Yahoo! potadg group — Messages 39076–39175

Dates: 2006-05-03 through 2006-05-08

Messages in potadg group. Page 204 of 451.
Index Prev  Next


Group: potadg Message: 39076 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
Group: potadg Message: 39077 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Resin bust? Apes with bangs?
Group: potadg Message: 39078 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Revolution #4 in shops this week
Group: potadg Message: 39079 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Chambers vs Baker (the look of the apes)
Group: potadg Message: 39080 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Costume tests
Group: potadg Message: 39081 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Chambers vs Baker (the look of the apes)
Group: potadg Message: 39082 From: luke_the_drifter52 Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
Group: potadg Message: 39083 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 39084 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD Cover!
Group: potadg Message: 39085 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
Group: potadg Message: 39086 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Costume tests
Group: potadg Message: 39087 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
Group: potadg Message: 39088 From: Neil Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 81
Group: potadg Message: 39089 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Revolution #4
Group: potadg Message: 39090 From: abmac@i-55.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Costume tests
Group: potadg Message: 39091 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Revolution #4
Group: potadg Message: 39092 From: Neil Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Costume tests
Group: potadg Message: 39093 From: John Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Revolution #4
Group: potadg Message: 39094 From: luke_the_drifter52 Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
Group: potadg Message: 39095 From: John Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
Group: potadg Message: 39096 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Paranoia or what?
Group: potadg Message: 39097 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39098 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
Group: potadg Message: 39099 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Paranoia or what?
Group: potadg Message: 39100 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Paranoia or what?
Group: potadg Message: 39101 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39102 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 39103 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39104 From: kidro85@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Paranoia or what?
Group: potadg Message: 39105 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Paranoia or what?
Group: potadg Message: 39106 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39107 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39108 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39109 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 39110 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Here's Manny...
Group: potadg Message: 39111 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Uncle Manny #23
Group: potadg Message: 39112 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Speaking of 2001: A Space Odyssey...
Group: potadg Message: 39113 From: John Date: 5/4/2006
Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 39114 From: sparkytb2005 Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Rare Beneath photos
Group: potadg Message: 39115 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39116 From: Dario Sciola Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Men'r'us
Group: potadg Message: 39117 From: Dario Sciola Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Revolution #4
Group: potadg Message: 39118 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Dr. Galen
Group: potadg Message: 39119 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: God and Ape
Group: potadg Message: 39120 From: abmac@i-55.com Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
Group: potadg Message: 39121 From: Patrick Tilton Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
Group: potadg Message: 39122 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Rare Beneath photos
Group: potadg Message: 39123 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39124 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
Group: potadg Message: 39125 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Revolution #4
Group: potadg Message: 39126 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
Group: potadg Message: 39127 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
Group: potadg Message: 39128 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
Group: potadg Message: 39129 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
Group: potadg Message: 39130 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
Group: potadg Message: 39131 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
Group: potadg Message: 39132 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
Group: potadg Message: 39133 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Uncle Manny #23
Group: potadg Message: 39134 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Speaking of 2001: A Space Odyssey...
Group: potadg Message: 39135 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Rare Beneath photos
Group: potadg Message: 39136 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39137 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Men'r'us
Group: potadg Message: 39138 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Naming protocol
Group: potadg Message: 39139 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: New Doctor Who?
Group: potadg Message: 39140 From: abmac40 Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
Group: potadg Message: 39141 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor Who?
Group: potadg Message: 39142 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
Group: potadg Message: 39143 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39144 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Naming protocol
Group: potadg Message: 39145 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Naming protocol
Group: potadg Message: 39146 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Naming protocol
Group: potadg Message: 39147 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39148 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Naming protocol
Group: potadg Message: 39149 From: Graham Hill Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: New Doctor Who?
Group: potadg Message: 39150 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39151 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Naming protocol
Group: potadg Message: 39152 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39153 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Naming protocol
Group: potadg Message: 39154 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39155 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 39156 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/6/2006
Subject: Re: Naming protocol
Group: potadg Message: 39157 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 5/7/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39158 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/7/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39159 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 5/7/2006
Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
Group: potadg Message: 39160 From: abmac@i-55.com Date: 5/7/2006
Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
Group: potadg Message: 39161 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/7/2006
Subject: The Might Peking Man
Group: potadg Message: 39162 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/7/2006
Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
Group: potadg Message: 39163 From: Dario Sciola Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Re: Men'r'us
Group: potadg Message: 39164 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Re: Men'r'us
Group: potadg Message: 39165 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor Who?
Group: potadg Message: 39166 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
Group: potadg Message: 39167 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Re: The Might Peking Man
Group: potadg Message: 39168 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Re: Naming protocol
Group: potadg Message: 39169 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Re: Mighty Peking Man
Group: potadg Message: 39170 From: abmac40 Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Planet and Escape Double Bill
Group: potadg Message: 39171 From: abmac40 Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Re: Men'r'us
Group: potadg Message: 39172 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 39173 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Here's Manny again...
Group: potadg Message: 39174 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Uncle Manny #24
Group: potadg Message: 39175 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
Subject: Re: Men'r'us



Group: potadg Message: 39076 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
.html
.html
 
I LIKE It!
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39077 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Resin bust? Apes with bangs?
.html
all the info in the bust is handwritten.....which is
odd they would have put the copywright on there....But
maybe that was the name of the kit "Wisest
Ape"....MEdicoms call him the "Greatest Ape" and of
course he is indeed both of these things. Hail
Lawgiver!

--- TZer0@... wrote:

>
> In a message dated 5/2/2006 10:52:06 A.M. Central
> Daylight Time,
> apefan23@... writes:
>
> "Wisest Ape copyright 2004 "
>
>
>
> That's usually the Japanese designation for The
> Lawgiver.
> Which makes sense, since garage kits started in
> Japan.
>
>
>


<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39078 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Revolution #4 in shops this week
.html
.html In a message dated 5/2/06 8:38:35 AM Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:


Thanks Greg – can't wait!


Cougar – you got yours yet?


Not a thing yet Whitty...
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39079 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Chambers vs Baker (the look of the apes)
.html
.html In a message dated 5/2/06 8:44:48 AM Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:


I wonder what Chambers would have come up with using today's technology?


Thing is that Chambers probably could have designed a more "realistic" looking ape, but he chose not to for aesthetic reasons... He felt that the audience would have been "grossed out" looking at real looking apes for 2 hrs...
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39080 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Costume tests
.html
You know you think you have seen a movie so many time
you would have noticed everything about it but I did
not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory about him
being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
perhaps??

--- abmac@... wrote:


>
> Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name
> doesn't have the
> Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate
> that he's a "foreigner"
> from another area who thinks he's being
> discriminated against because of his
> species, when his superiors are really prejudiced
> against him because of his
> place of origin.
>


<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39081 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Chambers vs Baker (the look of the apes)
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/3/2006 10:26:57 A.M. Central Daylight Time, mlccougar@... writes:
Thing is that Chambers probably could have designed a more "realistic" looking ape, but he chose not to for aesthetic reasons... He felt that the audience would have been "grossed out" looking at real looking apes for 2 hrs...
 
Yes, as I recall, they took great pains to create apes
that looked aesthetically pleasing.  If you've seen some
of the background apes you'll see there are a lot who aren't.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39082 From: luke_the_drifter52 Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
.html
I can't see it for some reason. All I get is a box that states
attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what I need to do to fix my
computer to where I can see this and other attachments?
Thanks
John

In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote:
>
> MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO!
>
> OK, here's yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one using
the
> original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can come up
with for a back
> cover. Again, I'm still working on it.
>
> -- Rory
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39083 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
.html
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
group.

File : /DVD Cover Ideas/DVD Cover II Beneath.jpg
Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
Description :

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/DVD%20Cover%20Ideas/DVD%20Cover%20II%20Beneath.jpg

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39084 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD Cover!
.html
.html Message
-- Looks great as usual Rory!
 
 
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 9:48 PM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com; PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Yet another Beneath DVD Cover!

OK, here's yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one using the original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can come up with for a back cover.  Again, I'm still working on it.
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39085 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
.html
.html Message -- No idea with the computer help John but I have uploaded a copy of the cover to the files section in the DVD Cover Ideas folder. Unfortunately I did have to lower the resolution a bit to make the file smaller.

Neil


> -----Original Message-----
> From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
>
On Behalf Of luke_the_drifter52
> Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 6:26
AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Yet another
Beneath DVD cover
>
>
> I can't see it for some reason. All I
get is a box that states
> attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what
I need to do
> to fix my
> computer to where I can see this and
other attachments?
> Thanks
> John
>
>  In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote:
> >
> > MIGHT BE A
GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO!
> >
> > OK, here's
yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one using
> the
> >
original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can come up
> with
for a back
> > cover.  Again, I'm still working on it.
> >
> > -- Rory
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>
Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go
to:
>    
href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/
>
>
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>    
PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to:
>    
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

>
>
>

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39086 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Costume tests
.html
.html Message -- Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and perhaps one to follow up in a future story maybe?

Neil



> -----Original Message-----
>
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
>
On Behalf Of abmac@...
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM
>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume
tests

> Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't
have the
> Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate
that
> he's a "foreigner"
> from another area who thinks he's being
discriminated against
> because of his
> species, when his superiors
are really prejudiced against him
> because of his
> place of
origin.

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39087 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
.html
.html Message -- One thing that may help is if you go to Edit Membership and in the Message Format check the convert to HTML section (see below). If you have it set for plain text you won't get the pictures that are sent in emails

Message Format



Neil



> -----Original Message-----
>
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
>
On Behalf Of luke_the_drifter52
> Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 6:26
AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Yet another
Beneath DVD cover
>
>
> I can't see it for some reason. All I
get is a box that states
> attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what
I need to do
> to fix my
> computer to where I can see this and
other attachments?
> Thanks
> John
>
>  In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote:
> >
> > MIGHT BE A
GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO!
> >
> > OK, here's
yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one using
> the
> >
original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can come up
> with
for a back
> > cover.  Again, I'm still working on it.
> >
> > -- Rory
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>
Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go
to:
>    
href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/
>
>
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>    
PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to:
>    
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

>
>
>

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39088 From: Neil Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 81
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Greg Plonowski <urko3085@...> wrote:
> Issue 81 is now available to download from Hunter's site. This issue
returns us to the Future History Chronicles storyline featuring giant
city-ships of apes. Art is by Tom Sutton. This issue also includes a
photo of Urko as well as a letters page.

-- As usual a big thanks to you Greg for scanning these comics and
Hunter for hosting them. As I've mentioned before, Tom Sutton was
always one of my least favourite Apes artists but that is not to put
down his work. There's just something about it that doesn't resonate
with me for some reason.

Neil
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39089 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Revolution #4
.html
just got a copy today.... haven't read it yet but I
did scan the letters section and Neil Foster and
DrJohnZaiusDavis have letters printed!

Tim

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39090 From: abmac@i-55.com Date: 5/3/2006
Subject: Re: Costume tests
.html
Attachments :
    .html Message -- Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and perhaps one to follow up in a future story maybe?

    Neil



    > -----Original Message-----
    >
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
    >
    On Behalf Of abmac@...
    > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM
    >
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume
    tests

    > Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't
    have the
    > Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate
    that
    > he's a "foreigner"
    > from another area who thinks he's being
    discriminated against
    > because of his
    > species, when his superiors
    are really prejudiced against him
    > because of his
    > place of
    origin.

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39091 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
    Subject: Re: Revolution #4
    .html
    .html Message -- Do we? Cool, can't wait to get my copy then!

    Neil




    > -----Original Message-----
    >
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
    >
    On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
    > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 8:09 AM
    > To:
    PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: [PotaDG] Revolution
    #4
    >
    >
    > just got a copy today.... haven't read it yet but
    I
    > did scan the letters section and  Neil Foster and
    >
    DrJohnZaiusDavis have letters printed!

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39092 From: Neil Date: 5/3/2006
    Subject: Re: Costume tests
    .html
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , abmac@... wrote:
    > How's that for a start on the background? Comments and suggestions
    are welcome.

    -- Excellent! Some really nice ideas to work with there.

    Neil
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39093 From: John Date: 5/3/2006
    Subject: Re: Revolution #4
    .html
    HOLY SH*T!!! I had no idea. I got my copies today and was just about
    to comment on how I would love to get my hands on Tom's pencil's for
    this issue. That's very cool, what a great surprise.



    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
    >
    > just got a copy today.... haven't read it yet but I
    > did scan the letters section and Neil Foster and
    > DrJohnZaiusDavis have letters printed!
    >
    > Tim
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39094 From: luke_the_drifter52 Date: 5/3/2006
    Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
    .html
    Mine was already set to that when I check my settings. Anyway,
    thanks for the uploaded copy Neil!
    Rory, this cover is awesome!!! I can't make up my mind on which
    Beneath cover I like the best; this one or your first one. But, if I
    had to pick, I would have to go with this one. What you did for the
    back cover is outstanding!!! The Mutants on the top is a neat touch!
    I wish I could figure out the Adobe Paint Shop I have so I could
    play around with my hand at making some covers!
    John



    In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
    >
    > -- One thing that may help is if you go to Edit Membership and in
    the
    > Message Format check the convert to HTML section (see below). If
    you
    > have it set for plain text you won't get the pictures that are
    sent in
    > emails
    >
    > Message Format
    >
    >
    > * Convert to HTML - Convert plain-text messages sent to me to
    > HTML.
    >
    >
    >
    > Neil
    >
    >
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
    > > On Behalf Of luke_the_drifter52
    > > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 6:26 AM
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
    > >
    > >
    > > I can't see it for some reason. All I get is a box that states
    > > attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what I need to do
    > > to fix my
    > > computer to where I can see this and other attachments?
    > > Thanks
    > > John
    > >
    > > In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@ wrote:
    > > >
    > > > MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO!
    > > >
    > > > OK, here's yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one
    using
    > > the
    > > > original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can come
    up
    > > with for a back
    > > > cover. Again, I'm still working on it.
    > > >
    > > > -- Rory
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Yahoo! Groups Links
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39095 From: John Date: 5/3/2006
    Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
    .html
    Mine was also already set but i can't view pics till Neil uploads
    them.


    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "luke_the_drifter52"
    <JLKINSER1970@...> wrote:
    >
    > Mine was already set to that when I check my settings. Anyway,
    > thanks for the uploaded copy Neil!
    > Rory, this cover is awesome!!! I can't make up my mind on which
    > Beneath cover I like the best; this one or your first one. But, if
    I
    > had to pick, I would have to go with this one. What you did for the
    > back cover is outstanding!!! The Mutants on the top is a neat
    touch!
    > I wish I could figure out the Adobe Paint Shop I have so I could
    > play around with my hand at making some covers!
    > John
    >
    >
    >
    > In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
    > >
    > > -- One thing that may help is if you go to Edit Membership and in
    > the
    > > Message Format check the convert to HTML section (see below). If
    > you
    > > have it set for plain text you won't get the pictures that are
    > sent in
    > > emails
    > >
    > > Message Format
    > >
    > >
    > > * Convert to HTML - Convert plain-text messages sent to me to
    > > HTML.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > Neil
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > > -----Original Message-----
    > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ]
    > > > On Behalf Of luke_the_drifter52
    > > > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 6:26 AM
    > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > I can't see it for some reason. All I get is a box that states
    > > > attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what I need to do
    > > > to fix my
    > > > computer to where I can see this and other attachments?
    > > > Thanks
    > > > John
    > > >
    > > > In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@ wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO!
    > > > >
    > > > > OK, here's yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one
    > using
    > > > the
    > > > > original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can
    come
    > up
    > > > with for a back
    > > > > cover. Again, I'm still working on it.
    > > > >
    > > > > -- Rory
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39096 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/3/2006
    Subject: Paranoia or what?
    .html
    .html Message
    -- Trawling the web I found an interview with David Charkham who played one of the apes in the 'Dawn of Man' sequence from 2001: A Space Odyssey. Here is a little snippet:
     
    "As for the general vibe on the movie, Dan Richter and possibly Kubrick were convinced that the Planet of the Apes, being made around the same time, technical crew were spying on us! One day we were rehearsing in a field on studio grounds and Dan made us all get in a tight huddle as an aircraft flew over in case they had a camera. Rumour had it that everything from the movie was destroyed to avoid copies etc"
     
    Were they really that paranoid? I find it hard to believe that Chambers and Co would have bothered spying myself!
     
    Neil
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39097 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
    Subject: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
    .html
    Attachments :
      .html.htmlHere's a DVD cover I've just finished for ESCAPE.  It features an alternative ad from the pressbook on the back.

      -- Rory
      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39098 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
      .html
      .html.html In a message dated 5/3/06 10:21:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time, JLKINSER1970@... writes:


      Rory, this cover is awesome!!! I can't make up my mind on which
      Beneath cover I like the best; this one or your first one. But, if I
      had to pick, I would have to go with this one. What you did for the
      back cover is outstanding!!! The Mutants on the top is a neat touch!
      I wish I could figure out the Adobe Paint Shop I have so I could
      play around with my hand at making some covers!
      John


      Thanks.  All I can say is once you learn how to use photoshop it's pretty easy, and you can do almost anything!

      I think you'll like the ESCAPE cover too.

      -- Rory
      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39099 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Paranoia or what?
      .html
      .html.html In a message dated 5/4/06 12:32:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:


      -- Trawling the web I found an interview with David Charkham who played one of the apes in the 'Dawn of Man' sequence from 2001: A Space Odyssey. Here is a little snippet:


      "As for the general vibe on the movie, Dan Richter and possibly Kubrick were convinced that the Planet of the Apes, being made around the same time, technical crew were spying on us! One day we were rehearsing in a field on studio grounds and Dan made us all get in a tight huddle as an aircraft flew over in case they had a camera. Rumour had it that everything from the movie was destroyed to avoid copies etc"

      Were they really that paranoid? I find it hard to believe that Chambers and Co would have bothered spying myself!

      Neil



      This story is very true, but says a lot more about what a paranoid nut case Kubrick was.

      By the time Chambers started working on APES, the stuff in 2001 had already been shot.  Anyway, Chambers knew nothing of it, and he thought 2001 sucked!

      Chambers getting the special Oscar for APES really pissed the 2001 people off!

      -- Rory
      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39100 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Paranoia or what?
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 5/3/2006 11:32:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
      Were they really that paranoid? I find it hard to believe that Chambers and Co would have bothered spying myself!
       
      Then again it was the Summer Of Love, when substances abounded.
      Brian Wilson was convinced that Phil Specter had him bugged.
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39101 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
      .html
      .html I like this one a lot... While I usually do NOT like the "family portrait", I like it in this case... It works very well...

      Also, I really dig the baby Milo photo on the back...

      The only thing that throws it off for me is the b&w picture on the bottom of the back... I hate to say it, but it may need text back there...

      Also, the mini picture on the spine is excellent...
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39102 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
      .html
      Hello,

      This email message is a notification to let you know that
      a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
      group.

      File : /DVD Cover Ideas/DVD Cover Escape.jpg
      Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
      Description :

      You can access this file at the URL:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/DVD%20Cover%20Ideas/DVD%20Cover%20Escape.jpg

      To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
      http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

      Regards,

      munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39103 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
      .html
      .html Message
      -- Another great cover Rory!
       
      I have uploaded a copy to the files section but unfortunately due to file size had to reduce the size by half.
       
      If any one wants the full size version I'm sure I can send it to them.
       
       
      Neil
      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
      Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 3:05 PM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com; pota@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [PotaDG] Escape this DVD cover NOT!

      Here's a DVD cover I've just finished for ESCAPE.  It features an alternative ad from the pressbook on the back.
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39104 From: kidro85@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Paranoia or what?
      .html
      .html
      Wow that's crazy stuff, childish also
       
      T
       
      In a message dated 5/3/2006 9:32:33 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
      -- Trawling the web I found an interview with David Charkham who played one of the apes in the 'Dawn of Man' sequence from 2001: A Space Odyssey. Here is a little snippet:
       
      "As for the general vibe on the movie, Dan Richter and possibly Kubrick were convinced that the Planet of the Apes, being made around the same time, technical crew were spying on us! One day we were rehearsing in a field on studio grounds and Dan made us all get in a tight huddle as an aircraft flew over in case they had a camera. Rumour had it that everything from the movie was destroyed to avoid copies etc"
       
      Were they really that paranoid? I find it hard to believe that Chambers and Co would have bothered spying myself!
       
      Neil
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39105 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Paranoia or what?
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 5/4/2006 1:20:06 A.M. Central Daylight Time, kidro85@... writes:
      Wow that's crazy stuff, childish also
       
      Knowing Specter, he may have.
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39106 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 5/4/2006 12:07:25 A.M. Central Daylight Time, Haristas@... writes:
      Here's a DVD cover I've just finished for ESCAPE.  It features an alternative ad from the pressbook on the back.
       
      I love that ad.  I remember being away for the summer
      in Montana at camp.  And somehow got a movie section
      of the paper, in a care package or something, and going
      ape that there was going to be a new POTA movie.
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39107 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
      .html
      .html
       I can send them directly to anyone too.
       
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Thu, 4 May 2006 15:46:03 +1000
      Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Escape this DVD cover NOT!

      -- Another great cover Rory!
       
      I have uploaded a copy to the files section but unfortunately due to file size had to reduce the size by half.
       
      If any one wants the full size version I'm sure I can send it to them.
       
       
      Neil
      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Haristas@...
      Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 3:05 PM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com; pota@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [PotaDG] Escape this DVD cover NOT!

      Here's a DVD cover I've just finished for ESCAPE.  It features an alternative ad from the pressbook on the back.


      SPONSORED LINKS
      Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction book club
      Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science fiction


      YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39108 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 5/4/2006 11:26:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time, Haristas@... writes:
       I can send them directly to anyone too.
       
      I'd like a full set!
       
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39109 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
      .html
      Hello,

      This email message is a notification to let you know that
      a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
      group.

      File : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 23.jpg
      Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
      Description :

      You can access this file at the URL:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%20Musings/UMM%2023.jpg

      To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
      http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

      Regards,

      munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39110 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Here's Manny...
      .html
      .html Message
      Its Friday so a new UNCLE MANNY'S MUSINGS is now available. Thanks to Michael and all who contributed. Just click the link on the Yahoo Home page or use this link:
       
      Neil
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39111 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/4/2006
      Subject: Uncle Manny #23
      .html
      Attachments :
        .html Message
         
        Neil
         
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39112 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/4/2006
        Subject: Speaking of 2001: A Space Odyssey...
        .html
        Attachments :
          .html Message
          Here's the first panel from the Mad parody which mentions Apes:
           
           
          Neil
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39113 From: John Date: 5/4/2006
          Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
          .html
          AHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!


          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, PotaDG@yahoogroups.com wrote:
          >
          >
          > Hello,
          >
          > This email message is a notification to let you know that
          > a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
          > group.
          >
          > File : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 23.jpg
          > Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
          > Description :
          >
          > You can access this file at the URL:
          > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%
          20Musings/UMM%2023.jpg
          >
          > To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
          > http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
          >
          > Regards,
          >
          > munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39114 From: sparkytb2005 Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Rare Beneath photos
          .html
          I thought I'd seen everything, but this guy's stuff is truly original.

          http://stores.ebay.com/planetoftheapesphotos

          Apologies if this has been flagged on the DG before.

          Mark T-B.
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39115 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
          .html
          .html.html In a message dated 5/4/06 3:35:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time, TZer0@... writes:


          I love that ad.  I remember being away for the summer
          in Montana at camp.  And somehow got a movie section
          of the paper, in a care package or something, and going
          ape that there was going to be a new POTA movie.


          Yeah, I first heard of ESCAPE in December of 1970 because there was an article in the New York Times about it, and I couldn't believe they were making another one.  I couldn't imagine it.  Somehow I figured someone had to blast off from the planet before it exploded, and I remember telling a lie to my cousin that I saw a picture from the new movie in a magazine that showed a spaceship erected in the center of Ape City.  I think he believed me!

          Now it's just Whitty that believes my made up stories -- like the one about Tom Baker!  Ha! Ha!

          -- Rory

          -- Rory
          <.html
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39116 From: Dario Sciola Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Men'r'us
          .html
          Agree. Even the fact that 'us' is a word with distinct meaning can
          come into play. Something like clansmanship. Either you are part
          of 'us' or you are not.

          Dario

          ----- Original Message -----
          From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
          Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 4:52 pm
          Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests

          > -- Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and perhaps
          > one to
          > follow up in a future story maybe?
          >
          >
          >
          > Neil
          >
          >
          >
          > > -----Original Message-----
          > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
          > > On Behalf Of abmac@...
          > > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM
          > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
          >
          > > Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't have
          the
          > > Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate that
          > > he's a "foreigner"
          > > from another area who thinks he's being discriminated against
          > > because of his
          > > species, when his superiors are really prejudiced against him
          > > because of his
          > > place of origin.
          >
          >
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39117 From: Dario Sciola Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Revolution #4
          .html
          Yes Neil, your mail is in "Hail Caesar".
          But to be honest I was really hoping to see some of your art in there!

          Next ish?

          Dario

          ----- Original Message -----
          From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
          Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 6:12 pm
          Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Revolution #4

          > -- Do we? Cool, can't wait to get my copy then!
          >
          >
          >
          > Neil
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > > -----Original Message-----
          > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
          > > On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
          > > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 8:09 AM
          > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          > > Subject: [PotaDG] Revolution #4
          > >
          > >
          > > just got a copy today.... haven't read it yet but I
          > > did scan the letters section and Neil Foster and
          > > DrJohnZaiusDavis have letters printed!
          >
          >
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39118 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Dr. Galen
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
          >
          > You know you think you have seen a movie so many time
          > you would have noticed everything about it but I did
          > not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory about him
          > being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
          > perhaps??
          >
          > --- abmac@... wrote:
          >

          *** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET without the -us
          ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in the Zaius Museum,
          which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin" rather
          than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin" to me, though others
          hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes are there? Zira is
          the only named female ape. The males are Zaius, Cornelius, Julius,
          Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and Galen (and Marcus,
          unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't actually named in the
          movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to check the end-
          credits to be sure). We don't really know the names of the "Hunt
          Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"... of the "Lieutenant"
          who tells Julius to prep Number Four for surgery... of the Ape
          Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a man!")... etc etc. For
          all we know, any number of them COULD have a name that also lacks
          the -us ending. Since all the names above are from Greco-Roman times
          with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle inventions), and
          since the name Galen refers to the most famous physician of
          antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow chimp doctor was
          named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking around for
          a 'classical' name for a character who happens to be a physician,
          they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.

          It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering about how it is that
          these talkin' apes speak the English language -- didn't also wonder
          why it is that so many of the names he hears are from Earth's
          classical antiquity.

          Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I wonder why they
          didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which were pretty cool
          names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's character "Helius" spoke
          in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?

          Patrick
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39119 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: God and Ape
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , TZer0@... wrote:
          >
          >
          > I'm surprised you know so much about religion Pat.
          > I thought you're an atheist.
          >

          *** I'm an agnostic, which means that I acknowledge the fact that I
          cannot prove there is no God, though I doubt 'His' existence. Of
          course, I can't prove that Leprechauns never existed (or STILL don't
          exist in the present day), either... The burden of proof is on the
          believer. Whether it's God, or Leprechauns, or Faeries, or Dragons,
          or UFOs, or Vampires, or Bigfoot. Extraordinary claims require
          extraordinary proof, as Carl Sagan once said.

          I believe -- or don't believe -- because I've never had a religious
          experience per se, and because my studies regarding the wide
          varieties of religious experience and belief have given me a fairly
          well-informed opinion on the subject.

          Case in point: the biblical "Creation" myth(s). Anybody who's read
          GENESIS knows the basic story... the whole shebang is created by
          Elohim (a Hebrew plural word that literally means "Gods") in 6 days,
          after which "He" (singular) rests on the 7th day. This story was
          written in the form we have today in the 8th-to-6th century B.C. (at
          the latest, if you believe the current consensus views of reputable
          textual scholars) or circa 1450 B.C. (at the earliest, if you are
          a "Bible Literalist" who believes Moses himself actually existed and
          wrote the Pentateuch).

          Yet that story is a blatant retelling of a much earlier Creation myth
          dating back well over a millennium before, to ancient Sumer, where
          the Heavens and Earth were created by a pantheon of gods (Anu, Enki,
          Enlil, Ninmah, Ninhursag, etc). The same 6-day pattern holds in both,
          and we know that the 7-day week (which is also supposedly 'created'
          by the bible's God in GENESIS 1) pre-existed the Hebrews, when it was
          invented by the Sumerians, whose inheritors -- the Babylonians --
          gave to the later Jews the very names of the months of the "Jewish
          Calendar"... names like Tammuz, Iyar, Sivan, Adar, etc. When did the
          Jews 'acquire' the Babylonian religious stories/calendar/traditions,
          one might ask? According to the Bible itself, over a century after
          the Assyrians conquered the northern 10-tribed nation of Israel in
          the 8th Century B.C., the Babylonians conquered the southern nation
          of Judah in the 6th Century B.C. and deported the aristocracy of
          Judah to Babylon: "By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat, yea! we
          wept..." It was while they were in Babylon that they saw Babylonian
          religious ceremonies on Babylonian holy days commemorating the
          Creation, the Flood, etc etc. When the Persian king Cyrus conquered
          the Babylonians, he gave the Jews permission to go back to their
          homeland, 70 years after having been forcibly removed from it... and
          they took back with them all sorts of myths and religious notions
          that they hadn't had before and they incorporated these things into
          their religion.

          That's how the book of GENESIS acquired its Creation narrative. It
          was a 'steal' from the official religion of a so-called 'pagan'
          nation. The pantheon of Babylonian "Gods" -- "Elohim", plural --
          became a single "God" who just happened to be referred to as a plural
          word. That's why he's alternately "nice" (creating Man & Woman,
          blessing them, etc)... then "nasty" (wiping out nearly all of them
          with a Deluge)... then "nice" (saving some of 'em in an ark). In the
          original stories, TWO gods played the major roles: Enki ("Lord of
          Earth") created Man and warned Utnapishtim to build a boat, whereas
          Enki's half-brother Enlil ("Lord of the Mountaintop") sent the Deluge
          to kill the noisy humans who kept him awake at night. The
          antagonistic roles of two rival gods in the source myth were
          transformed into a SINGLE "God" in the Hebrew re-telling... making
          him out to be a god with a bipolar disorder! First he's nice, then
          he's a jerk, then he's nice again...

          The texts of the original Creation myths were dug up in Mesopotamia
          in the 1800's, and when cuneiform was deciphered and these texts
          translated, ANYBODY could see that the LATER versions -- the versions
          retold in the Bible -- were based on these source stories. There is
          no excuse for anybody today to be a "Bible Literalist" -- to insist
          that the book of GENESIS is "divinely inspired" and "true history"
          and all that garbage. It's not even ORIGINAL. Everybody accepts the
          fact that the gods of the Romans were merely renamed versions of
          Greek gods (Aphrodite = Venus; Athena = Minerva; Zeus = Jupiter; Hera
          = Juno; Hermes = Mercury; Ares = Mars; etc) -- the Romans
          acknowledged that they 'adopted' the culture of the Greeks whom
          they'd conquered. So, too, did the Hebrews adopt much of the
          Babylonian culture, from the calendar to the Creation & Deluge myths
          and beyond), but CHANGING it so that a pantheon became Monotheistic.
          Even so, they didn't abolish belief in 'other' gods... they only re-
          invented them as Cherubim and Seraphim and B'nei Elohim ("Sons of
          God") who were the Nephilim/"Fallen Ones" who interbred with sexy
          human females to beget the Gibborim/"Mighty Ones" (GENESIS 6:1-6)
          just as the Greco-Roman gods routinely fathered (or mothered)
          children with mortal humans -- turning these 'other' gods into the
          Angels.

          As far as I'm concerned, anybody who espouses any belief system based
          on a book (or series of books) which has been deconstructed by
          competent scholars and shown to be anything BUT divinely inspired...
          is, to put it not-so-nicely, a fool or an ignoramus.

          That's not to say that there is no god. I can't prove the Universe
          WASN'T created by an invisible, intelligent Being. No theist can
          prove it WAS, though. They can BELIEVE it all they want, with all
          their heart. But, if they're partial to the notion of the Bible
          being "inerrant", NOT with all their MIND, if they would bother to
          read the Bible's sources, which are obviously polytheistic EARLIER
          works, predating the monotheistic revisions introduced in the 6th
          Century B.C. or thereabouts, after the "Babylonian Captivity".

          If they can't see the obvious, then they're OUT of their minds. That
          may sound harsh, but it's no harsher than the beliefs they spout
          about Doubters (whom they insist will burn in Hell for all eternity
          for not "believing on Christ Jesus as their personal savior"...).
          Look at where this God-of-the-Book belief system has gotten us of
          late: the War on Terror instigated by insane religious fanatics of
          the Muslim persuasion... fought by a religious fanatic of the
          Fundamentalist Christian persuasion... ultimately over a small chunk
          of real estate bordered by the Mediterranean Sea and the Dead Sea and
          currently "occupied" by people of the Jewish persuasion (some of whom
          are non-Orthodox, whereas others are crazy ultra-Orthodox messianic
          Jews). A crazy jerk who currently is the President of Iran is doing
          some sabre-rattling regarding its nuclear ambitions, threatening
          to "wipe Israel off the map", and there are those even in the anti-
          Iraq War camp who think that Iran is gonna have to be dealt with,
          probably with some sort of military action.

          All because of religion. If you've ever heard Frank Zappa's
          song "DUMB ALL OVER" (from the album "YOU ARE WHAT YOU IS"), it's
          amazing how apropos it is in the current world scene. People,
          motivated by their religion, can do some wonderful, beautiful
          things... creating art & architecture and music to make the heart
          soar. And, others -- also motivated by their religion, which they
          insist is the "true" religion -- can willingly murder those they
          consider to be "unbelievers" or "infidels", even suicidally murdering
          others, to become "martyrs".

          It's madness. And it comes with the danger of reading TOO FEW books,
          and being indoctrinated into believing that ONE particular book is
          THE "Book" that one MUST believe in -- NOT putting their own
          particular 'sacred' text to the same test they put the scriptures of
          their enemies. And none of 'em are worth their parchment, in my
          opinion. They don't deserve to be burned, but they don't deserved to
          be blindly believed in, either. Call me a "scientific heretic" if
          you'd like; philosophically, I'm on the side of the Ziras and
          Corneliuses of the world. Too bad the world is run by the Zaiuses and
          Ursuses...

          Patrick
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39120 From: abmac@i-55.com Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
          .html
          Ancient Greece and ancient Rome were distinctly different cultures. The status
          of a Greek in ancient Rome was much lower than that of a Roman citizen, and a
          Greek physican's status was little better than that of a slave.

          Serling chose to make a distinction between Galen and the other apes by giving
          him a Greek name, when it would've been easy to look up the name of a Roman
          physician, and to use one of Boulle's names for the gorilla attendant. Sure,
          Galen is better known, but why choose this name for an ambitious and unethical
          ape doctor whose superiors are willing to sacrifice him in order to silence
          Zira? It's not just because Galen was a physician; it's because he was a
          famous GREEK physician who practiced IN ROME.

          Unnamed characters are irrelevant, and nothing in the subtitles is canon.
          Subtitlers transcribe whatever they THINK they hear, and they often make
          mistakes. Since Quentin is a contemporary name and Quintus isn't, your brain
          interpreted it as the one that was more familiar to you. It's very common for
          people to mis-hear song lyrics that way, also.

          Besides, if they HAD named the young chimp Quentin, it could have signified
          that he and his mother were visiting from another area, probably while his
          father took care of business at one of the ministry buildings. I've noticed
          that people rarely go to local museums after their initial visit. I've been to
          the Smithsonian in Washington, DC, a lot more than I've been to NOMA.

          > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
          > >
          > > You know you think you have seen a movie so many time
          > > you would have noticed everything about it but I did
          > > not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory about him
          > > being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
          > > perhaps??
          > >
          > > --- abmac@... wrote:
          > >
          >
          > *** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET without the -us
          > ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in the Zaius Museum,
          > which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin" rather
          > than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin" to me, though others
          > hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes are there? Zira is
          > the only named female ape. The males are Zaius, Cornelius, Julius,
          > Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and Galen (and Marcus,
          > unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't actually named in the
          > movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to check the end-
          > credits to be sure). We don't really know the names of the "Hunt
          > Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"... of the "Lieutenant"
          > who tells Julius to prep Number Four for surgery... of the Ape
          > Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a man!")... etc etc. For
          > all we know, any number of them COULD have a name that also lacks
          > the -us ending. Since all the names above are from Greco-Roman times
          > with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle inventions), and
          > since the name Galen refers to the most famous physician of
          > antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow chimp doctor was
          > named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking around for
          > a 'classical' name for a character who happens to be a physician,
          > they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.
          >
          > It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering about how it is that
          > these talkin' apes speak the English language -- didn't also wonder
          > why it is that so many of the names he hears are from Earth's
          > classical antiquity.
          >
          > Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I wonder why they
          > didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which were pretty cool
          > names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's character "Helius" spoke
          > in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?
          >
          > Patrick
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39121 From: Patrick Tilton Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
          .html
          The historical Galen was actually named GALENUS
          CLAUDIUS, who wasn't Greek but from Pergamus in Asia
          Minor -- then a part of the Roman Empire since c. 100
          B.C. (he died in 193 A.D.). We know him as "Galen" for
          the same reason we know of the city of Troia as
          "Troy": it is customary in English to truncate certain
          placenames from foreign countries. Where the Romans
          would call him Galenus (the -us ending indicating the
          subject of a sentence), they would say "equus Galeni"
          if they wanted to say "Galen's horse". The root of the
          word/name is Galen- and in English it isn't all that
          rare to see an old name reduced to its root form.
          There was an actor named Cornel Wilde (if I remember
          right), whose first name is a similar truncated form
          of "Cornelius".

          Far from being of a "lower status", Galenus Claudius
          was an intimate of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius and had
          become famous in his day. Rivals who were jealous of
          his extraordinary cures attributed it to magic. He is
          known to have written no less than 200 books, most of
          which haven't survived.

          If Serling were to have chosen a name that was
          particularly GREEK, it would've been "Hippocrates" (of
          "Hippocratic Oath" fame), to whose works Galen
          acknowledged his own debt. The patron deity of
          Pergamus was Aesculapius (son of Apollo), the God of
          Medicine who was struck dead by Zeus on behalf of
          Hades due to the fact that Aesculapius' cures were
          'robbing' the Netherworld of a steady influx of
          population (i.e. the Deceased). Pergamus seems to have
          been THE place for a physician to learn his trade and
          excel at it.

          Contrary to popular opinion, the "lingua franca" of
          the Roman Empire was NOT Latin, but Greek. That's why
          the New Testament was written in Greek: Greek was the
          "international language" back then, during the heyday
          of the Julio-Claudian emperors. Roman poets would
          write their poetry in Latin, but the language that
          people who traveled or did business in (import/export)
          was Koine Greek -- the 'common' language. This is the
          prime example of Rome making use of Greek culture,
          rather than imposing their own on the world. They
          imposed Roman GOVERNMENT on the known world where they
          could, but they themselves preferred the Greek
          culture.

          So, then, the name "Galen" was not a Greek name (the
          Liddell & Scott GREEK-ENGLISH LEXICON doesn't even
          have an entry under the Gamma section with such a
          name). His full name being GALENUS CLAUDIUS suggests
          that he was a citizen of the Roman Empire -- a Roman,
          if not one who was born in Rome. He lived in Rome, of
          course, when he was in the court of Aurelius. Hardly
          the life of a slave.

          We can agree to disagree, but by naming the chimp
          doctor "Galen", Serling was doing no more than picking
          a name from classical antiquity that had something to
          do with the career of a physician, just as somebody in
          the future might choose the surname PATTON to depict a
          character who is a brilliant military leader. I really
          do not see any sense of this being a hint of him being
          a foreigner. Serling (and Wilson) were inventing new
          characters to superimpose over Boulle's original
          story, giving them names that fit in with names like
          "Cornelius" and "Helius" in the novel. Not every
          "Roman" name has to end in -us, at least as far as the
          English version of the Roman name goes. We never refer
          to Galen as "Galenus" or Pompey as "Pompeius", even
          though the Romans did.

          Patrick


          --- abmac@... wrote:

          > Ancient Greece and ancient Rome were distinctly
          > different cultures. The status
          > of a Greek in ancient Rome was much lower than that
          > of a Roman citizen, and a
          > Greek physican's status was little better than that
          > of a slave.
          >
          > Serling chose to make a distinction between Galen
          > and the other apes by giving
          > him a Greek name, when it would've been easy to look
          > up the name of a Roman
          > physician, and to use one of Boulle's names for the
          > gorilla attendant. Sure,
          > Galen is better known, but why choose this name for
          > an ambitious and unethical
          > ape doctor whose superiors are willing to sacrifice
          > him in order to silence
          > Zira? It's not just because Galen was a physician;
          > it's because he was a
          > famous GREEK physician who practiced IN ROME.
          >
          > Unnamed characters are irrelevant, and nothing in
          > the subtitles is canon.
          > Subtitlers transcribe whatever they THINK they hear,
          > and they often make
          > mistakes. Since Quentin is a contemporary name and
          > Quintus isn't, your brain
          > interpreted it as the one that was more familiar to
          > you. It's very common for
          > people to mis-hear song lyrics that way, also.
          >
          > Besides, if they HAD named the young chimp Quentin,
          > it could have signified
          > that he and his mother were visiting from another
          > area, probably while his
          > father took care of business at one of the ministry
          > buildings. I've noticed
          > that people rarely go to local museums after their
          > initial visit. I've been to
          > the Smithsonian in Washington, DC, a lot more than
          > I've been to NOMA.
          >
          > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\""
          > <apefan23@...> wrote:
          > > >
          > > > You know you think you have seen a movie so many
          > time
          > > > you would have noticed everything about it but I
          > did
          > > > not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory
          > about him
          > > > being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
          > > > perhaps??
          > > >
          > > > --- abmac@... wrote:
          > > >
          > >
          > > *** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET
          > without the -us
          > > ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in
          > the Zaius Museum,
          > > which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin"
          > rather
          > > than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin"
          > to me, though others
          > > hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes
          > are there? Zira is
          > > the only named female ape. The males are Zaius,
          > Cornelius, Julius,
          > > Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and
          > Galen (and Marcus,
          > > unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't
          > actually named in the
          > > movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to
          > check the end-
          > > credits to be sure). We don't really know the
          > names of the "Hunt
          > > Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"...
          > of the "Lieutenant"
          > > who tells Julius to prep Number Four for
          > surgery... of the Ape
          > > Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a
          > man!")... etc etc. For
          > > all we know, any number of them COULD have a name
          > that also lacks
          > > the -us ending. Since all the names above are from
          > Greco-Roman times
          > > with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle
          > inventions), and
          > > since the name Galen refers to the most famous
          > physician of
          > > antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow
          > chimp doctor was
          > > named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking
          > around for
          > > a 'classical' name for a character who happens to
          > be a physician,
          > > they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.
          > >
          > > It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering
          > about how it is that
          > > these talkin' apes speak the English language --
          > didn't also wonder
          > > why it is that so many of the names he hears are
          > from Earth's
          > > classical antiquity.
          > >
          > > Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I
          > wonder why they
          > > didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which
          > were pretty cool
          > > names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's
          > character "Helius" spoke
          > > in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?
          > >
          > > Patrick
          >


          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39122 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Rare Beneath photos
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , "sparkytb2005" <sparkytb@...> wrote:
          > I thought I'd seen everything, but this guy's stuff is truly original.
          > http://stores.ebay.com/planetoftheapesphotos
          > Apologies if this has been flagged on the DG before.

          -- Thanks MTB!
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39123 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Haristas@... wrote:
          > Yeah, I first heard of ESCAPE in December of 1970 because there was an
          > article in the New York Times about it, and I couldn't believe they
          were making another one.

          -- The first I knew about Escape was when I was an 8 year old sat in
          the audience at the movie that was put on by the RAAF every Friday
          night for the families stationed in Penang, Malaysia in 1971.

          I had never heard of Planet of the Apes before that and was blown away
          by the movie and it was one of the few I remembered from over that 3
          year period of watching latest release movies every Friday.

          Neil
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39124 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , "John" <DrZaiusDavis@...> wrote:
          > Mine was also already set but i can't view pics till Neil uploads
          > them.

          -- You may have to adjust some settings in your email program then maybe?

          Neil
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39125 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Revolution #4
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
          > Yes Neil, your mail is in "Hail Caesar".
          > But to be honest I was really hoping to see some of your art in there!

          -- I'm just chuffed that I have a letter in a POTA comic! I've never
          had a letter published in any comic before.

          Neil
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39126 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
          .html
          .htmlAnyone else not getting all the posts?

          I have been receiving all the posts from Neil (both his own and the ones to which he replied) but I am not receiving the others (such as from Rory or Dario, etc...)

          Also, where is Whitty hiding out all of a sudden?
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39127 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
          .html
          .html Message
          -- I seem to be having the same problem Mike. I missed out on the most recent ones from Rory, Dario, Patrick and the rest. I have been missing out on various posts for the last couple of days but not always ones from the same people.
           
          I have also not received some of the messages I should be getting as a group owner as well, though once again not all of them.
           
          It must be a Yahoo problem I think?
           
          Neil
          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 11:28 AM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Anyone else not getting all the posts?

          Anyone else not getting all the posts?

          I have been receiving all the posts from Neil (both his own and the ones to which he replied) but I am not receiving the others (such as from Rory or Dario, etc...)
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39128 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
          .html
          .html Message
          -- Don't know. I haven't heard from him for a day or so and my emails to him have been bouncing.
           
          Neil
          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 11:28 AM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Anyone else not getting all the posts?

          Also, where is Whitty hiding out all of a sudden?
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39129 From: Neil Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
          > I seem to be having the same problem Mike. I missed out on the most
          > recent ones from Rory, Dario, Patrick and the rest. I have been
          missing out on various posts for the last couple of days but not
          always ones from the same people.

          -- And I just received the message I sent after this one but didn't /
          haven't received this one!

          Neil
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39130 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
          .html
          .html Message

          I’m in the same boat.

           

          Maybe it was a gift from that quick visitor we had Neil?  J

          Michael

           

          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil T Foster
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 11:33 AM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Anyone else not getting all the posts?

           

          -- I seem to be having the same problem Mike. I missed out on the most recent ones from Rory, Dario, Patrick and the rest. I have been missing out on various posts for the last couple of days but not always ones from the same people.

           

          I have also not received some of the messages I should be getting as a group owner as well, though once again not all of them.

           

          It must be a Yahoo problem I think?

           

          Neil

          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 11:28 AM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Anyone else not getting all the posts?

          Anyone else not getting all the posts?

          I have been receiving all the posts from Neil (both his own and the ones to which he replied) but I am not receiving the others (such as from Rory or Dario, etc...)

           


          --
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39131 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
          .html
          .html

          Always here (sorry!).

           

          Just having the same problems.


          Michael

           

          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
          Sent:
          Saturday, 6 May 2006 11:28 AM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Anyone else not getting all the posts?


          Also, where is Whitty hiding out all of a sudden?

          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39132 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Anyone else not getting all the posts?
          .html
          .html

          OK – I’m heading to the site to post....

           

          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 11:49 AM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts?

           

          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:

          > I seem to be having the same problem Mike. I missed out on the most
          > recent ones from Rory, Dario, Patrick and the rest. I have been
          missing out on various posts for the last couple of days but not
          always ones from the same people.

          -- And I just received the message I sent after this one but didn't /
          haven't received this one!

          Neil


          -- <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39133 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Uncle Manny #23
          .html
          Hey Neil,

          Could you please send to me direct and/or to upload to the group?

          I did not get this and cannot view it on the group site.

          Michael

          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
          >
          >
          >
          > Neil
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39134 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Speaking of 2001: A Space Odyssey...
          .html
          Ummm.....WHERE?!?!

          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
          >
          > Here's the first panel from the Mad parody which mentions Apes:
          >
          >
          >
          > Neil
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39135 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Rare Beneath photos
          .html
          These are GREAT Mark - is this some of the stuff that Joe Russo has
          Rory?

          Michael

          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "sparkytb2005" <sparkytb@...> wrote:
          >
          > I thought I'd seen everything, but this guy's stuff is truly
          original.
          >
          > http://stores.ebay.com/planetoftheapesphotos
          >
          > Apologies if this has been flagged on the DG before.
          >
          > Mark T-B.
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39136 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
          .html
          What one about Tom Baker?

          Michael

          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote:
          >
          > In a message dated 5/4/06 3:35:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
          TZer0@...
          > writes:
          >
          >
          > > I love that ad. I remember being away for the summer
          > > in Montana at camp. And somehow got a movie section
          > > of the paper, in a care package or something, and going
          > > ape that there was going to be a new POTA movie.
          > >
          >
          > Yeah, I first heard of ESCAPE in December of 1970 because there
          was an
          > article in the New York Times about it, and I couldn't believe
          they were making
          > another one. I couldn't imagine it. Somehow I figured someone
          had to blast off
          > from the planet before it exploded, and I remember telling a lie
          to my cousin
          > that I saw a picture from the new movie in a magazine that showed
          a spaceship
          > erected in the center of Ape City. I think he believed me!
          >
          > Now it's just Whitty that believes my made up stories -- like the
          one about
          > Tom Baker! Ha! Ha!
          >
          > -- Rory
          >
          > -- Rory
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39137 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Men'r'us
          .html
          Like Bigus Dickus!

          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
          >
          >
          > Agree. Even the fact that 'us' is a word with distinct meaning can
          > come into play. Something like clansmanship. Either you are part
          > of 'us' or you are not.
          >
          > Dario
          >
          > ----- Original Message -----
          > From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
          > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 4:52 pm
          > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
          >
          > > -- Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and
          perhaps
          > > one to
          > > follow up in a future story maybe?
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > > Neil
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > > > -----Original Message-----
          > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ]
          > > > On Behalf Of abmac@...
          > > > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM
          > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          > > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
          > >
          > > > Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't
          have
          > the
          > > > Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate that
          > > > he's a "foreigner"
          > > > from another area who thinks he's being discriminated against
          > > > because of his
          > > > species, when his superiors are really prejudiced against him
          > > > because of his
          > > > place of origin.
          > >
          > >
          > >
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39138 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Naming protocol
          .html
          Oh boy am I goiing to steal some of these names!

          Garvon is now GarvUS and Gideon is GideUS.

          If I was American it would be my patriotic duty!

          MichelUS

          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "patrickmichaeltilton"
          <patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
          >
          > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@> wrote:
          > >
          > > You know you think you have seen a movie so many time
          > > you would have noticed everything about it but I did
          > > not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory about him
          > > being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
          > > perhaps??
          > >
          > > --- abmac@ wrote:
          > >
          >
          > *** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET without the -us
          > ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in the Zaius Museum,
          > which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin" rather
          > than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin" to me, though
          others
          > hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes are there? Zira
          is
          > the only named female ape. The males are Zaius, Cornelius, Julius,
          > Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and Galen (and Marcus,
          > unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't actually named in the
          > movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to check the end-
          > credits to be sure). We don't really know the names of the "Hunt
          > Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"... of
          the "Lieutenant"
          > who tells Julius to prep Number Four for surgery... of the Ape
          > Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a man!")... etc etc.
          For
          > all we know, any number of them COULD have a name that also lacks
          > the -us ending. Since all the names above are from Greco-Roman
          times
          > with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle inventions),
          and
          > since the name Galen refers to the most famous physician of
          > antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow chimp doctor was
          > named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking around for
          > a 'classical' name for a character who happens to be a physician,
          > they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.
          >
          > It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering about how it is
          that
          > these talkin' apes speak the English language -- didn't also
          wonder
          > why it is that so many of the names he hears are from Earth's
          > classical antiquity.
          >
          > Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I wonder why they
          > didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which were pretty cool
          > names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's character "Helius"
          spoke
          > in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?
          >
          > Patrick
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39139 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: New Doctor Who?
          .html
          .html

          Anyone here a fan?

           

          While I liked the resurrected Battlestar Galactica, I think by far the best TV Show to have been resurrected and modified is the new Dr Who.

           

          It has stayed true to the quirkiness of the original series, but it is more “now”.

           

          The tributes are there (Daleks and the old favourite villains).

           

          And in particular the last aired episode “School Reunion” brought back 2 of my favourite characters and also addresses the whole “Doctor’s Companion” thing that I took for granted to be platonic buddies in the past.

           

          Michael


          -- <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39140 From: abmac40 Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
          .html
          None of this stuff about Galen has any connection to Planet of the
          Apes. OK, he was from Turkey, not Greece. That doesn't matter. My
          point was that most people know that he was a foreigner in Rome.


          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Tilton
          <patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
          >
          > The historical Galen was actually named GALENUS
          > CLAUDIUS, who wasn't Greek but from Pergamus in Asia
          > Minor -- then a part of the Roman Empire since c. 100
          > B.C. (he died in 193 A.D.). We know him as "Galen" for
          > the same reason we know of the city of Troia as
          > "Troy": it is customary in English to truncate certain
          > placenames from foreign countries. Where the Romans
          > would call him Galenus (the -us ending indicating the
          > subject of a sentence), they would say "equus Galeni"
          > if they wanted to say "Galen's horse". The root of the
          > word/name is Galen- and in English it isn't all that
          > rare to see an old name reduced to its root form.
          > There was an actor named Cornel Wilde (if I remember
          > right), whose first name is a similar truncated form
          > of "Cornelius".
          >
          > Far from being of a "lower status", Galenus Claudius
          > was an intimate of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius and had
          > become famous in his day. Rivals who were jealous of
          > his extraordinary cures attributed it to magic. He is
          > known to have written no less than 200 books, most of
          > which haven't survived.
          >
          > If Serling were to have chosen a name that was
          > particularly GREEK, it would've been "Hippocrates" (of
          > "Hippocratic Oath" fame), to whose works Galen
          > acknowledged his own debt. The patron deity of
          > Pergamus was Aesculapius (son of Apollo), the God of
          > Medicine who was struck dead by Zeus on behalf of
          > Hades due to the fact that Aesculapius' cures were
          > 'robbing' the Netherworld of a steady influx of
          > population (i.e. the Deceased). Pergamus seems to have
          > been THE place for a physician to learn his trade and
          > excel at it.
          >
          > Contrary to popular opinion, the "lingua franca" of
          > the Roman Empire was NOT Latin, but Greek. That's why
          > the New Testament was written in Greek: Greek was the
          > "international language" back then, during the heyday
          > of the Julio-Claudian emperors. Roman poets would
          > write their poetry in Latin, but the language that
          > people who traveled or did business in (import/export)
          > was Koine Greek -- the 'common' language. This is the
          > prime example of Rome making use of Greek culture,
          > rather than imposing their own on the world. They
          > imposed Roman GOVERNMENT on the known world where they
          > could, but they themselves preferred the Greek
          > culture.
          >
          > So, then, the name "Galen" was not a Greek name (the
          > Liddell & Scott GREEK-ENGLISH LEXICON doesn't even
          > have an entry under the Gamma section with such a
          > name). His full name being GALENUS CLAUDIUS suggests
          > that he was a citizen of the Roman Empire -- a Roman,
          > if not one who was born in Rome. He lived in Rome, of
          > course, when he was in the court of Aurelius. Hardly
          > the life of a slave.
          >
          > We can agree to disagree, but by naming the chimp
          > doctor "Galen", Serling was doing no more than picking
          > a name from classical antiquity that had something to
          > do with the career of a physician, just as somebody in
          > the future might choose the surname PATTON to depict a
          > character who is a brilliant military leader. I really
          > do not see any sense of this being a hint of him being
          > a foreigner. Serling (and Wilson) were inventing new
          > characters to superimpose over Boulle's original
          > story, giving them names that fit in with names like
          > "Cornelius" and "Helius" in the novel. Not every
          > "Roman" name has to end in -us, at least as far as the
          > English version of the Roman name goes. We never refer
          > to Galen as "Galenus" or Pompey as "Pompeius", even
          > though the Romans did.
          >
          > Patrick
          >
          >
          > --- abmac@... wrote:
          >
          > > Ancient Greece and ancient Rome were distinctly
          > > different cultures. The status
          > > of a Greek in ancient Rome was much lower than that
          > > of a Roman citizen, and a
          > > Greek physican's status was little better than that
          > > of a slave.
          > >
          > > Serling chose to make a distinction between Galen
          > > and the other apes by giving
          > > him a Greek name, when it would've been easy to look
          > > up the name of a Roman
          > > physician, and to use one of Boulle's names for the
          > > gorilla attendant. Sure,
          > > Galen is better known, but why choose this name for
          > > an ambitious and unethical
          > > ape doctor whose superiors are willing to sacrifice
          > > him in order to silence
          > > Zira? It's not just because Galen was a physician;
          > > it's because he was a
          > > famous GREEK physician who practiced IN ROME.
          > >
          > > Unnamed characters are irrelevant, and nothing in
          > > the subtitles is canon.
          > > Subtitlers transcribe whatever they THINK they hear,
          > > and they often make
          > > mistakes. Since Quentin is a contemporary name and
          > > Quintus isn't, your brain
          > > interpreted it as the one that was more familiar to
          > > you. It's very common for
          > > people to mis-hear song lyrics that way, also.
          > >
          > > Besides, if they HAD named the young chimp Quentin,
          > > it could have signified
          > > that he and his mother were visiting from another
          > > area, probably while his
          > > father took care of business at one of the ministry
          > > buildings. I've noticed
          > > that people rarely go to local museums after their
          > > initial visit. I've been to
          > > the Smithsonian in Washington, DC, a lot more than
          > > I've been to NOMA.
          > >
          > > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\""
          > > <apefan23@> wrote:
          > > > >
          > > > > You know you think you have seen a movie so many
          > > time
          > > > > you would have noticed everything about it but I
          > > did
          > > > > not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory
          > > about him
          > > > > being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
          > > > > perhaps??
          > > > >
          > > > > --- abmac@ wrote:
          > > > >
          > > >
          > > > *** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET
          > > without the -us
          > > > ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in
          > > the Zaius Museum,
          > > > which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin"
          > > rather
          > > > than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin"
          > > to me, though others
          > > > hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes
          > > are there? Zira is
          > > > the only named female ape. The males are Zaius,
          > > Cornelius, Julius,
          > > > Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and
          > > Galen (and Marcus,
          > > > unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't
          > > actually named in the
          > > > movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to
          > > check the end-
          > > > credits to be sure). We don't really know the
          > > names of the "Hunt
          > > > Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"...
          > > of the "Lieutenant"
          > > > who tells Julius to prep Number Four for
          > > surgery... of the Ape
          > > > Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a
          > > man!")... etc etc. For
          > > > all we know, any number of them COULD have a name
          > > that also lacks
          > > > the -us ending. Since all the names above are from
          > > Greco-Roman times
          > > > with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle
          > > inventions), and
          > > > since the name Galen refers to the most famous
          > > physician of
          > > > antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow
          > > chimp doctor was
          > > > named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking
          > > around for
          > > > a 'classical' name for a character who happens to
          > > be a physician,
          > > > they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.
          > > >
          > > > It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering
          > > about how it is that
          > > > these talkin' apes speak the English language --
          > > didn't also wonder
          > > > why it is that so many of the names he hears are
          > > from Earth's
          > > > classical antiquity.
          > > >
          > > > Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I
          > > wonder why they
          > > > didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which
          > > were pretty cool
          > > > names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's
          > > character "Helius" spoke
          > > > in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?
          > > >
          > > > Patrick
          > >
          >
          >
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39141 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor Who?
          .html
          .html

          I’m asking because I wonder what we can learn from the way they have done the new Dr Who as fans of the POTA TV Show.

           

          For starters there seems to be a lot more thought gone into the scripts (which is a bonus seeing as the old scripts were a great example of story telling most of the time).

           

          I personally do not believe the POTA TV Show would succeed if a new series started and the shows were like new episodes of the original TV Show.

           

          While I have seen some great stories that I wish were shot (eg Values), I wonder how long the fugitive formula would last?

          I also liked the “Monument” story Dave B wrote (I liked it more than Dave did I think because I recall he told me Neil and I could use it but it required a complete re-write...frankly I thought it was quite fine!).  However when I enquired of a comic publisher I was told in no uncertain terms that anything about the POTA TV Show would have to take a completely different direction because it failed (that’s debatable too eh?).

           

          So what’s the consensus here?  If you saw a POTA TV Show comic book on the news stand.....what would you hope for it to contain?

           

          A new adventure that is much like the other adventures in the TV Show?

          Something providing a few answers to what happened to the 3 fugitives (something other than the “Aged Galen” scenario!)?

          And careful here because if you want more episodes of the TV Show – do you think it would be doomed to the same fate as the TV Show?  Would it therefore require some kind of clever balance?

          Michael

           

          -----Original Message-----
          From: friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com [friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of venkie@...
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 2:11 PM
          To: friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor Who?

           

          In a message dated 5/5/2006 11:09:12 P.M. Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

          Were you a fan of the original?

          I liked the fifth doctor a lot, and some of the 7th. I wasn't a major fan. I met Sylvester McCoy once, and saw Tom Baker once, though from a distance, and met a couple of the companions, at various cons.

           

          Sheila

          Eat, drink and be Merry--or Pippin!


          -- <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39142 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/5/2006
          Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
          .html
          .html

          And that does inspire a story, methinks.

           

          Michael

           

          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of abmac40
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 2:35 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dr. Galen

           

          My point was that most people know that he was a foreigner in Rome .


          -- <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39143 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
          .html
          .html
          In a message dated 5/5/2006 8:12:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
          I had never heard of Planet of the Apes before
           
          So how long was it before you saw the first two?
           
           
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39144 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: Naming protocol
          .html
          .html
          In a message dated 5/5/2006 10:17:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:
          How many named apes are there? Zira
          is
          > the only named female ape.
           
          True, from the early films.
          However Conquest carried on the
          tradition of female names ending in
          A.  Zira, Lisa, Zelda.  All of the
          television names did as well.  Kira,
          Fauna, Wanda, Jilla, Carsia, etc . . .
          If there's one that didn't I can't
          think of it.  Anyone?  Bueller?
           
           
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39145 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: Naming protocol
          .html
          .html
           
          How's that Before POTA comic coming?
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39146 From: Michael Whitty Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: Naming protocol
          .html
          .html

          Neil’s up to SOMETHING.....well, he hasn’t done ANYTHING for a WEEK......(lazy pom!).....

           

          Michael

           

          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 4:43 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Naming protocol

           

           

          How's that Before POTA comic coming?


          -- <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39147 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
          .html
          .html Message
          -- Another 3 or 4 years. The next one I saw was Planet when it was doing the cinema rounds on a double bill with Escape just as the TV show was being shown in England. Then later the same year (I think) I saw Beneath on TV.
           
          Neil
          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 4:15 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!

          In a message dated 5/5/2006 8:12:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
          I had never heard of Planet of the Apes before
           
          So how long was it before you saw the first two?
           
           
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39148 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: Naming protocol
          .html
          .html Message
          -- Slowly at the moment unfortunately like everything else I am supposed to be working on.
           
          Neil
          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
          Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 4:43 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Naming protocol

           
          How's that Before POTA comic coming?
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39149 From: Graham Hill Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: New Doctor Who?
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...> wrote:
          >
          > Anyone here a fan?
          >
          > While I liked the resurrected Battlestar Galactica, I think by far
          the
          > best TV Show to have been resurrected and modified is the new Dr
          Who.
          >
          > It has stayed true to the quirkiness of the original series, but
          it is
          > more "now".
          >
          > The tributes are there (Daleks and the old favourite villains).
          >
          > And in particular the last aired episode "School Reunion" brought
          back 2
          > of my favourite characters and also addresses the whole "Doctor's
          > Companion" thing that I took for granted to be platonic buddies in
          the
          > past.
          >
          > Michael
          >
          > --
          > Yeah great show. I was never a fan of the old series, stopped
          watching not long after Tom Baker arrived. Eccleston and Tennent
          have both put in fine performances and Billie Piper is almost the
          heart of the show. Germane Greer reviewed the first series on BBC2
          and could n't stop stating how great Piper was!! Got to dash I've
          got about 2 minutes before this weeks starts.
          Best Graham.
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39150 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
          .html
          .html
          In a message dated 5/6/2006 3:19:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
          -- Another 3 or 4 years. The next one I saw was Planet when it was doing the cinema rounds on a double bill with Escape
           
          I guess that kind of spoiled the ending for you.
           
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39151 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: Naming protocol
          .html
          .html
          In a message dated 5/6/2006 3:19:50 A.M. Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
          -- Slowly at the moment unfortunately like everything else I am supposed to be working on.
           
          Perhaps doing it in color was a tad ambitious.
           
          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 39152 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
          Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
          .html
          Attachments :
            I first saw planet when I was in Junior high school back in 71. I also
            scanned this photo for the group.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: TZer0@...
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Sent: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:18:47 EDT
            Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!

            In a message dated 5/6/2006 3:19:28 A.M. Central Daylight
            Time, ntfoster@... writes:
            -- Another 3 or 4 years. The next one I saw was Planet when it was
            doing the cinema rounds on a double bill with Escape


            I guess that kind of spoiled the ending for you.




            SPONSORED LINKS
            Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction book
            club
            Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science
            fiction

            --------
            YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

            * Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.

            * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
            PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

            * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

            --------
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39153 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
            Subject: Re: Naming protocol
            .html
            .html In a message dated 5/6/06 1:41:11 AM Central Daylight Time, TZer0@... writes:


            However Conquest carried on the
            tradition of female names ending in
            A.  Zira, Lisa, Zelda.  All of the
            television names did as well.  Kira,
            Fauna, Wanda, Jillia, Carsia, etc . . .
            If there's one that didn't I can't
            think of it.  Anyone?  Bueller?


            Galen's mother is named Ann(e), Polar's wife is named Zantes...
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39154 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/6/2006
            Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
            .html
            .html
             
            What's this makeup pic from?
             
             
             
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39155 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/6/2006
            Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
            .html
            Hello,

            This email message is a notification to let you know that
            a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
            group.

            File : /makeup015.jpg
            Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
            Description :

            You can access this file at the URL:
            http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/makeup015.jpg

            To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
            http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

            Regards,

            munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39156 From: mike_oz2005 Date: 5/6/2006
            Subject: Re: Naming protocol
            .html
            Short for AnnA and ZantesA! :)

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
            >
            > In a message dated 5/6/06 1:41:11 AM Central Daylight Time,
            TZer0@...
            > writes:
            >
            >
            > > However Conquest carried on the
            > > tradition of female names ending in
            > > A. Zira, Lisa, Zelda. All of the
            > > television names did as well. Kira,
            > > Fauna, Wanda, Jillia, Carsia, etc . . .
            > > If there's one that didn't I can't
            > > think of it. Anyone? Bueller?
            > >
            >
            > Galen's mother is named Ann(e), Polar's wife is named Zantes...
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39157 From: PofTAfan@aol.com Date: 5/7/2006
            Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
            .html
            When I won the picture from Ebay, the ad said it was Kim Hunter from
            Planet of the Apes.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: TZer0@...
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Sent: Sat, 6 May 2006 19:12:23 EDT
            Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!


            What's this makeup pic from?





            SPONSORED LINKS
            Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction book
            club
            Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science
            fiction

            --------
            YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

            * Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.

            * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
            PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

            * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

            --------
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39158 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/7/2006
            Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
            .html
            .html
            In a message dated 5/7/2006 12:36:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time, PofTAfan@... writes:
            When I won the picture from Ebay, the ad said it was Kim Hunter from
             
            It's not Escape.
            Wrong makeup artist.
            And the guy form Escape
            is the only one she mentions
            in her book.  I wonder who she
            got.  It's hard to tell from that angle.
            Emile LaVigne, William Tuttle
            without a mustache, Ben Nye Sr. 
            It could be any one of them with
            only glasses to go by.  The Making
            A Monster book has more pictures of
            the monsters than it does the makeup artists.
             
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39159 From: patrickmichaeltilton Date: 5/7/2006
            Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
            .html
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , "abmac40" <abmac@...> wrote:
            >
            > None of this stuff about Galen has any connection to Planet of the
            > Apes. OK, he was from Turkey, not Greece. That doesn't matter. My
            > point was that most people know that he was a foreigner in Rome.

            *** And my point was/is that Galenus Claudius may not have been born
            in Rome (the capitol of the Roman Empire), but THAT doesn't matter,
            since he was somebody with Roman citizenship. If Saul of Tarsus (a
            city in Cilicia, in southeast Asia Minor) could go from being a rabid
            persecutor of Christians on behalf of Judaism... then undergo a
            conversion experience on the way to Damascus and become a
            Christian... then proceed to become "the apostle to the Gentiles" and
            end the book of ACTS OF THE APOSTLES as a prisoner of the Jews,
            delivered by them to the Romans for execution and -- the Romans
            refusing to do so -- having to resort to appealing to Caesar when the
            Jews protest this, it should be recognized that Roman citizenship
            pertained to ALL non-slaves throughout the empire, from their
            territories in Britannia in the West to Judaea in the East and all
            points in-between. Paul was able to appeal to Caesar because he had
            rights under Roman Law as a citizen of the Roman Empire.

            Rome was the capitol city. Most of the Roman Empire's citizens dwelt
            throughout the countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea (called "the
            Roman lake"). Galen may not have been born in Rome, but that doesn't
            make him a foreigner. If anything, it's like a person from Idaho
            going to Washington D.C. to serve as the Surgeon General in the
            Federal Government. Being from Idaho doesn't make such a person
            a 'foreigner'. Asia Minor was as much a part of the Roman Empire as
            Italy was. Hell, later on, after the empire was bifurcated so that
            they had TWO capitol cities -- Rome in the East and Byzantium (a.k.a.
            Constantinople a.k.a. Istanbul) in the West -- Asia Minor was where
            one of those capitol cities was situated, just north of Troy where
            Roman legends claimed their ancestors came from (i.e. Aeneas, son of
            Priam, taking his son Ascanius/Iulus to Latium after the fall of
            Troy, Iulus being the lineal ancestor of Iulius Caesar). And Galen's
            home city of Pergamus was a stone's throw from both Troy and
            Byzantium, in northeast Turkey/Asia Minor.

            Galen -- Galenus Claudius -- was NOT a foreigner. To be a foreigner,
            he would have to have been from a country not dominated by Rome. For
            example, from sub-saharan Africa or from one of the 'barbaric'
            Germanic tribes north of Italy, or from China or India, etc. Galen
            was a Roman in the sense that "Rome" signified the Empire and NOT
            just the capitol city. In the U.S.A., we don't have a capitol city
            named "America" so that one has to literally live IN that city in
            order to be an 'American'. A New Yorker is as much an American as a
            citizen living in Washington D.C. is. The word(s) "New Yorker" can
            really only mean somebody who lives in New York City, but the
            word "Roman" means much more than somebody who lived in the city of
            Rome; when Rome was the capitol city of an Empire, to be "Roman"
            meant to be a citizen of that Roman Empire, regardless of whether or
            not you ever were born in Rome, traveled to Rome or lived in Rome.

            You say that nothing of this has anything to do with PLANET OF THE
            APES, but it has everything to do with your speculations regarding
            Dr. Galen being some kind of 'foreigner' from somewhere other than
            Ape City. Setting aside the sequels for the moment, it still seems
            obvious to me that the inhabited territory of Apedom -- even in just
            the first film -- is severely limited. Cornelius' map shows two
            territories, the livable areas on the left side of the dashed line
            and the Forbidden Zone on the right side. The ocean/sea borders both
            territories on the bottom of the map. Maybe the Apes have more
            territories "off the map" -- i.e. off the left side of the map, but
            Zaius makes rather pointed comments about how "Man is a nuisance"
            who "eats up his food supplies in the forest and then migrates to our
            green belts and ravages our crops". The subsequent lack of arable
            land has led to a food crisis: "It's a question of simian survival"
            we are told. In all probability, there are deserts on ALL sides of
            the Ape-populated region, so that Zaius can only hope that there are
            other jungles beyond the Forbidden Zone, not just to explain the
            appearance of Taylor but to possibly serve the apes for their
            agricultural needs.

            Ergo, the population of the simian world is rather limited, and IN
            that all-too-small area they have too big a population to sustain,
            given the fact that their crops are being ravaged by locust-like
            humans. In all probability, there ISN'T any 'foreign' land from which
            a 'foreigner' could come to Ape City.

            That's my opinion, at any rate. It's open to debate, though, if
            anybody else wants to offer up any other evidence. I've deliberately
            left out evidence from the sequels (i.e. from BENEATH,
            predominantly), though if I had culled details from BENEATH, I think
            it would be effectively proved that Apedom compromises a rather small
            territory -- since Ursus feels that the ONLY way to ward off
            starvation is to invade the Forbidden Zone, establishing new,
            improved feeding grounds there (since the inhabitants known to live
            there MUST eat, thus they have food supplies despite the fact that
            the Lawgiver had pronounced that whole area deadly). Ursus is
            compelled "to expand the boundaries of [the Apes'] ineluctable power"
            into the Forbidden Zone rather than in the OTHER direction on the
            map, which suggests that there is a desert wasteland across their
            OTHER border. Their region is hemmed in by the desert and the sea.
            There is no known 'foreign' land where they can hope to grow food to
            replace the ravaged crops -- they have to resort to invading the
            inhabited Forbidden Zone, to steal THEIR land, to grow crops.

            But, Abmac, if you want to believe that Dr. Galen -- lacking the -us
            ending to his name -- is a foreigner living in Ape City, go right
            ahead. With all due respect, I just don't think that any of the
            evidence supports this notion.

            Patrick
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39160 From: abmac@i-55.com Date: 5/7/2006
            Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
            .html
            Instead of Idaho, substitute Puerto Rico. A Puerto Rican in Washington, DC,
            will ALWAYS be a foreigner. Ignore it if you like but enough with the
            irrelevant crap. It sounds to me like you're just jealous.

            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "abmac40" <abmac@...> wrote:
            > >
            > > None of this stuff about Galen has any connection to Planet of the
            > > Apes. OK, he was from Turkey, not Greece. That doesn't matter. My
            > > point was that most people know that he was a foreigner in Rome.
            >
            > *** And my point was/is that Galenus Claudius may not have been born
            > in Rome (the capitol of the Roman Empire), but THAT doesn't matter,
            > since he was somebody with Roman citizenship. If Saul of Tarsus (a
            > city in Cilicia, in southeast Asia Minor) could go from being a rabid
            > persecutor of Christians on behalf of Judaism... then undergo a
            > conversion experience on the way to Damascus and become a
            > Christian... then proceed to become "the apostle to the Gentiles" and
            > end the book of ACTS OF THE APOSTLES as a prisoner of the Jews,
            > delivered by them to the Romans for execution and -- the Romans
            > refusing to do so -- having to resort to appealing to Caesar when the
            > Jews protest this, it should be recognized that Roman citizenship
            > pertained to ALL non-slaves throughout the empire, from their
            > territories in Britannia in the West to Judaea in the East and all
            > points in-between. Paul was able to appeal to Caesar because he had
            > rights under Roman Law as a citizen of the Roman Empire.
            >
            > Rome was the capitol city. Most of the Roman Empire's citizens dwelt
            > throughout the countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea (called "the
            > Roman lake"). Galen may not have been born in Rome, but that doesn't
            > make him a foreigner. If anything, it's like a person from Idaho
            > going to Washington D.C. to serve as the Surgeon General in the
            > Federal Government. Being from Idaho doesn't make such a person
            > a 'foreigner'. Asia Minor was as much a part of the Roman Empire as
            > Italy was. Hell, later on, after the empire was bifurcated so that
            > they had TWO capitol cities -- Rome in the East and Byzantium (a.k.a.
            > Constantinople a.k.a. Istanbul) in the West -- Asia Minor was where
            > one of those capitol cities was situated, just north of Troy where
            > Roman legends claimed their ancestors came from (i.e. Aeneas, son of
            > Priam, taking his son Ascanius/Iulus to Latium after the fall of
            > Troy, Iulus being the lineal ancestor of Iulius Caesar). And Galen's
            > home city of Pergamus was a stone's throw from both Troy and
            > Byzantium, in northeast Turkey/Asia Minor.
            >
            > Galen -- Galenus Claudius -- was NOT a foreigner. To be a foreigner,
            > he would have to have been from a country not dominated by Rome. For
            > example, from sub-saharan Africa or from one of the 'barbaric'
            > Germanic tribes north of Italy, or from China or India, etc. Galen
            > was a Roman in the sense that "Rome" signified the Empire and NOT
            > just the capitol city. In the U.S.A., we don't have a capitol city
            > named "America" so that one has to literally live IN that city in
            > order to be an 'American'. A New Yorker is as much an American as a
            > citizen living in Washington D.C. is. The word(s) "New Yorker" can
            > really only mean somebody who lives in New York City, but the
            > word "Roman" means much more than somebody who lived in the city of
            > Rome; when Rome was the capitol city of an Empire, to be "Roman"
            > meant to be a citizen of that Roman Empire, regardless of whether or
            > not you ever were born in Rome, traveled to Rome or lived in Rome.
            >
            > You say that nothing of this has anything to do with PLANET OF THE
            > APES, but it has everything to do with your speculations regarding
            > Dr. Galen being some kind of 'foreigner' from somewhere other than
            > Ape City. Setting aside the sequels for the moment, it still seems
            > obvious to me that the inhabited territory of Apedom -- even in just
            > the first film -- is severely limited. Cornelius' map shows two
            > territories, the livable areas on the left side of the dashed line
            > and the Forbidden Zone on the right side. The ocean/sea borders both
            > territories on the bottom of the map. Maybe the Apes have more
            > territories "off the map" -- i.e. off the left side of the map, but
            > Zaius makes rather pointed comments about how "Man is a nuisance"
            > who "eats up his food supplies in the forest and then migrates to our
            > green belts and ravages our crops". The subsequent lack of arable
            > land has led to a food crisis: "It's a question of simian survival"
            > we are told. In all probability, there are deserts on ALL sides of
            > the Ape-populated region, so that Zaius can only hope that there are
            > other jungles beyond the Forbidden Zone, not just to explain the
            > appearance of Taylor but to possibly serve the apes for their
            > agricultural needs.
            >
            > Ergo, the population of the simian world is rather limited, and IN
            > that all-too-small area they have too big a population to sustain,
            > given the fact that their crops are being ravaged by locust-like
            > humans. In all probability, there ISN'T any 'foreign' land from which
            > a 'foreigner' could come to Ape City.
            >
            > That's my opinion, at any rate. It's open to debate, though, if
            > anybody else wants to offer up any other evidence. I've deliberately
            > left out evidence from the sequels (i.e. from BENEATH,
            > predominantly), though if I had culled details from BENEATH, I think
            > it would be effectively proved that Apedom compromises a rather small
            > territory -- since Ursus feels that the ONLY way to ward off
            > starvation is to invade the Forbidden Zone, establishing new,
            > improved feeding grounds there (since the inhabitants known to live
            > there MUST eat, thus they have food supplies despite the fact that
            > the Lawgiver had pronounced that whole area deadly). Ursus is
            > compelled "to expand the boundaries of [the Apes'] ineluctable power"
            > into the Forbidden Zone rather than in the OTHER direction on the
            > map, which suggests that there is a desert wasteland across their
            > OTHER border. Their region is hemmed in by the desert and the sea.
            > There is no known 'foreign' land where they can hope to grow food to
            > replace the ravaged crops -- they have to resort to invading the
            > inhabited Forbidden Zone, to steal THEIR land, to grow crops.
            >
            > But, Abmac, if you want to believe that Dr. Galen -- lacking the -us
            > ending to his name -- is a foreigner living in Ape City, go right
            > ahead. With all due respect, I just don't think that any of the
            > evidence supports this notion.
            >
            > Patrick
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39161 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/7/2006
            Subject: The Might Peking Man
            .html
            .html
             
            IFC has a giant ape flick on today called The Mighty Peking Man.
            Anyone seen it?  It even has a chick in a Nova costume.
             
             
             
             
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39162 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 5/7/2006
            Subject: Re: Dr. Galen
            .html
            .html
            In a message dated 5/7/2006 1:25:29 P.M. Central Daylight Time, abmac@... writes:
            > Galen -- Galenus Claudius -- was NOT a foreigner.
             
            Yes, but as cool as his name is
            it's still not as cool as Jay Robinson
            saying, "Trrribune Gallio!"
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39163 From: Dario Sciola Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Re: Men'r'us
            .html
            Thats funny, but as I thought about it, another more serious idea came
            to mind?
            Why would the writers use 'us' for all the males?
            Perhaps it WAS a reference to roman gladiators. (We'll not bigus
            dickus, but spartacus, and his ilk.) That would also explain the lead
            up to the character of Caesar himself.

            Dario

            ----- Original Message -----
            From: mike_oz2005 <whitty@...>
            Date: Friday, May 5, 2006 11:01 pm
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Men'r'us

            > Like Bigus Dickus!
            >
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
            > >
            > >
            > > Agree. Even the fact that 'us' is a word with distinct meaning
            > can
            > > come into play. Something like clansmanship. Either you are part
            > > of 'us' or you are not.
            > >
            > > Dario
            > >
            > > ----- Original Message -----
            > > From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
            > > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 4:52 pm
            > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
            > >
            > > > -- Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and
            > perhaps
            > > > one to
            > > > follow up in a future story maybe?
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > Neil
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > > -----Original Message-----
            > > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
            > > > > On Behalf Of abmac@...
            > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM
            > > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > > > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
            > > >
            > > > > Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't
            > have
            > > the
            > > > > Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate that
            > > > > he's a "foreigner"
            > > > > from another area who thinks he's being discriminated against
            > > > > because of his
            > > > > species, when his superiors are really prejudiced against him
            > > > > because of his
            > > > > place of origin.
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > ------------------------ --------------------
            > ~-->
            > Home is just a click away. Make Yahoo! your home page now.
            > http://us.click.yahoo.com/DHchtC/3FxNAA/yQLSAA/9_IolB/TM
            > -------------------------------------------------------------------
            > -~->
            >
            >
            > Yahoo! Groups Links
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39164 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Re: Men'r'us
            .html
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
            > Thats funny, but as I thought about it, another more serious idea came
            > to mind?
            > Why would the writers use 'us' for all the males?

            -- It's also interesting that by the time they got to Escape and then
            with the next 2 movies they dropped the idea of ending male names with
            'us' such as Milo, Aldo, Virgil etc.

            Neil
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39165 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor Who?
            .html
            .html Message
            I too think that a new TV show could work but like you say only if they updated it and made it more adult. I do believe they would need to use new characters though and maybe have some sort of 'passing of the torch' from Burke, Virdon & Galen, some sort of conclusion to the original series.
            With the advances in technology and effects surely they could do a new series relatively inexpensively these days?
             
            Neil
             

            --- In friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com, "fanficwriter1966" <fanficwriter1966@...> wrote:
            > Thought-provoking
            questions, Michael!
            >
            > I haven't seen the new Dr. Who, and have
            never seen the original. 
            > However, I did watch the original
            Galactica, and LOVE the new
            > incarnation.  Can't wait till October,
            to see the story continue.
            >
            > As far as a new incarnation of POTA
            - I'm not much of a comics buyer,
            > so I can't respond to that.  But
            a new TV series I would like to see
            > follow the same trajectory as
            Galactica, being that I was a kid for
            > the original, and am an adult
            now.  I'd love to see them get rid of
            > the camp and the "aimed at
            kids" storytelling.  Use the same
            > characters but take a more
            gritty path.  What would REALLY happen to
            > two astronauts if they
            ended up in those circumstances?  Use CGI if
            > need be to fill in
            some blanks, but take full advantage of advances
            > in set-building,
            lighting, photography.  Lots of atmosphere.  (To my
            > eye,
            anything brightly lit these days looks fake and says "aimed at
            >
            kids.")  That's what appeals to me very strongly now -- anything that
            > I can accept as "real."  Recognizable real people in a situation
            > that's developed finely enough for me to imagine myself as part of
            > it.  What would I do?  How would I react?  Some of the
            Galactica
            > episodes have been well-done enough to deliver a gut punch
            (the
            > shooting of Adama at the end of season 1, for example).  The
            old 70's
            > campy-kiddy type stuff just didn't do that.  For me,
            anyway.  (And I
            > can only give an opinion from my own
            perspective.)
            >
            > I do think that if someone were to put together a
            21st century
            > version of POTA, and aim it at adults, that it would
            succeed.  The
            > themes of the original episodes were fine, but I'm
            not sure they have
            > as much relevance to a current audience as a new
            imagining might have.
            >
            > I'll try to tune in to an episode of Dr.
            Who to see how that's put
            > together, so I can comment further.  I'm
            willing to investigate
            > anything that involves good, gritty, realistic
            storytelling.
            >
            > Thanks again for the questions, Michael!
            >
            > Carol
            >
            > --- In
            href="mailto:friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com">friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty"
            > <whitty@> wrote:
            > >
            > > I'm
            asking because I wonder what we can learn from the way they have
            > >
            done the new Dr Who as fans of the POTA TV Show.
            > > 
            > > For starters there seems to be a lot more thought gone into the
            >
            scripts
            > > (which is a bonus seeing as the old scripts were a great
            example of
            > > story telling most of the time).
            > > 
            > > I personally do not believe the POTA TV Show would succeed if a
            new
            > > series started and the shows were like new episodes of the
            original
            > TV
            > > Show.
            > > 
            > > While I
            have seen some great stories that I wish were shot (eg
            > Values),
            > > I wonder how long the fugitive formula would last?
            > >
            > > I also liked the "Monument" story Dave B wrote (I liked it more
            than
            > > Dave did I think because I recall he told me Neil and I could
            use
            > it but
            > > it required a complete re-write...frankly I
            thought it was quite
            > fine!).
            > > However when I enquired of a
            comic publisher I was told in no
            > uncertain
            > > terms that
            anything about the POTA TV Show would have to take a
            > > completely
            different direction because it failed (that's debatable
            > too
            > > eh?).
            > > 
            > > So what's the consensus here? 
            If you saw a POTA TV Show comic book
            > on
            > > the news
            stand.....what would you hope for it to contain?
            > > 
            > > A new adventure that is much like the other adventures in the TV
            >
            Show?
            > >
            > > Something providing a few answers to what
            happened to the 3
            > fugitives
            > > (something other than the
            "Aged Galen" scenario!)?
            > >
            > >
            > > And careful
            here because if you want more episodes of the TV Show -
            > do
            > >
            you think it would be doomed to the same fate as the TV Show? 
            >
            Would it
            > > therefore require some kind of clever
            balance?
             
             
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39166 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
            .html
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , TZer0@... wrote:
            > I guess that kind of spoiled the ending for you.

            -- I suppose it should have but it really didn't bother me. I really
            had no idea what Planet was like and the TV series had just started
            which rekindled my interest in the apes I had first seen in Escape
            those few years earlier.

            I did at first think that Escape was connected to the TV series and
            remember commenting to my Mum when I first saw Galen something like
            'oh, I know what happens to him in the end, he and some other chimps
            go back in time in the space ship'!

            But then shortly after I saw Planet on the big screen and from the
            start realised it was something totally different to the TV show and
            things fell into place and I was completely blown away. I just wish
            they had shown it with Beneath and not Escape.

            Neil
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39167 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Re: The Might Peking Man
            .html
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , TZer0@... wrote:
            > IFC has a giant ape flick on today called The Mighty Peking Man.
            > Anyone seen it? It even has a chick in a Nova costume.

            -- Nope, haven't seen it. Was it any good?

            Neil
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39168 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Re: Naming protocol
            .html
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , TZer0@... wrote:
            > Perhaps doing it in color was a tad ambitious.

            -- No its not the doing it in colour that is the reason. I didn't get
            anything drawn last week due to illness and 'real life' crap.

            Neil
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39169 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Re: Mighty Peking Man
            .html
            .html.html In a message dated 5/8/06 7:10:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:


            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, TZer0@... wrote:
            > IFC has a giant ape flick on today called The Mighty Peking Man.
            > Anyone seen it?  It even has a chick in a Nova costume.

            -- Nope, haven't seen it. Was it any good?

            Neil


            IT SUCKED!

            -- Rory
            <.html
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39170 From: abmac40 Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Planet and Escape Double Bill
            .html
            I also saw Planet and Escape this way while I was in Middlesbrough,
            England. My brother and I went in when the theatre opened and we
            stayed until closing time. The movies alternated, and I think we saw
            each of them four times. A few days later, I went back alone and did
            it again.

            Anthony

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
            >
            > -- Another 3 or 4 years. The next one I saw was Planet when it was
            doing
            > the cinema rounds on a double bill with Escape just as the TV show
            was
            > being shown in England. Then later the same year (I think) I saw
            Beneath
            > on TV.
            >
            > Neil
            >
            > -----Original Message-----
            > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
            Behalf
            > Of TZer0@...
            > Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 4:15 PM
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
            >
            >
            >
            > In a message dated 5/5/2006 8:12:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
            > ntfoster@... writes:
            >
            > I had never heard of Planet of the Apes before
            >
            >
            > So how long was it before you saw the first two?
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39171 From: abmac40 Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Re: Men'r'us
            .html
            Aldo, Virgil, Mandemus, and the other apes in Battle were named by
            their human owners.

            Neil, do you think Milo and Garvon might've been from somewhere else?

            Anthony


            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
            >
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Dario Sciola <darios@> wrote:
            > > Thats funny, but as I thought about it, another more serious idea
            came
            > > to mind?
            > > Why would the writers use 'us' for all the males?
            >
            > -- It's also interesting that by the time they got to Escape and then
            > with the next 2 movies they dropped the idea of ending male names
            with
            > 'us' such as Milo, Aldo, Virgil etc.
            >
            > Neil
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39172 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
            .html
            Hello,

            This email message is a notification to let you know that
            a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
            group.

            File : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 24.jpg
            Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
            Description :

            You can access this file at the URL:
            http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%20Musings/UMM%2024.jpg

            To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
            http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

            Regards,

            munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39173 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Here's Manny again...
            .html
            .html Message
            new UNCLE MANNY'S MUSINGS is now available.
             
            Just click the link on the Group's Home Page or use this link for the Uncle Manny Folder - http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%20Musings/ 
             
            Previous UNCLE MANNY'S MUSINGS are available for viewing here:
             
             
            Cheers,
             
            Neil
             
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 39174 From: Neil T Foster Date: 5/8/2006
            Subject: Uncle Manny #24
            .html
            Attachments :
              .html Message
               
              Neil
               
              <.html
              <.html
              Group: potadg Message: 39175 From: Neil Date: 5/8/2006
              Subject: Re: Men'r'us
              .html
              --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , "abmac40" <abmac@...> wrote:
              > Neil, do you think Milo and Garvon might've been from somewhere else?

              -- Yes, I can certainly live with that theory.

              Neil
              <.html


              Copyright © 2026, Hunter Goatley. All rights reserved.
              Last updated 2026-03-31 10:43.