|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49125 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49126 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49127 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49128 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49129 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Conquest Blu ray features |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49130 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3544 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49131 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49132 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49133 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49134 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49135 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49136 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49137 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49138 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3543 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49139 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49140 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49141 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Crack |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49142 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49143 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49144 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49145 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49146 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49147 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Crack |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49148 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49149 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49150 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49151 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49152 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49153 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49154 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49155 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49156 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49157 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49158 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49159 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49160 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49161 |
From: John |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49162 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49163 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49164 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49165 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: London POTA ad |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49166 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49167 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49168 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: London POTA ad |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49169 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49170 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49171 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49172 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Sneaky Cornelius! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49173 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49174 |
From: Patrick Tilton |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49175 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49176 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49177 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49178 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49179 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49180 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49181 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49182 |
From: John |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49183 |
From: Neil |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49184 |
From: John |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49185 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49186 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49187 |
From: John |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49188 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49189 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49190 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3549 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49191 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49192 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49193 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49194 |
From: John |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49195 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/29/2008 |
| Subject: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49196 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/29/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49197 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/29/2008 |
| Subject: American Youth Symphony Salutes Jerry Goldsmith |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49198 |
From: John |
Date: 10/29/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49199 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49200 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49201 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49202 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49203 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49204 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49205 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49206 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Untitled comic |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49207 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Untitled comic |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49208 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Untitled comic |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49209 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49210 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Untitled comic |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49211 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49212 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49213 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49214 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49215 |
From: Terry Hoknes |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49216 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Next step for Fox. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49217 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49218 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49219 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49220 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49221 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Next step for Fox. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49222 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/31/2008 |
| Subject: New Sideshow??? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49223 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/31/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49224 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/31/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49125 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html.html
"Air leak, she died in her sleep"
"It's a little late for a wake, she's been dead for nearly a year."
Off the top of my head. Sorry if it's misquoted.
Al
From: "Tim "apefan"" <apefan23@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 5:37:27 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
speaking of Dead Stewart...I was reading an old Starburst mag I got on ebay in an overview of POTA films....the author obviously didn't do much homework as it was filled with inaccuracies. ...For instance: He said
since Roddy was busy and couldn't do Beneath they just wrote Cornelius out of the script!
Anyway one thing he said made me wonder.....he said that Stewart died DURING the crash....that her glass broke and she aged that quickly in those moments....I always thought she died sometime in space..but , how
would her glass case have cracked if they were all just sleeping?
you think she aged and died on impact??
--- On Thu, 10/23/08, nlmoxham <
neilmoxham@gmail. com> wrote:
> From: nlmoxham <
neilmoxham@gmail. com> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart > To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Date: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 11:39 AM > Found it!: >
> "(1967) July 18. We're back on the sound stages > again. After the Fox > ranch, this is luxury. Included in the cast today (as the > long dead
> Stewart) was an eighty-year old woman who played what must > surely be > the only role in the history of the drama as an > octogenarian lady
> astronaut. The dialog between the casting director and the > agents on > this one must have been marvelous." > >
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49126 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
I forgot about Taylor's line....but how the hell does he know that? He saw her just as long as the others did!
I agree...I think this guy was just making things up....
--- On Thu, 10/23/08, mlccougar@... <mlccougar@...
> wrote:
> From: mlccougar@... <mlccougar@...>
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 5:45 PM
> In a message dated 10/23/08 4:37:46 PM Central Daylight
> Time,
> apefan23@... writes:
>
> speaking of Dead Stewart...I was reading an old Starburst
> mag I got on ebay
> in an overview of POTA films....the author obviously
> didn't do much homework
> as it was filled with inaccuracies....For instance: He
> said since Roddy was
> busy and couldn't do Beneath they just wrote Cornelius
> out of the script!
>
> Anyway one thing he said made me wonder.....he said that
> Stewart died DURING
> the crash....that her glass broke and she aged that
> quickly in those
> moments....I always thought she died sometime in
> space..but , how would her glass
> case have cracked if they were all just sleeping?
>
> you think she aged and died on impact??
>
>
> *** No, I do not think she died during the crash...
> Remember, even Taylor
> says to Landon: "It's a little late for a wake,
> she's been dead nearly a year".
> As to why her case cracked who knows: I suppose you could
> think that a piece
> of equipment smacked into it? (And that is a total guess,
> I'm not even
> saying I think that's the case.) But anyway, I'm
> with you, she died while they
> were in space...
>
> The author was just wrong, and as you said, didn't do
> his homework. ***
> **************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All
> of your favorites,
> no registration required and great graphics – check it
> out!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir=
> http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001) <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49127 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html.html
As mission commander, perhaps Taylor knew from what he saw.
Al
From: "Tim "apefan"" <apefan23@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 5:48:04 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
I forgot about Taylor's line....but how the hell does he know that? He saw her just as long as the others did! I agree...I think this guy was just making things up....
--- On Thu, 10/23/08, mlccougar@aol. com <
mlccougar@aol. com> wrote:
> From: mlccougar@aol. com <
mlccougar@aol. com> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart > To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Date: Thursday,
October 23, 2008, 5:45 PM > In a message dated 10/23/08 4:37:46 PM Central Daylight > Time, > apefan23@yahoo. com writes:
> > speaking of Dead Stewart....I was reading an old Starburst > mag I got on ebay > in an overview of POTA films....the author obviously > didn't do much homework
> as it was filled with inaccuracies. ...For instance: He > said since Roddy was > busy and couldn't do Beneath they just wrote Cornelius > out of the script! >
> Anyway one thing he said made me wonder.....he said that > Stewart died DURING > the crash....that her glass broke and she aged that > quickly in those
> moments....I always thought she died sometime in > space..but , how would her glass > case have cracked if they were all just
sleeping? > > you think she aged and died on impact?? > > > *** No, I do not think she died during the crash... > Remember, even Taylor
> says to Landon: "It's a little late for a wake, > she's been dead nearly a year". > As to why her case cracked who knows: I suppose you could > think that a piece
> of equipment smacked into it? (And that is a total guess, > I'm not even > saying I think that's the case.) But anyway, I'm > with you, she died while they
> were in space... > > The author was just wrong, and as you said, didn't do > his homework. *** > ************ **Play online games for FREE at
Games.com! All > of your favorites, > no registration required and great graphics – check it > out! > (
http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121120 2682x1200689022/ aol?redir= >
http://www.games. com?ncid= emlcntusgame0000 0001)
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49128 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
In a message dated 10/23/08 4:48:15 PM Central Daylight Time,
apefan23@... writes:
I forgot
about Taylor's line....but how the hell does he know that? He saw her just as
long as the others did!
*** I'm gonna guess here, and it's only a guess... When he seen her
last, she was "unaged" as the rest of the crew was... When he seen her again,
she was dead and "mummified"... I'm guessing that "maybe" he seen her aged
condition and how the guys had aged and based on that he figured "Okay, the guys
aged x-number of years and judging by the condition of her body under glass,
she's been dead that long". *** <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49129 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Conquest Blu ray features |
.html.html
Disc Introduction by the Ape Guide
Conquest The Planet of The Apes- Unrated Version
Conquest The Planet of The Apes- Theatrical Version
Play Feature
Play Feature with Introduction
Isolated Score Track 5.1 DTS HD MA (Unrated Version Only)
Riots and Revolutions: Confronting the Times
A Look Behind The Planet Of The Apes (1972)
J. Lee Thompson Directs Conquest Of The Planet Of The Apes
Original Theatrical Trailer
Future News Gallery
Interactive Pressbook
Advertising Gallery
Lobby Card Gallery
Behind-the Scenes Gallery
Forced Farm
"Content Loading"ANSA Graphic
D-Box Logo
BD-Live Portal
Run Time: 88 Audio: Language: Dubbed: English, French, & Spanish / Subtitled: English & Spanish Close Captioned: Yes Color: n/a
Al
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49130 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3544 |
.html>Timeline Books advertised online
>Posted by: "nlmoxham" neilmoxham@... nlmoxham
>I'm looking forward to this Rich, do you expect it to be out by the end
>of the year?
Yep, we hope to have it out some time in November. I ultimately had
to self-publish since Timeline Books turned out to be a bust--long
story. That delayed the publication of this book by a few months,
but in the end, I'm glad it worked out as it did, because I think the
graphic artist who worked on this with me did a phenomenal job.
>Posted by: "John B Kirtley" johnbkirtley@... grotowski666
>This looks great. Can't wait to order it.
Thanks! Can't wait to have it ordered. :)
>What does 350 cover images mean?
There's a gallery in the back of the book, containing all of the
covers to the various novels, novelizations, VHS/DVD releases,
comics, etc., including the UK Marvel run.
>Posted by: "mlccougar@..." mlccougar@...
mlccougar
> From the British annuals. No fan fic included. :)
>*** Good, you had me worried for a minute... ***
LOL--not to worry, this book is a fan fic-free zone. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49131 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49132 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
Message
-- Funnily enough
this is something that Michael and I have come up with an explanation for in our
'Stewart story' but obviously I can't reveal anything
yet!
Neil
how would her glass case have cracked if they were all just sleeping?
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49133 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
Heston refused to wear the dentures
because they interfered to much with his speech.
Perhaps his rational was that since his character
was so old his teeth had fallen out. Who knows?
In a message dated 10/23/2008 3:33:51 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mlccougar@... writes:
From the pics I seen, if I rememebr right, it doesn't look like
he even has a complete ape "muzzle"...
*** <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49134 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlgood timing then! I look forward to your explanation!
--- On Thu, 10/23/08, Neil Foster <ntfoster@...> wrote:
> From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 10:53 PM
> -- Funnily enough this is something that Michael and I have
> come up with
> an explanation for in our 'Stewart story' but
> obviously I can't reveal
> anything yet!
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Tim "apefan"
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 7:37 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> how would her glass case have cracked if they were all just
> sleeping?
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=49123/stime=1224797850/nc1=5008815/nc2=3858793/nc3=3848621> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49135 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
Yeah - I don't know if this was a "flub" or if maybe it was an intended happening that left a prequel open, but there sure as shit ain't a reasonable explanation for the
glass to crack without someone/something having entered the ship!
Michael
---- "Tim \"apefan\"" < apefan23@...> wrote:
> good timing then! I look forward to your explanation!
>
>
> --- On Thu, 10/23/08, Neil Foster <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
> > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 10:53 PM
> > -- Funnily enough this is something that Michael and I have
> > come up with
> > an explanation for in our 'Stewart story' but
> > obviously I can't reveal
> > anything yet!
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of Tim "apefan"
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 7:37 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> >
> >
> >
> > how would her glass case have cracked if they were all just
> > sleeping?
> >
> > .
> >
> > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> > sgId=49123/stime=1224797850/nc1=5008815/nc2=3858793/nc3=3848621>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49136 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/23/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlDon't hold your breath! Things are moving on that comic but SLLLLOOOOowwww....
Michael
---- "Tim \"apefan\"" < apefan23@...> wrote:
> good timing then! I look forward to your explanation!
>
>
> --- On Thu, 10/23/08, Neil Foster <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
> > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 10:53 PM
> > -- Funnily enough this is something that Michael and I have
> > come up with
> > an explanation for in our 'Stewart story' but
> > obviously I can't reveal
> > anything yet!
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of Tim "apefan"
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 7:37 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> >
> >
> >
> > how would her glass case have cracked if they were all just
> > sleeping?
> >
> > .
> >
> > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> > sgId=49123/stime=1224797850/nc1=5008815/nc2=3858793/nc3=3848621>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49137 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
In a message dated 10/23/08 11:46:53 PM Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
Yeah - I
don't know if this was a "flub" or if maybe it was an intended happening that
left a prequel open, but there sure as shit ain't a reasonable explanation for
the glass to crack without someone/something having entered the
ship
*** I sure hope you're kidding about someone entering the ship to
crack that glass...*** <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49138 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3543 |
.html
.html
Here's a typical remark . . .
"I think Maurice, Roddy and Kim are excellent. Linda H.
has some problems, but Frank's keeping her nearly immobile
in her scenes, which works."
In a message dated 10/23/2008 9:39:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
handleyr@... writes:
He
complained about Linda Harrison? What did he say about
her?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49139 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlOr someTHING....
So how did it crack otherwise Mike?
Michael
---- mlccougar@... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 10/23/08 11:46:53 PM Central Daylight Time,
> sallywhitty@... writes:
>
> Yeah - I don't know if this was a "flub" or if maybe it was an intended
> happening that left a prequel open, but there sure as shit ain't a reasonable
> explanation for the glass to crack without someone/something having entered the
> ship
>
>
> *** I sure hope you're kidding about someone entering the ship to crack that
> glass...***
> **************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites,
> no registration required and great graphics – check it out!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir=
> http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001) <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49140 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
Message
Maybe the
air leak and the cracked glass are not
even related? There could have been an air leak during the flight and she could have been
dead and mummified long before the crash landing which caused the crack
in the glass.
Neil
Yeah - I don't know if this was a "flub" or if maybe it was an intended
happening that left a prequel open, but there sure as shit ain't a reasonable
explanation for the glass to crack without someone/something having entered
the ship!
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49141 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Crack |
.htmlAll this talk about crack......
---- Neil Foster < ntfoster@...> wrote:
> Maybe the air leak and the cracked glass are not even related? There
> could have been an air leak during the flight and she could have been
> dead and mummified long before the crash landing which caused the crack
> in the glass.
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@...
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 2:46 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: Tim "apefan"
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Yeah - I don't know if this was a "flub" or if maybe it was an intended
> happening that left a prequel open, but there sure as shit ain't a
> reasonable explanation for the glass to crack without someone/something
> having entered the ship!
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=49135/stime=1224823593/nc1=5008817/nc2=3848621/nc3=3858795>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49142 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
Message
A new race of
aliens then maybe, cool.... just kidding ;-)
Neil
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49143 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
That's not true. I have had glasses explode
just sitting in the cabinet. In fact there has
been a problem recently with the glass on
microwave ovens exploding even when the
thing isn't plugged in and it's brand new. If
this glass was made to be pressurized and
something went wrong in the manufacturing
process there's no reason it wouldn't crack
under one atmosphere of pressure. Look
it up. This sort of thing happens all the time.
In a message dated 10/23/2008 11:46:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
but
there sure as shit ain't a reasonable explanation for the glass to crack
without someone/something having entered the
ship!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49144 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
Message
Some sort
of MUTANT thing maybe? ;-)
Neil
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49145 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
Message
Or Taylor did it
and murdered her so she couldn't reveal their affair to the other
two...
Neil
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49146 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
Just one example of Exploding Glass . . .
In a message dated 10/24/2008 12:39:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
TZer0@... writes:
That's not true. I have had glasses explode
just sitting in the cabinet. In fact there has
been a problem recently with the glass on
microwave ovens exploding even when the
thing isn't plugged in and it's brand new. If
this glass was made to be pressurized and
something went wrong in the manufacturing
process there's no reason it wouldn't crack
under one atmosphere of pressure. Look
it up. This sort of thing happens all the time.
In a message dated 10/23/2008 11:46:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@ bigpond.com writes:
but
there sure as shit ain't a reasonable explanation for the glass to crack
without someone/something having entered the
ship!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49147 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Crack |
.html.html
Crack kills....
From: "sallywhitty@..." <sallywhitty@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:37:20 AM Subject:
[PotaDG] Crack
All this talk about crack......
---- Neil Foster <ntfoster@bigpond. com> wrote:
> Maybe the air leak and the cracked glass are not even related? There > could have been an air leak during the flight and she could have been
> dead and mummified long before the crash landing which caused the crack > in the glass. > > Neil > > > -----Original Message----- > From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf
> Of ymailto="mailto:sallywhitty%40bigpond.com">sallywhitty@ bigpond.com
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 2:46 PM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Cc: Tim "apefan"
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart > > > > Yeah - I don't know if this was a "flub" or if maybe it was an intended
> happening that left a prequel open, but there sure as shit ain't a > reasonable explanation for the glass to crack without someone/something > having entered the ship! > > . >
> <http://geo.yahoo. com/serv? s=97359714/ grpId=8605785/ grpspId=17050214 37/m
> sgId=49135/stime= 1224823593/ nc1=5008817/ nc2=3848621/ nc3=3858795> > >
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49148 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlthat's what I was thinking....
--- On Fri, 10/24/08, Neil Foster <ntfoster@...> wrote:
> From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, October 24, 2008, 1:34 AM
> Maybe the air leak and the cracked glass are not even
> related? There
> could have been an air leak during the flight and she could
> have been
> dead and mummified long before the crash landing which
> caused the crack
> in the glass.
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@...
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 2:46 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: Tim "apefan"
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Yeah - I don't know if this was a "flub" or
> if maybe it was an intended
> happening that left a prequel open, but there sure as shit
> ain't a
> reasonable explanation for the glass to crack without
> someone/something
> having entered the ship!
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=49135/stime=1224823593/nc1=5008817/nc2=3848621/nc3=3858795> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49149 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlAliens? Robots? Alien robots? Maybe a collision with the ape-onauts
going in the other direction?
I guessed it was just the pressure of the atmosphere that made the
glass crack, or maybe extreme temperatures?
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> A new race of aliens then maybe, cool.... just kidding ;-)
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@...
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: mlccougar@...
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Or someTHING....
>
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=49139/stime=1224826300/nc1=5008817/nc2=3848614/nc3=3858797>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49150 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html.html
Oh man – you guys ARE on
crack! J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim
"apefan"
Sent: Friday, 24 October 2008
10:42 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead
Stewart
that's what I was thinking....
--- On Fri, 10/24/08, Neil Foster <ntfoster@bigpond. com>
wrote:
> From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@bigpond. com>
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Friday, October 24, 2008, 1:34 AM
> Maybe the air leak and the cracked glass are not even
> related? There
> could have been an air leak during the flight and she could
> have been
> dead and mummified long before the crash landing which
> caused the crack
> in the glass.
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com]
On Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@ bigpond.com
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 2:46 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Cc: Tim "apefan"
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Yeah - I don't know if this was a "flub" or
> if maybe it was an intended
> happening that left a prequel open, but there sure as shit
> ain't a
> reasonable explanation for the glass to crack without
> someone/something
> having entered the ship!
>
> .
>
> < href="http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m">http://geo.yahoo. com/serv? s=97359714/ grpId=8605785/ grpspId=17050214 37/m
> sgId=49135/stime= 1224823593/ nc1=5008817/ nc2=3848621/ nc3=3858795>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49151 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html.html
I think it was Wilson or Serling! J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008
12:21 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
Aliens? Robots? Alien robots? Maybe a collision with
the ape-onauts
going in the other direction?
I guessed it was just the pressure of the atmosphere that made the
glass crack, or maybe extreme temperatures?
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Neil Foster" <ntfoster@.. .> wrote:
>
> A new race of aliens then maybe, cool.... just kidding ;-)
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups. com]
On
Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@ ...
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Cc: mlccougar@.. .
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Or someTHING... .
>
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo. com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId= 8605785/grpspId= 1705021437/ m
> sgId=49139/stime= 1224826300/ nc1=5008817/ nc2=3848614/ nc3=3858797>
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49152 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlWouldn't that be a bit counter-productive if it meant he was about to
start a new Eden with just Landon and Dodge? What about his "hot and
eager help"?!!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> Or Taylor did it and murdered her so she couldn't reveal their
affair to
> the other two...
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@...
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: mlccougar@...
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Or someTHING....
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=49139/stime=1224826300/nc1=5008817/nc2=3848614/nc3=3858797>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49153 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html.html
You didn’t see the way he looked at
those two?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008
12:28 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
Wouldn't that be a bit counter-productive if it meant
he was about to
start a new Eden
with just Landon and Dodge? What about his "hot and
eager help"?!!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Neil Foster" <ntfoster@.. .> wrote:
>
> Or Taylor
did it and murdered her so she couldn't reveal their
affair to
> the other two...
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups. com]
On
Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@ ...
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Cc: mlccougar@.. .
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Or someTHING... .
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo. com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId= 8605785/grpspId= 1705021437/ m
> sgId=49139/stime= 1224826300/ nc1=5008817/ nc2=3848614/ nc3=3858797>
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49154 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html.html
“Get your sweaty paws on me you
damned handsome boys!”.
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008
12:28 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
Wouldn't that be a bit counter-productive if it meant
he was about to
start a new Eden
with just Landon and Dodge? What about his "hot and
eager help"?!!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Neil Foster" <ntfoster@.. .> wrote:
>
> Or Taylor
did it and murdered her so she couldn't reveal their
affair to
> the other two...
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups. com]
On
Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@ ...
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Cc: mlccougar@.. .
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Or someTHING... .
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo. com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId= 8605785/grpspId= 1705021437/ m
> sgId=49139/stime= 1224826300/ nc1=5008817/ nc2=3848614/ nc3=3858797>
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49155 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlHmmm...he DID seem more upset about their fate than about
Stewart's...the plot thickens! So this comic - it will reveal that
Taylor murdered Stewart because of his latent homosexuality?!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> You didn't see the way he looked at those two?
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of
> nlmoxham
> Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008 12:28 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Wouldn't that be a bit counter-productive if it meant he was about
to
> start a new Eden with just Landon and Dodge? What about his "hot
and
> eager help"?!!
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
com, "Neil
> Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
> >
> > Or Taylor did it and murdered her so she couldn't reveal their
> affair to
> > the other two...
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> [PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com]
On
> Behalf
> > Of sallywhitty@
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > Cc: mlccougar@
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> >
> >
> >
> > Or someTHING....
> >
> > .
> >
> > <http://geo.yahoo <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?> com/serv?
> s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> > sgId=49139/stime=1224826300/nc1=5008817/nc2=3848614/nc3=3858797>
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49156 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Sneaky Stewart |
.html.html
No! He was bi! Remember NOVA!?!?!
Seriously though – Stewart was the first
of them to see the Planet of Apes. She landed prior to Taylor and the boys.
Any evidence to say she did not, or could
not have?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008
12:46 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
Hmmm...he DID seem more upset about their fate than
about
Stewart's... the plot thickens! So this comic - it will reveal that
Taylor murdered
Stewart because of his latent homosexuality? !
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
>
> You didn't see the way he looked at those two?
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups. com]
On
Behalf Of
> nlmoxham
> Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008 12:28 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Wouldn't that be a bit counter-productive if it meant he was about
to
> start a new Eden
with just Landon and Dodge? What about his "hot
and
> eager help"?!!
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG% 40yahoogroups. com>
com, "Neil
> Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
> >
> > Or Taylor
did it and murdered her so she couldn't reveal their
> affair to
> > the other two...
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG% 40yahoogroups. com>
com
> [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG% 40yahoogroups. com>
com]
On
> Behalf
> > Of sallywhitty@
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG% 40yahoogroups. com>
com
> > Cc: mlccougar@
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
> >
> >
> >
> > Or someTHING... .
> >
> > .
> >
> > <http://geo.yahoo. < href="http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?">http://geo.yahoo. com/serv?>
com/serv?
> s=97359714/grpId= 8605785/grpspId= 1705021437/ m
> > sgId=49139/stime= 1224826300/ nc1=5008817/ nc2=3848614/ nc3=3858797>
> >
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49157 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html
.html
In a message dated 10/24/08 9:52:37 AM Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
Stewart was the first
of them to see the Planet of Apes. She landed prior to Taylor and the
boys.
***
Exactly what are you basing this on? She died before the ship even crashed
into the Inland Sea. ***
Any evidence to say
she did not, or could not have?
*** Yes, the evidence is that her body couldn't have mummified in
the time it took for the ship to crash and to Taylor see her corpse. Add to
that, the entire crew was strapped into their chambers and there is no way she
was up and walking around, looking out the windows and then strapping herself
back into the bed in time to die just before they crashed... ***
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49158 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html.html
She landed in 2965.
She didn’t crash, she LANDED.
The other 3 chambers did not open.
Hers did and she got out….but where
was she? Alpha Centauri or Earth?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008
6:22 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Sneaky
Stewart
In a message dated 10/24/08 9:52:37 AM
Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com writes:
Stewart was the first of them to see the Planet of Apes. She
landed prior to Taylor and the boys.
***
Exactly what are you basing this on? She died before the ship even crashed into
the Inland Sea . ***
Any evidence to say she did not, or could not have?
*** Yes, the evidence is
that her body couldn't have mummified in the time it took for the ship to crash
and to Taylor
see her corpse. Add to that, the entire crew was strapped into their chambers
and there is no way she was up and walking around, looking out the windows and
then strapping herself back into the bed in time to die just before they
crashed... ***
Play online games for FREE at Games.com!
All of your favorites, no registration required and great graphics –
check
it out!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49159 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html
.html
In a message dated 10/24/08 3:56:42 PM Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
She landed in
2965.
She didn't crash, she
LANDED.
The other 3 chambers
did not open.
Hers did and she got
out….but where was she? Alpha Centauri or
Earth?
Whitty,
Your story is veering off into places left unexplored... Hers would not be
the sole chamber to open... If you recall in PLANET the three working ones
opened at the same time where Stewart's didn't because it was no longer
functioning... Had it been in working order it too would have opened when the
other crew members did.She was on the ship the whole time, just as the rest of
the crew was...
I cannot see the ship landing early, possibly on Earth... If it was Earth,
what'd Stewart find out there, the Tenctonese Newcomers from Alien-Nation (also
featured in the classic story Ape-Nation)?... Maybe the Newcomers had a
hand in wiping out humanity and a descendant of George Francisco threatened
Stewart with death if she didn't leave and to make sure she didn't tell Taylor
and the others about their plot, the Newcomer fixed her by destroying her sleep
chamber... That's how it all went down,right? 
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49160 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html.html
Mike – you will just have to wait
and see.
I am confident that our story will work,
and it would take us to a “prequel” Earth where we might have some
fun exploring various imaginative, creative things as we have in the past.
And who is to say that Stewart was not
intended to be the first out of the hatch?
You can be assured there will be no Alien
Nation or Star Trek crossover. What she would find is how the apes came
to rule (not Conquest, that’s how they came to rule the second time
around) and how humans devolved/apes evolved so swiftly.
Or do you think Conquest answers that
Mike?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008
10:43 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Sneaky
Stewart
In a message dated 10/24/08 3:56:42 PM
Central Daylight Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com writes:
She landed in 2965.
She didn't crash, she LANDED.
The other 3 chambers did not open.
Hers did and she got out….but where was she? Alpha
Centauri or Earth?
Your story is veering off into places
left unexplored.. . Hers would not be the sole chamber to open... If you
recall in PLANET the three working ones opened at the same time where Stewart's
didn't because it was no longer functioning. .. Had it been in working
order it too would have opened when the other crew members did.She was on the
ship the whole time, just as the rest of the crew was...
I cannot see the ship landing early,
possibly on Earth... If it was Earth, what'd Stewart find out there, the
Tenctonese Newcomers from Alien-Nation (also featured in the classic story
Ape-Nation)? ... Maybe the Newcomers had a hand in wiping out humanity
and a descendant of George Francisco threatened Stewart with death if she
didn't leave and to make sure she didn't tell Taylor and the others about their
plot, the Newcomer fixed her by destroying her sleep chamber... That's how it
all went down,right?
Play online games for FREE at Games.com!
All of your favorites, no registration required and great graphics –
check
it out!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49161 |
From: John |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlOr another cheesey robot from the Fantastic 4 cartoon? ;)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> Some sort of MUTANT thing maybe? ;-)
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@...
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: mlccougar@...
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Or someTHING....
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=49139/stime=1224826300/nc1=5008817/nc2=3848614/nc3=3858797>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49162 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/24/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html.html
Don’t remind me!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2008
12:50 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
Or another cheesey robot from the Fantastic 4 cartoon?
;)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Neil Foster" <ntfoster@.. .> wrote:
>
> Some sort of MUTANT thing maybe? ;-)
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups. com]
On
Behalf
> Of sallywhitty@ ...
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Cc: mlccougar@.. .
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
>
>
>
> Or someTHING... .
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo. com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId= 8605785/grpspId= 1705021437/ m
> sgId=49139/stime= 1224826300/ nc1=5008817/ nc2=3848614/ nc3=3858797>
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49163 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html
.html
In a message dated 10/24/08 9:09:47 PM Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
I am confident that
our story will work, and it would take us to a "prequel" Earth where we might
have some fun exploring various imaginative, creative things as we have in the
past.
*** I'm not against imaginative stories, but there has to be a
limit as to what would actually fit within the established canon that will
actually make sense and be "believable" within those confines... Just don't go
reinventing the wheel and coming up with a square when the circle was just great
as it was, that's all I'm gonna say. I'll just have to see what you come up with
I guess... ***
And who is to say that Stewart was not intended
to be the first out of the hatch?
*** As I said previously, their sleep chambers all opened at the
same time, so it's not like they were set to open in order of command or
anything else... Whoever woulda got out of their bed first woulda been the first
one out of their sleep chamber... And if you're asking "Who's to say Stewart
wasn't intended to be the first one out of the blown hatch on the cone of the
ship (ala PLANET)" nobody says she wasn't... My guess is that if the mission
went smoothly and everything went as it was "supposed to", I'd imagine Dodge
would have been the first one outside the ship being he appeared to be the most
scientifically proficient. I mean yes, they were all to a degree, but Dodge
seemed to be the one they counted on, so I'd guess he would have been the first
one out checking their surroundings (and again, that's a guess just based on
what I seen in the PLANET film.) ***
You can
be assured there will be no Alien Nation or Star Trek crossover. What
she would find is how the apes came to rule (not Conquest, that's how they
came to rule the second time around) and how humans devolved/apes evolved so
swiftly. Or do you think
Conquest answers that Mike?
*** Good of a film as it is, no, I don't think
CONQUEST answers much of anything other than how to make a "rushed sequel" on a
shoe-string budget... The events of CONQUEST happen waaaaay to quickly after the
events of ESCAPE, and despite Patrick's best efforts in his theory, I will never
beleive that Cornelius was lying about a revolt happening after centuries of
servitude, rather than a few years...
*** <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49164 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
.html
In a message dated 10/24/08 9:50:21 PM Central Daylight Time,
DrZaiusDavis@... writes:
Or
another cheesey robot from the Fantastic 4 cartoon?
;)
*** I thought that robot's sister was the computer of the ship in
Bill Hollweg's PLANET *** <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49165 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: London POTA ad |
|
.html
Found this in a UK published Digest mag called Showguide from April of 68....thought it might spark memories in our Brit members! <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49166 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlBrains in jars... It's always brains in jars !!!

Graham.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "John" <DrZaiusDavis@...> wrote: > > Or another cheesey robot from the Fantastic 4 cartoon? ;) > >
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" ntfoster@ wrote: > > > > Some sort of MUTANT thing maybe? ;-) > > > > Neil > > > >
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On > Behalf > > Of sallywhitty@ > > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:32 PM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com > > Cc: mlccougar@ > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart > > > > > > > > Or someTHING.... > >
> > . > > > > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv? > s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m > > sgId=49139/stime=1224826300/nc1=5008817/nc2=3848614/nc3=3858797>
> > >
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49167 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/25/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html
.html
I often dreamed of the crew of the Enterprise
kicking some gorilla butt. That would have
been better than a bunch of Ewoks beating
the Empire. But it's just as well Hollywood
didn't make it. And too bad they did make
the other one. It's pure greed to dumb down
science fiction into a mindless matinee.
In a message dated 10/24/2008 9:08:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
You can be assured
there will be no Alien Nation or Star Trek crossover.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49168 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: London POTA ad |
.html
.html
*** Very cool... It just makes me wish there had not been the low
budgeted sequels and that FOX had "stayed the course" and stayed "on" the
POTA... Now don't get me wrong, BENEATH is a cool film, but I just wish they had
done more films on an actual ape ruled planet, rather than jumping back to "our
time" and restarting the franchise from square one... POTA should be on an ape
dominated planet after all, don't you think? (That's a lot of the reason I like
the TV series so much... Apes are in control and they are the dominant
species... )*** <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49169 |
From: patrickmichaeltilton |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
> *** Good of a film as it is, no, I don't think CONQUEST answers much of > anything other than how to make a "rushed sequel" on a shoe-string budget... The
> events of CONQUEST happen waaaaay too quickly after the events of ESCAPE, and > despite Patrick's best efforts in his theory, I will never believe that
> Cornelius was lying about a revolt happening after centuries of servitude, rather > than a few years... ***
__________________________________________________________
*** You'll forgive me, here, if I chime in, I hope?
When Dehn was told to write APES 3 (i.e. ESCAPE), he did it with the intention that it would end with a shocker "cliff-hanger" setting the stage for APES 4
, which he had already planned, plot-wise and all. Before they even began filming ESCAPE, Dehn already knew what story he'd be telling next as CONQUEST.
After the Presidential Commission scene in ESCAPE, Cornelius and Zira admit to Lewis and Stevie that "there was one moment" during the foregoing that was -- shall we say -- "iffy." When they had
started to ask the Ape-onauts about Taylor. Cornelius and Zira admit to their two human friends ["We have to be HONEST
with someone!"] that they did indeed know Colonel Taylor.
Cornelius, if you will remember, when asked by the Commission member, had LIED to him: "No... is he a soldier?" Remember???
The reason he lied about that -- the reason he and Zira give to Dixon & Branton immediately afterwards -- is due to the fact that if
they had admitted to knowing Taylor, they would've then been asked if he were still alive...
... and Taylor CANNOT be alive, they say, because they saw the planet Earth, while they were up in orbit above it, destroyed!
They didn't want to reveal the fact that the planet would be destroyed in the wake of "an ape war of aggression" -- as their conversation with Milo at the Zoo plainly reveals the wise reticence they
should have to any such "full disclosure" to their "human captors."
Cornelius admits to Dixon and Branton that he had LIED to the Commission about that one single fact [i.e. having known Taylor]. It was the "one moment" that he had been untruthful... meaning that
everything else he and Zira had said to the Commission had been the truth
-- including the fact that the English language had been the language spoken by his ancestors [circa A.D. 3955] for "nearly two thousand years."
Remember that during the Presidential Commission hearing it is never revealed that the Ape-onauts came not only from Earth's future, but also from the planet Earth itself
. For all the Commission knows, in the aftermath of that hearing, the Ape-onauts could've come from some faraway planet orbiting a faraway star many many lightyears away from our Solar System. Hasslein asked,
"Where do you come from, Cornelius?" and Cornelius answered, "I'm not sure."
"Doctor Milo was sure," Zira adds. But she doesn't tell them WHERE Milo thought they had come from, only WHEN: "Of course the 'female' knows! We came from your future!"
That tells us (and Hasslein) the WHEN but not the WHERE. I would argue that the NASA scientists going over the flight record tapes would have been able to ascertain not only the exact year [EARTH-TIME] when that ship
had launched with the Ape-onauts aboard it -- 3955 -- but also where in Space-Time that launch had happened (i.e. on Earth).
But none of that information came out during that Commission meeting.
Remember, also, that after that first meeting of the Commission, when Hasslein is interviewed on TV by Bill Bonds, he speculates that the Ape-onauts were "jumped" from their time to our time due to some
incident "in the dark and turbulent corners of Outer Space":
"Now, Mister Bonds, I do not find it difficult to believe that in the dark and turbulent corridors of Outer Space, the impact of some distant planetary, even galactic disaster
, jumped the apes from their present into ours, and, indeed, the proof lies in their arrival among us, and in their spoken -- and I repeat, spoken -- testimony."
When Hasslein says this, he is still in ignorance about the complete flight record of that spaceship. It isn't until later -- after he gets Zira drunk and gets her to reveal the year on the "date meter"
as "... thirty-nine... fifty... something..." -- that he is told by the President that the exact year of Earth's destruction is "... thirty-nine fifty-FIVE... A.D., presumably."
So, then, Hasslein doesn't even know that the Apes came from EARTH in the future until Zira specifically tells him -- whilst drunk -- the following:
"When we were in space, we saw a bright, white, blinding light. Then we saw the rim of the Earth... melt... then there was a tornado in the sky."
Hasslein: "The date meter on the spaceship... what did it read after Earth's destruction?"
Zira: "Nineteen... seventy... three."
Hasslein: "And before -- before the white light and the tornado?"
Zira: "Thirty-nine... fifty... something."
This moment in the film is exactly when Hasslein first becomes aware that the event that jumped the apes from their time back to ours did not happen in some "distant planetary" location -- let alone a
distant "galactic disaster" -- but in the vicinity of the planet Earth. What Zira and Cornelius told to Dixon & Branton, sober, Zira told to Hasslein later on -- drunk on champagne.
It was to conceal the fact that they came from Earth (a destroyed Earth), initially, that Cornelius LIED to the Commission about whether or not they knew Taylor.
Cornelius LIED about that. But he didn't lie about the fact that his ancestors had been speaking English for "nearly TWO THOUSAND YEARS."
"I speak the language taught to me by my father and mother, who were taught by their fathers and mothers before them. It has been the language of our ancestors for nearly TWO THOUSAND YEARS. As to its origins,
ooh, who can be sure? The gorillas and orangutans of our community believed that God created the Ape in His own image, and that our language--"
Get this through your heads, guys & gals: Cornelius was telling the absolute truth here, as he knew it. This bit is not the "one moment" of untruthfulness mentioned by Dixon in the post-hearing scene.
Cornelius is providing us a specifically important nugget of information for the Dehn-invented timeline of the "future history" of the planet of the apes: that the English-speaking apes of 3955 were the
descendants of English-speaking apes going back "nearly 2,000 years."
Dehn, when he wrote that line, already had CONQUEST all planned out... a story about the surviving changeling son of Zira and Cornelius who would grow to maturity and, when aged 18 in the year 1991, would become the
Spartacus/Moses/Christ-figure of the original Ape Histories... the "history scrolls that were hidden from the masses" (probably by Zaius and his ancestors), a.k.a. the "Secret Scrolls."
The one thing that Cornelius would have to say -- later, to Hasslein and the two insulting CIA interrogators -- in order to protect the life of his unborn son in the near-future
-- is that the Ape Revolt dates some 500 years after the Pet Plague that he knows will happen soon (in fact, in exactly one decade, in the year 1983, eight years before the Ape Revolt will really
happen, with his son CAESAR leading it. Cornelius lies about the timing of that event in order to protect his son -- the future Ape King who will be revered for centuries after-the-fact as "Our
Savior." Instead of telling Hasslein the truth, that an ape named CAESAR will "turn the tables" on Man soon
, in a mere 18 years, he tells Hasslein that "an ape named ALDO" would become the first to articulate his refusal, some five centures after the Pet Plague strikes.
Why would Cornelius refer to "Aldo" as the ape-to-watch-out-for? Because Cornelius knows that Caesar will attempt to found a Dynasty... and that that attempt will fail due to the fact that Caesar's heir
(named CORNELIUS) will be murdered by a gorilla named Aldo. Cornelius tries to get Aldo murdered by Hasslein (or by some like-minded follower of Hasslein's agenda) so as to save the life of his yet-to-be-born
son's one-day heir... an ape who will uncoincidentally be given the name of his grandfather: Himself!
Cornelius gives two competing timelines regarding the Future: the wholly truthful one to the Commission and the mostly true yet selectively false one to the CIA interrogation team. BOTH TIMELINES CANNOT BE TRUE. And
Dehn himself knew it when he wrote it. He knew that Cornelius' son would be the hero of the next film, grown to adulthood in 1991. He knew that Apes living then, in 1973, would be alive
and speaking English during the Revolt against Mankind, in the near-future of 1991.
But it would've been foolish for Cornelius to tell Hasslein the true chronology of the near-future. If he would've said to Hasslein that the Pet Plague would happen 10 years in the future... that Man would
replace the Dogs and Cats with Monkeys and Apes... that Apes would subsequently be turned into Slaves... and that an ape named CAESAR would lead a slave-revolt against their human oppressors a mere EIGHT YEARS after the
Pet Plague, culminating in a Nuclear War some FIFTEEN YEARS after that... then what would likely have happened to him? To Zira? To their unborn child?
Hasslein would've probably called an armed soldier into the interrogation room, ordered him to hand over his gun, and right then-and-there murdered
them, the President's orders be damned!
Cornelius -- in LYING to Hasslein during that interrogation about the name of the Ape ["Aldo"] and the chronology of it [i.e. after at least 500 years] -- puts these arrogant humans into a false sense of
security. He lets them believe that Man will have another HALF A MILLENNIUM to rule the world... rather than only 33 more years, when the Nuclear War will be waged that will wipe out human civilization.
Not only does it makes sense for Cornelius to do this, it is what Dehn intended for the already-plotted APES 4, CONQUEST. Instead of writing a sequel like BENEATH (which was supposed to be the "last" of the
APES films), which ends with everybody dying as the very planet is destroyed, Dehn had to then write a 3rd film, in which the possibility of yet another sequel afterwards -- a 4th APES film -- could be planned, in the
event that APES 3 made enough money to warrant making a 4th film. That's why he ended the film with Baby Milo going "Ma-ma! Ma-ma!"
He could've ended the film with the murdered Apes -- Zira, Cornelius, and their true child -- lying on that ship. It would've been tragic, sure enough. The film could've ended with Man's future safe
from Ape dominance. But Dehn went out of his way to set the stage for the "future"... with the surviving Talking Chimp baby foreshadowing that future in a "twist" ending for the film. Dehn knew what
he was doing, people! He didn't write ESCAPE, ending it the way he did, without knowing what kind of story he'd be cooking up to follow it! He didn't stop typing after "THE END" and then say to
himself, "Well, that sequel's written. If FOX wants another one, well, then I'll have to figure out what the hell I can do to further explore this bizarro scenario... but I'll leave that for
later."
No... Dehn already knew the story for CONQUEST before he finished writing ESCAPE. He planned BOTH films, story-wise, when he was given the job: "Apes Live! Sequel Required!" Just as Paramount planned to
resurrect Spock in STAR TREK III while they filmed STAR TREK II, by putting in that one brief Mind-Meld shot: "Remember!"... knowing they would use that as the seed for the next film's story.
Jesus! Why else did Dehn put in all that Christ-imagery into ESCAPE??? Remember the Nativity scene: Armando's animal-filled menagerie tent where the Baby Savior was born, just like Christ in a barn? The President
makes a reference to Herod and the Slaughter of the Innocents... which Christ survived. And which BABY MILO survived, as part of Dehn's plan to tell the story of an Ape Savior, a Christ-like leader whose efforts
would complete the Circle that is the POTA timeline. Just as the story of Jesus, as told in the Gospels, begins with the Nativity and then jumps forwards to an event when he was a child-prodigy (aged 12, teaching in the
Temple) and then jumps forwards to his Baptism at about age 30... so, too, does Dehn begin the story of this Ape Messiah by giving him a parallel Nativity and Slaughter-of-the-Innocents episode.
And the next film -- CONQUEST -- would jump forwards to this Ape Messiah's emergence on the world scene to fulfill his "mission" -- whilst suffering a CRUCIFIXION and RESURRECTION, also paralleling
Christ.
Dehn had all that planned out when he began writing ESCAPE, people! Every detail that he put into ESCAPE was put there in anticipation of being elucidated by the following film, CONQUEST. And that includes the
duelling Chronologies given by Cornelius, the first to the Presidential Commission, the second (false) one to the antagonistic interrogators.
Cornelius can -- and does -- lie. When it suits him. When he has a reason to lie. Hell, we learn in PLANET that he had lied to Zaius and the Academy a year before, misusing his Travel Permit in order to get a chance
to "exceed his orders" and venture out into the Forbidden Zone. Cornelius and Zira were both deceptive when Zaius and Maximus rudely walked in on their (written) conversation with Taylor. Think about it! Does
Cornelius tell Zaius and Maximus, "Hey! Dig this! This human with the throat wound can WRITE! Can you BELIEVE it!? Look at these notes he's written to us, answering our questions, and asking questions of us!
LOOK at 'em!"
NO! Cornelius and Zira pretend that they're "conducting a new experiment" with this man she's named "Bright Eyes"... and when Zaius picks up the paper airplane, Zira tells him that it's
a toy that floats on the air... but she doesn't tell him that THE HUMAN MADE IT!!! Oh, there's no doubt that Zaius already knows Taylor made it. But Zira doesn't tell him that. And why not? Because she's
not stupid, and isn't willing to commit career suicide then-and-there.
So she and Cornelius LIE. They conceal the truth about Taylor's ability to write. They DECEIVE, out of necessity. Later on, Zira will become unreasonably idealistic regarding pure honesty ["... the time [for
Truth] is always Now!"] and her hatred of deceit. But she isn't above being deceitful when there is an overriding necessity. Such as the safety of her unborn son. Remember, Zira switches babies with Heloise...
not telling Cornelius that she had done so, and pretending that the baby with them on that old ship is their male child ["HE wants feeding" she says], rather than Heloise's female child Salome.
For God's sake, Zira is willing to deceive her beloved husband
at that moment. Why should anybody think that either Zira or Cornelius is somehow "above" deceiving humans whom they don't trust and whom they have valid reasons to fear?
Patrick
P.S. Stewart died from an airleak. We know that the cabin of that spaceship had a breathable atmosphere in it, since that's what Taylor was breathing during his Final Report! If air had leaked OUT of Stewart's
hibernation chamber, it had to have leaked OUTSIDE THE SHIP. Such a change in air pressure would account for the glass on her bunk's sliding door cracking. The air didn't leak out of her bunk into
the ship's cabin; it leaked from
her bunk to OUTSIDE the ship. The other 3 bunks were air-tight, so that the air in them didn't also evacuate to outside the ship. It's possible that some of the cabin's air leaked through the cracked
glass into Stewart's bunk and thence outside the ship through the punctured hull there.
The notion, however, that the ship had somehow landed prior to the splashdown in Dead Lake... and that Stewart had had some sort of adventure prior to returning to her hibernation bunk (etc etc etc)... uh, I just
don't buy it. Remember: Taylor says that HE had tucked his crew in for the Long Sleep. That procedure involved INJECTING a serum into them (as he finally did to himself) which, when combined, perhaps, with a
catalyst agent in the air supplied to each hibernation bunk, caused each astronaut to go into a state of hibernation. It is only after the 3 chambers open up to the cabin
air that the hibernation effect comes to an end. Witness how Taylor suddenly takes in a full inhalation of air after "nearly a year" of suspended animation, where his breathing rate had been slowed down
to a crawl. This first waking breath happens only after the bunk's sliding door opens up, when he's no longer breathing whatever specialized air had been provided in the sleep-bunk.
Further, I would surmise that the amount of serum to be injected had to be planned for a known duration of hibernation. Taylor knew that they would spend 6 months awake and then undergo 12 months of hibernation. Too
little serum would wear off too soon, and too much serum would keep them in suspended animation for longer than 12 months. The amount of serum injected would have to be enough to keep them in hibernation for the exact
amount of Ship-Time required for them to reach their Destination, 320 lightyears from Earth, for the "sleep-phase" of the journey -- 12 of the 18 months of Ship-Time.
Stewart's bunk-space had to have been punctured so that there was a hull-breach. When it sucked the air out of her bunk -- causing the glass in the sliding door to crack -- she remained unconscious due to the fact
that the serum in her bloodstream was still affecting her brain. But, even in suspended animation, she needs air, even if she only breathes in-and-out once every ten minutes or so. Taylor -- knowing that the air in her
bunk had to have leaked outside the ship -- says that she died IN HER SLEEP. She couldn't have woken up. Had she been able to wake up, she would've been able to press the button that makes the sliding door
retract into the ceiling-hull, not to mention undo the buckles on the straps holding her into the form-fitting mould.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49170 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
|
.html Sorry, Patrick, but there's just no logic to the idea that Cornelius
knew he and Zira would have a son who would lead the apes in
rebellion. The films don't support that idea, and it doesn't make any
sense from a logic standpoint. I mean no disrespect when I say that,
by the way, as I've always found your theories very interesting to
read, if a bit LSD-induced, but the idea that Caesar knew his
soon-to-be-born son would create the Planet of the Apes is, in my
opinion, unsupportable. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49171 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html.html
Was hoping you would!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of patrickmichaeltilton
Sent: Monday, 27 October 2008 3:18
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Sneaky
Stewart
--- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com , mlccougar@.. .
wrote:
> *** Good of a film as it is, no, I don't think CONQUEST answers much of
> anything other than how to make a "rushed sequel" on a
shoe-string budget... The
> events of CONQUEST happen waaaaay too quickly after the events of ESCAPE,
and
> despite Patrick's best efforts in his theory, I will never believe that
> Cornelius was lying about a revolt happening after centuries of servitude,
rather
> than a few years... ***
____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
***
You'll forgive me, here, if I chime in, I hope?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49172 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Sneaky Cornelius! |
.html.html
I agree it’s unsupportable –
but kinda consistent with the telepathy of Conquest!
And don’t forget if you subscribe to
the CIRCULAR timeline, it’s just going on so many times you’dd
eventually remember your….ummm….future! J
Oh dear – here comes Cougar! RUN!!!
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of rassmguy
Sent: Monday, 27 October 2008 5:03
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Sneaky
Stewart
Sorry, Patrick, but there's just no logic to the idea
that Cornelius
knew he and Zira would have a son who would lead the apes in
rebellion. The films don't support that idea, and it doesn't make any
sense from a logic standpoint. I mean no disrespect when I say that,
by the way, as I've always found your theories very interesting to
read, if a bit LSD-induced, but the idea that Caesar knew his
soon-to-be-born son would create the Planet of the Apes is, in my
opinion, unsupportable.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49173 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html
.html
Message
Maybe he was
injecting himself with something else entirely? Taylor the secret junkie...
;-)
Neil
That procedure involved INJECTING a serum into them (as he finally
did to himself) which, when combined, perhaps, with a catalyst agent in the
air supplied to each hibernation bunk, caused each astronaut to go into a
state of hibernation.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49174 |
From: Patrick Tilton |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html|
Rich, I believe you misspoke below when you say: "... the idea that CAESAR knew his soon-to-be-born son would create the Planet of the Apes..." Don't you mean CORNELIUS, instead of Caesar, Caesar being
his soon-to-be-born son?
My support for the notion that Cornelius (i.e. Zira's fiancee in PLANET, husband in BENEATH and ESCAPE) knew that his soon-to-be-born son would "create" the Planet of the Apes hinges on those Secret
Scrolls, which he describes as "history scrolls kept hidden from the masses." Everything he and Zira tell Hasslein and the other two interrogators regarding the "pre-history" that he -- as an
archaeologist -- had learned of, stems from the contents of those mysterious scrolls.
That interrogation scene is the first inkling we have that such pre-SACRED SCROLLS texts existed and were "kept hidden from the masses." It is from these SECRET SCROLLS that Cornelius and Zira inform
Hasslein (et al.) about the Plague... the replacement of the lost pets with Apes... the enslavement of those Apes, etc.
We never get to see those texts ourselves, and we only have Cornelius' and Zira's word that the contents of those scrolls are being faithfully described. I argue that most of the information they relay to
Hasslein is factual -- i.e. there was a Pet Plague, the dead dogs and cats were replaced by apes, the apes were eventually enslaved, etc etc -- but that the TIMELINE they infer
is and must be exaggerated. The so-called "centuries" they refer to being replacements for what those Secret Scrolls originally had as "years."
It wasn't 500 years after the Plague that Apes first
began to speak English, as so many of the advocates of the Caesar-changed-the-Future theory insist. Cornelius had previously testified that his culture's ancestors had been speaking the language we call English
"for nearly TWO THOUSAND YEARS." No matter how you slice it, Cornelius cannot be telling the truth in both
instances: one of them MUST be a lie. I argue that Zira and Cornelius trusted Dixon and Branton enough to admit the truth to them -- Zira says, "I have to be honest with someone!" They then go on to
reveal the horrible truth about the destruction of the Earth that they had witnessed from the windows of the spaceship.
DIXON
But... there was a moment--
ZIRA
There was... when he started to ask us--
CORNELIUS
Zira!
ZIRA
Cornelius, I think we should tell them--
CORNELIUS
No!
ZIRA
But, o-only to Lewis and Stevie.
CORNELIUS
Oh, Zira...
ZIRA
I have to be honest with someone! Cornelius... please? You tell them.
Then Cornelius and Zira admit to Dixon and Branton that
1. They did know Colonel Taylor and came to love him.
2. Where they came from, Apes did not love Humans.
3. Apes [gorillas, we know] hunted Humans for sport.
4. Apes used Human bodies, alive and dead, experimentally for anatomical dissection and scientific research.
5. From the windows of the spaceship, they saw the Earth destroyed.
We know, Rich, that all five of these "revelations" Zira and Cornelius impart to Lewis and Stevie are true
. As Dixon says, there was "one moment" during the hearing -- one moment when the Apes were not
telling the truth. It was "... when he started to ask us" ... about what? About whether or not they knew Colonel Taylor. You'll remember that, when asked it point blank, Cornelius LIED to the
Commission: "No... is he a soldier?"
That was the ONLY LIE they told to the Commission. That they didn't
know Taylor. Everything else they said was the Truth, including the fact that in their time -- A.D. 3955 -- their language [English] had been the language of their ancestors for "nearly 2000 years."
Dehn has plainly admitted in at least one interview that he intended the sequels he wrote to be a Circular timeline. That BATTLE sets the stage, ultimately, for PLANET and BENEATH. That's why he has Mendez in
BATTLE, with the Doomsday Bomb becoming an object of veneration for those "mutant" survivors. Sure, about 600 years after BATTLE takes place, there's a society of Chimps, Orangutans, and Humans living in
peace, taught their history by a benevolent "Lawgiver"... but there aren't any Gorillas in that audience, you'll remember. The only logical conclusion to draw for the lack of gorilla children in this
"nice" Lawgiver's audience is that the gorillas will not join in with a mixed-race crowd, just as happened when Aldo and his fellow gorillas stormed out of the Council when Caesar welcomed humans into it.
We know that Caesar's story -- or, a religiously-embellished version of it, anyway -- existed in the year 2670, since the Lawgiver tells that story to his audience of children. The last image we have from BATTLE
is of the statue of Caesar, depicted holding a SCROLL with his right hand. It's a fair bet that the scroll held in the hand of statue-Caesar is the same scroll that the Lawgiver reads from (the Lawgiver's scroll
either the actual scroll in question, or a copy of it). This scene, which takes place in the year 2670, predates the writing of the SACRED SCROLLS by about 85 years: we know this because Zaius told Taylor that the
Sacred Scrolls were written "twelve hundred years ago" -- i.e. 1,200 years before 3955, or the year c. 2755. In PLANET, Zira refers to artifacts Cornelius had discovered in the Forbidden Zone which were
"older than RECORDED TIME." The "recorded time" she's referring to goes back only 1,200 years -- the human-hating Lawgiver
being the one who recorded the official "history" that Apes are taught in their schools in Ape City.
But Zaius and his ancestors had been keeping hidden from the masses OLDER scrolls... older works of history: the "SECRET SCROLLS" Cornelius calls them. When did Cornelius and Zira become aware of these
older scrolls? It had to have been sometime after the events of PLANET and before they launched into orbit with Milo. In my scenario, Zaius conveys those scrolls to Zira and Cornelius just before he heads out of Ape
City with Ursus. That is, Cornelius and Zira don't know about those scrolls when they find Brent and Nova in their home.
In other words, not only did Cornelius and Zira then become aware of this older "history" that they'd been almost completely ignorant of... but Zaius knew that history, too. He had known it all along.
He was one of the few who would ever know those old stories from the Secret Scrolls. Stories about how Man once had a high civilization... and, prior to destroying it, how they had lost their beloved pets to a Plague...
replaced those "dogs" and "cats" with Apes, whom they had eventually reduced to Slavery.
And what does the scroll say then? The Lawgiver in BATTLE tells of how God, in His wrath, sent the world a Savior, miraculously born of two PARENT APES who had descended on Earth from Earth's own Future.
Dehn intended this series to be a Circular timeline. Thus, he intended for this mysterious pre-history to have been known all along to the line of Zaius, culminating in Dr. Zaius eventually bequeathing those scrolls
to Cornelius and Zira. Thus, Cornelius and Zira were able to read that story of King Caesar for themselves, shortly before they joined Milo on their flight in Taylor's ship.
When they launched that spaceship, they didn't expect to witness the destruction of the planet Earth. Nor did they expect to be propelled through a Timewarp to a date 1,982 years in their own Past. They had no
inkling that the two "parent apes" of King Caesar in that strange pre-history scroll were themselves...
... until, that is, Milo explained to them that they had, indeed, travelled from Earth's future to Earth's past. It is only then that the "unbelievable" notion of time-travelling "parent
apes" bringing King Caesar into the world would become not only possible but probable.
It would then make sense to them that old King Caesar had named his doomed heir "Cornelius"... he had to have named him after his own father. And doesn't it help to explain how Zira can have become
such a gorilla-hating person? Sure, she had contempt for the "bully" Ursus prior to their launch with Milo in the ship. But was Zira -- prior to her learning about the first Ape-on-Ape murder -- thoroughly
hateful of gorillas? What about Julius?
Cornelius refers to Milo having been "murdered" in a human zoo. Cornelius knows that the gorilla who killed Milo was an animal, a non-intelligent ape. Cornelius makes the distinction between the
intelligent Talking Apes and the nonintelligent "primitive" apes, such as when Zira -- just before giving birth -- attempts to get Heloise's baby Salome to say "Ma-ma"... just "getting into
practice," she says. For Cornelius to attribute murderous
intent to that primitive gorilla who had killed Milo... suggests, to me, that Cornelius, by that point, was more-than-suspecting that he and Zira were the "parent apes" written of in that old scroll, who
had "descended on Earth from Earth's own future." Whose son would beget an heir to a hoped-for dynasty... hopes that would be dashed due to the ugly fact that a gorilla
named Aldo had murdered Prince Cornelius.
Cornelius knew that the ape Savior would be a chimpanzee named CAESAR, the son of two "parent apes" who had descended on Earth from Earth's own future. The truth of that didn't dawn on him until
after Milo told them, "I know where we are... I know what has happened."
One other thing: Cornelius and Zira had learned of and read those "Secret Scrolls" that Zaius had "kept hidden" from the masses... but Milo had not. Cornelius knows -- based on his testimony that
his ancestors had spoken English for nearly 2,000 years (a timeframe 800 years longer than the "recorded time" he had learned of from official History) -- that there are English-speaking Apes on Earth in 1973,
or, there will be soon. But Milo doesn't know that, since he tells his friends, "Apes, at this instant in time, cannot yet talk. For the moment, we should follow their example." Milo may have been a genius
far in advance of his time, but he had not been shown the Secret Scrolls. Perhaps Cornelius and Zira spoke of them to him that night before Dixon and Branton showed up at the zoo to begin studying them.
One other item. I ask you, How did Caesar know that Man would "finally and self-destructively" wage a Nuclear War, reducing their cities to "radioactive rubble"? Is he genuinely able to see into
the Future, like some kind of simian Nostradamus?
Let's think about it logically. The ONLY people who had such knowledge about the future were his time-traveling parents, Zira and Cornelius. Here's how I connect-the-dots.
1. Cornelius and Zira are given the Secret Scrolls to read by Zaius.
2. In that scroll, reference is made to "the vilest war in human history" in which "the cities of the world were flattened" -- and, out of one such city, Caesar led his people to live in peace
according to Divine Will.
3. In the story of Caesar's journey to "Hell" with Virgil and MacDonald, reference is made to the RADIOACTIVITY present there, an after-effect of that "vilest war".
4. After time-travelling back from Doomsday in 3955 to the year 1973, Cornelius and Zira know that there will a Plague 10 years after the birth of King Caesar... that Caesar would rescue his people from slavery
after another 18 years... and that after a further 15 years the "vilest war" would be waged, causing the cities of Man to be flattened and rendered "radioactive rubble."
5. Before leaving Armando, Cornelius tells him that an old old story says that Apes were once enslaved by Man... and freed from slavery by a Savior named CAESAR, 15 years before Man destroyed his civilization with
bombs that cause RADIOACTIVITY.
6. When the Plague strikes in 1983, and Apes are subsequently enslaved, Armando knows that he is living in the time Cornelius spoke of. He knows that an ape named CAESAR will lead Apes to freedom and will survive a
Nuclear War to rule over Apes and Humans.
7. Armando RENAMES "Baby Milo" a.k.a. "Solomon" (the male-equivalent of "Salome" whom he had replaced) as he had been known... renaming him CAESAR in private. Armando wants to fulfill
Cornelius' "Secret Scrolls" as if they are Prophecy (which they are, due to Time Travel). Armando loved chimpanzees the best of all apes... and Zira and Cornelius the best of all chimpanzees. Thus, Armando
wants their son to be the King Caesar that Cornelius had told him about.
8. After renaming "Milo"/"Solomon" CAESAR, Armando eventually brings him to Breck's city and -- starting at the Pet Memorial -- Armando begins to clue Caesar in on the events that are
"destined" to happen in the near future.
9. Armando tells Caesar that there is going to be a Nuclear War in 15 years' time. Caesar had no way of knowing this would eventually happen; but he becomes aware of it now, since Armando had foreknowledge of it
-- knowledge he could only have acquired from someone who was capable of having foreknowledge: Cornelius, the historian from the Future.
10. After Caesar defeats Breck, he then rants to MacDonald about how his people will crouch and conspire and plot and plan for the INEVITABLE DAY OF MAN'S DOWNFALL... the day of the writing in the sky, when he
finally and self-destructively turns his own weapons against himself. Where the sea is a DEAD sea and the land a WASTELAND. Caesar can only have gotten such dead-on information about the condition of Earth in the Future
from an EYEWITNESS. Caesar got it from Armando, who got it from the eyewitness Cornelius, who got it from having been there (in the Future) and from having read about the true timeline of events of the life of King
Caesar, from his Birth to the Plague to the Enslavement of Apes to the Freeing of the Slaves and to the Nuclear War that ended Man's civilization. Caesar predicts Nuclear War with confidence, having been given
inside information about it. Cornelius never told Dixon & Branton about the Nuclear War that would
happen during their lifetimes (assuming they lived to the year 2006). Cornelius never told Hasslein that there would be a Nuclear War. He wanted Hasslein to believe the lie that Man would rule the Earth for at least
another 5 centuries, instead.
But Cornelius DID tell Armando about the soon-to-occur Nuclear War. He had
to have told him! Caesar couldn't have learned about it any other way! Only Armando had been in a position to inform him of that "inevitable day of Man's downfall." The only other option is to
grant to Caesar the supernatural ability to see into the Future, like a prophet from Bible times.
I don't consider that "logical" though. Caesar had foreknowledge of Man's "vilest war" because Armando had told him of it... having been given information from Cornelius, who had learned
of it from the Secret Scrolls. This proves that Man's civilization never did last that 5 centuries more that Hasslein had been led to believe -- that so many POTA fans want to believe.
But Dehn was projecting his own pessimism into this film series when he concocted his sequel stories. When he planned ESCAPE and CONQUEST (and the story for BATTLE), he designed it based on the archetypal events of
the Epic Hero. The Miraculous Birth... the danger as an infant... the coming-of-age to Rule... the Death-and-Resurrection... the Descent into "Hell"... the founding of a Culture. Storybooks are full of such
figures out of Myth. George Lucas designed the plot of STAR WARS using these archetypes of Joseph Campbell's "Hero with a thousand faces." Dehn, a poet himself, knew those archetypes well enough to design
the Life of Caesar around it. The plots of ESCAPE, CONQUEST and BATTLE didn't just happen! Dehn designed the plot structure around this Epic paradigm. He was able to make Caesar a "prophet" -- accurately
predicting a Nuclear War -- by using the Science Fiction element of TIME TRAVEL to provide characters from the Future to know their
own history as the yet-to-happen Future from the point of view of the distant Past. Jumping the Ape-onauts from 3955 to 1973 was a brilliant way to set-the-stage for the Life of the Epic Hero CAESAR. The "Secret
Scrolls" are the key to it all, connecting the dots from what Cornelius came to know to what Caesar was able to foretell on the Night of the Fires.
Think of it this way: If Cornelius truly believed that an ape named Aldo would be the first ape capable of speaking articulately -- expressing REFUSAL to a human "master" -- would he be so callous as to
make him a target for Hasslein's descendants in the future that is presumably just over 500 years away? Wouldn't he be signing Aldo's death warrant? Wouldn't it be in Man's best interest to kill any
ape who might be given the name "Aldo" by a human master? Wouldn't Cornelius be in danger of altering the future, by clueing Hasslein in on the identity of the First Talking Ape, Aldo? If Hasslein learns
of a real Aldo who will be alive in some 500 years' time, then Hasslein's descendants -- forewarned -- will be forearmed, and able to nip that simian revolt in the bud by slaughtering Aldo.
No... it just doesn't make sense. Cornelius told Hasslein about "an ape named Aldo" because he was hoping that the future murderer of his own grandson would be prevented from committing that murder.
Cornelius was attempting to manipulate Hasslein (and his ilk) into ensuring the survival of his yet-to-be-born son's kingly dynasty. Cornelius hopes to change the future... to save his namesake, the heir of Caesar,
so that CHIMPANZEES will be in control of the government, rather than the Orangutans and Gorillas. In 3955, Cornelius lamented that "we chimpanzees are too few"... that they have no Power, politically. As long
as there are Gorillas and Orangutans running the show, the Chimpanzees are subjected to oppression (the Quota System, etc).
Cornelius finds himself in the position of perhaps being able to CHANGE ALL THAT. By lying to Hasslein... to manipulate him into possibly killing Aldo before Aldo can get a chance to become the simian Cain,
murdering the chimpanzee heir to Caesar's throne.
How can you not see the logic in that? It makes perfect sense to me, and it makes sense of information presented in those sequel movies that otherwise do not make sense.
Ah, well. To each their own!
Patrick
--- On Sun, 10/26/08, rassmguy <handleyr@...> wrote:
From: rassmguy <handleyr@...> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Sneaky Stewart To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, October 26, 2008, 2:03 PM
Sorry, Patrick, but there's just no logic to the idea that Cornelius knew he and Zira would have a son who would lead the apes in
rebellion. The films don't support that idea, and it doesn't make any sense from a logic standpoint. I mean no disrespect when I say that,
by the way, as I've always found your theories very interesting to read, if a bit LSD-induced, but the idea that Caesar knew his soon-to-be-born son would create the Planet of the Apes is, in my
opinion, unsupportable.
|
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49175 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.htmlOr cocaine, like Holmes!
---- Neil Foster < ntfoster@...> wrote:
> Maybe he was injecting himself with something else entirely? Taylor the
> secret junkie... ;-)
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf
> Of patrickmichaeltilton
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 3:18 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Sneaky Stewart
>
>
>
>
> That procedure involved INJECTING a serum into them (as he finally did
> to himself) which, when combined, perhaps, with a catalyst agent in the
> air supplied to each hibernation bunk, caused each astronaut to go into
> a state of hibernation.
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=49169/stime=1225041512/nc1=5008815/nc2=3848627/nc3=3858794>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49176 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 10/26/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, Patrick Tilton
<patrickmichaeltilton@...> wrote:
> Rich, I believe you misspoke below when you say: "...
> the idea that CAESAR knew his soon-to-be-born son would
> create the Planet of the Apes..." Don't you mean
> CORNELIUS, instead of Caesar, Caesar being his soon-to-
>be-born son?
Clearly, yes.
> My support for the notion that Cornelius
> (i.e. Zira's fiancee in PLANET, husband in
> BENEATH and ESCAPE) knew that his soon-to-
> be-born son would "create" the Planet of the
> Apes hinges on those Secret Scrolls, which
> he describes as "history scrolls kept hidden
> from the masses."
<SNIP FOR BREVITY>
I'll give you this--you've definitely thought it out, and have
actually made a compelling case for your assertion. I think it's
off-base, and that this is not what's happening in the films, but I
can respect what you've come up with. It has a certain elegance and
originality to it. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49177 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html
.html
Message
Thanks for that
guys, that's one less comic story I have to bother drawing now!
;-)
Neil
The notion, however, that the ship had somehow landed prior to the
splashdown in Dead Lake... and that Stewart had had some sort of adventure
prior to returning to her hibernation bunk (etc etc etc)... uh, I just don't
buy it. Remember: Taylor says that HE had tucked his crew in for the Long
Sleep. That procedure involved INJECTING a serum into them (as he
finally did to himself) which, when combined, perhaps, with a catalyst agent
in the air supplied to each hibernation bunk, caused each astronaut to go into
a state of hibernation. It is only after the 3 chambers open up to the
cabin air that the hibernation effect comes to an end. Witness how
Taylor suddenly takes in a full inhalation of air after "nearly a year" of
suspended animation, where his breathing rate had been slowed down to a crawl.
This first waking breath happens only after the bunk's sliding door
opens up, when he's no longer breathing whatever specialized air had been
provided in the sleep-bunk.
Further, I would surmise that the amount of serum to be injected had to be
planned for a known duration of hibernation. Taylor knew that they would spend
6 months awake and then undergo 12 months of hibernation. Too little serum
would wear off too soon, and too much serum would keep them in suspended
animation for longer than 12 months. The amount of serum injected would have
to be enough to keep them in hibernation for the exact amount of Ship-Time
required for them to reach their Destination, 320 lightyears from Earth, for
the "sleep-phase" of the journey -- 12 of the 18 months of Ship-Time.
Stewart's bunk-space had to have been punctured so that there was a
hull-breach. When it sucked the air out of her bunk -- causing the glass in
the sliding door to crack -- she remained unconscious due to the fact that the
serum in her bloodstream was still affecting her brain. But, even in suspended
animation, she needs air, even if she only breathes in-and-out once every ten
minutes or so. Taylor -- knowing that the air in her bunk had to have leaked
outside the ship -- says that she died IN HER SLEEP. She couldn't have woken
up. Had she been able to wake up, she would've been able to press the button
that makes the sliding door retract into the ceiling-hull, not to mention undo
the buckles on the straps holding her into the form-fitting mould.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49178 |
From: sallywhitty@bigpond.com |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.htmlYeah - screw it.
---- Neil Foster < ntfoster@...> wrote:
> Thanks for that guys, that's one less comic story I have to bother
> drawing now! ;-)
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf
> Of patrickmichaeltilton
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 3:18 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Sneaky Stewart
>
>
>
>
> The notion, however, that the ship had somehow landed prior to the
> splashdown in Dead Lake... and that Stewart had had some sort of
> adventure prior to returning to her hibernation bunk (etc etc etc)...
> uh, I just don't buy it. Remember: Taylor says that HE had tucked his
> crew in for the Long Sleep. That procedure involved INJECTING a serum
> into them (as he finally did to himself) which, when combined, perhaps,
> with a catalyst agent in the air supplied to each hibernation bunk,
> caused each astronaut to go into a state of hibernation. It is only
> after the 3 chambers open up to the cabin air that the hibernation
> effect comes to an end. Witness how Taylor suddenly takes in a full
> inhalation of air after "nearly a year" of suspended animation, where
> his breathing rate had been slowed down to a crawl. This first waking
> breath happens only after the bunk's sliding door opens up, when he's no
> longer breathing whatever specialized air had been provided in the
> sleep-bunk.
>
> Further, I would surmise that the amount of serum to be injected had to
> be planned for a known duration of hibernation. Taylor knew that they
> would spend 6 months awake and then undergo 12 months of hibernation.
> Too little serum would wear off too soon, and too much serum would keep
> them in suspended animation for longer than 12 months. The amount of
> serum injected would have to be enough to keep them in hibernation for
> the exact amount of Ship-Time required for them to reach their
> Destination, 320 lightyears from Earth, for the "sleep-phase" of the
> journey -- 12 of the 18 months of Ship-Time.
>
> Stewart's bunk-space had to have been punctured so that there was a
> hull-breach. When it sucked the air out of her bunk -- causing the glass
> in the sliding door to crack -- she remained unconscious due to the fact
> that the serum in her bloodstream was still affecting her brain. But,
> even in suspended animation, she needs air, even if she only breathes
> in-and-out once every ten minutes or so. Taylor -- knowing that the air
> in her bunk had to have leaked outside the ship -- says that she died IN
> HER SLEEP. She couldn't have woken up. Had she been able to wake up, she
> would've been able to press the button that makes the sliding door
> retract into the ceiling-hull, not to mention undo the buckles on the
> straps holding her into the form-fitting mould.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49179 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html
.html
He was smuggling Cuban cigars
aboard a spaceship and smoking
them after the rest of the crew was
asleep. How do I know it was a Cuban?
Simple. If you were an astronaut, and
you were going into space with quite
probably the last cigar you would ever
smoke, what would you take? You can
bet it's not just some El Cheapo brand.
In a message dated 10/26/2008 4:43:34 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
ntfoster@... writes:
Maybe he was
injecting himself with something else entirely? Taylor the secret junkie...
;-)
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49180 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.html
.html
If anyone is on a 7% solution
it's Patrick. Just look at the
way the theories in his posts
ramble on, and on and on and . . .
In a message dated 10/26/2008 8:50:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
Or
cocaine, like Holmes!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49181 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49182 |
From: John |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Sneaky Stewart |
.htmlGood. Now you'll have time to work on the Power Record comics. ;)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for that guys, that's one less comic story I have to bother
> drawing now! ;-)
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of patrickmichaeltilton
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 3:18 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Sneaky Stewart
>
>
>
>
> The notion, however, that the ship had somehow landed prior to the
> splashdown in Dead Lake... and that Stewart had had some sort of
> adventure prior to returning to her hibernation bunk (etc etc
etc)...
> uh, I just don't buy it. Remember: Taylor says that HE had tucked
his
> crew in for the Long Sleep. That procedure involved INJECTING a
serum
> into them (as he finally did to himself) which, when combined,
perhaps,
> with a catalyst agent in the air supplied to each hibernation bunk,
> caused each astronaut to go into a state of hibernation. It is only
> after the 3 chambers open up to the cabin air that the hibernation
> effect comes to an end. Witness how Taylor suddenly takes in a full
> inhalation of air after "nearly a year" of suspended animation,
where
> his breathing rate had been slowed down to a crawl. This first
waking
> breath happens only after the bunk's sliding door opens up, when
he's no
> longer breathing whatever specialized air had been provided in the
> sleep-bunk.
>
> Further, I would surmise that the amount of serum to be injected
had to
> be planned for a known duration of hibernation. Taylor knew that
they
> would spend 6 months awake and then undergo 12 months of
hibernation.
> Too little serum would wear off too soon, and too much serum would
keep
> them in suspended animation for longer than 12 months. The amount of
> serum injected would have to be enough to keep them in hibernation
for
> the exact amount of Ship-Time required for them to reach their
> Destination, 320 lightyears from Earth, for the "sleep-phase" of the
> journey -- 12 of the 18 months of Ship-Time.
>
> Stewart's bunk-space had to have been punctured so that there was a
> hull-breach. When it sucked the air out of her bunk -- causing the
glass
> in the sliding door to crack -- she remained unconscious due to the
fact
> that the serum in her bloodstream was still affecting her brain.
But,
> even in suspended animation, she needs air, even if she only
breathes
> in-and-out once every ten minutes or so. Taylor -- knowing that the
air
> in her bunk had to have leaked outside the ship -- says that she
died IN
> HER SLEEP. She couldn't have woken up. Had she been able to wake
up, she
> would've been able to press the button that makes the sliding door
> retract into the ceiling-hull, not to mention undo the buckles on
the
> straps holding her into the form-fitting mould.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49183 |
From: Neil |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.htmlI've just uploaded a sketch I did for a possible cover to the files
section
Neil
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@...> wrote:
> By the way - Neil and I are working on a new comic that features
Stewart.
> Neil - care to share the thumbnail roughs? <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49184 |
From: John |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
.htmlSo this is after he stabbed Stewart but before he put her back in her
chamber? :) You can make even the craziest off the wall Planet of
the Apes story look amazing. Bring back the robot!!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, PotaDG@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This email message is a notification to let you know that
> a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
> group.
>
> File : /Members' Art gallery/Stewart cover.jpg
> Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
> Description : 'Stewart story' cover sketch idea
>
> You can access this file at the URL:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Members%27%20Art%
20gallery/Stewart%20cover.jpg
>
> To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
>
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.htm
lfiles
>
> Regards,
>
> munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49185 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
.html
.html
Message
It's not her
blood, it's a tease. I really should post detailed explanations with everything
I draw these days it seems.
Neil
So this is after he stabbed Stewart but before he put her back in her
chamber?
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49186 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
.html
.html
Message
Rereading that it sounds a tad harsh
, my apologies. I was going off
over something non POTA art
related, sorry, bad timing, no
offence or anything
intended.
Neil
It's not her
blood, it's a tease. I really should post detailed explanations with
everything I draw these days it seems.
Neil
So this is after he stabbed Stewart but before he put her back in her
chamber?
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49187 |
From: John |
Date: 10/27/2008 |
| Subject: Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
.htmlNone taken. I was havin' a go at the picture anyway. No matter what
is truly going on in the picture, its awesome.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> Rereading that it sounds a tad harsh, my apologies. I was going off
over
> something non POTA art related, sorry, bad timing, no offence or
> anything intended.
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of Neil Foster
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 6:58 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
>
>
>
>
>
> It's not her blood, it's a tease. I really should post detailed
> explanations with everything I draw these days it seems.
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of John
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 6:55 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: New file uploaded to PotaDG
>
>
>
> So this is after he stabbed Stewart but before he put her back in
her
> chamber?
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=49185/stime=1225141099/nc1=5008815/nc2=3858794/nc3=3848607>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49188 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil" <ntfoster@...> wrote: > > I've just uploaded a sketch I did for a possible cover to the files > section >
> Neil > >
Great to see Neil, got that Frazetta primate and helpless women vibe going

http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w252/hill19652000/FA86.jpg
Fully painted ??
(It'd be great with all them greens and purples)
Best,Graham.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49189 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html.html
Hey – that’s a nice pic!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Graham Hill
Sent: Tuesday, 28 October 2008
7:27 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ,
"Neil" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> I've just uploaded a sketch I did for a possible cover to the files
> section
>
> Neil
>
>
Great to see Neil, got that Frazetta primate and helpless women vibe going

http://i178. photobucket. com/albums/ w252/hill1965200 0/FA86.jpg
Fully
painted
??
(It'd be
great with all them greens and purples)
Best,Graham.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49190 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3549 |
.html>Posted by: "
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com" PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
>This email message is a notification to let you know that
>a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
>group.
>Description : 'Stewart story' cover sketch idea
>munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
That's great work, Neil. You should be doing comic art professionally. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49191 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> Hey - that's a nice pic!
>
>
>
oh...just to make it clear it's a Frazetta.
Graham. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49192 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html.html
Yes – I know!
But it is nice….
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Graham Hill
Sent: Wednesday, 29 October 2008
1:00 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Dead Stewart
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hey - that's a nice pic!
>
>
>
oh...just to make it clear it's a Frazetta.
Graham.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49193 |
From: Graham Hill |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
.html
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote: > > Yes - I know! > > > > But it is nice.. >
>
It's the purples...
Graham.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49194 |
From: John |
Date: 10/28/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Dead Stewart |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49195 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/29/2008 |
| Subject: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49196 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/29/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html.html
Me too – looks like a good, well put
together special!
CAN’T WAIT!!!!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008
6:12 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA
Blu-ray footage!!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49197 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/29/2008 |
| Subject: American Youth Symphony Salutes Jerry Goldsmith |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49198 |
From: John |
Date: 10/29/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.htmlMe three! Actually new special features none of us have seen.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> Me too - looks like a good, well put together special!
>
>
>
> CAN'T WAIT!!!!
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of
> Alex Ruiz
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008 6:12 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!!
>
>
>
> Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage.
>
> <http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEA87EDH1QvLDJ>
> http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEA87EDH1QvLDJ
>
>
>
> Now I'm really getting pumped! 6 days and counting :o)
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
>
> Al
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49199 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
.html
.html
I cannot believe the "discussions" infesting the
"other" group. James will not admit that there
ever was a female orangutan in Conquest, nor
that anyone could survive in the desert for a
week or more. No one is that stupid, except
James, of course. I'm not even sure he believes
any of this. I think he's just arguing to boost the
number of posts over there. It's driving me nuts!
Does anyone here believe that Orang was male
because the script says so? Or eve considered
it? And how do you look at a picture of an oasis
and say there's not enough there to sustain life?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49200 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
.html
.html
*** I know the discussions you're talking about and I don't find
either of those as annoying as you're seeming to... The one getting me is the
whole "third ship" thing and when I ask(ed) where the other crew members are, I
get no answer to that...
I wish there were more going on here so I'd have something to
counteract the non responsiveness over there... I don't mind people having
different opinions as long as they say "why" they hold such an opinion...
***
In a message dated 10/30/08 2:36:00 AM Central Standard Time, TZer0@...
writes:
I cannot believe the "discussions" infesting the
"other" group. James will not admit that there
ever was a female orangutan in Conquest, nor
that anyone could survive in the desert for a
week or more. No one is that stupid, except
James, of course. I'm not even sure he believes
any of this. I think he's just arguing to boost the
number of posts over there. It's driving me nuts!
Does anyone here believe that Orang was male
because the script says so? Or eve considered
it? And how do you look at a picture of an oasis
and say there's not enough there to sustain life?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49201 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
.html
.html
Message
There are no other
crew members. According to that theory there are 4 spare seats left over in
two rescue ships. Enough for all the 4 missing original astronauts to sit in
when they have been rescued. Pretty simple to understand.
I myself would
find those discussions annoying, if only for the reason that we've already
debated that stuff to death (probably more than once) already over the
years.
Neil
*** I know the discussions you're talking about and I don't find
either of those as annoying as you're seeming to... The one getting me is the
whole "third ship" thing and when I ask(ed) where the other crew members are,
I get no answer to
that...
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49202 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
.html
.html
Message
I thought everyone
had figured this out years ago. I'm sure a couple of us have been saying as much
for a good few years now.
Neil
I cannot believe the "discussions" infesting the
"other" group. James will not admit that there
ever was a female orangutan in Conquest, nor
that anyone could survive in the desert for a
week or more. No one is that stupid, except
James, of course. I'm not even sure he believes
any of this. I think he's just arguing to boost the
number of posts over there.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49203 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
.html.html
It’s a tactic, and you can’t
blame him!
Discussion on the Planet of the Apes seems
to be dead and buried.
I say good on James if he’s “playing
a role” that results in people “having a chat”!
You guys do realize these are “CHAT”
groups right? ie the entire OBJECTIVE is that people DISCUSS Planet of
the Apes.
T – we all know if you want to boost
posts you:
(1) say something bad about Jerry Golsmith (and wait for about 20 insulting,
brainless onslaughts from Rory, for which there will be at least another 60
posts generated from Rory’s);
(2) mention Kim (and LordT will suddenly
find voice);
(3) create a HOTMAIL address and chime in
with “I love Tim Burton’s movie!”;
Neil – can you throw in a
couple!?!?!? J
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008
10:28 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] What's
another word for Bullsh*t?
I thought everyone had figured this out years ago. I'm
sure a couple of us have been saying as much for a good few years now.
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008
6:36 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: [PotaDG] What's another
word for Bullsh*t?
I cannot believe the "discussions" infesting the
"other" group. James will not admit that
there
ever was a female orangutan in Conquest, nor
that anyone could survive in the desert for a
week or more. No one is that stupid, except
James, of course. I'm not even sure he believes
any of this. I think he's just arguing to boost the
number of posts over there.

<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49204 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html.html
Is that Veetus’ mate Eric Greene?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008
6:12 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA
Blu-ray footage!!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49205 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
.html
.html
Message
I could add a few
more tricks of the trade but why bother. If people really can't (or don't want
to) figure it out for themselves then tough. It's not that difficult to pick
this sort of stuff and if some are willing to put up with it so be it, it's
nothing to me.
Neil
It’s a tactic, and
you can’t blame him!
Neil – can you throw
in a
couple!?!?!?
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49206 |
From: rassmguy |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Untitled comic |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49207 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Untitled comic |
.html
.html
Message
The link doesn't
work Rich.
Neil
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49208 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Untitled comic |
.html.html
Is it in the DG Files?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 8:07
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Untitled
comic
The link doesn't work Rich.
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of rassmguy
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008
7:58 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: [PotaDG] Untitled comic
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49209 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
.html
.html
Message
I just had a quick
look and I notice he is against changing or adding stuff to the originals but is
totally okay with the Brokensea audio adaptation? Excuse me if I'm being
ignorant but didn't they add a whole lot of stuff as well as changing some
things?
Doesn't make a lot
of sense to me and I don't see why anyone would want to debate something with
someone who makes up the rules (his) as he goes along but they still do!
Sigh...
Neil
I cannot believe the "discussions" infesting the
"other" group. James will not admit that there
ever was a female orangutan in Conquest, nor
that anyone could survive in the desert for a
week or more. No one is that stupid, except
James, of course. I'm not even sure he believes
any of this. I think he's just arguing to boost the
number of posts over there. It's driving me nuts!
Does anyone here believe that Orang was male
because the script says so? Or eve considered
it? And how do you look at a picture of an oasis
and say there's not enough there to sustain life?
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49210 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Untitled comic |
.html
.html
Message
Must be as Rich
did say that he was looking through the files.
Neil
Is it in the DG
Files?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 8:07
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Untitled
comic
The link doesn't work
Rich.
Neil
-----Original
Message----- From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of rassmguy Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 7:58
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject: [PotaDG] Untitled
comic

<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49211 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html.html
Yeah, that's Eric.
I really don't expect these special features to run more than 10 to 15 minutes or so, usually features that are presented in the same disc as the movie, don't. But it's really great to see something new
for a change. For me the real bonus to all this are the films themselves in HD. And an Unrated Conquest just makes it even more sweeter.
Al
From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:42:34 AM Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!!
Is that Veetus' mate Eric Greene?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.. com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008 6:12 AM To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject:
[PotaDG] Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49212 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: What's another word for Bullsh*t? |
.html.html
We’re just jealous because there are
actually people discussing POTA there! J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 8:35
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] What's
another word for Bullsh*t?
I just had a quick look and I notice he is against
changing or adding stuff to the originals but is totally okay with the
Brokensea audio adaptation? Excuse me if I'm being ignorant but didn't they add
a whole lot of stuff as well as changing some things?
Doesn't make a lot of sense to me and I don't see why
anyone would want to debate something with someone who makes up the rules (his)
as he goes along but they still do! Sigh...
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008
6:36 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: [PotaDG] What's another
word for Bullsh*t?
I cannot believe the "discussions" infesting the
"other" group. James will not admit that
there
ever was a female orangutan in Conquest, nor
that anyone could survive in the desert for a
week or more. No one is that stupid, except
James, of course. I'm not even sure he believes
any of this. I think he's just arguing to boost the
number of posts over there. It's driving me nuts!
Does anyone here believe that Orang was male
because the script says so? Or eve considered
it? And how do you look at a picture of an oasis
and say there's not enough there to sustain life?

<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49213 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html.html
I’m amazed anyone is complaining!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 8:41
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Exclusive
POTA Blu-ray footage!!
I really don't expect these special features to run more than 10 to 15
minutes or so, usually features that are presented in the same disc as the
movie, don't. But it's really great to see something new for a change. For me
the real bonus to all this are the films themselves in HD. And an Unrated
Conquest just makes it even more sweeter.
From:
Michael
& Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008
11:42:34 AM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Exclusive
POTA Blu-ray footage!!
Is that Veetus' mate Eric Greene?
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. .
com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008
6:12 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA
Blu-ray footage!!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49214 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html.html
I'm amazed no one is even discussing it at all. Good or Bad.
It seems that story adaptations are more important right now.
But for me, 4 days and counting. :o)
Al
From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 7:49:44 PM Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!!
I'm amazed anyone is complaining!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 8:41 AM To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject:
Re: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!!
I really don't expect these special features to run more than 10 to 15 minutes or so, usually features that are presented in the same disc as the movie, don't. But it's really
great to see something new for a change. For me the real bonus to all this are the films themselves in HD. And an Unrated Conquest just makes it even more sweeter.
From:
Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.com> To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:42:34 AM Subject:
RE: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!!
Is that Veetus' mate Eric Greene?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008 6:12 AM To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject:
[PotaDG] Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49215 |
From: Terry Hoknes |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html
.html
So Alex and everyone once this blu-ray set comes
out with the new additions
will there be anything left
how is Fox going to promote POTA after this year
? <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49216 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Next step for Fox. |
.html.html
Ah – good question Terry!
There are still missing scenes from Planet.
These need to be found and added to the “50th
Anniversary” disc, before I die not having seen them! J
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Terry Hoknes
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008
10:18 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Exclusive
POTA Blu-ray footage!!
So Alex and everyone once this blu-ray set comes out with
the new additions
will there be anything left
how is Fox going to promote POTA after this year ?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49217 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html.html
And there’s missing scenes from
BENEATH too – extended SAUNA scene for example.
Surely they could find and release these?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Terry Hoknes
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008
10:18 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Exclusive
POTA Blu-ray footage!!
So Alex and everyone once this blu-ray set comes out with
the new additions
will there be anything left
how is Fox going to promote POTA after this year ?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49218 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html.html
And ESCAPE.
Was the “ASTRO APES IN SPACE”
sequence ever filmed (it is generally accepted that it was, with no FX added)?
So they should be able to find and release that too and maybe add the FX?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Terry Hoknes
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008
10:18 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Exclusive
POTA Blu-ray footage!!
So Alex and everyone once this blu-ray set comes out with
the new additions
will there be anything left
how is Fox going to promote POTA after this year ?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49219 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html.html
Conquest and
Battle are covered, but what about the TV Show?
There’s much debate about the
missing Bill Blake scenes, and I know I have seen BLOOPERS on the old blooper
shows of the mid-70s….
Not much they can do with RETURN –
maybe write an ending and film that?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Terry Hoknes
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008
10:18 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Exclusive
POTA Blu-ray footage!!
So Alex and everyone once this blu-ray set comes out with
the new additions
will there be anything left
how is Fox going to promote POTA after this year ?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49220 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html.html
Good question. I really don't know.
What I'll be covering on the site is anything and everything POTA related. From POTA movie related news to POTA fan projects, fanzines, convention appearances, theater showings and so on. I
would be the first to admit, it's not going to get updated everyday, but it will remain online for years to come.
Al
From: Terry Hoknes <hoknescards@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Thursday, October 30, 2008 8:18:08 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!!
So Alex and everyone once this blu-ray set comes out with the new additions
will there be anything left
how is Fox going to promote POTA after this year ?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49221 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 10/30/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Next step for Fox. |
.html.html
LOL.
From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups..com
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 8:24:46 PM Subject: [PotaDG] Next step for Fox.
Ah – good question Terry!
There are still missing scenes from Planet.
These need to be found and added to the "50th
Anniversary" disc, before I die not having seen them! J
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Terry Hoknes
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 10:18 AM To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject:
Re: [PotaDG] Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!!
So Alex and everyone once this blu-ray set comes out with the new additions
will there be anything left
how is Fox going to promote POTA after this year ?
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49222 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 10/31/2008 |
| Subject: New Sideshow??? |
.htmlSideshow Collectibles Revisits Planet Of The Apes
Posted by D_Martin on October 30, 2008 at 08:36 PM CST:
Sideshow has announced the future of their Planet Of The Apes collection. While there are no images yet, they have revealed that they will be producing premium format figures based on these classic films. Needless to
say, we're very excited about this and will provide more information as soon as it is available.
http://www.cooltoyreview.com/story/front/Sideshow_Collectibles_Revisits_Planet_Of_The_Apes_118804.asp
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49223 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/31/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html
.html
*** Can anyone tell me what that link posted last night is for? My computer
doesn't DL worth a shit and when it does, things get messed up so I didn't even
bother... So what is it, some sort of "teaser trailer" or
what?*** <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 49224 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 10/31/2008 |
| Subject: Re: Exclusive POTA Blu-ray footage!! |
.html
.html
In a message dated 10/30/08 6:18:31 PM Central Standard Time,
hoknescards@... writes:
So Alex and everyone once this Blu-Ray set comes
out with the new additions
will there be anything
left?
*** More than likely... I mean there's always "something" to add
whether they want to admit it or not... It's just a matter of digging it up... I
know that Joe Russo had things he offered to them and the Dumb F's at FOX didn't
want to use it!!! ***
How is Fox going to promote POTA after this year
?
*** Since this Blu-Ray set is coming out so late in the year,
they'll probably be living off whatever promotion they're getting now thru
2009... After that, I'm sure they'll go back to promoting APES the same way they
have more of the time: Poorly! *** <.html
<.html
|
|
|
|