.html <.html

.html <.html

Didn't realize Buck Kartalian was on Here Come The Brides. Julius and Urko on the same show. The old shows and movies had so many POTA actors in them

and now James Gregory on The Partridge Family.

Jeff B

On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Jeff Barkley <skintricks62@...> wrote:

Didn't realize Buck Kartalian was on Here Come The Brides. Julius and Urko on the same show. The old shows and movies had so many POTA actors in them

Caught the end of Hang 'em High the other night and saw Mark Lenard's name in the credits. Never noticed he was in it all the times I'd watched it before.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Barkley <skintricks62@...> wrote:
>
> Didn't realize Buck Kartalian was on Here Come The Brides. Julius and Urko
> on the same show. The old shows and movies had so many POTA actors in them
>

.html <.html

Just reminding members that the BTBR files are still available for viewing but you'd better get in quick because they are only up for a limited time and will soon be gone (for good this time).

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Sal & Mick" <smwhitty@...> wrote:
>
> Hurrah!
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
> munkeyman63au
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2012 3:34 PM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>
>
>
>
>
> Well now you can because they are back up in the files section:-
>
> http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Comics/Beware%20The%20Beas
> t%20%27Redux%27/
>
> Neil T.
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> , Tim
> <apefan23@> wrote:
> >
> > I didnt get a chance to compare when the files were up either...i'd love
> to get a look....
>

.html <.html

.html   <.html

.html <.html

.html   <.html

It's possible but I'm not going to be doing it. I'm not wasting more of my time, got better things to do. I was just warning people that the files will be taken down soon and this will be the last chance to see them.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Sal & Mick" <smwhitty@...> wrote:
>> Neil - do we have the technology to maybe do a page at a time, sent in a post to the group, showing the original and the redux and discussing com[parisons?
>

I don't see how it's a problem, you just click on the link to the Files section on the left of the Homepage and then the one for comics, etc. There was even a direct link to the folder in one of the previous posts.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Sal & Mick" <smwhitty@...> wrote:
>
> I approved the rejoin.
>
>
>
> I have the same problem getting into the files.
>
>
>
> That's why I'm thinking the comparative posts...?
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
> Jeff K.
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 January 2012 11:20 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>
>
>
>
>
> I can't get to the files and tried to rejoin but I haven't heard back.
>
>
>
> From: Sal <mailto:smwhitty@...> & Mick
>
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 5:13 PM
>
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>
>
>
>
>
> It would be great of people could just spend a short time looking and giving
> your feedback - good or bad. This took a lot of hard work and we'd really
> like to know if it was worthwhile.
>
> Neil - do we have the technology to maybe do a page at a time, sent in a
> post to the group, showing the original and the redux and discussing
> com[parisons?
>
> Maybe if we do this every couple of days it would be better?
>
> Michael
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
> munkeyman63au
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 January 2012 11:10 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>
>
>
> Just reminding members that the BTBR files are still available for viewing
> but you'd better get in quick because they are only up for a limited time
> and will soon be gone (for good this time).
>
> Neil T.
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> , "Sal &
> Mick" <smwhitty@> wrote:
> >
> > Hurrah!
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
> [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
> Of
> > munkeyman63au
> > Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2012 3:34 PM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well now you can because they are back up in the files section:-
> >
> >
> http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Comics/Beware%20The%20Beas
> > t%20%27Redux%27/
> >
> > Neil T.
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> , Tim
> > <apefan23@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I didnt get a chance to compare when the files were up either...i'd love
> > to get a look....
> >
>

.html <.html

.html <.html

I was just able to download them without a problem. The exact path is:
Files > Comics > Beware The Beast 'Redux'

I'll try to print and read them tonight. Curious as to what and how
much has changed.

Dario

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 04:14:33 +0000, munkeyman63au wrote:
> I don't see how it's a problem, you just click on the link to the
> Files section on the left of the Homepage and then the one for
> comics,
> etc. There was even a direct link to the folder in one of the
> previous
> posts.
>
> Neil T.
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Sal & Mick" <smwhitty@...> wrote:
>>
>> I approved the rejoin.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have the same problem getting into the files.
>>
>>
>>
>> That's why I'm thinking the comparative posts...?
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>>
>> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On
>> Behalf Of
>> Jeff K.
>> Sent: Tuesday, 24 January 2012 11:20 AM
>> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I can't get to the files and tried to rejoin but I haven't heard
>> back.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Sal <mailto:smwhitty@...> & Mick
>>
>> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 5:13 PM
>>
>> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
>>
>> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be great of people could just spend a short time looking
>> and giving
>> your feedback - good or bad. This took a lot of hard work and we'd
>> really
>> like to know if it was worthwhile.
>>
>> Neil - do we have the technology to maybe do a page at a time, sent
>> in a
>> post to the group, showing the original and the redux and discussing
>> com[parisons?
>>
>> Maybe if we do this every couple of days it would be better?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> _____
>>
>> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On
>> Behalf Of
>> munkeyman63au
>> Sent: Tuesday, 24 January 2012 11:10 AM
>> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>>
>>
>>
>> Just reminding members that the BTBR files are still available for
>> viewing
>> but you'd better get in quick because they are only up for a limited
>> time
>> and will soon be gone (for good this time).
>>
>> Neil T.
>>
>> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> ,
>> "Sal &
>> Mick" <smwhitty@> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hurrah!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _____
>> >
>> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
>> [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> ]
>> On Behalf
>> Of
>> > munkeyman63au
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2012 3:34 PM
>> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
>> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Well now you can because they are back up in the files section:-
>> >
>> >
>>
>> http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Comics/Beware%20The%20Beas
>> > t%20%27Redux%27/
>> >
>> > Neil T.
>> >
>> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
>> <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> , Tim
>> > <apefan23@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I didnt get a chance to compare when the files were up
>> either...i'd love
>> > to get a look....
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

.html <.html

.html <.html

.html <.html

.html <.html

Seriously? You didn't notice the word and thought balloons, changed or rearranged art panels and some changed dialog to help the flow of the story from what were originally 3 page episodes?!?

I despair at times, I really do.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> I just re read this awesome story....and love it still! But I compared it to the printed version I had and didn't see any differences! What was I looking for again??
> Really great stuff there guys!
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>

.html

It's simple really, it didn't deserve (or get) a whole bunch of Oscar nominations because it's not very good.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: Jeff K.
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:58 AM
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com ; PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Goooo WETA!
>
>
> Well, it was a pretty bad year for apes at the Oscars. "Rise" got the expected Visual FX nom but that's it. Even "Project Nim" didn't get a nomination. Andy Serkis didn't get one for Best Supporting Actor (nor did the expected Albert Brooks) but the campaign for him and the dialogue about motion capture was still historic. So "Rise" takes a backseat to the original POTA re: Oscar.
> "So be it". - - - Ursus
>

Good picture, shows how the CG artists have completely changed the expression on his face. Mouth, eyes especially look totally different when compared side by side. The closest thing is the slightly raised eyebrow. So who's performance was it?

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
>
> Someone managed to snap a picture of Andy Serkis as he was learning the news this morning that he didn't get an Oscar nomination. He was with a simian friend at the time and they were getting ready to celebrate his "victory". Better luck next time, Andy.
>
> http://www.riseoftheplanetoftheapes.com/weta_gallery/album/slides/weta15.html"
>

The smart thing to do would have been to make a smart movie in the first place, they had the time and the resources but they didn't they made a dumb one with massive plot holes and crap editing etc. etc.
No surprise to me that it's not getting huge Oscar recognition. I know standards have dropped in the modern era but come on, it is no where near being an Oscar winning movie.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> The smart thing to do was to give Andy a nomination. And even if the academy isn't ready to give an Oscar for motion capture, at least the hype and the hoopla surrounding the nomination would have at least made the Oscars a bit more interesting to watch this year.
> Â
> Now all of America and the world are headed for another boring ass Oscar night.
> And believe me, it will be boring. Thank God for TIVO. Fast Forward to Best Visual Effects, please. lol
> Â
> Al
> Â
> Â
>
>
>

.html

Dream on.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> I think one out of every 1 million people would agree with you on that. lol
> Â
> Al
>
>
> > >

.html

Reminder from:		PotaDG Yahoo! Group
Title:		Gregory Sierra's Birthday
Date:		Wednesday January 25, 2012
Time:		All Day
Repeats:		This event repeats every year.
Notes:		Happy Birthday Gregory! (Verger: Beneath the Planet of the Apes (1970))
Yahoo! Greetings:		Send a Yahoo! Greeting
Yahoo! Shopping:		Browse Yahoo! Shopping Gift Guide
Get reminders on your mobile, Yahoo! Messenger, and email. Edit reminder options

Copyright © 2012  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | <.html

.html

I really hate to sound negative and stuff...but Neil...you are spot on! I feel like I'm one of the handful of individuals who weren't particularly impressed by Rise. Sometimes I have to hold back and not post anything...for fear of the poo flinging.....

:)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:28 PM, munkeyman63au < ntfoster@...> wrote:

It's simple really, it didn't deserve (or get) a whole bunch of Oscar nominations because it's not very good.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: Jeff K.
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:58 AM
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com ; PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Goooo WETA!
>
>
> Well, it was a pretty bad year for apes at the Oscars. "Rise" got the expected Visual FX nom but that's it. Even "Project Nim" didn't get a nomination. Andy Serkis didn't get one for Best Supporting Actor (nor did the expected Albert Brooks) but the campaign for him and the dialogue about motion capture was still historic. So "Rise" takes a backseat to the original POTA re: Oscar.
> "So be it". - - - Ursus
>

I agree too that the special Oscar for the makeup was due to the campaigning...

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:06 AM, jessica rotich <jessicarotich@... > wrote:

I really hate to sound negative and stuff...but Neil...you are spot on! I feel like I'm one of the handful of individuals who weren't particularly impressed by Rise. Sometimes I have to hold back and not post anything...for fear of the poo flinging.....

:)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:28 PM, munkeyman63au < ntfoster@...> wrote:

It's simple really, it didn't deserve (or get) a whole bunch of Oscar nominations because it's not very good.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff K." <veetus@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: Jeff K.
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:58 AM
> To: pota@yahoogroups.com ; PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Goooo WETA!
>
>
> Well, it was a pretty bad year for apes at the Oscars. "Rise" got the expected Visual FX nom but that's it. Even "Project Nim" didn't get a nomination. Andy Serkis didn't get one for Best Supporting Actor (nor did the expected Albert Brooks) but the campaign for him and the dialogue about motion capture was still historic. So "Rise" takes a backseat to the original POTA re: Oscar.
> "So be it". - - - Ursus
>

.html <.html

.html <.html

ha ha ha that's very funny Jeff.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Jeff K. <veetus@...> wrote:

Someone managed to snap a picture of Andy Serkis as he was learning the news this morning that he didn't get an Oscar nomination. He was with a simian friend at the time and they were getting ready to celebrate his "victory". Better luck next time, Andy.

http://www.riseoftheplanetoftheapes.com/weta_gallery/album/slides/weta15.html"

.html <.html

.html

I have to have Tim's back on this. I haven't commented because when I looked at the "redux" I didn't notice the changes either. Maybe I expected something more drastic & I had not read it in some time but I didn't see it. I too didn't look at them side by side but will when I get a chance. Sorry Neil. I hate when you two start to get discouraged & lash out but as someone who reads comics regularly I am surpised I didn't notice the changes.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> Don't despair Neil...I was looking at them two different times...I was looking mostly at the art....
>
>
>
> > >

For a start no one is 'lashing out' certainly not me and to tell the truth I'm a little bit offended by you intimating that.

I just can not understand how someone looking at the thing can not see that it now has word and thought balloons for a start when the original only had word boxes for everything, apart from the other little art changes.

Granted they're not big changes for the most part because we did not want to completely rewrite and change the story, we just wanted to make it flow better instead of having little 'cliff-hangers' every 3 pages and to fix a few things that some readers originally bitched about.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "drzaiusdavis" <DrZaiusDavis@...> wrote:
>
> I have to have Tim's back on this. I haven't commented because when I looked at the "redux" I didn't notice the changes either. Maybe I expected something more drastic & I had not read it in some time but I didn't see it. I too didn't look at them side by side but will when I get a chance. Sorry Neil. I hate when you two start to get discouraged & lash out but as someone who reads comics regularly I am surpised I didn't notice the changes.
>
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@> wrote:
> >
> > Don't despair Neil...I was looking at them two different times...I was looking mostly at the art....
> >
> >
> >
> > > > >

Sorry again Neil.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "munkeyman63au" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> For a start no one is 'lashing out' certainly not me and to tell the truth I'm a little bit offended by you intimating that.
>
> I just can not understand how someone looking at the thing can not see that it now has word and thought balloons for a start when the original only had word boxes for everything, apart from the other little art changes.
>
> Granted they're not big changes for the most part because we did not want to completely rewrite and change the story, we just wanted to make it flow better instead of having little 'cliff-hangers' every 3 pages and to fix a few things that some readers originally bitched about.
>
> Neil T.
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "drzaiusdavis" <DrZaiusDavis@> wrote:
> >
> > I have to have Tim's back on this. I haven't commented because when I looked at the "redux" I didn't notice the changes either. Maybe I expected something more drastic & I had not read it in some time but I didn't see it. I too didn't look at them side by side but will when I get a chance. Sorry Neil. I hate when you two start to get discouraged & lash out but as someone who reads comics regularly I am surpised I didn't notice the changes.
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Don't despair Neil...I was looking at them two different times...I was looking mostly at the art....
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > >

.html

Not negative just truthful. Now from Apes fans I'm seeing a lot of stuff like 'the Oscars are a joke' 'going to be boring as heck' etc. etc. just because the motion capture bloke didn't get nominated. Toys being thrown out of the pram time.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, jessica rotich <jessicarotich@...> wrote:
>
> I really hate to sound negative and stuff...but Neil...you are spot on! I
> feel like I'm one of the handful of individuals who weren't particularly
> impressed by Rise. Sometimes I have to hold back and not post
> anything...for fear of the poo flinging.....

Yep, really looking forward to hearing the views of the 4 or 5 people who still participate on this group.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Sal & Mick" <smwhitty@...> wrote:
>
> They are really subtle but we thought they were necessary – hence the need
> for feedback! :-)

.html   <.html

.html <.html

.html <.html

.html <.html

.html <.html

.html <.html

Not trying to be a smart arse here but so many of them are painfully obvious. If not here's a few to be starting with:-

http://movieplotholes.com/rise-of-the-planet-of-the-apes.html"

And there's many, many more!

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, chimel23@... wrote:
>
> Can someone post or offlist-mail a page on what the plot holes were that were so big? I think we've been over a few, but I'm still not sure what all of them were that everyone keeps referring to. I'm not certain why, either.
>
> Thanks
> Mel
>

I'm assuming that Jeff means when Gideon is being chased by the humans and he gets lost in the dark when night falls. He gets lost and disorientated because it's dark and he can't see where he is. Pretty self explanatory why the humans couldn't find him to kill him I think.

Neil T.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Sal & Mick" <smwhitty@...> wrote:
>
> Actually I'm fairly sure it was just Gideon and his rifle chasing down a
> solitary human that night but I'll check to see if there is a plot hole.
>
>
>
> If there is, it will be fixed before being released to the paying public (as
> plot holes should be!).
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of
> Jeff K.
> Sent: Thursday, 26 January 2012 10:16 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, I prefer the new version. It looks more professional.
>
> I didn't buy that he could fend off all those humans by himself. And why
> didn't they kill him at night? Plot holes!
>
> Liked the ending and the artwork was good. You ought to be in "pictures".
>
>
>
> From: Sal <mailto:smwhitty@...> & Mick
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 2:13 PM
>
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>
>
>
>
>
> Maybe you printed the redux?
>
> The major difference is the LETTERING and in particular the placement of the
> words/the existence of word and thought BOXES (character actually SPEAKING
> rather than a box for commentator and thoughts/words from Gideon).
>
> You should see changes...
>
> Michael
>
> _____
>
> From: <mailto:PotaDG@yahoogroups.com> PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tim "apefan"
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2012 7:44 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>
>
>
> I just re read this awesome story....and love it still! But I compared it to
> the printed version I had and didn't see any differences! What was I looking
> for again??
>
> Really great stuff there guys!
>
> Tim
>
> _____
>
> From: munkeyman63au <ntfoster@...>
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 8:10 PM
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
>
>
>
> Just reminding members that the BTBR files are still available for viewing
> but you'd better get in quick because they are only up for a limited time
> and will soon be gone (for good this time).
>
> Neil T.
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> , "Sal &
> Mick" <smwhitty@> wrote:
> >
> > Hurrah!
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
> [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
> Of
> > munkeyman63au
> > Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2012 3:34 PM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Beware The Beast Redux question
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well now you can because they are back up in the files section:-
> >
> >
> http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/Comics/Beware%20The%20Beas
> > t%20%27Redux%27/
> >
> > Neil T.
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> , Tim
> > <apefan23@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I didnt get a chance to compare when the files were up either...i'd love
> > to get a look....
> >
>

.html <.html

.html   <.html

.html   <.html

.html   <.html

.html <.html

40 gun salute in Ape City! Hurray!

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Jeff K. <veetus@...> wrote:

Indeed.

From: Sal & Mick

Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:10 AM

To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com

Subject: [PotaDG] Happy Australia Day!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia_Day

.html   <.html

.html <.html

.html <.html

.html   <.html

.html <.html

.html <.html

.html <.html