|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39868 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39869 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 12/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39870 |
From: James |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39871 |
From: thadesdarlinghuman |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Halloween, 2003... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39872 |
From: James |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39873 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Monkey business |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39874 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39875 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Monkey business |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39876 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/9/2006 |
| Subject: Power Records POTA on You Tube |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39877 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/9/2006 |
| Subject: who built the Alpha Omega bomb? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39878 |
From: Ty Templeton |
Date: 12/9/2006 |
| Subject: Re: who built the Alpha Omega bomb? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39879 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/9/2006 |
| Subject: Michael Clarke Duncan's Birthday , 12/10/2006, 12:00 am |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39880 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 12/10/2006 |
| Subject: gorilla extinction |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39881 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/10/2006 |
| Subject: Re: gorilla extinction |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39882 |
From: rberk1382 |
Date: 12/10/2006 |
| Subject: Mort Abrahams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39883 |
From: James |
Date: 12/10/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39884 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39885 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Revolution Rocks! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39886 |
From: Cornelius718@aol.com |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39887 |
From: rberk1382@aol.com |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39888 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39889 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39890 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39891 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Message in a bottle when and h |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39892 |
From: James |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Message in a bottle when and h |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39893 |
From: James |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39894 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Richard D. Zanuck's Birthday , 12/13/2006, 12:00 am |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39895 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39896 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: who built the Alpha Omega bomb? |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39897 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: BENEATH trivia |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39898 |
From: Ty Templeton |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39899 |
From: brendan486 |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Power Records POTA on You Tube |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39900 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39901 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 113 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39902 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: GOOD news |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39903 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/14/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39904 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/14/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39905 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/14/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39906 |
From: gp3085 |
Date: 12/14/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams and Simian Scrolls |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39907 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/15/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Power Records POTA on You Tube |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39908 |
From: James |
Date: 12/15/2006 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39909 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/16/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39910 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/16/2006 |
| Subject: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39911 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/17/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39912 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/17/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39913 |
From: James |
Date: 12/17/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39914 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39915 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39916 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39917 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39918 |
From: brendan486 |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39919 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39920 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39921 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/19/2006 |
| Subject: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39922 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/19/2006 |
| Subject: NEW TO THE POTA MESSAGE BOARD |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39923 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 114 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39924 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39925 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Re: NEW TO THE POTA MESSAGE BOARD |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39926 |
From: p3murds@aol.com |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Re: NEW TO THE POTA MESSAGE BOARD |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39927 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Re: NEW TO THE POTA MESSAGE BOARD |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39928 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: APE CITY WEBSITE |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39929 |
From: James |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: APE CITY WEBSITE |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39930 |
From: James |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39931 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39932 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39933 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39934 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: APE CITY WEBSITE |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39935 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: APE CITY WEBSITE |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39936 |
From: brendan486 |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39937 |
From: Robert J. Sawyer |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39938 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39939 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39940 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39941 |
From: James |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39942 |
From: James |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39943 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Estella Warren's Birthday , 12/23/2006, 12:00 am |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39944 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Estella Warren's Birthday  , 12/23/2006, 12:00 am |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39945 |
From: brendan486 |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39946 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Estella Warren's Birthday  , 12/23/2006, 12:00 am |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39947 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Happy Holidays everyone... |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39948 |
From: p3murds@aol.com |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Re: [POTA] Re: Estella Warren's Birthday  , 12/23/2006, 12:0 |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39949 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Merry Christmas |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39950 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Holiday |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39951 |
From: john rutkoski |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Holiday |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39952 |
From: john rutkoski |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Merry Christmas |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39953 |
From: Robert J. Sawyer |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39954 |
From: theskulpter |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39955 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Have a Merry Christmas :-) |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39956 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39957 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39958 |
From: Robert J. Sawyer |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39959 |
From: Judy Watson |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39960 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Planet of the Apes 1968, 12/25/2006, 2:00 am |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39961 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39962 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39963 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39964 |
From: Robert J. Sawyer |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39965 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/26/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39966 |
From: theskulpter |
Date: 12/26/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39967 |
From: theskulpter |
Date: 12/26/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39868 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
.htmlyes the one on the left seems to be looking in a
particular direction and enjoying it!! I wonder what
Merou is doing in that pose tho? The whole magazine is
illustrated by the same person altho it doesn't say
who it is....all a bit risque as it is a men's pulp
mag.....there is one of a stripper dancing for a drunk
man in another story....
Tim
--- brendan486 < nzape@...> wrote:
> Pretty cool Tim. I hadn't seen these before and
> thanks for the nude
> picture alert.Fortunately the Human male didn't turn
> around, but I
> am wondering why the Gorillas are smiling.
> Brendan.
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\""
> <apefan23@...> wrote:
> >
> > I won this magazine on ebay.....It is "Bizarre!
> > Mystery Magazine" Vol.1 No. 2 November 1965 and
> > features a new story by Pierre Boulle. Not sure
> how
> > condensed it is.....I see right off the bat Jinn
> and
> > Phyllis are not in it...It says "Complete Short
> Novel"
> > on the cover...Not sure what that means!! It is
> called
> > Planet of the Apes in the mag and there are only
> two
> > illustrations... enclosed here....NAKED people
> > alert!!...which sort of look like the Hungarian
> > drawings...maybe they are! ......someone might
> have
> > shared these before but I hadn't seen them...
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
_________
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39869 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 12/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
.htmlI'm not seeing any picture...Are they in the Files section?...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> I won this magazine on ebay.....It is "Bizarre!
> Mystery Magazine" Vol.1 No. 2 November 1965 and
> features a new story by Pierre Boulle. Not sure how
> condensed it is.....I see right off the bat Jinn and
> Phyllis are not in it...It says "Complete Short Novel"
> on the cover...Not sure what that means!! It is called
> Planet of the Apes in the mag and there are only two
> illustrations... enclosed here....NAKED people
> alert!!...which sort of look like the Hungarian
> drawings...maybe they are! ......someone might have
> shared these before but I hadn't seen them...
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
__________
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39870 |
From: James |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
.htmlThey can be seen by clicking here: http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/spnew
Thanks to Tim for sharing them with us.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "hotscheetz" <HotScheetz@...> wrote: > > I'm not seeing any picture...Are they in the Files section?... > > G > > --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" apefan23@ wrote: > > > > I won this magazine on ebay.....It is "Bizarre! > > Mystery Magazine" Vol.1 No. 2 November 1965 and > > features a new story by Pierre Boulle. Not sure how > > condensed it is.....I see right off the bat Jinn and > > Phyllis are not in it...It says "Complete Short Novel" > > on the cover...Not sure what that means!! It is called > > Planet of the Apes in the mag and there are only two > > illustrations... enclosed here....NAKED people > > alert!!...which sort of look like the Hungarian
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39871 |
From: thadesdarlinghuman |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Halloween, 2003... |
|
.html All together I paid almost 200.00 bucks for the POTA mask: latex,
makeup, the works, plus some sh!T that was much stronger than rubber
cement. In fact it had a special adhesive relaxer called "Bondoff".
So anyway, I had a lot of laughs on the way to work wearing this
full ape prosthesis, all the way to real hair and that, not to mention
I had on a pair of sunglasses and was followed and pulled up next to
just to get a better look.
Wrinkle the nose, show some teeth and they drove off with a leary
not...
I work in liquor store you can imagine what my "regular"
customers were going through(I believe a few joined A.A.!). It was all
fine and dandy until I dropped a keg on a sandaled foot(MINE!). Oh,
black and blue and sore as hell but I was not about to go to ER like
that, so I hobbled through until 12:00 am and went home and that was
where I forgot about how badly my foot ached...
This was some really strong stuff I had stuck on my face! It took
an hour and a half to rip the mask off of my face and in between the
breaks of pulling, I looked like a leper... Big hunks of skin hanging
off of my face, ya know?
By the time I yanked it all of with the help of "Bond off", the top
of my foot was as black as a bowling ball but there were no broken
bones! I went back to work the next day and was really careful about
dropping those kegs so that if they bounced they did not use my foot
as a buffer...
Masks are fun as long as you can simply lift them over your head.
Just don't glue 'em to your face like I did... ;}
Truly,
Thade's Darling Human <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39872 |
From: James |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver |
.htmlThe new LESSON FROM THE LAWGIVER is now available. This is part four in our multi-part LESSON. Thanks to Glen and all who contributed.
To view the LESSON click on the banner on the Yahoo Home page or click this link: http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/LFTL.htm.
Visit all the Group's special features including:
Also, be sure to join our sub-groups:
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39873 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Monkey business |
|
.html Reading Boulle's Monkey Planet for the first time in years I noticed
that the narrative suddenly switches from past to present tense half
way through chapter 27...
Deliberate or a translation error?
CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN
I woke early after a restless night. I turned over three or four times
in my bed and rubbed my eyes before fully recovering consciousness,
still unaccustomed to the civilized I life I had been leading for a
month, feeling anxious every morning at not hearing the straw creak
and not feeling Nova's warmth against me.
I eventually came to my senses. I was living in one of the most
comfortable apartments in the institute. The apes had proved extremely
generous. I had a bedroom, a bathroom, clothes, books, a television
set. I read all the papers, I was free, I could go out, walk about the
streets, attend any entertainment. My presence in a public place still
provoked considerable interest, but the emotion of the first few days
had started to die down.
Cornelius was now the scientific head of the institute. Zaius had been
dismissedhe had been given another post, however, and a new
decorationand Zira's fianc6 installed in his place. This had resulted
in a reorganization of the personnel, a general promotion of the
chimpanzee element, and renewed activity in every department Zira had
become the new director's assistant.
As for me, I took part in the scientist's research work, no longer as
a guinea pig but as a collaborator. However, it was only with great
difficulty and after much hesitation on the part of the Grand Council
that Cornelius had been granted this favor. The authorities still
appeared reluctant to admit my nature and origin.
I dressed quickly, left my room, and walked over to the wing of the
institute where I had once been a prisoner: the department under Zira,
who was still directing it in addition to her new duties. With
Cornelius' permission ; I had embarked there on a systematic study of
the men.
***And then...***
Here I am in the room with the cages, walking along the corridor in
front of the bars like one of the masters of this planet. Shall I
admit that I come here frequently, more frequently than my duties
demand? There are times when I feel burdened by constantly simian
surroundings, and here I find a sort of refuge.
The captives are well acquainted with me now and recognize my
authority. Do they see any difference between me, Zira, and the
warders who bring them their food? I should like to think so, but I
doubt it. For the last month, despite my patience and efforts, I, too,
have been unsuccessful in making them achieve any higher level of
performance than that of well-trained animals. A secret intuition
tells me, however, that their potentialities are enormous.
I should like to teach them to talk. This is my great ambition. I have
not succeeded, I admit. It is only with the utmost difficulty that
some of them manage to repeat a monosyllabic sound or two, which
certain chimpanzees on Earth can do. It is not much, but I am
persevering. What encourages me is the new persistence with which
their eyes try to meet mine, eyes which for some time have seemed to
be gradually changing in expression. I fancy I can see in them a spark
of curiosity, associated with a superior mentality, breaking through
the animal mindlessness.
I move slowly around the room, stopping in front of each of the
captives. I speak to them; I speak to them gently, patiently. They are
now accustomed to this unusual behavior on my part. They seem to
listen. I go on for several minutes, then stop speaking in whole
sentences and pronounce a few simple words, repeating them over and
over again, hoping for an echo. One of them clumsily articulates a
syllable, but this is as far as he will go today. The subject soon
gets tired, abandons the superhuman task, and lies down on the floor
as though after some exhausting effort. I sigh and pass on to the next
one. I finally come to the cage in which Nova is at present vegetating
in solitary sadness. Sadnessthis at least is what I, with my
Earthman's conceit, wish to believe, and I struggle to detect this
emotion on her beautiful but inexpressive features. Zira has not given
her another mate, and I am grateful for that.
Dave <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39874 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
.htmlThanks, James...Is there any way to have the entire story scanned and
put into the Files for everyone?...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
>
>
> They can be seen by clicking here:
> http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/spnew
> <http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/spnew>
>
> Thanks to Tim for sharing them with us.
>
>
>
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "hotscheetz" <HotScheetz@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not seeing any picture...Are they in the Files section?...
> >
> > G
> >
> > --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" apefan23@ wrote:
> > >
> > > I won this magazine on ebay.....It is "Bizarre!
> > > Mystery Magazine" Vol.1 No. 2 November 1965 and
> > > features a new story by Pierre Boulle. Not sure how
> > > condensed it is.....I see right off the bat Jinn and
> > > Phyllis are not in it...It says "Complete Short Novel"
> > > on the cover...Not sure what that means!! It is called
> > > Planet of the Apes in the mag and there are only two
> > > illustrations... enclosed here....NAKED people
> > > alert!!...which sort of look like the Hungarian
> > > drawings...maybe they are! ......someone might have
> > > shared these before but I hadn't seen them...
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
__________
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39875 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 12/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Monkey business |
.htmlI always felt it was deliberate...It changes the pace of the story,
making it more immediate...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Dave B" <smugster2000@...> wrote:
>
> Reading Boulle's Monkey Planet for the first time in years I noticed
> that the narrative suddenly switches from past to present tense half
> way through chapter 27...
>
> Deliberate or a translation error?
>
>
> CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN
>
> I woke early after a restless night. I turned over three or four
times
> in my bed and rubbed my eyes before fully recovering consciousness,
> still unaccustomed to the civilized I life I had been leading for
a
> month, feeling anxious every morning at not hearing the straw creak
> and not feeling Nova's warmth against me.
>
> I eventually came to my senses. I was living in one of the most
> comfortable apartments in the institute. The apes had proved
extremely
> generous. I had a bedroom, a bathroom, clothes, books, a television
> set. I read all the papers, I was free, I could go out, walk about
the
> streets, attend any entertainment. My presence in a public place
still
> provoked considerable interest, but the emotion of the first few
days
> had started to die down.
>
> Cornelius was now the scientific head of the institute. Zaius had
been
> dismissedhe had been given another post, however, and a new
> decorationand Zira's fianc6 installed in his place. This had
resulted
> in a reorganization of the personnel, a general promotion of the
> chimpanzee element, and renewed activity in every department Zira
had
> become the new director's assistant.
>
> As for me, I took part in the scientist's research work, no longer
as
> a guinea pig but as a collaborator. However, it was only with great
> difficulty and after much hesitation on the part of the Grand
Council
> that Cornelius had been granted this favor. The authorities still
> appeared reluctant to admit my nature and origin.
> I dressed quickly, left my room, and walked over to the wing of the
> institute where I had once been a prisoner: the department under
Zira,
> who was still directing it in addition to her new duties. With
> Cornelius' permission ; I had embarked there on a systematic study
of
> the men.
>
> ***And then...***
>
> Here I am in the room with the cages, walking along the corridor in
> front of the bars like one of the masters of this planet. Shall I
> admit that I come here frequently, more frequently than my duties
> demand? There are times when I feel burdened by constantly simian
> surroundings, and here I find a sort of refuge.
>
> The captives are well acquainted with me now and recognize my
> authority. Do they see any difference between me, Zira, and the
> warders who bring them their food? I should like to think so, but I
> doubt it. For the last month, despite my patience and efforts, I,
too,
> have been unsuccessful in making them achieve any higher level of
> performance than that of well-trained animals. A secret intuition
> tells me, however, that their potentialities are enormous.
>
> I should like to teach them to talk. This is my great ambition. I
have
> not succeeded, I admit. It is only with the utmost difficulty that
> some of them manage to repeat a monosyllabic sound or two, which
> certain chimpanzees on Earth can do. It is not much, but I am
> persevering. What encourages me is the new persistence with which
> their eyes try to meet mine, eyes which for some time have seemed to
> be gradually changing in expression. I fancy I can see in them a
spark
> of curiosity, associated with a superior mentality, breaking through
> the animal mindlessness.
>
> I move slowly around the room, stopping in front of each of the
> captives. I speak to them; I speak to them gently, patiently. They
are
> now accustomed to this unusual behavior on my part. They seem to
> listen. I go on for several minutes, then stop speaking in whole
> sentences and pronounce a few simple words, repeating them over and
> over again, hoping for an echo. One of them clumsily articulates a
> syllable, but this is as far as he will go today. The subject soon
> gets tired, abandons the superhuman task, and lies down on the floor
> as though after some exhausting effort. I sigh and pass on to the
next
> one. I finally come to the cage in which Nova is at present
vegetating
> in solitary sadness. Sadnessthis at least is what I, with my
> Earthman's conceit, wish to believe, and I struggle to detect this
> emotion on her beautiful but inexpressive features. Zira has not
given
> her another mate, and I am grateful for that.
>
> Dave
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39876 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/9/2006 |
| Subject: Power Records POTA on You Tube |
| Group: pota |
Message: 39877 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/9/2006 |
| Subject: who built the Alpha Omega bomb? |
|
.html While thinking about the POTA timeline earlier today, I realized
something that I'm not sure has been addressed or not. In REVOLUTION,
Breck says that he "conceived, commissioned, and funded" (or something to
that effect) the Doomsday bomb, which implies that it was built when
Breck was in a position of power. So then, how did Taylor (in BENEATH)
know about it's existence? He would have had to know when he left Earth,
which is almost 20 years prior to CONQUEST/REVOLUTION. Even
conservatively placing Breck at 40/45 years of age during CONQUEST, I
can't see him having that kind of power when he was in his early 20's.
Thoughts, anyone?
Chris L. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39878 |
From: Ty Templeton |
Date: 12/9/2006 |
| Subject: Re: who built the Alpha Omega bomb? |
.htmlI always felt Breck was bragging a bit, and that he had been INVOLVED in the government project (as was Taylor) but the funding and design certainly came from the taxpayer. No doubt Taylor and Breck knew each other, as did Hasslein.
Ty the Guy. Plotting, not dialogue. On 12/9/06, Chris Lawless <lawford42@...> wrote:
While thinking about the POTA timeline earlier today, I realized
something that I'm not sure has been addressed or not. In REVOLUTION,
Breck says that he "conceived, commissioned, and funded" (or something to
that effect) the Doomsday bomb, which implies that it was built when
Breck was in a position of power. So then, how did Taylor (in BENEATH)
know about it's existence? He would have had to know when he left Earth,
which is almost 20 years prior to CONQUEST/REVOLUTION. Even
conservatively placing Breck at 40/45 years of age during CONQUEST, I
can't see him having that kind of power when he was in his early 20's.
Thoughts, anyone?
Chris L.
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39879 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/9/2006 |
| Subject: Michael Clarke Duncan's Birthday , 12/10/2006, 12:00 am |
.html.html
| Reminder from: |
|
pota's Calendar |
| Title: |
|
Michael Clarke Duncan's Birthday |
| Date: |
|
Sunday December 10, 2006 |
| Time: |
|
All Day
|
| Repeats: |
|
This event repeats every year. |
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39880 |
From: taebokitti@aol.com |
Date: 12/10/2006 |
| Subject: gorilla extinction |
|
.html .html
I was just reading on the internet that 5,000 gorillas have died from the ebola virus, not good news. Elaine<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39881 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/10/2006 |
| Subject: Re: gorilla extinction |
.htmlYes I heard that on NPR....chimps dying as well....
Tim
--- taebokitti@... wrote:
> I was just reading on the internet that 5,000
> gorillas have died from the
> ebola virus, not good news. Elaine
>
________________________
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39882 |
From: rberk1382 |
Date: 12/10/2006 |
| Subject: Mort Abrahams |
|
.html Hello. I am Mort Abrahams niece. I am trying to find out if there is
more than one version of Behind the Planet of the Apes. I have a
recollection of seeing a version on TV that consisted mostly of
interaction with my uncle. The version I recently viewed on the 35th
Anniversary DVD seems different. Is it my memory? Or is it reality?
I emailed Terry Hoknes with this question and he suggested that I
contact you all.
By the way, my uncle, now 90, is terrific, and living in the LA area.
He is still a voting member of the Motion Picture Academy, and a sharp
and vigorous person. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39883 |
From: James |
Date: 12/10/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
.htmlI believe the DVD version added 10 to 15 minutes to the film that was
not shown on TV.
It is good to hear that your uncle is doing so well. There are so few
of the original cast and crew still around anymore. Please be sure and
give him our warmest regards.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "rberk1382" <rberk1382@...> wrote:
>
> Hello. I am Mort Abrahams niece. I am trying to find out if there
is
> more than one version of Behind the Planet of the Apes. I have a
> recollection of seeing a version on TV that consisted mostly of
> interaction with my uncle. The version I recently viewed on the 35th
> Anniversary DVD seems different. Is it my memory? Or is it
reality?
> I emailed Terry Hoknes with this question and he suggested that I
> contact you all.
>
> By the way, my uncle, now 90, is terrific, and living in the LA
area.
> He is still a voting member of the Motion Picture Academy, and a
sharp
> and vigorous person.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39884 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
.htmlUs hairy monkeys at Simian Scrolls can vouch for Mort being sharp and
intelligent--he's given us a wonderful interview that will grace the
next issue of Scrolls, due out early next year.Mort is a living legend!
John, Scrolls.
>
> Hello. I am Mort Abrahams niece. I am trying to find out if there
is
> more than one version of Behind the Planet of the Apes. I have a
> recollection of seeing a version on TV that consisted mostly of
> interaction with my uncle. The version I recently viewed on the 35th
> Anniversary DVD seems different. Is it my memory? Or is it
reality?
> I emailed Terry Hoknes with this question and he suggested that I
> contact you all.
>
> By the way, my uncle, now 90, is terrific, and living in the LA
area.
> He is still a voting member of the Motion Picture Academy, and a
sharp
> and vigorous person.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39885 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Revolution Rocks! |
|
.html Mr.Comics' Revolution has a really good review in Jack Kirby Collector
#47( Kirby's Kamandi is viewed as 'DCs Planet of the Apes' by
many).They say 'the expert upstarts at Mr. Comics make it worth the
trip and describe the series as 'an impressive job'.From the home of
Kirby, that's praise indeed. Now I'm even more rabid for the trade
paperback! John, Scrolls. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39886 |
From: Cornelius718@aol.com |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
.html.html
When next year and how can I get a copy?
-----Original Message-----
From: john@...
To: pota@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:32 AM
Subject: [POTA] Re: Mort Abrahams
Us hairy monkeys at Simian Scrolls can vouch for Mort being sharp and
intelligent- -he's given us a wonderful interview that will grace the
next issue of Scrolls, due out early next year.Mort is a living legend!
John, Scrolls.
>
> Hello. I am Mort Abrahams niece. I am trying to find out if there
is
> more than one version of Behind the Planet of the Apes. I have a
> recollection of seeing a version on TV that consisted mostly of
> interaction with my uncle. The version I recently viewed on the 35th
> Anniversary DVD seems different. Is it my memory? Or is it
reality?
> I emailed Terry Hoknes with this question and he suggested that I
> contact you all.
>
> By the way, my uncle, now 90, is terrific, and living in the LA
area.
> He is still a voting member of the Motion Picture Academy, and a
sharp
> and vigorous person.
>
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39887 |
From: rberk1382@aol.com |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
.html
.html
And when can I get a copy of Mort Abrahams
interview? <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39888 |
From: hotscheetz |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
.htmlTim, Is there a way you can scan the whole story, and post it here?...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> I won this magazine on ebay.....It is "Bizarre!
> Mystery Magazine" Vol.1 No. 2 November 1965 and
> features a new story by Pierre Boulle. Not sure how
> condensed it is.....I see right off the bat Jinn and
> Phyllis are not in it...It says "Complete Short Novel"
> on the cover...Not sure what that means!! It is called
> Planet of the Apes in the mag and there are only two
> illustrations... enclosed here....NAKED people
> alert!!...which sort of look like the Hungarian
> drawings...maybe they are! ......someone might have
> shared these before but I hadn't seen them...
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
__________
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39889 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/11/2006 |
| Subject: Re: speaking of Monkey Planet |
.htmlI could....Hunter actually offered to host it.....I
haven't compared it to the novel yet....but since it
is from the novel I thought that it might be
repetitive since the novel is readily
available...those were the only two
illustrations....but I can if there is interest...have
to find time to scan!
Tim
--- hotscheetz < HotScheetz@...> wrote:
> Tim, Is there a way you can scan the whole story,
> and post it here?...
>
> G
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\""
> <apefan23@...> wrote:
> >
> > I won this magazine on ebay.....It is "Bizarre!
> > Mystery Magazine" Vol.1 No. 2 November 1965 and
> > features a new story by Pierre Boulle. Not sure
> how
> > condensed it is.....I see right off the bat Jinn
> and
> > Phyllis are not in it...It says "Complete Short
> Novel"
> > on the cover...Not sure what that means!! It is
> called
> > Planet of the Apes in the mag and there are only
> two
> > illustrations... enclosed here....NAKED people
> > alert!!...which sort of look like the Hungarian
> > drawings...maybe they are! ......someone might
> have
> > shared these before but I hadn't seen them...
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
__________
________________________
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39890 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
.htmlWe're aiming at Feb 2007 and ordering details will appear on this
Group, courtesy of the lovely James.We have, courtesy of the even more
lovely Kass(please don't tell her I said that) a US ordering option.
We'll keep everyone posted.We've learned over the years that Christmas
and New Year must be avoided as release dates!Mort's niece is entitled
to a free copy for having such a great uncle, so if we get a postal
address, that would be our pleasure. John, Scrolls.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39891 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Message in a bottle when and h |
|
.html Upon re-reading the conclusion of Boulle's original Novel I found
myself wondering how Merou managed to get that bottle, containing his
message, back into space.
Dave <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39892 |
From: James |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Message in a bottle when and h |
.htmlI always imagined that Nova and the child ran back to the spaceship.
Ulysess ran after them and relaunched the ship into space to seek a
planet where humans still ruled.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Dave B" <smugster2000@...> wrote:
>
> Upon re-reading the conclusion of Boulle's original Novel I found
> myself wondering how Merou managed to get that bottle, containing his
> message, back into space.
>
> Dave
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39893 |
From: James |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "shanter2002" <john@...> wrote:
> the lovely James.
Dems fightin' words:-) <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39894 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/12/2006 |
| Subject: Richard D. Zanuck's Birthday , 12/13/2006, 12:00 am |
.html.html
| Reminder from: |
|
pota's Calendar |
| Title: |
|
Richard D. Zanuck's Birthday |
| Date: |
|
Wednesday December 13, 2006 |
| Time: |
|
All Day
|
| Repeats: |
|
This event repeats every year. |
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39895 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
.html
.html
Isn't the DVD version the same as the version that was broadcast in the UK
initially?
Chris L.
>>I believe the DVD version added 10 to 15 minutes to the film that
was not shown on TV. << <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39896 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: who built the Alpha Omega bomb? |
.html
.html
Interesting. Hinting at elements in the next story, Ty??
:-)
Actually, that ball would be in your court (and by "your", I mean the whole
team behind the series) since I don't think Breck claiming responsibility
for creating the bomb has appeared anywhere else (novelizations, etc) except
REVOLUTION.
Chris L.
>>I always felt Breck was bragging a bit, and that he had been
INVOLVED in the government project (as was Taylor) but the funding and design
certainly came from the taxpayer. No doubt Taylor and Breck knew each other,
as did Hasslein. Ty the Guy. Plotting, not dialogue. <<
>>While thinking about the POTA timeline earlier today, I
realized something that I'm not sure has been addressed or not. In
REVOLUTION, Breck says that he "conceived, commissioned, and funded" (or
something to that effect) the Doomsday bomb, which implies that it was built
when Breck was in a position of power. So then, how did Taylor (in
BENEATH) know about it's existence? He would have had to know when he left
Earth, which is almost 20 years prior to CONQUEST/REVOLUTION .
Even conservatively placing Breck at 40/45 years of age during CONQUEST,
I can't see him having that kind of power when he was in his early 20's.
Thoughts, anyone? << <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39897 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: BENEATH trivia |
.html
.html
A few odds & ends I found on both Wikipedia and IMDB:
>>The closing sequence with Taylor dying and accidentally detonating
the doomsday bomb was a last minute change made on the day the scene was filmed.
In the original scripted scene, his detonation of the bomb was deliberate.
<<
I always thought it was deliberate, though maybe a little more so in the
original (final draft) of the shooting script (which was used in Marvel's
adaptation of BENEATH).
>>The film's themes of a future world where intelligent animals had
evolved to supplant man as the dominant form of life on the planet and a society
that worshiped a nuclear missile were featured in "Kamandi", a DC Comics comic book series created by acclaimed
artist Jack Kirby.
<<
Anyone know if this is true or not? I may have to pick up those hardcover
reprints if that's the case.
>> The Alpha Omega bomb design was inspired by the 7mm Remington
Magnum rifle cartridge. <<
I'd never heard this before. Makes sense when you look at it
though:
>>A heavily edited version of the film was shown on British
television c.1991 which excised most of the violent and horrific scenes, most
notably from the last third of the film, including both scenes where Brent is
forced to attack Nova, the revelation of the underground humans true appearance,
the fight Brent & Taylor are forced to have in the prison cell, and much of
the shoot-out at the film's climax. <<
Can any of our UK fans shed some light on this one?
There's more info on each site, in case anyone is interested.
Chris L.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39898 |
From: Ty Templeton |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
.html>>The film's themes of a future world where intelligent animals had
evolved to supplant man as the dominant form of life on the planet and a society
that worshiped a nuclear missile were featured in "Kamandi", a
DC Comics comic book series created by acclaimed
artist Jack Kirby.
<<
Anyone know if this is true or not? I may have to pick up those hardcover
reprints if that's the case.<< Holy cow! I thought every POTA fan knew about this.
Yup, Kamandi is "not that loosely" based on Planet of the Apes, and even in the face of such clear cut intellectual theft, the series is a high water mark in the career of the King. I consider it second only to the Fantastic Four as Jack's best sustained work. The series was ALL about the world after the Great Disaster, when the cities were destroyed and a great number of different animal species gain the power of speech and reason. Not just apes (although gorillas feature PROMINENTLY throughout the series), but tigers, dogs, snakes, bears and cats, become rulers of the Earth, in place of an essentially extinct mankind. The sub-title for the series was "The Last Boy On Earth". Think of it more as Planet of the Beasts, and you have the series in a nutshell, with a teenager substituting for Taylor. There's even a "Nova" character, in the form of a sexy, mute female (topless, but for well placed long
hair), who followed Kamandi around for much of the series as the love interest. As in Planet of the Apes, horses and cows remained domestic animals, which led to many covers featuring tigers and bears on horseback.
One of my favorite comics of the Seventies, a treat for the imagination. The first issue's cover eveen featured a half destroyed Statue of Liberty, so neither the publisher, nor the artist was being shy about their attempt to glom onto the success of the Apes film franchise.
http://www.comics.org/coverview.lasso?id=25510&zoom=4That's a link to the cover for #1. Here's a link to much info on the series itself, including a cover gallery of every issue cover...check out the CLEAR Planet of the Apes covers on issues # 3, 5, 16, 19
http://www.comics.org/covers.lasso?SeriesID=2028Hope this helps. Ty the Guy. The nexus of things Comics and Apes
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39899 |
From: brendan486 |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Power Records POTA on You Tube |
| Group: pota |
Message: 39900 |
From: Hunter Goatley |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
.html> A few odds & ends I found on both Wikipedia and IMDB:
> >>The closing sequence with Taylor dying and accidentally detonating the
> doomsday bomb was a last minute change made on the day the scene was
> filmed. In the original scripted scene, his detonation of the bomb was
> deliberate. <<
> I always thought it was deliberate, though maybe a little more so in the
> original (final draft) of the shooting script (which was used in Marvel's
> adaptation of BENEATH).
I never thought anyone could possibly think it was accidental. It
always seemed very obviously deliberate to me.
Hunter <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39901 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 113 |
.htmlMarvel UK issue 113 is now available to download from Hunter's site. This issue has more of the Battle adaptation, and another installment of the re-printing of the Beneath adaptation. No letter column again this week. Thanks, Greg
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39902 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/13/2006 |
| Subject: GOOD news |
|
.html Endangered gorillas prosper in heart of Africa
By Marie-Louise Gumuchian Wed Dec 13, 8:43 AM ET
PARC NATIONAL DES VOLCANS, Rwanda (Reuters) - One
hour's trek into the Rwandan rainforest, a crunching
sound breaks the silence that hangs over the misty
thick bush.
Slow and loud, it lasts for a few minutes, then stops
abruptly. Suddenly a gorilla's face peers through the
giant nettles to look at the tourists who have sweated
along jungle trails to catch a glimpse of him and his
family.
The 200-kg (440-lb) male, the silver-grey saddle on
his back signaling maturity, studies his visitors.
Then, his curiosity satisfied, the mountain gorilla
emerges from the bush, crawls to the top of a clearing
on the lush mountainside and continues loudly chomping
on his bamboo shoot.
A female follows and stretches out next to the
silverback, keeping a careful eye on the intruders as
her babies playfully fight, thumping their chests and
rolling down the hill.
Their low-pitched grunts are answered in kind by a
guide so both humans and gorillas know the others are
just observing. "Look at those babies," one tourist
marvels. "Aren't they amazing?"
Agashya and his family are among the world's 700-odd
surviving mountain gorillas who live in their natural
habitats in Rwanda, Uganda and Democratic Republic of
Congo.
Split between the Virunga volcanoes which straddle the
borders of the three central African countries and
Uganda's Bwindi National Park, the gorillas have
actually seen their numbers increase in the last few
years.
A 2003 census showed a 17 percent increase from 1989
to 380 mountain gorillas living around the Virunga
volcanoes in a series of three national parks. About
320 live in Bwindi.
"There is no difference in the number of births," said
Justin Rurangirwa, chief park warden of Rwanda's Parc
National des Volcans (PNV) where Agashya lives. "What
has changed is that there's no more poaching."
POACHING PATROLS
International studies of mountain gorillas began after
German explorer Oscar von Beringe became the first
non-African to encounter one in the Virungas in 1902.
In the two decades that followed, scientists and
trophy hunters killed over 50 mountain gorillas, the
International Gorilla Conservation Program says.
Hunting and habitat destruction have also driven them
to the verge of extinction.
Mountain gorillas are not hunted for bushmeat. Some
were poached to sell their hands and feet to
collectors. Others have been maimed or killed by traps
intended for other animals.
U.S. researcher Dian Fossey brought the gorillas
international fame with her efforts to save them from
poachers.
Fossey studied the gorillas in Rwanda before her
murder in 1985 -- her work was the subject of the 1988
Hollywood movie "Gorillas in the Mist."
Dedicated anti-poaching and conservation efforts,
which include close monitoring and working with locals
to protect the habitat, have helped increase numbers.
"There is a lot of protection and conservation. Not
only in Rwanda, Uganda and Congo, the whole world is
taking part," said guide Francis Bayingana. "We have
poaching patrols on a daily basis."
Bayingana said the last poaching incident in the
Rwandan park was in 2002 when two females were shot
dead, a baby taken and a silverback injured.
The gorillas have also been threatened by conflict in
Congo and Rwanda. Rebels would flit easily across the
region's borders and sometimes the gorillas were
caught in crossfire.
VISIT FOR $375
With its robust build, long muscular arms, massive
chest and broad hands and feet, the mountain gorilla
is closely related to man, sharing 98 percent of its
genetic material with humans.
That makes it vulnerable to many of the same diseases
-- but without necessary immunities so that a sickness
that may seem harmless to humans can be dangerous for
gorillas.
Tourists are told to stand at a certain distance from
the gorillas they encounter and must turn away to
cough.
A maximum of eight people are allowed to visit a group
each day and stay for just one hour. Each foreign
visitor pays $375 for the experience in Rwanda, where
seven groups of gorillas have become used to receiving
visitors.
To see the gorillas, which live 2,500 metres (8,200
ft) above sea level with some roaming higher, visitors
trek on muddy trails across rugged slopes covered in
bamboo, moss and stumps.
Hundreds visit every month and numbers are growing,
giving Rwanda's government a powerful incentive to
protect the animals in a country better known to many
for a 1994 genocide in which around 800,000 people
were killed.
"Gorillas are our national pride," Bayingana said.
"There has to be promotion of conservation."
About 10,650 tourists came to Rwanda's park last year.
Up to November this year, nearly 12,000 had been, park
figures show.
Agashya's Group 13 is the only one at the park which
has seen its numbers increase dramatically. From 7
members in 2002, Group 13 now counts 20 members. Other
groups are stable, although in the largest, rare twins
were born in 2004.
Although strong and powerful, the gorillas are
generally gentle. Tourists are told how to behave in
their presence -- whisper, no pointing, eating or
shouting when stung by a nettle.
Leaving bags and walking sticks with porters, they can
take cameras with them but no flash photography is
allowed.
And if a gorilla charges, stand still unless told to
crouch or move back. Despite the fearful looks from
the animals, Bayingana is reassuring.
"They don't mind our presence," he said. "They do what
they do unless we disturb them."
________________________
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39903 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/14/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
.html
.html
Thanks for the info/links Ty.
I was aware of the series and a general resemblance to POTA, but I didn't
realize to what extent it actually mirrored the concepts. Was there actually an
issue that featured an society that worshipped a nuclear missile?
BTW (on a *slightly* related note)- anyone who's Jack Kirby
fan should really check out the show 'Minoriteam' on Adult Swim. It's a
great tribute to both Jack Kirby and The Marvel Superheroes cartoon series from
1966. Returns to the schedule in February.
Chris L.
>>Holy cow! I thought every POTA fan knew about this.
Yup,
Kamandi is "not that loosely" based on Planet of the Apes, and even in the
face of such clear cut intellectual theft, the series is a high water mark in
the career of the King. I consider it second only to the Fantastic Four as
Jack's best sustained work. The series was ALL about the world after the
Great Disaster, when the cities were destroyed and a great number of
different animal species gain the power of speech and reason. Not just apes
(although gorillas feature PROMINENTLY throughout the series), but tigers,
dogs, snakes, bears and cats, become rulers of the Earth, in place of an
essentially extinct mankind. The sub-title for the series was "The Last Boy
On Earth". Think of it more as Planet of the Beasts, and you have the series
in a nutshell, with a teenager substituting for Taylor. There's even a "Nova"
character, in the form of a sexy, mute female (topless, but for well placed
long hair), who followed Kamandi around for much of the series as the love
interest. As in Planet of the Apes, horses and cows remained domestic
animals, which led to many covers featuring tigers and bears on
horseback. One of my favorite comics of the Seventies, a treat for the
imagination. The first issue's cover eveen featured a half destroyed
Statue of Liberty, so neither the publisher, nor the artist was being shy
about their attempt to glom onto the success of the Apes film
franchise. http://www.comics. org/coverview. lasso?id= 25510&zoom= 4That's
a link to the cover for #1. Here's a link to much info on the series itself,
including a cover gallery of every issue cover...check out the CLEAR Planet
of the Apes covers on issues # 3, 5, 16, 19 http://www.comics. org/covers. lasso?SeriesID= 2028Hope
this helps. << <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39904 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/14/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
.htmlKirby was, and is, King, no doubt about it.He actually did some
Planet of the Apes art when he did some designs for a planned 80s
animated series loosely based on the TV Series. Apes and Kirby--it
don't get no better than that! John, Scrolls.
>
> >>The film's themes of a future world where intelligent animals had
evolved
> to supplant man as the dominant form of life on the planet and a
society
> that worshiped a nuclear missile were featured in
*"Kamandi<http://wiki/Kamandi>
> "*, a DC Comics <http://wiki/DC_Comics> comic book
> <http://wiki/Comic_book>series created by acclaimed artist Jack
> Kirby <http://wiki/Jack_Kirby>. <<
>
>
> Anyone know if this is true or not? I may have to pick up those
hardcover
> reprints if that's the case.<<
>
>
>
> Holy cow! I thought every POTA fan knew about this.
>
> Yup, Kamandi is "not that loosely" based on Planet of the Apes, and
even in
> the face of such clear cut intellectual theft, the series is a high
water
> mark in the career of the King. I consider it second only to the
Fantastic
> Four as Jack's best sustained work. The series was ALL about the
world
> after the Great Disaster, when the cities were destroyed and a
great number
> of different animal species gain the power of speech and reason.
Not just
> apes (although gorillas feature PROMINENTLY throughout the
series), but
> tigers, dogs, snakes, bears and cats, become rulers of the Earth,
in place
> of an essentially extinct mankind. The sub-title for the series
was "The
> Last Boy On Earth". Think of it more as Planet of the Beasts, and
you have
> the series in a nutshell, with a teenager substituting for Taylor.
There's
> even a "Nova" character, in the form of a sexy, mute female
(topless, but
> for well placed long hair), who followed Kamandi around for much of
the
> series as the love interest. As in Planet of the Apes, horses and
cows
> remained domestic animals, which led to many covers featuring
tigers and
> bears on horseback.
>
> One of my favorite comics of the Seventies, a treat for the
imagination.
>
> The first issue's cover eveen featured a half destroyed Statue of
Liberty,
> so neither the publisher, nor the artist was being shy about their
attempt
> to glom onto the success of the Apes film franchise.
>
>
> http://www.comics.org/coverview.lasso?id=25510&zoom=4
>
> That's a link to the cover for #1. Here's a link to much info on
the series
> itself, including a cover gallery of every issue cover...check out
the CLEAR
> Planet of the Apes covers on issues # 3, 5, 16, 19
>
> http://www.comics.org/covers.lasso?SeriesID=2028
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Ty the Guy. The nexus of things Comics and Apes
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39905 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/14/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams |
.html
.html
What was the number of the most recent issue? I'm drawing a complete blank
right now...
Chris L.
"shanter2002" < john@... > wrote:
>>We're aiming at Feb 2007 and ordering details will appear on this
Group, courtesy of the lovely James.We have, courtesy of the even more
lovely Kass(please don't tell her I said that) a US ordering option.
We'll keep everyone posted.We've learned over the years that Christmas
and New Year must be avoided as release dates!Mort's niece is entitled
to a free copy for having such a great uncle, so if we get a postal
address, that would be our pleasure. <<<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39906 |
From: gp3085 |
Date: 12/14/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Mort Abrahams and Simian Scrolls |
.htmlIssue 12 was the most recent. It came out earlier this year.
Greg
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Chris Lawless <lawford42@...> wrote:
>
> What was the number of the most recent issue? I'm drawing a complete
> blank right now...
>
>
> Chris L. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39907 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/15/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Power Records POTA on You Tube |
.html
.html
I don't know if anyone ever figured out who did what. One of these days
I'll have to look around for some Power Records sites and see if any info was
available.
I've always thought that they were pretty ambitious projects, and the
artwork in the POTA releases in particular was very well done. The image of
the unmasked mutants creeped me out so much as a kid that I couldn't
even look at it. Some of the music in the adaptations was pretty interesting
too. Presumably it was all stock library music, but the cues that were chosen
accompanied the scenes exceptionally well.
After watching the You Tube version, I remembered how some of the sound
effects were used a few times throughout i.e. the background noises from when
Taylor is beating the gorilla hunter in the beginning ("THIS is for Dodge, and
THIS is for Landon!!") is used again when Julius is beating Taylor for
stealing Zira's clipboard and also when Lucius is helping Taylor escape
("Hit him Bright Eyes!"). Also some of the same voice actors doing different
parts i.e. Landon, Dr. Galen, Lucius, and the gorilla guard who
says "I've told the authorities about your talking trick Bright Eyes." were
all voiced by the same person who supplied Brent's voice in the BENEATH
adaptation. The fact that the same guy voiced Taylor in both PLANET and
BENEATH shows that at least someone was paying attention to detail, though I
have to admit Brendan that I don't quite hear Mayor West there.
:-)
Chris L.
"brendan486" < nzape@...
> wrote:
>>Chris,I was interested. It has been years since I heard this and I
had forgotten how hilarious the Voice of Taylor was. Who was the voice
artist? I think it was reminiscient of Mayor Adam West from the Family Guy.
<< <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39908 |
From: James |
Date: 12/15/2006 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver |
.htmlThis week's LESSON FROM THE LAWGIVER is now available. This is the final chapter of the special 5 part LESSON. Thanks to Glen Scheetz and all who contributed.
To view the LESSON click on the banner on the Yahoo Home page or use this link: http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/LFTL.htm.
Visit all the Group's special features including:
Also, be sure to join our sub-groups:
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39909 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/16/2006 |
| Subject: Re: BENEATH trivia |
.html
.html
Was there ever any definitive info released about this past the fact that
it was in the planning stages? That really could have been interesting if it had
been given a chance. I wonder if it would have been a more serialized type
of storytelling like RETURN was (or KAMANDI for that matter)? It's a shame it
never happened.
Chris L.
>>Kirby was, and is, King, no doubt about it.He actually did some
Planet of the Apes art when he did some designs for a planned 80s
animated series loosely based on the TV Series. Apes and Kirby--it don't
get no better than that! <<<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39910 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/16/2006 |
| Subject: Parrots on POTA |
.htmlJust my wild imagination here. I was talking to a woman yesterday who had 2 talking parrots. I was thinking why werent there any parrots on POTA? I would have loved to see a Gorillas face when he heard a parrot talk....... Imagine Brent's facial expression when Cornelious told him not to speak to the Gorrilas.... Classic..... Happy Holidays Dave-NYC..... Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39911 |
From: Chris Lawless |
Date: 12/17/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.html
.html
There really weren't any domesticated animals that I remember, save for the
dog in the TV series. Wonder if that was intentional or not, and if so, was it a
statement being made about how one animal species would or wouldn't treat
another?
Chris L.
>>Just my wild imagination here. I was talking to a woman yesterday
who had 2 talking parrots. I was thinking why werent there any parrots on
POTA? I would have loved to see a Gorillas face when he heard a parrot
talk....... Imagine Brent's facial expression when Cornelious told him not to
speak to the Gorrilas.... Classic..... << <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39912 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/17/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.htmlHorses and cows, too...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Chris Lawless <lawford42@...> wrote:
>
> There really weren't any domesticated animals that I remember, save
for
> the dog in the TV series. Wonder if that was intentional or not,
and if
> so, was it a statement being made about how one animal species
would or
> wouldn't treat another?
>
>
> Chris L.
>
>
>
> "David Giwner" < bikergator25@... >
>
> >>Just my wild imagination here. I was talking to a woman yesterday
who
> had 2 talking parrots.
> I was thinking why werent there any parrots on POTA?
> I would have loved to see a Gorillas face when he heard a parrot
> talk.......
> Imagine Brent's facial expression when Cornelious told him not to
speak
> to the Gorrilas....
> Classic..... <<
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39913 |
From: James |
Date: 12/17/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.htmlIn Planet the only animals seen are horses and humans. In Beneath at
least one bird is shown after the Gorilla shoots Brent. There are
numerous animals in Escape but none in Conquest. In Battle Cornelius
has his squirrel and rabbits are mentioned. The TV series had the dog
plus several species of farm animals and a scorpion.
The cartoon series & comics had several mutated monsters which I'm glad
the live-action films & series never induldged in.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Glen" <HotScheetz@...> wrote:
>
> Horses and cows, too...
>
> G
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39914 |
From: Dave B |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
|
.html When Zira first speaks to the Inquest during 'Escape' her simple
answers are compared to those of a Parrot. Her response 'A PARROT!"
seems quite indignant from which I assume she knows what a parrot is
and is offended by being compared to one...
One could also argue that her response is merely one of confusion ("A
Parrot?")
Is this line in the script?
Dave <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39915 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.htmlYoung Cornelius had Ricky, his pet squirrel.John, Scrolls.
>
> There really weren't any domesticated animals that I remember, save
for
> the dog in the TV series. Wonder if that was intentional or not,
and if
> so, was it a statement being made about how one animal species
would or
> wouldn't treat another?
>
>
> Chris L.
>
>
>
> "David Giwner" < bikergator25@... >
>
> >>Just my wild imagination here. I was talking to a woman yesterday
who
> had 2 talking parrots.
> I was thinking why werent there any parrots on POTA?
> I would have loved to see a Gorillas face when he heard a parrot
> talk.......
> Imagine Brent's facial expression when Cornelious told him not to
speak
> to the Gorrilas....
> Classic..... <<
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39916 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.htmlDave, you are so right,. I forgot about that scene. Dave-NYC...
Dave B <smugster2000@...> wrote: When Zira first speaks to the Inquest during 'Escape' her simple answers are compared to those of a Parrot. Her response 'A PARROT!" seems quite indignant from which I assume she knows what a parrot is and is offended by being compared to one...
One could also argue that her response is merely one of confusion ("A Parrot?")
Is this line in the
script?
Dave
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39917 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.htmlYeah, you are right. But it did not talk. I was thinking about what Dr. Zaius siad about the apes being Gods chosen.. Dave-NYC
shanter2002 <john@...> wrote: Young Cornelius had Ricky, his pet squirrel.John, Scrolls. > > There really weren't any domesticated animals that I remember, save for > the dog in the TV series. Wonder if that was intentional or not, and if > so, was it a statement being made about how one animal species
would or > wouldn't treat another? > > > Chris L. > > > > "David Giwner" < bikergator25@ ... > > > >>Just my wild imagination here. I was talking to a woman yesterday who > had 2 talking parrots. > I was thinking why werent there any parrots on POTA? > I would have loved to see a Gorillas face when he heard a parrot > talk....... > Imagine Brent's facial expression when Cornelious told him not to speak > to the Gorrilas.... > Classic..... << >
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39918 |
From: brendan486 |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.htmlSince the Apes speak English, could this comment about being
compared to a Parrot be a reference to the colloquial/idiomatic use
of the word 'parrot.'
i.e. someone who is nothing but a mimic.Someone who mimics.
Zira may not even know that the word represented a specie of bird.
It is still insulting to be compared to someone who mimics only as
it implies they have no ability to think for oneself.
Brendan
-- In pota@yahoogroups.com, David Giwner <bikergator25@...> wrote:
>
> Dave, you are so right,. I forgot about that scene.
> Dave-NYC...
>
> Dave B <smugster2000@...> wrote:
> When Zira first speaks to the Inquest during 'Escape'
her simple
> answers are compared to those of a Parrot. Her response 'A PARROT!"
> seems quite indignant from which I assume she knows what a parrot
is
> and is offended by being compared to one...
>
> One could also argue that her response is merely one of confusion
("A
> Parrot?")
>
> Is this line in the script?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39919 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.html
.html
In a message dated 12/17/2006 5:38:11 P.M. Central Standard Time,
lawford42@... writes:
There
really weren't any domesticated animals that I
remember
And yet when Zira is compared to a parrot
she seems to know what they're talking about.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39920 |
From: LordTZer0@AOL.com |
Date: 12/18/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.html
.html
In a message dated 12/18/2006 12:39:22 A.M. Central Standard Time,
smugster2000@... writes:
Her
response 'A PARROT!" seems quite indignant from which I assume she knows
what a parrot is and is offended by being compared to one...
One
could also argue that her response is merely one of confusion
("A Parrot?")
More like righteous indignation. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39921 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/19/2006 |
| Subject: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
.htmlGreetings All :-)
I've been a member of this group for a while now,
and though I've been largely a lurker here- primarily
because I've been so busy elsewhere, namely with run-
ning an RP on Yahoo and being a busy 3D and photoma-
nipulation artist, in addition to work and the other
time-consuming aspects of real life- but I come here
from time to time to partake in the posted exchsanges
between the active members here, in addition to using
the various wonderful POTA links to be found here.
Anyway, to get more to the point; While going through
the messages here from the last month or so, a link was
posted, leading to the website of 'THE HASSLEIN CURVE-
A Timeline of the Planet of the Apes, to be found at...
http://rhandley.0catch.com/POTA/timeline_01.html"
Being deeply interested in the POTA saga, I was
compelled to read most of it, when I cam across some-
thing I didn't expect, a full mention of 'inter-species
relations' between 'unrelated' Ape species, namely that
of a love, and sex, shared between a female Chimpanzee
and a male Gorilla. Noted on the last page of the very
extensive chronology, an exerpt is below, with full
credit to the author, of course, and I quote;
------------------------------------------------------
Early 3900s
A female chimpanzee and a male gorilla elope to Wambo
Province to escape persecution for their forbidden
cross-species love.
Return to the Planet of the Apes episode #7: "River
of Flames" (BB-n)
NOTE: This information comes from the novelization
of the episode, entitled Return to the Planet of
the Apes #3: Man, the Hunted Animal.
The gorilla's name is Truga.
Return to the Planet of the Apes episode #2: "Escape
from Ape City" (BB-n)
NOTE: This information comes from the novelization
of the episode, entitled Return to the Planet of
the Apes #1: Visions from Nowhere.
Their grandson, Mungwort, later faces racial pre-
judice because of his resultant mixed heritage.
Return to the Planet of the Apes episode #7: "River
of Flames" (BB-n)
NOTE: This information comes from the novelization
of the episode, entitled Return to the Planet of the
Apes #3: Man, the Hunted Animal.
------------------------------------------------------
Now... I don't know if the subject of such inter-Ape
relations has much been discussed here, or even if it is
completely appropriate, but I'd like to discuss this
subject in a mature and adult context with anyone inter-
ested.
I'd like to first note that I an something of a
student of history, and history indeed does include
the examination of society over time, including the
study of social morals, standards and laws, when it
comes to the matter of 'sex'... and venial relations
between people deemed to be of different social stand-
ing, and... 'race'
It is notable that in Human history, even in the
U.S. of the 20th century, some laws, especially in
the U.S. South, made it illegal for persons of dif-
ferent races to 'intermix' in an intimate or carnal
way, and certainly racial intermarriage was indeed
quite forbidden. This was considered to be a true
crime, and was legally severely punishable. Thank
God such laws are not currently upheald, and in most
cases have been removed from the books.
The mixing of the Human races, known as 'miscege-
nation', is still, in this modern world of the 21st
Century, unfortunately, frowned upon in many places,
either passively or actively. In some places the
intermarrying of a Christian to a Jew or an Arab
can result in legal sanctions or horrific public
uproar, which can result in imprisonment, injury,
or death. It's depressing that such prejudices still
exist in this day and age.
Anyway... POTA is loaded with prejudices, namely
that of Humans Vs. Apes in particular, and very
likely within Ape society itself on many levels.
Notable however... is that Ape society isn't com-
prised of just one race as with Humans, but made up
of three distinctly different sentient species, each
having evolved on three different branches of the
Ape line of generally-related limb of the evolution-
ary tree. The distinctions between them are clear,
ad in spite of their general similarities, it's
amazing that they intermix at all beyond perhaps
a limited commercial/trade level. More than that
ther share the same city, blocks, and homes and
places of work, being fully interactive on virtually
all social levels. Other than the fact that they are
al generally Apes, the only thing that seems to be
holding them together as a society of mixed species,
is their central beliefs, which they all seem to
generally agree upon. It's further amazing because
in nature... the three Ape forms don't mix, and when
they meet- there's terrible and often violent con-
flict.
More to the point, in such a society, the subject
of sex between these three species is one, which if
looked at realistically, must be one of serious in-
terest and consideration. Whether or not the three
species in some combination or another can interbreed
is to a large degree irrelavant, as surely there are
either laws or moral standards in place that forbid
intimate- i.e. a 'sexual relations', between the three.
Even if punitive measures are not in place, there cer-
tainly must be common moral social standards in place
that could bring serious social consequences upon those
whom would risk such behavior, contrary to those stan-
dards. The consternation of local citizens can bring
great pressure upon such individuals that break the
social rules. 'Offenders' risk being ostrasized by
their families, and possible exile from their homes,
community, or their homeland. The matter is indeed
even more serious in their society, if a hybrid off-
spring is the result.
My question to any interested members here is;
How much of a problem do you think this is in the
mixed Ape society that we have come to know so well,
with many questions... not answered, and likely not
forthcoming? How often do you think such things
occur? And perhaps, is hybridization actually even
possible betwen any of the three, or do they naturally
remain 'pure', in the same sense that cats and dogs
cannot interbreed?
I'll be very interested in hearing your feedback
on this matter. Thankyou :-)
Jon Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39922 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/19/2006 |
| Subject: NEW TO THE POTA MESSAGE BOARD |
|
.html My name is Paul, and I live in the Seattle area (from Detroit). I am
43 years old, remember watching the firt POTA movie when it came out.
I was a kid watching it from the back seat with my parents watching
from the front seat. It was amazing for me at the time.
Today, I am still in love with watching these Apes videos. I also have
a bunch of figures as well.
Does anyone enjoy watching the POTA cartoons as much as I do?
I want to get some of the comics next, and the series even though it
wasn't that good.
Very respectfully, Paul <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39923 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 114 |
.htmlThe latest issue is now available to download from Hunter's site. This issue continues both the Battle adaptation and the reprinting of the Beneath adaptation. As a special holiday bonus, the letter column is back, with two pages of letters for all you letter column fans. I'll be traveling next Wednesday and won't have internet access, so you're all on your own to find your way to Hunter's site to download issue 115 next week. Hope you all have a nice, safe holiday. Greg <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39924 |
From: David Giwner |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Parrots on POTA |
.htmlYes, you are right. SO I guess the parrots where around. Dave-NYC
LordTZer0@... wrote: In a message dated 12/17/2006 5:38:11 P.M. Central Standard Time, lawford42@juno. com writes: There really weren't any domesticated animals that I remember
And yet when Zira is compared to a parrot she seems to know what they're talking about.
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39925 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Re: NEW TO THE POTA MESSAGE BOARD |
.htmlHi Paul, Welcome aboard...You'll find people here that luv every
aspect of POTA -- even Burton...=)
You might want to check out Hunter's site, where he has most every
comic on Apes uploaded... https://pota.goatley.com/
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <p3murds@...> wrote:
>
> My name is Paul, and I live in the Seattle area (from Detroit). I am
> 43 years old, remember watching the firt POTA movie when it came
out.
> I was a kid watching it from the back seat with my parents watching
> from the front seat. It was amazing for me at the time.
>
> Today, I am still in love with watching these Apes videos. I also
have
> a bunch of figures as well.
>
> Does anyone enjoy watching the POTA cartoons as much as I do?
>
> I want to get some of the comics next, and the series even though it
> wasn't that good.
>
> Very respectfully, Paul
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39926 |
From: p3murds@aol.com |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Re: NEW TO THE POTA MESSAGE BOARD |
.html
.html
The goatley site is great! Thanks!
~Paul <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39927 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/20/2006 |
| Subject: Re: NEW TO THE POTA MESSAGE BOARD |
.htmlSorry, I guess I should have called it Hunter's Site! I love it, and
now I can read all those comics! I am looking forward to getting a
collection of these books myself via Ebay of course!
Here is another thing, I know that the last POTA movie wasn't
considered good by many, but I disagree with not wanting another one
made if some how anyone was considering doing so. I do think that the
last movie left things very open for a sequel the could be great.
Very respectfully Paul Wright
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, p3murds@... wrote:
>
> The goatley site is great! Thanks! ~Paul
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39928 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: APE CITY WEBSITE |
|
.html Have any of you seen this site? Is the Ape-City.com website out of
commision? I enjoyed it the first time I seen it, But had an email
rejected when I sent it to the webmaster. Does this person frequent
this board? I guess his name is Andrew Parmet (according to the
website). Still, even though no updates, it is entertaining.
~Paul <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39929 |
From: James |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: APE CITY WEBSITE |
.htmlThe site is still up and working. It hasn't been updated though. Andrew
is a member here but has been quiet recently.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <p3murds@...> wrote:
>
> Have any of you seen this site? Is the Ape-City.com website out of
> commision? I enjoyed it the first time I seen it, But had an email
> rejected when I sent it to the webmaster. Does this person frequent
> this board? I guess his name is Andrew Parmet (according to the
> website). Still, even though no updates, it is entertaining.
>
> ~Paul
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39930 |
From: James |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
.htmlFirst, welcome to the group Jon.
In answer to your question, the classic films or the TV series never covered this subject. It would have been an interesting topic for the TV series to explore. Since that society was a caste system with each species having an assigned role, I would imagine that extra-species relationships were frowned upon.
In the remake, we do see an elderly orangutan married to a Chimp trophy wife. So in that society interspecies marrige was acceptable. Or maybe they weren't married and it was just a civil union;-)
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Jonathan" <phil_harmonik2005@...> wrote: > > > My question to any interested members here is; > How much of a problem do you think this is in the > mixed Ape society that we have come to know so well, > with many questions... not answered, and likely not > forthcoming? How often do you think such things > occur? And perhaps, is hybridization actually even > possible betwen any of the three, or do they naturally > remain 'pure', in the same sense that cats and dogs > cannot interbreed? > > I'll be very interested in hearing your feedback > on this matter. Thankyou :-) > > Jon Rich >
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39931 |
From: shanter2002 |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
.htmlAnd in the novels of the animated series, one of the gorillas is
derided for having a chimp grandparent.John, Scrolls.
>
>
> First, welcome to the group Jon.
>
> In answer to your question, the classic films or the TV series never
> covered this subject. It would have been an interesting topic for
the TV
> series to explore. Since that society was a caste system with each
> species having an assigned role, I would imagine that extra-species
> relationships were frowned upon.
>
> In the remake, we do see an elderly orangutan married to a Chimp
trophy
> wife. So in that society interspecies marrige was acceptable. Or
maybe
> they weren't married and it was just a civil union;-)
>
>
>
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Jonathan" <phil_harmonik2005@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > My question to any interested members here is;
> > How much of a problem do you think this is in the
> > mixed Ape society that we have come to know so well,
> > with many questions... not answered, and likely not
> > forthcoming? How often do you think such things
> > occur? And perhaps, is hybridization actually even
> > possible betwen any of the three, or do they naturally
> > remain 'pure', in the same sense that cats and dogs
> > cannot interbreed?
> >
> > I'll be very interested in hearing your feedback
> > on this matter. Thankyou :-)
> >
> > Jon Rich
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39932 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
.html> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Jonathan" <phil_harmonik2005@> wrote:
> >
> > My question to any interested members here is;
> > How much of a problem do you think this is in the
> > mixed Ape society that we have come to know so well,
> > with many questions... not answered, and likely not
> > forthcoming? How often do you think such things
> > occur? And perhaps, is hybridization actually even
> > possible betwen any of the three, or do they naturally
> > remain 'pure', in the same sense that cats and dogs
> > cannot interbreed?
> >
> > I'll be very interested in hearing your feedback
> > on this matter. Thankyou :-)
> >
> > Jon Rich
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
>
> First, welcome to the group Jon.
Thankyou :-)
> In answer to your question, the classic films or
> the TV series never covered this subject.
Indeed it didn't. And the TV series in parti-
cular would have been a marvelous forum to explore
it, since it had many more opportunities to do so
that the cinema films didn't.
The concept of 'forbidden relationships' or
'forbidden love' in storylines goes back before
even Romeo and Juliette- where warring families
are the center of the forbidden love of the young
couple, and for more modern times, and prior to
the POTA TV series, TV shows like Star Trek ex-
plored prejudice deeply [Let That Be Your Last
Battlefield] and for TV defined the first inter-
racial kiss [Plato's Stepchildren]. And since
POTA-TV came somewhat later tha trek, I'm surprised
that the writers weren't brave enough to explore
the issue.
> It would have been an interesting topic for the
> TV series to explore. Since that society was a
> caste system with each species having an assigned
> role, I would imagine that extra-species relation-
> ships were frowned upon.
I think... that the problem was actually more
centered on limits placed by the producers of the
TV version. They didn't want to risk allegations
or accusations of 'bestiality' in 'any' form. They
took note, likely, of Taylor's kissing of Zira, as
some fededback told that some people felt that that
was such- so it was something of a real issue with
some people. The producers of the TV version wan-
ted to avoid the issue in any context. They had
advertisers they didn't want to offend. As usual-
it again boils down to 'money', tempered by the
moral standards of the time.
And interesting... considering that in these more
recent times, TV shows like 'Hercules' quite often
touched upon interspecies relationships, and... in-
terbreeding, rooted in the actual Ancient greek
myths. Good to see that times have changed :-)
The subject is approached now in a more adult con-
text now, and truer to the real history of the
mythology.
> In the remake, we do see an elderly orangutan mar-
> ried to a Chimp trophy wife. So in that society
> interspecies marrige was acceptable. Or maybe they
> weren't married and it was just a civil union;-)
I noted that too, though the Tim Burton film never
addresed that situation. However, it does indeed ap-
pear that in his version, such relationships weren't
frowned upon, as it was taking place right in front of
their highest leaders right there at the dinner table!
One can presume that such was allowed in TB's version
of Ape culture, at least in 'his' interpretation of it.
But then again... he made many such 'adjustments'. It's
not really the same culture. It's... a very different
Ape planet. But then again, there's a lot of odd things
about that film.
Anyway... on the subject of miscegenation, I per-
sonally think that the Ape culture would have similar
problems dealing with it that many societies do in
our world of today, and even... in free America, as
the subject of racial and societal intermixing is still
a deep issue with many people... unfortunately.
The Ape movies, I can see, from the perspective of
the Apes, defined Humans as 'one people'. Just... 'the
Humans'. The Apes then become a parody of us... and
our differences, the barriers we put up or still main-
tain, the Humans becoming mindless innocents in the jungle
while the Apes with their prejudices and corruptions re-
flect... what Humans 'once' were. Or... still are...
in the form of the underground Mutants. POTA as a form
of commentary on our society it obvious, and hard to deny.
The worst of what were are is defined... in them. And it
can be hard... to look into that mirror...
~ Jon Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39933 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "shanter2002" <john@...> wrote:
>
> And in the novels of the animated series, one of
> the gorillas is derided for having a chimp grand-
> parent. John, Scrolls.
Well... if the animated series for POTA is accepted
as Ape 'canon', and the novels too, then it tells that
the Apes, especially the Gorillas and Chimps, can in-
deed interbreed. And... jst as many humans of today,
the child of mixed blood endures some real social ne-
gativity for being such. it defines that Apes are
just as prejudiced as many of us real life Humans are,
and again... the Apes are a refelction in parody, of
ourselves. More social commentary.
I have noticed that in many stories, and in many
role playing games that may involve anything from
Elves and Gnomes to Aliens and Furries... Humans are
often held up as examples of what 'not' to be like.
the way of Humans... is to be avoided. But with POTA,
the Apes are more reflections of ourselves, mirror
of Humankind.
And perhaps, just like in the evolutionary sense,
as POTA defines, the Apes are not that far removed
from us, since we ourselves evolved from an Ape-like
ancestor. And it stands as social commentary, and
most episodes serve as morality plays, as many are
designed to. They are lessons... that we're expected
to learn something from.
~ Jon Rich. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39934 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: APE CITY WEBSITE |
.htmlOh, thats good! As I mentioned, I once tried to email him, but the
email was returned. ~Paul
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
>
> The site is still up and working. It hasn't been updated though.
Andrew
> is a member here but has been quiet recently.
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <p3murds@> wrote:
> >
> > Have any of you seen this site? Is the Ape-City.com website out of
> > commision? I enjoyed it the first time I seen it, But had an email
> > rejected when I sent it to the webmaster. Does this person
frequent
> > this board? I guess his name is Andrew Parmet (according to the
> > website). Still, even though no updates, it is entertaining.
> >
> > ~Paul
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39935 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: APE CITY WEBSITE |
.htmlI found this when I went on the site:
New site with actual content coming soon! In the meantime, if there's
something you'd like to see added, let me know.
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "James" <JamesA1102@...> wrote:
>
> The site is still up and working. It hasn't been updated though.
Andrew
> is a member here but has been quiet recently.
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <p3murds@> wrote:
> >
> > Have any of you seen this site? Is the Ape-City.com website out of
> > commision? I enjoyed it the first time I seen it, But had an email
> > rejected when I sent it to the webmaster. Does this person
frequent
> > this board? I guess his name is Andrew Parmet (according to the
> > website). Still, even though no updates, it is entertaining.
> >
> > ~Paul
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39936 |
From: brendan486 |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Jonathan" <phil_harmonik2005@...> wrote:
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "shanter2002" <john@> wrote:
> >
> > And in the novels of the animated series, one of
> > the gorillas is derided for having a chimp grand-
> > parent. John, Scrolls.
>
> Well... if the animated series for POTA is accepted
> as Ape 'canon', and the novels too, then it tells that
> the Apes, especially the Gorillas and Chimps, can in-
> deed interbreed.
Are we to understand that since there are no examples of interbreeding
with Orangutangs that even in Ape Society there is prejudice against
people with Ginger Hair!!!!
Well, it seems that Apes are no better than Humans afterall.
Brendan ;- ) <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39937 |
From: Robert J. Sawyer |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.htmlTaylor's spaceship is only seen partially submerged in the original
PLANET OF THE APES. But I've stumbled upon an image that shows the
full-size exterior mock-up out of the water as it was in 1967; it's
grainy and small, but possibly of use to model makers. This is the
version of the ship sometimes referred to as "Icarus" or the ANSA
starship before it was modified for BENEATH or ESCAPE. The little
image, and details about it, are in my blog:
http://sfwriter.com/2006/12/bottom-of-taylors-starship-revealed.html"
All best wishes.
Rob
----------------
ROBERT J. SAWYER, Science Fiction Writer
Hugo Award winner for HOMINIDS
Nebula Award winner for THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT
John W. Campbell Memorial Award winner for MINDSCAN
http://www.sfwriter.com * sawyer@...
---------------- <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39938 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/21/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.htmlThanks, Rob...Great find...Too bad there isn't a clearer shot
somewhere...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Robert J. Sawyer" <robertjsawyer@...>
wrote:
>
> Taylor's spaceship is only seen partially submerged in the original
> PLANET OF THE APES. But I've stumbled upon an image that shows the
> full-size exterior mock-up out of the water as it was in 1967; it's
> grainy and small, but possibly of use to model makers. This is the
> version of the ship sometimes referred to as "Icarus" or the ANSA
> starship before it was modified for BENEATH or ESCAPE. The little
> image, and details about it, are in my blog:
>
> http://sfwriter.com/2006/12/bottom-of-taylors-starship-revealed.html"
>
> All best wishes.
>
> Rob
>
>
> ----------------
> ROBERT J. SAWYER, Science Fiction Writer
>
> Hugo Award winner for HOMINIDS
> Nebula Award winner for THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT
> John W. Campbell Memorial Award winner for MINDSCAN
>
> http://www.sfwriter.com * sawyer@...
> ----------------
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39939 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.htmlJust yesterday in Ebay someone was selling a model kit of this
spaceship. Nothing big, ...small scale. I guess someone snatched it
up because I can't find it in there anymore.
~Paul
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Glen" <HotScheetz@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Rob...Great find...Too bad there isn't a clearer shot
> somewhere...
>
> G
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Robert J. Sawyer" <robertjsawyer@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Taylor's spaceship is only seen partially submerged in the
original
> > PLANET OF THE APES. But I've stumbled upon an image that shows
the
> > full-size exterior mock-up out of the water as it was in 1967;
it's
> > grainy and small, but possibly of use to model makers. This is
the
> > version of the ship sometimes referred to as "Icarus" or the ANSA
> > starship before it was modified for BENEATH or ESCAPE. The little
> > image, and details about it, are in my blog:
> >
> > http://sfwriter.com/2006/12/bottom-of-taylors-starship-
revealed.htmlbr>
> >
> > All best wishes.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > ----------------
> > ROBERT J. SAWYER, Science Fiction Writer
> >
> > Hugo Award winner for HOMINIDS
> > Nebula Award winner for THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT
> > John W. Campbell Memorial Award winner for MINDSCAN
> >
> > http://www.sfwriter.com * sawyer@
> > ----------------
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39940 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Apes... and Miscegenation |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "brendan486" <nzape@...> wrote:
>
> > > And in the novels of the animated series,
> > > one of the gorillas is derided for having
> > > a chimp grandparent. John, Scrolls.
> >
> > Well... if the animated series for POTA is
> > accepted as Ape 'canon', and the novels too,
> > then it tells that the Apes, especially the
> > Gorillas and Chimps, can indeed interbreed.
>
> Are we to understand that since there are no
> examples of interbreeding with Orangutangs that
> even in Ape Society there is prejudice against
> people with Ginger Hair!!!! Well, it seems that
> Apes are no better than Humans afterall.
> Brendan ;- )
LOL- Funny :-)
~Jon Rich
Another dumb blond :-) <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39941 |
From: James |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.htmlThanks so much for pointing this out. I've watched Roody's home
movies several times and never noticed the ship.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Robert J. Sawyer" <robertjsawyer@...>
wrote:
>
> Taylor's spaceship is only seen partially submerged in the original
> PLANET OF THE APES. But I've stumbled upon an image that shows the
> full-size exterior mock-up out of the water as it was in 1967; it's
> grainy and small, but possibly of use to model makers. This is the
> version of the ship sometimes referred to as "Icarus" or the ANSA
> starship before it was modified for BENEATH or ESCAPE. The little
> image, and details about it, are in my blog:
>
> http://sfwriter.com/2006/12/bottom-of-taylors-starship-revealed.html"
>
> All best wishes.
>
> Rob
>
>
> ----------------
> ROBERT J. SAWYER, Science Fiction Writer
>
> Hugo Award winner for HOMINIDS
> Nebula Award winner for THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT
> John W. Campbell Memorial Award winner for MINDSCAN
>
> http://www.sfwriter.com * sawyer@...
> ----------------
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39942 |
From: James |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Lesson from the Lawgiver |
.htmlHappy Holidays everyone! To celebrate the holidays we're repeating a special LESSON FROM THE LAWGIVER from last year. Thanks to Elaine, Glen, Dave and all who contributed.
To view the LESSON click on the banner on the Yahoo Home page or use this link: http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/files/LFTL.htm.
Visit all the Group's special features including:
Also, be sure to join our sub-groups:
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39943 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/22/2006 |
| Subject: Estella Warren's Birthday , 12/23/2006, 12:00 am |
.html.html
| Reminder from: |
|
pota Yahoo! Group |
| |
| Title: |
|
Estella Warren's Birthday |
| |
| Date: |
|
Saturday December 23, 2006 |
| Time: |
|
All Day
|
| Repeats: |
|
This event repeats every year. |
| Notes: |
|
Thank you God! |
| |
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39944 |
From: Paul |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Estella Warren's Birthday  , 12/23/2006, 12:00 am |
.htmlShe is a beauty, that is for sure! Wish I could be at her birthday
party!
~Paul Wright
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, pota@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
> Reminder from: pota Yahoo! Group
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/cal
>
> Estella Warren's Birthday
> Saturday December 23, 2006
> All Day
> (This event repeats every year.)
>
> Notes:
> Thank you God!
>
>
> All Rights Reserved
> Copyright © 2006
> Yahoo! Inc.
> http://www.yahoo.com
>
> Privacy Policy:
> http://privacy.yahoo.com/privacy/us
>
> Terms of Service:
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39945 |
From: brendan486 |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.htmlFor years I sold your novels through my old business and only had a
chance to read Illegal Alien.
I will now read the rest.
Had I known you were an Ape fan I would have forced every customer
to buy one.
Thank you for the Taylor ship photo.
Brendan.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Robert J. Sawyer" <robertjsawyer@...>
wrote:
>
> Taylor's spaceship is only seen partially submerged in the original
> PLANET OF THE APES. But I've stumbled upon an image that shows the
> full-size exterior mock-up out of the water as it was in 1967; it's
> grainy and small, but possibly of use to model makers. This is the
> version of the ship sometimes referred to as "Icarus" or the ANSA
> starship before it was modified for BENEATH or ESCAPE. The little
> image, and details about it, are in my blog:
>
> http://sfwriter.com/2006/12/bottom-of-taylors-starship-
revealed.htmlbr>
>
> All best wishes.
>
> Rob
>
>
> ----------------
> ROBERT J. SAWYER, Science Fiction Writer
>
> Hugo Award winner for HOMINIDS
> Nebula Award winner for THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT
> John W. Campbell Memorial Award winner for MINDSCAN
>
> http://www.sfwriter.com * sawyer@...
> ----------------
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39946 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Estella Warren's Birthday  , 12/23/2006, 12:00 am |
.htmlYes, she's a prime example of someone who has "made it" in Hollywood
on their looks, and no talent...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <p3murds@...> wrote:
>
> She is a beauty, that is for sure! Wish I could be at her birthday
> party!
>
> ~Paul Wright
>
>
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, pota@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> >
> > Reminder from: pota Yahoo! Group
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pota/cal
> >
> > Estella Warren's Birthday
> > Saturday December 23, 2006
> > All Day
> > (This event repeats every year.)
> >
> > Notes:
> > Thank you God!
> >
> >
> > All Rights Reserved
> > Copyright © 2006
> > Yahoo! Inc.
> > http://www.yahoo.com
> >
> > Privacy Policy:
> > http://privacy.yahoo.com/privacy/us
> >
> > Terms of Service:
> >
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39947 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Happy Holidays everyone... |
|
.html Here's my gift for wishing everyone a happy and safe holiday season,
and a prosperous New Year...:
Desiderata
Go placidly amid the noise and haste,
and remember what peace there may be in silence.
As far as possible without surrender
be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly;
and listen to others,
even the dull and the ignorant;
they too have their story.
Avoid loud and aggressive persons,
they are vexations to the spirit.
If you compare yourself with others,
you may become vain and bitter;
for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.
Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans.
Keep interested in your own career, however humble;
it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time.
Exercise caution in your business affairs;
for the world is full of trickery.
But let this not blind you to what virtue there is;
many persons strive for high ideals;
and everywhere life is full of heroism.
Be yourself.
Especially, do not feign affection.
Neither be cynical about love;
for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment
it is as perennial as the grass.
Take kindly the counsel of the years,
gracefully surrendering the things of youth.
Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune.
But do not distress yourself with dark imaginings.
Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness.
Beyond a wholesome discipline,
be gentle with yourself.
You are a child of the universe,
no less than the trees and the stars;
you have a right to be here.
And whether or not it is clear to you,
no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.
Therefore be at peace with God,
whatever you conceive Him to be,
and whatever your labors and aspirations,
in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams,
it is still a beautiful world.
Be cheerful.
Strive to be happy.
Max Ehrmann <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39948 |
From: p3murds@aol.com |
Date: 12/23/2006 |
| Subject: Re: [POTA] Re: Estella Warren's Birthday  , 12/23/2006, 12:0 |
.html
.html
I've never heard anything bad about her either like Britney Spears, or
Paris Hilton. Is she as good of a girl as I
think?
~Paul <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39949 |
From: Rich Handley |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Merry Christmas |
|
.html Hi, everyone,
I just wanted to wish you all a very happy holiday season!
Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39950 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Holiday |
|
.html Have a great holiday everyone ......no matter what you
celebrate!
Gather your family for a reading of the Sacred Scrolls
and decorate the Lawgiver statue!
Tim
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39951 |
From: john rutkoski |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Holiday |
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39952 |
From: john rutkoski |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Merry Christmas |
.htmlThankyou very much Rich ! I wish you a joyous season also. Rich Handley <handleyr@...> wrote: Hi, everyone,
I just wanted to wish you all a very happy holiday season!
Rich
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39953 |
From: Robert J. Sawyer |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.htmlHi, Brendan. I'm a HUGE Apes fan. In fact, it's been said that my
NEANDERTHAL PARALLAX trilogy (the Hugo-winning HOMINIDS, plus HUMANS
and HYBRIDS) is my response to PLANET OF THE APES ... ;) And here's
a little snippet from my 2000 novel, CALCULATING GOD:
>>
Susan once quipped that the only piece of scripture I knew was the
Lawgiver's Twenty-ninth Scroll:
<BLOCKQUOTE>
Beware the beast Man, for he is the devil's pawn. Alone among God's
primates, he kills for sport, or lust, or greed. Yea, he will murder
his brother to possess his brother's land. Let him not breed in great
numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him.
Drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death.
</BLOCKQUOTE>
It's what Cornelius read to Taylor near the end of PLANET OF THE APES.
Powerful words, and, like Dr. Zaius, I've always tried to live by
their injunction. But Susan isn't quite right. Back when I was a
student at U of T, lo those many years ago, I occasionally audited
classes by Northrop Frye, the great teacher of English ...
<<
Rob
http://sfwriter.com
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "brendan486" <nzape@...> wrote:
>
> For years I sold your novels through my old business and only had a
> chance to read Illegal Alien.
> I will now read the rest.
> Had I known you were an Ape fan I would have forced every customer
> to buy one.
> Thank you for the Taylor ship photo.
> Brendan.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Robert J. Sawyer" <robertjsawyer@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Taylor's spaceship is only seen partially submerged in the original
> > PLANET OF THE APES. But I've stumbled upon an image that shows the
> > full-size exterior mock-up out of the water as it was in 1967; it's
> > grainy and small, but possibly of use to model makers. This is the
> > version of the ship sometimes referred to as "Icarus" or the ANSA
> > starship before it was modified for BENEATH or ESCAPE. The little
> > image, and details about it, are in my blog:
> >
> > http://sfwriter.com/2006/12/bottom-of-taylors-starship-
> revealed.htmlbr>
> >
> > All best wishes.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > ----------------
> > ROBERT J. SAWYER, Science Fiction Writer
> >
> > Hugo Award winner for HOMINIDS
> > Nebula Award winner for THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT
> > John W. Campbell Memorial Award winner for MINDSCAN
> >
> > http://www.sfwriter.com * sawyer@
> > ----------------
> >
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39954 |
From: theskulpter |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
|
.html HI Ape gang. I just finished a new head sculpt of General Urko last
week,figured I would share some pics, so I added some new photos of it
in the photo section, I will add more when I finish the helmet after
the Holidays. Ok Hope all have a great Holiday, The Farrow. <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39955 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Have a Merry Christmas :-) |
|
.html Hello all :-)
I would like to wish all of you a very Merry Christmas :-)
Seasons Greeting to all members, friends and lovers :-)
May you all receive everything you've hoped for :-)
Sincerely,
Jon Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39956 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Robert J. Sawyer" <robertjsawyer@...>
wrote:
>
> Taylor's spaceship is only seen partially submerged
> in the original PLANET OF THE APES. But I've stum-
> bled upon an image that shows the full-size exterior
> mock-up out of the water as it was in 1967; it's
> grainy and small, but possibly of use to model makers.
> This is the version of the ship sometimes referred to
> as "Icarus" or the ANSA starship before it was modified
> for BENEATH or ESCAPE. The little image, and details
> about it, are in my blog:
>
> http://sfwriter.com/2006/12/bottom-of-taylors-starship-revealed.html"
>
> All best wishes.
>
> Rob
Amazing that the spacecraft had so little in the way
of an actual engine, for spaceflight, but even more
amazing that it was able to be restored for flight again,
for a complete new liftoff from Earth... by Apes with
tech knowledge no better than found in the American Old
West of the early 1800's!!! An amazing inconsistancy.
It also additionally means that the Apes somehow had
the industial-level tech to seek out and actually find
the ship in deep water, also scuba-diving tech to rig
the ship for raising to the water's surface (for a spe-
cies that can't swim and fears the water!), and the
ability to also bring it fully to the surface and then
ashore, actually 'repair' water-soaked tech a couple of
centuries ahead of their time, then somehow figure out
what powers and fuels it and devise the tech for fuel
synthesis or manufacturing--- THEN get it off the ground
for a frightening trip to points unknown!!!
It... boggles the mind. But then again... I'm nit-
picking. It's just that good fiction, is 'believable'
fiction.
~ Jon <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39957 |
From: Glen |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
.htmlExcellent work!...Do you ever do figures for others to purchase?...
G
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "theskulpter" <theskulpter@...> wrote:
>
> HI Ape gang. I just finished a new head sculpt of General Urko last
> week,figured I would share some pics, so I added some new photos of
it
> in the photo section, I will add more when I finish the helmet after
> the Holidays. Ok Hope all have a great Holiday, The Farrow.
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39958 |
From: Robert J. Sawyer |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.htmlJon wrote, referring to the salvaging and relaunch of Taylor's ship,
"It... boggles the mind."
But you bought the part about the talking apes, right? ;)
Really, it's fun to speculate, and there are many possibilities.
For instance, Cornelius, Zira, and Milo are in the Forbidden Zone on
an archeological dig. The Alpha-Omega bomb goes off some distance
away, causes an earthquake that drains the lake, revealing the ship.
As conditions get worse and worse in the chain reaction following the
detonation of the bomb, they crawl into the ship for shelter, and Milo
hits the launch button, and -- the rest is history. (The ship had to
be at least partially automated, since it was designed to operate for
many months without intervention while the crew was in hibernation,
and we know it launched just before the chain-reaction got out of
control, since Zira describes it as seen from space in ESCAPE.)
Or the ship propels itself up onto dry land after having sunk, after
something -- an electrical short, maybe -- causes its main engines to
briefly fire, pushing it up on shore, where it's found by apes; again,
automation to the rescue; they activate the computerized launch
sequence, and we're off to 1973.
We know the ship wasn't designed to come down in water (that's said in
dialog in POTA), and we know from BENEATH that its sister ship had
tripodal landing gear (the gear seen in the wreckage is actually the
landing gear from the full-size mockup of the Jupiter 2 from LOST IN
SPACE). So, again, once it's ashore, the apes might have used
block-and-tackle (just as they do with the Alpha-Omega bomb) to raise
it onto its landing gear, and they get in and fire the main engine.
Remember, the flight isn't necessarily anything more than the ship
going up and coming down (with the pesky business of a Hasslein-curve
timewarp in between, but that's caused by the bomb, rather than by
anything Milo does), so it's hardly as though they have to learn how
to pilot it (and it obviously aborts its flight improperly, again
coming down in water, which, as was said, it wasn't designed to do,
although presumably at some point the ship's computer dumped the lower
stage with the landing gear, leaving only the re-entry capsule with
the heat-shield intact, as seen in ESCAPE).
Or, how 'bout this: Landon's lobotomy isn't as bad as Taylor assumed.
Although he's been rendered docile and mute (or maybe is just
refusing to speak in front of the apes, having seen what happened to
Dodge), Landon leads Milo to the site of the sunken ship. A lot of
debris has floated out of the ship (the hatch was blown, after all),
including a spacesuit with air tanks. Landon uses the spacesuit as a
diving suit, dives down to the sunken ship, and manages to inflate the
ship's emergency flotation collar (included in the unlikely event of
an unplanned water landing), bringing the ship to the surface.
You want to go really far out? There's the underexplored notion of
psychic connections between apes in the film series: the apes' IQs
are rising spontaneously and en masse BEFORE THE ADVENT OF CAESAR in
CONQUEST, and Caesar himself says he can possibly communicate with
apes on the five continents without actually talking to them, and he
also seems to have a connection ACROSS TIME to his statue 600 years in
the future (which cries at the end of BATTLE). So maybe Milo is
channeling Virgil, the orangutan Einstein from BATTLE, and has all the
knowledge he needs about Taylor's spaceship (the plans for which
MacDonald's brother might have quietly taken with him from the
Archives Section, where he used to work).
Or ... well, make up your own scenario. To me, it's a lot more fun to
imagine possible solutions than to reject the notion out of hand. For
my money, Paul Dehn was a genius in thinking of having apes salvage
Taylor's ship.
Happy Holidays!
Rob
----------------
ROBERT J. SAWYER, Science Fiction Writer
Hugo Award winner for HOMINIDS
Nebula Award winner for THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT
John W. Campbell Memorial Award winner for MINDSCAN
http://www.sfwriter.com * sawyer@...
---------------- <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39959 |
From: Judy Watson |
Date: 12/24/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.htmlJust wanted to add my Happy Holidays to all the group and I love this constant discussion about things that I never thought of - what a great bunch of intelligent ape loving people ! "Robert J. Sawyer" <robertjsawyer@...> wrote: Jon wrote, referring to the salvaging and relaunch of Taylor's ship, "It... boggles the mind." But you bought the part about the talking apes, right? ;) Really, it's fun to speculate, and there are many possibilities. For instance, Cornelius, Zira, and Milo are in the
Forbidden Zone on an archeological dig. The Alpha-Omega bomb goes off some distance away, causes an earthquake that drains the lake, revealing the ship. As conditions get worse and worse in the chain reaction following the detonation of the bomb, they crawl into the ship for shelter, and Milo hits the launch button, and -- the rest is history. (The ship had to be at least partially automated, since it was designed to operate for many months without intervention while the crew was in hibernation, and we know it launched just before the chain-reaction got out of control, since Zira describes it as seen from space in ESCAPE.) Or the ship propels itself up onto dry land after having sunk, after something -- an electrical short, maybe -- causes its main engines to briefly fire, pushing it up on shore, where it's found by apes; again, automation to the rescue; they activate the computerized launch sequence, and we're off to
1973. We know the ship wasn't designed to come down in water (that's said in dialog in POTA), and we know from BENEATH that its sister ship had tripodal landing gear (the gear seen in the wreckage is actually the landing gear from the full-size mockup of the Jupiter 2 from LOST IN SPACE). So, again, once it's ashore, the apes might have used block-and-tackle (just as they do with the Alpha-Omega bomb) to raise it onto its landing gear, and they get in and fire the main engine. Remember, the flight isn't necessarily anything more than the ship going up and coming down (with the pesky business of a Hasslein-curve timewarp in between, but that's caused by the bomb, rather than by anything Milo does), so it's hardly as though they have to learn how to pilot it (and it obviously aborts its flight improperly, again coming down in water, which, as was said, it wasn't designed to do,
although presumably at some point the ship's
computer dumped the lower stage with the landing gear, leaving only the re-entry capsule with the heat-shield intact, as seen in ESCAPE). Or, how 'bout this: Landon's lobotomy isn't as bad as Taylor assumed. Although he's been rendered docile and mute (or maybe is just refusing to speak in front of the apes, having seen what happened to Dodge), Landon leads Milo to the site of the sunken ship. A lot of debris has floated out of the ship (the hatch was blown, after all), including a spacesuit with air tanks. Landon uses the spacesuit as a diving suit, dives down to the sunken ship, and manages to inflate the ship's emergency flotation collar (included in the unlikely event of an unplanned water landing), bringing the ship to the surface. You want to go really far out? There's the underexplored notion of psychic connections between apes in the film series: the apes' IQs
are rising spontaneously and en masse BEFORE THE ADVENT
OF CAESAR in CONQUEST, and Caesar himself says he can possibly communicate with apes on the five continents without actually talking to them, and he also seems to have a connection ACROSS TIME to his statue 600 years in the future (which cries at the end of BATTLE). So maybe Milo is channeling Virgil, the orangutan Einstein from BATTLE, and has all the knowledge he needs about Taylor's spaceship (the plans for which MacDonald's brother might have quietly taken with him from the Archives Section, where he used to work). Or ... well, make up your own scenario. To me, it's a lot more fun to imagine possible solutions than to reject the notion out of hand. For my money, Paul Dehn was a genius in thinking of having apes salvage Taylor's ship. Happy Holidays! Rob ------------ ---- ROBERT J. SAWYER, Science Fiction Writer Hugo Award winner for HOMINIDS Nebula Award winner for THE TERMINAL
EXPERIMENT John W. Campbell Memorial Award winner for MINDSCAN http://www.sfwriter .com * sawyer@sfwriter. com------------ ----
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39960 |
From: pota@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Planet of the Apes 1968, 12/25/2006, 2:00 am |
.html.html
| Reminder from: |
|
pota Yahoo! Group |
| |
| Title: |
|
Planet of the Apes 1968 |
| |
| Date: |
|
Monday December 25, 2006 |
| Time: |
|
2:00 am
- 4:30 am
|
| Location: |
|
Sci Fi Channel |
| |
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39961 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Robert J. Sawyer" <robertjsawyer@...>
wrote:
>
> Jon wrote, referring to the salvaging and relaunch
> of Taylor's ship, "It... boggles the mind."
>
> But you bought the part about the talking apes,
> right? ;)
Sure, that's easy to accept, because... 'we'
are actually 'talking apes' after all. It's not
that big a leap between making sounds, and making
sounds with more complex meanings and in greater
variety.
Notable... is a cable program I saw recently, which
examined an odd Human condition in which some people
were inexplicably incabale of cognitive speech. An
examination of their DNA revealed a missing component,
normally found in normal speaking people. AND... that
gene is not found in any of the primates. It seems
that evolution, by random chance, resulted in the
development of a gene that makes intelligent Human
speech possible. Strange? Not really. It is these
miscropic differences between species that make them
all unique in their own way. And since were are 97%-99%
genetically similar to our closest primate relatives,
it's parts of that 1%-3% difference that makes us what
we are, and them... what they are. Amazing... how one
missing or incorrect gene can make all the difference,
and there are tens of thousands of 'defects', linked to
a single gene, that cause maladies, and similarly, those
that make us Human, genes smaller by count, but amazing
in the effect of making us what we are.
Another example of a similar defect is that
of some people whom cannot walk upright, as they
are apparently missing a gene... which permits a
normal upright walking stance. It serves as evi-
dence that the upright stance in more than skele-
tal/anatomical. A gene missing, must be present,
to permit for proper upright walking. Ultimately
it took immense effort to get those poor folks to
walk upright, but the walk isn't normal, and they
do so with difficulty and lack of confidence.
> Really, it's fun to speculate, and there are many
> possibilities.
And I'm happy to read about them :-) And...
to politely debate them :-D
> For instance, Cornelius, Zira, and Milo are
> in the Forbidden Zone on an archeological
> dig. The Alpha-Omega bomb goes off some dis-
> tance away, causes an earthquake that drains
> the lake, revealing the ship. As conditions
> get worse and worse in the chain reaction
> following the detonation of the bomb, they
> crawl into the ship for shelter, and Milo
> hits the launch button, and -- the rest is
> history. (The ship had to be at least par-
> tially automated, since it was designed to
> operate for many months without intervention
> while the crew was in hibernation, and we know
> it launched just before the chain-reaction got
> out of control, since Zira describes it as seen
> from space in ESCAPE.)
Your first supposition above falls apart at
the beginning, sorry to say. The first reason
I will cite, is that very likely the A-O bomb
would have enveloped the area of the lake... in
seconds, if not in fractions of a second. That
leaves no time to run and hide in the ship. They
would be too close to a bomb... that will eventu-
ally consume the Earth. They're at point blank
range. And once they even saw the light of the
explosion- they'd be fried. See it- then die-
and in the same instant.
But you also have the timeline wrong. Zera
herself confessed that they were already in space
when the A-O bomb went off, and she described this
sequence of events, as seen from space;
1) A bright, white, blinding light.
2) Then a 'storm'. Likely the shockwave of the
explosion, the Earth's atmosphere blown out into
space toward them.
3) She/They witnessed the rim off the Earth 'melt',
an odd thing to say, since it wouldn't be like the
Earth could drip like a candle or anything, but it
could have turned white-hot, suggesting 'melting',
like soft metal in a hot furnace.
Conclusively, they were already in space when the
A-O bomb explosion occurred.
Oh... and the idea that Milo merely 'hits a
button' to launch the ship, is... well... prepos-
terous. Just to drive a car alone takes a mini-
mum of SIX actions, before one is driving down
the road; Insert the key. Turn it to start the
car. Put it into gear. Pull the emergency brake
to unlock it. Press the gas. Turn the steering
wheel to follow one's chosen course.
Preflight checks are... enormous, requiring
many steps. How did Milo learn what they are,
those dozen... if not hundreds of preflight steps?
From the computer? Gee... how did he learn how to
work that??? I have been on computers for decades,
Windows-operated IBM-type machines... and I GET LOST
if asked to run a MAC! What about checking the sys-
tems for air, potable water, fuel, electricity, pro-
perly-operating systems and all thet? How does he
know that they're working and up to par? it takes
more than a preflight checklist for all of that.
Where'd he get the fuel??? Did he use Ape lamp
oil? Discover the undergrond tanks of an ancient
gas station somewhere? How did he liquify the
oxygen he would need? Where'd he find the hoses
and fitings... needed to pump it aboard? How did
he store it- before then, if he figured out how to
make fuel and liquid oxygen? he would have... had
to re-invent dozens of advanced technologies to
make that flight... and... in a very short period
of time, to make that ship flight-ready. I say...
impossible.
> Or the ship propels itself up onto dry land
> after having sunk, after something -- an
> electrical short, maybe -- causes its main
> engines to briefly fire, pushing it up on
> shore, where it's found by apes; again, auto-
> mation to the rescue; they activate the com-
> puterized launch sequence, and we're off to 1973.
The above supposition, again viewed from a
realistic point of view, itself does not hold
water, because water alone is a BIG problem.
The ship was filled to the gills with water, a
ship designed to carry just four people by weight
weighing in total somewhere between 700 and 800
pounds. And ship... now filled with water and
overburdened by many TONS. A ship that has to
now move those tons of water... THROUGH water,
then... somehow, by what can be described as
nothing less than a miracle, wound up on that
rocky shore... full of water, and not experiencing
a singular dent in a fender or buckled hullplate!!!
The simple physics of what your descrbe... just
aren't being taken into account. The difference
is similar to dropping a 1-gallon plastic milk jug
filled only with air, and one filled with water.
The carrying of an air-filled jug up to the roof
for dropping, is virtually effortless. A water-
filled one, a full gallon, takes much more work.
Just carrying one home from the grocery store is
a pain to the fingers. Now imagine that the water
jug is much larger weighs tons. It will be geome-
trically much, much heavier. Now drop both jugs.
The air-filled one will drop to bounce safely,
and would likely experience no damage at all is
dropped from any building height. Now drop the
water-filled milk jug. The effect is devasting.
SPLASH- the jug bursts open to the point of use-
lessness. And if tons in weight, even more so.
The physics is simple, and considering that
the darned thing began leaking so easily, to
sink, proves that the ship was no submarine!
My goodness- no. How, I wonder, how did Milo
perform the repairs on the high tech metals of
that leaking hull too??? Tar and Oakum? Chew-
ing gum? A plasma welder? Delco Caulking Com-
pound? Epoxy? Glue made from Human flesh?
it makes one wonder.
I would suggest an experiment, to show you
how much water weighs, in real volume. Take
a container that measure say, 12" in all sides,
then another of merely double the dimensions, at
24" on a side. Not fill both with water. Now try
to pick each up from the floor, one at a time.
The 12" container will be heavy, but you can lift
it easily, but the 24" filled container will be 8X
heavier, and you'd be hard-pressed to lift it at
all, or with real difficulty. A starship of that
size... would fill with many weighty tons. Quite a
bit to demand of those engines, pre-programmed or
not. Then... there's that rocky shore-side land-
ing, with a full water load, and with nary a scratch
Erf :-( I don't think so.
And even if the ship didn't come ashore
that way, but instead had to be brought up,
how and why did the apes... develop diving
bell and scuba technology? the former is
easy, but very tricky. The latter... takes
much more tech effort, including the re-inven-
tion of compressor technology, to fill the
scuba tanks. Many sciences were involved.
Remember- Jaques Cousteau and other, after
much investment of time, money, and much
experimentation, perfected the simplest
workable scuba gear. It took many people and
years, to come up with something the worked
reliably and safely. Diving bells and diving
suits required less tech knowledge, but its
a heck of a thing to re-invent and perfect,
in such a VERY short period of time. A time
way to short to perfect such for safe useful-
ness.
> We know the ship wasn't designed to come down
> in water (that's said in dialog in POTA), and
> we know from BENEATH that its sister ship had
> tripodal landing gear (the gear seen in the
> wreckage is actually the landing gear from the
> full-size mockup of the Jupiter 2 from LOST IN
> SPACE). So, again, once it's ashore, the apes
> might have used block-and-tackle (just as they
> do with the Alpha-Omega bomb) to raise it onto
> its landing gear, and they get in and fire the
> main engine.
Thinking on this. But the same probs are
fully in place. Read down further.
> Remember, the flight isn't necessarily anything
> more than the ship going up and coming down
> (with the pesky business of a Hasslein-curve
> timewarp in between, but that's caused by the
> bomb, rather than by anything Milo does), so
> it's hardly as though they have to learn how
> to pilot it (and it obviously aborts its flight
> improperly, again coming down in water, which,
> as was said, it wasn't designed to do, although
> presumably at some point the ship's computer
> dumped the lower stage with the landing gear,
> leaving only the re-entry capsule with the heat-
> shield intact, as seen in ESCAPE).
Well... dumping the rear engine sure does make
liftoff again- imposible- right? it's then just
an enginless capsule, meaning that the engine
would still have ti be recovered, meaning that
TWO big parts had to be retrieved. A doubly
tough ffort, then the followup reassembly by
non-high-tech-comprehending Ape-folks. The above
premise has all kinds of holes in it. Just...
not plausible.
And yes, it IS all just science fiction, but the
difference between science fiction, and fantasy, is
the workable plausibility of it. Often something
touted as sci-fi is so poorly plausible that it
cannot be enjoyed, because the 'science' is just
so bad, that the serious watcher of the film can-
not enjoy it. magic as found in fantasy, is auto-
matically accepted as is. Magic... is just magic,
and accepted on belief alone. How it works is
entirely irrelavent. It requires no more explana-
tion than does one's believe in (a) God, or Angels.
What makes good science fiction, is plausibility,
especially if it's part of the plotline, in a
universe where things are naturally explanable in
one way or another... even if the pseudo-scientific
explanation is pure balony... as with Star Trek's
Warp Drive, Transporters, and Antigrav lifting de-
vices. Tech-lovers love that stuff, watch science
fiction often because of it, and its plausibility,
and it's part of what scirnce fiction stories are
made of, that makes them what they are, along with
hopefully decent stories and plot-lines.
As a rule... the 'story' of POTA is more important,
even when the science fails. It's a great fish-out-
of-water story, and an immense informative morality
tale. Science... was never meant to be a part of any
actual center of the story. the truest science fic-
tion parts, are shown and done, at the beginning of
most of the film stories, meant thereafter to be ig-
nored, and forgotten. The spaceships... are just
plot devices, used then cast aside, where in stories
like Star Trek and Star wars and others, the tech is
around all the time, in common daily use.
In POTA... the tech of it was never really planned
out well, nor explained, and was never meant to be,
BUT... sci-fi tech lovers love those parts of science
fiction, as I am one, and suck it up with relish.
But with POTA... there are too many holes in the tech,
forcing us to try to figure it out, which in itself...
is part of the whole of the fun! :-D
> Or, how 'bout this: Landon's lobotomy isn't as
> bad as Taylor assumed. Although he's been ren-
> dered docile and mute (or maybe is just refusing
> to speak in front of the apes, having seen what
> happened to Dodge), Landon leads Milo to the site
> of the sunken ship. A lot of debris has floated
> out of the ship (the hatch was blown, after all),
> including a spacesuit with air tanks. Landon uses
> the spacesuit as a diving suit, dives down to the
> sunken ship, and manages to inflate the ship's
> emergency flotation collar (included in the unlike-
> ly event of an unplanned water landing), bringing
> the ship to the surface.
Sorry... but I just don't buy that. I can't
even magine how that proposal would fit into the
possibilities, and there's no hint of any kind,
none, that Landon was able, or willing, or capable,
of doing any such a thing.
I think that Landon, injured and in a semi-
conscious stupor, was 'talking in his sleep' as
it were, babbling ro smething in his injured
state, as Zaius was made aware of this, when he
decided to, One; have him operated on to see how
this speech was possible, or Two; ordered him
labotomized to silence him. Remember, Zaius
'knows' that man could once speak, and is likely
aware that Speakin Man as a civilization preceeded
the Apes, and is hell-bent on keeping Man at the
bottom of the social ladder, merely one among all
the other animals. This... conflicts with his
Faith, and will do anything to maintain his Faith,
and Ape superiority Zaius and other know this 'Big
Secret', and cannot cope with the possible compe-
tion with another sentient, and very violent, race
or species. They want to rule, forever, and nothing
will stop them from trying to maintain their status
as the most intelligent species on the planet. it
is their turn, as it were, and they want to stay on
top- at all costs.
And in this day and age, in real life, we all
know what people will do... in the name of self-
preservation... and... Faith :-(
> You want to go really far out? There's the under-
> explored notion of psychic connections between apes
> in the film series: the apes' IQs are rising spon-
> taneously and en masse BEFORE THE ADVENT OF CAESAR
> in CONQUEST, and Caesar himself says he can possibly
> communicate with apes on the five continents without
> actually talking to them, and he also seems to have
> a connection ACROSS TIME to his statue 600 years in
> the future (which cries at the end of BATTLE). So
> maybe Milo is channeling Virgil, the orangutan Ein-
> stein from BATTLE, and has all the knowledge he needs
> about Taylor's spaceship (the plans for which MacDo-
> nald's brother might have quietly taken with him from
> the Archives Section, where he used to work).
Well... I don't but any psychic scenario or
idea that may be presented. Nothing at all sup-
ports the Apes having 'psionic' abilities of any
kind, or spirits 'communicating' across the eons.
Just doesn't work for me at all. Sorry.
> Or ... well, make up your own scenario. To me,
> it's a lot more fun to imagine possible solutions
> than to reject the notion out of hand. For my
> money, Paul Dehn was a genius in thinking of hav-
> ing apes salvage Taylor's ship.
That... was the only possible solution to the
problem of making the storyline work, I would say.
Salvage was the only solution.
But for my money- no way it could have happened.
It would make more sense if the Apes had stumbled
upon a solar-powered time-machime, which was ready'
to use... when the 'Big War' started, preventing
the Humans that invented it from using it for some
reason. But that of course would have presented
something of a different story, as far as ESCAPE
is concerned, in particular.
Anyway... in my view the knowledge and
logistics and additional tech needed, to raise
and prepare and launch that ship, would have
involved many years, and likely decades to work
out... to fit to 'reason'. Being technologically
more than a century or two behind, is just too much,
and it's worse than a hundered years before our
real life present time, bacause Ape tech goes back
at least two full centuries before the present,
again more like Old America of the Early 1800's
or worse. That concept of their level of tech
works, that comparitive timeframe of development,
because they do have firearms and photography, but
no electricity, radio, or electric lighting. They
had not as yet re-invented the 'Age of Electricity',
and are in fact Pre-Industrial. Their tech is just
above Medieval a smidgeon or so. Yheir society is
also somewhat Feudal, or more a Caste system. And
that hardly permits much in the way of important in-
dividual efforts to progress technologically. The
incentives really just aren't there.
Just imagine a cowboy of 1820 America... suddenly
presented with a keyless 2007 Cadilac. He'd more
likely shoot holes in it in fear or frustration,
than even think of imagining... driving it around.
The truest 'fix' for this whole issue, would
just be that the spaceship didn't 'crash' in the
first place. It landed nicely, as they then just
began to explore their 'new' world :-) That would
leave the rest of the story intact, deaths and
injuries and all, Taylor keeping the ship a
secret because he hopes to get back to it, in
hopes of making a clean... ESCAPE FROM THE PLANET
OF THE APES! :-D But... he is captured by the
underground mutants... before he can get back to
it. Sad :-(
In conclusion, so that I can just sit and
enjoy the story, I just accept that they did
what they did, and... that's it. Somehow they
simply pulled it off. I can then enjoy the
acting and storyline and concept, to great plea-
sure, since the story itself is the thing- what's
truly important about it all :-) The 'story' is
what truly counts :-) To Devil with the tech-
such as it is...
> Happy Holidays!
You too, good buddy :-)
And... sorry for the long reply, but... this
'issue' poses immense questions, and a great many
of them. That's... just the way it is.
AND... you don't have to agree with any of what
I said. It's just discussion, and I have no inten-
tion of bursting anyone's bubble on what they be-
lieve as far as POTA tech is concerned. It's a big
nit-pick, but I for one won't be upset if you agree
with nothing I said, or don't want to 'argue' any
of my points :-) I just love... chatting about
things like this. That's the fun of it, just as
it is :-D
> Rob
Merry Christmas!!! :-D
~ Jon Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39962 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "theskulpter" <theskulpter@...> wrote:
>
> HI Ape gang. I just finished a new head sculpt of
> General Urko last week,figured I would share some
> pics, so I added some new photos of it in the pho-
> to section, I will add more when I finish the hel-
> met after the Holidays. Ok Hope all have a great
> Holiday, The Farrow.
WOW! THAT'S AMAZING WORK! Bloody fantastic!
Love it. Perfectly marvelous :-) Kudos, Fallow :-D
A big ape-like pat on the back there :-)
~ Jon Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39963 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, Judy Watson <bettabeedee@...> wrote:
>
> Just wanted to add my Happy Holidays to all the
> group and I love this constant discussion about
> things that I never thought of - what a great
> bunch of intelligent ape loving people !
Thank you so much, Judy :-)
I must say that I've been in groups that 'claim'
to be open to such extensive levels of discussion,
but... they aren't. Many have childish members
whom, thier own theories not being accepted, get
defensive, angry, or worse.
I lurked here for a long time before I decided
to speak up, because I was judging the maturity of
this group. I found it to ve VERY mature, and
decided to get involved :-) And so far... I am
loving it. Glad you are too :-)
And here's a question for you; Ahve you ever
wondered why the Apes had such nice automatic
weapons, such nice frearms that work so well and
are, apparently, the most advanced tech they have?
Have you noticed... how technologically smooth and
clean and functional they are, when everything else
they design looks so rough and angular and... stone-
aged? Ever notice that? :-) Even a common and
surely function wagon wheel... looks like the
Flintstones themselves desighed it!
I have my own theory about that. I say that
such things as guns, a device and tool so very
necessary for hunting and defense, will, as a
useful design, be maintained and carried one for
many hundreds if not thousands of years. The
gun mechanisms and working principles were carried
on over time for all that time, because they worked,
and worked well, the original designs being Human
in origin and carried on across all those centuries,
and such designs, as efficient as they are now,
will be just as effecient as the then to come,
centuries hence. A Human of today, knowledgeable
of current gun designs, will likely recignize me-
chanical elements that are largely unchanged over
those many centuries!!! You just can't beat- what
works :-)
And the technology for it all is very simple too,
and can be carried out in any blacksmith's shop,
by someone trained in gun-making. Given the plans
and current tools, even 'you' can make a gun in
your own home from raw metal stock. Such has even
been done... in actual real life prisons, with what
they have very limited access to. Given the time
and tools, anything can be done, especially if the
tech is relativelt simple :-)
It's notable that in the POTA Tv series, Human
books were all over the place. Likely the acid-
laden paper f those times did not survive to the
time of Taylor's entry into POTA, but surely, like
the Bible, those pages were copied numerous times
over the centuries, drawings included :-)
Knowledge... is power, and surely even the Apes
know that. And guns are power too, as a certain
Gorilla in BATTLE knew that. Knowledge... and guns.
Knowledge... and... guns...
~ Jon Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39964 |
From: Robert J. Sawyer |
Date: 12/25/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.htmlHi, Jon.
Well, neither of us knows anything about how the Alpha-Omega bomb does
its business, but, as you say, we have Zira's testimony that it
"melted" the rim of the earth, plausibly implying that its destructive
mechanism isn't one we're familiar with. :)
So it might have been a slow-acting or multi-step process that could
have allowed earthquakes, etc., prior to actually destroying the
planet. It's plausible that Taylor's ship wasn't at point-blank range
to the Mutant Cathedral ("ground zero"); after all, Taylor and Nova
were heading AWAY from where he'd been before, not back to where the
ship had come down.
And your discussion of the difficulty of moving a jug full of water
through air is missing a hugely key point: you're forgetting that the
ship full of water (or partially full of; we don't know which) is
surrounded BY water -- right up until the very end, when it comes out
of it onto shore.
Most living tissue has about the same density as water, and moving it
through water can be done with no more energy than is provided by a
Big Mac and a large order of fries: we call it swimming. :)
And very large entities, on the order of the size of the part of
Taylor's ship we saw, that have densities equal to water also move
through it easily, with little energy; think of giant squids.
Plus, of course, the engines on Taylor's ship aren't mere rockets;
rather, they're engines capable of interstellar travel -- his was a
starship, remember. An engine that can propel a ship from Sol to a
star in the constellation of Orion (where Taylor thought they were
going) can surely push it up onto shore.
There's no canonical reason to believe that what landed in POTA was
only a landing module and not the full ship.) And I disagree that the
ship shows no signs of damage; look at it in ESCAPE -- it's a lot more
beat up than it was in PLANET, and it's just as plausible that the
beating-up happened as the ship came ashore in 3955 as that it
happened during re-entry in 1973. After all, we saw in PLANET that
the ship could do a re-entry on its own without even getting singed.
In any event, we have no idea what sort of fuel the ship used, or
whether its reserves were depleted or intact. Milo may have found the
ship fully fueled.
As for breathing air -- we have no idea how long the ape-o-nauts were
aboard the ship, but if the interior is large enough, there's
breathing air for hours just in the sealed ship, without any need for
any further life-support equipment. And, yes, there are all kinds of
substances the apes had that could be used to plug holes in the hull
(or maybe they never bothered: it's notable that the ape-o-nauts don
spacesuits for their flight, meaning perhaps that the ship's hull
never was completely sealed again).
Or, if it was a multistage landing craft, like the Apollo-era Lunar
Module it may have been something as simple as when the ship finally
hit the bottom of the lake, the shock jolted free the ascent stage
which floated to the surface of its own accord.
And we don't know how many stages there were: there could have been
three or more: a stardrive section, which could have broken off when
the ship hit the lake's bottom; an ascent-engine, which could have got
them into space in 3955 and been jettisoned by the computer upon
commencement of re-entry in 1973; and the capsule that we saw already
down in the water in 1973. We just don't know.
And, yes, if the ape-o-nauts hadn't been blown back in time, they
might have died rather quickly after the ship launched, because of all
the things Milo doubtless didn't understand or overlooked, but the
"fact" is that they WERE blown backwards in time.
And, forgive me, but, again, it's funny to me that you balk at the
salvaging of the ship, but say nothing about the far-less-likely
reverse time travel. One either buys the looseness of the science in
the films as a whole, or one doesn't, but to get so hung up on one
point seems odd to me, but, hey, to each his own ... :)
Anyway, yes, a launch is complex -- but so is re-entry; indeed, the
re-entry that Taylor's ship did in POTA is arguably a much more
complex operation than the launch that Milo presumably engineered:
all Milo had to do was get the ship to go more-or-less up (he never
needed to worry about achieving orbit or executing a flight plan),
whereas in POTA the ship had to get the angles and speeds exactly
right to avoid burning up on re-entry -- AND ALL OF THAT HAPPENED WITH
NO ONE PUSHING EVEN A SINGLE BUTTON. The ship is demonstrably highly
automated.
But if you want to argue that Milo had to push more than one button,
fine: we see in BENEATH that the Apes not only speak our language,
but they also read and write it (recall the signs written in English
used by the anti-war protesters). So, all Milo had to do was read the
(plasticized hardcopy) manual, or follow on-screen prompts. And we
saw the instrumentation in Taylor's ship: it's very simple, much
simpler than the flight deck of a Space Shuttle (or even a Gemini
capsule), again, arguing for a very high degree of automation.
As for the psionics stuff, I agree it's far out, but psionics ARE
canonically part of the POTA cycle; the mutants in BENEATH absolutely
have them (and Caesar does sound like he's arguing for a form of them
at the end of CONQUEST with the Emperor Moth analogy). If you are
arguing that ONLY humans might be capable of them in a universe in
which they categorically do exist, well, that's a bit specist, and I
doubt Virgil would approve. :)
Also, if there is in fact no psychic connection between Caesar of the
early 21st century in the main story of BATTLE, and the Caesar statue
of the 27th century in the epilogue to BATTLE, how do you explain the
statue crying at the end of BATTLE? :) (No, I'm not pushing the
psychic angle; it's just a fun one to consider in a fictional universe
that demonstrably -- the mutants in BENEATH -- has already allowed for
psychic powers.)
The bottom line for me is that it IS canonical to the Apes series that
Milo DID manage to get Taylor's ship to fly, at least briefly. For
me, saying "it couldn't have happened" over and over again is far less
interesting (or fun!) than trying to think of ways in which it might
have. :)
As for the rules for writing science fiction, I'll try to keep 'em in
mind ... ;)
All best wishes.
----------------
ROBERT J. SAWYER, Science Fiction Writer
Hugo Award winner for HOMINIDS
Nebula Award winner for THE TERMINAL EXPERIMENT
John W. Campbell Memorial Award winner for MINDSCAN
http://www.sfwriter.com * sawyer@...
---------------- <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39965 |
From: Jonathan |
Date: 12/26/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Taylor's spaceship on Fox lot in 1967, showing rear details |
.html--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Robert J. Sawyer" <robertjsawyer@...>
wrote:
>
> Hi, Jon.
Hello, Robert :-)
> Well, neither of us knows anything about how
> the Alpha-Omega bomb does its business, but,
> as you say, we have Zira's testimony that it
> "melted" the rim of the earth, plausibly im-
> plying that its destructive mechanism isn't
> one we're familiar with. :)
Well... certainly it was 'atomic', or better-
'nuclear', and it would have to be to have the
effect it had. Otherwise the 'visual' or practical
effect of the bomb need not be that unusual. It
quite simply was a very, very, very powerful type
of nuclear bomb.
The description of Zira of the 'the rim of the
Earth melting' was merely her best interpretation
of what she saw as the planet went white hot after
the initial blast wave. The 'storm' the preceded
Zira's observations, surely could have drawn them to
a viewport to see what in fact was happening outside.
Otherwise... her limited experience and interpreta-
tion of the thing she saw, was based on her life
experience in a society 100 to 200 years behind our
modern times. She merely described what she saw,
as best she could.
Then again... the blast and effects of the A-O
bomb surely could be such- enough- to bulge out
enormous globules of Earth-mass, much in the way
of the goo in a lava lamp, and with it happening
on such a largely massive scale, could have moved
and flowed like... melting. Surely the force of
the A-O blast 'could' have had that effect. And it
certainly would have been something amazing to see,
the Earth rippling and bulging it protest against
what it just endured.
> So it might have been a slow-acting or multi-step
> process that could have allowed earthquakes, etc.,
I don't see... how a singular explosion could
be a multi-step process, especially as far as a
nuclear-like process is concerned. It's effect
is so devastating due to its sudden-release-of-
all effect, after all. And the effect had to be
so intense, that it virtually induced fission of
the mass of the Earth itself, at least in large
part, and surely enough... to destroy the world-
with just one shot. Devastating. At the least
the Earth was reduced into a huge, totally molten
mass. Heck... life could even arise there again,
given 3 billion years or so... to cool. Over that
period of time, even the Sun itself would still have
some 3 nillion years of its own life left, assuming
it has 6 billion remaining now.
> prior to actually destroying the planet. It's
> plausible that Taylor's ship wasn't at point-blank
> range to the Mutant Cathedral ("ground zero"); after
> all, Taylor and Nova were heading AWAY from where
> he'd been before, not back to where the ship had
> come down.
Well... Cornelius' own map, shown to Taylor,
told that the Forbidden Zone wasn't all that far
from Ape City proper. Even a conventional nu-
clear explosion would have reached Ape city quickly
if above ground, and it's obvious that the A-O
bomb was much, much more powerful than that-
enough to destroy the entire Earth, of course.
Ape City, I feel certain, would have been itself
destroyed in the first second, and the entire
Earth within a couple of moments.
> And your discussion of the difficulty of moving
> a jug full of water through air is missing a
> hugely key point: you're forgetting that the
> ship full of water (or partially full of; we
> don't know which) is surrounded BY water --
> right up until the very end, when it comes out
> of it onto shore.
True. Very true. But you're forgetting
about inertia. Surrounded by water or not,
the engines STILL have to push around many tons
of water- through a watery medium that is 800
time DENSER than AIR. Another major negative
influence. So... that poor ship had to have
pushed a LOT of mass, through even a much denser
mass than air. Oh... the strain.
And still... that ship, overburdened with
its liquid load, had to land on the beach intact
with that load. Heck, it couldn't even withstand
just floating on the surface, without springing
leaks all over the place. So... how can it pos-
sibly have withstood a full-load beaching, with-
out bursting open like a dropped whale??? See
my point? :-)
> Most living tissue has about the same density
> as water, and moving it through water can be
> done with no more energy than is provided by
> a Big Mac and a large order of fries: we call
> it swimming. :)
Very true, even if we can swin faster than
a walk, and run faster than swimming. But it
must be taken into account the the geometrically
larger mass of the water-filled ship... is an
entirely different problem.
I don't know what the volume of the spacecraft
was, but... if it is approximately the volume of
the trailor of a semi truck that carries gasoline,
oil, milk or whatever, the sheer weight of all that
is between 50,000 and 54,000 pounds. I know because
I weighed such trucks before and after loading, for
a living. So, in addition to it's own weight or
mass, the ship was perhaps carrying an additional
50 to 54 tons! Not a light burder. And I'll wager
that the truer volume- was much greater than that,
because that ship was as high as a semi-truck tank
container, but was easily twice as wide. It may have
been hauling between 75 and 100 additional tons... and
without bursting open- when beached... at speed. So
if that 'is' what occured, its an amazing feat, for
a spacecraft meant to just hold back vacuum, or rather,
just to hold air and fly like a jet and spacecraft.
Gee... it's a cast-iron bucket! A Sherman tank!
> And very large entities, on the order of the size
> of the part of Taylor's ship we saw, that have
> densities equal to water also move through it
> easily, with little energy; think of giant squids.
Apples and oranges. The ship cannot possibly
be compared to a squid in any way. Sorry... my
friend.
> Plus, of course, the engines on Taylor's ship
> aren't mere rockets; rather, they're engines
> capable of interstellar travel -- his was a
> starship, remember. An engine that can propel
> a ship from Sol to a star in the constellation
> of Orion (where Taylor thought they were going)
> can surely push it up onto shore.
But you see... that would make that stardrive
even more amazing! It can move the ship, at
any speed below that of light, AND propel FTL!
Bloody amazing versatility... even when serving
as an impromptu submarine! LOL :-)
Improbable considering the decade that 'engine'
was developed, during a time, when in real life,
at least four different kinds of jet engines are
required to fly in differing altitude environments,
and none of them can operate in 'all' of them. A
scamjet engine for example, cannot operate at all
at below supersonic speeds. It requires supersonic
velocities to be in effect- to operate- in the first
place. Any slower... and it stalls and shuts down.
The point is... is that that ship's engine would
have to have positively amazing operating flexibility
to do what it does, in so many varied environments,
truly. Quite amazing, from a RL engineering point
of view.
> There's no canonical reason to believe that what
> landed in POTA was only a landing module and not
> the full ship.) And I disagree that the ship
> shows no signs of damage; look at it in ESCAPE
> -- it's a lot more beat up than it was in PLANET,
> and it's just as plausible that the beating-up
> happened as the ship came ashore in 3955 as that
> it happened during re-entry in 1973. After all,
> we saw in PLANET that the ship could do a re-entry
> on its own without even getting singed.
The kind of damage I'm defining would have
to be considerably more than the dents and dings
the ship experienced, as seen in the films. If
it did do, what is described as it may have done,
that ship would be a bloody wreck. Not programmed
to land in the water? Why not? Likely because
it was very bad for it, a thin-skinned lightweight
craft... now having to endure water impact, crushing
water depths instead of the vacuum of space (grossly
reversed environmental stresses) and now... must
serve as a submarine, fully loaded with water, and
land on a rocky, or sandy shore... totally intact.
Really??? Even more amazing engineering... border-
ing on 'magic', I say.
> In any event, we have no idea what sort of fuel
> the ship used, or whether its reserves were de-
> pleted or intact. Milo may have found the ship
> fully fueled.
'Fully' fueled??? What, Taylor and crew used
no fuel at all, for the first trip to the Monkey
Planet? I find that... rather unlikely. At best,
it had fuel enough for the two noted trips, at
the very, very least. And interesting... consider-
ing that it was to be a one-way trip in the first
place. Reserves, if any, would have been minimal,
and likely only enough for some air flight time,
enougn to find a good landing spot. But... the
ship failed to do that... surrounded by desert all
around! A big arguement against super high-tech
automation. The darned computer couldn't even
find the land... ALL around that Dead Lake. It
must have been havng a bad camera day.
> As for breathing air -- we have no idea how
> long the ape-o-nauts were aboard the ship, but
> if the interior is large enough, there's breath-
> ing air for hours just in the sealed ship, with-
> out any need for any further life-support equip-
> ment. And, yes, there are all kinds of substances
> the apes had that could be used to plug holes in
> the hull (or maybe they never bothered: it's no-
> table that the ape-o-nauts don spacesuits for their
> flight, meaning perhaps that the ship's hull never
> was completely sealed again).
Well, let's forget about the plugging stuff. Let's
just look at the trip the Apes took. The trip origi-
nally required suspended animation to make a trip that
was at the least... many months long. Suspended anima-
tion is necessary, for only one reason; That the ship
could not possibly carry enough food, water, and air,
for an awake crew to make the trip comfortably. SA
serves no other purpose otherwise. It certainly did
not stop their aging, because as Taylor noted- Landon
had 'gone gray'. SA serves no other purpose than to
stretch minimal suppies. Suspended Animation as
appied in the film, can't have served any other
purpose. It defined no other benefit.
So... unless Milo ALSO figured out what the SA
chambers were for, he ALSO figured out how to make
them work. And surely... finding Stewart's body
inside one with broken glass... would not have in-
stilled much confidence in any of them- towrd using
them. I know that I sure as heck wouldn't :-/
So, okay, they made the entire long trip... in
those spacesuits. The entire trip?!?! Oh my
goodness, they must have been gamey by the time
they reached Earth! Gee... and nothing tells that
the ship even had toilets!!! But... we can ignore
that. Anyway, IF the ship could hold air, why the
need for the suits then? If the ship could not hold
air, and they were stuck in those suits, how did they
eat and drink all that time, locked in those suits,
the cabin 'filled' with vacuum, at it were? Big...
big questions, really, and again, if looked at from
a realistic persepctive. Then there's the logistics
of taking aboard enough food and water. Okay- forget
the water- it 'can' be recycled. Kool. But to take
enough food, in its raw and bulky form, must have
very nearly filled the ship to the rafters. And how
did any of them know how much to take? Taylor never
told any of them, how long the trip took, and how
much bulky food they'd need. My... goodness. And
even if they found 'manuals' aboard, do you imagine
that they would tell how much raw bulky food would be
needed, if such was required for a return trip, which
was supposed to be one-way in the first place? I would
say... not. No way. I also can't even imagine how they
kept all that food fresh, for so long. the smell of
the rotting food... would have been awful, and even...
fatal, because of some of the gasses rotting food puts
out. it would have smeeld worse than a garbage dump in
that small tight space. ICK!!!
And I very seriously doubt that high-tech compact
foods were aboard in any real quantity, since such
isn't needed... if the astronauts were to be asleep
for the entire trip. A few snacks, maybe, but likely
little else. Think about it.
Those Apes, Zira, Cornelius, and Milo, should
have looked like hell by the time then got back to
1973 Earth. They would have been in worse con-
dition than Altantic-crossing travelors from the
time of Columbus or the Pilgrims. They would have
been in terrible shape, I believe. They likely
would have all died, before arriving back in 1973.
And oh yes... these are delightful nit-picks, AND...
I have never seen anyone, anywhwere, point them out be-
fore, so... these are entirely NEW! :-D
> Or, if it was a multistage landing craft, like
> the Apollo-era Lunar Module, it may have been
> something as simple as when the ship finally
> hit the bottom of the lake, the shock jolted
> free the ascent stage which floated to the sur-
> face of its own accord. And we don't know how
> many stages there were: there could have been
> three or more: a stardrive section, which could
> have broken off when the ship hit the lake's bot-
> tom; an ascent-engine, which could have got them
> into space in 3955 and been jettisoned by the com-
> puter upon commencement of re-entry in 1973; and
> the capsule that we saw already down in the water
> in 1973. We just don't know.
Indeed- we don't know. Quite true. But... since
we are making suppositions all over the place, let's
suppose that this is the case, while we throrize;
Let's say, and prehaps agree, since you brought it
up, that the ship we see is indeed at least the des-
cent or ascent stage. We can say it's capable of
launching, landing, and perhaps several times with one
good load of fuel, all by itself, then presume further
that the stardrive stage... was in orbit! Ever see a
movie called 'Journey to the Far Side of the Sun'?
That stage, left in orbit, was used to go from Earth,
to the Doppleganger Earth on the far side of the sun.
It was used to traverse the immense space in between,
while the descent craft, also an ascent craft, moved
up to it, or down away from it, when necessary. The
POTA ship could have worked the very same way, as its
amazing automation docked and undocked with it, no
matter where it was, when the ascent-descent stage
arrived back in orbit. If still in orbit, the tra-
versing stardrive stage would be found, and redocked
with, and used again. Thusly the stardrive stage
never made landfall :-) And it could remain in
orbit for years, decades... or even centuries. The
concept otherwise is very workable, especially in
a science fiction workable sense :-) Put an engine
on the International Space Station, for trips back
and forth to Mars, and you'd have the same thing :-)
> And, yes, if the ape-o-nauts hadn't been blown
> back in time, they might have died rather quick-
> ly after the ship launched, because of all the
> things Milo doubtless didn't understand or over-
> looked, but the "fact" is that they WERE blown
> backwards in time.
Yes-yes-yes... they were. Accepted, and canon.
But the point of a nit-picker's discussion is to
approach the subject from a RL perspective. All
of the books known as 'The Nit-picker's Guide to
Star Trek'... made that writer comparitively RICH!
And we do what we do, for free :-D Sad... when
you think about it :-( So, there's no need to
point out that things 'did' happen as they did.
We both know that. The fun is defining why such
things 'shouldn't' or 'couldn't' have happened,
That IS where the pleasure is :-)
> And, forgive me, but, again, it's funny to me
> that you balk at the salvaging of the ship, but
> say nothing about the far-less-likely reverse
> time travel. One either buys the looseness of
> the science in the films as a whole, or one
> doesn't, but to get so hung up on one point
> seems odd to me, but, hey, to each his own ... :)
Again, that's the fun of nit-picking. Yes,
canon is canon. In the film(s) what happened-
happened. Granted. But the point of nit-picking
is to serve other writers... in pointing out why
some story elements fail so badly, resulting
in nit-pick sessions like this one. It defines
how things need to be thought out with reasonable
clarity, so that the story reader and movie watcher
isn't naturally forced to make natural double-takes
and question the validity of the logic that should
be in place. Again, 'good' science fiction takes
this into account, the completeness of the apparent
or applied pseudo-science that is being employed in
the story. This principle has been pointed out by
MANY writers before I ever said a word on the subject.
Issac Asimov was just one among many. He too was a
nit-picker. But more about him- below- later :-)
As far as POTA in particualar was concerned, it
was a great story and meant for a good telling,
and the spacecraft was just a plot device utilized to
get the main characters to where they were supposed
to be. BUT... that ship, that simple and very useful
tool as a plot device, serving the same purpose trans-
porters do in Start Trek, has been analyzed to death
LONG before I myself ever mentioned it, with an entire
website noted as being devoted to that one spacecraft
alone! Amazing, really. I've found less material,
about the Jupiter 2, at least as well known.
About Isacc Asimov- early in his writing career
he wrote a series of novels, about a space-faring
Earth group, and in one novel, in the storyline
they encountered an alien spacecraft that had a
'ray weapon'. Now... this story was written BE-
FORE the laser was invented, and in the plot dialog
Asimov expressed, via the characters, that such a
ray weapon was impossible- because it had to be
hotter at the source- than at the target, if fired.
TRUE... given what was known by science at the time.
Then some time later, the ruby laser was invented,
proving that in fact the weapon did NOT have to be
hotter at the source, than at the target. In fact
it runs... cool to the touch, the flash being momen-
tary, but with the target receiving many hundreds of
degress of photon energy. Asimov highly prided him-
self on writing science fiction, with real science at
work in his fictions. He was a genius in that respect,
and truly respectful of physics, chemistry, engineering
and so on. He applied what was truly scientific fact-
'at the time'. In this case, he was both embarassed and
pleased- to be proven wrong, as were the scientists whom
were also quite wrong. Fantastic :-)
> Anyway, yes, a launch is complex -- but so is re-
> entry; indeed, the re-entry that Taylor's ship
> did in POTA is arguably a much more complex oper-
> ation than the launch that Milo presumably engi-
> neered: all Milo had to do was get the ship to go
> more-or-less up (he never needed to worry about
> achieving orbit or executing a flight plan), where-
> as in POTA the ship had to get the angles and speeds
> exactly right to avoid burning up on re-entry -- AND
> ALL OF THAT HAPPENED WITH NO ONE PUSHING EVEN A SINGLE
> BUTTON. The ship is demonstrably highly automated.
Yes... but not smart enough to find... 'land'.
Strange. *Snicker* :-) Automation, even in this
case, has its obvious very serious drawbacks.
Anyway, granted, since canon tells that's what
Milo 'must' have done :-] *Wince*
> But if you want to argue that Milo had to push more
> than one button, fine: we see in BENEATH that the
> Apes not only speak our language, but they also
> read and write it (recall the signs written in Eng-
> lish used by the anti-war protesters). So, all Milo
> had to do was read the (plasticized hardcopy) manual,
> or follow on-screen prompts. And we saw the instru-
> mentation in Taylor's ship: It's very simple, much
> simpler than the flight deck of a Space Shuttle (or
> even a Gemini capsule), again, arguing for a very
> high degree of automation.
Again, granted. I still believe it would have
been better if in fact the ship landed on land,
safely and fully intact. That would have made ALL
of this much more believable. Launch... could even
have been a fortunate accident, rather than purpose-
ful, as Milo fiddled with controls while the three
were aboard, and... away they went- ZOOM! :-D But
then again... there's that pesky Suspended Animation
and bulky food problem. I can't even imagine why they
would take so much aboard, being no logical reason.
The only saving grace in that case, is the possibility
that going BACK in time, occurs much faster than being
forced forward. It may occur even in a few seconds
once orbit was reached. Climbing the 'mountain of
time' is a lot harder... than rolling back down the
mountain of time. Going down hill, coming back, just
happens to be easier. Bouncing back, comes with
greater ease. FOOD PROBLEM SOLVED... and no SA re-
quired ;-D And a virtually medieval Milo isn't ex-
pected to really figure out much at all. He becomes
a fortunate bumbler, like many other scientists :-)
> As for the psionics stuff, I agree it's far out,
> but psionics ARE canonically part of the POTA
> cycle; the mutants in BENEATH absolutely have
> them (and Caesar does sound like he's arguing
> for a form of them at the end of CONQUEST with
> the Emperor Moth analogy). If you are arguing
> that ONLY humans might be capable of them in a
> universe in which they categorically do exist,
> well, that's a bit specist, and I doubt Virgil
> would approve. :)
Erf... the Apes have already developed and been
given the gifts of sentience and reason! Would
you give them Psi powers too! Ugh. Next... comes
Flying Monkeys, I suppose :-( Lions and Tigers
and Bears... oh my...
... but... speaking through time does not
require psionics at all. The Lawgiver does so
just fine, whith his written words, the Scrolls,
and others similarly could have had their writings
passed down through time- a method going back before
Sanskrit. With that method, speaking across time
is child's play, and positively anyone can do it.
No psionics required :-)
> Also, if there is in fact no psychic connection
> between Caesar of the early 21st century in the
> main story of BATTLE, and the Caesar statue of
> the 27th century in the epilogue to BATTLE, how
> do you explain the statue crying at the end of
> BATTLE? :) (No, I'm not pushing the psychic
> angle; it's just a fun one to consider in a fic-
> tional universe that demonstrably -- the mutants
> in BENEATH -- has already allowed for psychic
> powers.)
I understand. But I'd prefer leaving the gift
or ability of psionics- to the Mutants. It's their
condition of forced mutation due to radiation that
provided that 'power', and their societal conditions
and isolation that drove them to develop it to an
ability and art.
> The bottom line for me is that it IS canonical
> to the Apes series that Milo DID manage to get
> Taylor's ship to fly, at least briefly. For me,
> saying "it couldn't have happened" over and over
> again is far less interesting (or fun!) than try-
> ing to think of ways in which it might have. :)
Well... I haven't so much said that it 'couldn't'
have happened, but to define why it 'shouldn't have
happened, all things considered from a realistic point
of view, even if it 'is' science fiction.
The real probem, if a problem it is, is that;
1) POTA was never meant to be produced as a series
as per sequels, but it did so well that sequels
proved profitable, one after another.
2) The spacecraft itself was NEVER meant to become
one of the 'characters' of the film, like the Enter-
prise, the Jupiter 2, or the Proteus from Fantastic
Voyage (an Isaac Asimov tale).
3) Considering point 1 & 2, the spacecraft and how
it all worked, was never developed beyond the shape
of the descent craft, as a tool- a plot device- to
get the astronauts where they needed to be. There
was no need for that, and it would have been, quite
simply, a very unnecessary studio expense, and it
ALWAYS boils down to money! No question. Never
forget that as far as cinematography is concerned.
Money is always the real concern, from day one.
Staying in budget is always the first consideration.
It may be entertainment but it is first- a business.
No, that silly spaceship and the circumstances of
its use... doesn't 'need' to be scrutinized so closely,
but... there's no fun in not doing that. It just re-
fuses... to be ignored, and... we so much love her,
don't we? Yeah- sure we do :-D
> As for the rules for writing science fiction,
> I'll try to keep 'em in mind ... ;)
They... aren't so much rules, as suggestions
offered by many other writers, and why such shows
as Star Trek: The Next generation... actually has
scientists- physicists, on their writer and crea-
tive staff. Most script-writers of the show could
not come up with all of that pseudo techno-babble,
as those science advisors had to come up with all
of that baffling crap. AND... the reason that most
of it 'works' as fiction, is because the majority
of it is all made up! 95% of the techno-babble is
itself truly fiction. And... it fits very nicely
in ST's timeframe and sci-fi universe, and virtual-
ly everyone accepts it- just as is :-D Amazing.
> All best wishes.
Same to you, good buddy :-)
> ROBERT J. SAWYER
~ Jon Rich <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39966 |
From: theskulpter |
Date: 12/26/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
.htmlThanks so much Jonathan, Glad you like it. I have been missing all the
Ape figures being released, and items etc,so I figured it was about
time to make my own figures. I just finished a new General Ursus last
night when I got home after celebrating Christmas with the family, Iam
real happy with the way it came out, I will post photos next week
sometime. I have to make a Helmet for the both of them this week.
Alrighty Ape, Happy New Year, The Farrow.--- In
pota@yahoogroups.com, "Jonathan" <phil_harmonik2005@...> wrote:
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "theskulpter" <theskulpter@> wrote:
> >
> > HI Ape gang. I just finished a new head sculpt of
> > General Urko last week,figured I would share some
> > pics, so I added some new photos of it in the pho-
> > to section, I will add more when I finish the hel-
> > met after the Holidays. Ok Hope all have a great
> > Holiday, The Farrow.
>
> WOW! THAT'S AMAZING WORK! Bloody fantastic!
> Love it. Perfectly marvelous :-) Kudos, Fallow :-D
>
> A big ape-like pat on the back there :-)
>
> ~ Jon Rich
> <.html
|
|
| Group: pota |
Message: 39967 |
From: theskulpter |
Date: 12/26/2006 |
| Subject: Re: New General Urko 12" custom pics added,+ Merry Christmas APES! |
.htmlHi Glen, thanks for the compliment. Yes I have alot of orders from
people, mostly rock groups like KISS, AEROSMITH, THE STONES,ETC. But I
just did these Apes for myself,I love Palnet of the apes, I was not
thinking of selling any when I did the sculpt. they are alot of work,
and they would be pretty expensive . But you can email me at
theskulpter@... if you are interested in working a deal out.I
just finished a highly detailed General Ursus last night, so hopefully
I can post pics next week sometime. Ok thanks again, The Farrow.
--- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "Glen" <HotScheetz@...> wrote:
>
> Excellent work!...Do you ever do figures for others to purchase?...
>
> G
>
> --- In pota@yahoogroups.com, "theskulpter" <theskulpter@> wrote:
> >
> > HI Ape gang. I just finished a new head sculpt of General Urko last
> > week,figured I would share some pics, so I added some new photos of
> it
> > in the photo section, I will add more when I finish the helmet
after
> > the Holidays. Ok Hope all have a great Holiday, The Farrow.
> >
> <.html
|
|
|
|