|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51426 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/10/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Simian Scrolls |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51427 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/10/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51428 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/10/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51429 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: new image |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51430 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51431 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: new image |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51432 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51433 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51434 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51435 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3699 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51436 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51437 |
From: ~~Joanne~~ |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51438 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51439 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51440 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51441 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51442 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51443 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51444 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51445 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51446 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51447 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51448 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51449 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51450 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51451 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51452 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51453 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: GoogleEarth 3955 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51454 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Aussie Fire! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51455 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51456 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Aussie Fire! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51457 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51458 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51459 |
From: jessica rotich |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51460 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51461 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Fire down under! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51462 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51463 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51464 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51465 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51466 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51467 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51468 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51469 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51470 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51471 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51472 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51473 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51474 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51475 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51476 |
From: ~~Joanne~~ |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51477 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51478 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51479 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51480 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51481 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51482 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Money (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51483 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51484 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Money (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51485 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51486 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51487 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Money (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51488 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51489 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51490 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51491 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Money (OT) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51492 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51493 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51494 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51495 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51496 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51497 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51498 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51499 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51500 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51501 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Planet of the Apes Wagon |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51502 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51503 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51504 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51505 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51506 |
From: jessica rotich |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51507 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51508 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51509 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51510 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Planet of the Apes Wagon |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51511 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51512 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51513 |
From: John |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Valentine's Day |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51514 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51515 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Valentine's Day |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51516 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51517 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51518 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51519 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51520 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51521 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51522 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Valentine's Day |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51523 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51524 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51525 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51426 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/10/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Simian Scrolls |
.htmlModerators! :)
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "rassmguy" <handleyr@...> wrote:
>
> If Cornelius had used it, Zira might not have loathed bananas so
much.
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@> wrote:
> > The Viagra story? Real ape fans only use Cialis, recommended by
> James Naughton!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: nlmoxham
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 3:57 AM
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Simian Scrolls
> >
> >
> > These are from the Viraga story? I'd like to see them!
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
> > <sallywhitty@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > There's 3 more pages to add to the page Rich refers to in the
> > Scrolls
> > > article, attributed to Sonny Trinidad (but denied by him as
being
> > his work)
> > > and also some deleted pages from BATTLE where you can
actually
> > EASILY see
> > > where they would slip in.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Neil - are you able to upload these pages to the files?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The 3 additional pages really bring light to the one page
Rich
> > originally
> > > sourced and who knows..maybe the rest are out there somewhere?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems sure that the entire comic was at least WRITTEN (by
whom?)
> > and at
> > > least these 4 pages (maybe more?) drawn.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This is an ongoing mystery but if there's any comics out
there from
> > the era
> > > I'd love to see them find the light of day.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Rich - with the 3 new pages having been found, would you
consider
> > re-asking
> > > sonny about these?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Similarly, would you consider re-asking Mr Moench? I reckon
if we
> > find a
> > > script we could con Foster into doing a Sonny style and
complete the
> > > comic..!
> > >
> > > Uh oh, he's just fainted again..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51427 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/10/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
.html.html
I actually sat down today and just started reading it word for word .....I'm up to the late 70's! .....! and Man Rich! You have outdone yourself....how the hell did you keep all this straight putting this
together! and so detailed......!!! GOOD WORK
From: rassmguy <handleyr@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
8:15:23 PM Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Rich's Timeline Book
It's probably best not to. I'm Irish--and, thus, very pale.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
>
> Don't make the guy blush! :-)
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
] On
Behalf Of
> ~~Joanne~~
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 6:46 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book
>
>
>
>
> it's a great book
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
> Subject: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 3:44 PM
>
> I can't WAIT for mine!
>
> I have one on order.
>
>
>
> In the interim, I've discovered a site that has some pages for
preview and
> they look GREAT!
>
> There seems to be illustrations of various things (comic book covers
etc) in
> the columns that I wasn't expecting.
>
>
>
> I originally was skeptical about the depth and length Rich went to,
but upon
> consideration. ..if we are free to make of it what we will, then the
more the
> better.
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
Behalf
> Of Dario Sciola
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 6:34 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Happy Birthday, Dario!
>
> I received my copy of Rich's Timeline book and wanted to comment a
bit on
> that. But it's so HUGE that it'll take me a while to read. But I can say
> that it's as comprehensive as he could have made it, even
incorporating the
> William T. Quick prequel novels (The Fall and Colony) published to
the 2001
> POTA novelization. (I know that may be blsphemous to some, but I'm just
> illustrating that Rich left no stone unturned.) My copy is a softcover.
> Weren't the originals Hardcover? I would have prefered a hardcover,
but the
> lulu site only indicates softcover for sale..
>
>
>
<
http://geo.yahoo. com/serv? s=97359714/ grpId=8605785/ grpspId=17050214 37/msgId
> =51405/stime= 1234298061/ nc1=3848621/ nc2=3858795/ nc3=5522129>
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51428 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/10/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
.html
.html
*** I'm still waiting on my free copy so I can write a review for
it... ;) ***
In a message dated 2/10/09 11:24:29 PM Central Standard Time,
apefan23@... writes:
> From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...> >
Subject: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com >
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 3:44 PM > > I can't WAIT for
mine! > > I have one on order.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51429 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: new image |
.html
.html
In the latest Make Up Artist Magazine, there's an
article on the career of Tom Burman. There's a never before published
photo of Tom with an Orangutan extra. <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51430 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
.html
.html
Message
I'm jealous Tim, I
am so looking forward to this book. Bloody stupid Aussie Post, if they did their
job properly I would already be stuck into it!
Neil
I actually sat down today and just started reading it word for word
.....I'm up to the late 70's! .....! and Man Rich! You have outdone
yourself.... how the hell did you keep all this straight putting this
together! and so detailed.... ..!!!
GOOD WORK
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51431 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: new image |
.html.html
Thanks Jeff!!!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009
4:07 PM
To: pota@yahoogroups.com;
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] new image
In the latest Make Up Artist Magazine, there's an article on
the career of Tom Burman. There's a never before published photo of Tom
with an Orangutan extra.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51432 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
.html.html
Hey Rich
This one dude:
http://books.google.com/books?id=p9dCrSQWhHMC&pg=PT204&lpg=PT204&dq=Sonny+Trinidad+apes&source=web&ots=hhTYkIhFQD&sig=cgSQxV0CCMUdibRuaQ9nwZvrs_Q&hl=en&ei=i8mSSbWwKpqqtQPdhaXACw&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=7&ct=result
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of rassmguy
Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009
11:14 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Rich's
Timeline Book
--"Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
> I can't WAIT for mine!
> I have one on order.
And, with any luck, you'll have it soon! (Due to the idiocy of the
Post Office, they returned his and Neil's books to my house, with a
sticker saying they'd never been claimed in
Australia --even though
Neil and Mike were never notified of their arrival at the Post Office
to go pick them up. Sheesh.
> In the interim, I've discovered a site that has some
> pages for preview and they look GREAT!
Thanks! Just curious, which page is that? Google Books? Lulu?
Hassleinbooks. com? (All three have previews--I was just curious, for
marketing purposes, which one caught your eye.)
> There seems to be illustrations of various things
> (comic book covers etc) in the columns that I
> wasn't expecting.
Yep! We have illustrations throughout the book, and a huge cover
gallery of everything in the back, along with a number of appendices.
> I originally was skeptical about the depth and length
> Rich went to,
So was my wife, I think. :)
> but upon consideration. ..if we are free to make of
> it what we will, then the more the better.
Cool, I'm glad you see it that way.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51433 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
Maybe I’m slightly misquoting but I
thought Heston said “I’ll only do
Taylor if you kill him of” then he
changed that to “if you blow up the whole world”.
Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009
11:40 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it
wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have
said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So
it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all
figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as
the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he
saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't
on the same page.
Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking
forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do
with her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody
was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for
the next sequel. They weren't planning any.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday, February
09, 2009 8:42 AM
Subject:
[PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
In the script on Hunter's site
Taylor is only in the beginning and
end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's
fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
countless new stories.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
TZer0@... wrote:
>
>
> Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
> Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
> even took his pay for Beneath and donated
> it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
> to do it because they assured him they's kill
> off his character. They said they couldn't
> get financing without his name attached to
> the project. So take your hat off to the man.
> As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
> if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
> efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
>
>
>
> In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> sallywhitty@ ... writes:
>
> Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
career!
>
> ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol?
redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
> bemailfooterNO62)
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51434 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.htmlI read somewhere that heston was wanting his part ( taylor ) killed
of in the second film Beneath , because he didnt want to be type cast.
The suggestion of blowing it up was a suggestion, Heston didn't write
it, and your wright about wanting shock value.
Don't forget they didn't leave Planet or Beneath open at the end
because there where not planning on a follow up.
Which is a shame because the storyline may have been even better with
a little forward planning .
Bet they never thought they could wind out five films.
Mark
-- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only
do Taylor
> if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the
whole
> world".
>
>
>
> Jeff - did I misunderstand slightly?
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of
> Jeff K.
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
>
>
>
> Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand.
I think
> the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they
wanted
> "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's
idea (or he
> takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the
last movie.
> So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate
shock. Though
> didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag
about it
> in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.
>
> Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to
moving on
> and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and
had a TV
> series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking
at "Beneath" the
> way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't
planning
> any.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: nlmoxham <mailto:neilmoxham@...>
>
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com> com
>
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
>
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
>
>
>
> In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
> end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
> which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
> Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes,
having
> him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
It's
> fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
> want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some
integrity
> on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
> careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
> in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined
up
> for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
> used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
> been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
for
> countless new stories.
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com,
TZer0@
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
> > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
> > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
> > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
> > to do it because they assured him they's kill
> > off his character. They said they couldn't
> > get financing without his name attached to
> > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
> > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
> > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
> > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
> >
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > sallywhitty@ writes:
> >
> > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
> career!
> >
> > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
> just 2 easy
> > steps!
> > (http://pr.atwola
> <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1218550342x1201216770/aol?>
> com/promoclk/100000075x1218550342x1201216770/aol?
> redir=http://www.freecred
> <http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%25>
> itreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%
> 26hmpgID=62%26bcd=fe
> > bemailfooterNO62)
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51435 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Digest Number 3699 |
.html>Posted by: "Tim "apefan""
apefan23@... apefan23
>I actually sat down today and just started reading it word for word
>.....I'm up to the late 70's! .....! and Man Rich! You have outdone
>yourself....how the hell did you keep all this straight putting this
>together! and so detailed......!!! GOOD WORK
Thanks, Tim! You should see how many revisions of the thing I had to
do as I went through each set of stories. :) <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51436 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html
.html
In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I
blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck
were buds and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston
portrays it as suggestions.
And Zanuck convinced Heston to do
POTA2001.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53
AM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
Maybe IÂ’m slightly
misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only do
Taylor if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if
you blow up the whole world”.
Jeff – did I
misunderstand slightly?
Michael
Heston suggested they
blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people
like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of
the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they
pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world
was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was
pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the
director wasn't on the same page.
Linda Harrison told me at
the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd
done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's
World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be
best for the next sequel. They weren't planning
any.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday,
February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
Subject:
[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
In the
script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the
beginning and end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive
the bomb, which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So
clearly Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes,
having him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
It's fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
countless new stories.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
TZer0@... wrote: > > > Not true. He did it as a favor to
Znauck. > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston > even took
his pay for Beneath and donated > it to his son Fraiser's school. He
only agreed > to do it because they assured him they's kill >
off his character. They said they couldn't > get financing without his
name attached to > the project. So take your hat off to the
man. > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse, > if they
got made at all, if it hadn't been for his > efforts. He is the
cornerstone of these films. > > > > In a message
dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, >
sallywhitty@ ... writes: > > Heston didn't do it as a
favour for us....he did it for his career! > >
************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
just 2 easy > steps! > (
http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol? redir=
http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072% 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe >
bemailfooterNO62) >
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51437 |
From: ~~Joanne~~ |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book |
.html|
It's a book you can read over and over again and each time still be amazed at what you are reading.
Rich definately outdid himself.
--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Tim "apefan" <apefan23@...> wrote:
From: Tim "apefan" <apefan23@...> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rich's Timeline Book
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 12:24 AM
I actually sat down today and just started reading it word for word .....I'm up to the late 70's! .....! and Man Rich! You have outdone yourself.... how the hell did you keep all this straight putting
this together! and so detailed.... ..!!!
GOOD WORK
From: rassmguy <handleyr@optonline. net> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Sent:
Tuesday, February 10, 2009 8:15:23 PM Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Rich's Timeline Book
It's probably best not to. I'm Irish--and, thus, very pale. --- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
> > Don't make the guy blush! :-) > > > > _____ > > From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of > ~~Joanne~~
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 6:46 AM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book > > > > > it's a great book > > > > >
> --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote: > > > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
> Subject: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 3:44 PM > > I can't WAIT for mine! > > I have one on order. > > >
> In the interim, I've discovered a site that has some pages
for preview and > they look GREAT! > > There seems to be illustrations of various things (comic book covers etc) in > the columns that I wasn't expecting. > > >
> I originally was skeptical about the depth and length Rich went to, but upon > consideration. ..if we are free to make of it what we will, then the more the > better. > >
> > Michael > > > > _____ > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf > Of Dario Sciola
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 6:34 AM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Happy Birthday, Dario! >
> I received my copy of Rich's Timeline book and wanted to comment a bit on > that. But it's so HUGE that it'll take me a while to read. But I can say > that it's as comprehensive as
he could have made it, even incorporating the > William T. Quick prequel novels (The Fall and Colony) published to the 2001 > POTA novelization. (I know that may be blsphemous to some, but I'm just
> illustrating that Rich left no stone unturned.) My copy is a softcover. > Weren't the originals Hardcover? I would have prefered a hardcover, but the
> lulu site only indicates softcover for sale.. > > > <
http://geo.yahoo. com/serv? s=97359714/ grpId=8605785/ grpspId=17050214 37/msgId
> =51405/stime= 1234298061/ nc1=3848621/ nc2=3858795/ nc3=5522129> >
|
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51438 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
Yeah, I know.
In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it. The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock
ending.
Worked for me. I loved it.
But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
Al
From: Jeff K. <veetus@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without
the director's blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions.
And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the whole
world".
Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
Michael
Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted
"shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the
ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.
Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go
to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning any.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
Subject:
[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
been left intact, and the Planet of
Apes wide open as the setting for countless new stories.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@... wrote: > >
> Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck. > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston > even took his pay for Beneath and donated > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
> to do it because they assured him they's kill > off his character. They said they couldn't > get financing without his name attached to > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
> As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse, > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films. > > >
> In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, > sallywhitty@ ...
writes: > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his career! > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy > steps!
> (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol? redir=
http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072% 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe > bemailfooterNO62)
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51439 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
OK. I have read it differently but I don’t
know where so what I read may have been stretched!
Darn – I’ll have to ease up on the big guy now! J
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009
2:38 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if
I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he
and Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without the director's blessing.
But Heston portrays it as suggestions.
And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday,
February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
Subject:
RE: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
Maybe I’m slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said
“I’ll only do Taylor
if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if you blow up the
whole world”.
Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
Michael
Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the
main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted
"shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea
(or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last
movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate shock.
Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about
it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.
Linda
Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of
playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go to
("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the
way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning
any.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
In the
script on Hunter's site Taylor
is only in the beginning and
end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's
fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
countless new stories.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
TZer0@... wrote:
>
>
> Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
> Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
> even took his pay for Beneath and donated
> it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
> to do it because they assured him they's kill
> off his character. They said they couldn't
> get financing without his name attached to
> the project. So take your hat off to the man.
> As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
> if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
> efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
>
>
>
> In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> sallywhitty@ ... writes:
>
> Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
career!
>
> ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol?
redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
> bemailfooterNO62)
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51440 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
Yeah I loved it too Al – it’s as final as
you can get really isn’t it? J
But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on the planet….
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009
6:23 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from
Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so he
told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it.
The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the
soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock
ending.
Worked for me. I loved it.
But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their asses. If
you ask my opionion. :o)
From:
Jeff K.
<veetus@earthlink. net>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009
11:38:21 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if
I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he
and Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without the director's blessing.
But Heston portrays it as suggestions.
And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday,
February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
Subject:
RE: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
Maybe I’m slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only
do Taylor if
you kill him of” then he changed that to “if you blow up the whole world”.
Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
Michael
Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the
main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted
"shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea
(or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last
movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate shock.
Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about
it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.
Linda
Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of
playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go to
("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the
way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning
any.
-----
Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
In the
script on Hunter's site Taylor
is only in the beginning and
end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's
fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
countless new stories.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
TZer0@... wrote:
>
>
> Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
> Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
> even took his pay for Beneath and donated
> it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
> to do it because they assured him they's kill
> off his character. They said they couldn't
> get financing without his name attached to
> the project. So take your hat off to the man.
> As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
> if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
> efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
>
>
>
> In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> sallywhitty@ ... writes:
>
> Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
career!
>
> ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
0342x1201216770/ aol?
redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
> bemailfooterNO62)
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51441 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html
.html
Message
In Heston's
'The Actor's Life' book, he makes it sound like it was his
idea:
September 30. Fox is now willing to
accept my proposal to do a brief transition bit for them in their new version of
APES. I don't think it's a good idea, but of course I'll carry out my promise to
them.
*
The overwhelming success of PLANET OF THE
APES reasonably enough prompted Fox to undertake a sequel. I pointed out to Dick
Zanuck that, while I sympathized with him from a corporate point of view, as an
actor there was really no sequel possible. The only story you could tell had
been told; anything further would just be adventures among the monkeys. While
this might well be profitable (as indeed it was; I think they made five of them,
plus a TV series), there was nothing new to act in it. Still, as Dick said, they
couldn't really undertake a sequel if I weren't in it at all. Moved by this
wistful observation, I offered to appear in the opening sequence, if they'd then
kill me off. This proved agreeable, though they asked me to simply disappear in
the opening sequence, and be killed off in the end. I agreed, thinking I
could end the whole thing with a death that included the end of the world. I
sold them on this, but they were cleverer than I; they still made several
sequels, though without me
Neil
Maybe I’m slightly
misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only do
Taylor if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if
you blow up the whole world”.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51442 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
.html
http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2009/02/11/warren/life/0
211war-bell0.txt
CHRIS AND KYLEE
Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic love.
It can also be a celebration of love between family members.
Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her first
birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle Starr.
She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of the
Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.
"I knew my days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the
Warrenton area.
Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the theater.
When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged," and as the opening credits
began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to come
with her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others.
"Everything was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I was
getting a little nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said.
She rested in a back room decorated with old movie posters for most
of the movie before joining her family.
"I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,' because it was
a special night," she said.
She said she felt miserable the remainder of the night, but her
prayer was answered. Approximately 24 hours later Chris went into
labor and gave birth to her only daughter, Kylee.
Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of Kylee's birth. When
she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that before."
Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris because,
she said, the day is about the special people in your life.
"I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was my
first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little
personal valentine." <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51443 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation. It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world).
At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have seriously puked. :o)
Al
From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really isn't it?
J
But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on the planet….
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Subject:
Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it. The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the soul purpose of trying to eclipse
Planet's original shock ending.
Worked for me. I loved it.
But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
From:
Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com Sent:
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds and they kind
of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions.
And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
Subject:
RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the whole
world".
Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
Michael
Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted
"shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the
ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.
Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go
to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning any.
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
Subject:
[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
been left intact, and the Planet of
Apes wide open as the setting for countless new stories.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@... wrote: > >
> Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck. > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston > even took his pay for Beneath and donated > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
> to do it because they assured him they's kill > off his character. They said they couldn't > get financing without his name attached to > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
> As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse, > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films. > > >
> In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, > sallywhitty@ ...
writes: > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his career! > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy > steps!
> (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol? redir=
http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072% 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe > bemailfooterNO62)
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51444 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
.html
.html
7 years ago? Was it POTA2001?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:07
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] CHRIS AND KYLEE
http://suburbanjour nals.stltoday. com/articles/ 2009/02/11/ warren/life/ 0 211war-bell0. txt
CHRIS
AND KYLEE
Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic
love. It can also be a celebration of love between family
members.
Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her
first birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle
Starr.
She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of
the Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.
"I knew my
days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the Warrenton
area.
Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the theater.
When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged, " and as the opening credits
began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to come with
her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others.
"Everything
was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I was getting a little
nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said.
She rested in a back
room decorated with old movie posters for most of the movie before joining
her family.
"I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,'
because it was a special night," she said.
She said she felt
miserable the remainder of the night, but her prayer was answered.
Approximately 24 hours later Chris went into labor and gave birth to her
only daughter, Kylee.
Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of
Kylee's birth. When she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that
before."
Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris
because, she said, the day is about the special people in your
life.
"I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was
my first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little
personal valentine."
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51445 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html
.html
As usual, "POTA Revisited" to the
rescue.
Once again, Heston says the ending of
"Beneath" was his idea: "I sold the director and producer on the
idea".
Director Ted Post says it was because
Richard Zanuck was being removed from Fox.
Post: "We had other endings, but the order
came down from Dick...that was the picture I was involved with that found Dick
Zanuck not in a very happy state of mind. His conclusion about the picture was a
reflection either consciously or unconsciously of what he felt".
Both Post and James Franciscus hated the
ending.
Post: "The meaning of it was not too
profound and, if anything, it lacked meaning. It lacked human significance.
It didn't have a theme or a premise worth anything. If anything, it was cynical
and pessimistic because of the finish of it. I don't believe in dampening the
human spirit like that. I don't care how realistic you want to be - I'm an
optimist, basically".
Franciscus: "I thought the ending was awful.
A picture without hope...I think Ted and I PLEADED for someone to survive this
mess, be it Chuck's character or the girl or Brent's character - SOMEBODY
far enough away from the explosion for whatever reason so that mankind is still
left".
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:04
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
In
Heston's 'The Actor's Life' book, he makes it sound like it was his
idea:
September
30. Fox is now willing to accept my proposal to do a brief transition bit for
them in their new version of APES. I don't think it's a good idea, but of
course I'll carry out my promise to them. * The overwhelming
success of PLANET OF THE APES reasonably enough prompted Fox to undertake a
sequel. I pointed out to Dick Zanuck that, while I sympathized with him from a
corporate point of view, as an actor there was really no sequel possible. The
only story you could tell had been told; anything further would just be
adventures among the monkeys. While this might well be profitable (as indeed
it was; I think they made five of them, plus a TV series), there was nothing
new to act in it. Still, as Dick said, they couldn't really undertake a sequel
if I weren't in it at all. Moved by this wistful observation, I offered to
appear in the opening sequence, if they'd then kill me off. This proved
agreeable, though they asked me to simply disappear in the opening sequence,
and be killed off in the end. I agreed, thinking I could end the whole
thing with a death that included the end of the world. I sold them on
this, but they were cleverer than I; they still made several sequels,
though without me
Neil
Maybe IÂ’m slightly
misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only do
Taylor if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if
you blow up the whole world”.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51446 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
I don't know, Jeff.
The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
Especially when you have an actor (Heston) who's not willing to make another sequel and a prior movie (Planet) your trying to out do (ending wise).
So for any of them to be surprised by it, it's surprising to me.
Something just doen't add up there.
Al
From: Jeff K. <veetus@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:12:27 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
As usual, "POTA Revisited" to the rescue.
Once again, Heston says the ending of "Beneath" was his idea: "I sold the director and producer on the idea".
Director Ted Post says it was because Richard Zanuck was being removed from Fox.
Post: "We had other endings, but the order came down from Dick...that was the picture I was involved with that found Dick Zanuck not in a very happy state of mind. His conclusion
about the picture was a reflection either consciously or unconsciously of what he felt".
Both Post and James Franciscus hated the ending.
Post: "The meaning of it was not too profound and, if anything, it lacked meaning. It lacked human significance. It didn't have a theme or a premise worth anything. If
anything, it was cynical and pessimistic because of the finish of it. I don't believe in dampening the human spirit like that. I don't care how realistic you want to be - I'm an optimist, basically".
Franciscus: "I thought the ending was awful. A picture without hope...I think Ted and I PLEADED for someone to survive this mess, be it Chuck's character or the girl or
Brent's character - SOMEBODY far enough away from the explosion for whatever reason so that mankind is still left".
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
In Heston's 'The Actor's Life' book, he makes it sound like it was his idea:
September 30. Fox is now willing to accept my proposal to do a brief transition bit for them in their new version of APES. I don't think it's a good idea, but of
course I'll carry out my promise to them. *
The overwhelming success of PLANET OF THE APES reasonably enough prompted Fox to undertake a sequel. I pointed out to Dick Zanuck that, while I sympathized with him from a corporate point of view, as an actor there
was really no sequel possible. The only story you could tell had been told; anything further would just be adventures among the monkeys. While this might well be profitable (as indeed it was; I think they made five of
them, plus a TV series), there was nothing new to act in it. Still, as Dick said, they couldn't really undertake a sequel if I weren't in it at all. Moved by this wistful observation, I
offered to appear in the opening sequence, if they'd then kill me off. This proved agreeable, though they asked me to simply disappear in the opening sequence, and be killed off in the end.
I agreed, thinking I could end the whole thing with a death that included the end of the world. I sold them on this, but they were cleverer than I; they still made several sequels, though without me
Neil
Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the whole
world".
.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51447 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html
.html
Message
But didn't an
early version of the script have the bomb exploding but not destroying the
planet with Taylor, Brent and Nova surviving. I think I have read somewhere that
it was going to end with 2 or 3 mutated gorillas emerging from one of the
underground tunnels?
The inclusion of
the bomb in the story doesn't mean that they were planning to have it just as an
instrument for destroying the planet. I though the main reason for the bomb was
to highlight the absurdity of the mutants worshiping the thing as a
god?
Neil
I don't know, Jeff.
The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being
surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51448 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.htmlT3 was OK but lacked depth and soul.
I'd hardly be interested in seeing it again.
T1 was great and SO far ahead of it's time. I'd watch it any time.
T2 was the best - even when I see it's half over on TV I always sit
down and watch the end....that's how you know a really great movie!
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because
of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
> From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
>
> Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the
same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
> So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation.
It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world).
>
> At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
> Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
seriously puked. :o)
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51449 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.htmlYes - T4 will be (like Conquest and - possibly - CAESAR) how the
ROBOTS (or apes) took over. Cannot wait!
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because
of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
> From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
>
> Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the
same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
> So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation.
It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world).
>
> At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
> Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
seriously puked. :o)
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51450 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
.htmlIt forced a movement Jeff - it MUST have been!
I gave birth that day too!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
>
> 7 years ago? Was it POTA2001?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Whitty
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:07 PM
> Subject: [PotaDG] CHRIS AND KYLEE
>
>
>
http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2009/02/11/warren/life/0
> 211war-bell0.txt
>
> CHRIS AND KYLEE
>
> Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic
love.
> It can also be a celebration of love between family members.
>
> Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her
first
> birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle Starr.
>
> She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of
the
> Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.
>
> "I knew my days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the
> Warrenton area.
>
> Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the theater.
> When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged," and as the opening
credits
> began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to come
> with her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others.
>
> "Everything was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I
was
> getting a little nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said.
>
> She rested in a back room decorated with old movie posters for
most
> of the movie before joining her family.
>
> "I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,' because it
was
> a special night," she said.
>
> She said she felt miserable the remainder of the night, but her
> prayer was answered. Approximately 24 hours later Chris went into
> labor and gave birth to her only daughter, Kylee.
>
> Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of Kylee's birth.
When
> she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that before."
>
> Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris
because,
> she said, the day is about the special people in your life.
>
> "I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was
my
> first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little
> personal valentine."
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51451 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.htmlLike so many things - everyone seems to have a unique
recollection! :)
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
>
> As usual, "POTA Revisited" to the rescue.
>
> Once again, Heston says the ending of "Beneath" was his idea: "I
sold the director and producer on the idea".
>
> Director Ted Post says it was because Richard Zanuck was being
removed from Fox.
> Post: "We had other endings, but the order came down from
Dick...that was the picture I was involved with that found Dick
Zanuck not in a very happy state of mind. His conclusion about the
picture was a reflection either consciously or unconsciously of what
he felt".
>
> Both Post and James Franciscus hated the ending.
>
> Post: "The meaning of it was not too profound and, if anything,
it lacked meaning. It lacked human significance. It didn't have a
theme or a premise worth anything. If anything, it was cynical and
pessimistic because of the finish of it. I don't believe in dampening
the human spirit like that. I don't care how realistic you want to
be - I'm an optimist, basically".
>
> Franciscus: "I thought the ending was awful. A picture without
hope...I think Ted and I PLEADED for someone to survive this mess, be
it Chuck's character or the girl or Brent's character - SOMEBODY far
enough away from the explosion for whatever reason so that mankind is
still left".
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Neil Foster
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:04 PM
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
>
>
>
> In Heston's 'The Actor's Life' book, he makes it sound like it
was his idea:
>
> September 30. Fox is now willing to accept my proposal to do a
brief transition bit for them in their new version of APES. I don't
think it's a good idea, but of course I'll carry out my promise to
them.
>
> * The overwhelming success of PLANET OF THE APES reasonably
enough prompted Fox to undertake a sequel. I pointed out to Dick
Zanuck that, while I sympathized with him from a corporate point of
view, as an actor there was really no sequel possible. The only story
you could tell had been told; anything further would just be
adventures among the monkeys. While this might well be profitable (as
indeed it was; I think they made five of them, plus a TV series),
there was nothing new to act in it. Still, as Dick said, they
couldn't really undertake a sequel if I weren't in it at all. Moved
by this wistful observation, I offered to appear in the opening
sequence, if they'd then kill me off. This proved agreeable, though
they asked me to simply disappear in the opening sequence, and be
killed off in the end. I agreed, thinking I could end the whole thing
with a death that included the end of the world. I sold them on this,
but they were cleverer than I; they still made several sequels,
though without me
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On
Behalf Of Michael & Sally Whitty
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:53 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
>
>
> Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll
only do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you
blow up the whole world".
>
> .
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51452 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html
.html
And you'd better like it or Christian Bale
will track you down and call you stupid.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 6:08
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
Yes - T4 will be (like Conquest and - possibly - CAESAR) how the ROBOTS
(or apes) took over. Cannot wait!
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex
Ruiz <pota1968@.. .> wrote: > > I don't know. For me
personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because of it, we have five fresh
stories in the Apes saga. > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4
sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too
much over kill. > > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at
the sametime it was the same old story that been told over again
since T1 and T2. > So for me that's the one good thing I see in
Terminator Salvation. It's a whole new world and direction in the saga
(post atomic world). > > At least it's a new direction from the
last 3 films. > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I
would have seriously puked. :o) > > Al > >
> > >
____________ _________ _________ __ > From: Michael &
Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com >
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM > Subject: RE: [PotaDG]
Re: Heston/BENEATH > > > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as
final as you can get really isn't it? J > > But at the
same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on the
planetÂ…. > > Michael > > >
____________ _________ _________ __ > >
From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com ] On
Behalf Of Alex Ruiz > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23
AM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH > > Yeah, I know. > In the
Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from
Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so
he told Post to blow up planet.. :o) > > Persoanlly I
believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it. The only reason
that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the soul purpose of
trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending. >
> Worked for me. I loved it. > But again. Both Heston and
Post are both talking out of their asses. If you ask my
opionion. :o) > > Al >
> >
____________ _________ _________ __ > > From:Jeff K.
<veetus@earthlink. net> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com >
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM > Subject: Re: [PotaDG]
Re: Heston/BENEATH > In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I
blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and
Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without the director's
blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions. > And Zanuck
convinced Heston to do POTA2001. > > ----- Original Message
----- > From:Michael & Sally Whitty >
To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009
4:53 AM > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > >
Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only do
Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the
whole world". > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly? >
Michael > >
____________ _________ _________ __ > >
From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
Behalf Of Jeff K. > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40
AM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH > Heston suggested they blow up the Earth
but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort
Abrahams have said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the
original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they
pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the
world was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted
Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I
guess the director wasn't on the same page. > Linda Harrison
told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of
playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to
go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we
do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning
any. > ----- Original Message ----- > From:nlmoxham >
To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com > Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42
AM > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > In the script on
Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and > end, and Brent is
in the main part, but they all survive the bomb, > which only destroys
the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly > Heston's initial
demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having > him killed
off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's > fair
enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't > want to
make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity > on
his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and >
careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was >
in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
> for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
> used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
> been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
for > countless new stories. > > --- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote: > > > > > >
Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck. > > Zanuck agreed to do the
first one. Heston > > even took his pay for Beneath and
donated > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed >
> to do it because they assured him they's kill > > off his
character. They said they couldn't > > get financing without his name
attached to > > the project. So take your hat off to the man. >
> As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse, > > if they got
made at all, if it hadn't been for his > > efforts. He is the
cornerstone of these films. > > > > > > >
> In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, >
> sallywhitty@ ... writes: > > > > Heston didn't do it
as a favour for us....he did it for his > career! > > >
> ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in >
just 2 easy > > steps! > > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
0342x1201216770/ aol? > redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default.
aspx?sc=668072% > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe > >
bemailfooterNO62) > > > >
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51453 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: GoogleEarth 3955 |
.html.html
http://blameitonthevoices.blogspot.com/2009/02/improbable-google-street-view-shots.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51454 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Aussie Fire! |
.html.html
I hope all you Aussie guys are safe from the horrible fires down there!!!!
Tim
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51455 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
he'll call you more than that and for 12 minutes!
From: Jeff K. <veetus@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:52:07 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
And you'd better like it or Christian Bale
will track you down and call you stupid.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 6:08
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
Yes - T4 will be (like Conquest and - possibly - CAESAR) how the ROBOTS
(or apes) took over. Cannot wait!
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex
Ruiz <pota1968@.. .> wrote: > > I don't know. For me
personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because of it, we have five fresh
stories in the Apes saga. > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4
sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too
much over kill. > > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at
the sametime it was the same old story that been told over again
since T1 and T2. > So for me that's the one good thing I see in
Terminator Salvation. It's a whole new world and direction in the saga
(post atomic world). > > At least it's a new direction from the
last 3 films. > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I
would have seriously puked. :o) > > Al > >
> > >
____________ _________ _________ __ > From: Michael &
Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com >
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM > Subject: RE: [PotaDG]
Re: Heston/BENEATH > > > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as
final as you can get really isn't it? J > > But at the
same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on the
planet…. > > Michael > > >
____________ _________ _________ __ > >
From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com ] On
Behalf Of Alex Ruiz > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23
AM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH > > Yeah, I know. > In the
Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from
Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so
he told Post to blow up planet.. :o) > > Persoanlly I
believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it. The only reason
that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the soul purpose of
trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending. >
> Worked for me. I loved it. > But again. Both Heston and
Post are both talking out of their asses. If you ask my
opionion. :o) > > Al >
> >
____________ _________ _________ __ > > From:Jeff K.
<veetus@earthlink. net> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com >
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM > Subject: Re: [PotaDG]
Re: Heston/BENEATH > In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I
blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and
Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without the director's
blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions. > And Zanuck
convinced Heston to do POTA2001. > > ----- Original Message
----- > From:Michael & Sally Whitty >
To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009
4:53 AM > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > >
Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only do
Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the
whole world". > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly? >
Michael > >
____________ _________ _________ __ > >
From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
Behalf Of Jeff K. > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40
AM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH > Heston suggested they blow up the Earth
but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort
Abrahams have said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the
original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they
pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the
world was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted
Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I
guess the director wasn't on the same page. > Linda Harrison
told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of
playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to
go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we
do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning
any. > ----- Original Message ----- > From:nlmoxham >
To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com > Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42
AM > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > In the script on
Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and > end, and Brent is
in the main part, but they all survive the bomb, > which only destroys
the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly > Heston's initial
demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having > him killed
off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's > fair
enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't > want to
make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity > on
his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and >
careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was >
in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
> for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
> used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
> been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
for > countless new stories. > > --- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote: > > > > > >
Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck. > > Zanuck agreed to do the
first one. Heston > > even took his pay for Beneath and
donated > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed >
> to do it because they assured him they's kill > > off his
character. They said they couldn't > > get financing without his name
attached to > > the project. So take your hat off to the man. >
> As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse, > > if they got
made at all, if it hadn't been for his > > efforts. He is the
cornerstone of these films. > > > > > > >
> In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, >
> sallywhitty@ ... writes: > > > > Heston didn't do it
as a favour for us....he did it for his > career! > > >
> ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in >
just 2 easy > > steps! > > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
0342x1201216770/ aol? > redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default.
aspx?sc=668072% > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe > >
bemailfooterNO62) > > > >
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51456 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Aussie Fire! |
.html
.html
Message
Yep, we're
extremely lucky where we are, fires to the south and massive floods up above us
to the north!
Neil
I
hope all you Aussie guys are safe from the horrible fires down there!!!!
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51457 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
Yeah, that's when you know a movie is really great.
When you can enjoy it the same years later. While other films are great, but only great at the moment.
When you can't enjoy it as much years later, that's when you know it was just great in the moment.
POTA2001 was a great example of that. For me anyway.
Al
From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:05:56 PM Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
T3 was OK but lacked depth and soul.
I'd hardly be interested in seeing it again.
T1 was great and SO far ahead of it's time. I'd watch it any time.
T2 was the best - even when I see it's half over on TV I always sit down and watch the end....that' s how you know a really great movie!
Michael
--- In
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@... .> wrote: >
> I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga. > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill. > > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
> So
for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation. It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world). > > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
> Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have seriously puked.. :o) > > Al > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > > > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really isn't
it? J > > But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on the planet…. > >
Michael > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
> Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > > Yeah, I know.
> In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so he told Post to blow up planet.. :o) >
> Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it. The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the
soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending. > > Worked for me. I loved it. > But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their
asses. If you ask my
opionion. :o) > > Al > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > From:Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds
and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions. > And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001. > > ----- Original Message -----
> From:Michael & Sally Whitty > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH >
> Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only do
Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the whole world". > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly? > Michael > > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K. > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is
they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all
figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post
was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I
guess the director wasn't on the same page. > Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with
her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning any.
> ----- Original Message ----- > From:nlmoxham > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com > Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and > end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
> which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly > Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
> him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
It's > fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't > want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
> on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and > careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
> in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up > for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
> used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had > been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for > countless new stories. >
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote: > > > > > > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck. > > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
> > even took his pay for Beneath and donated > > it to his son Fraiser's
school. He only agreed > > to do it because they assured him they's kill > > off his character. They said they couldn't > > get financing without his name attached to
> > the project. So take your hat off to the man. > > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse, > > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
> > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films. > > > > > > > > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, > > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
> > > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his > career! > > > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
> just 2 easy > > steps! > > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
0342x1201216770/ aol? > redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072% > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
> > bemailfooterNO62) > > > >
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51458 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
I don't know about that. But I will say that if the cast and crew didn't know anything about it,
surely some one at Fox knew the intension from the very start.
Perhaps it was better for the cast and crew to know when it was too late to turn back with everyone already comited to the project and already filming.
At that point, no matter what anyone says, you do what Fox tells you. ;o)
Al
From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:49:22 PM Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
But didn't an early version of the script have the bomb exploding but not destroying the planet with Taylor, Brent and Nova surviving. I think I have read somewhere that it was going to
end with 2 or 3 mutated gorillas emerging from one of the underground tunnels?
The inclusion of the bomb in the story doesn't mean that they were planning to have it just as an instrument for destroying the planet. I though the main reason for the bomb was to
highlight the absurdity of the mutants worshiping the thing as a god?
Neil
I don't know, Jeff.
The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51459 |
From: jessica rotich |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
.htmlha ha ha ha ha!!!!
Jessica.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Michael Whitty <
sallywhitty@...> wrote:
It forced a movement Jeff - it MUST have been!
I gave birth that day too!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote: >
> 7 years ago? Was it POTA2001? >
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Whitty > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:07 PM > Subject: [PotaDG] CHRIS AND KYLEE
> > > http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2009/02/11/warren/life/0
> 211war-bell0.txt
> > CHRIS AND KYLEE > > Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic love. > It can also be a celebration of love between family members. >
> Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her
first > birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle Starr. > > She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of the
> Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.
> > "I knew my days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the > Warrenton area. > > Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the theater.
> When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged," and as the opening
credits > began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to come > with her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others. >
> "Everything was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I
was > getting a little nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said. > > She rested in a back room decorated with old movie posters for most > of the movie before joining her family.
> > "I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,' because it was > a special night," she said. >
> She said she felt miserable the remainder of the night, but her
> prayer was answered. Approximately 24 hours later Chris went into > labor and gave birth to her only daughter, Kylee. > > Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of Kylee's birth.
When
> she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that before." > > Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris because,
> she said, the day is about the special people in your life.
> > "I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was my > first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little > personal valentine."
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51460 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/11/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html
.html
*** Yeah, I don't think that would have mattered nearly as much as
one might think... Look at the STAR WARS films, they're all set in the same
basic area ("outer space") and yet they managed to keep things new by going to
different planets, introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been
done for an APES film series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They could
have really delved into the apes' society and customs, they could have had
stories set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in
PLANET/BENEATH and shown more of their populated areas beyond the "APE CITY"
region...
And one more thing, I'm not sure how you feel about the TV series,
but had that gone on, it would have spent it's entire run on the "PLANET"... How
would you have felt about that? Would have that been too much overkill?
***
In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM Central Standard Time,
pota1968@... writes:
Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would
have been too much over kill.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51461 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Fire down under! |
.htmlNeil and I live about 1,000 miles North of it and we're fine thanks
Tim - thanks for asking!
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> I hope all you Aussie guys are safe from the horrible fires down
there!!!!
>
> Tim
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51462 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.htmlYou are absolved my son....
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's when you know a movie is really great.
> When you can enjoy it the same years later. While other films are
great, but only great at the moment.
> When you can't enjoy it as much years later, that's when you
know it was just great in the moment.
>
> POTA2001 was a great example of that. For me anyway.
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51463 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE |
.htmlStop laughinng at me! :)
It was flowing from BOTH ends after seeing that movie!
How's the mask going Jess?
Michael
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, jessica rotich <jessicarotich@...>
wrote:
>
> ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
>
> Jessica.
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Michael Whitty
<sallywhitty@...>wrote:
>
> > It forced a movement Jeff - it MUST have been!
> >
> > I gave birth that day too!
> >
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>, "Jeff
K."
> > <veetus@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 7 years ago? Was it POTA2001?
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Michael Whitty
> > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:07 PM
> > > Subject: [PotaDG] CHRIS AND KYLEE
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2009/02/11/warren/life/0
> > > 211war-bell0.txt
> > >
> > > CHRIS AND KYLEE
> > >
> > > Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic
> > love.
> > > It can also be a celebration of love between family members.
> > >
> > > Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her
> > first
> > > birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle Starr.
> > >
> > > She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of
> > the
> > > Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.
> > >
> > > "I knew my days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the
> > > Warrenton area.
> > >
> > > Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the
theater.
> > > When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged," and as the opening
> > credits
> > > began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to
come
> > > with her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others.
> > >
> > > "Everything was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I
> > was
> > > getting a little nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said.
> > >
> > > She rested in a back room decorated with old movie posters for
> > most
> > > of the movie before joining her family.
> > >
> > > "I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,' because it
> > was
> > > a special night," she said.
> > >
> > > She said she felt miserable the remainder of the night, but her
> > > prayer was answered. Approximately 24 hours later Chris went
into
> > > labor and gave birth to her only daughter, Kylee.
> > >
> > > Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of Kylee's birth.
> > When
> > > she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that before."
> > >
> > > Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris
> > because,
> > > she said, the day is about the special people in your life.
> > >
> > > "I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was
> > my
> > > first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little
> > > personal valentine."
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51464 |
From: Jeff K. |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html
.html
I liked the idea of going back and forth in
time. I just wish the budgets had been better, and that it had been planned out
so there wasn't all the leaps in logic. But a TV series has to stay the same.
Comfort food, as they say.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:51
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
*** Yeah, I don't think that would have mattered nearly as much
as one might think... Look at the STAR WARS films, they're all set in the same
basic area ("outer space") and yet they managed to keep things new by going to
different planets, introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been
done for an APES film series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They
could have really delved into the apes' society and customs, they could have
had stories set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in
PLANET/BENEATH and shown more of their populated areas beyond the "APE CITY"
region...
And one more thing, I'm not sure how you feel about the TV
series, but had that gone on, it would have spent it's entire run on the
"PLANET"... How would you have felt about that? Would have that been too much
overkill? ***
In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM Central Standard Time,
pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would
have been too much over kill.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See
yours in just 2 easy steps!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51465 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.htmlWell said, your write , i personally was under the same conclusion
that the Alpha Omega bomb was a thing of worship, i mean think about
it if they wanted to they had mind reading powers.
Or did they not work on apes?
They did when they arrived in the Zone because of them seeing fire
and gaurds crusified up-side down and a bleeding lawmaker.
So why did they allow them entrance so easy??
Maybe thats the reason they let them come so easy because they
planned to finish it all off?
Mark
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> But didn't an early version of the script have the bomb exploding
but
> not destroying the planet with Taylor, Brent and Nova surviving. I
think
> I have read somewhere that it was going to end with 2 or 3 mutated
> gorillas emerging from one of the underground tunnels?
>
> The inclusion of the bomb in the story doesn't mean that they were
> planning to have it just as an instrument for destroying the
planet. I
> though the main reason for the bomb was to highlight the absurdity
of
> the mutants worshiping the thing as a god?
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of Alex Ruiz
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:59 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
>
>
>
> I don't know, Jeff.
> The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being
> surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=51446/stime=1234400366/nc1=3858795/nc2=3848627/nc3=5170418>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51466 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.htmlLet me guess does it begin with F***
Mark
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> he'll call you more than that and for 12 minutes!
>
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51467 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled. :o)
And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill. :o)
Al
From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:51:32 AM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
*** Yeah, I don't think that would have mattered nearly as much as one might think... Look at the STAR WARS films, they're all set in the same basic area ("outer space") and yet they managed to
keep things new by going to different planets, introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been done for an APES film series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They could have really delved into
the apes' society and customs, they could have had stories set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in PLANET/BENEATH and shown more of their populated areas beyond the "APE CITY" region...
And one more thing, I'm not sure how you feel about the TV series, but had that gone on, it would have spent it's entire run on the "PLANET"... How would you have felt about that? Would have
that been too much overkill? ***
In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours in
just 2 easy steps!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51468 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
Yeah well.
Now looking back at both POTA2001 and T3, while both films didn't come close in to their originals, one things for certain.
They both had the best Trailers and TV Trailers I've ever seen on any film. I still love those trailers to this day.
Al
From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@bigpond..com> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:07:23 AM Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
You are absolved my son....
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@.. .> wrote:
> > Yeah, that's when you know a movie is really great. > When you can enjoy it the same years later. While other films are great, but only great at the moment.
> When you can't enjoy it as much years later, that's when you know it was just great in the moment. > > POTA2001 was a great example of that. For me anyway. > > Al
> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...> > To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.. com > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:05:56
PM > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > > > T3 was OK but lacked depth and soul. > > I'd hardly be interested in seeing it again. >
> T1 was great and SO far ahead of it's time. I'd watch it any time. > > T2 was the best - even when I see it's half over on TV I always sit
> down and watch the end.....that' s how you know a really great movie! > > Michael > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@ .> wrote: > >
> > I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because > of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
> > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet > of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill. > >
> > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the > same old story
that been told over again since T1 and T2. > > So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation. > It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic
world). > > > > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films. > > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have > seriously puked. :o) > >
> > Al > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > > > >
> > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really isn't > it? J > > > > But at the same time it would have been
nice to see more sequels on > the planet…. > > > > Michael > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > >
> > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com ] On > Behalf Of Alex Ruiz > > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > > > > Yeah, I know. > > In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from
> Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so > he told Post to blow up planet.. :o) > >
> > Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it. > The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the > soul purpose of trying to eclipse
Planet's original shock ending. > > > > Worked for me. I loved it. > > But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their > asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
> > > > Al > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > From:Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> > In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He > never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds
> and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston > portrays it as suggestions. > > And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001. > >
> > ----- Original
Message ----- > > From:Michael & Sally Whitty > > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com > > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM > > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> > > > Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only > do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up
> the whole world". > > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly? > > Michael > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > >
> > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On > Behalf Of Jeff K. > > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > > Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. > I think the main thing, as
people like Mort Abrahams have said, is > they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was > Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all
> figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was > agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post
> was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I > guess the director wasn't on the same page.
> > Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to > moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with
> her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was > looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the
> next sequel. They weren't planning any. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From:nlmoxham > > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com > >
Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM > > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH > > In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
> > end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb, > > which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
> > Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, > having > > him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. > It's
> > fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't > > want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some > integrity
> > on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and > > careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
> > in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined > up >
> for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be > > used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
> > been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting > for > > countless new stories. > > > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote: > > >
> > > > > > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck. > > > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston > > > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
> > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed > > > to do it because they assured him they's kill > > > off his character. They said they couldn't
> > > get financing without his name attached to > > > the project. So take your hat off to the man. > > > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse, >
> > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his > > > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films. > > > > > > > > >
> > > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, > > > sallywhitty@ ..... writes: > > >
> > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his > > career! > > > > > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
> > just 2 easy > > > steps! > > > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 > 0342x1201216770/ aol?
> > redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx? sc=668072% > > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe > > >
bemailfooterNO62) > > > > > > > > > > __._,_..___ > Messages in this topic (64) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic
> Messages | Files | Photos | Database | Polls > To visit your group on the web, go to: >
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/PotaDG/ > > MARKETPLACE > > ____________ _________ _________ __
> From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft Foods > > Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional > Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe > Recent Activity > * 1
> New Members > * 9 > New FilesVisit Your Group >
Yahoo! News > Get it all here > Breaking news to > entertainment news > Yahoo! Search > Start Searching > Find everything > you're looking for. > Check out the
> Y! Groups blog > Stay up to speed > on all things Groups! > . >
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51469 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
How I wish that was the case....although I enjoyed Escape, I do wish all the films had been set ON POTA contiuing on after Beneath.....oh well.....you can't change
history..................or can you?!?!?!?
From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:51:32 AM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
*** Yeah, I don't think that would have mattered nearly as much as one might think... Look at the STAR WARS films, they're all set in the same basic area ("outer space") and yet they managed to
keep things new by going to different planets, introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been done for an APES film series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They could have really delved into
the apes' society and customs, they could have had stories set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in PLANET/BENEATH and shown more of their populated areas beyond the "APE CITY" region...
And one more thing, I'm not sure how you feel about the TV series, but had that gone on, it would have spent it's entire run on the "PLANET"... How would you have felt about that? Would have
that been too much overkill? ***
In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours in
just 2 easy steps!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51470 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
Yes – that’s what FOX likes is a good
TRAILER! I’d swear sometimes they make the TRAILER before the MOVIE! J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009
10:02 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
Now looking back at both POTA2001 and T3, while both films didn't come
close in to their originals, one things for certain.
They both had the best Trailers and TV Trailers I've ever seen on any
film. I still love those trailers to this day.
From:
Michael
Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.. com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009
1:07:23 AM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
You are absolved my son....
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex
Ruiz <pota1968@.. .> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's when you know a movie is really great.
> When you can enjoy it the same years later. While other films are
great, but only great at the moment.
> When you can't enjoy it as much years later, that's when you
know it was just great in the moment.
>
> POTA2001 was a great example of that. For me anyway.
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
> To: ymailto="mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com">PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:05:56 PM
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
>
>
> T3 was OK but lacked depth and soul.
>
> I'd hardly be interested in seeing it again.
>
> T1 was great and SO far ahead of it's time. I'd watch it any time.
>
> T2 was the best - even when I see it's half over on TV I always sit
> down and watch the end.....that' s how you know a really great movie!
>
> Michael
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@ .> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing.
Because
> of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
> > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
> of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
> >
> > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was
the
> same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
> > So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator
Salvation.
> It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic
world).
> >
> > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
> > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
> seriously puked. :o)
> >
> > Al
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM
> > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> >
> >
> > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really
isn't
> it? J
> >
> > But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels
on
> the planet….
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> >
> > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. .
com ] On
> Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
> > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> >
> > Yeah, I know.
> > In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call
from
> Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so
> he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
> >
> > Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of
it.
> The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the
> soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock
ending.
> >
> > Worked for me. I loved it.
> > But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their
> asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
> >
> > Al
> >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> >
> > From:Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> > In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow
up the world?".
He
> never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds
> and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But
Heston
> portrays it as suggestions.
> > And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:Michael & Sally Whitty
> > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
> > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
> > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> >
> > Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll
only
> do Taylor
if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow
up
> the whole world".
> > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
> > Michael
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> >
> > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ]
On
> Behalf Of Jeff K.
> > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> > Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a
demand.
> I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is
> they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it
was
> Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all
> figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was
> agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post
> was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So
I
> guess the director wasn't on the same page.
> > Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to
> moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do
with
> her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody
was
> looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for
the
> next sequel. They weren't planning any.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:nlmoxham
> > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
> > Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
> > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
> > In the script on Hunter's site Taylor
is only in the beginning
and
> > end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the
bomb,
> > which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
> > Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes,
> having
> > him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
> It's
> > fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
> > want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some
> integrity
> > on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
> > careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius
was
> > in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined
> up
> > for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't
be
> > used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth
had
> > been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
> for
> > countless new stories.
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
> > > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
> > > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
> > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
> > > to do it because they assured him they's kill
> > > off his character. They said they couldn't
> > > get financing without his name attached to
> > > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
> > > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
> > > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
> > > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > > sallywhitty@ ..... writes:
> > >
> > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
> > career!
> > >
> > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours
in
> > just 2 easy
> > > steps!
> > > (http://pr.atwola.
com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
> 0342x1201216770/ aol?
> > redir=http://www.freecred
itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?
sc=668072%
> > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
> > > bemailfooterNO62)
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> __._,_..___
> Messages in this topic (64) Reply (via web post) | Start a new
topic
> Messages | Files | Photos | Database | Polls
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> target="_blank">http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/PotaDG/
>
> MARKETPLACE
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft
Foods
>
> Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch
format to Traditional
> Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
> Recent Activity
> * 1
> New Members
> * 9
> New FilesVisit Your Group
> Yahoo! News
> Get it all here
> Breaking news to
> entertainment news
> Yahoo! Search
> Start Searching
> Find everything
> you're looking for.
> Check out the
> Y! Groups blog
> Stay up to speed
> on all things Groups!
> .
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51471 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
Yes you can!
But you may have to settle for your “movie”
being a comic book!
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
Sent: Friday, 13 February 2009
12:21 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
How I wish that was the case....although I enjoyed Escape,
I do wish all the films had been set ON POTA contiuing on after Beneath..... oh
well.....you can't change history..... ......... ....or can you?!?!?!?
From:
"mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009
12:51:32 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
*** Yeah, I don't think
that would have mattered nearly as much as one might think... Look at the STAR
WARS films, they're all set in the same basic area ("outer space")
and yet they managed to keep things new by going to different planets,
introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been done for an APES film
series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They could have
really delved into the apes' society and customs, they could have had stories
set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in PLANET/BENEATH and
shown more of their populated areas beyond the "
APE CITY "
region...
And one more thing, I'm
not sure how you feel about the TV series, but had that gone on, it would have
spent it's entire run on the "PLANET"... How would you have felt
about that? Would have that been too much overkill? ***
In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM
Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of
the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
A Good Credit Score is
700 or Above.
See yours in
just 2 easy steps!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51472 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
In a message dated 2/12/09 5:35:20 AM Central Standard Time,
pota1968@... writes:
It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled.
:o)
*** I still believe it was canceled when it was because the "powers
that be" WANTED it gone... Sure, the ratings might not have been what they hoped
for when the series was announced, but the network also didn't do anything to
help it... For starters, they could have easily tried it on a
different night and see how it went. But they put it and kept it on the "death
slot" on Friday night and they also wouldn't let another network pick it up
either... It was, as Roddy said "dead in the water" before it even aired... More
things indicate that CBS didn't want the show to do well than what shows they
had faith in it. I really don't think it was canceled because people thought
APES on TV was "overkill".***
And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor
Chronicles.
You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill.
:o)
*** And that's why the TV series, had it continued and gone down
the right road, wouldn't have that fate fall on it... Another thing even Roddy
brought up on the BEHIND interview was that they mistakenly made the show about
the astronauts when it was proven time and again, people wanted to see (stories
about) apes... Personally, I don't think the TV series is as repetitive as
everyone makes it out to be... THE DECEPTION and THE TYRANT are good examples of
episodes that don't follow the "get caught 'n rescued" scenario that everyone
sticks on the TV series and you know they could have easily came up with more
episodes like that... Even one of the UK Annuals has an entire story that is
just based within the apes, no astronauts in sight and it's very good... I don't
think APES on TV for say, three years would have been too much, especially if
they focused more on the apes and their culture...
And as far as APES on television, or the TERMINATOR/Sarah Connor
Chronicles, you say they suffer from overkill and that's your opinion which is
fine... But couldn't you say that about ANY television series before it becomes
too much... I mean how many times can The Sapranos bump a guy off and dump
him... How many times can you watch Homer simpson be the king of all buffoons,
how any times can you watch the crew of The Enterprise save a planet or an
entire galaxy?
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51473 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
He can be heard in all his glory here:
http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_audio/020209_christianbale.mp3
But be warned.....the language will offend some people!!' not for children!
There's also a cool remix of it on youtube!
From: haydon.mark <markhaydon3@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:33:47 AM Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
Let me guess does it begin with F***
Mark
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:
>
> he'll call you more than that and for 12 minutes!
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Jeff K. <veetus@...>
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:52:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
>
>
> And you'd better like it or Christian Bale
> will track you down and call you stupid.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51474 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.html.html
I wonder if Gordon Ramsay is the head chef
on the set? ;)
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
Sent: Friday, 13 February 2009
6:18 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
He can be heard in all his glory here:
http://www.aolcdn. com/tmz_audio/ 020209_christian bale.mp3
But be warned.....the language will offend some people!!' not for
children!
There's also a cool remix of it on youtube!
From:
haydon.mark <markhaydon3@ aol.com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009
4:33:47 AM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re:
Heston/BENEATH
Let me guess does it begin with F***
Mark
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:
>
> he'll call you more than that and for 12 minutes!
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Jeff K. <veetus@...>
> To: ymailto="mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com">PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:52:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
>
>
> And you'd better like it or Christian Bale
> will track you down and call you stupid.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51475 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html.html
Persoanlly I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm watching these days is Sarah Connor.
But lately even that's starting to get to me.
Al
From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:40:53 PM Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
In a message dated 2/12/09 5:35:20 AM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled. :o)
*** I still believe it was canceled when it was because the "powers that be" WANTED it gone... Sure, the ratings might not have been what they hoped for when the series was announced, but the network
also didn't do anything to help it... For starters, they could have easily tried it on a different night and see how it went. But they put it and kept it on the "death slot" on Friday night and
they also wouldn't let another network pick it up either... It was, as Roddy said "dead in the water" before it even aired... More things indicate that CBS didn't want the show to do well than what
shows they had faith in it. I really don't think it was canceled because people thought APES on TV was "overkill".* **
And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill. :o)
*** And that's why the TV series, had it continued and gone down the right road, wouldn't have that fate fall on it... Another thing even Roddy brought up on the BEHIND interview was that they mistakenly
made the show about the astronauts when it was proven time and again, people wanted to see (stories about) apes... Personally, I don't think the TV series is as repetitive as everyone makes it out to be... THE
DECEPTION and THE TYRANT are good examples of episodes that don't follow the "get caught 'n rescued" scenario that everyone sticks on the TV series and you know they could have easily came up with more
episodes like that... Even one of the UK Annuals has an entire story that is just based within the apes, no astronauts in sight and it's very good... I don't think APES on TV for say, three years would have been
too much, especially if they focused more on the apes and their culture...
And as far as APES on television, or the TERMINATOR/Sarah Connor Chronicles, you say they suffer from overkill and that's your opinion which is fine... But couldn't you say that about ANY television
series before it becomes too much... I mean how many times can The Sapranos bump a guy off and dump him... How many times can you watch Homer simpson be the king of all buffoons, how any times can you watch the crew of
The Enterprise save a planet or an entire galaxy?
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours in
just 2 easy steps!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51476 |
From: ~~Joanne~~ |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
Sarah does get a bit repetitive....
--- On Thu, 2/12/09, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
From: Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 4:58 PM
Persoanlly I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm watching these days is Sarah Connor.
But lately even that's starting to get to me.
Al
From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:40:53 PM Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
In a message dated 2/12/09 5:35:20 AM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled. :o)
*** I still believe it was canceled when it was because the "powers that be" WANTED it gone... Sure, the ratings might not have been what they hoped for when the series was announced, but the network
also didn't do anything to help it... For starters, they could have easily tried it on a different night and see how it went. But they put it and kept it on the "death slot" on Friday night and
they also wouldn't let another network pick it up either... It was, as Roddy said "dead in the water" before it even aired... More things indicate that CBS didn't want the show to do well than what
shows they had faith in it. I really don't think it was canceled because people thought APES on TV was "overkill".* **
And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill. :o)
*** And that's why the TV series, had it continued and gone down the right road, wouldn't have that fate fall on it... Another thing even Roddy brought up on the BEHIND interview was that they mistakenly
made the show about the astronauts when it was proven time and again, people wanted to see (stories about) apes... Personally, I don't think the TV series is as repetitive as everyone makes it out to be... THE
DECEPTION and THE TYRANT are good examples of episodes that don't follow the "get caught 'n rescued" scenario that everyone sticks on the TV series and you know they could have easily came up with more
episodes like that... Even one of the UK Annuals has an entire story that is just based within the apes, no astronauts in sight and it's very good... I don't think APES on TV for say, three years would have been
too much, especially if they focused more on the apes and their culture...
And as far as APES on television, or the TERMINATOR/Sarah Connor Chronicles, you say they suffer from overkill and that's your opinion which is fine... But couldn't you say that about ANY television
series before it becomes too much... I mean how many times can The Sapranos bump a guy off and dump him... How many times can you watch Homer simpson be the king of all buffoons, how any times can you watch the crew of
The Enterprise save a planet or an entire galaxy?
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours in
just 2 easy steps!
|
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51477 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
*** Well, if you don't watch TV, how are you going to see Whitty and Neil
on "Dancing with the Stars"? ***
In a message dated 2/12/09 3:58:49 PM Central Standard Time,
pota1968@... writes:
Personally I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm
watching these days is Sarah Connor
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51478 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.htmlThere's not much i watch on t.v other than Ross Kemp return to
Afganistan which is fantastic ( no CGI ) also looking forward to new
season of Bones.
And still awaiting the return of Dr Who , other than that most of the
programs on t.v are brain dead entertainment.
Getting on to comments about P.O.T.A series and the fact that it was
doomed from the start wouldn't surprise me , maybe a tax loss???
Its been done many times Rambo first blood was meant to be a tax
lost , didn't even go on the big screen stright to video.
However once they saw it was doing so well they put more money into
it for a follow up.
I have heard of this being done many times with big artists for tax
losses, it sort of reminds me of the film The Produucer's original
Mel Brooks or remake?
Mark
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> Persoanlly I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm
watching these days is Sarah Connor.
> But lately even that's starting to get to me.
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51479 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
*** Are you talking about the original 1982(?) FIRST BLOOD film
starring Stallone and Brian Dennehy? I don't know how it was released in the UK
but it was released theatrically in the US. ***
In a message dated 2/12/09 4:12:23 PM Central Standard Time,
markhaydon3@... writes:
Getting
on to comments about P.O.T.A series and the fact that it was doomed from
the start wouldn't surprise me , maybe a tax loss??? Its been done many
times Rambo first blood was meant to be a tax lost , didn't even go on the
big screen stright to video.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51480 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html.html
LOL!
Al
From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:08:39 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
*** Well, if you don't watch TV, how are you going to see Whitty and Neil on "Dancing with the Stars"? ***
In a message dated 2/12/09 3:58:49 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Personally I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm watching these days is Sarah Connor
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours in
just 2 easy steps!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51481 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html.html
So true. Lucky for me I work nights so I'm not really missing much.
The other week I was on vacation and spent much of my time surfing the channels. It drove me nuts.
Ended up watching movies, history and discovery channel more than anything else. Normaly I would travel but with today's economy I felt best to stay home this time around. But again, TV programing was pretty
much driving me nuts. :o)
Al
From: ~~Joanne~~ <josievan@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:06:00 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
Sarah does get a bit repetitive.. ..
--- On Thu, 2/12/09, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: Alex Ruiz <pota1968@yahoo. com> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill" To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 4:58 PM
Persoanlly I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm watching these days is Sarah Connor.
But lately even that's starting to get to me.
Al
From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:40:53 PM Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
In a message dated 2/12/09 5:35:20 AM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled. :o)
*** I still believe it was canceled when it was because the "powers that be" WANTED it gone... Sure, the ratings might not have been what they hoped for when the series was announced, but the network
also didn't do anything to help it... For starters, they could have easily tried it on a different night and see how it went. But they put it and kept it on the "death slot" on Friday night and
they also wouldn't let another network pick it up either... It was, as Roddy said "dead in the water" before it even aired... More things indicate that CBS didn't want the show to do well than what
shows they had faith in it. I really don't think it was canceled because people thought APES on TV was "overkill".* **
And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill. :o)
*** And that's why the TV series, had it continued and gone down the right road, wouldn't have that fate fall on it... Another thing even Roddy brought up on the BEHIND interview was that they mistakenly
made the show about the astronauts when it was proven time and again, people wanted to see (stories about) apes... Personally, I don't think the TV series is as repetitive as everyone makes it out to be... THE
DECEPTION and THE TYRANT are good examples of episodes that don't follow the "get caught 'n rescued" scenario that everyone sticks on the TV series and you know they could have easily came up with more
episodes like that... Even one of the UK Annuals has an entire story that is just based within the apes, no astronauts in sight and it's very good... I don't think APES on TV for say, three years would have been
too much, especially if they focused more on the apes and their culture...
And as far as APES on television, or the TERMINATOR/Sarah Connor Chronicles, you say they suffer from overkill and that's your opinion which is fine... But couldn't you say that about ANY television
series before it becomes too much... I mean how many times can The Sapranos bump a guy off and dump him... How many times can you watch Homer simpson be the king of all buffoons, how any times can you watch the crew of
The Enterprise save a planet or an entire galaxy?
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours in
just 2 easy steps!
|
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51482 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Money (OT) |
.html
.html
*** I'm no economist, but what's up with no one spending? I'm not
singling you out, but people ought to spend "some" even if it's not what they'd
normally spend... I mean how can things turn around otherwise?(i.e. Creating
demand for factory's products, which would create or at least keep jobs, etc.)
Let's say you did travel: You would have helped support the
airlines (and all they include) or even if you drove, you would have helped
support gas-stations, motels, etc. ***
In a message dated 2/12/09 4:56:40 PM Central Standard Time,
pota1968@... writes:
Normally I would travel but with today's economy I felt best to stay
home this time around.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51483 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
Absolutely. That's where I first saw it.
I'm not even sure Blockbusters was around back then.
In a message dated 2/12/2009 4:23:32 P.M. Central Standard Time,
mlccougar@... writes:
*** Are you talking about the original 1982(?) FIRST BLOOD film
starring Stallone and Brian Dennehy? I don't know how it was released in the
UK but it was released theatrically in the US.
*** Nothing says I love you like flowers!
Find a florist near you now.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51484 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Money (OT) |
.html.html
First and foremost you need money to spend.
And before that happens my bills comes first. :o)
Al
From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:04:32 PM Subject: [PotaDG] Money (OT)
*** I'm no economist, but what's up with no one spending? I'm not singling you out, but people ought to spend "some" even if it's not what they'd normally spend... I mean how can
things turn around otherwise?(i. e. Creating demand for factory's products, which would create or at least keep jobs, etc.)
Let's say you did travel: You would have helped support the airlines (and all they include) or even if you drove, you would have helped support gas-stations, motels, etc. ***
In a message dated 2/12/09 4:56:40 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
Normally I would travel but with today's economy I felt best to stay home this time around.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours in
just 2 easy steps!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51485 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.htmlI could be wrong but i thought it went striaght to video here in the
U.K, but i did spend most of 1982 in the south Atlantic and Falkland
Islands.
But there are plenty more films out there that where made with the
same principal that i'm talking about.
Nobody likes paying tax?
Mark
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, TZer0@... wrote:
>
>
> Absolutely. That's where I first saw it.
> I'm not even sure Blockbusters was around back then.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 4:23:32 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> mlccougar@... writes:
>
> *** Are you talking about the original 1982(?) FIRST BLOOD film
starring
> Stallone and Brian Dennehy? I don't know how it was released in
the UK but it
> was released theatrically in the US. ***
>
> **************Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist
near you
> now. (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?
query=florist&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000002)
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51486 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.htmlI saw it the first time on HBO while I was living in Beavercreek
OHIO in 1983!!!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@...> wrote:
>
> I could be wrong but i thought it went striaght to video here in
the
> U.K, but i did spend most of 1982 in the south Atlantic and
Falkland
> Islands.
> But there are plenty more films out there that where made with the
> same principal that i'm talking about.
> Nobody likes paying tax?
> Mark
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, TZer0@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > Absolutely. That's where I first saw it.
> > I'm not even sure Blockbusters was around back then.
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 2/12/2009 4:23:32 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> > mlccougar@ writes:
> >
> > *** Are you talking about the original 1982(?) FIRST BLOOD film
> starring
> > Stallone and Brian Dennehy? I don't know how it was released in
> the UK but it
> > was released theatrically in the US. ***
> >
> > **************Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a
florist
> near you
> > now. (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?
> query=florist&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000002)
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51487 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Money (OT) |
.html
.html
*** Paying off the Blu-Ray player huh? JK ;) ***
In a message dated 2/12/09 7:02:39 PM Central Standard Time,
pota1968@... writes:
First and foremost you need money to spend.
And before that happens my bills comes first.
:o)
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51488 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard Time,
markhaydon3@... writes:
Nobody
likes paying tax? Mark
Nothing says I love you like flowers!
Find a florist near you now.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51489 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
I just checked.
Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
TZer0@... writes:
Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard Time,
markhaydon3@ aol.com writes:
Nobody likes paying
tax? Mark
Nothing says I love you like flowers!
Find a florist near you now.
Nothing says I love you like flowers!
Find a florist near you now.<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51490 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
*** All we had locally was a two store "chain" called "The Video Station"
and there was also this weird store called "Pages at the Movies" which sold
used/vintage books and rented films... No Blockbuster here until around 1989 or
so, and twenty years later, they still suck. ***
In a message dated 2/12/09 11:01:33 PM Central Standard Time, TZer0@...
writes:
Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51491 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/12/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Money (OT) |
.html.html
Blu-ray player and then some. :o)
But also paying your bills helps the economy so it works both ways. :o)
Al
From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Thursday, February 12, 2009 11:32:58 PM Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Money (OT)
*** Paying off the Blu-Ray player huh? JK ;) ***
In a message dated 2/12/09 7:02:39 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
First and foremost you need money to spend.
And before that happens my bills comes first. :o)
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours in
just 2 easy steps!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51492 |
From: Jeff |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to
'85
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
I just checked.
Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time, TZer0@... writes:
Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
Nobody likes paying
tax? Mark
Nothing says I love you like flowers!
Find a florist near you now.
Nothing says I love you like flowers!
Find a florist near you now.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51493 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.htmlGod knows the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal Navy
and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
per week.
We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
videos are now has good as obsolete.
Mark
-- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff" <skintricks@...> wrote:
>
> Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: TZer0@...
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
>
>
>
>
> I just checked.
> Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
TZer0@... writes:
>
>
> Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
Time, markhaydon3@... writes:
> Nobody likes paying tax?
> Mark
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
now.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51494 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html.html
J
The good old days!
I remember that!
I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)! It cost over $100 AUS and man I
watched it SO many times.
I never got to copy any of the other POTA
movies so that was about it until the 90’s when FOX released the 5 movies
(and I’d bought the 90’s UK Planet Widescreen around the same
time).
I shudder when I think about just how much
money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to
replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!! J
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009
2:35 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
God knows the name of the video shop we used i was in
the Royal Navy
and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
per week.
We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
videos are now has good as obsolete.
Mark
-- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Jeff" <skintricks@ ...> wrote:
>
> Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: TZer0@...
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
>
>
>
>
> I just checked.
> Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
TZer0@... writes:
>
>
> Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
Time, markhaydon3@ ... writes:
> Nobody likes paying tax?
> Mark
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
--------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
now.
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
----------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51495 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.htmlI here you , but i'm lucky i didn't go down that road with Beta ( yes
the quality was better than VHS but there was not the choice of films
about ) i think thats why VHS took over and swomped the market.
Even those over sized lazer discs didnt do well , they had the choice
of films available but to costly???
I got rid of over seven hundred video's one a year ago and for little
money.
I remember spending a lot on Scarface and Once upon a time in
America , but getting a couple of £ each for them???Gutted.
Mark
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> :-)
>
>
>
> The good old days!
>
> I remember that!
>
> I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)! It cost over $100 AUS and
man I
> watched it SO many times.
>
>
>
> I never got to copy any of the other POTA movies so that was about
it until
> the 90's when FOX released the 5 movies (and I'd bought the 90's UK
Planet
> Widescreen around the same time).
>
>
>
> I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old
BETA, then
> VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs
with
> Blu-Ray!!! :-)
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of
> haydon.mark
> Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 2:35 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
>
>
>
> God knows the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal
Navy
> and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
> recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
> into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
> That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
> per week.
> We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
> Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about
£70
> upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
> was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop
had
> any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
> Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
> videos are now has good as obsolete.
> Mark
> -- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
com, "Jeff"
> <skintricks@> wrote:
> >
> > Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: TZer0@
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I just checked.
> > Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> TZer0@ writes:
> >
> >
> > Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
> Time, markhaydon3@ writes:
> > Nobody likes paying tax?
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
> now.
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51496 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
Two things killed Beta. It was the better
system, but it cost more. That and all
porn was only available on VHS tapes.
In a message dated 2/13/2009 4:15:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
markhaydon3@... writes:
i
think thats why VHS took over and swomped the
market.
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51497 |
From: haydon.mark |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.htmlI dont know about being more expensive because i with three others
bought a VHS recorder when they came out and you could have bought a
moterbike for the amount we payed.
But you are probably right about porn,someone made a killing on that
one!
Mark
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, TZer0@... wrote:
>
>
> Two things killed Beta. It was the better
> system, but it cost more. That and all
> porn was only available on VHS tapes.
>
>
>
> In a message dated 2/13/2009 4:15:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> markhaydon3@... writes:
>
> i think thats why VHS took over and swomped the market.
>
>
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?
redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%
26hmpgID=62%26bcd=fe
> bemailfooterNO62)
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51498 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html.html
Michael, I just bought a BETA copy of Planet on ebay for.....99 cents!!
From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Friday, February 13, 2009 3:55:06 PM Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
J
The good old days!
I remember that!
I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)! It cost over $100 AUS and man I
watched it SO many times.
I never got to copy any of the other POTA
movies so that was about it until the 90's when FOX released the 5 movies
(and I'd bought the 90's UK Planet Widescreen around the same
time).
I shudder when I think about just how much
money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to
replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!! J
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009
2:35 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
God knows the name of the video shop we used i was in
the Royal Navy
and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
per week.
We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
videos are now has good as obsolete.
Mark
-- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Jeff" <skintricks@ ...> wrote:
>
> Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: TZer0@...
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
>
>
>
>
> I just checked.
> Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
TZer0@... writes:
>
>
> Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
Time, markhaydon3@ ... writes:
> Nobody likes paying tax?
> Mark
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
--------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
now.
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
----------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51499 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH |
.htmlYes, that's the script I was talking about - it's on Hunter's site
(as 'POTA Revisited'). The film develops as in 'Beneath' until the
gorilla army reaches the mutant city; at that point Taylor, Nova and
Brent escape and make a run for it. When the bomb goes off it
destroys the gorillas and mutants ONLY. Taylor and Brent have an long
meandering scene about whether to try to return to their own time
(Brent wants to - presumably his ship wasn't damaged) or stay and
build a new society (Taylor). They stay, and the narrative skips
forward maybe a hundred years to a group of ape and human children
being taught by a chimp (the scene reused with the Lawgiver
in 'Battle'). I'm guessing that the ape/human hybrid child would have
appeared at this point to visualise the ultimate reconciliation
between the species. And that's one shock ending for this movie, the
second being those mutated apes crawling out of the mutant bomb site.
So that has the bomb, the twist ending, and sets up a possible sequel
without Taylor, who's expressly been dead for some time by this final
scene, yet it was altered to have the bomb abruptly cut the final
scenes off. From what others have said, it sounds like Heston might
have wanted this new ending and Zanuck agreed, but each for different
motivations, and forced it on Post (although I take back what I said
about Franciscus and Harrison's careers, their characters would have
been dead by a third Apes movie either way).
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> But didn't an early version of the script have the bomb exploding
but
> not destroying the planet with Taylor, Brent and Nova surviving. I
think
> I have read somewhere that it was going to end with 2 or 3 mutated
> gorillas emerging from one of the underground tunnels?
>
> The inclusion of the bomb in the story doesn't mean that they were
> planning to have it just as an instrument for destroying the
planet. I
> though the main reason for the bomb was to highlight the absurdity
of
> the mutants worshiping the thing as a god?
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of Alex Ruiz
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:59 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
>
>
>
> I don't know, Jeff.
> The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being
> surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=51446/stime=1234400366/nc1=3858795/nc2=3848627/nc3=5170418>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51500 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
*** You're supposed to be the optomist Whitty... Look on the bright side
and think of all the enjoyment you had when you were enjoying the APES Films on
Beta, VHS and DVD. ***
In a message dated 2/13/09 2:55:27 PM Central Standard Time,
sallywhitty@... writes:
I shudder when I
think about just how much money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD
because I have decided to replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!!
J
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51501 |
From: Alex Ruiz |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Planet of the Apes Wagon |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51502 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html.html
Maybe in the
USA , but I still have oodles of
BETA Porn (including The Devil In Miss Jones 3!) on Beta.
There was always a far bigger range of VHS
but plenty of BETA to keep the naughty monkey being punished for its behaviour!
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009
9:50 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
Two things killed Beta. It was the
better
system, but it cost more. That and
all
porn was only available on VHS
tapes.
In a message dated 2/13/2009 4:15:23 P.M.
Central Standard Time, markhaydon3@ aol.com writes:
i think thats why VHS
took over and swomped the market.
A Good
Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See
yours in just 2 easy steps!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51503 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
J
My dad actually sent a cheque to the
USA for a set
of POTA films on Beta when they were first released (my guess is I was about 14
so 1979 maybe?).
It was from an ad in a
US magazine,
who dad eventually phoned and they explained:
(1)
we would not be able to PLAY it in
Australia ;
(2)
he couldn’t cash the bank cheque!
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009
2:13 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
Michael, I just bought a BETA copy of Planet on ebay for.....99 cents!!
From:
Michael
& Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009
3:55:06 PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
J
The good old days!
I remember that!
I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)! It cost over $100 AUS and man I
watched it SO many times.
I never got to copy any of the other POTA movies so that was about
it until the 90’s when FOX released the 5 movies (and I’d bought the 90’s UK
Planet Widescreen around the same time).
I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old
BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs
with Blu-Ray!!! J
Michael
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009
2:35 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
God knows
the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal Navy
and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
per week.
We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
videos are now has good as obsolete.
Mark
-- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Jeff" <skintricks@ ...> wrote:
>
> Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: TZer0@...
> To: ymailto="mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com">PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
>
>
>
>
> I just checked.
> Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
TZer0@... writes:
>
>
> Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
Time, markhaydon3@ ... writes:
> Nobody likes paying tax?
> Mark
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
--------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
now.
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
----------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51504 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html
.html
Keep it for the 50th Anniversary
DVD!!! J
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009
2:13 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
Michael, I just bought a BETA copy of Planet on ebay for.....99 cents!!
From:
Michael
& Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.com>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009
3:55:06 PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
J
The good old days!
I remember that!
I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)! It cost over $100 AUS and man I
watched it SO many times.
I never got to copy any of the other POTA movies so that was about
it until the 90’s when FOX released the 5 movies (and I’d bought the 90’s UK
Planet Widescreen around the same time).
I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old
BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs
with Blu-Ray!!! J
Michael
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009
2:35 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
God knows
the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal Navy
and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
per week.
We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
videos are now has good as obsolete.
Mark
-- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
"Jeff" <skintricks@ ...> wrote:
>
> Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: TZer0@...
> To: ymailto="mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com">PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
>
>
>
>
> I just checked.
> Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
TZer0@... writes:
>
>
> Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
Time, markhaydon3@ ... writes:
> Nobody likes paying tax?
> Mark
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
--------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
now.
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
----------
> Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
>
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51505 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/13/2009 |
| Subject: Re: APES "overkill" |
.html.html
I’m no optimist Mike I assure you.
And don’t worry – I do recall
fondly the enjoyment I got but it is a futile old battle collecting movies for
home entertainment.
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009
3:17 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES
"overkill"
*** You're supposed to be the optomist
Whitty... Look on the bright side and think of all the enjoyment you had when
you were enjoying the APES Films on Beta, VHS and DVD. ***
In a message dated 2/13/09 2:55:27 PM
Central Standard Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com writes:
I shudder when I think about just how much
money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to
replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!! J
A Good
Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See
yours in just 2 easy steps!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51506 |
From: jessica rotich |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale |
.html
This is the second outfit in the world like this, but I do not own it. It is enroute to its new owner in Kentucky. Someday I will make one for myself...
Jessica. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51507 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale |
.html
.html
*** Very nice.***
In a message dated 2/14/09 12:31:25 AM Central Standard Time,
jessicarotich@... writes:
This is the second outfit in the world like this, but I do not own
it. It is enroute to its new owner in Kentucky. Someday I will
make one for myself...
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51508 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale |
.html.html
Very nice.
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of jessica rotich
Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009
4:31 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ;
POTA
Subject: [PotaDG] Zira Escape
Outfit, 1:6 scale
This is the second outfit in the world like this, but I do not own
it. It is enroute to its new owner in
Kentucky . Someday I will make one for
myself...
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51509 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.htmlThanks for the review Dario. It's fascinating to see this and wonder.
Like those twenty-or-so comic covers from the 1950's and 60's that
featured a post-apocalyptic Statue Of Liberty years before
POTA 'invented' the idea!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
>
> Here's a book review for "Genus Homo" that I wrote for an SF site.
>
> Dario
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Genus Homo (L. Sprague de Camp and P. Schuyler Miller - 1950)
>
> As an avid Planet of the Apes fan and enthusiast, I enjoy searching
> out all literature on the subject, including those not directly
> associated with the series, but those whose themes mirror the POTA
> scenario.
>
> The novel Genus Homo, jointly penned by L. Sprague de Camp and P.
> Schuyler Miller, and predates Pierre Boulle's Planet of the Apes
novel
> by more than a decade, fits that mold perfectly.
>
> The story begins with a busload of people waking up after some sort
of
> geological event which knocked out all the passengers on the trip.
> They find thenselves overturned and in the dark and as the slowly
> awake to assess the situation, determine that they are in some
> underground cave. They make their way to the top and immediately
note
> that they seem to be in some remote wilderness and thus must have
been
> displaced from the normal bus route they were on. They also see
that
> the climate has changed drastically from the time they were last
awake
> on the bus and discern that they must have been asleep or comatose
for
> a significant amount of time as well. As a number of passengers are
> scientist of various disciplines, their suspended state is
attributed
> to a leaked gas that one of the scientists was transporting. As the
> trek in search of civilization proceeds, they realize that they are
> much further from civilization than can possible be explained a
mere
> displacement of the bus. After a few encounters with oversized
animals
> and heretofore unknown species, the group comes to realize that
they
> have somehow been projected into the far future.
>
> The predicament of the group quickly leads to a requirement of a
new
> social order, and the protagonist of the novel, a chemist named
> Bridger finds himself as a leader. He is quickly deposed, and just
as
> quickly reinstated as the group realizes that a fair solid thinker
is
> better than a coniving lawyer. The groups deals with issues such as
> sex (a group of dancers are part of the mix), scientific analysis
of
> the situation (a group of scientists were on their way to a
seminar),
> and a few people who simply want to do as they please.
>
> It is only after all these are explored does the group finally come
> into contact with apes (supposedly evolved gorillas) that are
> intelligent. A few humans are captured and placed into a zoo for a
few
> days when the captors realize that they are no mere animals.
Another
> ape is brought in evidently to test the intelligence of the humans.
> The two groups soon establish communication through language and
the
> humansbegin to learn the post holocaust history of the earth which
led
> to the new order of 'civilization' while at the same time the apes
> learn more about the past. While we never find out exactly why
there
> was a transition and what led to the downfall of mankind as the
> preeminent species, we do know that it has been millions of years
> since man last ruled the Earth, and almost all evidence of his time
> has vanished. While technologically the ape civilization is a
backward
> one, they do have steam power, and with a disticnt lack of metals
and
> iron, they have advanced wood building skills as well as a much
more
> resistant strain of wood growth allowing them to have a far
superior
> wood manufacturing base.
>
> We learn that there are other species of apes on other continents,
and
> that just like man before him, ape history is just as plagued by
wars.
> The novel ends with just such an escalation as the 'good' apes are
> faced with an attacking force of baboons.
>
> There are a lot of good points in the novel, but it is also
> unsatisfying in many ways. The initial section dealing with the
humans
> just waking up is rather long and slow going. There a lot of human
> characters for which the authors try to develop, but once the apes
> come into the picture all that character development is just thrown
to
> the wayside. A brewing relationship between Bridger and one of the
> female humans is carefully planned out and is then summarily
addressed
> by only a sentence or two in the very last paragraph. The apes
> civilization is absolutely fascinating, but once the conflict with
the
> baboons comes into play, the novel concentrates on the stragegy and
> climactic battle and ends the story there.
>
> When it comes to determining whether Boulle could have read and
been
> influenced by Genus Homo, the answer is yes. In order to have read
> Genus Homo, a french translation needed to be available for Boulle
to
> read. Genus Homo was first translated and sold in France as "Le
règne
> du gorille" in 1951, well before Boulle penned "La Planete des
> singes". (Other editions came out in 1982 and again in 1984).
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51510 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Planet of the Apes Wagon |
.htmlWell who hasn't accidently spent 20k on ebay?!
I noticed an interview with him during the week ('Minder' publicity)
where he was asked if he used Facebook - he said he does but under the
name 'Roddy O'Neill' - POTA reference? I haven't gotten round to adding
him as my friend yet!
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> Has anyone read Shane Richie's story on bying the Wagon from POTA?
> Pretty wild. I know he mentions it at the U.K. Convention but here's
more detials on it.
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1144704/I-blew-20-000-
eBay-wasted-Jack-Daniels-admits-Shane-Richie-bought-Planet-Of-The-Apes-
prop.htmlbr>
>
> Al
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51511 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51512 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51513 |
From: John |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Valentine's Day |
|
.html Hallmark had Planet of the Apes Valentine's Day cards featuring the
picture of Taylor kissing Zira & when you open it, it plays some of
Jerry Goldsmith's score with the caption "Put your stinkin' paws on me,
you damned dirty ape!" Even had a cool little picture of the Icarus on
the back. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51514 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.html
.html
*** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to
act like it was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth and
that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the story of who
came up with the ending, they almost always say they seen a sign or something
with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use her as their ending... I've
never heard anyone say it was totally their own fabrication. ***
In a message dated 2/14/09 5:25:28 AM Central Standard Time,
neilmoxham@... writes:
Like
those twenty-or-so comic covers from the 1950's and 60's that featured a
post-apocalyptic Statue Of Liberty years before POTA 'invented' the
idea!
A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51515 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Valentine's Day |
.html.html
Well, if you send me that I will be YOUR
Valentine, sexy! ;)
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Sunday, 15 February 2009
3:15 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Valentine's Day
Hallmark had Planet of the Apes Valentine's Day cards
featuring the
picture of Taylor
kissing Zira & when you open it, it plays some of
Jerry Goldsmith's score with the caption "Put your stinkin' paws on me,
you damned dirty ape!" Even had a cool little picture of the Icarus on
the back.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51516 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.html.html
Good point Mike.
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Sunday, 15 February 2009
5:40 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Genus
Homo: book review
*** The thing is, I
don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to act like it was "their"
idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth and that the Statue would
be what gave it away, but regardless of the story of who came up with the ending,
they almost always say they seen a sign or something with the Statue of Liberty
that inspired them to use her as their ending... I've never heard anyone say it
was totally their own fabrication. ***
In a message dated 2/14/09 5:25:28 AM
Central Standard Time, neilmoxham@gmail. com writes:
Like those twenty-or-so comic covers from
the 1950's and 60's that
featured a post-apocalyptic Statue Of Liberty years before
POTA 'invented' the idea!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51517 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.html
.html
Message
I thought Rod
Serling did claim it as his own idea to have the statue at the end of the film
as did Arthur P. Jacobs? In Brian Pendreigh's excellent book The Legend of
the Planet of the Apes, one time choice for director Blake Edwards claims he
came up with the statue idea along with ex-Disney artist Don Peters
and that it was mostly Peters' idea. Don Peters was the guy who did
the original publicity paintings with the Statue of Liberty scenes and he
claims in the book that it was his idea alone.
Neil
*** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to
act like it was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth
and that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the story of
who came up with the ending, they almost always say they seen a sign or
something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use her as their
ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their own fabrication.
***
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51518 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.html
.html
Message
These days, think
'half buried Statue of Liberty in the future' and I would bet most people think
'Planet of the Apes'. I think most people wouldn't even be aware of all those
old pulp and science magazines etc. that used the image on their
covers.
Neil
*** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to
act like it was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth
and that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the story of
who came up with the ending, they almost always say they seen a sign or
something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use her as their
ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their own fabrication.
***
In a message dated 2/14/09 5:25:28 AM Central Standard Time,
neilmoxham@gmail. com writes:
Like those
twenty-or-so comic covers from the 1950's and 60's that featured a
post-apocalyptic Statue Of Liberty years before POTA 'invented' the
idea!
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51519 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.htmlI thought the Pendreigh book had it the other way around.
I thought it was Blake who claimed that while sitting in a restaurant
with Serling that HE came up with the idea. (Pendreigh could not have
interview Serling, but he could have interview Blake who was still alive
at the time.)
But I've always believe that the moment had the Serling 'touch', the
type of ideas he had written so many times in his writing carreer and it
was very much like something that he would come up with. That's why I've
always believe that it was Serling's idea, although there will never be
indisputable proof of who really came up with the idea.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009 5:52 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review
> I thought Rod Serling did claim it as his own idea to have the
> statue at
> the end of the film as did Arthur P. Jacobs? In Brian Pendreigh's
> excellent book The Legend of the Planet of the Apes, one time
> choice for
> director Blake Edwards claims he came up with the statue idea along
> withex-Disney artist Don Peters and that it was mostly Peters'
> idea. Don
> Peters was the guy who did the original publicity paintings with the
> Statue of Liberty scenes and he claims in the book that it was his
> ideaalone.
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf
> Of mlccougar@...
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 5:40 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review
>
>
>
> *** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to act
> like it
> was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth and
> that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the
> storyof who came up with the ending, they almost always say they
> seen a sign
> or something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use
> her as
> their ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their own
> fabrication. ***
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=51514/stime=1234640385/nc1=3848621/nc2=3858793/nc3=5191952>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51520 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.html
.html
Message
Nope, that was
Jacobs who claimed he came up with it in the restaurant while having lunch
with Edwards. It's in the Cinefantastique 'Apes issue'. In the Pendreigh book
Edwards comes as close to calling Jacobs a liar about that recollection as you
can without actually saying it.
Neil
I thought the Pendreigh book had it the other way around. I thought it
was Blake who claimed that while sitting in a restaurant with Serling that
HE came up with the idea. (Pendreigh could not have interview Serling, but
he could have interview Blake who was still alive at the time.) <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51521 |
From: Neil Foster |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.html
.html
Message
Well if there is a
way of verifying when Don Peters did his concept sketches and paintings and if
they were done before Serling's scripts it may well be proof that it was
originally Peters' idea.
I myself believe
it was a combination of people that came up with it, which ones though? Like you
I don't think we'll never know for sure.
Neil
But I've always believe that the moment had the Serling 'touch',
the type of ideas he had written so many times in his writing carreer and
it was very much like something that he would come up with. That's why
I've always believe that it was Serling's idea, although there will never
be indisputable proof of who really came up with the idea. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51522 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Valentine's Day |
.html
.html
I saw that! and I got it! Here's the cover..... and the quote from the inside....it even has a pic of "Icarus" on the back!
All copywritten and everything complete with credit to Goldsmith!
From: John <DrZaiusDavis@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent:
Saturday, February 14, 2009 12:15:16 PM Subject: [PotaDG] Valentine's Day
Hallmark had Planet of the Apes Valentine's Day cards featuring the
picture of Taylor kissing Zira & when you open it, it plays some of
Jerry Goldsmith's score with the caption "Put your stinkin' paws on me,
you damned dirty ape!" Even had a cool little picture of the Icarus on
the back.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51523 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.html
.html
In a message dated 2/14/09 6:13:03 PM Central Standard Time,
ntfoster@... writes:
I myself believe it was a
combination of people that came up with it, which ones though?
*** All I was getting at is that the idea of a post-Apocalyptic Statue of
Liberty existed before APES ever did and that (to the best of my knowledge) none
of the people involved claimed THAT as being their original idea... Now as far
as who came up with the idea to use that idea in PLANET is another issue
altogether and is not what I was getting at in my post.
*** A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above.
See yours
in just 2 easy steps!<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51524 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.html.html
SO this really is strange!
How can we have so many people claim to be responsible?
Are people LIARS? Do they have FALSE
MEMORIES? Were they on far too much COCAINE?
What was it?
Michael
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Sunday, 15 February 2009
8:53 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Genus
Homo: book review
I thought Rod Serling did claim it as his own idea to
have the statue at the end of the film as did Arthur P. Jacobs? In Brian
Pendreigh's excellent book The Legend of the Planet of the Apes, one time
choice for director Blake Edwards claims he came up with the statue
idea along with ex-Disney artist Don Peters and that it was mostly Peters'
idea. Don Peters was the guy who did the original publicity
paintings with the Statue of Liberty scenes and he claims in the book that
it was his idea alone.
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of
mlccougar@aol. com
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009
5:40 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Genus
Homo: book review
*** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's
crew ever tried to act like it was "their" idea... It was their
idea to have it be future Earth and that the Statue would be what gave it away,
but regardless of the story of who came up with the ending, they almost always
say they seen a sign or something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them
to use her as their ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their
own fabrication. ***
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 51525 |
From: Michael & Sally Whitty |
Date: 2/14/2009 |
| Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review |
.html.html
But is he LYING or what I wonder?
From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
Sent: Sunday, 15 February 2009
9:39 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: RE: [PotaDG] Re:
Genus Homo: book review
Nope, that was Jacobs who claimed he came up with it
in the restaurant while having lunch with Edwards. It's in the
Cinefantastique 'Apes issue'. In the Pendreigh book Edwards comes as close to
calling Jacobs a liar about that recollection as you can without actually
saying it.
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
[ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ]
On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009
9:06 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] Re:
Genus Homo: book review
I thought
the Pendreigh book had it the other way around.
I thought it was Blake who claimed that while sitting in a restaurant
with Serling that HE came up with the idea. (Pendreigh could not have
interview Serling, but he could have interview Blake who was still alive
at the time.)
<.html
<.html
|
|
|
|