|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39577 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39578 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: EW names best of nearly unwatchable sequels |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39579 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39580 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39581 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39582 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39583 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39584 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39585 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39586 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39587 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39588 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39589 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39590 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39591 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39592 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39593 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: New scripts added to Hunter's site |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39594 |
From: Whitty |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts added to Hunter's site |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39595 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts added to Hunter's site |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39596 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: POTA Reference |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39597 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39598 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: The switch.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39599 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39600 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39601 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39602 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: An APES question! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39603 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39604 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Rorster |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39605 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39606 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39607 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39608 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39609 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39610 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The new comic pg4 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39611 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Zira.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39612 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Introductory Massage..... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39613 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39614 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39615 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39616 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The switch.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39617 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39618 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39619 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Switch |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39620 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39621 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39622 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Hello New Members |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39623 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CON |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39624 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] The switch.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39625 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39626 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Introductory Massage..... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39627 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Fwd: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39628 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39629 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39630 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] The switch.... |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39631 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39632 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39633 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39634 |
From: laroweramity |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: New Member says hi |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39635 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39636 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CON |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39637 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39638 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39639 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39640 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39641 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39642 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39643 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: New Member says hi |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39644 |
From: Wendy Kostora |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39645 |
From: Wendy Kostora |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39646 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39647 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39648 |
From: John |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39649 |
From: Whitty |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39650 |
From: Lou Melograna |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39651 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39652 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39653 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39654 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39655 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39656 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39657 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Reissues? |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39658 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39659 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39660 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} RE: [PotaDG] Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39661 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Simon's Boots! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39662 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39663 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Simon in Full Kit! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39664 |
From: laroweramity |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Simon's Boots! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39665 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39666 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39667 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Simon in Full Kit! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39668 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39669 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Simon in Full Kit! |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39670 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39671 |
From: kidro85@aol.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Kamandi -- No Cartoon ( OT ) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39672 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39673 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/9/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Kamandi -- No Cartoon ( OT ) |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39674 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/9/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39675 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/9/2006 |
| Subject: OT: "Hulk" a "do over" |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39676 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/9/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39577 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
.html
.html Message
Contractually, I've heard Fox has to keep
pumping out movies based on the Marvel comics. Otherwise they lose those
properties like "X-Men" and "Fantastic 4". Marvel has already taken most of it's
toys and gone home. They are going to be producing their own movies based on the
characters they have left and Paramount will release them (including a "Hulk
2"). I guess the studios that did the other movies (Sony with "Spiderman", Fox's
movies) will continue until their rights expire. Meanwhile, Fox owns POTA and
can go back to that whenever they want; ten, twenty years later if it strikes
them. Until then it's a Marvel world and we're just buying popcorn in it. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:32
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Cast &
Crew
After at least a 10
year wait wasnt it (or more?).
I think Batman has
LOTS more fans too.....
But yes, they are
making sequels to worse movies than POTA (so did THOSE movies sell more
toys?).
Michael
-----Original
Message----- From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of veetus@... Sent:
Sunday,
4 June 2006
2:48
AM To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast &
Crew
They
came out for "Batman Begins" after "Batman and Robin".
-- This message has been
scanned for viruses and dangerous content by CyberOne E-Mail Spam and
Virus Protection Service, and is believed to be clean from viruses. CyberOne
accepts no responsibility for the content of messages in transit through our
servers. -- Suspected unsolicited commercial bulk messages (SPAM)
have been marked with {Spam?} tag in the subject line enabling you to filter
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39578 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: EW names best of nearly unwatchable sequels |
.html
.html
Cover her up with makeup?! Rory's gay! - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:59
PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: EW names best of
nearly unwatchable sequels
In a message dated 6/3/06 7:49:02 PM Eastern
Daylight Time, whitty@...
writes:
Do you think (based on her other movies then!) she'd be a good
Nova?
No! She'd be a
better Zira. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39579 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
.html
.html Message
Also, people forget "X-Men" was a flop as a comic book when it
started. They actually stopped publishing it. Then it was rebooted around '75 by
Chris Claremont ( a writer for the POTA magazine) and started it's climb to be
THE most popular comic book. There's always a new beginning if the creative
people and the financial people are up to it.
And the "X-Men" movies have not done better than POTA2001. The
movies' box office has improved as the budgets have ( "X-Men 3" cost almost $200
million, that's double what POTA reportedly cost). POTA2001 did better than
"X-Men 1". But POTA2001 was a corporate embarrassment (people really dog piled
on it for messing up a classic) and it's questionable they'd want to revisit it.
Fox screwed up, not POTA. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 2:19
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Cast &
Crew
-- Well where is this
audience then? Surely if there is a large audience waiting around for a new
movie they would also be buying things like the new comic but even that isn't
guaranteed to go to a second series as it seems it hasn't sold in huge numbers
as Ty has repeatedly said any 2nd series will be based on the graphic novel
having large enough sales to justify that happening.
Apes is dead and Fox
knows it, the world has moved on to embrace other things since those good old
days when anything 'Ape' was guaranteed to sell.
For the last 20 odd
years or so anything to do with X - men has been guaranteed to sell comics in
massive numbers so it is little surprise that Fox will be milking that
franchise to death and I suspect all those X - fans will turn up at any
movie that has any link to that franchise, no matter how bad the movie is
or which X character it is about.
Neil
I disagree. I think there is a large audience for new POTA
movies (shown by POTA2001's opening weekend; even Ben Affleck left rehab to
see it). The problem, I think, is the quality of the movie and now Fox isn't
sure if people would turn out for a sequel, even if it was good. I think
they would, audiences are very forgiving. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39580 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html Message
They probably did retrieve the baby's body.
And after an autopsy showed it wasn't Baby Milo they visited Armando. After they
heard Milo babbling "mamma, mamma", Armando paid them off. That's why he had to
promote his circus so much, to cover the government bribes! - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes
get so smart after CONQUEST?
I guess we are
assuming a hungry shark beat them to it Neil because yes, they would recover
that body with a very high priority (if they
COULD...)!
Ill never forget
that feeling of horror when Zira pushed the baby
over the side. Thankfully my dad
was nearby to explain!
Michael
-----Original
Message----- From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Neil T Foster Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 7:05
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes
get so smart after CONQUEST?
-- One thing that has always
bugged me is wouldn't the body of (fake) baby Milo have been recovered from
the water? Surely the authorities would want to confirm it's death and more
importantly it's identity?
Neil
-----Original
Message----- From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of majorhendricks Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48
AM To:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get
so smart after CONQUEST?
I would conjecture that after the
apeonaut's deaths, there bodies were put into
storage and used -- from time to time -- by scientists for study.
-- This message has been
scanned for viruses and dangerous content by CyberOne E-Mail Spam and
Virus Protection Service, and is believed to be clean from viruses. CyberOne
accepts no responsibility for the content of messages in transit through our
servers. -- Suspected unsolicited commercial bulk messages (SPAM)
have been marked with {Spam?} tag in the subject line enabling you to filter
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39581 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.htmlIt's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue to
talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dario Sciola" <darios@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
if the body was recovered, so what?
Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
those who may have questioned the matter further.
We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
chimp was there as well).
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Sunday, June 4, 2006 5:05 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
> -- One thing that has always bugged me is wouldn't the body of (fake)
> baby Milo have been recovered from the water? Surely the authorities
> would want to confirm it's death and more importantly it's identity?
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of majorhendricks
> Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
>
> I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
> were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by
> scientists
> for study.
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39582 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
I got the feeling Zira was trying to protect it from the humans some
how, or drown it so it wouldn't be at the mercy of the humans. I liked that
moment, it was kind of an odd "nature/instinct" thing. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes
get so smart after CONQUEST?
In a message dated 6/4/2006 5:03:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:
I'll never forget
that feeling of horror when Zira pushed the baby
over the side. Thankfully my
dad was nearby to explain!
Maybe you can explain it to me then.
I wasn't entirely sure about that scene.
I thought it was a combination of . . .
"You want the baby so much? then
here!" and just getting rid of any
evidence of the switch of the chimps.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39583 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
.htmlSomething that has always intrigued me but to which I have no clear
answer is how the POTA rights are distributed.
The APJAC story is well documented (how Jacobs was smart enough to
retain all the merchandising right while Fox kept the movie rights,
until of course he reverted them back to Fox). But how does Boulle
(and now his estate) fit into all this. Based on Fox'es actions, I
have always assumed that somehow they've either acquired Boulle's
rights OR that his rights somehow only extend to his original novel.
How then, can Fox keep up pumping out stuff that was based on his
creation? Murky territory. Does anyone have the full story about what
rights, if any, are still held by Boulle's estate?
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: veetus@...
Date: Monday, June 5, 2006 10:36 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew
> Message
> Contractually, I've heard Fox has to keep pumping out movies
> based on the Marvel comics. Otherwise they lose those properties
> like "X-Men" and "Fantastic 4". Marvel has already taken most of
> it's toys and gone home. They are going to be producing their own
> movies based on the characters they have left and Paramount will
> release them (including a "Hulk 2"). I guess the studios that did
> the other movies (Sony with "Spiderman", Fox's movies) will
> continue until their rights expire. Meanwhile, Fox owns POTA and
> can go back to that whenever they want; ten, twenty years later if
> it strikes them. Until then it's a Marvel world and we're just
> buying popcorn in it. - - - Jeff
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Whitty
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:32 PM
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew
>
>
> After at least a 10 year wait wasn't it (or more?).
>
>
>
> I think Batman has LOTS more fans too.....
>
>
>
> But yes, they are making sequels to worse movies than POTA (so
> did THOSE movies sell more toys?).
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of veetus@...
> Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2006 2:48 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew
>
>
>
> They came out for "Batman Begins" after "Batman and Robin".
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Planet of the apes
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> of Service.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
>
>
> --
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39584 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.htmlOn the face of it, I always took it to mean that Zira was trying one
lat desperate act to save the baby (regardless if it was really Milo
or not). After all, she knew that if it was still alive, it would be
destroyed now that she and Cornelius were goners. So even if the odds
of surviving being dumped into the bay like that were not good, It was
still better than doing nothing as shocking as the act may be.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: TZer0@...
Date: Monday, June 5, 2006 10:02 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
> In a message dated 6/4/2006 5:03:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> whitty@... writes:
>
> I'll never forget that feeling of horror when Zira pushed the
> baby over the
> side. Thankfully my dad was nearby to explain!
>
>
>
>
> Maybe you can explain it to me then.
> I wasn't entirely sure about that scene.
> I thought it was a combination of . . .
> "You want the baby so much? then
> here!" and just getting rid of any
> evidence of the switch of the chimps.
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39585 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:11 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
veetus@... writes:
instead
they made POTA "uncool"
Exactly! And the only way to make it
cool again, is to not make a kids movie.
The original wasn't one, it shouldn't be.
The issues it deals with are too adult.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39586 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/3/2006 10:39:49 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
Bill auditioned to do Cornelius in the POTA cartoon but was turned down because he sounded "too
much" like Roddy and they were afraid Roddy would sue.
Well, if that's the case, then why didn't he simply create another voice for his audition(s)? Or, just audition
using his regular voice? There certainly are ways he could have gotten around "sounding like Roddy"... I'm afraid I just don't buy it...
Then they traced over Bill's picture for the "Mission of Mercy" episode without credit or compensation.
I'm pretty sure that they would have been using the stills that FOX gave them to work with... As such, they were
probably owned by the studio and any residuals would have been paid out before hand... Unless he owned the pictures himself, it's very unlikely he'd get paid for them using anything the studio owned...
Bill did his part for POTA but POTA has not been kind to him.
I'd disagree with that... His going around as Cornelius was a big part in the launching of his career... Plus, I seen where he sells face castings of the APES makeups mounted on wood... He owes the start of his
career to the APES "roadshow", and he still profits from APES today with the items he sells... APES owes him nothing...
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39587 |
From: Dario Sciola |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.htmlYes but wouldn't she as a mother still try to get the other baby to
talk evenshe knew it was not the real Milo? Call it a mother's
instinct. She probably believe that all apes could talk if trained to.
I just can't see Armando switching the babies without telling her. Why
would he do something like that to someone he cared for? There was no
assurance that they (C&Z) would be caught, although they knew they
were in for a chase.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: veetus@...
Date: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:01 am
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
> It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she
> continue to
> talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dario Sciola" <darios@...>
> To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 6:16 AM
> Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after
> CONQUEST?
>
> Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
> have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
> if the body was recovered, so what?
>
> Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74
the
> year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
> was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really
> was no
> reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
> through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
> believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any
> doubts to
> those who may have questioned the matter further.
>
> We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
> circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
> chimp was there as well).
>
> Dario
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
> Date: Sunday, June 4, 2006 5:05 pm
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
> > -- One thing that has always bugged me is wouldn't the body of
> (fake)> baby Milo have been recovered from the water? Surely the
> authorities> would want to confirm it's death and more importantly
> it's identity?
> >
> > Neil
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On
> Behalf
> > Of majorhendricks
> > Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
> >
> >
> > I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
> > were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by
> > scientists
> > for study.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ --------------------
> ~-->
> You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free.
> See how.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/9_IolB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39588 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 10:00:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
veetus@... writes:
It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue
to talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
I don't buy that. That scene in the cage would have no purpose.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39589 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 10:15:19 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
darios@... writes:
So even
if the odds of surviving being dumped into the bay like that were not good, It
was still better than doing nothing as shocking as the act may
be.
That doesn't make any sense.
After Hasslein pumped all those
slugs into it, how does chucking
it in the water save it. Babies
can't swim. Baby apes doubly
so. That goes triple for swaddled
baby apes. Even without being
shot, that alone would have killed
it. It didn't need all that lead to
drown. The only way that death
could have been more final is if
a tug boat had com along and
chopped it up with it's propeller.
Have I gone too far with it yet?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39590 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 11:23:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
darios@... writes:
Yes but
wouldn't she as a mother still try to get the other baby to talk evenshe
knew it was not the real Milo? Call it a mother's
instinct.
Yeah, I don't think she even told Cornelius about the switch.
The plan was to hook up with Armando later and go to the
Everglades. This was her insurance in case they didn't make it.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39591 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, darios@... writes:
Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even if the body was recovered, so what?
Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to those who may have questioned the matter further.
We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby chimp was there as well).
Dario
At the time of ESCAPE, a simple blood test could have proven if Cornelius was the father of the chimp or not.
I have no doubt that the authorities would have made extraordinary attempts to recover the body of an alien visitor from the shallow waters of the harbor. I would guess that
once the blood work was done, the authorities were well aware that the chimp was not baby Milo. Putting the blood work aside, a comparative autopsy would have proven that the baby chimp's brain and vocal anatomy
were not the same as C&Z.
And didn't Hasslein shoot the baby dead before Zira through him in the harbor?
Bill
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39592 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 12:36:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, TZer0@... writes:
Yes but wouldn't she as a mother still try to get the other baby to
talk evenshe knew it was not the real Milo? Call it a mother's instinct.
Yeah, I don't think she even told Cornelius about the switch.
The plan was to hook up with Armando later and go to the
Everglades. This was her insurance in case they didn't make it.
Yes, I agree. Zira's "talking" to the fake Milo may have been part for Cornelius' benefit and part for her own. As a new mother, it must have been difficult to be
separated so soon from her baby.
Zira tossed the dead baby into water in a futile attempt to hide the fact that it was not Milo. As a scientist, she knew that a comparative autopsy would reveal that the
baby was not theirs.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39593 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: New scripts added to Hunter's site |
.htmlTwo new TV series scripts have been added to the script archive on Hunter's site:
The Good Seeds - First Draft by Robert W. Lenski - thanks to Mark Rogers and John Roche for their help in acquiring this earlier draft of the script for the first Apes episode filmed. Previously the archive had
only the Final Revised script for this episode.
The Horse Race - Second Draft by David P. Lewis and Booker Bradshaw. The episode was titled simply The Race at this stage, and the script is much different than the filmed episode. Thanks to Mark Rogers for
supplying the scans for this script from his collection. Hunter's site: Mark's site:
Greg <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39594 |
From: Whitty |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts added to Hunter's site |
.htmlThanks Greg. What scripts are now missing? Michael
--------- Original Message -------- From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com To: "friends & fugitives"
<friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com>, "potadg@yahoogroups.com"
<potadg@yahoogroups.com>, "pota@yahoogroups.com"
<pota@yahoogroups.com> Subject: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts
added to Hunter's site Date: 06/06/06
21:06
Two new TV series scripts have been added to the script archive on
Hunter's site:
The Good Seeds - First Draft by Robert W. Lenski - thanks to Mark
Rogers and John Roche for their help in acquiring this earlier draft of the
script for the first Apes episode filmed. Previously the archive had
only the Final Revised script for this episode.
The Horse Race - Second Draft by David P. Lewis and Booker Bradshaw.
The episode was titled simply The Race at this stage, and the script is much
different than the filmed episode. Thanks to Mark Rogers for supplying the
scans for this script from his collection.
Hunter's site:
Mark's site:
Greg
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39595 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/5/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts added to Hunter's site |
.html
The Deception is the only TV episode not represented in the archive, but Mark and John have acquired a copy of the script for that episode, so we'll be adding it soon. Greg
Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:
Thanks Greg. What scripts are now missing? Michael
.,___ <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39596 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: POTA Reference |
.html
.html
I'd left the TV on Cartoon Network after Adult Swim
and what do you think I saw when I turned it back on?
Billy on The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy had
defrosted Fred Flintstone. And when he was refrozen
in an ice cream accident he buried him for the future,
which was portrayed by a half buried Statue of Liberty.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39597 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
I'm sure Patrick will correct me if I'm wrong,
but I believe the old blood tests could only
conclusively exclude paternity, not confirm
it, by checking the possible blood types of
the pairing. And as for comparative anatomy,
I wouldn't put much into these movies. The
makers certainly didn't. Not if we're supposed
to believe Z & C are the same species as
those apes. Or that those apes were apes.
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39598 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: The switch.... |
.html
.html
My dad told me it meant
the chimp babies where switched and because Zira had
a male (and the other chimp was a female) she didn’t want them to see the
gender of the chimp baby and find her real baby.
At first I thought the talking chimp at
the end signified that they hadn’t changed anything – chimps were starting to learn
to talk.
Dumb 10 year old kid! J
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:03
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the
Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
In a
message dated 6/4/2006 5:03:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
whitty@... writes:
I’ll
never forget that feeling of horror when Zira pushed
the baby over the side. Thankfully my
dad was nearby to explain!
Maybe
you can explain it to me then.
I
wasn't entirely sure about that scene.
I
thought it was a combination of . . .
"You
want the baby so much? then
here!"
and just getting rid of any
evidence
of the switch of the
chimps.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39599 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html
Well, I think it is due to poor
thinking/writing by Dehn.
He should have set Conquest FAR into the
future, after Caesar (or baby Milo
– was he Caesar with Armando or did he choose that name
himself?) had mated with many different females and had some talking kids, who
bred more etc. etc.
In Conquest it seems to be “A kind
of Magic” that makes the apes all synchronise an attack.
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of majorhendricks
Sent:
Monday, 5
June 2006
12:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes
get so smart after CONQUEST?
At the beginning of
CONQUEST, we see that ape labor has become a
necessary evil in this society. However, there are reports (before
Caesar even starts his revolution) that there are a great rise in the
number of ape disobedience and unauthorized gatherings.
But how did apes become so intelligent within only 20 years after
Cornelius, Milo , and Zira'a arrival
on earth?
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39600 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html
This makes sense.
Not what Dehn
had in mind I am sure, but it sounds very clever to me.
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of majorhendricks
Sent:
Monday, 5
June 2006
12:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes
get so smart after CONQUEST?
I would conjecture that
after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by scientists
for study. Years later, the plague from space killed man's pets and
apes were then used as a substitute. It was not long after this that
is was realized the Apes could be trained for manual labor, however
training them and conditioning them was costly and time consuming --
and their abilities were limited at best.
It would be at this point that the company or companies that procured
the ape slave trade discovered that the genes of Cornelius, Zira and
Milo could be used to breed a new race of
apes -- eugenically
programmed to learn quicker than your average ape.
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39601 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html
Hmmmm...hard to
ignore the prediction of doomsday! J
But for the sake of the story –
yeah!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of majorhendricks
Sent:
Monday, 5
June 2006
12:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes
get so smart after CONQUEST?
Of course, the government
approved of this -- no doubt the lobbying
dollars of these powerful ape brokers, outweighed the prophecies of
C&Z regarding the downfall of mankind.
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39602 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: An APES question! |
.html
.html
Tom!
There’s lots of apes questions my
friend, but most of them are in the ARCHIVES (with the footage of Zira and Cornelius, watch out for radioactive humans!).
J
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tshaf37@...
Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 8:11 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the
Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Wow an
apes question, I'm not sure how to respond to this one? That's a great
question, I have always wondered the same myself. Welcome to the group Bill.
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39603 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html
Sounds
like James! J
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent:
Monday, 5
June 2006
11:03 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the
Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Remember,
Breck is EXTREMELY paranoid and anything and everything is seen as a threat by
him...
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39604 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Rorster |
.html
.html
No – he seems to prefer his chimps to be
FEMALES! So he’s just a freak! ;)
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:41
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: EW names
best of nearly unwatchable sequels
Cover her up with makeup?!
Rory's gay! - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Saturday,
June 03, 2006 4:59 PM
Subject:
[PotaDG]
Re: EW names best of nearly unwatchable sequels
In a message dated 6/3/06 7:49:02
PM Eastern Daylight Time, whitty@...
writes:
Do you
think (based on her other movies then!) she’d be a good Nova?
No! She'd be a better Zira.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39605 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
.html
.html
Message
That’s the question – what IS
the true spirit of the original?
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:24
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast &
Crew
The audience was there opening weekend. Fox screwed it up and the interest
died. Fox needed a movie people could rally around; instead they made POTA
"uncool" and now it's a dirty word. But if they did a good movie, one
that's true to the spirit of the originals, I think the audience would come
back. - - - Jeff
-----
Original Message -----
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39606 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
.html
.html
Message
It seems the outcome is that X-Men sells
more toys/books etc where POTA did not (just ask Terry Hoknes!).
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:30
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast &
Crew
Also, people forget "X-Men" was a flop as a comic book when it
started. They actually stopped publishing it. Then it was rebooted around '75
by Chris Claremont ( a writer for the POTA magazine) and started it's climb to
be THE most popular comic book. There's always a new beginning if the creative
people and the financial people are up to it.
And the "X-Men" movies have not done better than POTA2001. The
movies' box office has improved as the budgets have ( "X-Men 3" cost
almost $200 million, that's double what POTA reportedly cost). POTA2001 did
better than "X-Men 1". But POTA2001 was a corporate embarrassment
(people really dog piled on it for messing up a classic) and it's questionable
they'd want to revisit it. Fox screwed up, not POTA. - - - Jeff
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Saturday, June 03, 2006
2:19 PM
Subject:
RE:
[PotaDG] Cast & Crew
-- Well where is this audience then? Surely if there is a
large audience waiting around for a new movie they would also be buying things
like the new comic but even that isn't guaranteed to go to a second series as
it seems it hasn't sold in huge numbers as Ty has repeatedly said any 2nd
series will be based on the graphic novel having large enough sales to
justify that happening.
Apes is dead and Fox knows it, the world has moved on to
embrace other things since those good old days when anything 'Ape' was
guaranteed to sell.
For the last 20 odd years or so anything to do with X - men
has been guaranteed to sell comics in massive numbers so it is little surprise
that Fox will be milking that franchise to death and I suspect all those X
- fans will turn up at any movie that has any link to that franchise,
no matter how bad the movie is or which X character it is about.
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2006 2:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast &
Crew
I disagree. I think there is a large audience for new POTA movies (shown by
POTA2001's opening weekend; even Ben Affleck left rehab to see it). The
problem, I think, is the quality of the movie and now Fox isn't sure if people
would turn out for a sequel, even if it was good. I think they would, audiences
are very forgiving.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39607 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html
I think Zira did
it....
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:02 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did
the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
It's possible
Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue to
talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dario Sciola" <darios@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
if the body was recovered, so what?
Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
those who may have questioned the matter further.
We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
chimp was there as well).
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Sunday, June 4, 2006 5:05 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
> -- One thing that has always bugged me is wouldn't the body of (fake)
> baby Milo have been recovered from the water? Surely the authorities
> would want to confirm it's death and more importantly it's identity?
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of majorhendricks
> Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
>
> I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
> were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by
> scientists
> for study.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39608 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
Precisely.
Jeff’s
teasing! ;)
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 2:22 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the
Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
In a
message dated 6/5/2006 10:00:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
veetus@... writes:
It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue to
talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
I don't buy that. That scene in the cage would have no
purpose.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39609 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
.html.html
I think they paid him for all the rights
to his story.... ???
Just a “one-off” payment.
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dario
Sciola
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:05 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Boulle/Apjac/Fox
et al.
Something that has always
intrigued me but to which I have no clear
answer is how the POTA rights are distributed.
The APJAC story is well documented (how Jacobs was smart enough to
retain all the merchandising right while Fox kept the movie rights,
until of course he reverted them back to Fox). But how does Boulle
(and now his estate) fit into all this. Based on Fox'es actions, I
have always assumed that somehow they've either acquired Boulle's
rights OR that his rights somehow only extend to his original novel.
How then, can Fox keep up pumping out stuff that was based on his
creation? Murky territory. Does anyone have the full story about what
rights, if any, are still held by Boulle's estate?
Dario
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39610 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The new comic pg4 |
.html
.html
OK!
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2006 6:38 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The new
comic pg4
In a
message dated 6/3/2006 6:35:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
whitty@... writes:
Watch VM, T.
Go hire Season 1 on DVD.
Remind
me next month.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39611 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Zira.... |
.html
.html
So who WOULD.....?
Methinks another Aussie:
Cate Blanchett.

Or Kate Winslett.
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2006 6:57 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: EW names
best of nearly unwatchable sequels
In a
message dated 6/3/2006 6:59:59 P.M. Central Daylight Time, Haristas@...
writes:
No! She'd be a better Zira.
She
doesn't have the acting chops to pull off Zira.
Granted I didn't see the remake of Ringu, or I
heart Huckabees. Or 21
Grams, but she didn't
win the Oscar for it. Brit awards and Palm de Ore
don't count. Then
again H B'C lost her Oscar too.
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39612 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Introductory Massage..... |
.html.html
And now for a massage from the Swedish Prime Minister.....
No wait – I mean – Neil.....we have a few new
members.
Could you please send the introductory welcome?
Michael
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39613 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html
Yes, yes and yes.
Yesman
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of atragon1@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:14 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the
Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:23
AM Eastern Standard Time, darios@... writes:
Setting aside the very probable fact
that was pointed out that it may
have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
if the body was recovered, so what?
Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
those who may have questioned the matter further.
We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
chimp was there as well).
Dario
At the time of ESCAPE, a simple blood
test could have proven if Cornelius was the father of the chimp or not.
I have no doubt that the authorities
would have made extraordinary attempts to recover the body of an alien
visitor from the shallow waters of the harbor. I would guess that once the
blood work was done, the authorities were well aware that the chimp was not
baby Milo. Putting the blood work aside, a comparative autopsy would have
proven that the baby chimp's brain and vocal anatomy were not the same as
C&Z.
And didn't Hasslein shoot the baby
dead before Zira through him in the harbor?
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39614 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
I am not sure how much
further you COULD go – but I know better than to challenge you to do so! J
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent:
Tuesday, 6
June 2006
2:30 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the
Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Have I
gone too far with it yet?
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39615 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html
She was being normal – where she
came from that’s what you would do!
Also, she wanted Cornelius to feel everything was as per normal.....
Michael
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dario
Sciola
Sent:
Tuesday, 6
June 2006
1:21 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did
the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Yes but wouldn't she as a
mother still try to get the other baby to
talk evenshe knew it was not the real Milo ?
Call it a mother's
instinct. She probably believe that all apes could
talk if trained to.
--
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39616 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The switch.... |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/6/2006 1:51:55 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
My dad told me it meant the chimp babies where switched and because Zira had a male (and the other chimp was a female) she
didn't want them to see the gender of the chimp baby and find her real baby.
...Which makes sense to an extent, BUT, the authorities would not have known the sex of the child ape... Remember, he was born in secrecy and out of view of Hasslein and Company... The authorities wouldn't know what
the baby was until they had fully interrogated Stevie and Lewis & Armando, and even then there's no guarantee they would know what was born... After all, S & L could just say that Z & C were out of their
sight and care and Zira gave birth out of sight so they'd not know what was born... And Armando had been checked out already, so they'd think he didn't have any contact with them and wouldn't know the
gender either...<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39617 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
.html
.html
Hi Mr. Sunshine,
a) I don't know the details of the audition
but Bill said they told him he sounded too much like Roddy and were afraid Roddy
would sue (and the same with Paula Crist sounding like Zira). Roddy later told
Bill he wouldn't have sued. Maybe the company just said that to blow Bill off
because they wanted a "name" voice actor, but whatever
b) The picture they traced over is Bill's
that he left there after his audition. He had it photographed specifically for
his purposes. It wasn't Fox's to use without permission. They were so exact they
even traced an identifying scar by Bill's eye. Obviously they had a lot of
pictures to choose from so the fact that they used that particular picture and
were so exacting about shows there was something in Bill's performance they
wanted. Instead that picture is often assumed to be Roddy (such as in a recent
"Simian Scrolls").
c) Bill and Paula didn't "get" the gig to
tour as Cornelius and Zira. It was their idea and their hard work to do as good
a job as they did. The makeup would've been enough. They didn't have to perfect
the voices or the moves. They could've been as mediocre as most of Fox's
approached to POTA. Yes, they made some good money back then (he still hasn't
begun on those collectibles you mnetioned). I'm just saying it's too bad with
Bill's quality ape work his performance in the TV show is lost and his
"performance in the cartoon was
"stolen". - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Got
Cornelius?
In a message dated 6/3/2006 10:39:49 AM Central
Standard Time, veetus@...
writes:
Bill auditioned to do Cornelius in the POTA cartoon but was
turned down because he sounded "too much" like Roddy and they were afraid
Roddy would sue.
Well, if that's the case, then
why didn't he simply create another voice for his audition(s)? Or, just
audition using his regular voice? There certainly are ways he could have
gotten around "sounding like Roddy"... I'm afraid I just don't buy
it...
Then
they traced over Bill's picture for the "Mission of Mercy" episode without
credit or compensation.
I'm pretty sure that they would
have been using the stills that FOX gave them to work with... As such, they
were probably owned by the studio and any residuals would have been paid out
before hand... Unless he owned the pictures himself, it's very unlikely he'd
get paid for them using anything the studio owned...
Bill did
his part for POTA but POTA has not been kind to him.
I'd
disagree with that... His going around as Cornelius was a big part in the
launching of his career... Plus, I seen where he sells face castings of the
APES makeups mounted on wood... He owes the start of his career to the APES
"roadshow", and he still profits from APES today with the items he sells...
APES owes him
nothing... <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39618 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/6/2006 1:55:36 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Well, I think it is due to poor thinking/writing by Dehn.
EXACTLY!!!!
He should have set Conquest FAR into the future,
Agreed again... The only reason they set CONQUEST in Caesar's adulthood was so they could have
continuity and show the fate of the baby from the previous film...
was he Caesar with Armando or did he choose that name himself?
Yes, he was Caesar when he was with Armando... Right near the beginning of the film Armando calls him Caesar and he never
mentions his former "Milo" name...
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39619 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: The Switch |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/6/2006 6:26:21 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
I think Zira did it....
Everyone knows that Zira did the switch... It's very obvious when she goes into the cage with Heloise (to "say goodbye") that she is up to something other than just saying "farewell"...
<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39620 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
I love that scene in the cage. It's just two apes communicating as
mothers despite their differences in intelligence. I never took that scene to
mean she was going to switch the babies. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes
get so smart after CONQUEST?
In a message dated 6/5/2006 10:00:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue
to talk to it when they are on the run? - - -
Jeff
I don't buy that. That scene in the cage would have no
purpose.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39621 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
That's probably why the government in "Conquest" is so paranoid.
They knew they didn't get the right baby. I guess we have to assume they never
made the connection with Armando. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes
get so smart after CONQUEST?
In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, darios@... writes:
Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it
may have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
if the body was recovered, so what?
Remember that DNA technology
just wasn't available (neither in '74 the year of the movie, and just
barely in the supposed 1980 that the film was set in). Even if the
technology was available, there really was no reason to suspect that a
switch had been made. The fact that Zira through the baby in the water
supported the notion that she herself believed it to be her own, an act
that would have erased any doubts to those who may have questioned the
matter further.
We (the audience) only know she did the switch,
because her circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time
a baby chimp was there as well).
Dario
At the time of ESCAPE, a simple
blood test could have proven if Cornelius was the father of the chimp or
not.
I have no doubt that the authorities
would have made extraordinary attempts to recover the body of an alien
visitor from the shallow waters of the harbor. I would guess that once the
blood work was done, the authorities were well aware that the chimp was not
baby Milo. Putting the blood work aside, a comparative autopsy would have
proven that the baby chimp's brain and vocal anatomy were not the same as
C&Z.
And didn't Hasslein shoot the baby
dead before Zira through him in the harbor?
Bill
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39622 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Hello New Members |
.html
.html
Message
To all our recently joined new
members - welcome!
Feel free to jump in and contribute if a subject
takes your fancy, or please start one
up yourself!
An
original comic strip called Within t
he Planet of the
Apes can be found
in the files section of the
DG Photos
group:
It ha
s been collected as pages in PDF format.
Make
sure you also read the Planet
of the Apes
TV Show comic book -
Going Home
!
Go to the Home
Page, scroll down to around the
middle of the page and click on the
link to take you to the
finished
pages.
And new for your
viewing pleasure - Uncle Manny's
Musings! A light hearted look at the world from one
of our wisest (Ha!) apes
.
Check out the Home Page for a
link to his latest piece of wisdom!
;-)
Uncle Manny
Archives can be found here:
Also, we now have a group set up for the
uploading of rare photographs and other
stuff that we have
been discussing for the Rare Photos CD project.
It is called
Pota DG Projects and it can be found here:
There have already
been some great rare photographs uploaded and anyone who wishes to
upload pictures just needs to let us know on the DG and we will
send you an invite or alternately you can go to the group and join
yourself.
Don't forget we
also have 4 other
groups 'attached' to the main
one.
First up there is
the DG Archives
group:
This group was created to store old posts from the group
which have been deleted from the main site. We have to do this periodically to free up space
as Yahoo does not allot much space to the groups anymore.
As this group is
so active we tend to fill up very quickly and instead of losing old posts
forever we like to keep a copy of them all. They can be found in the Files
section listed by month and year.
There is
also the DG Fan
Fiction group where members can place, in th
e group's Files section,
their Fan Fiction stories, poems etc. to be enjoyed
by all:
Then there's the
DG Photos
group:
Where photos
and files
are occasionally moved to save space on the main DG
group
Finally
there's the DG
Photos2
group
A second photos group where photos and files
are occasionally moved to save space on the main DG
group
All the sites
can be easily accessed via the links on each
one's Homepage.
Don't
forget to check out the DG 's vast Photos
section and all that great stuff in the Files section!
And w
hilst you're here
why not participate in a Poll or check out all
those
wonderful links and generally
have a fun filled family
experience!
Your Pals The
Owners
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39623 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CON |
.html
.html
For such a paranoid
Government, they were quick to raise enormous apes to release on society!
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 2:21
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG]
How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
That's probably
why the government in "Conquest" is so paranoid. They knew they
didn't get the right baby. I guess we have to assume they never made the
connection with Armando. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday,
June 05, 2006 8:13 AM
Subject:
Re:
[PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
In a message dated
6/5/2006 9:17:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, darios@...
writes:
Setting aside the very probable fact
that was pointed out that it may
have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
if the body was recovered, so what?
Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
those who may have questioned the matter further.
We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
chimp was there as well).
Dario
At the time of ESCAPE, a simple blood test could have proven if
Cornelius was the father of the chimp or not.
I have no doubt that the authorities would have made
extraordinary attempts to recover the body of an alien visitor from the
shallow waters of the harbor. I would guess that once the blood work was done,
the authorities were well aware that the chimp was not baby Milo. Putting the
blood work aside, a comparative autopsy would have proven that the baby chimp's
brain and vocal anatomy were not the same as C&Z.
And didn't Hasslein shoot the baby dead before Zira through him
in the harbor?
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39624 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] The switch.... |
.html
.html
Ahhh
....but if they found out Z&C were in the Circus they could
have discovered that the gender of Armando’s chimp had changed!
See – Dehn did think of SOME things (no doubt
because a proof reader told him!) J
-----Original
Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 1:42
AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG]
The switch....
In a message dated 6/6/2006 1:51:55 AM Central Standard
Time, whitty@... writes:
My dad told me it meant
the chimp babies where switched and because Zira had a male (and the other
chimp was a female) she didn't want them to see the gender of the chimp baby
and find her real baby.
....Which makes sense to an extent, BUT, the authorities would not have known
the sex of the child ape... Remember, he was born in secrecy and out of view of
Hasslein and Company... The authorities wouldn't know what the baby was until
they had fully interrogated Stevie and Lewis & Armando, and even then
there's no guarantee they would know what was born... After all, S & L
could just say that Z & C were out of their sight and care and Zira gave
birth out of sight so they'd not know what was born... And Armando had been
checked out already, so they'd think he didn't have any contact with them and
wouldn't know the gender either...
--
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39625 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
.html
.html
Message
-- Jeff, now that
Fox has released the cartoons on DVD would it be worth Bill doing something
about it now to try and get some sort of compensation and/or
recognition?
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39626 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Introductory Massage..... |
.html
.html
Message
Yep, no
problem.
Neil
No wait – I mean – Neil.....we
have a few new members.
Could you please send the
introductory
welcome? <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39627 |
From: atragon1@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Fwd: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/6/2006 11:55:52 AM Eastern Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
Yes, he was Caesar when he was with Armando... Right near the beginning of the film Armando calls him Caesar and he never
mentions his former "Milo" name...
****************
It was logical for Armando to change baby Milo's name. After all, it was public knowledge that Dr. Milo was one of the apeonauts -- to have a circus ape named "Milo"
would have aroused suspicions ... or maybe "Caesar" was Milo's stage name...?
Bill <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39628 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/6/2006 11:18:45 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
That's probably why the government in "Conquest" is so paranoid. They knew they didn't
get the right baby. I guess we have to assume they never made the connection with Armando. -
NOT TRUE...
It's believed they had gotten the right baby up until the whole Caesar fiasco... It was only then that Breck started to reconsider things and got to thinking that "maybe" the right infant wasn't
killed...
And what connection would there be to Armando? His circus was checked and believed to have been "clean" of the talking chimps, so they went on their way... <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39629 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/6/2006 4:38:34 PM Central Standard Time, ntfoster@... writes:
-- Jeff, now that Fox has released the cartoons on DVD would it be worth Bill doing something about it now to try and get
some sort of compensation and/or recognition?
For what?
It may have been a picture that Bill had taken specifically, but let's not forget he was in POTA makeup and FOX owns POTA... They probably DID have rights to it being that it IS their property and he was under
license from them... He was made up as a trademarked character that FOX owns exclusively...<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39630 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] The switch.... |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/6/2006 4:11:31 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
Ahhh....but if they found out Z&C were in the Circus they could have discovered that the gender of Armando's chimp
had changed!
When Armando is being checked by the authorities, he never said that Heloise's baby was a female... As a matter of fact, when they're looking around and Armando is talking about when the baby was born, it really
sounds like he says "Look how he's growing..."<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39631 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/6/2006 10:47:22 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:
They were so exact they even traced an identifying scar by Bill's eye. Obviously they had a lot of
pictures to choose from so the fact that they used that particular picture and were so exacting about shows there was something in Bill's performance they wanted.
How do you figure that? I mean a picture left behind would have no connction to the guy's performance... It was a still
left behind, that probably got mixed in with the rest of the APES stills and that was that... The way he looked made up would have had no bearing on his voacl work (if they liked it or not...)
Instead that picture is often assumed to be Roddy (such as in a recent "Simian Scrolls").
If that's the case, then maybe that's why the "mysterious missing scene" from "The
Interrogation" was cut... They might not have wanted people thinking Galen was in there twice...
c) Bill and Paula didn't "get" the gig to tour as Cornelius and Zira. It was their idea and their hard work
to do as good a job as they did.
They did "get" FOX's permission to go out as the apes, so that was something though... I
mean FOX gave them the rights to use their property to tour as C & Z after all...
He still hasn't begun on those collectibles you mentioned.
Why not? They are being advertised as being available on the last page of the newest issue of "Simian
Scrolls"... He's not going around selling items he doesn't even have yet is he? (If that's the case, then he should be in cahoots with a certain comic dealer out of Canada who shall remain nameless...)
I'm just saying it's too bad with Bill's quality ape work his performance in the TV show is
lost and his "performance" in the cartoon was "stolen"
I have seen that bit where he does Caesar's speech from CONQUEST... I will agree with you that he does do
pretty good work... That said, he still didn't have any part in the cartoon other than having his still used...
<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39632 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
They had to be genetically altered.
Unless we're supposed to believe
they're the same apes. Then again,
those Orangs magically transform
after putting them in jumpsuits, so
I don't know what we're supposed
to believe. Maybe it's the suits!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39633 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/6/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/6/2006 6:24:15 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
whitty@... writes:
That's the question –
what IS the true spirit of the
original?
POTA was a shocking film. Shock after shock.
Even though we knew there were apes, when
you first see the humans, you think, "Oh cavemen!"
Wrong . . . Shock Horror! Gorillas on horses! "Oh
there's Landon!" Shock Horror! Lobotomized! "Ah,
he's free!" Shock Horror! It's Earth! The new
one
tried with that Calima thing and an ending borrowed
from the book. But it takes a lot more to shock an
audience today. Bonnie & Clyde was shocking then.
Now it would just be a run-of-the-mill motion picture.
But that's just one element in the spirit of the original.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39634 |
From: laroweramity |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: New Member says hi |
|
.html Hi to all, im a new member from the uk, ive had an interest in all
things sc/fi and horror since i was a young kid, im now 40, the
original "Planet Of The Apes" film has always held a special place for
me and i still find it an amazing film to watch,
Im also a big fan of Ray Harryhausen and the Hammer films of the 60's
and 70's, but this is an ape forum so ill keep it just "Ape", i look
forward to chatting with you along the way.
Simon <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39635 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
This week's issue, containing the stunning conclusion to last week's story of Derek Zane and the chimp who calls himself Robin Hood, is now available to download from Hunter's site.
Next week, Jason and Alexander are back with more Terror on the Planet of the Apes! Greg <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39636 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CON |
.html
.html
Anything for a buck! - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 2:07
PM
Subject: RE: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How
did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
For such a paranoid
Government, they were quick to raise enormous apes to release on
society!
-----Original
Message----- From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
[PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of veetus@... Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 2:21
AM To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Subject:
{Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did
the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
That's probably why the government in
"Conquest" is so paranoid. They knew they didn't get the right baby. I guess
we have to assume they never made the connection with Armando. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday,
June 05, 2006 8:13 AM
Subject:
Re:
[PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after
CONQUEST?
In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:23 AM Eastern
Standard Time, darios@...
writes:
Setting aside the very
probable fact that was pointed out that it may have been impossible to
get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even if the body was
recovered, so what?
Remember that DNA technology just wasn't
available (neither in '74 the year of the movie, and just barely in
the supposed 1980 that the film was set in). Even if the technology
was available, there really was no reason to suspect that a switch had
been made. The fact that Zira through the baby in the water supported
the notion that she herself believed it to be her own, an act that
would have erased any doubts to those who may have questioned the
matter further.
We (the audience) only know she did the switch,
because her circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a
time a baby chimp was there as
well).
Dario
At the time
of ESCAPE, a simple blood test could have proven if Cornelius was the father
of the chimp or not.
I have no
doubt that the authorities would have made extraordinary attempts to
recover the body of an alien visitor from the shallow waters of the harbor.
I would guess that once the blood work was done, the authorities were well
aware that the chimp was not baby Milo. Putting the blood work aside, a
comparative autopsy would have proven that the baby chimp's brain and vocal
anatomy were not the same as C&Z.
And didn't
Hasslein shoot the baby dead before Zira through him in the
harbor?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39637 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
.html
.html
He's already on it. - -
-Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 2:36
PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Got
Cornelius?
-- Jeff, now
that Fox has released the cartoons on DVD would it be worth Bill doing
something about it now to try and get some sort of compensation and/or
recognition?
Neil
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39638 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
Just because the government is nervous that
they didn't get the right baby doesn't mean a low level thug like Breck would
know about it. The official line was that they got the right one. Eventually
Breck himself considers that maybe they didn't. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 6:52
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes
get so smart after CONQUEST?
In a message dated 6/6/2006 11:18:45 AM Central
Standard Time, veetus@...
writes:
That's
probably why the government in "Conquest" is so paranoid. They knew they
didn't get the right baby. I guess we have to assume they never made the
connection with Armando. -
NOT TRUE...
It's
believed they had gotten the right baby up until the whole Caesar fiasco... It
was only then that Breck started to reconsider things and got to thinking that
"maybe" the right infant wasn't killed...
And what connection would
there be to Armando? His circus was checked and believed to have been "clean"
of the talking chimps, so they went on their way...
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39639 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Got Cornelius? |
.html
.html
Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi's estates own
the rights to their likeness even though they are in Universal's makeup. There
is something to be said for performance. Roddy and Kim got paid for being in the
films under makeup. Yeah, it's just a picture but there was something about the
picture they wanted (and went out of their way to duplicate it exactly).
Recently the "Taster's Choice" guy got compensation for being on their packages
without permission. - - - Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 7:02
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Got
Cornelius?
In a message dated 6/6/2006 4:38:34 PM Central
Standard Time, ntfoster@...
writes:
-- Jeff, now that Fox has released the cartoons on DVD would it
be worth Bill doing something about it now to try and get some sort of
compensation and/or recognition?
For what?
It may have
been a picture that Bill had taken specifically, but let's not forget he was
in POTA makeup and FOX owns POTA... They probably DID have rights to it being
that it IS their property and he was under license from them... He was made up
as a trademarked character that FOX owns exclusively...
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39640 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
.html
.html
POTA2001 didn't earn it's shocks because it
had sitcom characters. You have to have a certain atmosphere for "shocks" to
work. At no time in the movie was I worried I'd see a lobotomy in the movie.
Burton is very limited in what he can do as a director. - - -
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:06
PM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast &
Crew
In a message dated 6/6/2006 6:24:15 A.M. Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:
That's the question
– what IS the true spirit of the
original?
POTA was a shocking film. Shock after shock.
Even though we knew there were apes, when
you first see the humans, you think, "Oh cavemen!"
Wrong . . . Shock Horror! Gorillas on horses! "Oh
there's Landon!" Shock Horror! Lobotomized! "Ah,
he's free!" Shock Horror! It's Earth! The new
one
tried with that Calima thing and an ending borrowed
from the book. But it takes a lot more to shock an
audience today. Bonnie & Clyde was shocking then.
Now it would just be a run-of-the-mill motion picture.
But that's just one element in the spirit of the original.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39641 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/7/2006 11:09:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
veetus@... writes:
POTA2001 didn't earn it's shocks because it had
sitcom characters. You have to have a certain atmosphere for "shocks" to
work.
Too right! POTA should never never be played
for laughs.
Even that one 3 Monkeys scene was a mistake, and Kim
thought so too. But I guess they felt it was so heavy it
needed a tension breaker. And I can excuse one. I
won't say that Paul Giamatti ruined that movie single
handedly, because he had a lot of help ruining it.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39642 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
.html
Message
-- As usual,
thanks for all your hard work Greg, these comics really are
appreciated.
Neil
This week's issue, containing the stunning conclusion to last week's
story of Derek Zane and the chimp who calls himself Robin Hood, is now
available to download from Hunter's site.
Next week, Jason and Alexander are back with more Terror on the Planet of
the Apes!
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39643 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: New Member says hi |
.html
.html
Hi
Simon!
I’m glad you found your way in!
Simon, would you mind if I share with the
group the photos you send directly to me a couple of days ago?
Michael
(Message over 64 KB, truncated)
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39644 |
From: Wendy Kostora |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.htmlComing form a female's standpoint, every mother intuitively knows the baby
is really hers. Second, when Zira changes the diaper, she would know right
off that this chimp isn't hers. To add to conterversy, I believe Cornelius
didn't have a clue.
>From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
>Reply-To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
>To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: RE: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 21:24:51 +1000
>
>I think Zira did it....
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf
>Of veetus@...
>Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:02 AM
>To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
> It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue
>to
>talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dario Sciola" <darios@...>
>To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 6:16 AM
>Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
>
>Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
>have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
>if the body was recovered, so what?
>
>Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
>year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
>was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
>reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
>through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
>believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
>those who may have questioned the matter further.
>
>We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
>circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
>chimp was there as well).
>
>Dario
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
>Date: Sunday, June 4, 2006 5:05 pm
>Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
> > -- One thing that has always bugged me is wouldn't the body of (fake)
> > baby Milo have been recovered from the water? Surely the authorities
> > would want to confirm it's death and more importantly it's identity?
> >
> > Neil
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
] On
>Behalf
> > Of majorhendricks
> > Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
> >
> >
> > I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
> > were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by
> > scientists
> > for study.
>
>--
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39645 |
From: Wendy Kostora |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.htmlVery good scenario Bill. I've tangoed with this question as well, even going
as far as writing fanfic that was at length of a trilogy. Imagine what Fox
could with the "what if" for "Conquest", which to me is indeed an open
book. So much had happened during that time, events which are profound to
the apes' history and their future.
Welcome to the group.
Wendy
>
>I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
>were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by scientists
>for study. Years later, the plague from space killed man's pets and
>apes were then used as a substitute. It was not long after this that
>is was realized the Apes could be trained for manual labor, however
>training them and conditioning them was costly and time consuming --
>and their abilities were limited at best.
>
>It would be at this point that the company or companies that procured
>the ape slave trade discovered that the genes of Cornelius, Zira and
>Milo could be used to breed a new race of apes -- eugenically
>programmed to learn quicker than your average ape.
>
>Of course, the government approved of this -- no doubt the lobbying
>dollars of these powerful ape brokers, outweighed the prophecies of
>C&Z regarding the downfall of mankind.
>
>By the time Caesar arrives in the city, I would think that there were
>already isolated incidents of apes who could speak. These apes were
>rounded up and destroyed immediately by the police. Why else would
>the police be so ready to accept the possibility that it was Caesar
>who could have made the outburst?
>
>It was too late when man realized that these apes were now too smart -
>- there was no way to remove all the apes from society without the
>economy collapsing. All they could do was to create a "police state"
>and destroy any and all apes that were too intelligent (classified
>as "disobedient") as they surfaced. Caesar is really only the spark
>that sets off the forest fire that would be the ape revolution.
>
>Bill
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39646 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
|
.html .html.html
The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link is this Tuesday, June 13. I've pre-ordered mine. Anyone else getting it?
-- Rory<.html<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39647 |
From: Tim "apefan" |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
.htmlI'll go out and get it!!! Tim Haristas@... wrote:
The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link is this Tuesday, June 13. I've pre-ordered mine. Anyone else getting it?
-- Rory
Ring'em or ping'em. Make
PC-to-phone calls as low as 1¢/min
with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39648 |
From: John |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
.htmlI can't wait. I will be at Best Buy right after work. My Son is going
to love these.
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote:
>
> The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link is this Tuesday, June 13.
I've
> pre-ordered mine. Anyone else getting it?
>
> -- Rory
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39649 |
From: Whitty |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
.htmlYeah if you send it to me! :)
--------- Original Message -------- From:
PotaDG@yahoogroups.com To: "pota@yahoogroups.com"
<pota@yahoogroups.com>, "PotaDG@yahoogroups.com"
<PotaDG@yahoogroups.com> Subject: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot
Link: Secret Chimp Date: 08/06/06
19:50
The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link
is this Tuesday, June 13. I've pre-ordered mine. Anyone else
getting it?
-- Rory
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39650 |
From: Lou Melograna |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
.html
hey all..I'm a new guy...now call me an idiot...but
when did they start reissuing POTA comic books?
Lou
"Hot monkey love for Zira"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 8:41
AM
Subject: [PotaDG] Marvel UK issue
86
This week's issue, containing the stunning conclusion to last week's
story of Derek Zane and the chimp who calls himself Robin Hood, is now
available to download from Hunter's site.
Next week, Jason and Alexander are back with more Terror on the Planet of
the Apes!
Greg
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39651 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Cast & Crew |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/7/2006 12:09:27 PM Central Standard Time, TZer0@... writes:
POTA should never never be played for laughs.
Right on!!!!! You are right on the ball T!!!<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39652 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/7/2006 8:45:15 PM Central Standard Time, lmelogra@... writes:
hey all..I'm a new guy...now call me an idiot...but when did they start reissuing POTA comic books?
Reissuing them? Do you mean the re-issues of the TERROR comics? Those were put out by ADVENTURE in about 90 or 91 I think...
If you mean the REVOLUTION series, that started a few months ago... <.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39653 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST? |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/7/2006 6:16:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
Willowape@... writes:
Coming form a female's standpoint, every mother intuitively knows the baby
is really hers
For the most part I agree, especially the diaper part.
However then have been hospital screw ups with
babies and the mothers were none the wiser,
which would tend to discount a mothers
instincts if they hadn't had a chance
to bond yet. I have now doubt she
did the switch though. I know
this intuitively! Not just
from studying film, but
from studying the
expression on
her face.
I mean . . .
What do you need?
An X-Ray showing the wheels turning in her mind?
How about a Light Bulb turning on over her head?
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39654 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/7/2006 8:45:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
lmelogra@... writes:
...now
call me an idiot...
Okay kid . . . You're an idiot. ; )
But seriously, I don't think they did
reissue them . . . as far as I know.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39655 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/7/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/7/2006 9:19:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mlccougar@... writes:
Reissuing them? Do you
mean the re-issues of the TERROR comics? Those were put out by ADVENTURE in
about 90 or 91 I think...
If you mean the REVOLUTION series, that
started a few months ago...
I think he's talking about the original releases on hunter's site.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39656 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
.html
Message
-- Lou, If you are
referring to the Marvel UK comics, these are scanned by group member Greg
Plonowski and hosted by Hunter Goatley (along with many, many other Apes
goodies) on his POTA archive site.
Greg has been hard
at work doing this for a while now starting with the first issue and he will be
continuing to the end of the run I believe.
Which
means he's probably got another year or two to go now with them I would
guess?
Neil
hey all..I'm a new guy...now call me an
idiot...but when did they start reissuing POTA comic books?
_,_._,___ <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39657 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Reissues? |
.html
.html
And these are not reissues
– they are scans of comics that were released in the ‘70s.
Hope that helps!
< (Message over 64 KB, truncated) <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39658 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
Exactly one year and one week to go, Neil, until the last Marvel UK issue is archived on Hunter's site.
Lou, these are not reissues, they are the Marvel UK editions from 30 years ago, published concurrently with the US versions. For the past year and a half or so I have been scanning and posting an issue each week, 30
years after it was originally available in the UK. Greg
Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...> wrote:
-- Lou, If you are
referring to the Marvel UK comics, these are scanned by group member Greg Plonowski and hosted by Hunter Goatley (along with many, many other Apes goodies) on his POTA archive site.
Greg has been hard at work doing this for a while now starting with the first issue and he will be continuing to the end of the run I believe.
Which means he's probably got another year or two to go now with them I would guess?
Neil
.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39659 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39660 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} RE: [PotaDG] Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
.html
Greg
will do the Aussie comics next – right Greg? <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39661 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Simon's Boots! |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39662 |
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG |
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39663 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Simon in Full Kit! |
.html
.html
And
here’s Simon again – in full kit!
Simon, can you give us a bit of a
commentary mate? J (Message over 64 KB, truncated) <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39664 |
From: laroweramity |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Simon's Boots! |
.htmlHi Mike
about the boots, i had them made by Brian over at the "Apemania"
studios, ive fancied having a costume made for some time but the
price was a bit out of my reach at the time, as a collector of
sci/fi and horror film stuff from the 60's and 70's and since this
had been going on for over 30 years i thought it was about time i
had a little clear out...to my pleasant suprise several of the sales
afforded me the opportunity to put together a full gorilla uniform,
i contacted brian and after a few days of sending over many
measurements they got to work.
What you see in the first picture file are the superb leather boots,
i thought at first these would have been made of rubber but when
brian sent me pics of the finished items i was very pleasantly
suprised, the boots are full leather top to bottom, the ape split
toe is cast in rubber and then glued to the front section of the
boot, next to be applied are the calf buckles on the side of each
boot, these again are made of rubber, the boots are then sprayed a
very dark plum colour and then a liberal sprinkling of fullers earth
is applied to give them that rode in look...
Although they may seem a little steep in price (these cost me $350)
believe me when you get them the cost is forgoten, they also do a
delux hand made pair of boots which have i believe the split toe
also made in leather along with proper side buckles, at the end of
the day you are only going to buy something this expensive once in
your life so why not have the best available, brian at apemania also
tells me that all the castings ( split toes / buckles ) are all cast
from originals / or moulds of originals
simon
- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...> wrote:
>
> Hey All
>
> New member Simon has a very fancy gorilla outfit he has sent me
some
> photos of.
>
> I will be uploading these to the FILES SECTION as time permits.
>
> For starters - the BOOTS!
>
> Simon, could you tell us about the boots? Restoration or
reproduction?
> Price? Etc!
>
>
http://f6.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/QBGIRMU7dbYL7dUx_0Fp7sCanapjTPHx8r5FwVC_
jmm
> poAhlK0rirSdFQwR6THM_Nr-QxBF3ZjpK6AUVzQKC/boots.jpg
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39665 |
From: Haristas@aol.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
.html.html
You mean you want a copy "wink, wink"? -----Original Message----- From: Whitty <whitty@...> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:25:55 +1000
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
Yeah if you send it to me! :)
--------- Original Message -------- From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
To: "pota@yahoogroups.com" <pota@yahoogroups.com>, "PotaDG@yahoogroups.com" <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com> Subject: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp Date: 08/06/06 19:50
The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link is this Tuesday, June 13. I've pre-ordered mine. Anyone else getting it?
Check out AOL.com today
. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39666 |
From: Michael Whitty |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp |
.html
.html
Yes
PLEASE!
Hey – how about those
SOPRANOS.....another season in January!
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39667 |
From: mlccougar@aol.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Simon in Full Kit! |
.html.html .html
In a message dated 6/8/2006 8:06:27 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:
And here's Simon again – in full kit!
Very cool outfit...
Hunt Leader bandolier AND the neck piece! Doesn't get much better than that... (Except for other gorilla outfits that is...)<.html
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39668 |
From: Greg Plonowski |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
Um, no. And not just because I don't have them in my collection to scan and I'm really looking forward to having more time for other projects once this one is complete.
I decided to scan the Marvel UKs because between the covers, the new splash pages that had to be drawn for stories broken into smaller chunks and even the Apeslayer story there's a lot of art in the Marvel UKs
that many fans haven't seen if they only have the US magazines. If I understand correctly, the Australian comics are just straight reprints of the US versions, same covers and contents, right?
Greg
Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:
Greg will do the Aussie comics next right Greg?
J
.
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39669 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Simon in Full Kit! |
.html
.html
Message
-- Yeah very nice.
So Simon, do you wear this to the pub on Saturday nights?
;-)
Neil
Very cool
outfit...
Hunt Leader bandolier AND the neck piece! Doesn't get much
better than that.... (Except for other gorilla outfits that is...)
. <.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39670 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86 |
.html
.html
Message
-- Totally correct
Greg, they are just exact copies and printed on paper of far inferior quality.
The story is that
the guy who published them over here was a newspaper printer and he only did it
so he could save money by not having to turn his printing presses off every
weekend when they wouldn't be used to print up the weekly papers. They were also
printed on newsprint paper, therefore the low quality and why so few have
survived to this day.
Neil
If I understand correctly, the Australian comics are just straight
reprints of the US versions, same covers and contents, right?
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39671 |
From: kidro85@aol.com |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Kamandi -- No Cartoon ( OT ) |
.html
.html
Read below, too bad it wont happen though.
Tony
Kamandi Animated Series
One of Jack Kirby's most oddball creations of the '70s was a
science fiction comic series called Kamandi, the Last Boy on Earth. It
told the adventures of the last young man in a world ruled over by intelligent
animals... like Planet of the Apes with dogs, lions, tigers, bears, etc.
added in. Having said that, is it possible this esoteric comic might make the
jump to animated TV series? It will if Bruce Timm (Batman Beyond) has
anything to say about it. While talking to the Detroit News Comic Book
Continuum, Timm revealed that he had already made a pitch to Kids' WB which was
turned down. Timm says, "Actually, Kamandi is not dead. In fact, we are
looking at possibly doing a Kamandi pilot for Cartoon
Network."
Timm also revealed details of his pitch saying, "I've always
thought that Kamandi would make just an excellent kids cartoon, [b]ut I
actually went back and re-read them and went, 'Wow, this is really pretty
violent.' But it's fantasy violence. It's Jonny Quest on the Planet of
the Apes. That's kind of how I pitched it to them. And they went, 'Oooh!'
and they liked that idea."
Unfortunately, they ended up turning it down because the series
wouldn't appeal to female viewers as well as Timm's insistence on animating the
series so it looked exactly the way Jack Kirby drew
it. <.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39672 |
From: nlmoxham |
Date: 6/8/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
.htmlThis may explain what happened to Boulle's rights, though it doesn't
specify exactly how much control he sold:
"Before the
book was even released in the English language, Arthur P.
Jacobs had purchased the rights. He had been in Europe
shopping for "a new KING KONG." .... During the
meeting, the agent mentioned Boulle's novel, and the
Hollywood producer purchased the rights based on a short
description by the agent. Jacobs later read the novel, and
found that it far outpassed his expectations. To him,
Boulle was a genius." - http://www.towson.edu/~flynn/apes.html"
--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...> wrote:
>
> I think they paid him for all the rights to his story.... ???
>
> Just a "one-off" payment.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of Dario Sciola
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:05 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
>
> Something that has always intrigued me but to which I have no
clear
> answer is how the POTA rights are distributed.
>
> The APJAC story is well documented (how Jacobs was smart enough to
> retain all the merchandising right while Fox kept the movie
rights,
> until of course he reverted them back to Fox). But how does Boulle
> (and now his estate) fit into all this. Based on Fox'es actions, I
> have always assumed that somehow they've either acquired Boulle's
> rights OR that his rights somehow only extend to his original
novel.
> How then, can Fox keep up pumping out stuff that was based on his
> creation? Murky territory. Does anyone have the full story about
what
> rights, if any, are still held by Boulle's estate?
>
> Dario
>
> --
> <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39673 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/9/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Kamandi -- No Cartoon ( OT ) |
.html
.html
Message
-- Wow if only
this would have happened! What a great cartoon this would have been, done by
Bruce Timm in the style of Jack Kirby, what more could one ask for! Damn those
female viewers. ;-)
I'm sure stuff
like Dragon Ball Z doesn't appeal to 'female viewers' but that doesn't seem to
have hampered it's success, damn if only I had spawned girls!!!!
:-D
Neil
Read below, too bad it wont happen though.
Tony
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39674 |
From: Neil T Foster |
Date: 6/9/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
.html
.html
Message
-- So by the
sounds of all this it seems like Boulle made bugger all from POTA apart from the
sales of his book. I wonder how much he got for them attaching the 'based on
characters' blurb?
Neil
This may explain what happened to Boulle's
rights, though it doesn't specify exactly how much control he
sold:
"Before the
book was even released in the English
language, Arthur P.
Jacobs had purchased the rights. He had been in
Europe
shopping for "a new KING KONG." .... During the
meeting,
the agent mentioned Boulle's novel, and the
Hollywood producer
purchased the rights based on a short
description by the agent. Jacobs
later read the novel, and
found that it far outpassed his expectations.
To him,
Boulle was a genius." - http://www.towson. edu/~flynn/ apes.html"
.
<.html
<.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39675 |
From: veetus@earthlink.net |
Date: 6/9/2006 |
| Subject: OT: "Hulk" a "do over" |
.html
.html
www.aintitcool.com has an article
where Marvel's Avi Arad saya they are going to start from scratch with the next
"Hulk" film. What this has to do with POTA is here's a model of a hot "property"
being revamped when a "reimagination" doesn't go over well. I happened to like
"The Hulk" film (directed by Ang Lee, who almost got an Oscar this year for
"Brokeback Mountain"). But obviously it didn't make the dough they had expected.
Even though I liked the movie it seems obvious that the best mode is to stay
true to what people liked about something in the first place. The big hits
("Harry Potter", "Spiderman", "Lord of the Rings") are true to their original
material. When artists like Ang Lee or Tim Burton try to show they are more
clever than the material there are problems. I haven't seen lat year's
"Bewitched" remake but I heard it wasn't very good because the filmmakers tried
to avoid the TV show remake trap by not really making it like the TV show.
That backfired. It almost seems like bad advice to tell filmmakers not to use
their imagination and instead be slaves to what worked before but I guess it's
true. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Anyway, they are planning to return
"Hulk" to the way it was in the comics. If that works maybe that will inspire
Fox to do a "do over" with POTA. We know how crazy they are with Marvel. - - -
Jeff
<.html <.html
|
|
| Group: potadg |
Message: 39676 |
From: TZer0@aol.com |
Date: 6/9/2006 |
| Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al. |
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/9/2006 8:59:45 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
ntfoster@... writes:
-- So by the
sounds of all this it seems like Boulle made bugger all from POTA apart from
the sales of his book.
That had to be a huge boost to sales.
It might have remained a mediocre
untranslated French pulp otherwise.
<.html
<.html
|
|
|
|