--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@...> wrote:
>
> highly unikely but...umm....hell yes! although I remember when they
were making Burton's my instinct was to do anything I could to be in
it....but I actually decided that I'd rather just watch (not that I
could have marched in there and gotten a part!)....sort of like, not
wanting to go backstage at Cirque du Soleil!!
>
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 1/29/09, Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...>
> > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 6:09 PM
> > If you get a part will you take it? :)
> >
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim
> > \"apefan\"" <apefan23@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > probably not....first because it wounds like it really
> > won't have
> > anything to do with it! and because it isn't from THAT
> > world which is
> > what I like about POTA....those characters, those
> > stories....like I
> > said I was more than willing to accept
> > Burton's...especially because
> > of the title but I'm just going to sit back and see
> > about this new
> > one....who knows...if it's a great movie, I'll be
> > all over it!
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Neil Foster <ntfoster@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@>
> > > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT
> > REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"
> > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 3:53 PM
> > > > So you will accept this new movie as 'Planet
> > of the
> > > > Apes'?
> > > >
> > > > Neil
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > > [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > > > Of Tim "apefan"
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:59 AM
> > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT
> > REMAKING
> > > > CONQUEST OF POTA"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Neil...come on.....you know I enjoy and
> > appreciate and
> > > > welcome new
> > > > things...I dig (and buy) all the new toys and
> > comics....and
> > > > I was
> > > > absolutly welcoming to POTA 2001 .....until it
> > got made!
> > > >
> > > > ANY new story with Zira, Cornelius and Zaius
> > would just
> > > > muck it up...not
> > > > to mention the difficulty Rich would have trying
> > to fit any
> > > > new story
> > > > lines in to the timeline!
> > > >
> > > > POTA is NOT dead ..look at all the new
> > merchandise.....and
> > > > I've heard of
> > > > young people ...many who have found these
> > groups...that are
> > > > into the
> > > > originals ...
> > > > Films do not have to constantly be remade for
> > fans to find
> > > > and
> > > > appreciate them....
> > > >
> > > > --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Neil <ntfoster@bigpond.
> > > > <mailto:ntfoster%40bigpond.com> com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Neil <ntfoster@bigpond.
> > > > <mailto:ntfoster%40bigpond.com> com>
> > > > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT
> > REMAKING
> > > > CONQUEST OF POTA"
> > > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.
> > > > <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > > > > Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 4:01 AM
> > > > > And we wonder why POTA is dead and
> > considered old
> > > > fashioned
> > > > > and
> > > > > treated as a bit of a joke by the younger
> > generations.
> > > > As
> > > > > far as I can
> > > > > tell there's too many 'old fans'
> > not
> > > > prepared
> > > > > to move on or even try
> > > > > something a bit different.
> > > > >
> > > > > Frankly as far as I'm concerned we
> > deserve what
> > > > little
> > > > > (we think) we
> > > > > get (even though we get plenty for a dead
> > old
> > > > franchise.)
> > > > > Almost
> > > > > anything new or slightly daring or different
> > usually
> > > > gets
> > > > > met with way
> > > > > too much negativity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Neil
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.
> > > > <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com,
> > "Tim
> > > > > \"apefan\""
> > > > <apefan23@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would rather it be on it's own as
> > well....I
> > > > > don't want a new POTA
> > > > > or even a new take on the old POTA
> > >
>

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> Well I just can't understand why you and a few others feel like
this.
>
> So what if it doesn't feature any of the classic characters or
clothes
> or looks etc. as far as I'm concerned they can still call it Planet
of
> the Apes or Caesar or whatever they want even if it is going to be a
> revamped version for the modern era. It's just a title after all
and if
> they add the old 'based on the book by Pierre Boulle' they have
every
> right to use the title as far as I'm concerned.
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of Tim "apefan"
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:04 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"
>
>
>
> probably not....first because it wounds like it really won't have
> anything to do with it! and because it isn't from THAT world which
is
> what I like about POTA....those characters, those stories....like I
said
> I was more than willing to accept Burton's...especially because of
the
> title but I'm just going to sit back and see about this new
one....who
> knows...if it's a great movie, I'll be all over it!
>
> --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Neil Foster <ntfoster@bigpond.
> <mailto:ntfoster%40bigpond.com> com> wrote:
>
> > From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@bigpond. <mailto:ntfoster%
40bigpond.com>
> com>
> > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"
> > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups. <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 3:53 PM
> > So you will accept this new movie as 'Planet of the
> > Apes'?
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=50921/stime=1233270242/nc1=3858795/nc2=3848627/nc3=5579910>
>

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> So how do people who won't accept a film using a character named
Caesar
> as Planet of the Apes, feel about Return to the Planet of the Apes?
> That used familiar names (obviously for the recognition factor and
to
> cash in on the originals) but the settings, technology and just
about
> everything else was NOT classic POTA.
> Is Return acceptable as 'Planet of the Apes'? Or should it be
renamed
> 'Return To The Planet Where Apes Talk And Rule On A Planet Which
Isn't
> Really THE Planet of the Apes? ;-)
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of Tim "apefan"
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:04 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"
>
>
>
> probably not....first because it wounds like it really won't have
> anything to do with it! and because it isn't from THAT world which
is
> what I like about POTA....those characters, those stories....
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=50921/stime=1233270242/nc1=3858795/nc2=3848627/nc3=5579910>
>

>
> When you say ANYTHING....would you have made love to Estella Warren?
>
> :)
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim \"apefan\"" <apefan23@> wrote:
> >
> > highly unikely but...umm....hell yes! although I remember when

> were making Burton's my instinct was to do anything I could to be

> it....but I actually decided that I'd rather just watch (not that I
> could have marched in there and gotten a part!)....sort of like,

> wanting to go backstage at Cirque du Soleil!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Thu, 1/29/09, Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@>
> > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"
> > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > Date: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 6:09 PM
> > > If you get a part will you take it? :)
> > >
> > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Tim
> > > \"apefan\"" <apefan23@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > probably not....first because it wounds like it really
> > > won't have
> > > anything to do with it! and because it isn't from THAT
> > > world which is
> > > what I like about POTA....those characters, those
> > > stories....like I
> > > said I was more than willing to accept
> > > Burton's...especially because
> > > of the title but I'm just going to sit back and see
> > > about this new
> > > one....who knows...if it's a great movie, I'll be
> > > all over it!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Neil Foster <ntfoster@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Neil Foster <ntfoster@>
> > > > > Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT
> > > REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"
> > > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 3:53 PM
> > > > > So you will accept this new movie as 'Planet
> > > of the
> > > > > Apes'?
> > > > >
> > > > > Neil
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > > > > Of Tim "apefan"
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:59 AM
> > > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT
> > > REMAKING
> > > > > CONQUEST OF POTA"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Neil...come on.....you know I enjoy and
> > > appreciate and
> > > > > welcome new
> > > > > things...I dig (and buy) all the new toys and
> > > comics....and
> > > > > I was
> > > > > absolutly welcoming to POTA 2001 .....until it
> > > got made!
> > > > >
> > > > > ANY new story with Zira, Cornelius and Zaius
> > > would just
> > > > > muck it up...not
> > > > > to mention the difficulty Rich would have trying
> > > to fit any
> > > > > new story
> > > > > lines in to the timeline!
> > > > >
> > > > > POTA is NOT dead ..look at all the new
> > > merchandise.....and
> > > > > I've heard of
> > > > > young people ...many who have found these
> > > groups...that are
> > > > > into the
> > > > > originals ...
> > > > > Films do not have to constantly be remade for
> > > fans to find
> > > > > and
> > > > > appreciate them....
> > > > >
> > > > > --- On Wed, 1/28/09, Neil <ntfoster@bigpond.
> > > > > <mailto:ntfoster%40bigpond.com> com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: Neil <ntfoster@bigpond.
> > > > > <mailto:ntfoster%40bigpond.com> com>
> > > > > > Subject: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT
> > > REMAKING
> > > > > CONQUEST OF POTA"
> > > > > > To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.
> > > > > <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com
> > > > > > Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 4:01 AM
> > > > > > And we wonder why POTA is dead and
> > > considered old
> > > > > fashioned
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > treated as a bit of a joke by the younger
> > > generations.
> > > > > As
> > > > > > far as I can
> > > > > > tell there's too many 'old fans'
> > > not
> > > > > prepared
> > > > > > to move on or even try
> > > > > > something a bit different.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Frankly as far as I'm concerned we
> > > deserve what
> > > > > little
> > > > > > (we think) we
> > > > > > get (even though we get plenty for a dead
> > > old
> > > > > franchise.)
> > > > > > Almost
> > > > > > anything new or slightly daring or different
> > > usually
> > > > > gets
> > > > > > met with way
> > > > > > too much negativity.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Neil
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.
> > > > > <mailto:PotaDG%40yahoogroups.com> com,
> > > "Tim
> > > > > > \"apefan\""
> > > > > <apefan23@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would rather it be on it's own as
> > > well....I
> > > > > > don't want a new POTA
> > > > > > or even a new take on the old POTA
> > > >
> >
>

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> I really don't take any of this negative talk on Caesar too serious.
> Remeber, back in 2001 most POTA fans where saying the same thing
about Burton's POTA.
>
> And yet, there is not one person on either POTA group that hasn't
seen Burton's POTA.
> So what does that tell you? ;o)
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
>

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Alex Ruiz
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 10:16 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"

And yet, there is not one person on either POTA group that hasn't seen Burton's POTA.

.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
And Neil, I can see you POV about people like myself, Tim, and a few
others when you ask "Where do you draw the line on what is or isn't
APES?" Let me put it to you like this: There are people for whom only
the 60s STAR TREK is TREK... Then there are some who really only dig
ST:TNG because it was "updated" for the time it was made. Others will
like both the original and TNG because the TNG didn't bastardize ST but
they don't try to mesh the two because they really know they are
separate entities, and then there are some who love EVERY entity of the
TREK name simply because it's ST... TREK fans have all sorts of
variables as to what it's followers like and don't like, etc. Why
should APES be any different? ***

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
>
>
> *** You wanna bet on that?!?! We're going on 8 years and I've
NEVER watched
> it! ***
>
>
> In a message dated 1/29/09 6:15:59 PM Central Standard Time,
> pota1968@... writes:
>
> And yet, there is not one person on either POTA group that hasn't
seen
> Burton's POTA.
>
>
>
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?
redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%
26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
> cemailfooterNO62)
>

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
>
> My biggest problem with RETURN is the way it was
> executed... Put the storyline from that series in the setting seen
in
> PLANET/BENEATH and they might have had something good... That or
they should have
> just pulled a STAR TREK and had RETURN pick up where the TV series
left off...

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
> Never bothered to see Burton's POTA? Linda Harrison nor Heston's
cameos either?
> Man, that's pretty amazing.
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
> >

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Alex Ruiz <pota1968@...> wrote:
>
> The issue is not what you thought of their cameos. The issue is
being a huge fan of POTA and passing up a chance to see two major
stars from the original POTA doing a cameo in a remake years later.
Now that to me shows an incredible retraint. Just totally blows my
mind.
>
> All Hail Cougar! :o)
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
>

> Not to mention the incredible restraint from watching.
> As a Planet of the Apes fan of course. Really amazing.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Hunter Goatley <goathunter@...> wrote:
> I never purchased anything related to the Burton movie, though I do
> own a copy, because it came in the Ape head DVD set.
>
> Hunter
>

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
>
>
> *** If I wanted to watch it, the used DVD store has plenty of
copies
> collecting dust. They can keep them, even for the $4 they're
asking. ***
>
>
> In a message dated 1/30/09 9:15:26 AM Central Standard Time,
> markhaydon3@... writes:
>
> The fact that you have not even attempted to watch this and
condone it ????
> are you sure that your not a trekkie instead.
>
>
>
>
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?
redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%
26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
> cemailfooterNO62)
>

> _Click here: Mego Dr. Zaius Prototype: Planet of the Apes Gallery: Mego
> Museum : Mego Corp_ (http://www.megomuseum.com/pota/pzaius.html

>
> Does anyone think it's a coincidence that a chimp was chosen for

> and, more specifically, the head of CAESAR?
>
> At the time I thought it was a curious choice and I wondered if

> was trying to raise public awareness of Caesar.
>
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On

> Hunter Goatley
> Sent: Saturday, 31 January 2009 2:20 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"
>
> I never purchased anything related to the Burton movie, though I do
> own a copy, because it came in the Ape head DVD set.
>
> Hunter
>

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:14 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"

"Where do you draw the line on what is or isn't APES?" Let me put it to you like this: There are people for whom only the 60s STAR TREK is TREK... Then there are some who really only dig ST:TNG because it was "updated" for the time it was made. Others will like both the original and TNG because the TNG didn't bastardize ST but they don't try to mesh the two because they really know they are separate entities, and then there are some who love EVERY entity of the TREK name simply because it's ST... TREK fans have all sorts of variables as to what it's followers like and don't like, etc. Why should APES be any different? ***

.

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of rassmguy
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:48 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"

In truth, he's not missing much regarding Heston's cameo--I've always
found that to be one of the worst aspects of the film.

.

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of rassmguy
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 3:37 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"

Much to my surprise, the novels and comics based on that film are a
good deal better than the movie itself.

.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "Neil Foster" <ntfoster@...> wrote:
>
> I haven't read the novels but I quite liked the comics, some of the
art
> was great.
>
> Neil
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of rassmguy
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 3:37 AM
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: "I'M NOT REMAKING CONQUEST OF POTA"
>
>
>
> Much to my surprise, the novels and comics based on that film are a
> good deal better than the movie itself.
>
>
> .
>
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=8605785/grpspId=1705021437/m
> sgId=50951/stime=1233337025/nc1=3858797/nc2=3848627/nc3=4836041>
>

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 5:25 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Speaking of head......

*** I think it's all a coincidence. .. The head was released too far ahead of any announcement( s) of the (possible) CAESAR film to say "They're trying to drive chimps into the public consciousness. "

.

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 5:25 AM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Speaking of head......

I think the reason they went with him instead of Cornelius was because they didn't want to invest the extra time, effort, and maybe costs into designing the bust to have the leather collar with hieroglyphics on it. I'm sure it was NOT an early form of subliminal brainwashing. .. ***

.

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:55 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Speaking of head......

I gave you my opinion and why I feel that way and then you tell me you disagree... It's fine that you disagree and all, but why ask what people think if you're not going to (possibly) agree with them or at least give reasons why you disagree with their POV? It's like asking someone "Do you prefer Coke or Pepsi", they tell you they prefer Coke and then you say "You're nuts, only freaks drink Coke."

 

I guess you want everyone to follow Homer Simpson's Code of the School-yard: "Don't say anything unless you're sure everyone agrees with you."... Well, I broke your code and stand by it ;)

.

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael & Sally Whitty
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 5:28 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [PotaDG] Speaking of head......

Why did they use CAESAR’s head, not a more RECOGNISABLE ape?

.

-----Original Message-----
From: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com [PotaDG@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mlccougar@...
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:19 PM
To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PotaDG] Speaking of head......

*** I covered that in my post... And do we really know that is Caesar and not some generic chimp? At the rate things are going, nobody will ever know what Caesar really looks like... He doesn't look right as the ULTIMATE bust, the fake one on the Blu-Ray set doesn't look anything like him either... Will the real Caesar please stand up? ***

.

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
>
> If my computer wasn't such a piece of junk, I'd DL and read your
story... I
> like the fact that you have the fugitives doing things a bit more
> "realistically" under their circumstances... In other words, while
I'm sure normally
> Virdon, and Galen especially, would want to "talk it out" they did
take an
> action which would maybe be better in their sitaution... The same
way it would
> have been better on the TV show if they actually kicked humans
asses rather than
> K.O.ing an armed Gorilla! That's something I don't like: They
could beat the
> crap out of a Gorilla who could have pulled the trigger before
they even
> took a swing, but they couldn't manage to escape from humans armed
with
> machettes (even though the astronauts could have at least grabbed a
stick to ward off
> any attempted slashings)...
>
>
> **************Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499.
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1217883258x1201191827/aol?
redir=http://www.dell.com/co
> ntent/products/features.aspx/laptops_great_deals?c=us%26cs=19%
26l=en%26s=d
> hs%26~ck=anavml)
>

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@... wrote:
>
> If my computer wasn't such a piece of junk, I'd DL and read your
story... I
> like the fact that you have the fugitives doing things a bit more
> "realistically" under their circumstances... In other words, while
I'm sure normally
> Virdon, and Galen especially, would want to "talk it out" they did
take an
> action which would maybe be better in their sitaution... The same
way it would
> have been better on the TV show if they actually kicked humans
asses rather than
> K.O.ing an armed Gorilla! That's something I don't like: They
could beat the
> crap out of a Gorilla who could have pulled the trigger before
they even
> took a swing, but they couldn't manage to escape from humans armed
with
> machettes (even though the astronauts could have at least grabbed a
stick to ward off
> any attempted slashings)...
>
>
> **************Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499.
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1217883258x1201191827/aol?
redir=http://www.dell.com/co
> ntent/products/features.aspx/laptops_great_deals?c=us%26cs=19%
26l=en%26s=d
> hs%26~ck=anavml)
>

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@...> wrote:
>
> What about the fact that during the T.V series every time it came
to
> unarmed combat Vernon & Burke could beat Gorilla gaurds , i'm sure
> even back in the good old days of the seventy's we had the sense to
> realise that gorilla's could break bones with a single swipe of
there
> arms???
> But no because these two are supposed to be clever because they are
> more advanced they can beat a gorilla gaurd ( not in the real
world ).
> So timesthat by the fact they carry rifles , does it make sence to
> hide in a tree and jump out on a gorilla gaurd ????
> Doesn't make much sense to me!!!
> Mark
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, mlccougar@ wrote:
> >
> > If my computer wasn't such a piece of junk, I'd DL and read your
> story... I
> > like the fact that you have the fugitives doing things a bit
more
> > "realistically" under their circumstances... In other words,
while
> I'm sure normally
> > Virdon, and Galen especially, would want to "talk it out" they
did
> take an
> > action which would maybe be better in their sitaution... The same
> way it would
> > have been better on the TV show if they actually kicked humans
> asses rather than
> > K.O.ing an armed Gorilla! That's something I don't like: They
> could beat the
> > crap out of a Gorilla who could have pulled the trigger before
> they even
> > took a swing, but they couldn't manage to escape from humans
armed
> with
> > machettes (even though the astronauts could have at least grabbed
a
> stick to ward off
> > any attempted slashings)...
> >
> >
> > **************Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499.
> >
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1217883258x1201191827/aol?
> redir=http://www.dell.com/co
> > ntent/products/features.aspx/laptops_great_deals?c=us%26cs=19%
> 26l=en%26s=d
> > hs%26~ck=anavml)
> >
>

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, TZer0@... wrote:
>
>
> Probably. With Caesar you only need a jumpsuit.
> Zaius need glifs, red blonde hair, blue eyes, etc . . .
>
>
> In a message dated 2/1/2009 6:09:41 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> ntfoster@... writes:
>
> A Zaius wouldn't have cost more to make would it.
>
> **************Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499.
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1217883258x1201191827/aol?
redir=http://www.dell.com/co
> ntent/products/features.aspx/laptops_great_deals?c=us%26cs=19%
26l=en%26s=d
> hs%26~ck=anavml)
>

>
> the ape wedding had me find screen pics from apes[although off tv

> wayne
> --- On Sun, 1/2/09, Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
> From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...>
> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: RE:AN APE WEDDING.
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, 1 February, 2009, 11:28 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have to agree again.
>
>
>
> It never occured to me when I was a kid watching them - I was just

>
> happy something else POTA was on!
>
>
>
> But now it's all a bit "yell at the TV!".
>
>
>
> Apologies to TV Show fans who disagree! xoxo
>
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@ ...>

>
> >
>
> > What about the fact that during the T.V series every time it came
>
> to
>
> > unarmed combat Vernon & Burke could beat Gorilla gaurds , i'm

>
> > even back in the good old days of the seventy's we had the sense

>
> > realise that gorilla's could break bones with a single swipe of
>
> there
>
> > arms???
>
> > But no because these two are supposed to be clever because they

>
> > more advanced they can beat a gorilla gaurd ( not in the real
>
> world ).
>
> > So timesthat by the fact they carry rifles , does it make sence

>
> > hide in a tree and jump out on a gorilla gaurd ????
>
> > Doesn't make much sense to me!!!
>
> > Mark
>
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, mlccougar@ wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > If my computer wasn't such a piece of junk, I'd DL and read

>
> > story... I
>
> > > like the fact that you have the fugitives doing things a bit
>
> more
>
> > > "realistically" under their circumstances. .. In other words,
>
> while
>
> > I'm sure normally
>
> > > Virdon, and Galen especially, would want to "talk it out" they
>
> did
>
> > take an
>
> > > action which would maybe be better in their sitaution... The

>
> > way it would
>
> > > have been better on the TV show if they actually kicked humans
>
> > asses rather than
>
> > > K.O.ing an armed Gorilla! That's something I don't like: They
>
> > could beat the
>
> > > crap out of a Gorilla who could have pulled the trigger before
>
> > they even
>
> > > took a swing, but they couldn't manage to escape from humans
>
> armed
>
> > with
>
> > > machettes (even though the astronauts could have at least

>
> a
>
> > stick to ward off
>
> > > any attempted slashings).. .
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > ************ **Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499.
>
> > >
>
> (http://pr.atwola com/promoclk/ 100000075x121788 3258x1201191827/

>
> > redir=http://www.dell com/co
>
> > > ntent/products/ features. aspx/laptops_ great_deals& #63;c=us%

>
> > 26l=en%26s=d
>
> > > hs%26~ck= anavml)
>
> > >
>
> >
>

> I have 8 minutes of footage from roddy in TYRANT[cut from original ep]

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Michael Whitty < sallywhitty@...> wrote:

I'm checking in through the group site and I don't see an attachment!

D'oh!

Michael

--- In PotaDG@yahoogroups.com, Wayne Sylvester <wayne.sylvester@...>
wrote:

>
> the ape wedding had me find screen pics from apes[although off tv
screen]....this is my choice of the chimp bride, Zelgar;see pic
> wayne

> --- On Sun, 1/2/09, Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...> wrote:
> From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...>

> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: RE:AN APE WEDDING.
> To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, 1 February, 2009, 11:28 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have to agree again.
>
>
>
> It never occured to me when I was a kid watching them - I was just
so
>
> happy something else POTA was on!
>
>
>
> But now it's all a bit "yell at the TV!".
>
>
>
> Apologies to TV Show fans who disagree! xoxo
>
>
>
> --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@ ...>
wrote:
>
> >
>
> > What about the fact that during the T.V series every time it came
>
> to
>
> > unarmed combat Vernon & Burke could beat Gorilla gaurds , i'm
sure
>
> > even back in the good old days of the seventy's we had the sense
to
>
> > realise that gorilla's could break bones with a single swipe of
>
> there
>
> > arms???
>
> > But no because these two are supposed to be clever because they
are
>
> > more advanced they can beat a gorilla gaurd ( not in the real
>
> world ).
>
> > So timesthat by the fact they carry rifles , does it make sence
to
>
> > hide in a tree and jump out on a gorilla gaurd ????
>
> > Doesn't make much sense to me!!!
>
> > Mark
>
> > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, mlccougar@ wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > If my computer wasn't such a piece of junk, I'd DL and read
your
>
> > story... I
>
> > > like the fact that you have the fugitives doing things a bit
>
> more
>
> > > "realistically" under their circumstances. .. In other words,
>
> while
>
> > I'm sure normally
>
> > > Virdon, and Galen especially, would want to "talk it out" they
>
> did
>
> > take an
>
> > > action which would maybe be better in their sitaution... The
same
>
> > way it would
>
> > > have been better on the TV show if they actually kicked humans
>
> > asses rather than
>
> > > K.O.ing an armed Gorilla! That's something I don't like: They
>
> > could beat the
>
> > > crap out of a Gorilla who could have pulled the trigger before
>
> > they even
>
> > > took a swing, but they couldn't manage to escape from humans
>
> armed
>
> > with
>
> > > machettes (even though the astronauts could have at least
grabbed
>
> a
>
> > stick to ward off
>
> > > any attempted slashings).. .
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > ************ **Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499.
>
> > >
>
> (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121788 3258x1201191827/
aol?
>
> > redir= http://www.dell. com/co
>
> > > ntent/products/ features. aspx/laptops_ great_deals& #63;c=us%
26cs=19%
>
> > 26l=en%26s=d
>
> > > hs%26&#126;ck= anavml)
>
> > >
>
> >
>

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Wayne Sylvester < wayne.sylvester@...> wrote:

this is the latest addition to a room full of APES memorabilia. i am the one in middle[small pic...thought i would put face to name, for you apies!!!! WAYNE SYLVESTER I have 8 minutes of footage from roddy in TYRANT[cut from original ep]bought it in china./TV fair event. --- On Sun, 1/2/09, Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...> wrote: From: Michael Whitty <sallywhitty@...> Subject: [PotaDG] Re: RE:AN APE WEDDING. To: PotaDG@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, 1 February, 2009, 11:28 PM I have to agree again. It never occured to me when I was a kid watching them - I was just so happy something else POTA was on! But now it's all a bit "yell at the TV!". Apologies to TV Show fans who disagree! xoxo --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, "haydon.mark" <markhaydon3@ ...> wrote: > > What about the fact that during the T.V series every time it came to > unarmed combat Vernon & Burke could beat Gorilla gaurds , i'm sure > even back in the good old days of the seventy's we had the sense to > realise that gorilla's could break bones with a single swipe of there > arms??? > But no because these two are supposed to be clever because they are > more advanced they can beat a gorilla gaurd ( not in the real world ). > So timesthat by the fact they carry rifles , does it make sence to > hide in a tree and jump out on a gorilla gaurd ???? > Doesn't make much sense to me!!! > Mark > --- In PotaDG@yahoogroups. com, mlccougar@ wrote: > > > > If my computer wasn't such a piece of junk, I'd DL and read your > story... I > > like the fact that you have the fugitives doing things a bit more > > "realistically" under their circumstances. .. In other words, while > I'm sure normally > > Virdon, and Galen especially, would want to "talk it out" they did > take an > > action which would maybe be better in their sitaution... The same > way it would > > have been better on the TV show if they actually kicked humans > asses rather than > > K.O.ing an armed Gorilla! That's something I don't like: They > could beat the > > crap out of a Gorilla who could have pulled the trigger before > they even > > took a swing, but they couldn't manage to escape from humans armed > with > > machettes (even though the astronauts could have at least grabbed a > stick to ward off > > any attempted slashings).. . > > > > > > ************ **Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499. > > ( http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100000075x121788 3258x1201191827/ aol? > redir=http://www.dell. com/co > > ntent/products/ features. aspx/laptops_ great_deals& #63;c=us% 26cs=19% > 26l=en%26s=d > > hs%26&#126;ck= anavml) > > >