|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39076 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39077 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Resin bust? Apes with bangs? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39078 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 in shops this week |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39079 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Chambers vs Baker (the look of the apes) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39080 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Costume tests |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39081 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Chambers vs Baker (the look of the apes) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39082 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39083 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39084 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD Cover! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39085 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39086 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Costume tests |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39087 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39088 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 81 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39089 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Revolution #4 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39090 |
From: abmac@i-55.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Costume tests |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39091 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39092 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Costume tests |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39093 |
From: John |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39094 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39095 |
From: John |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39096 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Paranoia or what? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39097 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39098 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39099 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Paranoia or what? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39100 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Paranoia or what? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39101 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39102 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39103 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39104 |
From: kidro85@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Paranoia or what? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39105 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Paranoia or what? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39106 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39107 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39108 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39109 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39110 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Here's Manny... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39111 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Uncle Manny #23 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39112 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Speaking of 2001: A Space Odyssey... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39113 |
From: John |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39114 |
From: sparkytb2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Rare Beneath photos |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39115 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39116 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Men'r'us |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39117 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39118 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Dr. Galen |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39119 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: God and Ape |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39120 |
From: abmac@i-55.com |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39121 |
From: Patrick Tilton |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39122 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Rare Beneath photos |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39123 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39124 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39125 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39126 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39127 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39128 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39129 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39130 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39131 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39132 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39133 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Uncle Manny #23 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39134 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Speaking of 2001: A Space Odyssey... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39135 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Rare Beneath photos |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39136 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39137 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39138 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Naming protocol |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39139 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: New Doctor Who? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39140 |
From: abmac40 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39141 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor Who? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39142 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39143 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39144 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39145 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39146 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39147 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39148 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39149 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New Doctor Who? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39150 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39151 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39152 |
From: PofTAfan@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39153 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39154 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39155 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39156 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39157 |
From: PofTAfan@aol.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39158 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39159 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39160 |
From: abmac@i-55.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39161 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: The Might Peking Man |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39162 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39163 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39164 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39165 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor Who? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39166 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39167 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Might Peking Man |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39168 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39169 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mighty Peking Man |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39170 |
From: abmac40 |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Planet and Escape Double Bill |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39171 |
From: abmac40 |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39172 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39173 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Here's Manny again... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39174 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Uncle Manny #24 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39175 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39076 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39077 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Resin bust? Apes with bangs? |
.htmlall the info in the bust is handwritten.....which is
odd they would have put the copywright on there....But
maybe that was the name of the kit "Wisest
Ape"....MEdicoms call him the "Greatest Ape" and of
course he is indeed both of these things. Hail
Lawgiver!
--- TZer0@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 5/2/2006 10:52:06 A.M. Central
> Daylight Time,
> apefan23@... writes:
>
> "Wisest Ape copyright 2004 "
>
>
>
> That's usually the Japanese designation for The
> Lawgiver.
> Which makes sense, since garage kits started in
> Japan.
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39078 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 in shops this week |
.html.html
In a message dated 5/2/06 8:38:35 AM Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:
Thanks Greg – can't wait!
Cougar – you got yours yet?
Not a thing yet Whitty...<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39079 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Chambers vs Baker (the look of the apes) |
.html.html
In a message dated 5/2/06 8:44:48 AM Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:
I wonder what Chambers would have come up with using today's technology?
Thing is that Chambers probably could have designed a more "realistic" looking ape, but he chose not to for aesthetic reasons... He felt that the audience would have been "grossed out" looking at
real looking apes for 2 hrs...<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39080 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Costume tests |
.htmlYou know you think you have seen a movie so many time
you would have noticed everything about it but I did
not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory about him
being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
perhaps??
--- abmac@... wrote:
>
> Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name
> doesn't have the
> Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate
> that he's a "foreigner"
> from another area who thinks he's being
> discriminated against because of his
> species, when his superiors are really prejudiced
> against him because of his
> place of origin.
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39081 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Chambers vs Baker (the look of the apes) |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/3/2006 10:26:57 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
mlccougar@... writes:
Thing is that Chambers probably
could have designed a more "realistic" looking ape, but he chose not to for
aesthetic reasons... He felt that the audience would have been "grossed out"
looking at real looking apes for 2 hrs...
Yes, as I recall, they took great pains to create apes
that looked aesthetically pleasing. If you've seen some
of the background apes you'll see there are a lot who aren't.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39082 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
.htmlI can't see it for some reason. All I get is a box that states
attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what I need to do to fix my
computer to where I can see this and other attachments?
Thanks
John
In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote:
>
> MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO!
>
> OK, here's yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one using
the
> original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can come up
with for a back
> cover. Again, I'm still working on it.
>
> -- Rory
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39083 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39084 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD Cover! |
.html
.html
Message
-- Looks great as
usual Rory!
Neil
OK, here's yet another
BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one using the original 1-sheet for the front
cover, then the best I can come up with for a back cover. Again, I'm
still working on
it. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39085 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
.html
.html
Message
-- No
idea with the computer help John but I have uploaded a copy of the cover to the
files section in the DVD
Cover Ideas folder. Unfortunately I did
have to lower the resolution a bit to make the file
smaller.
Neil
> -----Original Message----- > From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
>
On Behalf Of luke_the_drifter52
> Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 6:26
AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Yet another
Beneath DVD cover
> > > I can't see it for some reason. All I
get is a box that states
> attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what
I need to do
> to fix my > computer to where I can see this and
other attachments?
> Thanks > John > > In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote:
> > > > MIGHT BE A
GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO!
> > > > OK, here's
yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one using
> the > >
original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can come up
> with
for a back
> > cover. Again, I'm still working on it. >
> > > -- Rory >
> > > > > > > > > >
Yahoo! Groups Links
> > <*> To visit your group on the web, go
to:
>
href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/
> >
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
>
PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <*> Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to:
>
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39086 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Costume tests |
.html
.html
Message
--
Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and perhaps one to
follow up in a future story maybe?
Neil
> -----Original Message----- >
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] >
On Behalf Of abmac@... > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM >
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume
tests > Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't
have the > Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate
that > he's a "foreigner" > from another area who thinks he's being
discriminated against > because of his > species, when his superiors
are really prejudiced against him > because of his > place of
origin. <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39087 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
.html
.html
Message
-- One thing that may help is if you go to Edit Membership and in the
Message Format check the convert to HTML section (see below). If you have it set
for plain text you won't get the pictures that are sent in emails
Message Format
Neil
> -----Original Message----- >
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] >
On Behalf Of luke_the_drifter52 > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 6:26
AM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Yet another
Beneath DVD cover > > > I can't see it for some reason. All I
get is a box that states > attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what
I need to do > to fix my > computer to where I can see this and
other attachments? > Thanks > John > > In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote: > > > > MIGHT BE A
GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO! > > > > OK, here's
yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one using > the > >
original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can come up > with
for a back > > cover. Again, I'm still working on it. >
> > > -- Rory >
> > > > > > > > > >
Yahoo! Groups Links > > <*> To visit your group on the web, go
to: >
href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/ > >
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to: >
PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > <*> Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to: >
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > >
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39088 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 81 |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Greg Plonowski <urko3085@...> wrote:
> Issue 81 is now available to download from Hunter's site. This issue
returns us to the Future History Chronicles storyline featuring giant
city-ships of apes. Art is by Tom Sutton. This issue also includes a
photo of Urko as well as a letters page.
-- As usual a big thanks to you Greg for scanning these comics and
Hunter for hosting them. As I've mentioned before, Tom Sutton was
always one of my least favourite Apes artists but that is not to put
down his work. There's just something about it that doesn't resonate
with me for some reason.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39089 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Revolution #4 |
|
.html just got a copy today.... haven't read it yet but I
did scan the letters section and Neil Foster and
DrJohnZaiusDavis have letters printed!
Tim
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39090 |
From: abmac@i-55.com |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Costume tests |
.html
.html
Message
--
Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and perhaps one to
follow up in a future story maybe?
Neil
> -----Original Message----- >
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] >
On Behalf Of abmac@... > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM >
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume
tests > Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't
have the > Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate
that > he's a "foreigner" > from another area who thinks he's being
discriminated against > because of his > species, when his superiors
are really prejudiced against him > because of his > place of
origin.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39091 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 |
.html
.html
Message
-- Do
we? Cool, can't wait to get my copy then!
Neil
> -----Original Message----- >
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] >
On Behalf Of Tim "apefan" > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 8:09 AM > To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [PotaDG] Revolution
#4 > > > just got a copy today.... haven't read it yet but
I > did scan the letters section and Neil Foster and >
DrJohnZaiusDavis have letters printed! <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39092 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Costume tests |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, abmac@... wrote:
> How's that for a start on the background? Comments and suggestions
are welcome.
-- Excellent! Some really nice ideas to work with there.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39093 |
From: John |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 |
.htmlHOLY SH*T!!! I had no idea. I got my copies today and was just about
to comment on how I would love to get my hands on Tom's pencil's for
this issue. That's very cool, what a great surprise.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> just got a copy today.... haven't read it yet but I
> did scan the letters section and Neil Foster and
> DrJohnZaiusDavis have letters printed!
>
> Tim
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39094 |
From: luke_the_drifter52 |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
.htmlMine was already set to that when I check my settings. Anyway,
thanks for the uploaded copy Neil!
Rory, this cover is awesome!!! I can't make up my mind on which
Beneath cover I like the best; this one or your first one. But, if I
had to pick, I would have to go with this one. What you did for the
back cover is outstanding!!! The Mutants on the top is a neat touch!
I wish I could figure out the Adobe Paint Shop I have so I could
play around with my hand at making some covers!
John
In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> -- One thing that may help is if you go to Edit Membership and in
the
> Message Format check the convert to HTML section (see below). If
you
> have it set for plain text you won't get the pictures that are
sent in
> emails
>
> Message Format
>
>
> * Convert to HTML - Convert plain-text messages sent to me to
> HTML.
>
>
>
> Neil
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of luke_the_drifter52
> > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 6:26 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
> >
> >
> > I can't see it for some reason. All I get is a box that states
> > attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what I need to do
> > to fix my
> > computer to where I can see this and other attachments?
> > Thanks
> > John
> >
> > In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@ wrote:
> > >
> > > MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO!
> > >
> > > OK, here's yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one
using
> > the
> > > original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can come
up
> > with for a back
> > > cover. Again, I'm still working on it.
> > >
> > > -- Rory
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39095 |
From: John |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
.htmlMine was also already set but i can't view pics till Neil uploads
them.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "luke_the_drifter52"
<JLKINSER1970@...> wrote:
>
> Mine was already set to that when I check my settings. Anyway,
> thanks for the uploaded copy Neil!
> Rory, this cover is awesome!!! I can't make up my mind on which
> Beneath cover I like the best; this one or your first one. But, if
I
> had to pick, I would have to go with this one. What you did for the
> back cover is outstanding!!! The Mutants on the top is a neat
touch!
> I wish I could figure out the Adobe Paint Shop I have so I could
> play around with my hand at making some covers!
> John
>
>
>
> In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
> >
> > -- One thing that may help is if you go to Edit Membership and in
> the
> > Message Format check the convert to HTML section (see below). If
> you
> > have it set for plain text you won't get the pictures that are
> sent in
> > emails
> >
> > Message Format
> >
> >
> > * Convert to HTML - Convert plain-text messages sent to me to
> > HTML.
> >
> >
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
]
> > > On Behalf Of luke_the_drifter52
> > > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 6:26 AM
> > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover
> > >
> > >
> > > I can't see it for some reason. All I get is a box that states
> > > attachment not stored. Can any one tell me what I need to do
> > > to fix my
> > > computer to where I can see this and other attachments?
> > > Thanks
> > > John
> > >
> > > In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA IF I INCLUDE THE ATTACHED PHOTO!
> > > >
> > > > OK, here's yet another BENEATH DVD cover I've made, this one
> using
> > > the
> > > > original 1-sheet for the front cover, then the best I can
come
> up
> > > with for a back
> > > > cover. Again, I'm still working on it.
> > > >
> > > > -- Rory
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39096 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/3/2006 |
| Subject: Paranoia or what? |
.html
.html
Message
-- Trawling the
web I found an interview with David Charkham who played one of the apes in
the 'Dawn of Man' sequence from 2001: A Space Odyssey. Here is a little
snippet:
"As for the
general vibe on the movie, Dan Richter and possibly Kubrick were convinced
that the Planet of the Apes, being made around the same time, technical crew
were spying on us! One day we were rehearsing in a field on studio grounds
and Dan made us all get in a tight huddle as an aircraft flew over in case they
had a camera. Rumour had it that everything from the movie was destroyed to
avoid copies etc"
Were they really
that paranoid? I find it hard to believe that Chambers and Co would have
bothered spying myself!
Neil
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39097 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
.html
.html.htmlHere's a DVD cover I've just finished for ESCAPE. It features an alternative ad from the pressbook on the back.
-- Rory<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39098 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 5/3/06 10:21:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time, JLKINSER1970@... writes:
Rory, this cover is awesome!!! I can't make up my mind on which
Beneath cover I like the best; this one or your first one. But, if I
had to pick, I would have to go with this one. What you did for the
back cover is outstanding!!! The Mutants on the top is a neat touch!
I wish I could figure out the Adobe Paint Shop I have so I could
play around with my hand at making some covers!
John
Thanks. All I can say is once you learn how to use photoshop it's pretty easy, and you can do almost anything!
I think you'll like the ESCAPE cover too.
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39099 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Paranoia or what? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 5/4/06 12:32:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
-- Trawling the web I found an interview with David Charkham who played one of the apes in the 'Dawn of
Man' sequence from 2001: A Space Odyssey. Here is a little snippet:
"As for the general vibe on the movie,
Dan Richter and possibly Kubrick were convinced that the Planet of the Apes, being made around the same time, technical crew were spying on us!
One day we were rehearsing in a field on studio grounds and Dan made us all get in a tight huddle as an aircraft flew over in case they had a camera. Rumour had it that everything from the movie was destroyed to
avoid copies etc"
Were they really that paranoid? I find it hard to believe that Chambers and Co would have bothered spying myself!
Neil
This story is very true, but says a lot more about what a paranoid nut case Kubrick was.
By the time Chambers started working on APES, the stuff in 2001 had already been shot. Anyway, Chambers knew nothing of it, and he thought 2001 sucked!
Chambers getting the special Oscar for APES really pissed the 2001 people off!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39100 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Paranoia or what? |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/3/2006 11:32:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
ntfoster@... writes:
Were they really that
paranoid? I find it hard to believe that Chambers and Co would have bothered
spying myself!
Then again it was the Summer Of Love, when substances
abounded.
Brian Wilson was convinced that Phil Specter had him bugged.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39101 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
|
.html .html
I like this one a lot... While I usually do NOT like the "family portrait", I like it in this case... It works very well...
Also, I really dig the baby Milo photo on the back...
The only thing that throws it off for me is the b&w picture on the bottom of the back... I hate to say it, but it may need text back there...
Also, the mini picture on the spine is excellent...<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39102 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39103 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html
.html
Message
-- Another great
cover Rory!
I have uploaded a
copy to the files section but unfortunately due to file size had to
reduce the size by half.
If any one wants
the full size version I'm sure I can send it to them.
Neil
Here's a DVD cover I've just finished
for ESCAPE. It features an alternative ad from the pressbook on the
back. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39104 |
From: kidro85@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Paranoia or what? |
.html
.html
Wow that's crazy stuff, childish also
T
In a message dated 5/3/2006 9:32:33 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ntfoster@... writes:
-- Trawling the
web I found an interview with David Charkham who played one of the apes
in the 'Dawn of Man' sequence from 2001: A Space Odyssey. Here is a little
snippet:
"As for the
general vibe on the movie, Dan Richter and possibly Kubrick were convinced
that the Planet of the Apes, being made around the same time, technical crew
were spying on us! One day we were rehearsing in a field on studio grounds
and Dan made us all get in a tight huddle as an aircraft flew over in case
they had a camera. Rumour had it that everything from the movie was destroyed
to avoid copies etc"
Were they really
that paranoid? I find it hard to believe that Chambers and Co would have
bothered spying myself!
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39105 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Paranoia or what? |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/4/2006 1:20:06 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
kidro85@... writes:
Wow
that's crazy stuff, childish also
Knowing Specter, he may have.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39106 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/4/2006 12:07:25 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
Haristas@... writes:
Here's a DVD cover I've just finished for ESCAPE.
It features an alternative ad from the pressbook on the
back.
I love that ad. I remember being away for the summer
in Montana at camp. And somehow got a movie section
of the paper, in a care package or something, and going
ape that there was going to be a new POTA movie.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39107 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html.html
I can send them directly to anyone too. -----Original Message----- From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, 4 May 2006 15:46:03 +1000
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Escape this DVD cover NOT!
-- Another great cover Rory!
I have uploaded a copy to the files section but unfortunately due to file size had to reduce the size by half.
If any one wants the full size version I'm sure I can send it to them.
Neil
Here's a DVD cover I've just finished for ESCAPE. It features an alternative ad from the pressbook on the back.
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39108 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/4/2006 11:26:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
Haristas@... writes:
I can send them directly to anyone too.
I'd like a full set!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39109 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39110 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Here's Manny... |
.html
.html
Message
Its Friday so a new
UNCLE MANNY'S MUSINGS
is now available. Thanks to Michael and all who contributed. Just click the
link on the Yahoo Home page or use this link:
Neil
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39111 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Uncle Manny #23 |
.html
.html
Message
Neil
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39112 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Speaking of 2001: A Space Odyssey... |
.html
.html
Message
Here's the first
panel from the Mad parody which mentions Apes:
Neil
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39113 |
From: John |
Date: 5/4/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
.htmlAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, PotaDG@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This email message is a notification to let you know that
> a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
> group.
>
> File : /Uncle Manny's Musings/UMM 23.jpg
> Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
> Description :
>
> You can access this file at the URL:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Uncle%20Manny%27s%
20Musings/UMM%2023.jpg
>
> To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
> http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
>
> Regards,
>
> munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39114 |
From: sparkytb2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Rare Beneath photos |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39115 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 5/4/06 3:35:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time, TZer0@... writes:
I love that ad. I remember being away for the summer
in Montana at camp. And somehow got a movie section
of the paper, in a care package or something, and going
ape that there was going to be a new POTA movie.
Yeah, I first heard of ESCAPE in December of 1970 because there was an article in the New York Times about it, and I couldn't believe they were making another one. I couldn't imagine it. Somehow I
figured someone had to blast off from the planet before it exploded, and I remember telling a lie to my cousin that I saw a picture from the new movie in a magazine that showed a spaceship erected in the center of Ape
City. I think he believed me!
Now it's just Whitty that believes my made up stories -- like the one about Tom Baker! Ha! Ha!
-- Rory
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39116 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Men'r'us |
.htmlAgree. Even the fact that 'us' is a word with distinct meaning can
come into play. Something like clansmanship. Either you are part
of 'us' or you are not.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 4:52 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
> -- Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and perhaps
> one to
> follow up in a future story maybe?
>
>
>
> Neil
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of abmac@...
> > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
>
> > Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't have
the
> > Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate that
> > he's a "foreigner"
> > from another area who thinks he's being discriminated against
> > because of his
> > species, when his superiors are really prejudiced against him
> > because of his
> > place of origin.
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39117 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 |
.htmlYes Neil, your mail is in "Hail Caesar".
But to be honest I was really hoping to see some of your art in there!
Next ish?
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 6:12 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Revolution #4
> -- Do we? Cool, can't wait to get my copy then!
>
>
>
> Neil
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
> > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2006 8:09 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Revolution #4
> >
> >
> > just got a copy today.... haven't read it yet but I
> > did scan the letters section and Neil Foster and
> > DrJohnZaiusDavis have letters printed!
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39118 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Dr. Galen |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> You know you think you have seen a movie so many time
> you would have noticed everything about it but I did
> not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory about him
> being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
> perhaps??
>
> --- abmac@... wrote:
>
*** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET without the -us
ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in the Zaius Museum,
which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin" rather
than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin" to me, though others
hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes are there? Zira is
the only named female ape. The males are Zaius, Cornelius, Julius,
Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and Galen (and Marcus,
unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't actually named in the
movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to check the end-
credits to be sure). We don't really know the names of the "Hunt
Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"... of the "Lieutenant"
who tells Julius to prep Number Four for surgery... of the Ape
Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a man!")... etc etc. For
all we know, any number of them COULD have a name that also lacks
the -us ending. Since all the names above are from Greco-Roman times
with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle inventions), and
since the name Galen refers to the most famous physician of
antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow chimp doctor was
named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking around for
a 'classical' name for a character who happens to be a physician,
they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.
It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering about how it is that
these talkin' apes speak the English language -- didn't also wonder
why it is that so many of the names he hears are from Earth's
classical antiquity.
Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I wonder why they
didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which were pretty cool
names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's character "Helius" spoke
in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39119 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: God and Ape |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, TZer0@... wrote:
>
>
> I'm surprised you know so much about religion Pat.
> I thought you're an atheist.
>
*** I'm an agnostic, which means that I acknowledge the fact that I
cannot prove there is no God, though I doubt 'His' existence. Of
course, I can't prove that Leprechauns never existed (or STILL don't
exist in the present day), either... The burden of proof is on the
believer. Whether it's God, or Leprechauns, or Faeries, or Dragons,
or UFOs, or Vampires, or Bigfoot. Extraordinary claims require
extraordinary proof, as Carl Sagan once said.
I believe -- or don't believe -- because I've never had a religious
experience per se, and because my studies regarding the wide
varieties of religious experience and belief have given me a fairly
well-informed opinion on the subject.
Case in point: the biblical "Creation" myth(s). Anybody who's read
GENESIS knows the basic story... the whole shebang is created by
Elohim (a Hebrew plural word that literally means "Gods") in 6 days,
after which "He" (singular) rests on the 7th day. This story was
written in the form we have today in the 8th-to-6th century B.C. (at
the latest, if you believe the current consensus views of reputable
textual scholars) or circa 1450 B.C. (at the earliest, if you are
a "Bible Literalist" who believes Moses himself actually existed and
wrote the Pentateuch).
Yet that story is a blatant retelling of a much earlier Creation myth
dating back well over a millennium before, to ancient Sumer, where
the Heavens and Earth were created by a pantheon of gods (Anu, Enki,
Enlil, Ninmah, Ninhursag, etc). The same 6-day pattern holds in both,
and we know that the 7-day week (which is also supposedly 'created'
by the bible's God in GENESIS 1) pre-existed the Hebrews, when it was
invented by the Sumerians, whose inheritors -- the Babylonians --
gave to the later Jews the very names of the months of the "Jewish
Calendar"... names like Tammuz, Iyar, Sivan, Adar, etc. When did the
Jews 'acquire' the Babylonian religious stories/calendar/traditions,
one might ask? According to the Bible itself, over a century after
the Assyrians conquered the northern 10-tribed nation of Israel in
the 8th Century B.C., the Babylonians conquered the southern nation
of Judah in the 6th Century B.C. and deported the aristocracy of
Judah to Babylon: "By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat, yea! we
wept..." It was while they were in Babylon that they saw Babylonian
religious ceremonies on Babylonian holy days commemorating the
Creation, the Flood, etc etc. When the Persian king Cyrus conquered
the Babylonians, he gave the Jews permission to go back to their
homeland, 70 years after having been forcibly removed from it... and
they took back with them all sorts of myths and religious notions
that they hadn't had before and they incorporated these things into
their religion.
That's how the book of GENESIS acquired its Creation narrative. It
was a 'steal' from the official religion of a so-called 'pagan'
nation. The pantheon of Babylonian "Gods" -- "Elohim", plural --
became a single "God" who just happened to be referred to as a plural
word. That's why he's alternately "nice" (creating Man & Woman,
blessing them, etc)... then "nasty" (wiping out nearly all of them
with a Deluge)... then "nice" (saving some of 'em in an ark). In the
original stories, TWO gods played the major roles: Enki ("Lord of
Earth") created Man and warned Utnapishtim to build a boat, whereas
Enki's half-brother Enlil ("Lord of the Mountaintop") sent the Deluge
to kill the noisy humans who kept him awake at night. The
antagonistic roles of two rival gods in the source myth were
transformed into a SINGLE "God" in the Hebrew re-telling... making
him out to be a god with a bipolar disorder! First he's nice, then
he's a jerk, then he's nice again...
The texts of the original Creation myths were dug up in Mesopotamia
in the 1800's, and when cuneiform was deciphered and these texts
translated, ANYBODY could see that the LATER versions -- the versions
retold in the Bible -- were based on these source stories. There is
no excuse for anybody today to be a "Bible Literalist" -- to insist
that the book of GENESIS is "divinely inspired" and "true history"
and all that garbage. It's not even ORIGINAL. Everybody accepts the
fact that the gods of the Romans were merely renamed versions of
Greek gods (Aphrodite = Venus; Athena = Minerva; Zeus = Jupiter; Hera
= Juno; Hermes = Mercury; Ares = Mars; etc) -- the Romans
acknowledged that they 'adopted' the culture of the Greeks whom
they'd conquered. So, too, did the Hebrews adopt much of the
Babylonian culture, from the calendar to the Creation & Deluge myths
and beyond), but CHANGING it so that a pantheon became Monotheistic.
Even so, they didn't abolish belief in 'other' gods... they only re-
invented them as Cherubim and Seraphim and B'nei Elohim ("Sons of
God") who were the Nephilim/"Fallen Ones" who interbred with sexy
human females to beget the Gibborim/"Mighty Ones" (GENESIS 6:1-6)
just as the Greco-Roman gods routinely fathered (or mothered)
children with mortal humans -- turning these 'other' gods into the
Angels.
As far as I'm concerned, anybody who espouses any belief system based
on a book (or series of books) which has been deconstructed by
competent scholars and shown to be anything BUT divinely inspired...
is, to put it not-so-nicely, a fool or an ignoramus.
That's not to say that there is no god. I can't prove the Universe
WASN'T created by an invisible, intelligent Being. No theist can
prove it WAS, though. They can BELIEVE it all they want, with all
their heart. But, if they're partial to the notion of the Bible
being "inerrant", NOT with all their MIND, if they would bother to
read the Bible's sources, which are obviously polytheistic EARLIER
works, predating the monotheistic revisions introduced in the 6th
Century B.C. or thereabouts, after the "Babylonian Captivity".
If they can't see the obvious, then they're OUT of their minds. That
may sound harsh, but it's no harsher than the beliefs they spout
about Doubters (whom they insist will burn in Hell for all eternity
for not "believing on Christ Jesus as their personal savior"...).
Look at where this God-of-the-Book belief system has gotten us of
late: the War on Terror instigated by insane religious fanatics of
the Muslim persuasion... fought by a religious fanatic of the
Fundamentalist Christian persuasion... ultimately over a small chunk
of real estate bordered by the Mediterranean Sea and the Dead Sea and
currently "occupied" by people of the Jewish persuasion (some of whom
are non-Orthodox, whereas others are crazy ultra-Orthodox messianic
Jews). A crazy jerk who currently is the President of Iran is doing
some sabre-rattling regarding its nuclear ambitions, threatening
to "wipe Israel off the map", and there are those even in the anti-
Iraq War camp who think that Iran is gonna have to be dealt with,
probably with some sort of military action.
All because of religion. If you've ever heard Frank Zappa's
song "DUMB ALL OVER" (from the album "YOU ARE WHAT YOU IS"), it's
amazing how apropos it is in the current world scene. People,
motivated by their religion, can do some wonderful, beautiful
things... creating art & architecture and music to make the heart
soar. And, others -- also motivated by their religion, which they
insist is the "true" religion -- can willingly murder those they
consider to be "unbelievers" or "infidels", even suicidally murdering
others, to become "martyrs".
It's madness. And it comes with the danger of reading TOO FEW books,
and being indoctrinated into believing that ONE particular book is
THE "Book" that one MUST believe in -- NOT putting their own
particular 'sacred' text to the same test they put the scriptures of
their enemies. And none of 'em are worth their parchment, in my
opinion. They don't deserve to be burned, but they don't deserved to
be blindly believed in, either. Call me a "scientific heretic" if
you'd like; philosophically, I'm on the side of the Ziras and
Corneliuses of the world. Too bad the world is run by the Zaiuses and
Ursuses...
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39120 |
From: abmac@i-55.com |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
.htmlAncient Greece and ancient Rome were distinctly different cultures. The status
of a Greek in ancient Rome was much lower than that of a Roman citizen, and a
Greek physican's status was little better than that of a slave.
Serling chose to make a distinction between Galen and the other apes by giving
him a Greek name, when it would've been easy to look up the name of a Roman
physician, and to use one of Boulle's names for the gorilla attendant. Sure,
Galen is better known, but why choose this name for an ambitious and unethical
ape doctor whose superiors are willing to sacrifice him in order to silence
Zira? It's not just because Galen was a physician; it's because he was a
famous GREEK physician who practiced IN ROME.
Unnamed characters are irrelevant, and nothing in the subtitles is canon.
Subtitlers transcribe whatever they THINK they hear, and they often make
mistakes. Since Quentin is a contemporary name and Quintus isn't, your brain
interpreted it as the one that was more familiar to you. It's very common for
people to mis-hear song lyrics that way, also.
Besides, if they HAD named the young chimp Quentin, it could have signified
that he and his mother were visiting from another area, probably while his
father took care of business at one of the ministry buildings. I've noticed
that people rarely go to local museums after their initial visit. I've been to
the Smithsonian in Washington, DC, a lot more than I've been to NOMA.
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
> >
> > You know you think you have seen a movie so many time
> > you would have noticed everything about it but I did
> > not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory about him
> > being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
> > perhaps??
> >
> > --- abmac@... wrote:
> >
>
> *** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET without the -us
> ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in the Zaius Museum,
> which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin" rather
> than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin" to me, though others
> hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes are there? Zira is
> the only named female ape. The males are Zaius, Cornelius, Julius,
> Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and Galen (and Marcus,
> unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't actually named in the
> movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to check the end-
> credits to be sure). We don't really know the names of the "Hunt
> Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"... of the "Lieutenant"
> who tells Julius to prep Number Four for surgery... of the Ape
> Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a man!")... etc etc. For
> all we know, any number of them COULD have a name that also lacks
> the -us ending. Since all the names above are from Greco-Roman times
> with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle inventions), and
> since the name Galen refers to the most famous physician of
> antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow chimp doctor was
> named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking around for
> a 'classical' name for a character who happens to be a physician,
> they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.
>
> It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering about how it is that
> these talkin' apes speak the English language -- didn't also wonder
> why it is that so many of the names he hears are from Earth's
> classical antiquity.
>
> Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I wonder why they
> didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which were pretty cool
> names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's character "Helius" spoke
> in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?
>
> Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39121 |
From: Patrick Tilton |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
.htmlThe historical Galen was actually named GALENUS
CLAUDIUS, who wasn't Greek but from Pergamus in Asia
Minor -- then a part of the Roman Empire since c. 100
B.C. (he died in 193 A.D.). We know him as "Galen" for
the same reason we know of the city of Troia as
"Troy": it is customary in English to truncate certain
placenames from foreign countries. Where the Romans
would call him Galenus (the -us ending indicating the
subject of a sentence), they would say "equus Galeni"
if they wanted to say "Galen's horse". The root of the
word/name is Galen- and in English it isn't all that
rare to see an old name reduced to its root form.
There was an actor named Cornel Wilde (if I remember
right), whose first name is a similar truncated form
of "Cornelius".
Far from being of a "lower status", Galenus Claudius
was an intimate of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius and had
become famous in his day. Rivals who were jealous of
his extraordinary cures attributed it to magic. He is
known to have written no less than 200 books, most of
which haven't survived.
If Serling were to have chosen a name that was
particularly GREEK, it would've been "Hippocrates" (of
"Hippocratic Oath" fame), to whose works Galen
acknowledged his own debt. The patron deity of
Pergamus was Aesculapius (son of Apollo), the God of
Medicine who was struck dead by Zeus on behalf of
Hades due to the fact that Aesculapius' cures were
'robbing' the Netherworld of a steady influx of
population (i.e. the Deceased). Pergamus seems to have
been THE place for a physician to learn his trade and
excel at it.
Contrary to popular opinion, the "lingua franca" of
the Roman Empire was NOT Latin, but Greek. That's why
the New Testament was written in Greek: Greek was the
"international language" back then, during the heyday
of the Julio-Claudian emperors. Roman poets would
write their poetry in Latin, but the language that
people who traveled or did business in (import/export)
was Koine Greek -- the 'common' language. This is the
prime example of Rome making use of Greek culture,
rather than imposing their own on the world. They
imposed Roman GOVERNMENT on the known world where they
could, but they themselves preferred the Greek
culture.
So, then, the name "Galen" was not a Greek name (the
Liddell & Scott GREEK-ENGLISH LEXICON doesn't even
have an entry under the Gamma section with such a
name). His full name being GALENUS CLAUDIUS suggests
that he was a citizen of the Roman Empire -- a Roman,
if not one who was born in Rome. He lived in Rome, of
course, when he was in the court of Aurelius. Hardly
the life of a slave.
We can agree to disagree, but by naming the chimp
doctor "Galen", Serling was doing no more than picking
a name from classical antiquity that had something to
do with the career of a physician, just as somebody in
the future might choose the surname PATTON to depict a
character who is a brilliant military leader. I really
do not see any sense of this being a hint of him being
a foreigner. Serling (and Wilson) were inventing new
characters to superimpose over Boulle's original
story, giving them names that fit in with names like
"Cornelius" and "Helius" in the novel. Not every
"Roman" name has to end in -us, at least as far as the
English version of the Roman name goes. We never refer
to Galen as "Galenus" or Pompey as "Pompeius", even
though the Romans did.
Patrick
--- abmac@... wrote:
> Ancient Greece and ancient Rome were distinctly
> different cultures. The status
> of a Greek in ancient Rome was much lower than that
> of a Roman citizen, and a
> Greek physican's status was little better than that
> of a slave.
>
> Serling chose to make a distinction between Galen
> and the other apes by giving
> him a Greek name, when it would've been easy to look
> up the name of a Roman
> physician, and to use one of Boulle's names for the
> gorilla attendant. Sure,
> Galen is better known, but why choose this name for
> an ambitious and unethical
> ape doctor whose superiors are willing to sacrifice
> him in order to silence
> Zira? It's not just because Galen was a physician;
> it's because he was a
> famous GREEK physician who practiced IN ROME.
>
> Unnamed characters are irrelevant, and nothing in
> the subtitles is canon.
> Subtitlers transcribe whatever they THINK they hear,
> and they often make
> mistakes. Since Quentin is a contemporary name and
> Quintus isn't, your brain
> interpreted it as the one that was more familiar to
> you. It's very common for
> people to mis-hear song lyrics that way, also.
>
> Besides, if they HAD named the young chimp Quentin,
> it could have signified
> that he and his mother were visiting from another
> area, probably while his
> father took care of business at one of the ministry
> buildings. I've noticed
> that people rarely go to local museums after their
> initial visit. I've been to
> the Smithsonian in Washington, DC, a lot more than
> I've been to NOMA.
>
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\""
> <apefan23@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > You know you think you have seen a movie so many
> time
> > > you would have noticed everything about it but I
> did
> > > not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory
> about him
> > > being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
> > > perhaps??
> > >
> > > --- abmac@... wrote:
> > >
> >
> > *** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET
> without the -us
> > ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in
> the Zaius Museum,
> > which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin"
> rather
> > than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin"
> to me, though others
> > hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes
> are there? Zira is
> > the only named female ape. The males are Zaius,
> Cornelius, Julius,
> > Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and
> Galen (and Marcus,
> > unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't
> actually named in the
> > movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to
> check the end-
> > credits to be sure). We don't really know the
> names of the "Hunt
> > Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"...
> of the "Lieutenant"
> > who tells Julius to prep Number Four for
> surgery... of the Ape
> > Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a
> man!")... etc etc. For
> > all we know, any number of them COULD have a name
> that also lacks
> > the -us ending. Since all the names above are from
> Greco-Roman times
> > with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle
> inventions), and
> > since the name Galen refers to the most famous
> physician of
> > antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow
> chimp doctor was
> > named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking
> around for
> > a 'classical' name for a character who happens to
> be a physician,
> > they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.
> >
> > It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering
> about how it is that
> > these talkin' apes speak the English language --
> didn't also wonder
> > why it is that so many of the names he hears are
> from Earth's
> > classical antiquity.
> >
> > Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I
> wonder why they
> > didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which
> were pretty cool
> > names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's
> character "Helius" spoke
> > in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?
> >
> > Patrick
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39122 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Rare Beneath photos |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "sparkytb2005" <sparkytb@...> wrote:
> I thought I'd seen everything, but this guy's stuff is truly original.
> http://stores.ebay.com/planetoftheapesphotos
> Apologies if this has been flagged on the DG before.
-- Thanks MTB! <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39123 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Haristas@... wrote:
> Yeah, I first heard of ESCAPE in December of 1970 because there was an
> article in the New York Times about it, and I couldn't believe they
were making another one.
-- The first I knew about Escape was when I was an 8 year old sat in
the audience at the movie that was put on by the RAAF every Friday
night for the families stationed in Penang, Malaysia in 1971.
I had never heard of Planet of the Apes before that and was blown away
by the movie and it was one of the few I remembered from over that 3
year period of watching latest release movies every Friday.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39124 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Yet another Beneath DVD cover |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "John" <DrZaiusDavis@...> wrote:
> Mine was also already set but i can't view pics till Neil uploads
> them.
-- You may have to adjust some settings in your email program then maybe?
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39125 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Revolution #4 |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
> Yes Neil, your mail is in "Hail Caesar".
> But to be honest I was really hoping to see some of your art in there!
-- I'm just chuffed that I have a letter in a POTA comic! I've never
had a letter published in any comic before.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39126 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
|
.html .htmlAnyone else not getting all the posts?
I have been receiving all the posts from Neil (both his own and the ones to which he replied) but I am not receiving the others (such as from Rory or Dario, etc...)
Also, where is Whitty hiding out all of a sudden?<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39127 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
.html
.html
Message
-- I seem to be
having the same problem Mike. I missed out on the most recent ones
from Rory, Dario, Patrick and the rest. I have been missing out on various posts
for the last couple of days but not always ones from the same people.
I have also not
received some of the messages I should be getting as a group owner as well,
though once again not all of them.
It must be a Yahoo
problem I think?
Neil
Anyone else not getting all the
posts?
I have been receiving all the posts from Neil (both his own and
the ones to which he replied) but I am not receiving the others (such as from
Rory or Dario, etc...)
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39128 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
.html
.html
Message
-- Don't know. I
haven't heard from him for a day or so and my emails to him have been
bouncing.
Neil
Also, where is Whitty hiding out
all of a sudden? <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39129 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
> I seem to be having the same problem Mike. I missed out on the most
> recent ones from Rory, Dario, Patrick and the rest. I have been
missing out on various posts for the last couple of days but not
always ones from the same people.
-- And I just received the message I sent after this one but didn't /
haven't received this one!
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39130 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
.html
.html
Message
I’m in the same boat.
Maybe it was a gift from that quick
visitor we had Neil? J
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil
T Foster
Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 11:33
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Anyone else
not getting all the posts?
-- I seem to be having the same
problem Mike. I missed out on the most recent ones from Rory, Dario,
Patrick and the rest. I have been missing out on various posts for the last
couple of days but not always ones from the same people.
I have also not received some of
the messages I should be getting as a group owner as well, though once again
not all of them.
It must be a Yahoo problem I
think?
Neil
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 11:28
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Anyone else not
getting all the posts?
Anyone else not
getting all the posts?
I have been receiving all the posts from Neil (both his own and the ones to
which he replied) but I am not receiving the others (such as from Rory or
Dario, etc...)
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39131 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
.html.html
Always
here (sorry!).
Just having the same
problems.
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent:
Saturday,
6 May 2006
11:28 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Anyone else not
getting all the posts?
Also, where is Whitty hiding out all of a sudden?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39132 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Anyone else not getting all the posts? |
.html.html
OK – I’m heading to the site
to post....
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil
Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 11:49
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Anyone else
not getting all the posts?
--- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
> I seem to be having the same problem Mike. I missed out on the most
> recent ones from Rory, Dario, Patrick and the rest. I have been
missing out on various posts for the last couple of days but not
always ones from the same people.
-- And I just received the message I sent after this one but didn't /
haven't received this one!
Neil
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39133 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Uncle Manny #23 |
.htmlHey Neil,
Could you please send to me direct and/or to upload to the group?
I did not get this and cannot view it on the group site.
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Neil
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39134 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Speaking of 2001: A Space Odyssey... |
.htmlUmmm.....WHERE?!?!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> Here's the first panel from the Mad parody which mentions Apes:
>
>
>
> Neil
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39135 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Rare Beneath photos |
.htmlThese are GREAT Mark - is this some of the stuff that Joe Russo has
Rory?
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "sparkytb2005" <sparkytb@...> wrote:
>
> I thought I'd seen everything, but this guy's stuff is truly
original.
>
> http://stores.ebay.com/planetoftheapesphotos
>
> Apologies if this has been flagged on the DG before.
>
> Mark T-B.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39136 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.htmlWhat one about Tom Baker?
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 5/4/06 3:35:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
TZer0@...
> writes:
>
>
> > I love that ad. I remember being away for the summer
> > in Montana at camp. And somehow got a movie section
> > of the paper, in a care package or something, and going
> > ape that there was going to be a new POTA movie.
> >
>
> Yeah, I first heard of ESCAPE in December of 1970 because there
was an
> article in the New York Times about it, and I couldn't believe
they were making
> another one. I couldn't imagine it. Somehow I figured someone
had to blast off
> from the planet before it exploded, and I remember telling a lie
to my cousin
> that I saw a picture from the new movie in a magazine that showed
a spaceship
> erected in the center of Ape City. I think he believed me!
>
> Now it's just Whitty that believes my made up stories -- like the
one about
> Tom Baker! Ha! Ha!
>
> -- Rory
>
> -- Rory
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39137 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
.htmlLike Bigus Dickus!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
>
>
> Agree. Even the fact that 'us' is a word with distinct meaning can
> come into play. Something like clansmanship. Either you are part
> of 'us' or you are not.
>
> Dario
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
> Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 4:52 pm
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
>
> > -- Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and
perhaps
> > one to
> > follow up in a future story maybe?
> >
> >
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
]
> > > On Behalf Of abmac@...
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM
> > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
> >
> > > Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't
have
> the
> > > Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate that
> > > he's a "foreigner"
> > > from another area who thinks he's being discriminated against
> > > because of his
> > > species, when his superiors are really prejudiced against him
> > > because of his
> > > place of origin.
> >
> >
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39138 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Naming protocol |
.htmlOh boy am I goiing to steal some of these names!
Garvon is now GarvUS and Gideon is GideUS.
If I was American it would be my patriotic duty!
MichelUS
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "patrickmichaeltilton"
<patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@> wrote:
> >
> > You know you think you have seen a movie so many time
> > you would have noticed everything about it but I did
> > not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory about him
> > being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
> > perhaps??
> >
> > --- abmac@ wrote:
> >
>
> *** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET without the -us
> ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in the Zaius Museum,
> which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin" rather
> than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin" to me, though
others
> hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes are there? Zira
is
> the only named female ape. The males are Zaius, Cornelius, Julius,
> Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and Galen (and Marcus,
> unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't actually named in the
> movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to check the end-
> credits to be sure). We don't really know the names of the "Hunt
> Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"... of
the "Lieutenant"
> who tells Julius to prep Number Four for surgery... of the Ape
> Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a man!")... etc etc.
For
> all we know, any number of them COULD have a name that also lacks
> the -us ending. Since all the names above are from Greco-Roman
times
> with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle inventions),
and
> since the name Galen refers to the most famous physician of
> antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow chimp doctor was
> named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking around for
> a 'classical' name for a character who happens to be a physician,
> they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.
>
> It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering about how it is
that
> these talkin' apes speak the English language -- didn't also
wonder
> why it is that so many of the names he hears are from Earth's
> classical antiquity.
>
> Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I wonder why they
> didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which were pretty cool
> names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's character "Helius"
spoke
> in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?
>
> Patrick
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39139 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: New Doctor Who? |
.html.html
Anyone here a fan?
While I liked the resurrected Battlestar
Galactica, I think by far the best TV Show to have been resurrected and
modified is the new Dr Who.
It has stayed true to the quirkiness of
the original series, but it is more “now”.
The tributes are there (Daleks and the old
favourite villains).
And in particular the last aired episode “School
Reunion” brought back 2 of my favourite characters and also addresses the
whole “Doctor’s Companion” thing that I took for granted to
be platonic buddies in the past.
Michael
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39140 |
From: abmac40 |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
.htmlNone of this stuff about Galen has any connection to Planet of the
Apes. OK, he was from Turkey, not Greece. That doesn't matter. My
point was that most people know that he was a foreigner in Rome.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Tilton
<patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
>
> The historical Galen was actually named GALENUS
> CLAUDIUS, who wasn't Greek but from Pergamus in Asia
> Minor -- then a part of the Roman Empire since c. 100
> B.C. (he died in 193 A.D.). We know him as "Galen" for
> the same reason we know of the city of Troia as
> "Troy": it is customary in English to truncate certain
> placenames from foreign countries. Where the Romans
> would call him Galenus (the -us ending indicating the
> subject of a sentence), they would say "equus Galeni"
> if they wanted to say "Galen's horse". The root of the
> word/name is Galen- and in English it isn't all that
> rare to see an old name reduced to its root form.
> There was an actor named Cornel Wilde (if I remember
> right), whose first name is a similar truncated form
> of "Cornelius".
>
> Far from being of a "lower status", Galenus Claudius
> was an intimate of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius and had
> become famous in his day. Rivals who were jealous of
> his extraordinary cures attributed it to magic. He is
> known to have written no less than 200 books, most of
> which haven't survived.
>
> If Serling were to have chosen a name that was
> particularly GREEK, it would've been "Hippocrates" (of
> "Hippocratic Oath" fame), to whose works Galen
> acknowledged his own debt. The patron deity of
> Pergamus was Aesculapius (son of Apollo), the God of
> Medicine who was struck dead by Zeus on behalf of
> Hades due to the fact that Aesculapius' cures were
> 'robbing' the Netherworld of a steady influx of
> population (i.e. the Deceased). Pergamus seems to have
> been THE place for a physician to learn his trade and
> excel at it.
>
> Contrary to popular opinion, the "lingua franca" of
> the Roman Empire was NOT Latin, but Greek. That's why
> the New Testament was written in Greek: Greek was the
> "international language" back then, during the heyday
> of the Julio-Claudian emperors. Roman poets would
> write their poetry in Latin, but the language that
> people who traveled or did business in (import/export)
> was Koine Greek -- the 'common' language. This is the
> prime example of Rome making use of Greek culture,
> rather than imposing their own on the world. They
> imposed Roman GOVERNMENT on the known world where they
> could, but they themselves preferred the Greek
> culture.
>
> So, then, the name "Galen" was not a Greek name (the
> Liddell & Scott GREEK-ENGLISH LEXICON doesn't even
> have an entry under the Gamma section with such a
> name). His full name being GALENUS CLAUDIUS suggests
> that he was a citizen of the Roman Empire -- a Roman,
> if not one who was born in Rome. He lived in Rome, of
> course, when he was in the court of Aurelius. Hardly
> the life of a slave.
>
> We can agree to disagree, but by naming the chimp
> doctor "Galen", Serling was doing no more than picking
> a name from classical antiquity that had something to
> do with the career of a physician, just as somebody in
> the future might choose the surname PATTON to depict a
> character who is a brilliant military leader. I really
> do not see any sense of this being a hint of him being
> a foreigner. Serling (and Wilson) were inventing new
> characters to superimpose over Boulle's original
> story, giving them names that fit in with names like
> "Cornelius" and "Helius" in the novel. Not every
> "Roman" name has to end in -us, at least as far as the
> English version of the Roman name goes. We never refer
> to Galen as "Galenus" or Pompey as "Pompeius", even
> though the Romans did.
>
> Patrick
>
>
> --- abmac@... wrote:
>
> > Ancient Greece and ancient Rome were distinctly
> > different cultures. The status
> > of a Greek in ancient Rome was much lower than that
> > of a Roman citizen, and a
> > Greek physican's status was little better than that
> > of a slave.
> >
> > Serling chose to make a distinction between Galen
> > and the other apes by giving
> > him a Greek name, when it would've been easy to look
> > up the name of a Roman
> > physician, and to use one of Boulle's names for the
> > gorilla attendant. Sure,
> > Galen is better known, but why choose this name for
> > an ambitious and unethical
> > ape doctor whose superiors are willing to sacrifice
> > him in order to silence
> > Zira? It's not just because Galen was a physician;
> > it's because he was a
> > famous GREEK physician who practiced IN ROME.
> >
> > Unnamed characters are irrelevant, and nothing in
> > the subtitles is canon.
> > Subtitlers transcribe whatever they THINK they hear,
> > and they often make
> > mistakes. Since Quentin is a contemporary name and
> > Quintus isn't, your brain
> > interpreted it as the one that was more familiar to
> > you. It's very common for
> > people to mis-hear song lyrics that way, also.
> >
> > Besides, if they HAD named the young chimp Quentin,
> > it could have signified
> > that he and his mother were visiting from another
> > area, probably while his
> > father took care of business at one of the ministry
> > buildings. I've noticed
> > that people rarely go to local museums after their
> > initial visit. I've been to
> > the Smithsonian in Washington, DC, a lot more than
> > I've been to NOMA.
> >
> > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\""
> > <apefan23@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You know you think you have seen a movie so many
> > time
> > > > you would have noticed everything about it but I
> > did
> > > > not realize this until JUST NOW! Nice theory
> > about him
> > > > being from somewhere else...an illegal immigrant
> > > > perhaps??
> > > >
> > > > --- abmac@ wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > *** Dr. Galen is the only NAMED male ape in PLANET
> > without the -us
> > > ending -- unless you also count the chimp kid in
> > the Zaius Museum,
> > > which one subtitler (at least) has being "Quentin"
> > rather
> > > than "Quintus" [it always sounded like "Quentin"
> > to me, though others
> > > hear "Quintus" it seems...]. How many named apes
> > are there? Zira is
> > > the only named female ape. The males are Zaius,
> > Cornelius, Julius,
> > > Lucius, Maximus, Honorius, Proteus, Marcus and
> > Galen (and Marcus,
> > > unless I'm not remembering it right, isn't
> > actually named in the
> > > movie, just on the posters... though I'd have to
> > check the end-
> > > credits to be sure). We don't really know the
> > names of the "Hunt
> > > Leader"... of the "President of the Assembly"...
> > of the "Lieutenant"
> > > who tells Julius to prep Number Four for
> > surgery... of the Ape
> > > Minister... of the gorilla kid ("Look! It's a
> > man!")... etc etc. For
> > > all we know, any number of them COULD have a name
> > that also lacks
> > > the -us ending. Since all the names above are from
> > Greco-Roman times
> > > with the exceptions of Zira and Zaius (both Boulle
> > inventions), and
> > > since the name Galen refers to the most famous
> > physician of
> > > antiquity, it seems obvious why Zira's fellow
> > chimp doctor was
> > > named 'Galen' -- it was, in a way, lazy! Looking
> > around for
> > > a 'classical' name for a character who happens to
> > be a physician,
> > > they go for the obvious one: 'Galen'.
> > >
> > > It's a wonder Taylor -- in addition to wondering
> > about how it is that
> > > these talkin' apes speak the English language --
> > didn't also wonder
> > > why it is that so many of the names he hears are
> > from Earth's
> > > classical antiquity.
> > >
> > > Although I like Julius (as a character) better, I
> > wonder why they
> > > didn't use the names "Zoran" and "Zanam" -- which
> > were pretty cool
> > > names Boulle invented. I wonder if Boulle's
> > character "Helius" spoke
> > > in a cartoony-high-pitched voice?
> > >
> > > Patrick
> >
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39141 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor Who? |
.html
.html
I’m asking because
I wonder what we can learn from the way they have done the new Dr Who as fans
of the POTA TV Show.
For starters there seems to be a lot more
thought gone into the scripts (which is a bonus seeing as the old scripts were
a great example of story telling most of the time).
I personally do not believe the POTA TV
Show would succeed if a new series started and the shows were like new episodes
of the original TV Show.
While I have seen some great stories that I
wish were shot (eg Values), I wonder how long the fugitive formula would last?
I also liked the “Monument” story Dave B wrote (I liked it more
than Dave did I think because I recall he told me Neil and I could use it but
it required a complete re-write...frankly I thought it was quite fine!). However when I enquired of a comic
publisher I was told in no uncertain terms that anything about the POTA TV Show
would have to take a completely different direction because it failed (that’s
debatable too eh?).
So what’s the consensus here? If you saw a POTA TV Show comic book on
the news stand.....what would you hope for it to contain?
A new adventure that is much
like the other adventures in the TV Show?
Something providing a few answers to what happened to the 3 fugitives (something
other than the “Aged Galen” scenario!)?
And careful here because
if you want more episodes of the TV Show – do you think it would be
doomed to the same fate as the TV Show? Would it therefore
require some kind of clever balance?
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com
[friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of venkie@...
Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 2:11 PM
To:
friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor
Who?
In a message dated 5/5/2006 11:09:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
whitty@... writes:
Were you a fan of the original?
I liked the fifth doctor a lot, and some of the 7th. I wasn't a
major fan. I met Sylvester McCoy once, and saw Tom Baker once, though from a
distance, and met a couple of the companions, at various cons.
Sheila
Eat, drink and be Merry--or Pippin!
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39142 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
.html.html
And that does inspire a story, methinks.
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of abmac40
Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 2:35 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dr. Galen
My point was that most
people know that he was a foreigner in Rome .
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39143 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/5/2006 8:12:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
ntfoster@... writes:
I had
never heard of Planet of the Apes before
So how long was it before you saw the first two?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39144 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/5/2006 10:17:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
whitty@... writes:
How many
named apes are there? Zira is > the only named female
ape.
True, from the early films.
However Conquest carried on the
tradition of female names ending in
A. Zira, Lisa, Zelda. All of the
television names did as well. Kira,
Fauna, Wanda, Jilla, Carsia, etc . . .
If there's one that didn't I can't
think of it. Anyone? Bueller?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39145 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
.html
.html
How's that Before POTA comic coming?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39146 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
.html
.html
Neil’s up to
SOMETHING.....well, he hasn’t done ANYTHING for a WEEK......(lazy
pom!).....
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 4:43 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Naming
protocol
How's
that Before POTA comic coming?
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39147 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html
.html
Message
-- Another 3 or 4 years.
The next one I saw was Planet when it was doing the cinema rounds on a double
bill with Escape just as the TV show was being shown in England. Then later the
same year (I think) I saw Beneath on TV.
Neil
In a message dated 5/5/2006 8:12:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
ntfoster@... writes:
I had never heard of Planet
of the Apes before
So how long was it before you saw the first two?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39148 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
.html
.html
Message
-- Slowly at the moment
unfortunately like everything else I am supposed to be working
on.
Neil
How's that Before POTA comic coming?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39149 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New Doctor Who? |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...> wrote:
>
> Anyone here a fan?
>
> While I liked the resurrected Battlestar Galactica, I think by far
the
> best TV Show to have been resurrected and modified is the new Dr
Who.
>
> It has stayed true to the quirkiness of the original series, but
it is
> more "now".
>
> The tributes are there (Daleks and the old favourite villains).
>
> And in particular the last aired episode "School Reunion" brought
back 2
> of my favourite characters and also addresses the whole "Doctor's
> Companion" thing that I took for granted to be platonic buddies in
the
> past.
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Yeah great show. I was never a fan of the old series, stopped
watching not long after Tom Baker arrived. Eccleston and Tennent
have both put in fine performances and Billie Piper is almost the
heart of the show. Germane Greer reviewed the first series on BBC2
and could n't stop stating how great Piper was!! Got to dash I've
got about 2 minutes before this weeks starts.
Best Graham. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39150 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/6/2006 3:19:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
ntfoster@... writes:
-- Another 3 or 4 years. The next
one I saw was Planet when it was doing the cinema rounds on a double bill with
Escape
I guess that kind of spoiled the ending for you.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39151 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/6/2006 3:19:50 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
ntfoster@... writes:
-- Slowly at the moment
unfortunately like everything else I am supposed to be working
on.
Perhaps doing it in color was a tad ambitious.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39152 |
From: PofTAfan@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html
I first saw planet when I was in Junior high school back in 71. I also
scanned this photo for the group.
-----Original Message-----
From: TZer0@...
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:18:47 EDT
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
In a message dated 5/6/2006 3:19:28 A.M. Central Daylight
Time, ntfoster@... writes:
-- Another 3 or 4 years. The next one I saw was Planet when it was
doing the cinema rounds on a double bill with Escape
I guess that kind of spoiled the ending for you.
SPONSORED LINKS
Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction book
club
Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science
fiction
--------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
-------- <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39153 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
.html.html
In a message dated 5/6/06 1:41:11 AM Central Daylight Time, TZer0@... writes:
However Conquest carried on the
tradition of female names ending in
A. Zira, Lisa, Zelda. All of the
television names did as well. Kira,
Fauna, Wanda, Jillia, Carsia, etc . . .
If there's one that didn't I can't
think of it. Anyone? Bueller?
Galen's mother is named Ann(e), Polar's wife is named Zantes...<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39154 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html
.html
What's this makeup pic from?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39155 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39156 |
From: mike_oz2005 |
Date: 5/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
.htmlShort for AnnA and ZantesA! :)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 5/6/06 1:41:11 AM Central Daylight Time,
TZer0@...
> writes:
>
>
> > However Conquest carried on the
> > tradition of female names ending in
> > A. Zira, Lisa, Zelda. All of the
> > television names did as well. Kira,
> > Fauna, Wanda, Jillia, Carsia, etc . . .
> > If there's one that didn't I can't
> > think of it. Anyone? Bueller?
> >
>
> Galen's mother is named Ann(e), Polar's wife is named Zantes...
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39157 |
From: PofTAfan@aol.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.htmlWhen I won the picture from Ebay, the ad said it was Kim Hunter from
Planet of the Apes.
-----Original Message-----
From: TZer0@...
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, 6 May 2006 19:12:23 EDT
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
What's this makeup pic from?
SPONSORED LINKS
Fantasy science fiction Science fiction books Science fiction book
club
Science fiction magazine Science fiction novel Writing science
fiction
--------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
-------- <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39158 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/7/2006 12:36:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
PofTAfan@... writes:
When I
won the picture from Ebay, the ad said it was Kim Hunter
from
It's not Escape.
Wrong makeup artist.
And the guy form Escape
is the only one she mentions
in her book. I wonder who she
got. It's hard to tell from that angle.
Emile LaVigne, William Tuttle
without a mustache, Ben Nye Sr.
It could be any one of them with
only glasses to go by. The Making
A Monster book has more pictures of
the monsters than it does the makeup artists.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39159 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "abmac40" <abmac@...> wrote:
>
> None of this stuff about Galen has any connection to Planet of the
> Apes. OK, he was from Turkey, not Greece. That doesn't matter. My
> point was that most people know that he was a foreigner in Rome.
*** And my point was/is that Galenus Claudius may not have been born
in Rome (the capitol of the Roman Empire), but THAT doesn't matter,
since he was somebody with Roman citizenship. If Saul of Tarsus (a
city in Cilicia, in southeast Asia Minor) could go from being a rabid
persecutor of Christians on behalf of Judaism... then undergo a
conversion experience on the way to Damascus and become a
Christian... then proceed to become "the apostle to the Gentiles" and
end the book of ACTS OF THE APOSTLES as a prisoner of the Jews,
delivered by them to the Romans for execution and -- the Romans
refusing to do so -- having to resort to appealing to Caesar when the
Jews protest this, it should be recognized that Roman citizenship
pertained to ALL non-slaves throughout the empire, from their
territories in Britannia in the West to Judaea in the East and all
points in-between. Paul was able to appeal to Caesar because he had
rights under Roman Law as a citizen of the Roman Empire.
Rome was the capitol city. Most of the Roman Empire's citizens dwelt
throughout the countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea (called "the
Roman lake"). Galen may not have been born in Rome, but that doesn't
make him a foreigner. If anything, it's like a person from Idaho
going to Washington D.C. to serve as the Surgeon General in the
Federal Government. Being from Idaho doesn't make such a person
a 'foreigner'. Asia Minor was as much a part of the Roman Empire as
Italy was. Hell, later on, after the empire was bifurcated so that
they had TWO capitol cities -- Rome in the East and Byzantium (a.k.a.
Constantinople a.k.a. Istanbul) in the West -- Asia Minor was where
one of those capitol cities was situated, just north of Troy where
Roman legends claimed their ancestors came from (i.e. Aeneas, son of
Priam, taking his son Ascanius/Iulus to Latium after the fall of
Troy, Iulus being the lineal ancestor of Iulius Caesar). And Galen's
home city of Pergamus was a stone's throw from both Troy and
Byzantium, in northeast Turkey/Asia Minor.
Galen -- Galenus Claudius -- was NOT a foreigner. To be a foreigner,
he would have to have been from a country not dominated by Rome. For
example, from sub-saharan Africa or from one of the 'barbaric'
Germanic tribes north of Italy, or from China or India, etc. Galen
was a Roman in the sense that "Rome" signified the Empire and NOT
just the capitol city. In the U.S.A., we don't have a capitol city
named "America" so that one has to literally live IN that city in
order to be an 'American'. A New Yorker is as much an American as a
citizen living in Washington D.C. is. The word(s) "New Yorker" can
really only mean somebody who lives in New York City, but the
word "Roman" means much more than somebody who lived in the city of
Rome; when Rome was the capitol city of an Empire, to be "Roman"
meant to be a citizen of that Roman Empire, regardless of whether or
not you ever were born in Rome, traveled to Rome or lived in Rome.
You say that nothing of this has anything to do with PLANET OF THE
APES, but it has everything to do with your speculations regarding
Dr. Galen being some kind of 'foreigner' from somewhere other than
Ape City. Setting aside the sequels for the moment, it still seems
obvious to me that the inhabited territory of Apedom -- even in just
the first film -- is severely limited. Cornelius' map shows two
territories, the livable areas on the left side of the dashed line
and the Forbidden Zone on the right side. The ocean/sea borders both
territories on the bottom of the map. Maybe the Apes have more
territories "off the map" -- i.e. off the left side of the map, but
Zaius makes rather pointed comments about how "Man is a nuisance"
who "eats up his food supplies in the forest and then migrates to our
green belts and ravages our crops". The subsequent lack of arable
land has led to a food crisis: "It's a question of simian survival"
we are told. In all probability, there are deserts on ALL sides of
the Ape-populated region, so that Zaius can only hope that there are
other jungles beyond the Forbidden Zone, not just to explain the
appearance of Taylor but to possibly serve the apes for their
agricultural needs.
Ergo, the population of the simian world is rather limited, and IN
that all-too-small area they have too big a population to sustain,
given the fact that their crops are being ravaged by locust-like
humans. In all probability, there ISN'T any 'foreign' land from which
a 'foreigner' could come to Ape City.
That's my opinion, at any rate. It's open to debate, though, if
anybody else wants to offer up any other evidence. I've deliberately
left out evidence from the sequels (i.e. from BENEATH,
predominantly), though if I had culled details from BENEATH, I think
it would be effectively proved that Apedom compromises a rather small
territory -- since Ursus feels that the ONLY way to ward off
starvation is to invade the Forbidden Zone, establishing new,
improved feeding grounds there (since the inhabitants known to live
there MUST eat, thus they have food supplies despite the fact that
the Lawgiver had pronounced that whole area deadly). Ursus is
compelled "to expand the boundaries of [the Apes'] ineluctable power"
into the Forbidden Zone rather than in the OTHER direction on the
map, which suggests that there is a desert wasteland across their
OTHER border. Their region is hemmed in by the desert and the sea.
There is no known 'foreign' land where they can hope to grow food to
replace the ravaged crops -- they have to resort to invading the
inhabited Forbidden Zone, to steal THEIR land, to grow crops.
But, Abmac, if you want to believe that Dr. Galen -- lacking the -us
ending to his name -- is a foreigner living in Ape City, go right
ahead. With all due respect, I just don't think that any of the
evidence supports this notion.
Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39160 |
From: abmac@i-55.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
.htmlInstead of Idaho, substitute Puerto Rico. A Puerto Rican in Washington, DC,
will ALWAYS be a foreigner. Ignore it if you like but enough with the
irrelevant crap. It sounds to me like you're just jealous.
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "abmac40" <abmac@...> wrote:
> >
> > None of this stuff about Galen has any connection to Planet of the
> > Apes. OK, he was from Turkey, not Greece. That doesn't matter. My
> > point was that most people know that he was a foreigner in Rome.
>
> *** And my point was/is that Galenus Claudius may not have been born
> in Rome (the capitol of the Roman Empire), but THAT doesn't matter,
> since he was somebody with Roman citizenship. If Saul of Tarsus (a
> city in Cilicia, in southeast Asia Minor) could go from being a rabid
> persecutor of Christians on behalf of Judaism... then undergo a
> conversion experience on the way to Damascus and become a
> Christian... then proceed to become "the apostle to the Gentiles" and
> end the book of ACTS OF THE APOSTLES as a prisoner of the Jews,
> delivered by them to the Romans for execution and -- the Romans
> refusing to do so -- having to resort to appealing to Caesar when the
> Jews protest this, it should be recognized that Roman citizenship
> pertained to ALL non-slaves throughout the empire, from their
> territories in Britannia in the West to Judaea in the East and all
> points in-between. Paul was able to appeal to Caesar because he had
> rights under Roman Law as a citizen of the Roman Empire.
>
> Rome was the capitol city. Most of the Roman Empire's citizens dwelt
> throughout the countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea (called "the
> Roman lake"). Galen may not have been born in Rome, but that doesn't
> make him a foreigner. If anything, it's like a person from Idaho
> going to Washington D.C. to serve as the Surgeon General in the
> Federal Government. Being from Idaho doesn't make such a person
> a 'foreigner'. Asia Minor was as much a part of the Roman Empire as
> Italy was. Hell, later on, after the empire was bifurcated so that
> they had TWO capitol cities -- Rome in the East and Byzantium (a.k.a.
> Constantinople a.k.a. Istanbul) in the West -- Asia Minor was where
> one of those capitol cities was situated, just north of Troy where
> Roman legends claimed their ancestors came from (i.e. Aeneas, son of
> Priam, taking his son Ascanius/Iulus to Latium after the fall of
> Troy, Iulus being the lineal ancestor of Iulius Caesar). And Galen's
> home city of Pergamus was a stone's throw from both Troy and
> Byzantium, in northeast Turkey/Asia Minor.
>
> Galen -- Galenus Claudius -- was NOT a foreigner. To be a foreigner,
> he would have to have been from a country not dominated by Rome. For
> example, from sub-saharan Africa or from one of the 'barbaric'
> Germanic tribes north of Italy, or from China or India, etc. Galen
> was a Roman in the sense that "Rome" signified the Empire and NOT
> just the capitol city. In the U.S.A., we don't have a capitol city
> named "America" so that one has to literally live IN that city in
> order to be an 'American'. A New Yorker is as much an American as a
> citizen living in Washington D.C. is. The word(s) "New Yorker" can
> really only mean somebody who lives in New York City, but the
> word "Roman" means much more than somebody who lived in the city of
> Rome; when Rome was the capitol city of an Empire, to be "Roman"
> meant to be a citizen of that Roman Empire, regardless of whether or
> not you ever were born in Rome, traveled to Rome or lived in Rome.
>
> You say that nothing of this has anything to do with PLANET OF THE
> APES, but it has everything to do with your speculations regarding
> Dr. Galen being some kind of 'foreigner' from somewhere other than
> Ape City. Setting aside the sequels for the moment, it still seems
> obvious to me that the inhabited territory of Apedom -- even in just
> the first film -- is severely limited. Cornelius' map shows two
> territories, the livable areas on the left side of the dashed line
> and the Forbidden Zone on the right side. The ocean/sea borders both
> territories on the bottom of the map. Maybe the Apes have more
> territories "off the map" -- i.e. off the left side of the map, but
> Zaius makes rather pointed comments about how "Man is a nuisance"
> who "eats up his food supplies in the forest and then migrates to our
> green belts and ravages our crops". The subsequent lack of arable
> land has led to a food crisis: "It's a question of simian survival"
> we are told. In all probability, there are deserts on ALL sides of
> the Ape-populated region, so that Zaius can only hope that there are
> other jungles beyond the Forbidden Zone, not just to explain the
> appearance of Taylor but to possibly serve the apes for their
> agricultural needs.
>
> Ergo, the population of the simian world is rather limited, and IN
> that all-too-small area they have too big a population to sustain,
> given the fact that their crops are being ravaged by locust-like
> humans. In all probability, there ISN'T any 'foreign' land from which
> a 'foreigner' could come to Ape City.
>
> That's my opinion, at any rate. It's open to debate, though, if
> anybody else wants to offer up any other evidence. I've deliberately
> left out evidence from the sequels (i.e. from BENEATH,
> predominantly), though if I had culled details from BENEATH, I think
> it would be effectively proved that Apedom compromises a rather small
> territory -- since Ursus feels that the ONLY way to ward off
> starvation is to invade the Forbidden Zone, establishing new,
> improved feeding grounds there (since the inhabitants known to live
> there MUST eat, thus they have food supplies despite the fact that
> the Lawgiver had pronounced that whole area deadly). Ursus is
> compelled "to expand the boundaries of [the Apes'] ineluctable power"
> into the Forbidden Zone rather than in the OTHER direction on the
> map, which suggests that there is a desert wasteland across their
> OTHER border. Their region is hemmed in by the desert and the sea.
> There is no known 'foreign' land where they can hope to grow food to
> replace the ravaged crops -- they have to resort to invading the
> inhabited Forbidden Zone, to steal THEIR land, to grow crops.
>
> But, Abmac, if you want to believe that Dr. Galen -- lacking the -us
> ending to his name -- is a foreigner living in Ape City, go right
> ahead. With all due respect, I just don't think that any of the
> evidence supports this notion.
>
> Patrick <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39161 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: The Might Peking Man |
.html
.html
IFC has a giant ape flick on today called The Mighty Peking Man.
Anyone seen it? It even has a chick in a Nova costume.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39162 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 5/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Dr. Galen |
.html
.html
In a message dated 5/7/2006 1:25:29 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
abmac@... writes:
>
Galen -- Galenus Claudius -- was NOT a foreigner.
Yes, but as cool as his name is
it's still not as cool as Jay Robinson
saying, "Trrribune Gallio!" <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39163 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
.htmlThats funny, but as I thought about it, another more serious idea came
to mind?
Why would the writers use 'us' for all the males?
Perhaps it WAS a reference to roman gladiators. (We'll not bigus
dickus, but spartacus, and his ilk.) That would also explain the lead
up to the character of Caesar himself.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: mike_oz2005 <whitty@...>
Date: Friday, May 5, 2006 11:01 pm
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Men'r'us
> Like Bigus Dickus!
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Agree. Even the fact that 'us' is a word with distinct meaning
> can
> > come into play. Something like clansmanship. Either you are part
> > of 'us' or you are not.
> >
> > Dario
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
> > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 4:52 pm
> > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
> >
> > > -- Anthony, this is a very interesting and new theory and
> perhaps
> > > one to
> > > follow up in a future story maybe?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Neil
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com]
> > > > On Behalf Of abmac@...
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 5:09 PM
> > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Costume tests
> > >
> > > > Dr. Galen is the only male ape in Planet whose name doesn't
> have
> > the
> > > > Roman "us" ending. Perhaps this was done to indicate that
> > > > he's a "foreigner"
> > > > from another area who thinks he's being discriminated against
> > > > because of his
> > > > species, when his superiors are really prejudiced against him
> > > > because of his
> > > > place of origin.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ --------------------
> ~-->
> Home is just a click away. Make Yahoo! your home page now.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/DHchtC/3FxNAA/yQLSAA/9_IolB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39164 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
> Thats funny, but as I thought about it, another more serious idea came
> to mind?
> Why would the writers use 'us' for all the males?
-- It's also interesting that by the time they got to Escape and then
with the next 2 movies they dropped the idea of ending male names with
'us' such as Milo, Aldo, Virgil etc.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39165 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: [pota_tv] New Doctor Who? |
.html
.html
Message
I too think that a new TV show could work but
like you say only if they updated it and made it more adult. I do believe they
would need to use new characters though and maybe have some sort of 'passing of
the torch' from Burke, Virdon & Galen, some sort of conclusion to the
original series. With the advances in technology and effects surely they
could do a new series relatively inexpensively these days?
--- In friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com,
"fanficwriter1966" <fanficwriter1966@...> wrote:
> Thought-provoking
questions, Michael!
> > I haven't seen the new Dr. Who, and have
never seen the original.
> However, I did watch the original
Galactica, and LOVE the new
> incarnation. Can't wait till October,
to see the story continue.
> > As far as a new incarnation of POTA
- I'm not much of a comics buyer,
> so I can't respond to that. But
a new TV series I would like to see
> follow the same trajectory as
Galactica, being that I was a kid for
> the original, and am an adult
now. I'd love to see them get rid of
> the camp and the "aimed at
kids" storytelling. Use the same
> characters but take a more
gritty path. What would REALLY happen to
> two astronauts if they
ended up in those circumstances? Use CGI if
> need be to fill in
some blanks, but take full advantage of advances
> in set-building,
lighting, photography. Lots of atmosphere. (To my
> eye,
anything brightly lit these days looks fake and says "aimed at
>
kids.") That's what appeals to me very strongly now -- anything that
> I can accept as "real." Recognizable real people in a situation
> that's developed finely enough for me to imagine myself as part of
> it. What would I do? How would I react? Some of the
Galactica
> episodes have been well-done enough to deliver a gut punch
(the
> shooting of Adama at the end of season 1, for example). The
old 70's
> campy-kiddy type stuff just didn't do that. For me,
anyway. (And I
> can only give an opinion from my own
perspective.)
> > I do think that if someone were to put together a
21st century
> version of POTA, and aim it at adults, that it would
succeed. The
> themes of the original episodes were fine, but I'm
not sure they have
> as much relevance to a current audience as a new
imagining might have.
> > I'll try to tune in to an episode of Dr.
Who to see how that's put
> together, so I can comment further. I'm
willing to investigate
> anything that involves good, gritty, realistic
storytelling.
> > Thanks again for the questions, Michael! >
> Carol > > --- In href="mailto:friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com">friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com,
"Michael Whitty"
> <whitty@> wrote: > > > > I'm
asking because I wonder what we can learn from the way they have
> >
done the new Dr Who as fans of the POTA TV Show.
> > >
> For starters there seems to be a lot more thought gone into the >
scripts
> > (which is a bonus seeing as the old scripts were a great
example of
> > story telling most of the time). > >
> > I personally do not believe the POTA TV Show would succeed if a
new
> > series started and the shows were like new episodes of the
original
> TV > > Show. > > > > While I
have seen some great stories that I wish were shot (eg
> Values), >
> I wonder how long the fugitive formula would last? > > >
> I also liked the "Monument" story Dave B wrote (I liked it more
than
> > Dave did I think because I recall he told me Neil and I could
use
> it but > > it required a complete re-write...frankly I
thought it was quite
> fine!). > > However when I enquired of a
comic publisher I was told in no
> uncertain > > terms that
anything about the POTA TV Show would have to take a
> > completely
different direction because it failed (that's debatable
> too >
> eh?). > > > > So what's the consensus here?
If you saw a POTA TV Show comic book
> on > > the news
stand.....what would you hope for it to contain?
> > >
> A new adventure that is much like the other adventures in the TV >
Show?
> > > > Something providing a few answers to what
happened to the 3
> fugitives > > (something other than the
"Aged Galen" scenario!)?
> > > > > > And careful
here because if you want more episodes of the TV Show -
> do > >
you think it would be doomed to the same fate as the TV Show?
>
Would it
> > therefore require some kind of clever
balance?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39166 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT! |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, TZer0@... wrote:
> I guess that kind of spoiled the ending for you.
-- I suppose it should have but it really didn't bother me. I really
had no idea what Planet was like and the TV series had just started
which rekindled my interest in the apes I had first seen in Escape
those few years earlier.
I did at first think that Escape was connected to the TV series and
remember commenting to my Mum when I first saw Galen something like
'oh, I know what happens to him in the end, he and some other chimps
go back in time in the space ship'!
But then shortly after I saw Planet on the big screen and from the
start realised it was something totally different to the TV show and
things fell into place and I was completely blown away. I just wish
they had shown it with Beneath and not Escape.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39167 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Might Peking Man |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, TZer0@... wrote:
> IFC has a giant ape flick on today called The Mighty Peking Man.
> Anyone seen it? It even has a chick in a Nova costume.
-- Nope, haven't seen it. Was it any good?
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39168 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Naming protocol |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, TZer0@... wrote:
> Perhaps doing it in color was a tad ambitious.
-- No its not the doing it in colour that is the reason. I didn't get
anything drawn last week due to illness and 'real life' crap.
Neil <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39169 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mighty Peking Man |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 5/8/06 7:10:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, TZer0@... wrote:
> IFC has a giant ape flick on today called The Mighty Peking Man.
> Anyone seen it? It even has a chick in a Nova costume.
-- Nope, haven't seen it. Was it any good?
Neil
IT SUCKED!
-- Rory<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39170 |
From: abmac40 |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Planet and Escape Double Bill |
.htmlI also saw Planet and Escape this way while I was in Middlesbrough,
England. My brother and I went in when the theatre opened and we
stayed until closing time. The movies alternated, and I think we saw
each of them four times. A few days later, I went back alone and did
it again.
Anthony
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil T Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> -- Another 3 or 4 years. The next one I saw was Planet when it was
doing
> the cinema rounds on a double bill with Escape just as the TV show
was
> being shown in England. Then later the same year (I think) I saw
Beneath
> on TV.
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of TZer0@...
> Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2006 4:15 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Escape this DVD cover NOT!
>
>
>
> In a message dated 5/5/2006 8:12:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> ntfoster@... writes:
>
> I had never heard of Planet of the Apes before
>
>
> So how long was it before you saw the first two? <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39171 |
From: abmac40 |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
.htmlAldo, Virgil, Mandemus, and the other apes in Battle were named by
their human owners.
Neil, do you think Milo and Garvon might've been from somewhere else?
Anthony
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Dario Sciola <darios@> wrote:
> > Thats funny, but as I thought about it, another more serious idea
came
> > to mind?
> > Why would the writers use 'us' for all the males?
>
> -- It's also interesting that by the time they got to Escape and then
> with the next 2 movies they dropped the idea of ending male names
with
> 'us' such as Milo, Aldo, Virgil etc.
>
> Neil
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39172 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39173 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Here's Manny again... |
.html
.html
Message
A new
UNCLE MANNY'S MUSINGS is now
available.
Previous
UNCLE MANNY'S MUSINGS are available for viewing
here:
Cheers,
Neil
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39174 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Uncle Manny #24 |
.html
.html
Message
Neil
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39175 |
From: Neil |
Date: 5/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Men'r'us |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "abmac40" <abmac@...> wrote:
> Neil, do you think Milo and Garvon might've been from somewhere else?
-- Yes, I can certainly live with that theory.
Neil <.html
|
|
|
|