Yahoo! potadg group — Messages 28568–28667

Dates: 2005-04-23 through 2005-04-28

Messages in potadg group. Page 99 of 451.
Index Prev  Next


Group: potadg Message: 28568 From: Jake Le Master Date: 4/23/2005
Subject: Apes-like Book
Group: potadg Message: 28569 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/23/2005
Subject: Re: Apes-like Book
Group: potadg Message: 28570 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Apes like Cougar
Group: potadg Message: 28571 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28572 From: HollowedOut Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST ANSWER
Group: potadg Message: 28573 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28574 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST ANSWER
Group: potadg Message: 28575 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST ANSWER
Group: potadg Message: 28576 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28577 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Comics
Group: potadg Message: 28578 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28579 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28580 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: LOTL (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 28581 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1552
Group: potadg Message: 28582 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1553
Group: potadg Message: 28583 From: Jake Le Master Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Apes like Cougar
Group: potadg Message: 28584 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28585 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: LOTL (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 28586 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: LOTL (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 28587 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: LOTL (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 28588 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28589 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1553
Group: potadg Message: 28590 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28591 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28592 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: LOTL (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 28593 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28594 From: John Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28595 From: John Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Moderating
Group: potadg Message: 28596 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Moderating
Group: potadg Message: 28597 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28598 From: Tont Nunes Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28599 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28600 From: geekorama2005 Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Sideshow's POTA toys
Group: potadg Message: 28601 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28602 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28603 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28604 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28605 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28606 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28607 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28608 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28609 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28610 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28611 From: Anthony B. McElveen Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28612 From: Matt Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Sideshow Slave Brent Exclusive Figure
Group: potadg Message: 28613 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Sideshow Slave Brent Exclusive Figure
Group: potadg Message: 28614 From: John Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28615 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28616 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 28617 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 28618 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28619 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28620 From: John Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28621 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28622 From: John Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28623 From: Jake Le Master Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings
Group: potadg Message: 28624 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28625 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings
Group: potadg Message: 28626 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28627 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings
Group: potadg Message: 28628 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Within - strip 37
Group: potadg Message: 28629 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28630 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Within - strip 37
Group: potadg Message: 28631 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28632 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28633 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28634 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28635 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28636 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28637 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28638 From: John Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28639 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Marvel UK issue 28
Group: potadg Message: 28640 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28641 From: Dario Sciola Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28642 From: taebokitti@aol.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28643 From: ron kenner Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28644 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28645 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28646 From: Neil Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28647 From: Neil Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28648 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28649 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28650 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 28
Group: potadg Message: 28651 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28652 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28653 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28654 From: Neil Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28655 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
Group: potadg Message: 28656 From: John Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Spoiling the group
Group: potadg Message: 28657 From: Dario Sciola Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Apes like Cougar
Group: potadg Message: 28658 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Ron Harper Lands
Group: potadg Message: 28659 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28660 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28661 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28662 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Spoiling the group
Group: potadg Message: 28663 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28664 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
Group: potadg Message: 28665 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 4/28/2005
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1554
Group: potadg Message: 28666 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 4/28/2005
Subject: Poll results for PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 28667 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 4/28/2005
Subject: Poll results for PotaDG



Group: potadg Message: 28568 From: Jake Le Master Date: 4/23/2005
Subject: Apes-like Book
.html
Does anyone know the name of the book that's about about some scientists and they are in suspended animation and they crash on a planet ruled by intelligent primates?  It was written before Boulle's Monkey Planet.  I think its called "Homos..." something.  Its driving me nuts and I would appreciate some help!
-Jake

Do You Yahoo!?

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28569 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/23/2005
Subject: Re: Apes-like Book
.html
.html.html In the most recent issue of Simian Scrolls, it mentions two "APES-like" books that pre-date Monkey Planet... They are titled: Genus Homo by L. Sprague de Camp & P. Schuyler Miller... Another is titled Across Time by David Grinnell...


In a message dated 4/23/2005 11:46:03 PM Central Standard Time, neptunewanter@... writes:

Does anyone know the name of the book that's about about some scientists and they are in suspended animation and they crash on a planet ruled by intelligent primates?  It was written before Boulle's Monkey Planet.  I think its called "Homos..." something.  Its driving me nuts and I would appreciate some help!


<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28570 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Apes like Cougar
.html
.html
  The one he's thinking of is "Genus Homo". The other one isn't much like POTA. Also cool is the horsie section of "Gulliver's Travels". - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes-like Book

In the most recent issue of Simian Scrolls, it mentions two "APES-like" books that pre-date Monkey Planet... They are titled: Genus Homo by L. Sprague de Camp & P. Schuyler Miller... Another is titled Across Time by David Grinnell...


In a message dated 4/23/2005 11:46:03 PM Central Standard Time, neptunewanter@... writes:

Does anyone know the name of the book that's about about some scientists and they are in suspended animation and they crash on a planet ruled by intelligent primates?  It was written before Boulle's Monkey Planet.  I think its called "Homos..." something.  Its driving me nuts and I would appreciate some help!


<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28571 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html

Fox has given you the green light to resurrect the POTA TV Show.

 

You have some decisions to make.

 

You want to conclude the 1974 TV Series and generate a new, better show.

 

Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke, Virdon and Galen?

 

I know for a FACT that Ron Harper would be available, but it is unlikely that James Naughton would be involved.

 

Would you go with a double/lookalike or would you write Pete out?

Comments?  Thoughts?

Michael

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28572 From: HollowedOut Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST ANSWER
.html
I'd call Naughten's agent and let him know with his last gig being a "Celebrix" commercial he could be doing better... I'd MAKE him come back on.
 
I would do a 4 hour mini movie pilot alla Battlestar Galactica... as for the story I'd make Whitty write something up (cause he'd so damn CHEAP!!) and have Neil come up with some story boards (again CHEAP!!) <Remeber I'm from FOX> ... as for the new story lines... not really sure but damnit it would be a winner.. alla Battlestar Galactica!!!
-Chris
Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:

Fox has given you the green light to resurrect the POTA TV Show.

 

You have some decisions to make.

 

You want to conclude the 1974 TV Series and generate a new, better show.

 

Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke, Virdon and Galen?

 

I know for a FACT that Ron Harper would be available, but it is unlikely that James Naughton would be involved.

 

Would you go with a double/lookalike or would you write Pete out?

Comments?  Thoughts?

Michael

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

<.html <.html
Group: potadg Message: 28573 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/24/2005 2:28:24 A.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Would you go with a double/lookalike or would you write Pete out?
 
Pete and Galen would have been killed in a raid.
Virdon manages to escape and hooks up with
another sympathetic chimp, like Kira or someone.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28574 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST ANSWER
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/24/2005 2:54:46 A.M. Central Standard Time, at_deaths_door@... writes:
I'd call Naughten's agent and let him know with his last gig being a "Celebrix" commercial he could be doing better... I'd MAKE him come back on.
 
Hey, national commercials pay good money.
I don't see any Land Of The Lost reunion shows.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28575 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST ANSWER
.html
.html

Cheap bastard!  ;)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of HollowedOut
Sent: Sunday, 24 April 2005 5:54 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST ANSWER

 

I'd call Naughten's agent and let him know with his last gig being a "Celebrix" commercial he could be doing better... I'd MAKE him come back on.

 

I would do a 4 hour mini movie pilot alla Battlestar Galactica... as for the story I'd make Whitty write something up (cause he'd so damn CHEAP!!) and have Neil come up with some story boards (again CHEAP!!) <Remeber I'm from FOX> ... as for the new story lines... not really sure but damnit it would be a winner.. alla Battlestar Galactica!!!

-Chris
Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:

Fox has given you the green light to resurrect the POTA TV Show.

 

You have some decisions to make.

 

You want to conclude the 1974 TV Series and generate a new, better show.

 

Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke, Virdon and Galen?

 

I know for a FACT that Ron Harper would be available, but it is unlikely that James Naughton would be involved.

 

Would you go with a double/lookalike or would you write Pete out?

Comments?  Thoughts?

Michael


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28576 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html

Well done T.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Sunday, 24 April 2005 9:22 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

 

In a message dated 4/24/2005 2:28:24 A.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

Would you go with a double/lookalike or would you write Pete out?

 

Pete and Galen would have been killed in a raid.

Virdon manages to escape and hooks up with

another sympathetic chimp, like Kira or someone.


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28577 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Comics
.html
Whitster...I think you might be asking for trouble
.....Several people trying to fashion the strip might
prove to be frustrating for you and Neil....and why
shouldn't we trust you? It's worked so far!

TIm

--- Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:

> Still not sure if I do want to. However, you seem
> to be the only person
> here who wants to get involved (which is
> understandable - and quite a
> compliment that you all seem to trust me! ;) so
> unlikely.
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of John
> Sent: Saturday, 23 April 2005 12:29 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Comics
>
>
> I'm in. That is if you really think you want to get
> outside opinions
> on a story you've worked so hard on already. I'm
> always willing to
> chime in with some thoughts on story ideas and
> options.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty"
> <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Now that we have actually been getting some
> feedback on the comics,
> I am
> > wondering if the group would like to participate
> in the direction of
> the
> > comics.
> >
> > It really is a treat to just see the new pages
> when they are done.
> >
> > However if people are interested, I may consider
> telling where we are
> > going to get comments and possibly make
> adjustments as we go along.
> >
> > I would probably deliver the story in the same
> manner as the comics
> are
> > delivered.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Michael
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an
> email to:
> PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
<mailto:PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
>
>
> *
> the Yahoo! Terms of
> <
>
> --
>


<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28578 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
Change the cast and format....maybe make references to
burke, virdon and galen as "the ones that came before"
or something...but a new cast would be good. Maybe
Harper could make a guest appearance as Old Virdon and
help the new cast out........

Tim
--- Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:

> Fox has given you the green light to resurrect the
> POTA TV Show.
>
> You have some decisions to make.
>
> You want to conclude the 1974 TV Series and generate
> a new, better show.
>
> Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you
> write in Burke,
> Virdon and Galen?
>
> I know for a FACT that Ron Harper would be
> available, but it is unlikely
> that James Naughton would be involved.
>
> Would you go with a double/lookalike or would you
> write Pete out?
>
> Comments? Thoughts?
>
> Michael
>


<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28579 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html.html In a message dated 4/24/2005 2:28:22 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke, Virdon and Galen?


I would just pick their story up where it left off on the original series... I doubt that they'd still be running around after thirty years anyway, so it would make sense to just pick it up where it left off rather than have it that they survived 30 years of wandering...

I don't think you'd need the original actors to portray their characters, you'd just need the characters themselves...
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28580 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: LOTL (OT)
.html
.html.html In a message dated 4/24/2005 6:28:55 AM Central Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:

I don't see any Land Of The Lost reunion shows.


Harper is doing commentary and an interview for the third season of LOTL... Does that count?
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28581 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1552
.html
Dario <darios@...> wrote:
>
> OT: I too an familiar with "On the Beach", both the (highly underrated)
> movie and the novel written by Nevil Shute. The story is of course set
> mainly in Aussie-land, but is Shute an Aussie himself? Didn't know that.

I've just kind of assumed he was since he wrote "On the Beach" and also
"Walkabout". I'm pretty sure he wrote another famous book whose title
escapes me that was also set in Oz.

Alan
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28582 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1553
.html
"Michael Whitty" <whitty@... > wrote:
>
> You want to conclude the 1974 TV Series and generate a new, better show.
>
> Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke,
> Virdon and Galen?

Here are my thoughts.

Roddy obviously isn't available and it's highly unlikely that Naughton would
have anything to do with it (although for the right money, you never
know...) so it's really only Harper that would return.

First things first, this show cannot survive by just trying to appeal to the
original audience. Hell, even half the original audience probably don't
remember enough about it to pick up from where it ended. So I would start
afresh with a new cast (I'd go with the RETURN dynamic of two men and a
woman) - I'd also give consideration to how they get there. It seems to me
that we've done astronauts to death so it'd be either some kind of time
travel experiment or else maybe some cryogenic experiment.

They'd awake in the future many years after the original TV show, discover
that Earth has been taken over by apes, etc. (and since there's no space
travel involved we'd not need to worry about them believing whether they
were on Earth or not - they'd know). After some introductory story
showcasing this strange new world, they'd run into Alan Virdon, who'd tell
them all about what happened to him and his crew (a quick recap of the
original show's premise, meaning we can continue from there without needing
to spend ages explaining who all these characters were).

We'd now learn that Galen and Burke were eventually killed by Zaius and Urko
and as a result Virdon is a bitter and twisted old man who hates the apes.
He's finally at the end of his tether and has hatched an elaborate plot to
lead a human revolt.

Our new travellers however gradually realise that this plot will end up
being a bloodthirsty coup with high death tolls on both sides and decide to
go against Alan and avert it. They save the day but because of their known
association with Alan they are implicated in the plot. Cue the action-packed
finale which sees Virdon redeem himself again by sacrificing his own life to
save the lives of the three new characters, who are now forced to go on the
run and voila, we have a similar premise to the original show but with two
men and a woman rather than two men and an ape (two men and a woman would
give rise to its own set of problems I think).

Of course, we'd discover later in the series that Virdon didn't actually
die, he was merely horribly injured and would be back later in the season
even madder than ever.

Alan
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28583 From: Jake Le Master Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Apes like Cougar
.html
Thanks for the help.  Both books are shipping out to me tomorrow.  Have any of you ever read actually read them?

veetus@... wrote:
  The one he's thinking of is "Genus Homo". The other one isn't much like POTA. Also cool is the horsie section of "Gulliver's Travels". - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes-like Book

In the most recent issue of Simian Scrolls, it mentions two "APES-like" books that pre-date Monkey Planet ... They are titled: Genus Homo by L. Sprague de Camp & P. Schuyler Miller... Another is titled Across Time by David Grinnell...


In a message dated 4/23/2005 11:46:03 PM Central Standard Time, neptunewanter@... writes:

Does anyone know the name of the book that's about about some scientists and they are in suspended animation and they crash on a planet ruled by intelligent primates?  It was written before Boulle's Monkey Planet.  I think its called "Homos..." something.  Its driving me nuts and I would appreciate some help!


Do You Yahoo!?

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28584 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/24/2005 9:55:47 A.M. Central Standard Time, apefan23@... writes:
Maybe Harper could make a guest appearance as Old Virdon and
help the new cast out........
 
THAT's an idea.  They could be hiding in a cave an run into
a Hermit Virdon, adding to a sense of foreboding to their chances
for a life on the planet of the apes.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28585 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: LOTL (OT)
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/24/2005 11:32:59 A.M. Central Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
Harper is doing commentary and an interview for the third season of LOTL... Does that count?
 
As long as he got a paycheck it does.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28586 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: LOTL (OT)
.html
.html
  The "Hollywood Reporter" has just announced that Will Ferrell is going to star in the "Land of the Lost" movie, being made by his "Anchorman" director. It's a comedy. This is NOT a joke (go to www.comingsoon.net ). Sorry, "Land of the Lost" fans. Hollywood chews up and spits out another one. - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 9:32 AM
Subject: [PotaDG] LOTL (OT)

In a message dated 4/24/2005 6:28:55 AM Central Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:

I don't see any Land Of The Lost reunion shows.


Harper is doing commentary and an interview for the third season of LOTL... Does that count?
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28587 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: LOTL (OT)
.html
Read yesterday where Will Farrell will be in the new
movie version......didn't he play a cop once named
"Marshall Willnholly"?

Tim


--- LordTZer0@... wrote:

>
> In a message dated 4/24/2005 11:32:59 A.M. Central
> Standard Time,
> mlccougar@... writes:
>
> Harper is doing commentary and an interview for the
> third season of LOTL...
> Does that count?
>
>
>
> As long as he got a paycheck it does.
>
>


<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28588 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html

That’s interesting – I would have thought most people would want to see the characters played only by the actors (well, except Galen of course!).

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Monday, 25 April 2005 2:29 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

 

In a message dated 4/24/2005 2:28:22 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke, Virdon and Galen?



I would just pick their story up where it left off on the original series... I doubt that they'd still be running around after thirty years anyway, so it would make sense to just pick it up where it left off rather than have it that they survived 30 years of wandering...

I don't think you'd need the original actors to portray their characters, you'd just need the characters themselves...

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28589 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1553
.html
This is EXTREMELY close to what I am thinking Alan - I am running to the
copyright store as we speak! ;)

Really, this is DAMNED close!

However, there needs to be an enormous change in the character of the
mains and the events causing that need to be (not TOO!) detailed and
believable.....and with the onslaught of "missing link cartoons"
(Matrix, Riddick etc), this is something I'd love to have - an animated
"missing link".

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Alan Maxwell
Sent: Monday, 25 April 2005 2:00 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Digest Number 1553


"Michael Whitty" <whitty@...> wrote:
>
> You want to conclude the 1974 TV Series and generate a new, better
show.
>
> Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke,
> Virdon and Galen?

Here are my thoughts.

Roddy obviously isn't available and it's highly unlikely that Naughton
would
have anything to do with it (although for the right money, you never
know...) so it's really only Harper that would return.

First things first, this show cannot survive by just trying to appeal to
the
original audience. Hell, even half the original audience probably don't
remember enough about it to pick up from where it ended. So I would
start
afresh with a new cast (I'd go with the RETURN dynamic of two men and a
woman) - I'd also give consideration to how they get there. It seems to
me
that we've done astronauts to death so it'd be either some kind of time
travel experiment or else maybe some cryogenic experiment.

They'd awake in the future many years after the original TV show,
discover
that Earth has been taken over by apes, etc. (and since there's no space
travel involved we'd not need to worry about them believing whether they
were on Earth or not - they'd know). After some introductory story
showcasing this strange new world, they'd run into Alan Virdon, who'd
tell
them all about what happened to him and his crew (a quick recap of the
original show's premise, meaning we can continue from there without
needing
to spend ages explaining who all these characters were).

We'd now learn that Galen and Burke were eventually killed by Zaius and
Urko
and as a result Virdon is a bitter and twisted old man who hates the
apes.
He's finally at the end of his tether and has hatched an elaborate plot
to
lead a human revolt.

Our new travellers however gradually realise that this plot will end up
being a bloodthirsty coup with high death tolls on both sides and decide
to
go against Alan and avert it. They save the day but because of their
known
association with Alan they are implicated in the plot. Cue the
action-packed
finale which sees Virdon redeem himself again by sacrificing his own
life to
save the lives of the three new characters, who are now forced to go on
the
run and voila, we have a similar premise to the original show but with
two
men and a woman rather than two men and an ape (two men and a woman
would
give rise to its own set of problems I think).

Of course, we'd discover later in the series that Virdon didn't actually
die, he was merely horribly injured and would be back later in the
season
even madder than ever.

Alan
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28590 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html

Sounds good to me! ;)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
Sent: Monday, 25 April 2005 12:26 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

 

Change the cast and format....maybe make references to
burke, virdon and galen as "the ones that came before"
or something...but a new cast would be good. Maybe
Harper could make a guest appearance as Old Virdon and
help the new cast out........

Tim
--- Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:

> Fox has given you the green light to resurrect the
> POTA TV Show.

> You have some decisions to make.

> You want to conclude the 1974 TV Series and generate
> a new, better show.

> Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you
> write in Burke,
> Virdon and Galen?

> I know for a FACT that Ron Harper would be
> available, but it is unlikely
> that James Naughton would be involved.

> Would you go with a double/lookalike or would you
> write Pete out?
>
> Comments?  Thoughts?
>
> Michael


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28591 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
  They should do a campy movie version of the series with Ben Stiller as Burke and Owen Wilson as Virdon. Galen is now Galene and is played by Nicole Kidman. Sorry folks, but this is the ONLY way it will get made. Do you want it or not? - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:27 PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

That’s interesting – I would have thought most people would want to see the characters played only by the actors (well, except Galen of course!).

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Monday, 25 April 2005 2:29 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

 

In a message dated 4/24/2005 2:28:22 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke, Virdon and Galen?



I would just pick their story up where it left off on the original series... I doubt that they'd still be running around after thirty years anyway, so it would make sense to just pick it up where it left off rather than have it that they survived 30 years of wandering...

I don't think you'd need the original actors to portray their characters, you'd just need the characters themselves...

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28592 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: LOTL (OT)
.html
Hey, that's right! Farrell played Marshall Willenholly in "Jay and Silent
Bob Strike Back", which had plenty of POTA references. I was there when they
filmed the cornfield hunt parody. - - - Jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim "apefan"" <apefan23@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] LOTL (OT)


>
> Read yesterday where Will Farrell will be in the new
> movie version......didn't he play a cop once named
> "Marshall Willnholly"?
>
> Tim
>
>
> --- LordTZer0@... wrote:
>
> >
> > In a message dated 4/24/2005 11:32:59 A.M. Central
> > Standard Time,
> > mlccougar@... writes:
> >
> > Harper is doing commentary and an interview for the
> > third season of LOTL...
> > Does that count?
> >
> >
> >
> > As long as he got a paycheck it does.
> >
> >
>
>
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28593 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html.html In a message dated 4/24/2005 6:35:18 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

That's interesting – I would have thought most people would want to see the characters played only by the actors (well, except Galen of course!).

It's not a neccessity to have them played by the same people as long as their replacements are like them (but NOT cheap imitations of them, or parodies of them).
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28594 From: John Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
A new actor would be easy to pull off. Most people would be new fans
and not too critical or comparing, and old fans would be glad to see
the characters return in any form.






--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Fox has given you the green light to resurrect the POTA TV Show.
>
> You have some decisions to make.
>
> You want to conclude the 1974 TV Series and generate a new, better
show.
>
> Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke,
> Virdon and Galen?
>
> I know for a FACT that Ron Harper would be available, but it is
unlikely
> that James Naughton would be involved.
>
> Would you go with a double/lookalike or would you write Pete out?
>
> Comments? Thoughts?
>
> Michael
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28595 From: John Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Moderating
.html
Are you now going to moderate the group or have I been ousted for some
reason. My last couple of post are not showing up. Why have you
forsaken me. Is it cause I was the only one interested in helping to
tinker with the comics? I take it back. I was just kidding around. Of
course I wouldn't want to mess with perfection.... you F@#$'n
bastards!!!! Now let me back in before I go apeshit on ya!
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28596 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/24/2005
Subject: Re: Moderating
.html
.html

You are definitely not being moderated!

 

Probably some problem with yahoo

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Monday, 25 April 2005 1:19 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Moderating

 


Are you now going to moderate the group or have I been ousted for some
reason. My last couple of post are not showing up. Why have you
forsaken me. Is it cause I was the only one interested in helping to
tinker with the comics? I take it back. I was just kidding around. Of
course I wouldn't want to mess with perfection.... you F@#$'n
bastards!!!! Now let me back in before I go apeshit on ya!





--
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28597 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html

No thanks – PASS!

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent:
Monday, 25 April 2005 9:55 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

 

  They should do a campy movie version of the series with Ben Stiller as Burke and Owen Wilson as Virdon. Galen is now Galene and is played by Nicole Kidman. Sorry folks, but this is the ONLY way it will get made. Do you want it or not? - - - Jeff

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:27 PM

Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

 

That’s interesting – I would have thought most people would want to see the characters played only by the actors (well, except Galen of course!).

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent:
Monday, 25 April 2005 2:29 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

 

In a message dated 4/24/2005 2:28:22 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


Keeping in mind it has been 30 years, how would you write in Burke, Virdon and Galen?



I would just pick their story up where it left off on the original series... I doubt that they'd still be running around after thirty years anyway, so it would make sense to just pick it up where it left off rather than have it that they survived 30 years of wandering...

I don't think you'd need the original actors to portray their characters, you'd just need the characters themselves...


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28598 From: Tont Nunes Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
What if, instead of them finding Virdon, hermit Virdon
is still on the run after all these years and while
ducking into a cave discovers the freezing chambers?
He could be the one that awakens them.

Someone should be writing all of this down.


--- LordTZer0@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 4/24/2005 9:55:47 A.M. Central
> Standard Time,
> apefan23@... writes:
>
> Maybe Harper could make a guest appearance as Old
> Virdon and
> help the new cast out........
>
>
>
>
> THAT's an idea. They could be hiding in a cave an
> run into
> a Hermit Virdon, adding to a sense of foreboding to
> their chances
> for a life on the planet of the apes.
>
>

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28599 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html

Again – extremely close to what I have planned.

 

I have a twist on the suspended animation though, that I think you will all like.  A similar idea, but more in line with the current big issues today (not suspended animation, but a different method by which we might “resurrect the dead!).

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tont Nunes
Sent: Tuesday, 26 April 2005 3:26 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

 

What if, instead of them finding Virdon, hermit Virdon
is still on the run after all these years and while
ducking into a cave discovers the freezing chambers?
He could be the one that awakens them.

Someone should be writing all of this down.


--- LordTZer0@... wrote:

> In a message dated 4/24/2005 9:55:47 A.M. Central
> Standard Time, 
> apefan23@... writes:
>
>
Maybe  Harper could make a guest appearance as Old
> Virdon and
> help the new cast  out........


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28600 From: geekorama2005 Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Sideshow's POTA toys
.html
Sorry guys, I'm a little behind the times on the posts as I was out of town for a while. I've
just been going back through to see what I missed (man you guys can talk!! - so fun to
read it all!) and I just wanted to make a point in Sideshow's defense here (as a fairly rabid
collector of theirs! - and not just of POTA - have you seen their new Grievous statue??
Amazing... anyway, back on topic!). I think what we're talking about here is the difference
between "dolls" and "collectibles". These are technically collectibles - I don't know a whole
lot of people who actually take them down and play with them and re-dress them etc. (I
know I don't - I'm always nervous of messing something up! - that's probably one of the
reasons they don't sell the clothes separately too - it cuts down on accidentally damaging
the figure) - they are not for children to play with (the amount of work that goes into them
drives up the cost beyond that level) - they are for displaying and enjoying as an adult -
admiring the detailing in the costumes and props, etc. I personally like having the
different variations of characters so that I can display them all at the same time - rather
than one day having astronaut Brent and then one day having slave Brent, I can have both
at the same time, forming a character collage. But that's just my opinion. I mean,
honestly, how often would you be changing the clothes on them? Personally I would
probably just leave the figure in one outfit anyway. This way we can choose - would I
rather have this one, or that one? Or both?? Anyway, that's just my 2 cents. I suppose it
would be nice to have the OPTION of buying just the outfit on any variation, but then we
would be living in a perfect world and that just ain't gonna happen! :)
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28601 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/25/2005 12:27:04 P.M. Central Standard Time, arseface00@... writes:
What if, instead of them finding Virdon, hermit Virdon
is still on the run after all these years and while
ducking into a cave discovers the freezing chambers?
He could be the one that awakens them.
 
Wait, finds who?
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28602 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
I'm assuming he would find the new main characters......
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:59 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

In a message dated 4/25/2005 12:27:04 P.M. Central Standard Time, arseface00@... writes:
What if, instead of them finding Virdon, hermit Virdon
is still on the run after all these years and while
ducking into a cave discovers the freezing chambers?
He could be the one that awakens them.
 
Wait, finds who?
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28603 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
Or, have Virdon, fleeing the gorillas come across what use to be the remains of a cyrogenic research facility and going into a underground level which was undamaged during the nuclear war come across the three cryo chambers with the new characters inside them .
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28604 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
Close.
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of PofTAfan@...
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:03 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

Or, have Virdon, fleeing the gorillas come across what use to be the remains of a cyrogenic research facility and going into a underground level which was undamaged during the nuclear war come across the three cryo chambers with the new characters inside them .
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28605 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/25/2005 6:53:18 P.M. Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
I'm assuming he would find the new main characters......
 
I kind of lie that idea.
There's more than one way to travel to the future.
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28606 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
Yup.
 
And I thik we are all agreed that the Astronauts proving Hasslein's theories have been done to death.
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 12:54 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

In a message dated 4/25/2005 6:53:18 P.M. Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
I'm assuming he would find the new main characters......
 
I kind of lie that idea.
There's more than one way to travel to the future.
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28607 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
and their pet chimp!
>
> Or, have Virdon, fleeing the gorillas come across
> what use to be the remains
> of a cyrogenic research facility and going into a
> underground level which
> was undamaged during the nuclear war come across the
> three cryo chambers
> with the new characters inside them .
>
>

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28608 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
You know - I was thinking about that too.....what happened to the lower great apes as the upright walking apes came on to the scene.
 
I have plotted something that we were going to explore in "Within".
 
By the way - anyone want to see the next "Within" strip?  I know there are another 4 spectacular strips finished.....
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 2:21 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

and their pet chimp!
>
> Or, have Virdon, fleeing the gorillas come across
> what use to be the remains
> of a cyrogenic research facility and going into a
> underground level which
> was undamaged during the nuclear war come across the
> three cryo chambers
> with the new characters inside them .
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28609 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/25/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html.html In a message dated 4/25/2005 11:31:55 PM Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:

By the way - anyone want to see the next "Within" strip?

I'd like to see all four...
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28610 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
GREEDY!  ;)

Neil, where's the next one buddy?  Or do we need another few requests...?
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 2:49 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

In a message dated 4/25/2005 11:31:55 PM Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:

By the way - anyone want to see the next "Within" strip?


I'd like to see all four...
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28611 From: Anthony B. McElveen Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
On Apr 26, 2005, at 12:19 AM, Whitty, Michael wrote:

> Neil, where's the next one buddy? Or do we need another few
> requests...?

Here's mine; Please, may we see them, Neil?
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28612 From: Matt Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Sideshow Slave Brent Exclusive Figure
.html
Not sure if this has been posted yet, but here it is:

http://www.sideshowtoy.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi?item=75091


Matt
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28613 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Sideshow Slave Brent Exclusive Figure
.html
.html

Thanks Matt.

 

Looks GOOFY!

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, 26 April 2005 11:42 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Sideshow Slave Brent Exclusive Figure

 


Not sure if this has been posted yet, but here it is:

http://www.sideshowtoy.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi?item=75091


Matt


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28614 From: John Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
>
> Neil, where's the next one buddy? Or do we need another few
requests...?
>


Man. You can't turn these things out fast enough for most of us and
now we find out that your sitting on them. You are an evil bastard
Neil. I guess that's part of what I like about you.
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28615 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html

Hey – aren’t you on moderation?  J

Did you work out what the problem is?

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2005 5:36 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

 



>
> Neil, where's the next one buddy?  Or do we need another few
requests...?
>


Man. You can't turn these things out fast enough for most of us and
now we find out that your sitting on them. You are an evil bastard
Neil. I guess that's part of what I like about you.


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28616 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
.html
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
group.

File : /Within the Planet of the Apes/chapter 37.jpg
Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
Description : Chapter 37

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Within%20the%20Planet%20of%20the%20Apes/chapter%2037.jpg

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28617 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
.html
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
group.

File : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 06.jpg
Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
Description : Scroll 6

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%20Musings/UMM%2006.jpg

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28618 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/26/2005 2:39:19 P.M. Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:

Man. You can't turn these things out fast enough for most of us and
now we find out that your sitting on them. You are an evil bastard
 
As much as I like them I don't want Neil to compromise the quality.
That's what I really like about them.  The art is as good, and in
many cases better, than the original commercial comics.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28619 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
That's what continues to amaze me.
 
Neil has uploaded the next chapter I see.
 
The following 3 chapters are also quite outstanding.
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 8:41 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

In a message dated 4/26/2005 2:39:19 P.M. Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:

Man. You can't turn these things out fast enough for most of us and
now we find out that your sitting on them. You are an evil bastard
 
As much as I like them I don't want Neil to compromise the quality.
That's what I really like about them.  The art is as good, and in
many cases better, than the original commercial comics.
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28620 From: John Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
I'm not sure what was going on. I purged a lot of crap off of my
computer and started having that problem. Since I've restarted my
computer everything seems to be back to normal.






--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Hey - aren't you on moderation? :-)
>
> Did you work out what the problem is?
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of John
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2005 5:36 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
>
>
>
> >
> > Neil, where's the next one buddy? Or do we need another few
> requests...?
> >
>
>
> Man. You can't turn these things out fast enough for most of us and
> now we find out that your sitting on them. You are an evil bastard
> Neil. I guess that's part of what I like about you.
>
> --
Group: potadg Message: 28621 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
Maybe you got the groups mixed up?
 
Now go read Within...and make a comment...OR I'LL PLACE YOU ON MODERATION!!!!  ;)

Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of John
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 8:57 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!


I'm not sure what was going on. I purged a lot of crap off of my
computer and started having that problem. Since I've restarted my
computer everything seems to be back to normal.






--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Hey - aren't you on moderation?  :-)
>
> Did you work out what the problem is?
>
> Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of John
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2005 5:36 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

>
>
> >
> > Neil, where's the next one buddy?  Or do we need another few
> requests...?
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28622 From: John Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
How DARE YOU accuse ME of confusing groups. I know where I'm at at
all times... and so does the State. So your lucky I can't hop on down
there and give you a good thrashing. As for Within. Maybe I could
comment more if I had more to work with. Neil? I mean I'm pretty sure
Milo is not going to get shot, right?






--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Whitty, Michael"
<Michael.Whitty@d...> wrote:
> Maybe you got the groups mixed up?
>
> Now go read Within...and make a comment...OR I'LL PLACE YOU ON
> MODERATION!!!! ;)
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of
> John
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 8:57 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
>
>
>
> I'm not sure what was going on. I purged a lot of crap off of my
> computer and started having that problem. Since I've restarted my
> computer everything seems to be back to normal.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Hey - aren't you on moderation? :-)
> >
> > Did you work out what the problem is?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On
> Behalf
> > Of John
> > Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2005 5:36 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Neil, where's the next one buddy? Or do we need another few
> > requests...?
>
>
Group: potadg Message: 28623 From: Jake Le Master Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings
.html
Hahaha....I heard that one a long long time ago and totally forgot about it.  That cracked me up and was very insightful.
-Jake

PotaDG@yahoogroups.com wrote:


Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
group.

  File        : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 06.jpg
  Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
  Description : Scroll 6

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%20Musings/UMM%2006.jpg

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>









Yahoo! Groups Links

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

<.html <.html
Group: potadg Message: 28624 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
Who says it is Milo?  :)
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of John
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:10 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!


How DARE YOU accuse ME of confusing groups. I know where I'm at at
all times... and so does the State. So your lucky I can't hop on down
there and give you a good thrashing. As for Within. Maybe I could
comment more if I had more to work with. Neil? I mean I'm pretty sure
Milo is not going to get shot, right?






--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Whitty, Michael"
<Michael.Whitty@d...> wrote:
> Maybe you got the groups mixed up?

> Now go read Within...and make a comment...OR I'LL PLACE YOU ON
> MODERATION!!!!  ;)
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of
> John
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 8:57 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
>
>
>
> I'm not sure what was going on. I purged a lot of crap off of my
> computer and started having that problem. Since I've restarted my
> computer everything seems to be back to normal.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > Hey - aren't you on moderation?  :-)
> >
> > Did you work out what the problem is?
> >
> > Michael
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of John
> > Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2005 5:36 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
> > 
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Neil, where's the next one buddy?  Or do we need another few
> > requests...?
>
>
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28625 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings
.html
.html
Was this the one about the wise ape who would not listen to people saying anything bad about others?
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Jake Le Master
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:17 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings

Hahaha....I heard that one a long long time ago and totally forgot about it.  That cracked me up and was very insightful.
-Jake

PotaDG@yahoogroups.com wrote:


Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
group.

  File        : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 06.jpg
  Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>
  Description : Scroll 6

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%20Musings/UMM%2006.jpg

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

munkeyman63au <nfoster@...>









Yahoo! Groups Links

Do You

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28626 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
I thought about the last post that I sent in about this and I came up with this.
 
        Virdon, on seeing Galen captured by Urko and his soldiers and Burke killed by the same Virdon flees into the area what the ape civilization called the Wastelands(i.e the Mohave Desert) as the gorillas does not even follows him into the region. To the gorillas and Urko, Virdon is dead.  Thirty years later, two chimpanzee archeologists (male and female assistant) upon rumors of an ancient civilization deep in the Wastelands go to investigate that are these rumors are true or not.
          After a ten day trek across the Wastelands, the two stumbled across the remains of a military base which was once called Area 51. Upon exploring the ruins of the base they see a perfectly preserved spaceship(the same ship that crashed landed on Earth during Escape) and run into Virdon who was for the past twelve years was hiding at the ruins and was also repairing the ship so he could get back to his family. One of the apes(the male) recognized him because about thirty years before, the trio went through his town when he was a child. As the male chimpanzee tells Virdon that Galen upon his capture by Urko and his gorillas was imprision for twenty years for treason but was pardoned by Zaius upon he renounced Burke and Virdon. While the male archeologist and Virdon discussed the past thirty years the female assistant was exploring the remains of top secret base finds the room which has several cylinder chambers in them (five cylinders are in the room), as she goes to one of the cylinders, she rubs of the frost off of one of them which to her has strange feel to her looks into the cylinder and then lets out a scream.  Virdon and the male chimpanzee runs towards the room. When they get to the room, the female assistant is on the floor pointing to one of the cylinder,as Virdon and the male chimpanzee moves towards the cylinder they peer into the cylinder and see a human male preserved in one the cylinder. Virdon who thinks that there could be more checks the rest of the cylinders. As he does he finds a female in the other, as Virdon looks in the other,  the two chimpanzees examines the panel and accidentally hits a button which now starts to thaw two of the five cylinders, unbeknown to the trio. As Virdon  looks in the third cylinder and calls over the two chimpanzee archeologists. Inside the cylinder is a chimpanzee, a male chimpanzee. As the three looks into the cylinder, the first cylinder opens up and the male who was in the cylinder falls to the floor, unconscious but alive.
 
             This is what I thought about last night and this today and I am not finished with this. Please give me your comments and thoughts about this.
 
Kevin
 
P.S. I am still working on this.
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28627 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings
.html
No, that was #5, which I thought was very good. Who came up with that one?
 
#6 was funny, but a bit on the rude side. Not exactly 'family friendly' if you ask me. Are we still trying to keep this board safe for kids or has that ship sailed?
 
Greg

"Whitty, Michael" <Michael.Whitty@...> wrote:
Was this the one about the wise ape who would not listen to people saying anything bad about others?
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Jake Le Master
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:17 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings

Hahaha....I heard that one a long long time ago and totally forgot about it.  That cracked me up and was very insightful.
-Jake

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28628 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Within - strip 37
.html
It figures that after the big reveal of strip 36 we switch locales again and return to Ursus, Zaius and Milo (or whoever that is if it's not Milo but until he actually gets named I'm calling him Milo). I'm still not entirely clear on who's allied with who here. Zaius and Ursus seem to have learned about Garvon's discovery through different means. This strip would seem to indicate that Milo was reporting back to Zaius, but perhaps he was playing both Ursus and Zaius against each other? Or maybe it was Marcus who was getting his info from Milo and he's the one leaking to both Zaius and Ursus?
 
Maybe I'm overthinking this. Can we have more pretty pictures of the spaceships and mutants, please?
 
Greg
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28629 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
I think it depends on Helen's presence....or absence as the case may be.  ;)
 
I'd certainly like to come to a decision on this Greg, and I can only go on the feedback I get.
 
Please put forward you opinions people and I will make a decision on the first of May.
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Greg Plonowski
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:31 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings

No, that was #5, which I thought was very good. Who came up with that one?
 
#6 was funny, but a bit on the rude side. Not exactly 'family friendly' if you ask me. Are we still trying to keep this board safe for kids or has that ship sailed?
 
Greg

"Whitty, Michael" <Michael.Whitty@...> wrote:
Was this the one about the wise ape who would not listen to people saying anything bad about others?
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Jake Le Master
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:17 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's Musings

Hahaha....I heard that one a long long time ago and totally forgot about it.  That cracked me up and was very insightful.
-Jake
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28630 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Within - strip 37
.html
.html
No, you are not overthinking at all Greg.
 
Chimp X has announced that he betrayed Garvon.
 
In my mind he did this by reporting the spoils of the diggings (the ones Garvon insisted be kept from Zaius for obvious reasons) to Zaius.  I have tried not to be TOO specific about ANYTHING.
 
Big ears heard about Chimp X's information and Ursus found out/came to see what is going on.  I again explained generally, but the back story is that Usrus himself came across an old human relic that detailed military ranks etc.  I intentionally avoided too much detail but Zaius (typically) destroyed the book.
 
Ursus however is obsessed with the military and why?  POWER.  Something he makes it obvious to us all that he craves.  Again I have not dwelled upon it but I believe the power freak is really his wife and she lives out her quest through the large brute.  She has the intelligence to point him in the right direction.
 
I did a LOT of thinking before constructing these......and I have gone out of my way to use certain twists to actually soften our suspension of disbelief later...when somehow 3 chimps end up driving a spacecraft.....but gently does it!  ;)
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Greg Plonowski
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:38 PM
To: PotaDG
Subject: [PotaDG] Within - strip 37

It figures that after the big reveal of strip 36 we switch locales again and return to Ursus, Zaius and Milo (or whoever that is if it's not Milo but until he actually gets named I'm calling him Milo). I'm still not entirely clear on who's allied with who here. Zaius and Ursus seem to have learned about Garvon's discovery through different means. This strip would seem to indicate that Milo was reporting back to Zaius, but perhaps he was playing both Ursus and Zaius against each other? Or maybe it was Marcus who was getting his info from Milo and he's the one leaking to both Zaius and Ursus?
 
Maybe I'm overthinking this. Can we have more pretty pictures of the spaceships and mutants, please?
 
Greg
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28631 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html.html In a message dated 4/26/2005 8:27:17 PM Central Standard Time, PofTAfan@... writes:

Please give me your comments and thoughts about this.


Half way decent idea for a "modern day" production...
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28632 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
Any suggestions to make it better?

Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 1:34 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

In a message dated 4/26/2005 8:27:17 PM Central Standard Time, PofTAfan@... writes:

Please give me your comments and thoughts about this.


Half way decent idea for a "modern day" production...
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28633 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html.html In a message dated 4/26/2005 10:39:26 PM Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:

Any suggestions to make it better?

Yep.. Call the area that Virdon escapes to/hides in "The Forbidden Zone"
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28634 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
That's what I have done in my story where SOMEONE/S find SOMETHING/S.
 
It ain't area 51 but it does add an interesting dimension if it is.
 
It always occurred to me that Pete and Alan really should have had a look at the map in Urko's office and laid out a strategy about finding areas they recalled being useful...ie military bases, weapons warehouses, presidential bunkers (as in T3) etc.....they DO exist!
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 1:50 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!

In a message dated 4/26/2005 10:39:26 PM Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:

Any suggestions to make it better?


Yep.. Call the area that Virdon escapes to/hides in "The Forbidden Zone"
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28635 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html.html In a message dated 4/26/2005 11:04:34 PM Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:

It always occurred to me that Pete and Alan really should have had a look at the map in Urko's office and laid out a strategy about finding areas they recalled being useful...ie military bases, weapons warehouses, presidential bunkers (as in T3) etc.....they DO exist!

They "might" exist, but I think they wanted to act like all of Man's civilization was layed to ruins, making Virdon's hope for a "technologically advanced" city being even more of a pipe dream...
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28636 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/26/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/26/2005 9:42:18 P.M. Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
Please put forward you opinions people and I will make a decision on the first of May.
 
A little colorful language or off-color humor doesn't bother me.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28637 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
Me neither, but it is not just us that we have to consider I guess.
 
My kids don't read this group - does anyone here have concerns about family friendliness for whatever reason/s?
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 2:44 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Family Friendliness.

In a message dated 4/26/2005 9:42:18 P.M. Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
Please put forward you opinions people and I will make a decision on the first of May.
 
A little colorful language or off-color humor doesn't bother me.
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28638 From: John Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
Well, I know I have a tendency to offend some of the people from the
other group when they read my post in this one. Most of my Uncle
Manny submissons were not exactly family friendly but I thought that
was the whole point of the Uncle Manny gag. Maybe like Richard Zanuck
I was in the dark and didn't get what everyone else was trying to do.
If we are going to regurgitate the same kind of Life Lessons From the
Lawgiver, why do a Uncle Manny? I'm not saying one is better than the
other (even if I feel that way) but you have a choice and you know
what to expect from each one. Now, I really do like everyone I've met
in both groups and don't wish to upset anyone, but I think everyone
in the DG is an adult and many of us seem to have the same twisted
sense of humor. I would hate to see the group watered down. I also
thought that was why this group was not moderated... even if you
tried on me you bastards. Again, maybe I was in the dark. So, before
you start to censor the group... PISS OFF!!!






--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Whitty, Michael"
<Michael.Whitty@d...> wrote:
> I think it depends on Helen's presence....or absence as the case
may be. ;)
>
> I'd certainly like to come to a decision on this Greg, and I can
only go on
> the feedback I get.
>
> Please put forward you opinions people and I will make a decision
on the
> first of May.
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of
> Greg Plonowski
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:31 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's
Musings
>
>
> No, that was #5, which I thought was very good. Who came up with
that one?
>
> #6 was funny, but a bit on the rude side. Not exactly 'family
friendly' if
> you ask me. Are we still trying to keep this board safe for kids or
has that
> ship sailed?
>
> Greg
>
> "Whitty, Michael" <Michael.Whitty@d...> wrote:
>
> Was this the one about the wise ape who would not listen to people
saying
> anything bad about others?
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of
> Jake Le Master
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:17 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] New file uploaded to PotaDG-Uncle Manny's
Musings
>
>
> Hahaha....I heard that one a long long time ago and totally forgot
about it.
> That cracked me up and was very insightful.
> -Jake
>
>
Group: potadg Message: 28639 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Marvel UK issue 28
.html
Marvel UK issue 28 is now available on Hunter's site. Once again we have an installment of the Apeslayer! saga. In addition there is an article showing the make-up application process. In this case, it shows Roddy McDowall being made up as Galen for the episode Tomorrow's Tide.
 
 
Greg
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28640 From: Michael Whitty Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html

You sound like Rory!

Rory, where the hell are you?

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2005 10:07 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Family Friendliness.

 


Well, I know I have a tendency to offend some of the people from the
other group when they read my post in this one. Most of my Uncle
Manny submissons were not exactly family friendly but I thought that
was the whole point of the Uncle Manny gag. Maybe like Richard Zanuck
I was in the dark and didn't get what everyone else was trying to do.
If we are going to regurgitate the same kind of Life Lessons From the
Lawgiver, why do a Uncle Manny? I'm not saying one is better than the
other (even if I feel that way) but you have a choice and you know
what to expect from each one. Now, I really do like everyone I've met
in both groups and don't wish to upset anyone, but I think everyone
in the DG is an adult and many of us seem to have the same twisted
sense of humor. I would hate to see the group watered down. I also
thought that was why this group was not moderated... even if you
tried on me you bastards. Again, maybe I was in the dark. So, before
you start to censor the group... PISS OFF!!!






--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Whitty, Michael"
<Michael.Whitty@d...> wrote:
> I think it depends on Helen's presence....or absence as the case
may be.  ;)

> I'd certainly like to come to a decision on this Greg, and I can
only go on
> the feedback I get.

> Please put forward you opinions people and I will make a decision
on the
> first of May.

> Michael


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28641 From: Dario Sciola Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
Ditto here.
But I think that if some members object to any of it, we should respect
their wishes.

If possible we could all agree that certain areas (Uncle Manny files
being perfect example) can be open to raunchiness, while the DG postings
themselves are kept clean.

Dario

----- Original Message -----
From: LordTZer0@...
Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 0:44 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Family Friendliness.

>
> In a message dated 4/26/2005 9:42:18 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> Michael.Whitty@... writes:
>
> Please put forward you opinions people and I will make a decision
> on the
> first of May.
>
>
>
> A little colorful language or off-color humor doesn't bother me.
>
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28642 From: taebokitti@aol.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html Good story, Kevin! I enjoyed this little bit, give us some more! Elaine<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28643 From: ron kenner Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
i'm not a frequent poster, but i would say an occasional crude comment is not too harmful.
but i dont have children reading the posts.
poop.
rob/ron

LordTZer0@... wrote:
In a message dated 4/26/2005 9:42:18 P.M. Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
Please put forward you opinions people and I will make a decision on the first of May.
 
A little colorful language or off-color humor doesn't bother me.
 


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

<.html <.html
Group: potadg Message: 28644 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/27/2005 7:10:21 A.M. Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
I would hate to see the group watered down. I also
thought that was why this group was not moderated...
Since when is this group unmoderated?
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28645 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html.html In a message dated 4/27/05 9:51:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:


You sound like Rory!



Rory, where the hell are you?



Michael



I haven't been reading any of these posts titled "Family Friendliness" (Until this one.), nor have I been paying any attention to these "Uncle Manny" things.

As I said, "Manny's evil, capable of nothing but destruction."

-- Rory
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28646 From: Neil Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Dario Sciola <darios@n...> wrote:
> Ditto here.
> But I think that if some members object to any of it, we should
respect their wishes.
If possible we could all agree that certain areas (Uncle Manny files
being perfect example) can be open to raunchiness, while the DG
postings themselves are kept clean.

I completely agree with what Dario has said here.

Neil
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28647 From: Neil Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>Since when is this group unmoderated?

-- This group has NOT been moderated since James left. If you check
the home page description and the settings on the main page you can
see this is clearly stated along with any other little 'rules' we have
here.

Some infrequent posters may find themselves on moderation as when the
girls (Marauders) took over the group they placed everybody on
moderation and as people post for the first time since then they may
find that they have not had their status returned to what it was.
Of course whenever we see this happen we remove that member from
moderation.

Neil
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28648 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
That all sounds great Kevin....my only thing is....Why
hadn't Virdon already discovered the cryo chambers if
he'd been there so long?

Tim

-- mlccougar@... wrote:

> In a message dated 4/26/2005 10:39:26 PM Central
> Standard Time,
> Michael.Whitty@... writes:
>
> > Any suggestions to make it better?
>
> Yep.. Call the area that Virdon escapes to/hides in
> "The Forbidden Zone"
>


<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28649 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
I have no restrictions!!!

Tim

--- "Whitty, Michael" <Michael.Whitty@...>
wrote:

> Me neither, but it is not just us that we have to
> consider I guess.
>
> My kids don't read this group - does anyone here
> have concerns about family
> friendliness for whatever reason/s?
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
> LordTZer0@...
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 2:44 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Family Friendliness.
>
>
>
> In a message dated 4/26/2005 9:42:18 P.M. Central
> Standard Time,
> Michael.Whitty@... writes:
>
> Please put forward you opinions people and I will
> make a decision on the
> first of May.
>
>
> A little colorful language or off-color humor
> doesn't bother me.
>
>
>
>


<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28650 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 28
.html
These are excellent...! Thanks to all involved! Great
scans!

Tim


--- Greg Plonowski <urko3085@...> wrote:

> Marvel UK issue 28 is now available on Hunter's
> site. Once again we have an installment of the
> Apeslayer! saga. In addition there is an article
> showing the make-up application process. In this
> case, it shows Roddy McDowall being made up as Galen
> for the episode Tomorrow's Tide.
>
> http://www.goatley.com/pota/
>
> Greg
>


<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28651 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
Sound good.
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 12:02 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Family Friendliness.

Ditto here.
But I think that if some members object to any of it, we should respect
their wishes.

If possible we could all agree that certain areas (Uncle Manny files
being perfect example) can be open to raunchiness, while the DG postings
themselves are kept clean.

Dario

----- Original Message -----
From: LordTZer0@...
Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 0:44 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Family Friendliness.

>
> In a message dated 4/26/2005 9:42:18 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
> Michael.Whitty@... writes:
>
> Please put forward you  opinions people and I will make a decision
> on the
> first of  May.
>
>
>
> A little colorful language or off-color humor doesn't bother me.
>
>
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28652 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
Since about a year ago.
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:09 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Family Friendliness.

In a message dated 4/27/2005 7:10:21 A.M. Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
I would hate to see the group watered down. I also
thought that was why this group was not moderated...
Since when is this group unmoderated?
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28653 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
And there is a spam filter - people can't just jpoin and post about date clubs or penis enhancers!

Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Neil
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:53 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Family Friendliness.


--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>Since when is this group unmoderated?

-- This group has NOT been moderated since James left. If you check
the home page description and the settings on the main page you can
see this is clearly stated along with any other little 'rules' we have
here.

Some infrequent posters may find themselves on moderation as when the
girls (Marauders) took over the group they placed everybody on
moderation and as people post for the first time since then they may
find that they have not had their status returned to what it was.
Of course whenever we see this happen we remove that member from
moderation.

Neil
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28654 From: Neil Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , "Whitty, Michael" <Michael.Whitty@d...>
wrote:
> And there is a spam filter - people can't just join and post about
date clubs or penis enhancers!

--Awww! So I have to go looking for these things myself then?! Ummm, I
mean for a friend of mine of course...

An Onny Mouse
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28655 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Hypothetical - FIRST QUESTION!
.html
.html
            Because Virdon was focused too much on the spaceship and the only time he went exploring the complex was to look for parts for the spaceship that he working on.  Virdon was hiding in  a vast complex, and these complexes are part of the government's top secret black ops projects and other highly secretive experiments and in this case the complex that Virdon was hiding in was one of the most largest and highly classified bases in what use to be the United States. There might be floors and other top secret chambers that were off limits to most personnel. 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28656 From: John Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Spoiling the group
.html
Hey, as the father of a 5yr. old I can understand not getting carried
away with what we post here. I really think everything has been pretty
PG-13 and I do show my son the comics or if someone post a rare photo
or something, but I don't think any children are joining a group to
talk about films and TV shows that came out 30 years ago unless they
have parents that are introducing them, such as myself. Again, maybe I
am the one in the dark. These are films that turn everything around
and poke fun at us... sometimes to make it interesting, I like to poke
back. I try to behave myself in the other group because I know I've
upset people before and that is never my goal. Here I always let loose
because it seemed everyone got the humor and could laugh it off. This
is the place I post regularly and consider home. I don't mean to spoil
it for anyone.
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28657 From: Dario Sciola Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Apes like Cougar
.html
.html No but I've been looking for them for some time. Even before they were reviewed in depth in the last issue of Scrolls, someone here already mentioned them. If I can't find it in used book stores, I'll search on ebay or ABE .

Dario

Jake Le Master wrote:
Thanks for the help.  Both books are shipping out to me tomorrow.  Have any of you ever read actually read them?

veetus@... wrote:
  The one he's thinking of is "Genus Homo". The other one isn't much like POTA. Also cool is the horsie section of "Gulliver's Travels". - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes-like Book

In the most recent issue of Simian Scrolls, it mentions two "APES-like" books that pre-date Monkey Planet... They are titled: Genus Homo by L. Sprague de Camp & P. Schuyler Miller... Another is titled Across Time by David Grinnell...


In a message dated 4/23/2005 11:46:03 PM Central Standard Time, neptunewanter@... writes:

Does anyone know the name of the book that's about about some scientists and they are in suspended animation and they crash on a planet ruled by intelligent primates?  It was written before Boulle's Monkey Planet.  I think its called "Homos..." something.  Its driving me nuts and I would appreciate some help!


________________________________________________


<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28658 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Ron Harper Lands
.html
.html
  "Land of the Lost" season 3 is in stores already, I think a week early. Those who want to see 13 episodes of vintage POTA-era Ron Harper running from dinosaurs, get going. - - - Jeff
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28659 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/27/2005 3:54:31 P.M. Central Standard Time, nfoster@... writes:
-- This group has NOT been moderated since James left. If you check
the home page description and the settings on the main page you can
see this is clearly stated along with any other little 'rules' we have
here.
 
That makes no sense as a sentence.
 
Much like those ads that say FREE! *
 
* + $99.95 Shipping & Handling
 
 
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28660 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/27/2005 4:48:06 P.M. Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
Since about a year ago.
 
Oh I see . . . Shortly after I was moderated then, eh?
 
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28661 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
When were you moderated T?
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 1:54 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Family Friendliness.

In a message dated 4/27/2005 4:48:06 P.M. Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
Since about a year ago.
 
Oh I see . . . Shortly after I was moderated then, eh?
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28662 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Spoiling the group
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/27/2005 7:36:20 P.M. Central Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
Hey, as the father of a 5yr.
 
Don't tell me HE's reading the posts.
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28663 From: LordTZer0@AOL.com Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
In a message dated 4/27/2005 11:04:21 P.M. Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
When were you moderated T?
 
That's my polite way of
saying kicked out.
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28664 From: Whitty, Michael Date: 4/27/2005
Subject: Re: Family Friendliness.
.html
.html
Since you have returned to the DG you have not been moderated.
 
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of LordTZer0@...
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:47 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Family Friendliness.

In a message dated 4/27/2005 11:04:21 P.M. Central Standard Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
When were you moderated T?
 
That's my polite way of
saying kicked out.
<.html

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28665 From: Alan Maxwell Date: 4/28/2005
Subject: Re: Digest Number 1554
.html
Jake Le Master <neptunewanter@... > wrote:
>Thanks for the help. Both books are shipping out to me tomorrow.
>Have any of you ever read actually read them?

As it was me who wrote the piece in Scrolls, I would have to say yes... it
was a while ago mind you. Genus Homo is the more PotA-like but Across Time
has enough to be of interest. The latter is a bit more sci-fi oriented, with
spaceships and aliens, etc. but worth a read - but if you're looking for
PotA comparisons Genus Homo will probably be the more satisfying. It
actually goes into the whole ape culture in a lot more depth than PotA (or
at least in terms of how each of the different kinds of ape evolved
differently).

Alan
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28666 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 4/28/2005
Subject: Poll results for PotaDG
.html
The following PotaDG poll is now closed. Here are the
final results:


POLL QUESTION: If you saw yet another new poll would you:

CHOICES AND RESULTS
- Check it out and cast a vote, 4 votes, 66.67%
- Check it out but cast no vote, 0 votes, 0.00%
- Not bother checking it out, 0 votes, 0.00%
- Not bother checking it out but still cast a vote (!?), 0 votes, 0.00%
- Non of the above, 2 votes, 33.33%



For more information about this group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG

For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 28667 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 4/28/2005
Subject: Poll results for PotaDG
.html
The following PotaDG poll is now closed. Here are the
final results:


POLL QUESTION: Do you think the infamous exclusive Tuska sketch from SS#10
is really the work of 'the man himself'?

CHOICES AND RESULTS
- Yes, 1 votes, 16.67%
- No, 3 votes, 50.00%
- Yes (but 'the man himself' is someone else!), 0 votes, 0.00%
- Maybe, 2 votes, 33.33%



For more information about this group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG

For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/
<.html


Copyright © 2026, Hunter Goatley. All rights reserved.
Last updated 2026-03-31 10:43.