] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 10:47 PM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: [pota] Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Disney)
Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Disney):
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/21st-century-fox-shares-soar-reports-comcast-acquisition-1059228
Wouldn't Disney do a better job of making Apes more mainstream, like it has been working to do with Star Wars? But Disney could also make Apes less edgy and more mind-numbing, like it did with the recent Star Wars: The Force Awakens. It sold well due to hype and tradition, but sure was a let-down in my humble opinion.
Anyhow, happy Thanksgiving to all, from Houston... <.html <.html
|
|
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76565 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/17/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Dis |
.htmlComcast owns NBC/Universal. If they buy Fox studio and their library, do you realize what that means?
We could finally get the greatest mashup ever!
The Universal Monsters on the Planet of the Apes!!!!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Nov 17, 2017 10:59 am
Subject: RE: [pota] Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Disney) [1 Attachment]
I offered to just buy POTA but they laughed at me. : (
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: georgetaylor68@... [pota]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 10:47 PM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [pota] Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Disney)
Wouldn't Disney do a better job of making Apes more mainstream, like it has been working to do with Star Wars? But Disney could also make Apes less edgy and more mind-numbing, like it did with the recent Star Wars: The Force Awakens. It sold well due to hype and tradition, but sure was a let-down in my humble opinion.
Anyhow, happy Thanksgiving to all, from Houston...
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76566 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/17/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Verizon & Comcast reportedly want part of Fox, too (not just Dis |
.htmlI think I've heard that Disney owns ABC. Meanwhile Haristas says that Comcast owns NBC. Verizon might not own a television network (as FIOS doesn't count, I presume).
What's my point? Well.... If I were with the network that loses out on acquiring Fox, why would I want to show Planet of the Apes re-runs? That is, unless a non-competitor (of sorts) buys it, such as Verizon.
Granted, I don't watch television and merely have broadband access to the 'net (which is largely sufficient for me). Maybe the jealousies and territorialities mentioned above are mistakenly ascribed by me. But I like it when POTA is on as many channels as possible.
Happy Thanksgiving from Houston
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76567 |
From: George Taylor |
Date: 11/18/2017 |
| Subject: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't i |
.html.html Well, War for the POTA seems to have leveled off at $490 million globally. It needed to reach around $523 million to catch Rise, adjusted for inflation.
I noticed that Japan only yielded around $4 million in ticket sales:
I wondered if the late release date impacted sales, but then I noticed that Rise (which brought in 7 times as much) was also released comparatively late in Japan, as was Dawn (which also performed somewhat better than War, though not as well as Rise).
Maybe the growing prevalence of video downloading helps explain the fizzle in Japan. In Mexico, War made $15 million though. Japan has a history of invading foreign territories and denying responsibility, whereas Mexico does not (although the Spaniards sure did disrupt the indigenous tribes' lives before Mexico seceded). Anyhow my theory for months, as you might recall, has been that War wouldn't go over too well in Japan. They don't like the notion of seeing culpability and consequences emerge after bad deeds. But they also aren't fans of war nowadays. The atomic bombs provided experiences for them that are unique to Japan. I had good friends from Japan decades ago and we shared housing. When I played the Terminator 2 soundtrack bit involving Sara Connor's nuclear war dream (and I told them
what it was), they were noticeably subdued, including their visiting friends. They knew I meant no offensiveness by it; we all liked each other very much. But maybe any movie entitled "War" just doesn't excite the Japanese to want to spend money for the experience. I dunno.
In other news, there are even more suitors for Fox's movies division now, according to DrudgeReport.com . Perhaps the Koch brothers will acquire them. I'd be fine with that. I liked how Rise didn't try to make whites seem uniquely blameworthy for the apes' plight. The selection for the head of the pharmaceutical company that was responsible for Koba's plight was fabulous. That actor later starred in Selma, as you recall. His British accent in Rise was good. So was Rise. Maybe Koch influences could make more Apes movies similarly as good, or at least not slanted against white males like the new Star Wars: The Force Awakens seemed to be. After George Lucas sold the rights to the movie franchise, he even said in an interview that he'd sold Star Wars to the "evil white
people" at Disney. WTF; that was uncalled for.
Anyhow, happy Thanksgiving to all from Houston ...
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76568 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/18/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. |
.html
I noticed that Japan only yielded around $4 million in ticket sales:
If only we had Zatoichi on the Planet of the Apes
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76569 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/18/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
.html.html I remember with Rise and Dawn they seemed to be over in Japan and then there'd be a last minute dump of money as the final tally came in. Might still happen with War ($4 million seems kinda low) but doubtful now it will reach $500 million. Doesn't really matter, any way you slice it it's a disappointment. Maybe too much of a downer but brave of Fox to do it. The way forward (if Fox doesn't get sold) is maybe cut the budget to $100 million, concentrate more on the downtrodden humans and less on the expensive apes. And make a more entertaining picture that will get that box office back up there. Entertaining doesn't mean dumbed down. Sent from
Mail for Windows 10 From: George Taylor georgetaylor68@... [pota] Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 12:56 PM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: [pota] All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't it? As for Fox acquisition talk...
Well, War for the POTA seems to have leveled off at $490 million globally. It needed to reach around $523 million to catch Rise, adjusted for inflation. I noticed that Japan only yielded around $4 million in ticket sales:
I wondered if the late release date impacted sales, but then I noticed that Rise (which brought in 7 times as much) was also released comparatively late in Japan, as was Dawn (which also performed somewhat better than War, though not as well as Rise).
Maybe the growing prevalence of video downloading helps explain the fizzle in Japan. In Mexico, War made $15 million though. Japan has a history of invading foreign territories and denying responsibility, whereas Mexico does not (although the Spaniards sure did disrupt the indigenous tribes' lives before Mexico seceded). Anyhow my theory for months, as you might recall, has been that War wouldn't go over too well in Japan. They don't like the notion of seeing culpability and consequences emerge after bad deeds. But they also aren't fans of war nowadays. The atomic bombs provided experiences for them that are unique to Japan. I had good friends from Japan decades ago and we shared housing. When I played the Terminator 2 soundtrack bit involving Sara Connor's nuclear war dream (and I told them
what it was), they were noticeably subdued, including their visiting friends. They knew I meant no offensiveness by it; we all liked each other very much. But maybe any movie entitled "War" just doesn't excite the Japanese to want to spend money for the experience. I dunno.
In other news, there are even more suitors for Fox's movies division now, according to DrudgeReport.com . Perhaps the Koch brothers will acquire them. I'd be fine with that. I liked how Rise didn't try to make whites seem uniquely blameworthy for the apes' plight. The selection for the head of the pharmaceutical company that was responsible for Koba's plight was fabulous. That actor later starred in Selma, as you recall. His British accent in Rise was good. So was Rise. Maybe Koch influences could make more Apes movies similarly as good, or at least not slanted against white males like the new Star Wars: The Force Awakens seemed to be. After George Lucas sold the rights to the movie franchise, he even said in an interview that he'd sold Star Wars to the "evil white
people" at Disney. WTF; that was uncalled for. Anyhow, happy Thanksgiving to all from Houston ... <.html <.html
|
|
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76570 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/18/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn |
.htmlIf Sony buys Fox's movie properties, as is rumored to be a serious possibility, my guess is that revenues in Japan would increase for future Apes installments.
Sony might take Apes in the direction that could warrant a Beneath prequel, too. Nuclear fallout's certainly in Japan's history. Meanwhile, North Korea...
But just a few years ago, I had read that Sony Pictures was going to go out of business. The Japanese will tell you that they're so homogenous that creativity's rather lacking there.
As for War's box office intake, I've visited Red Box twice in the past couple of weeks and each time the other person there sought War for the Planet of the Apes. :-) Houston rocks. The original Terminator didn't do so well at the box office but made up for it on video rentals.
War made nearly half a billion dollars at the box office with a budget that was well under a third of that amount. There's still considerable money left to be made, too. If that's disappointing, I suppose that one can be similarly sad that one's favorite football team which reached, or even won the Playoffs nevertheless didn't qualify for the Super Bowl that season. Apes still rock. Try a visit to Redbox and see if you have a similar experience. :-)
Hey, does Planet of the Apes really need a major corporate owner in the era of digital transmissions to theaters and pay-per-downloads? We're in the Netflix era, during which we can download films for a fee not just from Apple but also Google / Youtube, Amazon, Netflix and maybe even Facebook (etc.). Meanwhile Indy studios make films without major corporate backing, and they succeed at times.
Anybody want to put together a business that could bid for Planet of the Apes from Fox? :-)
Granted, the last time I checked, 2/3's of Hollywood's films lose money. Also, piracy's a problem too. I did a law school thesis on copyright protection overseas of movies and such.
Out of curiosity, have Battlestar Galactica's spinoffs concluded? I.e. has that franchise been allowed to end its activity, other than through re-runs? I see that the prequel "Caprica" only lasted a year, in 2010. I'm not aware of other spinoffs, but I also don't own (or want) a t.v. At any rate, we don't want POTA to similarly fizzle.
Terminator will be back:
I'm not persuaded that Blade Runner will be though. It has lost money (thus far) despite being out for a while.
Perhaps Andy Serkis, the actor who played Caesar in the trilogy, will seek to purchase the POTA franchise but it's an office job and he might not want that.
A good weekend to all, from Houston...
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76571 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Odd, isn't it? |
.html.html At this point I'd say there's little chance of Fox being sold. AT&T is having trouble getting their Time/Warner purchase to go through. Meanwhile, it's business as usual at Fox so likely they are figuring out the next Apes. deadline.com/2017/11/att-time-warner-merger-concerns-justice-department-fox-delay-1202211167/ Loved the new "Battlestar Galactica". As I've said here before, the producer Ron Moore is an Apes fan who put many references in the show. The actor who played Gaeta played Spear in "War". The helicopter pilot in "Rise" made many BSG appearances.
The new BSG feature film (no relation to the series) is being produced for Universal by Dylan (Rise/Dawn/War) Clark. And Apes may join it if Comcast (owner of Universal) buys Fox. The BSG spinoffs were "Caprica" and a pilot called "Blood and Chrome" (on video). "Blade Runner" is outa here but the director is doing "Dune", which will also flop because nobody bothers going to serious sci-fi. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:
georgetaylor68@... [pota] Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2017 4:49 PM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [pota] All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't it? As for Fox acquisition talk... If Sony buys Fox's movie properties, as is rumored to be a serious possibility, my guess is that revenues in Japan would increase for future Apes installments.
Sony might take Apes in the direction that could warrant a Beneath prequel, too. Nuclear fallout's certainly in Japan's history. Meanwhile, North Korea... But just a few years ago, I had read that Sony Pictures was going to go out of business. The Japanese will tell you that they're so homogenous that creativity's rather lacking there.
As for War's box office intake, I've visited Red Box twice in the past couple of weeks and each time the other person there sought War for the Planet of the Apes. :-) Houston rocks. The original Terminator didn't do so well at the box office but made up for it on video rentals.
War made nearly half a billion dollars at the box office with a budget that was well under a third of that amount. There's still considerable money left to be made, too. If that's disappointing, I suppose that one can be similarly sad that one's favorite football team which reached, or even won the Playoffs nevertheless didn't qualify for the Super Bowl that season. Apes still rock. Try a visit to Redbox and see if you have a similar experience. :-)
Hey, does Planet of the Apes really need a major corporate owner in the era of digital transmissions to theaters and pay-per-downloads? We're in the Netflix era, during which we can download films for a fee not just from Apple but also Google / Youtube, Amazon, Netflix and maybe even Facebook (etc.). Meanwhile Indy studios make films without major corporate backing, and they succeed at times. Anybody want to put together a business that could bid for Planet of the Apes from Fox? :-)
Granted, the last time I checked, 2/3's of Hollywood's films lose money. Also, piracy's a problem too. I did a law school thesis on copyright protection overseas of movies and such. Out of curiosity, have Battlestar Galactica's spinoffs concluded? I.e. has that franchise been allowed to end its activity, other than through re-runs? I see that the prequel "Caprica" only lasted a year, in 2010. I'm not aware of other spinoffs, but I also don't own (or want) a t.v. At any rate, we don't want POTA to similarly fizzle. I'm not persuaded that Blade Runner will be though. It has lost money (thus far) despite being out for a while. Perhaps Andy Serkis, the actor who played Caesar in the trilogy, will seek to purchase the POTA franchise but it's an office job and he might not want that.
A good weekend to all, from Houston... <.html <.html
|
|
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76572 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
.html
Entertaining doesn't mean dumbed down.
Oh, yes it does. Most entertainment is low brow, dumbed down for the general masses, and it's only gotten worse since the American film industry became dependant on foreign markets where there are less educated people than even in our under-educated society. Why do you think we get mostly stupid action and comic book superhero movies these days? When was the last time you saw a movie aimed at people with PhDs? I don't think even the original PLANET OF THE APES could get made today without one word not being changed in its final script.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76573 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
.html
Sony might take Apes in the direction that could warrant a Beneath prequel, too. Nuclear fallout's certainly in Japan's history. Meanwhile, North Korea...
But just a few years ago, I had read that Sony Pictures was going to go out of business. The Japanese will tell you that they're so homogenous that creativity's rather lacking there.
Yeah, like Sony in America is mostly those foreign Japanese sitting around thinking only inscrutable oriental thoughts! Man, you are a racist!
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76574 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Odd, isn't it? |
.html
At this point I'd say there's little chance of Fox being sold.
It's going to get sold. It's only a matter of time. The Murdoch sons don't want the entertainment division. And as far as I'm concerned, good riddance to them.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76575 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
.html.html I should of said it doesn't HAVE to be dumbed down. There's plenty of smart, entertaining movies. But most movies are dumbed down because people are dumbed down. By the way, Many people see the POTA concept as a "dumb, campy" idea. Their loss. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:
Haristas@... [pota] Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2017 8:13 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: [pota] Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't it? As for Fox acquisition talk...
Entertaining doesn't mean dumbed down.
Oh, yes it does. Most entertainment is low brow, dumbed down for the general masses, and it's only gotten worse since the American film industry became dependant on foreign markets where there are less educated people than even in our under-educated society. Why do you think we get mostly stupid action and comic book superhero movies these days? When was the last time you saw a movie aimed at people with PhDs? I don't think even the original PLANET OF THE APES could get made today without one word not being changed in its final script.
<.html <.html
|
|
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76576 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Odd, isn't it? |
.html.html From what I understand, the Murdochs are pretty hands off on their movies. They have final say but it's mostly the studio heads that mold the films. And they've got a pretty good team now (POTA, "Logan"). Unfortunately audiences don't reward innovation, so they'll have to be more cookie cutter like Disney. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:
Haristas@... [pota] Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2017 8:21 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: [pota] Re: Odd, isn't it?
At this point I'd say there's little chance of Fox being sold.
It's going to get sold. It's only a matter of time. The Murdoch sons don't want the entertainment division. And as far as I'm concerned, good riddance to them.
<.html <.html
|
|
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76577 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
.html
In particular: “Ursus, to me, is just an old soldier, with no more wars to
fight,”
Swing and a miss...
BTW, the whole "I'm a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, and
when I was a kid (fill in the blank).." trope is getting a bit tired every time
a new projects is announced.
Chris L.
___________________________________________________________ <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76578 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/19/2017 |
| Subject: Don Pedro Colley obituary on THR.com |
| Group: pota |
Message: 76579 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
.htmlHaristas: Regarding your self-indulging assertion that I'm a racist, Sony USA would be run according to Japanese principles as much as they could get away with. If that surprises you, I don't know why... considering how various Japanese car manufacturers have had to cope with rough awakenings in U.S. courts for stuff like sexual harassment, discrimination and negligence. I don't know how they'd treat Planet of the Apes if they acquired rights to it, but I think it'd be easier to get a Beneath prequel made if they do.
Meanwhile the Japanese pride themselves on being very Japanese, to the exclusion of foreigners.
THEY are the racists if anyone is. I've dated 2 or 3 women from there over the years, and I used to be conversant in Mandarin (mainland China's main language) (while I've lived with a South Korean apartment mate for a few months). And during law school I dated (for nearly a semester) a Philippina, and years before then I occasionally dated a Vietnamese. I know a Chinese gal or two nowadays whom I'd date but it's not in the cards as they're STEM and I'm into social sciences, politics and law. But I reiterate what folks from those other countries will eagerly tell you if you care to ask: the Japanese are the racists, and I'm not faulting them for it either. They also supposedly have the world's highest IQ, after all:
The USA's would be far higher if it wasn't for some laws that are widely accredited with making our public schools costly but undesirable places.
Anyhow, it'll be interesting to see if Sony buys Fox Movies and Planet of the Apes....
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76580 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
.html.html .htmlI agree with your statement 100%... One has to use caution approaching projects by people stating that... But, if you think that one's bad, the one I find even worse is when they'll say "Nobody's a bigger POTA fan than me..."
In a message dated 11/19/2017 4:14:40 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
BTW, the whole "I'm a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, and when I was a kid (fill in the blank).." trope is getting a bit tired every time a new projects is announced.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76581 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
.html
Bull
-----Original Message-----
From: georgetaylor68@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 20, 2017 2:35 am
Subject: [pota] Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't it? As for Fox acquisition talk...
Haristas:
Regarding your self-indulging assertion that I'm a racist, Sony USA would be run according to Japanese principles as much as they could get away with. If that surprises you, I don't know why... considering how various Japanese car manufacturers have had to cope with rough awakenings in U.S. courts for stuff like sexual harassment, discrimination and negligence. I don't know how they'd treat Planet of the Apes if they acquired rights to it, but I think it'd be easier to get a Beneath prequel made if they do.
Meanwhile the Japanese pride themselves on being very Japanese, to the exclusion of foreigners. THEY are the racists if anyone is. I've dated 2 or 3 women from there over the years, and I used to be conversant in Mandarin (mainland China's main langua
ge) (while I've lived with a South Korean apartment mate for a few months). And during law school I dated (for nearly a semester) a Philippina, and years before then I occasionally dated a Vietnamese. I know a Chinese gal or two nowadays whom I'd date but it's not in the cards as they're STEM and I'm into social sciences, politics and law. But I reiterate what folks from those other countries will eagerly tell you if you care to ask: the Japanese are the racists, and I'm not faulting them for it either. They also supposedly have the world's highest IQ, after all:
The USA's would be far higher if it wasn't for some laws that are widely accredited with making our public schools costly but undesirable plac
es.
Anyhow, it'll be interesting to see if Sony buys Fox Movies and Planet of the Apes....
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76582 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
.html
Tough
-----Original Message-----
From: mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 20, 2017 6:33 am
Subject: Re: [pota] uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series
I agree with your statement 100%... One has to use caution approaching projects by people stating that... But, if you think that one's bad, the one I find even worse is when they'll say "Nobody's a bigger POTA fan than me..."
In a message dated 11/19/2017 4:14:40 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
BTW, the whole "I'm a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, and when I was a kid (fill in the blank).." trope is getting a bit tired every time a new projects is announced.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76583 |
From: knightangel314 |
Date: 11/20/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn |
|
.html No it isn't bull.
Mel <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76584 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 11/21/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
.html.html .html"Touchy, isn't he?"
In a message dated 11/20/2017 4:58:17 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
Tough
-----Original Message-----
From: mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 20, 2017 6:33 am
Subject: Re: [pota] uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series
I agree with your statement 100%... One has to use caution approaching projects by people stating that... But, if you think that one's bad, the one I find even worse is when they'll say "Nobody's a bigger POTA fan than me..."
In a message dated 11/19/2017 4:14:40 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
BTW, the whole "I'm a lifelong Planet of the Apes fan, and when I was a kid (fill in the blank).." trope is getting a bit tired every time a new projects is announced.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76585 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/21/2017 |
| Subject: Re: All Apes trilogy movies were released late in Japan. Odd, isn't |
.html
What have we got here, anti-Japanese bigotry? The Japanese aren't good people, at least not as good as "us"? Boy, am I so often ashamed these days of my fellow "Americans." The Planet of the Boneheads.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76586 |
From: George Taylor |
Date: 11/23/2017 |
| Subject: Should War for the POTA have been released on discs around Thanksgiv |
.html.html Happy Thanksgiving to all, from Houston. That goes double for our favorite Turkey here, whose moniker begins with an H. ;-)
Seriously though, should War for the POTA have been released around Thanksgiving on DVD / Blu-Ray etc. instead of a month or so ago?
Like Star Trek, it has that inter-generational appeal that gives folks something to discuss besides the weather at the Thanksgiving table. But I guess the whipping and starvation scenes made folks decide it wasn't fodder for the holidays. Were they mistaken?
Unfortunately this source of DVD / Blu-Ray sales doesn't seem to be getting updated:
Meanwhile didn't I read here recently that we're not seeing POTA toys released in significant (if any) quantities this Xmas season?
Either way, season's greetings and I wish you all the best during 2018 (and beyond)...
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76587 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/23/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Should War for the POTA have been released on discs around Thank |
.html.html Being released earlier doesn't stop people from watching/discussing "War" during Thanksgiving – but it's no turkey! Yes, POTA merchandise is dead in the water. Unless Disney buys Fox and we get cuddly, huggable Dr. Zaiuses. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: George Taylor georgetaylor68@... [pota] Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 4:26 PM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: [pota] Should War for the POTA have been released on discs around Thanksgiving instead of weeks beforehand? Happy Thanksgiving to all, from Houston. That goes double for our favorite Turkey here, whose moniker begins with an H. ;-) Seriously though, should War for the POTA have been released around Thanksgiving on DVD / Blu-Ray etc. instead of a month or so ago?
Like Star Trek, it has that inter-generational appeal that gives folks something to discuss besides the weather at the Thanksgiving table. But I guess the whipping and starvation scenes made folks decide it wasn't fodder for the holidays. Were they mistaken? Unfortunately this source of DVD / Blu-Ray sales doesn't seem to be getting updated:
Meanwhile didn't I read here recently that we're not seeing POTA toys released in significant (if any) quantities this Xmas season? Either way, season's greetings and I wish you all the best during 2018 (and beyond)... <.html <.html
|
|
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76588 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 11/24/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Should War for the POTA have been released on discs around Thank |
.html.html .htmlI'm not sure what their status is these days, but weren't there supposed to be some ReAction(?) figures coming down the pike? The ones that are supposed to be similar in size and design of the Kenner "Star Wars" figures?
In a message dated 11/23/2017 10:50:21 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
Yes, POTA merchandise is dead in the water. Unless Disney buys Fox and we get cuddly, huggable Dr. Zaiuses.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76589 |
From: James |
Date: 11/24/2017 |
| Subject: FW: Google Alert - "planet of the apes" |
| Group: pota |
Message: 76590 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/27/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Should War for the POTA have been released on discs around Thank |
.html
I will **gladly** take possession of any "dead" POTA merchandise from the
70's still lying around. Just point me in the right direction...
Chris L.
Jeff K. wrote:
>>Yes, POTA merchandise is dead in the water.
<<
__________________________________________________________
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76591 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/27/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
.html
I know, right? Me- of all people- making a post criticizing something
related to BENEATH (which haristas outright hates), and said post still gets a
negative response from him. Smh...
Chris L.
mlccougar wrote:
>>"Touchy, isn't he?" <<
haristas wrote:
>>Tough <<
____________________________________________________________ <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76592 |
From: totellthetruth42 |
Date: 11/27/2017 |
| Subject: Re: uh-oh #1 for the Ursus mini-series |
.html
mlccougar wrote:
>>I agree with your statement 100%... One has to use caution
approaching projects by people stating that... But, if you think that one's bad,
the one I find even worse is when they'll say "Nobody's a bigger POTA fan than
me..." <<
Yup. In fact, I'd say that's the worst of them. It's like this
passive/aggressive pat on their own back where they preemptively cast shade on
anyone who may disagree with their approach to the material. Or anything
previously published which is contradictory. Of course that same article
featured a quote where the artist was preemptively fluffing the writer
("Personally, I think David has nailed UrsusÂ’ character with this series"), so
that's really strike two.
Chris L.
____________________________________________________________ <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76593 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/27/2017 |
| Subject: Merry Apesmas! |
.html.html The holidaze are upon us and this Caesar ice sculpture in London (congrats, Prince Harry!) is apeon us. twitter.com/firstshowing/status/935192149620076545 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76594 |
From: georgetaylor68 |
Date: 11/28/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Merry Apesmas! |
.html
Thanks for sharing that with us. How sad that it must melt. I wonder if it was made from a mold or manually chiseled... If the former, it's replaceable. :-) And well worth proliferating throughout chilly parts of the world. :-)
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76595 |
From: rv.cupp01 |
Date: 11/28/2017 |
| Subject: Didn't like War |
.htmlHello, I've been gone for a long time but haven't posted anything to the boards here for a while.
I'm probably one of the few but I didn't like War for the Planet of the Apes. I felt it wasn't Ape-like in that the Apes were too peaceful. The whole thing about animals being better, more peaceful and reserved than humans was moronic. I don't think animals who have been mistreated by humans would be more majestic than we are, I feel like they would have been more violent. I was hoping this would turn into more of a real Planet of the Apes film.
I was hoping the world the Apes were shaping would become the world that Taylor found, but it sure didn't. It ended up being more "lollipops and rainbows."
Of course, I didn't like the peaceful, saccharine sweet moments in Battle for the Planet of the Apes either. I felt they were forced, much the same way the many of the moments in War were forced. The whole avalanche gets rid of the bad humans was jumping the shark.
As to the new trilogy as a whole, I have many of the same feelings. I am still waiting for a real Planet of the Apes film. I guess I'll stick to the old movie series...
Just my opinion and not meant to tick anyone off.
Ape fan. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76596 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/28/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Didn't like War |
.html
We're majestic animals? Yeah, right.
-----Original Message-----
From: rv.cupp01@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Nov 28, 2017 2:31 pm
Subject: [pota] Didn't like War
Hello, I've been gone for a long time but haven't posted anything to the boards here for a while.
I'm probably one of the few but I didn't like War for the Planet of the Apes. I felt it wasn't Ape-like in that the Apes were too peaceful. The whole thing about animals being better, more peaceful and reserved than humans was moronic. I don't think animals who have been mistreated by humans would be more majestic than we are, I feel like they would have been more violent. I was hoping this would turn into more of a real Planet of the Apes film.
I was hoping the world the Apes were shaping would become the world that Taylor found, but it sure didn't. It ended up being more "lollipops and rainbows."
Of course, I didn't like the peaceful, saccharine sweet moments in Battle for the Planet of
the Apes either. I felt they were forced, much the same way the many of the moments in War were forced. The whole avalanche gets rid of the bad humans was jumping the shark.
As to the new trilogy as a whole, I have many of the same feelings. I am still waiting for a real Planet of the Apes film. I guess I'll stick to the old movie series...
Just my opinion and not meant to tick anyone off.
Ape fan.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76597 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/28/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Didn't like War |
.html.html Yikes, if only it was more "lollipops and rainbows" it might have done better at the box office. Hard to say the apes weren't bitter given what Koba and crew were up to in "Dawn". And even Caesar was turned into a killing machine in "War". All he wanted was to get a Woody. In the end an expensive movie needs someone to root for and the apes were the heroes in this (like in Escape, Conquest and Battle). I'm sure it's time for the apes to be the big bad and humans the heroes.
As for the avalanche, Matt Reeves said in the commentary that this was his Moses story and the avalanche was his parting of the Red Sea. Maybe too on the nose about the human era being over but a nice metaphor: the apes survived it because they were apes and could climb trees. It reminded me of the Boulle novel where I think it was Zira explaining why apes became top banana. Because they could use all four limbs and understand the dimensions of space. Something like that. Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: rv.cupp01@... [pota] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 7:22 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: [pota] Didn't like War Hello, I've been gone for a long time but haven't posted anything to the boards here for a while.
I'm probably one of the few but I didn't like War for the Planet of the Apes. I felt it wasn't Ape-like in that the Apes were too peaceful. The whole thing about animals being better, more peaceful and reserved than humans was moronic. I don't think animals who have been mistreated by humans would be more majestic than we are, I feel like they would have been more violent. I was hoping this would turn into more of a real Planet of the Apes film. I was hoping the world the Apes were shaping would become the world that Taylor found, but it sure didn't. It ended up being more "lollipops and rainbows." Of course, I didn't like the peaceful, saccharine sweet moments in Battle for the Planet of the Apes either. I felt they were forced, much the same way the many of the moments in War were forced. The whole avalanche gets rid of the bad humans was jumping the shark.
As to the new trilogy as a whole, I have many of the same feelings. I am still waiting for a real Planet of the Apes film. I guess I'll stick to the old movie series... Just my opinion and not meant to tick anyone off. Ape fan. <.html <.html
|
|
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76598 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html Last night I went to a screening of "War For the POTA" with a Q & A of the director Matt Reeves. It was a Jeff Goldsmith screening which means it was a low key groovy event. There was like 20 people there so I got to ask what I want. By the way, Jeff Goldsmith Q & A's are awesome so when this becomes available I will let you know.
To the point: I asked Matt about the box office and whether Fox wants to consider more Apes with the drop from "Dawn" to "War". He sez "War" made a profit and Fox is still enthusiastic. (for those who think Reeves is lying because he directed "War", I was there and believe him; he's a serious guy). He also said he doesn't know about any future movies but maybe they will wait for him. He definitely wants to do more Apes. He is a true believer. BUT with Batman on his dance card maybe for the next decade that might not be a good idea. His Batman might flop and he could go back to Apes soonish but I doubt it. Call Oliver Stone. I also asked him my big question about the movie: Where do the apes end up? As far as Reeves is concerned it's an open question but he assumes they are in Nevada (most of the movie taking place in California).
Those were my questions and for asking them I received an awesome "War" poster personalized by Matt. He also added his sig to my Eric Greene book (between Heston and Oliver Stone). Reeves is as friendly and full of stamina as you'd want. His plate is full but he was graceful to everyone. As far as the rest of the lengthy Q & A (which I will announce when it's up) he said they toyed with the idea of Maurice being the Lawgiver (literally like in "Battle" where you hear his voice in the beginning and at the end you know who it is). The thing about Goldsmith's Q & A is it's writer centric so there's lots of gems about the creative process.
Another thing that stood out: Fox was high on Reeves and while he was finishing "Dawn" they asked him to do "War". So when they started "War" he and his co-writer Mark Bombeck (who is also giving his opinion on Batman) asked Fox to let them watch some movies together as inspiration. Fox let them use the Zanuck Theater. Reeves' dad worked in the industry and Reeves got to see the original "Star Wars" at the Zanuck Theater in 1977 before it was released (of course now his lifetime pal and collaborator J. J. Abrams is literally working on the new "Star Wars" movies – talk about surreal!). Anyway, they could use the Zanuck theater but watch the movies on blu-ray. BUT Fox said they could watch ONE movie in it's original print. So they chose "The Empire Strikes Back". Reeves assumed "Dawn" would be their "Empire" (a dark middle chapter) but now he sees "War" that way.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10 <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76599 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html
On 11/29/2017 10:49 AM, Jeff K.
veetus@... [pota] wrote:
Last night I went to a screening of
"War For the POTA" with a Q & A of the director Matt
Reeves. It was a Jeff Goldsmith screening which means it
was a low key groovy event. There was like 20 people
there so I got to ask what I want. By the way, Jeff
Goldsmith Q & A's are awesome so when this becomes
available I will let you know.
Sounds like a great event! Thanks. I look forward to it becoming
available.
Hunter
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76600 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html Thanx Hunter for all you do. My last Goldsmith Q & A was for "Rise" (with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) 6 years ago. It feels full circle, the beginning and the end (as Woody's people might say). I did a transcript for that (Dec. 2011) and I might for this as well. It really does get into the nitty gritty of the script. It's not "what was it like working with Andy Serkis?". The Jaffa one was incredible and showed how they nursed "Rise" for years. Without them these new movies just wouldn't have happened. Fans groan that Boulle doesn't get credit in these new ones and that complaint is legit. But the Jaffas deserve their "created by" and producer credit. Sent from
Mail for Windows 10
On 11/29/2017 10:49 AM, Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] wrote: Last night I went to a screening of "War For the POTA" with a Q & A of the director Matt Reeves. It was a Jeff Goldsmith screening which means it was a low key groovy event. There was like 20 people there so I got to ask what I want. By the way, Jeff Goldsmith Q & A's are awesome so when this becomes available I will let you know.
Sounds like a great event! Thanks. I look forward to it becoming available.
Hunter
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76601 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlThanks for that War Q&A briefing Jeff. One of
the advantages of living in your neck of the woods is having the
opportunity to attend stuff like that. Very envious.
As for
the Jaffa and Silver's presentation on Rise I suspect most of what they
said was captured in a podcast I downloaded months ago but only got
around to listening a few weeks ago. Fascinating stuff especially how
some things ended up in the script in surprising ways. I
don't recall how I ended up with the podcast link and if it was every
brought up here, but if other are interested I'll try to find it again
and barring that i could put it up on a link myself. Mentioning our
great friend Hunter, it may even already be on his website. It
is highly recommended listening not only for the Rise specific
discussion but also also the background shenanigans that go around in
Hollywood. If you give it a listen you'll also be more appreciative of
the script given the circumstances the couple were given the scripting
duties.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76602 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html Yeah, I gave the link for that podcast. It's Jeff Goldsmith's. theqandapodcast.com/2011/12/rise-of-planet-apes-q.html Here's the one for "Dawn" I haven't even listened to yet. theqandapodcast.com/2014/08/matt-reeves-dawn-of-planet-of-apes-q.html Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Thanks for that War Q&A briefing Jeff. One of the advantages of living in your neck of the woods is having the opportunity to attend stuff like that. Very envious. As for the Jaffa and Silver's presentation on Rise I suspect most of what they said was captured in a podcast I downloaded months ago but only got around to listening a few weeks ago. Fascinating stuff especially how some things ended up in the script in surprising ways. I don't recall how I ended up with the podcast link and if it was every brought up here, but if other are interested I'll try to find it again and barring that i could put it up on a link myself. Mentioning our great friend Hunter, it may even already be on his website.
It is highly recommended listening not only for the Rise specific discussion but also also the background shenanigans that go around in Hollywood. If you give it a listen you'll also be more appreciative of the script given the circumstances the couple were given the scripting duties. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Thanx Hunter for all you do.
My last Goldsmith Q & A was for "Rise" (with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) 6 years ago. It feels full circle, the beginning and the end (as Woody's people might say). I did a transcript for that (Dec. 2011) and I might for this as well. It really does get into the nitty gritty of the script. It's not "what was it like working with Andy Serkis?". The Jaffa one was incredible and showed how they nursed "Rise" for years. Without them these new movies just wouldn't have happened. Fans groan that Boulle doesn't get credit in these new ones and that complaint is legit. But the Jaffas deserve their "created by" and producer credit.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
On 11/29/2017 10:49 AM, Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] wrote:
Last night I went to a screening of "War For the POTA" with a Q & A of the director Matt Reeves. It was a Jeff Goldsmith screening which means it was a low key groovy event. There was like 20 people there so I got to ask what I want. By the way, Jeff Goldsmith Q & A's are awesome so when this becomes available I will let you know.
Sounds like a great event! Thanks. I look forward to it becoming available.
Hunter
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76603 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/29/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html This thread shows the scene last night and the kind of guy Matt Reeves is. twitter.com/SunflowerJD/status/935684334802976768 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Thanks for that War Q&A briefing Jeff. One of the advantages of living in your neck of the woods is having the opportunity to attend stuff like that. Very envious.
As for the Jaffa and Silver's presentation on Rise I suspect most of what they said was captured in a podcast I downloaded months ago but only got around to listening a few weeks ago. Fascinating stuff especially how some things ended up in the script in surprising ways. I don't recall how I ended up with the podcast link and if it was every brought up here, but if other are interested I'll try to find it again and barring that i could put it up on a link myself. Mentioning our great friend Hunter, it may even already be on his website.
It is highly recommended listening not only for the Rise specific discussion but also also the background shenanigans that go around in Hollywood. If you give it a listen you'll also be more appreciative of the script given the circumstances the couple were given the scripting duties. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Thanx Hunter for all you do.
My last Goldsmith Q & A was for "Rise" (with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) 6 years ago. It feels full circle, the beginning and the end (as Woody's people might say). I did a transcript for that (Dec. 2011) and I might for this as well. It really does get into the nitty gritty of the script. It's not "what was it like working with Andy Serkis?". The Jaffa one was incredible and showed how they nursed "Rise" for years. Without them these new movies just wouldn't have happened. Fans groan that Boulle doesn't get credit in these new ones and that complaint is legit. But the Jaffas deserve their "created by" and producer credit.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
On 11/29/2017 10:49 AM, Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] wrote:
Last night I went to a screening of "War For the POTA" with a Q & A of the director Matt Reeves. It was a Jeff Goldsmith screening which means it was a low key groovy event. There was like 20 people there so I got to ask what I want. By the way, Jeff Goldsmith Q & A's are awesome so when this becomes available I will let you know.
Sounds like a great event! Thanks. I look forward to it becoming available.
Hunter
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76604 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/30/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlDid anyone think to ask Reeves when and how a nuclear holocaust would come into possible future APES movies to lead to "the world of the '68 original"?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wed, Nov 29, 2017 7:15 pm
Subject: RE: [pota] Life in a "War" zone
This thread shows the scene last night and the kind of guy Matt Reeves is.
twitter.com/SunflowerJD/status/935684334802976768
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Thanks for that War Q&A briefing Jeff. One of the advantages of living in your neck of the woods is having the opportunity to attend stuff like that. Very envious.
As for the Jaffa and Silver's presentation on Rise I suspect most of what they said was captured in a podcast I downloaded months ago but only got around to listening a few weeks ago. Fascinating stuff especially how some things ended up in the script in surprising ways.
I don't recall how I ended up with the podcast link and if it was every brought up here, but if other are interested I'll try to find it again and barring that i could put it up on a link myself. Mentioning our great friend Hunter, it may even already be on his website.
It is highly recommended listening not only for the Rise specific discussion but also also the background shenanigans that go around in Hollywood. If you give it a listen you'll also be more appreciative of the script given the circumstances the couple were given the scripting duties.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Thanx Hunter for all you do.
My last Goldsmith Q & A was for "Rise" (with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) 6 years ago. It feels full circle, the beginning and the end (as Woody's people might say). I did a transcript for that (Dec. 2011) and I might for this as well. It really does get into the nitty gritty of the script. It's not "what was it like working with Andy Serkis?".
The Jaffa one was incredible and showed how they nursed "Rise" for years. Without them these new movies just wouldn't have happened. Fans groan that Boulle doesn't get credit in these new ones and that complaint is legit. But the Jaffas deserve their "created by" and producer credit.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
On 11/29/2017 10:49 AM, Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] wrote:
Last night I went to a screening of "War For the POTA" with a Q & A of the director Matt Reeves. It was a Jeff Goldsmith screening which means it was a low key groovy event. There was like 20 people there so I got to ask what I want. By the way, Jeff Goldsmith Q & A's are awesome so when this becomes available I will let you know.
Sounds like a great event! Thanks. I look forward to it becoming available.
Hunter
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76605 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 11/30/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html He reiterated that it can't be the same timeline because the virus wuz the culprit, not nukes. Doesn't matter, he's gone for now. The next director could introduce nukes. Fun fact: Oliver Stone recently watched "Dr. Strangelove" with Putin (hint, hint). Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Haristas@... [pota]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:07 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone Did anyone think to ask Reeves when and how a nuclear holocaust would come into possible future APES movies to lead to "the world of the '68 original"?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com> To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wed, Nov 29, 2017 7:15 pm Subject: RE: [pota] Life in a "War" zone This thread shows the scene last night and the kind of guy Matt Reeves is. twitter.com/SunflowerJD/status/935684334802976768 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Thanks for that War Q&A briefing Jeff. One of the advantages of living in your neck of the woods is having the opportunity to attend stuff like that. Very envious.
As for the Jaffa and Silver's presentation on Rise I suspect most of what they said was captured in a podcast I downloaded months ago but only got around to listening a few weeks ago. Fascinating stuff especially how some things ended up in the script in surprising ways. I don't recall how I ended up with the podcast link and if it was every brought up here, but if other are interested I'll try to find it again and barring that i could put it up on a link myself. Mentioning our great friend Hunter, it may even already be on his website.
It is highly recommended listening not only for the Rise specific discussion but also also the background shenanigans that go around in Hollywood. If you give it a listen you'll also be more appreciative of the script given the circumstances the couple were given the scripting duties. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Thanx Hunter for all you do.
My last Goldsmith Q & A was for "Rise" (with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) 6 years ago. It feels full circle, the beginning and the end (as Woody's people might say). I did a transcript for that (Dec. 2011) and I might for this as well. It really does get into the nitty gritty of the script. It's not "what was it like working with Andy Serkis?". The Jaffa one was incredible and showed how they nursed "Rise" for years. Without them these new movies just wouldn't have happened. Fans groan that Boulle doesn't get credit in these new ones and that complaint is legit. But the Jaffas deserve their "created by" and producer credit.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
On 11/29/2017 10:49 AM, Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] wrote:
Last night I went to a screening of "War For the POTA" with a Q & A of the director Matt Reeves. It was a Jeff Goldsmith screening which means it was a low key groovy event. There was like 20 people there so I got to ask what I want. By the way, Jeff Goldsmith Q & A's are awesome so when this becomes available I will let you know.
Sounds like a great event! Thanks. I look forward to it becoming available.
Hunter
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76606 |
From: haristas |
Date: 11/30/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html
He reiterated that it can't be the same timeline because the virus wuz the culprit, not nukes.
Probably good that he's gone then. I hope Mark Bomback, too. This shows that these guys really have limited imaginations. WAR disappointing many -- and not for nothing. How many times has Reeves and other said that these reboots lead to the world of the '68 original? Many times! But if it's another timeline, then it doesn't anymore lead to the world of the '68 than the events of ESCAPE, CONQUEST or BATTLE do. They really don't know what they're doing. Good thing I wasn't at the Q & A.
If you look at the original PLANET OF THE APES movies and come away from it thinking that a nuclear holocaust and only that somehow magically jumped simian evolution -- then I contend you look at the thing with a still adolescent mentality, and to an incredible degree this is what is the problem with Reeves. He's no Franklin J. Schaffner, and Mark Bomback is no Michael Wilson much less Rod Serling. And it was a huge failing with Paul Dehn that he never bothered to explain how the apes suddenly became super-intelligent and able to talk -- they just did. That's the main reason I don't like the sequels -- they're truly half-baked.
Luckily, these three reboots have only moved us to 2030 (or maybe just 2028) in the timeline. I just hope whoever takes over the franchise has a good imagination. There are many possibilities for future scenarios -- if they ever happen.
Rory
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Nov 30, 2017 1:35 pm
Subject: RE: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
He reiterated that it can't be the same timeline because the virus wuz the culprit, not nukes.
Doesn't matter, he's gone for now. The next director could introduce nukes.
Fun fact: Oliver Stone recently watched "Dr. Strangelove" with Putin (hint, hint).
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Haristas@... [pota]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:07 AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
Did anyone think to ask Reeves when and how a nuclear holocaust would come into possible future APES movies to lead to "the world of the '68 original"?
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76607 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 11/30/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlI don't care what was said, who said it and how many times they said it.
One look at Rise and I considered these movies a 'reimagining', 'reboot", or whatever. This was a new story as far as I was concerned and I no longer even tried to associate it with the classic apes franchise. I think that disassociation made it far easier for me to enjoy these films for what the are (and not worry as to what I hoped they would be).
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76608 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/1/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlI've been saying these new films are their own entity since before they were ever released... I think they're okay on their own terms, but I *never* thought to myself "These are going to lead into the world of PLANET".
I actually think it's kind of sad that people will grasp at any loose straw they can to tie these into the originals, tough it's so obvious they're cut from different cloth. These NuApes films are their own take on the name and all the hoping and wishing that they'll tie into the original is just bizarre to me.
In a message dated 11/30/2017 6:01:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
One look at Rise and I considered these movies a 'reimagining', 'reboot", or whatever. This was a new story as far as I was concerned and I no longer even tried to associate it with the classic apes franchise. I think that disassociation made it far easier for me to enjoy these films for what the are (and not worry as to what I hoped they would be).
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76609 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/1/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlWhat's bizarre is that you don't see that they obviously tied themselves to the original(s) with their constant homage to the original(s).
If they don't have a link to the "world of the '68 original," than they are meaningless and can't be enjoyed at all.
If you don't think these franchise films need to be linked together than you live in a bizarre bubble where you don't see how most fans of Star Wars, Star Trek, the Marvel Universe and the other comic book superhero crap are all obsessed with continuity.
This PLANET OF THE APES trilogy was an "origins" prequel saga to the setup for the original movie, before any of the events of the original series happened, before Cornelius and Zira go back in time, before their child that will be named Ceasar and does his thing -- on an alternate timeline. That's just a FACT!
-----Original Message-----
From: mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 1, 2017 8:47 am
Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
I've been saying these new films are their own entity since before they were ever released... I think they're okay on their own terms, but I *never* thought to myself "These are going to lead into the world of PLANET".
I actually think it's kind of sad that people will grasp at any loose straw they can to tie these into the originals, tough it's so obvious they're cut from different cloth. These NuApes films are their own take on the name and all the hoping and wishing that they'll tie into the original is just bizarre to me.
In a message dated 11/30/2017 6:01:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
One look at Rise and I considered these movies a 'reimagining', 'reboot", or whatever. This was a new story as far as I was concerned and I no longer even tried to associate it with the classic apes franchise. I think that disassociation made it far easier for me to enjoy these films for what the are (and not worry as to what I hoped they would be).
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76610 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/1/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html As they stand right now I think Nu Apes can be enjoyed either way. On their own (meaningless, my ass! Fans, appreciate these because they are miracles) or they are early enough in the story to connect to the original if you want to. If, like Haristas and me, you see the originals as two timeline (Planet/Beneath and Escape/Conquest/Battle) then Rise/Dawn/War could fit in the early days of the original (with minor contradictions). The nukes haven't hit yet.
If you're a circularist who sees Escape leading to Beneath it doesn't work of course, which I think is how Matt Reeves sees it, two separate origin stories. But if you believe Cornelius and Zira changed history by going back (which jives with modern physics) then Rise and Co. could be the origin of the world Taylor finds (Taylor having come from a separate timeline, why he left long before "Rise" takes place. Look at it however you want and enjoy these new movies which are damn good. Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Haristas@... [pota] Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 8:09 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone What's bizarre is that you don't see that they obviously tied themselves to the original(s) with their constant homage to the original(s). If they don't have a link to the "world of the '68 original," than they are meaningless and can't be enjoyed at all. If you don't think these franchise films need to be linked together than you live in a bizarre bubble where you don't see how most fans of Star Wars, Star Trek, the Marvel Universe and the other comic book superhero crap are all obsessed with continuity. This PLANET OF THE APES trilogy was an "origins" prequel saga to the setup for the original movie, before any of the events of the original series happened, before Cornelius and Zira go back in time, before their child that will be named Ceasar and does his thing -- on an alternate timeline. That's just a FACT!
-----Original Message----- From: mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com> To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Fri, Dec 1, 2017 8:47 am Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
I've been saying these new films are their own entity since before they were ever released... I think they're okay on their own terms, but I *never* thought to myself "These are going to lead into the world of PLANET".
I actually think it's kind of sad that people will grasp at any loose straw they can to tie these into the originals, tough it's so obvious they're cut from different cloth. These NuApes films are their own take on the name and all the hoping and wishing that they'll tie into the original is just bizarre to me.
In a message dated 11/30/2017 6:01:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
One look at Rise and I considered these movies a 'reimagining', 'reboot", or whatever. This was a new story as far as I was concerned and I no longer even tried to associate it with the classic apes franchise. I think that disassociation made it far easier for me to enjoy these films for what the are (and not worry as to what I hoped they would be).
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76611 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/1/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html
If you're a circularist who sees Escape leading to Beneath it doesn't work of course, which I think is how Matt Reeves sees it
That's my biggest problem with Reeves -- he "likes" Beneath. Blaaaaahhhhh!!!!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 1, 2017 4:05 pm
Subject: RE: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
As they stand right now I think Nu Apes can be enjoyed either way. On their own (meaningless, my ass! Fans, appreciate these because they are miracles) or they are early enough in the story to connect to the original if you want to. If, like Haristas and me, you see the originals as two timeline (Planet/Beneath and Escape/Conquest/Battle) then Rise/Dawn/War could fit in the early days of the original (with minor contradictions). The nukes haven't hit yet.
If you're a circularist who sees Escape leading to Beneath it doesn't work of course, which I think is how Matt Reeves sees it, two separate origin stories. But if you believe Cornelius and Zira changed history by going back (which jives with modern physics) then Rise and Co. could be the origin of the world Taylor finds (Taylor having come from a separate timeline, why he left long before "Rise" takes place.
Look at it however you want and enjoy these new movies which are damn good.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Haristas@... [pota]
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 8:09 AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
What's bizarre is that you don't see that they obviously tied themselves to the original(s) with their constant homage to the original(s).
If they don't have a link to the "world of the '68 original," than they are meaningless and can't be enjoyed at all.
If you don't think these franchise films need to be linked together than you live in a bizarre bubble where you don't see how most fans of Star Wars, Star Trek, the Marvel Universe and the other comic book superhero crap are all obsessed with continuity.
This PLANET OF THE APES trilogy was an "origins" prequel saga to the setup for the original movie, before any of the events of the original series happened, before Cornelius and Zira go back in time, before their child that will be named Ceasar and does his thing -- on an alternate timeline. That's just a FACT!
-----Original Message-----
From: mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Dec 1, 2017 8:47 am
Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
I've been saying these new films are their own entity since before they were ever released... I think they're okay on their own terms, but I *never* thought to myself "These are going to lead into the world of PLANET".
I actually think it's kind of sad that people will grasp at any loose straw they can to tie these into the originals, tough it's so obvious they're cut from different cloth. These NuApes films are their own take on the name and all the hoping and wishing that they'll tie into the original is just bizarre to me.
In a message dated 11/30/2017 6:01:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
One look at Rise and I considered these movies a 'reimagining', 'reboot", or whatever. This was a new story as far as I was concerned and I no longer even tried to associate it with the classic apes franchise. I think that disassociation made it far easier for me to enjoy these films for what the are (and not worry as to what I hoped they would be).
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76612 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlRather than engage in a debate on this, again, I encourage everyone to read this excellent article on the subject over at the POTA Wiki: http://planetoftheapes.wikia.com/wiki/Circular_vs_Linear_Timelines---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@...> wrote : As they stand right now I think Nu Apes can be enjoyed either way. On their own (meaningless, my ass! Fans, appreciate these because they are miracles) or they are early enough in the story to connect to the original if you want to. If, like Haristas and me, you see the originals as two timeline (Planet/Beneath and Escape/Conquest/Battle) then Rise/Dawn/War could fit in the early days of the original (with minor contradictions). The nukes haven't hit yet.
If you're a circularist who sees Escape leading to Beneath it doesn't work of course, which I think is how Matt Reeves sees it, two separate origin stories. But if you believe Cornelius and Zira changed history by going back (which jives with modern physics) then Rise and Co. could be the origin of the world Taylor finds (Taylor having come from a separate timeline, why he left long before "Rise" takes place. Look at it however you want and enjoy these new movies which are damn good. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76613 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 12/1/2017 10:29:36 AM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
What's bizarre is that you don't see that they obviously tied themselves to the original(s) with their constant homage to the original(s).
Oh, they did? In what way? By having charaters with the same names? By having the guy in RISE say Taylor's "trademarked" line? So, that ties them to the originals? All those cute little "references?
If they don't have a link to the "world of the '68 original," than they are meaningless and can't be enjoyed at all.
Then why continue to watch them? Because you hope they build future movies around a few lines of throw away dialog from PLANET? If you really think they're going to build a movie around a line pertaining to "the bones of carnivorous gorillas" or a possible storm of meteors (of which even Zira says they can't be sure), you have another thing coming, and that's just a FACT! And as far as the line about there being a strange luminosity, but no moon" it's quite possible it was new moon when that was said-And if someone doesn't think there can still be a strange luminosity, then they've never been outside at night, because I've been outside planety of times, even during new moon when the sky is still light enough to make it possible to see things, even though it's dark out.
If you don't think these franchise films need to be linked together than you live in a bizarre bubble where you don't see how most fans of Star Wars, Star Trek, the Marvel Universe and the other comic book superhero crap are all obsessed with continuity.
Well, guess what: I'm not one of those type of fans that thinks everything has to be linked together... Going by your logic, then you'd also say that Tim Burton's film would tie into the original... These new movies are tied to the original about as much as George Reeves' Superman is the same one as played by Christopher Reeves (they must be the same, the actors even have the same last names!) Oh yeah, and Gal Gadot is the same exact Wonder Woman as played by Linda Carter... And, I suppose you think the kids on the series "Riverdale" are the same exact bunch who recorded "Sugar, Sugar"...
This PLANET OF THE APES trilogy was an "origins" prequel saga to the setup for the original movie, before any of the events of the original series happened, before Cornelius and Zira go back in time, before their child that will be named Ceasar and does his thing -- on an alternate timeline. That's just a FACT!
WRONG! Yeah, theses new ones are an origins story, but they're not the origins of the first movie... For better or for worse, Cornelius and Zira, who are from the first timeline, said their origins lie in slavery and that's how it was explained in ESCAPE, by characters from timeline 1. And go back and read my old posts, I've ALWAYS been of the two (*alternate") timelines, so I don't know what you're getting at... The origins of Zira and Cornelius's world (the original movie) was because their ancestors were slaves of man, and in the new Caesar trilogy, their origins lie in the ALZ-112.<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76614 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 12/1/2017 3:02:14 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
As they stand right now I think Nu Apes can be enjoyed either way. On their own (meaningless, my ass! Fans, appreciate these because they are miracles) or they are early enough in the story to connect to the original if you want to. If, like Haristas and me, you see the originals as two timeline (Planet/Beneath and Escape/Conquest/Battle) then Rise/Dawn/War could fit in the early days of the original (with minor contradictions). The nukes haven't hit yet.
As I said, I too am of the two timeline theory, so I am not sure what you're getting at? These new films, are their own timeline/origins story and this has been confirmed by Reeves. They are the origins of a probable apes ruled world of the future, but they are not the origins of PLANET OF THE APES. <.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76615 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlI'll give you this much, at least you're being reasonable about this: You're open to the idea that they're not the same origins as the first film's world. You're not dead set that they are the origins of PLANET.
In a message dated 12/1/2017 3:02:14 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
As they stand right now I think Nu Apes can be enjoyed either way. On their own (meaningless, my ass! Fans, appreciate these because they are miracles) or they are early enough in the story to connect to the original if you want to. If, like Haristas and me, you see the originals as two timeline (Planet/Beneath and Escape/Conquest/Battle) then Rise/Dawn/War could fit in the early days of the original (with minor contradictions). The nukes haven't hit yet.
If you're a circularist who sees Escape leading to Beneath it doesn't work of course, which I think is how Matt Reeves sees it, two separate origin stories. But if you believe Cornelius and Zira changed history by going back (which jives with modern physics) then Rise and Co. could be the origin of the world Taylor finds (Taylor having come from a separate timeline, why he left long before "Rise" takes place.
Look at it however you want and enjoy these new movies which are damn good.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76616 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 12/1/2017 4:24:18 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
That's my biggest problem with Reeves -- he "likes" Beneath. Blaaaaahhhhh!!!!!!
I thought you didn't like him because he burst your bubble about the new trilogy not being in the same timeline as the original PLANET?<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76617 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html Oliver Stone adding nukes to POTA - $12 million Oliver Stone making the apes look more like the makeup in the original - $54 million Haristas and Matt Reeves going fishing together - priceless Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:
mlccougar@... [pota] Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2017 8:46 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone In a message dated 12/1/2017 4:24:18 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
That's my biggest problem with Reeves -- he "likes" Beneath. Blaaaaahhhhh!!!!!!
I thought you didn't like him because he burst your bubble about the new trilogy not being in the same timeline as the original PLANET?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76618 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html I'm getting at that if you want Rise/Dawn/War to lead to the original ("Besides, man is a nuisance. He migrates to our green belts and ravages our crops") you can. Doesn't matter what Matt Reeves sez, he hasn't looked deep into his own soul. Just as it doesn't matter that Paul Dehn said Escape leads to Planet. It's what you the viewer wants, baby. If Cornelius and Zira go to another timeline and Taylor is from that timeline, who do we hurt? Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: mlccougar@... [pota] Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2017 8:46 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone In a message dated 12/1/2017 3:02:14 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
As they stand right now I think Nu Apes can be enjoyed either way. On their own (meaningless, my ass! Fans, appreciate these because they are miracles) or they are early enough in the story to connect to the original if you want to. If, like Haristas and me, you see the originals as two timeline (Planet/Beneath and Escape/Conquest/Battle) then Rise/Dawn/War could fit in the early days of the original (with minor contradictions). The nukes haven't hit yet.
As I said, I too am of the two timeline theory, so I am not sure what you're getting at? These new films, are their own timeline/origins story and this has been confirmed by Reeves. They are the origins of a probable apes ruled world of the future, but they are not the origins of PLANET OF THE APES.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76619 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html COUGAR: So you're saying I can accept Rise/Dawn/War as part of the original POTA timeline? THERAPIST: Yes. Gift yourself! COUGAR: It feels unnatural… But I'll do it! Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: mlccougar@... [pota] Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2017 8:46 AM To:
pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone I'll give you this much, at least you're being reasonable about this: You're open to the idea that they're not the same origins as the first film's world. You're not dead set that they are the origins of PLANET.
In a message dated 12/1/2017 3:02:14 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
As they stand right now I think Nu Apes can be enjoyed either way. On their own (meaningless, my ass! Fans, appreciate these because they are miracles) or they are early enough in the story to connect to the original if you want to. If, like Haristas and me, you see the originals as two timeline (Planet/Beneath and Escape/Conquest/Battle) then Rise/Dawn/War could fit in the early days of the original (with minor contradictions). The nukes haven't hit yet.
If you're a circularist who sees Escape leading to Beneath it doesn't work of course, which I think is how Matt Reeves sees it, two separate origin stories. But if you believe Cornelius and Zira changed history by going back (which jives with modern physics) then Rise and Co. could be the origin of the world Taylor finds (Taylor having come from a separate timeline, why he left long before "Rise" takes place.
Look at it however you want and enjoy these new movies which are damn good.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76620 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlI'd be interested in knowing who wrote that because it's clearly not definitive (because that's really not possible) and yet it wants to eat its cake and have it too. This quote is especially a load of bullshit:
The majority of Planet of the Apes fans — both casual and devoted — consider the movie series to be a continuous loop
When exactly was a pole conducted of "the majority of PLANET OF THE APES fans --both casual and devoted"? And since when does majority opinion rule in such matters? Usually, only if you feel you're in the majority.
Also, what Paul Dehn said in interviews (after the production of CONQUEST and then after that) is constantly quoted as "proof" that the correct view of the original five-film series is that it's a closed timeloop -- simply because Paul Dehn said it was. But, of course, what conveniently gets ignored is that when Dehn wrote each of these sequels, there were no further sequels planned. It is just a FACT that no PLANET OF THE APES sequel was decided upon until after the previous entry was in theaters. So, Dehn was making up as he went and was struck with what he had previously written. The proof of this is in the abundant and huge continuity errors between the films.
For me, the illogic of going back in time to create your own destiny can only be logically approached by the idea that you would somehow alter history in the act of doing so. No less a Science Fiction author than Ray Bradbury dealt with this, and I put him on a much higher level as to how the Science Fiction aspects of the PLANET OF THE APES film series should be considered than that of Paul Dehn.
So, huge raspberry to that Wiki page.
-----Original Message-----
From: JamesA1102@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Dec 3, 2017 9:17 am
Subject: RE: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
---In pota@yahoogroups.com, < veetus@...> wrote :
As they stand right now I think Nu Apes can be enjoyed either way. On their own (meaningless, my ass! Fans, appreciate these because they are miracles) or they are early enough in the story to connect to the original if you want to. If, like Haristas and me, you see the originals as two timeline (Planet/Beneath and Escape/Conquest/Battle) then Rise/Dawn/War could fit in the early days of the original (with minor contradictions). The nukes haven't hit yet.
If you're a circularist who sees Escape leading to Beneath it doesn't work of course, which I think is how Matt Reeves sees it, two separate origin stories. But if you believe Cornelius and Zira changed history by going back (which jives with modern physics) then Rise and Co. could be the origin of the world Taylor finds (Taylor having come from a separate timeline, why he left long before "Rise" takes place.
Look at it however you want and enjoy these new movies which are damn good.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76621 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlWRONG! in your final conclusion because this is all in how the viewer wants to look at it. There is no definitive interpretation of this new APES trilogy NOT being an origin story for the '68 original -- and I primarily believe that -- AND want to see it that way -- because it's a better origin story that that ESCAPE, CONQUEST and BATTLE. The origin scenario that Dehn invented was lame, illogical and eventually silly. The modern APES trilogy is just plain better Science Fiction. My only complaint about it is that it's not filled in enough.
-----Original Message-----
From: mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Dec 3, 2017 12:06 pm
Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
In a message dated 12/1/2017 10:29:36 AM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
What's bizarre is that you don't see that they obviously tied themselves to the original(s) with their constant homage to the original(s).
Oh, they did? In what way? By having charaters with the same names? By having the guy in RISE say Taylor's "trademarked" line? So, that ties them to the originals? All those cute little "references?
If they don't have a link to the "world of the '68 original," than they are meaningless and can't be enjoyed at all.
Then why continue to watch them? Because you hope they build future movies around a few lines of throw away dialog from PLANET? If you really think they're going to build a movie around a line pertaining to "the bones of carnivorous gorillas" or a possible storm of meteors (of which even Zira says they can't be sure), you have another thing coming, and that's just a FACT! And as far as the line about there being a strange luminosity, but no moon" it's quite possible it was new moon when that was said-And if someone doesn't think there can still be a strange luminosity, then they've never been outside at night, because I've been outside planety of times, even during new moon when the sky is still light enough to make it possible to see things, even though it's dark out.
If you don't think these franchise films need to be linked together than you live in a bizarre bubble where you don't see how most fans of Star Wars, Star Trek, the Marvel Universe and the other comic book superhero crap are all obsessed with continuity.
Well, guess what: I'm not one of those type of fans that thinks everything has to be linked together... Going by your logic, then you'd also say that Tim Burton's film would tie into the original... These new movies are tied to the original about as much as George Reeves' Superman is the same one as played by Christopher Reeves (they must be the same, the actors even have the same last names!) Oh yeah, and Gal Gadot is the same exact Wonder Woman as played by Linda Carter... And, I suppose you think the kids on the series "Riverdale" are the same exact bunch who recorded "Sugar, Sugar"...
This PLANET OF THE APES trilogy was an "origins" prequel saga to the setup for the original movie, before any of the events of the original series happened, before Cornelius and Zira go back in time, before their child that will be named Ceasar and does his thing -- on an alternate timeline. That's just a FACT!
WRONG! Yeah, theses new ones are an origins story, but they're not the origins of the first movie... For better or for worse, Cornelius and Zira, who are from the first timeline, said their origins lie in slavery and that's how it was explained in ESCAPE, by characters from timeline 1. And go back and read my old posts, I've ALWAYS been of the two (*alternate") timelines, so I don't know what you're getting at... The origins of Zira and Cornelius's world (the original movie) was because their ancestors were slaves of man, and in the new Caesar trilogy, their origins lie in the ALZ-112.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76622 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlReeves hasn't said anything definitive, he's been playing it cute, trying to eat his cake and have it, too. He knows his films don't fill in all the blanks as to how you'd get to "the world of the '68 original," and so now he and some of the other producers are just tap dancing. What matters is what the studio wants, and I contend the studio wants them linked.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff K. veetus@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Dec 3, 2017 12:56 pm
Subject: RE: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
I'm getting at that if you want Rise/Dawn/War to lead to the original ("Besides, man is a nuisance. He migrates to our green belts and ravages our crops") you can.
Doesn't matter what Matt Reeves sez, he hasn't looked deep into his own soul. Just as it doesn't matter that Paul Dehn said Escape leads to Planet.
It's what you the viewer wants, baby.
If Cornelius and Zira go to another timeline and Taylor is from that timeline, who do we hurt?
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: mlccougar@... [pota]
Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2017 8:46 AM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
In a message dated 12/1/2017 3:02:14 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
As they stand right now I think Nu Apes can be enjoyed either way. On their own (meaningless, my ass! Fans, appreciate these because they are miracles) or they are early enough in the story to connect to the original if you want to. If, like Haristas and me, you see the originals as two timeline (Planet/Beneath and Escape/Conquest/Battle) then Rise/Dawn/War could fit in the early days of the original (with minor contradictions). The nukes haven't hit yet.
As I said, I too am of the two timeline theory, so I am not sure what you're getting at? These new films, are their own timeline/origins story and this has been confirmed by Reeves. They are the origins of a probable apes ruled world of the future, but they are not the origins of PLANET OF THE APES.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76623 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlAlright, a 'circularists' discussion (we'll well see if it remains that.). Been a while since we flogged that horse.
I am a devout circularist when it comes to the first five movies because ... that was the way I saw it when I first viewed that cycle. The fact that Dehn said so was nice to hear, but irrelevant when I get right down to it. Yes it is a 'flawed' circle, but what isn't flawed when you start picking at the threads. I know I'm in the minority but once again, it is what you the viewers want it to be.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76624 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlYou not in the minority Dario. Those who accept the story of the original films just aren't as vocal. ---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <dario.sciola@...> wrote : Alright, a 'circularists' discussion (we'll well see if it remains that.). Been a while since we flogged that horse.
I am a devout circularist when it comes to the first five movies because ... that was the way I saw it when I first viewed that cycle. The fact that Dehn said so was nice to hear, but irrelevant when I get right down to it. Yes it is a 'flawed' circle, but what isn't flawed when you start picking at the threads.
I know I'm in the minority but once again, it is what you the viewers want it to be. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76625 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/3/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlSuch a view invalidates episodes of Star Trek, The Twilight Zone, Doctor Who and films like The Terminator. The "Time Loop" or pre-destination paradox, as some call it is a valid narrative device used by many authors in many stories. ---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <Haristas@...> wrote :
For me, the illogic of going back in time to create your own destiny can only be logically approached by the idea that you would somehow alter history in the act of doing so. No less a Science Fiction author than Ray Bradbury dealt with this, and I put him on a much higher level as to how the Science Fiction aspects of the PLANET OF THE APES film series should be considered than that of Paul Dehn.
So, huge raspberry to that Wiki page.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76626 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlThat's funny.
In a message dated 12/3/2017 11:55:40 AM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
Oliver Stone adding nukes to POTA - $12 million
Oliver Stone making the apes look more like the makeup in the original - $54 million
Haristas and Matt Reeves going fishing together - priceless
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76627 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlI could never see myself saying that... I could see myself saying they're part of an alternate timeline, but "the original", not gonna happen anytime soon... I'd switch therapists.
In a message dated 12/3/2017 12:39:53 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
COUGAR: So you're saying I can accept Rise/Dawn/War as part of the original POTA timeline?
THERAPIST: Yes. Gift yourself!
COUGAR: It feels unnatural… But I'll do it!
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76628 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlI agree with this.
In a message dated 12/3/2017 12:41:06 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
Also, what Paul Dehn said in interviews (after the production of CONQUEST and then after that) is constantly quoted as "proof" that the correct view of the original five-film series is that it's a closed timeloop -- simply because Paul Dehn said it was. But, of course, what conveniently gets ignored is that when Dehn wrote each of these sequels, there were no further sequels planned. It is just a FACT that no PLANET OF THE APES sequel was decided upon until after the previous entry was in theaters. So, Dehn was making up as he went and was struck with what he had previously written. The proof of this is in the abundant and huge continuity errors between the films.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76629 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlThere is no 'correct' view when it comes to the well trodden 'time travel' trope which is why it is so often used. In fact, time travel stories are a particular favorite of mine especially when it comes to SF short stories.
But sometimes it is presented are unalterable and sometimes it is fluid. Sometimes the concept of alternate universes is used as a crutch to address changes in time, and sometimes there is just one that does indeed change... or not. But it is all just storytelling until someone creates a real time machine. Remember we are just discussing a Science Fiction movie franchise here, not actual history.
For some real fun I suggest you watch the movie Primer. A lot budget film that has something cult following. I watched it twice now but never made it to the end without loosing track of what was 'when'. How convoluted is it? Someone decoded all 9 timelines:
Challenging film, but worth it if you like time travel.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76630 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html I'd say it's funny because you wouldn't say that. From your posts it's obvious you wouldn't say that. Just being a comedian. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: mlccougar@... [pota] Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 5:16 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject:
Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone I could never see myself saying that... I could see myself saying they're part of an alternate timeline, but "the original", not gonna happen anytime soon... I'd switch therapists.
In a message dated 12/3/2017 12:39:53 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
COUGAR: So you're saying I can accept Rise/Dawn/War as part of the original POTA timeline?
THERAPIST: Yes. Gift yourself!
COUGAR: It feels unnatural… But I'll do it!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76631 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlEverything's cool... I knew you were saying it in jest-I got the joke : )
After reading your posts for 15+ years, i can pretty much tell when you're joking around.
In a message dated 12/4/2017 10:47:44 AM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
I'd say it's funny because you wouldn't say that. From your posts it's obvious you wouldn't say that.
Just being a comedian.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76632 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlMust be closer to 20.
Pretty sure I was on these forums pre-2001 Burton debacle.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76633 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Dizzy Disney talks |
.html.html Word is that Disney is still negotiating for Fox so POTA might have a new home before the year is out. Comcast (which owns Universal Pictures) is also a suitor (I'd prefer them because they are not so family friendly). Meanwhile Cornelius is holding Zira close… Sent from Mail for Windows 10 <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76634 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/4/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html
As far as we know, travelling back in time is sheer fantasy, so when that concept was introduced into the franchise with ESCAPE it actually hurt APES further as Science Fiction.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dario Sciola dario.sciola@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 4, 2017 11:08 am
Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
There is no 'correct' view when it comes to the well trodden 'time travel' trope which is why it is so often used. In fact, time travel stories are a particular favorite of mine especially when it comes to SF short stories.
But sometimes it is presented are unalterable and sometimes it is fluid. Sometimes the concept of alternate universes is used as a crutch to address changes in time, and sometimes there is just one that does indeed change... or not.
But it is all just storytelling until someone creates a real time machine. Remember we are just discussing a Science Fiction movie franchise here, not actual history.
For some real fun I suggest you watch the movie Primer. A lot budget film that has something cult following. I watched it twice now but never made it to the end without loosing track of what was 'when'. How convoluted is it? Someone decoded all 9 timelines:
Challenging film, but worth it if you like time travel.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76635 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Dizzy Disney talks |
.html.html .htmlMaybe we'll finally get the long awaited "Planet of the Apes" musical we've all been clamoring for...
Word is that Disney is still negotiating for Fox so POTA might have a new home before the year is out.
Comcast (which owns Universal Pictures) is also a suitor (I'd prefer them because they are not so family friendly).
Meanwhile Cornelius is holding Zira close…
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76636 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlProbably closer to 16 and 1/2, going on 17 for me... I think I signed up just a few months or so before the Burton film came out.
In a message dated 12/4/2017 11:58:27 AM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
Must be closer to 20.
Pretty sure I was on these forums pre-2001 Burton debacle.
Dario
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:05 PM, mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Everything's cool... I knew you were saying it in jest-I got the joke : )
After reading your posts for 15+ years, i can pretty much tell when you're joking around.
In a message dated 12/4/2017 10:47:44 AM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
I'd say it's funny because you wouldn't say that. From your posts it's obvious you wouldn't say that.
Just being a comedian.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76637 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlWow! You just threw everything from H.G. Wells 'The Time Machine' to Back to the Future and 12 Monkeys under the bus. ---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <Haristas@...> wrote : As far as we know, travelling back in time is sheer fantasy, so when that concept was introduced into the franchise with ESCAPE it actually hurt APES further as Science Fiction. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76638 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Dizzy Disney talks |
.html.html According to CNBC this deal could be announced next week, the perfect Christmas gift for the studio that has everything (Disney). Basically Disney would get the entertainment assets (valued at $60 billion +) and Fox would keep "FOX", the news and sports stuff. Though it would no longer have the movie studio for which it wuz named. collider.com/disney-fox-deal/ Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Word is that Disney is still negotiating for Fox so POTA might have a new home before the year is out.
Comcast (which owns Universal Pictures) is also a suitor (I'd prefer them because they are not so family friendly). Meanwhile Cornelius is holding Zira close… Sent from Mail for Windows 10 <.html <.html
|
|
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76639 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlSpare me the hyperbole. There are two types of Science Fiction: Hard and Soft. Hard SF is that which sticks strictly to known facts or plausible and probably true facts, such as the laws of physics. Most of H.G. Wells and probably all of Jules Verne are "soft" SF, in that they are either highly improbable, if not impossible, and definately ignore the laws of physics.
PLANET OF THE APES, both the book and original movie, are soft SF, but BENEATH gets even softer, and then ESCAPE even softer than that. And, of course, by the time you get to BATTLE, you're into "soft in the head" territory.
Oh, another HUGE reason why I think the circular, closed-loop timeline outlook on the original five films is wrong is because of the very conclusion of BATTLE. You have a Lawgiver at a time, according to what's said in the '68 original, before he's supposed to have lived, in a society with apes and intelligent humans living together, which wasn't what was said was the past in the first movie. It's therefore obvious that the timeline of ESCAPE, CONQUEST and BATTLE is an altered one from the first two movies. Pretty simple, I think. Which is why those that want to think of it as a closed loop not only puzzles me, but agrivates the hell out of me. What is wrong with your minds?
-----Original Message-----
From: JamesA1102@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 5, 2017 10:12 am
Subject: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
Wow! You just threw everything from H.G. Wells 'The Time Machine' to Back to the Future and 12 Monkeys under the bus.
---In pota@yahoogroups.com, < Haristas@...> wrote :
As far as we know, travelling back in time is sheer fantasy, so when that concept was introduced into the franchise with ESCAPE it actually hurt APES further as Science Fiction.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76640 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Dizzy Disney talks |
.htmlI've just been thinking about it, and if this modern APES trilogy got us, two thousand years in the future in its timeline to a simian society in 3978 that's like that depicted in the Boulle novel.... then that would be OK with me. That would be the remake of PLANET OF THE APES we should have got in 2001.
-----Original Message-----
From: mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 5, 2017 9:06 am
Subject: [pota] Re: Dizzy Disney talks
Maybe we'll finally get the long awaited "Planet of the Apes" musical we've all been clamoring for...
Word is that Disney is still negotiating for Fox so POTA might have a new home before the year is out.
Comcast (which owns Universal Pictures) is also a suitor (I'd prefer them because they are not so family friendly).
Meanwhile Cornelius is holding Zira close…
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76641 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlI can't remember when I joined this group, maybe as early as 1999 or 2000, but it was Jeff Krueger that told me I needed to join. I think he's regretted it ever since.
-----Original Message-----
From: mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 5, 2017 9:11 am
Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
Probably closer to 16 and 1/2, going on 17 for me... I think I signed up just a few months or so before the Burton film came out.
In a message dated 12/4/2017 11:58:27 AM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
Must be closer to 20.
Pretty sure I was on these forums pre-2001 Burton debacle.
Dario
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:05 PM, mlccougar@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Everything's cool... I knew you were saying it in jest-I got the joke : )
After reading your posts for 15+ years, i can pretty much tell when you're joking around.
In a message dated 12/4/2017 10:47:44 AM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
I'd say it's funny because you wouldn't say that. From your posts it's obvious you wouldn't say that.
Just being a comedian.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76642 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlSo I guess most science fiction, like Star Wars, is soft. ---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <Haristas@...> wrote : Spare me the hyperbole. There are two types of Science Fiction: Hard and Soft. Hard SF is that which sticks strictly to known facts or plausible and probably true facts, such as the laws of physics. Most of H.G. Wells and probably all of Jules Verne are "soft" SF, in that they are either highly improbable, if not impossible, and definately ignore the laws of physics. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76643 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Dizzy Disney talks |
.html.html .htmlThat could be interesting, though I'm sure I'd always prefer the "horse and buggy" approach they took with the original film.
In a message dated 12/5/2017 12:55:15 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
I've just been thinking about it, and if this modern APES trilogy got us, two thousand years in the future in its timeline to a simian society in 3978 that's like that depicted in the Boulle novel.... then that would be OK with me. That would be the remake of PLANET OF THE APES we should have got in 2001.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76644 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlI know your comment was directed toward Haristas, but I've always considered STAR WARS to be "space fantasy", not Sci-Fi.
In a message dated 12/5/2017 1:05:24 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
So I guess most science fiction, like Star Wars, is soft.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76645 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlIf you wish to view the original films as two timelines and that enhances your enjoyment of them, great. More power to you. However, please don't insult others, including the original screenwriter, who happen to have a different interpretation just because it doesn't agree yours. Thank you. ---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <Haristas@...> wrote :
Oh, another HUGE reason why I think the circular, closed-loop timeline outlook on the original five films is wrong is because of the very conclusion of BATTLE. You have a Lawgiver at a time, according to what's said in the '68 original, before he's supposed to have lived, in a society with apes and intelligent humans living together, which wasn't what was said was the past in the first movie. It's therefore obvious that the timeline of ESCAPE, CONQUEST and BATTLE is an altered one from the first two movies. Pretty simple, I think. Which is why those that want to think of it as a closed loop not only puzzles me, but agrivates the hell out of me. What is wrong with your minds? <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76646 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlDefinitely agree with you here re: The Lawgiver... Not only is he alive before he was supposed to be according to what was said in PLANET, BATTLE's Lawgiver was basically a "human lover", at least compared to what the original timeline Lawgiver was...
In a message dated 12/5/2017 12:54:45 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
You have a Lawgiver at a time, according to what's said in the '68 original, before he's supposed to have lived, in a society with apes and intelligent humans living together, which wasn't what was said was the past in the first movie. It's therefore obvious that the timeline of ESCAPE, CONQUEST and BATTLE is an altered one from the first two movies.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76647 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlPoint taken. 😀 ---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <mlccougar@...> wrote : I know your comment was directed toward Haristas, but I've always considered STAR WARS to be "space fantasy", not Sci-Fi.
In a message dated 12/5/2017 1:05:24 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
So I guess most science fiction, like Star Wars, is soft.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76648 |
From: Dario |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html But is "The Lawgiver" one unique individual or more a position or honorific? I waver between those to definitions as I believe the films themselves do. On Dec 5, 2017, at 1:12 PM, "Haristas@... [pota]" <pota@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Spare me the hyperbole. There are two types of Science Fiction: Hard and Soft. Hard SF is that which sticks strictly to known facts or plausible and probably true facts, such as the laws of physics. Most of H.G. Wells and probably all of Jules Verne are "soft" SF, in that they are either highly improbable, if not impossible, and definately ignore the laws of physics.
PLANET OF THE APES, both the book and original movie, are soft SF, but BENEATH gets even softer, and then ESCAPE even softer than that. And, of course, by the time you get to BATTLE, you're into "soft in the head" territory.
Oh, another HUGE reason why I think the circular, closed-loop timeline outlook on the original five films is wrong is because of the very conclusion of BATTLE. You have a Lawgiver at a time, according to what's said in the '68 original, before he's supposed to have lived, in a society with apes and intelligent humans living together, which wasn't what was said was the past in the first movie. It's therefore obvious that the timeline of ESCAPE, CONQUEST and BATTLE is an altered one from the first two movies. Pretty simple, I think. Which is why those that want to think of it as a closed loop not only puzzles me, but agrivates the hell out of me. What is wrong with your minds?
-----Original Message-----
From: JamesA1102@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 5, 2017 10:12 am
Subject: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
Wow! You just threw everything from H.G. Wells 'The Time Machine' to Back to the Future and 12 Monkeys under the bus.
---In pota@yahoogroups.com, < Haristas@...> wrote :
As far as we know, travelling back in time is sheer fantasy, so when that concept was introduced into the franchise with ESCAPE it actually hurt APES further as Science Fiction.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76649 |
From: Dario |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html I could be wrong but despite Lucas later trying to explain the 'science' behind the force, everyone would probably agree with that. It was lumped and categorized as SF simply because it was in space and had a lot of tech. But the story was pure Fantasy. Dario
On Dec 5, 2017, at 2:14 PM, "mlccougar@... [pota]" <pota@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I know your comment was directed toward Haristas, but I've always considered STAR WARS to be "space fantasy", not Sci-Fi.
In a message dated 12/5/2017 1:05:24 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
So I guess most science fiction, like Star Wars, is soft.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76650 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a Disney zone |
.html.html I'll tell you who the Lawgiver's gonna be – Disney. We might as well start calling it Planet of the Mice right now! Game over, man! It's over! (quote from the Fox film "Aliens"). Sent from Mail for Windows 10 But is "The Lawgiver" one unique individual or more a position or honorific? I waver between those to definitions as I believe the films themselves do.
On Dec 5, 2017, at 1:12 PM, "Haristas@... [pota]" <pota@yahoogroups.com> wrote: Spare me the hyperbole. There are two types of Science Fiction: Hard and Soft. Hard SF is that which sticks strictly to known facts or plausible and probably true facts, such as the laws of physics. Most of H.G. Wells and probably all of Jules Verne are "soft" SF, in that they are either highly improbable, if not impossible, and definately ignore the laws of physics.
PLANET OF THE APES, both the book and original movie, are soft SF, but BENEATH gets even softer, and then ESCAPE even softer than that. And, of course, by the time you get to BATTLE, you're into "soft in the head" territory.
Oh, another HUGE reason why I think the circular, closed-loop timeline outlook on the original five films is wrong is because of the very conclusion of BATTLE. You have a Lawgiver at a time, according to what's said in the '68 original, before he's supposed to have lived, in a society with apes and intelligent humans living together, which wasn't what was said was the past in the first movie. It's therefore obvious that the timeline of ESCAPE, CONQUEST and BATTLE is an altered one from the first two movies. Pretty simple, I think. Which is why those that want to think of it as a closed loop not only puzzles me, but agrivates the hell out of me. What is wrong with your minds?
-----Original Message----- From: JamesA1102@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com> To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tue, Dec 5, 2017 10:12 am Subject: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone Wow! You just threw everything from H.G. Wells 'The Time Machine' to Back to the Future and 12 Monkeys under the bus.
---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <Haristas@...> wrote : As far as we know, travelling back in time is sheer fantasy, so when that concept was introduced into the franchise with ESCAPE it actually hurt APES further as Science Fiction.
<.html <.html
|
|
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76651 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/5/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlWell that is debatable. Is the Lawgiver in Battle the same Lawgiver spoken about in Planet? Zaius says the Lawgiver wrote the Sacred Scrolls 1,200 year earlier. But the Lawgiver scenes in Battle take place 1,300 years before Planet.
Also, we never see the Lawgiver in Planet, other than a statue. We just hear some anti-human quotes. But the Lawgiver in Battle does speak of 'evil men who betrayed God's trust'. So was it a different Lawgiver who was anti-human or was the same Lawgiver who teachings were distorted over the centuries?
---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <dario.sciola@...> wrote : But is "The Lawgiver" one unique individual or more a position or honorific?
I waver between those to definitions as I believe the films themselves do. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76652 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlI'd say one unique individual... In PLANET, they refer to him as "The greatest ape of all, our Lawgiver" or words to that effect, and in BENEATH, he's referred to as "our prophet, our great Lawgiver" (or words to that effect). To me, in those words, he's being referred to as one ape. they don't say anything like, "Down thru the years, our Lawgivers" or anything like that-There's nothing to indicate that he's plural.
n a message dated 12/5/2017 4:48:35 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
But is "The Lawgiver" one unique individual or more a position or honorific?
I waver between those to definitions as I believe the films themselves do.
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76653 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlI think that should have read, "Your prophet, our great Lawgiver"...
In a message dated 12/6/2017 7:09:31 AM Central Standard Time, MLCCOUGAR@... writes:
in BENEATH, he's referred to as "our prophet, our great Lawgiver"
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76654 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlStar Wars is especially soft, so soft it's more fantasy than SF.
-----Original Message-----
From: JamesA1102@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 5, 2017 2:05 pm
Subject: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
So I guess most science fiction, like Star Wars, is soft.
---In pota@yahoogroups.com, < Haristas@...> wrote :
Spare me the hyperbole. There are two types of Science Fiction: Hard and Soft. Hard SF is that which sticks strictly to known facts or plausible and probably true facts, such as the laws of physics. Most of H.G. Wells and probably all of Jules Verne are "soft" SF, in that they are either highly improbable, if not impossible, and definately ignore the laws of physics.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76655 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html
If you wish to view the original films as two timelines and that enhances your enjoyment of them, great. More power to you. However, please don't insult others, including the original screenwriter, who happen to have a different interpretation just because it doesn't agree yours. Thank you.
Paul Dehn is NOT the original screenwriter -- Michael Wilson is. Dehn just screwed things up.
-----Original Message-----
From: JamesA1102@... [pota] <pota@yahoogroups.com>
To: pota <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 5, 2017 2:19 pm
Subject: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
If you wish to view the original films as two timelines and that enhances your enjoyment of them, great. More power to you. However, please don't insult others, including the original screenwriter, who happen to have a different interpretation just because it doesn't agree yours. Thank you.
---In pota@yahoogroups.com, < Haristas@...> wrote :
Oh, another HUGE reason why I think the circular, closed-loop timeline outlook on the original five films is wrong is because of the very conclusion of BATTLE. You have a Lawgiver at a time, according to what's said in the '68 original, before he's supposed to have lived, in a society with apes and intelligent humans living together, which wasn't what was said was the past in the first movie. It's therefore obvious that the timeline of ESCAPE, CONQUEST and BATTLE is an altered one from the first two movies. Pretty simple, I think. Which is why those that want to think of it as a closed loop not only puzzles me, but agrivates the hell out of me. What is wrong with your minds?
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76656 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html
But is "The Lawgiver" one unique individual or more a position or honorific?
I waver between those to definitions as I believe the films themselves do.
This is the thing -- if you want to start interpreting stuff there's no end to it and you can come up with answers to anything that doesn't add up.
I take the films on face value. As far as I can see, there is only one Lawgiver because Dr. Zaius says in PLANET that he was "the greatest ape of all, our Lawgiver." That doesn't imply there was more than one. Zaius also says the Scared Scrolls were written: "1200 years ago." That would be 3978 minus 1200 which equals 2778. BATTLE opens in 2670 with a Lawgiver that already seems old and is reading from a scroll which I'd have to assume is a scared one, though again, that's interpretation. The hundred years difference isn't that great and Zaius in PLANET could only be talking roughly about the timescale. Still...
There's this big difference... In PLANET, Zaius says the apes, specifically what he calls "the ancients," kept humans as household pets. OK, I see this as meaning apes before the time of the Lawgiver, and I don't see keeping an intelligent and especially an articulate creature such as a talking, thinking human being as a pet. Therefore, humans were already regressive animals before the time of the Lawgiver and the writing of the Sacred Scrolls, and add to that the text of the Twenty-Ninth Scroll and its warning about deadly nature of Mankind, and clearly, by what you see at the end of BATTLE, humanity has not regressed to an animal state, nor is the ape society hateful toward and shunning of the human race.
Conclusion, therefore..... The timeline has been changed.
However, since Dehn has the statue of Caesar shed a tear at the very end of BATTLE, it can still be seen, despite the timeline not exactly matching up, as portent that the peaceful society of apes and man as it is shown at the end of BATTLE isn't going to last and still could very well lead to the world of the original movie and the events of BENEATH.
Dehn basically tried to eat his cake and have it, too. The original five-film series can be interpreted either was, as two timelines, or as a timeloop. For me, though, the timeloop view has too many holes in it. Also, being a hater of the conclusion of BENEATH, I like the idea that those events can be changed.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76657 |
From: haristas |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html
Well that is debatable. Is the Lawgiver in Battle the same Lawgiver spoken about in Planet? Zaius says the Lawgiver wrote the Sacred Scrolls 1,200 year earlier. But the Lawgiver scenes in Battle take place 1,300 years before Planet.
Also, we never see the Lawgiver in Planet, other than a statue. We just hear some anti-human quotes. But the Lawgiver in Battle does speak of 'evil men who betrayed God's trust'. So was it a different Lawgiver who was anti-human or was the same Lawgiver who teachings were distorted over the centuries?
You see what you're doing there, you're making assumptions to try to correct contradictions in order to make the view of things as a closed timeloop make perfect sense. The problem is, things said and depicted in the movies just don't match or perfectly add up. They just don't, but if you want to start assuming things, you can go anywhere.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76658 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html There's a damn lot of time between "Battle" and "Planet". Especially for such a primitive society it's unrealistic to think they know exactly what went down in all those years. If in 30 years Haristas starts calling Donald Trump "the greatest person of all, our Lawgiver" that doesn't mean there weren't other presidents. It's true that if John Huston is called the Lawgiver we assume it's the same ape referred to later, but maybe he changed his tune and started hating humans. Though I don't believe Battle and Planet are the same timeline so why am I fighting your battles for you? Sent from
Mail for Windows 10 From: mlccougar@... [pota] Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 5:09 AM To: pota@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [pota] Re: Life in a "War" zone
I'd say one unique individual... In PLANET, they refer to him as "The greatest ape of all, our Lawgiver" or words to that effect, and in BENEATH, he's referred to as "our prophet, our great Lawgiver" (or words to that effect). To me, in those words, he's being referred to as one ape. they don't say anything like, "Down thru the years, our Lawgivers" or anything like that-There's nothing to indicate that he's plural.
n a message dated 12/5/2017 4:48:35 PM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
But is "The Lawgiver" one unique individual or more a position or honorific? I waver between those to definitions as I believe the films themselves do. <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76659 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: ape night on Nat Geo |
.html.html National Geographic Channel is repeating a 2-part thing "Kingdom of the Apes" tonight (Wednesday) and then start a 3-part doc on Dian Fossey, the famed gorilla researcher. Sigourney Weaver, who played Fossey in the acclaimed "Gorillas in the Mist", narrates it. Add this to "Jane", the doc about Jane Goodall that looks like it has a shot at an Oscar nomination/win for Best Doc. In times like these we need to go ape! Sent from Mail for Windows 10 <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76660 |
From: mlccougar |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.html.html .htmlIn a message dated 12/6/2017 11:07:14 AM Central Standard Time, pota@yahoogroups.com writes:
There's a damn lot of time between "Battle" and "Planet". Especially for such a primitive society it's unrealistic to think they know exactly what went down in all those years.
If in 30 years Haristas starts calling Donald Trump "the greatest person of all, our Lawgiver" that doesn't mean there weren't other presidents.
It's true that if John Huston is called the Lawgiver we assume it's the same ape referred to later, but maybe he changed his tune and started hating humans.
You know I'm of the altered/"two-timeline" theory, so all I'm getting at is in PLANET and BENEATH they refer to The Lawgiver in the singular sense... Just like there was only one Moses in Biblical times, there was only one Lawgiver in the original timeline of the apes.
As far as The Lawgiver in BATTLE, he doesn't count-He's a new prophet for a new timeline... A new orangutan with a whole new set of ideas and values, ready to shake up the establishment with his crazy pro-peaceful coexistence rhetoric. Actually, the way I see it, in the altered timeline, some of the same things that happened in the original will happen again, but differently ("altered")... Take the slavery thing-In the original timeline, apes were slaves to man for 500 years, in the altered, it was less than 10, so it happened again, but at a different rate of speed... And in the altered timeline, like slavery, the thing of there being a Lawgiver repeated itself, but in the new timeline, he was changed to an ape who was not a human hater, etc.
Though I don't believe Battle and Planet are the same timeline so why am I fighting your battles for you?
To show how much you like me?<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 76661 |
From: jamesa1102 |
Date: 12/6/2017 |
| Subject: Re: Life in a "War" zone |
.htmlNot assuming anything, just pointing out the inconsistencies based on what the audience actually sees in the films. ---In pota@yahoogroups.com, <Haristas@...> wrote :
You see what you're doing there, you're making assumptions to try to correct contradictions in order to make the view of things as a closed timeloop make perfect sense. The problem is, things said and depicted in the movies just don't match or perfectly add up. They just don't, but if you want to start assuming things, you can go anywhere.
<.html
|
|
|
|