|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29968 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/26/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29969 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/26/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Rory's just bein' petulant... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29970 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29971 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Fwd: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sequels |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29972 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: OT: Jackson's "King Kong" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29973 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Kong's vitals |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29974 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29975 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29976 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29977 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Fwd: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sequels |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29978 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29979 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sequels |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29980 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29981 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29982 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29983 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sequels |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29984 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29985 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29986 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: OT: Jackson's "King Kong" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29987 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29988 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr Ploog |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29989 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr Ploog |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29990 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: King Kong Trailer |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29991 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Kong play by play |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29992 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Jackson gives good gorilla |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29993 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong Trailer |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29994 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: POTA in Kong? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29995 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29996 |
From: Dario |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29997 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29998 |
From: Dario |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr Ploog |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29999 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Filmed-yet-edited out scenes |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30000 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Filmed-yet-edited out scenes |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30001 |
From: John |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30002 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr Ploog |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30003 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30004 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Fwd: Finding Milo |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30005 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Finding Money |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30006 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30007 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30008 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30009 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: The Face of Kong |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30010 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30011 |
From: John |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30012 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30013 |
From: John |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30014 |
From: Tim |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Beneath Finland poster |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30015 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Beneath Finland poster |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30016 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30017 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30018 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30019 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30020 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30021 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Foundation etc. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30022 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Inclusion |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30023 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: TV links to movies |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30024 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Hey there T. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30025 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: TV links to movies |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30026 |
From: LordTZer0 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Filmed-yet-edited out scenes |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30027 |
From: LordTZer0 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Hey there T. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30028 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30029 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30030 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30031 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30032 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30033 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30034 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30035 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30036 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30037 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30038 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Beneath Finland poster |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30039 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30040 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30041 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30042 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Beneath Finland poster |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30043 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30044 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30045 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30046 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30047 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: when did the nuclear war happen in apeline one and ... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30048 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30049 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30050 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30051 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30052 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30053 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30054 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30055 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30056 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30057 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30058 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30059 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30060 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30061 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30062 |
From: John |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30063 |
From: John |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30064 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30065 |
From: John |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30066 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Giamatti on "Apes" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30067 |
From: John |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Giamatti on "Apes" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29968 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/26/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/26/05 8:17:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Michael.Whitty@... writes:
Bit of both - how about you?
Whitty
same<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29969 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/26/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Rory's just bein' petulant... |
.html
.html
Yeah but we
might all be idiots!
I think it's
good that Patrick cares.
It is a shame
that in reality the POTA series IS very much like all the Frankentstein movies -
there is no real genuine conntinuity. Would be nice to start again with a
Planet sequel/prequel that does not take the others into
account.
Still, Planet
itself had some problems. What were they again?
Michael
In a message
dated 6/26/05 10:19:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** It has EVERYTHING to do with the movies themselves. And the
TV episodes, as well. You just hate Paul Dehn (et al.) for having added
onto the POTA saga, wishing that ONLY the 1st film existed. You're
predisposed to dislike anything having anything to do with "BENEATH"
and the rest. You're a "PLANET" fan, Rory, not a "POTA"
fan.
Absolutely right, but it seems like many others here
that are less critical of the merits of the sequels don't care much for your
"re-writing" either.
-- Rory
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29970 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/26/2005 6:48:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
Kevin
Smith will probably be saying "damn, that's a whole lotta f*%$ing
dialog
Word scripts never translate to film.
Film is a visual medium. And the
best actors cans say more with
a look than a whole page of dialogue.
If you watch Rio Bravo, or Once Upon
A Time In Then West, the first ten
minutes have no dialogue at all.
No one wants to sit through My
Dinner With Andre unless they're
a pretentious snob.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29971 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Fwd: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sequels |
.htmlHA! He said COCKSUCKER!
Have you been warned yet T? ;)
Michael
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
In a message dated 6/26/2005 2:19:46 A.M. Central Standard Time,
dave@4... writes:
Can anyone think of any earlier examples?
usually a movie with the same character(s) with one or more
sequels IS unrelated. Most were detective films. Mr. Moto
Charlie Chan, Sherlock Holmes, The Thin Man etc . . .
The only other example I can think of is Son of Kong.
Another ape picture. What are the odds?
The comedy team stuff, Marx Bros., Abbott & Costello,
Bob & Bing, were playing the same guys but not the same
characters. Can anyone think of a running storyline that
wasn't a serial? I can't. Even in Blondie the only continuity
is Baby Dumpling. I don't think Ma and Pa Kettle was
continuous. And in the Frankenstein stuff Lugosi was all
over the place, one movie he's Ygor, and the next he's
fighting the Wolf Man as the monster. One up on Karloff
I guess.
"That Limey cocksucker!"
~~~Martin Landau as Bela Lugosi~~~~
--- End forwarded message --- <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29972 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: OT: Jackson's "King Kong" |
.html
.html
I found a book about Peter Jackson that's
pretty good ("Peter Jackson: From Gore to Mordor", 2005 ), a compilation of
various writings about his career, including the upcoming "King Kong". It's a
U.K. book, part of a series edited by Paul A. Woods (author of the book "The
Planet of the Apes Chronicles").
Woods writes: "It would be nearly three
decades on from his first viewing of the original that Jackson's
oft-mooted project to remake "Kong" - which eluded him (in 1996) while the more
unlikely ("Lord of the) Rings" trilogy got the green light - would finally be an
actuality. The monster fanboy director has since altered his plans (from 1996),
claiming, "I don't want to change what I loved about it. I don't want to
reinvent it because it doesn't need reinventing", perhaps a sideswipe against
Tim Burton's disappointing "reimagining" of "Planet of the Apes" (2001). Jackson
was once mooted as a likely director for the POTA remake, which may have
rankled, given that the original (POTA) was his other favorite great ape -
monster movie as a child. There is a jokey reference to the film in the 1996
"Kong" screenplay, where Ann tries to protect Kong by shouting at Denham, "Take
your filthy paws off him - you ignorant pig!" But it's unlikely Jackson could
have been much more successfulthan the usually inspiring Burton, if saddled with
the same leadenly literal POTA screenplay".
Of course, "Ape" fans now have visions of a
"Lord of the Rings"esque POTA if Jackson had directed, but he sought it out back
in 1992 when he was a much different director, and in 1996 Fox sought him out
(Jackson got a rep for doing terrific FX cheap after "The Frighteners") but he
was doing his first attempt at "King Kong" (which resulted in a bad script,
often found on the internet). "Kong" got cancelled and during the early stages
of "Lord of the Rings" Jackson and his producer Fran Walsh hooked up with writer
Phillipa Boyens. It's the three of them that made "Lord of the Rings" what it
was and probably what the improved "Kong" will be (along with the help Jackson's
clout provides in terms of not having to jump through studio hoops; maybe "Kong"
not being a Fox film will help). So if Jackson had done POTA it doesn't mean it
would have been a home run.
A couple "Kong" tidbits:
Jackson says the story is "about love" and
that "Kong is a very old and very brutal gorilla and he's never before felt a
single bit of empathy for another living creature. For the first time in his
life, he feels empathy when he meets Ann Darrow. Initially he thinks he's going
to kill her and then he slowly moves away from that". Jackson says most of the
movie will take place on Kong's island home (battling dinosaurs and such); the
last third will take place in 1933 New York (the year the original came out).
Jackson will also do the spider pit sequence, which was filmed and lost in the
original.
Jackson: "We will play on the similarities
between the jungle of the New York skyscrapers and the jungle where King Kong
lives".
Jackson: "I'm interested in "Kong" being
quite stylised and the jungles of Skull Island I want to be very over-the-top,
like a jungle from hell".
Jackson: "Our first script ('96) was sort of
"Indiana Jones"-ish and rather flippant. It was what I regard as a very
Hollywood script, but now, what we've come to like with "Lord of the Rings" is
the approach of making the situations feel very real, even though we're dealing
with extraordinary situations and weird characters like elves, hobbits, trolls,
orcs and the like. We didn't let the fantasy nature of the story dictate the
tone...We decided that that was the approach we wanted to take with "Kong" as
well".
The 2 and a half minute trailer for "Kong"
premieres tonight on NBC and various affiliated cable channels around 8:59 P.M.
and will be in theaters with "War of the Worlds" this week. - - -
Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29973 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Kong's vitals |
.html
.html
In anticipation of tonight's trailer there's
an article on the film in "USA Today" (says www.comingsoon.net ). In it, Peter Jackson
notes that Kong is 25 feet tall and 120 - 150 years old, and has a
snaggletooth ("We had the notion that Kong's jawbone was smashed in an ancient
fight and mended itself at a crooked angle"). - - - Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29974 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
.htmlThanks for making our day by (1) asking him to draw an ape, and (2)
posting it here.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim <apefan23@...>
Date: Saturday, June 25, 2005 7:35 pm
Subject: [PotaDG] PLOOG!
> Today I went to the Heroes Comic Convention here in Charlotte, NC
> and
> stood and waited for Mr. Mike Ploog to autograph a Marvel Issue
> No. 1 ! Right
> under the Lawgiver in "Terror". Then I asked if he could draw an
> ape for
> me....and he did! I have posted the drawing under Photos>Art. ..He
> was a very
> nice gentleman. I asked where he got his references for the
> series (which he
> LOVED working on) and he said he had some pics but also was
> friends with
> the original storyboard artist whose name I, of course, have
> forgotten! I
> thouroughly enjoyed meeting him and it made my day!
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29975 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
>
> Patrick is evil, capable of nothing but destruction -- to the
original POTA scripts!
>
> -- Rory
*** The scripts aren't as important (to me) as what actually ended up
on screen. Scenes which did not end up on screen yet were in the
script and which I think are too good to exclude, I shall include in
my POTA saga. The scene with Ursus, Zaius, and the Minister -- that
scene is included in Avallone's novelization, and it won't be missing
from mine, either. It'd be nice to see some "lost footage" of that
scene: if such exists, then the dialogue from it would be (in my
version) transcribed as-spoken on screen, if such dialogue differs
slightly from the actual script.
Oh, and you're a bloody bastard. :)
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29976 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/26/2005 6:48:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> DrZaiusDavis@a... writes:
>
> Kevin Smith will probably be saying "damn, that's a whole
> lotta f*%$ing dialog
>
>
>
> Word scripts never translate to film.
> Film is a visual medium. And the
> best actors cans say more with
> a look than a whole page of dialogue.
> If you watch Rio Bravo, or Once Upon
> A Time In Then West, the first ten
> minutes have no dialogue at all.
> No one wants to sit through My
> Dinner With Andre unless they're
> a pretentious snob.
*** It depends on the scriptwriter's savvy with language. Quentin
Tarantino's scripts ("TRUE ROMANCE", "RESERVOIR DOGS", and "PULP
FICTION", anyway, which I own and have read) are all dialogue-driven,
rather than action-driven, or overly dependent on visual gimmicks. A
stage version of "RESERVOIR DOGS" has been performed; that script
actually is ideal for a stage presentation. Tarantino tends to be
heavy on the dialogue, and he's so good a writer of dialogue that it
tends to "work" rather well. The 'action' in a Tarantino flick tends
to be all-the-more explosive when it does happen (I'm thinking,
especially, of "RESERVOIR DOGS" here... the Ear-scene, the Mexican
stand-off, etc).
As for novels with a whole lotta dialogue (and not much action),
well, Isaac Asimov's best SF novels tend to be predominantly dialogue-
driven. Read his "FOUNDATION" trilogy, or his Elijah Bailey detective
novels, for examples.
For my POTA project, I'm aiming for a comfortable medium, with plenty
of action and goings-on, plus dialogue at pretty much the same rate
that already appears in the novelizations we've all read.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29977 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Fwd: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sequels |
.html> --- In
pota@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/26/2005 2:19:46 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> dave@4... writes:
>
> Can anyone think of any earlier examples?
>
>
> usually a movie with the same character(s) with one or more
> sequels IS unrelated. Most were detective films. Mr. Moto
> Charlie Chan, Sherlock Holmes, The Thin Man etc . . .
> The only other example I can think of is Son of Kong.
> Another ape picture. What are the odds?
> The comedy team stuff, Marx Bros., Abbott & Costello,
> Bob & Bing, were playing the same guys but not the same
> characters. Can anyone think of a running storyline that
> wasn't a serial? I can't. Even in Blondie the only continuity
> is Baby Dumpling. I don't think Ma and Pa Kettle was
> continuous. And in the Frankenstein stuff Lugosi was all
> over the place, one movie he's Ygor, and the next he's
> fighting the Wolf Man as the monster. One up on Karloff
> I guess.
*** I'd put the POTA film series in the same sort of "running
storyline" as the "BACK TO THE FUTURE" series. The 1st BTTF film was
a stand-alone work, just as "PLANET" was, even though its ending did
rather lend itself to the prospect of a sequel ("It's your KIDS,
Marty! Something has to be done about your kids!").
When they eventually planned/filmed BTTF #2 and #3, they did so with
the aim of having them all tie together with all their T's crossed
and I's dotted. They probably could have continued making more BTTF
movies (and I'm ignoring the cartoon that was made), but the two main
characters -- Marty McFly and Doc Brown -- had gone through their
story arcs with thorough resolutions for each, and no more "real"
sequels were needed.
It would've been trite for a 4th film to be made using DIFFERENT
characters (say, somebody who managed to steal Doc Brown's plans for
a Time Machine, and goes off and builds his own). Such a movie
wouldn't really be much of a "sequel" in the same sense of the word --
just a derivative knock-off.
Personally, I like BTTF #3, mostly because it gives more character
emphasis on Doc Brown -- the rationalist scientist who dismisses the
idea of romantic love... until he falls for a woman who SHOULD have
died in an accident that he fortuitously prevents. Christopher Lloyd
was given a meatier role to play in that flick -- the same role he'd
already played, but with more depth to it. The same character, but a
changed man.
I think similarly about the changed characters of Zira and Cornelius,
from "PLANET" to "BENEATH" and from "BENEATH" to "ESCAPE".
In "ESCAPE", Cornelius is an expectant father -- and he knows that
Hasslein wants that unborn son killed. He's filled with anger at how
they treated his pregnant wife -- sticking her with needles, and all
that. And he lashes out reflexively at one of the few humans around
who seems to evince an unquestionable concern for not only him and
Zira, but also for their unborn baby... but, not knowing that the
word "monkey" is considered an insult, his use of it triggers
Cornelius' sudden VIOLENCE. Cornelius, in his unthinking anger, has
lumped that Orderly into the same group as Hasslein and the other
interrogators from the NSA/CIA, and he lashes out. He ceases to be
his "better self". He didn't INTEND to kill the young man, but that's
small consolation. When the disturbed gorilla killed Milo, that was
tragic and unforeseeable. Cornelius could have kept himself in check,
not let his emotions "rule his brain" -- as Zaius once accused all
Mankind of doing. And that little fit of anger probably leads to his
own death -- the one who shoots him probably believed that Cornelius
purposely murdered that Orderly, with malice.
There's a lot going on there. As good as Pournelle's novelization
was, it only scratched the surface, I think. Cornelius has a "dark
night of the soul", I'm sure, over the death of that Orderly. Who,
watching "PLANET", could ever have imagined this somewhat easily brow-
beaten "young ape with a shovel", whose spine is less firm than that
of his fiesty fiancee, Zira, being driven to commit an unthinking act
of manslaughter? It's almost a "STRAW DOGS" moment. And it's
something that he'd probably never entirely feel unresponsible for --
despite his too-insistent protestations of non-responsibility.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29978 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
.htmlYou are welcome Dario...it was the first thing I
thought as I was walking away..."I gotta post this on
DG".....I guess it could be a drawing of "Jason" since
he kind of used the open magazine to glance
at.....going to get it framed today...
Tim
--- Dario Sciola < darios@...> wrote:
> Thanks for making our day by (1) asking him to draw
> an ape, and (2)
> posting it here.
>
> Dario
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tim <apefan23@...>
> Date: Saturday, June 25, 2005 7:35 pm
> Subject: [PotaDG] PLOOG!
>
> > Today I went to the Heroes Comic Convention here
> in Charlotte, NC
> > and
> > stood and waited for Mr. Mike Ploog to autograph a
> Marvel Issue
> > No. 1 ! Right
> > under the Lawgiver in "Terror". Then I asked if he
> could draw an
> > ape for
> > me....and he did! I have posted the drawing under
> Photos>Art. ..He
> > was a very
> > nice gentleman. I asked where he got his
> references for the
> > series (which he
> > LOVED working on) and he said he had some pics but
> also was
> > friends with
> > the original storyboard artist whose name I, of
> course, have
> > forgotten! I
> > thouroughly enjoyed meeting him and it made my
> day!
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29979 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sequels |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/27/2005 5:41:48 A.M. Central Standard Time,
Michael.Whitty@... writes:
Have you
been warned yet T?
Oh yeah, anyone can say anything, except me.
I'm going to go look for the last time someone
wrote something questionable and see if they were
warned. I don't believe they were, especially when
it was you yourself. Did you warn yourself. I'm
sure someone will correct me if you've never used
profanity. Anyway that was a quote. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29980 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/27/2005 9:59:15 A.M. Central Standard Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
The
scripts aren't as important (to me) as what actually ended up on screen.
Then why are you revising POTA with scenes that either aren't going
to be filmed, or are going to be film but cut?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29981 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/27/2005 12:30:18 PM Central Standard Time, LordTZer0@... writes:
In a message dated 6/27/2005 9:59:15 A.M. Central Standard Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
The scripts aren't as important (to me) as what actually ended up
on screen.
Then why are you revising POTA with scenes that either aren't going
to be filmed, or are going to be film but cut?
So the unused/cut scenes can help pull his rewriting together... An example would be: Just because an ape says "The only good human is a dead human", that gorilla suddenly is Ursus, just because Ursus says that
line later on in BENEATH... The truth is, it's probably a common saying among all apes, at least the gorilla Hunters/Warriors...<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29982 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/27/2005 10:10:17 A.M. Central Standard Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
("TRUE
ROMANCE", "RESERVOIR DOGS", and "PULP FICTION", anyway, which I own and
have read) are all dialogue-driven, rather than
action-driven
The reason for that is when he started he didn't have money for
action.
That's why Reservoir Dogs takes place almost exclusively in a
warehouse. He wanted the best actors he could get for the
least money. And you do that by writing a character driven
story with juicy lines that actors can sink their teeth into.
I'm not saying you can't have dialogue. We aren't in the
silent picture days. In The Fountainhead Gary Cooper
has a huge courtroom monologue that is positively
inspired! Not surprising since it's an Ayn Rand
story, but when an director wants actors to start
he doesn't say TALK, he says ACTION. They
are after all called ACTORS, not talkers.
Enough speechafyin'
Actions speak louder than . . .
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29983 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Planet of the Apes] Sequels |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/27/2005 10:41:09 A.M. Central Standard Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
*** I'd
put the POTA film series in the same sort of "running storyline" as the
"BACK TO THE FUTURE" series.
Can anyone think of something like that
between Kong and POTA? There is in
fact a second book about Little Big Man
that was never made into a film. But a
film that did so well that sequels had to
be made? That there was no further
books written? I can't think of any
off the top of my head. As far as I
know POTA was the first and inspired
everything from Star Wars to The Godfather.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29984 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Manageable chunks (OT) |
.htmlNot to be too picky here, but "Foundation" hasn't been a 'trilogy'
since 1982. The novels that I know/have are
- Foundation
- Second Foundation
- Foundation and Empire
- Foundation's edge
- Foundation and Earth
Asimov may even have written more before he passed away for all I know.
But I'll let it slide, since you did mention the robot detective
series, which I've always thought were even better than Foundation.
----- Original Message -----
From: patrickmichaeltilton <patrickmichaeltilton@...>
Date: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:09 am
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Manageable chunks
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 6/26/2005 6:48:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>
> > DrZaiusDavis@a... writes:
> >
> > Kevin Smith will probably be saying "damn, that's a whole
> > lotta f*%$ing dialog
> >
> >
> >
> > Word scripts never translate to film.
> > Film is a visual medium. And the
> > best actors cans say more with
> > a look than a whole page of dialogue.
> > If you watch Rio Bravo, or Once Upon
> > A Time In Then West, the first ten
> > minutes have no dialogue at all.
> > No one wants to sit through My
> > Dinner With Andre unless they're
> > a pretentious snob.
>
> *** It depends on the scriptwriter's savvy with language. Quentin
> Tarantino's scripts ("TRUE ROMANCE", "RESERVOIR DOGS", and "PULP
> FICTION", anyway, which I own and have read) are all dialogue-
> driven,
> rather than action-driven, or overly dependent on visual gimmicks.
> A
> stage version of "RESERVOIR DOGS" has been performed; that script
> actually is ideal for a stage presentation. Tarantino tends to be
> heavy on the dialogue, and he's so good a writer of dialogue that
> it
> tends to "work" rather well. The 'action' in a Tarantino flick
> tends
> to be all-the-more explosive when it does happen (I'm thinking,
> especially, of "RESERVOIR DOGS" here... the Ear-scene, the Mexican
> stand-off, etc).
>
> As for novels with a whole lotta dialogue (and not much action),
> well, Isaac Asimov's best SF novels tend to be predominantly
> dialogue-
> driven. Read his "FOUNDATION" trilogy, or his Elijah Bailey
> detective
> novels, for examples.
>
> For my POTA project, I'm aiming for a comfortable medium, with
> plenty
> of action and goings-on, plus dialogue at pretty much the same
> rate
> that already appears in the novelizations we've all read.
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29985 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
.html.html
Thanks Tim.
A great addition to your collection!
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim
"apefan"
Sent: Tuesday, 28 June 2005 2:51
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] PLOOG!
You are welcome Dario...it
was the first thing I
thought as I was walking away..."I gotta post
this on
DG".....I guess it could be a drawing of
"Jason" since
he kind of used the open magazine to glance
at.....going to get it framed today...
Tim
--- Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
> Thanks for making our day by (1) asking him
to draw
> an ape, and (2)
> posting it here.
>
> Dario
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tim <apefan23@...>
> Date: Saturday, June 25, 2005 7:35 pm
> Subject: [PotaDG] PLOOG!
>
> > Today I went to the Heroes Comic
Convention here
> in Charlotte, NC
> > and
> > stood and waited for Mr. Mike Ploog to
autograph a
> Marvel Issue
> > No. 1 ! Right
> > under the Lawgiver in
"Terror". Then I asked if he
> could draw an
> > ape for
> > me....and he did! I have posted the
drawing under
> Photos>Art. ..He
> > was a very
> > nice gentleman. I asked where he
got his
> references for the
> > series (which he
> > LOVED working on) and he said he had
some pics but
> also was
> > friends with
> > the original storyboard artist whose
name I, of
> course, have
> > forgotten! I
> > thouroughly enjoyed meeting him and it
made my
> day!
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29986 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: OT: Jackson's "King Kong" |
.html
.html
Thanks Jeff -
this is a fascinating read.
Michael
I found a book about Peter Jackson that's
pretty good ("Peter Jackson: From Gore to Mordor", 2005 ), a compilation of
various writings about his career, including the upcoming "King Kong". It's a
U.K. book, part of a series edited by Paul A. Woods (author of the book "The
Planet of the Apes Chronicles").
Woods writes: "It would be nearly three
decades on from his first viewing of the original that Jackson's
oft-mooted project to remake "Kong" - which eluded him (in 1996) while the
more unlikely ("Lord of the) Rings" trilogy got the green light - would
finally be an actuality. The monster fanboy director has since altered his
plans (from 1996), claiming, "I don't want to change what I loved about it. I
don't want to reinvent it because it doesn't need reinventing", perhaps a
sideswipe against Tim Burton's disappointing "reimagining" of "Planet of the
Apes" (2001). Jackson was once mooted as a likely director for the POTA
remake, which may have rankled, given that the original (POTA) was his other
favorite great ape - monster movie as a child. There is a jokey reference to
the film in the 1996 "Kong" screenplay, where Ann tries to protect Kong by
shouting at Denham, "Take your filthy paws off him - you ignorant pig!" But
it's unlikely Jackson could have been much more successfulthan the usually
inspiring Burton, if saddled with the same leadenly literal POTA
screenplay".
Of course, "Ape" fans now have visions of
a "Lord of the Rings"esque POTA if Jackson had directed, but he sought it out
back in 1992 when he was a much different director, and in 1996 Fox sought him
out (Jackson got a rep for doing terrific FX cheap after "The Frighteners")
but he was doing his first attempt at "King Kong" (which resulted in a bad
script, often found on the internet). "Kong" got cancelled and during the
early stages of "Lord of the Rings" Jackson and his producer Fran Walsh hooked
up with writer Phillipa Boyens. It's the three of them that made "Lord of the
Rings" what it was and probably what the improved "Kong" will be (along with
the help Jackson's clout provides in terms of not having to jump through
studio hoops; maybe "Kong" not being a Fox film will help). So if Jackson had
done POTA it doesn't mean it would have been a home run.
A couple "Kong" tidbits:
Jackson says the story is "about love" and
that "Kong is a very old and very brutal gorilla and he's never before felt a
single bit of empathy for another living creature. For the first time in his
life, he feels empathy when he meets Ann Darrow. Initially he thinks he's
going to kill her and then he slowly moves away from that". Jackson says most
of the movie will take place on Kong's island home (battling dinosaurs and
such); the last third will take place in 1933 New York (the year the original
came out). Jackson will also do the spider pit sequence, which was filmed and
lost in the original.
Jackson: "We will play on the similarities
between the jungle of the New York skyscrapers and the jungle where King Kong
lives".
Jackson: "I'm interested in "Kong" being
quite stylised and the jungles of Skull Island I want to be very over-the-top,
like a jungle from hell".
Jackson: "Our first script ('96) was sort
of "Indiana Jones"-ish and rather flippant. It was what I regard as a very
Hollywood script, but now, what we've come to like with "Lord of the Rings" is
the approach of making the situations feel very real, even though we're
dealing with extraordinary situations and weird characters like elves,
hobbits, trolls, orcs and the like. We didn't let the fantasy nature of the
story dictate the tone...We decided that that was the approach we wanted to
take with "Kong" as well".
The 2 and a half minute trailer for "Kong"
premieres tonight on NBC and various affiliated cable channels around 8:59
P.M. and will be in theaters with "War of the Worlds" this week. - - -
Jeff <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29987 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "John" <DrZaiusDavis@a...> wrote:
> I gotta get Neil to draw me a quick original doodle before he gets
too big
-- In the interests of common decency I will not be tempted to reply
to this. ;-)
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29988 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr Ploog |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Do you have a story to share with everyone regarding our good
friends at Simian Scrolls?
I take it you mean how I got my Ploog signature? When my good mate
Dave Ballard queued up for hours at a convention in the UK recently he
had the decency to show Mr Ploog the 2 ashcan editions of Beware the
Beast and asked if he would sign one for me (he explained I was a big
fan)
Mr Ploog, after having a good look through the comics, signed the
inside cover of #1 for me and added some very nice comments.
Not as good as seeing him in the flesh and getting a signed sketch but
an enormous thrill for me anyhow.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29989 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr Ploog |
.html
.html
And the
(anonymous) cartoon artists behind the new Canadian series said some very
complimentary things too - as did Gary Challoner.
So how do we
convert these praises to $s? ;)
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty"
<whitty@c...> wrote: > Do you have a story to share with everyone
regarding our good friends at Simian Scrolls?
I take it you mean
how I got my Ploog signature? When my good mate Dave Ballard queued up for
hours at a convention in the UK recently he had the decency to show Mr
Ploog the 2 ashcan editions of Beware the Beast and asked if he would sign
one for me (he explained I was a big fan) Mr Ploog, after having a
good look through the comics, signed the inside cover of #1 for me and
added some very nice comments.
Not as good as seeing him in the flesh
and getting a signed sketch but an enormous thrill for me
anyhow.
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29990 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: King Kong Trailer |
|
.html .html.html
So, now we have a good idea of what this movie will be like. I'm glad they set it in the early 1930s. At least the movie will have the right look. The original (concept, story, film) was a thing
of its time and it always been kind of married to the 30's, so I'm grateful for that. I don't really agree the look of Kong. Watching a real, although oversized, gorilla going through everything
Kong has to go through isn't going to be fun. I feel too much empathy with gorillas. I prefer the more monstrous look of the original. What Jackson's gone for looks more like the mating of an
ape and Wallace Beery. Anyway, as a CGI spectacular, it should be great.
-- Rory<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29991 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Kong play by play |
.html
.html
Here's tonight's "King Kong" trailer frame
by frame. I haven't seen the trailer yet, but Kong sure is tiny. That's not King
Kong to me. Looks more like Mighty Joe Young. I think Jackson did a good job of
bringing a sense of reality to "Lord of the rings", but in this case reality
might bite.
- - - Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29992 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Jackson gives good gorilla |
.html
.html
OK, after seeing the trailer I guess Kong is
big enough. I wasn't blown away by the trailer (seemed like "Jurassic Park";
those dinosaurs also visited a city). But it has potential and I have a lot of
faith in Jackson and his writers. Would've been cool to see Kong climb the
Empire State Building to knock the trailer out of the park. But definitely I'm
excited about the movie and it's potential to show up Fox. As I mentioned
in a recent e-mail, Jackson's 1996 Kong script had a nod to POTA. I wonder if
there will be one in the final version? - - - Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29993 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: King Kong Trailer |
.html
.html
You're supposed to feel empathy for Kong.
That's what made the original a classic. But hopefully this won't turn it into
the "Godzilla" remake, where it's so real it loses it's charm. Giving Kong a
snaggletooth might have been a good idea to give Kong character. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 7:22 PM
Subject: [PotaDG] King Kong Trailer
So, now we have a good idea of what this
movie will be like. I'm glad they set it in the early 1930s. At
least the movie will have the right look. The original (concept, story,
film) was a thing of its time and it always been kind of married to the 30's,
so I'm grateful for that. I don't really agree the look of Kong.
Watching a real, although oversized, gorilla going through everything Kong has
to go through isn't going to be fun. I feel too much empathy with
gorillas. I prefer the more monstrous look of the original. What
Jackson's gone for looks more like the mating of an ape and Wallace
Beery. Anyway, as a CGI spectacular, it should be great.
--
Rory <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29994 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: POTA in Kong? |
.html
.html
Here's a way to bring this around on topic.
Let's hear some ideas about how Peter Jackson could put a POTA moment in the
movie. Since he also loves POTA, how could he do it without taking people out of
the movie? (By the way, I liked in the trailer when Kong said, "Bow your
heads!"). This thread just occurred to me so I don't have anything to start it
with, but if I think of something I'll post it. - - - Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29995 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/27/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
.html
.html
How about "I
wish you weren't so damned ugly" when the girl kisses the ape?
;)
Here's a way to bring this around on
topic. Let's hear some ideas about how Peter Jackson could put a POTA moment
in the movie. Since he also loves POTA, how could he do it without taking
people out of the movie? (By the way, I liked in the trailer when Kong said,
"Bow your heads!"). This thread just occurred to me so I don't have anything
to start it with, but if I think of something I'll post it. - - -
Jeff <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29996 |
From: Dario |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
.htmlThe first season is already in reruns here in Canada and it's a hit.
Like many others who only mildly liked the old series, this latest
series is much more appealing. Chris Eccleston as the Doctor was just
great and many are already wondering if the new Doctor (Tenant) who will
be used for season two will live up.
I've also rekindled my interest in the old novels and read yet another
just last week ("Doctor Who and the Giant Robot").
Dario
>
>> Anybody been watching the new Doctor Who?
>>
>> Michael
>
> *
> We haven't got it here in the States yet.
>
> -- Rory*
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29997 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
.html.html
They were fantastic!
Dr Who? on the tube, King Kong, Batman and War of the
Worlds at the movies…..what year is this and how far away might another
go at Planet of the Apes be?
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dario
Sent: Tuesday, 28 June 2005 9:27
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dr Zaius
- Dr WHO?
The first season is already in reruns here in
Canada and it's a hit.
Like many others who only mildly liked the old
series, this latest
series is much more appealing. Chris Eccleston as
the Doctor was just
great and many are already wondering if the new
Doctor (Tenant) who will
be used for season two will live up.
I've also rekindled my interest in the old novels
and read yet another
just last week ("Doctor Who and the Giant
Robot").
Dario
>
>> Anybody been watching the new Doctor Who?
>>
>> Michael
>
> *
> We haven't got it here in the States yet.
>
> -- Rory
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29998 |
From: Dario |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr Ploog |
.html
.html
Cool story about the Ploog signed sketches Neil.
For those that may happen to be in the Toronto, Canada area August
26-28, that city will be holding it's annual
SF/Horror/Comic/Anime/Gaming super convention. I've just confirmed that
at least two of the artists that will be working on the new Canadian
POTA strips will be there (Tom Fowler and Ty Templeton) as well as Kent
Burles who worked on the old Adventure POTA series (I think I already
mentioned this quite a while back). So there will be chance to meet #
POTA artists at once.
If I do get down there I'll see if any more info about the apes series
gets leaked.
Dario
Whitty, Michael wrote:
And the (anonymous) cartoon artists behind the new
Canadian series said some very complimentary things too - as did Gary
Challoner.
So how do we convert these praises to $s? ;)
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty"
<whitty@c...> wrote:
> Do you have a story to share with everyone regarding our good
friends at Simian Scrolls?
I take it you mean how I got my Ploog signature? When my good mate
Dave Ballard queued up for hours at a convention in the UK recently he
had the decency to show Mr Ploog the 2 ashcan editions of Beware the
Beast and asked if he would sign one for me (he explained I was a big
fan)
Mr Ploog, after having a good look through the comics, signed the
inside cover of #1 for me and added some very nice comments.
Not as good as seeing him in the flesh and getting a signed sketch but
an enormous thrill for me anyhow.
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 29999 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Filmed-yet-edited out scenes |
.htmlpatrick-
i know you have been working on thsi for a while, and it soudns interesting.
i guess you will need to add a lot of material to link the movies to the tv show?
patrickmichaeltilton <patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
> > In a message dated 6/25/2005 11:39:49 A.M. Central Standard Time, > Haristas@a... writes: > > Based on all this, in my POTA
> project, I'm gonna have it that the Hunt Leader in this filmed-yet- > edited-out scene actually IS Ursus > > > > Wait, let me get this straight.
> You rewriting POTA so there's > a filmed, yet edited out, scene? > What purpose does that serve? > You're completely insane!
*** I'm NOVELIZING "PLANET", re-novelizing "BENEATH"-through- "BATTLE", (re-)novelizing all 14 TV episodes (the 8 Effinger already
did, plus the other 6), so as to tell one humongous overall story.
What purpose does it serve? Well, MY purpose(s), for one. In my scenario, all the ANSA
astronauts we've seen on-screen so far knew each other -- Taylor knew Virdon & Burke, for instance. They each left Earth in their respective missions (to Alpha Centauri and
to 'somewhere' in Orion) within a half-year of each other, and as a result of Taylor being chosen to head the Orion mission and Virdon to
head the Centauri mission -- rather than vice versa -- the Earth ends up being destroyed: Virdon, in Taylor's shoes, would not have detonated the Bomb, because they are fundamentally different people.
Taylor left Earth because there was nobody to hold him there (he was a lonely, embittered man)... but Virdon left Earth on the Centauri mission with the intention of eventually getting back home to his
wife Sally, and even when Burke thinks he's "off his rocker" to think he has cause to hope he'll return to her one day, he's the type of
guy who would cling to that impossible hope. Virdon wouldn't have made the
'connection' to Nova that Taylor made -- Virdon would've kept faithful to his long-dead wife -- so that Nova's death, though
tragic, wouldn't have been "just another brick in the wall" that eventually drove Taylor to detonate the Bomb.
In a way, the decision (by somebody, be it the President or some ANSA
upper-eschelon decision-maker) to send George Taylor and Alan Virdon to command their respective missions has repercussions that could hardly be imagined at the time (late 1971). Kinda like choosing a
President, to see what sorts of decisions they'll make that will affect us all, whether we like it or not, and that'll be felt years
down the line by later generations. Imagine Taylor and Burke in 3085, and Virdon, Landon & Dodge in 3955 -- how differently would things have gone down, then?
The POTA saga affords an opportunity for any 'fanfic' author to address those topics that matter to them. The guys who wrote all
the POTA scripts after "PLANET", from Dehn & the Corringtons to the TV scripters, they all had things on their mind that they could address
in the fictional 'world' of POTA. Just as STAR TREK writers could address topics near and dear to their own perspectives. POTA is specifically apropos for discussions of Race, Religion, Politics,
even Sexuality.
Why is it "insane" to include scenes that didn't make it into the final print? All the prior novelizations (the film ones, anyway)
include scenes that were in the scripts yet did not make it into the finished film -- whether those scenes were filmed or not. My own
attempts to 'improve' on the prior novelizations centers around being slavishly faithful to the actual filmed-as-spoken dialogue. Working
from the shooting scripts, Avallone, Pournelle, Jakes & Gerrold all wrote novelizations that have dialogue that varies from the actual filmed dialogue.
One quick
example. In "ESCAPE", the script has Zira say, "Because I loathe and detest bananas." (scene B-33)
Pournelle's novelization (chapter 5, page 32) has this paragraph:
Zira turned to the girl. "Because I loathe and detest bananas." Her voice was very clear and carefully controlled.
In issue 12 of Marvel's POTA magazine, Dixon audibly
wonders, "HMMM... THEN I WONDER WHY THEY WON'T EAT THEM..." and Zira replies, "BECAUSE WE LOATHE AND DETEST BANANAS!"
None of these is a slavishly faithful rendering of what Kim Hunter spoke on-camera: "Because I loathe bananas!"
Kim's script called for her to say "Because I loathe AND DETEST
bananas" but she delivered her line without those two words -- "and detest".
As far as I'm concerned, if it is NOT as it was spoken on-screen, it
isn't canon. The words "and detest" -- though they are in the script, which Pournelle and Moench parroted, they are NOT what Kim spoke in the
actual movie, so that in MY project her actual words are and will be, "Because I loathe bananas!"
Just as Han Solo's line about making the Kessel Run in less than
12 "standard time parts" in the original "STAR WARS" novelization differs from the on-screen dialogue ("less than 12 parsecs") and thus
is not considered "canonical" for later writers of "STAR WARS" books, so too am I deferring to what is on-screen. I wonder if Lucas will
ever have some other SF writer re-novelize the entire 6-film "STAR WARS" saga, so as to have the text of that novelization be slavishly
faithful to the actual "final" versions of the films, where Greedo shoots first, and all that? I could imagine a newer version of the
Episode IV story, where Ben Kenobi sees (and, via the Force, 'feels') Luke falling in love/lust with the holographic recording of Princess
Leia -- his own sister -- and thinking to himself, 'Should I tell him she's his sister? If I
do, will it put her in danger? But if he's kept in the dark about this much longer, it'll be tragic later on for him to realize he's been masturbating over fantasies of a cute chick
he didn't know was his twin sister! What would Yoda do...?' etc. The thoughts going through Obi-Wan's head would take on a whole new set
of assumptions, based on what the new prequels have added to the mix.
At any rate, my POTA project will occasionally continue a conversation between certain characters after the filmed scene cuts
to the next scene (thus, all the 'afterwards' dialogue will be original stuff I've added in), but where a filmed scene plays out
in "screen-time" my novelization will be absolutely faithful to the dialogue delivered by the actors.
Not that you or Rory have to like it, of course...
Patrick
Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30000 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Filmed-yet-edited out scenes |
.htmlrory- in terms of fan-fic in general, i have often wondered something similar.
specifically: a fan may have some excellent ideas, but if he or she is not good with prose...then what?
i dont know; havent read much fan fic, other than those awesome pota comics from thsi group.
ron/rob
Haristas@... wrote:
In a message dated 6/26/05 10:08:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Not that you or Rory have to like it, of course...
Patrick
And Fox certainly isn't going to like it, so your "novelization" will never get published, and no one but you will read it!
You do have me curious, though. I wonder how you handle dialogue? All the characters aren't going to sound like you, are they?
-- Rory
Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Discover Yahoo!
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out!
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30001 |
From: John |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
.htmlI set myself up pretty good for that one. Ya Bastard.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil" <nfoster@h...> wrote:
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "John" <DrZaiusDavis@a...> wrote:
> > I gotta get Neil to draw me a quick original doodle before he gets
> too big
>
> -- In the interests of common decency I will not be tempted to reply
> to this. ;-)
>
> Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30002 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Mr Ploog |
.html
.html
Thanks Dario
that would be great!
Cool story about the Ploog signed sketches
Neil.
For those that may happen to be in the Toronto, Canada area
August 26-28, that city will be holding it's annual
SF/Horror/Comic/Anime/Gaming super convention. I've just confirmed that at
least two of the artists that will be working on the new Canadian POTA strips
will be there (Tom Fowler and Ty Templeton) as well as Kent Burles who worked
on the old Adventure POTA series (I think I already mentioned this quite a
while back). So there will be chance to meet # POTA artists at once.
If I do get down there I'll see if any more info about the apes series
gets leaked.
Dario
Whitty, Michael wrote:
And the
(anonymous) cartoon artists behind the new Canadian series said some very
complimentary things too - as did Gary Challoner.
So how do
we convert these praises to $s? ;)
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Michael
Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote: > Do you
have a story to share with everyone regarding our good friends at
Simian Scrolls?
I take it you mean how I got my Ploog signature?
When my good mate Dave Ballard queued up for hours at a convention in
the UK recently he had the decency to show Mr Ploog the 2 ashcan
editions of Beware the Beast and asked if he would sign one for me (he
explained I was a big fan) Mr Ploog, after having a good look
through the comics, signed the inside cover of #1 for me and added
some very nice comments.
Not as good as seeing him in the flesh and
getting a signed sketch but an enormous thrill for me
anyhow.
Neil <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30003 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: PLOOG! |
.html
.html
What is your
fixation with doodles all about John? ;)
I set myself up pretty good for that one. Ya
Bastard.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil" <nfoster@h...>
wrote: > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "John" <DrZaiusDavis@a...>
wrote: > > I gotta get Neil to draw me a quick original doodle before
he gets > too big > > -- In the interests of common
decency I will not be tempted to reply > to this. ;-) > >
Neil <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30004 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Fwd: Finding Milo |
.html--- In
pota@yahoogroups.com, "shanter2002" <mail@m...> wrote:
Helen, more power to you---you've certainly found out more than I ever
dreamed. Wouldn't it be astonishing if Kelley is our chimp.Good luck
and if you need any help just ask.John, Scrolls.
--- End forwarded message --- <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30005 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Finding Money |
.html
.html
Maybe you
should ask the guys at Scrolls if they could help out Helen by offering to
replace the money she collected for them that is frozen in her account from when
she collected money for them!
That MIGHT
help!
Michael
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "shanter2002"
<mail@m...> wrote: Helen, more power to you---you've certainly found
out more than I ever dreamed. Wouldn't it be astonishing if Kelley is our
chimp.Good luck and if you need any help just ask.John, Scrolls. ---
End forwarded message
--- <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30006 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
.htmlHow about when Kong gets shot on the Empire State building, just
before he falls, he makes the same sound and spits like Cornelius did
in Escape just before he falls to the lower deck of the ship!
John
In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> Here's a way to bring this around on topic. Let's hear some ideas
about how Peter Jackson could put a POTA moment in the movie. Since he
also loves POTA, how could he do it without taking people out of the
movie? (By the way, I liked in the trailer when Kong said, "Bow your
heads!"). This thread just occurred to me so I don't have anything to
start it with, but if I think of something I'll post it. - - - Jeff <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30007 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
.html
.html
Like
it!
How about when Kong gets shot on the
Empire State building, just before he falls, he makes the same sound and
spits like Cornelius did in Escape just before he falls to the lower deck
of the ship! John
In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...>
wrote: > Here's a way to bring this around on topic. Let's
hear some ideas about how Peter Jackson could put a POTA moment in the
movie. Since he also loves POTA, how could he do it without taking people
out of the movie? (By the way, I liked in the trailer when Kong said, "Bow
your heads!"). This thread just occurred to me so I don't have anything to
start it with, but if I think of something I'll post it. - - -
Jeff <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30008 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: Re: POTA in Kong? |
.htmlI like that one. As we know, Arthur Jacobs was a King Kong fan (and it in
fact was how he learned about POTA). I think the end of "Escape" is supposed
to be a nod to Kong. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "luke_the_drifter52" <JLKINSER1970@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 8:35 PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: POTA in Kong?
>
> How about when Kong gets shot on the Empire State building, just
> before he falls, he makes the same sound and spits like Cornelius did
> in Escape just before he falls to the lower deck of the ship!
> John
>
> In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <veetus@e...> wrote:
> > Here's a way to bring this around on topic. Let's hear some ideas
> about how Peter Jackson could put a POTA moment in the movie. Since he
> also loves POTA, how could he do it without taking people out of the
> movie? (By the way, I liked in the trailer when Kong said, "Bow your
> heads!"). This thread just occurred to me so I don't have anything to
> start it with, but if I think of something I'll post it. - - - Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30009 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/28/2005 |
| Subject: The Face of Kong |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30010 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.html
Marvel UK issue 37, continuing the Beneath adaptation, is now available to download from Hunter's site. Like last issue, there are some pictures from the TV series on the final page.
Next week y'all are on your own to find your way to Hunter's site when issue 38 is posted, as I'll be building sandcastles with my nephews on the beach.
Greg
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30011 |
From: John |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.htmlHave fun. I spent the day at the lovely brown waters of the Miss. Gulf
Coast yesterday. My 5yr. old plummeted to his knees and screamed "You
maniacs. You blew it up! Ugh! Damn You! Godamn you all to hell!!" as
he smashed his fist in the sand. The look on this little old lady in
her sundress was priceless. Enough people laughed like the caught it,
though. I was so proud. :) Thanks again for the update on the latest
issue posted.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Greg Plonowski <urko3085@s...> wrote:
> Marvel UK issue 37, continuing the Beneath adaptation, is now
available to download from Hunter's site. Like last issue, there are
some pictures from the TV series on the final page.
>
> Next week y'all are on your own to find your way to Hunter's site
when issue 38 is posted, as I'll be building sandcastles with my
nephews on the beach.
>
> http://www.goatley.com/pota/
>
> Greg <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30012 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.html
Heh. That's great. Not sure my sister-in-law would appreciate it if my 4 year old nephew started repeating that line, though. Maybe if we did the version from Madagascar. I figure it will be an other year or two
before I can watch Apes with him.
Of course, if after we build a sandcastle we pretend we're a gorilla army who invade and destroy the castle, that's just plain imaginative fun, isn't it?
Greg
John <DrZaiusDavis@...> wrote:
Have fun. I spent the day at the lovely brown waters of the Miss. Gulf
Coast yesterday. My 5yr. old plummeted to his knees and screamed "You maniacs. You blew it up! Ugh! Damn You! Godamn you all to hell!!" as
he smashed his fist in the sand. The look on this little old lady in her sundress was priceless. Enough people laughed like the caught it, though. I was so proud. :) Thanks again for the update on the latest
issue posted.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30013 |
From: John |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.htmlYeah. My Wife was pretty embarrassed. She's not too happy with him
repeating some of the stuff he watches with Dad. Hey, I watched them
when I was two with my Dad and those are some of my youngest and most
fond memories. He also has a tendency to do things like sing Iron
Maiden while they are in line at the store. He can't help it. He's my
mini-me.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Greg Plonowski <urko3085@s...> wrote:
> Heh. That's great. Not sure my sister-in-law would appreciate it if
my 4 year old nephew started repeating that line, though. Maybe if we
did the version from Madagascar. I figure it will be an other year or
two before I can watch Apes with him.
>
> Of course, if after we build a sandcastle we pretend we're a
gorilla army who invade and destroy the castle, that's just plain
imaginative fun, isn't it?
>
> Greg
>
> John <DrZaiusDavis@a...> wrote:
> Have fun. I spent the day at the lovely brown waters of the Miss.
Gulf
> Coast yesterday. My 5yr. old plummeted to his knees and
screamed "You
> maniacs. You blew it up! Ugh! Damn You! Godamn you all to hell!!"
as
> he smashed his fist in the sand. The look on this little old lady
in
> her sundress was priceless. Enough people laughed like the caught
it,
> though. I was so proud. :) Thanks again for the update on the
latest
> issue posted. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30014 |
From: Tim |
Date: 6/29/2005 |
| Subject: Beneath Finland poster |
|
.html Just uploaded a Beneath poster from Finland! On the DG site.....under
Photos>Foreign Posters>Beneath....
Enjoy!
Tim <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30015 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Beneath Finland poster |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Tim" <apefan23@y...> wrote:
> Just uploaded a Beneath poster from Finland! On the DG
site.....under Photos>Foreign Posters>Beneath....
-- Thanks Tim it looks great, I love all the different ways the
posters were approached by other countries.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30016 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Greg Plonowski <urko3085@s...> wrote:
> Marvel UK issue 37, continuing the Beneath adaptation, is now
available to download from Hunter's site. Like last issue, there are
some pictures from the TV series on the final page.
> Next week y'all are on your own to find your way to Hunter's site
when issue 38 is posted, as I'll be building sandcastles with my
nephews on the beach.
-- Thanks as usual for doing this Greg and have yourself a good time
next week mate.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30017 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> They were fantastic!
Dr Who? on the tube, King Kong, Batman and War of the Worlds at the
movies...what year is this and how far away might another go at Planet
of the Apes be?
--The new Doctor Who is excellent and could give any new POTA project
an idea how to do things. Sure the older series of Dr.Who had dodgy,
lowest of the low, special effects but was so popular and ran for so
long because of great scripts and stories. Now with vastly improved
special effects they have still kept up with the tradition of the
story being all important.
We all know what happens when a film is made with a crap script don't
we!
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30018 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
.html
.html
Actually
Neil, as you will discover next week, the final 5 episodes of Dr Who? are even
better than the first 8 and it seems there is a common thread
throughout!
You will love
the last two episodes in particular......
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty"
<whitty@c...> wrote: > They were fantastic! Dr Who? on the
tube, King Kong, Batman and War of the Worlds at the movies...what year is
this and how far away might another go at Planet of the Apes
be?
--The new Doctor Who is excellent and could give any new POTA
project an idea how to do things. Sure the older series of Dr.Who had
dodgy, lowest of the low, special effects but was so popular and ran for
so long because of great scripts and stories. Now with vastly improved
special effects they have still kept up with the tradition of the
story being all important. We all know what happens when a film is
made with a crap script don't we!
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30019 |
From: Neil |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Whitty, Michael" <Michael.Whitty@d...>
wrote:
> Actually Neil, as you will discover next week, the final 5 episodes
of Dr Who? are even better than the first 8 and it seems there is a
common thread throughout!
> You will love the last two episodes in particular......
-- Cool, can't wait!
Now if only our favourite Timelord would get in his Tardis and zip to
the Earth's future and find that it is ruled by intelligent talking
apes! Hey how about a Dr. Who / Apes crossover? Doctor Who on the
Planet of the Apes... ;-)
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30020 |
From: Whitty, Michael |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Dr Zaius - Dr WHO? |
.html
.html
Oh boy - I
hope Cougar isn't listening! ;)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Whitty, Michael"
<Michael.Whitty@d...> wrote: > Actually Neil, as you will
discover next week, the final 5 episodes of Dr Who? are even better than
the first 8 and it seems there is a common thread throughout! > You
will love the last two episodes in particular......
-- Cool, can't
wait! Now if only our favourite Timelord would get in his Tardis and zip
to the Earth's future and find that it is ruled by intelligent talking
apes! Hey how about a Dr. Who / Apes crossover? Doctor Who on the
Planet of the Apes... ;-)
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30021 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Foundation etc. |
|
.html Hmmm... Well, the original Foundation stories were packaged into a
Foundation "trilogy" way back when, and he didn't start writing any
newer Foundation books until the 1980s (Foundation's Edge, Foundation
and Earth, Prelude to Foundation, and Forward the Foundation). I have
a trade paperback edition of the original "Foundation Trilogy" -- the
3 original 'books'-from-novellas that Asimov wrote in the 1940s.
Speaking of "trilogy" types of books, there is the "Second Foundation
Trilogy" written by the "Three Bs": Gregory Benford, Greg Bear, and
David Brin -- "Foundation's Fear", "Foundation and Chaos",
and "Foundation's Triumph". That implies that the first 3 Asimov
novels were the "first" trilogy, doesn't it? That original trilogy
wasn't really conceived of as a trilogy, though, no more so than
Tolkien's "LORD OF THE RINGS" was a trilogy (it was a single work
divided into SIX smaller "books" -- 2 per volume). It was an on-going
saga, which became fuller and richer when Asimov added to it in the
1980s, when he bridged the gaps between his Robot novels and his
Foundation novels ("The Robots of Dawn" and "Robots and Empire",
etc). I've always thought that Commander Data, from STAR TREK Next
Generation, was a poor-man's Daneel Olivaw. I wonder if we'll ever
see a faithful film adaptation of an Asimov novel? The only thing I
didn't really like about the Will Smith film was the title: it made
for a decent Asimovian robot story, but had virtually nothing to do
with the story collection known as "I, Robot".
Patrick
P.S. To keep this POTA-related, the TV episode "THE LEGACY" owes a
hell of a lot to "FOUNDATION". Scientists who know their world is
doomed, so they leave a hologram-message for posterity... just like
Hari Seldon, the Psychohistorian, foretells the fall of the Galactic
Empire, and leaves holographic recordings for posterity...
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30022 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Inclusion |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/27/2005 9:59:15 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@y... writes:
>
> The scripts aren't as important (to me) as what actually ended up
> on screen.
>
>
>
> Then why are you revising POTA with scenes that either aren't going
> to be filmed, or are going to be film but cut?
*** Uh, don't you mean "weren't going to be filmed" and "were going
to be cut"? We're talking about movies made 30+ years ago.
Here's an example. It seems that a scene WAS not only scripted but
filmed (yet, sadly, edited out), involving Nova being diagnosed by
Zira as "pregnant".
They didn't include that footage in the film, of course. And there's
no hint in "BENEATH" that Nova is pregnant. If she is, it's still too
soon for her to be showing any outward signs of being pregnant --
she's in her first trimester, in other words.
But if she IS pregnant, it adds a certain dimension to the final
moments of "BENEATH". Taylor -- after not having seen Nova since his
disappearance, and after perhaps giving up any hope of ever seeing
her again... as well as their CHILD -- finally he is reunited with
her...
... and then a gorilla riddles her with bullets. And she's dead. And,
IF she's pregnant, so too is Taylor's own child. Whatever dreams or
hopes he may have been clinging to in that prison cell regarding Nova
and their child... those dreams are now gone.
Perhaps it isn't merely the death of Nova that puts Taylor in the
frame-of-mind to destroy the entire world. Perhaps it is the loss of
her AND THEIR CHILD that puts him over-the-edge. Remember the
movie "THE PEACEMAKER" with George Clooney and Nicole Kidman? The
terrorist who almost nukes the U.N. Building (and New York City along
with it) is driven by the loss of family members -- in specific, a
daughter, I think. His kid -- dead. He wants to make HIS war a war
that is felt in America. He's gonna punish EVERYBODY, symbolically,
for the actions of those who killed his child. So, too, is Taylor put
in his armageddon state-of-mind by his loss... or "losses".
Reason enough to consider the inclusion of scripted and possibly
filmed scenes that don't conflict with the final cut versions, yet
add nuances and details and relevance to the overall storyline.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30023 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 6/30/2005 |
| Subject: Re: TV links to movies |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, ron kenner <brindlepit2002@y...> wrote:
> patrick-
> i know you have been working on this for a while, and it sounds
interesting.
> i guess you will need to add a lot of material to link the movies
to the tv show?
*** A fair amount, Ron. Mostly, it's going into background details
regarding barely-mentioned elements -- such as the Astronauts Urko
killed, and the one with the grenade caught sneaking into Central
City whom Zaius had had killed (who, exactly, were they? and
where/when did they come from?)... and the 'Scientists' who left the
holograph projector in the Oakland Science Institute in "THE LEGACY",
etc. Virdon mentions that the O.S.I. was a "think-tank", as far back
as the time they left Earth. Were they a government-affiliated think-
tank, or one devoted to certain business interests with long-term
goals, such as a Bill Gates-type company? Oakland is notorious for
its counter-culture types (Berkeley, etc).
Also, the posters in the subway station Burke 'explains' to Urko.
They detail several "inventions" that weren't around when Burke left
Earth, but that he can reasonably understand. What sort of societal
transformations might those inventions have spawned? Think of our
world without the Internet -- how different would it be? In the POTA
universe, we have the Authenticator; imagine how the widespread use
of such a device might transform society -- for the Better and for
the Worse.
POTA skips over the Nuclear War (sometime between "CONQUEST"
and "BATTLE"), but I'm gonna have to depict it, which also involves
depicting the society that had all the things shown in "THE TRAP"
(the "meal-in-a-pill", "disposable clothing", the "neurological
monitor" thing -- perhaps a derivative invention from the
Authenticator, etc). We don't know which country did the "First
Strike" in the War, let alone who specifically pushed the Button (or
ordered it pushed)... but in my story, I'll have to address this.
There are a lotta blanks to fill in, and my scenario/plotline will be
just one way of filling-in-those-blanks. I choose to have the POTA TV
show be in the "same" universe as the movies -- others don't, so
their scenarios will of course differ from mine. My choices, in part,
dictate what my scenario MUST include, in order for it to make sense
to me.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30024 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Hey there T. |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30025 |
From: ron kenner |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: TV links to movies |
.htmlso, the tv show events will kind of be in the background of these new stories?
patrickmichaeltilton <patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, ron kenner <brindlepit2002@y...> wrote: > patrick- > i know you have been working on this for a while, and it sounds interesting.
> i guess you will need to add a lot of material to link the movies to the tv show?
*** A fair amount, Ron. Mostly, it's going into background details
regarding barely-mentioned elements -- such as the Astronauts Urko killed, and the one with the grenade caught sneaking into Central City whom Zaius had had killed (who, exactly, were they? and
where/when did they come from?)... and the 'Scientists' who left the holograph projector in the Oakland Science Institute in "THE LEGACY",
etc. Virdon mentions that the O.S.I. was a "think-tank", as far back as the time they left Earth. Were they a government-affiliated think- tank, or one devoted to certain
business interests with long-term goals, such as a Bill Gates-type company? Oakland is notorious for its counter-culture types (Berkeley, etc).
Also, the posters in the subway station Burke 'explains' to Urko. They detail several "inventions" that weren't around when Burke left
Earth, but that he can reasonably understand. What sort of societal transformations might those inventions have spawned? Think of our world without the Internet -- how different would it be? In the POTA
universe, we have the Authenticator; imagine how the widespread use of such a device might transform society -- for the Better and for the Worse.
POTA skips over the Nuclear War (sometime between "CONQUEST" and "BATTLE"), but I'm gonna have to depict it, which also involves
depicting the society that had all the things shown in "THE TRAP" (the "meal-in-a-pill", "disposable clothing", the "neurological monitor" thing -- perhaps a derivative
invention from the Authenticator, etc). We don't know which country did the "First Strike" in the War, let alone who specifically pushed the Button (or
ordered it pushed)... but in my story, I'll have to address this.
There are a lotta blanks to fill in, and my scenario/plotline will be
just one way of filling-in-those-blanks. I choose to have the POTA TV show be in the "same" universe as the movies -- others don't, so
their scenarios will of course differ from mine. My choices, in part, dictate what my scenario MUST include, in order for it to make sense to me.
Patrick
Learn more about pitbulls at the official Free Pitbulls, Inc. website:
go vegetarian!

Yahoo! Sports
Rekindle the
Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30026 |
From: LordTZer0 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Filmed-yet-edited out scenes |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, ron kenner <brindlepit2002@y...> wrote:
> patrick-
> i know you have been working on thsi for a while, and it soudns
interesting.
So is the novel I'm going to write and throw straight on the fire. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30027 |
From: LordTZer0 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Hey there T. |
.htmlI'd say they missed one, since my computer crapped out and I had to
wipe the drive clean to get Windows to boot. I don't even know
everything I've lost. But the worst part is the latest version of my
screeplay is lost and gone forever. Some may consider that a good
thing, but I don't.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
>
>
> --
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30028 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
.html Just a question about the TV episode The Trap.
When Burke and Urko are trapped underground we get to see a BART (Bay
Area Rapid Transport) train and a poster advertising the San Francisco
zoo.
I have read elsewhere that people have automatically assumed because
of this they are in San Francisco but are they? Is it mentioned
anywhere in the episode that they are?
I know (from a little research on the net) that the BART system also
extends to other cities (Oakland, Fremont etc.)
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30029 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/1/05 7:48:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, nfoster@... writes:
Just a question about the TV episode The Trap.
When Burke and Urko are trapped underground we get to see a BART (Bay
Area Rapid Transport) train and a poster advertising the San Francisco
zoo.
I have read elsewhere that people have automatically assumed because
of this they are in San Francisco but are they? Is it mentioned
anywhere in the episode that they are?
I know (from a little research on the net) that the BART system also
extends to other cities (Oakland, Fremont etc.)
Neil
You answered your own question. It's supposed to be in the general area. Hey, it's better than the Queensborough Plaza subway station in BENEATH -- because there isn't one! The Queensborough
Plaza is all above ground. Here's a link to a shot of it!
http://www.mylife2live.com/000108.html"
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30030 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
>You answered your own question.
-- Not really, I asked if it was mentioned anywhere in that episode
that they were in San Francisco.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30031 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/1/05 8:29:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time, nfoster@... writes:
-- Not really, I asked if it was mentioned anywhere in that episode
that they were in San Francisco.
Neil
Not that I recall.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30032 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
> Hey, it's better than the Queensborough Plaza subway station in
BENEATH -- because there isn't one! The Queensborough Plaza is all
above ground.
-- Maybe they decided to have it buried underground because most of
the rest of New York is in the movie?
And how did that happen? Did the weight of all those buildings make
the ground sink or something!
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30033 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/1/05 8:35:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, nfoster@... writes:
> Hey, it's better than the Queensborough Plaza subway station in
BENEATH -- because there isn't one! The Queensborough Plaza is all
above ground.
-- Maybe they decided to have it buried underground because most of
the rest of New York is in the movie?
And how did that happen? Did the weight of all those buildings make
the ground sink or something!
Neil
I'm sure Patrick knows!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30034 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
>Not that I recall.
-- Thanks Rory, I'm just being lazy as I don't want to have to go and
watch the whole thing and haven't seen it for so long I can't remember
so I'm just hoping someone here has and knows!
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30035 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@a... wrote:
>Hey, it's better than the Queensborough Plaza subway station in
BENEATH -- because there isn't one! The Queensborough Plaza is all
above ground. Here's a link to a shot of it!
> http://www.mylife2live.com/000108.html"
-- I just went and checked it out on the net and the whole station is
way above the ground, even though it has a lower level it is all
raised up above street level.
Does anyone know if there is (or was) that tile wall with the station
name on it or was that just made up as well?
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30036 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html
I
think the implication was that the whole city was blown below….or
something?
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
Sent: Saturday, 2 July 2005 10:01
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's
TheTrap set?
In a message dated 7/1/05 7:48:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
nfoster@... writes:
Just a question about the TV episode The Trap.
When Burke and Urko are trapped underground we get to see a BART (Bay
Area Rapid Transport) train and a poster advertising the San Francisco
zoo.
I have read elsewhere that people have automatically assumed because
of this they are in San Francisco but are they? Is it mentioned
anywhere in the episode that they are?
I know (from a little research on the net) that the BART system also
extends to other cities (Oakland, Fremont etc.)
Neil
You answered your own question. It's supposed to be in the general
area. Hey, it's better than the Queensborough Plaza subway station in
BENEATH -- because there isn't one! The Queensborough Plaza is all above
ground. Here's a link to a shot of it!
http://www.mylife2live.com/000108.html
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30037 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html
Watching the TV Series can be traumatic!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil
Sent: Saturday, 2 July 2005 10:43
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's
TheTrap set?
--- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
>Not that I recall.
-- Thanks Rory, I'm just being lazy as I don't
want to have to go and
watch the whole thing and haven't seen it for so
long I can't remember
so I'm just hoping someone here has and knows!
Neil
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30038 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Beneath Finland poster |
.htmlThanks for posting the Finland poster! I have never seen this one!
- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim" <apefan23@y...> wrote:
> Just uploaded a Beneath poster from Finland! On the DG
site.....under
> Photos>Foreign Posters>Beneath....
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Tim <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30039 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/1/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
.html In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
Watching the TV Series can be traumatic!
I take it that you aren't a big fan of the TV series Michael?
John <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30040 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html
I love the TV Series John.
I just don’t LIKE it!
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of luke_the_drifter52
Sent: Saturday, 2 July 2005 2:52
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's
TheTrap set?
In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty"
<whitty@c...> wrote:
Watching the
TV Series can be traumatic!
I take it
that you aren't a big fan of the TV series Michael?
John
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30041 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.html.html
In a message dated 6/29/2005 3:40:13 PM Pacific Standard Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
Yeah. My Wife was pretty embarrassed. She's not too happy with him
repeating some of the stuff he watches with Dad. Hey, I watched them when I was two with my Dad and those are some of my youngest and most fond memories. He also has a tendency to do things like sing Iron
Maiden while they are in line at the store. He can't help it. He's my mini-me.
That's great, he is going to follow Dad into the world of sci-fi. My niece who is only 2yrs old, is obsessed with gorillas. She talks about them constantly. Guess who got her started on that track.
When she comes to my house, she wants to see the monkeys and the cats.
Elaine
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30042 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Beneath Finland poster |
.htmlI hadn't either....and I won't see it in person cause
I was outbid dammit.....
Tim
--- luke_the_drifter52 < JLKINSER1970@...>
wrote:
> Thanks for posting the Finland poster! I have never
> seen this one!
>
>
> - In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim" <apefan23@y...>
> wrote:
> > Just uploaded a Beneath poster from Finland! On
> the DG
> site.....under
> > Photos>Foreign Posters>Beneath....
> >
> > Enjoy!
> >
> > Tim
>
>
>
____________________________________________________
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30043 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.htmlLOL I have never heard it put that way but I guess I can see your
point. I love it AND like it but have to admith that some of the
episodes are hard to get through.
John
In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> I love the TV Series John.
>
> I just don't LIKE it!
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of luke_the_drifter52
> Sent: Saturday, 2 July 2005 2:52 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's TheTrap set?
>
> In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> Watching the TV Series can be traumatic!
>
> I take it that you aren't a big fan of the TV series Michael?
> John
>
> --
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30044 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/2/2005 7:58:13 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
taebokitti@... writes:
she
wants to see the monkeys and the cats.
Talking cats?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30045 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/2/05 2:02:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, JLKINSER1970@... writes:
LOL I have never heard it put that way but I guess I can see your
point. I love it AND like it but have to admith that some of the
episodes are hard to get through.
John
I have the same problem now with other Fox SF TV shows like LOST IN SPACE, VOYAGE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA and LAND OF THE GIANTS. They just haven't aged well at all.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30046 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html
But
you NEVER liked the TV Show did you Rory?
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
Sent: Sunday, 3 July 2005 9:15 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's
TheTrap set?
In a message dated 7/2/05 2:02:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
JLKINSER1970@... writes:
LOL I have never heard it put that way but I guess I can see
your
point. I love it AND like it but have to admith that some of the
episodes are hard to get through.
John
I have the same problem now with other Fox SF TV shows like LOST IN SPACE,
VOYAGE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA and LAND OF THE GIANTS. They just haven't
aged well at all.
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30047 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: when did the nuclear war happen in apeline one and ... |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/2/05 3:01:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, apecalypsenow@... writes:
it seems to me that you're the master of the multilane drivers.
so? i guess 26th.
Well, forgetting that we see the remains of a mid-twentieth century city bus in the ruins of NYC in BENEATH, and believing Cornelius' statements in ESCAPE, then I guess that in the "original" timeline that
lead to the planet of the apes that Taylor crash-lands on in PLANET, then the nuclear war that destroyed human civilization happened at either the end of the 25th century or the beginning of the 26th.
I suppose that at the point when the apes were about to take everything over anyway, those human beings that still had the will to do something about it (remembering what Boulle's thesis was on the fall of man)
decided better to blow it all up then let the monkeys have it.
Of course, Caesar's jump start of the revolution in CONQUEST changed all that in the second timeline that leads into BATTLE.
You see, I can, just as Patrick does, look at the five films as complete saga, only I don't think that Cornelius is lying in ESCAPE, as Patrick insists. Therefore, if in fact the past can't be changed, then
the filmmakers were in error changing it in CONQUEST and BATTLE, but the fact is that budgetary limitations meant they simply could not tell a five-hundred-year-long story in the two remaining films. Pity that.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30048 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/2/05 7:28:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:
But you NEVER liked the TV Show did you Rory?
I was very disappointed with it, yes. I remember feeling rather depressed the next Saturday morning after I'd watched the first episode Friday night. Of course, I was there for every episode and I hoped
it would get better, and I was upset when it was so quickly canceled because I wouldn't or couldn't give up hoping that it would get better, but in retrospect it was ill-conceived and it was a good thing it
faded away quickly.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30049 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>> In a message dated 7/2/2005 7:58:13 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
taebokitti@a... writes:
>> she wants to see the monkeys and the cats.
> Talking cats?
-- Talking cats who enslave humans?
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30050 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html
I
would love to know what you think might have happened to make it better.
I have my own ideas, and I have tried to apply
these in the new comic.
I’m fairly sure you would all be
pissed if I say TOO much coz I think you are going to like what I’ve
done, but I’d really like to hear from individuals what they think would
have improved/saved the TV Show and why it….well…..SUCKED! ;)
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
Sent: Sunday, 3 July 2005 9:46 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's
TheTrap set?
In a message dated 7/2/05 7:28:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
whitty@... writes:
But you
NEVER liked the TV Show did you Rory?
I was very disappointed with it, yes. I remember feeling rather depressed
the next Saturday morning after I'd watched the first episode Friday
night. Of course, I was there for every episode and I hoped it would get
better, and I was upset when it was so quickly canceled because I wouldn't or
couldn't give up hoping that it would get better, but in retrospect it was
ill-conceived and it was a good thing it faded away quickly.
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30051 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.html.html
I think there’s a movie about
talking pussies……..
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil
Sent: Sunday, 3 July 2005 10:00 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Marvel UK
issue 37 now online
--- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>> In a message dated 7/2/2005 7:58:13 A.M.
Central Daylight Time,
taebokitti@a... writes:
>> she wants to see the monkeys and
the cats.
> Talking cats?
-- Talking cats who enslave humans?
Neil
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30052 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/2/05 8:04:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:
I would love to know what you think might have happened to make it better.
Well, I don't NOW think it would have gotten better, but I think you want to know what I'd have done or would do now, if I had the magical power to do so, to make it better, but I don't have the time to go
into that right now.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30053 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html
Well
could you touch on SOME points?
PLEASE!!??
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
Sent: Sunday, 3 July 2005 10:09 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's
TheTrap set?
In a message dated 7/2/05 8:04:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
whitty@... writes:
I would
love to know what you think might have happened to make it better.
Well, I don't NOW think it would have gotten better, but I think you want to
know what I'd have done or would do now, if I had the magical power to do so,
to make it better, but I don't have the time to go into that right now.
-- Rory
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30054 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/2/05 8:13:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:
Well could you touch on SOME points? PLEASE!!??
8:17 p.m. here! Haven't had dinner yet! Logging off now! Bye!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30055 |
From: Neil |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
>I'd really like to hear from individuals what they think would have
improved/saved the TV Show and why it..well...SUCKED! ;)
-- Well I don't think it sucked but certain parts of it did. I always
these days think back to things like in the episode The Legacy where
Zaius and Co use an old building as a temporary base and outside there
are ape flags hung on the building. Only there is no wind so they
attached string to a corner of the flag to pull it and make it look
like it is blowing in the breeze and you can clearly see that string.
Just little things but they add up!
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30056 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html
I think it lacked organisation.
The stories, on the whole, seemed aimless
too.
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil
Sent: Sunday, 3 July 2005 10:26 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's
TheTrap set?
--- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
>I'd
really like to hear from individuals what they think would have
improved/saved
the TV Show and why it..well...SUCKED! ;)
-- Well I
don't think it sucked but certain parts of it did. I always
these days
think back to things like in the episode The Legacy where
Zaius and Co
use an old building as a temporary base and outside there
are ape
flags hung on the building. Only there is no wind so they
attached
string to a corner of the flag to pull it and make it look
like it is
blowing in the breeze and you can clearly see that string.
Just little
things but they add up!
Neil
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30057 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.htmlI have to admit that I was really anxious to see "The Liberator"
when the DVD set came out because I have never seen it. After seeing
it I feel that it is THE WORST of the whole series!!! I don't even
think the apperance of Urko or Zaius could have saved that episode.
And the acting sucked also. (Not Burke, Virdon, or Galen. The rest
of the actors)
I feel that the make up lacked from what we had in the movies also.
You could see the actors teeth all blacked out with out trying to
and Roddy McDowall had gloves on that really looked like gloves. And
who ever did the stand in parts for Roddy as Galen didn't even
resemble Galen or Roddy.
But, on the same hand, if Sideshow releases the Apes TV series as
figures, I will be the first in line to buy them.
In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> I think it lacked organisation.
>
> The stories, on the whole, seemed aimless too.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of Neil
> Sent: Sunday, 3 July 2005 10:26 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's TheTrap set?
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...>
wrote:
> >I'd really like to hear from individuals what they think would
have
> improved/saved the TV Show and why it..well...SUCKED! ;)
>
> -- Well I don't think it sucked but certain parts of it did. I
always
> these days think back to things like in the episode The Legacy
where
> Zaius and Co use an old building as a temporary base and outside
there
> are ape flags hung on the building. Only there is no wind so they
> attached string to a corner of the flag to pull it and make it
look
> like it is blowing in the breeze and you can clearly see that
string.
>
> Just little things but they add up!
>
> Neil
>
> --
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30058 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 7/2/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
|
.html Hey, Neil & Rory,
Yes, "THE TRAP" is set in San Francisco specifically. The subway
station has writing on the wall that reads "EXIT TO SUTTER ST" (cue
to 17:55 on the episode). There is a Sutter Street in San Francisco
(check Mapquest or some other Internet map source, and I'm sure
you'll find it). Exactly WHERE along Sutter Street the building Burke
& Urko are trapped in, that's another matter altogether. But it is in
San Francisco. Evidently, the "exit to Sutter Street" is caved in,
otherwise Burke could've just waltzed out while Urko was still conked
out.
See? Rory was right: Patrick DOES know! So there!
Patrick
P.S. The Queensboro Plaza subway station must've been delved with an
underground line sometime after Taylor & Brent left Earth. In OUR
universe, it'll never have an underground tunnel leading to
Manhattan... but in the POTA universe, an underground track is
created leading from Queensboro Plaza to the vicinity of the New York
Public Library.
One offhand, incidental thing about the NYPL: the Australian novelist
Matt Reilly self-published his first novel, called "CONTEST", and has
since re-written it a bit and had it republished professionally, and
it's set in the NYPL. For a first novel, it's pretty good (and it's
neat to see the NYPL as a setting -- he really goes into detail about
it), though his other novels are much better ("ICE STATION", "AREA
7", "TEMPLE" and "SCARECROW"). His novels are like "DIE HARD" on
hyper-steroids. Lotsa fun. "ICE STATION" has been optioned as a film,
and if it's anything like the book, it'll kick a whole lotta ass.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30059 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/2/2005 7:05:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
whitty@... writes:
I think there's a
movie about talking pussies……..
Yeah. It's called Team America.
Watched it last night. Check out
the bonus features in the Extras.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30060 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html
.html
In a message dated 7/2/2005 6:47:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
Haristas@... writes:
in retrospect it was
ill-conceived and it was a good thing it faded away quickly.
--
Rory
Well said. It was trying to help everyone from town to town like Kung
Fu. An did approached that in epis like The Deception, but then they's
'Jump the Shark" with a hang glider. Very uneven. And I know of many
series' that start off bad and get better with time --
any STTNG episode where Riker hasn't got a beard yet comes to
mind. Or any Simpsons where Homer still sounds a little to much like
Walter Matthau is the same -- hard to watch. There just wasn't time for it
to get better. Makeup shows are expensive. Especially when they
aren't working -- like the last season of Dark Angel -- and even when the are
working -- like the last season of Enterprise. Studios hate paying bills,
even when they have sponsors paying them. But when ever Burman Studios
decides they need a showcase there will be another one. It's the law of
economics. That or develop CG makeups. That'll be next.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30061 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/2/05 11:28:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time, patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Yes, "THE TRAP" is set in San Francisco specifically. The subway
station has writing on the wall that reads "EXIT TO SUTTER ST" (cue
to 17:55 on the episode). There is a Sutter Street in San Francisco
(check Mapquest or some other Internet map source, and I'm sure
you'll find it). Exactly WHERE along Sutter Street the building Burke
& Urko are trapped in, that's another matter altogether. But it is in
San Francisco. Evidently, the "exit to Sutter Street" is caved in,
otherwise Burke could've just waltzed out while Urko was still conked
out.
See? Rory was right: Patrick DOES know! So there!
Patrick
Patrick, you are and ever will be the King of POTA geeks!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30062 |
From: John |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 37 now online |
.htmlTeam America... F#ck YEAH!!!!
-- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, LordTZer0@A... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/2/2005 7:05:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> whitty@c... writes:
>
> I think thereâs a movie about talking pussiesâ¦â¦..
>
>
>
> Yeah. It's called Team America.
> Watched it last night. Check out
> the bonus features in the Extras. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30063 |
From: John |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.htmlLook. The T.V. show is not not the great SciFi epic tht will be
remembered for "changing the face" of television but just like Dehn's
storyline, when we over analyze it now as adults, we forget that the
T.V.'s greatest fans were kids. I was like 3yrs. old when my Dad
would let me stay up to watch it with him and I loved every second! I
could follow the simple story and was intrigued to see how the
fugitives would escape this weeks disaster. The next morning I would
have my MEGO figures and Treehouse playset moved into the livingroom
and play out last nights story. No other Television show had that
kind of impact on me. Nothing would till Star Wars years later. Most
of my earliest childhood memories are in some way tied into Planet of
the Apes.(see member pics) I don't think I would have had that kind
of reaction to the T.V. series if it had the involved adult
storylines we are looking for now.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "luke_the_drifter52"
<JLKINSER1970@h...> wrote:
> I have to admit that I was really anxious to see "The Liberator"
> when the DVD set came out because I have never seen it. After
seeing
> it I feel that it is THE WORST of the whole series!!! I don't even
> think the apperance of Urko or Zaius could have saved that episode.
> And the acting sucked also. (Not Burke, Virdon, or Galen. The rest
> of the actors)
> I feel that the make up lacked from what we had in the movies also.
> You could see the actors teeth all blacked out with out trying to
> and Roddy McDowall had gloves on that really looked like gloves.
And
> who ever did the stand in parts for Roddy as Galen didn't even
> resemble Galen or Roddy.
> But, on the same hand, if Sideshow releases the Apes TV series as
> figures, I will be the first in line to buy them.
>
> In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...> wrote:
> > I think it lacked organisation.
> >
> > The stories, on the whole, seemed aimless too.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On
> Behalf
> > Of Neil
> > Sent: Sunday, 3 July 2005 10:26 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Where's TheTrap set?
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@c...>
> wrote:
> > >I'd really like to hear from individuals what they think would
> have
> > improved/saved the TV Show and why it..well...SUCKED! ;)
> >
> > -- Well I don't think it sucked but certain parts of it did. I
> always
> > these days think back to things like in the episode The Legacy
> where
> > Zaius and Co use an old building as a temporary base and outside
> there
> > are ape flags hung on the building. Only there is no wind so they
> > attached string to a corner of the flag to pull it and make it
> look
> > like it is blowing in the breeze and you can clearly see that
> string.
> >
> > Just little things but they add up!
> >
> > Neil
> >
> > --
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30064 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 7/3/05 10:41:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time, DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
No other Television show had that
kind of impact on me. Nothing would till Star Wars years later.
STAR WARS?!!!
You traitor!
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30065 |
From: John |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Where's TheTrap set? |
.htmlThis coming from my favorite Star Trek nerd. :)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 7/3/05 10:41:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> DrZaiusDavis@a... writes:
>
>
> > No other Television show had that
> > kind of impact on me. Nothing would till Star Wars years later.
>
> STAR WARS?!!!
>
> You traitor! <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30066 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Giamatti on "Apes" |
|
.html From the June issue of Playboy:
Paul Giamatti 20 Questions
Q14
Playboy: Would you reveal what substances, illegal or
not, you all had to be on while making "Planet of the
Apes"?
Giamatti: We should have been taking drugs.
Unfortunately we weren't on anything. It was fantastic
when my agent called and said , "Tim Burton wants to
meet you for "Planet of the Apes." The script that
actually came across my desk meandered. Bad script. If
you're going to remake that movie, let alone a good
science-fiction film, plot would seem to be of the
essence. Not that the first movie is Jonathon Swift,
but it has a good satirical point of view. This one?
Nothing. It just dribbled away. But it turned out to
be one of the best times I've ever had filming."
Tim
__________________________________
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 30067 |
From: John |
Date: 7/3/2005 |
| Subject: Re: Giamatti on "Apes" |
.htmlYou actually READ the articles? Weirdo! :)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@y...> wrote:
> From the June issue of Playboy:
> Paul Giamatti 20 Questions
>
> Q14
>
> Playboy: Would you reveal what substances, illegal or
> not, you all had to be on while making "Planet of the
> Apes"?
>
> Giamatti: We should have been taking drugs.
> Unfortunately we weren't on anything. It was fantastic
> when my agent called and said , "Tim Burton wants to
> meet you for "Planet of the Apes." The script that
> actually came across my desk meandered. Bad script. If
> you're going to remake that movie, let alone a good
> science-fiction film, plot would seem to be of the
> essence. Not that the first movie is Jonathon Swift,
> but it has a good satirical point of view. This one?
> Nothing. It just dribbled away. But it turned out to
> be one of the best times I've ever had filming."
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
<.html
|
|
|
|