Yahoo! potadg group — Messages 51426–51525

Dates: 2009-02-10 through 2009-02-14

Messages in potadg group. Page 327 of 451.
Index Prev  Next


Group: potadg Message: 51426 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/10/2009
Subject: Re: Simian Scrolls
Group: potadg Message: 51427 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/10/2009
Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
Group: potadg Message: 51428 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/10/2009
Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
Group: potadg Message: 51429 From: Jeff Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: new image
Group: potadg Message: 51430 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
Group: potadg Message: 51431 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: new image
Group: potadg Message: 51432 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
Group: potadg Message: 51433 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51434 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51435 From: Rich Handley Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3699
Group: potadg Message: 51436 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51437 From: ~~Joanne~~ Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
Group: potadg Message: 51438 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51439 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51440 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51441 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51442 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: CHRIS AND KYLEE
Group: potadg Message: 51443 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51444 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE
Group: potadg Message: 51445 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51446 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51447 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51448 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51449 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51450 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE
Group: potadg Message: 51451 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51452 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51453 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: GoogleEarth 3955
Group: potadg Message: 51454 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Aussie Fire!
Group: potadg Message: 51455 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51456 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Aussie Fire!
Group: potadg Message: 51457 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51458 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51459 From: jessica rotich Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE
Group: potadg Message: 51460 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51461 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Fire down under!
Group: potadg Message: 51462 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51463 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE
Group: potadg Message: 51464 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51465 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51466 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51467 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51468 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51469 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51470 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51471 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51472 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51473 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51474 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51475 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51476 From: ~~Joanne~~ Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51477 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51478 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51479 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51480 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51481 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51482 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Money (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 51483 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51484 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Money (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 51485 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51486 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51487 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Money (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 51488 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51489 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51490 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51491 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
Subject: Re: Money (OT)
Group: potadg Message: 51492 From: Jeff Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51493 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51494 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51495 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51496 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51497 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51498 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51499 From: nlmoxham Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
Group: potadg Message: 51500 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51501 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Planet of the Apes Wagon
Group: potadg Message: 51502 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51503 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51504 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51505 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
Group: potadg Message: 51506 From: jessica rotich Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale
Group: potadg Message: 51507 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale
Group: potadg Message: 51508 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale
Group: potadg Message: 51509 From: nlmoxham Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51510 From: nlmoxham Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Planet of the Apes Wagon
Group: potadg Message: 51511 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 51512 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 51513 From: John Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Valentine's Day
Group: potadg Message: 51514 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51515 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Valentine's Day
Group: potadg Message: 51516 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51517 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51518 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51519 From: Dario Sciola Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51520 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51521 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51522 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Valentine's Day
Group: potadg Message: 51523 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51524 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
Group: potadg Message: 51525 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review



Group: potadg Message: 51426 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/10/2009
Subject: Re: Simian Scrolls
.html
Moderators! :)

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "rassmguy" <handleyr@...> wrote:
>
> If Cornelius had used it, Zira might not have loathed bananas so
much.
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@> wrote:
> > The Viagra story? Real ape fans only use Cialis, recommended by
> James Naughton!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: nlmoxham
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 3:57 AM
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Simian Scrolls
> >
> >
> > These are from the Viraga story? I'd like to see them!
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
> > <sallywhitty@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > There's 3 more pages to add to the page Rich refers to in the
> > Scrolls
> > > article, attributed to Sonny Trinidad (but denied by him as
being
> > his work)
> > > and also some deleted pages from BATTLE where you can
actually
> > EASILY see
> > > where they would slip in.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Neil - are you able to upload these pages to the files?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The 3 additional pages really bring light to the one page
Rich
> > originally
> > > sourced and who knows..maybe the rest are out there somewhere?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It seems sure that the entire comic was at least WRITTEN (by
whom?)
> > and at
> > > least these 4 pages (maybe more?) drawn.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This is an ongoing mystery but if there's any comics out
there from
> > the era
> > > I'd love to see them find the light of day.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Rich - with the 3 new pages having been found, would you
consider
> > re-asking
> > > sonny about these?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Similarly, would you consider re-asking Mr Moench? I reckon
if we
> > find a
> > > script we could con Foster into doing a Sonny style and
complete the
> > > comic..!
> > >
> > > Uh oh, he's just fainted again..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> >
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 51427 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/10/2009
Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
.html
.html
I actually sat down today and just started reading it word for word .....I'm up to the late 70's! .....! and Man Rich! You have outdone yourself....how the hell did you keep all this straight putting this together! and so detailed......!!!
GOOD WORK


From: rassmguy <handleyr@...>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 8:15:23 PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Rich's Timeline Book

It's probably best not to. I'm Irish--and, thus, very pale.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
<sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:

>
> Don't make the guy blush! :-)
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
Behalf Of
> ~~Joanne~~
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 6:46 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book
>
>
>
>
> it's a great book
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
> Subject: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 3:44 PM
>
> I can't WAIT for mine!
>
> I have one on order.
>
>
>
> In the interim, I've discovered a site that has some pages for
preview and
> they look GREAT!
>
> There seems to be illustrations of various things (comic book covers
etc) in
> the columns that I wasn't expecting.
>
>
>
> I originally was skeptical about the depth and length Rich went to,
but upon
> consideration. ..if we are free to make of it what we will, then the
more the
> better.
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
Behalf
> Of Dario Sciola
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 6:34 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Happy Birthday, Dario!
>
> I received my copy of Rich's Timeline book and wanted to comment a
bit on
> that. But it's so HUGE that it'll take me a while to read. But I can say
> that it's as comprehensive as he could have made it, even
incorporating the
> William T. Quick prequel novels (The Fall and Colony) published to
the 2001
> POTA novelization. (I know that may be blsphemous to some, but I'm just
> illustrating that Rich left no stone unturned.) My copy is a softcover.
> Weren't the originals Hardcover? I would have prefered a hardcover,
but the
> lulu site only indicates softcover for sale..
>
>
>
< http://geo.yahoo. com/serv? s=97359714/ grpId=8605785/ grpspId=17050214 37/msgId
> =51405/stime= 1234298061/ nc1=3848621/ nc2=3858795/ nc3=5522129>
>


<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 51428 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/10/2009
Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
.html
.html
*** I'm still waiting on my free copy so I can write a review for it... ;) ***
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 2/10/09 11:24:29 PM Central Standard Time, apefan23@... writes:
> From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
> Subject: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
> Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 3:44 PM
>
> I can't WAIT for mine!
>
> I have one on order.
 


A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 51429 From: Jeff Date: 2/11/2009
Subject: new image
.html
Attachments :
    .html
    In the latest Make Up Artist Magazine, there's an article on the career of Tom Burman.  There's a never before published photo of Tom with an Orangutan extra.
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51430 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
    .html
    .html Message
    I'm jealous Tim, I am so looking forward to this book. Bloody stupid Aussie Post, if they did their job properly I would already be stuck into it!
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:24 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rich's Timeline Book

    I actually sat down today and just started reading it word for word .....I'm up to the late 70's! .....! and Man Rich! You have outdone yourself.... how the hell did you keep all this straight putting this together! and so detailed.... ..!!!
    GOOD WORK

     
    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51431 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: new image
    .html
    .html

    Thanks Jeff!!!

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff
    Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 4:07 PM
    To: pota@yahoogroups.com; PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] new image

     

    In the latest Make Up Artist Magazine, there's an article on the career of Tom Burman.  There's a never before published photo of Tom with an Orangutan extra.

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51432 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
    .html
    .html

    Hey Rich

     

    This one dude:

     

    http://books.google.com/books?id=p9dCrSQWhHMC&pg=PT204&lpg=PT204&dq=Sonny+Trinidad+apes&source=web&ots=hhTYkIhFQD&sig=cgSQxV0CCMUdibRuaQ9nwZvrs_Q&hl=en&ei=i8mSSbWwKpqqtQPdhaXACw&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=7&ct=result

     

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of rassmguy
    Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:14 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Rich's Timeline Book

     

    --"Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:

    > I can't WAIT for mine!
    > I have one on order.

    And, with any luck, you'll have it soon! (Due to the idiocy of the
    Post Office, they returned his and Neil's books to my house, with a
    sticker saying they'd never been claimed in Australia --even though
    Neil and Mike were never notified of their arrival at the Post Office
    to go pick them up. Sheesh.

    > In the interim, I've discovered a site that has some
    > pages for preview and they look GREAT!

    Thanks! Just curious, which page is that? Google Books? Lulu?
    Hassleinbooks. com? (All three have previews--I was just curious, for
    marketing purposes, which one caught your eye.)

    > There seems to be illustrations of various things
    > (comic book covers etc) in the columns that I
    > wasn't expecting.

    Yep! We have illustrations throughout the book, and a huge cover
    gallery of everything in the back, along with a number of appendices.

    > I originally was skeptical about the depth and length
    > Rich went to,

    So was my wife, I think. :)

    > but upon consideration. ..if we are free to make of
    > it what we will, then the more the better.

    Cool, I'm glad you see it that way.

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51433 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html

    Maybe I’m slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only do Taylor if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if you blow up the whole world”.

     

    Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?

     

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
    Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

       Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.

      Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning any.

     

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: nlmoxham

    Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM

    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

    In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
    him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's
    fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
    on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
    for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
    countless new stories.

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@... wrote:
    >
    >
    > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > get financing without his name attached to
    > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    >
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
    >
    > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    career!
    >
    > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    just 2 easy
    > steps!
    > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol?
    redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
    26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > bemailfooterNO62)
    >

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51434 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    I read somewhere that heston was wanting his part ( taylor ) killed
    of in the second film Beneath , because he didnt want to be type cast.
    The suggestion of blowing it up was a suggestion, Heston didn't write
    it, and your wright about wanting shock value.
    Don't forget they didn't leave Planet or Beneath open at the end
    because there where not planning on a follow up.
    Which is a shame because the storyline may have been even better with
    a little forward planning .
    Bet they never thought they could wind out five films.
    Mark
    -- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
    <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
    >
    > Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only
    do Taylor
    > if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the
    whole
    > world".
    >
    >
    >
    > Jeff - did I misunderstand slightly?
    >
    >
    >
    > Michael
    >
    >
    >
    > _____
    >
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
    Behalf Of
    > Jeff K.
    > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    >
    > Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand.
    I think
    > the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they
    wanted
    > "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's
    idea (or he
    > takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the
    last movie.
    > So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate
    shock. Though
    > didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag
    about it
    > in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.
    >
    > Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to
    moving on
    > and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and
    had a TV
    > series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking
    at "Beneath" the
    > way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't
    planning
    > any.
    >
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    >
    > From: nlmoxham <mailto:neilmoxham@...>
    >
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com> com
    >
    > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
    >
    > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    >
    > In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    > end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    > which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    > Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes,
    having
    > him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
    It's
    > fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    > want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some
    integrity
    > on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    > careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    > in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined
    up
    > for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    > used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    > been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
    for
    > countless new stories.
    >
    > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com,
    TZer0@
    > wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > > get financing without his name attached to
    > > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > > sallywhitty@ writes:
    > >
    > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    > career!
    > >
    > > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    > just 2 easy
    > > steps!
    > > (http://pr.atwola
    > <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1218550342x1201216770/aol?>
    > com/promoclk/100000075x1218550342x1201216770/aol?
    > redir=http://www.freecred
    > <http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%25>
    > itreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%
    > 26hmpgID=62%26bcd=fe
    > > bemailfooterNO62)
    > >
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51435 From: Rich Handley Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Digest Number 3699
    .html
    >Posted by: "Tim "apefan"" apefan23@... apefan23
    >I actually sat down today and just started reading it word for word
    >.....I'm up to the late 70's! .....! and Man Rich! You have outdone
    >yourself....how the hell did you keep all this straight putting this
    >together! and so detailed......!!! GOOD WORK

    Thanks, Tim! You should see how many revisions of the thing I had to
    do as I went through each set of stories. :)
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51436 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
      In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions.
     And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Maybe I’m slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only do Taylor if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if you blow up the whole world”.

    Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?

    Michael


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
    Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

       Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.

      Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning any.

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: nlmoxham

    Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM

    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
    him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's
    fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
    on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
    for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
    countless new stories.

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@... wrote:
    >
    >
    > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > get financing without his name attached to
    > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    >
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
    >
    > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    career!
    >
    > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    just 2 easy
    > steps!
    > ( http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol?
    redir= http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
    26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > bemailfooterNO62)
    >

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51437 From: ~~Joanne~~ Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Rich's Timeline Book
    .html
    It's a book you can read over and over again and each time still be amazed at what you are reading.  
     
    Rich definately outdid himself.

     


    --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Tim "apefan" <apefan23@...> wrote:

    From: Tim "apefan" <apefan23@...>
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Rich's Timeline Book
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 12:24 AM

    I actually sat down today and just started reading it word for word .....I'm up to the late 70's! .....! and Man Rich! You have outdone yourself.... how the hell did you keep all this straight putting this together! and so detailed.... ..!!!
    GOOD WORK


    From: rassmguy <handleyr@optonline. net>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 8:15:23 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Rich's Timeline Book

    It's probably best not to. I'm Irish--and, thus, very pale.

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
    <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
    >
    > Don't make the guy blush! :-)
    >
    >
    >
    > _____
    >
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com] On
    Behalf Of
    > ~~Joanne~~
    > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 6:46 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > it's a great book
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
    >
    >
    > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
    > Subject: [PotaDG] Rich's Timeline Book
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 3:44 PM
    >
    > I can't WAIT for mine!
    >
    > I have one on order.
    >
    >
    >
    > In the interim, I've discovered a site that has some pages for
    preview and
    > they look GREAT!
    >
    > There seems to be illustrations of various things (comic book covers
    etc) in
    > the columns that I wasn't expecting.
    >
    >
    >
    > I originally was skeptical about the depth and length Rich went to,
    but upon
    > consideration. ..if we are free to make of it what we will, then the
    more the
    > better.
    >
    >
    >
    > Michael
    >
    >
    >
    > _____
    >
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
    Behalf
    > Of Dario Sciola
    > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 6:34 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Happy Birthday, Dario!
    >
    > I received my copy of Rich's Timeline book and wanted to comment a
    bit on
    > that. But it's so HUGE that it'll take me a while to read. But I can say
    > that it's as comprehensive as he could have made it, even
    incorporating the
    > William T. Quick prequel novels (The Fall and Colony) published to
    the 2001
    > POTA novelization. (I know that may be blsphemous to some, but I'm just
    > illustrating that Rich left no stone unturned.) My copy is a softcover.
    > Weren't the originals Hardcover? I would have prefered a hardcover,
    but the
    > lulu site only indicates softcover for sale..
    >
    >
    >
    < http://geo.yahoo. com/serv? s=97359714/ grpId=8605785/ grpspId=17050214 37/msgId
    > =51405/stime= 1234298061/ nc1=3848621/ nc2=3858795/ nc3=5522129>
    >



    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51438 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    Yeah, I know. 
    In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
     
    Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it. The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending.
     
    Worked for me. I loved it.
    But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
     
    Al  


    From: Jeff K. <veetus@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

      In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions.
     And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the whole world".

    Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?

    Michael


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
    Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

       Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.

      Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning any.

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: nlmoxham

    Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM

    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
    him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's
    fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
    on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
    for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
    countless new stories.

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@... wrote:
    >
    >
    > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > get financing without his name attached to
    > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    >
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
    >
    > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    career!
    >
    > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    just 2 easy
    > steps!
    > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol?
    redir= http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
    26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > bemailfooterNO62)
    >


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51439 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html

    OK.  I have read it differently but I don’t know where so what I read may have been stretched!

    Darn – I’ll have to ease up on the big guy now! 
    J

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
    Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 2:38 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

      In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions.

     And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.

     

    ----- Original Message -----

    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM

    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

    Maybe I’m slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only do Taylor if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if you blow up the whole world”.

    Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?

    Michael


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
    Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

       Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.

      Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning any.

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: nlmoxham

    Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM

    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
    him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's
    fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
    on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
    for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
    countless new stories.

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@... wrote:
    >
    >
    > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > get financing without his name attached to
    > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    >
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
    >
    > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    career!
    >
    > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    just 2 easy
    > steps!
    > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol?
    redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
    26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > bemailfooterNO62)
    >

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51440 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html

    Yeah I loved it too Al – it’s as final as you can get really isn’t it?  J

    But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on the planet….

     

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

    Yeah, I know. 

    In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)

     

    Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it. The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending.

     

    Worked for me. I loved it.

    But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)

     

    Al  

     


    From: Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

      In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions.

     And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.

     

    ----- Original Message -----

    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM

    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

    Maybe I’m slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only do Taylor if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if you blow up the whole world”.

    Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?

    Michael


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
    Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

       Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.

      Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning any.

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: nlmoxham

    Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM

    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
    him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's
    fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
    on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
    for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
    countless new stories.

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@... wrote:
    >
    >
    > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > get financing without his name attached to
    > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    >
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
    >
    > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    career!
    >
    > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    just 2 easy
    > steps!
    > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol?
    redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
    26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > bemailfooterNO62)
    >

     

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51441 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html Message
    In  Heston's 'The Actor's Life' book, he makes it sound like it was his idea:
     

    September 30. Fox is now willing to accept my proposal to do a brief transition bit for them in their new version of APES. I don't think it's a good idea, but of course I'll carry out my promise to them.

    * The overwhelming success of PLANET OF THE APES reasonably enough prompted Fox to undertake a sequel. I pointed out to Dick Zanuck that, while I sympathized with him from a corporate point of view, as an actor there was really no sequel possible. The only story you could tell had been told; anything further would just be adventures among the monkeys. While this might well be profitable (as indeed it was; I think they made five of them, plus a TV series), there was nothing new to act in it. Still, as Dick said, they couldn't really undertake a sequel if I weren't in it at all. Moved by this wistful observation, I offered to appear in the opening sequence, if they'd then kill me off. This proved agreeable, though they asked me to simply disappear in the opening sequence, and be killed off in the end. I agreed, thinking I could end the whole thing with a death that included the end of the world. I sold them on this, but they were cleverer than I; they still made several sequels, though without me
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael & Sally Whitty
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:53 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Maybe I’m slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only do Taylor if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if you blow up the whole world”.

    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51442 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: CHRIS AND KYLEE
    .html
    http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2009/02/11/warren/life/0
    211war-bell0.txt

    CHRIS AND KYLEE

    Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic love.
    It can also be a celebration of love between family members.

    Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her first
    birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle Starr.

    She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of the
    Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.

    "I knew my days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the
    Warrenton area.

    Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the theater.
    When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged," and as the opening credits
    began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to come
    with her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others.

    "Everything was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I was
    getting a little nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said.

    She rested in a back room decorated with old movie posters for most
    of the movie before joining her family.

    "I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,' because it was
    a special night," she said.

    She said she felt miserable the remainder of the night, but her
    prayer was answered. Approximately 24 hours later Chris went into
    labor and gave birth to her only daughter, Kylee.

    Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of Kylee's birth. When
    she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that before."

    Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris because,
    she said, the day is about the special people in your life.

    "I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was my
    first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little
    personal valentine."
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51443 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
    From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
     
    Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
    So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation. It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world).
     
    At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
    Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have seriously puked. :o)
     
    Al


    From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really isn't it?  J

    But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on the planet….

     

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

    Yeah, I know. 

    In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)

     

    Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it. The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending.

     

    Worked for me. I loved it.

    But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)

     

    Al  

     


    From: Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

      In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston portrays it as suggestions.

     And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.

     

    ----- Original Message -----

    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM

    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

    Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the whole world".

    Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?

    Michael


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Jeff K.
    Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

       Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand. I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I guess the director wasn't on the same page.

      Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the next sequel. They weren't planning any.

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: nlmoxham

    Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM

    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes, having
    him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming. It's
    fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some integrity
    on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined up
    for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting for
    countless new stories.

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@... wrote:
    >
    >
    > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > get financing without his name attached to
    > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    >
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
    >
    > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    career!
    >
    > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    just 2 easy
    > steps!
    > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855 0342x1201216770/ aol?
    redir= http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
    26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > bemailfooterNO62)
    >

     


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51444 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE
    .html
    .html
      7 years ago? Was it POTA2001?
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:07 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] CHRIS AND KYLEE

    http://suburbanjour nals.stltoday. com/articles/ 2009/02/11/ warren/life/ 0
    211war-bell0. txt

    CHRIS AND KYLEE

    Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic love.
    It can also be a celebration of love between family members.

    Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her first
    birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle Starr.

    She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of the
    Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.

    "I knew my days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the
    Warrenton area.

    Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the theater.
    When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged, " and as the opening credits
    began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to come
    with her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others.

    "Everything was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I was
    getting a little nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said.

    She rested in a back room decorated with old movie posters for most
    of the movie before joining her family.

    "I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,' because it was
    a special night," she said.

    She said she felt miserable the remainder of the night, but her
    prayer was answered. Approximately 24 hours later Chris went into
    labor and gave birth to her only daughter, Kylee.

    Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of Kylee's birth. When
    she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that before."

    Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris because,
    she said, the day is about the special people in your life.

    "I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was my
    first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little
    personal valentine."

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51445 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
      As usual, "POTA Revisited" to the rescue.
     
      Once again, Heston says the ending of "Beneath" was his idea: "I sold the director and producer on the idea".
     
      Director Ted Post says it was because Richard Zanuck was being removed from Fox.
      Post: "We had other endings, but the order came down from Dick...that was the picture I was involved with that found Dick Zanuck not in a very happy state of mind. His conclusion about the picture was a reflection either consciously or unconsciously of what he felt".
     
      Both Post and James Franciscus hated the ending.
     
      Post: "The meaning of it was not too profound and, if anything, it lacked meaning. It lacked human significance. It didn't have a theme or a premise worth anything. If anything, it was cynical and pessimistic because of the finish of it. I don't believe in dampening the human spirit like that. I don't care how realistic you want to be - I'm an optimist, basically".
     
      Franciscus: "I thought the ending was awful. A picture without hope...I think Ted and I PLEADED for someone to survive this mess, be it Chuck's character or the girl or Brent's character - SOMEBODY far enough away from the explosion for whatever reason so that mankind is still left".
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:04 PM
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    In  Heston's 'The Actor's Life' book, he makes it sound like it was his idea:
     

    September 30. Fox is now willing to accept my proposal to do a brief transition bit for them in their new version of APES. I don't think it's a good idea, but of course I'll carry out my promise to them.

    * The overwhelming success of PLANET OF THE APES reasonably enough prompted Fox to undertake a sequel. I pointed out to Dick Zanuck that, while I sympathized with him from a corporate point of view, as an actor there was really no sequel possible. The only story you could tell had been told; anything further would just be adventures among the monkeys. While this might well be profitable (as indeed it was; I think they made five of them, plus a TV series), there was nothing new to act in it. Still, as Dick said, they couldn't really undertake a sequel if I weren't in it at all. Moved by this wistful observation, I offered to appear in the opening sequence, if they'd then kill me off. This proved agreeable, though they asked me to simply disappear in the opening sequence, and be killed off in the end. I agreed, thinking I could end the whole thing with a death that included the end of the world. I sold them on this, but they were cleverer than I; they still made several sequels, though without me
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Michael & Sally Whitty
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:53 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Maybe I’m slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said “I’ll only do Taylor if you kill him of” then he changed that to “if you blow up the whole world”.

    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51446 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    I don't know, Jeff.
    The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
    Especially when you have an actor (Heston) who's not willing to make another sequel and a prior movie (Planet) your trying to out do (ending wise).
     
    So for any of them to be surprised by it, it's surprising to me.
    Something just doen't add up there. 
     
    Al

     


    From: Jeff K. <veetus@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:12:27 PM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

      As usual, "POTA Revisited" to the rescue.
     
      Once again, Heston says the ending of "Beneath" was his idea: "I sold the director and producer on the idea".
     
      Director Ted Post says it was because Richard Zanuck was being removed from Fox.
      Post: "We had other endings, but the order came down from Dick...that was the picture I was involved with that found Dick Zanuck not in a very happy state of mind. His conclusion about the picture was a reflection either consciously or unconsciously of what he felt".
     
      Both Post and James Franciscus hated the ending.
     
      Post: "The meaning of it was not too profound and, if anything, it lacked meaning. It lacked human significance. It didn't have a theme or a premise worth anything. If anything, it was cynical and pessimistic because of the finish of it. I don't believe in dampening the human spirit like that. I don't care how realistic you want to be - I'm an optimist, basically".
     
      Franciscus: "I thought the ending was awful. A picture without hope...I think Ted and I PLEADED for someone to survive this mess, be it Chuck's character or the girl or Brent's character - SOMEBODY far enough away from the explosion for whatever reason so that mankind is still left".
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:04 PM
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    In  Heston's 'The Actor's Life' book, he makes it sound like it was his idea:
     

    September 30. Fox is now willing to accept my proposal to do a brief transition bit for them in their new version of APES. I don't think it's a good idea, but of course I'll carry out my promise to them.

    * The overwhelming success of PLANET OF THE APES reasonably enough prompted Fox to undertake a sequel. I pointed out to Dick Zanuck that, while I sympathized with him from a corporate point of view, as an actor there was really no sequel possible. The only story you could tell had been told; anything further would just be adventures among the monkeys. While this might well be profitable (as indeed it was; I think they made five of them, plus a TV series), there was nothing new to act in it. Still, as Dick said, they couldn't really undertake a sequel if I weren't in it at all. Moved by this wistful observation, I offered to appear in the opening sequence, if they'd then kill me off. This proved agreeable, though they asked me to simply disappear in the opening sequence, and be killed off in the end. I agreed, thinking I could end the whole thing with a death that included the end of the world. I sold them on this, but they were cleverer than I; they still made several sequels, though without me
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Michael & Sally Whitty
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:53 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up the whole world".

    .


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51447 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html Message
    But didn't an early version of the script have the bomb exploding but not destroying the planet with Taylor, Brent and Nova surviving. I think I have read somewhere that it was going to end with 2 or 3 mutated gorillas emerging from one of the underground tunnels?
     
    The inclusion of the bomb in the story doesn't mean that they were planning to have it just as an instrument for destroying the planet. I though the main reason for the bomb was to highlight the absurdity of the mutants worshiping the thing as a god?
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:59 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    I don't know, Jeff.
    The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
     
    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51448 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    T3 was OK but lacked depth and soul.

    I'd hardly be interested in seeing it again.

    T1 was great and SO far ahead of it's time. I'd watch it any time.

    T2 was the best - even when I see it's half over on TV I always sit
    down and watch the end....that's how you know a really great movie!

    Michael


    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
    >
    > I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because
    of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
    > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
    of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
    >
    > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the
    same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
    > So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation.
    It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world).
    >
    > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
    > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
    seriously puked. :o)
    >
    > Al
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > > > >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51449 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    Yes - T4 will be (like Conquest and - possibly - CAESAR) how the
    ROBOTS (or apes) took over. Cannot wait!

    Michael

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
    >
    > I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because
    of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
    > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
    of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
    >
    > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the
    same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
    > So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation.
    It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world).
    >
    > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
    > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
    seriously puked. :o)
    >
    > Al
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > > > >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51450 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE
    .html
    It forced a movement Jeff - it MUST have been!

    I gave birth that day too!


    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
    >
    > 7 years ago? Was it POTA2001?
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Michael Whitty
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:07 PM
    > Subject: [PotaDG] CHRIS AND KYLEE
    >
    >
    >
    http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2009/02/11/warren/life/0
    > 211war-bell0.txt
    >
    > CHRIS AND KYLEE
    >
    > Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic
    love.
    > It can also be a celebration of love between family members.
    >
    > Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her
    first
    > birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle Starr.
    >
    > She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of
    the
    > Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.
    >
    > "I knew my days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the
    > Warrenton area.
    >
    > Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the theater.
    > When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged," and as the opening
    credits
    > began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to come
    > with her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others.
    >
    > "Everything was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I
    was
    > getting a little nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said.
    >
    > She rested in a back room decorated with old movie posters for
    most
    > of the movie before joining her family.
    >
    > "I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,' because it
    was
    > a special night," she said.
    >
    > She said she felt miserable the remainder of the night, but her
    > prayer was answered. Approximately 24 hours later Chris went into
    > labor and gave birth to her only daughter, Kylee.
    >
    > Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of Kylee's birth.
    When
    > she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that before."
    >
    > Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris
    because,
    > she said, the day is about the special people in your life.
    >
    > "I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was
    my
    > first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little
    > personal valentine."
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51451 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    Like so many things - everyone seems to have a unique
    recollection! :)

    Michael

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
    >
    > As usual, "POTA Revisited" to the rescue.
    >
    > Once again, Heston says the ending of "Beneath" was his idea: "I
    sold the director and producer on the idea".
    >
    > Director Ted Post says it was because Richard Zanuck was being
    removed from Fox.
    > Post: "We had other endings, but the order came down from
    Dick...that was the picture I was involved with that found Dick
    Zanuck not in a very happy state of mind. His conclusion about the
    picture was a reflection either consciously or unconsciously of what
    he felt".
    >
    > Both Post and James Franciscus hated the ending.
    >
    > Post: "The meaning of it was not too profound and, if anything,
    it lacked meaning. It lacked human significance. It didn't have a
    theme or a premise worth anything. If anything, it was cynical and
    pessimistic because of the finish of it. I don't believe in dampening
    the human spirit like that. I don't care how realistic you want to
    be - I'm an optimist, basically".
    >
    > Franciscus: "I thought the ending was awful. A picture without
    hope...I think Ted and I PLEADED for someone to survive this mess, be
    it Chuck's character or the girl or Brent's character - SOMEBODY far
    enough away from the explosion for whatever reason so that mankind is
    still left".
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Neil Foster
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:04 PM
    > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    >
    > In Heston's 'The Actor's Life' book, he makes it sound like it
    was his idea:
    >
    > September 30. Fox is now willing to accept my proposal to do a
    brief transition bit for them in their new version of APES. I don't
    think it's a good idea, but of course I'll carry out my promise to
    them.
    >
    > * The overwhelming success of PLANET OF THE APES reasonably
    enough prompted Fox to undertake a sequel. I pointed out to Dick
    Zanuck that, while I sympathized with him from a corporate point of
    view, as an actor there was really no sequel possible. The only story
    you could tell had been told; anything further would just be
    adventures among the monkeys. While this might well be profitable (as
    indeed it was; I think they made five of them, plus a TV series),
    there was nothing new to act in it. Still, as Dick said, they
    couldn't really undertake a sequel if I weren't in it at all. Moved
    by this wistful observation, I offered to appear in the opening
    sequence, if they'd then kill me off. This proved agreeable, though
    they asked me to simply disappear in the opening sequence, and be
    killed off in the end. I agreed, thinking I could end the whole thing
    with a death that included the end of the world. I sold them on this,
    but they were cleverer than I; they still made several sequels,
    though without me
    >
    > Neil
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On
    Behalf Of Michael & Sally Whitty
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:53 PM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    > Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll
    only do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you
    blow up the whole world".
    >
    > .
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51452 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
      And you'd better like it or Christian Bale will track you down and call you stupid.
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 6:08 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Yes - T4 will be (like Conquest and - possibly - CAESAR) how the
    ROBOTS (or apes) took over. Cannot wait!

    Michael

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@.. .> wrote:
    >
    > I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because
    of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
    > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
    of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
    >
    > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the
    same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
    > So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation.
    It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world).
    >
    > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
    > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
    seriously puked. :o)
    >
    > Al
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM
    > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really isn't
    it?  J
    >
    > But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on
    the planetÂ….
    >  
    > Michael
    >  
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    >
    > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com ] On
    Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >  
    > Yeah, I know. 
    > In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from
    Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so
    he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
    >  
    > Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it.
    The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the
    soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending.
    >  
    > Worked for me. I loved it.
    > But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their
    asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
    >  
    > Al  
    >  
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    >
    > From:Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >   In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He
    never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds
    and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston
    portrays it as suggestions.
    >  And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
    >  
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From:Michael & Sally Whitty
    > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
    > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >  
    > Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only
    do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up
    the whole world".
    > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
    > Michael
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    >
    > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
    Behalf Of Jeff K.
    > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >    Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand.
    I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is
    they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was
    Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all
    figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was
    agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post
    was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I
    guess the director wasn't on the same page.
    >   Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to
    moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with
    her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was
    looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the
    next sequel. They weren't planning any.
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From:nlmoxham
    > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
    > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    > end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    > which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    > Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes,
    having
    > him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
    It's
    > fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    > want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some
    integrity
    > on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    > careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    > in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined
    up
    > for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    > used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    > been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
    for
    > countless new stories.
    >
    > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > > get financing without his name attached to
    > > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
    > >
    > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    > career!
    > >
    > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    > just 2 easy
    > > steps!
    > > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
    0342x1201216770/ aol?
    > redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
    > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > > bemailfooterNO62)
    > >
    >  
    >

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51453 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: GoogleEarth 3955
    .html
    .html

    http://blameitonthevoices.blogspot.com/2009/02/improbable-google-street-view-shots.html

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51454 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Aussie Fire!
    .html
    .html

    I hope all you Aussie guys are safe from the horrible fires down there!!!!

    Tim

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51455 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    he'll call you more than that and for 12 minutes!


    From: Jeff K. <veetus@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:52:07 PM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    And you'd better like it or Christian Bale will track you down and call you stupid.
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 6:08 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Yes - T4 will be (like Conquest and - possibly - CAESAR) how the
    ROBOTS (or apes) took over. Cannot wait!

    Michael

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@.. .> wrote:
    >
    > I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because
    of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
    > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
    of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
    >
    > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the
    same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
    > So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation.
    It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world).
    >
    > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
    > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
    seriously puked. :o)
    >
    > Al
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM
    > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really isn't
    it? J
    >
    > But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on
    the planet….
    >
    > Michael
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    >
    > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com ] On
    Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    > Yeah, I know.
    > In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from
    Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so
    he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
    >
    > Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it.
    The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the
    soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending.
    >
    > Worked for me. I loved it.
    > But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their
    asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
    >
    > Al
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    >
    > From:Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He
    never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds
    and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston
    portrays it as suggestions.
    > And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From:Michael & Sally Whitty
    > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
    > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    > Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only
    do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up
    the whole world".
    > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
    > Michael
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    >
    > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
    Behalf Of Jeff K.
    > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand.
    I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is
    they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was
    Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all
    figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was
    agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post
    was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I
    guess the director wasn't on the same page.
    > Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to
    moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with
    her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was
    looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the
    next sequel. They weren't planning any.
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From:nlmoxham
    > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
    > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    > end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    > which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    > Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes,
    having
    > him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
    It's
    > fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    > want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some
    integrity
    > on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    > careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    > in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined
    up
    > for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    > used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    > been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
    for
    > countless new stories.
    >
    > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > > get financing without his name attached to
    > > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
    > >
    > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    > career!
    > >
    > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    > just 2 easy
    > > steps!
    > > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
    0342x1201216770/ aol?
    > redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
    > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > > bemailfooterNO62)
    > >
    >
    >


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51456 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Aussie Fire!
    .html
    .html Message
    Yep, we're extremely lucky where we are, fires to the south and massive floods up above us to the north!
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 3:15 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Aussie Fire!


    I hope all you Aussie guys are safe from the horrible fires down there!!!!

     
    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51457 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    Yeah, that's when you know a movie is really great.
    When you can enjoy it the same years later. While other films are great, but only great at the moment.
    When you can't enjoy it as much years later, that's when you know it was just great in the moment.
     
    POTA2001 was a great example of that. For me anyway.
     
    Al

     


    From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:05:56 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    T3 was OK but lacked depth and soul.

    I'd hardly be interested in seeing it again.

    T1 was great and SO far ahead of it's time. I'd watch it any time.

    T2 was the best - even when I see it's half over on TV I always sit
    down and watch the end....that' s how you know a really great movie!

    Michael

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@... .> wrote:
    >
    > I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing. Because
    of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
    > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
    of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
    >
    > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was the
    same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
    > So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator Salvation.
    It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic world).
    >
    > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
    > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
    seriously puked.. :o)
    >
    > Al
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM
    > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really isn't
    it?  J
    >
    > But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels on
    the planet….
    >  
    > Michael
    >  
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    >
    > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com ] On
    Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >  
    > Yeah, I know. 
    > In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call from
    Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so
    he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
    >  
    > Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it.
    The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the
    soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending.
    >  
    > Worked for me. I loved it.
    > But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their
    asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
    >  
    > Al  
    >  
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    >
    > From:Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >   In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?". He
    never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds
    and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But Heston
    portrays it as suggestions.
    >  And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
    >  
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From:Michael & Sally Whitty
    > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
    > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >  
    > Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll only
    do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow up
    the whole world".
    > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
    > Michael
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    >
    > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
    Behalf Of Jeff K.
    > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >    Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a demand.
    I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is
    they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was
    Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all
    figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was
    agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post
    was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I
    guess the director wasn't on the same page.
    >   Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to
    moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do with
    her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was
    looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the
    next sequel. They weren't planning any.
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From:nlmoxham
    > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
    > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning and
    > end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the bomb,
    > which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    > Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes,
    having
    > him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
    It's
    > fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    > want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some
    integrity
    > on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    > careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius was
    > in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined
    up
    > for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't be
    > used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth had
    > been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
    for
    > countless new stories.
    >
    > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > > get financing without his name attached to
    > > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > > sallywhitty@ ... writes:
    > >
    > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    > career!
    > >
    > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    > just 2 easy
    > > steps!
    > > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
    0342x1201216770/ aol?
    > redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?sc=668072%
    > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > > bemailfooterNO62)
    > >
    >  
    >


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51458 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    I don't know about that. But I will say that if the cast and crew didn't know anything about it,
    surely some one at Fox knew the intension from the very start.
     
    Perhaps it was better for the cast and crew to know when it was too late to turn back with everyone already comited to the project and already filming.
    At that point, no matter what anyone says, you do what Fox tells you. ;o)
     
    Al

     


    From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:49:22 PM
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    But didn't an early version of the script have the bomb exploding but not destroying the planet with Taylor, Brent and Nova surviving. I think I have read somewhere that it was going to end with 2 or 3 mutated gorillas emerging from one of the underground tunnels?
     
    The inclusion of the bomb in the story doesn't mean that they were planning to have it just as an instrument for destroying the planet. I though the main reason for the bomb was to highlight the absurdity of the mutants worshiping the thing as a god?
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:59 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    I don't know, Jeff.
    The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
     
    .


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51459 From: jessica rotich Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE
    .html
    ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
     
    Jessica.

    On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Michael Whitty < sallywhitty@...> wrote:

    It forced a movement Jeff - it MUST have been!

    I gave birth that day too!



    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
    >
    > 7 years ago? Was it POTA2001?
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Michael Whitty
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:07 PM
    > Subject: [PotaDG] CHRIS AND KYLEE
    >
    >
    >
    http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2009/02/11/warren/life/0
    > 211war-bell0.txt
    >
    > CHRIS AND KYLEE
    >
    > Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic
    love.
    > It can also be a celebration of love between family members.
    >
    > Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her
    first
    > birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle Starr.
    >
    > She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of
    the
    > Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.
    >
    > "I knew my days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the
    > Warrenton area.
    >
    > Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the theater.
    > When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged," and as the opening
    credits
    > began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to come
    > with her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others.
    >
    > "Everything was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I
    was
    > getting a little nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said.
    >
    > She rested in a back room decorated with old movie posters for
    most
    > of the movie before joining her family.
    >
    > "I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,' because it
    was
    > a special night," she said.
    >
    > She said she felt miserable the remainder of the night, but her
    > prayer was answered. Approximately 24 hours later Chris went into
    > labor and gave birth to her only daughter, Kylee.
    >
    > Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of Kylee's birth.
    When
    > she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that before."
    >
    > Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris
    because,
    > she said, the day is about the special people in your life.
    >
    > "I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was
    my
    > first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little
    > personal valentine."
    >


    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51460 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/11/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    *** Yeah, I don't think that would have mattered nearly as much as one might think... Look at the STAR WARS films, they're all set in the same basic area ("outer space") and yet they managed to keep things new by going to different planets, introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been done for an APES film series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They could have really delved into the apes' society and customs, they could have had stories set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in PLANET/BENEATH and shown more of their populated areas beyond the "APE CITY" region...
     
    And one more thing, I'm not sure how you feel about the TV series, but had that gone on, it would have spent it's entire run on the "PLANET"... How would you have felt about that? Would have that been too much overkill? ***
     
     
    In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@... writes:
    Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
     
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51461 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Fire down under!
    .html
    Neil and I live about 1,000 miles North of it and we're fine thanks
    Tim - thanks for asking!

    Michael

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > I hope all you Aussie guys are safe from the horrible fires down
    there!!!!
    >
    > Tim
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51462 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    You are absolved my son....

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
    >
    > Yeah, that's when you know a movie is really great.
    > When you can enjoy it the same years later. While other films are
    great, but only great at the moment.
    > When you can't enjoy it as much years later, that's when you
    know it was just great in the moment.
    >
    > POTA2001 was a great example of that. For me anyway.
    >
    > Al
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51463 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: CHRIS AND KYLEE
    .html
    Stop laughinng at me! :)

    It was flowing from BOTH ends after seeing that movie!

    How's the mask going Jess?

    Michael

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, jessica rotich <jessicarotich@...>
    wrote:
    >
    > ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
    >
    > Jessica.
    >
    > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Michael Whitty
    <sallywhitty@...>wrote:
    >
    > > It forced a movement Jeff - it MUST have been!
    > >
    > > I gave birth that day too!
    > >
    > >
    > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>, "Jeff
    K."
    > > <veetus@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > 7 years ago? Was it POTA2001?
    > > >
    > > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > > From: Michael Whitty
    > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
    > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:07 PM
    > > > Subject: [PotaDG] CHRIS AND KYLEE
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    http://suburbanjournals.stltoday.com/articles/2009/02/11/warren/life/0
    > > > 211war-bell0.txt
    > > >
    > > > CHRIS AND KYLEE
    > > >
    > > > Valentine's Day is not limited to the celebration of romantic
    > > love.
    > > > It can also be a celebration of love between family members.
    > > >
    > > > Seven years ago, during Chris Slaughter's third pregnancy, her
    > > first
    > > > birthing contractions began while she was at the Belle Starr.
    > > >
    > > > She, her husband, Ken, and her two sons went to see "Planet of
    > > the
    > > > Apes" though Chris was far along in her pregnancy.
    > > >
    > > > "I knew my days were numbered," said Chris, who lives in the
    > > > Warrenton area.
    > > >
    > > > Sure enough, Chris felt something as she walked into the
    theater.
    > > > When she sat down, the baby "jig-jagged," and as the opening
    > > credits
    > > > began to roll, Chris excused herself. Her husband offered to
    come
    > > > with her, but she declined, not wanting to disturb the others.
    > > >
    > > > "Everything was fine. I wasn't having severe contractions, but I
    > > was
    > > > getting a little nervous. They were 10 minutes apart," she said.
    > > >
    > > > She rested in a back room decorated with old movie posters for
    > > most
    > > > of the movie before joining her family.
    > > >
    > > > "I said a little prayer to myself, 'Oh, not tonight,' because it
    > > was
    > > > a special night," she said.
    > > >
    > > > She said she felt miserable the remainder of the night, but her
    > > > prayer was answered. Approximately 24 hours later Chris went
    into
    > > > labor and gave birth to her only daughter, Kylee.
    > > >
    > > > Seven years later, Chris still tells the story of Kylee's birth.
    > > When
    > > > she does, Kylee says, "You've told me that before."
    > > >
    > > > Valentine's Day brings back those family memories for Chris
    > > because,
    > > > she said, the day is about the special people in your life.
    > > >
    > > > "I'm always going to remember that night," Chris said. "She was
    > > my
    > > > first girl and it was just God's way of giving me my own little
    > > > personal valentine."
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51464 From: Jeff K. Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
      I liked the idea of going back and forth in time. I just wish the budgets had been better, and that it had been planned out so there wasn't all the leaps in logic. But a TV series has to stay the same. Comfort food, as they say.
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:51 PM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    *** Yeah, I don't think that would have mattered nearly as much as one might think... Look at the STAR WARS films, they're all set in the same basic area ("outer space") and yet they managed to keep things new by going to different planets, introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been done for an APES film series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They could have really delved into the apes' society and customs, they could have had stories set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in PLANET/BENEATH and shown more of their populated areas beyond the "APE CITY" region...
     
    And one more thing, I'm not sure how you feel about the TV series, but had that gone on, it would have spent it's entire run on the "PLANET"... How would you have felt about that? Would have that been too much overkill? ***
     
     
    In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
    Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
     
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51465 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    Well said, your write , i personally was under the same conclusion
    that the Alpha Omega bomb was a thing of worship, i mean think about
    it if they wanted to they had mind reading powers.
    Or did they not work on apes?
    They did when they arrived in the Zone because of them seeing fire
    and gaurds crusified up-side down and a bleeding lawmaker.
    So why did they allow them entrance so easy??
    Maybe thats the reason they let them come so easy because they
    planned to finish it all off?
    Mark
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
    >
    > But didn't an early version of the script have the bomb exploding
    but
    > not destroying the planet with Taylor, Brent and Nova surviving. I
    think
    > I have read somewhere that it was going to end with 2 or 3 mutated
    > gorillas emerging from one of the underground tunnels?
    >
    > The inclusion of the bomb in the story doesn't mean that they were
    > planning to have it just as an instrument for destroying the
    planet. I
    > though the main reason for the bomb was to highlight the absurdity
    of
    > the mutants worshiping the thing as a god?
    >
    > Neil
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
    Behalf
    > Of Alex Ruiz
    > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:59 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    >
    > I don't know, Jeff.
    > The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being
    > surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
    >
    > .
    >
    > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
    s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
    > sgId=51446/stime=1234400366/nc1=3858795/nc2=3848627/nc3=5170418>
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51466 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    Let me guess does it begin with F***
    Mark
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
    >
    > he'll call you more than that and for 12 minutes!
    >
    >
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51467 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled. :o)
     
    And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
    You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill. :o)
     
    Al


    From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:51:32 AM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    *** Yeah, I don't think that would have mattered nearly as much as one might think... Look at the STAR WARS films, they're all set in the same basic area ("outer space") and yet they managed to keep things new by going to different planets, introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been done for an APES film series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They could have really delved into the apes' society and customs, they could have had stories set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in PLANET/BENEATH and shown more of their populated areas beyond the "APE CITY" region...
     
    And one more thing, I'm not sure how you feel about the TV series, but had that gone on, it would have spent it's entire run on the "PLANET"... How would you have felt about that? Would have that been too much overkill? ***
     
     
    In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
    Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
     
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51468 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    Yeah well.
    Now looking back at both POTA2001 and T3, while both films didn't come close in to their originals, one things for certain.
    They both had the best Trailers and TV Trailers I've ever seen on any film. I still love those trailers to this day.
     
    Al


    From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@bigpond..com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:07:23 AM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    You are absolved my son....

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@.. .> wrote:
    >
    > Yeah, that's when you know a movie is really great.
    > When you can enjoy it the same years later. While other films are
    great, but only great at the moment.
    > When you can't enjoy it as much years later, that's when you
    know it was just great in the moment.
    >
    > POTA2001 was a great example of that. For me anyway.
    >
    > Al
    >
    >  
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.. com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:05:56 PM
    > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    > T3 was OK but lacked depth and soul.
    >
    > I'd hardly be interested in seeing it again.
    >
    > T1 was great and SO far ahead of it's time. I'd watch it any time.
    >
    > T2 was the best - even when I see it's half over on TV I always sit
    > down and watch the end.....that' s how you know a really great movie!
    >
    > Michael
    >
    > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@ .> wrote:
    > >
    > > I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing.
    Because
    > of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
    > > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
    > of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
    > >
    > > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was
    the
    > same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
    > > So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator
    Salvation.
    > It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic
    world).
    > >
    > > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
    > > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
    > seriously puked. :o)
    > >
    > > Al
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM
    > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >
    > >
    > > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really
    isn't
    > it?  J
    > >
    > > But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels
    on
    > the planet….
    > >  
    > > Michael
    > >  
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > >
    > > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. .
    com ] On
    > Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    > > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >  
    > > Yeah, I know. 
    > > In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call
    from
    > Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so
    > he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
    > >  
    > > Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of it.
    > The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the
    > soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock ending.
    > >  
    > > Worked for me. I loved it.
    > > But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their
    > asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
    > >  
    > > Al  
    > >  
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > >
    > > From:Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM
    > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >   In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow up the world?".
    He
    > never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds
    > and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But
    Heston
    > portrays it as suggestions.
    > >  And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
    > >  
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From:Michael & Sally Whitty
    > > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
    > > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >  
    > > Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll
    only
    > do Taylor if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow
    up
    > the whole world".
    > > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
    > > Michael
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > >
    > > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ]
    On
    > Behalf Of Jeff K.
    > > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >    Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a
    demand.
    > I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is
    > they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it was
    > Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all
    > figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was
    > agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post
    > was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So I
    > guess the director wasn't on the same page.
    > >   Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to
    > moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do
    with
    > her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody was
    > looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for the
    > next sequel. They weren't planning any.
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From:nlmoxham
    > > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > > Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
    > > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > > In the script on Hunter's site Taylor is only in the beginning
    and
    > > end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the
    bomb,
    > > which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    > > Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes,
    > having
    > > him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
    > It's
    > > fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    > > want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some
    > integrity
    > > on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    > > careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius
    was
    > > in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined
    > up
    > > for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't
    be
    > > used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth
    had
    > > been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
    > for
    > > countless new stories.
    > >
    > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote:
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > > > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > > > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > > > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > > > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > > > get financing without his name attached to
    > > > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > > > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > > > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > > > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > > > sallywhitty@ ..... writes:
    > > >
    > > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    > > career!
    > > >
    > > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours
    in
    > > just 2 easy
    > > > steps!
    > > > (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
    > 0342x1201216770/ aol?
    > > redir=http://www.freecred itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?
    sc=668072%
    > > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > > > bemailfooterNO62)
    > > >
    > >  
    > >
    >
    >
    > __._,_..___
    > Messages in this topic (64) Reply (via web post) | Start a new
    topic
    > Messages | Files | Photos | Database | Polls
    > To visit your group on the web, go to:
    >     http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/PotaDG/
    >
    > MARKETPLACE
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft
    Foods
    >
    > Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
    > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch
    format to Traditional
    > Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
    > Recent Activity
    > *  1
    > New Members
    > *  9
    > New FilesVisit Your Group
    > Yahoo! News
    > Get it all here
    > Breaking news to
    > entertainment news
    > Yahoo! Search
    > Start Searching
    > Find everything
    > you're looking for.
    > Check out the
    > Y! Groups blog
    > Stay up to speed
    > on all things Groups!
    > .
    >


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51469 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html


    How I wish that was the case....although I enjoyed Escape, I do wish all the films had been set ON POTA contiuing on after Beneath.....oh well.....you can't change history..................or can you?!?!?!?


    From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:51:32 AM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    *** Yeah, I don't think that would have mattered nearly as much as one might think... Look at the STAR WARS films, they're all set in the same basic area ("outer space") and yet they managed to keep things new by going to different planets, introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been done for an APES film series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They could have really delved into the apes' society and customs, they could have had stories set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in PLANET/BENEATH and shown more of their populated areas beyond the "APE CITY" region...
    And one more thing, I'm not sure how you feel about the TV series, but had that gone on, it would have spent it's entire run on the "PLANET"... How would you have felt about that? Would have that been too much overkill? ***
    In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
    Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51470 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html

    Yes – that’s what FOX likes is a good TRAILER!  I’d swear sometimes they make the TRAILER before the MOVIE!  J

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 10:02 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

    Yeah well.

    Now looking back at both POTA2001 and T3, while both films didn't come close in to their originals, one things for certain.

    They both had the best Trailers and TV Trailers I've ever seen on any film. I still love those trailers to this day.

     

    Al

     


    From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.. com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:07:23 AM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    You are absolved my son....

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@.. .> wrote:

    >
    > Yeah, that's when you know a movie is really great.
    > When you can enjoy it the same years later. While other films are
    great, but only great at the moment.
    > When you can't enjoy it as much years later, that's when you
    know it was just great in the moment.
    >
    > POTA2001 was a great example of that. For me anyway.
    >
    > Al
    >
    >  
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
    > To:
    ymailto="mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com">PotaDG@yahoogroups. . com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:05:56 PM
    > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    > T3 was OK but lacked depth and soul.
    >
    > I'd hardly be interested in seeing it again.
    >
    > T1 was great and SO far ahead of it's time. I'd watch it any time.
    >
    > T2 was the best - even when I see it's half over on TV I always sit
    > down and watch the end.....that' s how you know a really great movie!
    >
    > Michael
    >
    > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@ .> wrote:
    > >
    > > I don't know. For me personally, I wouldn't change a thing.
    Because
    > of it, we have five fresh stories in the Apes saga.
    > > From sequels to prequels. Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet
    > of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.
    > >
    > > Much like Terminator 3. T3 was good but at the sametime it was
    the
    > same old story that been told over again since T1 and T2.
    > > So for me that's the one good thing I see in Terminator
    Salvation.
    > It's a whole new world and direction in the saga (post atomic
    world).
    > >
    > > At least it's a new direction from the last 3 films.
    > > Again they were all good, but one more like it and I would have
    > seriously puked. :o)
    > >
    > > Al
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:47:27 PM
    > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >
    > >
    > > Yeah I loved it too Al – it's as final as you can get really
    isn't
    > it?  J
    > >
    > > But at the same time it would have been nice to see more sequels
    on
    > the planet….
    > >  
    > > Michael
    > >  
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > >
    > > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. .
    com ] On
    > Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
    > > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 6:23 AM
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >  
    > > Yeah, I know. 
    > > In the Beneath blu-rays, Ted Post said that he received a call
    from
    > Zanuck. Zanuck was fired from Fox during the filming of Beneath, so
    > he told Post to blow up planet.. :o)
    > >  
    > > Persoanlly I believe both Heston and Post are totally full of
    it.
    > The only reason that Alpha Omega bomb was in Beneath was for the
    > soul purpose of trying to eclipse Planet's original shock
    ending.
    > >  
    > > Worked for me. I loved it.
    > > But again. Both Heston and Post are both talking out of their
    > asses. If you ask my opionion. :o)
    > >  
    > > Al  
    > >  
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > >
    > > From:Jeff K. <veetus@earthlink. net>
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 11:38:21 AM
    > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >   In "Behind" Heston said, "How about if I blow
    up the world?".
    He
    > never demanded anything. I get the feeling he and Zanuck were buds
    > and they kind of did this without the director's blessing. But
    Heston
    > portrays it as suggestions.
    > >  And Zanuck convinced Heston to do POTA2001.
    > >  
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From:Michael & Sally Whitty
    > > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > > Sent:Wednesday, February 11, 2009 4:53 AM
    > > Subject:RE: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >  
    > > Maybe I'm slightly misquoting but I thought Heston said "I'll
    only
    > do Taylor
    if you kill him of" then he changed that to "if you blow
    up
    > the whole world".
    > > Jeff – did I misunderstand slightly?
    > > Michael
    > >
    > > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > >
    > > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ]
    On
    > Behalf Of Jeff K.
    > > Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2009 11:40 AM
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > >    Heston suggested they blow up the Earth but it wasn't a
    demand.
    > I think the main thing, as people like Mort Abrahams have said, is
    > they wanted "shock" value, like the end of the original. So it
    was
    > Heston's idea (or he takes credit for it) but they pretty much all
    > figured it was the last movie. So I think blowing up the world was
    > agreed on as the ultimate shock. Though didn't I read that Ted Post
    > was pissed off when he saw Heston brag about it in "Behind"? So
    I
    > guess the director wasn't on the same page.
    > >   Linda Harrison told me at the time she was looking forward to
    > moving on and tired of playing Nova. She'd done all she could do
    with
    > her and had a TV series to go to ("Bracken's World"). So nobody
    was
    > looking at "Beneath" the way we do now, what would be best for
    the
    > next sequel. They weren't planning any.
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From:nlmoxham
    > > To:PotaDG@yahoogrou ps. com
    > > Sent:Monday, February 09, 2009 8:42 AM
    > > Subject:[PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    > > In the script on Hunter's site Taylor
    is only in the beginning
    and
    > > end, and Brent is in the main part, but they all survive the
    bomb,
    > > which only destroys the mutant city & gorilla army. So clearly
    > > Heston's initial demand was that he'd only be in a few scenes,
    > having
    > > him killed off must have been a later demand, closer to filming.
    > It's
    > > fair enough wanting his character killed off, he obviously didn't
    > > want to make more than one ape movie, in fact it shows some
    > integrity
    > > on his part, but his later demands killed off the characters (and
    > > careers?) of Franciscus and Harrison (I can't remember if Zaius
    was
    > > in the mutant city originally). They would surely have been lined
    > up
    > > for another sequel? And those iconic sets and costumes couldn't
    be
    > > used in any of the sequels either. Personally, I wish the Earth
    had
    > > been left intact, and the Planet of Apes wide open as the setting
    > for
    > > countless new stories.
    > >
    > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, TZer0@ wrote:
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Not true. He did it as a favor to Znauck.
    > > > Zanuck agreed to do the first one. Heston
    > > > even took his pay for Beneath and donated
    > > > it to his son Fraiser's school. He only agreed
    > > > to do it because they assured him they's kill
    > > > off his character. They said they couldn't
    > > > get financing without his name attached to
    > > > the project. So take your hat off to the man.
    > > > As weak as the sequels are, they'd be worse,
    > > > if they got made at all, if it hadn't been for his
    > > > efforts. He is the cornerstone of these films.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > In a message dated 2/8/2009 5:22:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > > > sallywhitty@ ..... writes:
    > > >
    > > > Heston didn't do it as a favour for us....he did it for his
    > > career!
    > > >
    > > > ************ **A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours
    in
    > > just 2 easy
    > > > steps!
    > > > (http://pr.atwola.
    com/promoclk/ 100000075x121855
    > 0342x1201216770/ aol?
    > > redir=http://www.freecred
    itreport. com/pm/default. aspx?
    sc=668072%
    > > 26hmpgID=62% 26bcd=fe
    > > > bemailfooterNO62)
    > > >
    > >  
    > >
    >
    >
    > __._,_..___
    > Messages in this topic (64) Reply (via web post) | Start a new
    topic
    > Messages | Files | Photos | Database | Polls
    > To visit your group on the web, go to:
    >    
    target="_blank">http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/PotaDG/
    >
    > MARKETPLACE
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft
    Foods
    >
    > Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
    > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch
    format to Traditional
    > Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
    > Recent Activity
    > *  1
    > New Members
    > *  9
    > New FilesVisit Your Group
    > Yahoo! News
    > Get it all here
    > Breaking news to
    > entertainment news
    > Yahoo! Search
    > Start Searching
    > Find everything
    > you're looking for.
    > Check out the
    > Y! Groups blog
    > Stay up to speed
    > on all things Groups!
    > .
    >

     

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51471 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html

    Yes you can!

     

    But you may have to settle for your “movie” being a comic book!

     

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
    Sent: Friday, 13 February 2009 12:21 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

     

     

    How I wish that was the case....although I enjoyed Escape, I do wish all the films had been set ON POTA contiuing on after Beneath..... oh well.....you can't change history..... ......... ....or can you?!?!?!?

     


    From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:51:32 AM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    *** Yeah, I don't think that would have mattered nearly as much as one might think... Look at the STAR WARS films, they're all set in the same basic area ("outer space") and yet they managed to keep things new by going to different planets, introducing new characters, etc. The same could have been done for an APES film series that was actually set on the "PLANET"... They could have really delved into the apes' society and customs, they could have had stories set in the Forbidden Zone, gone beyond the areas we seen in PLANET/BENEATH and shown more of their populated areas beyond the " APE CITY " region...

    And one more thing, I'm not sure how you feel about the TV series, but had that gone on, it would have spent it's entire run on the "PLANET"... How would you have felt about that? Would have that been too much overkill? ***

    In a message dated 2/11/09 6:26:28 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:

    Had it been all 4 sequels on the Planet of the Apes, I think it would have been too much over kill.

     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

     

     

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51472 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    In a message dated 2/12/09 5:35:20 AM Central Standard Time, pota1968@... writes:
    It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled. :o)
    *** I still believe it was canceled when it was because the "powers that be" WANTED it gone... Sure, the ratings might not have been what they hoped for when the series was announced, but the network also didn't do anything to help it... For starters, they could have easily tried it on a different night and see how it went. But they put it and kept it on the "death slot" on Friday night and they also wouldn't let another network pick it up either... It was, as Roddy said "dead in the water" before it even aired... More things indicate that CBS didn't want the show to do well than what shows they had faith in it. I really don't think it was canceled because people thought APES on TV was "overkill".***
     
     
    And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
    You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill. :o)
    *** And that's why the TV series, had it continued and gone down the right road, wouldn't have that fate fall on it... Another thing even Roddy brought up on the BEHIND interview was that they mistakenly made the show about the astronauts when it was proven time and again, people wanted to see (stories about) apes... Personally, I don't think the TV series is as repetitive as everyone makes it out to be... THE DECEPTION and THE TYRANT are good examples of episodes that don't follow the "get caught 'n rescued" scenario that everyone sticks on the TV series and you know they could have easily came up with more episodes like that... Even one of the UK Annuals has an entire story that is just based within the apes, no astronauts in sight and it's very good... I don't think APES on TV for say, three years would have been too much, especially if they focused more on the apes and their culture...
     
    And as far as APES on television, or the TERMINATOR/Sarah Connor Chronicles, you say they suffer from overkill and that's your opinion which is fine... But couldn't you say that about ANY television series before it becomes too much... I mean how many times can The Sapranos bump a guy off and dump him... How many times can you watch Homer simpson be the king of all buffoons, how any times can you watch the crew of The Enterprise save a planet or an entire galaxy?
     
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51473 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html
    He can be heard in all his glory here:

    http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_audio/020209_christianbale.mp3

    But be warned.....the language will offend some people!!' not for children!

    There's also a cool remix of it on youtube!



    From: haydon.mark <markhaydon3@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:33:47 AM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Let me guess does it begin with F***
    Mark

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:
    >
    > he'll call you more than that and for 12 minutes!
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From: Jeff K. <veetus@...>
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:52:07 PM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    > And you'd better like it or Christian Bale
    > will track you down and call you stupid.


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51474 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    .html

    I wonder if Gordon Ramsay is the head chef on the set?  ;)

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
    Sent: Friday, 13 February 2009 6:18 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

     

    He can be heard in all his glory here:

     

    http://www.aolcdn. com/tmz_audio/ 020209_christian bale.mp3

     

    But be warned.....the language will offend some people!!' not for children!

     

    There's also a cool remix of it on youtube!

     

     


    From: haydon.mark <markhaydon3@ aol.com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:33:47 AM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH

    Let me guess does it begin with F***
    Mark
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:

    >
    > he'll call you more than that and for 12 minutes!
    >
    >
    >
    > ____________ _________ _________ __
    > From: Jeff K. <veetus@...>
    > To:
    ymailto="mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com">PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:52:07 PM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    > And you'd better like it or Christian Bale
    > will track you down and call you stupid.

     

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51475 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    Persoanlly I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm watching these days is Sarah Connor.
    But lately even that's starting to get to me.
     
    Al


    From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:40:53 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

    In a message dated 2/12/09 5:35:20 AM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
    It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled. :o)
    *** I still believe it was canceled when it was because the "powers that be" WANTED it gone... Sure, the ratings might not have been what they hoped for when the series was announced, but the network also didn't do anything to help it... For starters, they could have easily tried it on a different night and see how it went. But they put it and kept it on the "death slot" on Friday night and they also wouldn't let another network pick it up either... It was, as Roddy said "dead in the water" before it even aired... More things indicate that CBS didn't want the show to do well than what shows they had faith in it. I really don't think it was canceled because people thought APES on TV was "overkill".* **
     
     
    And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
    You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill. :o)
    *** And that's why the TV series, had it continued and gone down the right road, wouldn't have that fate fall on it... Another thing even Roddy brought up on the BEHIND interview was that they mistakenly made the show about the astronauts when it was proven time and again, people wanted to see (stories about) apes... Personally, I don't think the TV series is as repetitive as everyone makes it out to be... THE DECEPTION and THE TYRANT are good examples of episodes that don't follow the "get caught 'n rescued" scenario that everyone sticks on the TV series and you know they could have easily came up with more episodes like that... Even one of the UK Annuals has an entire story that is just based within the apes, no astronauts in sight and it's very good... I don't think APES on TV for say, three years would have been too much, especially if they focused more on the apes and their culture...
     
    And as far as APES on television, or the TERMINATOR/Sarah Connor Chronicles, you say they suffer from overkill and that's your opinion which is fine... But couldn't you say that about ANY television series before it becomes too much... I mean how many times can The Sapranos bump a guy off and dump him... How many times can you watch Homer simpson be the king of all buffoons, how any times can you watch the crew of The Enterprise save a planet or an entire galaxy?
     
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51476 From: ~~Joanne~~ Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    Sarah does get a bit repetitive....

     


    --- On Thu, 2/12/09, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:

    From: Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...>
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 4:58 PM

    Persoanlly I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm watching these days is Sarah Connor.
    But lately even that's starting to get to me.
     
    Al


    From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:40:53 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

    In a message dated 2/12/09 5:35:20 AM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
    It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled. :o)
    *** I still believe it was canceled when it was because the "powers that be" WANTED it gone... Sure, the ratings might not have been what they hoped for when the series was announced, but the network also didn't do anything to help it... For starters, they could have easily tried it on a different night and see how it went. But they put it and kept it on the "death slot" on Friday night and they also wouldn't let another network pick it up either... It was, as Roddy said "dead in the water" before it even aired... More things indicate that CBS didn't want the show to do well than what shows they had faith in it. I really don't think it was canceled because people thought APES on TV was "overkill".* **
     
     
    And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
    You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill. :o)
    *** And that's why the TV series, had it continued and gone down the right road, wouldn't have that fate fall on it... Another thing even Roddy brought up on the BEHIND interview was that they mistakenly made the show about the astronauts when it was proven time and again, people wanted to see (stories about) apes... Personally, I don't think the TV series is as repetitive as everyone makes it out to be... THE DECEPTION and THE TYRANT are good examples of episodes that don't follow the "get caught 'n rescued" scenario that everyone sticks on the TV series and you know they could have easily came up with more episodes like that... Even one of the UK Annuals has an entire story that is just based within the apes, no astronauts in sight and it's very good... I don't think APES on TV for say, three years would have been too much, especially if they focused more on the apes and their culture...
     
    And as far as APES on television, or the TERMINATOR/Sarah Connor Chronicles, you say they suffer from overkill and that's your opinion which is fine... But couldn't you say that about ANY television series before it becomes too much... I mean how many times can The Sapranos bump a guy off and dump him... How many times can you watch Homer simpson be the king of all buffoons, how any times can you watch the crew of The Enterprise save a planet or an entire galaxy?
     
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!


    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51477 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    *** Well, if you don't watch TV, how are you going to see Whitty and Neil on "Dancing with the Stars"? ***
     
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/09 3:58:49 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@... writes:
    Personally I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm watching these days is Sarah Connor
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51478 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    There's not much i watch on t.v other than Ross Kemp return to
    Afganistan which is fantastic ( no CGI ) also looking forward to new
    season of Bones.
    And still awaiting the return of Dr Who , other than that most of the
    programs on t.v are brain dead entertainment.
    Getting on to comments about P.O.T.A series and the fact that it was
    doomed from the start wouldn't surprise me , maybe a tax loss???
    Its been done many times Rambo first blood was meant to be a tax
    lost , didn't even go on the big screen stright to video.
    However once they saw it was doing so well they put more money into
    it for a follow up.
    I have heard of this being done many times with big artists for tax
    losses, it sort of reminds me of the film The Produucer's original
    Mel Brooks or remake?
    Mark
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
    >
    > Persoanlly I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm
    watching these days is Sarah Connor.
    > But lately even that's starting to get to me.
    >
    > Al
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51479 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    *** Are you talking about the original 1982(?) FIRST BLOOD film starring Stallone and Brian Dennehy? I don't know how it was released in the UK but it was released theatrically in the US. ***
     
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/09 4:12:23 PM Central Standard Time, markhaydon3@... writes:
    Getting on to comments about P.O.T.A series and the fact that it was
    doomed from the start wouldn't surprise me , maybe a tax loss???
    Its been done many times Rambo first blood was meant to be a tax
    lost , didn't even go on the big screen stright to video.
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51480 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    LOL!
     
    Al


    From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:08:39 PM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

    *** Well, if you don't watch TV, how are you going to see Whitty and Neil on "Dancing with the Stars"? ***
     
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/09 3:58:49 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
    Personally I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm watching these days is Sarah Connor
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51481 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    So true. Lucky for me I work nights so I'm not really missing much.
    The other week I was on vacation and spent much of my time surfing the channels. It drove me nuts.
    Ended up watching movies, history and discovery channel more than anything else. Normaly I would travel but with today's economy I felt best to stay home this time around. But again, TV programing was pretty much driving me nuts. :o)
     
    Al


    From: ~~Joanne~~ <josievan@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:06:00 PM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

    Sarah does get a bit repetitive.. ..

     


    --- On Thu, 2/12/09, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@yahoo. com> wrote:

    From: Alex Ruiz <pota1968@yahoo. com>
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 4:58 PM

    Persoanlly I can't stand television programs. The only thing I'm watching these days is Sarah Connor.
    But lately even that's starting to get to me.
     
    Al


    From: "mlccougar@aol. com" <mlccougar@aol. com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:40:53 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

    In a message dated 2/12/09 5:35:20 AM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
    It seems that it was. In the end it got canceled. :o)
    *** I still believe it was canceled when it was because the "powers that be" WANTED it gone... Sure, the ratings might not have been what they hoped for when the series was announced, but the network also didn't do anything to help it... For starters, they could have easily tried it on a different night and see how it went. But they put it and kept it on the "death slot" on Friday night and they also wouldn't let another network pick it up either... It was, as Roddy said "dead in the water" before it even aired... More things indicate that CBS didn't want the show to do well than what shows they had faith in it. I really don't think it was canceled because people thought APES on TV was "overkill".* **
     
     
    And I see the very same fate facing Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
    You can only run from a Terminator so long before it becomes overkill. :o)
    *** And that's why the TV series, had it continued and gone down the right road, wouldn't have that fate fall on it... Another thing even Roddy brought up on the BEHIND interview was that they mistakenly made the show about the astronauts when it was proven time and again, people wanted to see (stories about) apes... Personally, I don't think the TV series is as repetitive as everyone makes it out to be... THE DECEPTION and THE TYRANT are good examples of episodes that don't follow the "get caught 'n rescued" scenario that everyone sticks on the TV series and you know they could have easily came up with more episodes like that... Even one of the UK Annuals has an entire story that is just based within the apes, no astronauts in sight and it's very good... I don't think APES on TV for say, three years would have been too much, especially if they focused more on the apes and their culture...
     
    And as far as APES on television, or the TERMINATOR/Sarah Connor Chronicles, you say they suffer from overkill and that's your opinion which is fine... But couldn't you say that about ANY television series before it becomes too much... I mean how many times can The Sapranos bump a guy off and dump him... How many times can you watch Homer simpson be the king of all buffoons, how any times can you watch the crew of The Enterprise save a planet or an entire galaxy?
     
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!



    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51482 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Money (OT)
    .html
    .html
    *** I'm no economist, but what's up with no one spending? I'm not singling you out, but people ought to spend "some" even if it's not what they'd normally spend... I mean how can things turn around otherwise?(i.e. Creating demand for factory's products, which would create or at least keep jobs, etc.)
     
    Let's say you did travel: You would have helped support the airlines (and all they include) or even if you drove, you would have helped support gas-stations, motels, etc. ***
     
    In a message dated 2/12/09 4:56:40 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@... writes:
    Normally I would travel but with today's economy I felt best to stay home this time around.
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51483 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
     
    Absolutely. That's where I first saw it.
    I'm not even sure Blockbusters was around back then. 
     
    In a message dated 2/12/2009 4:23:32 P.M. Central Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
    *** Are you talking about the original 1982(?) FIRST BLOOD film starring Stallone and Brian Dennehy? I don't know how it was released in the UK but it was released theatrically in the US. ***


    Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51484 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Money (OT)
    .html
    .html
    First and foremost you need money to spend.
    And before that happens my bills comes first. :o)
     
    Al


    From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:04:32 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Money (OT)

    *** I'm no economist, but what's up with no one spending? I'm not singling you out, but people ought to spend "some" even if it's not what they'd normally spend... I mean how can things turn around otherwise?(i. e. Creating demand for factory's products, which would create or at least keep jobs, etc.)
     
    Let's say you did travel: You would have helped support the airlines (and all they include) or even if you drove, you would have helped support gas-stations, motels, etc. ***
     
    In a message dated 2/12/09 4:56:40 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
    Normally I would travel but with today's economy I felt best to stay home this time around.
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51485 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    I could be wrong but i thought it went striaght to video here in the
    U.K, but i did spend most of 1982 in the south Atlantic and Falkland
    Islands.
    But there are plenty more films out there that where made with the
    same principal that i'm talking about.
    Nobody likes paying tax?
    Mark
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, TZer0@... wrote:
    >
    >
    > Absolutely. That's where I first saw it.
    > I'm not even sure Blockbusters was around back then.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 4:23:32 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > mlccougar@... writes:
    >
    > *** Are you talking about the original 1982(?) FIRST BLOOD film
    starring
    > Stallone and Brian Dennehy? I don't know how it was released in
    the UK but it
    > was released theatrically in the US. ***
    >
    > **************Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist
    near you
    > now. (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?
    query=florist&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000002)
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51486 From: Michael Whitty Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    I saw it the first time on HBO while I was living in Beavercreek
    OHIO in 1983!!!

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@...> wrote:
    >
    > I could be wrong but i thought it went striaght to video here in
    the
    > U.K, but i did spend most of 1982 in the south Atlantic and
    Falkland
    > Islands.
    > But there are plenty more films out there that where made with the
    > same principal that i'm talking about.
    > Nobody likes paying tax?
    > Mark
    > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, TZer0@ wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > Absolutely. That's where I first saw it.
    > > I'm not even sure Blockbusters was around back then.
    > >
    > >
    > > In a message dated 2/12/2009 4:23:32 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > > mlccougar@ writes:
    > >
    > > *** Are you talking about the original 1982(?) FIRST BLOOD film
    > starring
    > > Stallone and Brian Dennehy? I don't know how it was released in
    > the UK but it
    > > was released theatrically in the US. ***
    > >
    > > **************Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a
    florist
    > near you
    > > now. (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?
    > query=florist&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000002)
    > >
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51487 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Money (OT)
    .html
    .html
    *** Paying off the Blu-Ray player huh? JK ;) ***
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/09 7:02:39 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@... writes:
    First and foremost you need money to spend.
    And before that happens my bills comes first. :o)
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51488 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
     
    Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard Time, markhaydon3@... writes:
    Nobody likes paying tax?
    Mark


    Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51489 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
     
    I just checked.
    Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time, TZer0@... writes:

     
    Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard Time, markhaydon3@ aol.com writes:
    Nobody likes paying tax?
    Mark


    Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.



    Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51490 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    *** All we had locally was a two store "chain" called "The Video Station" and there was also this weird store called "Pages at the Movies" which sold used/vintage books and rented films... No Blockbuster here until around 1989 or so, and twenty years later, they still suck. ***
     
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/09 11:01:33 PM Central Standard Time, TZer0@... writes:
    Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51491 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/12/2009
    Subject: Re: Money (OT)
    .html
    .html
    Blu-ray player and then some. :o)
    But also paying your bills helps the economy so it works both ways. :o)
     
    Al


    From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 11:32:58 PM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Money (OT)

    *** Paying off the Blu-Ray player huh? JK ;) ***
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/09 7:02:39 PM Central Standard Time, pota1968@yahoo. com writes:
    First and foremost you need money to spend.
    And before that happens my bills comes first. :o)
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51492 From: Jeff Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: TZer0@...
    Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

     
    I just checked.
    Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time, TZer0@... writes:

     
    Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
     
     
    In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard Time, markhaydon3@ aol.com writes:
    Nobody likes paying tax?
    Mark


    Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.



    Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51493 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    God knows the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal Navy
    and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
    recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
    into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
    That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
    per week.
    We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
    Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
    upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
    was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
    any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
    Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
    videos are now has good as obsolete.
    Mark
    -- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff" <skintricks@...> wrote:
    >
    > Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: TZer0@...
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > I just checked.
    > Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    TZer0@... writes:
    >
    >
    > Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
    Time, markhaydon3@... writes:
    > Nobody likes paying tax?
    > Mark
    >
    >
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------
    --------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
    now.
    >
    >
    > --------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51494 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html

    J

    The good old days!

    I remember that!

    I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)! It cost over $100 AUS and man I watched it SO many times.

     

    I never got to copy any of the other POTA movies so that was about it until the 90’s when FOX released the 5 movies (and I’d bought the 90’s UK Planet Widescreen around the same time).

     

    I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!! J

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
    Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 2:35 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

     

    God knows the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal Navy
    and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
    recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
    into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
    That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
    per week.
    We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
    Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
    upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
    was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
    any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
    Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
    videos are now has good as obsolete.
    Mark
    -- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Jeff" <skintricks@ ...> wrote:

    >
    > Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: TZer0@...
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > I just checked.
    > Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    TZer0@... writes:
    >
    >
    > Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
    Time, markhaydon3@ ... writes:
    > Nobody likes paying tax?
    > Mark
    >
    >
    > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
    --------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
    now.
    >
    >
    > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
    ----------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
    >

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51495 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    I here you , but i'm lucky i didn't go down that road with Beta ( yes
    the quality was better than VHS but there was not the choice of films
    about ) i think thats why VHS took over and swomped the market.
    Even those over sized lazer discs didnt do well , they had the choice
    of films available but to costly???
    I got rid of over seven hundred video's one a year ago and for little
    money.
    I remember spending a lot on Scarface and Once upon a time in
    America , but getting a couple of £ each for them???Gutted.
    Mark

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty"
    <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
    >
    > :-)
    >
    >
    >
    > The good old days!
    >
    > I remember that!
    >
    > I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)! It cost over $100 AUS and
    man I
    > watched it SO many times.
    >
    >
    >
    > I never got to copy any of the other POTA movies so that was about
    it until
    > the 90's when FOX released the 5 movies (and I'd bought the 90's UK
    Planet
    > Widescreen around the same time).
    >
    >
    >
    > I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old
    BETA, then
    > VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs
    with
    > Blu-Ray!!! :-)
    >
    > Michael
    >
    >
    >
    > _____
    >
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
    Behalf Of
    > haydon.mark
    > Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 2:35 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
    >
    >
    >
    > God knows the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal
    Navy
    > and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
    > recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
    > into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
    > That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
    > per week.
    > We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
    > Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about
    £70
    > upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
    > was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop
    had
    > any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
    > Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
    > videos are now has good as obsolete.
    > Mark
    > -- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
    com, "Jeff"
    > <skintricks@> wrote:
    > >
    > > Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: TZer0@
    > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
    > > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
    > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > I just checked.
    > > Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
    > >
    > >
    > > In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > TZer0@ writes:
    > >
    > >
    > > Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
    > >
    > >
    > > In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
    > Time, markhaydon3@ writes:
    > > Nobody likes paying tax?
    > > Mark
    > >
    > >
    > > ----------------------------------------------------------
    > --------
    > > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
    > now.
    > >
    > >
    > > ----------------------------------------------------------
    > ----------
    > > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
    > >
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51496 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
     
    Two things killed Beta.  It was the better
    system, but it cost more.  That and all
    porn was only available on VHS tapes.
     
     
    In a message dated 2/13/2009 4:15:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, markhaydon3@... writes:
    i think thats why VHS took over and swomped the market.


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51497 From: haydon.mark Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    I dont know about being more expensive because i with three others
    bought a VHS recorder when they came out and you could have bought a
    moterbike for the amount we payed.
    But you are probably right about porn,someone made a killing on that
    one!
    Mark
    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, TZer0@... wrote:
    >
    >
    > Two things killed Beta. It was the better
    > system, but it cost more. That and all
    > porn was only available on VHS tapes.
    >
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/13/2009 4:15:23 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    > markhaydon3@... writes:
    >
    > i think thats why VHS took over and swomped the market.
    >
    >
    > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
    just 2 easy
    > steps!
    > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?
    redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%
    26hmpgID=62%26bcd=fe
    > bemailfooterNO62)
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51498 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    Michael, I just bought a BETA copy of Planet on ebay for.....99 cents!!


    From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:55:06 PM
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

    J

    The good old days!

    I remember that!

    I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)! It cost over $100 AUS and man I watched it SO many times.

    I never got to copy any of the other POTA movies so that was about it until the 90's when FOX released the 5 movies (and I'd bought the 90's UK Planet Widescreen around the same time).

    I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!! J

    Michael


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
    Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 2:35 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

    God knows the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal Navy
    and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
    recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
    into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
    That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
    per week.
    We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
    Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
    upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
    was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
    any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
    Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
    videos are now has good as obsolete.
    Mark
    -- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Jeff" <skintricks@ ...> wrote:

    >
    > Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: TZer0@...
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > I just checked.
    > Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    TZer0@... writes:
    >
    >
    > Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
    Time, markhaydon3@ ... writes:
    > Nobody likes paying tax?
    > Mark
    >
    >
    > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
    --------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
    now.
    >
    >
    > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
    ----------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
    >


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51499 From: nlmoxham Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: Heston/BENEATH
    .html
    Yes, that's the script I was talking about - it's on Hunter's site
    (as 'POTA Revisited'). The film develops as in 'Beneath' until the
    gorilla army reaches the mutant city; at that point Taylor, Nova and
    Brent escape and make a run for it. When the bomb goes off it
    destroys the gorillas and mutants ONLY. Taylor and Brent have an long
    meandering scene about whether to try to return to their own time
    (Brent wants to - presumably his ship wasn't damaged) or stay and
    build a new society (Taylor). They stay, and the narrative skips
    forward maybe a hundred years to a group of ape and human children
    being taught by a chimp (the scene reused with the Lawgiver
    in 'Battle'). I'm guessing that the ape/human hybrid child would have
    appeared at this point to visualise the ultimate reconciliation
    between the species. And that's one shock ending for this movie, the
    second being those mutated apes crawling out of the mutant bomb site.

    So that has the bomb, the twist ending, and sets up a possible sequel
    without Taylor, who's expressly been dead for some time by this final
    scene, yet it was altered to have the bomb abruptly cut the final
    scenes off. From what others have said, it sounds like Heston might
    have wanted this new ending and Zanuck agreed, but each for different
    motivations, and forced it on Post (although I take back what I said
    about Franciscus and Harrison's careers, their characters would have
    been dead by a third Apes movie either way).


    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
    >
    > But didn't an early version of the script have the bomb exploding
    but
    > not destroying the planet with Taylor, Brent and Nova surviving. I
    think
    > I have read somewhere that it was going to end with 2 or 3 mutated
    > gorillas emerging from one of the underground tunnels?
    >
    > The inclusion of the bomb in the story doesn't mean that they were
    > planning to have it just as an instrument for destroying the
    planet. I
    > though the main reason for the bomb was to highlight the absurdity
    of
    > the mutants worshiping the thing as a god?
    >
    > Neil
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
    Behalf
    > Of Alex Ruiz
    > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 10:59 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Heston/BENEATH
    >
    >
    >
    > I don't know, Jeff.
    > The whole idea of doing a movie with an Alpha Omega bomb, then being
    > surprised that's it's being used, is a bit too suspicions.
    >
    > .
    >
    > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
    s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
    > sgId=51446/stime=1234400366/nc1=3858795/nc2=3848627/nc3=5170418>
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51500 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html
    *** You're supposed to be the optomist Whitty... Look on the bright side and think of all the enjoyment you had when you were enjoying the APES Films on Beta, VHS and DVD. ***
     
     
    In a message dated 2/13/09 2:55:27 PM Central Standard Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
    I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!! J
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51501 From: Alex Ruiz Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Planet of the Apes Wagon
    .html
    .html

    Has anyone read Shane Richie's story on bying the Wagon from POTA?

    Pretty wild. I know he mentions it at the U.K. Convention but here's more detials on it.

     

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1144704/I-blew-20-000-eBay-wasted-Jack-Daniels-admits-Shane-Richie-bought-Planet-Of-The-Apes-prop.html/font>

     

    Al  


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51502 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html

    Maybe in the USA , but I still have oodles of BETA Porn (including The Devil In Miss Jones 3!) on Beta.

     

    There was always a far bigger range of VHS but plenty of BETA to keep the naughty monkey being punished for its behaviour!

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
    Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 9:50 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

     

     

    Two things killed Beta.  It was the better

    system, but it cost more.  That and all

    porn was only available on VHS tapes.

     

     

    In a message dated 2/13/2009 4:15:23 P.M. Central Standard Time, markhaydon3@ aol.com writes:

    i think thats why VHS took over and swomped the market.

     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51503 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html

    J

     

    My dad actually sent a cheque to the USA for a set of POTA films on Beta when they were first released (my guess is I was about 14 so 1979 maybe?).

     

    It was from an ad in a US magazine, who dad eventually phoned and they explained:

     

    (1)      we would not be able to PLAY it in Australia ;

    (2)      he couldn’t cash the bank cheque!

     

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
    Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 2:13 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

     

    Michael, I just bought a BETA copy of Planet on ebay for.....99 cents!!

     


    From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:55:06 PM
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

    J

    The good old days!

    I remember that!

    I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)!  It cost over $100 AUS and man I watched it SO many times.

     

    I never got to copy any of the other POTA movies so that was about it until the 90’s when FOX released the 5 movies (and I’d bought the 90’s UK Planet Widescreen around the same time).

     

    I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!! J

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
    Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 2:35 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

     

    God knows the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal Navy
    and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
    recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
    into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
    That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
    per week.
    We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
    Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
    upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
    was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
    any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
    Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
    videos are now has good as obsolete.
    Mark
    -- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Jeff" <skintricks@ ...> wrote:

    >
    > Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: TZer0@...
    > To:
    ymailto="mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com">PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > I just checked.
    > Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    TZer0@... writes:
    >
    >
    > Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
    Time, markhaydon3@ ... writes:
    > Nobody likes paying tax?
    > Mark
    >
    >
    > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
    --------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
    now.
    >
    >
    > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
    ----------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
    >

     

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51504 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html

    Keep it for the 50th Anniversary DVD!!! J

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
    Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 2:13 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

     

    Michael, I just bought a BETA copy of Planet on ebay for.....99 cents!!

     


    From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:55:06 PM
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

    J

    The good old days!

    I remember that!

    I bought BENEATH on BETA (still got it)!  It cost over $100 AUS and man I watched it SO many times.

     

    I never got to copy any of the other POTA movies so that was about it until the 90’s when FOX released the 5 movies (and I’d bought the 90’s UK Planet Widescreen around the same time).

     

    I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!! J

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
    Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 2:35 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

     

    God knows the name of the video shop we used i was in the Royal Navy
    and in 1980. four lads from our mess spent £800.00 on a video
    recorder , top loader with remote which was remote with wire going
    into the front of the video recorder( top of the range ).
    That was expensive because average ernings back then was £100-£150
    per week.
    We used to get 8 video's every weekend to watch.
    Back then video's where also to expensive to bye they cost about £70
    upwards each, the only way you could really get your hands on them
    was to bye x-rental tapes at about £25.00 each,if the video shop had
    any spare this was normally about 3 - 6 months after release.
    Just think of all that money which is worth nothing after the fact
    videos are now has good as obsolete.
    Mark
    -- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Jeff" <skintricks@ ...> wrote:

    >
    > Blockbuster was originally Video Library prior to '85
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: TZer0@...
    > To:
    ymailto="mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com">PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:01 PM
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > I just checked.
    > Blockbusters wasn't around until 1985.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 10:59:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
    TZer0@... writes:
    >
    >
    > Not even the new head of the IRS, apparently.
    >
    >
    > In a message dated 2/12/2009 8:23:06 P.M. Central Standard
    Time, markhaydon3@ ... writes:
    > Nobody likes paying tax?
    > Mark
    >
    >
    > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
    --------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
    now.
    >
    >
    > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
    ----------
    > Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you now.
    >

     

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51505 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/13/2009
    Subject: Re: APES "overkill"
    .html
    .html

    I’m no optimist Mike I assure you.

     

    And don’t worry – I do recall fondly the enjoyment I got but it is a futile old battle collecting movies for home entertainment.

     

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
    Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 3:17 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: APES "overkill"

     

    *** You're supposed to be the optomist Whitty... Look on the bright side and think of all the enjoyment you had when you were enjoying the APES Films on Beta, VHS and DVD. ***

     

     

    In a message dated 2/13/09 2:55:27 PM Central Standard Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com writes:

    I shudder when I think about just how much money I wasted on old BETA, then VHS tapes, now DVD because I have decided to replace all my DVDs with Blu-Ray!!! J

     

     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51506 From: jessica rotich Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale
    .html
    This is the second outfit in the world like this, but I do not own it.  It is enroute to its new owner in Kentucky.  Someday I will make one for myself...
     
     
     
     
    Jessica.
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51507 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale
    .html
    .html
    *** Very nice.***
     
     
    In a message dated 2/14/09 12:31:25 AM Central Standard Time, jessicarotich@... writes:
    This is the second outfit in the world like this, but I do not own it.  It is enroute to its new owner in Kentucky.  Someday I will make one for myself...
     
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51508 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale
    .html
    .html

    Very nice.

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of jessica rotich
    Sent: Saturday, 14 February 2009 4:31 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ; POTA
    Subject: [PotaDG] Zira Escape Outfit, 1:6 scale

     

    This is the second outfit in the world like this, but I do not own it.  It is enroute to its new owner in Kentucky .  Someday I will make one for myself...

     

     

     

     

    Jessica.

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51509 From: nlmoxham Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
    .html
    Thanks for the review Dario. It's fascinating to see this and wonder.
    Like those twenty-or-so comic covers from the 1950's and 60's that
    featured a post-apocalyptic Statue Of Liberty years before
    POTA 'invented' the idea!

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Dario Sciola <darios@...> wrote:
    >
    > Here's a book review for "Genus Homo" that I wrote for an SF site.
    >
    > Dario
    > ---------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Genus Homo (L. Sprague de Camp and P. Schuyler Miller - 1950)
    >
    > As an avid Planet of the Apes fan and enthusiast, I enjoy searching
    > out all literature on the subject, including those not directly
    > associated with the series, but those whose themes mirror the POTA
    > scenario.
    >
    > The novel Genus Homo, jointly penned by L. Sprague de Camp and P.
    > Schuyler Miller, and predates Pierre Boulle's Planet of the Apes
    novel
    > by more than a decade, fits that mold perfectly.
    >
    > The story begins with a busload of people waking up after some sort
    of
    > geological event which knocked out all the passengers on the trip.
    > They find thenselves overturned and in the dark and as the slowly
    > awake to assess the situation, determine that they are in some
    > underground cave. They make their way to the top and immediately
    note
    > that they seem to be in some remote wilderness and thus must have
    been
    > displaced from the normal bus route they were on. They also see
    that
    > the climate has changed drastically from the time they were last
    awake
    > on the bus and discern that they must have been asleep or comatose
    for
    > a significant amount of time as well. As a number of passengers are
    > scientist of various disciplines, their suspended state is
    attributed
    > to a leaked gas that one of the scientists was transporting. As the
    > trek in search of civilization proceeds, they realize that they are
    > much further from civilization than can possible be explained a
    mere
    > displacement of the bus. After a few encounters with oversized
    animals
    > and heretofore unknown species, the group comes to realize that
    they
    > have somehow been projected into the far future.
    >
    > The predicament of the group quickly leads to a requirement of a
    new
    > social order, and the protagonist of the novel, a chemist named
    > Bridger finds himself as a leader. He is quickly deposed, and just
    as
    > quickly reinstated as the group realizes that a fair solid thinker
    is
    > better than a coniving lawyer. The groups deals with issues such as
    > sex (a group of dancers are part of the mix), scientific analysis
    of
    > the situation (a group of scientists were on their way to a
    seminar),
    > and a few people who simply want to do as they please.
    >
    > It is only after all these are explored does the group finally come
    > into contact with apes (supposedly evolved gorillas) that are
    > intelligent. A few humans are captured and placed into a zoo for a
    few
    > days when the captors realize that they are no mere animals.
    Another
    > ape is brought in evidently to test the intelligence of the humans.
    > The two groups soon establish communication through language and
    the
    > humansbegin to learn the post holocaust history of the earth which
    led
    > to the new order of 'civilization' while at the same time the apes
    > learn more about the past. While we never find out exactly why
    there
    > was a transition and what led to the downfall of mankind as the
    > preeminent species, we do know that it has been millions of years
    > since man last ruled the Earth, and almost all evidence of his time
    > has vanished. While technologically the ape civilization is a
    backward
    > one, they do have steam power, and with a disticnt lack of metals
    and
    > iron, they have advanced wood building skills as well as a much
    more
    > resistant strain of wood growth allowing them to have a far
    superior
    > wood manufacturing base.
    >
    > We learn that there are other species of apes on other continents,
    and
    > that just like man before him, ape history is just as plagued by
    wars.
    > The novel ends with just such an escalation as the 'good' apes are
    > faced with an attacking force of baboons.
    >
    > There are a lot of good points in the novel, but it is also
    > unsatisfying in many ways. The initial section dealing with the
    humans
    > just waking up is rather long and slow going. There a lot of human
    > characters for which the authors try to develop, but once the apes
    > come into the picture all that character development is just thrown
    to
    > the wayside. A brewing relationship between Bridger and one of the
    > female humans is carefully planned out and is then summarily
    addressed
    > by only a sentence or two in the very last paragraph. The apes
    > civilization is absolutely fascinating, but once the conflict with
    the
    > baboons comes into play, the novel concentrates on the stragegy and
    > climactic battle and ends the story there.
    >
    > When it comes to determining whether Boulle could have read and
    been
    > influenced by Genus Homo, the answer is yes. In order to have read
    > Genus Homo, a french translation needed to be available for Boulle
    to
    > read. Genus Homo was first translated and sold in France as "Le
    règne
    > du gorille" in 1951, well before Boulle penned "La Planete des
    > singes". (Other editions came out in 1982 and again in 1984).
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51510 From: nlmoxham Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Planet of the Apes Wagon
    .html
    Well who hasn't accidently spent 20k on ebay?!
    I noticed an interview with him during the week ('Minder' publicity)
    where he was asked if he used Facebook - he said he does but under the
    name 'Roddy O'Neill' - POTA reference? I haven't gotten round to adding
    him as my friend yet!

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
    >
    > Has anyone read Shane Richie's story on bying the Wagon from POTA?
    > Pretty wild. I know he mentions it at the U.K. Convention but here's
    more detials on it.
    >
    > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1144704/I-blew-20-000-
    eBay-wasted-Jack-Daniels-admits-Shane-Richie-bought-Planet-Of-The-Apes-
    prop.htmlbr> >
    > Al
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51511 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
    .html
    Hello,

    This email message is a notification to let you know that
    a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
    group.

    File : /Apes Actors/themwhitmore.jpg
    Uploaded by : nlmoxham <neilmoxham@...>
    Description : James Whitmore in 'THEM!'

    You can access this file at the URL:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Apes%20Actors/themwhitmore.jpg

    To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
    http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.htmliles

    Regards,

    nlmoxham <neilmoxham@...>
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51512 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
    .html
    Hello,

    This email message is a notification to let you know that
    a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
    group.

    File : /Apes Actors/themcolman.jpg
    Uploaded by : nlmoxham <neilmoxham@...>
    Description : Booth Colman in 'THEM!'

    You can access this file at the URL:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Apes%20Actors/themcolman.jpg

    To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
    http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.htmliles

    Regards,

    nlmoxham <neilmoxham@...>
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51513 From: John Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Valentine's Day
    .html
    Hallmark had Planet of the Apes Valentine's Day cards featuring the
    picture of Taylor kissing Zira & when you open it, it plays some of
    Jerry Goldsmith's score with the caption "Put your stinkin' paws on me,
    you damned dirty ape!" Even had a cool little picture of the Icarus on
    the back.
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51514 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
    .html
    .html
    *** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to act like it was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth and that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the story of who came up with the ending, they almost always say they seen a sign or something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use her as their ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their own fabrication. ***
     
     
     
    In a message dated 2/14/09 5:25:28 AM Central Standard Time, neilmoxham@... writes:
    Like those twenty-or-so comic covers from the 1950's and 60's that
    featured a post-apocalyptic Statue Of Liberty years before
    POTA 'invented' the idea!
     


    A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51515 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Valentine's Day
    .html
    .html

    Well, if you send me that I will be YOUR Valentine, sexy!  ;)

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of John
    Sent: Sunday, 15 February 2009 3:15 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Valentine's Day

     

    Hallmark had Planet of the Apes Valentine's Day cards featuring the
    picture of Taylor kissing Zira & when you open it, it plays some of
    Jerry Goldsmith's score with the caption "Put your stinkin' paws on me,
    you damned dirty ape!" Even had a cool little picture of the Icarus on
    the back
    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51516 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
    .html
    .html

    Good point Mike.

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
    Sent: Sunday, 15 February 2009 5:40 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

     

    *** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to act like it was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth and that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the story of who came up with the ending, they almost always say they seen a sign or something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use her as their ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their own fabrication. ***

     

     

     

    In a message dated 2/14/09 5:25:28 AM Central Standard Time, neilmoxham@gmail. com writes:

    Like those twenty-or-so comic covers from the 1950's and 60's that
    featured a post-apocalyptic Statue Of Liberty years before
    POTA 'invented' the idea!

     

    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51517 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
    .html
    .html Message
    I thought Rod Serling did claim it as his own idea to have the statue at the end of the film as did Arthur P. Jacobs? In Brian Pendreigh's excellent book The Legend of the Planet of the Apes, one time choice for director Blake Edwards claims he came up with the statue idea along with ex-Disney artist Don Peters and that it was mostly Peters' idea. Don Peters was the guy who did the original publicity paintings with the Statue of Liberty scenes and he claims in the book that it was his idea alone.
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
    Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 5:40 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

    *** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to act like it was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth and that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the story of who came up with the ending, they almost always say they seen a sign or something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use her as their ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their own fabrication. ***
    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51518 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
    .html
    .html Message
    These days, think 'half buried Statue of Liberty in the future' and I would bet most people think 'Planet of the Apes'. I think most people wouldn't even be aware of all those old pulp and science magazines etc. that used the image on their covers.
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
    Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 5:40 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

    *** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to act like it was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth and that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the story of who came up with the ending, they almost always say they seen a sign or something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use her as their ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their own fabrication. ***
     
    In a message dated 2/14/09 5:25:28 AM Central Standard Time, neilmoxham@gmail. com writes:
    Like those twenty-or-so comic covers from the 1950's and 60's that
    featured a post-apocalyptic Statue Of Liberty years before
    POTA 'invented' the idea!
    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51519 From: Dario Sciola Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
    .html
    I thought the Pendreigh book had it the other way around.
    I thought it was Blake who claimed that while sitting in a restaurant
    with Serling that HE came up with the idea. (Pendreigh could not have
    interview Serling, but he could have interview Blake who was still alive
    at the time.)

    But I've always believe that the moment had the Serling 'touch', the
    type of ideas he had written so many times in his writing carreer and it
    was very much like something that he would come up with. That's why I've
    always believe that it was Serling's idea, although there will never be
    indisputable proof of who really came up with the idea.

    Dario

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
    Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009 5:52 pm
    Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

    > I thought Rod Serling did claim it as his own idea to have the
    > statue at
    > the end of the film as did Arthur P. Jacobs? In Brian Pendreigh's
    > excellent book The Legend of the Planet of the Apes, one time
    > choice for
    > director Blake Edwards claims he came up with the statue idea along
    > withex-Disney artist Don Peters and that it was mostly Peters'
    > idea. Don
    > Peters was the guy who did the original publicity paintings with the
    > Statue of Liberty scenes and he claims in the book that it was his
    > ideaalone.
    >
    > Neil
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
    > Of mlccougar@...
    > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 5:40 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review
    >
    >
    >
    > *** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to act
    > like it
    > was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth and
    > that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the
    > storyof who came up with the ending, they almost always say they
    > seen a sign
    > or something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use
    > her as
    > their ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their own
    > fabrication. ***
    > .
    >
    > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
    > sgId=51514/stime=1234640385/nc1=3848621/nc2=3858793/nc3=5191952>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51520 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
    .html
    .html Message
    Nope, that was Jacobs who claimed he came up with it in the restaurant while having lunch with Edwards. It's in the Cinefantastique 'Apes issue'. In the Pendreigh book Edwards comes as close to calling Jacobs a liar about that recollection as you can without actually saying it.
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
    Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:06 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

    I thought the Pendreigh book had it the other way around.
    I thought it was Blake who claimed that while sitting in a restaurant
    with Serling that HE came up with the idea. (Pendreigh could not have
    interview Serling, but he could have interview Blake who was still alive
    at the time.)

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51521 From: Neil Foster Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
    .html
    .html Message
    Well if there is a way of verifying when Don Peters did his concept sketches and paintings and if they were done before Serling's scripts it may well be proof that it was originally Peters' idea.
    I myself believe it was a combination of people that came up with it, which ones though? Like you I don't think we'll never know for sure.
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
    Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:06 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

    But I've always believe that the moment had the Serling 'touch', the
    type of ideas he had written so many times in his writing carreer and it
    was very much like something that he would come up with. That's why I've
    always believe that it was Serling's idea, although there will never be
    indisputable proof of who really came up with the idea.

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 51522 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 2/14/2009
    Subject: Re: Valentine's Day
    .html
    Attachments :
      .html
      I saw that! and I got it! Here's the cover.....
      and the quote from the inside....it even has a pic of "Icarus" on the back!
      All copywritten and everything complete with credit to Goldsmith!


      From: John <DrZaiusDavis@...>
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 12:15:16 PM
      Subject: [PotaDG] Valentine's Day

      Hallmark had Planet of the Apes Valentine's Day cards featuring the
      picture of Taylor kissing Zira & when you open it, it plays some of
      Jerry Goldsmith's score with the caption "Put your stinkin' paws on me,
      you damned dirty ape!" Even had a cool little picture of the Icarus on
      the back.


      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 51523 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 2/14/2009
      Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 2/14/09 6:13:03 PM Central Standard Time, ntfoster@... writes:
      I myself believe it was a combination of people that came up with it, which ones though?
      *** All I was getting at is that the idea of a post-Apocalyptic Statue of Liberty existed before APES ever did and that (to the best of my knowledge) none of the people involved claimed THAT as being their original idea... Now as far as who came up with the idea to use that idea in PLANET is another issue altogether and is not what I was getting at in my post. ***


      A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 51524 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
      Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
      .html
      .html

      SO this really is strange!

      How can we have so many people claim to be responsible?

       

      Are people LIARS?  Do they have FALSE MEMORIES?  Were they on far too much COCAINE?

      What was it?

      Michael

       


      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
      Sent: Sunday, 15 February 2009 8:53 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

       

      I thought Rod Serling did claim it as his own idea to have the statue at the end of the film as did Arthur P. Jacobs? In Brian Pendreigh's excellent book The Legend of the Planet of the Apes, one time choice for director Blake Edwards claims he came up with the statue idea along with ex-Disney artist Don Peters and that it was mostly Peters' idea. Don Peters was the guy who did the original publicity paintings with the Statue of Liberty scenes and he claims in the book that it was his idea alone.

       

      Neil

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@aol. com
      Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 5:40 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

      *** The thing is, I don't think PLANET's crew ever tried to act like it was "their" idea... It was their idea to have it be future Earth and that the Statue would be what gave it away, but regardless of the story of who came up with the ending, they almost always say they seen a sign or something with the Statue of Liberty that inspired them to use her as their ending... I've never heard anyone say it was totally their own fabrication. ***

      .

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 51525 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 2/14/2009
      Subject: Re: Genus Homo: book review
      .html
      .html

      But is he LYING or what I wonder?

       


      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
      Sent: Sunday, 15 February 2009 9:39 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

       

      Nope, that was Jacobs who claimed he came up with it in the restaurant while having lunch with Edwards. It's in the Cinefantastique 'Apes issue'. In the Pendreigh book Edwards comes as close to calling Jacobs a liar about that recollection as you can without actually saying it.

       

      Neil

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
      Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:06 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
      Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Genus Homo: book review

      I thought the Pendreigh book had it the other way around.
      I thought it was Blake who claimed that while sitting in a restaurant
      with Serling that HE came up with the idea. (Pendreigh could not have
      interview Serling, but he could have interview Blake who was still alive
      at the time.)

      <.html
      <.html


      Copyright © 2026, Hunter Goatley. All rights reserved.
      Last updated 2026-03-31 10:43.