Yahoo! potadg group — Messages 52326–52425

Dates: 2009-03-08 through 2009-03-10

Messages in potadg group. Page 336 of 451.
Index Prev  Next


Group: potadg Message: 52326 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Kim Hunter
Group: potadg Message: 52327 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Just Don't Read Them
Group: potadg Message: 52328 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: It's Very POTA
Group: potadg Message: 52329 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: It's Very POTA
Group: potadg Message: 52330 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: It's Very POTA
Group: potadg Message: 52331 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Kim Hunter
Group: potadg Message: 52332 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: FW: Unsubscription by PotaDG member
Group: potadg Message: 52333 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Is This a GENUINE Prop?
Group: potadg Message: 52334 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - yikes it makes even LESS sense!
Group: potadg Message: 52335 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - yikes it makes even LESS sense!
Group: potadg Message: 52336 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Calling Les Hemstock.....
Group: potadg Message: 52337 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Watchmen
Group: potadg Message: 52338 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: What would you rather see?
Group: potadg Message: 52339 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: What would you rather see?
Group: potadg Message: 52340 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
Group: potadg Message: 52341 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Just Don't Read Them
Group: potadg Message: 52342 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52343 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52344 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 52345 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
Group: potadg Message: 52346 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52347 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52348 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
Group: potadg Message: 52349 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52350 From: Neil Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52351 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52352 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52353 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52354 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52355 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52356 From: Michael Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Watchmen - 100% ON topic.
Group: potadg Message: 52357 From: Michael Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52358 From: Michael Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52359 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52360 From: Rich Handley Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
Group: potadg Message: 52361 From: Michael Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
Group: potadg Message: 52362 From: rassmguy Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
Group: potadg Message: 52363 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Watchmen - 100% ON topic.
Group: potadg Message: 52364 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52365 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
Group: potadg Message: 52366 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52367 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52368 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52369 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52370 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: iis this from the 70's? Brian says.....
Group: potadg Message: 52371 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Watchmen - 100% ON topic.
Group: potadg Message: 52372 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52373 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: The birth of Bill's (from Return) swimming teacher???
Group: potadg Message: 52374 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52375 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Watchmen - 100% ON topic.
Group: potadg Message: 52376 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
Group: potadg Message: 52377 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52378 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52379 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52380 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 52381 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52382 From: Dave B Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: The birth of Bill's (from Return) swimming teacher???
Group: potadg Message: 52383 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52384 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52385 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52386 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52387 From: Hunter Goatley Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52388 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52389 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52390 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52391 From: Hunter Goatley Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52392 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52393 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52394 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52395 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52396 From: Dario Sciola Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Apparently Aldo is a Swede...
Group: potadg Message: 52397 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52398 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52399 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52400 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52401 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52402 From: jessica rotich Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52403 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52404 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52405 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52406 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52407 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52408 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52409 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52410 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52411 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52412 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52413 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52414 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
Group: potadg Message: 52415 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52416 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52417 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52418 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52419 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52420 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52421 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52422 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52423 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52424 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
Group: potadg Message: 52425 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?



Group: potadg Message: 52326 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Kim Hunter
.html
.html Message
Funnily enough I was talking about Kim Hunter with Michael the other day and came to the realisation that if she hadn't been in the Planet of the Apes films I don't think I would know who she was! I've never actually seen her in any of her other movies.
There would be quite a few other 'Apes' actors and actresses that this applies to as well for me.
 
Neil
 
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
*** Well, that's just stupid, unless they're afraid of T knowing  more about
Kim Hunter than they do (and I'm sure T is the group Kim Hunter  expert!)..
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52327 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Just Don't Read Them
.html
.html

Well, it’s hard to know where to draw the line.

 

Gun and apes really do have common themes.

 

So do a lot of the other OT posts.

 

The WATCHMEN posts come from the fact that a hell of a large percentage of people here are comic book fans too.

 

But I think with the guns post enough people have asked for it to stop – so it shall.

 


From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2009 4:33 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Just Don't Read Them

 

*** I agree... The reason I said anything was because I'm tired of an APES group being anything but an APES group... I mean it was to the point where there'd be 35 posts, maybe one of which was anything to do with APES. ***

 

 

 

In a message dated 3/8/09 12:30:08 AM Central Standard Time, TZer0@... writes:

Just don't bother to read them.  I won't be offended.  Seems fair.

 

 

.

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52328 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: It's Very POTA
.html
.html

If you are trying to make a comparison with yourself T, you’d need to compare it to a new, different POTA movie where Zaius gives Heston a megaphone and allows him to walk around Ape City, freely voicing his opinion, often not comprehensible, until he pisses off too many people and is asked to go build his own house to talk shit in, instead of continuing to crash Ape City.

 

You still seem to have a megaphone, and you are still barely comprehensible.

 

 

 


From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2009 4:40 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] It's Very POTA

 

 

I think muzzling a point of view is very POTA.

That's what the trial scene was all about. It's

just that some people are cheering for the

Orangs and Gorillas.  They like watching

Heston getting the crap beat out of him.

 

 

In a message dated 3/8/2009 12:33:36 A.M. Central Standard Time, mlccougar@aol. com writes:

*** I agree... The reason I said anything was because I'm tired of an APES group being anything but an APES group... I mean it was to the point where there'd be 35 posts, maybe one of which was anything to do with APES. ***

 


Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52329 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: It's Very POTA
.html
.html

It certainly is about censorship, and about society/societies and communities.

 

This community (POTADG) has some rules – if only those of common sense.

 

We all saw what T and Rory did to the old POTA group when James and I started the DG.  They ruined it.  Not a place for many POTA fans and not much talk at all about POTA.

 

Me, I want a group where the only 100 or so POTA fans left in the world hang and chat about POTA and some other things they have in common.

 

If that means T has to start his own group to talk about guns, who cares?  And how is that muzzling someone?  It’s more like saying if you dump in my living room (after a thousand times being asked not to) you can go live in the toilet!

 

Muzzle that T!

 


From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2009 5:05 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] It's Very POTA

 

*** I'm not the only one that doesn't like the gun debate... But I will agree, don't go getting all "POTA as American Myth" here tying a political debate to a film. (Whether you're right about APES having to do with censorship isn't the point, you know these type of groups are meant to discuss the films in general terms and not getting all "Eric Greene" about things.) ***

 

 

 

In a message dated 3/8/09 12:53:23 AM Central Standard Time, ntfoster@bigpond. com writes:

You were asked to take your gun rantings that Mr. Cougar so abhors off this group that's all so don't now try and justify yourself by tagging it to POTA.

 

 

 


Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52330 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: It's Very POTA
.html
.html
 
Well, then maybe I reading more into it than is there. Apologies to Mr. Greene.  ; )  I don't want to go off on a rant like Rory just to make it seem tongue-in-cheek. I really think the main theme in the POTA subtext is one of stifling the opposition.  The Trial Scene was base on the HUAAC Witch Hunts.  Not so sure they were but I digress. I'm not afraid to be wrong.  I've been wrong many times.  Everyone is.  I won't resort to name calling.  Except in Patrick's case, because he's just nutty. ; ) Thank God we have a Nut like him in the group.  Apologies to the Atheists in the group. It's a group for POTA fans.  I dare say no one has spent more time thinking about it than he has. Maybe over thought it a bit, but that's beside the point. Again, this unmentionable issue has relevance to any adult discussion of POTA.  Other wise you get posts like, "Guns are bad, mmmkay."  "But ain't Gorillys with guns Kool!"  : P
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 3/8/2009 1:05:36 A.M. Central Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
you know these type of groups are meant to discuss the films in general terms and not getting all "Eric Greene" about things.) ***


Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52331 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Kim Hunter
.html
.html
 
You're missing out on a lot of great film.  But they are dramas.  Not many people want watch them.  I know a lot of kids today who refuse to watch ANY film that's in B&W.  Sure a lot of people think POTA when they think of Kim, but she got her Oscar for Streetcar.  Some people only think The Godfather when you mention Brando.  That of Apocalypse Now.  She starred with some Hollywood Greats.  Bogart, Mitchum, Lancaster.  Super Stars so big you only have to say their last name.  And she was every bit as good as they were.  People used to say Fred Astaire was a great dancer.  But that Ginger Rodgers did the same dance only backwards and in heels.  Sure those other actors gave great performances.  But she gave a great performance under all that makeup and in a hobble skirt.
 
 
In a message dated 3/8/2009 1:38:00 A.M. Central Standard Time, ntfoster@... writes:

Funnily enough I was talking about Kim Hunter with Michael the other day and came to the realisation that if she hadn't been in the Planet of the Apes films I don't think I would know who she was! I've never actually seen her in any of her other movies.
There would be quite a few other 'Apes' actors and actresses that this applies to as well for me.
 
Neil
 
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, mlccougar@.. . wrote:
*** Well, that's just stupid, unless they're afraid of T knowing  more about
Kim Hunter than they do (and I'm sure T is the group Kim Hunter  expert!)..
 



Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52332 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: FW: Unsubscription by PotaDG member
.html
Great news everyone! :)

Michael


-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG-owner@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG-owner@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Yahoo! Groups Notification
Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2009 7:53 PM
To: PotaDG-owner@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Unsubscription by PotaDG member


Hello,

This is an automated email message to let you know that
LordTZer0 <TZer0@...> unsubscribed from your PotaDG
group.

Your group is currently configured to send you email
notification whenever a member unsubscribes. To turn off
notification, visit:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/join

Thank you for choosing Yahoo! Groups as your email group
service for the PotaDG group.

Regards,

Yahoo! Groups Customer Care

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52333 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Is This a GENUINE Prop?
.html
.html <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52334 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - yikes it makes even LESS sense!
.html
.html
True! Didn't even think about that!!!


From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2009 11:57:44 PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - yikes it makes even LESS sense!

Very good point Tim. Also how come they weren't in suspended animation chambers?
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 8:36 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - yikes it makes even LESS sense!

Just watched the first three episodes the other day...

WHY didn't B&V & Jonesy have BEARDS???
.


<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52335 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - yikes it makes even LESS sense!
.html
.html
Funny how thy just closed that whole section off with a wall of lights and switches.....


From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 12:21:34 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - yikes it makes even LESS sense!

In a message dated 3/7/09 11:03:39 PM Central Standard Time, ntfoster@bigpond. com writes:
Also how come they (the TV astronauts) weren't in suspended animation chambers?
*** A scenario that might explain it is that they hit the radio-active turbulance while they were awake and if the ship had sleep chambers, they wouldn't have been in them while they were working. ***


Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52336 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Calling Les Hemstock.....
.html
.html

Les

 

I see on closer inspection there’s a Certificate of Authenticity from you!

Is this you selling it at the moment?

 

Michael

 


From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Michael & Sally Whitty
Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 12:12 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Is This a GENUINE Prop?

 

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52337 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Watchmen
.html
There's no season this year, just the three more one-off specials. One's at Easter, not sure when the others are, and they may be two parts of the same story, ending with a new Doctor. Then it's back to a full season next year.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@...> wrote:
>
> I dont know much more than you other than if you want to find info go to BBC website/ Dr Who there is probably more info there than what i can give.
> Mark :)
> -- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty> So who IS going to be in this season – how can it BE Dr Who WOTHOUT a Dr for
> > ¾ of the episodes?
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> > haydon.mark
> > Sent: Saturday, 7 March 2009 8:04 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Watchmen
> >
> >
> >
> > No he should'nt be in this season but tennant must regenerate at the end of
> > the last special.
> > Mark
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Michael &
> > Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@> wrote:
> > >
> > > But the NEW doctor..is he coming in Season 2009? I don't think he is!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > [PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com] On Behalf
> > Of
> > > haydon.mark
> > > Sent: Saturday, 7 March 2009 6:51 AM
> > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Watchmen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tennant was doing four specials , one has been on t.v at xmas.
> > > Three more to come.
> > > The new docter has already chosen i forget his name but he has got big
> > boots
> > > to fill.
> > > Russell.t.davis has also been replaced has the writer, but the new writer
> > is
> > > a fantastic writer and has already scripted some of the previous episodes.
> > > Mark
> > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Michael
> > &
> > > Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Lucky bugger!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So, I hear David Tennant is only in 3 episodes this season - is that
> > > right?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > How are they going to pull that off?
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _____
> > > >
> > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > > [PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com] On
> > Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > nlmoxham
> > > > Sent: Saturday, 7 March 2009 1:21 AM
> > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Watchmen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That's funny!
> > > > My understanding wife surprised me with tickets to a Doctor Who
> > convention
> > > > in England tomorrow. We fly out tonight. Though I've never been to a
> > > > convention before and the last thing I want to do is embaress myself
> > > infront
> > > > of the hardcore Whovians...
> > > >
> > > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com, TZer0@
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought the aside article was more interesting.
> > > > > Made me think of you Jess. And indeed all of us.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > IN LOVE WITH A FANBOY?
> > > > > Conducting a relationship with a sci-fi or comic-book fanboy (or
> > > fangirl)
> > > > > when you're not one yourself is a delicate dance full of compromise.
> > For
> > >
> > > > > example: "No, you may not keep your Boba Fett cardboard cutout in our
> > > > bedroom, but
> > > > > you can keep it downstairs in your man cave."
> > > > > The tug-of-war continues this weekend as the graphic novel-inspired
> > > > Watchmen
> > > > > hits theaters. Are you being dragged along? Or did you have to
> > convince
> > > > > someone to go with you? If you are part of a fanboy-nonbeliever union,
> > > we
> > > > want to
> > > > > hear about how you make it work. Share your stories with us, and the
> > > > really
> > > > > good ones might just make it into a story.
> > > > > E-mail us at _jjanssen@_ (mailto:jjanssen@) . Please
> > > > > include your full name(s), hometowns and a daytime contact number.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In a message dated 3/5/2009 9:32:53 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> > > > > goathunter@ writes:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Really? Tsk, what would they know ! :-)
> > > > > > Did they give any reasons?
> > > > >
> > > > > 'Watchmen' forgettable after initial blast
> > > > >
> > > > > _http://www.usatoday
> > > > <http://www.usatoday
> > > <http://www.usatoday
> > <http://www.usatodayhttp:/wwwhttp:/www.usathttp:/www.http:/wwhttp:_>
> > http:/wwwhttp:/www.usathttp:/www.http:/wwhttp:_>
> > > http:/wwwhttp:/www.usathttp:/www.http:/wwhttp:_>
> > > > http://wwwhttp: <http://wwwhttp:
> > <http://wwwhttp:/www.usathttp:/www.http:/wwhttp:_>
> > /www.usathttp:/www.http:/wwhttp:_>
> > > //www.usathttp: <www.usathttp://www.http:/wwhttp:_> //www.http://wwhttp:_
> > > > > (http://www.usatoday
> > > > <http://www.usatoday
> > > <http://www.usatoday
> > <http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2009-03-04-watchmen_N.htm>
> > .com/life/movies/reviews/2009-03-04-watchmen_N.htm>
> > > .com/life/movies/reviews/2009-03-04-watchmen_N.htm>
> > > > .com/life/movies/reviews/2009-03-04-watchmen_N.htm)
> > > > >
> > > > > Hunter
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2
> > > > easy
> > > > > steps!
> > > > > (http://pr.atwola.
> > > > <http://pr.atwola.
> > > <http://pr.atwola.
> > <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=htt
> > > com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=htt
> > > > com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=htt
> > > > p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm%25>
> > > >
> > >
> > com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=http://www.freecr
> > > > editreport.com/pm%
> > > > > 2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID%3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52338 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: What would you rather see?
.html
Well definately the same style, I wouldn't want to discard the original stuff. Characters drawn the same way but with more movement, that CGI would allow.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
>
>
> *** If there'd ever be a "conclusion" to RETURN, it might as well be the
> same half-assed animation they used just for continuity's sake... Having it be
> something else would be like throwing having an entire TV series shot in B&W
> and then having it's last episode shot in color... ***
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 3/6/09 9:12:27 AM Central Standard Time,
> neilmoxham@... writes:
>
> If I win the lottery I think I would commission someone to to a CGI
> completion of 'Return'. I know, that's crazy, but I like the story and with improved
> graphics (but keeping the original design as much as possible) and good
> writing, it could look great. It wouldn't offend anyone because it was never
> 'canon' anyway, and no-one's ever done 'Return' fan-fiction. And it would be just
> for me, cos no-one else like 'Return'!
>
>
>
>
>
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
> steps!
> ( http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
> %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52339 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: What would you rather see?
.html
I'm no writer!
Or at least, I've never tried...hmmm.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> Ummm..Neil and I are ACHING to do a RETURN comic..
>
>
>
> Get writing Moxy!
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
> nlmoxham
> Sent: Saturday, 7 March 2009 1:12 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: What would you rather see?
>
>
>
> Yeah both! Is that too greedy? Not for Star Wars.
>
> If I win the lottery I think I would commission someone to to a CGI
> completion of 'Return'. I know, that's crazy, but I like the story and with
> improved graphics (but keeping the original design as much as possible) and
> good writing, it could look great. It wouldn't offend anyone because it was
> never 'canon' anyway, and no-one's ever done 'Return' fan-fiction. And it
> would be just for me, cos no-one else like 'Return'!
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Michael
> Whitty" <sallywhitty@> wrote:
> >
> > BOTH!
> >
> > But with a preference for a well made, well drawn, adult animated POTA
> with classic settings and characters.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com,
> mlccougar@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Would you rather see a new film like the proposed "CAESAR" film where
> it'll
> > > be a whole new story all it's own with a new look, design, etc. etc. OR
> would
> > > you rather see a made for DVD animated film (like the new made for video
>
> > > WONDER WOMAN film) based on the same style as the old?
> > > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2
> easy
> > > steps!
> > > (http://pr.atwola
> <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=htt
> p://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID>
> com/promoclk/100126575x1219957551x1201325337/aol?redir=http://www.freecr
> editreport.com/pm/default.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
> > > %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
> > >
> >
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52340 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
.html
I think it's worth pointing out that no more than a small minority of cranks have ever supported the IRA, at least not in the last 85 years, and the vast majority of people on this island were (and are, in light of the latest murders) ashamed and distressed that these people claim to be acting in 'our name', whatever our political opinions.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> The IRA became extremists and killed innocent people.
>
>
>
> Anyone who thinks this is OK in any context - get the fuck off this group.
>
>
>
> Patrick, I know that's NOT what you are saying but damn you are going close.
>
>
>
> Now - anyone who wants to discuss guns and or the IRA please set up a group.
>
>
>
> I'll let the DG know about your group and anyone who wants to can join you
> group but right now, please let's get back to POTA.
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
> Neil Foster
> Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2009 2:34 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
>
>
>
> So which ones do you approve of then?
>
>
>
> And please be a bit more thoughtful when spouting off any more rubbish about
> the IRA on this forum please. I have relatives who served in the army in
> Northern Ireland in the 70's and I believe they are a bit more informed
> about what went on than you think you are.
>
>
>
> Neil
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
> patrickmichaeltilton
> Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 3:18 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
>
> Now, mind you, I don't approve of every single vicious act of violence
> committed by the IRA,
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52341 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: Just Don't Read Them
.html
...that, and the fact that Jackie Earle Haley was in a leading role and I thought that it was relevant to the proposed new POTA movie in regards to style/cast/etc. Apologies if I veered it off topic!

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> The WATCHMEN posts come from the fact that a hell of a large percentage of
> people here are comic book fans too.
>
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52342 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
.html
Tim - can you post a link for these pictures please? I don't get attachements, and I just finished writing my page on the stage & arena shows, thanks!

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> Found this on Flickr....are these performers from the stage show or arena show?
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 52343 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/8/2009
Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
.html
Attachments :
    .html
    well I just tried but it didn't work...can somebody add this to the files or photos please??


    From: nlmoxham <neilmoxham@...>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 1:29:59 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

    Tim - can you post a link for these pictures please? I don't get attachements, and I just finished writing my page on the stage & arena shows, thanks!

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:
    >
    > Found this on Flickr....are these performers from the stage show or arena show?
    >


    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 52344 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 3/8/2009
    Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
    .html
    Hello,

    This email message is a notification to let you know that
    a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
    group.

    File : /UK show apes.jpg
    Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
    Description :

    You can access this file at the URL:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/UK%20show%20apes.jpg

    To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
    http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.htmliles

    Regards,

    munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 52345 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
    Subject: Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
    .html
    .html

    Just for the record Neil (Moxy!) – you’re Irish and living in Ireland right?

    Michael

     


    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
    Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 3:16 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.

     

    I think it's worth pointing out that no more than a small minority of cranks have ever supported the IRA, at least not in the last 85 years, and the vast majority of people on this island were (and are, in light of the latest murders) ashamed and distressed that these people claim to be acting in 'our name', whatever our political opinions.

    --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:

    >
    > The IRA became extremists and killed innocent people.
    >
    >
    >
    > Anyone who thinks this is OK in any context - get the fuck off this group.
    >
    >
    >
    > Patrick, I know that's NOT what you are saying but damn you are going
    close.
    >
    >
    >
    > Now - anyone who wants to discuss guns and or the IRA please set up a
    group.
    >
    >
    >
    > I'll let the DG know about your group and anyone who wants to can join you
    > group but right now, please let's get back to POTA.
    >
    >
    >
    > Michael
    >
    >
    >
    > _____
    >
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of
    > Neil Foster
    > Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2009 2:34 PM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
    >
    >
    >
    > So which ones do you approve of then?
    >
    >
    >
    > And please be a bit more thoughtful when spouting off any more rubbish
    about
    > the IRA on this forum please. I have relatives who served in the army in
    > Northern Ireland
    in the 70's and I believe they are a bit more informed
    > about what went on than you think you are.
    >
    >
    >
    > Neil
    >
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of
    > patrickmichaeltilto n
    > Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 3:18 AM
    > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
    >
    > Now, mind you, I don't approve of every single vicious act of violence
    > committed by the IRA,
    >

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 52346 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/8/2009
    Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
    .html
    .html Message
    Okay, I've uploaded it to the files section. I'm not sure which it was from either so I just called it UK show apes.
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
    Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:26 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

    well I just tried but it didn't work...can somebody add this to the files or photos please??


    From: nlmoxham <neilmoxham@gmail. com>
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
    Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 1:29:59 PM
    Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

    Tim - can you post a link for these pictures please? I don't get attachements, and I just finished writing my page on the stage & arena shows, thanks!


    .

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 52347 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
    Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
    .html
    Attachments :
      .html

      Tim

       

      This looks like the Illusive Concepts costume I bought in (maybe) 1996.

       

      The masks seem to be from Apemania.

       

      Not sure if Brian can help?

       

      Michael

       


      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
      Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 5:26 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

       

      well I just tried but it didn't work...can somebody add this to the files or photos please??

       


      From: nlmoxham <neilmoxham@gmail. com>
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
      Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 1:29:59 PM
      Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

      Tim - can you post a link for these pictures please? I don't get attachements, and I just finished writing my page on the stage & arena shows, thanks!

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:

      >
      > Found this on Flickr....are these performers from the stage show or arena
      show?
      >

       

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52348 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
      .html
      Yes.

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
      >
      > Just for the record Neil (Moxy!) - you're Irish and living in Ireland right?
      >
      > Michael
      >
      >
      >
      > _____
      >
      > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
      > nlmoxham
      > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 3:16 AM
      > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
      >
      >
      >
      > I think it's worth pointing out that no more than a small minority of cranks
      > have ever supported the IRA, at least not in the last 85 years, and the vast
      > majority of people on this island were (and are, in light of the latest
      > murders) ashamed and distressed that these people claim to be acting in 'our
      > name', whatever our political opinions.
      >
      > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Michael &
      > Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@> wrote:
      > >
      > > The IRA became extremists and killed innocent people.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Anyone who thinks this is OK in any context - get the fuck off this group.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Patrick, I know that's NOT what you are saying but damn you are going
      > close.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Now - anyone who wants to discuss guns and or the IRA please set up a
      > group.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > I'll let the DG know about your group and anyone who wants to can join you
      > > group but right now, please let's get back to POTA.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Michael
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > _____
      > >
      > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
      > [PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com] On Behalf
      > Of
      > > Neil Foster
      > > Sent: Sunday, 8 March 2009 2:34 PM
      > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
      > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > So which ones do you approve of then?
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > And please be a bit more thoughtful when spouting off any more rubbish
      > about
      > > the IRA on this forum please. I have relatives who served in the army in
      > > Northern Ireland in the 70's and I believe they are a bit more informed
      > > about what went on than you think you are.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Neil
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
      > [PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com] On Behalf
      > Of
      > > patrickmichaeltilton
      > > Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 3:18 AM
      > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
      > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Places with gun control have fewer murders.
      > >
      > > Now, mind you, I don't approve of every single vicious act of violence
      > > committed by the IRA,
      > >
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52349 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      Thanks Neil, thanks Tim.

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
      >
      > Okay, I've uploaded it to the files section. I'm not sure which it was
      > from either so I just called it UK show apes.
      >
      > Neil
      >
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
      > Of Tim "apefan"
      > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:26 AM
      > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      >
      >
      >
      > well I just tried but it didn't work...can somebody add this to the
      > files or photos please??
      >
      >
      > _____
      >
      > From: nlmoxham <neilmoxham@...>
      > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 1:29:59 PM
      > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      >
      >
      >
      > Tim - can you post a link for these pictures please? I don't get
      > attachements, and I just finished writing my page on the stage & arena
      > shows, thanks!
      >
      >
      >
      > .
      >
      > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
      > sgId=52343/stime=1236540366/nc1=5191953/nc2=5349272/nc3=5579909>
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52350 From: Neil Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
      .html
      I take it from your question that you don't have a copy of Rich's Timelines book yet Mike?
      Just curious because even though many have purchased it most seem to be unwilling to comment much on it apart from our collective initial positive reactions.

      For me, reading through it I have found plenty to comment on (both positive and negative) but it looks like nobody else wants to which I find a bit strange as it's not very often we get something new to talk about POTA wise.

      Neil

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:

      > Cool
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52351 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      .html Message
      Not a problem but after reading Mr. Whitty's post about it maybe I got the title very wrong! Maybe it's from some recent convention or something?
       
      Neil
       
      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
      Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:46 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

      Thanks Neil, thanks Tim.

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@.. .> wrote:
      >
      > Okay, I've uploaded it to the files section. I'm not sure which it was
      > from either so I just called it UK show apes.

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52352 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      .html

      Dunno!

       

      The kid looks very 1970s!  Maybe a hippie kid?  J

       


      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
      Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 7:50 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

       

      Not a problem but after reading Mr. Whitty's post about it maybe I got the title very wrong! Maybe it's from some recent convention or something?

       

      Neil

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
      Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:46 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
      Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

      Thanks Neil, thanks Tim.

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@.. .> wrote:
      >
      > Okay, I've uploaded it to the files section. I'm not sure which it was
      > from either so I just called it UK show apes.

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52353 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 3/8/09 3:48:01 PM Central Standard Time, ntfoster@... writes:
      I take it from your question that you don't have a copy of Rich's Timelines book yet Mike?
      Just curious because even though many have purchased it most seem to be unwilling to comment much on it apart from our collective initial positive reactions.
      *** No, I haven't purchased the book yet, but I do plan on it...
       
      And you're right about it being surprising that few are commenting on it... I actually thought Whitty's post about it was going to get more people chatting about it... Whitty: Time to drum up another comment regarding Rich's book. ;) ***


      Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52354 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      No, this is the real thing - nice find Tim! I did a search on flickr and found the page and it's in a set called '1970's', with some other very 70's-looking pictures. The autographs are '(could be Orak), Galen & Zako', which are names only used for the arena show.

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
      >
      > Dunno!
      >
      >
      >
      > The kid looks very 1970s! Maybe a hippie kid? :-)
      >
      >
      >
      > _____
      >
      > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
      > Neil Foster
      > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 7:50 AM
      > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      >
      >
      >
      > Not a problem but after reading Mr. Whitty's post about it maybe I got the
      > title very wrong! Maybe it's from some recent convention or something?
      >
      >
      >
      > Neil
      >
      >
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
      > nlmoxham
      > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:46 AM
      > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      >
      > Thanks Neil, thanks Tim.
      >
      > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Neil
      > Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Okay, I've uploaded it to the files section. I'm not sure which it was
      > > from either so I just called it UK show apes.
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52355 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      I have spoke about this subject before , that i went and saw the show at Rochdale football ground in the seventy's.
      But i must point out that they came up into the stands and they came next to me and the costumes where a lot better than those in the photo.
      They are brown , where has the ones in the show where purple.
      They look home made and one looks like he's wearing moterbike gloves?????
      Mark :)
      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@...> wrote:
      >
      > No, this is the real thing - nice find Tim! I did a search on flickr and found the page and it's in a set called '1970's', with some other very 70's-looking pictures. The autographs are '(could be Orak), Galen & Zako', which are names only used for the arena show.
      >
      > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Dunno!
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > The kid looks very 1970s! Maybe a hippie kid? :-)
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > _____
      > >
      > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
      > > Neil Foster
      > > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 7:50 AM
      > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Not a problem but after reading Mr. Whitty's post about it maybe I got the
      > > title very wrong! Maybe it's from some recent convention or something?
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Neil
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
      > > nlmoxham
      > > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:46 AM
      > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      > >
      > > Thanks Neil, thanks Tim.
      > >
      > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Neil
      > > Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Okay, I've uploaded it to the files section. I'm not sure which it was
      > > > from either so I just called it UK show apes.
      > >
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52356 From: Michael Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Watchmen - 100% ON topic.
      .html
      Here's part of a review:

      While comic books have long dealt with issues of personal ethics, the big themes dealt with in "Watchmen" make it more akin to the science fiction we used to see decades ago. I won't compare it so much in terms of quality, but to take on these issues puts it in company with the likes of "Planet of the Apes" and the original "The Day the Earth Stood Still." Fans of the "Watchmen" series should also pick up Aldous Huxley's 1948 novel "Ape and Essence," which also depicts a future after humanity's aggressive nature has nearly driven it into extinction.

      The entire review can be found here:

      http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=10954

      Michael
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52357 From: Michael Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
      .html
      Mike,

      I actually get the feeling that I'm upsetting and/or offending people by doing so and actually generating LESS discussion.

      Rich has gone quiet, and he's posting on the other group now (about WATCHMEN, albeit...however that thread was started HERE).

      It's amazing....when Neil and I put out our comics we have come under serious criticism from people like Greg P (for example, about GOING HOME) who I consider a friend and a valuable critic. I'm at the point where I hate the writing of GOING HOME and I'll be re-writing it in the future the way I wanted it (not trying to paste my story over pictures made for Dave Ballard's MONUMENT). I don't hold any grudges. It hurt me to read some things, but I still did and still do and I don't take them personally.

      I think the worst thing about POTA fandom is that it's seen as personal every time someone disagrees and people don't look at it objectively.

      I really love Rich's book and so does Neil. We're honoured to have the book but we don't just throw it on the shelf and get on the group to praise it without saying WHY (as quite a few poeple have done on the POTA group).

      The REASON I love the book is that you can feel the dedication (obsession almost) to get all those pieces of information together. It's something I'd never be able to do. You can tell it's done by a fan but you can also feel the outstanding professionalism.

      There are parts I don't agree with, but they are wonderful seeds of discussion. However right now, as I said, I cannot see the value in discussing them.

      This has all just left me feeling empty and sad and wondering, yet again, why Neil and I slog it out to maintain the group.

      Michael

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
      >
      >
      > In a message dated 3/8/09 3:48:01 PM Central Standard Time,
      > ntfoster@... writes:
      >
      > I take it from your question that you don't have a copy of Rich's Timelines
      > book yet Mike?
      > Just curious because even though many have purchased it most seem to be
      > unwilling to comment much on it apart from our collective initial positive
      > reactions.
      >
      >
      > *** No, I haven't purchased the book yet, but I do plan on it...
      >
      > And you're right about it being surprising that few are commenting on it...
      > I actually thought Whitty's post about it was going to get more people
      > chatting about it... Whitty: Time to drum up another comment regarding Rich's book.
      > ;) ***
      > **************Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try
      > the new Email Toolbar now!
      > (http://toolbar.aol.com/mail/download.htmlncid=txtlnkusdown00000027)
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52358 From: Michael Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      That's DEFINITELY the ILLUSIVE CONCEPTS costume. I have it and it has the glove and boot SPATS (but they are even wearing BROWN SHOES the duffers!).

      Not sure why it was in that folder but I am VERY sure I recognise the outfit...

      Michael

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@...> wrote:
      >
      > I have spoke about this subject before , that i went and saw the show at Rochdale football ground in the seventy's.
      > But i must point out that they came up into the stands and they came next to me and the costumes where a lot better than those in the photo.
      > They are brown , where has the ones in the show where purple.
      > They look home made and one looks like he's wearing moterbike gloves?????
      > Mark :)
      > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@> wrote:
      > >
      > > No, this is the real thing - nice find Tim! I did a search on flickr and found the page and it's in a set called '1970's', with some other very 70's-looking pictures. The autographs are '(could be Orak), Galen & Zako', which are names only used for the arena show.
      > >
      > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Dunno!
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > The kid looks very 1970s! Maybe a hippie kid? :-)
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > _____
      > > >
      > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
      > > > Neil Foster
      > > > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 7:50 AM
      > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Not a problem but after reading Mr. Whitty's post about it maybe I got the
      > > > title very wrong! Maybe it's from some recent convention or something?
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Neil
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
      > > > nlmoxham
      > > > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:46 AM
      > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      > > >
      > > > Thanks Neil, thanks Tim.
      > > >
      > > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Neil
      > > > Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Okay, I've uploaded it to the files section. I'm not sure which it was
      > > > > from either so I just called it UK show apes.
      > > >
      > >
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52359 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      Aaaah...OK, I'll try and get in touch with the guy.

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
      >
      > That's DEFINITELY the ILLUSIVE CONCEPTS costume. I have it and it has the glove and boot SPATS (but they are even wearing BROWN SHOES the duffers!).
      >
      > Not sure why it was in that folder but I am VERY sure I recognise the outfit...
      >
      > Michael
      >
      > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@> wrote:
      > >
      > > I have spoke about this subject before , that i went and saw the show at Rochdale football ground in the seventy's.
      > > But i must point out that they came up into the stands and they came next to me and the costumes where a lot better than those in the photo.
      > > They are brown , where has the ones in the show where purple.
      > > They look home made and one looks like he's wearing moterbike gloves?????
      > > Mark :)
      > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > No, this is the real thing - nice find Tim! I did a search on flickr and found the page and it's in a set called '1970's', with some other very 70's-looking pictures. The autographs are '(could be Orak), Galen & Zako', which are names only used for the arena show.
      > > >
      > > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Dunno!
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > The kid looks very 1970s! Maybe a hippie kid? :-)
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > _____
      > > > >
      > > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
      > > > > Neil Foster
      > > > > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 7:50 AM
      > > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > Not a problem but after reading Mr. Whitty's post about it maybe I got the
      > > > > title very wrong! Maybe it's from some recent convention or something?
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > Neil
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > -----Original Message-----
      > > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
      > > > > nlmoxham
      > > > > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:46 AM
      > > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > > > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      > > > >
      > > > > Thanks Neil, thanks Tim.
      > > > >
      > > > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com, "Neil
      > > > > Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
      > > > > >
      > > > > > Okay, I've uploaded it to the files section. I'm not sure which it was
      > > > > > from either so I just called it UK show apes.
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52360 From: Rich Handley Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
      .html
      >Posted by: "Michael Whitty" sallywhitty@... mike_oz2002
      >Rich has gone quiet, and he's posting on the other group now (about
      >WATCHMEN, albeit...however that thread was started HERE).

      Just extremely busy. I've had about five minutes in the past couple
      of weeks to even scan the groups, between work and family
      obligations. There's nothing more to it than that.

      >I really love Rich's book and so does Neil. We're honoured to have
      >the book but we don't just throw it on the shelf and get on the
      >group to praise it without saying WHY (as quite a few poeple have
      >done on the POTA group). The REASON I love the book is that you can
      >feel the dedication (obsession almost) to get all those pieces of
      >information together. It's something I'd never be able to do. You
      >can tell it's done by a fan but you can also feel the outstanding
      >professionalism.

      Thanks. I'm glad the amount of work that went into researching and
      writing it apparently comes through.

      >There are parts I don't agree with,

      That's cool. I expected people to disagree with parts of it.

      >but they are wonderful seeds of discussion. However right now, as I
      >said, I cannot see the value in discussing them. This has all just
      >left me feeling empty and sad and wondering, yet again, why Neil and
      >I slog it out to maintain the group.

      Okay...I'm admittedly confused by that last part, as the tone of your
      post just changed in mid-stream. Did I miss something?
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52361 From: Michael Whitty Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
      .html
      Just saying I get the feeling I'm pissing people off or coming over as personally attacking you.

      Nobody is really joining in on the discussion and I guess that's what makes me feel this way.

      I'm glad you have just been busy and you are not taking it personally, but I think others are taking it some other way.

      And after all the shitty behind the scenes "chats" I've been having with the good lord T I'm feeling really drained.

      Michael

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Rich Handley <handleyr@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > Okay...I'm admittedly confused by that last part, as the tone of your
      > post just changed in mid-stream. Did I miss something?
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52362 From: rassmguy Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
      .html
      --"Michael Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
      >Just saying I get the feeling I'm pissing people off or coming over as personally attacking you.

      I didn't realize anyone had personally attacked me. I guess it's just as well that I haven't had time to read most of the posts, then.
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52363 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: Watchmen - 100% ON topic.
      .html
      .html
      *** And for the record, I never really had anything against the WATCHMEN posts... I just couldn't believe how many there were! ***
       
       
       
       
      In a message dated 3/8/09 6:04:07 PM Central Standard Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
      Here's part of a review:

      While comic books have long dealt with issues of personal ethics, the big themes dealt with in "Watchmen" make it more akin to the science fiction we used to see decades ago. I won't compare it so much in terms of quality, but to take on these issues puts it in company with the likes of "Planet of the Apes" and the original "The Day the Earth Stood Still." Fans of the "Watchmen" series should also pick up Aldous Huxley's 1948 novel "Ape and Essence," which also depicts a future after humanity's aggressive nature has nearly driven it into extinction.

      The entire review can be found here:

      http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=10954

      Michael
       


      Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52364 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 3/8/09 6:28:21 PM Central Standard Time, sallywhitty@... writes:
      That's DEFINITELY the ILLUSIVE CONCEPTS costume.  I have it and it has the glove and boot SPATS (but they are even wearing BROWN SHOES the duffers!).
      *** I didn't think the ILLUSIVE CONCEPTS costume was that detailed, unless they had two versions available... I always thought it was more along the lines of the background soldiers from BENEATH with the lines "printed" on rather than anything like the picture shows. ***


      Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52365 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/8/2009
      Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 3/8/09 8:44:28 PM Central Standard Time, handleyr@... writes:
      I didn't realize anyone had personally attacked me.
      *** Nobody has attacked you at all... ***


      Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52366 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      .html
      I've got that too but these look more elaborate.....and the masks are much better than the Illus.Concepts one...


      From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@...>
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 4:50:54 PM
      Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

      Tim

      This looks like the Illusive Concepts costume I bought in (maybe) 1996.

      The masks seem to be from Apemania.

      Not sure if Brian can help?

      Michael


      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
      Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 5:26 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

      well I just tried but it didn't work...can somebody add this to the files or photos please??


      From: nlmoxham <neilmoxham@gmail. com>
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
      Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 1:29:59 PM
      Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

      Tim - can you post a link for these pictures please? I don't get attachements, and I just finished writing my page on the stage & arena shows, thanks!

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:

      >
      > Found this on Flickr....are these performers from the stage show or arena
      show?
      >


      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52367 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
      Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
      .html
      .html
      I'm still reading it....not much to comment on except for it's thoroughness! There was one funny entry about something like the birth of Bill's (from Return) swimming teacher???


      From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 6:59:57 PM
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

      In a message dated 3/8/09 3:48:01 PM Central Standard Time, ntfoster@bigpond. com writes:
      I take it from your question that you don't have a copy of Rich's Timelines book yet Mike?
      Just curious because even though many have purchased it most seem to be unwilling to comment much on it apart from our collective initial positive reactions.
      *** No, I haven't purchased the book yet, but I do plan on it...
      And you're right about it being surprising that few are commenting on it... I actually thought Whitty's post about it was going to get more people chatting about it... Whitty: Time to drum up another comment regarding Rich's book. ;) ***


      Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52368 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      .html
      They must have had a photo op situation.....or maybe not since we haven't seen many of these!


      From: nlmoxham <neilmoxham@...>
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 7:26:08 PM
      Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

      No, this is the real thing - nice find Tim! I did a search on flickr and found the page and it's in a set called '1970's', with some other very 70's-looking pictures. The autographs are '(could be Orak), Galen & Zako', which are names only used for the arena show.

      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@ ...> wrote:
      >
      > Dunno!
      >
      >
      >
      > The kid looks very 1970s! Maybe a hippie kid? :-)
      >
      >
      >
      > _____
      >
      > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of
      > Neil Foster
      > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 7:50 AM
      > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
      > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      >
      >
      >
      > Not a problem but after reading Mr. Whitty's post about it maybe I got the
      > title very wrong! Maybe it's from some recent convention or something?
      >
      >
      >
      > Neil
      >
      >
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of
      > nlmoxham
      > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:46 AM
      > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
      > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
      >
      > Thanks Neil, thanks Tim.
      >
      > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG% 40yahoogroups. com> com, "Neil
      > Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Okay, I've uploaded it to the files section. I'm not sure which it was
      > > from either so I just called it UK show apes.
      >


      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 52369 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
      Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
      .html
      Attachments :
        .html
        Here is a comparison of the Illusive Concepts costume and mask with the pic in question....


        From: "mlccougar@..." <mlccougar@...>
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 11:38:47 PM
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

        In a message dated 3/8/09 6:28:21 PM Central Standard Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com writes:
        That's DEFINITELY the ILLUSIVE CONCEPTS costume. I have it and it has the glove and boot SPATS (but they are even wearing BROWN SHOES the duffers!).
        *** I didn't think the ILLUSIVE CONCEPTS costume was that detailed, unless they had two versions available... I always thought it was more along the lines of the background soldiers from BENEATH with the lines "printed" on rather than anything like the picture shows. ***


        Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52370 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: iis this from the 70's? Brian says.....
        .html
        .html

         

         


        From: Brian [afryt4u@...]
        Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 9:54 AM
        To: Michael & Sally Whitty
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
        Importance: High

         

        Nice job, but not Illusive and certainly not Apemania.

        Some nice fan work though.

         

        Bri

         

         

        On Mar 8, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Michael & Sally Whitty wrote:



        Tim

         

        This looks like the Illusive Concepts costume I bought in (maybe) 1996.

         

        The masks seem to be from Apemania.

         

        Not sure if Brian can help?

         

        Michael

         


        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
        Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 5:26 AM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

         

        well I just tried but it didn't work...can somebody add this to the files or photos please??

         


        From: nlmoxham <neilmoxham@gmail. com>
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
        Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 1:29:59 PM
        Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

        Tim - can you post a link for these pictures please? I don't get attachements, and I just finished writing my page on the stage & arena shows, thanks!

        --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:

        >
        > Found this on Flickr....are these performers from the stage show or arena show?
        >

         

        <3249399051_996926e4d9.jpg>

         

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52371 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: Re: Watchmen - 100% ON topic.
        .html
        .html

        Yeah fair enough.

         

        The only way I can tell if we go too far off topic is when people say something.

         

        Michael

         


        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
        Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 1:35 PM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Watchmen - 100% ON topic.

         

        *** And for the record, I never really had anything against the WATCHMEN posts... I just couldn't believe how many there were! ***

         

         

         

         

        In a message dated 3/8/09 6:04:07 PM Central Standard Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com writes:

        Here's part of a review:

        While comic books have long dealt with issues of personal ethics, the big themes dealt with in "Watchmen" make it more akin to the science fiction we used to see decades ago. I won't compare it so much in terms of quality, but to take on these issues puts it in company with the likes of "Planet of the Apes" and the original "The Day the Earth Stood Still." Fans of the "Watchmen" series should also pick up Aldous Huxley's 1948 novel "Ape and Essence," which also depicts a future after humanity's aggressive nature has nearly driven it into extinction.

        The entire review can be found here:

        http://www.the- trades.com/ article.php? id=10954

        Michael

         

         


        Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52372 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
        .html
        .html

        Oh the masks are FAR better!

         


        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
        Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 3:20 PM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

         

        I've got that too but these look more elaborate... ..and the masks are much better than the Illus.Concepts one...

         


        From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ bigpond.com>
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
        Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 4:50:54 PM
        Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

        Tim

         

        This looks like the Illusive Concepts costume I bought in (maybe) 1996.

         

        The masks seem to be from Apemania.

         

        Not sure if Brian can help?

         

        Michael

         


        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
        Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 5:26 AM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

         

        well I just tried but it didn't work...can somebody add this to the files or photos please??

         


        From: nlmoxham <neilmoxham@gmail. com>
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
        Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 1:29:59 PM
        Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

        Tim - can you post a link for these pictures please? I don't get attachements, and I just finished writing my page on the stage & arena shows, thanks!

        --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:

        >
        > Found this on Flickr....are these performers from the stage show or arena
        show?
        >

         

         

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52373 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: The birth of Bill's (from Return) swimming teacher???
        .html
        .html

        Ok Rich – this you have to explain!  J

         


        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
        Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 3:23 PM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

         

        I'm still reading it....not much to comment on except for it's thoroughness! There was one funny entry about something like the birth of Bill's (from Return) swimming teacher??? 

         


        From: " mlccougar@aol. com " < mlccougar@aol. com >
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
        Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 6:59:57 PM
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

        In a message dated 3/8/09 3:48:01 PM Central Standard Time, ntfoster@bigpond. com writes:

        I take it from your question that you don't have a copy of Rich's Timelines book yet Mike?
        Just curious because even though many have purchased it most seem to be unwilling to comment much on it apart from our collective initial positive reactions.

        *** No, I haven't purchased the book yet, but I do plan on it...

         

        And you're right about it being surprising that few are commenting on it... I actually thought Whitty's post about it was going to get more people chatting about it... Whitty: Time to drum up another comment regarding Rich's book. ;) ***

         


        Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!

         

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52374 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
        .html
        .html

        I stand corrected!

         


        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
        Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 3:34 PM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

         

        Here is a comparison of the Illusive Concepts costume and mask with the pic in question....

         


        From: " mlccougar@aol. com " < mlccougar@aol. com >
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
        Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 11:38:47 PM
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

        In a message dated 3/8/09 6:28:21 PM Central Standard Time, sallywhitty@ bigpond.com writes:

        That's DEFINITELY the ILLUSIVE CONCEPTS costume.  I have it and it has the glove and boot SPATS (but they are even wearing BROWN SHOES the duffers!).

        *** I didn't think the ILLUSIVE CONCEPTS costume was that detailed, unless they had two versions available...  I always thought it was more along the lines of the background soldiers from BENEATH with the lines "printed" on rather than anything like the picture shows. ***

         


        Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!

         

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52375 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: Re: Watchmen - 100% ON topic.
        .html
        .html Message
        I've got that and have read it. Very strange (but quite good) book, then again Huxley was a bit strange himself.
         
        Neil
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Whitty
        Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:04 AM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: [PotaDG] Watchmen - 100% ON topic.

        should also pick up Aldous Huxley's 1948 novel "Ape and Essence," which also depicts a future after humanity's aggressive nature has nearly driven it into extinction.

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52376 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: Re: Digest Number 3750
        .html
        .html Message
        Sorry but I won't be saying anything more on that subject.
         
        Neil
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Whitty
        Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:33 PM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Digest Number 3750

        Nobody is really joining in on the discussion and I guess that's what makes me feel this way.

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52377 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
        .html
        .html Message
        It comes with the territory. You put something out there and people will criticise it if they feel the need to but that's to be expected. Jeez we even had criticism about things in Beware the Beast by some people and some of the 'team' took it worse than others but that's life. And don't forget the very personal, even insulting, private emails we got from one coward about Within the Planet of the Apes! Lucky we didn't share those with the group! But what the hey, you just get on with things or you let it get to you. I know criticism upsets me deeply at first but I tend to get over it pretty quickly.
         
        Neil
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Whitty
        Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:21 AM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

        It's amazing....when Neil and I put out our comics we have come under serious criticism from people like Greg P (for example, about GOING HOME) who I consider a friend and a valuable critic.

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52378 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
        .html
        The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone needs to put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could make them a much better costume in five minutes???
        Mark :) :)
        --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
        >
        > I've got that too but these look more elaborate.....and the masks are much better than the Illus.Concepts one...
        >
        >
        >
        > > >
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52379 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
        .html
        .html Message
        Just need to make the point that it was only the first 2 pages (as far as I can recall) that were drawn originally for 'Monument' but I know what you mean, it meant it started wrongly for the story you were trying to tell.
         
        Neil
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Whitty
        Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:21 AM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

        I'm at the point where I hate the writing of GOING HOME and I'll be re-writing it in the future the way I wanted it (not trying to paste my story over pictures made for Dave Ballard's MONUMENT).

        .

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52380 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
        .html
        Hello,

        This email message is a notification to let you know that
        a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
        group.

        File : /UK apes comparison.jpg
        Uploaded by : munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
        Description :

        You can access this file at the URL:
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/UK%20apes%20comparison.jpg

        To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
        http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.htmliles

        Regards,

        munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 52381 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
        Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
        .html
        Attachments :
          .html Message
          They are definitely from the UK 70's shows. The costumes are exactly the same as the one in this 'signed' photo from the shows:
           
           
           
           
          Neil
           
          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
          Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:53 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

          The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone needs to put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could make them a much better costume in five minutes???
          Mark :) :)
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim "apefan"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:
          >
          > I've got that too but these look more elaborate... ..and the masks are much better than the Illus.Concepts one...

          .

          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52382 From: Dave B Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: The birth of Bill's (from Return) swimming teacher???
          .html
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
          >
          > Ok Rich - this you have to explain! :-)


          Hee-hee... I wondered how long it would be before the swimming instructor reared his soggy head (and don't get me started on bicycle thieves!:-)

          I think the explanation is obvious... Rich was attempting to be all-inclusive, which means you either include everything or you do not. If you knowingly do not, then it's not all-inclusive!

          A reference to Bill's swimming instructor IS made on-screen (or in the novelization, sorry, I can't remember which). So, for me its inclusion perfectly underlines not only the author's dedication, but also his stated intent to include EVERY snippet of info, large or small, trivial or otherwise, and let the reader decide if it was worthy of consideration.

          Pre-publication I thought the reference ought to have been deleted, (and said so), and now I'm truly glad Rich didn't listen to me. Because now, every time I pick up `Timeline', be it for reference or pleasure, I know it's as all-inclusive as the author could have made it.

          Dave
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52383 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
          .html
          .html

          Yeah Jess would sort them RIGHT out!

           


          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
          Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 6:53 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

           

          The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone needs to put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could make them a much better costume in five minutes???
          Mark :) :)
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:

          >
          > I've got that too but these look more elaborate... ..and the masks are
          much better than the Illus.Concepts one...
          >
          >
          >
          > ____________ _________ _________ __
          > From: Michael & Sally Whitty <sallywhitty@ ...>
          > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
          > Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 4:50:54 PM
          > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
          >
          >
          > Tim
          >
          > This looks like the Illusive Concepts
          > costume I bought in (maybe) 1996.
          >
          > The masks seem to be from Apemania.
          >
          > Not sure if Brian can help?
          >
          > Michael
          >
          >
          > ____________ _________ _________ __
          >
          > From:PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups. com ] On
          Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
          > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 5:26 AM
          > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
          > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this
          > from the 70's?
          >
          > well I just tried but it didn't work...can somebody add
          > this to the files or photos please??
          >
          >
          > ____________ _________ _________ __
          >
          > From:nlmoxham
          > <neilmoxham@ gmail. com>
          > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
          > Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009
          > 1:29:59 PM
          > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from
          > the 70's?
          > Tim - can you post a link for these pictures please? I
          > don't get attachements, and I just finished writing my page on the stage
          &
          > arena shows, thanks!
          >
          > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
          > "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@ .> wrote:
          > >
          > > Found this on Flickr....are these performers from the stage show or
          arena
          > show?
          > >
          >

          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52384 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
          .html
          I agree we should be allowed to air our views, even if its just having a bad evening or work was crap, a movie not related to planet of the apes , Guns ?, IRA after all we all have differant takes on things.
          My final thoughts on the gun issue is this.
          Differant country , differant rules , but please dont talk shit about the I.R.A .
          I served in Ireland and have seen what terrorists can and will do first hand.
          Also i lost family members in the Arndale shopping centre ( which is like a mall ) in manchester .
          It took two years to get it back to anything worth visiting.
          If the I.R.A are only fighting for what they believe in then so are the Talaban (9 / 11 ) suicide bombings in the middle east and the Klu Klux Klan.
          Do think before you let your fingers run away with you and post stupid comments that are going to upset those that have first hand knowledge of such things.
          Just so everyones aware i feel very strongly about this subject if fighting is to take place then let it be face to face not by killing innocent people.
          Has anyone been watching Ross Kemp in Afganistan ( case in question )
          He goes out on patrol with the irish regiment.
          They catch a suspected taliban after a brief shoot out, they tie his hands and make him sitdown on the floor.
          He keeps shouting out that hes not taliban.
          One soldier looks at the talibans? right shoulder there is bruising which is consistant with firing a rifle.
          Also they check his clothing and gunpowder traces are on his sleeves.
          But then we here they had to let him go not enough evidence???
          One thing the taliban do is if they see they are loosing then they drop there guns and blend in with the common folks of that settlement ( cowards ).
          So please guns and laws about them lets just drop it , unfortunatly none of us are in anyway in a position to do much about the war's of this world.
          Mark :)
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
          >
          > It comes with the territory. You put something out there and people will
          > criticise it if they feel the need to but that's to be expected. Jeez we
          > even had criticism about things in Beware the Beast by some people and
          > some of the 'team' took it worse than others but that's life. And don't
          > forget the very personal, even insulting, private emails we got from one
          > coward about Within the Planet of the Apes! Lucky we didn't share those
          > with the group! But what the hey, you just get on with things or you let
          > it get to you. I know criticism upsets me deeply at first but I tend to
          > get over it pretty quickly.
          >
          > Neil
          >
          >
          > -----Original Message-----
          > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
          > Of Michael Whitty
          > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:21 AM
          > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's
          > out?
          >
          >
          >
          > It's amazing....when Neil and I put out our comics we have come under
          > serious criticism from people like Greg P (for example, about GOING
          > HOME) who I consider a friend and a valuable critic.
          >
          > <mailto:PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=>
          > .
          >
          > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
          > sgId=52357/stime=1236558089/nc1=5191955/nc2=5658254/nc3=5202316>
          >
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52385 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
          .html
          .html

          It did – it took it into a different city etc.

           

          It was fun to write though with some constraints but never again (till next time….).

           


          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
          Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 6:51 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

           

          Just need to make the point that it was only the first 2 pages (as far as I can recall) that were drawn originally for 'Monument' but I know what you mean, it meant it started wrongly for the story you were trying to tell.

           

          Neil

           

          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Michael Whitty
          Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:21 AM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

          I'm at the point where I hate the writing of GOING HOME and I'll be re-writing it in the future the way I wanted it (not trying to paste my story over pictures made for Dave Ballard's MONUMENT).

          .

          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52386 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
          .html
          .html Message
          We already had.
           
          Neil
           
          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
          Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:17 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

          So please guns and laws about them lets just drop it ,

          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52387 From: Hunter Goatley Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
          .html
          > Rich has gone quiet, and he's posting on the other group now (about
          > WATCHMEN, albeit...however that thread was started HERE).

          Actually, that thread did not start here. The WATCHMEN thread over
          there was started by Jeff K's post, which he made to both groups.

          > This has all just left me feeling empty and sad and wondering, yet
          > again, why Neil and I slog it out to maintain the group.

          Maybe it's because you post entirely too many pity-party messages like
          this one. Maybe it's because everyone else is busy. Maybe it's
          because some of don't really care to argue (keyword) the minutiae
          included in the book.

          Your paranoia is showing again, Michael. And I mean that in the best
          way possible. Not everything that happens there or doesn't happen
          here is a result of people liking one group better than the other or
          disliking people on one group or the other. Sometimes, life
          intervenes. Sometimes your pity-party posts turn people off.
          Sometimes, people just don't have much to add....

          Hunter
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52388 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
          .html
          .html

          Ha!  Are you counting?  J

           

          It’s called honesty Hunter.  And I must say at times I’m that close to giving it all away that I really need to hear it’s worth it.

           

          It must be hard for many people to understand.

           

          Maybe if your site copped the same sort of shit and a crazy individual tried to have you fired from your job for posting from work (just to name a few pitiful battles I’ve fought) you’d get it.  Maybe if your counter showed you had no visitors at certain times and plenty at other times you’d see trends and you’d have a fair idea how things correlate.  And maybe I’m paranoid!

           

          But I tell you now I shun pity.  Pity is for the weak and I don’t see myself as weak or requiring pity – sorry if you do.

           

          Maybe I’ve lost something in translation but if you think I’m trying to get pity you are wrong.

           

          Fact is, if one day I have no reason to keep the group going, I’ll do something else with my time and the only reason to keep the group going is because members (no pun intended!) want it here.  Like the day Simian Scrolls prints 200 and sells one….why bother?

           

          The day I say “I wonder why we keep the group going” and we get a few “neither do we!” responses, then you can all go and get your POTA chat from a dictator who wants to say whatever he wants unchallenged (yeah I know – paranoid right?).  Sorry if my honesty offends anyone.

           

          Michael

           


          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Hunter Goatley
          Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 8:48 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

           

          Maybe it's because you post entirely too many pity-party messages like
          this one.

          .

          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52389 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
          .html
          .html
          yep Neil....no question!


          From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 5:04:35 AM
          Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

          They are definitely from the UK 70's shows. The costumes are exactly the same as the one in this 'signed' photo from the shows:
          Neil
          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
          Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:53 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
          Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

          The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone needs to put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could make them a much better costume in five minutes???
          Mark :) :)
          --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim "apefan"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:
          >
          > I've got that too but these look more elaborate... ..and the masks are much better than the Illus.Concepts one...

          .


          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52390 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
          .html
          .html Message
          Small or minor details are important to some of us.
           
          Neil
           
          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hunter Goatley
          Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 8:48 PM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

          Maybe it's because some of don't really care to argue (keyword) the minutiae  included in the book.

          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52391 From: Hunter Goatley Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
          .html
          > Small or minor details are important to some of us.

          I understand that. I wasn't suggesting that such topics were
          pointless, I was just offering one possible reason why people may not
          have joined in the discussion.

          Hunter
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52392 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
          .html
          .html Message
          Speaking of which, what's the story behind the two manga editions that you have pictured at the back of the book Rich?
           
          Neil
           
          -----Original Message-----
          From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
          Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:21 AM
          To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

          Small or minor details are important to some of us.

          .

          <.html
          <.html
          Group: potadg Message: 52393 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
          Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
          .html
          Attachments :
            .html

            Yeah yeah – I was a bit paranoid when I said it looked like the Illusive Concepts Costume – SORRY!!  Have pity on me!  ;)

             

            HEY - those masks look like they are made from original prosthetics!

             


            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
            Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 11:28 PM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

             

            yep Neil....no question! 

             


            From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 5:04:35 AM
            Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

            They are definitely from the UK 70's shows. The costumes are exactly the same as the one in this 'signed' photo from the shows:

             

             

             

             

            Neil

             

            -----Original Message-----
            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
            Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:53 PM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

            The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone needs to put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could make them a much better costume in five minutes???
            Mark :) :)
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim "apefan"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:
            >
            > I've got that too but these look more elaborate... ..and the masks are much better than the Illus.Concepts one...

            .

             

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52394 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            .html

            Oh yeah we were arguing about….I mean discussing those on the weekend…

             

            What the hell are they Rich?

             

            Michael

             


            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
            Sent: Tuesday, 10 March 2009 12:34 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

             

            Speaking of which, what's the story behind the two manga editions that you have pictured at the back of the book Rich?

             

            Neil

             

            -----Original Message-----
            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [ PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
            Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:21 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

            Small or minor details are important to some of us.

            .

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52395 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            I still remember them being purple not sandy brown costumes, maybe there was more than one show going around at a time.
            Also look at the rifle in the picture thats not a proper prop, anyone have a clue to what it is.
            My thinking is it looks a little like a lee enfield 303 with bolt action?
            Mark :)
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
            >
            > Yeah yeah - I was a bit paranoid when I said it looked like the Illusive
            > Concepts Costume - SORRY!! Have pity on me! ;)
            >
            >
            >
            > HEY - those masks look like they are made from original prosthetics!
            >
            >
            >
            > _____
            >
            > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
            > Tim "apefan"
            > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 11:28 PM
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            >
            >
            >
            > yep Neil....no question!
            >
            >
            >
            > _____
            >
            > From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@...>
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 5:04:35 AM
            > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            >
            > They are definitely from the UK 70's shows. The costumes are exactly the
            > same as the one in this 'signed' photo from the shows:
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > Neil
            >
            >
            >
            > -----Original Message-----
            > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of
            > haydon.mark
            > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:53 PM
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            >
            > The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone needs to
            > put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could make
            > them a much better costume in five minutes???
            > Mark :) :)
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> , "Tim
            > \"apefan\"" <apefan23@ .> wrote:
            > >
            > > I've got that too but these look more elaborate... ..and the masks are
            > much better than the Illus.Concepts one...
            >
            > <mailto:PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=>
            >
            > .
            >
            >
            > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/msgId
            > =52378/stime=1236588799/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3>
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52396 From: Dario Sciola Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Apparently Aldo is a Swede...
            .html
            Apparently Aldo is a Swede...

            http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/03/09/chimp-stones.html"

            The first rock has been thrown. The Revolution has begun.

            Dario
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52397 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            Oh yeah, I meant to ask about that - I've never heard about them before...

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
            >
            > Speaking of which, what's the story behind the two manga editions that
            > you have pictured at the back of the book Rich?
            >
            > Neil
            >
            >
            > -----Original Message-----
            > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
            > Of Neil Foster
            > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:21 AM
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and
            > what's out?
            >
            >
            >
            > Small or minor details are important to some of us.
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > .
            >
            > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
            > sgId=52390/stime=1236608810/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3>
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52398 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            There were also the personal appearances by individual characters at shopping centres, perhaps they used different outfits? Anyway, here's what I've come up with so far, hopefully I'll get a reply from this guy that might shed some light on the picture and allow me to include it:

            http://planetoftheapes.wikia.com/wiki/Planet_of_the_Apes_UK_Live_Show

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@...> wrote:
            >
            > I still remember them being purple not sandy brown costumes, maybe there was more than one show going around at a time.
            > Also look at the rifle in the picture thats not a proper prop, anyone have a clue to what it is.
            > My thinking is it looks a little like a lee enfield 303 with bolt action?
            > Mark :)
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@> wrote:
            > >
            > > Yeah yeah - I was a bit paranoid when I said it looked like the Illusive
            > > Concepts Costume - SORRY!! Have pity on me! ;)
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > HEY - those masks look like they are made from original prosthetics!
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > _____
            > >
            > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
            > > Tim "apefan"
            > > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 11:28 PM
            > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > yep Neil....no question!
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > _____
            > >
            > > From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@>
            > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 5:04:35 AM
            > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > >
            > > They are definitely from the UK 70's shows. The costumes are exactly the
            > > same as the one in this 'signed' photo from the shows:
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > Neil
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > -----Original Message-----
            > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of
            > > haydon.mark
            > > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:53 PM
            > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > >
            > > The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone needs to
            > > put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could make
            > > them a much better costume in five minutes???
            > > Mark :) :)
            > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> , "Tim
            > > \"apefan\"" <apefan23@ .> wrote:
            > > >
            > > > I've got that too but these look more elaborate... ..and the masks are
            > > much better than the Illus.Concepts one...
            > >
            > > <mailto:PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=>
            > >
            > > .
            > >
            > >
            > > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/msgId
            > > =52378/stime=1236588799/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3>
            > >
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52399 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            .html Message
            I find it highly doubtful that they would have gone to the bother and expense of having different costumes made up. I was at the Rochdale show as well but I can honestly not remember the colours of the costumes. One thing though, when looking at those pictures the bandoliers do start to momentarily stir a vague memory in me but it goes before I can remember anything significant!
             
            Neil
             
            -----Original Message-----
            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
            Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:17 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

            There were also the personal appearances by individual characters at shopping centres, perhaps they used different outfits? Anyway, here's what I've come up with so far, hopefully I'll get a reply from this guy that might shed some light on the picture and allow me to include it:

            http://planetofthea pes.wikia. com/wiki/ Planet_of_ the_Apes_ UK_Live_Show

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52400 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            Just been looking at the link most interesting, i think we have spoke about the live shows at Rochdale football ground. I still have not seen the poster that was put up to publish the time and date and where the show would be.
            It was colour and of urko ( the real one )and looking at the dates i wonder if it was nearer september if they did a a public appearance then maybe?
            But how i remember it they wear not wearing brown but purple costumes .
            But the info is still valid and most interesting read.
            Mark :)
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@...> wrote:
            >
            > There were also the personal appearances by individual characters at shopping centres, perhaps they used different outfits? Anyway, here's what I've come up with so far, hopefully I'll get a reply from this guy that might shed some light on the picture and allow me to include it:
            >
            > http://planetoftheapes.wikia.com/wiki/Planet_of_the_Apes_UK_Live_Show
            >
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@> wrote:
            > >
            > > I still remember them being purple not sandy brown costumes, maybe there was more than one show going around at a time.
            > > Also look at the rifle in the picture thats not a proper prop, anyone have a clue to what it is.
            > > My thinking is it looks a little like a lee enfield 303 with bolt action?
            > > Mark :)
            > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@> wrote:
            > > >
            > > > Yeah yeah - I was a bit paranoid when I said it looked like the Illusive
            > > > Concepts Costume - SORRY!! Have pity on me! ;)
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > HEY - those masks look like they are made from original prosthetics!
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > _____
            > > >
            > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
            > > > Tim "apefan"
            > > > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 11:28 PM
            > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > yep Neil....no question!
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > _____
            > > >
            > > > From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@>
            > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > > > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 5:04:35 AM
            > > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > > >
            > > > They are definitely from the UK 70's shows. The costumes are exactly the
            > > > same as the one in this 'signed' photo from the shows:
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > Neil
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > -----Original Message-----
            > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of
            > > > haydon.mark
            > > > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:53 PM
            > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            > > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > > >
            > > > The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone needs to
            > > > put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could make
            > > > them a much better costume in five minutes???
            > > > Mark :) :)
            > > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> , "Tim
            > > > \"apefan\"" <apefan23@ .> wrote:
            > > > >
            > > > > I've got that too but these look more elaborate... ..and the masks are
            > > > much better than the Illus.Concepts one...
            > > >
            > > > <mailto:PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=>
            > > >
            > > > .
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/msgId
            > > > =52378/stime=1236588799/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3>
            > > >
            > >
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52401 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            Its already been said that there where possibly more than one show doing the rounds at the time.
            One of the gorillas came right up to me and rubbed the top of my hair while the other boy i went with started crying because he got scared.
            Me i loved every minute of him being stood next to me, it was like all my christmas's coming at once.
            And the outfit was purple he stood next to me and then carried on walking up the stand's then running back down onto the pitch.
            Mark :)
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
            >
            > I find it highly doubtful that they would have gone to the bother and
            > expense of having different costumes made up. I was at the Rochdale show
            > as well but I can honestly not remember the colours of the costumes. One
            > thing though, when looking at those pictures the bandoliers do start to
            > momentarily stir a vague memory in me but it goes before I can remember
            > anything significant!
            >
            > Neil
            >
            >
            > -----Original Message-----
            > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
            > Of nlmoxham
            > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:17 AM
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            >
            >
            >
            > There were also the personal appearances by individual characters at
            > shopping centres, perhaps they used different outfits? Anyway, here's
            > what I've come up with so far, hopefully I'll get a reply from this guy
            > that might shed some light on the picture and allow me to include it:
            >
            > http://planetofthea
            > <http://planetoftheapes.wikia.com/wiki/Planet_of_the_Apes_UK_Live_Show>
            > pes.wikia.com/wiki/Planet_of_the_Apes_UK_Live_Show
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52402 From: jessica rotich Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            Funny enough...I was looking at the costumes and figuring out where it needed fixing...and then I came across Mark's post earlier...followed by this post. Hilarious! I guess I am just a creature of habit.

            Jess.

            On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Michael & Sally Whitty < sallywhitty@...> wrote:

            Yeah Jess would sort them RIGHT out!


            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
            Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 6:53 PM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

            The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone needs to put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could make them a much better costume in five minutes???
            Mark :) :)
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
            >
            > I've got that too but these look more elaborate.....and the masks are much better than the Illus.Concepts one...
            >
            >
            >
            > > >

            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52403 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            .html Message
            I've just looked at the link as well and it is a bit strange and shows that you can not believe everything you read on Wikipedia. The Rochdale show bit "as recalled by Apes fan Neil Foster" doesn't sound like something I have said about it and I certainly don't recall mentioning some of those things attributed to me! Weird.
             
            As for the poster Mark, the one I obtained from my local newsagent didn't have a picture of the real Urko on it as far as I can remember. I remember it as being similar to the one with the 3 silhouetted apes on horseback from the start of the TV show and I always thought that the shopping centre appearance happened before the live show as I do remember being peed off that I didn't hear about it until after because if I had known about it I would have been there. Then again I am forgetting more and more things these days! ;-)
             
            Neil
             
            -----Original Message-----
            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
            Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:45 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

            Just been looking at the link most interesting, i think we have spoke about the live shows at Rochdale football ground. I still have not seen the poster that was put up to publish the time and date and where the show would be.
            It was colour and of urko ( the real one )and looking at the dates i wonder if it was nearer september if they did a a public appearance then maybe?
            But how i remember it they wear not wearing brown but purple costumes .
            But the info is still valid and most interesting read.

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52404 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            .html Message
            There was only the one company doing the shows as far as I know.
             
            Neil
             
            -----Original Message-----
            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of haydon.mark
            Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:56 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

            Its already been said that there where possibly more than one show doing the rounds at the time.

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52405 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            I wrote this Neil. I beg your pardon, only the first sentance of the quote I attributed to you is yours, I mixed it up with what Mark recalled about the show. Apologies all around and I'll fix it immediately. I want to be as factual as I can and identify my quotes, but would you both rather I omitted your names from this article. Also let me know if there's any other mistakes, thanks...

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
            >
            > I've just looked at the link as well and it is a bit strange and shows
            > that you can not believe everything you read on Wikipedia. The Rochdale
            > show bit "as recalled by Apes fan Neil Foster" doesn't sound like
            > something I have said about it and I certainly don't recall mentioning
            > some of those things attributed to me! Weird.
            >
            > As for the poster Mark, the one I obtained from my local newsagent
            > didn't have a picture of the real Urko on it as far as I can remember. I
            > remember it as being similar to the one with the 3 silhouetted apes on
            > horseback from the start of the TV show and I always thought that the
            > shopping centre appearance happened before the live show as I do
            > remember being peed off that I didn't hear about it until after because
            > if I had known about it I would have been there. Then again I am
            > forgetting more and more things these days! ;-)
            >
            > Neil
            >
            >
            > -----Original Message-----
            > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
            > Of haydon.mark
            > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:45 AM
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            >
            >
            >
            > Just been looking at the link most interesting, i think we have spoke
            > about the live shows at Rochdale football ground. I still have not seen
            > the poster that was put up to publish the time and date and where the
            > show would be.
            > It was colour and of urko ( the real one )and looking at the dates i
            > wonder if it was nearer september if they did a a public appearance then
            > maybe?
            > But how i remember it they wear not wearing brown but purple costumes .
            > But the info is still valid and most interesting read.
            >
            >
            > .
            >
            > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
            > sgId=52400/stime=1236638695/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3>
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52406 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            .html Message
            Oh right, no problem at all Neil, that's fine. Now it makes sense to me (thought maybe a few more brain cells had gone forever!) ;-)
             
            Neil
             
            -----Original Message-----
            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
            Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:43 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

            I wrote this Neil. I beg your pardon, only the first sentance of the quote I attributed to you is yours, I mixed it up with what Mark recalled about the show. Apologies all around and I'll fix it immediately. I want to be as factual as I can and identify my quotes, but would you both rather I omitted your names from this article. Also let me know if there's any other mistakes, thanks...

            .

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52407 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            .html

            Moxy

             

            That’s farkin’ AWESOME!

             

            Michael

             


            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
            Sent: Tuesday, 10 March 2009 8:17 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

             

            There were also the personal appearances by individual characters at shopping centres, perhaps they used different outfits? Anyway, here's what I've come up with so far, hopefully I'll get a reply from this guy that might shed some light on the picture and allow me to include it:

            http://planetofthea pes.wikia. com/wiki/ Planet_of_ the_Apes_ UK_Live_Show

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@ ...> wrote:

            >
            > I still remember them being purple not sandy brown costumes, maybe there
            was more than one show going around at a time.
            > Also look at the rifle in the picture thats not a proper prop, anyone have
            a clue to what it is.
            > My thinking is it looks a little like a lee
            w:st="on">enfield 303 with bolt action?
            > Mark :)
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com,
            "Michael & Sally Whitty" <sallywhitty@ > wrote:
            > >
            > > Yeah yeah - I was a bit paranoid when I said it looked like the
            Illusive
            > > Concepts Costume - SORRY!! Have pity on me! ;)
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > HEY - those masks look like they are made from original prosthetics!
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > _____
            > >
            > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of
            > > Tim "apefan"
            > > Sent: Monday, 9 March 2009 11:28 PM
            > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > yep Neil....no question!
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > _____
            > >
            > > From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@>
            > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            > > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2009 5:04:35 AM
            > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > >
            > > They are definitely from the
            w:st="on">UK 70's shows. The costumes are exactly the
            > > same as the one in this 'signed' photo from the shows:
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > Neil
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > -----Original Message-----
            > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com [PotaDG@ yahoogroups. com] On
            Behalf Of
            > > haydon.mark
            > > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:53 PM
            > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > >
            > > The masks are quite good but the costumes are fancy dress, someone
            needs to
            > > put them in touch with jess i,m sure she's not that busy , she could
            make
            > > them a much better costume in five minutes???
            > > Mark :) :)
            > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com <mailto:PotaDG% 40yahoogroups. com>
            , "Tim
            > > \"apefan\"" <apefan23@ .> wrote:
            > > >
            > > > I've got that too but these look more elaborate... ..and the
            masks are
            > > much better than the Illus.Concepts one...
            > >
            > > <mailto:PotaDG-unsubscribe@ yahoogroups. com?subject=>
            > >
            > > .
            > >
            > >
            > > <
            href="http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/msgId">http://geo.yahoo. com/serv? s=97359714/ grpId=8605785/ grpspId=17050214 37/msgId
            > > =52378/stime= 1236588799/ nc1=1/nc2= 2/nc3=3>
            > >
            >

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52408 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            .html

            Umm…I think MOXY wrote this one…..

             


            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Neil Foster
            Sent: Tuesday, 10 March 2009 9:07 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

             

            I've just looked at the link as well and it is a bit strange and shows that you can not believe everything you read on Wikipedia.

            .

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52409 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            .html

            If you want to quote anything fictional you can put MY name to it Moxy!  J

             


            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
            Sent: Tuesday, 10 March 2009 9:43 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

             

            I wrote this Neil. I beg your pardon, only the first sentance of the quote I attributed to you is yours, I mixed it up with what Mark recalled about the show. Apologies all around and I'll fix it immediately. I want to be as factual as I can and identify my quotes, but would you both rather I omitted your names from this article. Also let me know if there's any other mistakes, thanks...

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@.. .> wrote:

            >
            > I've just looked at the link as well and it is a bit strange and shows
            > that you can not believe everything you read on Wikipedia. The
            w:st="on">Rochdale
            > show bit "as recalled by Apes fan Neil Foster" doesn't sound
            like
            > something I have said about it and I certainly don't recall mentioning
            > some of those things attributed to me! Weird.
            >
            > As for the poster Mark, the one I obtained from my local newsagent
            > didn't have a picture of the real Urko on it as far as I can remember. I
            > remember it as being similar to the one with the 3 silhouetted apes on
            > horseback from the start of the TV show and I always thought that the
            > shopping centre appearance happened before the live show as I do
            > remember being peed off that I didn't hear about it until after because
            > if I had known about it I would have been there. Then again I am
            > forgetting more and more things these days! ;-)
            >
            > Neil
            >
            >
            > -----Original Message-----
            > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            [PotaDG@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf
            > Of haydon.mark
            > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:45 AM
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            >
            >
            >
            > Just been looking at the link most interesting, i think we have spoke
            > about the live shows at Rochdale football
            ground. I still have not seen
            > the poster that was put up to publish the time and date and where the
            > show would be.
            > It was colour and of urko ( the real one )and looking at the dates i
            > wonder if it was nearer september if they did a a public appearance then
            > maybe?
            > But how i remember it they wear not wearing brown but purple costumes .
            > But the info is still valid and most interesting read.
            >
            >
            > .
            >
            > <
            href="http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m">http://geo.yahoo. com/serv? s=97359714/ grpId=8605785/ grpspId=17050214 37/m
            > sgId=52400/stime= 1236638695/ nc1=1/nc2= 2/nc3=3>
            >

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52410 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/9/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            .html Message
            Yep it's alright, we've sorted it.
             
            Neil
             
            -----Original Message-----
            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael & Sally Whitty
            Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:48 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?

            Umm…I think MOXY wrote this one…..

            .

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52411 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            I dont mind you using my name after all whats written about the rochdale event is what we where talking about on this group a little while back.
            Mark
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@...> wrote:
            >
            > I wrote this Neil. I beg your pardon, only the first sentance of the quote I attributed to you is yours, I mixed it up with what Mark recalled about the show. Apologies all around and I'll fix it immediately. I want to be as factual as I can and identify my quotes, but would you both rather I omitted your names from this article. Also let me know if there's any other mistakes, thanks...
            >
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
            > >
            > > I've just looked at the link as well and it is a bit strange and shows
            > > that you can not believe everything you read on Wikipedia. The Rochdale
            > > show bit "as recalled by Apes fan Neil Foster" doesn't sound like
            > > something I have said about it and I certainly don't recall mentioning
            > > some of those things attributed to me! Weird.
            > >
            > > As for the poster Mark, the one I obtained from my local newsagent
            > > didn't have a picture of the real Urko on it as far as I can remember. I
            > > remember it as being similar to the one with the 3 silhouetted apes on
            > > horseback from the start of the TV show and I always thought that the
            > > shopping centre appearance happened before the live show as I do
            > > remember being peed off that I didn't hear about it until after because
            > > if I had known about it I would have been there. Then again I am
            > > forgetting more and more things these days! ;-)
            > >
            > > Neil
            > >
            > >
            > > -----Original Message-----
            > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
            > > Of haydon.mark
            > > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:45 AM
            > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > Just been looking at the link most interesting, i think we have spoke
            > > about the live shows at Rochdale football ground. I still have not seen
            > > the poster that was put up to publish the time and date and where the
            > > show would be.
            > > It was colour and of urko ( the real one )and looking at the dates i
            > > wonder if it was nearer september if they did a a public appearance then
            > > maybe?
            > > But how i remember it they wear not wearing brown but purple costumes .
            > > But the info is still valid and most interesting read.
            > >
            > >
            > > .
            > >
            > > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
            > > sgId=52400/stime=1236638695/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3>
            > >
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52412 From: haydon.mark Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            Also it has been said that the poster was the only one going around, that isn't true because it was the poster with urko in colour that i saw while doing a sunday paper round in the window of a house.
            That is what spared me on to carry those very heavy sunday papers back then.
            Because i had to pay to go and see them with my own money and thats how i got the money togetter also went to a old tip collecting victorian bottles and selling them to a antique shop.
            The tip wasn't that bad because it was raised and flattened out with a ash football pitch on it, me and my mates just scrapped away down the bottom of the bank.
            I have got someone who still lives up there going to pay spotlands a visit to see if any info can be got.
            Mark :)
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@...> wrote:
            >
            > I dont mind you using my name after all whats written about the rochdale event is what we where talking about on this group a little while back.
            > Mark
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@> wrote:
            > >
            > > I wrote this Neil. I beg your pardon, only the first sentance of the quote I attributed to you is yours, I mixed it up with what Mark recalled about the show. Apologies all around and I'll fix it immediately. I want to be as factual as I can and identify my quotes, but would you both rather I omitted your names from this article. Also let me know if there's any other mistakes, thanks...
            > >
            > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
            > > >
            > > > I've just looked at the link as well and it is a bit strange and shows
            > > > that you can not believe everything you read on Wikipedia. The Rochdale
            > > > show bit "as recalled by Apes fan Neil Foster" doesn't sound like
            > > > something I have said about it and I certainly don't recall mentioning
            > > > some of those things attributed to me! Weird.
            > > >
            > > > As for the poster Mark, the one I obtained from my local newsagent
            > > > didn't have a picture of the real Urko on it as far as I can remember. I
            > > > remember it as being similar to the one with the 3 silhouetted apes on
            > > > horseback from the start of the TV show and I always thought that the
            > > > shopping centre appearance happened before the live show as I do
            > > > remember being peed off that I didn't hear about it until after because
            > > > if I had known about it I would have been there. Then again I am
            > > > forgetting more and more things these days! ;-)
            > > >
            > > > Neil
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > -----Original Message-----
            > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
            > > > Of haydon.mark
            > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:45 AM
            > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: is this from the 70's?
            > > >
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > Just been looking at the link most interesting, i think we have spoke
            > > > about the live shows at Rochdale football ground. I still have not seen
            > > > the poster that was put up to publish the time and date and where the
            > > > show would be.
            > > > It was colour and of urko ( the real one )and looking at the dates i
            > > > wonder if it was nearer september if they did a a public appearance then
            > > > maybe?
            > > > But how i remember it they wear not wearing brown but purple costumes .
            > > > But the info is still valid and most interesting read.
            > > >
            > > >
            > > > .
            > > >
            > > > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
            > > > sgId=52400/stime=1236638695/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3>
            > > >
            > >
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52413 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            >That's farkin' AWESOME!

            Thanks.

            > If you want to quote anything fictional you can put MY name to it Moxy! :-)
            >
            >

            Don't joke, it might just happen!
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52414 From: nlmoxham Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: is this from the 70's?
            .html
            OK, thank you.


            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@...> wrote:
            >
            > I dont mind you using my name after all whats written about the rochdale event is what we where talking about on this group a little while back.
            > Mark
            >

            Oh right, no problem at all Neil, that's fine. Now it makes sense to me (thought maybe a few more brain cells had gone forever!) ;-)

            Neil
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52415 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            Hi, Neil,

            I just noticed this question while skimming through recent messages. I do see your point regarding the "official" nature of the Argentine comics. In this particular case, I probably violated my own rules a bit, for the sake of including something the vast majority of Apes fans may not even realized were published--basically, it was because of their historical value.

            Rich



            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
            > Don't know if you missed this one or not but I really am curious about the reasoning behind including these non licensed comics?
            >
            > Neil
            >
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
            > >
            > > Another thing I am trying to figure out is why some things have been
            > > included. You state that you did not include any fan fics etc. which is
            > > fair enough. You have though included the Argentinean comics which as
            > > far as I am aware were never 'official' releases which in reality makes
            > > them little more than fan fics themselves doesn't it?
            > >
            > > Neil
            > >
            > >
            > > -----Original Message-----
            > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
            > > Of rassmguy
            > > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:40 PM
            > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's
            > > out?
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com,
            > > "Michael & Sally Whitty"
            > > <sallywhitty@> wrote:
            > > > It must have been difficult to draw the line on what to include and
            > > what not to include.
            > >
            > > <mailto:PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=>
            > > .
            > >
            > > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
            > > sgId=52156/stime=1236087579/nc1=3858796/nc2=3848627/nc3=5191954>
            > >
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52416 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com , mlccougar@... wrote:
            > *** Are/were the TV series stories from the UK Annuals included in the book too? ***

            Yep. The following were included in the book:

            * The movies
            * The TV series
            * The cartoons
            * The unpublished TV show scripts
            * Unpublished TV stories outlined in the writer's bible
            * Marvel Comics
            * Marvel UK
            * Unpublished Marvel tales
            * Gold Key's Beneath adaptation
            * All of the novelizations
            * Malibu Comics
            * Unpublished Malibu tales
            * Revolution on the POTA
            * Unpublished Mr. Comics tales
            * The Burton film
            * Dark Horse's Burton-film comics
            * Unpublished Dark Horse tales
            * The novels based on the Burton film
            * Unpublished novels based on the Burton film
            * The Argentine comics
            * Unpublished Argentine comics
            * The heralds released when the films were in theaters
            * The Chad Valley strips
            * The video games
            * The three UK hardcovers
            * The Power Records film adaptations
            * The Power Records TV-show tales
            * The unproduced cartoon based on the TV show
            * Possibly some other items I'm forgetting to mention at the moment
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52417 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            These were published only in Japan, many years ago, and contained adaptations of the first film. They remain the only two POTA comics I don't have, though I did find covers for them in (of all places) a Spanish-language forum for manga fans, and managed to get someone on those forums to translate the titles for me.


            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@...> wrote:
            > Oh yeah, I meant to ask about that - I've never heard about them before...
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
            > > Speaking of which, what's the story behind the two manga editions that you have pictured at the back of the book Rich?
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52418 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            .html Message
            Rich is Boulle's book included? I haven't seen anything from it so far as I have been going through Timelines or have I missed something?
             
            Neil
             
            -----Original Message-----
            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of rassmguy
            Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:38 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, mlccougar@.. . wrote:
            > *** Are/were the TV series stories from the UK Annuals included in the book too? ***

            Yep. The following were included in the book:

            * The movies
            * The TV series
            * The cartoons
            * The unpublished TV show scripts
            * Unpublished TV stories outlined in the writer's bible
            * Marvel Comics
            * Marvel UK
            * Unpublished Marvel tales
            * Gold Key's Beneath adaptation
            * All of the novelizations
            * Malibu Comics
            * Unpublished Malibu tales
            * Revolution on the POTA
            * Unpublished Mr. Comics tales
            * The Burton film
            * Dark Horse's Burton-film comics
            * Unpublished Dark Horse tales
            * The novels based on the Burton film
            * Unpublished novels based on the Burton film
            * The Argentine comics
            * Unpublished Argentine comics
            * The heralds released when the films were in theaters
            * The Chad Valley strips
            * The video games
            * The three UK hardcovers
            * The Power Records film adaptations
            * The Power Records TV-show tales
            * The unproduced cartoon based on the TV show
            * Possibly some other items I'm forgetting to mention at the moment

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52419 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            .html
            are they the Marvel adaptations or different? would love to see those!


            From: rassmguy <handleyr@...>
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 4:16:02 PM
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

            These were published only in Japan, many years ago, and contained adaptations of the first film. They remain the only two POTA comics I don't have, though I did find covers for them in (of all places) a Spanish-language forum for manga fans, and managed to get someone on those forums to translate the titles for me.

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@ ...> wrote:
            > Oh yeah, I meant to ask about that - I've never heard about them before...
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@> wrote:
            > > Speaking of which, what's the story behind the two manga editions that you have pictured at the back of the book Rich?


            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52420 From: Neil Foster Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            .html Message
            I would have thought that most Apes fans would be aware of them these days. They have been heavily publicised both on web sites and in Fan-zines like Scrolls.
             
            Neil
             
            -----Original Message-----
            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of rassmguy
            Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:30 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

            I probably violated my own rules a bit, for the sake of including something the vast majority of Apes fans may not even realized were published--

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52421 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            Just one entry--the last one. :)


            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
            >
            > Rich is Boulle's book included? I haven't seen anything from it so far
            > as I have been going through Timelines or have I missed something?
            >
            > Neil
            >
            >
            > -----Original Message-----
            > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
            > Of rassmguy
            > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:38 AM
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's
            > out?
            >
            >
            >
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com,
            > mlccougar@ wrote:
            > > *** Are/were the TV series stories from the UK Annuals included in the
            > book too? ***
            >
            > Yep. The following were included in the book:
            >
            > * The movies
            > * The TV series
            > * The cartoons
            > * The unpublished TV show scripts
            > * Unpublished TV stories outlined in the writer's bible
            > * Marvel Comics
            > * Marvel UK
            > * Unpublished Marvel tales
            > * Gold Key's Beneath adaptation
            > * All of the novelizations
            > * Malibu Comics
            > * Unpublished Malibu tales
            > * Revolution on the POTA
            > * Unpublished Mr. Comics tales
            > * The Burton film
            > * Dark Horse's Burton-film comics
            > * Unpublished Dark Horse tales
            > * The novels based on the Burton film
            > * Unpublished novels based on the Burton film
            > * The Argentine comics
            > * Unpublished Argentine comics
            > * The heralds released when the films were in theaters
            > * The Chad Valley strips
            > * The video games
            > * The three UK hardcovers
            > * The Power Records film adaptations
            > * The Power Records TV-show tales
            > * The unproduced cartoon based on the TV show
            > * Possibly some other items I'm forgetting to mention at the moment
            >
            > <mailto:PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=>
            > .
            >
            > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
            > sgId=52416/stime=1236710304/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3>
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52422 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            Nope, they're original manga adaptations.


            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
            > are they the Marvel adaptations or different? would love to see those!
            >
            >
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52423 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            .html
            *** Exactly what are these "magna" comics? ***
             
             
             
             
            In a message dated 3/10/09 2:16:32 PM Central Standard Time, handleyr@... writes:
            These were published only in Japan, many years ago, and contained adaptations of the first film. They remain the only two POTA comics I don't have, though I did find covers for them in (of all places) a Spanish-language forum for manga fans, and managed to get someone on those forums to translate the titles for me.

             
            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52424 From: Michael & Sally Whitty Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            .html

            So Taylor has big Mickey Mouse eyes?  J

             


            From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [ PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of rassmguy
            Sent: Wednesday, 11 March 2009 7:18 AM
            To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?

             

            Nope, they're original manga adaptations.

            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@.. .> wrote:

            > are they the Marvel adaptations or different? would love to see those!
            >
            > ____________ _________ _________ __
            > From: rassmguy <handleyr@.. .>
            > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. com
            > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 4:16:02 PM
            > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in
            and what's out?
            >
            >
            > These were published only in
            w:st="on">Japan , many years ago, and contained adaptations of the first film. They remain the only two POTA comics I don't have, though I did find covers for them in (of all places) a Spanish-language forum for manga fans, and managed to get someone on those forums to translate the titles for me.
            >
            > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "nlmoxham" <neilmoxham@
            ...> wrote:
            > > Oh yeah, I meant to ask about that - I've never heard about them
            before...
            > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "Neil Foster"
            <ntfoster@> wrote:
            > > > Speaking of which, what's the story behind the two manga
            editions that you have pictured at the back of the book Rich?
            >

            <.html
            <.html
            Group: potadg Message: 52425 From: rassmguy Date: 3/10/2009
            Subject: Re: Whitty's "Timeline" threads - what's in and what's out?
            .html
            Manga is a popular Japanese comic-book artform. Basically, in manga, everyone looks like the Campbell Soup kids. Think Speed Racer, or other anime-style drawing--that's how manga tends to be drawn as well. (I'm over-simplifying, as I'm sure any manga fan has already figured out, as I'm not a manga fan and know no more about the genre than what I just typed.)


            --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
            > *** Exactly what are these "magna" comics? ***
            >
            >
            > In a message dated 3/10/09 2:16:32 PM Central Standard Time,
            > handleyr@... writes:
            >
            > These were published only in Japan, many years ago, and contained
            > adaptations of the first film. They remain the only two POTA comics I don't have,
            > though I did find covers for them in (of all places) a Spanish-language forum for
            > manga fans, and managed to get someone on those forums to translate the
            > titles for me.
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
            > steps!
            > ( http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219671244x1201345076/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
            > %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
            >
            <.html


            Copyright © 2026, Hunter Goatley. All rights reserved.
            Last updated 2026-03-31 10:44.