Yahoo! potadg group — Messages 39577–39676

Dates: 2006-06-05 through 2006-06-09

Messages in potadg group. Page 209 of 451.
Index Prev  Next


Group: potadg Message: 39577 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
Group: potadg Message: 39578 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: EW names best of nearly unwatchable sequels
Group: potadg Message: 39579 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
Group: potadg Message: 39580 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39581 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39582 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39583 From: Dario Sciola Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
Group: potadg Message: 39584 From: Dario Sciola Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39585 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
Group: potadg Message: 39586 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
Group: potadg Message: 39587 From: Dario Sciola Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39588 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39589 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39590 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39591 From: atragon1@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39592 From: atragon1@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39593 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: New scripts added to Hunter's site
Group: potadg Message: 39594 From: Whitty Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts added to Hunter's site
Group: potadg Message: 39595 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts added to Hunter's site
Group: potadg Message: 39596 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: POTA Reference
Group: potadg Message: 39597 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39598 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: The switch....
Group: potadg Message: 39599 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39600 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39601 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39602 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: An APES question!
Group: potadg Message: 39603 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39604 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Rorster
Group: potadg Message: 39605 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
Group: potadg Message: 39606 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
Group: potadg Message: 39607 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39608 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39609 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
Group: potadg Message: 39610 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: The new comic pg4
Group: potadg Message: 39611 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Zira....
Group: potadg Message: 39612 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Introductory Massage.....
Group: potadg Message: 39613 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39614 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39615 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39616 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: The switch....
Group: potadg Message: 39617 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
Group: potadg Message: 39618 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39619 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: The Switch
Group: potadg Message: 39620 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39621 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39622 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Hello New Members
Group: potadg Message: 39623 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CON
Group: potadg Message: 39624 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] The switch....
Group: potadg Message: 39625 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
Group: potadg Message: 39626 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Introductory Massage.....
Group: potadg Message: 39627 From: atragon1@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Fwd: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39628 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39629 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
Group: potadg Message: 39630 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] The switch....
Group: potadg Message: 39631 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
Group: potadg Message: 39632 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39633 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
Group: potadg Message: 39634 From: laroweramity Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: New Member says hi
Group: potadg Message: 39635 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39636 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CON
Group: potadg Message: 39637 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
Group: potadg Message: 39638 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39639 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
Group: potadg Message: 39640 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
Group: potadg Message: 39641 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
Group: potadg Message: 39642 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39643 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: New Member says hi
Group: potadg Message: 39644 From: Wendy Kostora Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39645 From: Wendy Kostora Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39646 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
Group: potadg Message: 39647 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
Group: potadg Message: 39648 From: John Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
Group: potadg Message: 39649 From: Whitty Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
Group: potadg Message: 39650 From: Lou Melograna Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39651 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
Group: potadg Message: 39652 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39653 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
Group: potadg Message: 39654 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39655 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39656 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39657 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Reissues?
Group: potadg Message: 39658 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39659 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 39660 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} RE: [PotaDG] Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39661 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Simon's Boots!
Group: potadg Message: 39662 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
Group: potadg Message: 39663 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Simon in Full Kit!
Group: potadg Message: 39664 From: laroweramity Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: Simon's Boots!
Group: potadg Message: 39665 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
Group: potadg Message: 39666 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
Group: potadg Message: 39667 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: Simon in Full Kit!
Group: potadg Message: 39668 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39669 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: Simon in Full Kit!
Group: potadg Message: 39670 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
Group: potadg Message: 39671 From: kidro85@aol.com Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Kamandi -- No Cartoon ( OT )
Group: potadg Message: 39672 From: nlmoxham Date: 6/8/2006
Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
Group: potadg Message: 39673 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/9/2006
Subject: Re: Kamandi -- No Cartoon ( OT )
Group: potadg Message: 39674 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/9/2006
Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
Group: potadg Message: 39675 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/9/2006
Subject: OT: "Hulk" a "do over"
Group: potadg Message: 39676 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/9/2006
Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.



Group: potadg Message: 39577 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
.html
.htmlMessage
 
  Contractually, I've heard Fox has to keep pumping out movies based on the Marvel comics. Otherwise they lose those properties like "X-Men" and "Fantastic 4". Marvel has already taken most of it's toys and gone home. They are going to be producing their own movies based on the characters they have left and Paramount will release them (including a "Hulk 2"). I guess the studios that did the other movies (Sony with "Spiderman", Fox's movies) will continue until their rights expire. Meanwhile, Fox owns POTA and can go back to that whenever they want; ten, twenty years later if it strikes them. Until then it's a Marvel world and we're just buying popcorn in it. - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:32 PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

After at least a 10 year wait wasn’t it (or more?).

 

I think Batman has LOTS more fans too.....

 

But yes, they are making sequels to worse movies than POTA (so did THOSE movies sell more toys?).

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent:
Sunday, 4 June 2006 2:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

 

They came out for "Batman Begins" after "Batman and Robin".



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by CyberOne E-Mail Spam and Virus Protection Service, and is believed to be clean from viruses. CyberOne accepts no responsibility for the content of messages in transit through our servers.
--
Suspected unsolicited commercial bulk messages
(SPAM) have been marked with {Spam?} tag in the subject line enabling you to filter
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39578 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: EW names best of nearly unwatchable sequels
.html
 .html
  Cover her up with makeup?! Rory's gay! - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:59 PM
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: EW names best of nearly unwatchable sequels

In a message dated 6/3/06 7:49:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:


Do you think (based on her other movies then!) she'd be a good Nova?




No!  She'd be a better Zira.
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39579 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
.html
.htmlMessage
  Also, people forget "X-Men" was a flop as a comic book when it started. They actually stopped publishing it. Then it was rebooted around '75 by Chris Claremont ( a writer for the POTA magazine) and started it's climb to be THE most popular comic book. There's always a new beginning if the creative people and the financial people are up to it.
  And the "X-Men" movies have not done better than POTA2001. The movies' box office has improved as the budgets have ( "X-Men 3" cost almost $200 million, that's double what POTA reportedly cost). POTA2001 did better than "X-Men 1". But POTA2001 was a corporate embarrassment (people really dog piled on it for messing up a classic) and it's questionable they'd want to revisit it. Fox screwed up, not POTA. - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 2:19 PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

-- Well where is this audience then? Surely if there is a large audience waiting around for a new movie they would also be buying things like the new comic but even that isn't guaranteed to go to a second series as it seems it hasn't sold in huge numbers as Ty has repeatedly said any 2nd series will be based on the graphic novel having large enough sales to justify that happening.
 
Apes is dead and Fox knows it, the world has moved on to embrace other things since those good old days when anything 'Ape' was guaranteed to sell.
 
For the last 20 odd years or so anything to do with X - men has been guaranteed to sell comics in massive numbers so it is little surprise that Fox will be milking that franchise to death and I suspect all those X - fans will turn up at any movie that has any link to that franchise, no matter how bad the movie is or which X character it is about.
 
Neil
-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2006 2:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

  I disagree. I think there is a large audience for new POTA movies (shown by POTA2001's opening weekend; even Ben Affleck left rehab to see it). The problem, I think, is the quality of the movie and now Fox isn't sure if people would turn out for a sequel, even if it was good. I think they would, audiences are very forgiving.
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39580 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.htmlMessage
  They probably did retrieve the baby's body. And after an autopsy showed it wasn't Baby Milo they visited Armando. After they heard Milo babbling "mamma, mamma", Armando paid them off. That's why he had to promote his circus so much, to cover the government bribes! - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

I guess we are assuming a hungry shark beat them to it Neil because yes, they would recover that body with a very high priority (if they COULD...)!

 

I’ll never forget that feeling of horror when Zira pushed the baby over the side.  Thankfully my dad was nearby to explain!

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Neil T Foster
Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 7:05 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

-- One thing that has always bugged me is wouldn't the body of (fake) baby Milo have been recovered from the water? Surely the authorities would want to confirm it's death and more importantly it's identity?

 

Neil

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of majorhendricks
Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

 I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
were
put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by scientists
for study.



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by CyberOne E-Mail Spam and Virus Protection Service, and is believed to be clean from viruses. CyberOne accepts no responsibility for the content of messages in transit through our servers.
--
Suspected unsolicited commercial bulk messages
(SPAM) have been marked with {Spam?} tag in the subject line enabling you to filter
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39581 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue to
talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dario Sciola" <darios@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?


Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
if the body was recovered, so what?

Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
those who may have questioned the matter further.

We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
chimp was there as well).

Dario

----- Original Message -----
From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Sunday, June 4, 2006 5:05 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

> -- One thing that has always bugged me is wouldn't the body of (fake)
> baby Milo have been recovered from the water? Surely the authorities
> would want to confirm it's death and more importantly it's identity?
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of majorhendricks
> Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
>
> I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
> were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by
> scientists
> for study.
>
>




Yahoo! Groups Links
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39582 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
 .html
  I got the feeling Zira was trying to protect it from the humans some how, or drown it so it wouldn't be at the mercy of the humans. I liked that moment, it was kind of an odd "nature/instinct" thing. - - - Jeff
 
----- Original Message -----
From: TZer0@...
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

In a message dated 6/4/2006 5:03:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:
I'll never forget that feeling of horror when Zira pushed the baby over the side.  Thankfully my dad was nearby to explain!
 
Maybe you can explain it to me then.
I wasn't entirely sure about that scene.
I thought it was a combination of . . .
"You want the baby so much? then
here!" and just getting rid of any
evidence of the switch of the chimps.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39583 From: Dario Sciola Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
.html
Something that has always intrigued me but to which I have no clear
answer is how the POTA rights are distributed.

The APJAC story is well documented (how Jacobs was smart enough to
retain all the merchandising right while Fox kept the movie rights,
until of course he reverted them back to Fox). But how does Boulle
(and now his estate) fit into all this. Based on Fox'es actions, I
have always assumed that somehow they've either acquired Boulle's
rights OR that his rights somehow only extend to his original novel.
How then, can Fox keep up pumping out stuff that was based on his
creation? Murky territory. Does anyone have the full story about what
rights, if any, are still held by Boulle's estate?

Dario

----- Original Message -----
From: veetus@...
Date: Monday, June 5, 2006 10:36 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

> Message
> Contractually, I've heard Fox has to keep pumping out movies
> based on the Marvel comics. Otherwise they lose those properties
> like "X-Men" and "Fantastic 4". Marvel has already taken most of
> it's toys and gone home. They are going to be producing their own
> movies based on the characters they have left and Paramount will
> release them (including a "Hulk 2"). I guess the studios that did
> the other movies (Sony with "Spiderman", Fox's movies) will
> continue until their rights expire. Meanwhile, Fox owns POTA and
> can go back to that whenever they want; ten, twenty years later if
> it strikes them. Until then it's a Marvel world and we're just
> buying popcorn in it. - - - Jeff
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Whitty
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:32 PM
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew
>
>
> After at least a 10 year wait wasn't it (or more?).
>
>
>
> I think Batman has LOTS more fans too.....
>
>
>
> But yes, they are making sequels to worse movies than POTA (so
> did THOSE movies sell more toys?).
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of veetus@...
> Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2006 2:48 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew
>
>
>
> They came out for "Batman Begins" after "Batman and Robin".
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Planet of the apes
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "PotaDG" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> PotaDG-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> of Service.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
>
>
> --
Group: potadg Message: 39584 From: Dario Sciola Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
On the face of it, I always took it to mean that Zira was trying one
lat desperate act to save the baby (regardless if it was really Milo
or not). After all, she knew that if it was still alive, it would be
destroyed now that she and Cornelius were goners. So even if the odds
of surviving being dumped into the bay like that were not good, It was
still better than doing nothing as shocking as the act may be.

Dario

----- Original Message -----
From: TZer0@...
Date: Monday, June 5, 2006 10:02 am
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

>
> In a message dated 6/4/2006 5:03:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> whitty@... writes:
>
> I'll never forget that feeling of horror when Zira pushed the
> baby over the
> side. Thankfully my dad was nearby to explain!
>
>
>
>
> Maybe you can explain it to me then.
> I wasn't entirely sure about that scene.
> I thought it was a combination of . . .
> "You want the baby so much? then
> here!" and just getting rid of any
> evidence of the switch of the chimps.
>
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39585 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:11 A.M. Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
instead they made POTA "uncool"
 
Exactly!  And the only way to make it
cool again, is to not make a kids movie.
The original wasn't one, it shouldn't be.
The issues it deals with are too adult.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39586 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
.html
.html.html In a message dated 6/3/2006 10:39:49 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:

Bill auditioned to do Cornelius in the POTA cartoon but was turned down because he sounded "too much" like Roddy and they were afraid Roddy would sue.


Well, if that's the case, then why didn't he simply create another voice for his audition(s)? Or, just audition using his regular voice? There certainly are ways he could have gotten around "sounding like Roddy"... I'm afraid I just don't buy it...


Then they traced over Bill's picture for the "Mission of Mercy" episode without credit or compensation.


I'm pretty sure that they would have been using the stills that FOX gave them to work with... As such, they were probably owned by the studio and any residuals would have been paid out before hand... Unless he owned the pictures himself, it's very unlikely he'd get paid for them using anything the studio owned...

Bill did his part for POTA but POTA has not been kind to him.

I'd disagree with that... His going around as Cornelius was a big part in the launching of his career... Plus, I seen where he sells face castings of the APES makeups mounted on wood... He owes the start of his career to the APES "roadshow", and he still profits from APES today with the items he sells... APES owes him nothing...
<.html
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39587 From: Dario Sciola Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
Yes but wouldn't she as a mother still try to get the other baby to
talk evenshe knew it was not the real Milo? Call it a mother's
instinct. She probably believe that all apes could talk if trained to.

I just can't see Armando switching the babies without telling her. Why
would he do something like that to someone he cared for? There was no
assurance that they (C&Z) would be caught, although they knew they
were in for a chase.

Dario

----- Original Message -----
From: veetus@...
Date: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:01 am
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

> It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she
> continue to
> talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dario Sciola" <darios@...>
> To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 6:16 AM
> Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after
> CONQUEST?
>
> Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
> have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
> if the body was recovered, so what?
>
> Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74
the
> year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
> was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really
> was no
> reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
> through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
> believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any
> doubts to
> those who may have questioned the matter further.
>
> We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
> circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
> chimp was there as well).
>
> Dario
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
> Date: Sunday, June 4, 2006 5:05 pm
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
> > -- One thing that has always bugged me is wouldn't the body of
> (fake)> baby Milo have been recovered from the water? Surely the
> authorities> would want to confirm it's death and more importantly
> it's identity?
> >
> > Neil
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On
> Behalf
> > Of majorhendricks
> > Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
> >
> >
> > I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
> > were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by
> > scientists
> > for study.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ --------------------
> ~-->
> You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free.
> See how.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/9_IolB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39588 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 10:00:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
  It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue to
talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
 
I don't buy that. That scene in the cage would have no purpose.
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39589 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 10:15:19 A.M. Central Daylight Time, darios@... writes:
So even if the odds of surviving being dumped into the bay like that were not good, It was still better than doing nothing as shocking as the act may be.
 
That doesn't make any sense.
After Hasslein pumped all those
slugs into it, how does chucking
it in the water save it.  Babies
can't swim.  Baby apes doubly
so.  That goes triple for swaddled
baby apes.  Even without being
shot, that alone would have killed
it.  It didn't need all that lead to
drown.  The only way that death
could have been more final is if
a tug boat had com along and
chopped it up with it's propeller.
Have I gone too far with it yet?   
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39590 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 11:23:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time, darios@... writes:
Yes but wouldn't she as a mother still try to get the other baby to
talk evenshe knew it was not the real Milo? Call it a mother's
instinct.
 
Yeah, I don't think she even told Cornelius about the switch.
The plan was to hook up with Armando later and go to the
Everglades.  This was her insurance in case they didn't make it.
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39591 From: atragon1@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, darios@... writes:
Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
if the body was recovered, so what?

Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
those who may have questioned the matter further.

We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
chimp was there as well).

Dario
At the time of ESCAPE, a simple blood test could have proven if Cornelius was the father of the chimp or not.
 
I have no doubt that the authorities would have made extraordinary attempts to recover the body of an alien visitor from the shallow waters of the harbor. I would guess that once the blood work was done, the authorities were well aware that the chimp was not baby Milo. Putting the blood work aside, a comparative autopsy would have proven that the baby chimp's brain and vocal anatomy were not the same as C&Z.
 
And didn't Hasslein shoot the baby dead before Zira through him in the harbor?
Bill
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39592 From: atragon1@aol.com Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html
In a message dated 6/5/2006 12:36:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, TZer0@... writes:
Yes but wouldn't she as a mother still try to get the other baby to
talk evenshe knew it was not the real Milo? Call it a mother's
instinct.
 
Yeah, I don't think she even told Cornelius about the switch.
The plan was to hook up with Armando later and go to the
Everglades.  This was her insurance in case they didn't make it.
 
Yes, I agree. Zira's "talking" to the fake Milo may have been part for Cornelius' benefit and part for her own. As a new mother, it must have been difficult to be separated so soon from her baby.
 
Zira tossed the dead baby into water in a futile attempt to hide the fact that it was not Milo. As a scientist, she knew that a comparative autopsy would reveal that the baby was not theirs.
 
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39593 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: New scripts added to Hunter's site
.html
Two new TV series scripts have been added to the script archive on Hunter's site:
 
The Good Seeds - First Draft by Robert W. Lenski - thanks to Mark Rogers and John Roche for their help in acquiring this earlier draft of the script for the first Apes episode filmed. Previously the archive had only the Final Revised script for this episode.
 
The Horse Race - Second Draft by David P. Lewis and Booker Bradshaw. The episode was titled simply The Race at this stage, and the script is much different than the filmed episode. Thanks to Mark Rogers for supplying the scans for this script from his collection.
 
Hunter's site:
 
Mark's site:
 
Greg
 
 
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39594 From: Whitty Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts added to Hunter's site
.html
Thanks Greg.

What scripts are now missing?

Michael

--------- Original Message --------
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
To: "friends & fugitives" <friends_and_fugitives@yahoogroups.com>, "potadg@yahoogroups.com" <potadg@yahoogroups.com>, "pota@yahoogroups.com" <pota@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts added to Hunter's site
Date: 06/06/06 21:06

Two new TV series scripts have been added to the script archive on Hunter's site:
 
The Good Seeds - First Draft by Robert W. Lenski - thanks to Mark Rogers and John Roche for their help in acquiring this earlier draft of the script for the first Apes episode filmed. Previously the archive had only the Final Revised script for this episode.
 
The Horse Race - Second Draft by David P. Lewis and Booker Bradshaw. The episode was titled simply The Race at this stage, and the script is much different than the filmed episode. Thanks to Mark Rogers for supplying the scans for this script from his collection.
 
Hunter's site:
 
Mark's site:
 
Greg
 
 
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39595 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/5/2006
Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] New scripts added to Hunter's site
.html
The Deception is the only TV episode not represented in the archive, but Mark and John have acquired a copy of the script for that episode, so we'll be adding it soon.
 
Greg

Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:
Thanks Greg.

What scripts are now missing?

Michael

.,___

<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39596 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: POTA Reference
.html
.html
 
I'd left the TV on Cartoon Network after Adult Swim
and what do you think I saw when I turned it back on?
Billy on The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy had
defrosted Fred Flintstone.  And when he was refrozen
in an ice cream accident he buried him for the future,
which was portrayed by a half buried Statue of Liberty.
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39597 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html
 
I'm sure Patrick will correct me if I'm wrong,
but I believe the old blood tests could only
conclusively exclude paternity, not confirm
it, by checking the possible blood types of
the pairing. And as for comparative anatomy,
I wouldn't put much into these movies.  The
makers certainly didn't.  Not if we're supposed
to believe Z & C are the same species as
those apes.  Or that those apes were apes.
 
 
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39598 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: The switch....
.html
.html

My dad told me it meant the chimp babies where switched and because Zira had a male (and the other chimp was a female) she didn’t want them to see the gender of the chimp baby and find her real baby.

 

At first I thought the talking chimp at the end signified that they hadn’t changed anything – chimps were starting to learn to talk.

 

Dumb 10 year old kid!  J

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:03 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

In a message dated 6/4/2006 5:03:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:

I’ll never forget that feeling of horror when Zira pushed the baby over the side.  Thankfully my dad was nearby to explain!

 

Maybe you can explain it to me then.

I wasn't entirely sure about that scene.

I thought it was a combination of . . .

"You want the baby so much? then

here!" and just getting rid of any

evidence of the switch of the chimps.


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39599 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html

Well, I think it is due to poor thinking/writing by Dehn.

 

He should have set Conquest FAR into the future, after Caesar (or baby Milo – was he Caesar with Armando or did he choose that name himself?) had mated with many different females and had some talking kids, who bred more etc. etc.

 

In Conquest it seems to be “A kind of Magic” that makes the apes all synchronise an attack.

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of majorhendricks
Sent:
Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

At the beginning of CONQUEST, we see that ape labor has become a
necessary evil in this society. However, there are reports (before
Caesar even starts his revolution) that there are a great rise in the
number of ape disobedience and unauthorized gatherings.

But how did apes become so intelligent within only 20 years after
Cornelius
,
Milo , and Zira'a arrival on earth?


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39600 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html

This makes sense.

 

Not what Dehn had in mind I am sure, but it sounds very clever to me.

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of majorhendricks
Sent:
Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
were
put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by scientists
for study. Years later, the plague from space killed man's pets and
apes were then used as a substitute.  It was not long after this that
is was realized the Apes could be trained for manual labor, however
training them and conditioning them was costly and time consuming --
and their abilities were limited at best.

It would be at this point that the company or companies that procured
the
ape slave trade discovered that the genes of Cornelius, Zira and
Milo could be used to breed a new race of apes -- eugenically
programmed to learn quicker than your average ape.


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39601 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html

Hmmmm...hard to ignore the prediction of doomsday!  J

 

But for the sake of the story – yeah!

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of majorhendricks
Sent:
Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

Of course, the government approved of this -- no doubt the lobbying
dollars
of these powerful ape brokers, outweighed the prophecies of
C&Z regarding the downfall of mankind.


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39602 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: An APES question!
.html
.html

Tom!

 

There’s lots of apes questions my friend, but most of them are in the ARCHIVES (with the footage of Zira and Cornelius, watch out for radioactive humans!).  J

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tshaf37@...
Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 8:11 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

Wow an apes question, I'm not sure how to respond to this one? That's a great question, I have always wondered the same myself. Welcome to the group Bill.

 

Tom


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39603 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html

Sounds like James!  J

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent:
Monday, 5 June 2006 11:03 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

Remember, Breck is EXTREMELY paranoid and anything and everything is seen as a threat by him...

<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39604 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Rorster
.html
.html

No – he seems to prefer his chimps to be FEMALES!  So he’s just a freak!  ;)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:41 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: EW names best of nearly unwatchable sequels

 

  Cover her up with makeup?! Rory's gay! - - - Jeff

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:59 PM

Subject: [PotaDG] Re: EW names best of nearly unwatchable sequels

 

In a message dated 6/3/06 7:49:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:



Do you think (based on her other movies then!) she’d be a good Nova?



No!  She'd be a better Zira.


--
<.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39605 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
.html
.html Message

That’s the question – what IS the true spirit of the original?

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:24 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

 

   The audience was there opening weekend. Fox screwed it up and the interest died. Fox needed a movie people could rally around; instead they made POTA "uncool" and now it's a dirty word. But if they did a good movie, one that's true to the spirit of the originals, I think the audience would come back.  - - - Jeff

 

----- Original Message -----


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39606 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
.html
.html Message

It seems the outcome is that X-Men sells more toys/books etc where POTA did not (just ask Terry Hoknes!).

 

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:30 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

 

  Also, people forget "X-Men" was a flop as a comic book when it started. They actually stopped publishing it. Then it was rebooted around '75 by Chris Claremont ( a writer for the POTA magazine) and started it's climb to be THE most popular comic book. There's always a new beginning if the creative people and the financial people are up to it.

  And the "X-Men" movies have not done better than POTA2001. The movies' box office has improved as the budgets have ( "X-Men 3" cost almost $200 million, that's double what POTA reportedly cost). POTA2001 did better than "X-Men 1". But POTA2001 was a corporate embarrassment (people really dog piled on it for messing up a classic) and it's questionable they'd want to revisit it. Fox screwed up, not POTA. - - - Jeff

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 2:19 PM

Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

 

-- Well where is this audience then? Surely if there is a large audience waiting around for a new movie they would also be buying things like the new comic but even that isn't guaranteed to go to a second series as it seems it hasn't sold in huge numbers as Ty has repeatedly said any 2nd series will be based on the graphic novel having large enough sales to justify that happening.

 

Apes is dead and Fox knows it, the world has moved on to embrace other things since those good old days when anything 'Ape' was guaranteed to sell.

 

For the last 20 odd years or so anything to do with X - men has been guaranteed to sell comics in massive numbers so it is little surprise that Fox will be milking that franchise to death and I suspect all those X - fans will turn up at any movie that has any link to that franchise, no matter how bad the movie is or which X character it is about.

 

Neil

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2006 2:48 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

  I disagree. I think there is a large audience for new POTA movies (shown by POTA2001's opening weekend; even Ben Affleck left rehab to see it). The problem, I think, is the quality of the movie and now Fox isn't sure if people would turn out for a sequel, even if it was good. I think they would, audiences are very forgiving.


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39607 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html

I think Zira did it....

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:02 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

  It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue to
talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dario Sciola" <darios@...>
To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?


Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
if the body was recovered, so what?

Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
those who may have questioned the matter further.

We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
chimp was there as well).

Dario

----- Original Message -----
From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
Date: Sunday, June 4, 2006 5:05 pm
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

> -- One thing that has always bugged me is wouldn't the body of (fake)
> baby Milo have been recovered from the water? Surely the authorities
> would want to confirm it's death and more importantly it's identity?
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of majorhendricks
> Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
>
>
> I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
> were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by
> scientists
> for study.


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39608 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
.html
.html

Precisely.  Jeff’s teasing!  ;)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 2:22 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

 

In a message dated 6/5/2006 10:00:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:

  It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue to
talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff

 

I don't buy that. That scene in the cage would have no purpose.


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39609 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
.html
.html

I think they paid him for all the rights to his story....   ???

 

Just a “one-off” payment.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:05 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.

 

Something that has always intrigued me but to which I have no clear
answer is how the POTA rights are distributed.

The APJAC story is well documented (how Jacobs was smart enough to
retain all the merchandising right while Fox kept the movie rights,
until of course he reverted them back to Fox). But how does Boulle
(and now his estate) fit into all this. Based on Fox'es actions, I
have always assumed that somehow they've either acquired Boulle's
rights OR that his rights somehow only extend to his original novel.
How then, can Fox keep up pumping out stuff that was based on his
creation? Murky territory. Does anyone have the full story about what
rights, if any, are still held by Boulle's estate?

Dario


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39610 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Re: The new comic pg4
.html
.html

OK!

Michael

 

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2006 6:38 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] The new comic pg4

 

In a message dated 6/3/2006 6:35:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:

Watch VM, T.  Go hire Season 1 on DVD.

 

That good, eh?

And you can rent it?

If only I wasn't in the

middle of moving.

Remind me next month.


-- <.html
<.html
Group: potadg Message: 39611 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
Subject: Zira....
.html
Attachments :
    .html

    So who WOULD.....?

     

    Methinks another Aussie:

     

    Cate Blanchett

     

    Cate Blanchett.

     

    Kate Winslet

     

     

    Or Kate Winslett.

     

    Michael

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
    Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2006 6:57 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: EW names best of nearly unwatchable sequels

     

    In a message dated 6/3/2006 6:59:59 P.M. Central Daylight Time, Haristas@... writes:

    No!  She'd be a better Zira.

     

    She doesn't have the acting chops to pull off Zira.  Granted I didn't see the remake of Ringu, or I heart Huckabees. Or 21 Grams, but she didn't win the Oscar for it. Brit awards and Palm de Ore don't count.  Then again H B'C lost her Oscar too.


    -- <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39612 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Introductory Massage.....
    .html
    .html

    And now for a massage from the Swedish Prime Minister.....

     

    No wait – I mean – Neil.....we have a few new members.

     

    Could you please send the introductory welcome?

     

    Michael

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39613 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
    .html
    .html

    Yes, yes and yes.

     

    Yesman

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of atragon1@...
    Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:14 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

     

    In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, darios@... writes:

    Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
    have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
    if the body was recovered, so what?

    Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
    year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
    was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
    reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
    through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
    believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
    those who may have questioned the matter further.

    We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
    circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
    chimp was there as well).

    Dario

    At the time of ESCAPE, a simple blood test could have proven if Cornelius was the father of the chimp or not.

     

    I have no doubt that the authorities would have made extraordinary attempts to recover the body of an alien visitor from the shallow waters of the harbor. I would guess that once the blood work was done, the authorities were well aware that the chimp was not baby Milo. Putting the blood work aside, a comparative autopsy would have proven that the baby chimp's brain and vocal anatomy were not the same as C&Z.

     

    And didn't Hasslein shoot the baby dead before Zira through him in the harbor?

    Bill

     

     


    --
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39614 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
    .html
    .html

    I am not sure how much further you COULD go – but I know better than to challenge you to do so!  J

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of TZer0@...
    Sent:
    Tuesday, 6 June 2006 2:30 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

    Have I gone too far with it yet?   


    -- <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39615 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
    .html
    .html

    She was being normal – where she came from that’s what you would do!

    Also, she wanted Cornelius to feel everything was as per normal.....

     

    Michael

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dario Sciola
    Sent:
    Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:21 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

     

    Yes but wouldn't she as a mother still try to get the other baby to
    talk evenshe knew it was not the real
    Milo ? Call it a mother's
    instinct. She probably believe that all apes could talk if trained to.


    -- <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39616 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: The switch....
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 6/6/2006 1:51:55 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

    My dad told me it meant the chimp babies where switched and because Zira had a male (and the other chimp was a female) she didn't want them to see the gender of the chimp baby and find her real baby.

    ...Which makes sense to an extent, BUT, the authorities would not have known the sex of the child ape... Remember, he was born in secrecy and out of view of Hasslein and Company... The authorities wouldn't know what the baby was until they had fully interrogated Stevie and Lewis & Armando, and even then there's no guarantee they would know what was born... After all, S & L could just say that Z & C were out of their sight and care and Zira gave birth out of sight so they'd not know what was born... And Armando had been checked out already, so they'd think he didn't have any contact with them and wouldn't know the gender either...
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39617 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
    .html
    .html
      Hi Mr. Sunshine,
     
      a) I don't know the details of the audition but Bill said they told him he sounded too much like Roddy and were afraid Roddy would sue (and the same with Paula Crist sounding like Zira). Roddy later told Bill he wouldn't have sued. Maybe the company just said that to blow Bill off because they wanted a "name" voice actor, but whatever
     
      b) The picture they traced over is Bill's that he left there after his audition. He had it photographed specifically for his purposes. It wasn't Fox's to use without permission. They were so exact they even traced an identifying scar by Bill's eye. Obviously they had a lot of pictures to choose from so the fact that they used that particular picture and were so exacting about shows there was something in Bill's performance they wanted. Instead that picture is often assumed to be Roddy (such as in a recent "Simian Scrolls").
      c) Bill and Paula didn't "get" the gig to tour as Cornelius and Zira. It was their idea and their hard work to do as good a job as they did. The makeup would've been enough. They didn't have to perfect the voices or the moves. They could've been as mediocre as most of Fox's approached to POTA. Yes, they made some good money back then (he still hasn't begun on those collectibles you mnetioned). I'm just saying it's too bad with Bill's quality ape work his performance in the TV show is lost and his "performance in the cartoon was "stolen".         - - - Jeff
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:17 AM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Got Cornelius?

    In a message dated 6/3/2006 10:39:49 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:

    Bill auditioned to do Cornelius in the POTA cartoon but was turned down because he sounded "too much" like Roddy and they were afraid Roddy would sue.


    Well, if that's the case, then why didn't he simply create another voice for his audition(s)? Or, just audition using his regular voice? There certainly are ways he could have gotten around "sounding like Roddy"... I'm afraid I just don't buy it...


    Then they traced over Bill's picture for the "Mission of Mercy" episode without credit or compensation.


    I'm pretty sure that they would have been using the stills that FOX gave them to work with... As such, they were probably owned by the studio and any residuals would have been paid out before hand... Unless he owned the pictures himself, it's very unlikely he'd get paid for them using anything the studio owned...

    Bill did his part for POTA but POTA has not been kind to him.

    I'd disagree with that... His going around as Cornelius was a big part in the launching of his career... Plus, I seen where he sells face castings of the APES makeups mounted on wood... He owes the start of his career to the APES "roadshow", and he still profits from APES today with the items he sells... APES owes him nothing...
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39618 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 6/6/2006 1:55:36 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


     
    Well, I think it is due to poor thinking/writing by Dehn.

     
    EXACTLY!!!!

    He should have set Conquest FAR into the future,

         Agreed again... The only reason they set CONQUEST in Caesar's adulthood was so they could have continuity and show the fate of the baby from the previous film...


    was he Caesar with Armando or did he choose that name himself?

        
    Yes, he was Caesar when he was with Armando... Right near the beginning of the film Armando calls him Caesar and he never mentions his former "Milo" name...



    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39619 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: The Switch
    .html
    .html.html In a message dated 6/6/2006 6:26:21 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


    I think Zira did it....




    Everyone knows that Zira did the switch... It's very obvious when she goes into the cage with Heloise (to "say goodbye") that she is up to something other than just saying "farewell"...
    <.html
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39620 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
    .html
    .html
      I love that scene in the cage. It's just two apes communicating as mothers despite their differences in intelligence. I never took that scene to mean she was going to switch the babies. - - - Jeff
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: TZer0@...
    Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:21 AM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

    In a message dated 6/5/2006 10:00:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
      It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue to
    talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
     
    I don't buy that. That scene in the cage would have no purpose.
     
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39621 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
    .html
    .html
      That's probably why the government in "Conquest" is so paranoid. They knew they didn't get the right baby. I guess we have to assume they never made the connection with Armando. - - - Jeff
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:13 AM
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

    In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, darios@... writes:
    Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
    have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
    if the body was recovered, so what?

    Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
    year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
    was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
    reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
    through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
    believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
    those who may have questioned the matter further.

    We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
    circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
    chimp was there as well).

    Dario
    At the time of ESCAPE, a simple blood test could have proven if Cornelius was the father of the chimp or not.
     
    I have no doubt that the authorities would have made extraordinary attempts to recover the body of an alien visitor from the shallow waters of the harbor. I would guess that once the blood work was done, the authorities were well aware that the chimp was not baby Milo. Putting the blood work aside, a comparative autopsy would have proven that the baby chimp's brain and vocal anatomy were not the same as C&Z.
     
    And didn't Hasslein shoot the baby dead before Zira through him in the harbor?
    Bill
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39622 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Hello New Members
    .html
    .html Message
     
     
     
    To all our recently joined new members - welcome!
     
    Feel free to jump in and contribute if a subject takes your fancy, or please start one up yourself!
     
     
    An original comic strip called Within t he Planet of the Apes can be found in the files section of the DG Photos group:
     
     
    Just check out the Within the Planet of the Apes folder.
     
    It ha s been collected as pages in PDF format.
     
    Make sure you also read the  Planet of the Apes  TV Show comic book - Going Home !
     
    Go to the Home  Page, scroll down to around the middle of the page and click on the link to take you to the  finished pages.
     
    And new for your viewing pleasure - Uncle Manny's Musings! A light hearted look at the world from one of our wisest (Ha!) apes . Check out the Home Page for a link to his latest piece of wisdom! ;-)
     
    Uncle Manny Archives can be found here:
     
     
     
    Also,  we now have a group set up for the uploading of rare photographs and other stuff that we have been discussing for the Rare Photos CD project.
    It is called Pota DG Projects and it can be found here:
     
    There have already been some great rare photographs uploaded and anyone who wishes to upload pictures just needs to let us know on the DG and we will send you an invite or alternately you can go to the group and join yourself.
     
     
    Don't forget we also have 4 other groups 'attached' to the main one.
     
    First up there is the DG Archives group:
    This group was created to store old posts from the group which have been deleted from the main site. We have to do this periodically to free up space as Yahoo does not allot much space to the groups anymore.
    As this group is so active we tend to fill up very quickly and instead of losing old posts forever we like to keep a copy of them all. They can be found in the Files section listed by month and year.
     
     
    There is also the DG Fan Fiction group where members can place, in th e group's Files section, their Fan Fiction stories, poems etc. to be enjoyed by all:
     
     
    Then there's the  DG Photos group:
    Where photos  and files are occasionally moved to save space on the main DG group
     
     
    Finally there's the DG Photos2 group
    A second photos group where photos and files are occasionally moved to save space on the main DG group
     
     
    All the sites can be easily accessed via the links on each one's Homepage.
     
    Don't forget to check out the DG 's vast Photos section and all that great stuff in the Files section!
     
     
    And w hilst you're here why not participate in a Poll or check out all those
     
    wonderful links and generally have a fun filled family experience!
     
     
    Your Pals The Owners
     
     
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39623 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CON
    .html
    .html

    For such a paranoid Government, they were quick to raise enormous apes to release on society! 

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
    Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 2:21 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

     

      That's probably why the government in "Conquest" is so paranoid. They knew they didn't get the right baby. I guess we have to assume they never made the connection with Armando. - - - Jeff

     

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: atragon1@...

    Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:13 AM

    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

     

    In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, darios@... writes:

    Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
    have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
    if the body was recovered, so what?

    Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
    year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
    was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
    reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
    through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
    believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
    those who may have questioned the matter further.

    We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
    circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
    chimp was there as well).

    Dario

    At the time of ESCAPE, a simple blood test could have proven if Cornelius was the father of the chimp or not.

     

    I have no doubt that the authorities would have made extraordinary attempts to recover the body of an alien visitor from the shallow waters of the harbor. I would guess that once the blood work was done, the authorities were well aware that the chimp was not baby Milo. Putting the blood work aside, a comparative autopsy would have proven that the baby chimp's brain and vocal anatomy were not the same as C&Z.

     

    And didn't Hasslein shoot the baby dead before Zira through him in the harbor?

    Bill

     


    --
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39624 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] The switch....
    .html
    .html

    Ahhh ....but if they found out Z&C were in the Circus they could have discovered that the gender of Armando’s chimp had changed!

    See – Dehn did think of SOME things (no doubt because a proof reader told him!)
    J

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
    Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 1:42 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] The switch....

     

    In a message dated 6/6/2006 1:51:55 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

    My dad told me it meant the chimp babies where switched and because Zira had a male (and the other chimp was a female) she didn't want them to see the gender of the chimp baby and find her real baby.

    ....Which makes sense to an extent, BUT, the authorities would not have known the sex of the child ape... Remember, he was born in secrecy and out of view of Hasslein and Company... The authorities wouldn't know what the baby was until they had fully interrogated Stevie and Lewis & Armando, and even then there's no guarantee they would know what was born... After all, S & L could just say that Z & C were out of their sight and care and Zira gave birth out of sight so they'd not know what was born... And Armando had been checked out already, so they'd think he didn't have any contact with them and wouldn't know the gender either...


    --
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39625 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
    .html
    .html Message
    -- Jeff, now that Fox has released the cartoons on DVD would it be worth Bill doing something about it now to try and get some sort of compensation and/or recognition?
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
    Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 1:55 AM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Got Cornelius? 
    ,_._,__  
     
      b) The picture they traced over is Bill's that he left there after his audition. He had it photographed specifically for his purposes. It wasn't Fox's to use without permission. They were so exact they even traced an identifying scar by Bill's eye. Obviously they had a lot of pictures to choose from so the fact that they used that particular picture and were so exacting about shows there was something in Bill's performance they wanted. Instead that picture is often assumed to be Roddy (such as in a recent "Simian Scrolls"). _
    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39626 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Re: Introductory Massage.....
    .html
    .html Message
    Yep, no problem.
     
    Neil
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Whitty
    Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 9:57 PM
    To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [PotaDG] Introductory Massage.....

    No wait – I mean – Neil.....we have a few new members.

    Could you please send the introductory welcome?

    <.html
    <.html
    Group: potadg Message: 39627 From: atragon1@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
    Subject: Fwd: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
    .html
    Attachments :
      .html
      In a message dated 6/6/2006 11:55:52 AM Eastern Standard Time, mlccougar@... writes:
          Yes, he was Caesar when he was with Armando... Right near the beginning of the film Armando calls him Caesar and he never mentions his former "Milo" name...
      ****************
      It was logical for Armando to change baby Milo's name. After all, it was public knowledge that Dr. Milo was one of the apeonauts -- to have a circus ape named "Milo" would have aroused suspicions ... or maybe "Caesar" was Milo's stage name...?
       
      Bill
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39628 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
      Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      .html
      .html.html In a message dated 6/6/2006 11:18:45 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:

      That's probably why the government in "Conquest" is so paranoid. They knew they didn't get the right baby. I guess we have to assume they never made the connection with Armando. -


      NOT TRUE...

      It's believed they had gotten the right baby up until the whole Caesar fiasco... It was only then that Breck started to reconsider things and got to thinking that "maybe" the right infant wasn't killed...

      And what connection would there be to Armando? His circus was checked and believed to have been "clean" of the talking chimps, so they went on their way...
      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39629 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
      Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
      .html
      .html.html In a message dated 6/6/2006 4:38:34 PM Central Standard Time, ntfoster@... writes:

      -- Jeff, now that Fox has released the cartoons on DVD would it be worth Bill doing something about it now to try and get some sort of compensation and/or recognition?
       


      For what?

      It may have been a picture that Bill had taken specifically, but let's not forget he was in POTA makeup and FOX owns POTA... They probably DID have rights to it being that it IS their property and he was under license from them... He was made up as a trademarked character that FOX owns exclusively...
      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39630 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
      Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] The switch....
      .html
      .html.html In a message dated 6/6/2006 4:11:31 PM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:


             
      Ahhh....but if they found out Z&C were in the Circus they could have discovered that the gender of Armando's chimp had changed!




      When Armando is being checked by the authorities, he never said that Heloise's baby was a female... As a matter of fact, when they're looking around and Armando is talking about when the baby was born, it really sounds like he says "Look how he's growing..."
      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39631 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
      Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
      .html
      .html.html In a message dated 6/6/2006 10:47:22 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:

      They were so exact they even traced an identifying scar by Bill's eye. Obviously they had a lot of pictures to choose from so the fact that they used that particular picture and were so exacting about shows there was something in Bill's performance they wanted.


      How do you figure that? I mean a picture left behind would have no connction to the guy's performance... It was a still left behind, that probably got mixed in with the rest of the APES stills and that was that... The way he looked made up would have had no bearing on his voacl work (if they liked it or not...)


      Instead that picture is often assumed to be Roddy (such as in a recent "Simian Scrolls").


      If that's the case, then maybe that's why the "mysterious missing scene" from "The Interrogation" was cut... They might not have wanted people thinking Galen was in there twice...



      c) Bill and Paula didn't "get" the gig to tour as Cornelius and Zira. It was their idea and their hard work to do as good a job as they did.

          They did "get" FOX's permission to go out as the apes, so that was something though... I mean FOX gave them the     rights to use their property to tour as C & Z after all...


        He still hasn't begun on those collectibles you mentioned.


        Why not? They are being advertised as being available on the last page of the newest issue of "Simian Scrolls"... He's not going around selling items he doesn't even have yet is he? (If that's the case, then he should be in cahoots with a certain comic dealer out of Canada who shall remain nameless...)


      I'm just saying it's too bad with Bill's quality ape work his performance in the TV show is lost and his "performance" in the cartoon was "stolen"
       

         I have seen that bit where he does Caesar's speech from CONQUEST... I will agree with you that he does do pretty good work... That said, he still didn't have any part in the cartoon other than having his still used...

      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39632 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
      Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      .html
      .html
       
      They had to be genetically altered.
      Unless we're supposed to believe
      they're the same apes.  Then again,
      those Orangs magically transform
      after putting them in jumpsuits, so
      I don't know what we're supposed
      to believe.  Maybe it's the suits!
       
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39633 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/6/2006
      Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 6/6/2006 6:24:15 A.M. Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:

      That's the question – what IS the true spirit of the original?

       
      POTA was a shocking film.  Shock after shock.
      Even though we knew there were apes, when
      you first see the humans, you think, "Oh cavemen!"
      Wrong . . . Shock Horror!  Gorillas on horses!  "Oh
      there's Landon!"  Shock Horror!  Lobotomized!  "Ah,
      he's free!"  Shock Horror!  It's Earth!   The new one
      tried with that Calima thing and an ending borrowed
      from the book.  But it takes a lot more to shock an
      audience today.  Bonnie & Clyde was shocking then.
      Now it would just be a run-of-the-mill motion picture.
      But that's just one element in the spirit of the original.
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39634 From: laroweramity Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: New Member says hi
      .html
      Hi to all, im a new member from the uk, ive had an interest in all
      things sc/fi and horror since i was a young kid, im now 40, the
      original "Planet Of The Apes" film has always held a special place for
      me and i still find it an amazing film to watch,

      Im also a big fan of Ray Harryhausen and the Hammer films of the 60's
      and 70's, but this is an ape forum so ill keep it just "Ape", i look
      forward to chatting with you along the way.

      Simon
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39635 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Marvel UK issue 86
      .html
      This week's issue, containing the stunning conclusion to last week's story of Derek Zane and the chimp who calls himself Robin Hood, is now available to download from Hunter's site.
       
      Next week, Jason and Alexander are back with more Terror on the Planet of the Apes!
       
       
      Greg
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39636 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CON
      .html
      .html
         Anything for a buck!  - - - Jeff
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 2:07 PM
      Subject: RE: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

      For such a paranoid Government, they were quick to raise enormous apes to release on society! 

      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
      Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 2:21 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: {Disarmed} Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

        That's probably why the government in "Conquest" is so paranoid. They knew they didn't get the right baby. I guess we have to assume they never made the connection with Armando. - - - Jeff

      ----- Original Message -----

      From: atragon1@...

      Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:13 AM

      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

      In a message dated 6/5/2006 9:17:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, darios@... writes:

      Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
      have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
      if the body was recovered, so what?

      Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
      year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
      was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
      reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
      through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
      believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
      those who may have questioned the matter further.

      We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
      circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
      chimp was there as well).

      Dario

      At the time of ESCAPE, a simple blood test could have proven if Cornelius was the father of the chimp or not.

      I have no doubt that the authorities would have made extraordinary attempts to recover the body of an alien visitor from the shallow waters of the harbor. I would guess that once the blood work was done, the authorities were well aware that the chimp was not baby Milo. Putting the blood work aside, a comparative autopsy would have proven that the baby chimp's brain and vocal anatomy were not the same as C&Z.

      And didn't Hasslein shoot the baby dead before Zira through him in the harbor?

      Bill

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39637 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
      .html
      .html
        He's already on it.  - - -Jeff
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 2:36 PM
      Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Got Cornelius?

      -- Jeff, now that Fox has released the cartoons on DVD would it be worth Bill doing something about it now to try and get some sort of compensation and/or recognition?
       
      Neil
       
      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of veetus@...
      Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 1:55 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Got Cornelius? 
      ,_._,__  
       
        b) The picture they traced over is Bill's that he left there after his audition. He had it photographed specifically for his purposes. It wasn't Fox's to use without permission. They were so exact they even traced an identifying scar by Bill's eye. Obviously they had a lot of pictures to choose from so the fact that they used that particular picture and were so exacting about shows there was something in Bill's performance they wanted. Instead that picture is often assumed to be Roddy (such as in a recent "Simian Scrolls"). _

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39638 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      .html
      .html
        Just because the government is nervous that they didn't get the right baby doesn't mean a low level thug like Breck would know about it. The official line was that they got the right one. Eventually Breck himself considers that maybe they didn't. - - - Jeff
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 6:52 PM
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?

      In a message dated 6/6/2006 11:18:45 AM Central Standard Time, veetus@... writes:

      That's probably why the government in "Conquest" is so paranoid. They knew they didn't get the right baby. I guess we have to assume they never made the connection with Armando. -


      NOT TRUE...

      It's believed they had gotten the right baby up until the whole Caesar fiasco... It was only then that Breck started to reconsider things and got to thinking that "maybe" the right infant wasn't killed...

      And what connection would there be to Armando? His circus was checked and believed to have been "clean" of the talking chimps, so they went on their way...

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39639 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Got Cornelius?
      .html
      .html
        Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi's estates own the rights to their likeness even though they are in Universal's makeup. There is something to be said for performance. Roddy and Kim got paid for being in the films under makeup. Yeah, it's just a picture but there was something about the picture they wanted (and went out of their way to duplicate it exactly). Recently the "Taster's Choice" guy got compensation for being on their packages without permission. - - - Jeff
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 7:02 PM
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Got Cornelius?

      In a message dated 6/6/2006 4:38:34 PM Central Standard Time, ntfoster@... writes:

      -- Jeff, now that Fox has released the cartoons on DVD would it be worth Bill doing something about it now to try and get some sort of compensation and/or recognition?
       


      For what?

      It may have been a picture that Bill had taken specifically, but let's not forget he was in POTA makeup and FOX owns POTA... They probably DID have rights to it being that it IS their property and he was under license from them... He was made up as a trademarked character that FOX owns exclusively...

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39640 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
      .html
       .html
        POTA2001 didn't earn it's shocks because it had sitcom characters. You have to have a certain atmosphere for "shocks" to work. At no time in the movie was I worried I'd see a lobotomy in the movie. Burton is very limited in what he can do as a director.  - - - Jeff
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: TZer0@...
      Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:06 PM
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Cast & Crew

      In a message dated 6/6/2006 6:24:15 A.M. Central Daylight Time, whitty@... writes:

      That's the question – what IS the true spirit of the original?

       
      POTA was a shocking film.  Shock after shock.
      Even though we knew there were apes, when
      you first see the humans, you think, "Oh cavemen!"
      Wrong . . . Shock Horror!  Gorillas on horses!  "Oh
      there's Landon!"  Shock Horror!  Lobotomized!  "Ah,
      he's free!"  Shock Horror!  It's Earth!   The new one
      tried with that Calima thing and an ending borrowed
      from the book.  But it takes a lot more to shock an
      audience today.  Bonnie & Clyde was shocking then.
      Now it would just be a run-of-the-mill motion picture.
      But that's just one element in the spirit of the original.
       

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39641 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 6/7/2006 11:09:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time, veetus@... writes:
        POTA2001 didn't earn it's shocks because it had sitcom characters. You have to have a certain atmosphere for "shocks" to work.
       
      Too right!  POTA should never never be played for laughs.
      Even that one 3 Monkeys scene was a mistake, and Kim
      thought so too.  But I guess they felt it was so heavy it
      needed a tension breaker.  And I can excuse one. I
      won't say that Paul Giamatti ruined that movie single
      handedly, because he had a lot of help ruining it.
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39642 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
      .html
      .html Message
      -- As usual, thanks for all your hard work Greg, these comics really are appreciated.
       
      Neil
       
      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg Plonowski
      Sent: Wednesday, 7 June 2006 10:42 PM
      To: pota@yahoogroups.com; potadg@yahoogroups.com; friends & fugitives
      Subject: [PotaDG] Marvel UK issue 86

      This week's issue, containing the stunning conclusion to last week's story of Derek Zane and the chimp who calls himself Robin Hood, is now available to download from Hunter's site.
       
      Next week, Jason and Alexander are back with more Terror on the Planet of the Apes!
       
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39643 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: New Member says hi
      .html
      .html

      Hi Simon!

       

      I’m glad you found your way in!

      Simon, would you mind if I share with the group the photos you send directly to me a couple of days ago?

       

      Michael


      (Message over 64 KB, truncated)

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39644 From: Wendy Kostora Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      .html
      Coming form a female's standpoint, every mother intuitively knows the baby
      is really hers. Second, when Zira changes the diaper, she would know right
      off that this chimp isn't hers. To add to conterversy, I believe Cornelius
      didn't have a clue.


      >From: "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...>
      >Reply-To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      >To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
      >Subject: RE: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      >Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 21:24:51 +1000
      >
      >I think Zira did it....
      >
      >-----Original Message-----
      >From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf
      >Of veetus@...
      >Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:02 AM
      >To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      >Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      >
      > It's possible Armando made the switch, not Zira. Doesn't she continue
      >to
      >talk to it when they are on the run? - - - Jeff
      >
      >----- Original Message -----
      >From: "Dario Sciola" <darios@...>
      >To: <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
      >Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 6:16 AM
      >Subject: Re: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      >
      >
      >Setting aside the very probable fact that was pointed out that it may
      >have been impossible to get to the chimp in time (sharks, etc), even
      >if the body was recovered, so what?
      >
      >Remember that DNA technology just wasn't available (neither in '74 the
      >year of the movie, and just barely in the supposed 1980 that the film
      >was set in). Even if the technology was available, there really was no
      >reason to suspect that a switch had been made. The fact that Zira
      >through the baby in the water supported the notion that she herself
      >believed it to be her own, an act that would have erased any doubts to
      >those who may have questioned the matter further.
      >
      >We (the audience) only know she did the switch, because her
      >circumstances allowed it(being in Armondo's Circus at a time a baby
      >chimp was there as well).
      >
      >Dario
      >
      >----- Original Message -----
      >From: Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...>
      >Date: Sunday, June 4, 2006 5:05 pm
      >Subject: RE: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      >
      > > -- One thing that has always bugged me is wouldn't the body of (fake)
      > > baby Milo have been recovered from the water? Surely the authorities
      > > would want to confirm it's death and more importantly it's identity?
      > >
      > > Neil
      > >
      > > -----Original Message-----
      > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com ] On
      >Behalf
      > > Of majorhendricks
      > > Sent: Monday, 5 June 2006 12:48 AM
      > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      > > Subject: [PotaDG] How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      > >
      > >
      > > I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
      > > were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by
      > > scientists
      > > for study.
      >
      >--
      Group: potadg Message: 39645 From: Wendy Kostora Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      .html
      Very good scenario Bill. I've tangoed with this question as well, even going
      as far as writing fanfic that was at length of a trilogy. Imagine what Fox
      could with the "what if" for "Conquest", which to me is indeed an open
      book. So much had happened during that time, events which are profound to
      the apes' history and their future.


      Welcome to the group.


      Wendy


      >
      >I would conjecture that after the apeonaut's deaths, there bodies
      >were put into storage and used -- from time to time -- by scientists
      >for study. Years later, the plague from space killed man's pets and
      >apes were then used as a substitute. It was not long after this that
      >is was realized the Apes could be trained for manual labor, however
      >training them and conditioning them was costly and time consuming --
      >and their abilities were limited at best.
      >
      >It would be at this point that the company or companies that procured
      >the ape slave trade discovered that the genes of Cornelius, Zira and
      >Milo could be used to breed a new race of apes -- eugenically
      >programmed to learn quicker than your average ape.
      >
      >Of course, the government approved of this -- no doubt the lobbying
      >dollars of these powerful ape brokers, outweighed the prophecies of
      >C&Z regarding the downfall of mankind.
      >
      >By the time Caesar arrives in the city, I would think that there were
      >already isolated incidents of apes who could speak. These apes were
      >rounded up and destroyed immediately by the police. Why else would
      >the police be so ready to accept the possibility that it was Caesar
      >who could have made the outburst?
      >
      >It was too late when man realized that these apes were now too smart -
      >- there was no way to remove all the apes from society without the
      >economy collapsing. All they could do was to create a "police state"
      >and destroy any and all apes that were too intelligent (classified
      >as "disobedient") as they surfaced. Caesar is really only the spark
      >that sets off the forest fire that would be the ape revolution.
      >
      >Bill
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39646 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
      .html
      .html.html The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link is this Tuesday, June 13.  I've pre-ordered mine.  Anyone else getting it?

      -- Rory
      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39647 From: Tim "apefan" Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
      .html
      I'll go out and get it!!!

      Tim

      Haristas@... wrote:
      The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link is this Tuesday, June 13.  I've pre-ordered mine.  Anyone else getting it?

      -- Rory


      Ring'em or ping'em. Make PC-to-phone calls as low as 1¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39648 From: John Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
      .html
      I can't wait. I will be at Best Buy right after work. My Son is going
      to love these.



      --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Haristas@... wrote:
      >
      > The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link is this Tuesday, June 13.
      I've
      > pre-ordered mine. Anyone else getting it?
      >
      > -- Rory
      >
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39649 From: Whitty Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
      .html
      Yeah if you send it to me!  :)
      --------- Original Message --------
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
      To: "pota@yahoogroups.com" <pota@yahoogroups.com>, "PotaDG@yahoogroups.com" <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
      Date: 08/06/06 19:50

      The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link is this Tuesday, June 13.  I've pre-ordered mine.  Anyone else getting it?

      -- Rory

      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39650 From: Lou Melograna Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
      .html
      .html
      hey all..I'm a new guy...now call me an idiot...but when did they start reissuing POTA comic books?
       
      Lou
      "Hot monkey love for Zira"
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 8:41 AM
      Subject: [PotaDG] Marvel UK issue 86

      This week's issue, containing the stunning conclusion to last week's story of Derek Zane and the chimp who calls himself Robin Hood, is now available to download from Hunter's site.
       
      Next week, Jason and Alexander are back with more Terror on the Planet of the Apes!
       
       
      Greg

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39651 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Cast & Crew
      .html
      .html.html In a message dated 6/7/2006 12:09:27 PM Central Standard Time, TZer0@... writes:

      POTA should never never be played for laughs.


      Right on!!!!! You are right on the ball T!!!
      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39652 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
      .html
      .html.html In a message dated 6/7/2006 8:45:15 PM Central Standard Time, lmelogra@... writes:

      hey all..I'm a new guy...now call me an idiot...but when did they start reissuing POTA comic books?


      Reissuing them? Do you mean the re-issues of the TERROR comics? Those were put out by ADVENTURE in about 90 or 91 I think...

      If you mean the REVOLUTION series, that started a few months ago...
      <.html
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39653 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: How did the Apes get so smart after CONQUEST?
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 6/7/2006 6:16:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time, Willowape@... writes:

      Coming form a female's standpoint, every mother intuitively knows the baby
      is really hers

       
      For the most part I agree, especially the diaper part.
      However then have been hospital screw ups with
      babies and the mothers were none the wiser,
      which would tend to discount a mothers
      instincts if they hadn't had a chance
      to bond yet.  I have now doubt she
      did the switch though.  I know
      this intuitively!  Not just
      from studying film, but
      from studying the
      expression on
      her face.
      I mean . . .
      What do you need?
      An X-Ray showing the wheels turning in her mind?
      How about a Light Bulb turning on over her head?
       
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39654 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 6/7/2006 8:45:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time, lmelogra@... writes:
      ...now call me an idiot...
       
      Okay kid . . . You're an idiot.  ; )
      But seriously, I don't think they did
      reissue them . . . as far as I know.
       
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39655 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/7/2006
      Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
      .html
      .html
      In a message dated 6/7/2006 9:19:05 P.M. Central Daylight Time, mlccougar@... writes:
      Reissuing them? Do you mean the re-issues of the TERROR comics? Those were put out by ADVENTURE in about 90 or 91 I think...

      If you mean the REVOLUTION series, that started a few months ago...
       
      I think he's talking about the original releases on hunter's site.
       
       
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39656 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/8/2006
      Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
      .html
      .html Message
      -- Lou, If you are referring to the Marvel UK comics, these are scanned by group member Greg Plonowski and hosted by Hunter Goatley (along with many, many other Apes goodies) on his POTA archive site.
      Greg has been hard at work doing this for a while now starting with the first issue and he will be continuing to the end of the run I believe.
      Which means he's probably got another year or two to go now with them I would guess?
       
      Neil
       
      -----Original Message-----
      From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Lou Melograna
      Sent: Thursday, 8 June 2006 11:25 AM
      To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com; pota@yahoogroups.com; friends & fugitives
      Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Marvel UK issue 86

      hey all..I'm a new guy...now call me an idiot...but when did they start reissuing POTA comic books?
       _,_._,___
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39657 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
      Subject: Reissues?
      .html
      .html

      And these are not reissues – they are scans of comics that were released in the ‘70s.

       

      Hope that helps!

      <

      (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39658 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/8/2006
      Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
      .html
      Exactly one year and one week to go, Neil, until the last Marvel UK issue is archived on Hunter's site.
       
      Lou, these are not reissues, they are the Marvel UK editions from 30 years ago, published concurrently with the US versions. For the past year and a half or so I have been scanning and posting an issue each week, 30 years after it was originally available in the UK.
       
      Greg

      Neil T Foster <ntfoster@...> wrote:
      -- Lou, If you are referring to the Marvel UK comics, these are scanned by group member Greg Plonowski and hosted by Hunter Goatley (along with many, many other Apes goodies) on his POTA archive site.
      Greg has been hard at work doing this for a while now starting with the first issue and he will be continuing to the end of the run I believe.
      Which means he's probably got another year or two to go now with them I would guess?
       
      Neil
       
      .


      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39659 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 6/8/2006
      Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
      .html
      Hello,

      This email message is a notification to let you know that
      a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
      group.

      File : /boots.jpg
      Uploaded by : mike_oz2005 <whitty@...>
      Description : Simon's Boots

      You can access this file at the URL:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/boots.jpg

      To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
      http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

      Regards,

      mike_oz2005 <whitty@...>
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39660 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
      Subject: Re: {Disarmed} RE: [PotaDG] Marvel UK issue 86
      .html
      .html

      Greg will do the Aussie comics next – right Greg? 

      <.html
      <.html
      Group: potadg Message: 39661 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
      Subject: Simon's Boots!
      .html
      Attachments :
        .html

        Hey All

        New member Simon has a very fancy gorilla outfit he has sent me some photos of.

         

        I will be uploading these to the FILES SECTION as time permits.

         

        For starters – the BOOTS!

        Simon, could you tell us about the boots?  Restoration or reproduction?  Price?   Etc!

         

        http://f6.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/QBGIRMU7dbYL7dUx_0Fp7sCanapjTPHx8r5FwVC_jmmpoAhlK0rirSdFQwR6THM_Nr-QxBF3ZjpK6AUVzQKC/boots.jpg

         

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39662 From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: New file uploaded to PotaDG
        .html
        Hello,

        This email message is a notification to let you know that
        a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the PotaDG
        group.

        File : /S5020305.JPG
        Uploaded by : mike_oz2005 <whitty@...>
        Description : Simon Profile 1

        You can access this file at the URL:
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PotaDG/files/S5020305.JPG

        To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
        http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

        Regards,

        mike_oz2005 <whitty@...>
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39663 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Simon in Full Kit!
        .html
        .html

        And here’s Simon again – in full kit!

        Simon, can you give us a bit of a commentary mate?  J
        (Message over 64 KB, truncated)

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39664 From: laroweramity Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Re: Simon's Boots!
        .html
        Hi Mike
        about the boots, i had them made by Brian over at the "Apemania"
        studios, ive fancied having a costume made for some time but the
        price was a bit out of my reach at the time, as a collector of
        sci/fi and horror film stuff from the 60's and 70's and since this
        had been going on for over 30 years i thought it was about time i
        had a little clear out...to my pleasant suprise several of the sales
        afforded me the opportunity to put together a full gorilla uniform,
        i contacted brian and after a few days of sending over many
        measurements they got to work.

        What you see in the first picture file are the superb leather boots,
        i thought at first these would have been made of rubber but when
        brian sent me pics of the finished items i was very pleasantly
        suprised, the boots are full leather top to bottom, the ape split
        toe is cast in rubber and then glued to the front section of the
        boot, next to be applied are the calf buckles on the side of each
        boot, these again are made of rubber, the boots are then sprayed a
        very dark plum colour and then a liberal sprinkling of fullers earth
        is applied to give them that rode in look...

        Although they may seem a little steep in price (these cost me $350)
        believe me when you get them the cost is forgoten, they also do a
        delux hand made pair of boots which have i believe the split toe
        also made in leather along with proper side buckles, at the end of
        the day you are only going to buy something this expensive once in
        your life so why not have the best available, brian at apemania also
        tells me that all the castings ( split toes / buckles ) are all cast
        from originals / or moulds of originals

        simon



        - In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...> wrote:
        >
        > Hey All
        >
        > New member Simon has a very fancy gorilla outfit he has sent me
        some
        > photos of.
        >
        > I will be uploading these to the FILES SECTION as time permits.
        >
        > For starters - the BOOTS!
        >
        > Simon, could you tell us about the boots? Restoration or
        reproduction?
        > Price? Etc!
        >
        >
        http://f6.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/QBGIRMU7dbYL7dUx_0Fp7sCanapjTPHx8r5FwVC_
        jmm
        > poAhlK0rirSdFQwR6THM_Nr-QxBF3ZjpK6AUVzQKC/boots.jpg
        >
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39665 From: Haristas@aol.com Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
        .html
        .html
         You mean you want a copy "wink, wink"?
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Whitty <whitty@...>
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:25:55 +1000
        Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp

        Yeah if you send it to me!  :)
        --------- Original Message --------
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        To: "pota@yahoogroups.com" <pota@yahoogroups.com>, "PotaDG@yahoogroups.com" <PotaDG@yahoogroups.com>
        Subject: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
        Date: 08/06/06 19:50

        The offical DVD release of Lancelot Link is this Tuesday, June 13.  I've pre-ordered mine.  Anyone else getting it?

        Check out AOL.com today . Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39666 From: Michael Whitty Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Re: {Disarmed} [PotaDG] Re: Lancelot Link: Secret Chimp
        .html
        .html

        Yes PLEASE!

         

        Hey – how about those SOPRANOS.....another season in January!

         

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39667 From: mlccougar@aol.com Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Re: Simon in Full Kit!
        .html
        .html.html In a message dated 6/8/2006 8:06:27 AM Central Standard Time, whitty@... writes:

        And here's Simon again – in full kit!

        Very cool outfit...

        Hunt Leader bandolier AND the neck piece! Doesn't get much better than that... (Except for other gorilla outfits that is...)
        <.html
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39668 From: Greg Plonowski Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
        .html
        Um, no. And not just because I don't have them in my collection to scan and I'm really looking forward to having more time for other projects once this one is complete.
         
        I decided to scan the Marvel UKs because between the covers, the new splash pages that had to be drawn for stories broken into smaller chunks and even the Apeslayer story there's a lot of art in the Marvel UKs that many fans haven't seen if they only have the US magazines. If I understand correctly, the Australian comics are just straight reprints of the US versions, same covers and contents, right?
         
        Greg

        Michael Whitty <whitty@...> wrote:
        Greg will do the Aussie comics next – right Greg?  J
        .


        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39669 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Re: Simon in Full Kit!
        .html
        .html Message
        -- Yeah very nice. So Simon, do you wear this to the pub on Saturday nights? ;-)
         
        Neil
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
        Sent: Friday, 9 June 2006 1:47 AM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Simon in Full Kit!

        Very cool outfit...

        Hunt Leader bandolier AND the neck piece! Doesn't get much better than that.... (Except for other gorilla outfits that is...)

        .

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39670 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Re: Marvel UK issue 86
        .html
        .html Message
        -- Totally correct Greg, they are just exact copies and printed on paper of far inferior quality.
        The story is that the guy who published them over here was a newspaper printer and he only did it so he could save money by not having to turn his printing presses off every weekend when they wouldn't be used to print up the weekly papers. They were also printed on newsprint paper, therefore the low quality and why so few have survived to this day.
         
        Neil
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Greg Plonowski
        Sent: Friday, 9 June 2006 3:33 AM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Marvel UK issue 86

        If I understand correctly, the Australian comics are just straight reprints of the US versions, same covers and contents, right?
        .

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39671 From: kidro85@aol.com Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Kamandi -- No Cartoon ( OT )
        .html
        .html
        Read below, too bad it wont happen though.
         
         
        Tony
         

        Kamandi Animated Series

        One of Jack Kirby's most oddball creations of the '70s was a science fiction comic series called Kamandi, the Last Boy on Earth. It told the adventures of the last young man in a world ruled over by intelligent animals... like Planet of the Apes with dogs, lions, tigers, bears, etc. added in. Having said that, is it possible this esoteric comic might make the jump to animated TV series? It will if Bruce Timm (Batman Beyond) has anything to say about it. While talking to the Detroit News Comic Book Continuum, Timm revealed that he had already made a pitch to Kids' WB which was turned down. Timm says, "Actually, Kamandi is not dead. In fact, we are looking at possibly doing a Kamandi pilot for Cartoon Network."

        Timm also revealed details of his pitch saying, "I've always thought that Kamandi would make just an excellent kids cartoon, [b]ut I actually went back and re-read them and went, 'Wow, this is really pretty violent.' But it's fantasy violence. It's Jonny Quest on the Planet of the Apes. That's kind of how I pitched it to them. And they went, 'Oooh!' and they liked that idea."

        Unfortunately, they ended up turning it down because the series wouldn't appeal to female viewers as well as Timm's insistence on animating the series so it looked exactly the way Jack Kirby drew it.

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39672 From: nlmoxham Date: 6/8/2006
        Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
        .html
        This may explain what happened to Boulle's rights, though it doesn't
        specify exactly how much control he sold:

        "Before the

        book was even released in the English language, Arthur P.

        Jacobs had purchased the rights. He had been in Europe

        shopping for "a new KING KONG." .... During the

        meeting, the agent mentioned Boulle's novel, and the

        Hollywood producer purchased the rights based on a short

        description by the agent. Jacobs later read the novel, and

        found that it far outpassed his expectations. To him,

        Boulle was a genius." - http://www.towson.edu/~flynn/apes.html"



        --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Whitty" <whitty@...> wrote:
        >
        > I think they paid him for all the rights to his story.... ???
        >
        > Just a "one-off" payment.
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
        Behalf
        > Of Dario Sciola
        > Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 1:05 AM
        > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        > Subject: [PotaDG] Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
        >
        > Something that has always intrigued me but to which I have no
        clear
        > answer is how the POTA rights are distributed.
        >
        > The APJAC story is well documented (how Jacobs was smart enough to
        > retain all the merchandising right while Fox kept the movie
        rights,
        > until of course he reverted them back to Fox). But how does Boulle
        > (and now his estate) fit into all this. Based on Fox'es actions, I
        > have always assumed that somehow they've either acquired Boulle's
        > rights OR that his rights somehow only extend to his original
        novel.
        > How then, can Fox keep up pumping out stuff that was based on his
        > creation? Murky territory. Does anyone have the full story about
        what
        > rights, if any, are still held by Boulle's estate?
        >
        > Dario
        >
        > --
        >
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39673 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/9/2006
        Subject: Re: Kamandi -- No Cartoon ( OT )
        .html
        .html Message
        -- Wow if only this would have happened! What a great cartoon this would have been, done by Bruce Timm in the style of Jack Kirby, what more could one ask for! Damn those female viewers. ;-)
        I'm sure stuff like Dragon Ball Z doesn't appeal to 'female viewers' but that doesn't seem to have hampered it's success, damn if only I had spawned girls!!!! :-D
         
         
        Neil
        -----Original Message-----
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of kidro85@...
        Sent: Friday, 9 June 2006 1:23 PM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com; pota@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: [PotaDG] Kamandi -- No Cartoon ( OT )

        Read below, too bad it wont happen though.
         
         
        Tony
        .

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39674 From: Neil T Foster Date: 6/9/2006
        Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
        .html
        .html Message
        -- So by the sounds of all this it seems like Boulle made bugger all from POTA apart from the sales of his book. I wonder how much he got for them attaching the 'based on characters' blurb? 
         
        Neil
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nlmoxham
        Sent: Friday, 9 June 2006 1:48 PM
        To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: [PotaDG] Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.


        This may explain what happened to Boulle's rights, though it doesn't
        specify exactly how much control he sold:

        "Before the

        book was even released in the English language, Arthur P.

        Jacobs had purchased the rights. He had been in Europe

        shopping for "a new KING KONG." .... During the

        meeting, the agent mentioned Boulle's novel, and the

        Hollywood producer purchased the rights based on a short

        description by the agent. Jacobs later read the novel, and

        found that it far outpassed his expectations. To him,

        Boulle was a genius." - http://www.towson. edu/~flynn/ apes.html"

        .

        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39675 From: veetus@earthlink.net Date: 6/9/2006
        Subject: OT: "Hulk" a "do over"
        .html
        .html
         www.aintitcool.com  has an article where Marvel's Avi Arad saya they are going to start from scratch with the next "Hulk" film. What this has to do with POTA is here's a model of a hot "property" being revamped when a "reimagination" doesn't go over well. I happened to like "The Hulk" film (directed by Ang Lee, who almost got an Oscar this year for "Brokeback Mountain"). But obviously it didn't make the dough they had expected. Even though I liked the movie it seems obvious that the best mode is to stay true to what people liked about something in the first place. The big hits ("Harry Potter", "Spiderman", "Lord of the Rings") are true to their original material. When artists like Ang Lee or Tim Burton try to show they are more clever than the material there are problems. I haven't seen lat year's "Bewitched" remake but I heard it wasn't very good because the filmmakers tried to avoid the TV show remake trap by not really making it like the TV show. That backfired. It almost seems like bad advice to tell filmmakers not to use their imagination and instead be slaves to what worked before but I guess it's true. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Anyway, they are planning to return "Hulk" to the way it was in the comics. If that works maybe that will inspire Fox to do a "do over" with POTA. We know how crazy they are with Marvel. - - - Jeff
         
        <.html
        <.html
        Group: potadg Message: 39676 From: TZer0@aol.com Date: 6/9/2006
        Subject: Re: Boulle/Apjac/Fox et al.
        .html
        .html
        In a message dated 6/9/2006 8:59:45 A.M. Central Daylight Time, ntfoster@... writes:

        -- So by the sounds of all this it seems like Boulle made bugger all from POTA apart from the sales of his book.
         
        That had to be a huge boost to sales.
        It might have remained a mediocre
        untranslated French pulp otherwise.
         
        <.html
        <.html


        Copyright © 2026, Hunter Goatley. All rights reserved.
        Last updated 2026-03-31 10:43.