|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48625 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: The first 3 movies.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48626 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48627 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48628 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48629 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48630 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48631 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY & the PS3 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48632 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48633 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48634 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48635 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48636 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48637 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48638 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48639 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48640 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/5/2008 |
| Subject: Great Gorilla NEws!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48641 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/6/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48642 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Apes in 3D |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48643 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes in 3D |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48644 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48645 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48646 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48647 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes in 3D |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48648 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: More POTA Blu-ray Info from DVD Active. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48649 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: More POTA Blu-ray Info from DVD Active. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48650 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: HD 3D |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48651 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 8/8/2008 |
| Subject: Re: HD 3D |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48652 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/8/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes in 3D |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48653 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/9/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48654 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/10/2008 |
| Subject: The Complete Planet of the Apes Sunday Observer Special |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48655 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/10/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The Complete Planet of the Apes Sunday Observer Special |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48656 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/11/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48657 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/11/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48658 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/11/2008 |
| Subject: Home Page Pic |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48659 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/12/2008 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48660 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/13/2008 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48661 |
From: Terry Hoknes |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Message from POTA UK Chat Forum |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48662 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3481 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48663 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48664 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: POTA (& KONG) on the screen in El Paso, TEXAS! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48665 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48666 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48667 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48668 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48669 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48670 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48671 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48672 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48673 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48674 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48675 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48676 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48677 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48678 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48679 |
From: John B Kirtley |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48680 |
From: Mark Rice |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: introductory |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48681 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: introductory |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48682 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: introductory |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48683 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48684 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: introductory |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48685 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48686 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48687 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48688 |
From: David Jackson |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48689 |
From: David Jackson |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48690 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48691 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: FAKE news item from the net! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48692 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48693 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/18/2008 |
| Subject: Anniversary Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48694 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/18/2008 |
| Subject: Anniversary Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48695 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/19/2008 |
| Subject: Can anyone do APES screen grabs? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48696 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: CONQUEST stuff |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48697 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48698 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3486 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48699 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3486 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48700 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48701 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48702 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48703 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48704 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48705 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48706 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48707 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48708 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Aussie con |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48709 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48710 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Birthday Reminder |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48711 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48712 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48713 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48714 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48715 |
From: John B Kirtley |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48716 |
From: John |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48717 |
From: Terry Hoknes |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: PLANET OF THE APES MAKE-UP BOOK 2008 Author Signed NEW |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48718 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48719 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: PLANET OF THE APES MAKE-UP BOOK 2008 Author Signed NEW |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48720 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48721 |
From: Terry Hoknes |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: PLANET OF THE APES MAKE-UP BOOK 2008 Author Signed NEW |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48722 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48723 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48724 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3486 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48625 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: The first 3 movies.... |
.html
I'm not at all sure Patrick but I don't think they can just do the extra bits of Planet and Beneath.
I think the handsome (and missing!) Jeff K once explained that it's OK with Conquest and Battle because these are official releases and they exist as such. It's a matter of finding, cleaning and releasing them.
With the others (Planet, Beneath and Escape), I don't think a version with the additional footage was ever released, even to a select audience as with Conquest.
So I think the best we can ask is that the actual missing scenes be released for the other 3 and maybe a clever splice job can show us how it might have been?
Michael
---- patrickmichaeltilton < patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
>
> I wonder if this new Blu-ray Collection will have any extra footage for
> BENEATH and ESCAPE, too. Even if they don't add previously deleted
> scenes into those films, the way they're doing with CONQUEST, it would
> still be nice to see scenes included as "extras"... like the first scene
> in the ESCAPE script (the one showing the Ape-onauts inside the ANSA
> ship as they witness the destruction of Earth).
>
> I sure hope those Making-of Featurettes will include that stuff...
> otherwise we'll probably have to wait for the 50th Anniversary edition
> of POTA on whatever new format they'll have invented by then. Fittingly,
> that would be in the year 2018, which is when I place the events of
> BATTLE (i.e. which is 27 years after the events of CONQUEST, as per
> Mandemus' line regarding the fact that Caesar's armory had been his home
> for that long a time).
>
> I don't have a Blu-ray machine, but I'll be picking up this new edition
> anyway. And, what the hey, I'll probably have to go out and buy a
> Blu-ray machine to play 'em on, too. After all, I have POTA movies on
> Betamax... on Laserdisc... on VHS... on DVD... If this were the same
> stuff I already have on DVD, I might pass on it... but, dammit, I gots
> to get me all those extras! I'm betting that a few of those extra 8
> minutes in CONQUEST will be the teaser scene, depicting a failed attempt
> by an abused ape (a chimp in the John Jakes novelization) to escape
> Breck's city after having physically assaulted his own master... a scene
> referenced later on, in Breck's office during their interrogation of
> Armando. Ye gods, I remember reading Jakes' novelization way back in the
> mid-70s... seeing the Alfredo Alcala artwork depicting that scene in the
> MARVEL adaptation... and then being super disappointed when I finally
> bought CONQUEST when it had first been released on videotape, only to
> find the film opening with the daytime Ape Management depiction.
>
> The lost "tale" of that fugitive chimp being gunned down by Breck's
> security forces would've been a far better way to set the tone for this
> dystopian APES sequel, especially as it's a night-scene. I'm similarly
> bummed out that MGM nixed the original opening scene from their
> adaptation of LOGAN'S RUN, showing the Sandman, Francis 7, hunting and
> "terminating" a Runner. The opening scene of the original novel showed
> Logan gunning down a female Runner, also at night. Ever since the
> mid-to-late 1970's I've "connected" CONQUEST and LOGAN'S RUN
> thematically, due to that similar opening scene... and the notion that
> both societies are depicted as dystopian, oppressive "futuristic" worlds
> which end up being overthrown in a violent fashion. LOGAN'S RUN had a
> happier ending, though. The world of CONQUEST shows us the very
> beginnings of the epoch when enslaved Apes "turn the tables" on their
> masters... with the promise of an inevitable Nuclear War on the horizon,
> "... when your cities lie buried under radioactive rubble...!"
>
> Goddammit! We gotta wait 3 friggin' months for this new expanded version
> of CONQUEST??? Oh, well... we've already had to wait over 3 damned
> decades... :-(
>
> Patrick
>
> P.S. I wonder if we'll get to see bonus extra scenes from PLANET, too...
> like the "Nova's pregnant" scene, and the Hunt Club with the broken
> cage-wagon scene. And the expanded dialogue Taylor has in the cage right
> before the gorillas remove Nova from it. And the scene where Taylor,
> after escaping from his cage, at one point is in the river, a scene I've
> heard about -- and, I think, seen one still photo of -- but is rarely
> mentioned.
>
> We can only hope...
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48626 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
.htmlSo is PS3 a Blu-Ray player too John?
---- John < DrZaiusDavis@...> wrote:
> I have to say I really like the new Blu-ray packaging. That PS3 Santa
> brought my Son is looking like a very wise gift indeed!
>
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 8/1/2008 4:03:07 AM Central Daylight Time,
> > apefan23@... writes:
> >
> >
> > > Here's the packaging...No Liberty! And Apemania faces on the
> discs????
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Well, the packaging is sharper than I expected, so that's a plus
> right
> > there...
> >
> > And yes, they look like APEMANIA faces on the discs to me too... As
> much as I
> > really like the way they restore the original costumes, and their
> repros of
> > the costumes are excellent too, their makeup is lacking... Most of
> the gorillas
> > I've seen aren't bad, but their chimps and orangutans leave a lot
> to be
> > desired... Maybe it's the stuff they make them out of, maybe it's
> their appliance
> > molds but they just don't capture the actual APES look... They're
> close but
> > something just isn't right...
> >
> > I mean this sincerely when I say that maybe Brain at APEMANIA
> should get in
> > touch with Bill Blake... Bill knows how to properly make the
> appliances AND
> > even more importantly he knows how to APPLY it convincingly... I've
> seen the
> > footage of him doing the Caesar speech from CONQUEST and his makeup
> was pretty
> > much right on...
> >
> > (And for those who may want to stir shit up by bringing up the
> past, I am way
> > past any of that business with "THE INTERROGATION"... And even at
> that time,
> > I never denounced Bill's makeup artistry... He should be helping
> those
> > APEMANIA folks get it "right"...)
> <BR><BR><BR>**************<BR>Looking for a car that's sporty, fun
> > and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.<BR>
> > (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?
> ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )</HTML>
> >
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48627 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
.htmlIt's the original unrated version, so YES...I assume it will have the original soundtrack.
---- mlccougar@... wrote:
> In a message dated 8/2/2008 9:43:09 PM Central Daylight Time,
> DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
>
>I'm actually more interested in
> seeing if they restored the original score to the film than I am to see another
> riot officer getting his head bashed... <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48628 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
.html.html
In a message dated 8/3/2008 8:14:10 PM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
It's the original unrated version, so YES...I assume it will have the original soundtrack.
*** We can only hope... I know that there were some tracks that ended up being left off, and I have heard it was because they too were found to be "too disturbing"... Crazy shit if that's true...***
************** Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48629 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
.htmlI heard that too. Actually, everything they cut was to make it more kiddy friendly.
If it is the restored movie and soundtrack, I really DO think it's a completely different movie. Same script, but different feel.
---- mlccougar@... wrote:
> In a message dated 8/3/2008 8:14:10 PM Central Daylight Time,
> sallywhitty@... writes:
>
>
> > It's the original unrated version, so YES...I assume it will have the
> >
>
> *** We can only hope... I know that there were some tracks that ended up
> being left off, and I have heard it was because they too were found to be "too
> disturbing"... Crazy shit if that's true...***<BR><BR><BR>**************<BR>Looking for a car
> that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.<BR>
> (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017
)</HTML> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48630 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/3/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST! |
.html
I mini coffee table book I guess....not sure what's in it...probably pre-production sketches, production photos...... stuff we've seen before....I think the Cinemametro magazine
people put it together.....I'm not really sure...!
--- On Sun, 8/3/08, sallywhitty@... <
sallywhitty@...> wrote:
> From: sallywhitty@... <sallywhitty@...>
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's CONQUEST!
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: "Tim "apefan"" <apefan23@...>
> Date: Sunday, August 3, 2008, 8:24 PM
> Is that a coffee-table book?
>
>
> ---- "Tim \"apefan\""
> <apefan23@...> wrote:
> > Here's the packaging...No Liberty! and Apemania
> faces on the discs????
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 7/30/08, Tim "apefan"
> <apefan23@...> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Tim "apefan"
> <apefan23@...>
> > > Subject: [PotaDG] BLU-RAY CONTENTS--it's
> CONQUEST!
> > > To: "POTA"
> <pota@yahoogroups.com>, "POTA DG"
> <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 10:43 AM
> > > Planet of the Apes Officially Announced
> > >
> > > Posted July 30, 2008 08:36 AM by Josh Dreuth
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Fox Home Entertainment has announced that they
> will
> > > bring 'Planet Of The Apes: 40 Year Evolution
> Blu-ray
> > > Collection'
> > > to Blu-ray on November 4th. The set, which
> features all
> > > five original
> > > 'Planet of the Apes' films, will feature
> BD-50s
> > > utilizing 2.35:1 1080p
> > > AVC accompanied by a 5.1 DTS-HD Master Audio
> soundtrack.
> > >
> > >
> > > The five films - 'Planet Of The Apes',
> 'Beneath
> > > The Planet Of
> > > The Apes', 'Escape From The Planet Of The
> > > Apes', 'Conquest Of The
> > > Planet Of The Apes', and 'Battle For The
> Planet Of
> > > The Apes' - have all
> > > been specially prepared for this release,
> including a
> > > never-before-seen
> > > in the US unrated version of 'Conquest of the
> Planet of
> > > the Apes'.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Extras for this release will all be presented in
> stunning
> > > high definition. They include:
> > >
> > >
> > > Science of the Apes BONUSVIEW - Scientists,
> anthropologists
> > > and
> > > sociologists discuss the facts and fiction of
> the first
> > > film (BD Exclusive)
> > > "Beyond the Forbidden Zone" Adventure
> Game (BD
> > > Exclusive)
> > > "A Public Service Announcement From
> ANSA" in HD -
> > > A mission
> > > report from the agency regarding their brave
> astronauts
> > > (BD Exclusive)
> > > "Evolution of the Apes"- HD featurette
> tracing
> > > the apes story
> > > from the original novel to the screen (BD
> Exclusive)
> > > "Impact of the Apes" - HD featurette on
> how to
> > > market a
> > > worldwide pop culture phenomenon. The story
> behind the
> > > marketing and
> > > merchandising of one of the first ever film
> franchises and
> > > the
> > > series' lasting influence on pop culture
> through the
> > > years (BD Exclusive)
> > > HD Making-of Featurette for Each Sequel (BD
> Exclusive):
> > > Beneath the Planet of the Apes - "From Alpha
> to Omega:
> > > Building a Sequel"
> > > Escape from the Planet of the Apes - "The
> Secret
> > > Behind Escape"
> > > Conquest of the Planet of the Apes - "Riots
> and
> > > Revolutions: Confronting the Times"
> > > Battle for the Planet of the Apes - "End of
> an Epic:
> > > The Final Battle"
> > >
> > > Each Apes sequel will have an isolated score
> track in 5.1
> > > DTS
> > > Master Audio (BD Exclusive)
> > > Commentary by Composer Jerry Goldsmith
> > > Commentary by Actors Roddy McDowall, Natalie
> Trundy, Kim
> > > Hunter and
> > > Makeup Artist John Chambers
> > > Text Commentary by Eric Greene and Author of
> "Planet
> > > of the Apes as
> > > American Myth"
> > > Behind the Planet of the Apes Documentary -
> Includes all
> > > new
> > > interactivity and timeline
> > > Behind the Planet of the Apes Promo (1988)
> > > Planet of the Apes Makeup Test with Edward G.
> Robinson
> > > (1966)
> > > Roddy McDowall On-set Footage
> > > Planet of the Apes Dailies and Outtakes (No
> Audio)
> > > Planet of the Apes NATO Presentation (1967)
> > > Planet of the Apes Vintage Featurette (1968)
> > > A Look Behind the Planet of the Apes (1972)
> > > Don Taylor Directs Escape from the Planet of the
> Apes
> > > J. Lee Thompson Directs Conquest of the Planet of
> the Apes
> > > Six Original Theatrical Trailers
> > > Original Sketches by Costume Designer Morton
> Haack
> > > Photo Gallery
> > > Planet of the Apes Timeline
> > > Interactive Pressbooks
> > > Vintage Apes Newspaper Galleries
> > > Advertising and Lobby Card Galleries
> > > Behind-the-Scenes Galleries
> >
> >
> > <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48631 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY & the PS3 |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> So is PS3 a Blu-Ray player too John?
Chiming in...
When I was researching which blu-ray player to go for I considered the
PS3. The general verdict was that although it's an extraordinary games
console when judged purely on its merits as a movie player it is
pretty mediocre. (One reviewer likened it to using a shoe to bang in a
nail)
You will certainly see a vast improvement over standard def DVD but
even low-end dedicated players will give a better picture - and sound.
(but of course they won't play games).
If you want to play games equally as much as you want to watch movies
then go for the PS3. If it's movies only get yourself a dedicated
player for the same price. Many dedicated players will 'upscale' your
existing DVD movie collection making them look better than you've ever
seen - The PS3 will not.
Dave <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48632 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
.html
OK after much research it is VERY difficult to copy Blu-Ray and that's really why the big movie moguls want us all to switch!
I am looking at transferring it ti an AVI file. Then you can do anything with it.
Also, many of the moves can be flipped to watch in standard DVD format. Would be worth a quick question to Fox:
(1) will the movies also be available in STANDARD DVD?
(2) Will you be able to flip them to play the STANDARD DVD?
Also - is Battle going to be the extended or not, I wonder?
Michael
---- Dave B < smugster2000@...> wrote:
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
> >
> > So is PS3 a Blu-Ray player too John?
>
> Chiming in...
>
> When I was researching which blu-ray player to go for I considered the
> PS3. The general verdict was that although it's an extraordinary games
> console when judged purely on its merits as a movie player it is
> pretty mediocre. (One reviewer likened it to using a shoe to bang in a
> nail)
>
> You will certainly see a vast improvement over standard def DVD but
> even low-end dedicated players will give a better picture - and sound.
> (but of course they won't play games).
>
> If you want to play games equally as much as you want to watch movies
> then go for the PS3. If it's movies only get yourself a dedicated
> player for the same price. Many dedicated players will 'upscale' your
> existing DVD movie collection making them look better than you've ever
> seen - The PS3 will not.
>
> Dave
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48633 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
.html
.html
Yeah, I've been looking to put Fan Sub AVIs on a DVD format. So I
looked at machines that play AVI AND DivX and XVid
files. The one bit of advice I heard was use a stand-alone
machine. Which is a shame, because I also would have liked to put my
collection on disc, but I guess the DVD-R/VCR combos are out. Now they,
who ever they are . . .? They're saying wait and get a DVR/DVD-R
machine. I'd love to just forget all that and have one entertainment
computer. One machine that does it all. Then when Bowser pops up on a late
night infomercial flogging Time Life CD collections, you can just laugh because
you're already playing them on your home video jukebox. The portable one
you take with you in your car. The other one at home is too busy,
monitoring your bugler alarm, watering the lawn, and looking on the satellite to
add to you collection. Won't be long now and it'll be making music videos
out of your movie collection. Soon Werlitzers will all have iPod docks
built into them. Then when you leave you take the music video with you.
But when the credits from your quarters run out the file will self destruct like
a Jim Phelps tape recording on IM.
In a message dated 8/4/2008 1:48:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
I am
looking at transferring it ti an AVI file. Then you can do anything with
it.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48634 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
.html
I think I heard both versions of Battle will be on there but don't quote me!
--- On Mon, 8/4/08, sallywhitty@...
<sallywhitty@...> wrote:
From: sallywhitty@... <sallywhitty@...>
Subject: [PotaDG] BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Cc: "Dave B" <smugster2000@...> Date: Monday, August 4, 2008, 2:47 AM
OK after much research it is VERY difficult to copy Blu-Ray and that's really why the big movie moguls want us all to switch!
I am looking at transferring it ti an AVI file. Then you can do anything with it.
Also, many of the moves can be flipped to watch in standard DVD format. Would be worth a quick question to Fox:
(1) will the movies also be available in STANDARD DVD?
(2) Will you be able to flip them to play the STANDARD DVD?
Also - is Battle going to be the extended or not, I wonder?
Michael
---- Dave B <smugster2000@ yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > So is PS3 a Blu-Ray player too John?
>
> Chiming in...
>
> When I was researching which blu-ray player to go for I considered the
> PS3. The general verdict was that although it's an extraordinary games
> console when judged purely on its merits as a movie player it is
> pretty mediocre. (One reviewer likened it to using a shoe to bang in a
> nail)
>
> You will certainly see a vast improvement over standard def DVD but
> even low-end dedicated players will give a better picture - and sound.
> (but of course they won't play games).
>
> If you want to play games equally as much as you want to watch movies
> then go for the PS3. If it's movies only get yourself a dedicated
> player for the same price. Many dedicated players will 'upscale' your
> existing DVD movie collection making them look better than you've ever
> seen - The PS3 will not.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
|
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48635 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
.htmlI'd guess that some bright spark (not necessarily a POTA fan) will
find a way to convert these movies onto avi files or similar, and
make them available for download through a torrent site. Especially
if there's new material on them. The people who contribute to these
sites seem to be one step ahead of anything that's put in their way.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> OK after much research it is VERY difficult to copy Blu-Ray and
that's really why the big movie moguls want us all to switch!
>
> I am looking at transferring it ti an AVI file. Then you can do
anything with it.
>
> Also, many of the moves can be flipped to watch in standard DVD
format. Would be worth a quick question to Fox:
>
> (1) will the movies also be available in STANDARD DVD?
>
> (2) Will you be able to flip them to play the STANDARD DVD?
>
> Also - is Battle going to be the extended or not, I wonder?
>
> Michael
>
>
> ---- Dave B <smugster2000@...> wrote:
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <sallywhitty@> wrote:
> > >
> > > So is PS3 a Blu-Ray player too John?
> >
> > Chiming in...
> >
> > When I was researching which blu-ray player to go for I
considered the
> > PS3. The general verdict was that although it's an extraordinary
games
> > console when judged purely on its merits as a movie player it is
> > pretty mediocre. (One reviewer likened it to using a shoe to bang
in a
> > nail)
> >
> > You will certainly see a vast improvement over standard def DVD
but
> > even low-end dedicated players will give a better picture - and
sound.
> > (but of course they won't play games).
> >
> > If you want to play games equally as much as you want to watch
movies
> > then go for the PS3. If it's movies only get yourself a dedicated
> > player for the same price. Many dedicated players will 'upscale'
your
> > existing DVD movie collection making them look better than you've
ever
> > seen - The PS3 will not.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48636 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
.htmlNeil
I have an entire computer dedicated to such sites so I can see Time Team, Dr Who, Lost, Ashes to Ashes, Family Guy, the Simpsons, Heroes, the Wire (well, no longer) etc within 6 months of their showing (that's how
long it takes for Aussies to see most of these).
I am fairly sure there are no Blu-Ray avi files there, but I'll have a deeper probe tionight.
Michael
---- nlmoxham < neilmoxham@...> wrote:
> I'd guess that some bright spark (not necessarily a POTA fan) will
> find a way to convert these movies onto avi files or similar, and
> make them available for download through a torrent site. Especially
> if there's new material on them. The people who contribute to these
> sites seem to be one step ahead of anything that's put in their way.
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
> >
> > OK after much research it is VERY difficult to copy Blu-Ray and
> that's really why the big movie moguls want us all to switch!
> >
> > I am looking at transferring it ti an AVI file. Then you can do
> anything with it.
> >
> > Also, many of the moves can be flipped to watch in standard DVD
> format. Would be worth a quick question to Fox:
> >
> > (1) will the movies also be available in STANDARD DVD?
> >
> > (2) Will you be able to flip them to play the STANDARD DVD?
> >
> > Also - is Battle going to be the extended or not, I wonder?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > ---- Dave B <smugster2000@...> wrote:
> > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <sallywhitty@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So is PS3 a Blu-Ray player too John?
> > >
> > > Chiming in...
> > >
> > > When I was researching which blu-ray player to go for I
> considered the
> > > PS3. The general verdict was that although it's an extraordinary
> games
> > > console when judged purely on its merits as a movie player it is
> > > pretty mediocre. (One reviewer likened it to using a shoe to bang
> in a
> > > nail)
> > >
> > > You will certainly see a vast improvement over standard def DVD
> but
> > > even low-end dedicated players will give a better picture - and
> sound.
> > > (but of course they won't play games).
> > >
> > > If you want to play games equally as much as you want to watch
> movies
> > > then go for the PS3. If it's movies only get yourself a dedicated
> > > player for the same price. Many dedicated players will 'upscale'
> your
> > > existing DVD movie collection making them look better than you've
> ever
> > > seen - The PS3 will not.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48637 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
.html.html
In a message dated 8/4/2008 1:47:50 AM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
Also - is Battle going to be the extended or not, I wonder?
Yes
, The extended cut of BATTLE will be on the set...
**************
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48638 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
.html.html
| Reminder from: |
|
PotaDG Yahoo! Group |
| |
| Title: |
|
Natalie Trundy's Birthday |
| |
| Date: |
|
Tuesday August 5, 2008 |
| Time: |
|
All Day
|
| Repeats: |
|
This event repeats every year. |
| Notes: |
|
Happy Birthday Natalie! (Albina: Beneath the Planet of the Apes (1970) Dr. Stephanie 'Stevie' Branton: Escape from the POTA (1971)
Lisa: Conquest of the POTA (1972), Battle for the POTA (1973)) |
| |
| Yahoo! Greetings: |
|
Send a Yahoo! Greeting
|
| Yahoo! Shopping: |
|
Browse Yahoo! Shopping Gift Guide
|
| |
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48639 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 8/4/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48640 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/5/2008 |
| Subject: Great Gorilla NEws!! |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48641 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/6/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
.html
.html
No doubt in the near future as the lines blur
a computer/TV will search for programming
that might pique ones interest, and none too soon.
In a message dated 8/4/2008 7:29:56 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
I have
an entire computer dedicated to such sites so I can see Time Team, Dr Who,
Lost, Ashes to Ashes, Family Guy, the Simpsons, Heroes, the Wire (well, no
longer) etc within 6 months of their showing (that's how long it takes for
Aussies to see most of these). <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48642 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Apes in 3D |
|
.html What's up gang? Alex here. Long time no speak.
Just heard the news on POTA on Blu-ray. Fantastic news! Especially
since I've developed a pair of glasses that allows you to see HD in 3D.
The way the glasses work is that it allows you to see HDTV much sharper
than HD while giving you complete depth and perception between
charaters in the picture as well as backdrops. It's very cool. Works
great with Planet of the Apes on regular DVD so it's going to work even
better on Blu-ray. Simply because the sharper the picture, the greater
the 3D effect works. Which is why I refer to it as "HD in 3D."
They only cost me pennies to make so once I have a few made I'll ship
them out to you guys for free.
For those of you who don't know or remember me. I'm Alex. I counted
down Tim Burton's POTA 2001, also had an apes site "POTA Collective"
along with a couple of other ape sites.
Cheers!
Alex <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48643 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes in 3D |
.html
.html
That would be spectacular!
Jeff B
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 4:22
AM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [PotaDG] Apes
in 3D
What's up gang? Alex here. Long time no speak. Just heard the news on
POTA on Blu-ray. Fantastic news! Especially since I've developed a pair of
glasses that allows you to see HD in 3D. The way the glasses work is that
it allows you to see HDTV much sharper than HD while giving you complete
depth and perception between charaters in the picture as well as
backdrops. It's very cool. Works great with Planet of the Apes on regular
DVD so it's going to work even better on Blu-ray. Simply because the
sharper the picture, the greater the 3D effect works. Which is why I refer
to it as "HD in 3D."
They only cost me pennies to make so once I have a
few made I'll ship them out to you guys for free.
For those of you
who don't know or remember me. I'm Alex. I counted down Tim Burton's POTA
2001, also had an apes site "POTA Collective" along with a couple of other
ape sites.
Cheers! Alex
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48644 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> I'm not at all sure Patrick but I don't think they can just do the
extra bits of Planet and Beneath.
>
> I think the handsome (and missing!) Jeff K once explained that it's
OK with Conquest and Battle because these are official releases and
they exist as such. It's a matter of finding, cleaning and releasing
them.
>
> With the others (Planet, Beneath and Escape), I don't think a
version with the additional footage was ever released, even to a
select audience as with Conquest.
>
> So I think the best we can ask is that the actual missing scenes be
released for the other 3 and maybe a clever splice job can show us
how it might have been?
>
> Michael
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48645 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: BLU-RAY or not Blu-Ray...that is the question... |
.htmlAs I said last week, James seemed confident that this would see the
first release of the extended 'Battle' in the European region. I had
to use a torrent site for my copy.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> Mike - where did you read this?!?!?
>
>
> ---- mlccougar@... wrote:
> > In a message dated 8/4/2008 1:47:50 AM Central Daylight Time,
> > sallywhitty@... writes:
> >
> >
> > > Also - is Battle going to be the extended or not, I wonder?
> > >
> > > Yes, The extended cut of BATTLE will be on the
set...<BR><BR><BR>**************<BR>Looking
> > for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read
reviews on AOL Autos.<BR>
> >
> > (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?
ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )</HTML>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48646 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
.htmlPatrick - do you think any of the new material would contradict the
established facts? I mean, the original 'Conquest' would have ended
on a note of violent retribution (with the death of Brent?),
but 'Battle' was built upon the revised ending, with Caesar trying to
build an integrated community. That's the only example I can think
of, but there might be others?
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "patrickmichaeltilton"
<patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
>
> *** I probably didn't make myself as clear as I should've. Let me
> give it another go.
>
> Regarding the additional footage for CONQUEST, it seems we're being
> given a "director's cut" or "uncut" version, perhaps the same
version
> that was shown to preview audiences -- some of whom freaked -- and
> which was then edited to expunge some of the worst of the Watts
Riots-
> type footage. I'm hoping that this 'new' version of CONQUEST has
> everything they shot put back into it insofar as the film had been
> scripted and that script had been filmed.
>
> BATTLE, we already have in an "extended" cut, now, and I'm happy
with
> that... although I still would like to see other scenes that were
> probably filmed yet still haven't been included. Remember the scene
> where MacDonald, 'Teacher' Abe, and the blonde eat an illegal
rabbit
> dinner just prior to the trip to the Forbidden City? I'd like to
see
> that scene, too...
>
> As for PLANET, BENEATH and ESCAPE, I'm not holding out any hope
that
> any "extended cut" versions will be released soon or ever, but I
> would like to see a "deleted scenes" section, where they show ALL
the
> stuff they filmed for all the 5 movies in snippets that you can
> either play one-at-a-time or "play-all"... just like every other
> decent DVD "extras" feature for movies routinely released to DVD.
>
> I'd also like to see "extended scenes"... like the full
> Ursus "Citizens' Council" speech (it's evident, comparing the scene
> as-it-is with the screenplays, that there was more dialogue
there...
> but much of it ended up being trimmed out). This stuff has to exist
> somewhere, and jeez louise, but I'd give one of my kidneys to see
ALL
> of this footage included as "bonus" features, even if it isn't
> rejiggered into an "extended cut" version for each film. Hell, some
> enterprising POTA fan could then make a "rogue cut" version of each
> film, reincorporating that footage where it belongs [although I'm
> sure FOX would probably sic the lawyers on 'em pronto].
>
> This may be an improbable wish-list, but I don't wish for it merely
> as a POTA fan: I want to have access to every frame of these films
> for the sake of my DESTINY OF THE PLANET OF THE APES mega-novel
> project. I want to incorporate as much filmed data as I can, even
if
> it isn't included as part of any official "cut" of a film. For
> example, if I include ONLY the dialogue that exists on-screen, then
> my Citizen's Council Ursus speech scene will have less dialogue
than
> the Michael Avallone novelization, which of course was based on one
> of the screenplays prior to the trimmed release-version of BENEATH.
> If, however, the FULL filmed scene could be released as part of
> a "deleted scenes" archive of "extras"... then I would be more than
> happy to include that extra dialogue in my novel(-ization).
>
> A couple decades ago they released "THE COMPLEAT BEATLES"... I want
> my project to be a "COMPLEAT POTA" (with original extras by moi, of
> course).
>
> Patrick
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48647 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes in 3D |
.htmlI'm on vacation next week so I'll be able to ship out a few HD-3D
glasses before I leave for Washington D.C. late in the week.
For anyone interested in the glasses, send me a mailing address at
potacollective@... and I'll get them out to you before I
leave. You'll never see Planet of The Apes the sameway again. :)
Cheers.
Al
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff" <skintricks@...> wrote:
>
> That would be spectacular!
>
> Jeff B
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: pota1968
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 4:22 AM
> Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [PotaDG] Apes in 3D
>
>
> What's up gang? Alex here. Long time no speak.
> Just heard the news on POTA on Blu-ray. Fantastic news!
Especially
> since I've developed a pair of glasses that allows you to see HD
in 3D.
> The way the glasses work is that it allows you to see HDTV much
sharper
> than HD while giving you complete depth and perception between
> charaters in the picture as well as backdrops. It's very cool.
Works
> great with Planet of the Apes on regular DVD so it's going to
work even
> better on Blu-ray. Simply because the sharper the picture, the
greater
> the 3D effect works. Which is why I refer to it as "HD in 3D."
>
> They only cost me pennies to make so once I have a few made I'll
ship
> them out to you guys for free.
>
> For those of you who don't know or remember me. I'm Alex. I
counted
> down Tim Burton's POTA 2001, also had an apes site "POTA
Collective"
> along with a couple of other ape sites.
>
> Cheers!
> Alex
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48648 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: More POTA Blu-ray Info from DVD Active. |
.htmlHere's some more info from DVD Active. Boxset pictures provided.
Link:
http://www.dvdactive.com/news/releases/the-planet-of-the-apes.html"
And it seems that someone got a qoute from somewhere about Conquest.
Quote: "As a special treat for Apes fans, the collection includes an
unrated version of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes. Previously
unreleased in the United States, this version includes eight minutes of
unrated footage."
So in terms of Conquest, it isn't the test screening version which
never reached theaters but rather an unrated version that was never
released in the United States. Which include 8 extra minutes of unrated
footage. If what was quoted is true. I'm hoping for screen test
version.
You read more on fan reactions at:
http://www.dvdactive.com/news/releases/the-planet-of-the-apes.html"
Al <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48649 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: Re: More POTA Blu-ray Info from DVD Active. |
.htmlI think this is the TYEST version with origianl score and they mean
never OFFICIALLY released in the USA (released, and test screened,
are surely two different things...)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "pota1968" <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> Here's some more info from DVD Active. Boxset pictures provided.
>
> Link:
> http://www.dvdactive.com/news/releases/the-planet-of-the-apes.html"
>
> And it seems that someone got a qoute from somewhere about Conquest.
> Quote: "As a special treat for Apes fans, the collection includes
an
> unrated version of Conquest of the Planet of the Apes. Previously
> unreleased in the United States, this version includes eight
minutes of
> unrated footage."
>
> So in terms of Conquest, it isn't the test screening version which
> never reached theaters but rather an unrated version that was never
> released in the United States. Which include 8 extra minutes of
unrated
> footage. If what was quoted is true. I'm hoping for screen test
> version.
>
> You read more on fan reactions at:
> http://www.dvdactive.com/news/releases/the-planet-of-the-apes.html"
>
> Al
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48650 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/7/2008 |
| Subject: HD 3D |
.html
.html
I read a review on HD 3D Glasses. I don't know if they were Anaglyph
or
Anachrome, but they said the effect was negligible on Non-3D HD and
not
worth it for 3D movies. I have some 3D TV glasses that have some
3D
effect without electronics, but it takes so long to get used to them,
with one lens thick and shaded and the other lens clear, that I
almost never wear them. I'll wait for "no glasses required 3D.
I have noticed since getting an HD Box that I do prefer to
watch TV in the 16:9 aspect ration than in HD when given
a choice. I only have one widescreen TV, and didn't
realize how much more I don't like the black bars
on a widescreen set than I did the letterbox on
a 4:3 aspect ration screen. It makes a difference.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48651 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 8/8/2008 |
| Subject: Re: HD 3D |
.html.html
Well, the difference is that I made these 3D HD glasses. So it's not the ones you buy online.
These are Custom Made by me. And for free you can't beat the price. :)
Watching HD 3D is not something you'll do 24/7 but something you'll do to simply see a favorite movie, sporting event or TV show in a much different way. And believe me these work. Any HD TV.
Plasma, LCD, Pal or NTSC format. Make no difference.
All you need is an HD TV and an HD signal - TV or DVD.
Al
----- Original Message ----
From: "TZer0@..." <TZer0@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2008 9:20:42 PM Subject: [PotaDG] HD 3D
I read a review on HD 3D Glasses. I don't know if they were Anaglyph or
Anachrome, but they said the effect was negligible on Non-3D HD and not
worth it for 3D movies. I have some 3D TV glasses that have some 3D
effect without electronics, but it takes so long to get used to them,
with one lens thick and shaded and the other lens clear, that I
almost never wear them. I'll wait for "no glasses required 3D.
I have noticed since getting an HD Box that I do prefer to
watch TV in the 16:9 aspect ration than in HD when given
a choice. I only have one widescreen TV, and didn't
realize how much more I don't like the black bars
on a widescreen set than I did the letterbox on
a 4:3 aspect ration screen. It makes a difference.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48652 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/8/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes in 3D |
.html
.html
Wow! You can't beat free.
I think I paid 20 - 30 bucks
for mine. Good ones though.
In a message dated 8/7/2008 7:50:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
pota1968@... writes:
They
only cost me pennies to make so once I have a few made I'll ship them out
to you guys for free.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48653 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/9/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@...> wrote:
Patrick - do you think any of the new material would contradict the established facts? I mean, the original 'Conquest' would have ended on a note of violent retribution (with the death of Brent?), but
'Battle' was built upon the revised ending, with Caesar trying to build an integrated community. That's the only example I can think of, but there might be others?
_____________________________________________________________
*** You mean "the death of Breck" -- not of Brent -- right?
Did they actually depict (on film) the death of Breck? If the original preview cut of CONQUEST ended with Caesar shouting "... and that day is upon you now!"
... well, Breck was still alive for that. It is in John Jakes' novelization where Breck is depicted being strung up by the wrists, a foot or two off the ground, and whipped with a belt by each of the apes in
their turn... yet this was never filmed, I'm pretty sure, since it is during Caesar's final speech that Breck -- in the movie -- is depicted groveling on the ground with a group of gorillas looming over him.
Where Jakes depicts Breck being whipped, and shrieking, during Caesar's bellicose speech, the actual film did not depict this.
Even in Jakes' novelization, Breck doesn't necessarily die. He writes:
Cries of animal fury filled the plaza. Governor Breck's twitching body finally went limp. The screeching of the frustrated apes grew louder as they searched for new targets
for their unleashed resentment. By twos and threes, they broke away from the circle of light where Breck's body turned slowly. They raced toward the growing crowd of human prisoners in the holding area.
Now, this seems
as if Breck dies... but could just as easily be interpreted as meaning that he passed out completely from the pain. The apes who'd been whipping him were "frustrated" because they were deriving
pleasure from hearing Breck shriek every time the belt lashed his back. Once he passed out and stopped twitching, the apes torturing him couldn't get their kicks anymore. So... I don't think his death is
unequivocally depicted in Jakes' version -- at the most, it is hinted; but, even so, it is open to my interpretation, too.
As far as the tacked-on ending of CONQUEST, there have been times when I wish they never would've added it. So a preview audience freaked out... so what? That original ending -- harsh though it was -- had a
hard-hitting feel to it that would've made a more stunning impact, I think.
And yet... I also like that added scene. I like the idea that Lisa -- depicted as the first so-called "primitive" ape to acquire speech -- utters her first word: "No!"
If you remember, Cornelius told Hasslein that it would be an ape named Aldo who would be the first ape to "articulate"... voicing his refusal to a human master: "He... said...
'No'."
How ironic, then, for the true "savior" of the Apes to have succeeded in turning the tables on Man in this first battle... to be viciously prophetic about the approaching downfall of Man... to have
provided MacDonald a preview of how Apes will treat Man in the future...
... and then for Lisa, whom Caesar obviously cares about, to defy
his violent plan for Man's subjugation by Apes. Her protest had been hinted at earlier, when Caesar was collecting all those weapons in the warehouse/hide-out: Lisa, in the foreground, clearly is shown with a
sad, worried expression. It is one thing to defy human mastery by tossing aside the book she was carrying to her mistress... but using meat-cleavers, restaurant-stolen knives, etc etc, to fight back and revenge
themselves against their (at times) cruel masters... her intrinsic pacifistic personality doesn't like the soon-to-be-unleashed violence Caesar had been planning.
Thus, when she says "No!" in response to Caesar's harangue... it is like somebody doused Caesar with a bucket of cold water. Somebody whose opinion he cares about. Somebody whose good graces he wishes to
remain in. Perhaps that's what it took to get him to remember that he owes his life to two humans: Armando -- who raised him, taught him that people must love each other or die, and who literally died
for his sake -- and MacDonald, who cut the power to the electrocution table (the very table on which the "NO!" conditioning took place) to prevent Kolp's order from being carried out.
If Man, as a species, is "evil" in his view... how does he explain the exceptions to whom he owes his very life? It seems to me that Caesar has an "epiphany" of sorts: he comes to realize that the
human race has Good and Evil in it... but that Apes do not have the intrinsic Evil that had plagued human history. Man is a species which needs to be ruled, yes... but with compassion and understanding. To nurture the
Good in him, and to repress the Evil. It will take the murder of his own son by an Ape to convince Caesar that the Apes, too, have their share of intrinsic Evil... that they are no better than Man.
I wish I knew what all the "new material" actually is... but until I see it, I don't have much of a clue whether or not it might contradict any established facts. I suspect that there won't be any
real problems in this regard, however. Remember when they re-released STAR WARS as a "Special Edition"... putting back into it certain scenes that had been scripted and filmed, yet trimmed from the original
release? I'm thinking, in specific, of the scene where Han Solo meets Jabba the Hutt at the docking area where the Millennium Falcon awaits. Jabba had originally been portrayed by a burly dude who was just as human
as Han Solo. They had to use CGI to create a Jabba that resembled the character we saw in RETURN OF THE JEDI and "matte" it over the original footage, and also re-doing the dialogue Jabba speaks and subtitling
the dialogue originally spoken by the actor who originally played Jabba in that scene. In order to make sense of it, they had to animate Jabba reacting to Han stepping on his slug-tail (since Han had walked around the
human-Jabba in the filmed footage). At the very end of this scene, Han refers to Jabba as "a wonderful human being"... which doesn't make any fucking sense! If Lucas had always
intended Jabba to be that slug-thing, then he wouldn't have written that dialogue for STAR WARS and then filmed it. It's clear that Lucas changed
his initial conception of Jabba as a human being when they were prepping RETURN OF THE JEDI, and opted to re-make him as a giant slug -- which was okay as long as that edited footage from STAR WARS was still on the
cutting room floor.
But when they made the "Special Edition" they added that footage back into it... and since they couldn't very well portray Jabba as a human -- since audiences already "knew" that Jabba was a
big slug -- they CGI'd him over the human actor. But that line of dialogue still doesn't make any goddamned sense, and it never will. That
is an example of "new material" contradicting "established facts"... but I don't see such problems with any filmed-from-script scenes from the POTA films.
But, even if there are
some supposed contradictions on the horizon... I'm not worried. Not one bit! After all, I'm the goddamned King of Unflubbers! If I can unflub the 3978-versus-3955 Earth-Time dates, then I can unflub
whatever the hell else might show up as "extras" on this new Blu-Ray set. ;-)
Patrick
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48654 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/10/2008 |
| Subject: The Complete Planet of the Apes Sunday Observer Special |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48655 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/10/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The Complete Planet of the Apes Sunday Observer Special |
.html.html
In a message dated 8/10/2008 8:49:44 AM Central Daylight Time, apefan23@... writes:
http://notesfromthejunkyard.blogspot.com/2008/08/complete-planet-of-apes-sunday-observer.html/blockquote>
This thing is pretty cool... I'd like if someone decided to print up some repros of it...
**************
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48656 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/11/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
.htmlYes, Breck of course! (Boy, is my face red!)
I'm familiar with that Jabba scene, that's a good example. But I think
it also highlights the differences between the two franchises: Lucas is
right on the button in terms of continuity, that's not such a priority
for the owners of POTA. Can you imagine them CGI-ing an extra character
into the unreleased footage? I think not. (The two McDonald brothers
together anyone?)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "patrickmichaeltilton"
<patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
>
> *** You mean "the death of Breck" -- not of Brent -- right? <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48657 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/11/2008 |
| Subject: Re: The first 3 movies.... |
.html.html
J
!!!!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
Sent: Monday, 11 August 2008 7:26
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: The first 3
movies....
Yes, Breck of course! (Boy, is my face red!)
I'm familiar with that Jabba scene, that's a good example. But I think
it also highlights the differences between the two franchises: Lucas is
right on the button in terms of continuity, that's not such a priority
for the owners of POTA. Can you imagine them CGI-ing an extra character
into the unreleased footage? I think not. (The two McDonald brothers
together anyone?)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"patrickmichaeltilt on"
<patrickmichaeltilt on@...> wrote:
>
> *** You mean "the death
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48658 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/11/2008 |
| Subject: Home Page Pic |
|
.html Nice picture. Is that the one from the African stamp? <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48659 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/12/2008 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
.html.html
| Reminder from: |
|
PotaDG Yahoo! Group |
| |
| Title: |
|
Buck Kartalian's Birthday |
| |
| Date: |
|
Wednesday August 13, 2008 |
| Time: |
|
All Day
|
| Repeats: |
|
This event repeats every year. |
| Notes: |
|
Happy birthday Buck! (Julius: Planet of the Apes (1968) Gorilla Frank: Conquest of the Planet of the Apes (1972)) |
| |
| Yahoo! Greetings: |
|
Send a Yahoo! Greeting
|
| Yahoo! Shopping: |
|
Browse Yahoo! Shopping Gift Guide
|
| |
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48660 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/13/2008 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48661 |
From: Terry Hoknes |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Message from POTA UK Chat Forum |
.html
.html
I have recently set up a Chat Forum here in the UK
regarding Planet of the Apes, our hope is to make the forum a fun place for like
minded people who are fans of the Movie to chat and discuss about all things
POTA, we are very new and a member base is very low but building
slowly.
In the future we are also hoping to have costumed
members attend events and conventions similar to Apemania.com in the
US.
Infact we have contacted Apemania in the hope that
we can become the UK counterpart and eventually run under their
banner.
I have added the Link to our Forum in the hope that
you may pass the information on in one of your news letters and perhaps you
would care to sign up and join in the fun and chat too.
we would be more than happy to also promote your
magazine on the forum and i believe we could work together quite
well.
I hope very much that you may be able to help and
perhaps even see you on the forum for a chat.
Many thanks for your time
Simon
here is the link
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48662 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3481 |
.html>Posted by: "Terry Hoknes"
hoknescards@... hoknescomics
>I have recently set up a Chat Forum here in the UK regarding Planet
>of the Apes, our hope is to make the forum a fun place for like
>minded people who are fans of the Movie to chat and discuss about
>all things POTA, we are very new and a member base is very low but
>building slowly.
Good luck with that, Terry! The forum looks cool. I suggest making
the background image of the statue a bit less prominent, however--it
makes it a bit difficult to see the lettering on the page. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48663 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
Anyone knows if there's going to be an Apes Convention for the 40th Anniversary?
Is Apemania planning on doing anything special?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48664 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: POTA (& KONG) on the screen in El Paso, TEXAS! |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48665 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
In a message dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@... writes:
Is Apemania planning on doing anything special?
*** Why should they do anything of their own accord when the almighty FOX paid them to do things they wanted them to do (for the Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own when the corporation is willing to have you
sell a little bit of your soul... You get your name in the credits, a nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the chance to have Lisa Simpson buy your soul back for you... ***
**************
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48666 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
With FOX releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my new best friend.
I'm even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
As far as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th. And should be a national holiday from here on out. :)
Cheers.
----- Original Message ----
From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
In a message dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Is Apemania planning on doing anything special?
*** Why should they do anything of their own accord when the almighty FOX paid them to do things they wanted them to do (for the Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own when the corporation is willing to have you
sell a little bit of your soul... You get your name in the credits, a nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the chance to have Lisa Simpson buy your soul back for you... ***
************ **
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos. aol.com/cars- Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/
expert-review? ncid=aolaut00030 000000007 )
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48667 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/14/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
FOX may be your new best friend, but what about APEMANIA? They're the group that was in question...
As I've said before, I am all for
their restorations of the original outfits, and their repro outfits are cool too... But as far as their part in the new DVDs, I'm leary of that... I'm thinking they are/were FOX's patsy because they have
"the name" so FOX chose them to do the "extras", when in reality, TZer0 could have probably whipped out a better script (for the "new" extras) and get some of his pals to act it out...
In a message dated 8/14/2008 11:07:52 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@... writes:
With FOX releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my new best friend.
I'm even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
As far as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th. And should be a national holiday from here on out. :)
Cheers.
----- Original Message ----
From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
In a message dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Is Apemania planning on doing anything special?
*** Why should they do anything of their own accord when the almighty FOX paid them to do things they wanted them to do (for the Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own when the corporation is willing to have you
sell a little bit of your soul... You get your name in the credits, a nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the chance to have Lisa Simpson buy your soul back for you... ***
************** Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48668 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
I honestly don't know what's the issue with Apemania. As you know I haven't been around for a while.
But what I will tell you is that I have the same amount of respect for all ape fans. Including Brian and Apemania.
And if I'm ever in California, I'll be sure to look up Brian, visit his place and call him, "Friend."
Cheers.
----- Original Message ----
From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 12:49:00 AM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
FOX may be your new best friend, but what about APEMANIA? They're the group that was in question...
As I've said before, I am all for
their restorations of the original outfits, and their repro outfits are cool too... But as far as their part in the new DVDs, I'm leary of that... I'm thinking they are/were FOX's patsy because they have
"the name" so FOX chose them to do the "extras", when in reality, TZer0 could have probably whipped out a better script (for the "new" extras) and get some of his pals to act it out...
In a message dated 8/14/2008 11:07:52 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
With FOX releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my new best friend.
I'm even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
As far as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th. And should be a national holiday from here on out. :)
Cheers.
----- Original Message ---- From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
In a message dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Is Apemania planning on doing anything special?
*** Why should they do anything of their own accord when the almighty FOX paid them to do things they wanted them to do (for the Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own when the corporation is willing to have you
sell a little bit of your soul... You get your name in the credits, a nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the chance to have Lisa Simpson buy your soul back for you... ***
************ **
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your
budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos. aol.com/cars- Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/ expert-review? ncid=aolaut00030 000000007 )
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48669 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html
.html
Ditto, except I do live in CA. Also, I think
if someone offered any 1 of us the same opportunity, we'd do it for our love and
respect of POTA and the money!
Jeff B
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:19
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes
Convention?
I honestly don't know what's the issue with Apemania. As you know I
haven't been around for a while.
But what I will tell you is that I have the same amount of respect for
all ape fans. Including Brian and Apemania. And if I'm ever
in California, I'll be sure to look up Brian, visit his place and
call him, "Friend."
Cheers.
-----
Original Message ---- From: "mlccougar@aol. com"
<mlccougar@aol. com> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Sent:
Friday, August 15, 2008 12:49:00 AM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes
Convention?
FOX may be your new best friend,
but what about APEMANIA? They're the group that was in question...
As
I've said before, I am all for their restorations of the original
outfits, and their repro outfits are cool too... But as far as their part in
the new DVDs, I'm leary of that... I'm thinking they are/were FOX's patsy
because they have "the name" so FOX chose them to do the "extras", when in
reality, TZer0 could have probably whipped out a better script (for the "new"
extras) and get some of his pals to act it out...
In a message dated 8/14/2008 11:07:52 PM Central
Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
With FOX
releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my new best friend.
I'm even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
As far as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th. And
should be a national holiday from here on out. :)
Cheers.
----- Original Message ---- From: "mlccougar@aol. com"
<mlccougar@aol. com> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Sent:
Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes
Convention?
In a message dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight
Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Is Apemania
planning on doing anything special?
*** Why should they
do anything of their own accord when the almighty FOX paid them to do things
they wanted them to do (for the Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own
when the corporation is willing to have you sell a little bit of your soul...
You get your name in the credits, a nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the
chance to have Lisa Simpson buy your soul back for you... ***
************ ** Looking
for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL
Autos. (http://autos. aol.com/cars- Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/ expert-review?
ncid=aolaut00030 000000007 )
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48670 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
I think Mike just does not like the
Apemania apes used on the new DVDs.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2008 3:19
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes
Convention?
I honestly don't know what's the issue with Apemania. As you know I
haven't been around for a while.
But what I will tell you is that I have the same amount of respect for
all ape fans. Including Brian and Apemania.
And if I'm ever in California ,
I'll be sure to look up Brian, visit his place and call him, "Friend."
----- Original Message
----
From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 12:49:00 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
FOX may be your new
best friend, but what about APEMANIA? They're the group that was in question...
As I've said before, I am all for their restorations of the original
outfits, and their repro outfits are cool too... But as far as their part in
the new DVDs, I'm leary of that... I'm thinking they are/were FOX's patsy
because they have "the name" so FOX chose them to do the
"extras", when in reality, TZer0 could have probably whipped out a
better script (for the "new" extras) and get some of his pals to act
it out...
In a message dated 8/14/2008 11:07:52 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo.
com writes:
With FOX releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my new best friend.
I'm even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
As far as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th. And should be a
national holiday from here on out. :)
Cheers.
----- Original Message ----
From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
In a message dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo.
com writes:
Is Apemania planning on doing anything special?
*** Why should they do anything of their own accord
when the almighty FOX paid them to do things they wanted them to do (for the
Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own when the corporation is willing to
have you sell a little bit of your soul... You get your name in the credits, a
nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the chance to have Lisa Simpson buy your
soul back for you... ***
************ **
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on
AOL Autos.
(http://autos. aol.com/cars-
Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/ expert-review? ncid=aolaut00030 000000007 )
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48671 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
….and a complimentary set of discs!
J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2008 5:17
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes
Convention?
Ditto, except I do live in CA. Also, I think if
someone offered any 1 of us the same opportunity, we'd do it for our love and
respect of POTA and the money!
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday, August
14, 2008 10:19 PM
Subject:
Re: [PotaDG] Apes
Convention?
I honestly don't know what's the issue with Apemania. As you know I
haven't been around for a while.
But what I will tell you is that I have the same amount of respect for
all ape fans. Including Brian and Apemania.
And if I'm ever in California ,
I'll be sure to look up Brian, visit his place and call him,
"Friend."
----- Original Message
----
From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 12:49:00 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
FOX may be your new
best friend, but what about APEMANIA? They're the group that was in question...
As I've said before, I am all for their restorations of the original
outfits, and their repro outfits are cool too... But as far as their part in
the new DVDs, I'm leary of that... I'm thinking they are/were FOX's patsy
because they have "the name" so FOX chose them to do the "extras",
when in reality, TZer0 could have probably whipped out a better script (for the
"new" extras) and get some of his pals to act it out...
In a message dated 8/14/2008 11:07:52 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo.
com writes:
With FOX releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my new best friend.
I'm even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
As far as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th. And should be a
national holiday from here on out. :)
Cheers.
----- Original Message ----
From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
In a message dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo.
com writes:
Is Apemania planning on doing anything special?
*** Why should they do anything of their own
accord when the almighty FOX paid them to do things they wanted them to do (for
the Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own when the corporation is
willing to have you sell a little bit of your soul... You get your name in the
credits, a nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the chance to have Lisa
Simpson buy your soul back for you... ***
************ **
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on
AOL Autos.
(http://autos. aol.com/cars-
Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/ expert-review? ncid=aolaut00030 000000007 )
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48672 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
In a message dated 8/15/2008 2:17:23 AM Central Daylight Time, skintricks@... writes:
Also, I think if someone offered any 1 of us the same opportunity, we'd do it for our love and respect
of POTA and the money!
*** I'd "probably" do it for free... Especially if it'd just be a made-up extra... (And I'm talking a decent makeup job, none of that BENEATH pullover mask crap...) ***
************** Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48673 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
In a message dated 8/15/2008 2:44:28 AM Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
I think Mike just does not like the Apemania apes used on the new DVDs.
*** Exactly Whitty!
If people bothered to read what I wrote, they'd see that I have said many times that I am all for what APEMANIA does as far as restorations of original pieces (and yes, let's face it, they're historical
film pieces that need to be preserved so thankfully those guys are keeping the remaining original wardrobe as intact and all... )
I also think their repro outfits are top notch too, and it's obvious that a lot of time goes into them...
As to what you said: You are correct... I do not
have anything against APEMANIA per se, I just wish that FOX had bothered to do some more digging into their archives for yet to be found (or released) things like the PLANET radio spots and the like... I would just
have liked to see more original material on the DVDs (and not an APEMANIA chimp on the DVDs!)
**************
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48674 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html
.html
If I were to do a true POTA script I wouldn't do it for Fox.
Fox Searchlights, maybe. If you look at the old ads for
it, it looks like some weird S& M, B & D thing. Ape
Rule and Man is enslaved. Forced Mating! I would
go with that angle, only updated for today's jaded
audiences. Of course you could tease a bit to
keep it from getting an NC-17 rating, but then
release the uncut version on the DVD.
In a message dated 8/14/2008 11:49:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mlccougar@... writes:
TZer0
could have probably whipped out a better script (for the "new" extras) and get
some of his pals to act it out...
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48675 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html
.html
The issue is the same as putting an Elvis Impersonator
on the cover of an Elvis movie. Why? If you don't have
any stills from it use a screen grab. You don't put a
picture of Madonna, or Anna Nicole Smith on the
cover a Marilyn Monroe movie, do you? You
wouldn't use a picture of James Dean on
the cover of The Wild Ones. Same thing.
The fact is Fox exploits their assets, and
Apemania is one of them. I don't blame
Brian. Why would he say no? But why
would Fox ask them to? Did they think
we wouldn't know the difference? I'm
sure they can't tell the difference,
but the fans? They didn't care.
In a message dated 8/15/2008 1:32:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
pota1968@... writes:
I honestly don't know what's the issue with
Apemania. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48676 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html
.html
The fact is they took the easy way out, again!
Maybe for the 50th, but I doubt it. I don't think
anyone over there cares about finding unreleased
scenes, behind-the-scenes, photos or anything.
No one is going to the bottom of that salt mine
and look for anything when they can fake it
with people from Apemania. It's not a priority
for them. POTA is a cash cow to be milked.
In a message dated 8/15/2008 3:07:22 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
mlccougar@... writes:
I just
wish that FOX had bothered to do some more digging into their archives for yet
to be found (or released) things like the PLANET radio spots and the like...
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48677 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
*** You said it better than I did T! You are right on! ***
In a message dated 8/15/2008 3:31:13 AM Central Daylight Time, TZer0@... writes:
The issue is the same as putting an Elvis Impersonator
on the cover of an Elvis movie. Why? If you don't have
any stills from it use a screen grab. You don't put a
picture of Madonna, or Anna Nicole Smith on the
cover a Marilyn Monroe movie, do you? You
wouldn't use a picture of James Dean on
the cover of The Wild Ones. Same thing.
The fact is Fox exploits their assets, and
Apemania is one of them. I don't blame
Brian. Why would he say no? But why
would Fox ask them to? Did they think
we wouldn't know the difference? I'm
sure they can't tell the difference,
but the fans? They didn't care.
************** Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48678 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
Yes it’s a very good point. It
would be a bit like Paramount
releasing Star Trek DVDs with photos of convention fans on the DVDs!
No disrespect to Brian but they really
should have used their vast source archives.
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2008 6:47
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes
Convention?
*** You said it
better than I did T! You are right on! ***
In a message dated 8/15/2008 3:31:13 AM Central Daylight Time, TZer0@...
writes:
The issue is the same as putting an Elvis Impersonator
on the cover of an Elvis movie. Why? If you don't have
any stills from it use a screen grab. You don't put a
picture of Madonna, or Anna Nicole Smith on the
cover a Marilyn Monroe movie, do you? You
wouldn't use a picture of James Dean on
the cover of The Wild Ones. Same thing.
The fact is Fox exploits their assets, and
Apemania is one of them. I don't blame
Brian. Why would he say no? But why
would Fox ask them to? Did they think
we wouldn't know the difference? I'm
sure they can't tell the difference,
but the fans? They didn't care.
************ **
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on
AOL Autos.
(http://autos. aol.com/cars- Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/ expert-review? ncid=aolaut00030 000000007
)
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48679 |
From: John B Kirtley |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html
.html
Brian has always been friendly and more than
helpful. Especially in getting things to UK fast and giving advice on make-up
and all things "Ape".
Apemania has kept the flag flying for many years
when POTA was not recognized as the ground breaking set of films it is now
classed as.
JBK
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
I honestly don't know what's the issue with Apemania. As you know I haven't
been around for a while.
But what I will tell you is that I have the same amount of respect for all
ape fans. Including Brian and Apemania. And if I'm ever in California,
I'll be sure to look up Brian, visit his place and call him,
"Friend."
Cheers.
-----
Original Message ---- From: "mlccougar@aol. com"
<mlccougar@aol. com> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Sent:
Friday, August 15, 2008 12:49:00 AM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes
Convention?
FOX may be your new best friend,
but what about APEMANIA? They're the group that was in question...
As
I've said before, I am all for their restorations of the original
outfits, and their repro outfits are cool too... But as far as their part in the
new DVDs, I'm leary of that... I'm thinking they are/were FOX's patsy because
they have "the name" so FOX chose them to do the "extras", when in reality,
TZer0 could have probably whipped out a better script (for the "new" extras) and
get some of his pals to act it out...
In a message
dated 8/14/2008 11:07:52 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
With FOX
releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my new best friend. I'm
even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
As far
as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th. And should be a national
holiday from here on out. :)
Cheers.
----- Original
Message ---- From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com> To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
In a message dated
8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Is Apemania
planning on doing anything special?
*** Why should they do anything
of their own accord when the almighty FOX paid them to do things they wanted
them to do (for the Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own when the
corporation is willing to have you sell a little bit of your soul... You get
your name in the credits, a nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the chance to
have Lisa Simpson buy your soul back for you... ***
************ ** Looking
for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL
Autos. (http://autos. aol.com/cars- Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/ expert-review?
ncid=aolaut00030 000000007 )
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48680 |
From: Mark Rice |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: introductory |
.htmlHiya
Thank you so much for approving my membership. I have been an Apes fan since I was seven years old. Looking back on all this material brings a tear to my eye when I think that at the age of 13 I decided I was too
old for all this and sold everything I had. How silly I was, but since being able to get hold of all the Marvel UK issues in pdf format from the goatley site I've been re-aquiring a lot of it.
Thank you again and hope to see you on the message boards soon.
Mark |
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48681 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: introductory |
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Mark Rice <mar1mar5@...> wrote: > > Hiya
> Thank you so much for approving my membership. I have been an Apes fan since I was seven years old. Looking back on all this material brings a tear to my eye when I think that at the age of 13 I decided I was
too old for all this and sold everything I had. How silly I was, but since being able to get hold of all the Marvel UK issues in pdf format from the goatley site I've been re-aquiring a lot of it. > Â
> Thank you again and hope to see you on the message boards soon. > Â > Mark >
Hi Mark, Nice to see you here,
Hope you have fun... feel free to join in at any time.
Best, Graham.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48682 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: introductory |
.htmlWelcome Mark!
TIm
--- On Fri, 8/15/08, Mark Rice <mar1mar5@...> wrote:
> From: Mark Rice <mar1mar5@...>
> Subject: [PotaDG] introductory
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, August 15, 2008, 7:41 AM
> Hiya
> Thank you so much for approving my membership. I have been
> an Apes fan since I was seven years old. Looking back on all
> this material brings a tear to my eye when I think that at
> the age of 13 I decided I was too old for all this and sold
> everything I had. How silly I was, but since being able to
> get hold of all the Marvel UK issues in pdf format from the
> goatley site I've been re-aquiring a lot of it.
>
> Thank you again and hope to see you on the message boards
> soon.
>
> Mark <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48683 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.htmlI couldn't agree more with you. And if you ask me, if FOX does release
POTA DVDs, why not have it presented by fans such as Apemania? Isn't
that what POTADG, Ape Chronicles, Jeff, Terry, Eric, Bill and so many
others are all about? It's the fans that kept Planet of the Apes alive
over the years. So let it be fans that present these great releases of
POTA on DVD.
Also on behalf of FOX, since day one when FOX first released POTA on
DVD, to this day, I have never seen such an incredible collection of
rare footage on any moive other than Planet of the Apes. And yet their
going to give us even more on Blu-ray. If that's considered a poor job,
than "Poor" must be the new "Awesome" these days. FOX in my opinion has
done an amazing job. The only thing that comes close in my mind would
be Star Wars and Termintator 2 (2 disc set) The Ultimate Edition. And
not even those movies surpass what FOX has released on Planet of the
Apes.
Cheers.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "John B Kirtley" <johnbkirtley@...>
wrote:
>
> Brian has always been friendly and more than helpful. Especially in
getting things to UK fast and giving advice on make-up and all
things "Ape".
> Apemania has kept the flag flying for many years when POTA was not
recognized as the ground breaking set of films it is now classed as.
>
> JBK <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48684 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: introductory |
.html.html
Welcome Mark!
I don’t know if I’m buying or selling these
days either! J
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Rice
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2008 9:42
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] introductory
Thank you so much for approving my membership. I
have been an Apes fan since I was seven years old. Looking back on all this
material brings a tear to my eye when I think that at the age of 13 I decided
I was too old for all this and sold everything I had. How silly I was, but
since being able to get hold of all the Marvel UK issues in pdf format from
the goatley site I've been re-aquiring a lot of it.
Thank you again and hope to see you on the message
boards soon.
|
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48685 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
In a message dated 8/15/2008 9:36:49 AM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@... writes:
Also on behalf of FOX, since day one when FOX first released POTA on
DVD, to this day, I have never seen such an incredible collection of
rare footage on any movie other than Planet of the Apes.
*** Seriously, what are you talking about here? I'd love to know what all of this rare footage is and where ya get it because it's sure not on anyones DVDs that I know of... Other than a few of the things on
the BEHIND documentary nothing rare is out there. (And even most of the "rare" stuff was already floating around on bootlegs for years.)
**************
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48686 |
From: pota1968 |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.htmlOh, I forgot to add one last thing.
And as much materiel that has been released on Planet of the Apes
over the years on DVD, I can't be 100% but almost 1000% sure that
Brian and Apemania had a lot to do with it. Because Brian has been
with us for years and knew what we wanted to see on DVD. And I'm sure
by his infuence with FOX, he informed FOX what the fans wanted. So
not only does Brian have my greatest respect, gratitude and
appreciation, but when I get those Apemania POTA Blu-rays, I'm going
to dip them in GOLD and frame them on my wall. Because Brain and
Apemania are Gold Medal Champions in my book. :)
And I'll always be the first one to give credit where credit it due.
But anyway, I'm off to Wahington DC for a few days folks. If anyone
needs me, you can reach me at the White House.
Uh... White House Motel that is. :)
Cheers.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "pota1968" <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> I couldn't agree more with you. And if you ask me, if FOX does
release
> POTA DVDs, why not have it presented by fans such as Apemania?
Isn't
> that what POTADG, Ape Chronicles, Jeff, Terry, Eric, Bill and so
many
> others are all about? It's the fans that kept Planet of the Apes
alive
> over the years. So let it be fans that present these great releases
of
> POTA on DVD.
>
> Also on behalf of FOX, since day one when FOX first released POTA
on
> DVD, to this day, I have never seen such an incredible collection
of
> rare footage on any moive other than Planet of the Apes. And yet
their
> going to give us even more on Blu-ray. If that's considered a poor
job,
> than "Poor" must be the new "Awesome" these days. FOX in my opinion
has
> done an amazing job. The only thing that comes close in my mind
would
> be Star Wars and Termintator 2 (2 disc set) The Ultimate Edition.
And
> not even those movies surpass what FOX has released on Planet of
the
> Apes.
>
> Cheers.
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "John B Kirtley" <johnbkirtley@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Brian has always been friendly and more than helpful. Especially
in
> getting things to UK fast and giving advice on make-up and all
> things "Ape".
> > Apemania has kept the flag flying for many years when POTA was
not
> recognized as the ground breaking set of films it is now classed as.
> >
> > JBK
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48687 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
In a message dated 8/15/2008 9:36:49 AM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@... writes:
And if you ask me, if FOX does release POTA DVDs, why not have it presented by fans such as Apemania?
A) The APEMANIA makeup
isn't up to par and anyone with even a minimal idea of the APES films would see that. Their gorillas are usually pretty good, but their chimps and orangutans leave a lot to be desired... I've said it
recently and I'll say it again: APEMANIA needs to get a hold of Mr. Blake and employ him so he can teach them how to make appliances that actually look right and instruct them on proper application. Bill's
"Caesar" bit from outside that convention is far better than anything I've seen from APEMANIA... If he'd become their consultant (since the likes of Striepeke no longer do makeups) they'd be a lot
better off.
B) If FOX would ever allow fans to do anything it would be because they'd be taking the cheap way out... They'd say "Let's cop out and make them think they're really doing something so we
don't have to invest any more time/money in trying to get more actual vintage footage together... "
I'm just glad that you haven't gone as far as saying that fans should recreate the deleted scenes, but at the rate your praise meter seems to be going, I can see that coming down the pike...
************** Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007 )
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48688 |
From: David Jackson |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html11/4 is a national holiday
its election day
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> With FOX releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my new
best friend.
> I'm even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
> As far as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th. And
should be a national holiday from here on out. :)
> Cheers.
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
> To: PotaDG@...
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
>
>
> In a message dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time,
pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
>
>
>
>
> *** Why should they do anything of their own accord when the
almighty FOX paid them to do things they wanted them to do (for the
Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own when the corporation is
willing to have you sell a little bit of your soul... You get your
name in the credits, a nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the
chance to have Lisa Simpson buy your soul back for you... ***
>
>
> ************ **
> Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read
reviews on AOL Autos.
> (http://autos. aol.com/cars- Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/ expert-review?
ncid=aolaut00030 000000007 )
> Is Apemania planning on doing anything special?
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48689 |
From: David Jackson |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.htmlI live in la
where are they located
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff" <skintricks@...> wrote:
>
> Ditto, except I do live in CA. Also, I think if someone offered
any 1 of us the same opportunity, we'd do it for our love and respect
of POTA and the money!
>
> Jeff B
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alex Ruiz
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
>
>
>
> I honestly don't know what's the issue with Apemania. As you know
I haven't been around for a while.
> But what I will tell you is that I have the same amount of
respect for all ape fans. Including Brian and Apemania.
> And if I'm ever in California, I'll be sure to look up Brian,
visit his place and call him, "Friend."
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 12:49:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
>
>
> FOX may be your new best friend, but what about APEMANIA? They're
the group that was in question...
>
> As I've said before, I am all for their restorations of the
original outfits, and their repro outfits are cool too... But as far
as their part in the new DVDs, I'm leary of that... I'm thinking they
are/were FOX's patsy because they have "the name" so FOX chose them
to do the "extras", when in reality, TZer0 could have probably
whipped out a better script (for the "new" extras) and get some of
his pals to act it out...
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 8/14/2008 11:07:52 PM Central Daylight Time,
pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
>
>
>
>
>
> With FOX releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my
new best friend.
> I'm even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
>
> As far as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th. And
should be a national holiday from here on out. :)
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention?
>
> In a message dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time,
pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
>
>
>
> Is Apemania planning on doing anything special?
>
>
>
>
> *** Why should they do anything of their own accord when the
almighty FOX paid them to do things they wanted them to do (for the
Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on your own when the corporation is
willing to have you sell a little bit of your soul... You get your
name in the credits, a nice lil paycheck from Uncle Fox, and the
chance to have Lisa Simpson buy your soul back for you... ***
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************ **
> Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget?
Read reviews on AOL Autos.
> (http://autos. aol.com/cars- Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/ expert-
review? ncid=aolaut00030 000000007 )
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48690 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html.html
In a message dated 8/15/2008 12:17:31 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@... writes:
And as much material that has been released on Planet of the Apes
over the years on DVD, I can't be 100% but almost 1000% sure that
Brian and Apemania had a lot to do with it. Because Brian has been
with us for years and knew what we wanted to see on DVD. And I'm sure
by his infuence with FOX, he informed FOX what the fans wanted
*** And again, I ask you in all sincerity, what is all this great lost footage and where can it be found... You're dancing around a direct question..
And, I don't think Brian had nearly as much influence as you're giving him credit for... That's not to say that he didn't give them tips here and there, but for you to sit there and practically give
APEMANIA/Brian total credit is preposterous and I have a good feeling that Brian would say the same... I cannot see him taking credit for all you're giving him... I'm guessing he's quite content to help FOX
with the "makeup" side of things, I don't think that he was a "consultant" as to telling them what we want... And if Brian/APEMANIA did do more than the bumpers, etc. involving recreated makeps,
I'd like to know what other projects they did for FOX...
One last thing: If you're going to say that Brian pretty much single-handedly told FOX what to release (and for them to listen to one humble man) why didn't they listen to him years ago?
PS: I am NOT, I repeat NOT saying that Brian is saying ANYTHING as ridiculous as what Alex is saying... I just believe that his newly found enthusiasm is causing him to say these things and he's giving one man
and his business all the credit... I can not see APEMANIA taking credit where it may not be due...
**************
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00030000000007 )<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48691 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: FAKE news item from the net! |
.htmlBUSH UNVEILS NEW PLAN IN IRAQ: PRIMATE WARFARE
With the war in Iraq closing in on 7 years and thousands of casualties, the Pentagon is looking for new, inventive ideas to employ on the urban-desert battlefield. Operation Monkey Business may be exactly what the war in
Iraq needs. "New wars require new tactics," Said pentagon spokesmen James Farnuk, "and this tactic is pure gold."
The tactic Farnuk is referring to is the new plan unveiled today to train and arm 5500 monkeys, apes, and chimps for peacekeeping operations in the Iraq theater.
"This may sound slightly crazy," Farnuk said at a Pentagon press release, "But these primates are exactly what the war needs. They cannot speak English, so we don't have to hear them whining about how they'd
like to have ceramic plates in their body armor. They're used to living in a zoo or a jungle so housing them will be easy. And they've got opposable thumbs on their hands and their feet. Think about it: the average
foot soldier only has two limbs that can fire weapons. These buggers have four. Guns on their hands. Guns on their feet. These guys are bristling death!"
"Hannibal used elephants to great success, but this may be a tactic of a new order. Giving monkeys guns and grenades is radically different from using pachyderms to cross mountains." Said Col. Devin LaBrie of Army
Special Ops command. "These primates are not bound by the Geneva Convention which only applies to humans. Plus, they are ultra aggressive when we starve them for several days. Anyone that makes eye contact with these
chimps is gonna get a bullet in the brain, or any other place these monkeys can hit!"
The new plan was devised by the commander-in-chief after a late night viewing of Planet of the Apes.
"I never realized how ruthless apes can be until I saw Charlton Heston being man-handled by those dirty apes. It was terrifying to watch how vicious they could be!" Bush said in a press conference on Monday. "I
knew any ape that could handle a man like Heston would be a great soldier in Iraq. I got on the horn immediately to try and find out what happened to the apes in that movie. Were they executed for their crimes against
humanity? No one seems to know where they went. But I'm sure if we round up enough apes we'll get some of their descendants in the mix. They come from good stock. Tough fighters. Kinda creep though, apes talking
like men and wearing man-clothes, but that may be what we need. Bloodthirsty, smart apes that can speak perfect English. This is going to be the turning point of the war!" Bush said with unbridled enthusiasm.
The plan, however, is being criticized by animal rights groups that feel this would be placing primates in a difficult situation. "My God, these are peaceful creatures not tools of war!" Said Emily Smith of PETA.
"They know nothing of war or killing or even how to load a gun and the US military wants to use them as pawns to attack other humans. This is atrocious. How will the apes be compensated-in bananas? What about access
to health care on the battlefield? The hot sand will burn their tender foot pads. Who knows how to treat an ape on the battlefield? This plan is not sound."
The president, however, seems unperturbed by the critics.
"This plan rules. Once those apes touch down in Iraq they will be killing machines. No mercy, just chimps enslaving the terrorists and parading them around in leg irons and neck chains. This will be my greatest
success. Apes in Iraq is going to totally rock!"
http://theseusproper.wordpress.com/2008/08/15/bush-unveils-new-plan-in-iraq-primate-warfare/ <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48692 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 8/15/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Apes Convention? |
.html
.html
In L.A.
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 11:03
AM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Apes
Convention?
I live in la where are they located
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Jeff"
<skintricks@ ...> wrote: > > Ditto, except I do live in
CA. Also, I think if someone offered any 1 of us the same opportunity,
we'd do it for our love and respect of POTA and the money! >
> Jeff B > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alex Ruiz
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:19 PM > Subject: Re:
[PotaDG] Apes Convention? > > > > I honestly don't
know what's the issue with Apemania. As you know I haven't been around for
a while. > But what I will tell you is that I have the same amount of
respect for all ape fans. Including Brian and Apemania. > And if I'm
ever in California, I'll be sure to look up Brian, visit his place and
call him, "Friend." > > Cheers. > > >
> ----- Original Message ---- > From: "mlccougar@. .."
<mlccougar@. ..> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com >
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 12:49:00 AM > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes
Convention? > > > FOX may be your new best friend, but
what about APEMANIA? They're the group that was in question... >
> As I've said before, I am all for their restorations of the
original outfits, and their repro outfits are cool too... But as far
as their part in the new DVDs, I'm leary of that... I'm thinking they
are/were FOX's patsy because they have "the name" so FOX chose them to
do the "extras", when in reality, TZer0 could have probably whipped out a
better script (for the "new" extras) and get some of his pals to act it
out... > > > > > > In a message
dated 8/14/2008 11:07:52 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo. com
writes: > > > > > > With FOX
releasing Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray... FOX is my new best friend.
> I'm even think about changing my name to FOX. "Brian Fox." :)
> > As far as I'm concerned, Christmas Day is on November 4th.
And should be a national holiday from here on out. :) > >
Cheers. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From:
"mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com> > To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:43:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Apes Convention? > > In a message
dated 8/14/2008 6:15:13 PM Central Daylight Time, pota1968@yahoo. com
writes: > > > > Is Apemania planning on doing
anything special? > > > > > *** Why should
they do anything of their own accord when the almighty FOX paid them to do
things they wanted them to do (for the Blu-ray DVDs)... Why do anything on
your own when the corporation is willing to have you sell a little bit of
your soul... You get your name in the credits, a nice lil paycheck from
Uncle Fox, and the chance to have Lisa Simpson buy your soul back for
you... *** > > > > > > >
> > > > ************ ** > Looking for a car
that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL
Autos. > (http://autos. aol.com/cars-
Volkswagen- Jetta-2009/ expert- review? ncid=aolaut00030 000000007
) >
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48693 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/18/2008 |
| Subject: Anniversary Reminder |
.html.html
| Reminder from: |
|
PotaDG Yahoo! Group |
| |
| Title: |
|
On this day... |
| |
| Date: |
|
Tuesday August 19, 2008 |
| Time: |
|
All Day
|
| Repeats: |
|
This event repeats every year. |
| Next reminder: |
|
The next reminder for this event will be sent in 12 minutes. |
| Notes: |
|
1980: Astronauts' Virdon, Burke and Jones spacecraft encounters a radiation storm as it approaches Alpha Centari. |
| |
| Yahoo! Greetings: |
|
Send a Yahoo! Greeting
|
| Yahoo! Shopping: |
|
Browse Yahoo! Shopping Gift Guide
|
| |
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48694 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/18/2008 |
| Subject: Anniversary Reminder |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48695 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/19/2008 |
| Subject: Can anyone do APES screen grabs? |
.html
.html
If anyone out there can do screen grabs, please email me privately...
THANKS! It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal
here.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48696 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: CONQUEST stuff |
.html
I've been working on further backstory elements for the CONQUEST portion of my POTA epic. Since the story deals with Slavery, let me quote the actual text of the U.S. Constitution's AMENDMENT XIII:
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to
their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
It's important to realize the distinction eluded to with the use of the term "their jurisdiction"
in Section 1. The actual amendment does not wholly outlaw slavery or involuntary servitude. Indeed, a "duly convicted" criminal can be punished with an enforced status as a Slave, "as a punishment
for crime." When the words "United States" are used, they do not (necessarily) refer to the entire country (i.e. including the Federal Government of the U.S.A.)... and Section 1 above refers to
"their jurisdiction" -- i.e. the jurisdiction of the States-which-are-United.
The upshot of this is that Slavery is not allowed to exist within any of the 50 states comprising the United States of America [except as a punishment for a convicted criminal]... but Slavery is not
necessarily banned in Federal territories.
Article I, Section 8 says that
The Congress shall have Power... [Clause 17] To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States,
and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places
purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals,
dock-Yards and other needful Buildings
;--And [Clause 18] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in
any Department or Officer thereof.
In other words, the States have jurisdiction within their
own territories, except such jurisdiction defers to the Federal Government over such "Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings" which are not
State property anymore, though they may be inside the borders of a particular State. Just as the Federal Territory known as the District of Columbia doesn't belong to either Maryland or Virginia, so too do
certain sites occupying various portions of various States belong to the Federal Government of the U.S.A. [such as Military Bases, like the "Marine Corps AIR STATION, EL PALOMAR, CALIF."... the one in
ESCAPE where the Ape-onauts were taken before their transfer to the L.A. Zoo], being a kind of "Federal embassy" autonomous though inside the boundaries of a particular State's territory.
In my CONQUEST scenario, the "Cities" that Breck refers to are not cities which are part of the States, subject to State jurisdiction. Rather, one of the changes that had taken place after ESCAPE was that
the Executive branch of the Federal Government seized power after their election in 1976 (when "President Windom" lost his bid for re-election), declaring Martial Law and suspending elections in 1980...
1984... etc. It became a jurisdictional war between State authority and Federal authority, with certain like-minded States siding with the Police State mentality of those who've seized control of the Federal
Government... and certain other ("liberal") States opposing this totalitarian turn of events.
In my scenario, Breck's "City" was once the territory encompassing the towns of Cambria and San Simeon, about halfway between San Francisco and Los Angeles in San Luis Obispo County. The Federal
Government "purchased" this chunk of land from the State of California through a kind of blackmail, claiming that the territory comprised a "needful Building" and "dock-Yards" for the sake
of National Security... and Federal highway funds (etc) would be withheld from California unless they ceded jurisdiction over that land.
Thus, the city Breck would become the "Governor" over is created as a Federal territory, over which only the Federal Government would exercise jurisdiction.
That's why when Armando brings Caesar into that city, he is entering Federal jurisdiction... requiring that pit-stop at a Customs port (the helipad, where his papers are scrutinized by Border Agents).
Slavery is outlawed [excepting criminal punishment, etc.] in the jurisdiction of the States... but not in the Federal Territories
, as far as the Constitution is concerned. Thus, it isn't unconstitutional for Apes to be made Slaves in those territories. You'll note that the word "party" in the XIIIth Amendment does not
explicitly refer to Humans, though it's evident that only Humans were ever meant by the writers of that Amendment.
One could argue, though, that any "person" -- even a Talking Ape, if such an Ape could be defined in the Law as a "person" due to his or her command of vocal language -- could be
construed in a legal sense to be eligible for constitutional protections against Slavery... but only where the States have jurisdiction.
In my Timeline, BATTLE takes place in 2018, which is 27 years after the events of CONQUEST (due to Mandemus' line of dialogue). Mendez tells Kolp that there has been "twelve years of peace" up till then,
meaning that in 2006 some non-peaceful event transpired -- the Nuclear War, in my interpretation.
So, between the events of CONQUEST in 1991 and the Nuke War in 2006, there are 15 years of... what? Where did Caesar and his "people" (the freed Ape slaves) go, and how could they have survived as an intact
community?
My answer is: Caesar learned, during his time as Breck's slave, that if he could manage to get the enslaved Apes out of Federal jurisdiction
, an Anti-Federalist sympathizer in the California state government could provide immunity for the escaped slaves. It's all a matter of jurisdiction, and the willingness of a gutsy state politician (i.e. the
Governor of the State of California) to exercise jurisdictional sovereignty over State Territory, in defiance of the Governor of a Federal "City," would make all the difference.
Perhaps the ape who had been killed the night before the arrival of Armando and Caesar also
knew about this Federal-versus-State jurisdiction matter... and tried to escape the city so that he could find safety in State territory, where the XIIIth Amendment applies.
In my scenario, this Federal-versus-State jurisdictional "war" is a big deal. There are those in the State governments who believe that the Federalists will never give up power and will never
"un-suspend" elections, keeping the fear for "national security" so hot in the minds of the Right Wing fringe that their political base keeps them in power. One of the reasons this Left Wing
Anti-Federalist side of the battle is cynical regarding the Federalists who've seized power over the national government is due to the fact that these Federal City "governors" have violated Article I,
Section 9, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States
: and no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatsoever, from any King, Prince, or
foreign State.
The auctioneer refers to "his Excellency, Governor Breck"
-- which is the very kind of "Title of Nobility" that the Framers of the Constitution didn't want elected representatives -- or any other government officer -- to have. Who granted to Governor Breck
the Title of Nobility, "his Excellency"? Doesn't that smack of aristocratic, monarchic despotism? Like "your Majesty" and [to quote Han Solo] "your Worshipfulness"...?
Breck is the "governor" -- the "Lord" if you will -- of a Federal "city" exercising Federal jurisdiction, even when the manner of that governance is repugnant to the principles set forth
in the Constitution governing the States. The "Slavery Loophole" is found which enables pro-Slavery advocates to re-establish it constitutionally
, in the non-State territories subject to Federal jurisdiction.
But if Caesar can manage to get those freed slave-Apes out
of that jurisdiction... if he can manage to contact somebody high up in the government of the State of California ("the Provinces") who is sympathetic to the plight of the Slave -- be that slave a Human
or an Ape -- then perhaps the entire population of Apes who flee from Breck's jurisdiction can be granted asylum, under State jurisdiction. I'm concocting a scene where Caesar -- alone in Breck's office or
residence -- makes a phone call to such a bigwig in the government of the State of California (perhaps somebody who had been in the Press, vocally condemning the Ape Slavery in Federal territories located inside the
boundaries of a State). Of course, the person whom Caesar talks to doesn't know that he's a talking Ape -- merely an outraged person who sees the barbarity at first-hand, and wants to find a way to smuggle some
mistreated slaves out of Federal jurisdiction...
By the way, it was by noticing that auctioneer's line, "his Excellency, Governor Breck," that I remembered that bit in the Constitution which forbids Titles of Nobility. That jump-started me to thinking
about the effects that such contempt for the Constitution has, when politicians view themselves as "masters" and aristocratic "lords" over the people they're supposed to serve. If the so-called
"governors" of Federal territory "cities" deem themselves worthy of the high-falutin' Titles craved by despots the world over, how contemptible do they find the very citizens over whom they exert
power, within their jurisdictions?
Remember Aboro in "THE TYRANT"? He, too, seeks a higher office with its own jurisdiction, and uses it to abuse power in order to get rich, his constituents be damned.
For the sake of those who tire of the length of my messages to this board, I'll cut it short at that for now.
Patrick
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48697 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
.html
.html
In a message dated 8/24/08 11:38:55 AM Central Daylight Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Slavery
is outlawed [excepting criminal punishment, etc.] in the jurisdiction of the
States... but not in the Federal Territories, as far as the
Constitution is concerned. Thus, it isn't unconstitutional for Apes to be made
Slaves in those territories. You'll note that the word "party" in the XIIIth
Amendment does not explicitly refer to Humans, though it's evident that only
Humans were ever meant by the writers of that Amendment.
These laws against slavery would only be for humanity and you know
it.... They wouldn't apply to "beasts"/"animals"... Going by what you're saying
here, you'd argue that it's not unconstitutional for Budweiser to "enslave"
their Clydesdales, though it may be "against the law" outside of these
territories that you're speaking of... (After all, those horses are forced
to work against their will right? That'd make them "enslaved"...) The laws of
man don't apply to the animal kingdom, cause if they did not one animal would be
kept on a farm ("enslaved" because they're forced against their will to be food
sources), in a zoo ("enslaved" to provide cheap entertainment against their
will) or even kept as "helper animals" (How many monkeys and dogs do you know
that totally step up and and say "I want to be kept as a possession that helps
my master"). It's only a deal if it's where you
want to go. Find your travel deal
here.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48698 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3486 |
.html.html
At 01:38 PM 8/24/2008, you wrote:
Posted by:
"patrickmichaeltilton" patrickmichaeltilton@...
patrickmichaeltilton
I've been working on further backstory elements for the CONQUEST
portion
of my POTA epic. Since the story deals with Slavery, let me quote
the
actual text of the U.S. Constitution's AMENDMENT
XIII: [SNIP]
Sorry, Patrick--much as I've always respected your ability to look deeply
into the Planet of the Apes universe, I just don't buy this
one. The apes had NO rights in that universe before Caesar freed
them--that much is very obvious from Conquest, and there's just no
way to believably imply that humans saw anti-slavery laws as in any way
relating to the apes. Humans did not see them as people--they saw
them as animals, tools, nothing more. Anti-slavery laws would be no
more relevant to the apes than they would be to any other
animals.
In my Timeline, BATTLE takes
place in 2018, which is 27 years after the
events of CONQUEST (due to Mandemus' line of dialogue). Mendez tells
Kolp that there has been "twelve years of peace" up till then,
meaning
that in 2006 some non-peaceful event transpired -- the Nuclear War,
in
my interpretation.
Do you count Marvel in your view of the universe? If so, you might
need to revise those figures, as Mandemus became Caesar's armorer in
1993, moving BATTLE to 2020 and the non-peaceful event to 2008.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48699 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3486 |
.html
.html
In a message dated 8/24/08 1:01:44 PM Central Daylight Time,
handleyr@... writes:
Sorry,
Patrick--much as I've always respected your ability to look deeply into the
Planet of the Apes universe, I just don't buy this one. The apes
had NO rights in that universe before Caesar freed them--that much is very
obvious from Conquest, and there's just no way to believably imply that
humans saw antislavery laws as in any way relating to the apes. Humans
did not see them as people--they saw them as animals, tools, nothing
more. Antislavery laws would be no more relevant to the apes than they
would be to any other animals.
*** At least one dude here is on the right page... But rest
assured, next Sunday morning (if not before then) we will have a lengthy
rebuttal telling us how, because the apes in CONQUEST are the result of special
breeding projects done by the Roswell aliens, the people at Ape Management found
a way to classify them as "humanoid" and as such, they were considered partially
human and subject to human laws. *** It's only a deal if it's where you
want to go. Find your travel deal
here.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48700 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html
.html
Message
All the best mate,
have a great Birthday!
Neil
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48701 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html
.html
Cheers mate.
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2008 6:10
AM
To: 'PotaDG'
Subject: [PotaDG] Happy Birthday
Mr. Whitty!
All the best mate, have a great Birthday!
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48702 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html
.html
Nice gorilla!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2008 6:10
AM
To: 'PotaDG'
Subject: [PotaDG] Happy Birthday
Mr. Whitty!
All the best mate, have a great Birthday!
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48703 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.htmlHappy BD Michael and thanks for the nice drawing Neil.
And while I have your Aussie ears I wanted to point out to you guys that
you may want to consider going to a Worldcon coming to your continent.
It's now official:
Aussiecon Four, Aussiecon Four the 68th World Science Fiction
Convention, will be held in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia in 2010.
Who knows? You may bump into other POTA fans despite my very limited
success in finding such fans at previous worldcons I've attended. I'll
be going to the Worldcon in my neck of the woods next year in Montreal,
but as much as I'd love to go to Australia, I don't think that that will
happen.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Sunday, August 24, 2008 4:10 pm
Subject: [PotaDG] Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty!
>
> All the best mate, have a great Birthday!
>
> Neil
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48704 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html
.html
In a message dated 8/24/08 7:43:18 PM Central Daylight Time, darios@...
writes:
Happy BD
Michael and thanks for the nice drawing Neil.
*** I'm just curious as to how Neil got Whitty to stay in that pose long
enough for him to draw that birthday portrait. *** It's only a deal if it's where you
want to go. Find your travel deal
here.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48705 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html.html
Hanks Dario – we’ll start
saving our pennies!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2008 10:42
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Cc: 'PotaDG'
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Happy
Birthday Mr. Whitty!
Happy BD
Michael and thanks for the nice drawing Neil.
And while I have your Aussie ears I wanted to point out to you guys that
you may want to consider going to a Worldcon coming to your continent.
It's now official:
Aussiecon Four, Aussiecon Four the 68th World Science Fiction
Convention, will be held in Melbourne ,
Victoria , Australia
in 2010.
Who knows? You may bump into other POTA fans despite my very limited
success in finding such fans at previous worldcons I've attended. I'll
be going to the Worldcon in my neck of the woods next year in
Montreal ,
but as much as I'd love to go to
Australia , I don't think that that
will
happen.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@bigpond. com>
Date: Sunday, August 24, 2008 4:10 pm
Subject: [PotaDG] Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty!
>
> All the best mate, have a great Birthday!
>
> Neil
>
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48706 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html.html
Oh – if ONLY I could fit into that
suit! J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2008 10:46
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Happy
Birthday Mr. Whitty!
In a message dated 8/24/08 7:43:18 PM
Central Daylight Time, darios@... writes:
Happy BD Michael and thanks for the nice
drawing Neil.
*** I'm just curious as to how Neil got
Whitty to stay in that pose long enough for him to draw that birthday portrait.
***
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48707 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html
.html
In a message dated 8/24/08 8:29:33 PM Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
Thanks Dario – we'll
start saving our pennies!
Start saving them indeed... It sounds like it could be something cool, and
being that APES seemed to have been pretty popular down there, maybe there will
actually be a bit more APES-wise than what Dario encountered (or not
encountered) at that con he went to...
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal
here.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48708 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Aussie con |
.htmlShould have provided the URL right away. The site does not have much
info yet, but that is normal and the site will build up over the year as
the Worldcon date approaches:
http://www.aussiecon4.org.au/
In particular, the site will eventually list the many SF authors that
will attend. Of course there won't be any POTA authors (unless William
T. Quick shows up), but I wouldn't be surprised if POTA fans like Robert
Sawyer goes. (Robert are you still lurking around here?)
Toronto in 2003 hardly had any POTA fans that noted the different POTA
shirt I wore each day. Los Angeles in 2006 was only a slightly better,
but I did meet Eric Green there.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: mlccougar@...
Date: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:00 pm
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty!
>
> In a message dated 8/24/08 8:29:33 PM Central Daylight Time,
> sallywhitty@... writes:
>
> Thanks Dario – we'll start saving our pennies!
>
>
> Start saving them indeed... It sounds like it could be something
> cool, and
> being that APES seemed to have been pretty popular down there,
> maybe there will
> actually be a bit more APES-wise than what Dario encountered (or
> not
> encountered) at that con he went to...
>
>
>
>
>
> **************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find
> your travel
> deal here.
> (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48709 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Birthday Reminder |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48710 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Birthday Reminder |
.html.html
Noooooooooo!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ]
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2008 1:51
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Birthday
Reminder
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48711 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote: > > > All the best mate, have a great Birthday! > > Neil >
It's your birthday Michael !! (or was..) (ahh... I knew it was soon, I always seem to be a day late and a Dollar short :) )
Hope you had a good one.
Belated greetings.
http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w252/hill19652000/birthday.jpg
Best wishes, Graham.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48712 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html.html
Thanks old chap!
Still 4 hours to go of it and the bourbon
is becoming tasteless…..hmmm.
My family bought me a Blu-Ray DVD Player
so I can happily watch CONQUEST when it’s released!
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Graham Hill
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2008 7:35
PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Happy
Birthday Mr. Whitty!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ,
"Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
>
> All the best mate, have a great Birthday!
>
> Neil
>
It's your birthday Michael !! (or was..) (ahh... I knew it was
soon, I always seem to be a day late and a Dollar short :) )
Hope you had a good one.
Belated greetings.
http://i178. photobucket. com/albums/ w252/hill1965200 0/birthday. jpg
Best wishes, Graham.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48713 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
.htmlYou've reminded me that I was recently reading about the Haitian
revolution. In the mid-18th century, runaway slaves would hideout in
the forests of the central mountains and survive by raiding the
plantations and towns. There, these 'Maroons' were eventually organised
into an (initially unsuccessful) rebel army.
Wary as I am to compare the Ape revolution to the revolt by African
slaves, the comparison has already been made, and I think the after-
effects of that revolution are relevant since it's regarded as the
first successful slave rebellion in history: firstly, the slave-owning
colonial power (France) tried to reclaim the colony by dividing and
conquering (they captured and killed the original slave leader before
their new allies switched back to fighting for independence), secondly,
a ruling elite took power - the mostly mixed-race group that had had
some access to education, and thirdly, that Haiti has had a brutal,
bloody, dictatorial first 200 years of independence - this has been
blamed on the vicious independence struggle (though I'm not sure I buy
that - a lot of nations have been born out of revoutions: the USA and
Ireland to name but two).
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "patrickmichaeltilton"
<patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
>
>
> My answer is: Caesar learned, during his time as Breck's slave, that
if
> he could manage to get the enslaved Apes out of Federal jurisdiction,
an
> Anti-Federalist sympathizer in the California state government could
> provide immunity for the escaped slaves. It's all a matter of
> jurisdiction, and the willingness of a gutsy state politician (i.e.
the
> Governor of the State of California) to exercise jurisdictional
> sovereignty over State Territory, in defiance of the Governor of a
> Federal "City," would make all the difference. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48714 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
> Still 4 hours to go of it and the bourbon is becoming tasteless...hmmm.
> Michael > >
Yeah, but it goes down much easier that way :)
Best,Graham
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48715 |
From: John B Kirtley |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.html
.html
Happy Birthday Michael.
John
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 2:28 AM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty!
Hanks Dario well
start saving our pennies!
Happy BD
Michael and thanks for the nice drawing Neil.
And while I have your
Aussie ears I wanted to point out to you guys that you may want to consider
going to a Worldcon coming to your continent. It's now
official:
Aussiecon Four, Aussiecon Four the 68th World Science
Fiction Convention, will be held in Melbourne ,
Victoria , Australia in 2010.
Who knows? You
may bump into other POTA fans despite my very limited success in finding such
fans at previous worldcons I've attended. I'll be going to the Worldcon in my
neck of the woods next year in Montreal , but as much as
I'd love to go to Australia , I don't think that that
will happen.
Dario
----- Original Message ----- From: Neil
Foster <ntfoster@bigpond. com> Date:
Sunday, August 24, 2008 4:10 pm Subject: [PotaDG] Happy Birthday Mr.
Whitty!
> > All the best mate, have a great Birthday! >
> Neil > >
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48716 |
From: John |
Date: 8/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.htmlSorry I'm a little late. Happy Birthday.
I'll buy ya a table dance. Muhahahahahaha!!!!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
>
> All the best mate, have a great Birthday!
>
> Neil
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48717 |
From: Terry Hoknes |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: PLANET OF THE APES MAKE-UP BOOK 2008 Author Signed NEW |
.html
.html
We are selling
copies directly for the author from Brazil.
$25.00 US funds
includes a new copy of the book PLUS shipping PLUS an autographed special POTA
card from the author Luiz Saulo Adami
This amazing new POTA book tells the tale of the process to put the ape
makeup on and create a unique ape face. Text in 2 languages plus pictures.
MINT - Brand new copy - rare book - not available in stores. Released in
2008. Order now and the author includes a special autograph signed color POTA
card for you.
MESSAGE FROM THE AUTHOR: Hi! I am Saulo Adami, from Brazil, author of the
book O ÚNICO HUMANO BOM É AQUELE QUE ESTÁ MORTO!" (1996) - for you: THE ONLY
GOOD HUMAN IS A DEAD HUMAN! Now, I will to promote, briefly, my new book,
HOLLYWOOD DIARY: A BRAZILIAN ON THE PLANET OF THE APES (Portuguese/English
version) speaking about my personals PLANET OF THE APES experiences with make-up
and many more. <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48718 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty! |
.htmlHoo-Ray!! Happy birthday Michael!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> My family bought me a Blu-Ray DVD Player so I can happily watch
CONQUEST
> when it's released!
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of
> Graham Hill
> Sent: Monday, 25 August 2008 7:35 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Happy Birthday Mr. Whitty!
>
>
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > All the best mate, have a great Birthday!
> >
> > Neil
> >
>
> It's your birthday Michael !! (or was..) (ahh... I knew it was
soon, I
> always seem to be a day late and a Dollar short :) )
>
> Hope you had a good one.
>
> Belated greetings.
>
> http://i178.
> <http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w252/hill19652000/birthday.jpg>
> photobucket.com/albums/w252/hill19652000/birthday.jpg
>
> Best wishes, Graham.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48719 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: PLANET OF THE APES MAKE-UP BOOK 2008 Author Signed NEW |
.html
.html
In a message dated 8/26/08 1:42:34 AM Central Daylight Time,
hoknescards@... writes:
We are
selling copies directly for the author from
Brazil. $25.00 US funds includes a new copy of the book
PLUS shipping PLUS an autographed special POTA card from the author Luiz Saulo
Adami.
This book actually looks like something I "might" be interested in...
So, I have a few questions:
Does this $25.00 "include" shipping?
Even more importantly, do you actually have the book in hand or is
it something that'd have to be bought and then you wait to get it from him and
that whole ball of wax?
And finally, did poor Luis go crazy like Roddy did the first time he looked
in the mirror and seen himself done up in the APES makeup? ( I know, I know: If
ya wanna find out, you have to read the book...)
It's only a deal if it's where you
want to go. Find your travel deal
here.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48720 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
> > > In a message dated 8/24/08 11:38:55 AM Central Daylight Time,
> patrickmichaeltilton@... writes: > > Slavery is outlawed [excepting criminal punishment, etc.] in the
> jurisdiction of the States... but not in the Federal Territories, as far as the > Constitution is concerned. Thus, it isn't unconstitutional for Apes to be made
> Slaves in those territories. You'll note that the word "party" in the XIIIth > Amendment does not explicitly refer to Humans, though it's evident that only
> Humans were ever meant by the writers of that Amendment.
> > > These laws against slavery would only be for humanity and you know it....
> They wouldn't apply to "beasts"/"animals"... Going by what you're saying here, you'd argue
[No, I wouldn't: read below...]
that it's not unconstitutional for Budweiser to "enslave" their Clydesdales, though it may be "against the law" outside of these territories that you're speaking of... (After all,
those horses are forced to work against their will right? That'd make them "enslaved"...) The laws of man don't apply to the animal kingdom, cause if they did not one animal would be kept on a farm
("enslaved" because they're forced against their will to be food sources), in a zoo ("enslaved" to provide cheap entertainment against their will) or even kept as "helper animals" (How
many monkeys and dogs do you know that totally step up and and say "I want to be kept as a possession that helps my master").
___________________________________________________________________
*** Granted, when the XIIIth Amendment was written, they used the word "party" to refer to the only kind of "person" they knew of -- a human being. Nobody back in 1865 believed that any creature
other than a human being deserved to be considered a Person in possession of "unalienable rights" etc.
But in our day, there are those who consider Apes to be worthy of such distinction, due to the fact
that there are Apes who have been taught SIGN LANGUAGE. If an "animal" can communicate at least as well as a mute, mentally-handicapped human being, doesn't that animal deserve to be granted
Personhood?
You'll remember that in the POTA timeline, there appeared in 1973 three TALKING APES
. They could communicate VOCALLY, using syntactically perfect English. So they aren't human beings... so what??? They can TALK! You can damned well bet that there would be those in the scientific community who
would deem them worthy of the same Rights that were deemed "self-evident" by the Founding Fathers for "all Men" (i.e. all human beings).
Sure, even though Negroes were deemed "property" -- treated as de facto animals by the racists who prospered from their forced servitude -- up until the end of the Civil War, the Constitution was amended to
prevent that (at least, technically, within the jurisdiction of the States). Hell, even today there are racists who don't consider Blacks to be fully human. Double Hell... go watch "MALCOLM X" to see a
scene where one of his fellow black prisoners tells him the doctrine of the Black Muslims that the White race was not purely human... that they were the mixed breed created when Devils raped pure (i.e. Black) women, as
in Genesis VI.
Post-ESCAPE, there would effectively be two camps of polarized opinion: Those who -- despite the appearance of the Talking Ape-onauts -- still consider apes, ALL apes, to be mere "animals" unworthy of the
same rights as human beings... and, secondly, those who -- because
of the appearance of Zira and Cornelius -- consider apes (even those so-called "primitive" ones in the wild, in circuses, and in zoos) to be worthy of the same protected status enjoyed by human
beings.
Just the other week, I saw an article about a group of people who want all scientific research on primates to cease, due to the close relationship evolutionarily between Humans and Apes.
Your comparison to Clydesdales and farm animals is, quite frankly, disingenuous. Nobody in their right mind believes that horses, cows, (etc) are cognitively comparable to a human being. But a TALKING APE would
be, especially if their command of the English language is superior to that of George Dubya Bush!
In the POTA scenario, there are those who -- working in the Security forces of Breck's city -- have effectively altered the historical record, claiming that the Ape-onauts had not been "murdered
" (as Armando said) but, rather, "executed
" (as Kolp "corrects" him). Obviously, those in power in Breck's city don't consider Apes -- any ape, be it a "primitive" one or one capable of Speech -- worthy of the same
unalienable rights humans enjoy.
But as long as there are the Lewis Dixons and Stephanie Brantons in the POTA world, there would be those -- however small a minority they might be -- who would declare that it is unethical to treat Apes as
"animals" if it is possible for them to acquire the same level of intelligence as humans. There would be a political debate about this, with each side being adamant on behalf of their own views.
Some of the Animal Rights activists in our
world commit crimes to further their own views, in order to prevent the abuse of laboratory test-subjects. But they represent the extreme fringe of that opinion. Most pro-animal activists protest peacefully, like
Pamela Anderson's work for PETA, an advocate for Animal Rights. People for the ETHICAL TREATMENT of animals.
The enslavement of the Apes in cities like the one Breck governs would be condemned by those activists. Evidently, though, the people who live in those Federal cities [as my scenario paints it] do not share the same
"bleeding heart" sympathies... all excepting the few like Mr. MacDonald, whom Breck accuses of having a "bleeding heart" if you remember.
One last thing: there is a mythical non-human Primate which may or may not exist [it probably doesn't exist... but its nonexistence hasn't been proven], called Bigfoot and Sasquatch. Due to the slim
possibility that it may
exist, it has been granted a spot on the list of Endangered Species. I read about that several years ago. Now, granted, Bigfoot isn't deemed to be a Human; it isn't deemed to be worthy of the same rights
enjoyed by humans. But it is granted a status that protects it from illegal hunting and poaching... and this is all for a creature that might not even exist!
Sure, just as Taylor -- a Talking Human -- is not deemed to possess any Rights under Ape Law, there are those in the intolerant post-ESCAPE society dominating America who would consider a Talking Ape to be equally
unworthy of consideration regarding Rights under United States law. But would such an attitude be universal? Caesar acknowledges that there are "some" humans who are kind... but not "most" of them.
No doubt but by that time [when Caesar reveals his intelligence to MacDonald] Caesar already has learned that the Pro-Slavery/No-Rights-for-Apes crowd is in the majority, and that their opposition is a distinct
minority.
My point is, that Caesar would have to have planned for the aftermath of his victory over Breck's security forces. What good is it to defeat just one city's worth of armed police, if a host of better-armed
soldiers will descend on the scene and wipe you out? Caesar had to have planned some way to lead his people out of that city, as he says to MacDonald at the end of the film. Caesar knows that humans will, in time,
destroy their own civilization with nuclear weapons ["...when the sea is a dead sea, and the land is a wasteland...!"], which will necessitate the Apes being far enough away from the blast radius of the
nuke(s) that will hit Breck's city.
In my scenario, before Caesar begins his war against Breck's security forces (after his 'miraculous' Resurrection), he planned a way to escape -- with all the Ape slaves
-- from the city. To a place where Breck and his ilk have no jurisdiction. Outside of Federal areas, where the States have jurisdiction. Where sympathizers can help to protect the freed slaves.
Remember how escaping black slaves were brought through an "underground railroad" to the Northern states, across the Mason-Dixon line? Back then, there were states where slavery was legally permissible (the
South), and states where it was unlawful (the North). In the U.S. Constitution, ARTICLE IV, Section 2, Clause 3 states:
No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour,
but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.
In other words, if a Black Slave were to escape from the South to the North [an act which involves interstate activity, hence would be subject to Federal jurisdiction] he or she would not
become "free": they would still be deemed Slaves. The XIIIth Amendment changed this, when all
slavery within the several STATES was abolished in "their jurisdiction" -- but not, as I've indicated, in Federal jurisdictions.
CONQUEST is a "futuristic" story about the topic of America's albatross: Slavery. It behooves us to compare the situation described in that story with the historical record, and with the constitutional
aspects of this topic. In PLANET, Zira claims before the Tribunal that Taylor has the RIGHT to know whether or not there is a charge against him... and Honorius objects to that as a matter of Ape Law: no Human -- even a
TALKING human -- has such rights.
Because the Powers-that-be who control Ape society insist on it. Period. It is a doctrine of their religion that Man has no soul, that a Divine Spark exists only in the Simian brain. In the theocracy ruling Ape City,
such a doctrine can be given the force of law -- even despite the evidence to the contrary, which they attempt to explain away by concocting the absurd charge that Zira and Dr. Galen surgically tampered with the wounded
animal "Bright Eyes" in order to produce "a speaking Monster."
As long as "they" are in control, the Status Quo will remain the same. But when Ursus' army leaves (with Zaius trotting along beside him), the minority remaining behind as Pacifists will suddenly be a
majority... and Zira hints at the idea of Revolution (in the script and Avallone's novelization, anyway).
Patrick
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48721 |
From: Terry Hoknes |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: PLANET OF THE APES MAKE-UP BOOK 2008 Author Signed NEW |
.html
.html
HI Luiz sent me 10 copies so i'd be able to help
him out here
Yes $25.00 includes the book, shipping AND a bonus
autographed color POTA card he made for promo
and i am heading to post office
tomorrow
thanks <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48722 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
.html
.html
In a message dated 8/26/08 7:32:34 PM Central Daylight Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
Your
comparison to Clydesdales and farm animals is, quite frankly, disingenuous.
Nobody in their right mind believes that horses, cows, (etc) are cognitively
comparable to a human being.
*** Oh really now? Then how come there's one group (actually PETA I
believe) that has a saying that goes something like "A rat is a pig is a boy"
meaning to them EVERYTHING is "equal" ... It's only a deal if it's where
you want to go. Find your travel deal
here.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48723 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: CONQUEST stuff |
.html
.html
Patrick,
Are parrots and cockatoos covered under the Constitution as well? After
all, they talk ... just kidding!
But you draw some interesting parallels between Breck's government and Dr
Zaius'. Both governments encountered what they considered "talking primates",
and both governments acted the same way in their efforts to destroy these
anomalies -- and, of course, the irony is that the governments' very actions to
destroy these beings result in the governments own undoing. Dr. Zaius'
government had one up on Breck's though ... they could have used humans for
slave labor...but given the contents of the "secret scrolls" they knew
better!
As an aside, you should check out the 1959 Hammer film: The Abominable
Snowman. This film is not the typical Hammer fare, but offers some interesting
views on humanity and its relationship with potential "near human" beings. Its a
great film.
Bill
In a message dated 8/26/2008 8:32:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
patrickmichaeltilton@... writes:
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, mlccougar@.. .
wrote: > > > In a message dated
8/24/08 11:38:55 AM Central Daylight Time, >
patrickmichaeltilto n@... writes: > > Slavery is outlawed
[excepting criminal punishment, etc.] in the > jurisdiction of the
States... but not in the Federal Territories, as far as the >
Constitution is concerned. Thus, it isn't unconstitutional for Apes to be made
> Slaves in those territories. You'll note that the word "party" in the
XIIIth > Amendment does not explicitly refer to Humans, though it's
evident that only > Humans were ever meant by the writers of that
Amendment. > > > These laws
against slavery would only be for humanity and you know it.... > They
wouldn't apply to "beasts"/"animals" ... Going by what you're saying here,
you'd argue [No, I wouldn't: read below...] that
it's not unconstitutional for Budweiser to "enslave" their Clydesdales, though
it may be "against the law" outside of these territories that you're speaking
of... (After all, those horses are forced to work against their will right?
That'd make them "enslaved".. .) The laws of man don't apply to the animal
kingdom, cause if they did not one animal would be kept on a farm ("enslaved"
because they're forced against their will to be food sources), in a zoo
("enslaved" to provide cheap entertainment against their will) or even kept as
"helper animals" (How many monkeys and dogs do you know that totally step up
and and say "I want to be kept as a possession that helps my
master"). ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
*** Granted, when the XIIIth Amendment was written, they used the word
"party" to refer to the only kind of "person" they knew of -- a human being.
Nobody back in 1865 believed that any creature other than a human being
deserved to be considered a Person in possession of "unalienable rights"
etc.
But in our day, there are those who consider Apes to be
worthy of such distinction, due to the fact that
there are Apes who have been taught SIGN LANGUAGE. If an "animal" can
communicate at least as well as a mute, mentally-handicappe d human being,
doesn't that animal deserve to be granted Personhood?
You'll remember that in the POTA timeline, there appeared in 1973 three
TALKING APES. They could communicate VOCALLY,
using syntactically perfect English. So they aren't human beings... so what???
They can TALK! You can damned well bet that there would be those in the
scientific community who would deem them worthy of the same Rights that were
deemed "self-evident" by the Founding Fathers for "all Men" (i.e. all human
beings).
Sure, even though Negroes were deemed "property" -- treated as de facto
animals by the racists who prospered from their forced servitude -- up until
the end of the Civil War, the Constitution was amended to prevent that (at
least, technically, within the jurisdiction of the States). Hell, even today
there are racists who don't consider Blacks to be fully human. Double Hell...
go watch "MALCOLM X" to see a scene where one of his fellow black prisoners
tells him the doctrine of the Black Muslims that the White race was not purely
human... that they were the mixed breed created when Devils raped pure (i.e.
Black) women, as in Genesis VI.
Post-ESCAPE, there would effectively be two camps of polarized opinion:
Those who -- despite the appearance of the Talking Ape-onauts -- still
consider apes, ALL apes, to be mere "animals" unworthy of the same rights as
human beings... and, secondly, those who -- because
of the appearance of Zira and Cornelius -- consider apes (even those so-called
"primitive" ones in the wild, in circuses, and in zoos) to be worthy of the
same protected status enjoyed by human beings.
Just the other week, I saw an article about a group of people who want all
scientific research on primates to cease, due to the close relationship
evolutionarily between Humans and Apes.
Your comparison to Clydesdales and farm animals is, quite frankly,
disingenuous. Nobody in their right mind believes that horses, cows, (etc) are
cognitively comparable to a human being. But a TALKING APE would be,
especially if their command of the English language is superior to that of
George Dubya Bush!
In the POTA scenario, there are those who -- working in the Security forces
of Breck's city -- have effectively altered the historical record, claiming
that the Ape-onauts had not been "murdered" (as Armando said)
but, rather, "executed" (as Kolp "corrects" him).
Obviously, those in power in Breck's city don't consider Apes -- any ape, be
it a "primitive" one or one capable of Speech -- worthy of the same
unalienable rights humans enjoy.
But as long as there are the Lewis Dixons and Stephanie Brantons in the
POTA world, there would be those -- however small a minority they might be --
who would declare that it is unethical to treat Apes as "animals" if it is
possible for them to acquire the same level of intelligence as humans. There
would be a political debate about this, with each side being adamant on behalf
of their own views.
Some of the Animal Rights activists in our world commit crimes to
further their own views, in order to prevent the abuse of laboratory
test-subjects. But they represent the extreme fringe of that opinion. Most
pro-animal activists protest peacefully, like Pamela Anderson's work for PETA,
an advocate for Animal Rights. People for the ETHICAL TREATMENT of animals.
The enslavement of the Apes in cities like the one Breck governs would be
condemned by those activists. Evidently, though, the people who live in those
Federal cities [as my scenario paints it] do not share the same "bleeding
heart" sympathies.. . all excepting the few like Mr. MacDonald, whom Breck
accuses of having a "bleeding heart" if you remember.
One last thing: there is a mythical non-human Primate which may or may not
exist [it probably doesn't exist... but its nonexistence hasn't been proven],
called Bigfoot and Sasquatch. Due to the slim possibility that it may
exist, it has been granted a spot on the list of Endangered Species. I read
about that several years ago. Now, granted, Bigfoot isn't deemed to be a
Human; it isn't deemed to be worthy of the same rights enjoyed by humans. But
it is granted a status that protects it from illegal hunting and poaching...
and this is all for a creature that might not even exist!
Sure, just as Taylor -- a Talking Human -- is not deemed to possess any
Rights under Ape Law, there are those in the intolerant post-ESCAPE society
dominating America who would consider a Talking Ape to be equally unworthy of
consideration regarding Rights under United States law. But would such an
attitude be universal? Caesar acknowledges that there are "some" humans who
are kind... but not "most" of them. No doubt but by that time [when Caesar
reveals his intelligence to MacDonald] Caesar already has learned that the
Pro-Slavery/ No-Rights- for-Apes crowd is in the majority, and that
their opposition is a distinct minority.
My point is, that Caesar would have to have planned for the aftermath of
his victory over Breck's security forces. What good is it to defeat just one
city's worth of armed police, if a host of better-armed soldiers will descend
on the scene and wipe you out? Caesar had to have planned some way to lead his
people out of that city, as he says to MacDonald at the end of the film.
Caesar knows that humans will, in time, destroy their own civilization with
nuclear weapons ["...when the sea is a dead sea, and the land is a
wasteland... !"], which will necessitate the Apes being far enough away
from the blast radius of the nuke(s) that will hit Breck's city.
In my scenario, before Caesar begins his war against Breck's security
forces (after his 'miraculous' Resurrection) , he planned a way to escape
-- with all the Ape slaves -- from the city. To a place where Breck
and his ilk have no jurisdiction. Outside of Federal areas, where the States
have jurisdiction. Where sympathizers can help to protect the freed
slaves.
Remember how escaping black slaves were brought through an "underground
railroad" to the Northern states, across the Mason-Dixon line? Back then,
there were states where slavery was legally permissible (the South), and
states where it was unlawful (the North). In the U.S. Constitution, ARTICLE
IV, Section 2, Clause 3 states:
No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under
the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or
Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be
delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be
due.
In other words, if a Black Slave were to escape from the South to the North
[an act which involves interstate activity, hence would be subject to
Federal jurisdiction] he or she would not
become "free": they would still be deemed Slaves. The XIIIth
Amendment changed this, when all slavery within the several
STATES was abolished in "their jurisdiction" -- but not, as I've indicated, in
Federal jurisdictions.
CONQUEST is a "futuristic" story about the topic of America's albatross:
Slavery. It behooves us to compare the situation described in that story with
the historical record, and with the constitutional aspects of this topic. In
PLANET, Zira claims before the Tribunal that Taylor has the RIGHT to know
whether or not there is a charge against him... and Honorius objects to that
as a matter of Ape Law: no Human -- even a TALKING human -- has such rights.
Because the Powers-that- be who control Ape society insist on it.
Period. It is a doctrine of their religion that Man has no soul, that a Divine
Spark exists only in the Simian brain. In the theocracy ruling Ape City, such
a doctrine can be given the force of law -- even despite the evidence to the
contrary, which they attempt to explain away by concocting the absurd charge
that Zira and Dr. Galen surgically tampered with the wounded animal "Bright
Eyes" in order to produce "a speaking Monster."
As long as "they" are in control, the Status Quo will remain the same. But
when Ursus' army leaves (with Zaius trotting along beside him), the minority
remaining behind as Pacifists will suddenly be a majority... and Zira hints at
the idea of Revolution (in the script and Avallone's novelization, anyway).
Patrick
It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal
here.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 48724 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 8/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3486 |
.html
In my Timeline, BATTLE takes place in 2018, which is 27 years after the events of CONQUEST (due to Mandemus' line of dialogue). Mendez tells
Kolp that there has been "twelve years of peace" up till then, meaning that in 2006 some non-peaceful event transpired -- the Nuclear War, in my interpretation.
Do you count Marvel in your view of the universe? If so, you might need to revise those figures, as Mandemus became Caesar's armorer in 1993, moving BATTLE to 2020 and the non-peaceful
event to 2008. ____________________________________________________________
*** I do not
count Marvel in my POTA universe [i.e. only the 5 films & 14 live-action episodes]. Mandemus tells Caesar that the Armory has been his home "for TWENTY-SEVEN YEARS". The earliest opportunity that
Mandemus could've had to begin his residence there is in the year 1991, as soon as Caesar and his freed ex-slaves could relocate to that forested area after their flight from Breck's city. And, I would argue,
they wouldn't have had much of a chance to survive there had it not been for jurisdictional problems preventing Breck [i.e. Federal forces] from interfering in that territory.
Add 27 years to 1991 and you get the year A.D. 2018, the earliest possible date for BATTLE that is possible, given the evidence of the film.
Believe me, it would be much easier if Mandemus hadn't
said that line of dialogue! It would be easier to place BATTLE about 12 years or so after CONQUEST [i.e. in 2003 or 2004], having Mendez's line about "twelve years of peace" refer to the 12 years
following a Nuke War that almost immediately occurred after the events of CONQUEST.
But Mandemus' line makes it mandatory to place BATTLE some 27 years after CONQUEST. Because that dialogue is in the film, it's canon
as far as I'm concerned. You'll notice that David Gerrold, in his novelization of BATTLE, refers to the founding of Ape City "nine years" before the events of the film [Chapter One, page 12 of the
paperback]. Gerrold also has Mendez telling Kolp: "If we shoot them... we break years of peace." In the film, Mendez refers to "TWELVE YEARS of peace." Gerrold has Mandemus say, "Caesar, I must
ask a favor. This armory has been my home for many, many years." In the film, Mandemus says "for TWENTY-SEVEN YEARS."
What's canon? Gerrold's novelization or the filmed dialogue? As far as I'm concerned, it's what's in the film. Period
. CONQUEST happens in 1991, eight years after the Plague of 1983. BATTLE happens 27 years later, in 2018, twelve years after the last time "peace" was broken [i.e. the Nuke War of 2006]. That's the
only scenario that fits all the facts, unless we want to place the Nuke War prior to 2006 and speculate on some other [non-nuclear] breach of the peace in 2006. I see no reason to further complicate these set-in-stone
filmed numbers, though. I'd argue that the Nuke War had to have taken place in 2006, since Caesar tells MacDonald that "the bomb left nothing" in the Forbidden City... therefore there cannot have been any
armed conflict between Caesar's apes and Breck-or-Kolp's humans. Mendez refers to 12 years of peace... implying non-war between the Humans in the radioactive ruins and Caesar's Apes.
Moving BATTLE to 2020, just to accomodate Marvel's prequel to BATTLE, would just further complicate the matter. I enjoyed that Moench-written story for what it was, but consider it to be definitely non-canonical.
For one thing, it takes place after the Nuke War... yet Breck
is a character in it, as well being the antagonist in Marvel's adaptation of BATTLE. In the film, though, it is KOLP who is the governor of the post-nuke City, and he refers to the death of the former
governor (Breck) when he says that "if the Bomb hadn't killed the governor, boredom surely would have." In other words, Breck died when his city was hit by a nuclear overblast
. Therefore, he couldn't have been one of the subjugated humans in Caesar's Ape City in Marvel's story. Marvel based its version of BATTLE on an earlier script, when it was Breck
-- not Kolp -- playing the role of antagonist. Unless I'm mistaken, though, Don Murray declined to reprise his role from CONQUEST, which necessitated replacing Breck with Kolp [or, recasting the role, which
they must've decided not to do].
If not for Mandemus' line, I would've put BATTLE about a decade after the Nuke War, say 12 years or so after CONQUEST. Because Caesar and Lisa have one child, a chimp boy named Cornelius. No older or younger
siblings that we know of. Cornelius is Caesar's only
son and heir. Placing BATTLE in 2018 [of necessity] means that Cornelius impregnated Lisa with Cornelius a longgggg time after the events of CONQUEST, since otherwise Cornelius would've been around
26 years old during BATTLE, assuming that Caesar would've begotten a child on Lisa within a year of the events of CONQUEST.
In my scenario, Caesar and Lisa do
have children prior to the birth of Cornelius... but they are killed when the Nuke War hits. The reason Caesar and Lisa lose their firstborn child and 1 or 2 other kids is because they -- in the protected area
off-limits to Federal jurisdiction -- learn that after
Breck regained control of his city following the escape of Caesar and the former ape slaves, more and more shipments of Apes from overseas continued to arrive. Ape Slavery hadn't
been ended in that city. And it shamed the children of Caesar to know that whilst they were enjoying freedom in the forests miles away from Breck's city, there were enslaved Apes enduring the same or worse
treatment the former slaves had endured right then. So, waging what amounts to a "children's crusade" to attempt to free their enslaved brothers, they try to infiltrate Breck's city... and are either
killed in the attempt and subjected to slavery themselves for a time, or they are killed when the Nukes go off.
Thus, all of Cornelius' older siblings are killed in 2006, when their futile attempt to free the later-enslaved Apes is cut short by the Nuke War.
In my scenario, after Armando tells Caesar about the Plague [at the site of the Pet Memorial], he also
tells Caesar about certain things that Cornelius told him and Lewis Dixon just before they left his Circus to be brought to the city limits of L.A. Armando tells Caesar that Cornelius had told him the real
story that he had slightly exaggerated to Hasslein. Yes, there would be a Plague that would kill all the Dogs and Cats... but Apes would not be reduced from Pets to Slaves some 3
centuries
later (followed by the Talking Ape "Aldo" another two centuries afterwards)... Rather, they could expect Ape Slavery to begin THREE YEARS after the Plague, followed by the appearance of a Talking Ape named
"Caesar" who would be deemed a "Savior" by the writers of the Secret Scrolls.
In other words, Cornelius told Dixon and Armando, "When the Plague kills your Dogs and Cats, Man will replace them with simian pets some 3 years later... but will eventually enslave them over the course of
another THREE YEARS. And TWO YEARS after that, the Savior named "Caesar" will lead the slaves from their captivity. And, FIFTEEN YEARS after that -- some 23 years after the Plague strikes -- there will a War
which will flatten the cities of the Earth."
Thus, Armando and Dixon have the true timeline of the future... but they don't know when that Timeline will begin, until the year 1983, when the Plague strikes [brought back from the year 3085, when Virdon
re-appears from the Future].
Thus, Armando and Dixon know that they have but to add 3 years to 1983 to know when Man will begin to replace their lost Dogs and Cats with Simians [i.e. before taking Monkeys and Apes as pets, Man also domesticated
Rabbits, Squirrels, Chipmunks, you name it], in the year 1986. After another 3 YEARS [i.e. not the "centuries" they misled Hasslein with], Man will have reduced those Apes from Pets to Slaves, from 1986
through 1989. And, after TWO MORE YEARS [i.e. not the "centuries" etc] -- in 1991 -- a Talking Ape will articulate defiance against Human masters. But this Ape savior will not
be named "Aldo"... his true name is to be "Caesar".
As Armando raises the child of Cornelius and Zira, he had to rename him... but he doesn't give him the public name "Caesar" until much later. He first
has to pass him off as the child of Heloise, "the first chimpanzee ever to be born in a circus!" That child was a girl, named SALOME. Pretending that the gender had been
mistakenly ascertained as female, Armando renames the male child SOLOMON (the masculine version of Salome).
Publicly, the circus chimp is known as SOLOMON. When Breck's goons are looking for Armando's missing chimp, they think its name is Solomon, the name on the "updated" legal certification Armando
registered in the State of California, when he had the name changed from "Salome" to "Solomon".
But Armando RE-NAMED this chimp yet again, giving him a secret name that only he knew about. A name that nobody else could
know about -- hence it was safe for "Solomon" to deliberately pick that name, CAESAR, out of the Book of Names that Breck supplied for him for that purpose. If Armando's chimp had been known publicly
by the name of CAESAR, then Breck would've known immediately
that the chimp he had just purchased at that auction was the very chimp they were looking for. CAESAR had to have been a name that only he and Armando knew. And Armando had to have chosen
to give him that new, secret name for a good reason.
To prepare HIM for the role that Cornelius indicated would be played. A "King Caesar" who would be the savior of the Ape slaves. Armando wanted to fulfill this "destiny... the unalterable Will of
God." In a way, Cornelius -- by telling Armando these truths about the Future which he'd read in the Secret Scrolls -- was hoping that Armando would rename his son, knowing that Zira was switching babies as
they spoke.
Armando withheld certain information from "Baby Milo"/Solomon/Caesar until the right moment. Armando brought him into Breck's city in the very year he knew an ape named Caesar was "prophesied"
to free enslaved Apes, according to the timeline of the Future that Cornelius had informed him about. Armando also knew that there would be a Nuke War just 15 years later, with the world descending into chaos in the
interim. But before he and Caesar go to the site of the Labor Demonstration [where Caesar blurts out, "Lousy human bastard!"], Armando tells Caesar about the fact that Man will destroy his own civilization in
the year 2006, just 15 years in the future. That's why Caesar is able to inform MacDonald about it, in his rant at the end of the film. He had to have learned it from the only one in a position to inform him of it:
Armando. And Armando cannot have learned about this future event from anybody except Cornelius, whose exposure to the Secret Scrolls provided him with this information.
When Armando and Lewis realize that their world has only 23 years left to it -- if, that is, they can count on Cornelius' timeline derived from the Secret Scrolls -- they feel that it is impossible to change that
Future. Hasslein's attempt to change things only helped bring that Future into fruition. The only hope for Man is for him to be "dominated" by the likes of Zira and Cornelius... and with Armando raising
their son and future Savior, Man has at least a chance of being dominated with a certain amount of compassion. The friendship of the Dixons and of Armando towards Zira and Cornelius will prompt Caesar to be kinder
towards other Humans... at least, they hope so.
Thus, in my scenario, the older brothers of Prince Cornelius -- i.e. the 1st and 2nd born sons of Caesar and Lisa -- are named after the two male Humans whom Caesar's parents had trusted, and who had not
betrayed their trust: ARMANDO and DIXON. Caesar names his 3rd born son after his own father, CORNELIUS... and that child becomes the sole heir when the two older brothers die in 2006. Cornelius will have been only 1
year old or so when the two older siblings die, so that he is about 13 years old when BATTLE takes place. One of the reasons that Lisa will not want Cornelius to go off riding horses like a gorilla soldier, playing at
war, is because she had lost her first two sons when they did exactly that: gone off to War... and died in the attempt.
I realize, of course, that there is no mention in the films of these hypothetical other children of Caesar and Lisa. It's just my scenario. I'm trying to fill in the time period between CONQUEST and the Nuke
War, when I can't imagine Caesar and Lisa remaining celibate for fifteen years. They wouldn't have waited so long to beget and bear children... but the official on-screen chronology requires 27 years between
CONQUEST and BATTLE, and Cornelius cannot be anywhere near that age! My scenario, however much it adds to the mix, must be consistent with the filmed data, not contradicting anything. That's all I require, anyway,
for the sake of my POTA project.
Patrick
<.html
|
|
|
|